comp.lang.c (date)

September 30, 2008

September 29, 2008

September 28, 2008

September 27, 2008

September 26, 2008

September 25, 2008

September 24, 2008

Re: The Second Web | A C## Project, Jack Klein, 23:12
Re: The Second Web | A Whole New Internet ?!, Jack Klein, 23:12
Re: Help in writting a program, Jack Klein, 22:52
Re: help needed, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
Re: Any way to take a word as input from stdin ?, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
Re: code question, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
Re: help needed, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
Re: Pointer to array and gcc warnings, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
Re: question, Keith Thompson, 21:37
Re: question, Keith Thompson, 21:35
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 21:01
Re: Comment Style, Richard Harter, 20:46
Re: Comment Style, Richard, 20:46
Re: Comment Style, Richard Harter, 20:43
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 20:32
Re: question, Trent Josephsen, 20:08
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 20:07
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, Keith Thompson, 19:48
Re: question, Keith Thompson, 19:42
Re: question, Keith Thompson, 19:40
Re: question, Lew Pitcher, 19:32
Re: Good Tutorials, Keith Thompson, 19:30
Re: good c compiler, Keith Thompson, 19:28
Re: Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, Keith Thompson, 19:16
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, pete, 19:16
Re: good c compiler, jameskuyper, 19:15
Re: question, Richard, 19:10
Re: Good Tutorials, pete, 19:05
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 18:59
Re: question, CBFalconer, 18:59
Re: Comment Style, Keith Thompson, 18:55
Re: question, CBFalconer, 18:53
Re: use assert and defensive together, Richard Tobin, 18:51
Re: question, Ben Bacarisse, 18:49
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Ben Bacarisse, 18:40
Re: Comment Style, CBFalconer, 18:39
Re: Comment Style, Ian Collins, 18:30
Re: Comment Style, CBFalconer, 18:29
Re: good c compiler, CBFalconer, 18:20
Re: good c compiler, Ian Collins, 18:17
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 18:15
Re: good c compiler, Ian Collins, 18:15
Re: good c compiler, CBFalconer, 18:14
Re: question, vippstar, 18:12
Re: question, vippstar, 18:11
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Malcolm McLean, 18:11
Re: good c compiler, CBFalconer, 18:10
Re: use assert and defensive together, Malcolm McLean, 18:08
Re: good c compiler, CBFalconer, 18:06
Re: good c compiler, Tristan Miller, 18:04
Re: good c compiler, Mark McIntyre, 18:03
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 18:01
Re: good c compiler, Mark McIntyre, 17:59
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 17:59
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, CBFalconer, 17:56
Re: question, Malcolm McLean, 17:48
Re: good c compiler, Kenny McCormack, 17:48
Re: question, Trent Josephsen, 17:46
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:43
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:40
Re: Comment Style, Eric Sosman, 17:37
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:37
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:34
Re: question, Ben Bacarisse, 17:33
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:27
Re: question, Charlton Wilbur, 17:26
Re: good c compiler, Tristan Miller, 17:22
Re: question, Martin Ambuhl, 17:21
Re: question, osmium, 17:20
Re: question, Ian Collins, 17:18
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:16
Re: good c compiler, Tristan Miller, 17:12
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:12
Re: Comment Style, Keith Thompson, 17:10
Re: good c compiler, jameskuyper, 17:09
Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 16:55
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 16:42
Re: question, Trent Josephsen, 16:42
Re: Comment Style, Ian Collins, 16:41
Re: question, Richard, 16:40
Re: Comment Style, Eric Sosman, 16:39
Re: Comment Style, Richard, 16:38
Re: question, Ian Collins, 16:38
