comp.lang.c (date)
February 28, 2009
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 17:50
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper, 17:49
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 17:09
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 17:04
- Re: header, Bill Cunningham, 16:38
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 16:30
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson, 16:21
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 15:53
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 15:51
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kenny McCormack, 15:46
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 15:02
- Re: serial port in C, Antoninus Twink, 14:51
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 14:43
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 14:36
- Re: serial port in C, Keith Thompson, 14:20
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China, 14:04
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Bos, 13:59
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink, 13:55
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Eric Eide, 13:47
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 13:40
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 13:40
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Antoninus Twink, 13:35
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 13:31
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 13:29
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 13:23
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Harter, 13:18
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 13:18
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 13:16
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., nick_keighley_nospam, 13:13
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:06
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:52
- Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 12:46
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Joachim Schmitz, 12:44
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Bos, 12:21
- Re: usage of fwide function, Richard Bos, 12:21
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Bos, 12:21
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 12:10
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 12:10
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 12:08
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 12:03
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 12:02
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, John Regehr, 11:59
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 11:58
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 11:40
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 11:24
- Re: Strange !!, Kojak, 11:19
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard, 11:04
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard, 11:02
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 11:00
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 11:00
- Re: Strange !!, Han from China, 10:35
- Re: Strange !!, Ben Bacarisse, 10:22
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Ben Bacarisse, 10:17
- Re: Strange !!, Kojak, 10:13
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, jfbode1029, 10:03
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Han from China, 10:03
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Luuk, 09:57
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Mike, 09:56
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 09:53
- Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 09:47
- Re: serial port in C, Antoninus Twink, 09:44
- Re: Strange !!, Han from China, 09:43
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Flash Gordon, 09:42
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 09:42
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Flash Gordon, 09:35
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, karthikbalaguru, 09:35
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Andy Walker, 09:32
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, pete, 09:27
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Christian Audigier Women's T-Shirts, zhanglin099, 09:21
- Re: Allocating Memory And Strings, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:21
- Re: serial port in C, James Kuyper, 09:14
- Re: Strange !!, Flash Gordon, 09:13
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, James Kuyper, 09:13
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 09:02
- Allocating Memory And Strings, Mike, 09:01
- Re: Strange !!, Richard Heathfield, 08:55
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 08:54
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:53
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 08:50
- Strange !!, karthikbalaguru, 08:49
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, James Kuyper, 08:47
- Re: serial port in C, jacob navia, 08:47
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, jacob navia, 08:46
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 08:46
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 08:32
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 08:26
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:24
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 08:17
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, Flash Gordon, 08:12
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 08:00
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 07:52
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 07:49
- Re: Passing by reference, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: serial port in C, Han from China, 07:40
- Re: Passing by reference, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:34
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 07:33
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:29
- Re: Free C Compiler on Windows, LL, 07:26
- Free C Compiler on Windows, karthikbalaguru, 07:24
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 07:14
- Re: Passing by pointer, Flash Gordon, 07:06
- Re: Passing by reference, Richard Heathfield, 07:06
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 06:59
- Re: Passing by pointer, Han from China, 06:58
- Re: serial port in C, Richard Heathfield, 06:58
- Re: serial port in C, Kojak, 06:48
- Re: serial port in C, Richard Heathfield, 06:47
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Richard Heathfield, 06:42
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 06:41
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 06:38
- Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 06:37
- Re: serial port in C, Joachim Schmitz, 06:27
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, Joachim Schmitz, 06:23
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, LL, 06:19
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 06:11
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:07
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 06:07
- Re: Passing by pointer, Ike Naar, 06:00
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Albert, 05:55
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 05:53
- Re: header, Richard, 05:51
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:50
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 05:49
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Richard, 05:46
- Re: header, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:45
- Re: Interesting math problem, Richard, 05:45
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 05:42
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard, 05:38
- Re: Passing by pointer, LL, 05:38
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:37
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 05:37
- Passing by pointer, LL, 05:36
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 05:33
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 05:32
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 05:28
- Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 05:25
- Re: serial port in C, the consiglieri, 05:24
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 05:19
- Re: Passing by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:10
- Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 05:02
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 04:48
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 04:40
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Keith Thompson, 04:02
- Free Shipping NFL jerseys 16USD NHL Jerseys 34USD at www.guoshijerseys.com Paypal payment, guoshijerseys101, 03:56
- Re: header, Keith Thompson, 03:48
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 03:46
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 03:45
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 03:42
- Re: Passing by reference, LL, 03:12
- Re: Passing by reference, user923005, 03:06
- Passing by reference, LL, 02:58
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 02:57
- on all usenet, rio, 02:00
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Stephen Sprunk, 01:56
- Re: can we initialize a function argument in c, pete, 00:53
- can we initialize a function argument in c, harry, 00:19
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 00:16
February 27, 2009
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 23:16
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, pete, 22:55
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Ben Bacarisse, 22:53
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard, 22:51
- Re: Returning automatic pointers always bad?, Richard Heathfield, 22:50
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 22:48
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Richard Heathfield, 22:47
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Ben Bacarisse, 22:46
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Nate Eldredge, 22:34
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield, 22:32
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Richard Heathfield, 22:29
- Returning automatic pointers always bad?, C . J . Clegg, 22:14
- Re: header, Richard, 22:02
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Han from China, 21:30
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 21:21
- Re: Interesting math problem, Han from China, 21:18
- Re: Interesting math problem, Han from China, 21:03
- header, Bill Cunningham, 20:41
- Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba, 20:39
- Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse, 19:58
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Golden California Girls, 19:47
- Re: GPS tracking software, Bubba, 19:42
- Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 19:23
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, user923005, 19:21
- Re: GPS tracking software, Ben Bacarisse, 19:17
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Phil Carmody, 19:06
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Gil Hamilton, 19:01
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 19:01
- Re: Interesting math problem, Phil Carmody, 19:01
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Phil Carmody, 18:55
- Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, user923005, 18:55
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 18:53
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Ben Bacarisse, 18:52
- Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 18:50
- Re: usage of fwide function, CBFalconer, 18:42
- Re: usage of fwide function, Richard, 18:41
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Phil Carmody, 18:40
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard, 18:39
- GPS tracking software, Bubba, 18:31
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, CBFalconer, 18:14
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, CBFalconer, 18:04
- Re: C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, Flash Gordon, 17:57
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 17:57
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 17:51
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 17:37
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 17:36
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: Interesting math problem, CBFalconer, 17:23
- Re: usage of fwide function, Martin Ambuhl, 17:23
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Joachim Schmitz, 17:21
- Re: usage of fwide function, Joachim Schmitz, 17:17
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 17:15
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 17:06
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kenny McCormack, 16:45
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 16:44
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 16:43
- Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 16:37
- C <--> FORTRAN, but without ISO_C_BINDING, Arjan, 16:25
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 16:05
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 15:45
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Francogrex, 15:45
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, user923005, 15:35
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Joachim Schmitz, 15:31
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 15:26
- Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 14:47
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Keith Thompson, 14:30
- Re: [OT] Spam, Golden California Girls, 14:12
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, James Kuyper, 14:06
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Bos, 14:06
- Re: Interesting math problem, Richard Bos, 14:06
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Golden California Girls, 14:06
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 14:00
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 13:50
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Golden California Girls, 13:47
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 13:35
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 13:33
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 13:33
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 13:33
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Nate Eldredge, 13:24
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, pete, 13:20
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:20
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Harald van Dijk, 13:13
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, maciek borzecki, 13:13
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 13:09
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 13:07
- Re: C question, Lew Pitcher, 12:12
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 11:56
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 11:50
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Harter, 11:44
- Re: usage of fwide function, Richard, 11:42
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 11:37
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard, 11:35
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Kenneth Brody, 11:24
- Re: C question, Kenneth Brody, 11:19
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, Bill Cunningham, 11:16
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, Kenneth Brody, 11:15
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, jfbode1029, 11:14
- Re: how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:13
- Re: serial port in C, Kenneth Brody, 11:09
- how to maps an structure to a physical address such as 0x10000, henry, 10:59
- Re: [OT] Spam, Kojak, 10:47
- Re: [OT] Spam, Bill Cunningham, 10:38
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 10:36
- [OT] Spam, Bill Cunningham, 10:30
- Re: serial port in C, Sjouke Burry, 10:20
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Antoninus Twink, 09:53
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 09:41
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 09:36
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 09:32
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, James Kuyper, 09:26
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 09:19
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Ben Bacarisse, 09:18
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kojak, 09:06
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 09:01
- Re: Can you help me with this line of code please??, Eric Sosman, 08:42
- Re: C question, Kojak, 08:33
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 08:25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 08:25
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, Ben Bacarisse, 08:25
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., blargg, 08:24
- Can you help me with this line of code please??, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:23
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Antoninus Twink, 08:22
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kaz Kylheku, 08:15
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- [OT] Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Eric Sosman, 08:10
- C question, GayCProgrammer, 08:03
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:59
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:57
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, jacob navia, 07:51
- Re: pwd - C equivalent, Antoninus Twink, 07:50
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 07:48
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., James Kuyper, 07:45
- pwd - C equivalent, MN, 07:37
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., James Kuyper, 07:35
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, jacob navia, 07:22
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, mireillen, 07:20
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:19
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Chris Dollin, 07:07
- Re: implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Bartc, 07:06
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 07:05
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Tobin, 06:49
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:37
- implement default variable in C ?? is it possible, Tinku, 06:29
- Re: serial port in C, Ian Collins, 06:27
- serial port in C, the consiglieri, 06:19
- Re: Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, jacob navia, 05:44
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, TonyMc, 05:39
- Must a function pointer have a prototype in C, mireillen, 05:36
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 05:17
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Bos, 04:56
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., William Pursell, 04:56
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 04:54
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:36
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:26
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:14
- Re: Interesting math problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:59
- Re: Interesting math problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:54
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Han from China, 03:43
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Kojak, 03:41
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Richard Heathfield, 03:38
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Richard Heathfield, 03:38
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 03:34
- Re: How , system cpu and user cpu times calculates, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:29
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Heathfield, 03:26
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:25
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:24
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:14
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kenny McCormack, 03:04
- Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 03:00
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 02:46
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Phil Carmody, 02:38
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 02:31
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005, 01:51
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, Keith Thompson, 01:30
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, vamsi, 01:26
- Re: gets and puts warning, Ben Pfaff, 01:17
- gets and puts warning, pavunkumar, 01:14
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, qarnos, 01:08
- Re: Difference between fgets and gets, user923005, 00:43
February 26, 2009
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, user923005, 23:39
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Han from China, 23:32
- Re: Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, Ian Collins, 23:24
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 23:24
- Recursive functions Vs Non-recursive functions - performance aspect, vamsi, 23:04
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ike Naar, 21:03
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Keith Thompson, 20:44
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, qarnos, 20:35
- Re: Interesting math problem, Nikos Chantziaras, 20:32
- Re: test, Ian Collins, 20:21
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ian Collins, 20:20
- OT: Re: Interesting math problem, Tim Rentsch, 20:16
- Re: usage of fwide function, Han from China, 19:58
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Tim Rentsch, 19:56
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 19:53
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard Heathfield, 19:46
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, christian.bau, 19:40
- Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 19:30
- Re: Interesting math problem, Paul Hsieh, 19:16
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 19:06
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 19:01
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Han from China, 19:00
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 19:00
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 18:46
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard, 18:45
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 18:44
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard, 18:40
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, CBFalconer, 18:37
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, CBFalconer, 18:20
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Kaz Kylheku, 18:17
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 18:15
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Han from China, 18:04
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Ben Bacarisse, 18:02
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Old Wolf, 17:56
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 17:55
- Re: explanation for exec functions, CBFalconer, 17:54
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 17:25
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Kaz Kylheku, 17:16
- Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 16:54
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 16:48
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Nate Eldredge, 16:45
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, user923005, 16:41
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 16:35
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, gw7rib, 16:29
- Pascal to C string conversion algorithm needed, Guilbert STABILO, 16:24
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Anthony Fremont, 16:17
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Anthony Fremont, 16:12
- Re: Interesting math problem, Antoninus Twink, 16:04
- Re: Interesting math problem, Ralf Damaschke, 16:03
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 15:39
- Re: Interesting math problem, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Ian Collins, 15:10
- Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Keith Thompson, 15:03
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 14:55
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Phil Carmody, 14:47
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 14:37
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 14:34
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Golden California Girls, 14:27
- Re: Interesting math problem, Golden California Girls, 14:21
- Re: Interesting math problem, Richard Tobin, 13:42
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 13:38
- Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 13:21
- Re: How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- How to measure time a function spends in "user space" on Win32, Robbo, 12:45
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 12:36
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ben Bacarisse, 12:17
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Keith Thompson, 12:16
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 12:14
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, pete, 11:49
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., pete, 11:44
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 11:40
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Nate Eldredge, 11:36
- Re: Interesting math problem, Bartc, 10:59
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 10:56
- Re: Interesting math problem, Fred, 10:48
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kaz Kylheku, 10:47
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 10:18
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 10:18
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 09:54
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Ben Bacarisse, 09:19
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Richard Tobin, 09:07
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Richard Heathfield, 08:55
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Boon, 08:51
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Bartc, 08:45
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Bartc, 08:40
- Re: Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, Kojak, 08:31
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, blargg, 08:25
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, blargg, 08:23
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 08:21
- Help with reading this line of code -- thanks!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:16
- Re: usage of fwide function, Kenny McCormack, 07:36
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Kenny McCormack, 07:14
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:50
- Re: Very simple: passing parameters, Joachim Schmitz, 06:43
- Very simple: passing parameters, Francogrex, 06:38
- Re: usage of fwide function, Martin Ambuhl, 06:18
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 06:07
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Joachim Schmitz, 05:38
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 05:36
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 05:02
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, TonyMc, 04:51
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 04:40
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:35
- Re: What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Kojak, 04:23
- What is the purpose of the underscore before parenthesis?, Mark Hobley, 04:08
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", William Pursell, 04:02
- Re: On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Larry Gates, 03:54
- Re: Interesting math problem, Larry Gates, 03:46
- Movado Medalist Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 03:45
- Tissot V8 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 03:45
- Breguet Marine Automatic Big Date Mens Watch 5817ST.Y2.SVO, Best Wristwatch World, iwcwatches255, 03:45
- Breitling Navitimer 18kt Yellow Gold Steel Black Mens Watch D2332212-B6-431D, Best Wristwatch World, iwcwatches255, 03:45
- Rado Coupole Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches255, 03:45
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:38
- Re: explanation for exec functions, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:30
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:15
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Chris Dollin, 03:05
- Re: Interesting math problem, blargg, 02:58
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 02:57
- Re: Interesting math problem, Phil Carmody, 02:47
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., somenath, 01:33
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 01:18
February 25, 2009
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Keith Thompson, 23:53
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Barry Schwarz, 22:57
- Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 22:57
- Re: c to c++, Tony, 22:32
- On the acceptability of the redundant "explicit cast", Han from China, 22:24
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Doug Miller, 22:24
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 22:13
- Re: Interesting math problem, Kaz Kylheku, 22:10
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Dik T. Winter, 21:56
- Coogi Men's Jeans - discount, sxhhuangshuixian, 21:51
- Re: Interesting math problem, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:49
- Re: C mnemonics, CBFalconer, 21:41
- Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 21:36
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Dik T. Winter, 21:08
- Re: Interesting math problem, Bartc, 20:47
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 20:43
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Larry Gates, 19:54
- Re: Interesting math problem, christian.bau, 19:48
- Re: Interesting math problem, Paul Hsieh, 19:32
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 19:16
- Re: Interesting math problem, user923005, 19:12
