comp.lang.c (date)

January 31, 2009

January 30, 2009

January 29, 2009

January 28, 2009

Re: 'waitpid' query, Han from China - Master Troll, 23:54
Re: infinite loop, Mark L Pappin, 23:51
Re: infinite loop, Han from China - Master Troll, 22:45
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:07
Re: child exit status query, Kaz Kylheku, 21:38
Re: child exit status query, Richard, 21:13
Re: child exit status query, Richard, 21:10
Re: infinite loop, CBFalconer, 20:34
Re: child exit status query, Ben Pfaff, 19:52
Re: child exit status query, Ian Collins, 19:51
Re: portable printf of different size types, William Ahern, 19:35
Re: child exit status query, Ben Bacarisse, 19:19
Re: 'waitpid' query, Kenny McCormack, 19:07
Re: child exit status query, Ian Collins, 19:04
Re: child exit status query, Default User, 18:55
Re: child exit status query, Keith Thompson, 18:45
Re: child exit status query, Keith Thompson, 18:42
Re: child exit status query, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
Re: child exit status query, Ian Collins, 18:39
Re: child exit status query, Antoninus Twink, 18:25
child exit status query, Mike, 18:17
Re: portable printf of different size types, Antoninus Twink, 18:13
Re: validity of a pointer, Richard Heathfield, 17:50
Re: 'waitpid' query, Kaz Kylheku, 17:46
Re: portable printf of different size types, William Ahern, 17:45
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Bartc, 17:37
Re: 'waitpid' query, Antoninus Twink, 17:26
Re: Warning about constness (I think), CBFalconer, 17:21
Re: 'fork' query, Kaz Kylheku, 17:20
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, CBFalconer, 17:19
Re: infinite loop, CBFalconer, 17:16
Re: portable printf of different size types, Antoninus Twink, 17:13
Re: infinite loop, CBFalconer, 17:09
Re: portable printf of different size types, CBFalconer, 17:03
Re: 'waitpid' query, Antoninus Twink, 16:55
Re: validity of a pointer, CBFalconer, 16:55
Re: 'waitpid' query, Antoninus Twink, 16:37
Re: 'fork' query, Antoninus Twink, 16:34
Re: 'waitpid' query, Ian Collins, 16:27
Re: 'waitpid' query, Keith Thompson, 16:26
Re: 'fork' query, Ian Collins, 16:25
Re: infinite loop, Mark L Pappin, 16:23
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, jameskuyper, 16:22
'fork' query, Mike, 16:19
Re: Warning about constness (I think), Old Wolf, 16:13
'waitpid' query, Mike, 16:04
Re: infinite loop, Kaz Kylheku, 15:33
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Bartc, 15:09
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 14:32
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, lawrence . jones, 14:01
Re: validity of a pointer, Harald van Dĳk, 12:47
Re: validity of a pointer, Keith Thompson, 12:31
Re: validity of a pointer, Stephen Sprunk, 12:08
Re: Typedef-ing structs, Golden California Girls, 12:00
Re: validity of a pointer, James Kuyper, 11:52
Re: infinite loop, Stephen Sprunk, 11:29
Re: validity of a pointer, Harald van Dĳk, 11:04
Re: infinite loop, Keith Thompson, 11:01
Re: portable printf of different size types, James Kuyper, 10:58
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 10:55
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 10:53
Golden opportunity, Deepika, 10:29
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, James Kuyper, 09:52
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, James Kuyper, 09:46
Re: infinite loop, Eric Sosman, 09:43
Re: validity of a pointer, James Kuyper, 09:41
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Eric Sosman, 09:36
Re: validity of a pointer, James Kuyper, 09:30
Re: WINSCP for Linux, Kenny McCormack, 09:15
Re: infinite loop, Harold Aptroot, 08:12
Re: infinite loop, Martin Ambuhl, 07:59
Re: infinite loop, Bartc, 06:20
Re: validity of a pointer, Chris Dollin, 05:30
Re: validity of a pointer, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:24
Re: validity of a pointer, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:06
Re: Typedef-ing structs, Antoninus Twink, 05:02
Re: sequence points and the execution model, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:54
Re: sequence points and the execution model, Larry Gates, 04:02
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Keith Thompson, 03:51
Re: infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 03:42
Re: infinite loop, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:41
Re: infinite loop, Keith Thompson, 03:39
Re: infinite loop, karthikbalaguru, 03:33
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:23
Re: WINSCP for Linux, forkazoo, 02:59
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Richard Heathfield, 02:56
Re: infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 02:54
Re: portable printf of different size types, pete, 02:05
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, pete, 01:51
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, Richard Heathfield, 01:39
Re: infinite loop, karthikbalaguru, 01:38
Re: infinite loop, karthikbalaguru, 01:37
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Han from China - Master Troll, 01:33
Re: sequence points and the execution model, Larry Gates, 01:31
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, pete, 01:30
Re: exit() values and the C standards?, Golden California Girls, 01:27
Re: sequence points and the execution model, Larry Gates, 01:21
Re: validity of a pointer, pete, 01:18
Re: validity of a pointer, pete, 01:10
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, Ian Collins, 01:00
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, Richard Heathfield, 00:57
Re: infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 00:54
Re: Getting the 'routing' informations, Yevgen Muntyan, 00:45
exit() values and the C standards?, Zach, 00:43
Re: Typedef-ing structs, Richard Heathfield, 00:41
Re: Need clarity on structure alignment, Han from China - Master Troll, 00:39
Re: infinite loop, karthikbalaguru, 00:39
Re: sequence points and the execution model, Richard Heathfield, 00:24
Re: [POSIX & Win32API] Getting the 'routing' informations, Richard Heathfield, 00:06
Re: validity of a pointer, Richard Heathfield, 00:02

