comp.lang.c (date)
August 31, 2008
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Harald van Dijk, 17:31
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Harald van Dijk, 17:26
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 16:53
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 16:48
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Harald van Dijk, 16:47
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: diffrence?, Richard Heathfield, 16:38
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 16:37
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, James Tursa, 16:25
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, James Tursa, 16:20
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, James Tursa, 15:58
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Harald van Dijk, 15:39
- Re: what 's wrong with this code?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:34
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 15:32
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, James Tursa, 15:16
- Re: diffrence?, Ian Collins, 15:16
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Antoninus Twink, 11:29
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Bart, 11:23
- Re: char**, Ben Bacarisse, 10:26
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Richard, 09:09
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Malcolm McLean, 08:45
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 08:45
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 08:38
- Re: diffrence?, Richard Tobin, 08:36
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 08:09
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:50
- Re: diffrence?, cr88192, 07:44
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Keith Thompson, 07:33
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard, 06:24
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Richard, 06:21
- Re: char**, Barry Schwarz, 06:06
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Keith Thompson, 05:49
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Malcolm McLean, 05:04
- Re: char**, Malcolm McLean, 04:59
- Re: char**, Keith Thompson, 04:58
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, s0suk3, 04:39
- Re: char**, Harald van Dijk, 04:30
- Re: diffrence?, Keith Thompson, 04:29
- Re: char**, Keith Thompson, 04:23
- Re: char**, MN, 04:20
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 04:18
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Keith Thompson, 04:18
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Andrew Poelstra, 03:18
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Richard Heathfield, 02:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 02:35
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard Heathfield, 02:06
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Peter Michaux, 00:45
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 00:08
August 30, 2008
- Re: diffrence?, cch@srdgame, 23:26
- diffrence?, raashid bhatt, 23:22
- Re: char**, Barry Schwarz, 21:19
- Re: char**, Barry Schwarz, 21:19
- Re: char**, Barry Schwarz, 21:19
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Keith Thompson, 21:10
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Keith Thompson, 21:10
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Keith Thompson, 21:05
- Re: Help with understanding this please, mdh, 19:25
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Mark McIntyre, 19:21
- Re: return value?, Barry Schwarz, 19:20
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Malcolm McLean, 18:03
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Ian Collins, 17:23
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Pilcrow, 17:04
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard, 16:41
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Harald van Dijk, 15:33
- Re: C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Antoninus Twink, 15:17
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Help with understanding this please, lawrence . jones, 14:56
- Re: Help with understanding this please, lawrence . jones, 14:54
- C set-user-ID program wrapper for Perl script and security, Peter Michaux, 14:43
- Re: char**, Keith Thompson, 13:29
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard, 11:52
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Malcolm McLean, 11:32
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard, 11:20
- Re: Help with understanding this please, mdh, 10:38
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard Heathfield, 10:36
- Re: Help with understanding this please, mdh, 10:30
- Re: Help with understanding this please, mdh, 10:22
- Re: Help with understanding this please, mdh, 10:11
- Re: Help with understanding this please, Richard Heathfield, 10:11
- Help with understanding this please, mdh, 10:03
- Re: char**, Malcolm McLean, 08:49
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Eric Sosman, 08:37
- Re: char**, pete, 08:22
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), James Kuyper, 08:17
- Re: char**, MN, 08:07
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, August Karlstrom, 08:06
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, August Karlstrom, 08:06
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Anand Hariharan, 07:21
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Chris Torek, 07:01
- Re: char**, Richard Heathfield, 06:55
- Re: char**, zzt256, 06:32
- char**, MN, 06:01
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Martin Ambuhl, 04:41
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Richard Tobin, 04:39
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, utab, 04:29
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Richard Heathfield, 04:19
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, utab, 04:03
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Richard Heathfield, 03:58
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, utab, 03:19
- Re: incrementing a pointer to an array, Richard Heathfield, 02:51
- incrementing a pointer to an array, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India, 02:29
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Anand Hariharan, 02:01
August 29, 2008
- Re: Questions about a Windows struct, Chris Saunders, 19:24
- Re: Questions about a Windows struct, Ian Collins, 19:00
- Re: Questions about a Windows struct, Chris Saunders, 18:52
- Re: Questions about a Windows struct, Ben Bacarisse, 18:49
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Heathfield, 18:37
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Barry Schwarz, 18:35
- Re: Questions about a Windows struct, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Questions about a Windows struct, Chris Saunders, 18:07
- Re: Use of Double Pointers, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 18:03
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 17:39
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Flash Gordon, 17:27
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 17:26
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, jameskuyper, 17:26
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 17:12
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues - TPA, Default User, 16:52
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 16:50
- Re: large integers?, Flash Gordon, 16:46
- Re: Environmental limits, fjblurt, 16:31
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Keith Thompson, 16:17
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 16:15
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 16:06
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Re: Another C99 challenge, Flash Gordon, 15:21
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 15:05
- Re: Environmental limits, jacob navia, 15:01
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, jameskuyper, 14:56
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 14:54
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Flash Gordon, 14:44
- Re: triangular matrix, pete, 14:03
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Keith Thompson, 14:00
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 14:00
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, pete, 13:55
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 13:54
- Re: triangular matrix, MikeC, 13:45
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 13:45
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 13:37
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 13:36
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 13:27
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 12:45
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 12:32
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 12:11
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 12:07
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, jameskuyper, 11:25
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jameskuyper, 11:22
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Bartc, 11:18
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Richard Heathfield, 11:11
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 11:10
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, Richard Heathfield, 11:07
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Harald van Dijk, 11:05
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, Chad, 10:53
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, August Karlstrom, 10:51
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Andrew Poelstra, 10:49
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Andrew Poelstra, 10:43
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 10:38
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, jameskuyper, 10:31
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Andrew Poelstra, 10:29
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, Chad, 10:08
- www.cicigoogle.cn Affliction t shirts, affliction jeans, affliction hoodies, cicitrade01, 09:48
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 09:39
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Doug Miller, 09:17
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, pete, 09:11
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, mdh, 08:37
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Kenny McCormack, 08:14
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Eric Sosman, 08:11
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, James Kuyper, 07:08
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Bos, 06:50
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ian Collins, 06:50
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Old Wolf, 06:49
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 06:48
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, s.dhilipkumar@xxxxxxxxx, 06:16
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 06:15
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Bartc, 05:48
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard, 04:49
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, Barry Schwarz, 04:48
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 04:46
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 04:28
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:24
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 04:12
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 03:22
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 03:10
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, Richard Heathfield, 03:06
- Re: the struct haven't define when i use typedef, Richard Bos, 02:53
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 02:40
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, pete, 02:39
- the struct haven't define when i use typedef, lyf2iis, 01:37
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, mdh, 00:01
August 28, 2008
- Re: K&R Exercise 6-2, Richard Heathfield, 23:57
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 23:50
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 23:44
- Re: multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, pete, 23:39
- K&R Exercise 6-2, mdh, 23:34
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 23:31
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 23:28
- multi dimensional arrays as one dimension array, vippstar, 23:15
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ian Collins, 23:07
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, James Kuyper, 23:07
- Re: Environmental limits, vippstar, 22:55
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, James Kuyper, 22:52
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 22:47
- Re: Environmental limits, James Kuyper, 22:36
- Chanel Hobo Bag - White 22379 white Handbags, Luxury, Best,Inspired,Discount, blog508, 22:34
- Louis Vuitton Monogram Theda GM M92399 Handbags, Luxury, Best,Inspired,Discount, blog508, 22:33
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 22:33
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Eric Sosman, 22:32
- Re: Environmental limits, James Kuyper, 22:29
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 22:27
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, Jack Klein, 22:24
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, Richard Heathfield, 22:23
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ben Bacarisse, 22:22
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, pete, 22:22
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, vippstar, 22:19
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 22:18
- Re: Environmental limits, James Kuyper, 22:16
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ian Collins, 22:13
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 22:12
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Ian Collins, 22:02
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 22:01
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ian Collins, 22:00
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, Chad, 21:59
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 21:59
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ian Collins, 21:58
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Eric Sosman, 21:51
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, James Kuyper, 21:50
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, Richard Heathfield, 21:50
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 21:47
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 21:46
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, Anand Hariharan, 21:45
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 21:43
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 21:36
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 21:36
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 21:34
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 21:31
- Re: structure defintion vs declaration question, vippstar, 21:31
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 21:29
- structure defintion vs declaration question, Chad, 21:24
- Re: Environmental limits, vippstar, 21:22
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ben Bacarisse, 21:20
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 21:18
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, vippstar, 21:17
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 21:13
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Bill Reid, 21:06
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 20:56
- Re: C99 portability challenge, new to c, 20:55
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 20:49
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 20:40
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Richard Heathfield, 20:06
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 19:35
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Tobin, 19:05
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Kenny McCormack, 18:56
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Harald van Dijk, 18:24
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, vippstar, 18:12
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Harald van Dijk, 17:54
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Harald van Dijk, 17:46
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, vippstar, 17:26
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, jameskuyper, 17:04
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Harald van Dijk, 16:44
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Harald van Dijk, 16:40
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, jameskuyper, 16:39
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, vippstar, 16:02
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Herbert Rosenau, 15:57
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Andrew Poelstra, 15:51
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:45
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, vippstar, 15:44
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Bill Reid, 15:07
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 15:00
- Re: large integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:31
- Re: Environmental limits, Harald van Dijk, 13:17
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 11:57
- Re: large integers?, Richard Harter, 11:45
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Tobin, 11:44
- Re: return value?, Nick Keighley, 11:16
- Re: return value?, Keith Thompson, 10:57
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 10:55
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard, 10:53
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 10:53
- Re: triangular matrix, osmium, 09:58
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Bos, 09:24
- Re: triangular matrix, pete, 08:52
- Re: triangular matrix, mo/-/sin, 08:43
- Re: triangular matrix, mo/-/sin, 08:42
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Eric Sosman, 08:10
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 07:21
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: Storgae durations, J. F. Lemaire, 06:52
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 06:44
- Re: Storgae durations, Nick Keighley, 05:07
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Barry Schwarz, 04:46
- Re: Passing a 2D array as a pointer to a pointer, Nick Keighley, 04:36
- Re: return value?, Nick Keighley, 04:27
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Pietro Cerutti, 03:47
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 03:00
- Re: simulation of a "wc" command, Andrew Poelstra, 02:00
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 01:51
- Re: signed by Microsoft, Keith Thompson, 01:21
- simulation of a "wc" command, hiteshthappa, 01:18
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Heathfield, 00:57
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 00:34
- Re: Another C99 challenge, Keith Thompson, 00:27
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Heathfield, 00:01
August 27, 2008
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Peter Nilsson, 23:27
- Re: C99 test suite ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:27
- Re: C99 test suite ?, Eric Sosman, 22:17
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Jack Klein, 22:15
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Bill Reid, 21:02
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Peter Nilsson, 20:18
- Re: return value?, pete, 19:49
- Re: Passing a 2D array as a pointer to a pointer, Default User, 19:37
- Re: Passing a 2D array as a pointer to a pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 19:36
- Re: return value?, Default User, 19:04
- Passing a 2D array as a pointer to a pointer, PeterOut, 18:53
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Kenneth Brody, 18:49
- Re: return value?, Martien Verbruggen, 18:48
- Re: TCP-based chat program, phider1, 18:28
- Re: triangular matrix, Andrew Poelstra, 18:25
- Re: TCP-based chat program, Andrew Poelstra, 18:21
- Re: triangular matrix, Andrew Poelstra, 18:19
- Re: signed by Microsoft, Andrew Poelstra, 18:16
- Re: return value?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:15
- TCP-based chat program, phider1, 18:11
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 18:10
- Another C99 challenge, jacob navia, 18:09
- Re: return value?, fjblurt, 17:55
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Flash Gordon, 17:49
- Re: return value?, Keith Thompson, 17:13
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 16:55
- Re: Simple Array Question, Ray D., 16:49
- Re: return value?, Joe Wright, 16:46
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, REH, 16:37
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 16:26
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 16:16
- Re: return value?, pete, 16:13
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: Storgae durations, J. F. Lemaire, 16:09
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 16:06
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 16:05
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 16:05
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 15:58
- Re: Environmental limits, Bartc, 15:54
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Harald van Dijk, 15:39
- Re: qsort, Chris Torek, 15:34
- Re: return value?, fjblurt, 15:24
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 15:16
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 15:16
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Flash Gordon, 15:15
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Ian Collins, 15:09
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 15:08
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 15:03
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 15:03
- Re: triangular matrix, user923005, 15:00
- Re: return value?, Bill Cunningham, 14:58
- Re: Environmental limits, Harald van Dijk, 14:46
- Re: Is it implementation-defined whether this errors?, zaimoni, 14:35
- Re: Environmental limits, jameskuyper, 14:34
- Re: triangular matrix, jacob navia, 14:10
- Re: triangular matrix, Rui Maciel, 13:54
- Re: Environmental limits, Keith Thompson, 13:54
- Re: triangular matrix, Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:53
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: Is it implementation-defined whether this errors?, Eric Sosman, 13:32
- triangular matrix, mo/-/sin, 13:30
- Re: Environmental limits, Bartc, 13:29
- Re: triangular matrix, Obnoxious User, 13:24
- signed by Microsoft, Trups, 13:21
- Re: Environmental limits, Antoninus Twink, 12:59
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 12:56
- Re: qsort, Richard Harter, 12:28
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 12:28
- Re: Environmental limits, vippstar, 12:26
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), John Bode, 12:25
- Re: Is it implementation-defined whether this errors?, zaimoni, 12:23
- Re: qsort, Richard Harter, 12:18
- Re: Environmental limits, Bartc, 12:16
- Re: Environmental limits, vippstar, 12:13
- Re: Environmental limits, Sergio Perticone, 11:51
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Bartc, 11:39
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 11:27
- Re: Environmental limits, Richard Heathfield, 11:04
- Re: Environmental limits, pete, 10:56
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Bos, 10:43
- Re: C99 test suite ?, jacob navia, 10:32
- Re: C99 test suite ?, Eric Sosman, 10:30
- Re: Environmental limits, Richard Heathfield, 10:29
- Re: Is it implementation-defined whether this errors?, Eric Sosman, 10:26
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Andrew Poelstra, 10:25
- Environmental limits, vippstar, 10:19
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 09:54
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 09:52
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 09:45
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 09:39
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 09:35
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 09:28
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 09:28
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ben Bacarisse, 09:27
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Bartc, 09:16
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 09:13
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 08:55
- Re: Storgae durations, vippstar, 08:46
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 08:34
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 08:09
- Re: qsort, Eric Sosman, 08:06
- www.cicigoogle.cn air max 90, air max ltd, nike shox R4, NZ, Jordan 23, Jordan 5 fusion, air force one, dunk sb, cicitrade01, 08:04
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 07:57
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 07:54
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Willem, 07:48
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), pete, 07:41
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Ben Bacarisse, 07:16
- Re: Store int* array, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:11
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 07:09
- C99 test suite ?, oksid, 07:07
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:04
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), James Kuyper, 06:42
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, vippstar, 06:40
- Re: Using all CPAITAL letters for variable names, vippstar, 06:23
- Re: C99 portability challenge, vippstar, 06:16
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 05:58
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 05:55
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 05:53
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Richard Bos, 05:53
- Re: qsort, Richard Bos, 05:51
- Re: Simple Array Question, Richard Bos, 05:44
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Ike Naar, 04:39
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Nick Keighley, 04:32
- Re: Store int* array, MN, 04:32
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Nick Keighley, 04:25
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Ian Collins, 04:13
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Nick Keighley, 04:11
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Nick Keighley, 04:02
- Re: Using all CPAITAL letters for variable names, Nick Keighley, 03:56
- Re: Store int* array, Obnoxious User, 03:49
- Re: qsort, Ron Ford, 03:39
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, Nick Keighley, 03:37
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, (David P.), 03:32
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), Flash Gordon, 03:16
- Store int* array, MN, 03:07
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 03:03
- Re: qsort, Sensei, 02:56
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 02:48
- Using all CPAITAL letters for variable names, arnuld, 02:38
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 02:13
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 02:09
- Is it implementation-defined whether this errors?, zaimoni, 02:06
- Re: No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 01:23
- No return in LONG InterlockedDecrement ( LONG *lpAddend ), slackcode, 01:22
- Re: qsort, Ian Collins, 00:15
- Re: qsort, Ron Ford, 00:10
August 26, 2008
- Re: C99 portability challenge, vippstar, 23:44
- Re: qsort, Richard Harter, 23:41
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Anand Hariharan, 23:34
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 23:27
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Anand Hariharan, 23:19
- Re: qsort, vippstar, 22:55
- Re: qsort, Ron Ford, 22:47
- Re: return value?, pete, 22:06
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Ron Ford, 22:05
- Re: return value?, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: qsort, Eric Sosman, 22:05
- Re: qsort, pete, 22:03
- qsort, Ron Ford, 21:59