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Stephen Sprunk, 19:08
- Re: Interesting math problem, Ben Bacarisse, 18:36
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Flash Gordon, 18:36
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Ben Bacarisse, 18:32
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 18:30
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Han from China, 17:33
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Hans-Bernhard Bröker, 17:18
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, REH, 17:05
- Interesting math problem, Nikos Chantziaras, 16:41
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 16:37
- Re: Clarification required for linkage., Peter Nilsson, 16:16
- Re: rel strength index function, Kaz Kylheku, 14:54
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 14:52
- Re: rel strength index function, Phil Carmody, 14:00
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Phil Carmody, 13:47
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Bartc, 13:34
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 13:34
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Kaz Kylheku, 13:26
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Tobin, 13:22
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:19
- Clarification required for linkage., somenath, 13:12
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., jacob navia, 13:08
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Ben Bacarisse, 12:59
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Keith Thompson, 12:54
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:53
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 12:51
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 12:49
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:38
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 12:36
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Richard Bos, 12:29
- Re: free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., Lew Pitcher, 12:23
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 12:15
- free() function translated into C# equivalent - comments appreciated..., almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:05
- ANNOUNCE: PL/compiler postdoctoral research position (closes 3/31/09), smithmk, 12:00
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Harter, 11:55
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 11:48
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Nate Eldredge, 11:40
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard, 11:25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Harter, 11:03
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Tim Rentsch, 10:53
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Vladimir Vassilevsky, 10:47
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common, Dik T. Winter, 09:49
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Chris Dollin, 09:30
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard Bos, 09:27
- Re: printf output, Richard Bos, 09:27
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 09:23
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Richard, 09:20
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Charlton Wilbur, 09:17
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:13
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:10
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: rel strength index function, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: C mnemonics, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 07:56
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 07:47
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 07:25
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 06:57
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 06:44
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, pete, 05:57
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 05:36
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 05:25
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 05:19
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, blargg, 05:15
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ike Naar, 05:02
- Re: explanation for exec functions, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:26
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:21
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, David Brown, 04:15
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 04:12
- ATTN: Han Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Golden California Girls, 04:12
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 04:11
- Re: object & executable file, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:10
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:04
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 03:59
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Rentsch, 03:52
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, bigbrownbeastiebigbrownface, 03:48
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Ian Collins, 03:46
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Chris Dollin, 03:10
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tony M, 02:43
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 01:56
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 01:51
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, Kaz Kylheku, 01:43
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 01:39
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 00:11
- Re: clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, Gordon Burditt, 00:06
February 24, 2009
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Chris M. Thomasson, 23:43
- clock_settime/settimeofday issue observed on 64-bit, deepak . upp, 23:05
- Fashion True Religion Men's t shirt - discount, maipump01, 22:36
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Han from China, 22:34
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Tim Wescott, 22:12
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jack Klein, 22:03
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:53
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 21:52
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Keith Thompson, 21:41
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Vladimir Vassilevsky, 21:36
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 21:32
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 21:26
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 21:22
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 20:49
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:23
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:02
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Gordon Burditt, 19:56
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Heathfield, 19:53
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Kaz Kylheku, 19:49
- geld verdienen durch online sein,drakensang geld machen,internet geld verdienen forum,viel geld verdienen,im internet verdienen durch,, datona753, 19:45
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Flash Gordon, 19:22
- Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, CBFalconer, 19:22
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 19:18
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:17
- Re: Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Richard Heathfield, 19:14
- Re: object & executable file, jfbode1029, 19:13
- Question About Sequence Points and Interrupt/Thread Safety, Jujitsu Lizard, 18:58
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Han from China, 18:49
- Re: object & executable file, Han from China, 18:35
- Re: [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Mark McIntyre, 18:21
- Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, Antoninus Twink, 18:15
- Re: What is the proper way to do recursion, Eric Sosman, 18:06
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Richard, 17:42
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Richard, 17:31
- What is the proper way to do recursion, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 17:28
- Re: object & executable file, Antoninus Twink, 17:18
- On strictly conforming programs and the future of CLC, Han from China, 17:17
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Antoninus Twink, 17:10
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Keith Thompson, 16:08
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 16:06
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, CBFalconer, 15:48
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, CBFalconer, 15:44
- Re: explanation for exec functions, CBFalconer, 15:31
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, rkiesling, 15:21
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 15:19
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 14:45
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Martin Ambuhl, 14:35
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:59
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, jameskuyper, 13:54
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, David Schwartz, 13:46
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 13:32
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Phil Carmody, 13:32
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Kaz Kylheku, 13:27
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 13:25
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 13:11
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 13:09
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, teapot, 13:06
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 13:05
- Re: "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, Joachim Schmitz, 13:03
- "Cleaning up" inodes in a directory, J.A. Hacker, 12:59
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Nate Eldredge, 11:26
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Doug Miller, 11:13
- Re: object & executable file, Anthony Fremont, 10:30
- Re: object & executable file, osmium, 10:20
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Tim Rentsch, 09:56
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 09:49
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:31
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, William Pursell, 08:31
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 08:19
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 08:08
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, pete, 07:59
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Bos, 07:49
- Re:, Richard, 07:41
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:33
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:25
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 07:18
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, stijnvandongen, 07:17
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, sathya, 07:11
- Re: why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:07
- why 50% of allocated memory is not freed?, MN, 06:40
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 06:10
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, James Kuyper, 05:41
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 05:30
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 04:00
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 03:47
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 03:43
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 03:30
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Martin Ambuhl, 03:12
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 02:34
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Phil Carmody, 02:29
- Re: object & executable file, Ian Collins, 02:28
- Re: explanation for exec functions, Ian Collins, 02:26
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 02:18
- object & executable file, techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx, 01:42
- explanation for exec functions, techgroups.bk@xxxxxxxxx, 01:06
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 00:44
- Fashion True Religion Womens t shirt - discount, sxhhuangshuixian, 00:43
- Free shipping Wholesale NFL jerseys USD 20.06 ~ 21.95 MLB USD 20.06 ~ 21.95 Paypal payment, guoshitrade100, 00:41
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 00:28
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, mijoryx, 00:13
February 23, 2009
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 23:46
- Re:, Larry Gates, 23:31
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Chris M. Thomasson, 23:03
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Larry Gates, 23:00
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Chris M. Thomasson, 22:59
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 22:30
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, rkiesling, 21:51
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Dik T. Winter, 21:42
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 21:40
- Re: Segmentation fault, Dik T. Winter, 21:23
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 21:11
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 21:03
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 20:51
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, pete, 20:48
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Keith Thompson, 20:31
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Richard Heathfield, 20:14
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 19:59
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 19:45
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 19:40
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, user923005, 19:37
- Re: On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Richard, 19:36
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 19:23
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 19:21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 19:20
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, blargg, 19:17
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 19:11
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, CBFalconer, 19:10
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 19:05
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 19:03
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 18:47
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 18:44
- Re: Segmentation fault, Default User, 18:41
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, user923005, 18:30
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard, 17:51
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Richard, 17:50
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Bartc, 17:47
- Re: FYI - Thompson's killfile, Larry Gates, 17:44
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 17:37
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 17:27
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ butworks in gcc !, CBFalconer, 17:16
- Re: big mess, Kojak, 17:03
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Larry Gates, 16:49
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 16:33
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Kaz Kylheku, 16:25
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 16:23
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 16:14
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 16:14
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Bos, 16:14
- On implementation limits and the future of CLC, Han from China, 16:04
- Re: greedy algorithm, user923005, 16:04
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, jameskuyper, 16:04
- Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 15:51
- Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 15:41
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 14:39
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ian Collins, 14:39
- Re: Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances, Han from China, 14:33
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 14:29
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard Heathfield, 14:17
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Richard Heathfield, 14:12
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 13:48
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield, 13:46
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Joe Pfeiffer, 13:44
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Stupid Echo, 12:56
- Re: Segmentation fault, Stupid Echo, 12:53
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, rio, 12:38
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ulrich Eckhardt, 12:31
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 12:28
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 12:26
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 12:21
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 12:01
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 11:41
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 11:37
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 11:26
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 11:19
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ulrich Eckhardt, 10:48
- [OT] Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Eric Sosman, 10:43
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Bos, 10:42
- Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 10:42
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard Bos, 10:42
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 10:42
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 10:16
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 08:12
- www.dudes-mall.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.!, dudesmallmike002@xxxxxxxxx, 07:49
- Re: big mess, Kojak, 07:24
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 07:03
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Boon, 06:21
- www.dudes-mall.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes.!, www.dudes-mall.com, 06:12
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Bartc, 05:59
- Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 05:29
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 05:16
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, blargg, 05:02
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, James Kuyper, 05:02
- Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 04:54
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:27
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:23
- Re: greedy algorithm, Kojak, 04:07
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:01
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 03:46
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:34
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 03:05
- Rock And Republic Womens Jeans - fashion, sxhhuangshuixian, 02:47
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), fffffffffff, 02:31
- AIR Jordan 1 (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), fffffffffff, 02:31
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 02:25
- greedy algorithm, Jung, William, 02:19
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 01:45
- Re: big mess, Barry Schwarz, 01:42
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), 149jfkjg, 01:24
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, CBFalconer, 01:07
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 00:49
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, mijoryx, 00:02
February 22, 2009
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Han from China, 23:30
- Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 23:23
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 23:19
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 23:19
- Re: Segmentation fault, Stephen Sprunk, 22:47
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 22:25
- Re: hex to int, Mark L Pappin, 22:04
- Open Your Eyes To What’s REALLY Going On In The World!, asrock, 21:49
- Re: big mess, Joe Wright, 21:49
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 21:47
- Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 21:44
- Re: big mess, Bill Cunningham, 21:42
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Dik T. Winter, 21:41
- Re: Segmentation fault, osmium, 21:30
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Dik T. Winter, 21:28
- Conclusive proof concerning CBFalconer's thread annoyances, Han from China, 21:13
- Re: strange result, Dik T. Winter, 21:06
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Dik T. Winter, 20:56
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Dik T. Winter, 20:53
- Re: big mess, Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ben Bacarisse, 20:45
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, teapot, 20:43
- Re: big mess, Kojak, 20:42
- Re: big mess, Kojak, 20:10
- Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 20:01
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 19:58
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 19:38
- Re: hex to int, Barry Schwarz, 19:37
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 19:37
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 19:18
- big mess, Bill Cunningham, 19:13
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Richard Heathfield, 19:08
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 18:46
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Walter Banks, 18:44
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Nathan Mates, 18:27
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 18:27
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 18:13
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 18:11
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 17:31
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Han from China, 17:29
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 17:03
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 17:02
- Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 16:59
- Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 16:57
- Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 16:54
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Stephen Sprunk, 16:50
- Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 16:47
- Re: hex to int, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: hex to int, Martin Ambuhl, 16:31
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 16:24
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, blargg, 16:15
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 16:08
- Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 15:54
- Re: hex to int, Joachim Schmitz, 15:53
- Re: hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 15:53
- hex to int, Bill Cunningham, 15:48
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 15:32
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 15:31
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 15:30
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 15:07
- Re: dlopen of several lib, Antoninus Twink, 15:01
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 15:00
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 14:58
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Keith Thompson, 14:51
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 14:35
- Re: Segmentation fault, Han from China, 14:35
- dlopen of several lib, Anthony Catel, 14:28
- Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 14:25
- Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 14:23
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Flash Gordon, 14:20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 14:14
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Harald van $)CD)&k, 14:14
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 14:14
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 14:09
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 13:57
- Re: Segmentation fault, Stephen Sprunk, 13:53
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 13:49
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Phil Carmody, 13:48
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Malcolm McLean, 13:43
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ian Collins, 13:28
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 13:23
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 12:55
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Flash Gordon, 12:39
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 12:38
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Flash Gordon, 12:22
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Flash Gordon, 12:11
- Re: Ike Naar, Mark McIntyre, 11:52
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Mark McIntyre, 11:49
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 11:46
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Mark McIntyre, 11:46
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Malcolm McLean, 11:41
- Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 11:31
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Han from China, 11:25
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Malcolm McLean, 10:50
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:50
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Han from China, 10:41
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Malcolm McLean, 10:25
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 10:20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 10:19
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Malcolm McLean, 10:12
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Phil Carmody, 09:56
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard, 09:34
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard, 09:33
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 09:15
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 09:07
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, Antoninus Twink, 08:41
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 08:37
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Antoninus Twink, 08:36
- Re: numerical result out of range, Antoninus Twink, 08:35
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Antoninus Twink, 08:29
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Antoninus Twink, 08:27
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Ben Bacarisse, 08:20
- Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09, sr, 08:05
- china wholesale air jordan 1-24 shoes, cheap edhardy armani coogi men's t-shirts & jeans, hotsell51, 08:02
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Richard Heathfield, 07:45
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 07:42
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, pete, 07:00
- Re: lcc-win is not <some compiler>, Tea Pot, 06:40
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 06:39
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 06:38
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 06:35
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Tea Pot, 06:33
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 06:32
- Questionnaire, pkuphenix, 06:27
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, rio, 05:54
- lcc-win is not <some compiler>, jacob navia, 04:35
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Richard Heathfield, 04:30
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 04:25
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Ike Naar, 04:19
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 04:06
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 03:52
- Re: Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, Ian Collins, 03:09
- Do address have some special format to separate with common integers?, vib.cpp@xxxxxxxxx, 02:49
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 02:32
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 02:11
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Keith Thompson, 02:04
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 01:56
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 01:18
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Kaz Kylheku, 01:16
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Barry Schwarz, 01:13
- Re: Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, Richard Heathfield, 00:53
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 00:45
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 00:35
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard, 00:33
- Serious conformance bug in <some_compiler>, teapot, 00:01
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, teapot, 00:01
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 00:00
February 21, 2009
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 22:18
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 22:15
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 22:00
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 21:49
- Re: solving a recursion, CBFalconer, 21:29
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 21:24
- FYI - Thompson's killfile, Han from China, 21:23
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 21:18
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, CBFalconer, 21:13
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 20:32
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 19:52
- New well tested makepp snapshot released, Daniel Pfeiffer, 17:36
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 16:55
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Tobin, 16:31
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Han from China, 16:15
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 15:00
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Richard, 14:59
- Re:, Richard, 14:55
- Re:, Han from China, 14:27
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 14:10
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 14:10
- Re: "Referenced type ", lawrence . jones, 13:10
- Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 13:10
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 13:09
- Re: strange result, Richard Heathfield, 13:09