January 27, 2009

January 26, 2009

January 25, 2009

January 24, 2009

January 23, 2009

January 22, 2009

January 21, 2009

January 20, 2009

January 19, 2009

January 18, 2009

January 17, 2009

January 16, 2009

January 15, 2009

January 14, 2009

Re: C vs. C++, s0suk3, 23:57
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Keith Thompson, 23:52
Re: Bug analysis, Keith Thompson, 23:47
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Keith Thompson, 23:43
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Richard Harter, 23:36
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 23:35
Re: Q about passing data as a const array, Richard Harter, 23:27
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Han from China - Master Troll, 23:19
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Han from China - Master Troll, 22:51
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 22:35
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Han from China - Master Troll, 22:35
Re: Bug analysis, Richard Heathfield, 22:33
Re: Bug analysis, CBFalconer, 22:25
Re: Big numbers, Ben Bacarisse, 22:22
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Han from China - Master Troll, 22:11
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, CBFalconer, 22:11
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 21:56
Re: Bug analysis, Han from China - Master Troll, 21:55
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 21:53
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 21:49
Re: Big numbers, CBFalconer, 21:34
Re: Bug analysis, Richard Heathfield, 21:33
Re: Bug analysis, Richard Heathfield, 21:28
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Richard Heathfield, 21:27
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Spiros Bousbouras, 21:27
Re: C vs. C++, Keith Thompson, 21:00
Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal, Han from China - Master Troll, 20:45
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, cc, 20:31
Re: C vs. C++, Ian Collins, 20:24
Re: C vs. C++, Ian Collins, 20:18
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 20:11
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 20:02
Re: C vs. C++, Kaz Kylheku, 20:00
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 20:00
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 19:57
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 19:52
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 19:46
Re: Idea about trolls, Han from China - Master Troll, 19:36
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Peter Nilsson, 19:24
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Han from China - Master Troll, 19:10
Re: prg usin linkd list n files, CBFalconer, 19:07
Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal, CBFalconer, 18:56
Re: Q about passing data as a const array, CBFalconer, 18:51
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 18:45
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 18:34
Re: C vs. C++, Keith Thompson, 18:24
Re: C vs. C++, Han from China - Master Troll, 18:20
Re: C vs. C++, Han from China - Master Troll, 18:20
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Keith Thompson, 18:20
Re: C vs. C++, Han from China - Master Troll, 18:18
Re: C vs. C++, Kaz Kylheku, 18:08
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, CBFalconer, 18:03
Re: Idea about trolls, John Bode, 17:59
Re: pointer to function?, John Bode, 17:52
Re: [OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, Keith Thompson, 17:51
Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?, Keith Thompson, 17:45
Re: C vs. C++, Keith Thompson, 17:41
Re: Big numbers, James Kuyper, 17:40
Re: Bug analysis, CBFalconer, 17:39
Re: Bug analysis, CBFalconer, 17:36
[OFFTOPIC] Idea about trolls, vippstar, 17:35
Re: Beginner help, user923005, 17:34
Re: C vs. C++, Lew Pitcher, 17:29
Re: Big numbers, CBFalconer, 17:26
Re: Big numbers, CBFalconer, 17:23
Re: Beginner help, John Bode, 17:16
Re: Is this a Standard Portable C Program?, vippstar, 17:16
C programming music, Han from China - Master Troll, 17:15
Re: C vs. C++, CBFalconer, 17:13
Re: double cast to int reliable?, James Kuyper, 17:10
Re: C vs. C++, Bartc, 17:08
Re: C vs. C++, CBFalconer, 17:08
Re: C vs. C++, CBFalconer, 17:00
