comp.lang.c (date)
June 30, 2008
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, kid joe, 17:37
- More Freelance Projects in C, Jaik, 17:31
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:27
- Freelancing Projects up for grabs., Jaik, 17:23
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Ben Bacarisse, 17:04
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Eric Sosman, 16:51
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 16:35
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 16:32
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Keith Thompson, 16:24
- Re: OOP, Sjouke Burry, 15:50
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), Eric Sosman, 15:45
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: Is this legal C?, Ralf Damaschke, 15:40
- Re: search for files, Tony Mc, 15:38
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 15:37
- Re: Using a link list over an array., pereges, 15:35
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 15:28
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 15:23
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 15:18
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Edward A. Falk, 15:14
- Re: search for files, Bill Reid, 15:13
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 15:04
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: OOP, campyhapper, 14:57
- Some issue with pointers, Marco Trapanese, 14:56
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 14:53
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 14:50
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 14:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 14:27
- Re: OOP, Kaz Kylheku, 14:26
- Re: OOP, Cromulent, 14:19
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, santosh, 14:19
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 14:19
- Re: OOP, Lew Pitcher, 14:18
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pete, 14:16
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Keith Thompson, 14:13
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 14:13
- Re: OOP, santosh, 14:08
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, santosh, 14:05
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 14:02
- www.nikeadishoes.com, hongfeng02@xxxxxxxxx, 14:02
- Re: adding colums to text, santosh, 13:51
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, santosh, 13:50
- Re: adding colums to text, santosh, 13:47
- Re: OOP, pete, 13:43
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, santosh, 13:36
- Re: OOP, Richard Heathfield, 13:36
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pete, 13:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 13:28
- Re: OOP, Tor Rustad, 13:21
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), christian.bau, 13:19
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pete, 13:13
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pete, 13:10
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pereges, 13:08
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Keith Thompson, 13:07
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, Keith Thompson, 13:03
- Re: problem passing pointer array, vippstar, 13:00
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pereges, 12:59
- Re: OOP, pete, 12:58
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 12:57
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 12:55
- Re: problem passing pointer array, vippstar, 12:51
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, Stephen Sprunk, 12:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 12:46
- Re: OOP, Keith Thompson, 12:45
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:44
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Keith Thompson, 12:43
- Re: OOP, campyhapper, 12:41
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pereges, 12:39
- Re: OOP, Charlton Wilbur, 12:39
- Re: OOP, Richard Heathfield, 12:35
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pete, 12:33
- Re: YAPL - Yet Another Programming Language, campyhapper, 12:29
- OOP, campyhapper, 12:27
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Walter Roberson, 12:25
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 12:15
- Re: problem passing pointer array, pereges, 12:15
- [ot]Re: program won't work, pete, 12:02
- Re: problem passing pointer array, vippstar, 11:59
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Tony Mc, 11:54
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, Keith Thompson, 11:52
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Keith Thompson, 11:49
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:47
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 11:45
- Re: Pedants, Walter Roberson, 11:42
- problem passing pointer array, pereges, 11:33
- Re: how to release memory?, vippstar, 11:21
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 11:07
- Re: how to release memory?, santosh, 11:06
- Re: program won't work, Nick Keighley, 10:51
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 10:51
- Re: Pedants, Nick Keighley, 10:46
- Re: how to release memory?, vippstar, 10:30
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 08:16
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 08:10
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:07
- Re: How do you update a Makefile?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:49
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Kenny McCormack, 07:45
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 07:14
- Re: OFF TOPIC:Censorship By Google Groups Of My Post About Gordon Sauck Being A Police Agent, soscpd, 07:13
- Re: search for files, Jrdman, 07:08
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 06:49
