comp.lang.c (thread)

Christian Audigier Women's T-Shirts, zhanglin099, 2009/02/28
Allocating Memory And Strings, Mike, 2009/02/28
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, pete, 2009/02/28
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Mike, 2009/02/28
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, jfbode1029, 2009/02/28
Strange !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/28
- Re: Strange !!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Strange !!, Han from China, 2009/02/28
- Re: Strange !!, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Strange !!, Kojak, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Strange !!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Strange !!, Kojak, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Strange !!, Han from China, 2009/02/28
Free C Compiler on Windows, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/28
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, LL, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Luuk, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard, 2009/02/28
Free Shipping NFL jerseys 16USD NHL Jerseys 34USD at www.guoshijerseys.com Paypal payment, guoshijerseys101, 2009/02/28
Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
- Re: Passing by reference, user923005, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Passing by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
    - Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, Ike Naar, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 2009/02/28
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Passing by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Passing by reference, LL, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Passing by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Passing by reference, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/28
on all usenet, rio, 2009/02/28
can we initialize a function argument in c, harry, 2009/02/28
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, pete, 2009/02/28
  - Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, LL, 2009/02/28
    - Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
Returning automatic pointers always bad?, C . J . Clegg, 2009/02/27
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 2009/02/27
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/28
header, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/27
- Re: header, Richard, 2009/02/27
- Re: header, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
- Re: header, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
  - Re: header, Richard, 2009/02/28
  - Re: header, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/28
GPS tracking software, Bubba, 2009/02/27
- Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
  - Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba, 2009/02/27
    - Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba, 2009/02/27
C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, Arjan, 2009/02/27
- Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/27
- Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, user923005, 2009/02/27
how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 2009/02/27
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
  - Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, James Kuyper, 2009/02/27
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/27
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Kenneth Brody, 2009/02/27
  - Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 2009/02/27
    - Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, maciek borzecki, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
    - Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/27
[OT] Spam, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/27
- Re: [OT] Spam, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/27
- Re: [OT] Spam, Kojak, 2009/02/27
- Re: [OT] Spam, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/27
Can you help me with this line of code please??, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/27
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/27
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, James Kuyper, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/27
pwd - C equivalent, MN, 2009/02/27
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/27
  - Re: pwd - C equivalent, Kenneth Brody, 2009/02/27
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, jacob navia, 2009/02/27
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/27
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, user923005, 2009/02/27
implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Tinku, 2009/02/27
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Bartc, 2009/02/27
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/27
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/27
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, jacob navia, 2009/02/27
  - Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, CBFalconer, 2009/02/27
serial port in C, the consiglieri, 2009/02/27
- Re: serial port in C, Ian Collins, 2009/02/27
  - Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, Han from China, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, jacob navia, 2009/02/28
- Re: serial port in C, Sjouke Burry, 2009/02/27
  - Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: serial port in C, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: serial port in C, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, Kojak, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: serial port in C, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/28
    - Re: serial port in C, James Kuyper, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: serial port in C, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
- Re: serial port in C, Kenneth Brody, 2009/02/27
Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, mireillen, 2009/02/27
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, jacob navia, 2009/02/27
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, mireillen, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
Re: How , system cpu and user cpu times calculates, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
gets and puts warning, pavunkumar, 2009/02/27
- Re: gets and puts warning, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/27
Re: Difference between fgets and gets, user923005, 2009/02/27
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, qarnos, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Bos, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, user923005, 2009/02/27
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/27
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, CBFalconer, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Han from China, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, jfbode1029, 2009/02/27
Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, vamsi, 2009/02/26
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Ian Collins, 2009/02/26
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, vamsi, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Harter, 2009/02/27
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, pete, 2009/02/27
Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Guilbert STABILO, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, user923005, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, christian.bau, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, CBFalconer, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Han from China, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, qarnos, 2009/02/26
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 2009/02/26
- Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
  - Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 2009/02/26
    - Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 2009/02/26
Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/26
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Kojak, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Kojak, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Bartc, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Boon, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, pete, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Han from China, 2009/02/26
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/26
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ian Collins, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
Very simple: passing parameters, Francogrex, 2009/02/26
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, blargg, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Bos, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Ian Collins, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/27
      
      [OT] Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/27
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
  - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Francogrex, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/27
Re: usage of fwide function, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/26
- Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/26
  - Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 2009/02/26
    - Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Richard, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Richard, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, CBFalconer, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: usage of fwide function, Richard Bos, 2009/02/28
What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Mark Hobley, 2009/02/26
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kojak, 2009/02/26
  - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/26
    - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, blargg, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/28
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, TonyMc, 2009/02/26
  - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, gw7rib, 2009/02/26
  - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/26
    - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard, 2009/02/26
    - Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, TonyMc, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/27
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/26
Movado Medalist Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 2009/02/26
Tissot V8 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 2009/02/26
Breguet Marine Automatic Big Date Mens Watch 5817ST.Y2.SVO, Best Wristwatch World, iwcwatches255, 2009/02/26
Breitling Navitimer 18kt Yellow Gold Steel Black Mens Watch D2332212-B6-431D, Best Wristwatch World, iwcwatches255, 2009/02/26
Rado Coupole Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 2009/02/26
On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 2009/02/25
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 2009/02/26
  - Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 2009/02/26
    - Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 2009/02/28
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", William Pursell, 2009/02/26
  - Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 2009/02/26
Coogi Men's Jeans - discount, sxhhuangshuixian, 2009/02/25
Interesting math problem, Nikos Chantziaras, 2009/02/25
- Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/25
- Re: Interesting math problem, user923005, 2009/02/25
- Re: Interesting math problem, Paul Hsieh, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
    - Re: Interesting math problem, Paul Hsieh, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
      
