|
|
Tom Peters <tpeters@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Frank Küster wrote:
>>
>> Was the filename something like 23456ETXMFC, i.e. a "random" number plus
>> ETXMFC? Then it is probably a close relative to the bug above, or rather
>> the part that was only fixed with 2.0.2-22:
>
> Thank you for your reply: I indeed have a whole buch of such files in
> root's homedir.
>
> I currently have:
>
> # dpkg -s tetex-bin
> Package: tetex-bin
> Status: install ok installed
> ...
> Version: 2.0.2-20
[...]
> Setting up tetex-bin (2.0.2-22) ...
> Replacing config file /etc/texmf/texmf.d/95NonPath.cnf with new version
[..]
> OK, that works now; and no new *ETXMFC. TeX still seems to work too.
Good. I think we can close this bug. It's just a duplicate of the
similar reports we had on tetex-bin (none with a bug number, actually,
therefore nothing to close in 2.0.2-22).
If nobody cries out until tomorrow morning, I'll close it then.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
|
|