- Re: Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pete, 06:41
- How do you update a Makefile?, chutsu, 06:33
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 06:28
- Promoting unsigned long int to long int, pereges, 06:21
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Ben Bacarisse, 06:13
- Re: OFF TOPIC:Censorship By Google Groups Of My Post About Gordon Sauck Being A Police Agent, Tim Streater, 05:39
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:06
- Re: Runtime stack allocation, santosh, 05:06
- Runtime stack allocation, kid joe, 05:02
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Bert, 04:44
- Re: OFF TOPIC:Censorship By Google Groups Of My Post About Gordon Sauck Being A Police Agent, Richard Heathfield, 04:43
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 04:43
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Wolfgang Draxinger, 04:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 04:38
- OFF TOPIC:Censorship By Google Groups Of My Post About Gordon Sauck Being A Police Agent, Greg Carr, 04:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 04:23
- Re: Using getnameinfo(), Boon, 04:01
- Re: Using getnameinfo(), santosh, 03:57
- Re: inline + va_list, Laurent Deniau, 03:55
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), Boon, 03:50
- Re: Using getnameinfo(), Walter Roberson, 03:47
- Re: inline + va_list, Laurent Deniau, 03:30
- Using getnameinfo(), Mariano, 03:20
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Richard Bos, 03:15
- Re: search for files, santosh, 02:41
- Sexy INDIAN WOMEN SAREE Removing Video CLIP, Hot M.M.S Clips, 02:00
- Kerala Couples Enjoying At NET CAFE CENTER, Hot M.M.S Clips, 02:00
- Re: adding colums to text, santosh, 01:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, santosh, 00:10
June 29, 2008
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Dik T. Winter, 23:15
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 22:58
- Re: A tired question?, Keith Thompson, 22:57
- Re: A tired question?, santosh, 22:52
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 22:50
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: Storing input into a character array, pete, 22:28
- I-map Websolution...turning possibility into reality..., jhamz, 21:41
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:27
- Re: A tired question?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:10
- Cheap Price !! 25 Years AF1 Shoes, Timberland UGG Boots, Diesel Evisu Shoes, cheapforwholesale666, 21:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 20:27
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 20:12
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 20:05
- Re: A tired question?, pete, 19:49
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 19:47
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 19:44
- Re: inline + va_list, Jack Klein, 19:34
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Bert, 18:56
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 18:54
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 18:41
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 18:31
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 18:10
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: search for files, Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: some doubts in glib code, Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: how to release memory?, Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: how to release memory?, Barry Schwarz, 18:01
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., Ben Bacarisse, 17:45
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 17:35
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 17:04
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), pete, 16:50
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 16:39
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 16:29
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 16:13
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 16:08
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Tor Rustad, 16:07
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 16:07
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Fast fmodf(..., 1.0f), jason.cipriani@xxxxxxxxx, 15:57
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 15:40
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 15:22
- Re: How to learn C ?, lawrence . jones, 15:10
- Re: Pedants, lawrence . jones, 14:53
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 14:46
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 14:45
- Re: adding colums to text, rio, 14:42
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Keith Thompson, 14:40
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 14:37
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 14:07
- VMCAI 2009: Call for Papers, Markus Müller-Olm, 13:57
- Re: search for files, CBFalconer, 13:52
- Re: program won't work, pete, 12:57
- Re: program won't work, pete, 12:54
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nigel, 12:48
- Re: program won't work, Malcolm McLean, 12:47
- Re: program won't work, Mark McIntyre, 12:35
- Re: program won't work, pete, 12:21
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., pete, 12:13
- Re: search for files, Jrdman, 12:10
- Re: Storing input into a character array, pete, 12:01
- Re: program won't work, Ali Karaali, 12:00
- Re: search for files, pete, 11:47
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Joe Wright, 11:46
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., August Karlstrom, 11:40
- Re: search for files, Malcolm McLean, 11:40
- Re: search for files, osmium, 11:31
- Re: program won't work, Bingo Bongo, 11:26
