comp.lang.c (date)

April 30, 2009

Another question wrt storage alignment., qarnos, 17:30
Re: The 64bit future, Stephen Sprunk, 17:22
Re: Inline functions?, blargg, 16:52
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 16:06
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 15:51
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 15:12
http://www.guoshitrade.com . <<JUST DO IT>>> NIKE sneaker paypal payment free shipping, wholesale016, 15:11
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 15:00
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Golden California Girls, 14:14
Re: C Programming, Default User, 14:12
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 13:58
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 13:44
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 13:38
Re: The 64bit future, Paul Hsieh, 13:11
Re: const and #define, Ben Bacarisse, 12:56
Re: const and #define, jameskuyper, 12:45
｡◕‿◕｡｡◕ω◕｡｡◕﹏◕｡wholesale mlb jersey,mlb Red Sox jersey 　●０●　●＾●　●ω●　, abc351100, 12:32
Re: permutations II, Carl B. Edwinson, 12:31
Re: const and #define, jameskuyper, 12:28
Re: const and #define, Carl B. Edwinson, 12:26
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 11:45
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 11:39
Re: permutations II, Richard Heathfield, 11:37
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 11:21
Re: permutations II, Bill Cunningham, 11:11
const and #define, Sheldon, 10:53
Re: The 64bit future, lawrence . jones, 10:37
Re: The 64bit future, lawrence . jones, 10:35
Re: bug in gcc?, lawrence . jones, 10:34
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Richard Harter, 09:29
Re: pointer from integer?, Martin Ambuhl, 09:09
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 08:24
Re: The 64bit future, Tristan Miller, 08:03
Re: C Programming, Doug Miller, 06:59
Re: about inline functions, James Kuyper, 06:25
Re: pointer from integer?, Ian Collins, 06:19
pointer from integer?, Zach, 06:09
Re: process vs interrupt levels, jacob navia, 05:22
Re: Inline functions?, bill, 05:19
Re: The 64bit future, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:24
Re: Inline functions?, Ian Collins, 04:14
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 04:09
process vs interrupt levels, new, 04:00
Re: about inline functions, Kenny McCormack, 03:55
Re: The 64bit future, jacob navia, 03:55
Re: The maximum value held by a time_t ?, Ian Collins, 03:52
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 03:50
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 03:49
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 03:48
Re: The 64bit future, Ian Collins, 03:47
Re: Changing application's behavior without recompiling, Chris Dollin, 03:28
Re: The 64bit future, Phil Carmody, 03:00
Re: C program, Chris H, 02:59
Inline functions?, bill, 02:56
Re: Float comparison, Phil Carmody, 02:52
Re: about inline functions, Chetan, 02:31
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 02:03
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Keith Thompson, 01:58
Re: Changing application's behavior without recompiling, nick_keighley_nospam, 01:48
Rock & Republic Womens Jeans, dasenchan, 01:20
Re: about inline functions, Han from China, 00:52
Re: Question !!, Kojak, 00:42
Re: C Programming, Nate Eldredge, 00:02

