comp.lang.c (date)

May 31, 2009

May 30, 2009

May 29, 2009

May 28, 2009

May 27, 2009

May 26, 2009

May 25, 2009

May 24, 2009

May 23, 2009

May 22, 2009

May 21, 2009

May 20, 2009

May 19, 2009

Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:57
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:42
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:36
Re: Float comparison, Ben Bacarisse, 22:35
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:33
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:23
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 22:20
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 22:13
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 22:11
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:57
Re: ssize_t and size_t, James Kuyper, 21:51
Re: seeing dependencies?, luserXtrog, 21:45
Re: ssize_t and size_t, Nate Eldredge, 21:39
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:38
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, CBFalconer, 21:29
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, CBFalconer, 21:28
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:25
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, luserXtrog, 21:23
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:20
Re: seeing dependencies?, Zach Uram, 21:17
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:15
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:08
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 21:04
Re: ssize_t and size_t, Keith Thompson, 20:46
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 20:40
Re: multiple threads access to a large array, Keith Thompson, 20:39
Re: ssize_t and size_t, Keith Thompson, 20:36
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 20:34
Re: ssize_t and size_t, pete, 20:34
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 20:31
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 20:27
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Keith Thompson, 20:26
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 20:21
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 20:11
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 20:11
Re: Members in a struct, BartC, 19:38
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:33
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:32
Re: Float comparison, Joe Wright, 19:31
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:30
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:27
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:21
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:18
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:17
Re: ssize_t and size_t, Nate Eldredge, 19:16
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:15
Re: Float comparison, Ben Bacarisse, 19:13
Re: seeing dependencies?, Antoninus Twink, 19:10
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 19:10
Re: ssize_t and size_t, Antoninus Twink, 19:01
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 19:01
seeing dependencies?, Zach, 19:00
Re: multiple threads access to a large array, Antoninus Twink, 18:59
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 18:58
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 18:56
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, jameskuyper, 18:46
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:42
ssize_t and size_t, kid joe, 18:39
multiple threads access to a large array, nicholas . entropy, 18:35
Re: Integer Types, CBFalconer, 18:19
Re: Integer Types, CBFalconer, 18:17
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, CBFalconer, 18:12
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, CBFalconer, 18:04
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:57
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:52
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:47
Re: When shorts are longer than longs !, BartC, 17:42
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:40
Re: Float comparison, Ike Naar, 17:35
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:26
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:11
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:09
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:05
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 17:02
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:55
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:49
Re: Implementation of getbits() / setbits(), Twirlip of the Mists, 16:42
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:42
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:38
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:27
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:19
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:13
Re: Implementation of getbits() / setbits(), Twirlip of the Mists, 16:11
Re: IBM compilers (was Fortran by-reference, Donald L. Dobbs, 16:06
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:06
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:02
Re: Float comparison, Phil Carmody, 14:00
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 13:03
Re: Using C for competitive advantage, Raymond Toy, 12:42
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 12:38
Re: Float comparison, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:32
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 12:20
Re: Float comparison, Richard, 12:05
Re: Integer Types, Nigel, 11:43
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:39
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 11:35
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard, 11:25
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Nigel, 11:24
Re: Using C for competitive advantage, Pillsy, 11:12
♀~~♀ JUST BUY ITAll kinds of brand shoes!♂~~~♂ (paypal payment) ( www.mall0086.com ), mall0086017, 10:02
Rock & Republic Mens Jeans - Cheap, tanvon19, 09:56
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard, 09:56
Bi-Directional conversions with z/OS XL C/C++, Roded Bahat, 09:46
Re: Members in a struct, blargg, 08:57
Re: Float comparison, Ben Bacarisse, 08:54
Re: Using C for competitive advantage, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 08:15
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:05
Re: Float comparison, Richard, 07:30
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 07:26
Re: Float comparison, Richard, 07:26
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 07:22
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard Heathfield, 07:20
Re: Using C for competitive advantage, namekuseijin, 07:07
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, James Kuyper, 06:44
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, James Kuyper, 06:40
Re: Members in a struct, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:38
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:31
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, James Kuyper, 06:29
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:28
Re: Integer Types, James Kuyper, 06:24
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:13
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Rui Maciel, 06:11
Re: Float comparison, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:06
Re: Float comparison, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:40
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:16
Re: Float comparison, Richard, 05:13
Re: Float comparison, Richard, 05:13
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard, 05:11
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:08
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard Tobin, 05:02
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard Tobin, 04:58
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:39
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:27
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 04:26
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:25
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:20
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:20
Re: Float comparison, Ike Naar, 04:19
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:16
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:11
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:10
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:03
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:00
Re: Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 03:58
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Keith Thompson, 03:50
Re: Integer Types, Ian Collins, 02:48
Re: Implementation of getbits() / setbits(), Richard Heathfield, 02:13
Re: Microsoft and memcpy?, Richard Heathfield, 02:09
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 01:51
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
Re: Float comparison, Richard Heathfield, 01:33
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 00:14
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Tony, 00:09
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Tony, 00:07