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 21:58
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 21:54
- Re: return value?, Gordon Burditt, 21:41
- Re: return value?, Richard Heathfield, 21:23
- Re: return value?, vippstar, 21:20
- return value?, Bill Cunningham, 21:17
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Eric Sosman, 21:00
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:15
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Mark L Pappin, 20:10
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 20:02
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Ben Bacarisse, 20:00
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Ben Bacarisse, 19:51
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:24
- Re: Simple Array Question, pete, 19:23
- Re: Simple Array Question, Gene, 19:20
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 19:18
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:15
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, pete, 19:14
- Re: Simple Array Question, Bartc, 19:02
- Re: Simple Array Question, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:00
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Peter Nilsson, 18:52
- Re: Simple Array Question, Sergio Perticone, 18:43
- Re: Simple Array Question, Sergio Perticone, 18:40
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 18:40
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Ike Naar, 18:38
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 18:36
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Antoninus Twink, 18:32
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: Ping Randy Howard, Antoninus Twink, 18:13
- Re: C99 portability challenge, dj3vande, 18:12
- Re: C99 portability challenge, vippstar, 18:11
- Re: Ping Randy Howard, vippstar, 18:08
- Re: Ping Randy Howard, gw7rib, 18:01
- Re: C99 portability challenge, vippstar, 17:58
- Re: Simple Array Question, ssylee, 17:52
- Re: Simple Array Question, Bartc, 17:50
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 17:49
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Chris Torek, 17:49
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 17:48
- Re: Storgae durations, Kenny McCormack, 17:46
- Simple Array Question, Ray D., 17:44
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: gdb vs C standard, fjblurt, 16:52
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Eric Sosman, 16:48
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 16:40
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 16:30
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Lassie, 16:20
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Eric Sosman, 16:15
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:12
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:12
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Herbert Rosenau, 16:12
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:12
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 16:01
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jameskuyper, 15:53
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Willem, 15:42
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 15:36
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 15:31
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 15:28
- Ping Randy Howard, jacob navia, 15:26
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 15:25
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Flash Gordon, 14:52
- Re: C99 portability challenge, vippstar, 14:38
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Flash Gordon, 13:58
- anish add, anish, 13:43
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Rui Maciel, 13:37
- Re: C99 portability challenge, arnuld, 13:13
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Keith Thompson, 12:44
- Re: Test me, Keith Thompson, 12:44
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Rui Maciel, 11:37
- Re: Test me, Scott, 11:37
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Rui Maciel, 11:36
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Daniel Molina Wegener, 10:58
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 09:40
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, William Pursell, 09:35
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 09:27
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Nick Keighley, 08:06
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Pietro Cerutti, 07:54
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Bartc, 07:32
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Richard, 07:28
- Re: Test me, Willem, 07:24
- Re: Test me, Richard Bos, 07:15
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Richard Tobin, 07:07
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), raashid bhatt, 06:46
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Bos, 06:44
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Richard Heathfield, 06:38
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), raashid bhatt, 06:27
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 06:22
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Richard Heathfield, 06:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 06:16
- Re: Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), Ben Bacarisse, 06:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 05:58
- Problems With Global Variables (memory allocations), raashid bhatt, 05:54
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 05:31
- Re: C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 05:23
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard, 05:20
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Tobin, 05:01
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ian Collins, 04:54
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Nick Keighley, 04:53
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard, 04:47
- Re: Test me, Nick Keighley, 04:43
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Ian Collins, 04:43
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard, 04:39
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 04:34
- Re: C99 portability challenge, Jensen Somers, 04:28
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 04:23
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 04:20
- Re: C Compilation.., Nick Keighley, 04:20
- Re: Test me, Pilcrow, 04:19
- Re: Test me, Pilcrow, 04:15
- Re: Test me, Keith Thompson, 04:08
- C99 portability challenge, jacob navia, 04:07
- Re: Test me, Pilcrow, 04:04
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Peter Nilsson, 03:28
- Re: Test me, Richard Bos, 03:23
- Re: gdb vs C standard, Richard, 03:21
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 02:41
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 01:32
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, cr88192, 00:06
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, cr88192, 00:02
August 25, 2008
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 23:47
- Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 23:21
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 23:04
- Re: P142 K&R, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 22:55
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 22:32
- Re: P142 K&R, Eric Sosman, 22:01
- Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:52
- Re: P142 K&R, Richard Heathfield, 21:37
- Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 21:31
- Re: Test me, Randy Howard, 21:26
- Re: P142 K&R, mdh, 21:13
- Re: Test me, Pilcrow, 21:00
- Re: P142 K&R, Keith Thompson, 20:58
- Re: P142 K&R, Tim Prince, 20:56
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Bill Reid, 20:48
- Re: gdb vs C standard, vippstar, 20:44
- P142 K&R, mdh, 20:36
- Re: C Compilation.., August Karlstrom, 20:00
- Re: C Compilation.., Peter Nilsson, 19:54
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:42
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:40
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 18:57
- Re: C Compilation.., August Karlstrom, 18:45
- Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 18:29
- Re: problem with the code, August Karlstrom, 18:26
- Re: gdb vs C standard, Richard, 17:50
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 17:44
- Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 17:24
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 17:11
- Re: large integers?, jameskuyper, 17:03
- Re: gdb vs C standard, Ben Bacarisse, 16:57
- Re: gdb vs C standard, Eric Sosman, 16:52
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 16:44
- Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 16:36
- gdb vs C standard, Chris Peters, 16:36
- Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 16:24
- Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 16:13
- Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 16:08
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 15:54
- Re: large integers?, Dann Corbit, 15:41
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 15:16
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 15:05
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, jameskuyper, 14:40
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, jameskuyper, 14:10
- Re: Storgae durations, Randy Howard, 14:05
- Re: C Compilation.., jameskuyper, 13:47
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:17
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:14
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Kenny McCormack, 13:13
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 13:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Kenny McCormack, 13:05
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, kalyan, 12:45
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Barry Schwarz, 12:39
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Barry Schwarz, 12:39
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 12:32
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 12:22
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 12:12
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 12:12
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:58
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 10:31
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:15
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:05
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 10:01
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, kalyan, 09:50
- Re: C Compilation.., James Kuyper, 09:49
- Re: C Compilation.., James Kuyper, 09:36
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:19
- Re: Problem with offset based linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 09:03
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Boon, 08:12
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Kenny McCormack, 07:57
- Re: problem with the code, Richard, 07:28
- Re: problem with the code, Richard Heathfield, 07:27
- Re: problem with the code, pete, 07:17
- Re: problem with the code, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- Re: problem with the code, Richard Heathfield, 07:14
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: C Compilation.., Joachim Schmitz, 07:10
- Re: problem with the code, pete, 06:56
- Re: problem with the code, jacob navia, 06:44
- Re: problem with the code, Richard Heathfield, 06:26
- Problem with offset based linked list, kalyan, 06:16
- Re: printing variable length floats, Ouroborus777, 05:39
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 05:16
- Re: problem with the code, raashid bhatt, 05:02
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 04:52
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 04:49
- Re: problem with the code, Richard, 04:48
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 04:18
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Ian Collins, 04:10
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Jef Driesen, 04:02
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 03:52
- Re: C Compilation.., Willem, 03:49
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 03:34
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: problem with the code, Richard Heathfield, 03:25
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Richard Heathfield, 03:21
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Keith Thompson, 03:19
- Re: problem with the code, jacob navia, 03:14
- Re: problem with the code, jacob navia, 03:12
- Re: problem with the code, Default User, 03:12
- Re: problem with the code, Barry Schwarz, 03:07
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, fjblurt, 03:05
- Re: problem with the code, fjblurt, 03:00
- Re: problem with the code, ramu, 02:37
- problem with the code, ramu, 02:22
- Re: printing variable length floats, Gordon Burditt, 01:18
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Paul, 00:23
- Re: C Compilation.., dj3vande, 00:20
August 24, 2008
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Micheal Smith, 23:59
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Cromulent, 23:55
- Re: Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Martin Ambuhl, 23:50
- Pointer dereference rather than sizeof?, Micheal Smith, 23:43
- Re: catching exit, David Thompson, 23:01
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, David Thompson, 23:01
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, William Ahern, 22:59
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Chris McDonald, 22:02
- Re: Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, Keith Thompson, 21:06
- Writing my own wireless-driver, hard?, defn noob, 20:21
- Re: More structs, mdh, 19:22
- Re: text and binary streams, Peter Nilsson, 19:14
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 17:51
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 17:28
- Re: K&R p 130, Richard, 17:16
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard, 16:44
- Earn -Rs 5,000 to Rs 30,000, jass, 15:57
- Re: printing variable length floats, Joe Wright, 15:16
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 15:02
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 14:59
- Re: More structs, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 14:04
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 13:58
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 13:50
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 13:15
- Re: C Compilation.., santosh, 12:42
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 12:30
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 12:28
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 12:26
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, zaimoni, 11:57
- Re: printing variable length floats, Ouroborus777, 11:15
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 10:14
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 10:11
- Re: More structs, Ben Bacarisse, 09:54
- Re: More structs, mdh, 09:41
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 09:34
- Re: More structs, mdh, 09:33
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 09:33
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Ben Bacarisse, 09:14
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 09:11
- Re: C Compilation.., jameskuyper, 09:10
- Re: text and binary streams, Eric Sosman, 09:04
- Re: More structs, Eric Sosman, 08:53
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
- Re: C Compilation.., jameskuyper, 08:47
- Re: C Compilation.., Walter Banks, 07:50
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 06:45
- Re: More structs, pete, 06:43
- Re: Test me, Bartc, 06:06
- Re: C Compilation.., Bartc, 05:42
- Re: text and binary streams, Herbert Rosenau, 05:26
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, santosh, 05:05
- Re: C Compilation.., santosh, 05:01
- Re: C Compilation.., Lassie, 04:45
- Re: C Compilation.., Philipp Klaus Krause, 04:34
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 04:31
- Re: Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode file opening, Barry Schwarz, 03:51
- Re: More structs, Keith Thompson, 03:41
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Barry Schwarz, 03:39
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Jef Driesen, 02:34
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Jef Driesen, 02:31
- Difference between BINARY mode file opening and TEXT mode file opening, manu, 02:12
- Re: C Compilation.., cr88192, 01:59
- Re: More structs, mdh, 01:59
- Re: C Compilation.., cr88192, 01:53
- Re: C Compilation.., Lassie, 01:49
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, zaimoni, 01:17
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 00:06
August 23, 2008
- Re: Test me, Bill Reid, 23:45
- Re: text and binary streams, Jack Klein, 23:36
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 23:29
- Re: C Compilation.., Walter Banks, 22:30
- Re: More structs, mdh, 22:17
- Re: More structs, mdh, 22:10
- Re: More structs, Chris Torek, 20:58
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, E.D.G., 20:51
- Re: Forward declaration of static variable, Ben Bacarisse, 20:48
- Re: C Compilation.., Chris Torek, 20:28
- Re: C Compilation.., Philipp Klaus Krause, 19:03
- Re: More structs, Eric Sosman, 17:22
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Flash Gordon, 17:07
- Re: C Compilation.., Flash Gordon, 16:59
- Re: C Compilation.., Flash Gordon, 16:40
- Re: C Compilation.., Flash Gordon, 16:34
- Re: printing variable length floats, Gordon Burditt, 16:25
- Re: C Compilation.., Philipp Klaus Krause, 16:21
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 15:50
- Re: More structs, mdh, 15:43
- Re: C/C++ 64-bit compilers for Vista?, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: More structs, mdh, 15:19
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 15:17
- Re: More structs, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:13
- Re: More structs, Eric Sosman, 15:10
- Re: C Compilation.., jacob navia, 15:10
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: C Compilation.., Lassie, 14:51
- More structs, mdh, 14:50
- Re: C Compilation.., Boon, 14:25
- Re: C/C++ 64-bit compilers for Vista?, Boon, 14:19
- Re: C Compilation.., Keith Thompson, 14:11
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 13:21
- Re: C Compilation.., jacob navia, 13:13
- Re: C Compilation.., Joachim Schmitz, 13:03
- Re: C Compilation.., Bartc, 12:32
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 12:16
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 12:15
- Re: Error message explained, gw7rib, 12:13
- Re: Error message explained, Harald van Dijk, 12:06
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 12:06
- Re: Error message explained, mdh, 12:06
- Re: Error message explained, mdh, 12:04
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, fermineutron, 12:04
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 12:04
- Re: Error message explained, mdh, 12:03
- Re: C/C++ 64-bit compilers for Vista?, Harold Aptroot, 12:03
- Re: Error message explained, Bartc, 12:01
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 12:00
- Re: Error message explained, Joe Wright, 11:57
- Re: Error message explained, vippstar, 11:57
- Re: C/C++ 64-bit compilers for Vista?, jacob navia, 11:48
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Richard Tobin, 11:47
- Error message explained, mdh, 11:41
- C/C++ 64-bit compilers for Vista?, fermineutron, 11:36
- Error message explained, esclepius, 11:33
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 11:32
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 11:30
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Kenny McCormack, 11:06
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Ben Bacarisse, 10:42
- Re: C Compilation.., Joachim Schmitz, 10:25
- Re: C Compilation.., Kenny McCormack, 10:12
- Re: C Compilation.., jacob navia, 09:55
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, vippstar, 09:54
- Re: C Compilation.., jacob navia, 09:54
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 09:22
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 09:21
- Re: printing variable length floats, Bartc, 09:02
- Re: printing variable length floats, Ouroborus777, 08:27
- printing variable length floats, Ouroborus777, 08:23
- Re: text and binary streams, James Kuyper, 08:07
- Re: C Compilation.., Malcolm McLean, 08:04
- Re: text and binary streams, Richard Tobin, 07:49
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Tobin, 07:43
- text and binary streams, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India, 07:34
- Re: C Compilation.., Malcolm McLean, 06:03
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 06:02
- Re: C Compilation.., Malcolm McLean, 06:00
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 05:59
- Re: C Compilation.., raashid bhatt, 04:33
- Re: C Compilation.., Richard Heathfield, 04:28
- Re: C Compilation.., Antoninus Twink, 04:25
- C Compilation.., raashid bhatt, 04:13
- Forward declaration of static variable, Jef Driesen, 03:57
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Pilcrow, 02:54
- Re: Test me, Richard Heathfield, 02:21
- Test me, raashid bhatt, 02:08
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 01:55
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 01:14
August 22, 2008
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, James Kuyper, 22:47
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, fjblurt, 22:38
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Keith Thompson, 22:15
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, vippstar, 21:24
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Ben Bacarisse, 18:50
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 18:38
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 18:05
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 17:42
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Ben Bacarisse, 17:36
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Pilcrow, 17:33
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 17:17
- Re: struct member initialization, ssylee, 17:16
- Re: struct member initialization, s0suk3, 16:34
- Re: pointer problem, pete, 16:27
- Re: struct member initialization, pete, 16:16
- Re: struct member initialization, jameskuyper, 16:11
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Antoninus Twink, 15:38
- Re: struct member initialization, Sergio Perticone, 15:20
- Re: Storgae durations, lawrence . jones, 15:04
- struct member initialization, ssylee, 14:44
- Re: How best to provide a module, Stephen Sprunk, 14:34
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 13:47
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: pointer problem, Keith Thompson, 12:17
- Re: pointer problem, Joe Wright, 11:29
- Re: pointer problem, osmium, 11:23
- Re: pointer problem, Richard Heathfield, 11:23
- pointer problem, ramu, 11:09
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Richard Tobin, 10:32
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Ben Bacarisse, 10:15
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Bartc, 09:58
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Richard Heathfield, 09:43
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 09:31
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, raashid bhatt, 09:22
- Re: A File I/O Program, Ben Bacarisse, 09:18
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, Bartc, 08:06
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, Harold Aptroot, 07:59
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, James Kuyper, 06:31
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, William Pursell, 06:18
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), William Pursell, 06:14
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:03
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Richard Heathfield, 05:48
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, raashid bhatt, 05:29
- Re: How best to provide a module, Bartc, 05:28
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jacob navia, 04:57
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, jackie, 04:34
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 04:08
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Chris Torek, 03:28
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Chris Torek, 03:15
- Baume and Mercier Classima Executives Travel Clock 8705, blog119, 03:06
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Keith Thompson, 02:53
- Re: why dosent buffer gets overflowed, Richard Heathfield, 01:45
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Herbert Rosenau, 01:37
- why dosent buffer gets overflowed, raashid bhatt, 01:11
- Re: How best to provide a module, Keith Thompson, 01:07
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Richard Heathfield, 00:56
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Ian Collins, 00:42
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 00:03
August 21, 2008
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Barry Schwarz, 23:37
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 23:21
- Re: 2d arrays!, pete, 22:33
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, jackie, 21:41
- Re: Would this cause undefined behavior please?, lawrence . jones, 21:03
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jameskuyper, 20:03
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:55
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jacob navia, 19:28
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jameskuyper, 19:14
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Pietro Cerutti, 18:58
- Re: Storgae durations, lawrence . jones, 18:57
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:47
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Harald van Dijk, 18:40
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Pietro Cerutti, 18:21
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 18:05
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Richard Heathfield, 18:04
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Ali Karaali, 17:52
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Richard Heathfield, 17:48
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Richard Heathfield, 17:47
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Ali Karaali, 17:35
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, Ali Karaali, 17:32
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jacob navia, 17:32
- Re: Why const without type compiles?, jacob navia, 17:30
- Why const without type compiles?, nembo kid, 17:26
- Re: help me in writing C program, Bartc, 17:25
- Re: help me in writing C program, William Pursell, 17:07
- A File I/O Program, arnuld, 16:42
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 16:37
- Re: K&R p 130, Default User, 16:33
- Re: How best to provide a module, Eric Sosman, 16:19
- Re: How best to provide a module, James Harris, 16:11
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Tobin, 15:59
- Re: 2d arrays!, jameskuyper, 15:56
- Re: 2d arrays!, Harald van Dijk, 15:25
- Re: 2d arrays!, jameskuyper, 15:22
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), William Pursell, 15:20
- Re: How best to provide a module, Malcolm McLean, 15:16
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), William Pursell, 15:13
- Re: 2d arrays!, jameskuyper, 15:12
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, Harold Aptroot, 14:48
- Re: large integers?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:48
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., jameskuyper, 14:37
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, Keith Thompson, 14:35
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Joachim Schmitz, 14:26
- Re: K&R p 130, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 14:00
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Antoninus Twink, 13:58
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, Martin Ambuhl, 13:25
- Re: K&R p 130, Ron Ford, 13:24