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:50
- Re: strange result, Ben Bacarisse, 12:33
- Re: strange result, happytoday, 12:27
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:26
- Re: solving a recursion, gw7rib, 11:46
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 11:43
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 11:32
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:18
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 11:14
- Re: strange result, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:00
- Re: Just a bit of silliness, Barry, 10:19
- Re: strange result, Kojak, 09:56
- strange result, happytoday, 09:07
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 08:39
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 08:35
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 08:24
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 08:21
- Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 08:11
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 08:11
- Re: solving a recursion, pete, 08:10
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 08:07
- Re: Segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 08:00
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 07:57
- Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 07:48
- Re: printf output, Tim Rentsch, 07:46
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Tim Rentsch, 07:40
- solving a recursion, varun chadha, 07:40
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 07:34
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Richard Heathfield, 07:30
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Heathfield, 07:20
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 07:17
- Re: #include vs. -library, James Kuyper, 07:15
- Re: "Referenced type ", Tim Rentsch, 07:08
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 07:08
- Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 07:05
- Re: Segmentation fault, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:37
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kenny McCormack, 06:04
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kenny McCormack, 06:00
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Harald van Dijk, 06:00
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 05:56
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 05:55
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 05:49
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Woodall, 05:41
- Re: Segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield, 05:33
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kaz Kylheku, 05:26
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Kaz Kylheku, 05:05
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Phil Carmody, 04:00
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Phil Carmody, 03:41
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Flash Gordon, 03:16
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 02:42
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 02:40
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 01:49
- ed hardy men's underwear - fashionable, janetannjn, 01:42
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 01:16
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 01:08
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 00:59
- Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 00:57
- Re: rel strength index function, Barry Schwarz, 00:57
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 00:56
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 00:51
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 00:45
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Tim Rentsch, 00:24
February 20, 2009
- Re: Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 23:57
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Tim Rentsch, 23:49
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 23:43
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 23:39
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 23:36
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 23:27
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 23:23
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 23:17
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), CBFalconer, 23:06
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 23:03
- Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 22:57
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 22:54
- Just a bit of silliness, The Hippy, 22:41
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Chris Ahlstrom, 22:23
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 22:07
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 22:07
- Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 22:04
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 22:00
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Eric Sosman, 21:50
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 21:41
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Keith Thompson, 21:39
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 21:37
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 21:35
- Re: casting and arithmetic, pete, 21:02
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 20:57
- Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 20:57
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, pete, 20:56
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 20:55
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Randy Howard, 20:54
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: Segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: #include vs. -library, CBFalconer, 20:22
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 20:17
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Tim Rentsch, 20:17
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 20:07
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 20:01
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, user923005, 20:01
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 19:56
- Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 19:51
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 19:49
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 19:40
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Tim Rentsch, 19:39
- Re: OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Larry Gates, 19:36
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Ike Naar, 19:32
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 19:31
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, The unknown warrior, 19:26
- OT: Editor heritage [was: Re: C question], Tim Rentsch, 19:25
- OT: Hungarian notation [was: Re: va_list * and function parameters?], Tim Rentsch, 19:23
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 19:03
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, David Schwartz, 18:56
- Re: #include vs. -library, Gordon Burditt, 18:54
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 18:40
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 18:38
- Re: rel strength index function, Richard Bos, 18:38
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: printf output, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: C question, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 18:37
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Han from China, 18:21
- Re: #include vs. -library, Gordon Burditt, 18:07
- Re: #include vs. -library, Mark McIntyre, 18:04
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Chris McDonald, 17:55
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 17:51
- Re: Segmentation fault, vaib, 17:51
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 17:46
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 17:41
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 17:36
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Gordon Burditt, 17:30
- Re: On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 17:12
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Gordon Burditt, 17:05
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 16:58
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- On the default buffering of stdout and the future of CLC, Han from China, 16:47
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, jameskuyper, 16:41
- Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 16:39
- Re: Segmentation fault, Han from China, 16:31
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 16:23
- Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 16:18
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: printf output, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: #include vs. -library, jameskuyper, 15:57
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Re: #include vs. -library, Han from China, 15:35
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: printf output, Tim Rentsch, 15:10
- Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 15:09
- Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 15:08
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 15:02
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 14:56
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 14:50
- Re: C question, Tim Rentsch, 14:43
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, chrisv, 14:41
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 14:41
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 14:38
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 14:33
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 14:32
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Keith Thompson, 14:26
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 14:16
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Harald van Dijk, 14:15
- Re: a[i++] = j, Fred, 14:10
- Re: a[i++] = j, Kenny McCormack, 13:48
- Re: a[i++] = j, jameskuyper, 13:46
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 13:38
- Re: a[i++] = j, Han from China, 13:34
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Kenny McCormack, 13:30
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 13:25
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 13:19
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 13:18
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 13:15
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 13:10
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 13:09
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 13:06
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 13:04
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, chrisv, 13:02
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 13:00
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 12:57
- Re: a[i++] = j, Kojak, 12:49
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 12:48
- Re: "Referenced type ", Kaz Kylheku, 12:43
- Re: #include vs. -library, Phil Carmody, 12:43
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 12:41
- Re: Segmentation fault, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:39
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak, 12:37
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 12:33
- a[i++] = j, saurabh29789, 12:33
- Re: On "type casting", Phil Carmody, 12:16
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 12:12
- Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 12:12
- Re: #include vs. -library, Keith Thompson, 12:08
- Re: "Referenced type ", jameskuyper, 12:05
- Re: #include vs. -library, jfbode1029, 12:04
- Re: #include vs. -library, Golden California Girls, 12:02
- Re: Segmentation fault, Lew Pitcher, 12:00
- Re: "Referenced type ", Phil Carmody, 12:00
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 12:00
- Re: #include vs. -library, Erik Trulsson, 11:59
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kojak, 11:52
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 11:48
- Re: logging optimization, Nelu, 11:42
- Re: #include vs. -library, jameskuyper, 11:40
- Re: Segmentation fault, Obnoxious User, 11:36
- Segmentation fault, vaib, 11:14
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 10:27
- Re: #include vs. -library, Tom Impelluso, 10:15
- wholesale cheap lacoste puma trainers, edhardy bbc lrg t-shirts & jeans, www.globwholesale.com, 10:13
- Re: #include vs. -library, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:11
- Tips to earn more with no inverstment..., Sushmitha, 10:09
- Re: #include vs. -library, Ben Bacarisse, 10:07
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 09:59
- Re: #include vs. -library, Antoninus Twink, 09:58
- #include vs. -library, Tom Impelluso, 09:44
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Antoninus Twink, 09:35
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Anthony Fremont, 09:34
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Antoninus Twink, 09:29
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 09:10
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Eric Sosman, 09:03
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Anthony Fremont, 08:58
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Chris Dollin, 08:40
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 08:31
- Re: logging optimization, lndresnick, 08:26
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 08:24
- Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 07:58
- Re: casting and arithmetic, pete, 07:35
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ezekiel, 07:10
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, James Kuyper, 06:30
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 06:14
- Re: casting and arithmetic, James Kuyper, 06:11
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 06:04
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bartc, 05:11
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Richard Heathfield, 05:02
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Boon, 04:44
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Ike Naar, 04:17
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 04:09
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:54
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 03:22
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 03:21
- Re: rel strength index function, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:21
- Re: "Referenced type ", Flash Gordon, 03:12
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:07
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:00
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Flash Gordon, 02:58
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 02:57
- Re: logging optimization, nick_keighley_nospam, 02:53
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Phil Carmody, 02:25
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Phil Carmody, 02:19
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 02:14
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 02:11
- Re: logging optimization, Ian Collins, 02:06
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 01:49
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 01:39
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 01:39
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 01:35
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Erik Funkenbusch, 01:02
- logging optimization, Neo, 00:33
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 00:24
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, CBFalconer, 00:20
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Joe Pfeiffer, 00:06
February 19, 2009
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, The Lost Packet, 23:51
- Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 23:49
- Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 23:17
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 23:16
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 23:11
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Kaz Kylheku, 23:09
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Ben Bacarisse, 23:01
- Re: adding \ char to the string, CBFalconer, 22:59
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 22:57
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Sjouke Burry, 22:56
- ed hardy men's shirts - fashionable, hclchanglinghuang, 22:44
- Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 22:38
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 22:37
- Re: rel strength index function, Ben Bacarisse, 22:30
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 22:22
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 22:18
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 22:16
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Eric Sosman, 22:13
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 22:11
- Re: rel strength index function, user923005, 22:10
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 22:09
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Ian Collins, 22:03
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 22:03
- Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 22:01
- Re: rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 22:00
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Dik T. Winter, 21:54
- Re: rel strength index function, pete, 21:47
- Re: rel strength index function, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Keith Thompson, 21:40
- Re: About space for variable, westbest98, 21:34
- Re: More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", pete, 21:33
- Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 21:30
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 21:24
- rel strength index function, Bill Cunningham, 21:23
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Ben Bacarisse, 21:13
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 21:10
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 21:10
- Re: "Referenced type ", pete, 21:06
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 21:05
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 21:04
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 21:03
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 20:52
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 20:48
- Re: "Referenced type ", Kaz Kylheku, 20:29
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 20:13
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 20:08
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 19:32
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 19:28
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris McDonald, 19:25
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Richard Heathfield, 19:24
- Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 19:04
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Golden California Girls, 19:03
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 19:00
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 18:58
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 18:49
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 18:33
- Re: On "type casting", Han from China, 18:30
- More proof of errors going uncorrected among the "regs", Han from China, 18:26
- Re: On "type casting", blargg, 18:20
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Peter Nilsson, 18:07
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Antoninus Twink, 17:36
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, The unknown warrior, 17:32
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 17:27
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, user923005, 17:27
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Voigt [C++ MVP], 17:20
- Re: On "type casting", Stephen Sprunk, 17:18
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Peter Nilsson, 17:15
- Re: "Referenced type ", Bartc, 17:13
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 17:08
- Re: Compilers no longer release executables, Lew Pitcher, 17:03
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 16:29
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 16:15
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 15:47
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, William Hughes, 15:44
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard, 15:43
- Re: On "type casting", Han from China, 15:21
- Compilers no longer release executables, Clifford Stern, 15:18
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Gordon Burditt, 15:05
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Gordon Burditt, 14:52
- Re: "Referenced type ", Nelu, 14:41
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 14:25
- Re: "Referenced type ", blargg, 14:08
- Re: Current world's smallest chess program, Eric Sosman, 14:01
- Re: On "type casting", blargg, 14:00
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 13:54
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, blargg, 13:53
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 13:40
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Keith Thompson, 13:39
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 13:38
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 13:33
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 13:30
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Alex Blekhman, 13:17
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dijk, 13:15
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dijk, 13:14
- Re: "Referenced type ", Golden California Girls, 13:14
- Re: "Referenced type ", Keith Thompson, 13:12
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 13:11
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 13:10
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Tim Prince, 13:01
- Re: "Referenced type ", Han from China, 12:47
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 12:45
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 12:43
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 12:41
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 12:32
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Kaz Kylheku, 12:27
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 12:08
- Re: "Referenced type ", Richard, 12:06
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 12:04
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Walter Banks, 11:47
- Re: "Referenced type ", Eric Sosman, 11:44
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Nate Eldredge, 11:40
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Rainer Weikusat, 11:36
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Nate Eldredge, 11:31
- Current world's smallest chess program, biyubi, 11:30
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 11:30
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Bartc, 11:27
- Re: About space for variable, Nate Eldredge, 11:24
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 11:21
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 11:19
- Re: "Referenced type ", nick_keighley_nospam, 11:19
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 11:11
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Ira Baxter, 11:10
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Richard Harter, 11:08
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, rembremading, 10:51
- "Referenced type ", saurabh29789, 10:50
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 10:44
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 10:36
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Alex Blekhman, 10:25
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, mijoryx, 10:18
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 10:08
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Ben Bacarisse, 10:08
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, James Kuyper, 10:08
- Re: Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, Chris Ahlstrom, 10:07
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 10:04
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 09:59
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 09:57
- Strange - a simple assignment statement shows error in VC++ but works in gcc !, karthikbalaguru, 09:53
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Ben Bacarisse, 09:51
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 09:46
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:39
- pre teen sex, incest, lolitas bbs, lolita , s, oqadibohygi4800, 09:31
- lolita, sun bbs, , hussyfan, model galleries, oqadibohygi4800, 09:31
- child super models, russian lolita, boys, young child models, pedo, oqadibohygi4800, 09:31
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Han from China, 09:30
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 09:16
- Re: Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, Bartc, 09:15
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Chris Dollin, 09:10
- (WWW.STYLISHDUDES.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.stylishdudes.com, 08:59
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Eric Sosman, 08:46
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard, 08:43
- Speeding Up Branches Based on Comparisons Between Floats, rembremading, 08:42
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Eric Sosman, 08:36
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, pete, 08:34
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard, 08:27
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard, 08:25
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard, 08:23
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Dow Allen, 08:13
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 08:06
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Andrew Smallshaw, 08:03
- Re: About space for variable, Ben Bacarisse, 08:02
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 07:57
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:55
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, James Kuyper, 07:44
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Kojak, 07:43
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Ben Bacarisse, 07:43
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Bartc, 07:34
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 07:17
- Re: casting and arithmetic, James Kuyper, 07:09
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 07:07
- Re: any compiler that takes encrypted input, Richard Heathfield, 06:57
- any compiler that takes encrypted input, sh.vipin@xxxxxxxxx, 06:49
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Kuyper, 06:45
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, James Kuyper, 06:40
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:28
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 06:07
- Re: casting and arithmetic, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:05
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:57
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:51
- Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:39
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Bartc, 05:24
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Kenny McCormack, 05:24
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Tea Pot, 05:20
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Hans Schneider, 05:10
- Re: About space for variable, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 04:58
- Re: About space for variable, Kojak, 04:54
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Kenny McCormack, 04:48
- Re: About space for variable, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:48
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:37
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 04:29
- Re: Qsort-ing structures, Richard Heathfield, 04:21
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:12
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, James Dow Allen, 03:52
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Boon, 03:48
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 03:48
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 03:45
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 03:44
- Qsort-ing structures, Albert, 03:38
- Re: About space for variable, raashid bhatt, 03:37
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Kojak, 03:32
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Gordon Burditt, 02:58
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 02:57
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 02:38
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Phil Carmody, 02:38
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 02:37
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 02:26
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Flash Gordon, 02:12
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 01:59
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 01:14
- About space for variable, westbest98, 00:56
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Stephen Sprunk, 00:54
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kaz Kylheku, 00:53
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 00:51
- Re: bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, Flash Gordon, 00:49
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 00:48
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 00:47
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Flash Gordon, 00:42
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Kojak, 00:40
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Flash Gordon, 00:35
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 00:35
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 00:34
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Golden California Girls, 00:29
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Golden California Girls, 00:27
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Gordon Burditt, 00:22
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 00:12
- Re: adding \ char to the string, CBFalconer, 00:10
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Flash Gordon, 00:06
- Re: casting and arithmetic, CBFalconer, 00:02
February 18, 2009
