comp.lang.c (date)
December 31, 2008
- Re: generic linklist, blargg, 17:40
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Barry Schwarz, 17:12
- Re: generic linklist, pete, 17:00
- Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson, 16:27
- Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham, 16:21
- Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham, 16:18
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Keith Thompson, 14:55
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Richard Harter, 14:17
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Les Harris, 14:07
- Re: Error handling in C, Willem, 13:48
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Malcolm McLean, 13:40
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Keith Thompson, 13:09
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Keith Thompson, 12:57
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Bartc, 12:57
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete, 12:50
- Re: Defacto standard string library, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:40
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete, 12:38
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete, 12:27
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Keith Thompson, 12:25
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Stephen Sprunk, 12:22
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, jameskuyper, 12:16
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete, 12:08
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., iofferkick@xxxxxxxxx, 12:01
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Antoninus Twink, 11:56
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Harter, 11:45
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Malcolm McLean, 11:41
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:31
- Re: Error handling in C, jameskuyper, 11:30
- Re: Error handling in C, Rick Dearman, 10:27
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Moi, 10:23
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:15
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Flash Gordon, 10:03
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:57
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, Eric Sosman, 09:53
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:45
- baufinanzierung übersicht,immobilienfinanzierung günstig,hausfinanzierung lebensversicherung,baufinanzierung volksbank,hartz iv eigenheimzulage,immobilien finanzierung ausland,baufinanzierung 4,haus kauf finanzieren,, soul3ss386, 09:38
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 09:25
- Re: Simple question regarding the use of ;, pete, 09:08
- Simple question regarding the use of ;, Andrew, 09:00
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete, 08:58
- Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2, 08:54
- Re: Graphing Convolution, viper-2, 08:50
- Re: node again.., Richard Tobin, 08:02
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Bartc, 07:50
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, James Kuyper, 07:48
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 07:42
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Malcolm McLean, 07:23
- Re: node again.., Moi, 07:18
- Re: Error handling in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:43
- Re: Error handling in C, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:21
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Laurent Deniau, 04:56
- Wholesale world famous brand bag(handbags) 25$-30$ - www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade101, 04:42
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Flash Gordon, 04:41
- Re: Graphing Convolution, vippstar, 04:33
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, user923005, 03:26
- Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, moreau . steve, 02:13
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, deostroll, 01:48
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Frank, 01:47
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, JC, 00:54
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, JC, 00:52
- Re: OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, dj3vande, 00:41
- OO and C: Still a Good Idea?, Tony, 00:07
December 30, 2008
- Re: node again.., CBFalconer, 23:06
- Re: Error handling in C, blargg, 22:48
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 22:20
- Re: node again.., Stephen Sprunk, 22:16
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson, 21:05
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", James Kuyper, 21:02
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, pete, 20:48
- Re: node again.., Keith Thompson, 20:43
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson, 20:41
- Re: node again.., Barry Schwarz, 20:32
- Re: node again.., Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: node again.., CBFalconer, 20:18
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", CBFalconer, 20:10
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Richard Heathfield, 19:28
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:22
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Gordon Burditt, 18:40
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 18:25
- Re: node again.., Stephen Sprunk, 18:14
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Flash Gordon, 17:09
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", James Kuyper, 16:52
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Bacarisse, 16:50
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, CBFalconer, 16:36
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 16:26
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 15:37
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", blargg, 15:31
- Re: node again.., Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, user923005, 15:04
- Re: node again.., Bill Cunningham, 15:01
- Re: node again.., Keith Thompson, 14:43
- Re: node again.., Obnoxious User, 14:43
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson, 14:34
- Re: Error handling in C, Keith Thompson, 14:24
- Re: Error handling in C, c prog fan, 13:44
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Eric, 13:41
- Re: Error handling in C, c prog fan, 13:40
- Re: C language, Richard Bos, 13:24
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Flash Gordon, 13:13
- node again.., Bill Cunningham, 13:11
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, __PaTeR, 12:10
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 12:06
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Malcolm McLean, 12:01
- Re: Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, Keith Thompson, 11:46
- Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, Eric Sosman, 11:34
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Pfaff, 11:32
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:29
- Re: Error handling in C, Golden California Girls, 11:29
- Different behaviour in different struct declaration types, __PaTeR, 11:27
- Graphing Convolution, viper-2, 11:26
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc, 11:22
- Re: Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, Flash Gordon, 11:22
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:18
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Keith Thompson, 10:48
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Stephen Sprunk, 10:44
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Malcolm McLean, 10:41
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Stephen Sprunk, 10:40
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Stephen Sprunk, 10:38
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", Ben Pfaff, 10:23
- Re: generic linklist, gw7rib, 10:22
- Re: "#define" vs "const int", jacob navia, 10:21
- "#define" vs "const int", Eric, 10:04
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Tobin, 09:40
- Call again a variadic function (... variable number of arguments) with same arguments that its variadic wrapper, moreau . steve, 09:16
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Eric Sosman, 08:49
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, jacob navia, 08:23
- Re: Asynchronous i/o?, Malcolm McLean, 08:19
- Asynchronous i/o?, deostroll, 08:07
- www.cicigogo.cn shirt Artful dodger Burberry Burberry ggg A&F man A&F, cicitrade101, 07:42
- Re: Error handling in C, Bartc, 06:27
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 06:13
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 06:05
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 05:53
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Phil Carmody, 04:49
- Utah Leather Huron M92532 Collection, chanelwatches, 03:39
- Juicy Couture Handbag Silver Gray 06003 Collection, chanelwatches, 03:39
- Marc Jabocs Handbag Cream 200861 Collection, chanelwatches, 03:39
- Hermes Birkin 30cm Togo Leather Bag Brown Silver Collection, chanelwatches, 03:39
- Monogram Canvas Pochette Orsay M51790 Collection, chanelwatches, 03:39
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 03:22
- Louis Vuitton Tahitienne PM Blueviolet Collection, bagsbags02, 01:51
- Damier Azur Saleya PM N51186 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:14
- Monogram Mini Lin Lin Saumur XL M95220 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:14
- Chanel Modern Flap Bag Black 352922A Collection, chanelwatches, 00:14
- Perforation Speedy 30 Perfo Fuschia M95180 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Chloe Bay Handbag Black 097 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Utah Six Card And Bill Holder M92074 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Balenciaga "Giant Part Time" Bag Coffee 084328 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Chanel Patent Leather Bag Red 20061 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Gucci NEW BRITT beige white bag Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
- Monogram Canvas Exentri Cite M51161 Collection, chanelwatches, 00:13
December 29, 2008
- Re: Error handling in C, Golden California Girls, 22:18
- Re: generic linklist, blargg, 21:35
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Dik T. Winter, 21:12
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc, 21:01
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Dik T. Winter, 21:00
- Re: [OT] English spelling (was: Order of passing of parameters?), Dik T. Winter, 20:47
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 20:18
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005, 20:18
- Re: reassigning pointers, christian.bau, 18:52
- Re: Defacto standard string library, christian.bau, 18:39
- Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Eric Sosman, 17:43
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Eric Sosman, 17:35
- Re: Defacto standard string library, CBFalconer, 17:34
- Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, CBFalconer, 17:29
- Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, CBFalconer, 17:24
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, jacob navia, 17:24
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 17:21
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005, 16:54
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005, 16:37
- Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham, 16:18
- Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005, 16:15
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Harald van Dijk, 15:22
- Re: Defacto standard string library, pete, 14:49
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, user923005, 14:41
- Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005, 14:40
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:35
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, user923005, 14:31
- Re: Defacto standard string library, user923005, 14:23
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 14:08
- Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Andrew McMeikan, 13:51
- Re: generic linklist, Barry Schwarz, 12:54
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Barry Schwarz, 12:54
- Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Harald van Dijk, 12:36
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Flash Gordon, 12:25
- Re: Defacto standard string library, Malcolm McLean, 12:20
- Defacto standard string library, Jon Harrop, 11:59
- Re: generic linklist, gw7rib, 11:57
- Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Keith Thompson, 11:34
- Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Keith Thompson, 11:29
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 11:23
- www.cicigogo.cn Nike AirMax,nike shox,Air Jordan,air force one,dunk, cicitrade101, 10:48
- Re: array, Daniel Molina Wegener, 10:25
- Re: problem with pthread_cancel, Kenny McCormack, 09:43
- problem with pthread_cancel, vamsi, 09:30
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, pete, 08:52
- Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack, 05:51
- Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack, 05:44
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 04:07
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 04:02
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Default User, 03:20
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:11
- Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:03
- Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:03
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 01:03
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, David Thompson, 00:38
- Re: initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, Keith Thompson, 00:07
December 28, 2008
- initialize two dimension array of pointers using memset, davoti, 23:47
- Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, James Kuyper, 22:44
- Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, dj3vande, 22:37
- Re: C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, Sjouke Burry, 22:26
- C compilers' behaviour for multiple function definition, RealCat, 21:13
- Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Ben Bacarisse, 20:04
- Re: fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Ben Bacarisse, 19:55
- Re: moving average, Ben Bacarisse, 19:18
- Re: moving average, osmium, 18:58
- moving averages, Bill Cunningham, 18:52
- Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham, 18:43
- fflush(stdin), scanf and a space, Tagore, 18:22
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, osmium, 18:21
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, J. J. Farrell, 17:36
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Eric Sosman, 17:31
- Re: Error handling in C, Richard Heathfield, 17:21
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Thad Smith, 16:58
- Re: moving average, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: C language, Doug Miller, 16:44
- Re: C language, george972, 16:37
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Tagore, 16:37
- Re: [OT] English spelling, George, 16:29
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, Ben Pfaff, 16:04
- Re: char is signed or unsigned?, osmium, 15:52
- char is signed or unsigned?, Tagore, 15:29
- Re: C language, Flash Gordon, 15:20
- Re: moving average, Keith Thompson, 14:53
- Re: C language, Keith Thompson, 14:39
- Re: moving average, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: C language, Malcolm McLean, 13:18
- Re: Error handling in C, Malcolm McLean, 13:05
- Re: moving average, Richard Heathfield, 12:17
- Re: moving average, osmium, 10:52
- Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack, 09:45
- Re: Error handling in C, Kenny McCormack, 09:40
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 06:54
- Re: moving average, Default User, 04:42
- Re: moving average, Keith Thompson, 01:38
- Re: moving average, Martin Ambuhl, 01:11
December 27, 2008
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 23:37
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 23:20
- Re: moving average, CBFalconer, 21:19
- Re: moving average, Ben Bacarisse, 21:12
- Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham, 21:07
- Re: moving average, osmium, 21:00
- Re: moving average, CBFalconer, 19:47
- Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse, 19:44
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, CBFalconer, 19:42
- Trolls (was: reassigning pointers), CBFalconer, 19:32
- Re: fifo algotithm, CBFalconer, 19:13
- Re: moving average, pete, 16:41
- Re: moving average, Bill Cunningham, 16:19
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Error handling in C, blargg, 14:16
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 14:07
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 13:49
- Re: Pass by reference?, Barry Schwarz, 13:17
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 12:52
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 12:44
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 12:35
- Re: Error handling in C, James Kuyper, 11:42
- Re: Error handling in C, blargg, 11:26
- Re: Pass by reference?, James Kuyper, 11:22
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 11:08
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 11:06
- Re: Pass by reference?, __PaTeR, 10:57
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 10:57
- Re: Error handling in C, Tony, 10:54
- Re: Pass by reference?, __PaTeR, 10:46
- Re: reassigning pointers, James Kuyper, 10:37
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 10:27
- Re: reassigning pointers, Richard Heathfield, 10:17
- Re: tr-alike character replace function, Anthony Fremont, 09:42
- Re: Pass by reference?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:30
- Re: moving average, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
- Re: Pass by reference?, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
- Profession Wholesale world famous brand bag(handbags) 25$-30$, cicitrade101, 06:39
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, Antoninus Twink, 05:07
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan, 03:53
- Re: moving average, Martin Ambuhl, 03:23
- Re: moving average, Joachim Schmitz, 03:08
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan, 02:36
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 01:52
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan, 01:23
- Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk, 01:02
- Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk, 00:52
- Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar, 00:49
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, vippstar, 00:42
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 00:33
- Re: reassigning pointers, Ben Pfaff, 00:32
- Re: reassigning pointers, Harald van Dijk, 00:15
- fgets not doing as I expect., Andrew McMeikan, 00:13
- Online Trading, money_maker, 00:10
- Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar, 00:09
December 26, 2008
- Re: reassigning pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:51
- Re: reassigning pointers, vippstar, 23:26
- Re: Financial libraries in C?, vippstar, 23:09
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Stephen Sprunk, 22:55
- Re: reassigning pointers, Chad, 22:54
- Re: Pass by reference?, Kenny McCormack, 22:34
- Re: fifo algotithm, Kenny McCormack, 22:32
- Re: Pass by reference?, pete, 22:20
- Re: reassigning pointers, Richard Heathfield, 21:25
- Re: reassigning pointers, Barry Schwarz, 20:33
- Pass by reference?, __PaTeR, 20:00
- reassigning pointers, Chad, 19:47
- Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse, 19:16
- Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse, 19:10
- Re: fifo algotithm, Barry Schwarz, 18:37
- Re: fifo algotithm, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: fifo algotithm, cerr, 18:13
- Re: fifo algotithm, cerr, 18:08
- Re: fifo algotithm, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), James Kuyper, 17:42
- Re: fifo algotithm, cerr, 17:30
- moving average, Bill Cunningham, 16:41
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson, 16:27
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., CBFalconer, 16:21
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins, 16:05
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman, 16:00
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 15:56
- Re: tr-alike character replace function, Mik, 15:15
- Re: fifo algotithm, Ben Bacarisse, 14:45
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson, 14:25
- Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Keith Thompson, 14:18
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson, 14:17
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Keith Thompson, 14:05
- Re: C language, tommyprep, 13:51
- C language, ikcchowdhury, 13:39
- Re: fifo algotithm, cerr, 13:04
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Barry Schwarz, 12:33
- Re: fifo algotithm, Barry Schwarz, 12:33
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Barry Schwarz, 12:33
- Re: fifo algotithm, Malcolm McLean, 12:22
- Re: fifo algotithm, Eric Sosman, 11:17
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean, 10:50
- fifo algotithm, cerr, 10:17
- Ensure your success in SCJP,SCWCD,OCP,OCA, Oracle, Java exams @TechFaq360.com, techfaq360.com@xxxxxxxxx, 09:55
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman, 09:48
- Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, omkar pangarkar, 09:32
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 09:31
- Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, Ulrich Eckhardt, 09:26
- Re: Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:12
- Displaying enum symbol names in GDB, omkar pangarkar, 08:59
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., pete, 08:56