Re: Comment Style, Richard, 16:37
Re: Comment Style, Ian Collins, 16:34
Re: The Second Web | A Whole New Internet ?!, Sjouke Burry, 16:34
Re: The Second Web | A C## Project, Sjouke Burry, 16:33
Re: question, Richard, 16:28
Re: Comment Style, Sjouke Burry, 16:25
question, Bill Cunningham, 16:23
Re: Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, Eric Sosman, 16:18
Re: C Projects, Sjouke Burry, 16:18
Re: Comment Style, Flash Gordon, 16:13
Re: Comment Style, Ian Collins, 16:03
Re: Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, Keith Thompson, 15:58
Re: help needed, jameskuyper, 15:56
The Second Web | A C## Project, sureshkuumar, 15:53
Re: Comment Style, Robert Gamble, 15:52
Re: use assert and defensive together, Flash Gordon, 15:51
Secured Pharmacy - Anti-Acidity (we have it all...)llns9, gherlylu, 15:48
Re: Comment Style, jameskuyper, 15:48
The Second Web | A Whole New Internet ?!, suresh.kumarx1x@xxxxxxxxx, 15:38
Re: Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, Eric Sosman, 15:23
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Flash Gordon, 15:18
Re: good c compiler, Keith Thompson, 14:56
Re: good c compiler, Flash Gordon, 14:51
Re: Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, Ben Pfaff, 14:42
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., Flash Gordon, 14:36
Re: Comment Style, Keith Thompson, 14:35
Confusion in ANSI C's function concepts, vaib, 14:11
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard, 14:02
Re: Comment Style, Eric Sosman, 14:02
Re: Comment Style, Keith Thompson, 14:02
Re: Good Tutorials, jameskuyper, 13:55
Re: Comment Style, Richard Heathfield, 13:53
Re: Comment Style, Malcolm McLean, 13:52
Re: C Projects, Malcolm McLean, 13:43
Re: Comment Style, Richard, 13:35
Re: Comment Style, vippstar, 13:29
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Lew Pitcher, 13:28
Re: good c compiler, Keith Thompson, 13:03
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 13:00
Re: good c compiler, Keith Thompson, 12:59
Re: Good Tutorials, Keith Thompson, 12:46
Re: Comment Style, Ben Pfaff, 12:41
Re: "Continue" usage, Ben Pfaff, 12:40
Re: help needed, Richard, 12:29
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 12:29
Re: help needed, Stephen Sprunk, 12:23
Re: good c compiler, jameskuyper, 12:09
Re: help needed, Richard, 12:07
Re: help needed, jameskuyper, 12:02
Re: Good Tutorials, Keith Thompson, 11:53
Re: Comment Style, Richard, 11:39
Re: Comment Style, Richard Heathfield, 11:32
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard, 11:26
Comment Style, polas, 11:06
Re: good c compiler, user1, 11:05
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, brix99luftballons, 11:00
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, brix99luftballons, 10:50
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, CBFalconer, 10:38
Re: Good Tutorials, Tristan Miller, 10:34
Re: good c compiler, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 10:22
Re: good c compiler, CBFalconer, 10:11
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Richard, 10:03
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Richard Heathfield, 09:55
Re: Good Tutorials, CBFalconer, 09:54
Re: C Projects, Richard Heathfield, 09:53
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Ben Bacarisse, 09:49
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Lew Pitcher, 09:45
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Ben Bacarisse, 09:41
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Bartc, 09:39
Re: C Projects, supthere, 09:28
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, oksid, 09:19
Re: Good Tutorials, Trent Josephsen, 09:12
Re: C Projects, Chris Dollin, 09:05
Re: C Projects, Richard Heathfield, 08:57
Re: help needed, A.C., 08:56
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 08:54
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 08:49
Re: Initialization of const variables and C standards, Andrea Taverna (Tavs), 08:28
C Projects, supthere, 08:27
Re: help needed, vippstar, 08:26
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard, 08:26