April 29, 2009

Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 23:52
Question !!, rezve007, 23:44
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Golden California Girls, 23:42
Re: The 64bit future, blargg, 23:23
Re: about inline functions, James Kuyper, 23:21
Re: C program, Charles Richmond, 22:50
Re: The 64bit future, Keith Thompson, 21:46
Re: Changing application's behavior without recompiling, blargg, 21:42
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Keith Thompson, 21:42
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 21:39
wholesale polo t-shirt 9.9 USD from www.guoshitrade.com, wholesale free shipping, 21:19
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Keith Thompson, 21:16
Re: Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, CBFalconer, 20:44
Re: The maximum value held by a time_t ?, CBFalconer, 20:43
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, CBFalconer, 20:03
Re: The 64bit future, Richard Heathfield, 19:56
Re: C programming, CBFalconer, 19:50
Re: about inline functions, CBFalconer, 19:46
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 19:40
Re: C programming, Keith Thompson, 19:39
Re: The 64bit future, Paul Hsieh, 19:36
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 19:35
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 19:31
Re: The 64bit future, Gordon Burditt, 19:17
Re: The maximum value held by a time_t ?, jameskuyper, 19:05
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Gordon Burditt, 19:05
Re: The maximum value held by a time_t ?, Ben Pfaff, 19:02
Re: return "const char *", jameskuyper, 18:59
The maximum value held by a time_t ?, Chris McDonald, 18:50
Re: C programming, jameskuyper, 18:46
Re: return "const char *", pete, 18:45
Re: byte data manipulation, Joe Wright, 18:36
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, kid joe, 18:36
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, jameskuyper, 18:33
Re: structure address = structure first field address ?, Eric Sosman, 18:32
Re: The 64bit future, Carl, 18:32
Re: The 64bit future, Mark McIntyre, 18:27
Re: The 64bit future, jacob navia, 18:22
The 64bit future, kid joe, 18:18
structure address = structure first field address ?, Vincent De Groote, 18:15
Re: bug in gcc?, Kaz Kylheku, 17:55
Re: Operator, tw1s73dj0k3r, 17:49
Re: Switch, tw1s73dj0k3r, 17:47
Re: C program, Ike Naar, 16:52
Re: bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 16:38
Re: bug in gcc?, Eric Sosman, 15:59
Re: bug in gcc?, Keith Thompson, 15:52
Re: bug in gcc?, lawrence . jones, 15:47
Re: bug in gcc?, Eric Sosman, 15:33
Re: bug in gcc?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:26
Re: bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 15:06
Re: C programming, Joachim Schmitz, 14:49
Re: bug in gcc?, Carl, 14:47
Re: bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 14:42
Re: bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 14:39
Re: bug in gcc?, Harald van Dĳk, 14:32
Re: Float comparison, user923005, 14:31
Re: bug in gcc?, Fred, 14:30
Re: bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 14:25
Re: bug in gcc?, lndresnick, 14:14
bug in gcc?, jacob navia, 14:04
Re: c language, Default User, 13:37
Re: Shift for fun, Willem, 13:16
Re: C Programming, Doug Miller, 13:15
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 12:55
Re: Float comparison, Richard Harter, 12:23
Re: c language, Carl, 11:56
Re: C Programming, Richard Heathfield, 11:07
Re: c language, Boon, 10:59
Re: C program, Kenny McCormack, 10:19
Re: C program, Kenneth Brody, 10:07
Re: C Programming, Doug Miller, 09:46
Free shipping wholesale Nike Gucci Dior POLO LV D&G Lacoste BOSS shoes ,handbags,Clothing,shirt(PayPal payment) www.salewto.com, www_salewto001, 09:26
Re: return "const char *", James Kuyper, 09:10
Re: permutations II, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:54
Re: C Programming, Eric Sosman, 08:40
Re: Float comparison, Eric Sosman, 08:31
Re: structs and pointers, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
Re: p[1] = 'b', Barry Schwarz, 08:23
Re: Singly Linked List in C, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
Re: Float comparison, Doug Miller, 08:07
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 07:51
Re: Float comparison, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:43
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 07:36
Re: C program, Kenny McCormack, 06:48
Re: return "const char *", pete, 06:46
Re: structs and pointers, Kenny McCormack, 06:45
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, James Dow Allen, 06:37
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:21
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, James Dow Allen, 06:16
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Chris Dollin, 06:14
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, James Kuyper, 06:05
Techkicks.com technology links, community driven, Steven, 05:59
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, James Kuyper, 05:47
Re: about inline functions, Christian Kandeler, 05:29
Re: C program, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:25
Re: C programming, mukit1271, 04:55
C program, mukit1271, 04:51
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Richard Tobin, 04:49
Re: C programming, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:15
Re: C programming, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:14
Re: 1 QUESTION, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:11
Re: C programming, Kojak, 04:08
Re: 1 QUESTION, Boon, 03:56
C programming, mukit1271, 03:45
C programming, mukit1271, 03:42
Re: structs and pointers, Han from China, 03:39
Re: Shift for fun, Richard Heathfield, 03:06
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Chris Dollin, 03:00
Re: c language, Chris Dollin, 02:46
Re: c language, Phil Carmody, 02:46
Re: Shift for fun, blargg, 02:21
Re: return "const char *", Phil Carmody, 02:19
Re: structs and pointers, Keith Thompson, 02:18
Array, sabbirahmed . iut91, 02:08
Re: structs and pointers, R J C, 02:05
Switch, nafiz . cee, 02:04
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 01:59
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 01:56
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 01:54
Operator, sagaseige, 01:51
Re: Shift for fun, Sensei, 01:51
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 01:09
Re: structs and pointers, Keith Thompson, 01:01
Re: Shift for fun, CBFalconer, 00:11
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 00:01