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, ediebur, 13:21
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., ediebur, 13:20
- Re: help me in writing C program, Ben Bacarisse, 13:14
- Re: help me in writing C program, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 12:31
- Re: Storgae durations, Joachim Schmitz, 12:30
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Joachim Schmitz, 12:19
- Re: About MSIL Disassembler, Bartc, 12:12
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Keith Thompson, 11:59
- About MSIL Disassembler, jackie, 11:57
- Re: help me in writing C program, Bartc, 11:57
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Keith Thompson, 11:40
- Re: 2d arrays!, raashid bhatt, 11:18
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Les Cargill, 11:02
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Les Cargill, 10:55
- Re: How best to provide a module, Wolfgang Draxinger, 10:44
- Re: 2d arrays!, John Bode, 10:39
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 10:32
- Re: help me in writing C program, Ben Bacarisse, 10:25
- Re: How best to provide a module, Mike Wahler, 10:25
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, August Karlstrom, 10:20
- Re: How best to provide a module, James Harris, 10:10
- 2d arrays!, raashid bhatt, 09:53
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 09:52
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 09:51
- Re: OT Re: how to remove code duplication, Richard Bos, 09:51
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Andrew Poelstra, 09:50
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 09:48
- Re: OT Re: how to remove code duplication, Ben Bacarisse, 09:37
- Re: help me in writing C program, Tristan Miller, 09:34
- Re: OT Re: how to remove code duplication, Richard Bos, 09:21
- Re: OT Re: how to remove code duplication, Richard Heathfield, 09:17
- Re: How best to provide a module, Richard Heathfield, 09:15
- OT Re: how to remove code duplication, Ben Bacarisse, 09:06
- How best to provide a module, James Harris, 09:03
- Re: Real Mode, Les Cargill, 08:53
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Les Cargill, 08:47
- Re: ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:45
- Re: help me in writing C program, Bartc, 08:45
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Joe Wright, 08:42
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Les Cargill, 08:37
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Les Cargill, 08:36
- ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, aassime abdellatif, 08:24
- ISLAM and the AIM of LIFE, aassime abdellatif, 08:23
- Re: Strange Output, Ben Bacarisse, 07:41
- Re: help me in writing C program, Paul, 07:33
- Re: A problem about call Dll, Bartc, 07:24
- Re: help me in writing C program, Injam, 07:23
- Re: help me in writing C program, Paul, 07:19
- Re: help me in writing C program, Injam, 07:17
- Re: Strange Output, KellyB, 07:14
- Re: help me in writing C program, Tristan Miller, 07:04
- Re: Strange Output, pete, 06:58
- Re: help me in writing C program, Injam, 06:48
- Re: help me in writing C program, Injam, 06:41
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 06:41
- Re: Memory help?, pete, 06:39
- Re: Strange Output, Martin Ambuhl, 06:35
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Dik T. Winter, 06:35
- Re: help me in writing C program, Nick Keighley, 06:33
- Re: Memory help?, James Kuyper, 06:30
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Nick Keighley, 06:25
- Re: help me in writing C program, Richard Bos, 06:23
- Re: A problem about call Dll, Martin Ambuhl, 06:20
- Strange Output, KellyB, 06:18
- Re: Memory help?, Richard Bos, 06:16
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 06:10
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Herbert Rosenau, 06:03
- Re: A problem about call Dll, jacob navia, 05:36
- Re: A problem about call Dll, Bartc, 05:34
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 05:25
- Re: help me in writing C program, jacob navia, 05:22
- Re: A problem about call Dll, jacob navia, 05:21
- help me in writing C program, Injam, 05:01
- Re: A problem about call Dll, Willem, 04:40
- A problem about call Dll, ÓÚÑó, 04:32
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, jma, 04:26
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Richard Heathfield, 03:35
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Richard Heathfield, 03:31
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 03:26
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Richard Heathfield, 03:25
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 03:25
- Re: large integers?, Richard Heathfield, 03:24
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 03:14
- Re: large integers?, Nick Keighley, 03:12
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ian Collins, 03:08
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), William Pursell, 03:07
- Re: large integers?, jackie, 03:01
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Ike Naar, 03:00
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), Ike Naar, 02:56
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), William Pursell, 02:44
- Re: Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 02:01
- Re: Reading char* word by word, s0suk3, 01:33
- Segmentation Fault (was: how to remove code duplication), arnuld, 01:05
- Earn - Rs20,000 INR - Just for signing up!, jass, 00:49
August 20, 2008
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Anand Hariharan, 23:29
- Re: how to remove code duplication, vippstar, 23:21
- Re: Memory help?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:08
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Ben Bacarisse, 22:56
- Re: Memory help?, raashid bhatt, 22:35
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, voidpointer, 22:27
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 22:11
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Andrew Poelstra, 22:08
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Stan Milam, 22:04
- Re: Reading char* word by word, Harold Aptroot, 21:57
- Re: binary file, Doug Miller, 21:40
- Re: binary file, Bill Cunningham, 19:48
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 19:40
- Re: Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, Ben Bacarisse, 19:36
- Ah've got them Function Pointer blues, MikeC, 19:14
- Re: binary file, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: Reading char* word by word, Pietro Cerutti, 18:18
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 18:06
- Re: Reading char* word by word, Stuudent, 18:00
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 17:56
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, sln, 17:47
- Re: binary file, Doug Miller, 17:31
- Re: Reading char* word by word, Fred, 17:05
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Tobin, 17:00
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, E.D.G., 16:52
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 16:35
- Re: Storgae durations, kenny.riodan@xxxxxxxxx, 16:30
- Re: Storgae durations, Harald van Dijk, 16:22
- Re: how to remove code duplication, William Pursell, 16:02
- Re: binary file, Bill Cunningham, 15:58
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 15:58
- Re: how to remove code duplication, William Pursell, 15:55
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 15:49
- Re: K&R p 130, Default User, 15:47
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 15:47
- Reading char* word by word, Stuudent, 15:33
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 15:27
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Herbert Rosenau, 15:09
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Herbert Rosenau, 15:09
- Re: scandir and file_select(), Keith Thompson, 15:04
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 14:57
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, Keith Thompson, 14:55
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 14:46
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 14:40
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Andrew Poelstra, 13:34
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Keith Thompson, 13:17
- Re: large integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:16
- Re: A clarification please, Keith Thompson, 13:00
- Re: binary file, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 12:54
- Re: large integers?, Richard Heathfield, 12:47
- Re: large integers?, Richard Harter, 12:41
- Re: A clarification please, Ben Bacarisse, 12:18
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 12:17
- Re: Pointers and arrays., John Bode, 12:11
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Andrew Poelstra, 12:08
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Ben Bacarisse, 12:01
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Martin Ambuhl, 11:46
- Re: large integers?, Richard Bos, 11:39
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Bos, 11:38
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Richard Tobin, 11:35
- Re: large integers?, jameskuyper, 11:19
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Andreas Lundgren, 11:10
- Re: large integers?, Tristan Miller, 11:04
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, jma, 10:57
- Re: how to use the open() call, Richard Heathfield, 10:52
- Re: when to use volatile for reading from objects written by signal handlers, jameskuyper, 10:42
- Re: large integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:41
- Re: how to use the open() call, Chad, 10:40
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 10:35
- Re: [OT] how to use the open() call, Richard Heathfield, 10:35
- Re: scandir and file_select(), Richard Heathfield, 10:29
- Re: How to use strings for error handling, jameskuyper, 10:26
- Re: [OT] how to use the open() call, viza, 10:09
- Re: large integers?, Richard Heathfield, 10:05
- Re: dup2, fclose and rename ..., viza, 09:54
- when to use volatile for reading from objects written by signal handlers, viza, 09:46
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 09:43
- How to use strings for error handling, jma, 09:35
- Re: large integers?, Nick Keighley, 09:28
- Re: Real Mode, santosh, 09:08
- Real Mode, Jrdman, 09:01
- Re: scandir and file_select(), Sheldon, 08:58
- Re: scandir and file_select(), Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:33
- Re: scandir and file_select(), Richard Heathfield, 08:30
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 08:24
- Re: regarding the lseek(), Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Kenny McCormack, 08:08
- scandir and file_select(), Sheldon, 08:03
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:47
- Re: regarding the lseek(), santosh, 07:29
- Re: binary file, santosh, 07:27
- Re: binary file, Richard Heathfield, 07:07
- Re: regarding the lseek(), Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:55
- Re: binary file, Bill Cunningham, 06:49
- regarding the lseek(), pal, 06:49
- Re: large integers?, Richard Heathfield, 06:44
- Re: large integers?, Tristan Miller, 06:34
- Re: dup2, fclose and rename ..., santosh, 06:26
- Re: large integers?, Richard Heathfield, 06:09
- dup2, fclose and rename ..., wrenashe, 06:05
- large integers?, jackie, 06:02
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 05:58
- Re: Information, August Karlstrom, 05:47
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, James Harris, 05:46
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 05:34
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 05:28
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 05:15
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Nick Keighley, 04:25
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Richard Tobin, 03:58
- CU bug report, Richard Heathfield, 03:28
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Nick Keighley, 03:20
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 03:00
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 02:57
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 02:44
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 02:24
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, rudolf, 01:18
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 01:15
- Re: binary file, Richard Heathfield, 01:02
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 00:58
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 00:55
- Re: fscanf, Richard Heathfield, 00:53
- Re: K&R p 130, vippstar, 00:51
- Re: binary file, pete, 00:46
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 00:44
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 00:40
- Re: K&R p 130, Ian Collins, 00:39
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 00:38
- Re: binary file, vippstar, 00:36
- Re: binary file, Barry Schwarz, 00:25
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 00:24
- Re: binary file, Gordon Burditt, 00:09
- Re: binary file, Keith Thompson, 00:06
August 19, 2008
- Re: binary file, Ben Bacarisse, 23:27
- Re: binary file, Richard W, 23:25
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 23:20
- Re: buffer overflow, Richard W, 22:44
- binary file, Bill Cunningham, 22:42
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Keith Thompson, 22:28
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 22:10
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Eric Sosman, 21:50
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 21:41
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, James Harris, 21:40
- Re: K&R p 130, Ron Ford, 21:39
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Ron Ford, 21:26
- Re: Memory help?, Thad Smith, 20:14
- Re: how to use the open() call, vippstar, 19:54
- Re: fscanf, vippstar, 19:50
- Re: fscanf, vippstar, 19:48
- Re: fscanf, jameskuyper, 19:11
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 19:01
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 18:55
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 18:51
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Keith Thompson, 18:45
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, sln, 18:37
- Re: fscanf, vippstar, 18:36
- Re: Storgae durations, lawrence . jones, 18:20
- Re: Storgae durations, lawrence . jones, 18:15
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Keith Thompson, 17:48
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: fscanf, jameskuyper, 17:35
- Re: Storgae durations, Flash Gordon, 16:39
- Re: fscanf, Andrew Poelstra, 15:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 15:55
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 15:53
- Re: fscanf, Doug Miller, 15:50
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, mdh, 15:34
- Re: fscanf, santosh, 15:31
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 15:27
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 15:27
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 15:20
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 15:13
- Re: Combinations, Paul Hsieh, 14:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Default User, 14:19
- Re: buffer overflow, Daniel Molina Wegener, 14:00
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 13:18
- Re: Pointers and arrays., santosh, 13:16
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 13:14
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 13:05
- Re: Information, Charlton Wilbur, 12:51
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 12:51
- Re: A clarification please, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 12:27
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 12:18
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Keith Thompson, 12:11
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Joachim Schmitz, 12:09
- Re: Pointers and arrays., raashid bhatt, 12:05
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 12:04
- Re: Information, Mike Wahler, 12:00
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Mike Wahler, 11:57
- Re: Information, pete, 11:42
- Re: how to remove code duplication, William Pursell, 11:31
- Re: Information, raashid bhatt, 11:30
- Re: bmp file issues, steve, 11:25
- Re: Combinations, bearophileHUGS, 11:09
- Re: Information, Lee, 10:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 10:30
- Re: bmp file issues, Bartc, 10:30
- Re: Pointers and arrays., santosh, 10:28
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 10:20
- Re: Information, santosh, 10:18
- Re: Pointers and arrays., santosh, 10:15
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:09
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 10:08
- Re: buffer overflow, santosh, 10:08
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Nick Keighley, 10:07
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ben Bacarisse, 10:02
- Re: Pointers and arrays., raashid bhatt, 10:01
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 09:59
- Re: buffer overflow, Nick Keighley, 09:59
- Re: Information, Eric Sosman, 09:56
- Re: bmp file issues, steve, 09:56
- Re: Pointers and arrays., Mike Wahler, 09:54
- buffer overflow, raashid bhatt, 09:53
- Pointers and arrays., raashid bhatt, 09:47
- Re: Memory help?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:47
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Kenny McCormack, 09:41
- Re: Information, raashid bhatt, 09:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:02
- Re: K&R p 130, Tim Rentsch, 08:46
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 08:42
- Re: how to remove code duplication, James Kuyper, 08:40
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., ediebur, 08:29
- Re: Information, santosh, 08:23
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 08:22
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 08:19
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Re: Information, Nick Keighley, 08:09
- Re: how to use the open() call, viza, 08:01
- Re: Information, Martin Ambuhl, 07:59
- Re: Information, Joachim Schmitz, 07:59
- Information, raashid bhatt, 07:55
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 07:52
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: Storgae durations, Kenny McCormack, 07:39
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 07:39
- Re: Memory help?, Richard Tobin, 07:33
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:29
- Re: Memory help?, santosh, 07:21
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 07:16
- Memory help?, raashid bhatt, 07:04
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 06:51
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Chris M. Thomasson, 06:51
- Re: Insuring a function is only called from a macro, Richard Tobin, 06:31
- Re: how to use the open() call, Martin Ambuhl, 06:29
- www.cicigoogle.cn air max 90, air max ltd, nike shox R4, NZ, Jordan 23, Jordan 5 fusion, air force one, dunk sb, cicitrade01, 06:25
- Insuring a function is only called from a macro, holysmoke, 06:17
- how to use the open() call, pal, 06:16
- Re: how come OS be written in C, Bartc, 06:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 05:48
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 05:34
- Re: Storgae durations, Joachim Schmitz, 05:20
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Bartc, 05:13
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 04:47
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 04:45
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 04:43
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 04:36
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 04:34
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 04:31
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 04:26
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard, 04:23
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Nick Keighley, 04:18
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 04:13
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 04:10
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 04:03
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Andy, 04:03
- Re: problem with MSVC, Keith Thompson, 03:59
- Re: K&R p 130, Chris Torek, 03:59
- Re: Inline Functions?, Keith Thompson, 03:58
- Re: K&R Ex 1-22, Richard Heathfield, 03:57
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 03:40
- K&R Ex 1-22, Andrew C., 03:36
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 03:32
- Re: Inline Functions?, Luks, 02:49
- Re: Inline Functions?, santosh, 02:48
- Re: Inline Functions?, Richard Heathfield, 02:44
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 02:40
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 02:40
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 02:35
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, E.D.G., 02:29
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 02:16
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, E.D.G., 02:15
- Re: problem with MSVC, santosh, 02:04
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 01:46
- Inline Functions?, raashid bhatt, 01:40
- Re: A clarification please, Richard Heathfield, 01:36
- Re: Freeing Reallocated arrays, Ian Collins, 01:33
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Freeing Reallocated arrays, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 01:19
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., rio, 00:57
- Re: Combinations, rio, 00:57
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 00:49
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 00:48
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Kenny McCormack, 00:24
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Keith Thompson, 00:21
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, Richard Heathfield, 00:13
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 00:06
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, jackie, 00:03
August 18, 2008
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 23:45
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Aaron W . Hsu, 23:40
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 23:37
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 22:23
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Ron Ford, 22:19
- Re: fscanf, Ben Bacarisse, 22:13
- Re: fscanf, Paul, 22:03
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 21:47
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:39
- Re: fscanf, Richard Heathfield, 21:16
- Re: fscanf, Ben Bacarisse, 21:15
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:15
- Re: fscanf, Ben Bacarisse, 21:09
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:06
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:02
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 20:52
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 20:51
- Re: A clarification please, Richard Heathfield, 20:45
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 20:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 20:32
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 20:28
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 20:24
- Re: A clarification please, mdh, 20:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Tobin, 19:51
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Barry Schwarz, 19:48
- Re: fscanf, Barry Schwarz, 19:48
- Re: A clarification please, Barry Schwarz, 19:48
- Re: bmp file issues, Barry Schwarz, 19:48
- Re: A clarification please, jameskuyper, 19:40
- Attention Please. It's about the 1st Sport Competition In the World. (Olympic), saifullah, 19:12
- Re: how come OS be written in C, Herbert Rosenau, 19:11
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Herbert Rosenau, 19:11
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Herbert Rosenau, 19:11
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 18:47
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 18:45
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 18:41
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 18:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 18:32
- Re: problem with MSVC, Antoninus Twink, 18:28
- A clarification please, mdh, 18:23
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Bartc, 18:20
- Re: bmp file issues, Bartc, 17:57
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, lawrence . jones, 17:53
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, lawrence . jones, 17:52
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, lawrence . jones, 17:27
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 17:05
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, sln, 16:43
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 16:35
- Re: error with cygwin and gcc, Malcolm McLean, 16:27
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 16:21
- error with cygwin and gcc, Anish Chapagain, 16:21
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 15:50
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Flash Gordon, 15:44
- Re: Storgae durations, J. F. Lemaire, 15:36
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Malcolm McLean, 15:32
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., August Karlstrom, 15:29
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Malcolm McLean, 15:29
- Re: glibc ARM cross compile error, Flash Gordon, 15:29
- Re: bmp file issues, Malcolm McLean, 15:13
- Re: Storgae durations, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 15:13
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., August Karlstrom, 15:11
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 15:01
- Re: Outputting a string to STDOUT with our libc functions, gw7rib, 14:51
- Re: Programming Languages Decisions, gw7rib, 14:43
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, jameskuyper, 14:31
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 14:28
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Harter, 14:07
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, vippstar, 13:41
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Daniel Molina Wegener, 13:29
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Eric Sosman, 13:28
- bmp file issues, steve, 13:18
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 13:14
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Kenny McCormack, 13:13
- Re: problem with MSVC, Serve Lau, 12:47
- Re: Storgae durations, jameskuyper, 12:46
- Re: Question about fprintf, Richard Tobin, 12:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 12:09
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, pete, 12:02
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 11:53
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:49
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 11:47
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:41
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 11:30
- Re: converting floating point number to byte array in C, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:26
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Keith Thompson, 11:21
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Keith Thompson, 11:14
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., John Bode, 11:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:36
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:34
- converting floating point number to byte array in C, ssubbarayan, 10:32
- Re: Storgae durations, Joachim Schmitz, 10:28
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, jackie, 10:18
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Kenny McCormack, 10:10
- Re: Storgae durations, Joachim Schmitz, 10:08
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 10:02
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Ben Bacarisse, 09:26
- Re: K&R p 130, James Kuyper, 09:06
- Re: How to return an array with 2 dimension from function?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:05
- Re: Would this cause undefined behavior please?, rayw, 08:59
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 08:49
