comp.os.linux.networking (date)

comp.os.linux.networking (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

January 31, 2009

Re: VLAN routing issues, Bill, 15:42
VLAN routing issues, jonathantpage@xxxxxxxxx, 15:03
Re: mount.nfs internal error, Mark Hobley, 05:08

January 30, 2009

Re: mount.nfs internal error, Philip, 22:26
Re: mount.nfs internal error, Mark Hobley, 21:08
mount.nfs internal error, Philip, 16:09

January 29, 2009

trivial SSI doesn't work in apache2, louhinman, 21:25
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Bruce Cook, 07:05
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Bruce Cook, 06:57
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Bruce Cook, 06:49
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Bruce Cook, 06:47
wpa_supplicant only works with a non_blocking raw socket, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 01:55

January 28, 2009

Re: Getting Started With BGP, Bruce Cook, 16:46
Re: Bridging over VPN, Daniel, 11:31

January 27, 2009

Re: skype and NAT, Andrew Gideon, 22:10
Re: Bridging over VPN, Pascal Hambourg, 17:04
Re: Bridging over VPN, Daniel, 05:07

January 26, 2009

strongwan and cisco, proper config, Ted, 18:39
Re: Bridging over VPN, John Adams, 16:58
Re: Conditional Routing, Andrew Gideon, 14:33
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Pascal Hambourg, 07:47
Re: Bridging over VPN, Pascal Hambourg, 07:35
Bridging over VPN, Daniel, 06:52
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 04:06

January 25, 2009

Re: PPPoE Configuration, Moe Trin, 16:01
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Moe Trin, 15:59
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 05:38
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 05:23
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 05:21

January 24, 2009

Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 20:00
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Lew Pitcher, 13:50
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 13:12
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 13:10
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 12:59
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Lew Pitcher, 12:44
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Moe Trin, 12:24

January 23, 2009

Re: creating ssh key with no passphrase, smd, 21:12
Re: creating ssh key with no passphrase, Johannes Bauer, 20:59
Re: creating ssh key with no passphrase, smd, 20:25
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 18:59
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 18:52
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 18:48
Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option on an aliased interface, David Schwartz, 17:19
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Lew Pitcher, 17:16
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 16:33
Re: TCP/IP stack as single process, David Schwartz, 12:59
Re: TCP/IP stack as single process, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 09:16
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Christophe Lohr, 09:03
Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option on an aliased interface, Christophe Lohr, 07:59
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Pascal Hambourg, 05:02
Re: GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Mikko Rapeli, 00:10

January 22, 2009

Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 15:30
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Pascal Hambourg, 10:58
Re: TCP/IP stack as single process, David Schwartz, 10:40
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 10:07
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Pascal Hambourg, 09:36
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 09:05
TCP/IP stack as single process, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 08:52
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, David Schwartz, 07:19
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Burkhard Ott, 06:23
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Pascal Hambourg, 05:53
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Pascal Hambourg, 05:36
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 05:30
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, David Schwartz, 02:34

January 21, 2009

Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Pascal Hambourg, 17:16
Re: DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Pascal Hambourg, 17:15
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Pascal Hambourg, 16:52
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Pascal Hambourg, 16:36
DNATing without connection tracking - is it possible?, Chris Dew, 12:45
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, David Schwartz, 04:41
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, David Schwartz, 04:40
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Christophe Lohr, 02:59
Re: Why do UMTS-links provide DNS Server 10.11.12.13 and 10.11.12.14?, Mikko Rapeli, 02:58
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Christophe Lohr, 02:57
Re: Why do UMTS-links provide DNS Server 10.11.12.13 and 10.11.12.14?, Nico Schottelius, 01:45

January 20, 2009

Re: Why do UMTS-links provide DNS Server 10.11.12.13 and 10.11.12.14?, Chris Davies, 16:41
Re: GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Clifford Kite, 15:41
Re: Why do UMTS-links provide DNS Server 10.11.12.13 and 10.11.12.14?, Mikko Rapeli, 14:51
Why do UMTS-links provide DNS Server 10.11.12.13 and 10.11.12.14?, Nico Schottelius, 10:17
Re: GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Mikko Rapeli, 00:49
How to thanks for your beloved ?, maky, 00:21