April 28, 2009

Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 23:51
Re: Float comparison, Golden California Girls, 23:41
Re: C language, luserXtrog, 23:16
Re: C language, Golden California Girls, 23:04
Re: structs and pointers, Richard, 22:43
Re: structs and pointers, Han from China, 22:20
Re: structs and pointers, Bill Cunningham, 21:58
Re: return "const char *", Nate Eldredge, 21:55
Re: return "const char *", Han from China, 21:52
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Nate Eldredge, 21:45
Changing application's behavior without recompiling, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 21:39
Re: structs and pointers, Richard, 21:34
Re: structs and pointers, Keith Thompson, 21:33
Re: return "const char *", Nate Eldredge, 21:22
Re: return "const char *", luserXtrog, 21:02
Re: structs and pointers, Bill Cunningham, 20:45
Re: 1 QUESTION, luserXtrog, 19:57
Re: Singly Linked List in C, Ben Bacarisse, 19:22
Re: C Programming, Han from China, 19:11
Re: C Programming, Default User, 19:11
Re: C Programming, Default User, 19:10
Re: C Programming, Han from China, 18:51
Re: c language, Kenny McCormack, 18:46
Re: question based on programming C, Andrew Tomazos, 18:43
Re: [OT] Re: Float comparison, Ben Bacarisse, 18:42
Re: C Programming, Richard Harter, 18:22
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 18:21
Re: C Programming, Default User, 18:21
Re: question based on programming C, Richard Harter, 18:21
Re: C Programming, Richard Heathfield, 18:20
Re: recursion, Richard Harter, 18:15
Re: structs and pointers, Richard, 18:14
Re: permutations II, Carl, 18:12
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 18:12
Re: C Programming, Rich Webb, 18:07
Re: C Programming, Eric Sosman, 18:07
Re: return "const char *", blargg, 17:59
Re: C Programming, Keith Thompson, 17:58
Re: Shift for fun, blargg, 17:51
Re: recursion, Anthony Fremont, 17:24
Re: C Programming, Eric Sosman, 17:14
Re: C Programming, Keith Thompson, 17:05
Re: p[1] = 'b', Lew Pitcher, 16:59
Re: C programming, CBFalconer, 16:45
Re: <<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, CBFalconer, 16:44
Re: c language, Preston, 16:42
Re: c language, Keith Thompson, 16:38
Re: p[1] = 'b', CBFalconer, 16:32
c language, hisham32 . iut, 16:31
Re: p[1] = 'b', CBFalconer, 16:28
c language, hisham32 . iut, 16:26
Re: permutations II, Ben Bacarisse, 16:23
Re: Shift for fun, Han from China, 16:20
Re: Shift for fun, blargg, 16:17
Re: OT: Dynamic-CC, GC, Dynamic Types, and Prototype OO in C, CBFalconer, 16:12
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:07
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 16:01
Re: C Programming, Richard Heathfield, 15:59
Re: C programming, Eric Sosman, 15:59
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 15:58
Re: Float comparison, CBFalconer, 15:55
Re: recursion, Beej Jorgensen, 15:50
Re: permutations II, Bill Cunningham, 15:43
C Programming, noyim101161, 15:42
Re: c language, user923005, 15:40
Re: C programming, user923005, 15:39
Re: structs and pointers, Bill Cunningham, 15:38
Re: recursion, user923005, 15:37
Re: question based on programming C, user923005, 15:35
Re: structs and pointers, Bill Cunningham, 15:34
Re: question based on programming C, user923005, 15:34
Re: permutations II, Eric Sosman, 15:24
Re: Shift for fun, Richard Heathfield, 15:24
Re: 1 QUESTION, Kenny McCormack, 15:23
Re: question based on programming C, Ralf Damaschke, 15:18
Re: question based on programming C, Ralf Damaschke, 15:15
Re: User defined function, Drew Lawson, 15:08
Re: Could you please give me some advice on GC in C?, Rosario, 15:04
Re: permutations II, BartC, 15:04
[OFF] Re: 1 QUESTION, dfighter, 14:52
Shift for fun, Sensei, 14:51
question based on programming C, tanvir . cee, 14:44
Re: c language, Richard Heathfield, 14:43