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: adding \ char to the string, Jack Klein, 23:47
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kojak, 23:44
- bit-fields vs. egyptian integer flags?, mijoryx, 23:42
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 23:42
- adding \ char to the string, Rajshekhar, 23:27
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Richard Heathfield, 23:17
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 23:14
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 23:13
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 23:12
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 23:02
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 22:55
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 22:54
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 22:52
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard Heathfield, 22:51
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 22:49
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, lawrence . jones, 22:42
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Nate Eldredge, 22:42
- Re: casting and arithmetic, Peter Nilsson, 22:35
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 22:34
- Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 22:24
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Peter Nilsson, 22:20
- casting and arithmetic, Brice Rebsamen, 22:15
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 22:03
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 22:01
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 21:56
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 21:16
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, CBFalconer, 21:03
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kojak, 20:49
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Kaz Kylheku, 20:47
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, CBFalconer, 20:46
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Bartc, 20:37
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: reading socket data, Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 20:30
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 20:22
- Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, Keith Thompson, 20:12
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 20:06
- Re: Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 19:56
- Remebering the order of precedence, karthikbalaguru, 19:47
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard, 19:24
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Golden California Girls, 19:02
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 19:01
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 18:52
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 18:23
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 18:06
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 17:58
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ike Naar, 17:55
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 17:54
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 17:52
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 17:43
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dijk, 17:23
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dijk, 17:15
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Harald van Dijk, 17:11
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ike Naar, 17:05
- Re: C question, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:02
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Walter Banks, 17:01
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, gw7rib, 16:58
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 16:57
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kaz Kylheku, 16:44
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 16:41
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jameskuyper, 16:38
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 16:34
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 16:33
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, jameskuyper, 16:21
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 16:14
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 16:11
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 15:58
- On "type casting", Han from China, 15:45
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 15:42
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 15:41
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 15:28
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Phil Carmody, 15:15
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, blargg, 15:10
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 15:06
- Re: C mnemonics, Coos Haak, 15:00
- Re: reading socket data, Lew Pitcher, 14:17
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 14:09
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Phil Carmody, 13:51
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Harald van Dijk, 13:21
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 13:10
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Ian Collins, 13:06
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 12:45
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 12:37
- Re: C question, Richard, 12:35
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Phil Carmody, 12:34
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, jameskuyper, 12:30
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 12:23
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 12:01
- Re: C question, Stephen Sprunk, 12:00
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Nate Eldredge, 11:58
- Re: printf output, Han from China, 11:58
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 11:03
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:34
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Bartc, 09:51
- Re: printf output, Han from China, 09:42
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard, 08:45
- Re: C question, Richard, 08:37
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard, 08:33
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 08:25
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 08:18
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Kenny McCormack, 07:58
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 07:54
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 07:27
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 07:12
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 07:09
- Re: C question, Mark McIntyre, 07:05
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 06:59
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Bos, 06:56
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:43
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 06:39
- Re: C mnemonics, Han from China, 06:08
- Re: C mnemonics, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:01
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:56
- Re: printf output, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:46
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:38
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 05:35
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kenny McCormack, 05:35
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Han from China, 05:34
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 05:31
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Kenny McCormack, 05:31
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:29
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 05:28
- Re: C mnemonics, Antoninus Twink, 05:14
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Boon, 05:07
- Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:58
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:55
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:40
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:17
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, MisterE, 04:08
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Richard Heathfield, 03:09
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 03:03
- Re: reading socket data, Golden California Girls, 02:51
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 02:46
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Flash Gordon, 02:26
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 02:19
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Flash Gordon, 01:48
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Flash Gordon, 01:36
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Nate Eldredge, 01:27
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Flash Gordon, 01:21
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 01:15
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 01:13
- Re: Logical operator not working in if condition, Kojak, 00:51
- Logical operator not working in if condition, venkatarao0@xxxxxxxxx, 00:16
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Paul Hsieh, 00:12
- Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 00:02
February 17, 2009
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, dj3vande, 23:37
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, dj3vande, 23:31
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 23:30
- Re: external variables, pete, 22:54
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 22:53
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Flash Gordon, 22:10
- Re: external variables, pete, 21:41
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 21:31
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 21:21
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 21:12
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bartc, 21:10
- Re: C mnemonics, Larry Gates, 21:06
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 21:04
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 20:54
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, CBFalconer, 20:47
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 20:42
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 20:36
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 20:23
- Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 20:12
- Re: reading socket data, CBFalconer, 20:08
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard Heathfield, 20:07
- Re: printf output, CBFalconer, 20:02
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 19:38
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, jacob navia, 19:36
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 19:25
- Re: C question, CBFalconer, 19:18
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Han from China, 19:07
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 19:04
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 19:03
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Bartc, 18:51
- C mnemonics, Han from China, 18:47
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Han from China, 18:43
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: C question, user923005, 18:26
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 18:22
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:13
- Re: C question, Ficus Elastica, 18:11
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Keith Thompson, 18:11
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, gw7rib, 18:11
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Lew Pitcher, 18:11
- Re: Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, user923005, 18:03
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bartc, 17:48
- Serious conformance BUG in lcc-win32 still present, Tea Pot, 17:06
- Re: Function Call - help, John Bode, 17:05
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Ben Pfaff, 16:50
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 16:49
- Re: printf output, lawrence . jones, 16:14
- Re: printf output, jameskuyper, 15:36
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Harter, 15:32
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Richard Heathfield, 15:31
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 15:17
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 15:15
- Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 15:15
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 15:08
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, jameskuyper, 14:59
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Eric Sosman, 14:56
- Re: printf output, Nelu, 14:53
- Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 14:50
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Lew Pitcher, 14:48
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 14:43
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 14:41
- Re: printf output, Golden California Girls, 14:36
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 14:29
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 14:26
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 14:25
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 14:22
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, user923005, 14:16
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 14:09
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, Keith Thompson, 14:05
- Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 14:05
- Re: printf output, Keith Thompson, 14:01
- Re: How often do you read the C standard?, maciek borzecki, 13:34
- How often do you read the C standard?, David Resnick, 13:29
- Re: Function Call - help, Richard, 13:28
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 13:27
- Re: printf output, Kaz Kylheku, 12:43
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Nate Eldredge, 12:42
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 12:29
- Re: C question, blmblm, 12:25
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 12:16
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Keith Thompson, 12:05
- Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 11:53
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 11:49
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 11:35
- Re: Searching for history of "#if", Eric Sosman, 11:23
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, jameskuyper, 11:12
- Re: printf output, Keep Asking, 10:57
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 10:43
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 10:35
- Re: reading socket data, Han from China, 10:15
- Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 10:07
- Re: printf output, Kaz Kylheku, 10:05
- Re: Function Call - help, Richard, 09:31
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 09:23
- Re: Function Call - help, Ben Bacarisse, 09:19
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Kenny McCormack, 09:12
- Function Call - help, libertinux, 09:06
- Re: reading socket data, Richard, 08:57
- Re: reading socket data, Chris Dollin, 08:55
- Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 08:55
- Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:49
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 08:25
- Re: C question, Richard, 08:25
- Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 08:20
- Re: reading socket data, Anthony Fremont, 08:16
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Chris McDonald, 08:11
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 07:03
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:54
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 06:30
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:28
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Ike Naar, 06:27
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 06:20
- Re: (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Han from China, 05:45
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 05:37
- Re: reading socket data, Han from China, 05:30
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:07
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:05
- Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:58
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:50
- Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:42
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:22
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:10
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 04:08
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:05
- Re: printf output, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:57
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 03:55
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:53
- Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 03:39
- Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 03:39
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:34
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard Heathfield, 03:28
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:28
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:23
- Port Royal Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches114, 03:23
- Popular Cartier Watches, iwcwatches114, 03:23
- Vacheron Constantin Patrimony Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches114, 03:23
- Best Stuhrling Watches World, iwcwatches114, 03:22
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 03:22
- Re: reading socket data, Richard Heathfield, 03:21
- Re: printf output, Richard Heathfield, 03:19
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Ike Naar, 03:18
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), n5ghdfg, 03:08
- Re: reading socket data, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:07
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 02:23
- Re: reading socket data, Martin Ambuhl, 02:03
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 01:35
- reading socket data, nix, 01:33
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 01:31
- Re: printf output, jaysome, 01:21
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 00:56
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Gordon Burditt, 00:44
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 00:23
February 16, 2009
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 23:58
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 23:57
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Old Wolf, 23:51
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 23:49
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: C question, Richard, 23:42
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 23:37
- Re: printf output, Richard, 23:36
- (part1b) Han from China teaches you C, Han from China, 23:34
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 23:25
- Sport Shoes (paypal payment)(www.cicigogo.cn ), cicitrade601, 23:23
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Han from China, 23:14
- Re: printf output, Nelu, 23:13
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 23:10
- Re: printf output, Charlton Wilbur, 22:53
- Re: printf output, Jack Klein, 22:50
- printf output, Keep Asking, 22:32
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 22:29
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 21:44
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:44
- Re: external variables, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:28
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 21:25
- Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:17
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Dik T. Winter, 21:13
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 21:12
- Re: C question, Golden California Girls, 21:08
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 21:05
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 20:57
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 20:50
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 20:44
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Kaz Kylheku, 20:24
- Re: C question, Richard Heathfield, 20:22
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 20:18
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 20:09
- Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 19:54
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 19:08
- Re: C question, Ficus Elastica, 19:07
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 19:02
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 19:01
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 18:45
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 18:42
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ben Pfaff, 18:41
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ben Bacarisse, 18:16
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 18:15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 18:13
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 18:10
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 18:07
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Golden California Girls, 18:03
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Chris McDonald, 18:00
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Antoninus Twink, 18:00
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 17:55
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Antoninus Twink, 17:48
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 17:44
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ben Pfaff, 17:42
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 17:40
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, CBFalconer, 17:36
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 17:35
- Re: external variables, Han from China, 17:33
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 17:23
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Heathfield, 17:11
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 17:09
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 17:08
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Harter, 17:05
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, lawrence . jones, 16:56
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 16:51
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 16:38
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 16:32
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 16:30
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, christian.bau, 16:06
- Re: external variables, Han from China, 15:42
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 15:17
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, user923005, 15:15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 15:02
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Harter, 14:22
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 14:15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Golden California Girls, 13:56
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Golden California Girls, 13:53
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 13:43
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Kaz Kylheku, 13:31
- Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 13:23
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 12:57
- Re: passing reference to pointer, blargg, 12:50
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 12:47
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard Harter, 12:28
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 11:42
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Ben Pfaff, 11:16
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, James Kuyper, 11:15
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 11:00
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 10:41
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:37
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:35
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Han from China, 10:20
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Bartc, 10:20
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard, 10:00
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 10:00
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:51
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 09:50
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Charlton Wilbur, 09:42
- Re: "%d"+1 and printf !!, Richard, 09:29
- "%d"+1 and printf !!, karthikbalaguru, 09:23
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Richard, 09:17
- Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:46
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ben Bacarisse, 08:29
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 08:01
- Re: external variables, pete, 07:58
- Re: Function returning a char, WANG Cong, 07:42
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 07:11
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:59
- NFL Jerseys=22USD Mlb jerseys=20USD Nhl Jerseys=35USD paypal payment, cicitrade600, 06:47
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 06:35
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, William Pursell, 05:43
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:53
- Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:41
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:29
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 04:24
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:01
- Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 04:01
- Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 03:46
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:41
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:37
- Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 03:30
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:23
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 03:17
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 03:14
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 03:06
- Re: passing reference to pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 02:56
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Ram, 02:38
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 02:28
- ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount, jmsmark30, 02:23
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Han from China, 02:11
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Han from China, 02:00
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 01:55
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 01:28
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Nate Eldredge, 01:12
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Spiros Bousbouras, 01:06
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 01:06
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 01:04
- [Meta] Re: passing reference to pointer, Nate Eldredge, 01:03
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 01:02
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 00:45
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 00:36
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 00:35
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Ben Pfaff, 00:31
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 00:15
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, WANG Cong, 00:10
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Jujitsu Lizard, 00:01
February 15, 2009
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Peter Nilsson, 23:52
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Golden California Girls, 23:49
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 23:48
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 23:29
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 23:22
- Excuse me, ama, 23:09
- Re: va_list * and function parameters?, Tim Rentsch, 23:04
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Ian Collins, 22:46
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Dik T. Winter, 22:42
- va_list * and function parameters?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 22:33
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 22:31
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 22:25
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 22:16
- Re: ? :, pete, 22:03
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:54
- Re: ? :, Bill Cunningham, 21:28
- Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 21:28
- Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 21:27
- Environmental Living! - Join The Green Revolution!, greenliving.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 21:26
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Gordon Burditt, 21:06
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 20:53
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Ian Collins, 19:46
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Keith Thompson, 19:44
- Re: passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 19:37
- Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 19:35
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, Ian Collins, 19:35
- Re: Look for open source C library for text manipulation, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 19:31
- Look for open source C library for text manipulation, 1230987za, 19:17
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 19:14
- Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 17:56
- Re: ? :, Richard, 17:40
- Re: ? :, pete, 17:39
- Re: ? :, Lew Pitcher, 17:38
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 17:26
- Re: ? :, Ian Collins, 16:52
- ? :, Bill Cunningham, 16:50
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, dank420, 16:32
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 15:57
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 15:33
- Re: Function returning a char, Keith Thompson, 15:31
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Malcolm McLean, 15:06
- Re: external variables, Han from China, 15:05
- Re: Ike Naar, Harald van Dijk, 14:52
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 14:52
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 14:44
- Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 14:44
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Tim Rentsch, 14:39
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Bartc, 14:34
- Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 14:30