Re: Beginner help, Eric Sosman, 16:59
Re: Bug analysis, Eric Sosman, 16:56
Re: Beginner help, Spiros Bousbouras, 16:52
Re: C vs. C++, CBFalconer, 16:41
Re: Beginner help, asadfag, 16:40
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, William Pursell, 16:39
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Kaz Kylheku, 16:38
Re: double cast to int reliable?, CBFalconer, 16:36
Re: Beginner help, Eric Sosman, 16:27
Re: Bug analysis, John Doe, 16:17
Re: C vs. C++, Tony, 16:09
Beginner help, asadfag, 15:57
Re: Bug analysis, Eric Sosman, 15:07
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, user923005, 14:43
Re: C vs. C++, Jalapeno, 14:41
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Schwartz, 14:27
Re: C vs. C++, jacob navia, 14:06
Re: Bug analysis, John Doe, 14:06
Re: C vs. C++, Richard Tobin, 14:02
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Richard Tobin, 13:58
Re: C vs. C++, jacob navia, 13:47
Re: C vs. C++, jacob navia, 13:44
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Wolfgang Draxinger, 13:42
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Nate Eldredge, 13:20
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Falcon Kirtaran, 13:18
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 13:18
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Bertrand Mollinier Toublet, 13:08
Re: C vs. C++, REH, 13:07
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 13:02
Re: C vs. C++, jameskuyper, 13:00
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 12:58
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, jameskuyper, 12:51
Re: Bug analysis, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:50
Re: C vs. C++, REH, 12:50
Re: C vs. C++, jameskuyper, 12:46
Re: C vs. C++, REH, 12:46
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Falcon Kirtaran, 12:43
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 12:41
Re: C vs. C++, Ben Bacarisse, 12:39
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, David Resnick, 12:38
Re: C vs. C++, jameskuyper, 12:37
Re: pointer to function?, Richard, 12:30
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Ben Bacarisse, 12:29
Re: pointer to function?, Richard, 12:27
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 12:25
Re: C vs. C++, REH, 12:25
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Harald van Dĳk, 12:24
Re: C vs. C++, Bartc, 12:21
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Falcon Kirtaran, 12:21
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 12:16
Re: pointer to function?, John Bode, 12:12
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Ben Pfaff, 12:06
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, David Resnick, 11:58
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, jameskuyper, 11:57
Re: pointer to function?, Richard, 11:57
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 11:55
Re: pointer to function?, John Bode, 11:36
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Eric Sosman, 11:34
Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants, Keith Thompson, 11:30
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 11:29
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Phil Da Lick!, 11:25
Re: Default document viewer, Richard, 11:24
Re: Default document viewer, Keith Thompson, 11:20
Re: Default document viewer, Jack Klein, 11:10
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Richard Tobin, 11:08
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Jack Klein, 11:08
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 11:02
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Richard Tobin, 11:02
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 10:59
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 10:53
Re: C vs. C++, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:52
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Falcon Kirtaran, 10:43
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, jameskuyper, 10:40
Re: vsprintf without vsnprintf, Falcon Kirtaran, 10:40
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 10:38
vsprintf without vsnprintf, Guillaume Dargaud, 10:37
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 10:35
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 10:34