User defined function, mukit1271, 14:42
Re: c language, Richard Heathfield, 14:41
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 14:40
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Han from China, 14:21
c language, issttuu, 14:17
Re: c language, Jens Stueckelberger, 14:17
Re: 1 QUESTION, Fred, 14:11
Re: structs and pointers, Richard, 14:05
Re: structs and pointers, Lew Pitcher, 14:01
c language, issttuu, 13:52
Re: structs and pointers, Han from China, 13:50
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Chris H, 13:47
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard, 13:32
structs and pointers, Bill Cunningham, 13:29
Re: byte data manipulation, Flash Gordon, 13:24
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Han from China, 13:18
Re: recursion, dfighter, 13:16
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, jameskuyper, 12:56
c language, rsazzad094, 12:45
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, jameskuyper, 12:42
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Keith Thompson, 12:41
Re: permutations II, Carl, 12:40
Re: c language, Han from China, 12:30
Re: return "const char *", jameskuyper, 12:29
Re: permutations II, Bill Cunningham, 12:28
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Keith Thompson, 12:28
Re: permutations II, Keith Thompson, 12:22
Re: recursion, Drew Lawson, 12:21
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 12:18
Re: recursion, Richard Heathfield, 12:18
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
Re: p[1] = 'b', Keith Thompson, 12:12
Re: p[1] = 'b', Keith Thompson, 12:11
recursion, mosabbirpasha, 12:09
Re: C language, Richard Heathfield, 12:07
Re: return "const char *", Martin Ambuhl, 11:58
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Keith Thompson, 11:55
Re: Float comparison, Flash Gordon, 11:54
Re: c language, Richard Heathfield, 11:50
Re: c language, Richard Heathfield, 11:49
Re: c language, Richard Heathfield, 11:49
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 11:49
C language, z . sabbir126, 11:46
Re: C programming, Richard Tobin, 11:45
c language, mamun14 . iut, 11:41
New Style Designer Sunglasses - discount, widenoe74, 11:40
C programming, arnobbd, 11:33
Re: On Call By Value, Kenneth Brody, 11:30
c language, tanvir . cee, 11:26
Re: c language, Carl, 11:22
c language, issttuu, 11:18
Re: Float comparison, Flash Gordon, 11:16
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Harter, 11:07
Replica brand handbags wallets good quality wholesale from china www.guoshitrade.com paypal payment, wholesale free shipping www.guoshitrade.com, 11:02
Re: <<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, Paul, 10:54
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Harter, 10:53
Re: Optimizer Behavior with a Comparison, Andrew Tomazos, 10:50
Re: <<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, luserXtrog, 10:17
Re: Float comparison, Golden California Girls, 10:14
Re: return "const char *", luserXtrog, 10:09
Free shipping wholesale Nike Gucci Dior POLO LV D&G Lacoste BOSS shoes ,handbags,Clothing,shirt,glass ,PayPal, fjrjtrade005, 10:01
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Chris Dollin, 10:00
Re: question about c, James Kuyper, 09:55
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, James Kuyper, 09:27
Re: OT: geolocation, James Kuyper, 09:23
Re: Float comparison, James Kuyper, 09:18
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, James Kuyper, 09:16
Re: <<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, Carl, 09:12
Re: question about c, osmium, 08:57
Re: Singly Linked List in C, mark . bluemel, 08:49
<<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, Faport International, 08:42
<<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, Faport International, 08:41