- Re: Cosmetic Surgery Loans, Frithiof Jensen, 08:27
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:12
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean, 08:00
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:58
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., Ben Bacarisse, 07:47
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 07:37
- Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Anthony Fremont, 07:33
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 07:27
- Re: tr-alike character replace function, Ben Bacarisse, 07:24
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), c prog fan, 07:11
- Re: fgets not doing as I expect., William Pursell, 07:01
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tony Quinn, 07:00
- Re: tr-alike character replace function, William Pursell, 06:56
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Bartc, 06:46
- tr-alike character replace function, Mik, 06:16
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Peter, 05:24
- Funny Christmas wallpapers, theme & 15,999$/- per day, HAPPY NEW YEAR Funny Christmas wallpapers, theme Free Funny Christmas Wallpaper Software Downloads and earn 15,999$/-, 04:14
- Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Keith Thompson, 02:43
- Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Martin Ambuhl, 01:29
- Re: where is stdarg.h of gcc, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:20
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:15
- where is stdarg.h of gcc, mobile . parmenides, 01:11
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 01:07
- Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn ), ffffffffffff, 00:44
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 00:26
December 25, 2008
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan, 22:16
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz, 21:49
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, osmium, 21:36
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), William Pursell, 20:32
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson, 19:22
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Keith Thompson, 19:12
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, CBFalconer, 18:57
- [OT] English spelling (was: Order of passing of parameters?), CBFalconer, 18:48
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, CBFalconer, 18:13
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), s0suk3, 18:04
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 17:52
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan, 17:37
- Wish you Merry Christmas and a Happy & Prosperous New Year, ilogic consulting, 17:15
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper, 13:40
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:28
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 12:32
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz, 12:02
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Barry Schwarz, 12:02
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Thad Smith, 11:48
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, osmium, 10:50
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Ike Naar, 10:44
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Moi, 10:42
- Re: Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan, 10:10
- Cryptographic Hash: File vs Message?, Kenneth Kan, 09:59
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:58
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:31
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), August Karlstrom, 08:22
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Bartc, 06:39
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Harald van Dijk, 06:02
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Flash Gordon, 05:51
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, Barry Schwarz, 05:33
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk, 05:23
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Malcolm McLean, 03:53
- Re: Raising a Number doubt..?, user923005, 03:38
- Raising a Number doubt..?, cnoe, 03:11
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Keith Thompson, 02:11
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper, 00:11
December 24, 2008
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 22:24
- Re: A question on argument passing, M. Azam, 21:20
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 20:51
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 20:36
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx, 20:20
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg, 19:40
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg, 19:37
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk, 18:38
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk, 18:13
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins, 18:09
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk, 18:05
- Re: typedef v/s macro, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- typedef v/s macro, Tagore, 17:42
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Keith Thompson, 16:27
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 16:03
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg, 15:54
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg, 15:51
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper, 15:39
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, jameskuyper, 15:34
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, user923005, 15:18
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk, 14:23
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk, 14:20
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Harald van Dijk, 13:58
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Stephan Beal, 13:46
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, James Harris, 13:44
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Richard Heathfield, 13:08
- Re: Order of passing of parameters?, Ben Pfaff, 13:03
- Order of passing of parameters?, Tagore, 12:51
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 12:40
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Barry Schwarz, 12:27
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 12:15
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:07
- Re: Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Eric Sosman, 12:02
- Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper, 11:49
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper, 11:42
- Question regarding safety of a malloc(), Stephan Beal, 11:32
- Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake, 10:56
- Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake, 10:45
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 10:26
- Re: A question on argument passing, Keith Thompson, 09:51
- Re: A question on argument passing, Eric Sosman, 09:27
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Eric Sosman, 08:54
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Keith Thompson, 08:53
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, James Kuyper, 07:24
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper, 07:07
- Re: fgets problem, James Kuyper, 07:00
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody, 06:42
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, blargg, 06:40
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody, 06:33
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Antoninus Twink, 05:13
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 04:54
- Re: How to print like this?, Barry Schwarz, 04:42
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx, 04:28
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 04:27
- How to print like this?, JOYCE, 03:35
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE, 03:34
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 03:29
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 03:26
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 02:17
- Prada shoes (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn ), wholesalek, 02:16
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 02:07
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Heathfield, 01:48
- Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson, 01:24
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 01:08
December 23, 2008
- Re: Problem with realloc (I think), Eric Sosman, 23:50
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 23:41
- A question on argument passing, M. Azam, 23:14
- Problem with realloc (I think), DSF, 22:46
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, Dik T. Winter, 21:34
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:33
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody, 20:14
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody, 20:02
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 20:00
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins, 19:29
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper, 19:26
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 19:21
- Re: Cosmetic Surgery Loans, Clifford Heath, 19:16
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Jan Engelhardt, 19:13
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 18:44
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 18:24
- [OT] Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch, 18:09
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, Ian Collins, 17:58
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Eric Sosman, 17:55
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 17:52
- Re: va_list usage from multiple functions?, Harald van Dijk, 17:50
- Re: combination of a string and queries, user923005, 17:47
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: A question about pointer of array., lawrence . jones, 17:40
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, lawrence . jones, 17:39
- Re: query, Keith Thompson, 17:39
- va_list usage from multiple functions?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 17:32
- Re: query, Antoninus Twink, 17:27
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, jameskuyper, 17:22
- Re: Type-checking casts for GNU C, c prog fan, 17:06
- Re: query, Kenny McCormack, 16:39
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper, 16:37
- Re: query, jameskuyper, 16:34
- Re: query, Richard Heathfield, 16:06
- Re: query, Richard Heathfield, 16:05
- Re: query, CBFalconer, 15:56
- Re: query, jan olieslagers, 15:56
- Re: query, Richard Heathfield, 15:55
- Re: query, CBFalconer, 15:45
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 15:44
- Re: fgets problem, Richard Heathfield, 15:43
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 15:39
- Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer, 15:28
- Re: combination of a string and queries, Tagore, 15:17
- combination of a string and queries, Tagore, 15:15
- Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer, 15:15
- Type-checking casts for GNU C, Jan Engelhardt, 15:14
- Re: Cosmetic Surgery Loans, Michael A. Terrell, 15:10
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Flash Gordon, 13:46
- Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper, 13:28
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., user923005, 13:21
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Harald van Dijk, 13:04
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., jameskuyper, 12:35
- Re: Cosmetic Surgery Loans, Leo Lichtman, 12:11
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., user923005, 11:54
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, jameskuyper, 11:30
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Ben Bacarisse, 11:28
- Re: fgets problem, Ben Bacarisse, 11:09
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, user923005, 10:25
- Re: fgets problem, Antoninus Twink, 10:15
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Barry Schwarz, 10:11
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Tobin, 10:09
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg, 09:42
- Re: query, Keith Thompson, 09:34
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Keith Thompson, 09:30
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 09:28
- Re: query, osmium, 09:26
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, James Kuyper, 09:20
- Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, James Kuyper, 09:08
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Chad, 08:56
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 08:56
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., xyzzybill, 08:49
- Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake, 08:44
- Re: fgets problem, Kenny McCormack, 08:38
- Re: fgets problem, Alan Peake, 08:37
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper, 08:16
- query, swarnabl85, 08:14
- Re: fgets problem, Phil Carmody, 08:03
- Re: fgets problem, pete, 07:30
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, user923005, 07:18
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, user923005, 06:45
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE, 06:30
- iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 06:27
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody, 06:21
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, Phil Carmody, 06:08
- Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, Phil Carmody, 05:59
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Phil Carmody, 05:36
- Re: A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, Obnoxious User, 05:36
- Re: A question about pointer of array., vippstar, 05:26
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody, 05:12
- Re: Storing a pointer in an int?, Richard Tobin, 04:27
- A Question on Structure | struct seq_operation | New, RAKHE, 04:19
- Cosmetic Surgery Loans, tomhuges99, 04:12
- Storing a pointer in an int?, Evan Klitzke, 04:09
- fgets problem, Alan Peake, 03:37
- Part / Full Time Internet Jobs, manoj256sharma@xxxxxxxxx, 02:47
- Re: fgets problem, vippstar, 02:14
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg, 01:45
- Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson, 00:38
- Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson, 00:31
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, Peter, 00:15
December 22, 2008
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 23:57
- Re: fgets problem, vippstar, 23:51
- Re: pointer/linked List clarification, blargg, 23:48
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:07
- pointer/linked List clarification, Peter, 23:02
- Re: fgets problem, Barry Schwarz, 22:12
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield, 22:05
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 21:31
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield, 21:27
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., James Kuyper, 21:11
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard, 21:09
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Heathfield, 21:06
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard, 21:05
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard, 21:02
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Richard Heathfield, 21:01
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard, 20:56
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch, 20:56
- Re: offset, James Kuyper, 20:39
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 20:37
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Tim Rentsch, 20:22
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 20:10
- Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer, 20:01
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Keith Thompson, 19:44
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 19:43
- Re: fgets problem, vippstar, 19:40
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 19:33
- Re: fgets problem, CBFalconer, 19:26
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Richard Tobin, 19:20
- Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, CBFalconer, 19:18
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 19:13
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 19:05
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 18:59
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: offset, CBFalconer, 18:46
- Re: is byte allocated, Ian Collins, 18:38
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: A question about pointer of array., jameskuyper, 18:26
- Re: is byte allocated, CBFalconer, 18:23
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Harald van Dijk, 18:18
- Re: fgets problem, Eric Sosman, 18:08
- Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer, 18:03
- Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: fgets problem, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: fgets problem, Eric Sosman, 17:32
- Re: (slightly OT) info needed, c prog fan, 17:30
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., August Karlstrom, 16:46
- Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Eric Sosman, 16:11
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Harald van Dijk, 15:58
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Ian Collins, 15:55
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Keith Thompson, 15:39
- Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: (slightly OT) info needed, Mark McIntyre, 14:58
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Tim Rentsch, 14:55
- Re: (slightly OT) info needed, Antoninus Twink, 14:55
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 14:43
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Jujitsu Lizard, 14:23
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, lawrence . jones, 14:23
- Re: is byte allocated, Flash Gordon, 14:03
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 14:02
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Flash Gordon, 14:00
- Re: (slightly OT) info needed, Obnoxious User, 13:54
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:46
- (slightly OT) info needed, george972, 13:45
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:41
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:40
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:37
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 13:33
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:24
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Tim Rentsch, 13:19
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin, 12:05
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Jack Klein, 11:59
- Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Eric Sosman, 11:23
- Re: "Replace" function goes in overflow, Richard, 11:16
- Re: signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, Eric Sosman, 10:58
- "Replace" function goes in overflow, pater, 10:45
- signed and unsigned Sign bit doubt, hari, 10:10
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch, 09:54
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch, 09:39
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 08:25
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 08:14
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos, 07:06
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Richard Bos, 07:06
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 07:02
- Re: offset, James Kuyper, 06:25
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Tobin, 06:08
- For Sale: Premodded Video Game Consoles, Backups & Retro Stuff, wmic03, 05:58
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 05:52
- Footwear (paypal payment)www.king-trade.cn ), ffff, 04:15
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, ffff, 04:14
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Kenny McCormack, 03:59
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, s0suk3, 03:51
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, 张扬 Santa, 03:29
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, Martin Ambuhl, 03:17
- Re: offset, Stephen Sprunk, 02:21
- Re: Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, s0suk3, 01:29
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: typedef and pointers., David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: making bytes out of bits, David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: bitwise operator !!, David Thompson, 01:21
- Re: tree, David Thompson, 01:20
- Re: making bytes out of bits, David Thompson, 01:20
- Endless loop "--(end of buffer or a NULL)" in Flex++, 张扬 Santa, 00:13
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., iofferkicks007@xxxxxxxxx, 00:05
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:05
December 21, 2008
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 23:28
- Re: is byte allocated, Gordon Burditt, 22:59
- Re: is byte allocated, sinbad, 22:53
- Re: offset, Gordon Burditt, 22:41
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 22:22
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard Heathfield, 22:15
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 21:40
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse, 21:28
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 21:28
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 20:46
- Re: offset, Richard Heathfield, 20:46
- Re: offset, James Kuyper, 20:45
- offset, henry, 20:25
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 20:15
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 20:08
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 19:54
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 19:48
- Re: is byte allocated, Kenny McCormack, 19:40
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 19:39
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 19:38
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 19:36