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, Andreas Lundgren, 08:47
- Re: Do you know what *really* annoys me?, Eric Sosman, 08:25
- Re: How to return an array with 2 dimension from function?, Andreas Lundgren, 08:18
- Re: ansi c compiler character encoding, James Kuyper, 08:07
- Re: How to return an array with 2 dimension from function?, James Kuyper, 08:07
- Re: K&R p 130, James Kuyper, 07:58
- Re: How to return an array with 2 dimension from function?, pete, 07:49
- ansi c compiler character encoding, Andreas Lundgren, 07:48
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, James Kuyper, 07:47
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, James Kuyper, 07:47
- Re: Do you know what *really* annoys me?, Chris M. Thomasson, 07:28
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:20
- How to return an array with 2 dimension from function?, MN, 07:07
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 07:07
- Re: Question about fprintf, vamsi, 07:06
- Re: K&R p 130, Nick Keighley, 06:50
- Re: Help,how does division truncate?, pete, 06:48
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Pranav, 06:42
- Re: Would this cause undefined behavior please?, pete, 06:38
- Re: Do you know what *really* annoys me?, bcpkh, 06:32
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Nick Keighley, 06:22
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 06:14
- Re: Question about fprintf, Nick Keighley, 06:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, BWIGLEY, 06:05
- Re: fscanf, Nick Keighley, 06:04
- Question about fprintf, vamsi, 06:02
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 05:56
- Help,how does division truncate?, jackie, 05:56
- Re: glibc ARM cross compile error, Chris M. Thomasson, 05:49
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 05:47
- glibc ARM cross compile error, akhilesh.noida@xxxxxxxxx, 05:41
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 05:40
- Would this cause undefined behavior please?, rayw, 05:23
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 05:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Nick Keighley, 05:03
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 05:02
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 04:58
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Richard Bos, 04:49
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 04:48
- Re: Storgae durations, Nick Keighley, 04:35
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, David Thompson, 04:24
- Re: stack, David Thompson, 04:24
- Re: Storgae durations, Nick Keighley, 04:12
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 03:40
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Willem, 03:21
- Re: how to remove code duplication, santosh, 03:10
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 03:07
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 03:03
- Re: how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 02:51
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 01:34
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 01:33
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 01:10
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 00:56
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 00:52
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 00:47
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 00:43
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Gordon Burditt, 00:30
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Ben Bacarisse, 00:16
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Pranav, 00:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 00:04
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 00:03
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 00:02
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 00:00
August 17, 2008
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 23:04
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Ben Bacarisse, 22:42
- Re: Outputting a string to STDOUT with our libc functions, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: how come OS be written in C, Jack Klein, 22:36
- Re: fscanf, vippstar, 22:34
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 22:23
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Jack Klein, 22:06
- Re: fscanf, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: fscanf, Paul, 21:58
- Re: fscanf, Ian Collins, 21:55
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 21:52
- Re: fscanf, Barry Schwarz, 21:40
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:39
- Re: fscanf, Paul, 21:37
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, vippstar, 21:37
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, pete, 21:33
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, pete, 21:25
- Re: fscanf, Ian Collins, 21:20
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 21:08
- Re: fscanf, Ian Collins, 20:51
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 20:49
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 20:44
- Re: fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 20:39
- Re: fscanf, Anand Hariharan, 19:46
- Re: fscanf, vippstar, 19:42
- fscanf, Bill Cunningham, 19:39
- Re: Storgae durations, Ian Collins, 19:31
- Re: Storgae durations, Andrew Poelstra, 19:24
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 19:22
- Re: Storgae durations, vippstar, 19:19
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 19:13
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 19:09
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Ian Collins, 19:07
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Andrew Poelstra, 18:47
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Flash Gordon, 18:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Andrew Poelstra, 18:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 18:33
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Do you know what *really* annoys me?, Geoff Vince, 18:02
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Flash Gordon, 17:57
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, soscpd, 17:47
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Ben Bacarisse, 17:34
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 16:33
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Harter, 16:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 15:57
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Andrew Poelstra, 15:52
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Andrew Poelstra, 15:48
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 15:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 15:37
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Gordon Burditt, 15:33
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 15:32
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Joachim Schmitz, 15:31
- Re: sequence point, Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 15:17
- Re: sequence points, Ian Collins, 15:15
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 15:13
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Andrew Poelstra, 15:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 15:04
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Antoninus Twink, 14:56
- Re: Why is Address of Entry Point same for all PE FIles, santosh, 14:37
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 14:36
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Malcolm McLean, 14:32
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., santosh, 14:25
- Re: having more variables in program increases size?, Lee, 14:23
- Re: Why is Address of Entry Point same for all PE FIles, Antoninus Twink, 14:23
- Re: Outputting a string to STDOUT with our libc functions, santosh, 14:18
- Why is Address of Entry Point same for all PE FIles, raashid bhatt, 14:17
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Malcolm McLean, 14:15
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 14:12
- Re: having more variables in program increases size?, Malcolm McLean, 14:11
- Re: having more variables in program increases size?, santosh, 14:10
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 14:06
- Re: how come OS be written in C, santosh, 14:06
- having more variables in program increases size?, raashid bhatt, 14:05
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Ben Bacarisse, 14:03
- Re: problem with MSVC, santosh, 14:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 13:59
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., santosh, 13:54
- Re: K&R p 130, Barry Schwarz, 13:54
- Re: Storgae durations, Barry Schwarz, 13:54
- Re: Storgae durations, Barry Schwarz, 13:54
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Barry Schwarz, 13:54
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Kenny McCormack, 13:54
- Re: problem with MSVC, Ben Bacarisse, 13:51
- Re: Outputting a string to STDOUT with our libc functions, Andrew Poelstra, 13:50
- Re: sequence point, James Kuyper, 13:48
- Re: problem with MSVC, Antoninus Twink, 13:47
- Outputting a string to STDOUT with our libc functions, raashid bhatt, 13:47
- Re: how come OS be written in C, Antoninus Twink, 13:45
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Antoninus Twink, 13:41
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 13:34
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Jensen Somers, 13:33
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 13:33
- Re: why are GOTO's not used ..., Malcolm McLean, 13:32
- why are GOTO's not used ..., raashid bhatt, 13:28
- why are GOTO's not used ..., raashid bhatt, 13:28
- Re: problem with MSVC, Malcolm McLean, 13:23
- Re: how come OS be written in C, Malcolm McLean, 13:20
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 13:17
- Re: sequence points, Malcolm McLean, 13:08
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard, 13:08
- problem with MSVC, raashid bhatt, 13:07
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., William Pursell, 13:03
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 13:03
- Re: catching exit, Richard, 13:02
- how come OS be written in C, raashid bhatt, 13:02
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., raashid bhatt, 12:59
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Malcolm McLean, 12:52
- does having more variables increases the size of program., raashid bhatt, 12:50
- Re: does having more variables increases the size of program., Anand Hariharan, 12:50
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, 31349 83652, 12:43
- Re: sequence points, Anand Hariharan, 12:40
- Re: sequence points, osmium, 12:18
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 12:13
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 12:12
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 11:47
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 11:37
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 11:28
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Richard Tobin, 11:19
- Re: sequence points, Eric Sosman, 11:08
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 11:00
- Re: sequence points, Jrdman, 10:58
- Re: sequence points, Ben Bacarisse, 10:52
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 10:47
- sequence points, Jrdman, 10:47
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, santosh, 10:39
- Re: Amount OF Memory...,, Richard Heathfield, 10:22
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 10:18
- Amount OF Memory...,, Pranav, 10:14
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 10:01
- Re: K&R p 130, Ben Bacarisse, 09:50
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:36
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 09:34
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, kenny.riodan@xxxxxxxxx, 09:30
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, kenny.riodan@xxxxxxxxx, 09:27
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 09:24
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Kenny McCormack, 09:14
- Re: Storgae durations, Kenny McCormack, 08:58
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 08:30
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 08:29
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Ben Bacarisse, 08:24
- Re: Storgae durations, Malcolm McLean, 08:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 07:37
- Re: Storgae durations, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 07:33
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 07:26
- Re: Storgae durations, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 07:22
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 07:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 07:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 07:05
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 07:03
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 06:58
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 06:36
- Re: Storgae durations, Joachim Schmitz, 06:25
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 05:54
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 05:42
- Re: Storgae durations, Harald van Dijk, 05:41
- Re: K&R p 130, pete, 05:39
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 04:43
- Re: Storgae durations, Ian Collins, 04:41
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:36
- Re: Combinations, Richard Heathfield, 04:32
- Re: K&R p 130, 陈峰扬, 04:30
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 04:27
- Re: K&R p 130, Malcolm McLean, 04:25
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 04:21
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:20
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:17
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 04:07
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 04:07
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 03:58
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 03:45
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 03:32
- Re: sequence point, santosh, 03:30
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 03:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 03:23
- Re: sequence point, Joachim Schmitz, 03:12
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Serve Lau, 03:02
- Re: sequence point, santosh, 02:57
- Re: sequence point, Joachim Schmitz, 02:51
- Re: K&R p 130, mdh, 02:25
- Re: K&R p 130, santosh, 02:12
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Andrew Poelstra, 02:09
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 02:03
- K&R p 130, mdh, 01:59
- Re: sequence point, santosh, 01:55
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Pilcrow, 00:18
August 16, 2008
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Ian Collins, 23:55
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Ian Collins, 23:53
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Martin Ambuhl, 23:48
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, Martin Ambuhl, 23:45
- Re: Error executing link.exe??, raashid bhatt, 23:03
- Error executing link.exe??, surlogics, 22:16
- Re: sequence point, Keith Thompson, 21:52
- Re: Storgae durations, Keith Thompson, 21:43
- Re: library- functions, Keith Thompson, 21:29
- Re: Storgae durations, pete, 20:23
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 18:42
- Re: sequence point, Ian Collins, 18:21
- sequence point, Jrdman, 18:06
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, kenny . riodan, 17:47
- Re: Storgae durations, Ian Collins, 17:44
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 17:29
- Re: Combinations, Eric Sosman, 17:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, kenny . riodan, 17:21
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 17:20
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 17:11
- Re: library- functions, Malcolm McLean, 17:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 17:02
- Re: Combinations, Andrew Poelstra, 17:02
- Re: Combinations, Malcolm McLean, 17:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 16:55
- Combinations, jrdacc . i, 16:54
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:53
- Re: Storgae durations, Huibert Bol, 16:50
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 16:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 16:45
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 16:44
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 16:43
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 16:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 16:39
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 16:37
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 16:37
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 16:36
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 16:35
- Re: Storgae durations, Ian Collins, 16:34
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 16:29
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:28
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 16:25
- Re: Storgae durations, santosh, 16:25
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 16:16
- Re: Storgae durations, Harald van Dijk, 16:06
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 16:02
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Andrew Poelstra, 15:57
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 15:54
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 15:52
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, James Kuyper, 15:46
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, santosh, 15:40
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 15:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 15:24
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 15:06
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Richard Heathfield, 15:00
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:57
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 14:56
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Barry Schwarz, 14:03
- Re: Storgae durations, Barry Schwarz, 14:03
- Re: library- functions, Antoninus Twink, 13:59
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Keith Thompson, 13:57
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Keith Thompson, 13:49
- Re: library- functions, Keith Thompson, 13:44
- Re: Storgae durations, Huibert Bol, 13:42
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 13:40
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 13:40
- Re: Storgae durations, James Kuyper, 13:37
- Re: Storgae durations, Antoninus Twink, 13:36
- Re: Storgae durations, s0suk3, 13:32
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Andrew Poelstra, 13:14
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 13:06
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 12:55
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 12:32
- Re: Storgae durations, jacob navia, 12:31
- Re: Storgae durations, Ben Bacarisse, 12:19
- Re: Storgae durations, Richard Heathfield, 12:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 12:10
- Storgae durations, jrdacc . i, 12:02
- Re: size?, Serve Lau, 11:39
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Andrew, 10:51
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 10:04
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, James Kuyper, 09:05
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 08:43
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:32
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 08:09
- Re: size?, Antoninus Twink, 07:56
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 07:54
- Re: size?, jrdacc . i, 07:50
- Re: library- functions, Daniel Molina Wegener, 07:49
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 07:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 06:50
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joachim Schmitz, 06:38
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Tobin, 06:18
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 06:04
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Tobin, 05:24
- Re: scanf doubt, Flash Gordon, 04:50
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 04:41
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), santosh, 04:40
- Re: library- functions, William Pursell, 04:34
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, santosh, 04:31
- library- functions, onkar, 04:25
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 04:19
- Re: size?, santosh, 04:14
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Serve Lau, 02:35
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 00:27
August 15, 2008
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 23:52
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 22:55
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 22:37
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 22:31
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 22:21
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), s0suk3, 22:18
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, CBFalconer, 22:03
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, CBFalconer, 22:01
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 21:56
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), CBFalconer, 21:42
- Re: size?, Joe Wright, 21:26
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Keith Thompson, 20:45
- Re: size?, Keith Thompson, 20:37
- Re: size?, Flash Gordon, 20:22
- Re: How to Initialize Complex Numbers, Flash Gordon, 20:20
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Flash Gordon, 20:11
- Re: size?, Gordon Burditt, 20:02
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), s0suk3, 19:59
- Re: size?, Joe Wright, 19:53
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Keith Thompson, 19:45
- size?, Jrdman, 19:28
- Re: How to Initialize Complex Numbers, Jack Pot, 19:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 19:17
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 18:51
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 18:50
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Antoninus Twink, 18:41
- Re: New Joinee:-), Antoninus Twink, 18:37
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), s0suk3, 18:33
- Re: scanf doubt, Flash Gordon, 18:13
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Flash Gordon, 17:53
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, pete, 17:44
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Paul Hsieh, 17:37
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 17:31
- Re: New Joinee:-), Flash Gordon, 17:12
- Re: debugging - my own libc, Flash Gordon, 17:08
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Keith Thompson, 17:08
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Ian Collins, 17:05
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Ian Collins, 17:03
- Re: which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, Antoninus Twink, 16:56
- Re: scanf doubt, Flash Gordon, 16:55
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Paul Hsieh, 16:42
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 16:26
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, santosh, 16:21
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Flash Gordon, 16:06
- Re: scanf doubt, jameskuyper, 15:57
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Default User, 15:39
- Re: catching exit, Antoninus Twink, 15:17
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Keith Thompson, 14:57
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, s0suk3, 14:54
- Re: scanf doubt, pete, 14:53
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 14:40
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, DiAvOl, 14:06
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Tobin, 13:46
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 13:10
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 13:01
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Keith Thompson, 12:50
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keith Thompson, 12:49
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Keith Thompson, 12:41
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Keith Thompson, 12:36
- Re: Are 2D arrays contiguous?, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:28
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- [OT] Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Eric Sosman, 12:23
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keith Thompson, 12:18
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, Richard Tobin, 12:17
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Kenneth Brody, 12:16
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 12:12
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Richard Tobin, 12:07
- Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 09:54
- Re: Reading in a bitmap and getting RGB values, adam majewski, 09:47
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, James Kuyper, 09:44
- Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 09:39
- Re: debugging - my own libc, S James S Stapleton, 09:29
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:26
- Re: New Joinee:-), Andrew Poelstra, 09:12
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 09:04
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, CBFalconer, 09:04
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Tristan Miller, 09:04
- Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 09:01
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:01
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 08:58
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Bos, 08:52
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:49
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:46
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 08:46
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:42
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Richard Bos, 08:42
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Bos, 08:41
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 08:39
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:37
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:36
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:34
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:33
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:31
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:29
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 08:27
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:26
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 08:20
- Re: New Joinee:-), Willem, 08:18
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 08:13
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:11
- Re: which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, CBFalconer, 07:59
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Chris M. Thomasson, 07:59
- Re: Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 07:57
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 07:55
- Spaceball Source Code, Adeel Hasan Akbari, 07:53
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, pete, 07:49
- Re: what's meaning of this ?, vippstar, 07:47
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 07:46
- what's meaning of this ?, Tommy, 07:45
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, CBFalconer, 07:42
- Re: Are 2D arrays contiguous?, pete, 07:42
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 07:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:38
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Richard Bos, 07:23
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 07:11
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Tristan Miller, 07:04
- Re: Are 2D arrays contiguous?, daniel, 06:46
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Chris Torek, 06:38
- Are 2D arrays contiguous?, Tristan Miller, 06:38
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Bos, 06:23
- Re: which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, Tommy, 06:21
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Bos, 06:20