- Re: search for files, Jrdman, 11:22
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Chad, 11:18
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., Ben Bacarisse, 11:13
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 11:12
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 11:11
- Re: search for files, Jrdman, 11:08
- Re: program won't work, pete, 11:07
- Re: search for files, Stephen Sprunk, 10:57
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., pereges, 10:57
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:54
- Re: inline + va_list, Stephen Sprunk, 10:51
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:50
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 10:49
- program won't work, Bingo Bongo, 10:37
- Re: search for files, pete, 10:32
- Re: search for files, Lew Pitcher, 10:23
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., August Karlstrom, 10:17
- Re: search for files, Jrdman, 10:17
- Re: plus d'image !!!!, Valto Ahonen, 10:13
- Re: adding colums to text, Richard, 10:10
- Re: Agenouillez vous, le miracle est en marche, Jami Saarinen, 10:00
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 09:51
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 09:28
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 09:23
- Re: search for files, Malcolm McLean, 09:21
- Re: search for files, Walter Roberson, 09:14
- Re: Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., Walter Roberson, 09:07
- Re: how to release memory?, Joe Wright, 09:05
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 08:47
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 08:43
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 08:40
- Re: search for files, pete, 08:38
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 08:30
- Re: Storing input into a character array, pete, 08:27
- search for files, Jrdman, 08:24
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 08:24
- Re: Storing input into a character array, pete, 08:21
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 08:08
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Tor Rustad, 08:07
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Richard Heathfield, 08:01
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 07:57
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 07:50
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, Roland Pibinger, 07:39
- Re: are stdout and stderr different, Kenny McCormack, 07:37
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, Tor Rustad, 07:36
- Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., pereges, 07:29
- Writing a macro for checking close enough floating points., pereges, 07:28
- some doubts in glib code, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx, 07:26
- Re: are stdout and stderr different, vippstar, 06:46
- Re: Is this legal C?, Harald van Dijk, 06:25
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Rolf Magnus, 06:21
- Re: are stdout and stderr different, santosh, 06:11
- Re: Storing input into a character array, santosh, 06:08
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Herbert Rosenau, 06:07
- Re: Is this legal C?, Herbert Rosenau, 06:07
- Re: inline + va_list, Laurent Deniau, 05:56
- Re: Is this legal C?, CBFalconer, 05:54
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 05:53
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Bert, 05:53
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 05:47
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Keith Thompson, 05:41
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 05:33
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 05:29
- Re: how to release memory?, pereges, 05:14
- Re: Pedants, Rui Maciel, 05:11
- Re: Pedants, Chris H, 05:02
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, Harald van Dijk, 05:01
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Bert, 04:53
- Re: this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, badc0de4, 04:51
- Re: are stdout and stderr different, Malcolm McLean, 04:51
- are stdout and stderr different, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 04:40
- this calls and checks strtol() correctly?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 04:34
- Re: Is this legal C?, Willem, 03:53
- Re: Write in C!, santosh, 03:48
- Re: Is this legal C?, Harald van Dijk, 03:41
- Re: Storing input into a character array, badc0de4, 03:37
- Re: Storing input into a character array, badc0de4, 03:36
- Re: Write in C!, Richard Heathfield, 03:27
- Re: how to release memory?, Barry Schwarz, 03:25
- Re: how to release memory?, Barry Schwarz, 03:25
- Re: adding colums to text, Barry Schwarz, 03:25
- Re: adding colums to text, Barry Schwarz, 03:25
- Write in C!, santosh, 02:54
- Re: Storing input into a character array, Richard Heathfield, 02:09
- Storing input into a character array, Bert, 00:54
- Re: how to release memory?, pereges, 00:29
June 28, 2008
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 23:50
- Re: print binary, Richard Heathfield, 23:48
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 23:45
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:32
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, santosh, 23:26
- Re: adding colums to text, pete, 23:11
- C, C++ and Perl Programming Workshops from NYLXS, Ruben, 22:54
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, CBFalconer, 22:49
- Re: single if vs if else, Thad Smith, 22:45
- Internet secrets:The nobody know of place, jinole, 22:35
- Re: Global variables., viza, 22:27
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 22:18
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 21:36
- Re: adding colums to text, Ben Bacarisse, 21:33