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 19:30
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 19:29
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 19:25
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Keith Thompson, 19:22
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 19:15
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Flash Gordon, 19:06
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Flash Gordon, 18:32
- Re: is byte allocated, Gordon Burditt, 18:31
- Re: A question about pointer of array., pete, 18:24
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 18:04
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard, 18:02
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, vippstar, 17:40
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Harald van Dijk, 17:37
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku, 17:31
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard, 17:28
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Richard, 17:25
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, CBFalconer, 17:22
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: A question about pointer of array., CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer, 16:45
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer, 16:40
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 15:24
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Kenny McCormack, 15:12
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Kenny McCormack, 15:11
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, Richard Bos, 14:48
- Re: reading a config file, jan olieslagers, 14:37
- Re: Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, James Kuyper, 14:20
- Re: Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, Jack Klein, 14:19
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku, 14:18
- Re: obfiscated code, Kaz Kylheku, 14:04
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Jack Klein, 13:59
- [OT] Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Nate Eldredge, 13:55
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 13:49
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 13:48
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 13:45
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Nate Eldredge, 13:41
- Re: A question about pointer of array., James Kuyper, 13:38
- Error: sh: cannot duplicate fd 31 to fd 0: Bad file descriptor, bgold12, 12:52
- Re: reading a config file, Malcolm McLean, 12:13
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:12
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:06
- Re: is byte allocated, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:59
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Keith Thompson, 11:41
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Keith Thompson, 11:39
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont, 11:34
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Lassie, 11:33
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Lassie, 11:30
- Re: C is a Middle level language...., Coos Haak, 11:19
- C is a Middle level language...., adgaur . niit, 11:02
- Re: is byte allocated, Keith Thompson, 10:56
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 10:53
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Keith Thompson, 10:41
- is byte allocated, sinbad, 10:19
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin, 10:18
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 10:07
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont, 09:58
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard, 09:50
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Phil Carmody, 09:47
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Anthony Fremont, 09:38
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 09:31
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 09:26
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Richard, 09:15
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 09:13
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody, 09:06
- www.iofferkicks.com china cheap wholesale nike shoes,air jordan shoes,air force one shoes., www.iofferkicks.com, 08:59
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 08:56
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 08:48
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody, 08:42
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Phil Carmody, 08:18
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse, 08:08
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 08:04
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 08:02
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 08:00
- Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin, 07:45
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch, 07:41
- Re: Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, vippstar, 07:25
- Static-duration array objects beefing up the executable file size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:15
- Robotix, rahul, 06:20
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 06:18
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 06:14
- Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk, 06:01
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, td didi, 05:46
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku, 04:35
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku, 04:06
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Kaz Kylheku, 04:03
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 03:28
- Re: obfiscated code, Kaz Kylheku, 03:19
- Re: Basic doubt in datatypes of signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:17
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:12
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 03:03
- Re: gotoxy in linux?, Andrew McMeikan, 00:08
December 20, 2008
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 23:16
- Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson, 23:10
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Keith Thompson, 23:06
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 22:48
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 22:44
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 22:29
- Re: A question about pointer of array., blargg, 22:26
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Ben Bacarisse, 22:20
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 22:16
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 22:14
- Re: A question about pointer of array., pete, 22:14
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 22:10
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 22:09
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse, 22:05
- Re: A question about pointer of array., pete, 22:02
- Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse, 21:51
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse, 21:46
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ben Bacarisse, 21:42
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer, 21:37
- Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer, 21:31
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 21:23
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Keith Thompson, 21:12
- Re: generic linklist, pete, 21:11
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Anthony Fremont, 21:09
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 21:07
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 21:05
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, CBFalconer, 21:01
- Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson, 20:57
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Ben Bacarisse, 20:54
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 20:49
- Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse, 20:48
- Re: A question about pointer of array., Ian Collins, 20:44
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 20:44
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 20:43
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 20:38
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, CBFalconer, 20:23
- Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer, 20:19
- A question about pointer of array., 66650755, 20:18
- Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer, 20:11
- Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer, 20:03
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, MisterE, 18:16
- Re: total noob- call c function from c#, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin, 17:30
- total noob- call c function from c#, Adam Chapman, 17:29
- Re: reading a config file, Antoninus Twink, 15:41
- Re: reading a config file, Chad, 15:29
- Re: reading a config file, Richard Heathfield, 15:14
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Barry Schwarz, 14:38
- Re: reading a config file, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:17
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge, 14:13
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:01
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 13:46
- reading a config file, jan olieslagers, 13:38
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch, 13:16
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch, 13:09
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Tim Rentsch, 13:06
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:59
- Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk, 12:10
- Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk, 12:00
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge, 11:59
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Harald van Dijk, 11:45
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse, 11:12
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge, 11:12
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 10:50
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 10:47
- Re: pointer question, James Kuyper, 10:47
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper, 10:41
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 09:11
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 08:42
- Re: Merging Linked List in C, pete, 08:19
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 08:12
- Merging Linked List in C, dmp, 08:07
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 07:48
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 07:47
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 07:45
- Re: generic linklist, Richard, 07:29
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, pete, 06:57
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 06:54
- Re: obfiscated code, Richard Tobin, 06:04
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 05:55
- Wholesale Footwear Apparel Handbags(Nike Adidas Gucci Puma D&G) in china 8-35usd at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade101, 05:22
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 05:11
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard, 04:55
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:50
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 04:48
- Re: Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Barry Schwarz, 04:44
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 04:41
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 03:34
- Compiler-extension small int type promotion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:25
- Re: obfiscated code, Harald van Dijk, 02:16
- Re: pointer question, Martin Ambuhl, 00:25
December 19, 2008
- Re: generic linklist, pete, 23:26
- Re: obfiscated code, Nate Eldredge, 23:21
- Re: obfiscated code, pete, 23:15
- Re: obfiscated code, Richard Heathfield, 22:11
- Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson, 21:55
- Re: pointer question, Keith Thompson, 21:52
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, jkfffffffffff, 21:50
- Prada shoes (paypal payment)(www.gotoorder.cn ), jkfffffffffff, 21:50
- generic linklist, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 21:40
- Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer, 21:36
- Re: pointer question, Stephen Sprunk, 21:27
- pointer question, the . cool . dude . man, 21:16
- Re: obfiscated code, Ben Bacarisse, 20:25
- Re: simple region allocator..., Chris M. Thomasson, 19:55
- Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson, 19:46
- Re: obfiscated code, CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: Thanks to all, CBFalconer, 19:23
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 19:20
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 19:12
- Re: Big Tits Big Boobs, vippstar, 18:14
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones, 17:39
- Re: Big Tits Big Boobs, Charles Richmond, 17:19
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous, 17:15
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 16:56
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 16:41
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 16:38
- Big Tits Big Boobs, blady, 16:27
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 16:13
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 15:41
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete, 14:50
- Re: Example pdcurses, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:22
- Re: Example pdcurses, Flash Gordon, 14:17
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell, 13:42
- Re: Example pdcurses, jameskuyper, 13:38
- Re: Example pdcurses, vippstar, 13:33
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 12:24
- Example pdcurses, And ||, 11:39
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, rosario, 11:33
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 11:15
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 11:11
- HTTP://WWW.STREETCANDY.ORG, nikeshoe.nike30@xxxxxxxxx, 11:00
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete, 10:54
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 10:49
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 10:28
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Ben Bacarisse, 10:02
- Re: gotoxy in linux?, mstorkamp, 09:59
- Re: gotoxy in linux?, Joachim Schmitz, 09:58
- gotoxy in linux?, Psi, 09:53
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:14
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Bos, 08:40
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos, 08:40
- Re: generic linklist, xyzzybill, 08:06
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 07:46
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 07:38
- Optical Computing: special issue - Natural Computing, Springer, optical supercomputing, 07:22
- 15000$ per month, sapanapappu@xxxxxxxxx, 07:00
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Chris Dollin, 06:12
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Dik T. Winter, 06:11
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 05:47
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 05:34
- Re: obfiscated code, vippstar, 05:29
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Phil Carmody, 04:58
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz, 04:46
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 04:29
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, pater, 04:20
- Re: obfiscated code, Chris Dollin, 03:50
- Re: obfiscated code, Keith Thompson, 03:43
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin, 03:42
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Chris Dollin, 03:38
- Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR Jordans, salewholexian, 03:31
- Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR Jordans, salewholexian, 03:30
- Nike Jordans Fusion 23 AIR Jordan 22 Jordan Fusions 21 AIR Jordans, salewholexian, 03:30
- Re: obfiscated code, Richard Heathfield, 03:26
- obfiscated code, Mark, 02:48
- Re: A question about void pointers, David Thompson, 02:43
- Re: Thanks to all, Bill Reid, 01:55
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, sinbad, 00:28
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Barry Schwarz, 00:01
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Barry Schwarz, 00:01
December 18, 2008
- Thanks to all, dmp, 23:28
- Re: generic linklist, Richard Heathfield, 21:51
- Re: generic linklist, Chris M. Thomasson, 21:34
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous, 20:31
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Nomen Nescio, 20:20
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse, 19:58
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse, 19:33
- Re: generic linklist, pete, 19:05
- Re: generic linklist, CBFalconer, 19:02
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 18:38
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 18:31
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 18:28
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, CBFalconer, 18:22
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Moi, 17:27
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Hallvard B Furuseth, 16:49
- Re: generic linklist, Phil Carmody, 16:33
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 15:50
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, vippstar, 15:30
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge, 14:33
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Kevin D . Quitt, 14:23
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Phil Carmody, 14:20
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 13:46
- Re: generic linklist, John Bode, 13:35
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:25
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Ben Bacarisse, 12:23
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 11:31
- Re: Structures, Joachim Schmitz, 11:26
- Re: generic linklist, Chris Dollin, 10:18
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Chris Dollin, 10:17
- Re: Structures, Chris Dollin, 10:06
- Re: generic linklist, Eric Sosman, 09:39
- UGG shoes hot wholesale, yahoo808, 09:38
- Re: generic linklist, maverik, 09:35
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper, 09:23
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, August Karlstrom, 09:15
- generic linklist, aditya, 09:08
- Re: Structures, Richard Tobin, 09:04
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 09:01
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, James Kuyper, 09:00
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 08:55
- Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, nicolas . sitbon, 08:50
- Re: Structures, Joachim Schmitz, 08:49
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 08:42
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 08:40
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, James Kuyper, 08:21
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 08:18
- Re: Structures, Richard Tobin, 08:09
- Re: Structures, maverik, 08:09
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Anthony Fremont, 08:02
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, pete, 07:34
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:27
- Re: Structures, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 07:01
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Richard Tobin, 06:56
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz, 06:07
- Re: Structures, Chris Dollin, 05:38
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 05:37
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Chris Dollin, 05:36
- Structures, dmp, 05:32
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Antoninus Twink, 04:32
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Antoninus Twink, 04:27
- Re: float() function, jan olieslagers, 03:50
- Re: float() function, Martin Ambuhl, 03:33
- Re: float() function, Keith Thompson, 03:29
- Re: float() function, Richard Heathfield, 03:18
- float() function, jan olieslagers, 03:06
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Gordon Burditt, 01:30
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Sjouke Burry, 01:21
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:27
December 17, 2008
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Jujitsu Lizard, 22:56
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, Jack Klein, 22:30
- discount Air MAX LTD shoes, salewholexian, 21:57
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, salewholexian, 21:57
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz, 21:08
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz, 21:08
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Gordon Burditt, 20:48
- Returning structs, Nomen Nescio, 20:20
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 20:04
- Re: Returning structs, jameskuyper, 19:08
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge, 18:55
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, CBFalconer, 18:43
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, lawrence . jones, 18:33
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, christian.bau, 18:06
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: Returning structs, CBFalconer, 17:45
- Re: Stack depth, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:35
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Tobin, 17:23
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper, 17:03
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, jameskuyper, 17:01
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge, 16:54
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Keith Thompson, 16:32
- Meet Singles From All Over The World .. FOR FREE !!, zo0oma, 16:25
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Kevin D . Quitt, 16:21
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Tobin, 16:07
- Re: Stack depth, Bartc, 16:03
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joe Wright, 15:59
