On 2010-5-25, at 17:07, Eggert Lars (Nokia-NRC/Espoo) wrote:
> I see some weak consensus emerging for option #1. Please continue to state
> your opinion; I'll close the call Friday.
I haven't seen any further follow-up, so we do seem to have weak consensus of
going forward with option #1 (do one SCTP-specific and one DCCP-specific UDP
This means that TSCWG will progress draft-tuexen-sctp-udp-encaps and DCCP will
Thanks to all who stated an opinion.