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Richard Bos, 06:19
- Re: improved C1X security, Richard Bos, 06:18
- which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, Tommy, 06:10
- Re: which function should I use to list all of the FILE SYSTEMS in UNIX??, Ian Collins, 06:08
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 05:18
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 05:15
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Richard Heathfield, 05:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Nick Keighley, 03:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Nick Keighley, 03:45
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Russell Cranston, 03:41
- Re: New Joinee:-), CBFalconer, 03:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Bos, 02:58
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, CBFalconer, 02:43
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 02:26
- Re: New Joinee:-), Andrew Poelstra, 02:14
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), CBFalconer, 02:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 02:07
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), santosh, 01:29
- Re: Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, santosh, 01:24
- Re: New Joinee:-), Willem, 01:19
- Re: "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), s0suk3, 01:16
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, James Kuyper, 00:11
August 14, 2008
- Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 23:45
- Re: scanf doubt, James Kuyper, 23:41
- Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 23:01
- Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 22:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joe Wright, 22:09
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 21:53
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), CBFalconer, 21:52
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 21:44
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 21:42
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Richard Heathfield, 21:41
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 21:40
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 21:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 21:32
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 21:31
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Doug Miller, 21:10
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 21:04
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 21:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 20:47
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 20:28
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 20:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Joe Wright, 20:16
- Re: New Joinee:-), Pietro Cerutti, 20:14
- Re: Compilation error, Martin Ambuhl, 20:07
- Re: Compilation error, CBFalconer, 19:57
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Default User, 19:54
- Re: debugging - my own libc, CBFalconer, 19:53
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 19:50
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 19:44
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 19:41
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 19:39
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 19:35
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), jameskuyper, 19:31
- Re: scanf doubt, jameskuyper, 19:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, jameskuyper, 19:11
- Re: Compilation error, Antoninus Twink, 18:55
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Antoninus Twink, 18:53
- Re: Compilation error, Sjouke Burry, 18:52
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 18:51
- Compilation error, Chris Peters, 18:44
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Richard Heathfield, 18:42
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 18:34
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Default User, 18:30
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 18:23
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Keith Thompson, 18:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 18:09
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, jameskuyper, 18:03
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 18:02
- Re: [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Default User, 17:28
- [OT] "Usanians" (was Re: Why is it dangerous?), Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 17:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 17:07
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, ansh, 17:05
- Re: debugging - my own libc, Flash Gordon, 16:55
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 16:53
- Re: debugging - my own libc, Ben Bacarisse, 16:29
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 16:23
- Re: debugging - my own libc, Eric Sosman, 16:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 16:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 16:17
- Re: catching exit, Willem, 16:13
- Re: New Joinee:-), Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 16:10
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 16:07
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 16:06
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 16:06
- Re: catching exit, Kenny McCormack, 15:58
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Flash Gordon, 15:56
- Re: debugging - my own libc, S James S Stapleton, 15:51
- debugging - my own libc, S James S Stapleton, 15:44
- Re: catching exit, jameskuyper, 15:39
- Re: scanf doubt, jameskuyper, 15:09
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 14:17
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, lawrence . jones, 14:15
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 14:11
- Re: problem with macros, lawrence . jones, 14:02
- Re: New Joinee:-), Antoninus Twink, 13:56
- Re: scanf doubt, Antoninus Twink, 13:46
- Re: catching exit, Antoninus Twink, 13:43
- Re: catching exit, Antoninus Twink, 13:40
- Re: catching exit, Antoninus Twink, 13:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 13:37
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 13:29
- Re: catching exit, Kenny McCormack, 13:21
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 13:16
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 11:57
- Re: catching exit, santosh, 11:38
- Re: catching exit, Richard Harter, 11:35
- Re: scanf doubt, santosh, 11:29
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Kenny McCormack, 09:18
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 09:08
- Re: catching exit, Richard Heathfield, 08:58
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 08:24
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 08:16
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 08:10
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 08:05
- Re: Undefined behavior, August Karlstrom, 07:56
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 07:52
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 07:49
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 07:12
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 07:01
- Re: catching exit, James Kuyper, 06:57
- Re: New Joinee:-), santosh, 06:40
- New Joinee:-), DineshKumar, 05:50
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, santosh, 05:47
- Re: catching exit, Kenny McCormack, 05:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 05:27
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 05:12
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, James Dow Allen, 04:46
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Nick Keighley, 04:26
- Re: scanf doubt, Ian Collins, 04:24
- Re: scanf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 04:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 04:04
- Re: catching exit, Richard Heathfield, 03:55
- Re: Array definition guarantees, Chris Torek, 03:39
- Re: catching exit, Richard Heathfield, 03:31
- Pre Santa Barbara mailing available, Keld Jørn Simonsen, 03:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, James Dow Allen, 03:22
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 03:01
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 03:00
- Re: catching exit, mathieu, 02:59
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 01:13
- Re: scanf doubt, Andrew Poelstra, 00:47
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Barry Schwarz, 00:36
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Andrew Poelstra, 00:21
August 13, 2008
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 20:09
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 20:06
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 19:58
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Keith Thompson, 19:55
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, jameskuyper, 19:41
- Re: Value of int NULL, Richard Tobin, 19:30
- Re: scanf doubt, jameskuyper, 19:27
- Re: Value of int NULL, Harald van Dijk, 19:26
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 19:04
- Re: catching exit, Keith Thompson, 19:00
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Richard Tobin, 18:49
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 18:42
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Antoninus Twink, 18:24
- Re: catching exit, Antoninus Twink, 18:18
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, lawrence . jones, 18:13
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: catching exit, CBFalconer, 17:33
- Re: scanf doubt, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Value of int NULL, lawrence . jones, 17:23
- Re: Undefined behavior, Flash Gordon, 17:17
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Chris Torek, 17:09
- Re: Undefined behavior, Harald van Dijk, 17:04
- Re: Constraint violation - when?, jameskuyper, 17:04
- Undefined behavior, DonStarr, 16:54
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, jameskuyper, 16:48
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Malcolm McLean, 16:46
- Re: Reading in a bitmap and getting RGB values, Malcolm McLean, 16:37
- Re: problem with macros, lawrence . jones, 16:26
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 16:22
- Re: Array definition guarantees, jameskuyper, 16:14
- Re: Constraint violation - when?, lawrence . jones, 15:54
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Walter Roberson, 15:08
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 14:39
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Antoninus Twink, 14:27
- Re: catching exit, Eric Sosman, 14:17
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Paul, 14:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 13:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 13:34
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Walter Roberson, 13:34
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Heathfield, 13:32
- Reading in a bitmap and getting RGB values, steve, 13:24
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, jameskuyper, 13:24
- catching exit, mathieu, 13:13
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Walter Roberson, 13:00
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: scanf doubt, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: a basic question,need help, Antoninus Twink, 12:26
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, jameskuyper, 12:25
- Re: a basic question,need help, Keith Thompson, 12:18
- anish add, anish, 12:15
- Re: a basic question,need help, jameskuyper, 12:15
- Re: scanf doubt, vippstar, 12:08
- Re: scanf doubt, Daniel Molina Wegener, 12:06
- Re: a basic question,need help, Keith Thompson, 12:06
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Serve Lau, 12:00
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Keith Thompson, 11:56
- Re: scanf doubt, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:52
- Re: scanf doubt, Daniel Molina Wegener, 11:46
- Re: a basic question,need help, christian.bau, 11:31
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 11:01
- Re: a basic question,need help, CBFalconer, 10:55
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 10:44
- Re: How to catch this?, MN, 10:36
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:09
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, osmium, 10:08
- Re: scanf doubt, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:53
- scanf doubt, deepak, 09:46
- Re: Array definition guarantees, James Kuyper, 09:38
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, James Kuyper, 09:30
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 09:16
- OT: ++x is l-value in C++ (was: a basic question,need help), Spiro Trikaliotis, 09:04
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Dik T. Winter, 09:02
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, DiAvOl, 09:01
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Kenny McCormack, 09:00
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Kenny McCormack, 08:59
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 08:44
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Kenny McCormack, 08:44
- Re: Need help - pointers, Iman S. H. Suyoto, 08:37
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:30
- Re: Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, Willem, 08:29
- Re: a basic question,need help, James Kuyper, 08:29
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 08:27
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, James Kuyper, 08:16
- Need a Replica of FIOSENDFD (BSD) on Linux, ansh, 08:06
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 07:46
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, James Kuyper, 07:32
- Re: How to catch this?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 05:32
- Re: Display captured images in realtime, Joachim Schmitz, 04:40
- Re: a basic question,need help, jackie, 04:30
- Display captured images in realtime, rgagarrett, 04:25
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Chris Torek, 04:20
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Richard Heathfield, 04:14
- Re: a basic question,need help, CBFalconer, 04:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Bart, 04:07
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Antoninus Twink, 04:05
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 04:05
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 03:54
- Re: a basic question,need help, Keith Thompson, 03:29
- Re: How to catch this?, santosh, 03:21
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Bos, 02:55
- Re: How to catch this?, MN, 02:36
- Re: How to catch this?, Ulrich Eckhardt, 02:32
- Re: How to catch this?, Andrew Poelstra, 02:22
- How to catch this?, MN, 02:04
- Re: Array definition guarantees, Barry Schwarz, 02:03
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Barry Schwarz, 01:38
- Re: store char*, MN, 01:21
- Re: a basic question,need help, Eric Schmidt, 00:45
- Re: a basic question,need help, Daniel Pitts, 00:38
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, s0suk3, 00:34
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 00:17
- Re: a basic question,need help, CBFalconer, 00:00
August 12, 2008
- Re: a basic question,need help, Ian Collins, 23:59
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Ian Collins, 23:57
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, s0suk3, 23:55
- Re: a basic question,need help, Tommy, 23:49
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 23:47
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 23:46
- Re: Array definition guarantees, Eric Sosman, 23:39
- Re: a basic question,need help, Eric Sosman, 23:25
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 23:24
- Re: Array definition guarantees, s0suk3, 23:17
- Re: Array definition guarantees, Eric Sosman, 23:11
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 23:11
- Re: Array definition guarantees, Jack Klein, 23:01
- a basic question,need help, jackie, 22:56
- Re: Array definition guarantees, mdh, 22:55
- Re: Array definition guarantees, s0suk3, 22:51
- Array definition guarantees, mdh, 22:36
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 22:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 22:17
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Keith Thompson, 22:12
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 22:11
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, user923005, 21:35
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, user923005, 21:28
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 21:26
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Keith Thompson, 21:21
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, s0suk3, 21:07
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Paul Hsieh, 20:44
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, jameskuyper, 19:48
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Chris McDonald, 19:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 19:37
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, user923005, 19:21
- Re: static char arrays size, christian.bau, 19:11
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, vippstar, 19:08
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Antoninus Twink, 18:55
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, Eric Sosman, 18:44
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 18:33
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Antoninus Twink, 18:32
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 18:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Tobin, 18:13
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, DiAvOl, 18:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Paul Hsieh, 18:03
- Re: transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Tobin, 17:52
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 17:49
- Re: Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, scholz . lothar, 17:42
- Parsing a PATH null-terminated variable, DiAvOl, 17:30
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 16:48
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 16:46
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 16:38
- Re: transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, Martin Ambuhl, 16:37
- Re: transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, ssylee, 16:02
- Re: improved C1X security, Eric Sosman, 16:02
- Re: improved C1X security, William Ahern, 15:25
- Re: transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, Richard Heathfield, 15:19
- Re: transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, santosh, 15:15
- Re: improved C1X security, Richard Heathfield, 15:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 15:09
- transforming from a non-null terminated string into a null terminated string, ssylee, 15:06
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Keith Thompson, 14:58
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Bart, 13:52
- Re: improved C1X security, Robert Seacord, 13:49
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:26
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Tobin, 12:20
- Re: Getting an exception..,, jameskuyper, 12:19
- Re: Getting an exception..,, jameskuyper, 12:10
- Re: store char*, Jensen Somers, 12:10
- Re: store char*, vippstar, 12:05
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 11:49
- Re: store char*, s0suk3, 11:44
- Re: store char*, Mark B [Diputsur], 11:42
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Default User, 11:37
- Re: tokens, Eric Sosman, 11:01
- Re: Getting an exception..,, s0suk3, 10:45
- Re: store char*, Jensen Somers, 10:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, James Kuyper, 10:18
- Re: store char*, James Kuyper, 10:12
- Re: store char*, Richard Bos, 10:10
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Bos, 10:09
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Bos, 10:07
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Richard Bos, 10:04
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 09:43
- Re: store char*, Pietro Cerutti, 09:34
- store char*, Nezhate, 09:25
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Andrew Poelstra, 09:20
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Nick Keighley, 08:28
- C++/ Contract/ IN, Tom Gugger, 08:24
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Dik T. Winter, 08:13
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:57
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:51
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 06:43
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, santosh, 06:26
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 05:52
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, vippstar, 05:50
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Ben Bacarisse, 05:35
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 05:25
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 05:13
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Pranav, 05:10
- Re: question on ferror() function, Richard Heathfield, 05:03
- Re: tokens, Nick Keighley, 05:02
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, vippstar, 05:01
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 04:59
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, ssubbarayan, 04:44
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Tobin, 04:33
- Re: question on ferror() function, Ian Collins, 04:16
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Nick Keighley, 04:13
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Walter Roberson, 04:07
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 03:54
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Antoninus Twink, 03:51
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Tobin, 03:51
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Nick Keighley, 03:50
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Antoninus Twink, 03:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 03:46
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Keith Thompson, 03:42
- Re: question about fread function, Nick Keighley, 03:40
- Re: value of bit, vippstar, 03:31
- Re: value of bit, Willem, 03:28
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 02:43
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Martin Ambuhl, 02:37
- Re: question on ferror() function, Gordon Burditt, 02:24
- Re: question on ferror() function, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Heathfield, 02:01
- Re: Need help - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 01:59
- Re: Need help - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: question on ferror() function, Ian Collins, 01:28
- Re: Getting an exception..,, CBFalconer, 01:12
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 01:01
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Andrew Poelstra, 00:54
- Re: Need help - pointers, Barry Schwarz, 00:51
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Barry Schwarz, 00:51
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 00:49
- Re: question about fread function, CBFalconer, 00:44
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, ssubbarayan, 00:43
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, ssubbarayan, 00:39
- Re: Getting an exception..,, Andrew Poelstra, 00:34
- Getting an exception..,, Pranav, 00:24
August 11, 2008
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Andrew Poelstra, 23:47
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Ed Prochak, 23:33
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, fjblurt, 23:20
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, s0suk3, 23:07
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Keith Thompson, 21:49
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Keith Thompson, 21:43
- Re: value of bit, Jack Klein, 21:41
- Re: value of bit, Keith Thompson, 21:35
- Re: question about fread function, Keith Thompson, 21:32
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Bill Reid, 20:52
- Re: question about fread function, vippstar, 20:51
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 20:40
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 20:31
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:30
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 20:10
- Re: Need help - pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 20:03
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 19:57
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 19:56
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Richard Tobin, 19:54
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Default User, 19:49
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Gordon Burditt, 19:45
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 19:32
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, CBFalconer, 19:30
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 19:25
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Flash Gordon, 19:22
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:13
- Re: Need help - pointers, Martien Verbruggen, 19:10
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, s0suk3, 19:10
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Flash Gordon, 19:09
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Antoninus Twink, 19:06
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, vippstar, 19:04
- Re: How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Chris McDonald, 19:03
- Re: how to remove code duplication, CBFalconer, 18:59
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 18:52
- How to write to a file including full directory in C under Unix?, Hongyu, 18:51
- Re: value of bit, Dann Corbit, 18:49
- Re: question on ferror() function, CBFalconer, 18:46
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, CBFalconer, 18:41
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Richard Heathfield, 18:21
- Re: value of bit, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 18:17
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Bartc, 18:14
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Antoninus Twink, 18:12
- Re: value of bit, vippstar, 18:10
- Re: question about fread function, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Default User, 18:09
- Re: static array initialization, CBFalconer, 17:53
- Re: improved C1X security, Antoninus Twink, 17:49
- Re: value of bit, pete, 17:48
- Re: improved C1X security, pete, 17:42
- Re: improved C1X security, Antoninus Twink, 17:37
- Re: value of bit, Walter Roberson, 17:37
- Re: question on clearerr() function, vippstar, 17:36
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Willem, 17:34
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Chad, 17:34
- Re: tokens, mdh, 17:34
- Re: improved C1X security, Gordon Burditt, 17:33
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Flash Gordon, 17:31
- Re: improved C1X security, vippstar, 17:30
- Re: value of bit, vippstar, 17:22
- Re: value of bit, Willem, 17:04
- Re: tokens, Bartc, 17:02
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lCstd, Antoninus Twink, 17:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 16:54
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 16:51
- Re: Variable naming conventions., August Karlstrom, 16:50
- Re: static char arrays size, Bartc, 16:44
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Edward A. Falk, 16:31
- Re: value of bit, Walter Roberson, 16:30
- Re: improved C1X security, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: value of bit, Dann Corbit, 16:28
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Keith Thompson, 16:19
- value of bit, Lazyworm, 16:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Eric Sosman, 16:02
- Re: improved C1X security, Ben Pfaff, 15:34
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Gordon Burditt, 15:25
- improved C1X security, Robert Seacord, 15:22
- Re: static char arrays size, Flash Gordon, 15:11
- Re: for and arrays, Flash Gordon, 15:01