January 19, 2009

Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 22:48
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Pascal Hambourg, 19:38
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, dgetsman, 17:08
Make Money Online, lizzy, 16:42
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Pascal Hambourg, 16:00
Re: GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Günther Schwarz, 14:52
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 13:44
Re: GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Chris Davies, 06:47
GPRS and bad DNS servers like 10.11.12.13, Mikko Rapeli, 05:12
Re: PPPoE Configuration, stuckey, 04:10
Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option on an aliased interface, Christophe Lohr, 04:06
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Christophe Lohr, 04:02

January 18, 2009

Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, David Schwartz, 22:18
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Torsten Kaiser, 18:09
Re: PPPoE Configuration, ArameFarpado, 16:54
Re: cannot see an AccessPoint when scanning, Wolfgang Draxinger, 16:40
Re: PPPoE Configuration, stuckey, 16:01
Re: PPPoE Configuration, Unruh, 15:49
Re: PPPoE Configuration, stuckey, 15:12
Re: PPPoE Configuration, user, 15:00
PPPoE Configuration, stuckey, 14:37
Re: cannot see an AccessPoint when scanning, Unruh, 11:50
RIP count to infinity and OSPF, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 04:30
cannot see an AccessPoint when scanning, markryde@xxxxxxxxx, 02:38

January 17, 2009

Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 23:04
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, David Schwartz, 21:34
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, 1PW, 17:04
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, buck, 16:35
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 02:02
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 01:37

January 16, 2009

Re: receiving mjpegs over tcp and multicasting decoded rgb images slows network down?, David Schwartz, 20:39
Re: receiving mjpegs over tcp and multicasting decoded rgb images slows network down?, mikey79, 18:07
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, buck, 16:33
Re: Conditional Routing, buck, 16:20
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, Damon Getsman, 15:10
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Moe Trin, 14:56
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, David Schwartz, 14:48
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Chris Davies, 14:19
Re: strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, David Schwartz, 11:55
Re: SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option on an aliased interface, David Schwartz, 11:53
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, LEE Sau Dan, 11:32
Re: Mount external hard drive hosted on networked PC?, Andrew Woodward, 11:03
Re: WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 09:19
strange behavior when the client bind its UDP socket to a local address, Christophe Lohr, 08:04
SO_BINDTODEVICE socket option on an aliased interface, Christophe Lohr, 07:44
Re: here document + pipe, Maxwell Lol, 07:13
Re: Connecting to the internal network, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 07:03
Re: Connecting to the internal network, Floyd L. Davidson, 06:40
Re: Connecting to the internal network, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 04:15
Bulova Watch, Best Wristwatch, hualibao466, 02:16
Re: here document + pipe, Antonio Macchi, 01:56
Re: here document + pipe, Torsten Kaiser, 01:29
WHY: the client process has been killed, but the connection on server is still ESTABLISHED, Andrew Jsyqf, 01:07
here document + pipe, Antonio Macchi, 01:00

January 15, 2009

Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Antonio Macchi, 23:11
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Unruh, 22:38
Re: Connecting to the internal network, Unruh, 22:37
Re: Connecting to the internal network, Unruh, 22:35
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, terryc, 20:53
Re: Connecting to the internal network, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 19:35
Re: receiving mjpegs over tcp and multicasting decoded rgb images slows network down?, David Schwartz, 19:04
Re: Mount external hard drive hosted on networked PC?, Bill Marcum, 18:59
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Unruh, 18:47
Re: Connecting to the internal network, terryc, 18:43
Mount external hard drive hosted on networked PC?, Andrew Woodward, 17:38
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), oldreader, 17:29
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, 1PW, 15:49
receiving mjpegs over tcp and multicasting decoded rgb images slows network down?, mikey79, 14:08
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Antonio Macchi, 11:54
Re: UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Bill Marcum, 11:01
Re: Conditional Routing, Andrew Gideon, 08:53
Checkpoint issues, Anth, 06:34
UTC vs LocalTime in file transfers, Antonio Macchi, 01:13
Re: Connecting to the internal network, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 01:08
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, Damon Getsman, 01:05
Re: System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, terryc, 00:29