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Barry Schwarz, 14:30
- Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 14:30
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 14:29
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Malcolm McLean, 14:21
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 14:17
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 14:10
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, stoney, 14:03
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 13:45
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 13:42
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 13:35
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Tobin, 13:29
- Re: Typecast clarification, Kenny McCormack, 12:10
- Re: MACRO QUERY, pete, 11:58
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Bartc, 11:30
- Re: Function returning a char, Eric Sosman, 10:57
- Re: Function returning a char, Malcolm McLean, 10:45
- Re: advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, Malcolm McLean, 10:43
- Re: Typecast clarification, Stephen Sprunk, 10:43
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Malcolm McLean, 10:35
- Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: external variables, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: C question, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Tick counting problem, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Bos, 10:29
- Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:21
- Re: Switch for floating !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:44
- Re: MACRO QUERY, WANG Cong, 08:07
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 07:16
- Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 06:58
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:31
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:12
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 06:00
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Chris M. Thomasson, 04:58
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 04:51
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Martin Ambuhl, 04:45
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Han from China, 04:35
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Martin Ambuhl, 04:31
- Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 04:18
- Re: Function returning a char, Han from China, 04:10
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Han from China, 04:05
- Re: Switch for floating !!, mijoryx, 04:04
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Han from China, 03:40
- Re: Function returning a char, Nate Eldredge, 03:35
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Chris M. Thomasson, 03:27
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Jens Thoms Toerring, 03:24
- Re: passing reference to pointer, WANG Cong, 03:23
- Re: passing reference to pointer, Chris M. Thomasson, 03:22
- passing reference to pointer, softdeveloper007, 03:09
- Re: Function returning a char, WANG Cong, 02:59
- Re: HTTP RESPONSE query, Chris M. Thomasson, 01:29
- Re: Never reinstall XP again, Golden California Girls, 00:43
- HTTP RESPONSE query, Ram, 00:31
- Re: Freeing the allocated block, new, 00:02
February 14, 2009
- Re: Tick counting problem, myforwik, 23:50
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, myforwik, 23:38
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 23:29
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 23:24
- Never reinstall XP again, repairtool.vze@xxxxxxxxx, 23:20
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Chris M. Thomasson, 22:50
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Chad, 22:47
- Re: Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Keith Thompson, 22:36
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 22:34
- Re: Switch for floating !!, James Kuyper, 22:23
- Re: Typecast clarification, Dik T. Winter, 22:17
- Can you traverse over an array contents in c?, Chad, 22:15
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 21:37
- Re: Switch for floating !!, CBFalconer, 21:32
- Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 21:22
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 21:08
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 20:44
- Re: Function returning a char, Tim Rentsch, 20:33
- good quality nike jordan shoes from china(www.cnnshoe.com), wulee, 20:23
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Barry Schwarz, 20:04
- Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 20:04
- Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 20:04
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Golden California Girls, 19:30
- Re: Switch for floating !!, blargg, 17:55
- Re: Function returning a char, candide, 17:39
- Re: What does this code do?, Curtis Dyer, 17:36
- Re: Function returning a char, Eric Sosman, 17:19
- Re: c to c++, Charlton Wilbur, 16:46
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 16:44
- Re: Function returning a char, candide, 16:35
- Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 15:44
- Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 15:42
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 15:31
- Re: Tick counting problem, Anthony Fremont, 15:25
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 15:22
- Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 15:09
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Barry Schwarz, 14:44
- Re: Ike Naar, Barry Schwarz, 14:44
- Re: Function returning a char, Barry Schwarz, 14:44
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Joachim Schmitz, 13:37
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: Freeing the allocated block, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: Integer Overflow, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, gw7rib, 12:22
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Suvroc, 11:53
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Lorenzo Villari, 11:48
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Ralf Damaschke, 11:35
- Re: Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 11:08
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Suvroc, 10:50
- Function returning a char, candide, 09:29
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Lorenzo Villari, 08:45
- Re: oddness with strcpy, James Kuyper, 08:39
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 08:31
- Re: c to c++, Tony, 07:49
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Bartc, 06:34
- Re: Switch for floating !!, Richard Tobin, 06:12
- Switch for floating !!, karthikbalaguru, 05:54
- Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Tobin, 05:52
- ***************New Enthiran Stills Of Rajini & Aishwarya Rai****************, Enthian, 05:42
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Tobin, 05:35
- Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 05:30
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 05:10
- Re: external variables, Nate Eldredge, 04:49
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 04:42
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 04:37
- Re: Tick counting problem, JJ, 04:24
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 04:11
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 03:20
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 03:05
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Kenny McCormack, 02:57
- Re: c to c++, Tony, 02:37
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Tim Rentsch, 02:33
- Re: c to c++, Tony, 02:31
- Re: Typecast clarification, Tim Rentsch, 02:18
- Re: Typecast clarification, Tim Rentsch, 02:09
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 01:35
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 01:32
- OT: editors [was Re: C question], Tim Rentsch, 01:29
- Re: Copy and paste in software development, Larry Gates, 01:12
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Old Wolf, 00:50
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 00:25
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 00:08
February 13, 2009
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Tim Rentsch, 23:51
- Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 23:34
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Keith Thompson, 23:33
- Re: external variables, Ian Collins, 23:32
- Re: external variables, Ian Collins, 23:14
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 23:12
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 22:44
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 22:29
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 22:28
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, CBFalconer, 22:06
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 22:03
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Bartc, 21:56
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), CBFalconer, 21:50
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Ian Collins, 21:28
- Free credit report - 2009 Best Offer!, ojbaconstartle, 21:28
- Re: Ike Naar, Joe Wright, 21:26
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 21:15
- Re: Ike Naar, Joe Wright, 21:07
- Re: Copy and paste in software development, Spiros Bousbouras, 20:42
- Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 20:39
- Re: external variables, Nate Eldredge, 20:31
- Copy and paste in software development, jacob navia, 20:15
- Re: Typecast clarification, Kenny McCormack, 19:55
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 19:53
- Re: Typecast clarification, Ben Pfaff, 19:49
- Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 19:42
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 19:30
- Re: Typecast clarification, Dik T. Winter, 19:12
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 18:57
- Re: Tick counting problem, Anthony Fremont, 18:57
- Re: Typecast clarification, Kaz Kylheku, 18:33
- Re: Tick counting problem, Bartc, 18:30
- advice/thoughts on garbage collection?, mijoryx, 18:18
- Tick counting problem, JJ, 18:04
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 17:50
- Re: Ike Naar, pete, 17:30
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, pete, 17:24
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 17:23
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 17:21
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 17:19
- Re: external variables, pete, 17:17
- Re: [OT] Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 17:05
- Re: Ike Naar, Tim Rentsch, 17:00
- [OT] Re: c to c++, Tim Rentsch, 16:58
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Tim Rentsch, 16:23
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 16:22
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Tim Rentsch, 16:05
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 15:33
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 13:58
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Ben Pfaff, 13:46
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Tim Rentsch, 13:40
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Keith Thompson, 13:19
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, blargg, 13:17
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, blargg, 13:14
- Easy ways of earning money online guide, success, 13:09
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 13:01
- Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 12:54
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, mohi, 12:26
- Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 12:11
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:10
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:00
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard Tobin, 11:56
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, jameskuyper, 11:49
- Re: external variables, Boon, 11:45
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Han from China, 11:45
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, jameskuyper, 11:41
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Boon, 11:37
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 11:34
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, blargg, 11:32
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, blargg, 11:28
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:26
- Re: What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, pete, 11:23
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Nate Eldredge, 11:21
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 11:21
- Re: external variables, pete, 11:16
- What is the type of 1 ? 0L : (long long *)0, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:05
- Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, Eric Sosman, 10:44
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, WANG Cong, 10:35
- Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, Harold Aptroot, 10:15
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard Tobin, 08:51
- Re: Typecast clarification, Han from China, 08:45
- Re: A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:41
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Re: Typecast clarification, Bruce Cook, 08:17
- A little bit of C -> C# help required please!!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:14
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Steffen Buehler, 08:12
- Re: external variables, Boon, 08:03
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:09
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Lorenzo Villari, 07:01
- Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 06:48
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, pete, 06:45
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, s0suk3, 06:39
- Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 06:35
- Re: Typecast clarification, pete, 06:26
- Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 06:13
- Re: Freeing the allocated block, Jens Thoms Toerring, 05:29
- Freeing the allocated block, new, 05:13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, ugepp, 05:05
- Re: How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, Jens Thoms Toerring, 04:35
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:25
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Jens Thoms Toerring, 04:04
- Re: Strange behaviour of while loop !!, Daniel Kraft, 03:56
- Strange behaviour of while loop !!, karthikbalaguru, 03:41
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:35
- Re: What does this code do?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:18
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:12
- Re: Typecast clarification, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:07
- How to test if non-numeric macro tokens are the same, James Tursa, 02:58
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Tim Woodall, 02:50
- Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 02:42
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Roberto Divia, 02:38
- Re: What does this code do?, Golden California Girls, 02:36
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Golden California Girls, 02:31
- Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 02:23
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 02:18
- What's wrong with this code?, LL, 02:08
- Amazing Cool mobile application Absolutely FREE !!, Lima, 01:57
- free free free usenet, anandamerica@xxxxxxxxx, 01:57
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Han from China, 01:57
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Phil Carmody, 01:49
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 01:42
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Richard Heathfield, 01:39
- Re: Books, Phil Carmody, 01:26
- Re: Initializing with OL, Han from China, 01:26
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Han from China, 01:12
- Re: What does this code do?, Ben Pfaff, 01:03
- What does this code do?, keekeekee17, 00:54
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 00:25
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, CBFalconer, 00:23
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 00:20
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 00:16
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 00:13
- Re: Typecast clarification, Harald van Dijk, 00:09
- Re: Typecast clarification, Han from China, 00:06
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 00:00
February 12, 2009
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, Richard Heathfield, 23:58
- Re: Typecast clarification, Richard Heathfield, 23:55
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Richard Heathfield, 23:44
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Han from China, 23:40
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, George Orwell, 23:10
- Re: dynamic list of structures, CBFalconer, 22:17
- Re: Books, Nelu, 22:13
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 22:09
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, CBFalconer, 21:55
- Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 21:44
- Re: Typecast clarification, CBFalconer, 21:43
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Paul Hsieh, 21:42
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 21:38
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, David Resnick, 21:36
- Re: Typecast clarification, CBFalconer, 21:32
- Gucci Continental Wallet Gold 112724 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Gucci Princy Boston S Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Chanel Wallet Red C1509 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Monogram Canvas Designed Purse M61717 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Fendi Spring/Summer Black 2575 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Miu Miu Handbag Earth Yellow 57511 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:25
- Monogram Denim Camera Bag Collection, bagsbags31, 21:24
- Chanel Handbags Black 25205 Collection, bagsbags31, 21:24
- Re: Initializing with OL, CBFalconer, 21:24
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), CBFalconer, 21:15
- Re: Books, CBFalconer, 21:02
- Re: dynamic list of structures, Bartc, 21:01
- Re: Initializing with OL, pete, 20:48
- Re: Books, Nelu, 20:42
- Re: dynamic list of structures, pete, 20:38
- Re: Initializing with OL, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- dynamic list of structures, irwa82, 19:58
- Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 19:40
- Online pharmacies india winstrol - Best Site!, marquezuieven, 19:20
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, blargg, 19:12
- Re: Initializing with OL, MisterE, 18:45
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, marcia, 17:39
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, marcia, 17:32
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, Wolfgang Draxinger, 17:18
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:17
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, s0suk3, 17:10
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, user923005, 15:55
- Re: Suggestions about transparent data structures, user923005, 15:05
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kaz Kylheku, 14:52
- Re: Typecast clarification, jameskuyper, 14:09
- Re: C question, Nate Eldredge, 14:08
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Willem, 14:08
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Spiros Bousbouras, 14:04
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jameskuyper, 14:03
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Eric Sosman, 14:01
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Nelu, 13:58
- Re: c to c++, Tim Woodall, 13:49
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 13:43
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 13:31
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, HoofPrints, 13:28
- Suggestions about transparent data structures, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 13:28
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jameskuyper, 13:27
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 13:22
- Re: Typecast clarification, LL, 13:21
- Re: Typecast clarification, jameskuyper, 13:18
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 13:17
- Re: test, Lew Pitcher, 13:07
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 13:06
- test, LL, 13:01
- Re: oddness with strcpy, pete, 12:51
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 12:49
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Kenny McCormack, 12:48
- Re: oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 12:41
- Re: Why copy const char* argument?, pete, 12:40
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Nelu, 12:37
- Re: oddness with strcpy, Dominik Friedrichs, 12:26
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Bartc, 12:21
- oddness with strcpy, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 12:14
- Re: Books, Richard, 12:08
- Why copy const char* argument?, Dominik Friedrichs, 11:53
- Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 11:39
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Bartc, 11:33
- Re: C question, Keith Thompson, 11:32
- >>>Money Exchange<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:32
- >>>Conflict Resolution<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:31
- >>>Colonial America<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:31
- >>>Party Favors<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:31
- >>>Plastic Containers<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:30
- Re: Typecast clarification, Keith Thompson, 11:30
- >>>Olympic Games<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:30
- >>>Taco Bell<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:29
- >>>Ink Refill<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:29
- >>>Book Clubs<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:29
- >>>Radio Stations<<<__________________________________________________________, reggiehammink, 11:28
- Re: Integer Overflow, Tim Rentsch, 11:09
- Re: Books, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:52
- Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 10:51
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Tim Rentsch, 10:47
- Re: Typecast clarification, Bruce Cook, 10:46
- Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 10:39
- Re: C question, Nelu, 10:28
- Re: Books, Nelu, 10:23
- Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 10:19
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:17
- Re: Books, Antoninus Twink, 10:09
- Re: Books, Nelu, 10:04
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:00
- Re: Typecast clarification, Boon, 09:44
- Re: C question, Chris Dollin, 08:59
- Re: Typecast clarification, James Kuyper, 08:41
- Re: Books, Richard, 08:26
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 07:47
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 07:47
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 07:32
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, somenath, 07:13
- Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 07:03
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., nick_keighley_nospam, 07:02
- Re: Typecast clarification, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:54
- Re: Function for getting a serial number of computer..., Kenny McCormack, 06:49
- Re: Typecast clarification, WANG Cong, 06:45
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 06:33
- Re: Books, nick_keighley_nospam, 06:33
- Re: c to c++, James Kuyper, 06:21
- Function for getting a serial number of computer..., djuro . tost, 06:15
- Re: c to c++, Tim Woodall, 05:53
- Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 05:18
- Typecast clarification, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 04:49
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 04:23
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:31
- Re: C question, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:25
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:16
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Tim Rentsch, 02:06
- Re: external variables, pete, 02:02
- Re: c to c++, Phil Carmody, 01:59
- Re: c to c++, Phil Carmody, 01:56
- Re: C question, Golden California Girls, 01:52
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Phil Carmody, 01:45
- Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 01:45
- Re: Books, Golden California Girls, 01:30
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 00:55
- Re: Books, Flash Gordon, 00:43
- ED Hardy sunglasses - sunglasses discount, jmsmark30, 00:32
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 00:02
February 11, 2009
- Re: C question, Spiros Bousbouras, 23:58
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 23:57
- Re: C question, misty, 23:54
- Re: C question, Ian Collins, 23:53
- aansprakelijkheid software,bouwfonds hypotheek,lening afsluiten zonder bkr,geld kosten,zakelijk geld lenen,, canalien747, 23:46
- Re: external variables, Spiros Bousbouras, 23:30
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 23:26
- Re: external variables, Jack Klein, 23:23
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, CBFalconer, 23:20
- Re: Books, CBFalconer, 23:13
- Re: Books, CBFalconer, 23:09
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 23:07
- Re: C question, Martin Ambuhl, 23:07
- Re: C question, Richard Heathfield, 23:05
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Ian Collins, 23:01
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 22:53
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, CBFalconer, 22:51
- Re: Windows graphics problem, CBFalconer, 22:43
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 22:41
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 22:34
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 22:29
- Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 22:27
- Re: Books, James Kuyper, 22:26
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, CBFalconer, 22:21
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 22:08
- Re: C question, Ian Collins, 22:00
- Re: Books, Ian Collins, 21:59
- Re: C question, Jack Klein, 21:52
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 21:47
- Re: external variables, Jack Klein, 21:46
- Re: C question, Anthony Fremont, 21:26
- Re: "semantic" in n1336.pdf, Tim Rentsch, 21:24
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 21:18
- C question, Ficus Elastica, 21:17
- Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 21:12
- Re: external variables, Keith Thompson, 21:10
- Life insurance no medical exam - Best Site!, hfalmondarnold@xxxxxxxxx, 21:00
- Re: external variables, Richard, 20:48
- Re: infinite loop, Tim Rentsch, 20:41
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 20:35
- Re: external, Larry Gates, 20:32
- Re: Type casting void *, Richard, 20:32
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 20:30
- Re: Type casting void *, Tim Rentsch, 20:19
- Re: validity of a pointer, Tim Rentsch, 20:16
- Re: Books, Flash Gordon, 20:04
- Re: sequence points and the execution model, Tim Rentsch, 20:00
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Flash Gordon, 19:24
- Re: external variables, Larry Gates, 19:13
- Re: [repost] external, Larry Gates, 19:04
- Re: Books, Richard Tobin, 19:04
- Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 18:55
- Re: command line, Richard Heathfield, 18:38
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 18:36
- Re: command line, Richard, 18:23
- Searching For and Buying Health Insurance in a Bad Economy, healthplans.cjb@xxxxxxxxx, 18:21
- Re: command line, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Books, Richard, 17:50
- Re: command line, Richard, 17:49
- Re: command line, Richard, 17:48
- Re: Books, jameskuyper, 16:53
- Re: Books, user923005, 16:31
- Re: Books, Ben Pfaff, 16:12
- Re: Books, user923005, 16:11
- Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 16:02
- Re: Books, Ben Pfaff, 16:00
- Re: c to c++, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 16:00
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 15:55
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 15:53
- Re: Books, Ian Collins, 15:52
- Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 15:37
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 14:59
- Re: Books, user923005, 14:56
- Re: c to c++, user923005, 14:53
- Re: Books, Ian Collins, 14:49
- Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 14:44
- Re: [repost] external, Kenny McCormack, 14:42
- Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 14:37
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 14:22
- Re: Books, Ian Collins, 14:21
- Re: Books, jacob navia, 14:20
- Re: Books, Antoninus Twink, 14:09
- Re: Books, Richard Heathfield, 13:52
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 13:28
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 13:00
- Re: Books, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:38
- immigrants visas, Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area., marco.fernando02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:14
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 11:33
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 11:20
- Re: [repost] external, Martin Ambuhl, 11:16
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 09:59
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:33
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:24
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:22
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:17
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Richard, 08:49
- Re: external, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:22
- Re: external, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:14
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, James Kuyper, 07:34
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, Bartc, 07:18
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Bartc, 06:38
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, jacob navia, 06:09
- [repost] external, Larry Gates, 05:45
- Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 05:33
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:09
- Re: c to c++, user923005, 04:18
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 04:05
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 04:02
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Boon, 04:02
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 03:59
- Re: The best way to debug an error, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:43
- Re: Benefit of not defining the order of execution, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:26
- Re: c to c++, user923005, 03:25
- Re: Windows graphics problem, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:22
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:15
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:08
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 02:57
- Hogan shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn ), ffffffffffffffff, 02:55
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, ffffffffffffffff, 02:55
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Ian Collins, 02:54
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 02:27
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, Richard Heathfield, 02:21
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 02:19
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard, 02:06
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 01:46
- Benefit of not defining the order of execution, somenath, 01:46
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, Gordon Burditt, 01:11
- Rule-based AI in C, copx, 00:30
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Flash Gordon, 00:12
February 10, 2009
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 22:56
- Pay off debt - Best Choice, burialijjacobsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 22:23
- Re: c to c++, Dik T. Winter, 21:57
- Best online casino ranked - Best Choice, djroofdorsey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 21:11
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 20:49
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Han from China, 20:42
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Richard, 20:38
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 20:35
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 20:00
- Re: command line, Han from China, 19:53
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, CBFalconer, 19:52
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Ben Bacarisse, 19:38
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Default User, 19:04
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 18:53
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Richard Heathfield, 18:18
- Re: OIOIC, how about ?, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: Windows graphics problem, CBFalconer, 18:15
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', J. J. Farrell, 17:27
- Re: Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 17:22
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, J. J. Farrell, 17:17
- Re: The best way to debug an error, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 16:52
- Re: c to c++, user923005, 16:40
- Re: Initializing with OL, Keith Thompson, 16:35
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Phil Carmody, 16:29
- Re: Initializing with OL, Eric Sosman, 16:21
- Re: Books, user923005, 16:17
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 16:16
- Re: Initializing with OL, Richard Heathfield, 16:07
- Re: Initializing with OL, user923005, 16:06
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 16:04
- Initializing with OL, jimward2, 15:53
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard Bos, 15:15
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Bos, 15:15
- Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 15:15
- Re: command line, Antoninus Twink, 15:02
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 14:47
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Keith Thompson, 14:45
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Antoninus Twink, 14:43
- Re: numerical result out of range, Antoninus Twink, 14:40
- Re: command line, Bill Cunningham, 14:31
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Antoninus Twink, 14:23
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 14:19
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Missaka Wijekoon, 14:11
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 13:55
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 13:54
- Re: c to c++, Antoninus Twink, 13:49
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), John Bode, 13:40
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Martin Ambuhl, 13:32
- Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 13:30
- Re: Shelbyville, sparkoheaps, 13:15
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 13:13
- Re: The best way to debug an error, Richard, 12:57
- Re: Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 12:39
- The best way to debug an error, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 12:35
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 12:05
- Re: command line, Richard, 12:05
- join group, ketan, 12:02
- Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 12:02
- Re: c to c++, William Hughes, 11:51
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Golden California Girls, 11:36
- Re: Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Nate Eldredge, 11:35
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 11:21
- Re: Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Kenny McCormack, 11:20
- Converting Char Array with hex values into 32-bit integer, Martin Kleiner, 11:20
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 11:09
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, Eric Sosman, 11:08
- Re: Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, jameskuyper, 10:58
- Regarding Dynamic Memory Allocation, saurabh29789, 10:51
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 10:28
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 10:02
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 09:53
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Bin Chen, 08:57
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 08:46
- Re: Integer Overflow, Boon, 08:45
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:29
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 08:16
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:12
- Re: Newbie here, Jan Hyde, 08:07
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:07
- Re: external variables, pete, 07:54
- Re: command line, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:48
- Re: external variables, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:40
- Re: external variables, pete, 07:38
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:20
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:15
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:14
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 04:11
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, James Dow Allen, 04:10
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Keith Thompson, 03:52
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Bumbala, 03:11
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Ian Collins, 02:59
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, silusilusilu, 02:49
- Air Force1 and Air Jordan shoes PAYPAL wholesale, wholesale, 02:34
- Books, Cross, 02:14
- OIOIC, how about ?, gclcur, 01:36
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Larry Gates, 01:25
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Pranav, 00:32
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 00:20
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 00:17
- external variables, Larry Gates, 00:11
February 09, 2009
- Chuck Falconer shows a use for casting with malloc(), Han from China, 23:34
- Wholesale New NiKE Air Jordan 24(30$) Nike AirMax nike shox Air Jordan air force one dunk Free Shipping at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade601, 23:08
- Re: command line, Han from China, 22:54
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 22:14
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Kaz Kylheku, 22:08
- Re: command line, Richard, 21:25
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Han from China, 21:15
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Han from China, 21:04
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: command line, Ian Collins, 20:52
- command line, Bill Cunningham, 20:49
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: Variable Scope ?, CBFalconer, 20:29
- Re: Variable Scope ?, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Keith Thompson, 19:57
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, CBFalconer, 19:53
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 19:43
- Re: c to c++, Ben Bacarisse, 19:41
- Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 19:40
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 19:36
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 19:28
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 19:03
- Re: c to c++, CBFalconer, 18:59
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 18:58
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 18:55
- Re: Windows graphics problem, jacob navia, 18:53
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 18:48
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 18:38
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Kaz Kylheku, 18:32
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 18:29
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Ian Collins, 18:13
- Re: c to c++, Kaz Kylheku, 18:09
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Nate Eldredge, 18:08
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Kaz Kylheku, 18:03
- Re: Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 18:02
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Richard Heathfield, 17:51
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 17:49
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:49
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 17:46
- Re: Windows graphics problem, Ian Collins, 17:44
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Stephen Sprunk, 17:42
- Windows graphics problem, maan kapoor, 17:40
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Stephen Sprunk, 17:31
- Re: 0, NULL and variadic functions, Eric Sosman, 17:30
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 17:24
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Golden California Girls, 17:24
- Re: Can you help me to understand this define?, Ian Collins, 17:23
- Re: c to c++, user923005, 17:16
- Can you help me to understand this define?, silusilusilu, 17:07
- 0, NULL and variadic functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:05
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 16:58
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 16:56
- Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 16:15
- Re: c to c++, Richard Tobin, 16:13
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Default User, 16:13
- Re: c to c++, jameskuyper, 15:57
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 15:39
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 15:05
- Re: numerical result out of range, Default User, 15:03
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 15:03
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 15:03
- Re: c to c++, Richard Bos, 14:56
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Richard Bos, 14:56
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 14:50
- Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 14:50
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kaz Kylheku, 14:47
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 14:46
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 14:44
- Re: Ike Naar, Kaz Kylheku, 14:37
- Re: c to c++, Richard Heathfield, 14:35
- Re: c to c++, pete, 14:23
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:19
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 14:18
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 14:13
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Nate Eldredge, 14:08
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 14:06
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 14:01
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 13:59
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 13:57
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kenny McCormack, 13:53
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, 13:49
- Re: Ike Naar, Golden California Girls, 13:46
- Re: Graphing Convolution, Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Re: Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 13:18
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 13:02
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Kaz Kylheku, 12:53
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 12:47
- Re: c to c++, William Hughes, 12:33
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Eric Sosman, 12:21
- Re: Variable Scope ?, Nate Eldredge, 12:20
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard Tobin, 12:19
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 12:14
- Re: c to c++, Richard, 12:13
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 12:12
- Re: c to c++, J. J. Farrell, 12:11
- Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 12:07
- Re: Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: ridiculous, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: compiling C code, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: Graphing Convolution, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Bos, 12:03
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, John Bode, 12:02
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 11:53
- Variable Scope ?, 2DevOrNot2Dev, 11:43
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 11:29
- Re: c to c++, Eric Sosman, 11:06
- http://www.stylishdudes.com cheap sell air max shoes, nike shoes,ugg shoes,jordan shoes,handbag,jeans,shox shoes,Get Nike Shoes at Super Cheap Prices, www.stylishdudes.com, 11:01
- Re: c to c++, Eric Sosman, 10:58
- Re: Ike Naar, Nate Eldredge, 10:52
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Eric Sosman, 10:51
- Re: c to c++, Flash Gordon, 10:49
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 10:44
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Flash Gordon, 10:36
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, blargg, 09:55
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 09:17
- Re: Ike Naar, Lorenzo Villari, 08:16
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 07:38
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 07:33
- Re: Ike Naar, Kenny McCormack, 07:31
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 07:28
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 05:50
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 05:45
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard Heathfield, 05:44
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 04:51
- Re: Ike Naar, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:22
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:04
- Re: c to c++, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:42
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:20
- Re: c to c++, pete, 03:17
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 03:15
- Re: Ike Naar, pete, 03:07
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 02:50
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 02:48
- Evisu Jeans - fashionable, jmsmark30, 02:47
- Re: Ike Naar, Kenny McCormack, 02:37
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 02:35
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 02:34
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Barry Schwarz, 01:51
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 01:51
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 01:51
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 01:51
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Pranav, 00:35
- Re: Ike Naar, Flash Gordon, 00:25
- Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn ), shjfklsjf, 00:20
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, shjfklsjf, 00:19
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 00:17
February 08, 2009
- Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., Han from China, 23:53
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 23:51
- Re: c to c++, James Kuyper, 23:04
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 22:32
- Re: Ike Naar, Han from China, 22:12
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 21:45
- Re: Ike Naar, Richard, 21:01
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 20:49
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 20:45
- Re: c to c++, Keith Thompson, 20:42
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 20:42
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Gordon Burditt, 20:34
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard, 20:19
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Mark Wooding, 20:19
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 20:19
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 20:01
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Spiros Bousbouras, 19:58
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 19:54
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 19:52
- Re: c to c++, Kenny McCormack, 19:51
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 19:50
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Ben Bacarisse, 19:46
- Re: Ike Naar, pete, 19:38
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 19:35
- Re: c to c++, Ben Bacarisse, 19:34
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Han from China, 19:25
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, James Kuyper, 19:24
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 19:22
- Re: Ike Naar, Golden California Girls, 19:10
- Re: c to c++, s0suk3, 19:01
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 18:39
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 18:26
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 18:19
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kenny McCormack, 18:14
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 18:02
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 17:49
- Re: Query for the group, GANHE DINHEIRO NA WEB, 17:34
- Re: c to c++, Ian Collins, 17:34
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, blacklight, 17:33
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 17:28
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 17:22
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 16:34
- Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), blue indigo, 16:09
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Andrew Smallshaw, 16:06
- Re: c to c++, Lew Pitcher, 16:04
- Re: c to c++, blacklight, 16:02
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Phil Carmody, 15:46
- Re: c to c++, Martin Ambuhl, 15:18
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 15:17
- c to c++, eminhanif, 15:14
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 15:00
- [OT] Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Nate Eldredge, 14:32
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 14:16
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 13:43
- Re: pointer to array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 13:43
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 13:38
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 13:36
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 13:31
- Re: Ike Naar, Flash Gordon, 13:14
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 13:11
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 13:02
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 12:43
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 12:42
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 12:35
- Re: Ike Naar, Ben Bacarisse, 12:26
- Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 12:25
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 12:19
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 12:14
- Re: pointer to array of structs, Malcolm McLean, 12:04
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 12:01
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 11:55
- pointer to array of structs, brownqued, 11:54
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 11:53
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 11:47
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 11:46
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 11:41
- Re: Ike Naar, Stephen Sprunk, 11:09
- Re: Ike Naar, Keith Thompson, 11:08
- Re: Ike Naar, Malcolm McLean, 10:55
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 10:50
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, James Kuyper, 10:40
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 10:35
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 10:22
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 09:31
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 09:30
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 08:55
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ben Bacarisse, 08:51
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, James Kuyper, 08:39
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Richard, 08:16
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:09
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 08:06
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:51
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), James Kuyper, 07:43
- Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., guidoreina, 07:42
- Re: Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., nick_keighley_nospam, 07:34
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 07:28
- Re: Query for the group, richard.townsendrose, 07:24
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:23
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Rui Maciel, 07:13
- Re: More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Rui Maciel, 07:09
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 06:54
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Antoninus Twink, 06:51
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Antoninus Twink, 06:47
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Antoninus Twink, 06:41
- Re: Ike Naar, Antoninus Twink, 06:31
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kenny McCormack, 05:51
- Memory leak in pthread_cancel with a detached thread., guidoreina, 05:50
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 05:43
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, guidoreina, 05:39
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 05:19
- Re: memcpy calls causing segmentation error, Han from China, 05:05
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 05:02
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 04:59
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 04:35
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 04:28
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 04:25
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 04:24
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 04:23
- New Enthiran Stills ------------>>>>> New Rajini Stills, rajini.enthiran.robot@xxxxxxxxx, 04:19
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 04:17
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Golden California Girls, 03:27
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 03:13
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 03:10
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 03:10
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 03:01
- memcpy calls causing segmentation error, ssylee, 02:54
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 02:40
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Stephen Sprunk, 02:25
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 02:23
- Re: simple region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson, 02:05
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 02:01
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 01:32
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 01:26
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Nate Eldredge, 01:20
- Re: Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Gordon Burditt, 01:09
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 01:04
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 00:58
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Richard Heathfield, 00:17
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Kaz Kylheku, 00:13
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 00:10
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Golden California Girls, 00:05
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 00:03
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 00:02
February 07, 2009
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Golden California Girls, 23:49
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 23:39
- More posts in clc than in clc++ ?, Tony, 23:34
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Gordon Burditt, 23:33
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 23:29
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 23:28
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 23:19
- you can save up to $18,435 on....., Deena Richards, 23:07
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 23:07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 23:05
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 23:00
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Kaz Kylheku, 22:54
- Han from China is off-topic, George Orwell, 22:52
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Han from China, 22:40
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 22:25
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 22:24
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 22:19
- http://nasawallpapers.page.tl >> Free Desktop Download Gallery High Top Quality Hot, Bold, Sexy & Bikini Hollywood Celebrities & Models, Bollywood Hot Actresses, New Bollywood Actors, Latest 2008 2009 Movies, Bollywood Premiers/Awards/Shows, Hot Couples & Mix, Best Cities, Sport Cars, Sport Bikes, Tennis Star Sania Maria & Maria Sharapova, Sarah Palin, Mysterious Wallpapers/Photos/Pics/Photographs, SEXY, LINGERIE And BIKINI, 22:16
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 22:14
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, CBFalconer, 21:53
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, CBFalconer, 21:44
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 21:43
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:37
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 21:33
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Harold Aptroot, 21:24
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 21:23
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 21:21
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 21:21
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 21:15
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 21:09
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 21:07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 21:07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 21:02
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 21:01
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 20:58
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', CBFalconer, 20:56
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 20:49
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 20:49
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 20:47
- Re: convert byte array into string, J. J. Farrell, 20:45
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Han from China, 20:40
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Golden California Girls, 20:31
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Keith Thompson, 20:31
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ian Collins, 20:26
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Golden California Girls, 20:25
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 20:22
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Keith Thompson, 20:19
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Ike Naar, 20:13
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 20:11
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Barry Schwarz, 20:11
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 20:11
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ian Collins, 20:07
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard, 20:06
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, J. J. Farrell, 20:03
- Re: Ike Naar, Han from China, 19:59
- Re: Integer Overflow, Kaz Kylheku, 19:53
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Bruce Cook, 19:49
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 19:48
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, J. J. Farrell, 19:45
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Bruce Cook, 19:44
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Bart, 19:38
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Hans Schneider, 19:33
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, Richard Heathfield, 19:33
- Re: passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 19:02
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Ike Naar, 19:02
- Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 19:00
- passing char arrays by reference, jackassplus@xxxxxxxxx, 18:59
- Re: A question, Marc_F_Hult, 18:49
- Re: (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Han from China, 18:10