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Flash Gordon, 14:48
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Flash Gordon, 14:41
- Re: Need help - pointers, pete, 14:39
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Walter Roberson, 14:08
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Gordon Burditt, 14:03
- Re: tokens, mdh, 13:53
- Re: Count Messages in Message Queue, Antoninus Twink, 13:45
- Re: question on clearerr() function, Chris Torek, 13:14
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Ed Prochak, 12:54
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, osmium, 12:37
- Re: Variable naming conventions., August Karlstrom, 12:33
- Re: Need help - pointers, s0suk3, 12:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Serve Lau, 12:12
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Keith Thompson, 11:35
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Bartc, 11:03
- Re: static char arrays size, James Kuyper, 10:48
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Chad, 10:38
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Richard Heathfield, 09:25
- Re: Need help - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 09:21
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Nick Keighley, 09:14
- Re: Parsing a struct with bytes, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:13
- Re: Count Messages in Message Queue, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:52
- Parsing a struct with bytes, ssubbarayan, 08:48
- Re: Need help - pointers, Iman S. H. Suyoto, 08:31
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Eric Sosman, 08:31
- Re: static char arrays size, Bartc, 08:27
- Re: Need help - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 08:02
- Re: Need help - pointers, pete, 07:56
- Re: static char arrays size, James Kuyper, 07:39
- Need help - pointers, Nezhate, 07:07
- Perot, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Wipro, HCL, Infosys, Satyam Hiring software Engineering candidates and MBA candidates, Job Seeker, 07:06
- Re: static char arrays size, Bartc, 06:57
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 06:36
- static char arrays size, daniel, 06:28
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Bos, 06:26
- Re: tokens, Andrew Poelstra, 05:49
- Re: tokens, Bartc, 05:42
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Andrew Poelstra, 05:38
- Re: how to remove code duplication, Nick Keighley, 05:00
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Richard Bos, 04:58
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard Bos, 04:53
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard Bos, 04:48
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, James Dow Allen, 04:38
- Re: question about fread function, Ian Collins, 04:07
- Re: question about fread function, Nick Keighley, 04:02
- Re: question about fread function, Keith Thompson, 03:50
- Re: question about fread function, Pranav, 03:33
- how to remove code duplication, arnuld, 02:46
- Re: question on ferror() function, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: question about fread function, santosh, 01:48
- Re: question on ferror() function, Ian Collins, 01:47
- question on ferror() function, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India, 01:38
- Re: question on clearerr() function, Keith Thompson, 01:10
- Re: for and arrays, David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: compiling error, David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: static array initialization, David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: Segmentation fault error, David Thompson, 01:02
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), David Thompson, 01:02
- question on clearerr() function, subramanian100in@xxxxxxxxx, India, 00:34
- Re: URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Barry Schwarz, 00:29
- Re: tokens, Barry Schwarz, 00:12
- Re: Why not success write the data?, Barry Schwarz, 00:12
- URGENT help : sorting lines of a file, Rajshekhar, 00:06
August 10, 2008
- Re: Inlining (was: how to find number of bytes freed), Keith Thompson, 23:08
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: Count Messages in Message Queue, Jack Klein, 21:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:25
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 21:24
- Re: Variable naming conventions., CBFalconer, 21:16
- Re: tokens, mdh, 21:00
- Inlining (was: how to find number of bytes freed), CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: tokens, Harald van Dijk, 20:44
- Re: tokens, mdh, 20:16
- Re: tokens, Harald van Dijk, 20:11
- Re: tokens, mdh, 20:01
- Re: tokens, Harald van Dijk, 19:40
- Count Messages in Message Queue, Ahmad Jalil Qarshi, 19:27
- tokens, mdh, 19:20
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Flash Gordon, 17:50
- Re: Variable naming conventions., blargg, 17:07
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Keith Thompson, 16:32
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: question about fread function, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Harald van Dijk, 15:39
- Re: Variable naming conventions., pereges, 15:33
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Flash Gordon, 15:30
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Ian Collins, 15:05
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Flash Gordon, 14:52
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Doug Miller, 14:35
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Walter Roberson, 14:33
- Re: question about fread function, xiao, 14:14
- Re: question about fread function, Pranav, 14:01
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, Antoninus Twink, 13:55
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Harter, 13:37
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 13:34
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:20
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Flash Gordon, 13:12
- Re: Variable naming conventions., William Pursell, 13:11
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Harter, 13:07
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, CBFalconer, 13:02
- Re: question about fread function, xiao, 12:57
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 12:56
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, Kenny McCormack, 12:21
- Re: Variable naming conventions., s0suk3, 12:17
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Stephen Sprunk, 11:59
- New well tested makepp snapshot released, Daniel Pfeiffer, 11:56
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 11:49
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 11:46
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 11:40
- Re: Variable naming conventions., William Pursell, 11:33
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Barry Schwarz, 11:14
- Re: semantic question, Kenny McCormack, 10:40
- Re: Variable naming conventions., s0suk3, 10:20
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Malcolm McLean, 10:16
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard, 09:48
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard, 09:47
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Nick Keighley, 09:46
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Serve Lau, 09:46
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard, 09:42
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 09:34
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Antoninus Twink, 09:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 09:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 09:17
- Re: setlocale() always returns "C", santosh, 09:09
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Tobin, 09:06
- Re: setlocale() always returns "C", yogeshmk, 09:03
- Re: setlocale() always returns "C", Huibert Bol, 09:02
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Bartc, 08:56
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, CBFalconer, 08:54
- Re: setlocale() always returns "C", yogeshmk, 08:51
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Kenny McCormack, 08:49
- Re: question about fread function, Pranav, 08:33
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:21
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:20
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:15
- Re: setlocale() always returns "C", Huibert Bol, 08:12
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:47
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Chris M. Thomasson, 07:45
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard, 07:42
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 07:35
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, vippstar, 07:30
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, CBFalconer, 07:30
- Re: semantic question, Antoninus Twink, 07:28
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, vippstar, 07:26
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Antoninus Twink, 07:25
- Re: Variable naming conventions., CBFalconer, 07:22
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Chris M. Thomasson, 07:21
- Re: Variable naming conventions., CBFalconer, 07:19
- setlocale() always returns "C", yogeshmk, 07:19
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Antoninus Twink, 07:18
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Antoninus Twink, 07:15
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:12
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, CBFalconer, 06:56
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard, 06:38
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Bartc, 06:17
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 04:38
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Malcolm McLean, 04:27
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 04:25
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Harald van Dijk, 04:22
- Re: semantic question, Harald van Dijk, 04:16
- Re: Variable naming conventions., santosh, 04:09
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, santosh, 04:05
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Ian Collins, 04:03
- Re: Variable naming conventions., James Harris, 03:59
- Re: Variable naming conventions., James Harris, 03:58
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, santosh, 03:57
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Richard Tobin, 03:54
- Re: semantic question, santosh, 03:42
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, sidd, 03:41
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:37
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Chris M. Thomasson, 02:55
- Re: Variable naming conventions., William Pursell, 02:14
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 01:31
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Ian Collins, 01:18
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, CBFalconer, 00:54
- Re: semantic question, Richard, 00:36
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Richard, 00:35
August 09, 2008
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 23:51
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Keith Thompson, 23:44
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Keith Thompson, 23:40
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Keith Thompson, 23:38
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Keith Thompson, 23:36
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Keith Thompson, 23:33
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, CBFalconer, 23:29
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Keith Thompson, 23:20
- Re: Variable naming conventions., CBFalconer, 23:16
- Re: semantic question, Keith Thompson, 23:10
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, pete, 22:19
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Gordon Burditt, 22:00
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, s0suk3, 21:39
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Ian Collins, 21:03
- Re: Why is it dangerous?, Richard Heathfield, 20:59
- Why is it dangerous?, Julian, 20:42
- Re: Variable naming conventions., Richard Heathfield, 19:52
- Re: Variable naming conventions., James Harris, 19:40
- Re: Variable naming conventions., James Harris, 19:36
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Ian Collins, 18:52
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 18:35
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Harald van Dijk, 18:27
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Barry Schwarz, 18:17
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Barry Schwarz, 18:17
- Re: [OT] Re: question about fread function, Barry Schwarz, 18:17
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Barry Schwarz, 18:17
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Barry Schwarz, 18:17
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Gordon Burditt, 18:16
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Antoninus Twink, 17:08
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Bartc, 16:39
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, sidd, 16:13
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Antoninus Twink, 15:53
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Joe Wright, 15:18
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, santosh, 15:00
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, santosh, 14:54
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Bartc, 14:53
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, sidd, 14:46
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, santosh, 14:45
- Re: where do the automatic variables go ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:34
- where do the automatic variables go ?, sidd, 14:26
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Serve Lau, 14:11
- Re: [OT] Re: question about fread function, blargg, 13:19
- Re: Second instance of scnaf not working, CBFalconer, 11:56
- Re: Variable naming conventions., John Floren, 11:48
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, mommycalled, 11:44
- Re: [OT] Re: question about fread function, CBFalconer, 11:25
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, CBFalconer, 11:23
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, vippstar, 11:18
- Re: Variable naming conventions., William Pursell, 11:03
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Malcolm McLean, 10:17
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Bartc, 09:44
- Re: Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, Ben Bacarisse, 09:41
- Dynamic allocation of multi dimensional array, gianluca, 09:27
- Re: Setting Bitfields on big endian and little endian, Gordon Burditt, 09:12
- Re: Second instance of scnaf not working, pete, 09:11
- Re: Second instance of scnaf not working, vippstar, 08:51
- Re: Variable naming conventions., vippstar, 08:48
- [OT] Re: question about fread function, Eric Sosman, 08:47
- Re: Second instance of scnaf not working, vippstar, 08:45
- Re: Second instance of scnaf not working, raseelbhagat@xxxxxxxxx, 08:44
- Second instance of scnaf not working, raseelbhagat@xxxxxxxxx, 08:28
- Variable naming conventions., pereges, 08:27
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Serve Lau, 08:15
- Re: semantic question, Kenny McCormack, 07:53
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ben Bacarisse, 07:40
- Re: semantic question, Harald van Dijk, 06:59
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 06:41
- Re: semantic question, Kenny McCormack, 06:33
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Serve Lau, 06:25
- Re: Setting Bitfields on big endian and little endian, Malcolm McLean, 05:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, CBFalconer, 05:08
- leon95-gms-gz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, leon.le458@xxxxxxxxx, 05:00
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, CBFalconer, 04:59
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Richard Tobin, 03:53
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Johannes Bauer, 03:37
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 03:35
- Re: Setting Bitfields on big endian and little endian, Barry Schwarz, 03:32
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Barry Schwarz, 03:32
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, santosh, 03:17
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, santosh, 03:11
- Re: semantic question, Keith Thompson, 03:06
- Setting Bitfields on big endian and little endian, Ramesh, 01:43
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Ian Collins, 00:08
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 00:07
- Re: question about fread function, Walter Roberson, 00:04
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Gordon Burditt, 00:00
August 08, 2008
- question about fread function, xiao, 23:57
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Howard Jaegermeister, 23:50
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Howard Jaegermeister, 23:45
- Re: semantic question, mdh, 23:01
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Barry Schwarz, 22:51
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Barry Schwarz, 22:51
- Re: semantic question, Ben Bacarisse, 22:49
- Re: semantic question, mdh, 22:32
- Re: semantic question, mdh, 22:29
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Ian Collins, 21:59
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Howard Jaegermeister, 21:49
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Howard Jaegermeister, 21:46
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Keith Thompson, 21:39
- [OT] Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Eric Sosman, 21:36
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, santosh, 21:18
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 21:12
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 21:00
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Bill Cunningham, 20:32
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Richard Tobin, 19:48
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 19:03
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Keith Thompson, 18:58
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Default User, 18:49
- Re: semantic question, Antoninus Twink, 18:49
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 18:48
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ben Bacarisse, 18:43
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Keith Thompson, 18:38
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Default User, 18:33
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ian Collins, 18:28
- Re: semantic question, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Ben Bacarisse, 18:03
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Eric Sosman, 18:02
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Robert Gamble, 17:53
- Re: testing fclose...really necessary, Malcolm McLean, 17:48
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Ben Bacarisse, 17:46
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 17:06
- testing fclose...really necessary, Bill Cunningham, 16:58
- Re: pairwise comparison, Walter Roberson, 15:58
- Why not success write the data?, xiao, 15:52
- pairwise comparison, gianluca, 15:40
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Richard B. Gilbert, 15:07
- Re: what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, Default User, 14:48
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 14:48
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, santosh, 14:23
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Richard, 14:22
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Serve Lau, 14:22
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Richard, 14:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, santosh, 14:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Bartc, 13:54
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Walter Roberson, 13:42
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard, 13:37
- Re: Value of int NULL, Harald van Dijk, 13:25
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Malcolm McLean, 13:12
- Re: Font request, Malcolm McLean, 13:07
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Antoninus Twink, 12:52
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Antoninus Twink, 12:37
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Bartc, 12:34
- It is Wonderful, easyandfreexr84, 12:21
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Old Wolf, 12:19
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Walter Roberson, 12:14
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Eric Sosman, 11:34
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, sh . vipin, 11:02
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Chris Dollin, 10:52
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Walter Roberson, 10:42
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard Heathfield, 10:41
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Walter Roberson, 10:41
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, santosh, 10:32
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, CBFalconer, 10:24
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, sh . vipin, 10:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, vippstar, 10:15
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, sh . vipin, 10:12
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, Richard Heathfield, 10:10
- Re: how to find number of bytes freed, David Resnick, 10:06
- how to find number of bytes freed, sh . vipin, 09:58
- Re: semantic question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:46
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, mommycalled, 09:12
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Bartc, 09:10
- Re: Value of int NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 09:10
- Re: semantic question, mdh, 08:44
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 08:25
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 08:21
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Eric Sosman, 08:15
- Re: semantic question, Eric Sosman, 08:12
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 07:50
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Spiro Trikaliotis, 07:01
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 06:22
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Spiro Trikaliotis, 05:22
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 05:18
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Spiro Trikaliotis, 05:18
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Pilcrow, 04:41
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 04:14
- Re: Equivalency of Integral Pointers, Barry Schwarz, 04:12
- Equivalency of Integral Pointers, William Ahern, 03:22
- semantic question, mdh, 02:05
- Re: what sort is this?, Ron Ford, 00:52
- Re: [gcc] indent -kr, Ron Ford, 00:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 00:29
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, CBFalconer, 00:11
August 07, 2008
- Re: Value of int NULL, CBFalconer, 23:52
- Perot, IBM, Hewlett-Packard, Dell, Wipro, HCL, Infosys, Satyam Hiring software Engineering candidates and MBA candidates, Career Point, 23:07
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Dann Corbit, 22:56
- Re: what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, xiao, 22:43
- Re: Value of int NULL, Barry Schwarz, 22:39
- Re: what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, Barry Schwarz, 22:39
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Mark B (Diputsur), 22:16
- Re: Value of int NULL, Jack Klein, 22:14
- Re: what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, xiao, 22:04
- Re: Lotto 7/45, Ben Bacarisse, 22:02
- Re: what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, fjblurt, 21:56
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Martien Verbruggen, 21:46
- Re: Value of int NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 21:32
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Pilcrow, 21:30
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Old Wolf, 21:26
- what does double free or corruption (!prev): mean? Thank u~, xiao, 21:22
- Re: Lotto 7/45, Old Wolf, 21:21
- Re: Deficiency of strtok, Martien Verbruggen, 21:04
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 20:46
- Re: Value of int NULL, Kaz Kylheku, 20:26
- Re: Value of int NULL, Kaz Kylheku, 20:20
- Re: scanf double, Keith Thompson, 20:17
- Deficiency of strtok, Pilcrow, 20:14
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 19:46
- Re: scanf double, Richard Heathfield, 19:23
- Re: scanf double, Dann Corbit, 19:15
- Re: scanf double, Pietro Cerutti, 19:14
- Re: scanf double, Pietro Cerutti, 19:12
- Re: scanf double, Richard Heathfield, 19:09
- Re: scanf double, fnegroni, 19:05
- Re: scanf double, amarapreet, 19:04
- scanf double, amarapreet, 18:56
- Re: Value of int NULL, pete, 17:45
- Re: Value of int NULL, CBFalconer, 17:33
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 17:20
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 17:18
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Serve Lau, 17:08
- Re: Value of int NULL, Harald van Dijk, 17:07
- Re: Value of int NULL, pete, 16:50
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 15:55
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 15:53
- Re: Value of int NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 15:50
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Antoninus Twink, 15:35
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Antoninus Twink, 15:31
- Re: programi parsing question, Antoninus Twink, 15:29
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:04
- Re: Value of int NULL, pete, 14:54
- Re: Value of int NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 14:00
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 12:55
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 12:51
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Wolfgang Draxinger, 12:44
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 12:44
- Re: Value of int NULL, pete, 12:43
- Re: Value of int NULL, santosh, 12:41
- Re: Value of int NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 12:38
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: Value of int NULL, santosh, 12:28
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, santosh, 12:23
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 12:14
- Re: Value of int NULL, Keith Thompson, 12:09
- Re: Value of int NULL, Barry Schwarz, 12:04
- Re: Value of int NULL, Barry Schwarz, 12:04
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Mark B [Diputsur], 12:03
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 11:54
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 11:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Kenny McCormack, 11:36
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., soscpd, 11:29
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 11:03
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 11:02
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 11:01
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 11:00
- C++/ Contract/ IN, Tom Gugger, 11:00
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 10:57
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 10:53
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 10:52
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 10:43
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 10:37
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 10:36
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 10:26
- Re: Value of int NULL, CBFalconer, 10:19
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard, 10:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 10:14
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 10:02
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 09:58