January 14, 2009

System intrusion detection, primarily on linux servers with a handful of others, Damon Getsman, 23:05
Re: Cannot ping other servers, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 20:27
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Moe Trin, 20:26
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Moe Trin, 20:25
Airtunes behind wireless router/connecting two networks via a third, Helge Weissig, 18:25
Conditional Routing, Andrew Gideon, 17:43
Re: killing a socket connection from cmdline?, PEdroArthur_JEdi, 08:30
Re: Connecting to the internal network, Pascal Hambourg, 05:43
Re: Connecting to the internal network, Pascal Hambourg, 05:01
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Pascal Hambourg, 04:45
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Pascal Hambourg, 04:20
Connecting to the internal network, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 02:32
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Günther Schwarz, 02:17

January 13, 2009

Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Clifford Kite, 22:35
Re: Cannot ping other servers, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 22:11
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Moe Trin, 22:11
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Maxwell Lol, 20:36
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), oldreader, 19:50
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), oldreader, 19:50
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Moe Trin, 15:02
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Pascal Hambourg, 09:59
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Blah Blah Blah, 04:43
Re: killing a socket connection from cmdline?, Kevin.Gui, 02:50
Re: Cannot ping other servers, terryc, 02:34
Re: Cannot ping other servers, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 00:07

January 12, 2009

Re: Cannot ping other servers, terryc, 22:48
Re: Cannot ping other servers, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 22:34
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Rick Jones, 17:24
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Maxwell Lol, 16:03
Re: USR5637 USB modem setup (2), Moe Trin, 15:10
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Moe Trin, 15:09
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Blah Blah Blah, 14:48
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Blah Blah Blah, 14:43
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Rick Jones, 13:07
Re: Cannot ping other servers, Bill Marcum, 12:35
Re: Linux/Unix vs Microsoft Server market share stats, Peter Köhlmann, 10:59
Linux/Unix vs Microsoft Server market share stats, cakecam, 10:11
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Pascal Hambourg, 10:08
Re: getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Tobias Skytte, 06:50
getting tcp packets larger than MTU, how is that possible??, Tobias Skytte, 06:44
Cannot ping other servers, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 03:31

January 11, 2009

USR5637 USB modem setup (2), oldreader, 23:54
Re: killing a socket connection from cmdline?, Kevin.Gui, 22:58
Re: How to access Guest OS with NAT, Andrew Gideon, 20:56
Re: Unknown network traffic (Conclusion), * Tong *, 18:16
Re: Unknown network traffic (Conclusion), * Tong *, 18:05
Re: How to access Guest OS with NAT, Mrichael John Ruff, 03:25
Re: How to access Guest OS with NAT, Mrichael John Ruff, 03:22

January 10, 2009

Re: How to access Guest OS with NAT, Kevin.Gui, 22:40
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Matt Giwer, 20:41
Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, David Schwartz, 20:27
How to access Guest OS with NAT, tech_geek, 16:34
How to access Guest OS with NAT, tech_geek, 15:09
Re: New server FTP failures - empty files, user, 14:58

January 09, 2009

Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Andrew Gideon, 22:43
Re: Unknown network traffic, Eric Pozharski, 18:34
Re: Unknown network traffic, Chris Davies, 17:23
Re: Unknown network traffic, Allen Kistler, 12:54
Unknown network traffic, * Tong *, 12:22
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Michael Sierchio, 02:41
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Matt Giwer, 02:17
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Matt Giwer, 02:11

January 08, 2009

Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, David Schwartz, 15:57
Re: Kernel should not handle my ICMP Request, Pascal Hambourg, 11:23
Kernel should not handle my ICMP Request, Tarun, 10:04
Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Ravindra.B, 02:00

January 07, 2009

multicasting tools on linux/unix, luka, 14:17
Is there a socket option to set the fwmark?, Christophe Lohr, 11:58
Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Maxwell Lol, 10:03
Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Ravindra.B, 08:27
Re: Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Maxwell Lol, 07:14
Re: killing a socket connection from cmdline?, PEdroArthur_JEdi, 05:43
Multi-Threaded server which can handle UDP, TCP clients, Ravindra.B, 02:41
Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, David Brown, 01:58