Re: OT: geolocation, Richard Heathfield, 08:39
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Kenny McCormack, 08:30
Re: question about c, Eric Sosman, 08:21
Re: Optimizer Behavior with a Comparison, Eric Sosman, 08:12
Re: A doubly linked-list in C, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: adapting getline, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: Float comparison, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: Float comparison, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: On Call By Value, Richard Bos, 08:08
Re: question about c, Richard Heathfield, 08:02
Re: OT: geolocation, Richard Tobin, 07:51
Re: how to create a file with copy/read denied to it, Richard Tobin, 07:48
Re: Float comparison, Richard Tobin, 07:43
Re: C and XML, eps, 07:37
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 07:25
Re: p[1] = 'b', arnuld, 07:12
Re: question about c, Ian Collins, 06:51
question about c, rabbanirash . ha, 06:50
Re: p[1] = 'b', Ian Collins, 06:48
Re: permutations II, BartC, 06:46
Singly Linked List in C, arnuld, 06:45
Re: Optimizer Behavior with a Comparison, joecook, 06:43
../?\.... /?\o Okely Glasses cheap wholesaler (paypal payment)( www.fjrjtrade.com ) ../?\.... /?\o, j351119, 06:43
Re: p[1] = 'b', Richard Tobin, 06:38
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, James Dow Allen, 06:27
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:24
Re: p[1] = 'b', Edwin van den Oetelaar, 06:21
Re: Float comparison, Dik T. Winter, 06:21
Re: p[1] = 'b', chunpulee, 06:16
Re: On Call By Value, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:52
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Mark Wooding, 05:28
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Chris H, 05:27
Re: p[1] = 'b', Ian Collins, 05:25
Re: p[1] = 'b', Chris Dollin, 05:12
▶▶▶【*^__^*】Discount wholesale Free shipping T-shirts (Lacoste T-Shirt Ralph Lauren T- Shirt A&F T- Shirts ), l351119, 05:09
Re: p[1] = 'b', bert, 05:03
Re: return "const char *", Richard Heathfield, 04:56
p[1] = 'b', chunpulee, 04:55
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 04:54
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 04:19
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Keith Thompson, 04:16
<<<<<<<Offer for Motorcycle Clothing>>>>>>>>>, Faport International, 04:15
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Chris H, 04:13
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:08
Re: return "const char *", Nate Eldredge, 03:57
Re: return "const char *", Nate Eldredge, 03:55
Re: return "const char *", pete, 03:50
Re: return "const char *", pete, 03:43
Re: return "const char *", Golden California Girls, 03:39
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Richard Heathfield, 03:22
Re: Float comparison, Golden California Girls, 03:03
Re: return "const char *", luserXtrog, 02:14
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Golden California Girls, 02:10
Re: return "const char *", luserXtrog, 01:55
return "const char *", Mark, 01:47
Re: OT: Dynamic-CC, GC, Dynamic Types, and Prototype OO in C, Richard Harter, 01:17
Re: A lurker's take on C.L.C pedantry, Keith Thompson, 01:00
Re: permutations II, luserXtrog, 00:33
Re: permutations II, Keith Thompson, 00:19
Re: Float comparison, Keith Thompson, 00:18
Re: Float comparison, Han from China, 00:03

April 27, 2009

April 26, 2009

April 25, 2009

April 24, 2009

April 23, 2009

April 22, 2009

April 21, 2009

April 20, 2009

April 19, 2009

April 18, 2009

April 17, 2009

April 16, 2009

April 15, 2009

April 14, 2009

April 13, 2009

April 12, 2009

April 11, 2009

April 10, 2009

April 09, 2009

April 08, 2009

April 07, 2009

April 06, 2009

April 05, 2009

April 04, 2009

April 03, 2009

April 02, 2009

April 01, 2009

March 31, 2009