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Kaz Kylheku, 18:05
- Re: Integer Overflow, Han from China, 18:00
- Re: Integer Overflow, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- (part1a) Han from China teached you C, Han from China, 17:37
- Re: Integer Overflow, geo, 16:54
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 16:49
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Richard Tobin, 16:40
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 16:33
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Kaz Kylheku, 15:44
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, lawrence . jones, 14:56
- Re: Where do I find..., Swapnajit, 14:37
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Nelu, 14:34
- Re: Question about sscanf and sprintf, Eric Sosman, 14:24
- Question about sscanf and sprintf, Bumbala, 14:16
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard Tobin, 14:16
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 14:05
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Kaz Kylheku, 14:01
- Jobs listings, work abroad, study abroad and jobs in your area., nicky boy, 12:50
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:47
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 12:37
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 12:09
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Lew Pitcher, 11:26
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Mark Wooding, 11:20
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 11:19
- Re: A question, Marc_F_Hult, 10:51
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Han from China, 10:00
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluei increment', Han from China, 10:00
- Re:, Han from China, 09:40
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:37
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China, 08:32
- Re: On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), pete, 08:29
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Phil Carmody, 08:27
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 08:06
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 07:57
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluei increment', Han from China, 07:50
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), pete, 07:32
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Ike Naar, 07:11
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Heathfield, 07:05
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 06:44
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Ike Naar, 06:01
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kenny McCormack, 05:31
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kenny McCormack, 05:28
- Re: Creating an Apache module, Antoninus Twink, 04:59
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 04:58
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 04:00
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:51
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:45
- On the interchangeability of (void *) and (char *) to printf(), Han from China, 03:40
- nice shopping plaza, top-ugg.com, 03:33
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Kaz Kylheku, 02:39
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Kaz Kylheku, 02:37
- Re: Integer Overflow, Curtis Dyer, 02:33
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Keith Thompson, 02:27
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Keith Thompson, 02:21
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Golden California Girls, 02:01
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 01:52
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 01:42
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Richard, 01:14
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Richard, 01:09
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', Kaz Kylheku, 01:00
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 00:59
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 00:39
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvaluein increment', CBFalconer, 00:38
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 00:35
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 00:13
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Han from China, 00:00
February 06, 2009
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Martin Ambuhl, 23:33
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Spiros Bousbouras, 23:12
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Kaz Kylheku, 22:58
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 22:55
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 22:52
- Re: Shelbyville, Jeßus, 22:48
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Golden California Girls, 22:44
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Golden California Girls, 22:29
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 22:24
- Re: convert byte array into string, CBFalconer, 22:19
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:11
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Han from China, 22:02
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Kaz Kylheku, 22:01
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Richard, 21:56
- Re: New to group, Mark Wooding, 21:53
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, CBFalconer, 21:53
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 21:51
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 21:47
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 21:45
- Re: Pointer difficulties, CBFalconer, 21:40
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 21:24
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Richard, 21:19
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Richard, 21:18
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 21:15
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 21:14
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 21:13
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 21:06
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 21:01
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: Creating an Apache module, Barry Schwarz, 20:30
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Barry Schwarz, 20:30
- Re: convert byte array into string, CBFalconer, 20:28
- Re: Integer Overflow, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: Integer Overflow, christian.bau, 20:07
- Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 20:02
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 20:02
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 19:51
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Mark Wooding, 19:49
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Mark McIntyre, 19:47
- Re: ridiculous, Mark McIntyre, 19:43
- Re: Creating an Apache module, Han from China, 19:43
- Re: New to group, Tony Holland, 19:42
- Welcome to comp.lang.c - topicality guidelines, Han from China, 19:40
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 19:33
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Mark Wooding, 19:31
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Gordon Burditt, 19:29
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 19:26
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, blacklight, 19:10
- Re: Creating an Apache module, blacklight, 19:06
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Ian Collins, 19:05
- Re: Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, Antoninus Twink, 18:41
- Creating an Apache module, mydancake, 18:37
- Linux equivalent of Windows SendMessage, B Rubble, 18:32
- Re: fibonacci's music, Default User, 17:07
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Default User, 17:03
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 17:03
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 17:03
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Anthony Fremont, 16:49
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 16:36
- Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 16:35
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 16:32
- Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 15:50
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 15:46
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:26
- Re: repeating fraction part, Mark Wooding, 15:26
- NVHOST Website Design & Custom Programming Supports Cancer Charities, shopbeenvied.nv@xxxxxxxxx, 15:10
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 15:07
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Richard Tobin, 15:06
- Re: fibonacci's music, Phil Carmody, 14:55
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 14:53
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Eric Sosman, 14:48
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Phil Carmody, 14:47
- Re: Pointer difficulties, John Bode, 14:43
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Phil Carmody, 14:39
- Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 14:27
- Draft paper submission deadline extended: SETP-09, sr, 14:03
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Ben Bacarisse, 14:03
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 13:52
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50(FREE SHIPPING), www.iofferkicks.com, 13:52
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 13:10
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Keith Thompson, 13:03
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Bart, 12:41
- Re: fibonacci's music, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, jameskuyper, 12:25
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Antoninus Twink, 12:24
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Keith Thompson, 12:23
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, George Petasis, 12:18
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, REH, 12:13
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jameskuyper, 12:03
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Don Bruder, 11:46
- Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 11:39
- Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 11:38
- Re: ridiculous, Richard Harter, 11:31
- Have you ever thought to know your intelligence level?, iq, 11:22
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:15
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 11:12
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 10:58
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 10:57
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Nelu, 10:57
- Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Lew, 10:51
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Harter, 10:48
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 10:47
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ben Bacarisse, 10:45
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:41
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, John Bode, 10:41
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Antoninus Twink, 10:37
- Re: Why do i get runtime error ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:37
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 10:27
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:22
- Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 10:17
- Why do i get runtime error ?, karthikbalaguru, 10:15
- Re: ridiculous, Charlton Wilbur, 10:09
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 10:09
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 10:08
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Chris Ahlstrom, 10:07
- Re: convert byte array into string, Anthony Fremont, 10:00
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Erik Trulsson, 09:47
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Guillaume Dargaud, 09:46
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:21
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 09:20
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 09:19
- Every click makes $ money, honeymoney, 09:16
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:13
- Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 09:09
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 09:04
- Re: ridiculous, Richard Tobin, 08:52
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 08:48
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Han from China, 08:17
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Han from China, 07:48
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 07:46
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, James Kuyper, 07:20
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Antoninus Twink, 07:12
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 07:08
- Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 07:08
- Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 07:01
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 06:59
- Offre d'emploi, succes344@xxxxxxxxx, 06:40
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Bruce Cook, 06:30
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, suchenwi, 06:28
- Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 05:51
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:47
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Ike Naar, 05:41
- Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Kenny McCormack, 05:10
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 05:07
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 04:46
- Re: Pointer difficulties, Martin Ambuhl, 04:41
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 04:40
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 04:39
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Richard, 04:35
- Re: Newbie here, Richard, 04:31
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 04:30
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 04:30
- Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Richard, 04:27
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ian Collins, 03:55
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 03:54
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 03:48
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 03:44
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Roedy Green, 03:41
- Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 03:35
- Re: Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 03:28
- Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 03:26
- Re: Pointer difficulties, user923005, 03:22
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 03:15
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:09
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:07
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 03:01
- Pointer difficulties, spasmous, 02:58
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 02:51
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 02:47
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 02:44
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Han from China, 02:33
- Re: Newbie here, usablevirus, 02:32
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 02:26
- Omega Constellation Quadra Watch, Best Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 02:26
- Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 02:25
- Concord Saratoga Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 02:25
- Jaeger LeCoultre Grande Taille Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 02:24
- Cartier Pasha Watch, Popular Wristwatch, tagheuerwatches99@xxxxxxxxx, 02:24
- Re: Shelbyville, Homer, 02:18
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Phil Carmody, 01:55
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, baeuar@xxxxxxxxx, 01:54
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, William Pursell, 01:54
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, baeuar@xxxxxxxxx, 01:48
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 01:38
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 01:05
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Han from China, 01:05
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 00:55
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 00:55
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Han from China, 00:33
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 00:22
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 00:06
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard Heathfield, 00:03
February 05, 2009
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Gordon Burditt, 23:55
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Ian Collins, 23:52
- Re: Newbie here, Richard Heathfield, 23:51
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 23:49
- Re: fibonacci's music, Phil Carmody, 23:46
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Phil Carmody, 23:44
- Re: fibonacci's music, Larry Gates, 23:28
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 23:19
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Larry Gates, 23:09
- A Lange & Sohne 1815 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 23:08
- Blancpain Villeret Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 23:08
- Audemars Piguet Canape Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 23:08
- Oris Williams F1 Watch, Popular Wristwatch, iwcwatches20, 23:08
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Gordon Burditt, 22:51
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Kaz Kylheku, 22:50
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, James Kuyper, 22:39
- Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 22:37
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 22:34
- Re: ridiculous, James Kuyper, 22:30
- Christian Audigier Men Outerwear Discount, shanqiuyu, 22:25
- Re: ridiculous, Han from China, 22:23
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 22:13
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 22:13
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Dik T. Winter, 22:12
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 22:08
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 22:03
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Han from China, 22:01
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 21:56
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Dik T. Winter, 21:55
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 21:47
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 21:33
- Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 21:25
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 21:23
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 21:08
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, pete, 20:53
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 20:29
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 20:23
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 20:22
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 20:07
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Harold Aptroot, 20:06
- Re: Integer Overflow, Richard Tobin, 19:58
- Re: convert byte array into string, J. J. Farrell, 19:57
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 19:47
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 19:47
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Ben Bacarisse, 19:38
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 19:36
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, J. J. Farrell, 19:17
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Joe Wright, 19:13
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kaz Kylheku, 18:50
- Re: Newbie here, Nick Theodorakis, 18:20
- Re: Query for the group, Stephen Quinn, 17:40
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 17:34
- Re: repeating fraction part, Gordon Burditt, 17:28
- Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 17:24
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Ian Collins, 17:12
- Re: Trollish spoofs (Was: Is void main() OK in this case?), Lew, 17:11
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 17:11
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 17:10
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, CBFalconer, 17:01
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Mark McIntyre, 16:53
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, CBFalconer, 16:50
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Antoninus Twink, 16:40
- Re: Newbie here, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: Integer Overflow, Peter Nilsson, 16:32
- Re: Newbie here, CBFalconer, 16:28
- Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 15:59
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Lew, 15:53
- Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 15:50
- Re: ridiculous, REH, 15:47
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Kaz Kylheku, 15:28
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kaz Kylheku, 15:16
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 15:14
- Re: A question, Lew, 15:10
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 14:36
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Keith Thompson, 14:29
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, Flash Gordon, 14:08
- Re: Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, dj3vande, 14:06
- Re: Query for the group, RHui000, 14:05
- Which entity in a system detects segmentation fault ?, syuga2012@xxxxxxxxx, 13:58
- Re: repeating fraction part, Martin Ambuhl, 13:52
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 13:34
- Re: ridiculous, REH, 13:24
- Re: ridiculous, Chris McDonald, 13:18
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, jameskuyper, 13:07
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, George Peter Staplin, 13:02
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Keith Thompson, 12:57
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 12:54
- Re: convert byte array into string, Anthony Fremont, 12:53
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Martin Ambuhl, 12:46
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, J. J. Farrell, 12:38
- Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 12:37
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 12:19
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Richard, 12:09
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Richard, 12:07
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 12:00
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Kenny McCormack, 11:59
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 11:58
- Re: ridiculous, John Bode, 11:52
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 11:48
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 11:42
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 11:39
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 11:29
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, InuY4sha, 11:29
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, William Pursell, 11:28
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Bart, 11:25
- Re: convert byte array into string, Bart, 11:18
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, chris, 11:17
- Re: Integer Overflow, Ben Bacarisse, 11:14
- Re: convert byte array into string, Lew Pitcher, 11:13
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Antoninus Twink, 11:11
- Re: convert byte array into string, Ben Bacarisse, 11:03
- Re: convert byte array into string, alessio211734, 10:58
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Ian Osgood, 10:49
- Re: Newbie here, Rav, 10:47
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Ian Osgood, 10:43
- Re: New to group, rossum, 10:42
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 10:39
- Re: how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 10:38
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, John Reiser, 10:36
- Re: repeating fraction part, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:35
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Richard, 10:24
- how does printf handle an unknown number of arguments, InuY4sha, 10:22
- Re: Integer Overflow, geo, 10:07
- Re: convert byte array into string, James Kuyper, 09:57
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Harold Aptroot, 09:52
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 09:52
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 09:51
- repeating fraction part, Tagore, 09:49
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Nelu, 09:47
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Antoninus Twink, 09:47
- Re: Newbie here, HeyBub, 09:46
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Eric Sosman, 09:43
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:43
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 09:38
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Bernhard Agthe, 09:30
- Re: A question, RedGrittyBrick, 09:21
- Re: Newbie here, Michael Mattias, 09:18
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 09:18
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:14
- Re: Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, Anthony Fremont, 09:07
- Re: Experiment: functional concepts in C, Ertugrul Söylemez, 08:48
- Assigning a bool a numeric value -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 08:39
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Ben Bacarisse, 08:27
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Cameron Laird, 08:19
- Re: Query for the group, Willie Moore, 08:16
- convert byte array into string, alessio211734, 08:13
- Re: ridiculous, fmassei, 08:11
- Re: Where do I find..., N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\), 08:08
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, Kenny McCormack, 07:56
- Re: language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, vippstar, 07:55
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Rex Ballard, 07:54
- Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 07:52
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k), 07:43
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, pete, 07:24
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Larry W. Virden, 07:21
- language extensions needed by linux /usr/include headers, jacob navia, 07:11
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", James Kuyper, 07:04
- Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 07:00
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, High Plains Thumper, 06:58
- Re: ridiculous, Richard, 06:56
- Re: ridiculous, Rui Maciel, 06:51
- Re: Newbie here, Gosi, 06:33
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, jacob navia, 06:30
- Re: structs, Paul, 06:29
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 06:22
- Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 06:11
- Re: Experiment: functional concepts in C, Paul Rubin, 05:58
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, Xah Lee, 05:53
- Re: New to group, richard.townsendrose, 05:40
- Re: Query for the group, richard.townsendrose, 05:39
- Re: Simple math parser ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:29
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, schlenk, 05:26
- Re: Newsgroup info, Sabine Dinis Blochberger, 05:23
- Re: New to group, rossum, 05:12
- Re: Where do I find..., Reinout Heeck, 05:07
- Re: Query for the group, Jane Sullivan, 04:23
- Re: A question, Jane Sullivan, 04:23
- Re: Newbie here, Jane Sullivan, 04:23
- Re: if (pointer) ?, David Thompson, 03:53
- Re: Newbie here, Maarten, 03:52
- Re: Newbie here, Phil Last, 03:51
- Re: ridiculous, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:41
- Re: ridiculous, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:38
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 03:03
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:01
- Re: Newbie here, Arnold Trembley, 02:43
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Bill Reid, 02:08
- pretty russian girls!, cool buddy, 02:06
- HOT LIVE NEWS on Your Mobile for free :), cliford baak, 01:27
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, red floyd, 01:12
- Re: Newbie here, David Fanning, 01:08
- Re: Hello, quick question, usablevirus, 01:05
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Zach, 00:49
- Re: Where's the FAQ?, zs0723, 00:46
- Re: ridiculous, Zach, 00:34
February 04, 2009
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Richard, 23:58
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Man-wai Chang ToDie (33.6k), 23:46
- Re: Newbie here, David E. Ross, 23:45
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Kaz Kylheku, 23:37
- Re: ridiculous, Richard, 23:30
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, Richard Harter, 23:23
- Re: Hello, quick question, Bradley K. Sherman, 23:12
- Re: ridiculous, Ian Collins, 22:45
- Re: structs, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:57
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 21:40
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, 21:07
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, James Kuyper, 21:06
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Richard Heathfield, 21:06
- Re: ridiculous, Richard, 21:05
- Re: Integer Overflow, Richard Tobin, 20:57
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 20:50
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', CBFalconer, 20:43
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, Aragorn, 20:40
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, CBFalconer, 20:31
- Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 20:11
- Re: Integer Overflow, Gordon Burditt, 20:09
- Re: ridiculous, CBFalconer, 20:08
- Re: Can't figure this code out, CBFalconer, 19:59
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ben Pfaff, 19:34
- Re: ridiculous, Han from China - Master Troll, 19:32
- Re: Integer Overflow, jameskuyper, 19:16
- Re: structs, Bill Cunningham, 19:09
- Re: Integer Overflow, user923005, 19:08
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Kaz Kylheku, 18:55
- Re: Integer Overflow, Peter Nilsson, 18:38
- Re: ridiculous, Larry Gates, 18:36
- Re: structs, jameskuyper, 18:33