Re: good c compiler, James Kuyper, 08:25
Re: good c compiler, Chris Dollin, 08:21
Help in writting a program, razanrizk, 08:20
Re: Good Tutorials, vippstar, 08:16
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., James Kuyper, 08:09
Re: Initialization of const variables and C standards, Ben Bacarisse, 08:06
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 08:04
help needed, A.C., 08:03
Re: code question, Ben Bacarisse, 07:57
Re: good c compiler, James Kuyper, 07:38
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Bartc, 07:35
Re: Good Tutorials, James Kuyper, 07:28
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Ben Bacarisse, 07:16
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:12
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Richard Heathfield, 07:10
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard Heathfield, 07:03
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 06:57
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., Nick Keighley, 06:55
Re: Any way to take a word as input from stdin ?, Chris Dollin, 06:54
Re: good c compiler, Kenny McCormack, 06:52
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., Kenny McCormack, 06:49
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 06:44
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., James Kuyper, 06:41
Re: Alignment issues -- are they an issue?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:26
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Malcolm McLean, 06:16
Re: Any way to take a word as input from stdin ?, arnuld, 06:09
Re: use assert and defensive together, Malcolm McLean, 05:42
Re: Initialization of const variables and C standards, Andrea Taverna (Tavs), 05:16
Re: good c compiler, Bartc, 05:02
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, Bartc, 04:46
Re: Good Tutorials, Nick Keighley, 04:39
Re: Good Tutorials, Nick Keighley, 04:36
Re: good c compiler, Chris Dollin, 04:31
Re: "Continue" usage, Chris Dollin, 04:27
Re: Good Tutorials, Nick Keighley, 04:26
Re: Good Tutorials, soscpd, 04:14
Re: Good Tutorials, Nick Keighley, 04:12
Re: code question, Chris Dollin, 04:11
Re: good c compiler, Nick Keighley, 03:48
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 03:48
Re: c program, Chris Dollin, 03:47
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 03:46
Re: good c compiler, Nick Keighley, 03:44
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 03:44
Re: writing cgi programs in c: the system() call., Flash Gordon, 03:42
Re: c program, Chris Dollin, 03:35
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 03:33
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 03:23
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Nick Keighley, 03:22
Re: Good Tutorials, Flash Gordon, 03:19
Re: good c compiler, cr88192, 03:06
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Nick Keighley, 03:04
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 03:03
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 03:01
Re: good c compiler, jacob navia, 02:59
Re: good c compiler, cr88192, 02:54
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 02:47
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard Heathfield, 02:42
Re: "Continue" usage, Richard Bos, 02:37
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 02:34
Re: Good Tutorials, Keith Thompson, 02:33
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 02:19
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, arnuld, 02:17
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 01:53
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 01:39
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Richard Heathfield, 01:26
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, Richard Heathfield, 01:24
Re: good c compiler, s0suk3, 01:23
Re: Highly efficient string reversal code, Pilcrow, 01:17
Re: Good Tutorials, Richard Heathfield, 01:08
Re: Difference between C and advanced C, Ben Pfaff, 01:05
Re: good c compiler, Richard Heathfield, 01:02
Re: Any way to take a word as input from stdin ?, arnuld, 00:46
Difference between C and advanced C, sunnyalways4u2000, 00:45