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Richard Tobin, 15:57
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, pete, 14:29
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, jameskuyper, 14:01
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 13:58
- Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse, 13:58
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge, 13:49
- Re: Stack depth, Richard Bos, 13:46
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos, 13:46
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Bos, 13:46
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, jameskuyper, 13:40
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Nate Eldredge, 13:23
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Eric Sosman, 13:17
- Re: Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, vippstar, 13:16
- Copying Aggregate Data Types in C, Jujitsu Lizard, 13:09
- Re: Stack depth, jameskuyper, 12:52
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, Nate Eldredge, 12:46
- Re: Stack depth, Jujitsu Lizard, 12:41
- Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Tobin, 12:17
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:44
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:40
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 11:38
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:35
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:28
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:27
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Chris H, 11:25
- Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse, 11:21
- Re: Valid C syntax., pete, 10:59
- Re: Valid C syntax., pete, 10:55
- Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Heathfield, 10:52
- Re: Valid C syntax., jameskuyper, 10:47
- Re: Valid C syntax., emoh, 10:08
- Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Eric Sosman, 09:38
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 09:14
- Re: Stack depth, James Kuyper, 07:58
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 07:50
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 07:13
- Re: get_defined_vars, Giulio Orrù, 07:07
- Re: Stack depth, Ben Bacarisse, 07:06
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 06:56
- Re: Help with system() call in C, Richard Heathfield, 06:44
- Help with system() call in C, sunny4frenz, 06:33
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc, 06:05
- Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield, 06:00
- Re: Returning structs, Richard Tobin, 05:39
- Re: Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, christian.bau, 05:26
- Re: Stack depth, Rainer Weikusat, 05:14
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 04:03
- Re: Returning structs, Antoninus Twink, 04:01
- NIKE AIR JORDAN FORCE FUSION SHOES AJF 5 V JORDANs 5 FUSION NIKE, salewholegou, 03:45
- Re: Stack depth, Keith Thompson, 03:22
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin, 02:39
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, Andreas Eibach, 02:38
- Re: Stack depth, Jujitsu Lizard, 02:16
- Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 01:48
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 01:48
- Storing setjmp()'s rv in a variable, s0suk3, 01:31
- Re: Stack depth, Gene, 01:28
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 01:17
- Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield, 01:14
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, tommyprep, 00:53
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Peter Nilsson, 00:46
- Re: gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Keith Thompson, 00:38
- gcc compiler options for K&R C code Options, Utkado, 00:27
December 16, 2008
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, pete, 23:57
- Re: Const Char & Char Const, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:56
- ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 23:54
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:46
- Re: Returning structs, James Kuyper, 23:40
- Const Char & Char Const, tommyprep, 23:39
- sizeof unpadded struct size, George Orwell, 23:18
- Re: Returning structs, CBFalconer, 22:30
- Re: get_defined_vars, Gordon Burditt, 22:09
- Re: get_defined_vars, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: Stack depth, Gordon Burditt, 21:49
- get_defined_vars, Giulio Orrù, 21:44
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Peter Nilsson, 21:42
- www.honestaaa.com wholesal nike jordan adidas prada gucci bape shoes ugg boot, honest08, 21:37
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Nomen Nescio, 21:30
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 21:09
- Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop, 21:03
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 21:01
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous, 20:49
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Anonymous, 20:34
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, J. J. Farrell, 19:10
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 18:38
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete, 18:37
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 18:35
- Re: Software anti-bugs, pete, 18:22
- Re: Returning structs, Nate Eldredge, 18:13
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Andrew Smallshaw, 17:59
- ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell, 17:55
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, pete, 17:39
- Re: Software anti-bugs, pete, 17:34
- Re: Returning structs, Eric Sosman, 17:28
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, pete, 17:23
- Re: Returning structs, Keith Thompson, 17:10
- Re: Returning structs, Richard Heathfield, 17:01
- Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop, 17:01
- Re: Returning structs, Jon Harrop, 16:56
- sizeof unpadded struct size, Nomen Nescio, 16:50
- Re: Stack depth, CBFalconer, 16:27
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, CBFalconer, 16:05
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl, 16:01
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, soscpd, 15:58
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, CBFalconer, 15:48
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 15:43
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: Noncompliant codes, CBFalconer, 15:27
- Re: Returning structs, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, CBFalconer, 15:21
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, CBFalconer, 15:14
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Andrew Smallshaw, 15:09
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Chris McDonald, 14:58
- Re: Stack depth, Andrew Smallshaw, 14:54
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Andrew Smallshaw, 14:49
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 14:30
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc, 13:57
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, John Bode, 13:55
- Re: Returning structs, jacob navia, 13:25
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Eric Sosman, 13:06
- Re: Making an executable file from a program, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, lawrence . jones, 12:43
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 12:37
- Re: Making an executable file from a program, Bartc, 12:33
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, James Kuyper, 12:25
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Bartc, 12:23
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 12:20
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:14
- Re: websit, jan olieslagers, 11:33
- Re: websit, Richard Heathfield, 11:32
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 11:30
- Re: Stack depth, Nate Eldredge, 11:11
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Dik T. Winter, 11:01
- Re: Stack depth, Dik T. Winter, 10:59
- Re: Stack depth, Richard Tobin, 10:24
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Joachim Schmitz, 10:21
- Re: websit, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:03
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 09:57
- websit, abhaysin59, 09:48
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 09:23
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:05
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Barry Schwarz, 08:55
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:50
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Eric Sosman, 08:48
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:40
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 08:40
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, vippstar, 08:29
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:29
- Re: comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:27
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY, 07:57
- comaprison b/w signed and unsigned, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 07:52
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 07:24
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:20
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, pete, 07:19
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Phil Carmody, 07:19
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:15
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Chris Dollin, 07:14
- Re: Stack depth, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:11
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, James Kuyper, 06:59
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody, 06:59
- Stack depth, karthikbalaguru, 06:57
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 06:55
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 06:28
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Martin Ambuhl, 05:38
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 05:08
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: sizeof unpadded struct size, Ian Collins, 04:56
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins, 04:54
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Antoninus Twink, 04:53
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:53
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 04:52
- sizeof unpadded struct size, sinbad, 04:52
- Re: Software anti-bugs, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:49
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:24
- Re: Making an executable file from a program, Flash Gordon, 04:20
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 04:14
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon, 04:01
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:47
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 03:38
- Re: Making an executable file from a program, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:35
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:17
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:13
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:01
- Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz, 02:45
- Re: Making an executable file from a program, Richard Heathfield, 00:28
- Making an executable file from a program, Sowrabh, 00:15
December 15, 2008
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:37
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 23:36
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, CBFalconer, 23:23
- Re: reading input from a system call, CBFalconer, 23:18
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 23:10
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 23:01
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 23:00
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:57
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 22:53
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Nomen Nescio, 22:50
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 22:42
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:36
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:31
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Anthony Fremont, 22:27
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Richard Heathfield, 22:24
- Re: Returning structs, James Kuyper, 22:24
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:19
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Eric Sosman, 22:13
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Ben Bacarisse, 22:13
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:07
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:05
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, CBFalconer, 22:03
- Re: Returning structs, Nate Eldredge, 21:56
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, CBFalconer, 21:54
- Returning structs, Jon Harrop, 21:48
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, CBFalconer, 21:46
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 21:41
- Re: Noncompliant codes, CBFalconer, 21:38
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, CBFalconer, 21:29
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Mark L Pappin, 20:57
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Tobin, 20:04
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:54
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 19:41
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Peter Nilsson, 19:08
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont, 18:58
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont, 18:52
- Corruption in Montavista and not in RedHat, Anonymous, 18:41
- Re: Software anti-bugs, user923005, 17:53
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman, 17:06
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 16:30
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, James Harris, 15:58
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, James Harris, 15:57
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nate Eldredge, 15:16
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, jameskuyper, 15:03
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 14:59
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 14:49
- ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous, 14:44
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 14:43
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Antoninus Twink, 14:39
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Eric Sosman, 14:31
- /*Apologize [OT]*/, George Orwell, 14:16
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Amandil, 14:13
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Default User, 13:49
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, jameskuyper, 13:49
- Re: /*Apologize [OT]*/, Joachim Schmitz, 13:46
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 13:43
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 13:41
- ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio, 13:40
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 13:38
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 13:35
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 13:32
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 13:29
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:28
- ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 13:27
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin, 13:25
- ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 13:25
- ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous, 13:24
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 13:22
- /*Apologize [OT]*/, c . prog . fan, 13:13
- ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio, 13:10
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 13:08
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman, 13:08
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 13:08
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk, 13:05
- ENV VAR addresses, Nomen Nescio, 13:00
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", pete, 12:55
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Ben Pfaff, 12:53
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin, 12:52
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk, 12:51
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin, 12:47
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 12:41
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 12:22
- ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 12:17
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 12:10
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody, 12:01
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 11:59
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nate Eldredge, 11:58
- Re: Max value of typedef-ed type?, Eric Sosman, 11:57
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Keith Thompson, 11:49
- ENV VAR addresses, George Orwell, 11:45
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Richard Heathfield, 11:40
- ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous, 11:33
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 11:26
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Keith Thompson, 11:18
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Phil Carmody, 11:17
- Max value of typedef-ed type?, Nikita The Spider, 11:13
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Richard Bos, 10:47
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Bos, 10:47
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 10:46
- Re: Pointer Type, pete, 10:35
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:31
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:26
- Re: Software anti-bugs, jameskuyper, 10:15
- Re: Where is max/min ?, pete, 10:09
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, jameskuyper, 10:00
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, soscpd, 09:59
- Re: Where is max/min ?, pete, 09:57
- Re: Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 09:46
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 09:35
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:34
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 09:33
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, soscpd, 09:29
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Joachim Schmitz, 09:26
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:26
- Re: Pointer Type, Lew Pitcher, 09:20
- Pointer Type, polas, 09:14
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 09:05
- Re: Where is max/min ?, vippstar, 09:02
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 09:02
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 08:59
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Eric Sosman, 08:55
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Chris Dollin, 08:52
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 08:42
- Re: Software anti-bugs, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:36
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack, 08:34
- Re: Software anti-bugs, M.Caggiano, 08:33
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:26
- Re: Software anti-bugs, James Kuyper, 08:21
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:12
- Software anti-bugs, M.Caggiano, 08:06
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:06
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody, 08:05
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:52
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:50
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:49
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack, 07:43
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack, 07:37
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Kenny McCormack, 07:36
- Re: Directory reading, James Kuyper, 07:32
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Phil Carmody, 07:27
- Re: array, Chris Dollin, 07:22
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Ben Bacarisse, 07:14
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:08
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Joachim Schmitz, 07:05
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Bartc, 06:59
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, James Kuyper, 06:57
- Re: Where is max/min ?, vippstar, 06:49
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin, 06:34
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 06:25
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, James Kuyper, 06:17
- ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous, 06:16
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097, 06:13
- ENV VAR addresses, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 06:13
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, nick_keighley_nospam, 05:07
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Richard Tobin, 04:59
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:57
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Tobin, 04:55
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:41
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:25
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:17
- Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia, 04:14
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody, 04:11
- Re: Directory reading, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 04:03
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:00
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Keith Thompson, 03:47
- Re: Queue Data Structure Question, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:41
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, rosario, 03:29
- Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia, 03:28
- Re: Where is max/min ?, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:26
- Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia, 03:20
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, David Thompson, 03:15