January 06, 2009

Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, david, 22:10
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Joe Pfeiffer, 21:43
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, David Schwartz, 20:23
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Rick Jones, 20:05
Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, David Schwartz, 19:52
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, David Schwartz, 19:47
Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, tech_geek, 17:57
Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, Johannes Bauer, 17:50
Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, tech_geek, 17:50
Re: Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, David Schwartz, 17:44
Limiting OS resources on Linux on per process basis, tech_geek, 17:26
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Rick Jones, 17:03
Re: killing a socket connection from cmdline?, Rick Jones, 16:55
Re: skype and NAT, Maxwell Lol, 16:51
Re: skype and NAT, Andrew Gideon, 14:17
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Maxwell Lol, 06:59
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Tauno Voipio, 05:29

January 05, 2009

Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Maxwell Lol, 19:05
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Tauno Voipio, 14:41
Re: Dedicated DHCP distro with webaccess.., David Brown, 10:47
Re: Dedicated DHCP distro with webaccess.., Mrichael John Ruff, 07:50
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, The Night Tripper, 04:09
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, The Night Tripper, 04:09

January 04, 2009

Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., terryc, 23:23
Re: skype and NAT, terryc, 23:20
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, Maxwell Lol, 22:42
Re: skype and NAT, Maxwell Lol, 22:38
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, David Schwartz, 19:12
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, The Night Tripper, 18:27
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, David Schwartz, 17:45
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, David Schwartz, 17:41
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, Jerry Peters, 16:31
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, trashcan, 16:21
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, The Night Tripper, 15:43
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, Hactar, 15:31
Re: skype and NAT, Hactar, 15:28
Re: reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, David Schwartz, 14:13
reliability of datagrams between processes on same machine?, The Night Tripper, 13:51
Re: skype and NAT, A. Ben Hmeda, 13:37
Dedicated DHCP distro with webaccess.., Geir, 12:25
Re: skype and NAT, Maxwell Lol, 07:35
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., mathewm, 05:02
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., mathewm, 04:48
Re: skype and NAT, H.Janssen, 02:09

January 03, 2009

Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Jerry Peters, 16:59
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, Torsten Kaiser, 14:29
Re: skype and NAT, A. Ben Hmeda, 14:25
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, trashcan, 12:54
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 12:34
Re: dsl router vs data-fax moden, David Schwartz, 08:30
dsl router vs data-fax moden, alpe, 07:57
skype and NAT, alpe, 07:50
FTP 1yz reply, helloghui, 06:47

January 02, 2009

Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., kkt, 23:40
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 16:06
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Tauno Voipio, 16:01
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 15:38
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., David Brown, 15:14
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 15:08
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Giorgos Keramidas, 14:21
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Unruh, 13:01
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Unruh, 12:51
Re: Implementation of High Precision Timer, Boon, 12:23
Re: Implementation of High Precision Timer, bieradler, 11:40
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., David Brown, 09:22
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., David Brown, 09:06
Re: Implementation of High Precision Timer, Boon, 07:44
Re: Implementation of High Precision Timer, Boon, 07:42
Re: Implementation of High Precision Timer, Unruh, 01:13

January 01, 2009

Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Unruh, 23:57
Implementation of High Precision Timer, bieradler, 18:30
Re: Using a linux box as a router, Torsten Kaiser, 18:08
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Jerry Peters, 17:22
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 17:16
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., David Brown, 14:32
Re: Using a linux box as a router, David Schwartz, 13:08
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, David Schwartz, 13:01
Using a linux box as a router, LoneWolf, 11:58
Re: No software is free and spreading that misconception is harmful., Unruh, 11:05
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 09:05
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, David Schwartz, 09:00
Re: tun/tap device problem: packets are ignored, Florian Weingarten, 08:39
Re: 6to4 router vs 6to4 relay router, Allen Kistler, 06:06

December 31, 2008

Re: changing ethernet speed to slower, Allen Kistler, 23:19
Re: changing ethernet speed to slower, phil-news-nospam, 22:26
Re: Cisco VPN CLient: iptables rules, Chris Davies, 20:41