September 23, 2008

September 22, 2008

September 21, 2008

September 20, 2008

September 19, 2008

September 18, 2008

September 17, 2008

September 16, 2008

September 15, 2008

September 14, 2008

September 13, 2008

September 12, 2008

September 11, 2008

September 10, 2008

September 09, 2008

September 08, 2008

September 07, 2008

September 06, 2008

September 05, 2008

September 04, 2008

September 03, 2008

Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Pilcrow, 23:46
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, osmium, 23:03
Re: Typedef question, Richard Heathfield, 23:03
Re: printf, vippstar, 23:02
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 22:57
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 22:50
Re: Exercise 7-1, mdh, 22:30
Re: printf, Keith Thompson, 22:27
Re: Exercise 7-1, Keith Thompson, 22:22
Re: Exercise 7-1, Keith Thompson, 22:15
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, Eric Sosman, 22:14
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Keith Thompson, 22:06
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Eric Sosman, 22:04
Re: Exercise 7-1, vippstar, 22:04
Re: printf, Kenny McCormack, 21:54
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, Gene, 21:43
Re: printf, vippstar, 21:10
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, pete, 20:43
Re: p 145 K&R, Dan Henry, 20:37
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Bartc, 20:33
Re: Exercise 7-1, Andrew Poelstra, 20:11
Re: Exercise 7-1, mdh, 20:11
Re: Exercise 7-1, Keith Thompson, 20:00
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jameskuyper, 19:57
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Keith Thompson, 19:48
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jameskuyper, 19:40
Re: Exercise 7-1, mdh, 19:40
Re: Exercise 7-1, mdh, 19:36
Re: Typedef question, Mark L Pappin, 19:26
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Pilcrow, 19:20
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 19:08
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Flash Gordon, 18:55
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, Richard Tobin, 18:35
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, ediebur, 18:32
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 18:22
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 17:18
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 17:03
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jameskuyper, 16:28
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Antoninus Twink, 16:18
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jameskuyper, 16:15
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Keith Thompson, 16:15
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Pilcrow, 16:07
Re: printf, Malcolm McLean, 16:05
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Malcolm McLean, 15:45
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, Malcolm McLean, 15:41
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 15:38
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Willem, 15:35
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 15:34
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Kenny McCormack, 15:31
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Eric Sosman, 15:25
Re: Good C Practice, Ian Collins, 15:06
Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Antoninus Twink, 14:51
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 14:32
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 14:30
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 14:22
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Flash Gordon, 13:27
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Keith Thompson, 13:24
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 13:01
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 12:52
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 12:37
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Ben Bacarisse, 12:31
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 11:23
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, vippstar, 11:11
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 11:07
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Heathfield, 10:55
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, jacob navia, 10:47
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Kenny McCormack, 10:11
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Kenny McCormack, 10:06
Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Bill Reid, 09:36
Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Eric Sosman, 09:15
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:13
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Eric Sosman, 09:08
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Nick Keighley, 09:05
Re: p 145 K&R, Eric Sosman, 07:57
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, James Kuyper, 07:54
Re: Good C Practice, "Thommy M. Malmström", 07:52
Re: K&R Ex 1-22, James Kuyper, 07:41
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard, 07:23
Re: fwrite() does not write data to file, Richard Bos, 07:16
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, James Kuyper, 07:07
Re: C99 portability challenge, Ron Ford, 06:39
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Ron Ford, 06:28
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Ron Ford, 06:18
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, vippstar, 05:33
Re: Exercise 7-1, Ron Ford, 05:27
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Bartc, 05:15
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Richard, 05:02
Re: Good C Practice, Richard Bos, 04:36
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Richard Bos, 04:27
Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Richard Bos, 04:22
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Nick Keighley, 03:52
Re: Exercise 7-1, Keith Thompson, 03:35
Re: printf, Ron Ford, 03:33
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Flash Gordon, 03:30
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Nick Keighley, 03:23
Re: printf, Richard Heathfield, 03:16
Re: printf, Ron Ford, 03:10
Re: Exercise 7-1, Ron Ford, 03:07
Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Ron Ford, 03:02
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Ron Ford, 02:47
Re: printf, Richard Heathfield, 02:15
Re: Typedef question, Richard Heathfield, 02:06
Re: Exercise 7-1, vippstar, 01:52
Re: Exercise 7-1, vippstar, 01:48
Re: Good C Practice, Erik de Castro Lopo, 01:42
Re: Good C Practice, Erik de Castro Lopo, 01:36
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, pete, 01:29
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, vippstar, 01:25
Re: Pointer assigned by a function problem..., vippstar, 01:22
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, pete, 01:22
Re: Typedef question, pete, 01:16
Re: printf, raashid bhatt, 01:04
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Harald van Dĳk, 01:03
Re: Good C Practice, Ian Collins, 01:00
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Pilcrow, 00:55
Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, pete, 00:52
Re: Good C Practice, Pilcrow, 00:51
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, vippstar, 00:49
Re: printf, Pilcrow, 00:44
Re: detecting ASCII/EBCDIC, Pilcrow, 00:41
Re: Typedef question, Thad Smith, 00:38
Re: Internal implementation of realloc, Ian Collins, 00:38
Internal implementation of realloc, Kislay, 00:26
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Pilcrow, 00:25
Re: Exercise 7-1, mdh, 00:19
Re: UNIX, C, Perl, Pilcrow, 00:16
Re: qsort, Ron Ford, 00:00