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, David Thompson, 03:15
- Re: A question about void pointers, David Thompson, 03:15
- Re: Directory reading, David Thompson, 03:15
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl, 03:15
- Re: Where is max/min ?, jacob navia, 03:05
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Martin Ambuhl, 03:01
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Keith Thompson, 02:53
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, Joachim Schmitz, 02:41
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:36
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Keith Thompson, 02:26
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:26
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 02:09
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Stephen Sprunk, 02:02
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Ian Collins, 01:51
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody, 01:44
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Nate Eldredge, 01:41
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Martin Ambuhl, 01:26
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Chris M. Thomasson, 01:24
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097, 01:11
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 00:44
- Re: Where is max/min ?, Richard Heathfield, 00:38
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Richard Heathfield, 00:36
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Harald van Dijk, 00:35
- Where is max/min ?, Steven Woody, 00:31
- Re: size of a struct without "sizeof", Richard Heathfield, 00:31
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 00:26
- size of a struct without "sizeof", srikar2097, 00:18
December 14, 2008
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:30
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:27
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:18
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Heathfield, 23:16
- executable file runs on some computers, not all, George Orwell, 23:05
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Keith Thompson, 21:55
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:12
- Re: Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Eric Sosman, 20:58
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, pete, 20:01
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Anthony Fremont, 20:00
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 19:31
- Pointer to a 2 dimensional array?, Louise Hoffman, 19:27
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Harald van Dijk, 19:09
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman, 19:03
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Richard Tobin, 18:50
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:18
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Mark McIntyre, 18:17
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman, 18:15
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre, 18:12
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Zero, 18:05
- Re: How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Zero, 18:04
- Re: reading input from a system call, Ben Bacarisse, 18:03
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 17:48
- ENV VAR addresses, Anonymous, 17:38
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- How to split this c file up in .c and .h ?, Louise Hoffman, 17:27
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Flash Gordon, 17:24
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 17:11
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Andrew Smallshaw, 17:02
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl, 16:57
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 16:51
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 16:49
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, steere_mark, 16:35
- Re: ENV VAR addresses, pater, 16:23
- Re: [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- [LINUX] ENV VAR addresses, pater, 16:10
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson, 15:28
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Malcolm McLean, 15:06
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Anthony Fremont, 14:32
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl, 14:03
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Martin Ambuhl, 13:56
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody, 13:50
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 13:39
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Kenny McCormack, 13:26
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 13:12
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell, 13:07
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Anthony Fremont, 13:01
- executable file runs on some computers, not all, George Orwell, 12:36
- Re: [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Anthony Fremont, 12:31
- [Mildlt OT] Queue Data Structure Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 11:59
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 11:44
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 11:39
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody, 11:02
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 10:58
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Phil Carmody, 10:57
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 10:55
- Re: reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers, 10:34
- Re: reading input from a system call, Kenny McCormack, 10:27
- Re: reading input from a system call, Malcolm McLean, 10:22
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Malcolm McLean, 10:17
- Re: reading input from a system call, Eric Sosman, 09:41
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, August Karlstrom, 09:40
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 09:26
- Re: reading input from a system call, Ben Bacarisse, 08:21
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, pete, 08:04
- Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar, 07:35
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 07:20
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 07:03
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 06:43
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 06:39
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Tobin, 06:33
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Richard Heathfield, 06:11
- Re: !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Keith Thompson, 05:59
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 05:58
- Re: Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth, Harald van Dijk, 05:58
- !!<====== Existence of a variable - Debunk a myth ======>!!, Zero, 05:34
- reading input from a system call, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 04:50
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Harald van Dijk, 04:43
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:17
- Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar, 04:06
- Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar, 04:03
- Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz, 03:49
- reading input from a system call, Anonymous, 03:38
- Re: reading input from a system call, Keith Thompson, 03:37
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 03:34
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, George Orwell, 03:10
- Re: reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers, 03:00
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anonymous, 02:58
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Old Wolf, 02:51
- Re: reading input from a system call, vippstar, 02:50
- Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz, 02:49
- Re: reading input from a system call, Kenny McCormack, 02:47
- Re: reading input from a system call, Joachim Schmitz, 02:46
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Old Wolf, 02:39
- reading input from a system call, jan olieslagers, 02:30
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jujitsu Lizard, 02:07
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 01:04
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 00:59
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 00:46
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:24
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:11
December 13, 2008
- Trade marketplace,fashion product,luxury Porduct,Discount Price.8$-35$, cicitrade101, 23:44
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:37
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 23:37
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 23:19
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 23:12
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse, 22:54
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:54
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 22:47
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:36
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake, 22:16
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 22:14
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Ben Bacarisse, 22:09
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:07
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:02
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 21:54
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 21:53
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 21:49
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 21:41
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse, 21:37
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake, 21:36
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 21:35
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, vippstar, 21:24
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 21:17
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, vippstar, 21:15
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, vippstar, 21:08
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 20:51
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097, 20:42
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake, 20:33
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 20:33
- Re: err: req for member in something not struct, Nate Eldredge, 20:21
- err: req for member in something not struct, Kyle Blake, 20:12
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre, 19:57
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Ben Bacarisse, 19:51
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anthony Fremont, 19:26
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 19:17
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 19:09
- Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Anonymous, 19:05
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, J. J. Farrell, 18:41
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 18:26
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jack Klein, 18:26
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 18:25
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Kenny McCormack, 16:39
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, jacob navia, 15:18
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, viza, 14:51
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Coos Haak, 14:35
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 14:31
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Coos Haak, 14:29
- Why not a redefinition?, Nomen Nescio, 14:10
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Keith Thompson, 13:52
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Keith Thompson, 13:48
- Re: tree, osmium, 13:45
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 13:24
- Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Jujitsu Lizard, 13:20
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Keith Thompson, 13:18
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Mark McIntyre, 12:58
- Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:32
- Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:28
- Re: Borked Pseudo Mailed, pater, 12:20
- Re: Why not a redefinition?, Nate Eldredge, 12:18
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Stephen Sprunk, 11:43
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Stephen Sprunk, 11:37
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097, 11:28
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097, 11:23
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, srikar2097, 11:16
- Re: malloc() and C compiler bickering, Harald van Dijk, 11:12
- Re: typedef and pointers., srikar2097, 11:08
- malloc() and C compiler bickering, srikar2097, 11:06
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Golden California Girls, 10:47
- Re: Noncompliant codes, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:45
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:28
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:18
- Re: Why not a redefinition?, Flash Gordon, 10:11
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ben Bacarisse, 10:07
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 09:53
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, vippstar, 09:34
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack, 09:28
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Ben Bacarisse, 09:27
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Kenny McCormack, 09:25
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Bartc, 09:23
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Richard Heathfield, 09:12
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Andrew, 08:52
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, vippstar, 08:24
- Re: Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:15
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 08:14
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 07:55
- [OFF-TOPIC] Animosity on the part of Mr Richard Heathfield, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:49
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 07:26
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Kenny McCormack, 07:20
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 06:28
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Joachim Schmitz, 05:18
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Richard Heathfield, 05:15
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 05:08
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Joachim Schmitz, 05:03
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon, 05:03
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Nate Eldredge, 02:15
- Re: Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, vippstar, 02:13
- Re: Why not a redefinition?, Nate Eldredge, 02:09
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Nate Eldredge, 01:46
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, William Pursell, 01:43
- Can anyone get mudflap to work properly?!, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:28
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:15
- Why not a redefinition?, Bo Yang, 01:03
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, vippstar, 00:49
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz, 00:30
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz, 00:30
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Barry Schwarz, 00:30
December 12, 2008
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Gordon Burditt, 23:55
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins, 23:42
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Ian Collins, 23:40
- Re: executable file runs on some computers, not all, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:22
- Borked Pseudo Mailed, Stylianos, 23:01
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 22:39
- Re: Noncompliant codes, vippstar, 22:29
- Re: typedef and pointers., Jack Klein, 22:18
- executable file runs on some computers, not all, Andrew, 22:00
- sweater, Boss clothes, Evisu t-shirt, Evisu clothes, Evisu hoody,, salewholexian, 19:39
- Air force one shoes (paypal payment)(www.king-trade.cn, salewholexian, 19:38
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, blargg, 19:30
- Re: typedef and pointers., blargg, 18:24
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Kenny McCormack, 18:22
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, jameskuyper, 16:21
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, George Orwell, 16:10
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, user923005, 16:06
- No scams plz! read only if you want to make money on internet, suppertravel@xxxxxxxxx, 15:42
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, George Orwell, 15:10
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore, 15:02
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Antoninus Twink, 14:53
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon, 14:49
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon, 14:47
- The Best Freelance Home Jobs, Pay You $700 monthly, ncus, 14:39
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 14:31
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 14:25
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Eric Sosman, 14:24
- Re: Noncompliant codes, Fred, 14:23
- Noncompliant codes, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 14:18
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore, 13:59
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard, 13:54
- sizeof() and a structure, Nomen Nescio, 13:50
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Keith Thompson, 13:23
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore, 12:57
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Richard Heathfield, 12:31
- Re: typedef and pointers., jameskuyper, 12:28
- Re: typedef and pointers., John Bode, 12:19
- Re: typedef and pointers., Richard Bos, 11:17
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Richard Bos, 11:17
- Re: typedef and pointers., Fred, 10:40
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon, 10:31
- Re: typedef and pointers., James Kuyper, 09:50
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:48
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon, 09:48
- Re: typedef and pointers., Ben Bacarisse, 09:34
- wholesale NFL Jerseys Mlb jerseys Nhl hockey jerseys www.cicigogo.cn sale NFL Jerseys Mlb jerseys Nhl hockey jerseys www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade101, 09:14
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 09:09
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore, 09:08
- Re: typedef and pointers., srikar2097, 09:02
- Re: typedef and pointers., viza, 08:51
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 08:47
- typedef and pointers., srikar2097, 08:41
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, srikar2097, 08:35
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, maverik, 08:14
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, James Kuyper, 07:42
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, virtual, 07:41
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, vippstar, 07:21
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Richard Tobin, 06:49
- Re: Can any C debugger catch this error?, Nate Eldredge, 05:03
- Can any C debugger catch this error?, virtual, 04:45
- Re: C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, nicolas . sitbon, 04:17
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 04:03
- C/Ubuntu ][ Problem in Buffer Overflow logic, Programmatore, 02:43
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Richard Heathfield, 02:39
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon, 02:21
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx, 02:19
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, jaysome, 01:57
- discount Air Max 88 shoes www.king-trade.cn, wholesalezhi, 01:20
December 11, 2008
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, James Kuyper, 23:33
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 23:08
- (OT) engines, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 22:50
- Re: array, Phil Carmody, 22:46
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Joe Wright, 22:37
- For more products pls visit: www.king-trade.cn, fffffffffff, 22:03
- For more products pls visit: www.king-, fffffffffff, 22:02
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Jack Klein, 21:56
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:00
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 20:34
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 20:20
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Andy, 20:16
- Re: array, Richard Heathfield, 20:02
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, CBFalconer, 19:55
- Re: (OT) engines, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:46
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:43
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:43
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:42
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:42
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:40
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:40
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:39
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:39
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:38
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:38
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:37
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:37
- Re: type compatible and const qualifier, Peter Nilsson, 19:36
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:36
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:36
- sizeof() and a structure, George Orwell, 19:27