      OT: Re: Interesting math problem, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
- Re: Interesting math problem, christian.bau, 2009/02/25
- Re: Interesting math problem, Bartc, 2009/02/25
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Nikos Chantziaras, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Interesting math problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/27
- Re: Interesting math problem, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Larry Gates, 2009/02/26
- Re: Interesting math problem, blargg, 2009/02/26
- Re: Interesting math problem, Fred, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Bartc, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Ralf Damaschke, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/26
  - Re: Interesting math problem, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Interesting math problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/27
    - Re: Interesting math problem, Richard Bos, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Interesting math problem, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/28
  - Re: Interesting math problem, CBFalconer, 2009/02/27
Clarification required for linkage., somenath, 2009/02/25
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/25
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Clarification required for linkage., somenath, 2009/02/26
    - Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Clarification required for linkage., pete, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 2009/02/26
free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/25
  - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/25
    - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
  - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/25
    - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., jacob navia, 2009/02/25
  - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 2009/02/25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Bartc, 2009/02/25
  - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/26
    - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Bartc, 2009/02/26
    - Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., James Kuyper, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Golden California Girls, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Bos, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., James Kuyper, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kojak, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Harter, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 2009/02/27
ANNOUNCE: PL/compiler postdoctoral research position (closes 3/31/09), smithmk, 2009/02/25
clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 2009/02/24
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/25
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
  - Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 2009/02/25
  - Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 2009/02/25
Fashion True Religion Men's t shirt - discount, maipump01, 2009/02/24
geld verdienen durch online sein,drakensang geld machen,internet geld verdienen forum,viel geld verdienen,im internet verdienen durch,, datona753, 2009/02/24
Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/24
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Wescott, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Vladimir Vassilevsky, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/24
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/24
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/24
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Han from China, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/24
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jack Klein, 2009/02/24
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, bigbrownbeastiebigbrownface, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 2009/02/28
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Harter, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Harter, 2009/02/25
    - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Gil Hamilton, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Eric Eide, 2009/02/28
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Vladimir Vassilevsky, 2009/02/24
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 2009/02/25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, REH, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 2009/02/25
What is the proper way to do recursion, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/24
- Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/24
  - Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
- Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/24
On strictly conforming programs and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/24
"Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, J.A. Hacker, 2009/02/24
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/24
  - Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/24
    - Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/25
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, David Schwartz, 2009/02/24
why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/24
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, William Pursell, 2009/02/24
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, sathya, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/24
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
    - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/25
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 2009/02/25
    - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ike Naar, 2009/02/25
    - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Richard, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/25
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/25
    - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/25
  - Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
object & executable file, techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/24
- Re: object & executable file, Ian Collins, 2009/02/24
- Re: object & executable file, osmium, 2009/02/24
  - Re: object & executable file, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/24
  - Re: object & executable file, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/24
    - Re: object & executable file, Han from China, 2009/02/24
    - Re: object & executable file, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/25
- Re: object & executable file, jfbode1029, 2009/02/24
explanation for exec functions, techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/24
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Ian Collins, 2009/02/24
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/24
- Re: explanation for exec functions, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
  - Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard, 2009/02/24
  - Re: explanation for exec functions, Han from China, 2009/02/24
  - Re: explanation for exec functions, Ian Collins, 2009/02/25
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/24
  - Re: explanation for exec functions, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/25
    - Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: explanation for exec functions, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: explanation for exec functions, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: explanation for exec functions, CBFalconer, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: explanation for exec functions, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
    - Re: explanation for exec functions, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/25
  - Re: explanation for exec functions, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/25
Fashion True Religion Womens t shirt - discount, sxhhuangshuixian, 2009/02/24
Free shipping Wholesale NFL jerseys USD 20.06 ~ 21.95 MLB USD 20.06 ~ 21.95 Paypal payment, guoshitrade100, 2009/02/24
On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/23
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Richard, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/23
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/23
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, pete, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
    - Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, pete, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Larry Gates, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/26
www.dudes-mall.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.!, www.dudes-mall.com, 2009/02/23
- www.dudes-mall.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.!, dudesmallmike002@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/23
Rock And Republic Womens Jeans - fashion, sxhhuangshuixian, 2009/02/23
AIR Jordan 1 (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), fffffffffff, 2009/02/23
greedy algorithm, Jung, William, 2009/02/23
- Re: greedy algorithm, Kojak, 2009/02/23
- Re: greedy algorithm, user923005, 2009/02/23
Open Your Eyes To What’s REALLY Going On In The World!, asrock, 2009/02/22
Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances, Han from China, 2009/02/22
- Re: Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances, Han from China, 2009/02/23
big mess, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
- Re: big mess, Kojak, 2009/02/22
  - Re: big mess, Kojak, 2009/02/22
    - Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: big mess, Kojak, 2009/02/23
- Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
  - Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
    - Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: big mess, Kojak, 2009/02/23
- Re: big mess, Joe Wright, 2009/02/22
- Re: big mess, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/23
  - Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/23
hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
- Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
  - Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/22
- Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/22
  - Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
- Re: hex to int, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/22
  - Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
    - Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/22
    - Re: hex to int, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: hex to int, Mark L Pappin, 2009/02/22
- Re: hex to int, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 2009/02/22
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
  - Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 2009/02/22
    - Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 2009/02/22
    - Re: dlopen of several lib, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 2009/02/22
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
china wholesale air jordan 1-24 shoes, cheap edhardy armani coogi men's t-shirts & jeans, hotsell51, 2009/02/22
Questionnaire, pkuphenix, 2009/02/22
lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 2009/02/22
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Tea Pot, 2009/02/22
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
  - Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
    - Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, blargg, 2009/02/25
  - Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard, 2009/02/22
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, teapot, 2009/02/22
  - Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 2009/02/23
    - Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, teapot, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 2009/02/24
Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, vib.cpp@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/22
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/22
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, pete, 2009/02/22
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
    - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/24
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, pete, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 2009/02/25
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, blargg, 2009/02/23
Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, teapot, 2009/02/22
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Harald van $)CD)&k, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/22
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Ike Naar, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, blargg, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, rkiesling, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, rkiesling, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Bartc, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Stupid Echo, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, blargg, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 2009/02/21
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
  - Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Richard, 2009/02/23
  - Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
    - Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 2009/02/23
    - Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 2009/02/24
  - Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 2009/02/23
New well tested makepp snapshot released, Daniel Pfeiffer, 2009/02/21
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
Re:, Han from China, 2009/02/21
- Re:, Richard, 2009/02/21
  - Re:, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
    - Re:, Richard, 2009/02/24
strange result, happytoday, 2009/02/21
- Re: strange result, Kojak, 2009/02/21
  - Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
  - Re: strange result, happytoday, 2009/02/21
    - Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
  - Re: strange result, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/21
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
  - Re: strange result, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/21
    - Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
- Re: strange result, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
solving a recursion, varun chadha, 2009/02/21
- Re: solving a recursion, pete, 2009/02/21
- Re: solving a recursion, gw7rib, 2009/02/21
- Re: solving a recursion, CBFalconer, 2009/02/21
ed hardy men's underwear - fashionable, janetannjn, 2009/02/21
Just a bit of silliness, The Hippy, 2009/02/20
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Barry, 2009/02/21
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
  - Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/23
    - Re: Just a bit of silliness, user923005, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, user923005, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/25
    - Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Just a bit of silliness, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/25
  - Re: Just a bit of silliness, mijoryx, 2009/02/24
On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/20
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/20
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/20
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/20
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
    - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/20
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/20
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/20
    - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/21
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, rio, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 2009/02/23
    - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
  - Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/23
a[i++] = j, saurabh29789, 2009/02/20
- Re: a[i++] = j, Kojak, 2009/02/20
- Re: a[i++] = j, Han from China, 2009/02/20
  - Re: a[i++] = j, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/20
    - Re: a[i++] = j, Fred, 2009/02/20
- Re: a[i++] = j, jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
Segmentation fault, vaib, 2009/02/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, Obnoxious User, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Segmentation fault, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak, 2009/02/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Segmentation fault, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
    - Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Han from China, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Segmentation fault, vaib, 2009/02/20
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, osmium, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Default User, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Stupid Echo, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 2009/02/21
wholesale cheap lacoste puma trainers, edhardy bbc lrg t-shirts & jeans, www.globwholesale.com, 2009/02/20
Tips to earn more with no inverstment..., Sushmitha, 2009/02/20
#include vs. -library, Tom Impelluso, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Tom Impelluso, 2009/02/20
    - Re: #include vs. -library, jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Han from China, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/20
    - Re: #include vs. -library, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, Erik Trulsson, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
    - Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, jfbode1029, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
    - Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
- Re: #include vs. -library, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/20
- Re: #include vs. -library, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
  - Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/21
    - Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 2009/02/21
logging optimization, Neo, 2009/02/20
- Re: logging optimization, Ian Collins, 2009/02/20
- Re: logging optimization, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
- Re: logging optimization, lndresnick, 2009/02/20
- Re: logging optimization, Nelu, 2009/02/20
ed hardy men's shirts - fashionable, hclchanglinghuang, 2009/02/19
rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/19