May 18, 2009

May 17, 2009

May 16, 2009

May 15, 2009

May 14, 2009

May 13, 2009

May 12, 2009

May 11, 2009

May 10, 2009

May 09, 2009

May 08, 2009

May 07, 2009

May 06, 2009

May 05, 2009

May 04, 2009

May 03, 2009

May 02, 2009

Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, CBFalconer, 23:53
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, CBFalconer, 23:51
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 23:45
Re: comare tow int, Han from China, 23:40
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 23:38
Re: comare tow int, chunpulee, 23:30
Re: comare tow int, chunpulee, 23:27
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 23:23
Re: byte data manipulation, Nate Eldredge, 22:40
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: Arrays and pointers, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: comparing binary trees in C, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: byte data manipulation, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Barry Schwarz, 22:29
Re: User defined function, LiShuJun, 22:05
Re: comare tow int, Keith Thompson, 21:53
Re: comare tow int, Beej Jorgensen, 21:42
Re: comare tow int, Han from China, 21:40
Re: Over-riding an error, Richard Tobin, 21:19
Re: comare tow int, Han from China, 21:15
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 21:12
Re: comare tow int, Richard Tobin, 21:06
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Tobin, 20:59
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 20:55
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 20:51
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 20:50
Re: Over-riding an error, Brian Salter-Duke, 20:33
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:52
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:50
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:48
Re: The 64bit future, Ian Collins, 19:47
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:43
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:42
Re: comparing binary trees in C, Franken Sense, 19:40
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:39
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 19:36
Re: comare tow int, Lew Pitcher, 19:34
Re: Over-riding an error, Ian Collins, 19:32
Re: The 64bit future, Coos Haak, 19:31
Re: The 64bit future, Ian Collins, 19:28
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Lew Pitcher, 19:24
Re: comare tow int, Kenny McCormack, 19:21
Re: question about c, Richard Heathfield, 19:14
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 19:10
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 19:07
Re: Arrays and pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 18:53
Over-riding an error, Brian Salter-Duke, 18:41
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 18:20
Re: bits and good habits, blargg, 18:17
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Bill Cunningham, 18:17
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 18:15
Re: bits and good habits, blargg, 18:12
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Lew Pitcher, 18:06
Re: writing a getopt() like function, Lew Pitcher, 18:03
Re: question about c, Mark McIntyre, 17:55
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 17:54
Re: bits and good habits, Gene, 17:53
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 17:52
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 17:50
Re: The 64bit future, Philipp Klaus Krause, 17:49
writing a getopt() like function, Bill Cunningham, 17:42
Re: comare tow int, Keith Thompson, 17:13
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 17:06
Re: question about c, Spiros Bousbouras, 16:49
Re: question about c, Richard Heathfield, 16:45
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 16:44
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 16:43
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, blargg, 16:41
Re: bits and good habits, \"\", 16:39
Re: Arrays and pointers, Marston, 16:35
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Eric Sosman, 16:27
Re: Blank spaces removal in a file, Nate Eldredge, 15:55
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 15:39
Re: question about c, Mark McIntyre, 15:36
Re: The 64bit future, Philipp Klaus Krause, 15:29
Re: comare tow int, Golden California Girls, 15:17
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 15:09
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Golden California Girls, 15:07
Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 15:05
Re: Arrays and pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 15:03
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Golden California Girls, 15:00
Re: byte data manipulation, kid joe, 14:40
Re: question about c, Richard Heathfield, 14:34
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, blargg, 14:30
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, blargg, 14:28
Re: Blank spaces removal in a file, Beej Jorgensen, 14:25
Re: Blank spaces removal in a file, Eric Sosman, 14:05
Re: 1 QUESTION, luserXtrog, 14:05
Re: Blank spaces removal in a file, Lew Pitcher, 13:58
Blank spaces removal in a file, pushpakulkar, 13:43
Arrays and pointers, Sheldon, 13:36
Re: const variables, Marston, 13:21
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Keith Thompson, 13:04
Paypal wholesale Shoes Stock paypal payment www.guomeitrade.com, guomeitrade001, 12:31
Re: Subexpression types, Kirk Zurell, 12:07
Re: Subexpression types, Kirk Zurell, 12:04
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Bos, 12:00
Re: 1 QUESTION, Richard Bos, 12:00
Re: question about c, Richard Bos, 12:00
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Richard Bos, 12:00
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Richard Bos, 12:00
Re: bits and good habits, \"\", 11:29
Re: comare tow int, Hamiral, 11:18
Re: comare tow int, Eric Sosman, 10:50
Re: Float comparison, William Pursell, 10:41
Re: comare tow int, Lew Pitcher, 10:19
Re: End of the Epoch, Phil Carmody, 10:06
Re: Float comparison, Phil Carmody, 10:02
Re: comare tow int, Hamiral, 09:58
Re: Float comparison, Richard Tobin, 09:58
Re: The 64bit future, Phil Carmody, 09:54
Re: Subexpression types, Ben Bacarisse, 09:15
LV handbag / purse True leather AAA Wholesale (www.guoshitrade.com) paypal payment, wholesale free shipping paypal payment, 09:06
Subexpression types, Kirk Zurell, 08:37
Re: comare tow int, chunpulee, 08:16
Re: End of the Epoch, Joe Wright, 07:58
Re: comare tow int, Han from China, 07:55
Re: comare tow int, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Tony, 06:46
comare tow int, chunpulee, 06:26
Re: The 64bit future, Han from China, 06:16
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Ralf Damaschke, 06:06
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:38
Re: Float comparison, Willem, 04:18
Re: about inline functions, Chetan, 04:06
Re: Float comparison, William Pursell, 04:04
Re: The 64bit future, user923005, 03:36
Re: Float comparison, user923005, 03:31
New Styles ED Hardy Hoody- Cheapest, dasenchan, 02:49
Re: Float comparison, William Pursell, 02:47

May 01, 2009

April 30, 2009

November 03, 2005

April 20, 2005

Re: ULONG_MAX, Chris Croughton, 06:01