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:46
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Keith Thompson, 18:34
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, user923005, 18:03
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Keith Thompson, 17:50
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Jujitsu Lizard, 17:47
- Re: array, blargg, 17:33
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Keith Thompson, 17:32
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, blargg, 17:28
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, CBFalconer, 17:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 17:01
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 16:57
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, Martin Ambuhl, 16:35
- Re: sizeof() and a structure, user923005, 15:37
- sizeof() and a structure, srikar2097, 15:31
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, jameskuyper, 15:27
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 15:18
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Alfie Noakes, 15:15
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jensen Somers, 15:07
- type compatible and const qualifier, nicolas . sitbon, 14:52
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Gordon Burditt, 14:42
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Keith Thompson, 14:39
- Re: (OT) engines, Keith Thompson, 14:35
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson, 14:26
- Re: Standard U32 typedef, Jensen Somers, 14:24
- Standard U32 typedef, Alfie Noakes, 14:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 14:01
- Re: (OT) engines, Martin Ambuhl, 14:01
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Eric Sosman, 14:00
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Azazel, 13:54
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard, 13:46
- Re: Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, Gordon Burditt, 13:11
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 12:53
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- Re: array, Nate Eldredge, 12:47
- Re: array, Richard Heathfield, 12:42
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 12:38
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 12:25
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, jameskuyper, 12:15
- Re: making bytes out of bits, jameskuyper, 12:10
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 12:05
- Re: array, Richard Heathfield, 12:04
- Re: array, jameskuyper, 11:50
- Re: (OT) engines, Antoninus Twink, 11:45
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 11:34
- Re: (OT) engines, viza, 11:34
- Re: array, viza, 11:29
- Re: array, Paul, 11:03
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 10:03
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard, 09:55
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Phil Carmody, 09:41
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:27
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Lew Pitcher, 09:25
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:24
- Re: array, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:19
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Phil Carmody, 09:17
- Re: array, Kenny McCormack, 09:06
- Re: array, Paul, 09:03
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, osmium, 09:02
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Phil Carmody, 08:56
- Re: array, Paul, 08:56
- Re: array, Anthony Fremont, 08:39
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, vippstar, 07:43
- Re: array, viza, 07:08
- array, Ivan, 06:56
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, James Kuyper, 06:47
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, Ian Collins, 05:22
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, viza, 05:22
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY, 05:06
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY, 05:03
- Re: typical problem in C... hot to solve, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:50
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 04:29
- Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:29
- typical problem in C... hot to solve, @$|-|. DUBEY, 04:08
- Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:01
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, virtual, 03:57
- Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:55
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 03:38
- Re: Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:35
- Retaining the value of the variable across dynamic library, Karthikeyan, 03:16
- Re: How to replace parts of a string with something else, Richard Heathfield, 02:09
- How to replace parts of a string with something else, Melroy, 01:10
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, Nate Eldredge, 00:45
December 10, 2008
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: tree, Barry Schwarz, 23:46
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, Jujitsu Lizard, 23:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 23:14
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 22:07
- Re: Assertions that give full function call stack, James Kuyper, 22:07
- Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper, 21:59
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 21:54
- Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson, 21:54
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Peter Nilsson, 21:53
- Assertions that give full function call stack, virtual, 21:50
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson, 21:48
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 21:47
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 21:37
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson, 21:35
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 21:32
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:23
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Peter Nilsson, 21:21
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 21:20
- Re: making bytes out of bits, James Kuyper, 21:05
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 21:04
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 20:39
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 20:27
- Re: Addressing multidimensional arrays, vippstar, 20:26
- Addressing multidimensional arrays, Baboon, 20:06
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 19:59
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 19:39
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 17:25
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Richard Heathfield, 16:31
- (OT) engines, Ken McD, 15:17
- Re: Linking fails, Richard Heathfield, 13:12
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, Ben Bacarisse, 10:47
- Re: Multiple definition of xxx, Andrew Smallshaw, 09:15
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Laurent Deniau, 08:59
- Multiple definition of xxx, Rob Amboss, 08:21
- Re: cypher, Kenny McCormack, 07:30
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, jacob navia, 05:39
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Antoninus Twink, 05:22
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Antoninus Twink, 05:08
- Re: tree, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:00
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Border, 03:32
- Re: Linking fails, Chris Dollin, 03:22
- Re: Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:08
- Re: cypher, Keith Thompson, 02:37
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, William Pursell, 02:35
- Re: cypher, Richard Heathfield, 02:01
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, sylar, 01:52
- Re: cypher, blargg, 01:18
December 09, 2008
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, Rahul, 23:53
- Re: Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, user923005, 23:00
- Re: cypher, Jujitsu Lizard, 22:55
- Algorithm for Pascal Triangle, dmp, 22:05
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 21:32
- tree, Bill Cunningham, 21:29
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar, 21:20
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 21:12
- Re: Linking fails, Gordon Burditt, 21:10
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Erik de Castro Lopo, 21:04
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, vippstar, 19:43
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 19:41
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 19:15
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar, 19:04
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar, 19:02
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:49
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, CBFalconer, 18:43
- Re: Linking fails, CBFalconer, 18:40
- Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Bacarisse, 18:39
- Re: what should be the output, Eric Sosman, 18:34
- Re: cypher, CBFalconer, 18:33
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:29
- Re: cypher, Richard Tobin, 18:27
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:24
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 18:15
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: Best Build Tool for large C projects, user923005, 18:01
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont, 17:33
- Re: C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo, 17:26
- Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham, 17:22
- Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar, 17:21
- Best Build Tool for large C projects, scholz . lothar, 17:21
- Re: what should be the output, vippstar, 17:19
- Re: what should be the output, Trent, 17:06
- Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper, 16:30
- Re: cypher, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont, 16:26
- Re: cypher, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: what should be the output, Eric Sosman, 16:10
- Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper, 16:05
- Re: cypher, Ian Collins, 16:05
- Re: what should be the output, Peter Nilsson, 16:05
- Re: what should be the output, Peter Nilsson, 16:02
- Re: what should be the output, jameskuyper, 15:56
- Re: what should be the output, Anthony Fremont, 15:55
- Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham, 15:49
- Re: what should be the output, Trent, 15:46
- Re: cypher, Bill Cunningham, 15:45
- what should be the output, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:17
- Re: Linking fails, Harald van Dijk, 14:28
- Re: Linking fails, Martin Ambuhl, 13:58
- Re: cypher, vippstar, 13:50
- Re: Real meaning of addresses, tfelb, 13:28
- Re: Real meaning of addresses, tfelb, 13:26
- Re: Linking fails, Joachim Schmitz, 12:53
- Re: Linking fails, pete, 12:47
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Keith Thompson, 12:44
- Re: Real meaning of addresses, pete, 12:44
- Linking fails, Klaus Pirker, 12:41
- Re: C99's variadic macros., Laurent Deniau, 11:42
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 11:28
- Real meaning of addresses, tfelb, 10:35
- Re: pointer questions, Chris Dollin, 10:33
- Very Cute And Very Sexy Blonde Stripping, Sexy18, 10:28
- Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam, 10:10
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, James Kuyper, 09:53
- Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper, 09:46
- Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:35
- Re: cypher, Hyuga, 09:35
- Re: making bytes out of bits, nick_keighley_nospam, 09:20
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 09:12
- Re: pointer questions, tfelb, 08:58
- Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:29
- Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:09
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 07:59
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, pete, 07:26
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, pete, 07:14
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 06:57
- Re: C99's variadic macros., SozzlyJoe, 06:27
- Re: Help, James Kuyper, 06:11
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, Alexander Dolgarev, 06:00
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, James Kuyper, 05:55
- Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper, 05:49
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 05:36
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, Rahul, 05:34
- Re: carriage return and fprintf, Alexander Dolgarev, 05:04
- carriage return and fprintf, Rahul, 04:58
- Re: cypher, Phil Carmody, 03:59
- Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:25
- Re: cypher, Richard Tobin, 03:25
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:12
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 03:12
- Re: making bytes out of bits, nick_keighley_nospam, 02:59
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Triple-DES, 01:58
- Re: cypher, Jujitsu Lizard, 01:43
- Re: cypher, Barry Schwarz, 01:24
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 01:24
- Re: cypher, Richard Heathfield, 00:14
December 08, 2008
- cypher, Bill Cunningham, 23:59
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Gordon Burditt, 22:38
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Jack Klein, 22:27
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 22:23
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Jack Klein, 22:21
- Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper, 22:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge, 21:29
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse, 21:09
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 21:07
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 21:05
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge, 20:58
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:22
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon, 19:30
- Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper, 19:13
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge, 19:12
- Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper, 19:05
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:50
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, CBFalconer, 18:34
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 18:30
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, CBFalconer, 18:16
- Re: Help, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Re: bitwise operator !!, lawrence . jones, 18:05
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 17:57
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 17:57
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 17:56
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 17:50
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, christian.bau, 17:32
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Martin Ambuhl, 17:21
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 17:19
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, jameskuyper, 17:06
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, John Bode, 15:54
- Bobbles revisited., Richard Harter, 15:29
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Phil Carmody, 15:03
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 14:57
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 14:54
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse, 14:29
- Re: Help, Flash Gordon, 14:27
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, Harald van Dijk, 13:51
- Re: integer and floating point casts queries, osmium, 13:49
- integer and floating point casts queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 13:29
- Re: bitwise operator !!, jameskuyper, 12:54
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Keith Thompson, 12:25
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 12:15
- Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:14
- Re: Duplicate code, jameskuyper, 10:39
- Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman, 10:34
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 09:50
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 09:47
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 09:45
- Re: Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 09:36
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 08:28
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Tobin, 08:25
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Old Wolf, 08:24
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 08:17
- Re: Duplicate code, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:15
- Re: Duplicate code, Bartc, 08:09
- Re: static cons v/s cons, James Kuyper, 07:48
- Re: Duplicate code, maverik, 07:41
- Re: Duplicate code, James Kuyper, 07:39
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Dik T. Winter, 07:34
- Re: static cons v/s cons, litchie, 07:14
- Duplicate code, c . prog . fan, 07:12
- Re: A question about void pointers, Chad, 06:48
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 06:28
- Re: Help, James Kuyper, 06:04
- Re: GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, vippstar, 04:54
- Re: Help, vippstar, 04:49
- GCC Optimisation Produces Different Results, Paul, 04:45
- Re: SETP-09 call for papers,, Kenny McCormack, 04:23
- Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:03
- Re: Help, vippstar, 03:49
- Re: Help, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:37
- Re: bitwise operator !!, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:29
- SETP-09 call for papers,, john, 03:17
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ian Collins, 03:03
- Re: slurping in binary data, William Pursell, 02:55
- Re: Help, Flash Gordon, 02:43
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Flash Gordon, 02:34
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 02:12
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 02:03
- Re: Help, Jujitsu Lizard, 00:27
- Re: Help, vippstar, 00:07
December 07, 2008
- Help, poonkodi, 23:11
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 22:52
- Re: making bytes out of bits, George, 22:36
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge, 22:35
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 22:34
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 22:24
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Heathfield, 21:47
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:17
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, James Kuyper, 21:01
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse, 20:59
- Re: bitwise operator !!, James Kuyper, 20:49
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Nate Eldredge, 20:47
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 20:36
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 20:32
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:28
- Re: Why this strange behaviour?, blargg, 20:23
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 20:20
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:16
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:11
- Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Bacarisse, 19:58
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:50
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:48
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Bartc, 19:45
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Ben Bacarisse, 19:41
- Re: Why this strange behaviour?, Barry Schwarz, 19:24
- Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:23
- Re: bitwise operator !!, CBFalconer, 19:21
- Re: Why this strange behaviour?, mattia, 19:18
- Why this strange behaviour?, mattia, 19:10
- Re: C99's variadic macros., Ben Pfaff, 19:06
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Joe Wright, 16:29
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Joe Wright, 16:14
- Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Eric, 14:53
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Antoninus Twink, 14:15
- Re: C99's variadic macros., Nate Eldredge, 14:14
- Re: C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo, 13:32
- C99's variadic macros., João Jerónimo, 13:28
- Re: static cons v/s cons, blargg, 13:12
- Re: bitwise operator !!, blargg, 13:04
- Re: static cons v/s cons, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:51
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:45
- Re: static cons v/s cons, Flash Gordon, 12:20
- Re: fclose failure conditions, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:18
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Flash Gordon, 12:10
- Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:05
- Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam, 12:03
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, James Kuyper, 11:48
- Re: reading a structure with pointer, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:27
- Re: static cons v/s cons, Zero, 11:21
- static cons v/s cons, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 11:12
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, nick_keighley_nospam, 11:01
- Re: A question about void pointers, Chad, 09:43
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Eric Sosman, 09:17
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Ben Bacarisse, 08:38
- Re: making bytes out of bits, pete, 08:30
- Re: Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:28
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Ben Bacarisse, 08:22
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Bartc, 08:19
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Ben Bacarisse, 08:06
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Ben Bacarisse, 07:56
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:43
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Bartc, 06:48
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 06:42