- Re: rel strength index function, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
  - Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/19
    - Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/21
- Re: rel strength index function, pete, 2009/02/19
  - Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/19
    - Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/25
- Re: rel strength index function, user923005, 2009/02/19
- Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
  - Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/19
    - Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/20
- Re: rel strength index function, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
- Re: rel strength index function, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/19
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/19
  - Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/19
    - Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/22
  - Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
    - Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 2009/02/20
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 2009/02/21
Compilers no longer release executables, Clifford Stern, 2009/02/19
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/19
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/20
Current world's smallest chess program, biyubi, 2009/02/19
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, William Hughes, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/19
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, James Kuyper, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Walter Banks, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Old Wolf, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/27
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, The unknown warrior, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Doug Miller, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Doug Miller, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/27
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Andy Walker, 2009/02/28
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/25
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 2009/02/20
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/20
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, The unknown warrior, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 2009/02/20
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tony M, 2009/02/25
"Referenced type ", saurabh29789, 2009/02/19
- Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
  - Re: "Referenced type ", Richard, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/21
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
  - Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
  - Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/20
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Flash Gordon, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/26
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", lawrence . jones, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/20
  - Re: "Referenced type ", blargg, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 2009/02/19
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 2009/02/23
    - Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: "Referenced type ", Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 2009/02/19
- Re: "Referenced type ", pete, 2009/02/19
Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/19
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, blargg, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Voigt [C++ MVP], 2009/02/19
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Alex Blekhman, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Alex Blekhman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Erik Funkenbusch, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, chrisv, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, chrisv, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Boon, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ulrich Eckhardt, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, James Kuyper, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, jameskuyper, 2009/02/24
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Nathan Mates, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Joe Pfeiffer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, jameskuyper, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ulrich Eckhardt, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ian Collins, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/23
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Joe Pfeiffer, 2009/02/20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Boon, 2009/02/20
pre teen sex, incest, lolitas bbs, lolita , s, oqadibohygi4800, 2009/02/19
lolita, sun bbs, , hussyfan, model galleries, oqadibohygi4800, 2009/02/19
child super models, russian lolita, boys, young child models, pedo, oqadibohygi4800, 2009/02/19
(WWW.STYLISHDUDES.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.stylishdudes.com, 2009/02/19
Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, rembremading, 2009/02/19
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Bartc, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, rembremading, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Bartc, 2009/02/19
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Tim Prince, 2009/02/19
any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
  - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
    - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bartc, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
    - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Kojak, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
  - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
    - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Ira Baxter, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bartc, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 2009/02/19
    - Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/19
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Walter Banks, 2009/02/19
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/19
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/19
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
Qsort-ing structures, Albert, 2009/02/19
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/20
  - Re: Qsort-ing structures, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert, 2009/02/28
About space for variable, westbest98, 2009/02/19
- Re: About space for variable, raashid bhatt, 2009/02/19
  - Re: About space for variable, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
- Re: About space for variable, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
- Re: About space for variable, Kojak, 2009/02/19
  - Re: About space for variable, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
- Re: About space for variable, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/19
- Re: About space for variable, westbest98, 2009/02/19
bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, mijoryx, 2009/02/18
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
  - Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
    - Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, mijoryx, 2009/02/19
  - Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/19
    - Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
  - Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 2009/02/19
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Richard Harter, 2009/02/19
adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 2009/02/18
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Jack Klein, 2009/02/18
  - Re: adding \ char to the string, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/19
    - Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 2009/02/19
  - Re: adding \ char to the string, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/20
- Re: adding \ char to the string, CBFalconer, 2009/02/19
  - Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 2009/02/19
    - Re: adding \ char to the string, Han from China, 2009/02/19
    - Re: adding \ char to the string, CBFalconer, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: adding \ char to the string, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/20
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Kojak, 2009/02/19
  - Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 2009/02/19
    - Re: adding \ char to the string, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
    - Re: adding \ char to the string, Kojak, 2009/02/19
casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 2009/02/18
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/18
  - Re: casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 2009/02/18
    - Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 2009/02/19
    - Re: casting and arithmetic, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
    - Re: casting and arithmetic, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
    - Re: casting and arithmetic, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, James Kuyper, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, pete, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, pete, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: casting and arithmetic, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
- Re: casting and arithmetic, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/18
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/18
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Bartc, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Bartc, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Dow Allen, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Dow Allen, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/23
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/24
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Woodall, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
  - Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, mijoryx, 2009/02/23
On "type casting", Han from China, 2009/02/18
- Re: On "type casting", blargg, 2009/02/19
  - Re: On "type casting", Han from China, 2009/02/19
    - Re: On "type casting", Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: On "type casting", blargg, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: On "type casting", Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: On "type casting", Han from China, 2009/02/19
Logical operator not working in if condition, venkatarao0@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/18
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard, 2009/02/19
  - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Bartc, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 2009/02/18
C mnemonics, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: C mnemonics, Larry Gates, 2009/02/17
- Re: C mnemonics, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/18
  - Re: C mnemonics, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
    - Re: C mnemonics, Coos Haak, 2009/02/18
  - Re: C mnemonics, Han from China, 2009/02/18
- Re: C mnemonics, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
  - Re: C mnemonics, CBFalconer, 2009/02/25
Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/17
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, gw7rib, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, gw7rib, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/21
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/19
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 2009/02/19
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jacob navia, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 2009/02/21
    - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Andrew Smallshaw, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 2009/02/20
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, teapot, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/22
  - Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 2009/02/22
How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, maciek borzecki, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 2009/02/17
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ike Naar, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ike Naar, 2009/02/18
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 2009/02/18
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 2009/02/18
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, pete, 2009/02/20
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, user923005, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, user923005, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
    - [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/24
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, jameskuyper, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bartc, 2009/02/17
    - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bartc, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: How often do you read the C standard?, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/18
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/17
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/18
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
  - Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
Re: Searching for history of "#if", Eric Sosman, 2009/02/17
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
  - Re: Searching for history of "#if", Boon, 2009/02/18
    - Re: Searching for history of "#if", Ian Collins, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Searching for history of "#if", Boon, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Searching for history of "#if", Ian Collins, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Searching for history of "#if", Sjouke Burry, 2009/02/19
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
Function Call - help, libertinux, 2009/02/17
- Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/17
- Re: Function Call - help, Richard, 2009/02/17
  - Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Function Call - help, Richard, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/17
- Re: Function Call - help, John Bode, 2009/02/17
Port Royal Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches114, 2009/02/17
Popular Cartier Watches, iwcwatches114, 2009/02/17
Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches114, 2009/02/17
Best Stuhrling Watches World, iwcwatches114, 2009/02/17
reading socket data, nix, 2009/02/17
- Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/17
  - Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
    - Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
  - Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
    - Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/18
- Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
  - Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
    - Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
  - Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/17
    - Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/18
    - Re: reading socket data, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/17
    - Re: reading socket data, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: reading socket data, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/17
(part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Han from China, 2009/02/16
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Han from China, 2009/02/17
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Hans Schneider, 2009/02/19
  - Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Tea Pot, 2009/02/19
    - Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/19
    - Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Tea Pot, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
Sport Shoes (paypal payment)(www.cicigogo.cn ), cicitrade601, 2009/02/16
printf output, Keep Asking, 2009/02/16
- Re: printf output, Jack Klein, 2009/02/16
  - Re: printf output, Richard, 2009/02/16
  - Re: printf output, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
- Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/16
  - Re: printf output, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/17
    - Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: printf output, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: printf output, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: printf output, jameskuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: printf output, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: printf output, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: printf output, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/17
- Re: printf output, Nelu, 2009/02/16
  - Re: printf output, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
    - Re: printf output, Nelu, 2009/02/17
- Re: printf output, jaysome, 2009/02/17
- Re: printf output, Keep Asking, 2009/02/17
  - Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/17
  - Re: printf output, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
    - Re: printf output, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: printf output, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: printf output, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: printf output, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: printf output, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: printf output, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
"%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/16
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 2009/02/16
  - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, MisterE, 2009/02/18
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/18
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/16
  - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Bartc, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, christian.bau, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 2009/02/16
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Ike Naar, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, rio, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/23
      