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, jameskuyper, 10:29
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 10:24
Re: C vs. C++, Laurent Deniau, 10:20
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 10:19
Re: C vs. C++, jacob navia, 10:11
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Richard, 09:48
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Richard, 09:47
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 09:46
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 09:45
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 09:43
Re: C vs. C++, Bartc, 09:19
Re: C vs. C++, Dik T. Winter, 09:19
Re: prg usin linkd list n files, Falcon Kirtaran, 09:16
prg usin linkd list n files, mittalkratika817@xxxxxxxxx, 09:05
Re: double cast to int reliable?, Eric Sosman, 09:05
Re: pointer to function?, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx, 08:59
Re: C vs. C++, William Hughes, 08:59
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:52
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:51
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:50
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, Richard, 08:37
Re: Bug analysis, Richard, 08:21
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Wolfgang Draxinger, 08:05
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, David Webber, 08:00
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Bartc, 07:47
Re: Bug analysis, Richard, 07:39
Re: C vs. C++, Richard, 07:33
Re: pointer to function?, Richard, 07:33
Re: pointer to function?, Moi, 07:18
Re: How to check for errors when inputting a number, Kenny McCormack, 07:03
Re: Q about passing data as a const array, James Kuyper, 06:54
Re: Big numbers, James Kuyper, 06:40
Re: Arithmetic conversions and integer constants, James Kuyper, 06:29
Re: malloc and free?, James Kuyper, 06:15
Re: C vs. C++, Chris M. Thomasson, 05:34
Re: C vs. C++, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:46
Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal, Han from China - Master Troll, 04:44
Re: Viewing the padded bytes, user923005, 04:11
Default document viewer, wizard, 03:59
www.cicigogo.cn Nike AirMax,nike shox,Air Jordan,air force one,dunk,Puma,Shox,UGG 8-35$, cicitrade400, 03:59
Re: Bug analysis, Tim Rentsch, 03:59
Viewing the padded bytes, karthikbalaguru, 03:41
Re: Q about passing data as a const array, Keith Thompson, 03:31
Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal, William Pursell, 03:03
Re: connecting alternative output stream to terminal, William Pursell, 03:00
Re: Comment on thread "Heathfield's errors", Qwertyioup, 02:37
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Han from China - Master Troll, 02:35
Q about passing data as a const array, Richard Harter, 02:27
Re: malloc and free?, Phil Carmody, 01:57
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Han from China - Master Troll, 01:30
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 01:14
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, user923005, 01:10
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, user923005, 01:00
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 00:50
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Han from China - Master Troll, 00:49
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Han from China - Master Troll, 00:40
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 00:39
Re: C vs. C++, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:25
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, user923005, 00:25
Re: Are ++ and -- operators really more efficient, Han from China - Master Troll, 00:19
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, user923005, 00:19
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Sjouke Burry, 00:18
Re: Bug analysis, George, 00:13
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, user923005, 00:13
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:10
Re: memcpy() with unitialised memory, Ben Pfaff, 00:10

January 13, 2009

January 12, 2009

January 11, 2009

January 10, 2009

January 09, 2009

January 08, 2009

January 07, 2009

January 06, 2009

January 05, 2009

January 04, 2009

January 03, 2009

January 02, 2009

January 01, 2009

December 31, 2008