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Bartc, 06:29
- Re: bitwise operator !!, chang, 06:03
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie, 05:56
- Re: bitwise operator !!, Willem, 05:44
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, mathieu, 05:26
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk, 05:22
- Re: bitwise operator !!, chang, 05:16
- Re: bitwise operator !!, pete, 04:37
- bitwise operator !!, chang, 04:21
- Re: making bytes out of bits, Barry Schwarz, 03:59
- Array of pointer,multiple object and struct question?, Eric, 03:58
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Heathfield, 03:44
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk, 03:39
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson, 02:58
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson, 02:52
- Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan, 02:39
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 01:23
- Re: reading a structure with pointer, Mark L Pappin, 00:58
- Re: reading a structure with pointer, Martin Ambuhl, 00:45
December 06, 2008
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Richard Heathfield, 23:04
- making bytes out of bits, George, 22:38
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:52
- Re: reading a structure with pointer, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:47
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 21:31
- Re: reading a structure with pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 21:08
- Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 20:54
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Harald van Dijk, 20:36
- Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, CBFalconer, 20:33
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, CBFalconer, 20:25
- reading a structure with pointer, romesh, 20:24
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Keith Thompson, 20:18
- Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer, 20:11
- job wanted for good C/c++ programmer, amolaggarwal, 20:03
- Re: tokens concat, Ben Bacarisse, 20:02
- Re: C - malloc and user input, CBFalconer, 20:00
- Re: C - malloc and user input, CBFalconer, 19:56
- Re: slurping in binary data, Chad, 19:52
- Re: slurping in binary data, Chad, 19:39
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 18:15
- Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 16:58
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, George, 16:33
- Re: tokens concat, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: How to declare extern typedef struct?, Richard Tobin, 15:22
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- How to declare extern typedef struct?, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 15:04
- Re: tokens concat, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 14:58
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Ian Collins, 14:49
- Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan, 14:35
- Re: tokens concat, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 14:11
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 13:54
- Re: token concat, c . prog . fan, 13:52
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Kuyper, 13:17
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, blargg, 13:13
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin, 12:55
- Re: token concat, Thad Smith, 12:46
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin, 12:44
- Re: tokens concat, c . prog . fan, 12:39
- Re: Array vs Vector, Malcolm McLean, 12:33
- Re: strtok problem, Thad Smith, 12:18
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, James Kuyper, 11:46
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Harald van Dijk, 11:38
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie, 11:11
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, vippstar, 09:16
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, Eric Sosman, 09:06
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Bartc, 07:33
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Mark McIntyre, 07:29
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:04
- Re: Array vs Vector, Phil Carmody, 06:57
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Phil Carmody, 06:46
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Bartc, 06:33
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Phil Carmody, 06:31
- Re: cast to 'void *', James Kuyper, 06:28
- Re: C - malloc and user input, nicolas . sitbon, 06:24
- Re: C - malloc and user input, nicolas . sitbon, 06:22
- Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper, 06:16
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Martin Ambuhl, 05:56
- Re: tokens concat, viza, 05:49
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Kenny McCormack, 05:41
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, viza, 05:40
- Re: Portable way of testing if a function exist, nicolas . sitbon, 04:54
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 04:48
- Portable way of testing if a function exist, mathieu, 04:47
- Re: strtok problem, Zero, 04:40
- Re: cast to 'void *', nicolas . sitbon, 04:37
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Zero, 04:35
- Re: fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Richard Tobin, 04:33
- Re: strtok problem, Zero, 04:32
- fgetc - end of line - where is 0xD?, Zero, 04:17
- Re: token concat, Nate Eldredge, 04:06
- tokens concat, c . prog . fan, 03:58
- token concat, atorrses, 03:23
- Re: Directory reading, thomas . mertes, 03:20
December 05, 2008
- Array vs Vector, Anonymous, 23:40
- cast to 'void *', Anonymous, 23:30
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Heathfield, 23:20
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Richard Heathfield, 23:17
- Re: cast to 'void *', Mark, 21:30
- Directory reading, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 21:26
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Ian Collins, 19:34
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris, 19:33
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Keith Thompson, 19:05
- Re: fclose failure conditions, jameskuyper, 18:55
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson, 18:54
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Keith Thompson, 18:44
- Re: Array vs Vector, jameskuyper, 18:42
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin, 18:37
- Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer, 18:29
- Re: fclose failure conditions, CBFalconer, 18:26
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, CBFalconer, 18:23
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 18:21
- Re: Array vs Vector, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins, 18:08
- Re: Directory reading, CBFalconer, 18:04
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, Richard Tobin, 17:58
- Re: dynamically allocate array size using malloc, vippstar, 17:53
- dynamically allocate array size using malloc, SAUHING LEE, 17:32
- Re: cast to 'void *', Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: cast to 'void *', Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: cast to 'void *', blargg, 16:50
- +18! Hot girl sexy girl woman dance for mature older man! big boobs, hot ass, big booty tits breast, Hot sexy young girl woman, hot woman, sexy wo, sexy cougar babes, teens, bikini, virginman, girl18bebes, 16:40
- Re: Directory reading, mattia, 16:31
- Re: cast to 'void *', Martin Ambuhl, 16:17
- Re: fclose failure conditions, viza, 16:08
- Re: Directory reading, thomas . mertes, 15:39
- Re: cast to 'void *', Harald van Dijk, 15:12
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Keith Thompson, 15:11
- Re: cast to 'void *', blargg, 15:02
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Eric Sosman, 14:37
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Nate Eldredge, 13:56
- Re: strtok problem, rayw, 12:52
- strtok problem, rayw, 12:38
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, jameskuyper, 10:00
- Re: fclose failure conditions, jameskuyper, 09:56
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin, 09:50
- Re: fclose failure conditions, vippstar, 08:58
- Re: fclose failure conditions, vippstar, 08:57
- Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper, 08:34
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Richard Tobin, 08:28
- Re: fclose failure conditions, Bartc, 08:23
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, litchie, 08:19
- Free Domain Name for life. Supports for CNAME, A, MX, NS records! - Full DNS control - URL forwarding, srimo, 08:18
- Free Domain Name for life. Supports for CNAME, A, MX, NS records! - Full DNS control - URL forwarding, srimo, 08:17
- Re: fclose failure conditions, James Kuyper, 07:43
- Re: fclose failure conditions, ais523, 07:13
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Flash Gordon, 07:12
- fclose failure conditions, manu, 07:07
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Tobin, 06:31
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Chris Dollin, 05:34
- Re: Create multiple tree after calling self defined struct variable, nick_keighley_nospam, 04:58
- Re: Directory reading, Richard Tobin, 04:53
- Wonderful!!!!good news!!! luxury Products 8-35USD at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade, 04:32
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, George, 03:46
- cast to 'void *', George Orwell, 03:30
- Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Heathfield, 03:06
- Re: cast to 'void *', Ian Collins, 03:04
- cast to 'void *', Borked Pseudo Mailed, 03:00
- Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Heathfield, 02:51
- Re: cast to 'void *', Richard Heathfield, 02:47
- Re: Array vs Vector, Flash Gordon, 02:34
- Directory reading, Nomen Nescio, 01:40
- Re: cast to 'void *', Rolf Magnus, 01:03
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 00:28
- cast to 'void *', Mark, 00:15
- Create multiple tree after calling self defined struct variable, SAUHING LEE, 00:08
December 04, 2008
- Re: some queries, Barry Schwarz, 23:35
- Re: Directory reading, Phil Carmody, 23:30
- Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins, 22:46
- Re: Directory reading, Phil Carmody, 22:33
- Directory reading, George Orwell, 22:30
- Re: Array vs Vector, viza, 21:49
- Re: Directory reading, James Kuyper, 21:00
- Re: Directory reading, viza, 20:03
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris, 19:51
- Re: Directory reading, Default User, 19:37
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Keith Thompson, 19:37
- Re: Array vs Vector, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: Directory reading, CBFalconer, 19:31
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, CBFalconer, 19:17
- Re: Directory reading, Default User, 19:12
- Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer, 19:08
- Re: Directory reading, Chris McDonald, 19:05
- Re: Array vs Vector, CBFalconer, 19:04
- How to find out the weird character in the code, George Orwell, 18:59
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson, 18:37
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, John Bode, 18:23
- Re: Directory reading, Kenny McCormack, 18:07
- Re: Directory reading, Richard Tobin, 17:56
- Re: Directory reading, Default User, 17:51
- Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson, 17:51
- Re: Directory reading, Chris McDonald, 17:48
- Re: Directory reading, Default User, 17:40
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), christian.bau, 17:35
- Re: Directory reading, mattia, 17:17
- Re: Directory reading, Antoninus Twink, 16:38
- Re: Directory reading, mattia, 16:17
- Re: Directory reading, user923005, 15:41
- Re: Directory reading, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: Directory reading, Ian Collins, 15:24
- Re: Directory reading, vippstar, 15:24
- Directory reading, mattia, 15:19
- Re: Compiler Warning - TPA, Default User, 14:02
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), Ian Collins, 14:01
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Kenny McCormack, 13:44
- How to find out the weird character in the code, Nomen Nescio, 13:40
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Flash Gordon, 13:36
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Eric Sosman, 13:24
- Re: C - malloc and user input, jameskuyper, 13:20
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Keith Thompson, 13:18
- Re: C - malloc and user input, vippstar, 13:15
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Keith Thompson, 13:03
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Walter Banks, 12:50
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, jacob navia, 12:39
- Re: C - malloc and user input, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:36
- C - malloc and user input, srikar2097, 12:24
- Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 12:15
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Flash Gordon, 12:11
- How to find out the weird character in the code, Anonymous, 11:59
- Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type (proper), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:58
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, John Bode, 11:55
- Re: Compiler Warning, srikar2097, 11:55
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, dj3vande, 11:45
- Re: Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, jameskuyper, 11:43
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, jameskuyper, 11:39
- Re: some queries, Keith Thompson, 11:37
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., lawrence . jones, 11:22
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Eric Sosman, 11:12
- Finite list of things that vary with CPU-type, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:04
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Flash Gordon, 10:53
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, Richard Tobin, 10:50
- Re: How to find out the weird character in the code, 1230987za, 10:48
- How to find out the weird character in the code, 1230987za, 10:37
- Re: some queries, Bartc, 09:08
- Re: some queries, Ben Bacarisse, 09:05
- Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Tobin, 08:39
- Re: Array vs Vector, Richard Tobin, 08:24
- Re: Array vs Vector, Phil Carmody, 08:23
- Re: some queries, Phil Carmody, 08:15
- Re: Array vs Vector, nick_keighley_nospam, 07:43
- Re: Array vs Vector, s0suk3, 06:53
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 06:38
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 06:37
- Re: some queries, Phil Carmody, 06:37
- Re: some queries, James Kuyper, 06:35
- Re: some queries, viza, 06:32
- Re: Array vs Vector, Chris Dollin, 06:32
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Kuyper, 06:30
- Re: Array vs Vector, viza, 06:27
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris, 06:25
- Re: Array vs Vector, James Harris, 06:22
- Re: some queries, James Kuyper, 06:21
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 06:15
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 06:08
- Re: Array vs Vector, Martin Ambuhl, 06:03
- Re: Array vs Vector, Joachim Schmitz, 06:02
- Re: Array vs Vector, Martin Ambuhl, 05:56
- Re: Array vs Vector, cnoe, 05:52
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 05:36
- Re: Array vs Vector, Joachim Schmitz, 05:30
- Re: Array vs Vector, maverik, 05:26
- Profession Wholesale world famous brand bag(handbags) 25$-30$, cicitrade04, 04:58
- Array vs Vector, cnoe, 04:31
- Re: some queries, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:54
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:38
- Re: some queries, Keith Thompson, 03:35
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:34
- Re: some queries, Chris Dollin, 03:15
- Re: some queries, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:05
- Re: some queries, Richard Heathfield, 03:05
- some queries, c.lang.myself@xxxxxxxxx, 02:52
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Chris Dollin, 02:42
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 00:29
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, litchie, 00:28
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 00:21
December 03, 2008
- Re: void * and explicit cast, pete, 22:53
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 22:40
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Barry Schwarz, 21:56
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 20:25
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer, 19:55
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 19:51
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, blargg, 16:13
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones, 15:36
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, user923005, 15:36
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., lawrence . jones, 15:00
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 14:00
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Harald van Dijk, 13:47
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 13:37
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Antoninus Twink, 11:55
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 10:40
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, John Bode, 10:30
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Phil Carmody, 10:20
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 10:13
- Re: Is this some kind of hack, Keith Thompson, 10:11
- Re: Is this some kind of hack, James Kuyper, 10:07
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Flash Gordon, 10:06
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 09:52
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Flash Gordon, 09:35
- Re: Is this some kind of hack, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:30
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, nick_keighley_nospam, 08:17
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, viza, 08:07
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 08:02
- Re: Is this some kind of hack, viza, 08:01
- Is this some kind of hack, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:53
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell, 07:45
- Re: reading in multiple strings with scanf, viza, 07:43
- slurping in binary data, Nomen Nescio, 07:40
- reading in multiple strings with scanf, Heiko Schepanski, 07:23
- Re: slurping in binary data, Dik T. Winter, 07:08
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Anonymous, 06:31
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, James Kuyper, 06:30
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 05:55
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 05:55
- Prometric & Pearson VUE Exam Center - Cisco,Microsoft,Sun,HP,IBM,ITIL,Websense, Prometric Test center, 05:55
- writing uint16_t in a buffer, Anonymous, 05:35
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Tobin, 05:11
- www.cicigogo.cn shirt Artful dodger Burberry Burberry ggg A&F man A&F, cicitrade, 05:01
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Tobin, 04:50
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell, 04:26
- Re: slurping in binary data, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:12
- Re: learning C without an IDE, nick_keighley_nospam, 03:03
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Heathfield, 02:55
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 01:49
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Thad Smith, 01:15
- Re: (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, litchie, 00:00
December 02, 2008
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Peter Nilsson, 23:55
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, litchie, 23:34
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 23:19
- Re: void * and explicit cast, James Kuyper, 22:04
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 22:04
- (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 22:00
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 21:15
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 21:10
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Tim Rentsch, 21:04
- Re: learning C without an IDE, litchie, 20:59
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Heathfield, 20:46
- Re: z error, Tim Rentsch, 20:45
- Re: (part 45) Han from China answers your C questions, Tim Rentsch, 20:40
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 20:31
- Re: Question regarding prototypes for 0-ary functions., Tim Rentsch, 20:06
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 20:02
- volatile Keyword Question, Nomen Nescio, 20:00
- Re: learning C without an IDE, user1, 19:52
- Re: learning C without an IDE, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:45
- Re: tree example, Phil Carmody, 18:45
- what kind of function arguments iis this ??, George Orwell, 18:33
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 18:00
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Antoninus Twink, 17:38
- Re: learning C without an IDE, CBFalconer, 17:34
- Re: tree example, Bill Cunningham, 17:29
- Re: tree example, Bill Cunningham, 17:28
- Re: A question about void pointers, CBFalconer, 17:28
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman, 17:24
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 17:23
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Antoninus Twink, 17:17
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer, 17:08
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer, 17:05
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Peter Nilsson, 16:17
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Willem, 14:54
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, blargg, 14:39
- Re: learning C without an IDE, J. J. Farrell, 13:29