      ATTN: Han Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/25
    - Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/17
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 2009/02/16
NFL Jerseys=22USD Mlb jerseys=20USD Nhl Jerseys=35USD paypal payment, cicitrade600, 2009/02/16
Excuse me, ama, 2009/02/15
va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
  - Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
    - Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Han from China, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Han from China, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Phil Carmody, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Richard, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/16
    - Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/16
Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
- Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
- Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
Look for open source C library for text manipulation, 1230987za, 2009/02/15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/15
  - Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 2009/02/16
    - Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Harter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Harter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/18
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ian Collins, 2009/02/15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, WANG Cong, 2009/02/16
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, user923005, 2009/02/16
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Paul Hsieh, 2009/02/18
? :, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/15
- Re: ? :, Ian Collins, 2009/02/15
- Re: ? :, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/15
- Re: ? :, pete, 2009/02/15
  - Re: ? :, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/15
    - Re: ? :, pete, 2009/02/15
- Re: ? :, Richard, 2009/02/15
Re: MACRO QUERY, WANG Cong, 2009/02/15
- Re: MACRO QUERY, pete, 2009/02/15
passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/15
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, WANG Cong, 2009/02/15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/15
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/15
    - Re: passing reference to pointer, Ian Collins, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/16
      
      [Meta] Re: passing reference to pointer, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Old Wolf, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, blargg, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Ian Collins, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 2009/02/17
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
- Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/16
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 2009/02/16
    - Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
  - Re: passing reference to pointer, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
    - Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 2009/02/16
HTTP RESPONSE query, Ram, 2009/02/15
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/15
  - Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/15
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Han from China, 2009/02/15
  - Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Ram, 2009/02/16
Never reinstall XP again, repairtool.vze@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/14
- Re: Never reinstall XP again, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/15
Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Chad, 2009/02/14
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Chad, 2009/02/14
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, myforwik, 2009/02/14
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/15
good quality nike jordan shoes from china(www.cnnshoe.com), wulee, 2009/02/14
Function returning a char, candide, 2009/02/14
- Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Function returning a char, candide, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Function returning a char, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Function returning a char, candide, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Function returning a char, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Function returning a char, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Function returning a char, WANG Cong, 2009/02/15
    - Re: Function returning a char, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/15
    - Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Function returning a char, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Function returning a char, WANG Cong, 2009/02/16
  - Re: Function returning a char, Han from China, 2009/02/15
- Re: Function returning a char, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/15
Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/14
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/14
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, Ralf Damaschke, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/16
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/16
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/15
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/16
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, blargg, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/16
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 2009/02/16
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, Suvroc, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Suvroc, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/14
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Ike Naar, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Ike Naar, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/15
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, Han from China, 2009/02/15
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/16
  - Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 2009/02/16
***************New Enthiran Stills Of Rajini & Aishwarya Rai****************, Enthian, 2009/02/14
Free credit report - 2009 Best Offer!, ojbaconstartle, 2009/02/13
Copy and paste in software development, jacob navia, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copy and paste in software development, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/13
- Re: Copy and paste in software development, Larry Gates, 2009/02/14
advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/13
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/15
  - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
  - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
    - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Bartc, 2009/02/15
  - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
    - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Bartc, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/15
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
  - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/16
    - Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, dj3vande, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 2009/02/18
Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/13
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 2009/02/13
- Re: Tick counting problem, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Tick counting problem, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 2009/02/15
- Re: Tick counting problem, myforwik, 2009/02/14
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 2009/02/15
- Re: Tick counting problem, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
Easy ways of earning money online guide, success, 2009/02/13
What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/13
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, pete, 2009/02/13
  - Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/13
    - Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Boon, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, jameskuyper, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, blargg, 2009/02/13
    - Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, jameskuyper, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/13
- Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/13
- Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, Harold Aptroot, 2009/02/13
Freeing the allocated block, new, 2009/02/13
- Re: Freeing the allocated block, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/13
- Re: Freeing the allocated block, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
  - Re: Freeing the allocated block, new, 2009/02/15
Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/13
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Daniel Kraft, 2009/02/13
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Bartc, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/14
How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, James Tursa, 2009/02/13
- Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/13
- Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/13
What's wrong with this code?, LL, 2009/02/13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Roberto Divia, 2009/02/13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, ugepp, 2009/02/13
  - Re: What's wrong with this code?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
    - Re: What's wrong with this code?, pete, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What's wrong with this code?, pete, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 2009/02/13
  - Re: What's wrong with this code?, mohi, 2009/02/13
    - Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 2009/02/13
Amazing Cool mobile application Absolutely FREE !!, Lima, 2009/02/13
free free free usenet, anandamerica@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/13
What does this code do?, keekeekee17, 2009/02/13
- Re: What does this code do?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/13
- Re: What does this code do?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/13
  - Re: What does this code do?, Curtis Dyer, 2009/02/14
- Re: What does this code do?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 2009/02/13
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Problem with realloc (I think), CBFalconer, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Han from China, 2009/02/15
  - Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Han from China, 2009/02/13
Re: psych question about ignoring people, George Orwell, 2009/02/12
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 2009/02/13
Gucci Continental Wallet Gold 112724 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Gucci Princy Boston S Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Chanel Wallet Red C1509 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Monogram Canvas Designed Purse M61717 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Fendi Spring/Summer Black 2575 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Miu Miu Handbag Earth Yellow 57511 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Monogram Denim Camera Bag Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
Chanel Handbags Black 25205 Collection, bagsbags31, 2009/02/12
dynamic list of structures, irwa82, 2009/02/12
- Re: dynamic list of structures, pete, 2009/02/12
- Re: dynamic list of structures, Bartc, 2009/02/12
- Re: dynamic list of structures, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
Online pharmacies india winstrol - Best Site!, marquezuieven, 2009/02/12
Suggestions about transparent data structures, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, user923005, 2009/02/12
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, s0suk3, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, s0suk3, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Steffen Buehler, 2009/02/13
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, CBFalconer, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, gw7rib, 2009/02/14
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Wolfgang Draxinger, 2009/02/12
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, David Resnick, 2009/02/12
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, WANG Cong, 2009/02/13
test, LL, 2009/02/12
- Re: test, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/12
- Re: test, Ian Collins, 2009/02/26
oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 2009/02/12
  - Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 2009/02/12
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, pete, 2009/02/12
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Nelu, 2009/02/12
  - Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, Nelu, 2009/02/12
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, jameskuyper, 2009/02/12
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jameskuyper, 2009/02/12
  - Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/12
  - Re: oddness with strcpy, Old Wolf, 2009/02/14
    - Re: oddness with strcpy, James Kuyper, 2009/02/14
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/12
  - Re: oddness with strcpy, Han from China, 2009/02/13
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Willem, 2009/02/12
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Paul Hsieh, 2009/02/12
Why copy const char* argument?, Dominik Friedrichs, 2009/02/12
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, pete, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Why copy const char* argument?, blargg, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/13
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Why copy const char* argument?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Tim Woodall, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/13
>>>Money Exchange<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Conflict Resolution<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Colonial America<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Party Favors<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Plastic Containers<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Olympic Games<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Taco Bell<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Ink Refill<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Book Clubs<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
>>>Radio Stations<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 2009/02/12
Function for getting a serial number of computer..., djuro . tost, 2009/02/12
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/12
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Bartc, 2009/02/12
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Jujitsu Lizard, 2009/02/16
Typecast clarification, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/12
- Re: Typecast clarification, WANG Cong, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Typecast clarification, LL, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Typecast clarification, jameskuyper, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Typecast clarification, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/13
- Re: Typecast clarification, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
- Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Typecast clarification, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Typecast clarification, jameskuyper, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Typecast clarification, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
    - Re: Typecast clarification, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/15
  - Re: Typecast clarification, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Typecast clarification, pete, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Typecast clarification, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Typecast clarification, Han from China, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Typecast clarification, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
- Re: Typecast clarification, Boon, 2009/02/12
- Re: Typecast clarification, Han from China, 2009/02/13
ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount, jmsmark30, 2009/02/12
- ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount, jmsmark30, 2009/02/16
aansprakelijkheid software,bouwfonds hypotheek,lening afsluiten zonder bkr,geld kosten,zakelijk geld lenen,, canalien747, 2009/02/11
Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/13
  - Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
C question, Ficus Elastica, 2009/02/11
- Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/11
  - Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
    - Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, Nelu, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: C question, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/12
- Re: C question, Jack Klein, 2009/02/11
- Re: C question, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
- Re: C question, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
  - Re: C question, Ficus Elastica, 2009/02/16
    - Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: C question, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: C question, Richard, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: C question, Richard, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: C question, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: C question, Ficus Elastica, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: C question, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: C question, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      OT: Editor heritage [was: Re: C question], Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
    - Re: C question, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
    - Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/17
    - Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: C question, user923005, 2009/02/17
    - Re: C question, blmblm, 2009/02/17
    - Re: C question, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: C question, Richard, 2009/02/18
    - Re: C question, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: C question, Richard, 2009/02/18
    - Re: C question, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
- Re: C question, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/11
  - Re: C question, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
    - Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
  - OT: editors [was Re: C question], Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
- Re: C question, misty, 2009/02/11
- Re: C question, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/12
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
  - Re: C question, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/12
- C question, GayCProgrammer, 2009/02/27
  - Re: C question, Kojak, 2009/02/27
  - Re: C question, Kenneth Brody, 2009/02/27
  - Re: C question, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/27
Life insurance no medical exam - Best Site!, hfalmondarnold@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/11
Re: infinite loop, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
Re: Type casting void *, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
- Re: Type casting void *, Richard, 2009/02/11
Re: validity of a pointer, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
Re: sequence points and the execution model, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/11
Searching For and Buying Health Insurance in a Bad Economy, healthplans.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/11
immigrants visas, Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area., marco.fernando02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/11
[repost] external, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
- Re: external, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
  - Re: external, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
    - Re: external, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
- Re: [repost] external, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/11
  - Re: [repost] external, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/11
  - Re: [repost] external, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), ffffffffffffffff, 2009/02/11
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), n5ghdfg, 2009/02/17
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), 149jfkjg, 2009/02/23
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), fffffffffff, 2009/02/23
Benefit of not defining the order of execution, somenath, 2009/02/11
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Bartc, 2009/02/11
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, somenath, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Bartc, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Han from China, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, blargg, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/16
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/12
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, blargg, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/27
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 2009/02/17
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Ike Naar, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, dj3vande, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/18
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Chris Dollin, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/20
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/22
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/13
  - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/13
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/14
    - Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
Rule-based AI in C, copx, 2009/02/11
Pay off debt - Best Choice, burialijjacobsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/10
Best online casino ranked - Best Choice, djroofdorsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/10
Initializing with OL, jimward2, 2009/02/10
- Re: Initializing with OL, user923005, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Initializing with OL, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/10
- Re: Initializing with OL, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
- Re: Initializing with OL, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Initializing with OL, MisterE, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Initializing with OL, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Initializing with OL, pete, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Initializing with OL, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Initializing with OL, Han from China, 2009/02/13
The best way to debug an error, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/10
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Richard, 2009/02/10
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Missaka Wijekoon, 2009/02/10
  - Re: The best way to debug an error, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
  - Re: The best way to debug an error, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/10
  - Re: The best way to debug an error, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/10
join group, ketan, 2009/02/10
Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Martin Kleiner, 2009/02/10
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/10
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, CBFalconer, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Richard, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Boon, 2009/02/11
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
  - Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/11
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, saurabh29789, 2009/02/10
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, jameskuyper, 2009/02/10
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/10
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/11
Air Force1 and Air Jordan shoes PAYPAL wholesale, wholesale, 2009/02/10
Books, Cross, 2009/02/10
- Re: Books, user923005, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Books, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, user923005, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, jameskuyper, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, James Kuyper, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Nelu, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Richard, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Richard, 2009/02/12
    - Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, user923005, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Books, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Books, user923005, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Richard, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Nelu, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Nelu, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Nelu, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/13
OIOIC, how about ?, gclcur, 2009/02/10
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/10
  - Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
  - Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
    - Re: OIOIC, how about ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Bartc, 2009/02/11
external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/10
- Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/10
  - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
  - Re: external variables, Boon, 2009/02/13
    - Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Boon, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/16
  - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/13
    - Re: external variables, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/14
    - Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/13
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
  - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
    - Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/19
      
