Re: Subnetting/Routing

[SEND NO SPAM]

Tauno Voipio wrote:
> SEND NO SPAM wrote:
>
> > Wolf wrote:
> >
> > > "Ulf Volmer" <u.volmer@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > news:slrnd86hmd.g05.u.volmer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > > > Shadow_7 <wwwshadow7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> schrieb:
> > > >
> > > > > > > What A dim wad so use 255.255.253.0
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What a dim wad ... 255.255.253.0 is not a valid netmask.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > AFAIK, netmask is a bitwise operator.  So it would be valid.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > It's not valid.
> >
> >
> >
> > BY WHOSE RULES"S
>
>
> It's called CIDR, Classless Internet Domain Routing.
>
> All the ones in the mask must be on the more-significant
> side of any zeroes. No zeroes are allowed between the ones
> and no ones between the zeroes in the netmask.

Well thats not the rfd standard ! Go Read the standard !

The mask is valid but non-continous .. Not to mention You
can do anything You want on a private network