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, blargg, 12:55
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, jameskuyper, 12:12
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Flash Gordon, 11:18
- Re: Architecture design, Flash Gordon, 10:57
- Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3, 10:54
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Nick Keighley, 10:45
- Ideal girl dance WEBCAM ! Ideal boobs !, lolekk1223@xxxxx, 10:45
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Walter Banks, 10:36
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:23
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Mara Guida, 09:25
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman, 08:58
- Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), Chris Dollin, 08:57
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Bos, 08:54
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Chris Dollin, 08:48
- Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman, 08:46
- Re: Compiler Warning, Ben Bacarisse, 08:45
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Lorenzo Villari, 07:34
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Tetsuya, 07:33
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Bartc, 07:15
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Nick Keighley, 06:58
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Lorenzo Villari, 06:48
- Re: writing uint16_t in a buffer, Bartc, 06:37
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Richard Tobin, 06:33
- Re: Compiler Warning, Nick Keighley, 05:06
- Re: Architecture design, Nick Keighley, 04:56
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Nick Keighley, 04:47
- Re: learning C without an IDE, santoshsy, 04:47
- Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Nick Keighley, 04:37
- writing uint16_t in a buffer, Nomen Nescio, 04:20
- luxury Products - www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade04, 03:35
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Ian Collins, 03:34
- what kind of function arguments iis this ??, George Orwell, 03:02
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Richard Heathfield, 02:22
- writing uint16_t in a buffer, Alessio Sangalli, 02:08
- Re: Architecture design, Alessio Sangalli, 01:53
- Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3, 01:38
- Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Jujitsu Lizard, 01:02
- Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson, 00:59
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Jujitsu Lizard, 00:56
- Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, pete, 00:52
- Re: what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Gordon Burditt, 00:51
- Re: learning C without an IDE, darren, 00:17
- what kind of function arguments iis this ??, Sumit, 00:17
December 01, 2008
- Re: void * and explicit cast, pete, 23:52
- QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Nomen Nescio, 23:50
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 23:46
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 23:35
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, blargg, 22:46
- Re: A question about void pointers, James Kuyper, 22:45
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Jack Klein, 22:32
- Re: slurping in binary data, Barry Schwarz, 22:23
- Re: tree example, Barry Schwarz, 22:23
- Re: Compiler Warning, Barry Schwarz, 22:23
- Re: void * and explicit cast, James Kuyper, 22:18
- Re: learning C without an IDE, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:59
- Re: tree example, osmium, 21:52
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith, 21:41
- Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), user923005, 21:34
- Re: learning C without an IDE, user923005, 21:33
- Re: tree example, Ben Bacarisse, 21:33
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse, 21:28
- learning C without an IDE, Jason, 21:14
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, George, 21:11
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 21:05
- tree example, Bill Cunningham, 21:03
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 20:55
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 20:54
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Harald van Dijk, 20:43
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse, 20:42
- Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), Mark L Pappin, 20:34
- Re: void * and explicit cast, CBFalconer, 20:27
- Re: A question about void pointers, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: "Lost" (?) PDP11 C-compiler, any clues or info?, Rich Alderson, 20:14
- Re: What is this?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: "Lost" (?) PDP11 C-compiler, any clues or info?, Nate Eldredge, 19:42
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, George, 19:26
- Re: "Lost" (?) PDP11 C-compiler, any clues or info?, Al Kossow, 19:25
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 19:15
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 19:03
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 18:55
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 18:31
- Re: volatile in C99, George, 18:20
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, George, 18:11
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 18:03
- Re: "Lost" (?) PDP11 C-compiler, any clues or info?, user923005, 18:00
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, George, 17:57
- Re: void * and explicit cast, blargg, 17:54
- Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, CBFalconer, 17:54
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 17:49
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, CBFalconer, 17:48
- Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper, 17:21
- Re: Compiler Warning, Keith Thompson, 17:01
- Re: void * and explicit cast, pete, 17:00
- Re: A question about void pointers, jameskuyper, 16:56
- Re: void * and explicit cast, pete, 16:56
- Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: A question about void pointers, Jujitsu Lizard, 16:40
- Re: A question about void pointers, Jujitsu Lizard, 16:38
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 16:34
- Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman, 16:34
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 16:29
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, blargg, 16:15
- Re: A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 15:58
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman, 15:41
- Re: Searching for Link List Implementation (with requirements), user923005, 14:57
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 14:53
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman, 14:43
- Re: What is this?, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Harald van Dijk, 14:28
- Re: A question about void pointers, Eric Sosman, 13:02
- A question about void pointers, Richard Harter, 12:37
- Re: volatile in C99, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:36
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, jameskuyper, 12:24
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, lawrence . jones, 12:20
- Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper, 12:08
- Re: void * and explicit cast, jameskuyper, 12:06
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Richard Tobin, 11:55
- Re: void * and explicit cast, Jujitsu Lizard, 11:36
- Re: void * and explicit cast, maverik, 11:18
- Re: Compiler Warning, Nick Keighley, 11:17
- void * and explicit cast, regis, 10:56
- Re: Compiler Warning, s0suk3, 10:35
- Re: Compiler Warning, srikar2097, 10:35
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Walter Banks, 10:27
- Re: Compiler Warning, vippstar, 09:22
- Re: Compiler Warning, Bartc, 09:11
- Compiler Warning, srikar2097, 08:55
- tree, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 08:30
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 06:35
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, pete, 06:14
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, James Kuyper, 05:48
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete, 05:41
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, pete, 05:11
- Re: Valid C syntax., Chris Dollin, 04:48
- Re: **p vs. p[][], David Thompson, 04:40
- Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Harry Ebbers, 04:33
- Re: slurping in binary data, Nick Keighley, 04:32
- Re: slurping in binary data, Nick Keighley, 04:24
- Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Harry Ebbers, 04:22
- Re: slurping in binary data, Keith Thompson, 04:20
- get the time needed to process one function., George Orwell, 04:20
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Nick Keighley, 04:16
- Re: redefining functions, Nick Keighley, 04:09
- Wholesale world famous brand(shoes、bags、Apparel、Watch) in china 8-35usd at www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade, 03:54
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete, 03:37
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Nick Keighley, 03:22
- Re: tree, Nick Keighley, 03:15
- Re: slurping in binary data, Nate Eldredge, 03:10
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Barry Schwarz, 01:38
- Re: tree, Barry Schwarz, 01:38
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., MisterE, 01:37
November 30, 2008
- volatile Keyword Question, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 23:37
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Gordon Burditt, 22:14
- Re: tree, Ben Bacarisse, 21:58
- get the time needed to process one function., Borked Pseudo Mailed, 21:56
- get the time needed to process one function., Anonymous, 21:54
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 21:03
- Re: tree, osmium, 20:55
- Re: tree, Bill Cunningham, 20:41
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:39
- Re: tree, Ben Bacarisse, 20:28
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith, 20:26
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 20:16
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Thad Smith, 20:09
- tree, Bill Cunningham, 19:51
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 19:50
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., CBFalconer, 19:34
- get the time needed to process one function., George Orwell, 19:11
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Ben Bacarisse, 18:59
- Re: Free() and size of the process, christian.bau, 18:56
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Ben Bacarisse, 18:48
- Re: z error, Ben Bacarisse, 18:33
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:08
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 16:27
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, James Kuyper, 16:25
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Eric Sosman, 15:54
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Jujitsu Lizard, 15:53
- Re: volatile Keyword Question, Malcolm McLean, 15:39
- Re: z error, osmium, 15:20
- volatile Keyword Question, Jujitsu Lizard, 15:17
- Re: z error, Harald van Dijk, 15:15
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Malcolm McLean, 14:17
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Barry Schwarz, 13:51
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Bartc, 13:45
- Re: z error, Ben Bacarisse, 13:35
- Re: z error, Harald van Dijk, 13:33
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Ben Bacarisse, 12:34
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, S M Ryan, 12:20
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, S M Ryan, 12:15
- Re: Free() and size of the process, S M Ryan, 12:03
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Malcolm McLean, 11:54
- Re: z error, S M Ryan, 11:52
- Re: Free() and size of the process, Malcolm McLean, 11:47
- Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Heathfield, 11:46
- Re: redefining functions, rand mair fheal, 11:31
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Eric Sosman, 10:59
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, cnoe, 10:40
- "Lost" (?) PDP11 C-compiler, any clues or info?, sm6nnc, 09:53
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete, 08:55
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete, 08:51
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Eric Sosman, 08:46
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Bartc, 08:41
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., pete, 08:35
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Daffyduck, 06:57
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Antoninus Twink, 06:54
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Antoninus Twink, 06:48
- Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Tobin, 06:39
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Richard Tobin, 06:34
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell, 05:32
- get the time needed to process one function., Nomen Nescio, 05:30
- Unofficial Phone, ,the most cheap mobile phones from china ,30 kinds today, yingwen@xxxxxxx, 05:18
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Mark McIntyre, 04:52
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Mark McIntyre, 04:49
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, George, 04:30
- (part 3) Han from China's C learning program, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 04:26
- Re: volatile in C99, George, 01:59
- www.cicigogo.cn Nike AirMax,nike shox,Air Jordan,air force one,dunk,UGG,Adidas, cicitrade04, 01:50
- Valid C syntax., Nomen Nescio, 00:10
November 29, 2008
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., CBFalconer, 22:41
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Harold Aptroot, 22:25
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 22:15
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Ian Collins, 21:10
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., CBFalconer, 21:06
- Re: Valid C syntax., CBFalconer, 21:01
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, CBFalconer, 20:54
- get the time needed to process one function., Nomen Nescio, 20:50
- Re: Unable to bind a 2nd time if recv receives all bytes sent, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, CBFalconer, 20:40
- get the time needed to process one function., Borked Pseudo Mailed, 20:30
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Barry Schwarz, 20:23
- Re: get the time needed to process one function., Ian Collins, 20:02
- get the time needed to process one function., George Orwell, 19:40
- Re: Valid C syntax., Richard Heathfield, 19:33
- Re: Valid C syntax., Starfish, 19:24
- The logic behind the C standard header files, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 19:03
- get the time needed to process one function., Daffyduck, 18:48
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Richard Heathfield, 18:40
- Re: Valid C syntax., pete, 18:33
- Re: slurping in binary data, Chad, 18:12
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Andrew Smallshaw, 17:59
- Re: What is this?, Ben Bacarisse, 17:57
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, blargg, 17:47
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, jacob navia, 17:38
- Re: Valid C syntax., Ben Bacarisse, 17:31
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, pete, 17:24
- Re: slurping in binary data, pete, 17:03
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, pete, 17:00
- Re: (part 44) Han from China answers your C questions, pete, 16:40
- Re: Valid C syntax., pete, 16:07
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Martin Ambuhl, 16:07
- z error, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 16:02
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, George, 15:50
- Re: What is this?, pete, 15:40
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Extra characters on preprocessor line - error or warning?, Gordon Burditt, 14:36
- Re: Extra characters on preprocessor line - error or warning?, Richard Heathfield, 14:33
- Extra characters on preprocessor line - error or warning?, Spiro Trikaliotis, 13:43
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Chad, 13:20
- QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 11:55
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Francis Moreau, 11:45
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Francis Moreau, 11:40
- Re: z error, Barry Schwarz, 11:33
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell, 11:19
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, James Kuyper, 11:15
- Re: The logic behind the C standard header files, Joachim Schmitz, 11:05
- z error, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 11:04
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 10:54
- The logic behind the C standard header files, Francis Moreau, 10:46
- what is memory addressing ?, George Orwell, 10:33
- what is memory addressing ?, Nomen Nescio, 10:10
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Anonymous, 10:08
- (part 52) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 10:04
- Re: slurping in binary data, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- Re: Free() and size of the process, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- Re: z error, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Barry Schwarz, 09:53
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Anonymous, 09:33
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Nomen Nescio, 09:20
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, cnoe, 09:05
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 08:49
- Re: slurping in binary data, James Kuyper, 08:49
- Re: Naming curiosity, mason, 08:47
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Luuk, 08:41
- Re: Unable to bind a 2nd time if recv receives all bytes sent, James Kuyper, 08:40
- Re: Expanding buffer in C, James Harris, 08:39
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, cnoe, 08:38
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Luuk, 08:30
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, cnoe, 08:20
- Re: (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Phil Carmody, 08:08
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, Harold Aptroot, 08:04
- Re: what is memory addressing ?, vippstar, 07:59
- what is memory addressing ?, cnoe, 07:51
- Re: Unable to bind a 2nd time if recv receives all bytes sent, Joachim Schmitz, 06:37
- Free() and size of the process, pushpakulkar, 06:23
- z error, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 06:20
- (part 51) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 05:40
- Re: z error, Antoninus Twink, 04:36
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Ralf Damaschke, 04:02
- Trade marketplace,fashion product,luxury Porduct,Discount Price.www.cicigogo.cn, cicitrade, 03:58
- wholesal nike jordan adidas af1 gucci bape shoes ugg boot, honest08, 03:27
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, George Orwell, 03:14
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Nomen Nescio, 03:10
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Borked Pseudo Mailed, 02:51
- (part 50) Han from China answers your C questions, Anonymous, 02:49
- fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, George Orwell, 02:28
- fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Nomen Nescio, 02:20
- Re: z error, Gordon Burditt, 01:48
- Re: slurping in binary data, Barry Schwarz, 00:31
November 28, 2008
- Re: z error, Martin Ambuhl, 23:52
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 23:37
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:37
- Re: globals (again?), Eric Sosman, 23:20
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 23:01
- Re: z error, s0suk3, 22:49
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, James Kuyper, 22:26
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 22:18
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Eric Sosman, 22:13
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 22:09
- Re: z error, pete, 22:08
- Re: globals (again?), Eric Sosman, 22:06
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, George, 22:00
- Re: z error, Bill Cunningham, 21:56
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, rtillmore, 21:41
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 21:40
- Re: z error, CBFalconer, 21:39
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 21:35
- Re: z error, Martin Ambuhl, 21:28
- Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, Thad Smith, 21:21
- Re: z error, Richard Heathfield, 21:18
- Re: globals (again?), James Kuyper, 21:15
- z error, Bill Cunningham, 20:51
- Re: Pointer assigning., Richard Heathfield, 20:50
- Re: slurping in binary data, Barry Schwarz, 20:23
- Re: Sorry if it is not for this forum, Walter Banks, 20:00
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 19:46
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, William Pursell, 19:31
- Re: *scanf in Harbison and Steele, George, 19:20
- volatile in C99, George, 19:14
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 18:58
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 18:57
- Re: globals (again?), Phil Carmody, 18:55
- Re: slurping in binary data, George, 18:45
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 18:36
- Re: copy from a structure pointer the char array member to a char *, CBFalconer, 18:25
- Re: globals (again?), Phil Carmody, 18:24
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 18:19
- Re: QA-C gives side-effects warning. Unknown why, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: fprintf slower than printf and redirect?, Barry Schwarz, 18:15
- Re: globals (again?), Jack Klein, 18:11
- Re: globals (again?), Dirk Bruere at NeoPax, 17:51
- Re: globals (again?), jameskuyper, 17:48
Privacy Policy