      Re: external variables, Han from China, 2009/02/16
  - Re: external variables, Han from China, 2009/02/16
- Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/10
  - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
    - Re: external variables, Richard, 2009/02/11
    - Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/17
    - Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: external variables, pete, 2009/02/17
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/19
- Re: external variables, Jack Klein, 2009/02/11
  - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
    - Re: external variables, Jack Klein, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/12
    - Re: external variables, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/11
  - Re: external variables, Han from China, 2009/02/15
    - Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 2009/02/16
Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 2009/02/09
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Randy Howard, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Keith Thompson, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/21
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Eric Sosman, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), CBFalconer, 2009/02/20
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), John Bode, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 2009/02/10
Wholesale New NiKE Air Jordan 24(30$) Nike AirMax nike shox Air Jordan air force one dunk Free Shipping at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade601, 2009/02/09
command line, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/09
- Re: command line, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
- Re: command line, Richard, 2009/02/09
- Re: command line, Han from China, 2009/02/09
  - Re: command line, Richard, 2009/02/10
    - Re: command line, Han from China, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: command line, Richard, 2009/02/11
  - Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/10
- Re: command line, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
  - Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/11
    - Re: command line, Richard, 2009/02/11
    - Re: command line, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: command line, Richard, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: command line, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
- Re: command line, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/10
Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 2009/02/09
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Windows graphics problem, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/10
- Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, CBFalconer, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Han from China, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 2009/02/11
    - Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
Can you help me to understand this define?, silusilusilu, 2009/02/09
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, silusilusilu, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/10
0, NULL and variadic functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
  - Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/10
Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 2009/02/09
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Variable Scope ?, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Variable Scope ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Variable Scope ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Variable Scope ?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Variable Scope ?, Han from China, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Variable Scope ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/09
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Variable Scope ?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
http://www.stylishdudes.com cheap sell air max shoes, nike shoes,ugg shoes,jordan shoes,handbag,jeans,shox shoes,Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices, www.stylishdudes.com, 2009/02/09
Evisu Jeans - fashionable, jmsmark30, 2009/02/09
Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn ), shjfklsjf, 2009/02/09
c to c++, eminhanif, 2009/02/08
- Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/08
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 2009/02/08
  - Re: c to c++, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/08
  - Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/08
    - Re: c to c++, blacklight, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, James Kuyper, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Tim Woodall, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, Tim Woodall, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Tony, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: c to c++, Tony, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: c to c++, Tony, 2009/02/25
      
      Re: c to c++, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
    - Re: c to c++, s0suk3, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: c to c++, blacklight, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, pete, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, pete, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, blacklight, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, blacklight, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, William Hughes, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, William Hughes, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, user923005, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, user923005, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, user923005, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, user923005, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, James Kuyper, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/11
      