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 09:46
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:45
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:42
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard, 09:31
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard, 09:27
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 09:26
- Re: Value of int NULL, Chris M. Thomasson, 09:18
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 09:16
- Re: Value of int NULL, polas, 09:16
- Re: Value of int NULL, Eric Sosman, 09:11
- Re: Value of int NULL, santosh, 09:06
- Re: Value of int NULL, Salvatore Iovene, 09:04
- Re: Value of int NULL, Richard Bos, 09:04
- Re: _TIME_, CBFalconer, 09:00
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 08:57
- Value of int NULL, polas, 08:54
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:49
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:44
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, vippstar, 08:42
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 08:38
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 08:35
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, vippstar, 08:34
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 08:12
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Ben Bacarisse, 08:10
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Bartc, 08:03
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Nick Keighley, 07:41
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Nick Keighley, 07:36
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 07:35
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 07:28
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 07:24
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 07:23
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Ben Bacarisse, 07:20
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Bartc, 07:14
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 07:14
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 07:11
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 07:08
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, vippstar, 07:04
- Re: Font request, vippstar, 07:02
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 06:58
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 06:53
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, santosh, 06:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 06:42
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 06:42
- Re: Font request, Bartc, 06:36
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 06:36
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 06:26
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 06:25
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Bartc, 05:51
- Re: Font request, vippstar, 05:16
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 04:59
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 04:56
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 04:49
- Re: _TIME_, santosh, 04:44
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 04:39
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, vippstar, 04:37
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 04:35
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 04:18
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 04:09
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Willem, 04:09
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Riot Nrrrd™, 04:08
- Re: _TIME_, CBFalconer, 04:03
- Re: programi parsing question, CBFalconer, 03:57
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 03:52
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 03:49
- Re: programi parsing question, santosh, 03:47
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Flash Gordon, 03:42
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 03:31
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 03:05
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 02:47
- Re: programi parsing question, Richard Heathfield, 02:46
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, santosh, 02:39
- Re: programi parsing question, santosh, 02:26
- Re: programi parsing question, santosh, 02:25
- Re: _TIME_, Richard, 02:10
- Re: programi parsing question, James Dow Allen, 02:04
- Re: _TIME_, santosh, 01:57
- Re: De-referencing NULL, santosh, 01:36
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 01:26
August 06, 2008
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Keith Thompson, 23:50
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 23:46
- Re: De-referencing NULL, blargg, 23:12
- Re: _TIME_, CBFalconer, 22:32
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, CBFalconer, 22:19
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 22:07
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Tim Prince, 22:02
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 21:59
- Re: Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, Ian Collins, 21:00
- Win Vista 64-bit C compiler?, fermineutron, 20:58
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., soscpd, 20:17
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard, 20:12
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard Heathfield, 20:01
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Bartc, 19:59
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Harold Aptroot, 19:56
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Ben Bacarisse, 19:36
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Martien Verbruggen, 19:11
- Re: _TIME_, Robert Gamble, 18:56
- Re: _TIME_, Ian Collins, 18:54
- _TIME_, ramu, 18:49
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Harald van Dijk, 18:44
- Re: A suggestion on data structures., Dann Corbit, 18:31
- A suggestion on data structures., pereges, 18:20
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Riot Nrrrd™, 17:54
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Antoninus Twink, 17:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Eric Sosman, 17:20
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard, 17:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 17:02
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Chris Torek, 16:56
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 16:51
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 16:36
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Richard Tobin, 16:26
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, CBFalconer, 16:10
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, CBFalconer, 16:06
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 15:47
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Flash Gordon, 15:36
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 15:24
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Eric Sosman, 15:18
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 15:14
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, santosh, 15:05
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Mark B [Diputsur], 15:03
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, santosh, 14:53
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Huibert Bol, 14:46
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Mark B [Diputsur], 14:41
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Huibert Bol, 14:36
- Re: glibc modification and installation, Fred, 14:24
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Eric Sosman, 14:20
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Richard, 14:04
- Re: Meaning of implementation def. behaviour (was: Re: C99 IDE for windows), Richard Heathfield, 13:43
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Thomas in, 13:25
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Thomas in, 13:20
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Mark B [Diputsur], 13:18
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Huibert Bol, 13:16
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Thomas in, 13:12
- Re: Meaning of implementation def. behaviour (was: Re: C99 IDE for windows), Keith Thompson, 13:02
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Keith Thompson, 12:41
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: Meaning of implementation def. behaviour (was: Re: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 12:33
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Kenny McCormack, 12:17
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, Eric Sosman, 11:49
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 11:47
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 11:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 11:36
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 11:31
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 11:19
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 11:10
- Re: identifier scope in old-style declarations, santosh, 11:10
- Re: openning a file, santosh, 11:00
- identifier scope in old-style declarations, Thomas in, 10:52
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 10:51
- Re: glibc modification and installation, santosh, 10:43
- Re: glibc modification and installation, Fred, 10:37
- Re: Meaning of implementation def. behaviour (was: Re: C99 IDE for windows), Richard Heathfield, 10:14
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard Bos, 09:35
- glibc modification and installation, akhilesh.noida@xxxxxxxxx, 09:30
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 09:24
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, James Kuyper, 09:23
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 09:10
- Survey Software – Is Best Option To Improve Your Own Business, smomst, 08:53
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 08:40
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 08:29
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 08:22
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), CBFalconer, 08:14
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), CBFalconer, 08:11
- Meaning of implementation def. behaviour (was: Re: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 08:10
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Richard Tobin, 08:09
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Richard Tobin, 08:06
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 07:45
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Cromulent, 07:44
- Re: Application to check the Internet status??, santosh, 07:36
- www.topbrandbiz.net New releases PayPal acceptable, topbrandbiz, 07:03
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Dik T. Winter, 06:59
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 06:49
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 06:48
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Nick Keighley, 06:45
- Re: Application to check the Internet status??, Ravindra.B, 06:35
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 06:14
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), arnuld, 06:00
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 05:52
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 05:45
- Re: openning a file, Nick Keighley, 05:35
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Chris Torek, 05:34
- Re: openning a file, Nick Keighley, 05:29
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 05:28
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 05:27
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 05:24
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, pereges, 05:21
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Chris Torek, 05:18
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 05:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Nick Keighley, 05:13
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Chris Torek, 05:07
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), arnuld, 05:07
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Chris Dollin, 05:00
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Richard Bos, 04:53
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 04:45
- Parmigiano Reggiano DOP, raja, 04:43
- Looking for a New Job?, raja, 04:43
- Food & Drink Gifts, raja, 04:42
- Your Belly is Fat Because, raja, 04:41
- Improve food production, raja, 04:41
- Discover Sierra Leone, raja, 04:40
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 04:39
- Discover Sierra Leone, raja, 04:38
- Discover Sierra Leone, raja, 04:38
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Free Cookbooks? What?, raja, 04:37
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), Richard Heathfield, 04:34
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 04:31
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 04:28
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 04:28
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 04:22
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 04:04
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), arnuld, 04:01
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), arnuld, 04:00
- Re: sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), santosh, 03:50
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 03:43
- sprintf basics (was: C99 IDE for windows), arnuld, 03:38
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 03:20
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 03:15
- Re: stack, Chris Dollin, 03:07
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 03:00
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Dann Corbit, 02:54
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Harald van Dijk, 02:47
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 02:45
- Re: openning a file, santosh, 02:27
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 02:24
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 02:23
- Re: void pointers, bcpkh, 01:59
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, CBFalconer, 01:38
- Re: openning a file, CBFalconer, 01:15
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, rahul, 01:14
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 01:07
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 00:58
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 00:21
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Chris M. Thomasson, 00:16
August 05, 2008
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, santosh, 23:25
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 22:37
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, soscpd, 22:14
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: p124 K&R, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- [OT] Re: openning a file, Eric Sosman, 21:35
- Re: openning a file, Richard Heathfield, 21:21
- Re: openning a file, Ben Bacarisse, 21:20
- Re: openning a file, Jens Thoms Toerring, 21:14
- Re: stack, Richard Heathfield, 21:13
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 21:03
- Re: openning a file, Richard Heathfield, 20:57
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard Heathfield, 20:55
- Re: p124 K&R, mdh, 20:46
- Re: stack, Anand Hariharan, 20:43
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Kenny McCormack, 20:34
- Re: p124 K&R, mdh, 20:08
- Re: stack, Harald van Dijk, 19:14
- Re: openning a file, Keith Thompson, 19:13
- Re: [OT] Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 18:53
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 18:16
- Re: Application to check the Internet status??, Antoninus Twink, 18:10
- Re: openning a file, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: openning a file, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: openning a file, Bartc, 18:03
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Antoninus Twink, 18:00
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Antoninus Twink, 17:58
- Re: stack, Antoninus Twink, 17:51
- Re: stack, Antoninus Twink, 17:51
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 17:33
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 17:33
- Re: openning a file, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Cromulent, 17:16
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:12
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 17:10
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, s0suk3, 17:05
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 17:04
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Richard Heathfield, 17:01
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Mark B [Diputsur], 16:59
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Lew Pitcher, 16:58
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 16:50
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Mark B [Diputsur], 16:48
- Re: reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, Default User, 16:33
- Re: openning a file, Default User, 16:32
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Richard Heathfield, 16:26
- Re: stack, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- reverse string, how to print string and not decimals?, ssecorp, 16:19
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 15:47
- Re: stack, Default User, 15:37
- Re: openning a file, Flash Gordon, 15:36
- Re: openning a file, santosh, 15:35
- Re: openning a file, santosh, 15:32
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Dann Corbit, 15:27
- Re: openning a file, Dann Corbit, 15:25
- Re: L in C, Stephen Sprunk, 15:23
- Re: openning a file, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: p124 K&R, Flash Gordon, 15:18
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, user923005, 15:11
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 14:56
- Re: openning a file, Johannes Bauer, 14:48
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Flash Gordon, 14:40
- Re: openning a file, Eric Sosman, 14:39
- Re: openning a file, Willem, 14:36
- Re: openning a file, Fred, 14:28
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 14:22
- really easy, as seen on Oprah!, miljonair, 14:20
- Re: stack, Walter Roberson, 14:18
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 14:14
- Re: stack, Flash Gordon, 14:13
- Re: openning a file, Willem, 14:06
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 14:04
- Re: openning a file, xiao, 13:58
- Re: openning a file, Eric Sosman, 13:53
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 13:50
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 13:46
- Re: stream io in c, Flash Gordon, 13:43
- openning a file, xiao, 13:36
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 13:36
- Re: stack, Richard, 13:24
- Re: p124 K&R, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: void pointers, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Barry Schwarz, 13:23
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Walter Roberson, 13:16
- Re: stack, Walter Roberson, 13:10
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Ben Bacarisse, 12:55
- Re: Variable Length Arrays, Cromulent, 12:25
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 12:23
- Re: stack, Richard, 11:53
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 11:53
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 11:53
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Ben Bacarisse, 11:51
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 11:50
- Re: stack, Richard Heathfield, 11:47
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 11:44
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Ben Bacarisse, 11:42
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 11:25
- Re: stack, santosh, 11:23
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Keith Thompson, 11:20
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 11:18
- Re: stack, Eric Sosman, 11:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 11:14
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 11:10
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 11:08
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 10:58
- Re: void pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 10:52
- Re: void pointers, santosh, 10:47
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 10:46
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 10:44
- Re: void pointers, CBFalconer, 10:31
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 10:29
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Huibert Bol, 10:24
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Richard Heathfield, 10:21
- Re: Application to check the Internet status??, Richard Bos, 10:05
- Re: void pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 10:01
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 09:39
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Richard Bos, 09:32
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, CBFalconer, 09:24
- Re: void pointers, CBFalconer, 09:14
- Re: problem with macros, CBFalconer, 08:55
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: p124 K&R, mdh, 08:53
- Re: Application to check the Internet status??, santosh, 08:53
- Re: void pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 08:52
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, CBFalconer, 08:51
- Application to check the Internet status??, Ravindra.B, 08:46
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 08:46
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 08:34
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 08:32
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, s0suk3, 08:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 08:06
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Eric Sosman, 07:51
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 07:36
- Re: stack, Chris Dollin, 07:17
- Re: stack, Chris Dollin, 07:14
- Re: stack, santosh, 07:06
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 07:02
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 07:01
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Richard Heathfield, 06:58
- Re: stack, Richard Heathfield, 06:54
- Re: stack, santosh, 06:54
- Re: void pointers, santosh, 06:51
- Re: stack, santosh, 06:49
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 06:47
- Re: stack, Bartc, 06:45
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 06:43
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Doug Miller, 06:24
- Re: void pointers, bcpkh, 06:20
- Re: void pointers, bcpkh, 06:19
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 06:12
- Re: problem with macros, Nick Keighley, 06:07
- Re: stack, santosh, 05:45
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Nick Keighley, 05:42
- Re: stack, santosh, 05:41
- Re: stack, Chris Dollin, 05:39
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Bartc, 05:35
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 05:35
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Dann Corbit, 05:28
- Variable Length Arrays, Cromulent, 05:04
- Re: stack, Nick Keighley, 04:57
- Re: stack, Nick Keighley, 04:52
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Barry Schwarz, 04:44
- Re: void pointers, Barry Schwarz, 04:44
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 04:44
- Re: void pointers, Barry Schwarz, 04:44
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 04:29
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Hatzigiannakis Nikos, 04:26
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Nick Keighley, 04:23
- Re: void pointers, Nick Keighley, 04:16
- Re: De-referencing NULL, James Dow Allen, 03:39
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Martin Ambuhl, 03:22
- Re: void pointers, Ike Naar, 03:20
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Richard Bos, 03:20
- Re: L in C, Martin Ambuhl, 03:17
- Re: Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Richard Heathfield, 03:17
- Re: L in C, Richard Heathfield, 03:16
- Re: void pointers, blargg, 03:12
- Problem with accuracy in DEV C++, Hatzigiannakis Nikos, 02:50
- Re: L in C, santosh, 02:41
- L in C, |-|e|_|_ B0Ý, 02:34
- L in C, |-|e|_|_ B0Ý, 02:33
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 02:32
- Re: void pointers, bcpkh, 02:32
- Re: void pointers, santosh, 02:24
- void pointers, bcpkh, 02:16
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 02:09
August 04, 2008
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, CBFalconer, 23:53
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: stack, Walter Roberson, 22:45
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, James Kuyper, 22:31
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 22:12
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 22:08
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Keith Thompson, 21:54
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Greg Comeau, 21:46
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 21:45
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard Heathfield, 21:26
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Jack Klein, 21:24
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 21:11
- Re: [OT] Re: problem with macros, Kenny McCormack, 21:00
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 20:59
- Re: — conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Greg Comeau, 20:57
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 20:51
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 20:44
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Greg Comeau, 20:40
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Greg Comeau, 20:35
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Greg Comeau, 20:20
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 20:03
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 19:56
- Re: stream io in c, Keith Thompson, 19:52
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Keith Thompson, 19:49
- Re: stream io in c, vippstar, 19:00
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 18:57
- http://www.myslixbangonline.com/, My Slix Bang Online Hot Hardcore XXX Site, 18:50
- Re: problem with macros, Harald van Dijk, 18:45
- Re: [OT] Re: problem with macros, Coffee Pot, 18:42
- Re: problem with macros, Richard, 18:36
- Re: stack, Richard, 18:33
- Re: stack, Harald van Dijk, 18:25
- Re: Unix "system " command, Martin Ambuhl, 18:04
- Re: De-referencing NULL, CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Flash Gordon, 17:37
- Re: stack, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Harald van Dijk, 17:28
- Re: sscanf question, CBFalconer, 17:23
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 17:18
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Johannes Bauer, 17:17
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, jameskuyper, 17:16
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Barry Schwarz, 17:13
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 17:11
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 17:06
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 17:03
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Barry Schwarz, 17:01
- Re: problem with macros, CBFalconer, 17:01
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, jameskuyper, 16:58
- Re: stream io in c, CBFalconer, 16:53
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 16:48
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Default User, 16:43
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 16:36
- Re: [OT] Re: problem with macros, Kenny McCormack, 16:30
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 16:28
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 16:23
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 16:22
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 16:21
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, jameskuyper, 16:21
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 16:14
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 16:10
- Re: Font request, Bartc, 16:09
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, santosh, 16:06
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 16:03
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 15:59