September 02, 2008

September 01, 2008

August 31, 2008

August 30, 2008

August 29, 2008

August 28, 2008

August 27, 2008

August 26, 2008

August 25, 2008

Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 23:47
Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 23:21
Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 23:04
Re: P142 K&R, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 22:55
Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 22:32
Re: P142 K&R, Eric Sosman, 22:01
Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:52
Re: P142 K&R, Richard Heathfield, 21:37
Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:36
Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 21:31
Re: Test me, Randy Howard, 21:26
Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:13
Re: Test me, Pilcrow, 21:00
Re: P142 K&R, Keith Thompson, 20:58
Re: P142 K&R, Tim Prince, 20:56
Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Bill Reid, 20:48
Re: gdb vs C standard, vippstar, 20:44
P142 K&R, mdh, 20:36
Re: C Compilation.., August Karlstrom, 20:00
Re: C Compilation.., Peter Nilsson, 19:54
Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:42
Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:40
Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 18:57
Re: C Compilation.., August Karlstrom, 18:45
Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 18:29
Re: problem with the code, August Karlstrom, 18:26
Re: gdb vs C standard, Richard, 17:50
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 17:44
Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 17:24
Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 17:11
Re: large integers?, jameskuyper, 17:03
Re: gdb vs C standard, Ben Bacarisse, 16:57
Re: gdb vs C standard, Eric Sosman, 16:52
Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 16:44
Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 16:36
gdb vs C standard, Chris Peters, 16:36
Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 16:24
Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 16:13
Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 16:08
Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 15:54
Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 15:41
Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 15:16
Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 15:05
Re: Forward declaration of static variable, jameskuyper, 14:40
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, jameskuyper, 14:10
Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 14:05
Re: C Compilation.., jameskuyper, 13:47
Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:17
Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:14
Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:13
Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 13:06
Re: Storgae durations, Kenny McCormack, 13:05
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, kalyan, 12:45
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Barry Schwarz, 12:39
Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Barry Schwarz, 12:39
Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 12:32
Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 12:22
Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 12:12
Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 12:12
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:58
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 10:31
Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:15

August 24, 2008

Re: printing variable length floats, Ouroborus777, 11:15
Re: More structs, Ben Bacarisse, 09:54

August 23, 2008

Test me, raashid bhatt, 02:08
Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 01:55

August 19, 2008

Re: A clarification please, mdh, 01:46
Inline Functions?, raashid bhatt, 01:40
Re: A clarification please, Richard Heathfield, 01:36
Re: Freeing Reallocated arrays, Ian Collins, 01:33

August 15, 2008

Re: size?, Gordon Burditt, 20:02
Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), s0suk3, 19:59
Re: size?, Joe Wright, 19:53
Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Keith Thompson, 19:45
Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 09:54
Re: Reading in a bitmap and getting RGB values, adam majewski, 09:47
Re: what's meaning of this ?, James Kuyper, 09:44
Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 09:39
Re: debugging - my own libc, S James S Stapleton, 09:29
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:26
Re: New Joinee:-), Andrew Poelstra, 09:12
Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 09:04
Re: Spaceball Source Code, CBFalconer, 09:04
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Tristan Miller, 09:04
Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 09:01
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:01
Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 08:58
Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Bos, 08:52
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:49
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:46
Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 08:46
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:42
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Richard Bos, 08:42
Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Bos, 08:41
Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 08:39
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:37
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:36
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:34
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:33
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:31
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:29
Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 08:27
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:26
Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 08:20
Re: New Joinee:-), Willem, 08:18
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:13
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:11
Re: which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, CBFalconer, 07:59
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 07:59
Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 07:57
Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 07:55
Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 07:53
Re: what's meaning of this ?, pete, 07:49
Re: what's meaning of this ?, vippstar, 07:47
Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 07:46
what's meaning of this ?, Tommy, 07:45
Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, CBFalconer, 07:42
Re: Are 2D arrays contiguous?, pete, 07:42
Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 07:39
Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:38
Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Richard Bos, 07:23
Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 07:11
Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Tristan Miller, 07:04
Re: Are 2D arrays contiguous?, daniel, 06:46
comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
Re: New Joinee:-), CBFalconer, 03:21

August 10, 2008

August 02, 2008

Re: sh?tpile of errors, Robert Gamble, 17:32

July 30, 2008

July 22, 2008