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ben Pfaff, 18:31
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Integer Overflow, Tagore, 18:27
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Mark McIntyre, 18:25
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 18:19
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 18:16
- Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 18:13
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Richard Harter, 18:13
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Peter Nilsson, 17:57
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Keith Thompson, 17:55
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Default User, 17:46
- Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:33
- Re: structs, Scott David Daniels, 17:29
- Re: ridiculous, gw7rib, 17:25
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, ssylee, 17:22
- Re: ridiculous, John Bode, 17:21
- Re: initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, Ian Collins, 17:17
- initializing values of a pointer without using calloc, ssylee, 17:10
- Re: ridiculous, Kenny McCormack, 16:54
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard Heathfield, 16:30
- Re: ridiculous, Chad, 16:20
- Re: ridiculous, Antoninus Twink, 15:51
- Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Antoninus Twink, 15:46
- Re: structs, Richard, 14:52
- Re: structs, Bill Cunningham, 14:42
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Nelu, 12:28
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Bart, 12:18
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, J.O. Aho, 12:04
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Eric Sosman, 12:00
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 11:57
- Re: I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Keith Thompson, 11:56
- Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 11:46
- Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Rachel, 11:44
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Chris McDonald, 11:38
- I need a technical explanation on why I get 'error: invalid lvalue in increment', Chad, 11:33
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Keith Thompson, 11:17
- Re: Linux Bananed At My School, ray, 11:04
- The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 10:38
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 10:35
- Re: Simple math parser ?, Ben Pfaff, 10:30
- Romanian "Latin" and "Slavonic" words in the Sanskrit scripts, by Marin Barbulescu-Dacu, in 1936, hangeonos, 10:19
- Simple math parser ?, Guillaume Dargaud, 09:56
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 09:46
- hot hot sell!! high quality Abercrombie&Fitch t shirt,ANF sweater,A&F jeans, polo lacoste t shirt,ralph lauren polo shirt, burberry t shirt and so on, YEAH, 09:20
- pay-pal accept high quality celtics, lakers,NBA jersey Abercrombie t shirt, ANF jacket, ANF jeans, A&F Sweater, A&F Pant, ANF Fleece, A&F Long Sleeve, Ralph Lauren polo t shirt, Ralph Lauren polo wholesale, Ralph Lauren big pony, Ralph Lauren small pony, Ralph Lauren Sweater, Lacoste t shirt, Lacoste Sweater, Lacoste stripe polo shirts, Lacoste long sleeve, Burberry t shirt, Paul Smith polo t shirt, Paul Smith shirts,NBA Jersey, NBA Short ,Abercrombie bag, Abercrombie hat in www.spring-grass.com, YEAH, 09:19
- Re: structs, osmium, 09:12
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 09:12
- Re: conditional compilation, Richard Tobin, 08:49
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Ben Bacarisse, 08:07
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Barry Schwarz, 07:59
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 07:49
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:47
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:40
- Re: conditional compilation, Rouben Rostamian, 07:39
- Re: Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, jacob navia, 07:32
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, ln myshkin, 07:26
- conditional compilation, onkar . n . mahajan, 07:26
- Hot to compare source code with different multiling formatting?, bad . skipper, 07:20
- Confuzia intre geti si goti, hangeonos, 07:03
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 06:47
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, James Kuyper, 06:43
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, James Kuyper, 06:24
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Alex Buell, 05:07
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 05:04
- Chopard Happy Beach and Happy Fish Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 04:14
- Patek Philippe Golden Ellipse Watch, Best Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 04:14
- Cartier Ballon Bleu de Cartier Watch, Best Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 04:13
- Maurice Lacroix Calipso Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 04:13
- Breguet La Tradition Breguet Watch, Popular Wristwatch, zengjiangjin@xxxxxxxx, 04:13
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 04:13
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:56
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:45
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:32
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:28
- Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Tony, 03:20
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Flash Gordon, 02:53
- Re: compiling C code, Curtis Dyer, 02:47
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Flash Gordon, 02:43
- Re: Aliasing and optimization, Martin Ambuhl, 02:04
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Phil Carmody, 01:49
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, James Dow Allen, 01:34
- moto Mobile PSP Game & memory card, goodcheap@xxxxxxx, 01:34
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, goodcheap@xxxxxxx, 01:33
- Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Tim Hall, 01:28
- Aliasing and optimization, ln myshkin, 01:15
February 03, 2009
- Re: psych question about ignoring people, Zurikela, 23:58
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, bob young, 23:56
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 23:35
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 23:08
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Keith Thompson, 22:36
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Rockinghorse Winner, 22:29
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Bart, 22:05
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, pete, 22:01
- Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 21:51
- Re: ridiculous, Zach, 21:44
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Arne Vajhøj, 21:11
- Re: structs, Nelu, 21:09
- Re: structs, Keith Thompson, 21:08
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Ben Bacarisse, 20:52
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 20:52
- structs, Bill Cunningham, 20:48
- Re: ridiculous, Keith Thompson, 20:45
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Han from China - Master Troll, 20:38
- Michele Urban Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 20:37
- Baume & Mercier Classima Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 20:36
- Patek Philippe Calatrava Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 20:36
- Corum Bubble Mini Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 20:36
- Girard Perregaux Collection Lady Watch, Best Wristwatch, iwcwatches27, 20:36
- Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, The_LA_Flash, 20:30
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Zach, 20:29
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Zach, 20:21
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Kaz Kylheku, 20:20
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:15
- ridiculous, Zach, 20:13
- Re: C++ trap representations, Zach, 20:10
- Re: K&R analog, Zach, 20:09
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Zach, 20:09
- Re: question about the ISO standard, Zach, 20:08
- Re: compiling C code, Zach, 20:07
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Zach, 20:07
- Re: function call overhead, Zach, 20:07
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Ben Bacarisse, 20:04
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 19:58
- Re: What's the most elegant way of doing this?, user923005, 19:50
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 19:43
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 19:35
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 19:33
- ♀♂SELL NIKE SHOES AIR MAX 90 NEW 35$, wclxyj01@xxxxxxxxx, 19:22
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 19:19
- Re: K&R analog, Kaz Kylheku, 19:18
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Robibnikoff, 19:17
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Robibnikoff, 19:13
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Kaz Kylheku, 19:12
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Kaz Kylheku, 19:05
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, John Locke, 18:58
- fibonacci's music, oneearthone, 18:48
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, vicman, 18:45
- What's the most elegant way of doing this?, Alex Buell, 18:44
- Re: function call overhead, John Machin, 18:38
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, RoLo, 18:28
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., christian.bau, 18:22
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, dj3vande, 18:21
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, RoLo, 18:20
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 18:02
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 17:53
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, panamfloyd, 17:51
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 17:49
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, SkyEyes, 17:22
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Brian E . Clark, 17:06
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Default User, 17:02
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", 7, 16:53
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Phil Carmody, 16:50
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: Can't figure this code out, CBFalconer, 16:46
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Ian Collins, 16:44
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, nick_keighley_nospam, 16:39
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Lee, 15:52
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Han from China - Master Troll, 15:47
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Cary Kittrell, 15:44
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Christopher A . Lee, 15:33
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Syd M., 15:27
- Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Mike, 15:25
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", 7, 15:22
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 15:12
- Re: Who's your favorite American Idol ever?, Aaron, 15:11
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, John Baker, 15:05
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Mark McIntyre, 15:02
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., user923005, 15:02
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Christopher A . Lee, 15:01
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Default User, 14:50
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., user923005, 14:45
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 14:42
- Re: question about the ISO standard, amicus_curious, 14:39
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, J. J. Farrell, 14:10
- Re: Is void main() OK in this case?, Daniel Pitts, 14:08
- Re: K&R analog, user923005, 14:04
- Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 14:00
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jameskuyper, 13:57
- Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 13:54
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Mark McIntyre, 13:52
- Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 13:52
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Mark McIntyre, 13:47
- Re: compiling C code, Mark McIntyre, 13:46
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 13:43
- Re: Need a good anagram for my name, Mick Tully, 13:42
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 13:36
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Eric Sosman, 13:31
- Re: K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 13:24
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, D Herring, 13:11
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 13:10
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 13:01
- Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 12:54
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Phil Carmody, 12:49
- Re: Can anyone please explain this to me -- thanks, Lorenzo Villari, 12:47
- Re: More data definitions of the C variables, hhc314@xxxxxxxxx, 12:43
- Re: Can't figure this code out, jameskuyper, 12:39
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Steffen Schuler, 12:12
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50,FREE SHIPPING !, www.iofferkicks.com, 12:05
- Re: K&R analog, thomas . mertes, 11:58
- Re: K&R analog, thomas . mertes, 11:51
- Re: numerical result out of range, lawrence . jones, 11:39
- Re: K&R analog, Elros, 11:19
- Re: so why are atheists so pigheaded?, Bill M, 10:47
- Re: Christian interested in a mature debate, Bill M, 10:43
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Han from China - Master Troll, 10:00
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Bart, 09:31
- Re: Can't figure this code out, gw7rib, 09:21
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 09:00
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 08:51
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tauno Voipio, 08:46
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, WANG Cong, 08:21
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Rex Ballard, 08:09
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, James Kuyper, 07:36
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:17
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Ben Bacarisse, 07:10
- Re: compiling C code, C. (http://symcbean.blogspot.com/), 07:09
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", jacob navia, 06:41
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Jerry McBride, 06:40
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 06:32
- Re: question about the ISO standard, The Lost Packet, 06:29
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Jothy, 06:21
- Re: James Kuyper of Microsoft: "Linux has many disadvantages", Robin T Cox, 06:17
- Bitwise 2009 ($5000 prize money), birinder, 05:35
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 05:12
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, jacob navia, 04:50
- Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 04:47
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Kaz Kylheku, 04:43
- Re: C++ trap representations, anon, 04:42
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 04:34
- Re: numerical result out of range, jacob navia, 04:27
- Re: question about the ISO standard, Roy Schestowitz, 04:27
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:25
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Antoninus Twink, 04:06
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Les Neilson, 04:03
- Re: Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Ryan McCoskrie, 03:20
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Ludovic Brenta, 03:12
- Re: compiling C code, The Natural Philosopher, 03:10
- Re: compiling C code, Erwin Moller, 02:54
- Solving system of equations O(n =?) complexity doubt., cnoe, 01:28
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Zach, 00:43
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Jasen Betts, 00:43
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Larry Gates, 00:43
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Bill Reid, 00:41
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Ed Morton, 00:10
February 02, 2009
- Re: new to group - is there a FAQ?, Phlip, 23:28
- Christian Audigier Men Shirts, lingerliu17, 22:53
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Kaz Kylheku, 21:50
- Re: K&R analog, Richard Heathfield, 21:44
- Re: Can't figure this code out, pete, 21:40
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tim Greer, 21:33
- Re: K&R analog, Richard, 21:09
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Decimus Phostle, 21:08
- Re: K&R analog, user923005, 20:47
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Richard, 20:35
- Re: K&R analog, Kaz Kylheku, 20:12
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Kaz Kylheku, 20:05
- Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 20:04
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Peter Nilsson, 19:38
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, J. J. Farrell, 19:34
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Janaka, 19:27
- Re: Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, Han from China - Master Troll, 19:10
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Kaz Kylheku, 19:07
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Tim Greer, 19:03
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Antoninus Twink, 19:00
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 19:00
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Default User, 18:58
- Re: K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 18:54
- Re: Can't figure this code out, sln, 18:53
- Re: K&R analog, Keith Thompson, 18:46
- re: numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 18:44
- Re: K&R analog, Nelu, 18:44
- Re: C++ trap representations, Keith Thompson, 18:39
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 18:32
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 18:31
- Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 18:14
- K&R analog, Jeff R. Edgarson, 18:14
- Re: Can't figure this code out, Jim Gibson, 18:09
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Golden California Girls, 18:03
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Golden California Girls, 17:59
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 17:58
- Re: C++ trap representations, Golden California Girls, 17:56
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 17:55
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 17:51
- Re: C++ trap representations, Ian Collins, 17:47
- Re: C++ trap representations, Ian Collins, 17:44
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, J. J. Farrell, 17:22
- Re: reading in and parsing through a binary file, Nelu, 17:18
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Antoninus Twink, 17:00
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Antoninus Twink, 16:58
- reading in and parsing through a binary file, steve, 16:58
- Re: Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Antoninus Twink, 16:54
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 16:46
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 16:46
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Ian Collins, 16:40
- Re: What are the safest POSIX functions?, Ian Collins, 16:38
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 16:34
- Safe to get address of va_list function parameter?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 16:31
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Richard, 16:09
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Chris Friesen, 16:06
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Antoninus Twink, 15:51
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Eric Sosman, 15:43
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Lusotec, 15:35
- Re: C programming and the Linux kernel, Tim Greer, 15:34
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 15:28
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 15:25
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 15:24
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kenny McCormack, 15:23
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 14:50
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Phil Carmody, 14:41
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: main prototype pointless?, jameskuyper, 14:28
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Phil Carmody, 14:16
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, John Bode, 14:02
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, J. J. Farrell, 13:58
- Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2, 13:56
- Re: free problem, Andres Steinhilber, 13:56
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Han from China - Master Troll, 13:50
- Re: main prototype pointless?, Kevin D . Quitt, 13:32
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Huibert Bol, 13:14
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 12:00
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Han from China - Master Troll, 11:46
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, Nelu, 11:42
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:36
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, jameskuyper, 11:33
- Re: Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, Daniel Kraft, 11:30
- Simplying this conditional statement -- please help!, almurph@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 11:24
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, jameskuyper, 11:10
- Re: numerical result out of range, Lew Pitcher, 11:00
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Nate Eldredge, 10:50
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Aaron W . Hsu, 10:44
- Re: main prototype pointless?, Han from China - Master Troll, 10:25
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 10:21
- Fake killfiler Phil Carmody blows his game again, Han from China - Master Troll, 10:11
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Nelu, 10:06
- Re: main prototype pointless?, Nelu, 10:00
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Eric Sosman, 09:42
- Re: Inline not working properly in GCC?, Trent, 09:30
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:22
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Chad, 08:58
- Inline not working properly in GCC?, James Douglas, 08:58
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kenny McCormack, 08:57
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 07:59
- RE:Recent Unix Technology News!!!, Tekwits, 07:25
- Re: main prototype pointless?, jameskuyper, 07:00
- Re: main prototype pointless?, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:27
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 05:15
- Re: numerical result out of range, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:41
- Re: numerical result out of range, jacob navia, 04:39
- main prototype pointless?, Zach, 04:36
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:25
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 04:23
- Re: Resources about program design in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:14
- Dr.L.I.Cuesdean, alias Hangeonos, makes a try to learn you about the European Languages from the outset, hangeonos, 03:22
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 02:41
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 02:21
- Supply NFL Jerseys=20USD Mlb jerseys=20USD Nhl Jerseys=32USD(Wholesale Cheaper), cicitrade601, 02:16
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ian Collins, 01:46
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Phil Carmody, 01:37
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Golden California Girls, 00:33
- re: numerical result out of range, Richard Heathfield, 00:30
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Heathfield, 00:27
- Re: numerical result out of range, Richard Heathfield, 00:22
February 01, 2009
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Keith Thompson, 23:29
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 23:26
- re: numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 21:35
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 21:17
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, CBFalconer, 21:12
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 21:07
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 20:59
- Re: numerical result out of range, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: Resources about program design in C, pete, 20:12
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 20:09
- Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 19:54
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, J. J. Farrell, 19:38
- Re: numerical result out of range, Gordon Burditt, 19:37
- Re: numerical result out of range, Joe Wright, 19:32
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Ian Collins, 19:17
- Re: numerical result out of range, Ian Collins, 19:14
- Re: numerical result out of range, Lew Pitcher, 19:13
- Re: Resources about program design in C, John Bode, 19:03
- numerical result out of range, Maximilian, 18:59
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 17:50
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 17:28
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Brian Inglis, 17:28
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 17:28
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 16:31
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Mark McIntyre, 16:27
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Ian Collins, 15:27
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Golden California Girls, 15:06
- styleweb, stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx, 14:54
- styleweb, stylewebad@xxxxxxxxx, 14:53
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, William Pursell, 14:51
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Golden California Girls, 14:21
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Richard Harter, 13:35
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Nate Eldredge, 12:53
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 12:44
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Antoninus Twink, 12:01
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Harter, 11:38
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 11:37
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Lorenzo Villari, 11:30
- Re: [OT] Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Les Harris, 10:57
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Eric Sosman, 10:53
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Heathfield, 10:45
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 10:32
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 10:29
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, scholz . lothar, 10:29
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 10:27
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, scholz . lothar, 10:26
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 09:57
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 09:53
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 09:37
- Re: free problem, Barry Schwarz, 08:11
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:04
- Re: Another crazy new language effort - Language #42, Bill, 06:46
- Bollywood Hollywood Celebrities Junction called @ http://bollywoodwine.page.tl/, Sexy Katrina Kaif, 06:44
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Pete Becker, 06:42
- Re: Resources about program design in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:38
- Re: Constructing a scalar reference, Kaz Kylheku, 04:39
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Keith Thompson, 04:11
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 04:06
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Kaz Kylheku, 03:40
- Re: Resources about program design in C, Kaz Kylheku, 03:25
- (WWW.IOFFERKICKS.COM)nike shoes:$32,handbag:$35,NFL:$20,jean:$30,UGG boot:$50,FREE SHIPPING, www.iofferkicks.com, 03:21
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Kaz Kylheku, 03:09
- Re: Documented error values, Martin Ambuhl, 03:03
- Re: Pure virtual functions and multiple inheritance, Kaz Kylheku, 02:43
- Documented error values, Albert, 02:35
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, William Pursell, 02:19
- The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 00:10
- The $5 Dollar PayPal Money Making Method, woo, 00:08
January 31, 2009
- Supply New NiKE Air Jordan 24(30$) AirMax TN 10(23EURO) Luxury Porduct Free Shipping at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade601, 23:41
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, Richard Harter, 23:15
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, George Peter Staplin, 22:09
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Ian Collins, 21:49
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Wolfgang Draxinger, 21:39
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 20:24
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Rich Webb, 20:13
- Re: Forged articles - request for amnesty, rkiesling, 20:08
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Ian Collins, 19:56
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard Harter, 19:21
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, Richard, 19:04
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Richard, 19:02
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), Keith Thompson, 18:39
- Re: exit() values and the C standards?, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: A C style question and a review request (newbie alert), chris.j.smith.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:09
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:07
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Re: UNIX questions should be considered Semi-On Topic on clc, CBFalconer, 17:58
- Re: Which C Editor/IDE do you use?, Richard, 17:54
Privacy Policy