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 15:59
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, santosh, 15:56
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Harald van Dijk, 15:56
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 15:50
- Re: — conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Barry Schwarz, 15:48
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, osmium, 15:46
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 15:39
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 15:33
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 15:30
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, santosh, 15:25
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, Harald van Dijk, 15:23
- Re: stream io in c, santosh, 15:22
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 15:20
- Re: stream io in c, pete, 15:14
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 15:14
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 15:11
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 15:04
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 15:00
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Chris Torek, 14:55
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Chris Torek, 14:49
- Re: stream io in c, pete, 14:45
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 14:44
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Johannes Bauer, 14:42
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Eric Sosman, 14:42
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 14:41
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 14:40
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 14:36
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 14:35
- Re: conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, Chris Torek, 14:34
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 14:32
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 14:31
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, Malcolm McLean, 14:27
- Re: problem with macros, s0suk3, 14:24
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 14:23
- Re: which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, vippstar, 14:22
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 14:18
- Re: Font request, Malcolm McLean, 14:17
- Re: Creating wrapper for python.., Antoninus Twink, 14:17
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 14:09
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 14:09
- which functions set the end-of-file indicator?, nicolas . sitbon, 14:05
- Re: [OT] Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 14:02
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 14:00
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 13:59
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 13:57
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Anand Hariharan, 13:56
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 13:51
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 13:46
- — conversion of array to pointer not limited to lvalues, nicolas . sitbon, 13:44
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:42
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:36
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:33
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 13:31
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 13:27
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 13:26
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:26
- Re: problem with macros, Kenny McCormack, 13:22
- [OT] Re: problem with macros, Eric Sosman, 13:19
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:17
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 13:08
- Re: Font request, Amandil, 12:54
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 12:46
- Re: Creating wrapper for python.., Keith Thompson, 12:17
- Re: problem with macros, Ben Bacarisse, 12:15
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 12:09
- Re: problem with macros, jacob navia, 11:51
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 11:50
- Re: problem with macros, jacob navia, 11:49
- Re: C tutorial q4, Serve Lau, 11:48
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, s0suk3, 11:48
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Keith Thompson, 11:43
- Re: Font request, Malcolm McLean, 11:40
- Re: problem with macros, s0suk3, 11:34
- Re: problem with macros, Eric Sosman, 11:34
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, David Mathog, 11:29
- Re: Creating wrapper for python.., santosh, 11:26
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, David Mathog, 11:14
- Creating wrapper for python.., Anish Chapagain, 11:11
- Re: Unix "system " command, aki, 11:06
- Re: what sort is this?, regis, 10:57
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 10:55
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Richard Bos, 10:48
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, santosh, 10:47
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 10:44
- Re: problem with macros, jacob navia, 10:44
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, s0suk3, 10:42
- Re: problem with macros, Kenny McCormack, 10:40
- Re: Font request, Kenny McCormack, 10:36
- Re: problem with macros, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- Re: problem with macros, jacob navia, 10:06
- Re: Font request, Richard, 10:05
- Re: file deletion in a directory with some conditions ., Kenny McCormack, 10:00
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Kenny McCormack, 09:56
- Re: problem with macros, Kenny McCormack, 09:38
- Re: file deletion in a directory with some conditions ., Kenny McCormack, 09:37
- Re: stack, Eric Sosman, 08:53
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 08:32
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 08:31
- Re: Unix "system " command, santosh, 08:20
- Unix "system " command, aki, 08:18
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, santosh, 08:17
- Re: C99 IDE for windows, arnuld, 07:55
- Re: stack, MisterE, 07:40
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Chris Dollin, 06:17
- Re: stack, Johannes Bauer, 05:35
- Re: Translation environment and translator, Johannes Bauer, 05:33
- Re: De-referencing NULL, santosh, 03:37
- Re: De-referencing NULL, santosh, 03:28
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 03:20
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Nick Keighley, 03:14
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Richard Bos, 02:58
- Re: De-referencing NULL, santosh, 02:51
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Richard Heathfield, 02:51
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Keith Thompson, 02:42
- Re: De-referencing NULL, santosh, 02:39
- Re: De-referencing NULL, Gordon Burditt, 02:39
- De-referencing NULL, rahul, 02:24
- Re: stack, santosh, 02:09
- Re: p124 K&R, Barry Schwarz, 01:56
August 03, 2008
- Re: p124 K&R, mdh, 22:25
- Re: sscanf question, Barry Schwarz, 21:30
- Re: p124 K&R, Barry Schwarz, 21:30
- Re: some new intresting c programs, Barry Schwarz, 21:30
- Re: p124 K&R, mdh, 20:53
- Re: stack, Harold Aptroot, 20:36
- Re: stack, Bartc, 20:36
- Re: stack, Chris Torek, 19:50
- p124 K&R, mdh, 18:44
- Re: sscanf question, vippstar, 18:09
- Re: sscanf question, vippstar, 17:25
- Re: file deletion in a directory with some conditions ., Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: Font request, Malcolm McLean, 16:41
- Re: Font request, Bartc, 16:12
- Re: stack, John Floren, 15:51
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Serve Lau, 15:48
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 15:44
- Re: Font request, Malcolm McLean, 15:38
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 15:37
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Anand Hariharan, 15:15
- Re: Font request, Bartc, 15:13
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 15:11
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 15:08
- Re: file deletion in a directory with some conditions ., Antoninus Twink, 15:05
- Re: stack, santosh, 15:01
- Re: Font request, Gene, 14:53
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 14:47
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Serve Lau, 14:47
- Re: stack, Walter Roberson, 14:45
- Re: Font request, jellybean stonerfish, 14:33
- Re: stack, Keith Thompson, 14:27
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Keith Thompson, 14:20
- Re: some new intresting c programs, Keith Thompson, 14:10
- Re: stack, santosh, 13:58
- Font request, Malcolm McLean, 13:57
- Re: stack, santosh, 13:55
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Malcolm McLean, 13:44
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Greg Comeau, 13:36
- Re: stack, Harald van Dijk, 12:42
- Re: stack, jacob navia, 12:41
- stack, jt, 12:32
- Re: sscanf question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:57
- Re: sscanf question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:55
- Re: sscanf question, CBFalconer, 09:27
- Re: some new intresting c programs, raashid bhatt, 08:38
- Re: sscanf question, vippstar, 08:29
- Re: what sort is this?, arj, 08:00
- Re: what sort is this?, Kapteyn's Star, 06:36
- Re: what sort is this?, jacob navia, 05:51
- what sort is this?, Kapteyn's Star, 05:44
- Re: sscanf question, CBFalconer, 05:40
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, CBFalconer, 05:28
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, CBFalconer, 05:23
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Malcolm McLean, 05:01
- Re: some new intresting c programs, Malcolm McLean, 04:57
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, blargg, 04:23
- Re: some new intresting c programs, Barry Schwarz, 04:19
- Re: sscanf question, Chris Torek, 04:02
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, William Pursell, 03:21
- some new intresting c programs, yassu, 03:13
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Default User, 02:36
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Ian Collins, 02:02
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Richard Heathfield, 01:50
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 01:35
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Ian Collins, 01:26
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 01:26
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Ian Collins, 01:21
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Barry Schwarz, 01:16
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Barry Schwarz, 01:16
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Chris M. Thomasson, 01:12
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Keith Thompson, 00:41
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, santosh, 00:15
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Edward A. Falk, 00:13
- Re: problem with macros, Edward A. Falk, 00:12
August 02, 2008
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, D. Power, 23:50
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Peter Nilsson, 23:17
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, Stephen Sprunk, 23:15
- Re: How to call a C++ function from c code?, CBFalconer, 23:10
- How to call a C++ function from c code?, AL@TW, 22:51
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, CBFalconer, 21:53
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 21:41
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 21:19
- Re: problem with macros, Peter Nilsson, 21:08
- Re: problem with macros, Chris Torek, 21:05
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard, 21:05
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 21:02
- Re: C tutorial q4, vippstar, 20:49
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, vippstar, 20:48
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard Heathfield, 20:23
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 20:12
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 20:03
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Martien Verbruggen, 20:01
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Richard Heathfield, 20:00
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Keith Thompson, 19:57
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:54
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:50
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:48
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Martien Verbruggen, 19:48
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:46
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:44
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 19:42
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 19:40
- Re: file deletion in a directory with some conditions ., Keith Thompson, 19:32
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Ian Collins, 18:23
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Default User, 18:05
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Malcolm McLean, 17:54
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Robert Gamble, 17:32
- Re: static array initialization, mdh, 17:08
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Martin Ambuhl, 17:01
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Malcolm McLean, 16:35
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Jens Thoms Toerring, 16:34
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 16:06
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 15:22
- Re: static array initialization, Greg Comeau, 15:07
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: static array initialization, mdh, 14:50
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 14:26
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, osmium, 14:21
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Richard, 14:19
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, santosh, 14:11
- Re: problem with macros, Bartc, 14:07
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Richard, 14:06
- Re: problem with macros, Bartc, 14:03
- Re: sh?tpile of errors, Doug Miller, 14:02
- Re: problem with macros, santosh, 14:01
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard, 13:52
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard, 13:51
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard, 13:49
- sh?tpile of errors, Bill Cunningham, 13:45
- Re: problem with macros, pereges, 13:44
- Re: problem with macros, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: problem with macros, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: problem with macros, Greg Comeau, 13:21
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 13:11
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 13:07
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 13:05
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 13:05
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 13:04
- Re: Which is faster?, Greg Comeau, 12:40
- Re: problem with macros, Greg Comeau, 12:38
- Re: Which is faster?, Greg Comeau, 12:32
- Re: Procyon Library for Atmel AVR MCU - I²C problems, Three Headed Monkey, 12:30
- Re: C tutorial q4, Richard, 12:30
- Re: Which is faster?, rio, 12:19
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, vippstar, 12:04
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Ben Bacarisse, 10:04
- Re: problem with macros, Ben Bacarisse, 09:17
- Re: problem with macros, pereges, 08:29
- Re: problem with macros, Bartc, 08:02
- Re: Translation environment and translator, Kenny McCormack, 08:01
- Re: [gcc] indent -kr, Ron Ford, 07:49
- Re: stream io in c, CBFalconer, 07:48
- Re: problem with macros, pereges, 07:45
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, CBFalconer, 07:42
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., santosh, 07:42
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Ike Naar, 07:27
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, santosh, 07:21
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, vippstar, 06:12
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, vippstar, 06:10
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., vippstar, 06:07
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., William Pursell, 05:54
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., William Pursell, 05:28
- Re: Translation environment and translator, Antoninus Twink, 05:21
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., William Pursell, 05:18
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Harald van Dijk, 04:13
- Re: unknown character in output, Ike Naar, 03:53
- Re: problem with macros, Malcolm McLean, 03:28
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 03:03
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 03:00
- Re: [gcc] indent -kr, Keith Thompson, 02:58
- Re: stream io in c, santosh, 02:30
- Re: [gcc] indent -kr, santosh, 02:20
- Re: Translation environment and translator, Bob Nelson, 01:16
August 01, 2008
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, CBFalconer, 22:59
- Re: Translation environment and translator, Richard Heathfield, 22:21
- Translation environment and translator, Bob Nelson, 21:56
- [gcc] indent -kr, Ron Ford, 21:52
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 21:35
- Re: problem with macros, Ian Collins, 21:19
- Re: Silly do - while question, Newbie, 21:12
- Re: stream io in c, Ron Ford, 21:12
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard Heathfield, 21:04
- Re: Silly do - while question, Richard Heathfield, 21:01
- Re: Silly do - while question, Newbie, 20:44
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 20:36
- Re: Silly do - while question, Ben Bacarisse, 20:29
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Ben Bacarisse, 20:25
- Re: Silly do - while question, Newbie, 20:25
- Re: Silly do - while question, Ben Bacarisse, 20:19
- Re: problem with macros, Walter Roberson, 20:17
- Re: C tutorial q4, Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: problem with macros, Ben Bacarisse, 19:59
- Silly do - while question, Newbie, 19:55
- Re: Which is faster?, Keith Thompson, 19:52
- Re: problem with macros, Ian Collins, 19:28
- Re: Which is faster?, CBFalconer, 19:15
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 19:04
- Re: problem with macros, Bartc, 18:54
- Re: C tutorial q4, Antoninus Twink, 18:47
- Re: C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 18:42
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Antoninus Twink, 18:40
- Re: problem with macros, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:39
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:39
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 18:36
- Re: C tutorial q4, Default User, 18:35
- Visual C++/ C++/ TSQL/ Unix----Contract---IN, Tom Gugger, 18:30
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, David Mathog, 18:29
- Re: Which is faster?, Ali Karaali, 18:23
- Re: Which is faster?, Harald van Dijk, 18:21
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Which is faster?, Keith Thompson, 18:19
- Re: C tutorial q4, Keith Thompson, 18:15
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 18:15
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 18:14
- Re: problem with macros, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Eric Sosman, 17:59
- Re: for and arrays, CBFalconer, 17:50
- Re: Which is faster?, Willem, 17:47
- Re: problem with macros, Willem, 17:45
- Re: Which is faster?, Walter Roberson, 17:44
- Re: Which is faster?, Richard Heathfield, 17:43
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 17:42
- Re: problem with macros, Richard Heathfield, 17:41
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 17:36
- Re: Which is faster?, Ali Karaali, 17:35
- Re: C tutorial q4, Default User, 17:35
- Re: problem with macros, Bartc, 17:34
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: problem with macros, Eric Sosman, 17:26
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 17:25
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 17:24
- Re: $ & _, CBFalconer, 17:23
- Re: C tutorial q4, Keith Thompson, 17:22
- Re: sscanf question, Richard Heathfield, 17:20
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Keith Thompson, 17:20
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, CBFalconer, 17:17
- Re: Which is faster?, Greg Comeau, 17:13
- Re: problem with macros, Walter Roberson, 17:11
- Re: C tutorial q4, soscpd, 17:11
- Re: problem with macros, Greg Comeau, 17:10
- Re: Which is faster?, Ali Karaali, 17:08
- Re: problem with macros, Antoninus Twink, 17:06
- problem with macros, pereges, 16:52
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 16:45
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 16:43
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Ian Collins, 16:37
- Re: sscanf question, Bill Reid, 16:32
- Re: unknown character in output, Bill Reid, 16:32
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, santosh, 16:25
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
- Re: C tutorial q4, Default User, 16:13
- Re: function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, Eric Sosman, 16:08
- function calls, mandatory compiler promotion of int arguments to size_t?, David Mathog, 15:48
- Re: unknown character in output, Keith Thompson, 15:39
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: rounding of 4 unsigned char numbers, Herbert Kleebauer, 15:20
- Re: C tutorial q4, Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Re: unknown character in output, Ben Bacarisse, 14:47
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, jacob navia, 14:44
- Re: unknown character in output, santosh, 14:09
- Re: for and arrays, Barry Schwarz, 14:05
- Re: unknown character in output, santosh, 14:01
- Re: $ & _, santosh, 13:50
- Re: unknown character in output, rudra, 13:48
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bartc, 13:41
- Re: unknown character in output, Walter Roberson, 13:40
- Re: $ & _, blargg, 13:40
- Re: C tutorial q4, santosh, 13:39
- Re: for and arrays, Default User, 13:38
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 13:36
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 13:34
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Keith Thompson, 13:33
- unknown character in output, rudra, 13:32
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 13:32
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Antoninus Twink, 13:30
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 13:30
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, santosh, 13:28
- Re: C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 13:26
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Keith Thompson, 13:25
- Re: Which is faster?, Keith Thompson, 13:23
- Re: stream io in c, Keith Thompson, 13:17
- Re: Weird malloc behaviour, Kenneth Brody, 13:12
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Richard Heathfield, 12:16
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, vippstar, 12:15
- Re: $ & _, Mabden, 12:14
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, santosh, 12:07
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 11:58
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Mabden, 11:57
- Re: C tutorial q4, Nigel, 11:50
- Re: $ & _, blargg, 11:50
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 11:29
- Re: sscanf question, Bartc, 10:53
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Serve Lau, 10:51
- Re: sscanf question, santosh, 10:17
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, CBFalconer, 09:52
- Re: for and arrays, Mabden, 09:46
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., blargg, 09:23
- Re: warning c4121, Nick Keighley, 09:11
- warning c4121, Tim . Dent, 08:50
- Re: sscanf question, Chad, 08:47
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Richard, 08:29
- Re: Procyon Library for Atmel AVR MCU - I²C problems, Richard, 08:15
- Re: sscanf question, Richard Heathfield, 08:05
- sscanf question, Chad, 07:51
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Richard Bos, 07:45
- Re: Which is faster?, Richard Heathfield, 07:42
- Re: rounding of 4 unsigned char numbers, asutic, 07:40
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., rahul, 07:31
- Re: Which is faster?, pete, 06:59
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Richard Heathfield, 06:55
- Re: for and arrays, soscpd, 06:48
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), Richard Bos, 06:45
- Re: for and arrays, soscpd, 06:43
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, jacob navia, 06:01
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., Jens Thoms Toerring, 05:58
- Re: NDEBUG and assert macros., Nick Keighley, 05:57
- Re: FREAD fails on files >4GB, Richard Bos, 05:52
- Re: Endian Independence, Richard Bos, 05:50
- Re: for and arrays, Richard Bos, 05:45
- NDEBUG and assert macros., pereges, 05:44
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), Bartc, 05:40
- Re: Why do you like C more than other programming languages?, Richard Bos, 05:39
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Nick Keighley, 05:34
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Chris M. Thomasson, 05:01
- Re: stream io in c, Nick Keighley, 04:33
- rounding of 4 unsigned char numbers, asutic, 03:30
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), Richard Bos, 03:15
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Mark L Pappin, 02:14
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Mark L Pappin, 02:13
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 02:12
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 02:08
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, santosh, 01:55
July 31, 2008
- Re: stream io in c, Barry Schwarz, 22:35
- Re: stream io in c, Ben Bacarisse, 22:08
- Re: free()'ing restrict'ed pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 21:55
- Re: stream io in c, vippstar, 21:55
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, CBFalconer, 21:51
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 21:46
- Re: stream io in c, Ben Bacarisse, 21:38
- Re: Which is faster?, CBFalconer, 21:33
- Re: free()'ing restrict'ed pointers, CBFalconer, 21:20
- Re: stream io in c, vippstar, 21:17
- Re: C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:16
- Re: stream io in c, Ron Ford, 21:14
- Re: stream io in c, Ben Bacarisse, 21:05
- Re: Which is faster?, Barry Schwarz, 21:04
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Richard Heathfield, 20:42
- Re: stream io in c, Ron Ford, 20:37
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: stream io in c, Ron Ford, 20:29
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), vippstar, 19:57
- Re: Seg fault even though address space is accessible, Antoninus Twink, 19:54
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 19:53
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q3, was: for and arrays, Bill Cunningham, 19:38
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 19:34
- Re: GCC question, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:28
- Re: A basic question question about volatile use, Ark Khasin, 18:49
- Re: free()'ing restrict'ed pointers, christian.bau, 18:44
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 18:33
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 18:17
- Re: Procyon Library for Atmel AVR MCU - I²C problems, Kenny McCormack, 18:15
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:08
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 18:05
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 17:59
- Re: A basic question question about volatile use, Eric Sosman, 17:59
- Re: [BC] C tutorial q4, Bill Cunningham, 17:58
- Re: diagnostic message, Flash Gordon, 17:31
July 22, 2008
- Re: Library bug or my fault?, Richard Heathfield, 21:36
- Re: Why tthe header is not declared ?, Greg Comeau, 21:35
- Re: Why tthe header is not declared ?, Greg Comeau, 21:33
- Re: Library bug or my fault?, Peter Nilsson, 21:32
- Re: How to Initialize Complex Numbers, Dann Corbit, 21:21
Privacy Policy