      Re: c to c++, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: c to c++, jameskuyper, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, user923005, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 2009/02/15
- Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
  - Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
    - Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
  - Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/09
    - Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
    - Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
    - Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: c to c++, Richard, 2009/02/10
- Re: c to c++, Tony, 2009/02/14
pointer to array of structs, brownqued, 2009/02/08
- Re: pointer to array of structs, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/08
- Re: pointer to array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., guidoreina, 2009/02/08
- Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/08
  - Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., guidoreina, 2009/02/08
- Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., Han from China, 2009/02/08
New Enthiran Stills ------------>>>>> New Rajini Stills, rajini.enthiran.robot@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/08
memcpy calls causing segmentation error, ssylee, 2009/02/08
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Han from China, 2009/02/08
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, guidoreina, 2009/02/08
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/08
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, blacklight, 2009/02/08
  - Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
    - Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Han from China, 2009/02/08
  - Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
    - Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Pranav, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Pranav, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, CBFalconer, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, CBFalconer, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
  - Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, blargg, 2009/02/09
Re: simple region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/08
More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 2009/02/07
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Rui Maciel, 2009/02/08
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/08
  - Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Richard, 2009/02/08
  - Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 2009/02/10
    - Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 2009/02/10
you can save up to $18,435 on....., Deena Richards, 2009/02/07
Han from China is off-topic, George Orwell, 2009/02/07
http://nasawallpapers.page.tl >> Free Desktop Download Gallery High Top Quality Hot, Bold, Sexy & Bikini Hollywood Celebrities & Models, Bollywood Hot Actresses, New Bollywood Actors, Latest 2008 2009 Movies, Bollywood Premiers/Awards/Shows, Hot Couples & Mix, Best Cities, Sport Cars, Sport Bikes, Tennis Star Sania Maria & Maria Sharapova, Sarah Palin, Mysterious Wallpapers/Photos/Pics/Photographs, SEXY, LINGERIE And BIKINI, 2009/02/07
passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/07
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ike Naar, 2009/02/07
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Han from China, 2009/02/07
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Harold Aptroot, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, John Bode, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 2009/02/07
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/08
  - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/08
    - Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/09
(part1a) Han from China teached you C, Han from China, 2009/02/07
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Han from China, 2009/02/07
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Ike Naar, 2009/02/07
  - Re: Ike Naar, Han from China, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Ike Naar, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
    - Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, pete, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Ike Naar, pete, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Ike Naar, pete, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Joe Wright, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Joe Wright, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Harald van Dĳk, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Hans Schneider, 2009/02/07
Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 2009/02/07
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 2009/02/14
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 2009/02/21
  - Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Han from China, 2009/02/21
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 2009/02/28
Question about sscanf and sprintf, Bumbala, 2009/02/07
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/07
  - Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
  - Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, James Kuyper, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, James Kuyper, 2009/02/08
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Nelu, 2009/02/07
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Bumbala, 2009/02/10
Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area., nicky boy, 2009/02/07
Re:, Han from China, 2009/02/07
On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Han from China, 2009/02/07
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), pete, 2009/02/07
  - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Han from China, 2009/02/07
  - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
    - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Richard Tobin, 2009/02/07
  - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/07
    - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
  - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), James Kuyper, 2009/02/08
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
  - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
    - Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
nice shopping plaza, top-ugg.com, 2009/02/07
Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 2009/02/06
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/08
  - Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/08
    - Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Larry Gates, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/10
  - Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, James Dow Allen, 2009/02/10
- Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 2009/02/07
Creating an Apache module, mydancake, 2009/02/06
- Re: Creating an Apache module, blacklight, 2009/02/06
- Re: Creating an Apache module, Han from China, 2009/02/06
- Re: Creating an Apache module, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Creating an Apache module, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/07
Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, B Rubble, 2009/02/06
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Ian Collins, 2009/02/06
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, blacklight, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Default User, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard Bos, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Rui Maciel, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/08
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/06
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
NVHOST Website Design & Custom Programming Supports Cancer Charities, shopbeenvied.nv@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09, sr, 2009/02/06
- Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09, sr, 2009/02/22
(WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/06
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/07
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/08
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/10
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/11
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/12
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/14
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/15
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/20
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/20
Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?, iq, 2009/02/06
- Re: Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Andrew Smallshaw, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Han from China, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/08
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, John Bode, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Nelu, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Bart, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/06
Every click makes $ money, honeymoney, 2009/02/06
Offre d'emploi, succes344@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 2009/02/06
- Re: Pointer difficulties, user923005, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Pointer difficulties, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Pointer difficulties, Default User, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 2009/02/06
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Ike Naar, 2009/02/06
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Pointer difficulties, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 2009/02/07
- Re: Pointer difficulties, John Bode, 2009/02/06
- Re: Pointer difficulties, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 2009/02/07
  - Re: Pointer difficulties, Richard, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Pointer difficulties, Ike Naar, 2009/02/07
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
Omega Constellation Quadra Watch, Best Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Concord Saratoga Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Jaeger LeCoultre Grande Taille Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Cartier Pasha Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
A Lange & Sohne 1815 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 2009/02/05
Blancpain Villeret Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 2009/02/05
Audemars Piguet Canape Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 2009/02/05
Oris Williams F1 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 2009/02/05
Christian Audigier Men Outerwear Discount, shanqiuyu, 2009/02/05
Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/05
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, dj3vande, 2009/02/05
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/05
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, jameskuyper, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Joachim Schmitz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, baeuar@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Han from China, 2009/02/06
how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, InuY4sha, 2009/02/05
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
  - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, InuY4sha, 2009/02/05
    - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, jameskuyper, 2009/02/05
    - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
    - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, baeuar@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, pete, 2009/02/05
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Han from China, 2009/02/06
  - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
    - Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Han from China, 2009/02/06
repeating fraction part, Tagore, 2009/02/05
- Re: repeating fraction part, Jens Thoms Toerring, 2009/02/05
- Re: repeating fraction part, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/05
  - Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
- Re: repeating fraction part, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/05
- Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
- Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/05
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/05
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Don Bruder, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/06
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Harold Aptroot, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Harold Aptroot, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, James Kuyper, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Stephen Sprunk, 2009/02/08
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
convert byte array into string, alessio211734, 2009/02/05
- Re: convert byte array into string, James Kuyper, 2009/02/05
  - Re: convert byte array into string, alessio211734, 2009/02/05
    - Re: convert byte array into string, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
    - Re: convert byte array into string, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/05
    - Re: convert byte array into string, Bart, 2009/02/05
- Re: convert byte array into string, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/05
  - Re: convert byte array into string, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/05
    - Re: convert byte array into string, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: convert byte array into string, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: convert byte array into string, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: convert byte array into string, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/07
language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, vippstar, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, William Pursell, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Harter, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Anthony Fremont, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, William Pursell, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ian Collins, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jameskuyper, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Bart, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Bernhard Agthe, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, John Reiser, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, George Peter Staplin, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ian Collins, 2009/02/05
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Erik Trulsson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
    - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Wolfgang Draxinger, 2009/02/06
  - Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Message not available
  - Re: Shelbyville, Homer, 2009/02/06
- Message not available
  - Re: Shelbyville, Jeßus, 2009/02/06
- Message not available
  - Re: Shelbyville, sparkoheaps, 2009/02/10
Re: Experiment: functional concepts in C, Paul Rubin, 2009/02/05
- Re: Experiment: functional concepts in C, Ertugrul Söylemez, 2009/02/05
Re: Newsgroup info, Sabine Dinis Blochberger, 2009/02/05
Re: New to group, rossum, 2009/02/05
- Re: New to group, richard.townsendrose, 2009/02/05
- Re: New to group, rossum, 2009/02/05
- Re: New to group, Tony Holland, 2009/02/06
  - Re: New to group, Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
Re: Where do I find..., Reinout Heeck, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where do I find..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com $dlzc$, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where do I find..., Swapnajit, 2009/02/07
Re: Query for the group, Jane Sullivan, 2009/02/05
- Re: Query for the group, richard.townsendrose, 2009/02/05
- Re: Query for the group, Willie Moore, 2009/02/05
- Re: Query for the group, RHui000, 2009/02/05
- Re: Query for the group, Stephen Quinn, 2009/02/05
- Re: Query for the group, richard.townsendrose, 2009/02/08
- Re: Query for the group, GANHE DINHEIRO NA WEB, 2009/02/08
Re: A question, Jane Sullivan, 2009/02/05
- Re: A question, RedGrittyBrick, 2009/02/05
- Re: A question, Lew, 2009/02/05
- Re: A question, Marc_F_Hult, 2009/02/07
- Re: A question, Marc_F_Hult, 2009/02/07
Re: if (pointer) ?, David Thompson, 2009/02/05
pretty russian girls!, cool buddy, 2009/02/05
HOT LIVE NEWS on Your Mobile for free :), cliford baak, 2009/02/05
Re: Where's the FAQ?, zs0723, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Ian Osgood, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, red floyd, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, schlenk, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Xah Lee, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Larry W. Virden, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Cameron Laird, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Ian Osgood, 2009/02/05
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, suchenwi, 2009/02/06
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, George Petasis, 2009/02/06
Re: Newbie here, David E. Ross, 2009/02/04
- Re: Newbie here, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Newbie here, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Newbie here, Richard, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Newbie here, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, David Fanning, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Arnold Trembley, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Phil Last, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Maarten, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Jane Sullivan, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Gosi, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Michael Mattias, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, HeyBub, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Rav, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, Nick Theodorakis, 2009/02/05
- Re: Newbie here, usablevirus, 2009/02/06
- Re: Newbie here, Jan Hyde, 2009/02/10
Re: Hello, quick question, Bradley K. Sherman, 2009/02/04
- Re: Hello, quick question, usablevirus, 2009/02/05
Integer Overflow, Tagore, 2009/02/04
- Re: Integer Overflow, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Integer Overflow, user923005, 2009/02/04
- Re: Integer Overflow, jameskuyper, 2009/02/04
- Re: Integer Overflow, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/04
- Re: Integer Overflow, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/04
- Re: Integer Overflow, geo, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Integer Overflow, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
  - Re: Integer Overflow, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Integer Overflow, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/12
- Re: Integer Overflow, christian.bau, 2009/02/06
- Re: Integer Overflow, Curtis Dyer, 2009/02/07
  - Re: Integer Overflow, geo, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Integer Overflow, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, Boon, 2009/02/10
    - Re: Integer Overflow, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
    - Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, ssylee, 2009/02/04
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ian Collins, 2009/02/04
  - Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, ssylee, 2009/02/04
    - Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Default User, 2009/02/04
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
  - Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Richard Harter, 2009/02/04
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/04
  - Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/04
    - Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/05
I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Chad, 2009/02/04
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Eric Sosman, 2009/02/04
  - Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
  - Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
    - Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Richard, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Golden California Girls, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Keith Thompson, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluei increment', Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Phil Carmody, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Default User, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Ike Naar, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluei increment', Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Golden California Girls, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
    - Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Zach, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
Romanian "Latin" and "Slavonic" words in the Sanskrit scripts, by Marin Barbulescu-Dacu, in 1936, hangeonos, 2009/02/04
Simple math parser ?, Guillaume Dargaud, 2009/02/04
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Ben Pfaff, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Simple math parser ?, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Simple math parser ?, Guillaume Dargaud, 2009/02/06
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Bart, 2009/02/04
- Re: Simple math parser ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/05
hot hot sell!! high quality Abercrombie&Fitch t shirt,ANF sweater,A&F jeans, polo lacoste t shirt,ralph lauren polo shirt, burberry t shirt and so on, YEAH, 2009/02/04
pay-pal accept high quality celtics, lakers,NBA jersey Abercrombie t shirt, ANF jacket, ANF jeans, A&F Sweater, A&F Pant, ANF Fleece, A&F Long Sleeve, Ralph Lauren polo t shirt, Ralph Lauren polo wholesale, Ralph Lauren big pony, Ralph Lauren small pony, Ralph Lauren Sweater, Lacoste t shirt, Lacoste Sweater, Lacoste stripe polo shirts, Lacoste long sleeve, Burberry t shirt, Paul Smith polo t shirt, Paul Smith shirts,NBA Jersey, NBA Short ,Abercrombie bag, Abercrombie hat in www.spring-grass.com, YEAH, 2009/02/04
conditional compilation, onkar . n . mahajan, 2009/02/04
- Re: conditional compilation, Rouben Rostamian, 2009/02/04
- Re: conditional compilation, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/04
Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, bad . skipper, 2009/02/04
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, jacob navia, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, Richard Harter, 2009/02/04
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/04
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Confuzia intre geti si goti, hangeonos, 2009/02/04
Chopard Happy Beach and Happy Fish Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Patek Philippe Golden Ellipse Watch, Best Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Cartier Ballon Bleu de Cartier Watch, Best Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Maurice Lacroix Calipso Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Breguet La Tradition Breguet Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, David Thompson, 2009/02/12
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, REH, 2009/02/06
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 2009/02/06
  - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/10
      
      Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/10
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 2009/02/04
moto Mobile PSP Game & memory card, goodcheap@xxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, goodcheap@xxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, shjfklsjf, 2009/02/09
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, ffffffffffffffff, 2009/02/11
Aliasing and optimization, ln myshkin, 2009/02/04
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Aliasing and optimization, ln myshkin, 2009/02/04
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/04
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/04
structs, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/03
- Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
  - Re: structs, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/04
    - Re: structs, Richard, 2009/02/04
    - Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: structs, Bill Cunningham, 2009/02/04
  - Message not available
    - Re: structs, Scott David Daniels, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: structs, jameskuyper, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: structs, Spiros Bousbouras, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: structs, Paul, 2009/02/05
- Re: structs, Nelu, 2009/02/03
- Re: structs, osmium, 2009/02/04
  - Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
- Message not available
  - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, ray, 2009/02/04
- Message not available
  - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, J.O. Aho, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Chris Ahlstrom, 2009/02/06
- Message not available
  - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k), 2009/02/04
- Message not available
  - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k), 2009/02/05
- Message not available
  - Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Rex Ballard, 2009/02/05
Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 2009/02/03
- Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
Baume & Mercier Classima Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 2009/02/03
Patek Philippe Calatrava Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 2009/02/03
Corum Bubble Mini Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 2009/02/03
Girard Perregaux Collection Lady Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 2009/02/03
ridiculous, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
  - Re: ridiculous, Zach, 2009/02/03
    - Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: ridiculous, Zach, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
    - Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Chad, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, gw7rib, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Richard, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Ian Collins, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Richard, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, John Bode, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Richard, 2009/02/05
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: ridiculous, James Kuyper, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/06
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: ridiculous, Charlton Wilbur, 2009/02/06
      
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Message not available
      Re: ridiculous, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: ridiculous, John Bode, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, REH, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, REH, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Richard Tobin, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Richard Harter, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/05
- Re: ridiculous, fmassei, 2009/02/05
- Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/05
  - Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/05
    - Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: ridiculous, Han from China, 2009/02/05
♀♂SELL NIKE SHOES AIR MAX 90 NEW 35$, wclxyj01@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/03
fibonacci's music, oneearthone, 2009/02/03
- Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 2009/02/05
  - Re: fibonacci's music, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/05
    - Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: fibonacci's music, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/06
    - Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: fibonacci's music, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: fibonacci's music, Default User, 2009/02/06
What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Alex Buell, 2009/02/03
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, user923005, 2009/02/03
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/03
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
  - Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Alex Buell, 2009/02/04
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/03
Re: function call overhead, John Machin, 2009/02/03
- Re: function call overhead, Zach, 2009/02/03
Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Daniel Pitts, 2009/02/03
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Lew, 2009/02/05
    - Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Lew, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Richard, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Lew, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), blue indigo, 2009/02/08
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Zach, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Arne Vajhøj, 2009/02/03
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Roedy Green, 2009/02/06
Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/03
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/03
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/03
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/03
    - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Joe Wright, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ian Collins, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/09
      
      Message not available
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/08
      
      [OT] Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 2009/02/08
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, jacob navia, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/07
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/03
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, pete, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 2009/02/04
    - Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, pete, 2009/02/05
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, James Dow Allen, 2009/02/04
Re: More data definitions of the C variables, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/03
(WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50,FREE SHIPPING !, www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/03
Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Robin T Cox, 2009/02/03
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", jacob navia, 2009/02/03
  - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/03
  - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
    - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/04
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
  - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 2009/02/03
    - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", James Kuyper, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Richard, 2009/02/05
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Jerry McBride, 2009/02/03
  - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Phil Carmody, 2009/02/03
    - Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Rockinghorse Winner, 2009/02/03
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Rex Ballard, 2009/02/03
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", 7, 2009/02/03
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", 7, 2009/02/03
Bitwise 2009 ($5000 prize money), birinder, 2009/02/03
Re: question about the ISO standard, Roy Schestowitz, 2009/02/03
- Re: question about the ISO standard, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: question about the ISO standard, The Lost Packet, 2009/02/03
- Re: question about the ISO standard, amicus_curious, 2009/02/03
Re: compiling C code, Erwin Moller, 2009/02/03
- Re: compiling C code, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: compiling C code, The Natural Philosopher, 2009/02/03
  - Re: compiling C code, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
    - Re: compiling C code, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Re: compiling C code, C. (http://symcbean.blogspot.com/), 2009/02/03
- Re: compiling C code, Curtis Dyer, 2009/02/04
Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 2009/02/03
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/03
    - Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., user923005, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., user923005, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 2009/02/03
    - Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Bart, 2009/02/03
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., christian.bau, 2009/02/03
Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Phlip, 2009/02/02
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, CBFalconer, 2009/02/03
  - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/03
  - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Default User, 2009/02/03
    - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
      
      Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/09
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Ed Morton, 2009/02/03
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Ludovic Brenta, 2009/02/03
  - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Les Neilson, 2009/02/03
  - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
    - Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, dj3vande, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/04
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Steffen Schuler, 2009/02/03
Christian Audigier Men Shirts, lingerliu17, 2009/02/02
K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 2009/02/02
- Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 2009/02/02
  - Re: K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 2009/02/02
    - Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 2009/02/02
    - Re: K&R analog, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: K&R analog, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
    - Re: K&R analog, user923005, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: K&R analog, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: K&R analog, user923005, 2009/02/03
- Re: K&R analog, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
- Re: K&R analog, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/02
- Re: K&R analog, Elros, 2009/02/03
  - Re: K&R analog, thomas . mertes, 2009/02/03
    - Re: K&R analog, thomas . mertes, 2009/02/03
- Re: K&R analog, Zach, 2009/02/03
Re: Can't figure this code out, Jim Gibson, 2009/02/02
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Default User, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Can't figure this code out, Richard, 2009/02/02
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Can't figure this code out, gw7rib, 2009/02/03
    - Re: Can't figure this code out, jameskuyper, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, Zurikela, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, chris, 2009/02/05
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, HoofPrints, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, marcia, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, marcia, 2009/02/12
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: psych question about ignoring people, dank420, 2009/02/15
    - Re: Can't figure this code out, CBFalconer, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Flash Gordon, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, CBFalconer, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/04
  - Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/03
- Re: Can't figure this code out, sln, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Can't figure this code out, pete, 2009/02/02
    - Re: Can't figure this code out, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Tim Greer, 2009/02/02
Re: C++ trap representations, Ian Collins, 2009/02/02
- Re: C++ trap representations, Ian Collins, 2009/02/02
  - Re: C++ trap representations, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/02
  - Re: C++ trap representations, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
- Re: C++ trap representations, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: C++ trap representations, anon, 2009/02/03
reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 2009/02/02
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Nelu, 2009/02/02
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Bill Reid, 2009/02/03
  - Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 2009/02/04
    - Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Nelu, 2009/02/04
      
      Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Bill Reid, 2009/02/05
    - Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/05
      
      Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/06
Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/02
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/02
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/02
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/02
Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/02
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/02
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Peter Nilsson, 2009/02/02
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 2009/02/03
  - Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
    - Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, D Herring, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jameskuyper, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/04
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, RoLo, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, RoLo, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/12
Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tim Greer, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/02
  - Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Richard, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Lusotec, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Chris Friesen, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Janaka, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Decimus Phostle, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tim Greer, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/02
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Ryan McCoskrie, 2009/02/03
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Jothy, 2009/02/03
  - Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, WANG Cong, 2009/02/03
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tauno Voipio, 2009/02/03
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Bin Chen, 2009/02/10
Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2, 2009/02/02
- Re: Graphing Convolution, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
  - Re: Graphing Convolution, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/09
Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/02
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, Daniel Kraft, 2009/02/02
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, jameskuyper, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/02
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, Nelu, 2009/02/02
Fake killfiler Phil Carmody blows his game again, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/02
Inline not working properly in GCC?, James Douglas, 2009/02/02
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Trent, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/02
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Huibert Bol, 2009/02/02
RE:Recent Unix Technology News!!!, Tekwits, 2009/02/02
main prototype pointless?, Zach, 2009/02/02
- Re: main prototype pointless?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/02
- Re: main prototype pointless?, jameskuyper, 2009/02/02
  - Re: main prototype pointless?, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/02
- Re: main prototype pointless?, Nelu, 2009/02/02
- Re: main prototype pointless?, Kevin D . Quitt, 2009/02/02
  - Re: main prototype pointless?, jameskuyper, 2009/02/02
Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, hangeonos, 2009/02/02
- Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, CBFalconer, 2009/02/02
  - Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
Supply NFL Jerseys=20USD Mlb jerseys=20USD Nhl Jerseys=32USD(Wholesale Cheaper), cicitrade601, 2009/02/02
numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 2009/02/01
- Re: numerical result out of range, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/01
  - Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/02
    - Re: numerical result out of range, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
    - Re: numerical result out of range, Lew Pitcher, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
- Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 2009/02/01
  - Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 2009/02/01
- Re: numerical result out of range, Joe Wright, 2009/02/01
- Re: numerical result out of range, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/01
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/01
  - re: numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 2009/02/01
    - Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/01
    - re: numerical result out of range, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/02
- Re: numerical result out of range, jacob navia, 2009/02/02
  - re: numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 2009/02/02
    - Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, lawrence . jones, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Bill M, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/23
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/23
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Bill M, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Christopher A . Lee, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, John Baker, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Aaron, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Mike, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Syd M., 2009/02/03
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Christopher A . Lee, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Cary Kittrell, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Lee, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Brian E . Clark, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, SkyEyes, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, panamfloyd, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, vicman, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, John Locke, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Robibnikoff, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Robibnikoff, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, The_LA_Flash, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, bob young, 2009/02/03
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Tim Hall, 2009/02/04
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Rachel, 2009/02/04
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, stoney, 2009/02/15
    - Re: numerical result out of range, jacob navia, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 2009/02/03
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
  - Re: numerical result out of range, Default User, 2009/02/09
    - Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
  - Re: numerical result out of range, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/10
    - Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 2009/02/20
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/22
      
      Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 2009/02/23
styleweb, stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/01
- styleweb, stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/01
Re: free problem, Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/01
- Re: free problem, Andres Steinhilber, 2009/02/02
Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42, Bill, 2009/02/01
Bollywood Hollywood Celebrities Junction called @ http://bollywoodwine.page.tl/, Sexy Katrina Kaif, 2009/02/01
Re: Constructing a scalar reference, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
Re: Resources about program design in C, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 2009/02/01
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 2009/02/01
    - Re: Resources about program design in C, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: Resources about program design in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 2009/02/02
- Re: Resources about program design in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/01
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Resources about program design in C, pete, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Resources about program design in C, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/02
- Re: Resources about program design in C, John Bode, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Resources about program design in C, Ian Collins, 2009/02/01
    - Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 2009/02/01
(WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50,FREE SHIPPING, www.iofferkicks.com, 2009/02/01
Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Pete Becker, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 2009/02/01
    - Message not available
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/01
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 2009/02/02
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Zach, 2009/02/03
Documented error values, Albert, 2009/02/01
- Re: Documented error values, Martin Ambuhl, 2009/02/01
The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 2009/02/01
- The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 2009/02/01
- The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 2009/02/04
Supply New NiKE Air Jordan 24(30$) AirMax TN 10(23EURO) Luxury Porduct Free Shipping at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade601, 2009/01/31
Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, rkiesling, 2009/01/31
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Harter, 2009/01/31
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/01
  - Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/01
    - Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Harter, 2009/02/01
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, CBFalconer, 2009/01/31
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/01
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Brian Inglis, 2009/02/01
  - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/01
    - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Eric Sosman, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 2009/02/02
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Larry Gates, 2009/02/03
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Jasen Betts, 2009/02/03
  - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/04
  - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, James Kuyper, 2009/02/04
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Zach, 2009/02/03
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, 2009/02/04
  - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Gordon Burditt, 2009/02/05
    - Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, 2009/02/09
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/05
Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/01/31
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 2009/01/31
  - Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard, 2009/01/31
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 2009/01/31
  - Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ian Collins, 2009/01/31
    - Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 2009/02/01
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ian Collins, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Phil Carmody, 2009/02/02
      
      Message not available
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Zach, 2009/02/03
  - Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/04
    - Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Mark Wooding, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), pete, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Mark Wooding, 2009/02/07
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 2009/02/12
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 2009/02/15
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Han from China, 2009/02/13
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 2009/02/06
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/14
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ben Bacarisse, 2009/02/16
      
      Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 2009/02/16
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 2009/02/14
Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 2009/01/31
Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 2009/01/31
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/01/31
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 2009/01/31
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 2009/01/31
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Ian Collins, 2009/01/31
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 2009/02/01
    - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
    - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Heathfield, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 2009/02/01
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/01
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/01
    - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kenny McCormack, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, J. J. Farrell, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/03
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/03
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 2009/02/01
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/01
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Chad, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Nelu, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Nate Eldredge, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, jameskuyper, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Phil Carmody, 2009/02/02
  - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 2009/02/02
    - Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/02
      
      Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 2009/02/02
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/02
Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/01/31
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 2009/01/31
  - Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/01/31
    - Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, William Pursell, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, William Pursell, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, scholz . lothar, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard Bos, 2009/02/09
    - Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: [OT] Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Les Harris, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Antoninus Twink, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Lorenzo Villari, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Golden California Girls, 2009/02/01
      
      Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Ian Collins, 2009/02/01
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, George Peter Staplin, 2009/01/31
  - Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, scholz . lothar, 2009/02/01
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Aaron W . Hsu, 2009/02/02
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Han from China - Master Troll, 2009/02/02
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, John Bode, 2009/02/02