- Re: adding colums to text, CBFalconer, 21:31
- Re: inline + va_list, Jack Klein, 21:31
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 21:24
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Tim Prince, 21:18
- Re: Is this legal C?, CBFalconer, 21:17
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 21:08
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 21:07
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 21:04
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 21:03
- Re: adding colums to text, Ben Bacarisse, 20:47
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Stephen Sprunk, 20:47
- Re: how to release memory?, Joe Wright, 20:41
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Stephen Sprunk, 20:26
- Re: pointer question, mdh, 20:20
- Re: pointer question, pete, 20:17
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 20:07
- pointer question, mdh, 20:03
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 19:18
- Re: how to release memory?, Raymond Martineau, 19:13
- Re: adding colums to text, Bartc, 19:13
- Re: (OT) Battery question, pete, 19:05
- Re: adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 19:04
- Re: compile BCC 4.52 ancient program, Raymond Martineau, 19:02
- Re: Lies of Billy Gates of Microcrap, Tim Prince, 18:43
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- inline + va_list, Laurent Deniau, 17:54
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 17:54
- Re: (OT) Battery question, pete, 17:37
- Re: (OT) Battery question, pete, 17:31
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pete, 17:19
- Re: adding colums to text, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: print binary, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: Is this legal C?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:46
- Re: Global variables., Eric Sosman, 16:19
- Re: (OT) Battery question, santosh, 16:12
- Re: adding colums to text, santosh, 16:04
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Global variables., pereges, 15:38
- adding colums to text, Bill Cunningham, 15:34
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: C newbie problem, Malcolm McLean, 15:06
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 14:00
- Re: print binary, santosh, 13:16
- Re: C newbie problem, santosh, 13:08
- Re: print binary, vippstar, 12:52
- Re: print binary, santosh, 12:42
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:37
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:36
- Re: C newbie problem, Ben Bacarisse, 12:32
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 12:32
- Re: How to learn C ?, lawrence . jones, 12:24
- Re: C newbie problem, vippstar, 12:20
- C newbie problem, tom, 12:01
- Re: Pedants, lawrence . jones, 11:47
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pereges, 11:46
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 11:21
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pereges, 11:14
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, vippstar, 11:05
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 10:36
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 10:12
- Re: Simple sscanf parsing problem, CBFalconer, 10:11
- Re: How to learn C ?, mike . rosset+gnus, 10:10
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Richard Tobin, 10:09
- Re: (OT) Battery question, CBFalconer, 10:03
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:01
- Re: Is this legal C?, CBFalconer, 10:00
- Re: print binary, vippstar, 09:57
- Re: directories, Lew Pitcher, 09:56
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 09:48
- Re: Is this legal C?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:34
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 09:27
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 09:21
- Re: Simple sscanf parsing problem, Timo, 09:08
- Great new projects in C for freelancers, Jaik, 09:05
- Re: Simple sscanf parsing problem, Ali Karaali, 09:00
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 08:54
- Re: Simple sscanf parsing problem, pete, 08:47
- Re: Simple sscanf parsing problem, badc0de4, 08:46
- Simple sscanf parsing problem, Timo, 08:31
- Re: Is this legal C?, pete, 08:28
- Re: (OT) Battery question, pete, 08:23
- Re: Is this legal C?, Hans Schneider, 08:18
- Re: directories, Dann Corbit, 07:59
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 07:49
- Re: (OT) Battery question, pete, 07:30
- Re: [OT] Battery question, viza, 06:47
- Make your money with GOOGLE ADSENSE, saifullah, 06:20
- Re: (OT) Battery question, Antoninus Twink, 06:11
- (OT) Battery question, kid joe, 05:59
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 05:51
- Re: Is this legal C?, Erik Trulsson, 04:30
- Re: Is this legal C?, Willem, 02:45
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 02:32
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 01:51
- Re: how to release memory?, Barry Schwarz, 00:05
June 27, 2008
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 22:18
- Re: Is this legal C?, pete, 22:11
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 21:47
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Is this legal C?, Max, 21:36
- Re: Is this legal C?, Kenny McCormack, 21:34
- Re: directories, Lew Pitcher, 21:16
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Hans Schneider, 21:12
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, ediebur, 21:04
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 20:59
- Re: directories, user923005, 20:53
- Re: Is this legal C?, pete, 20:52
- Re: directories, user923005, 20:49
- Re: Is this legal C?, Richard Heathfield, 20:25
- Re: Is this legal C?, Keith Thompson, 20:05
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 19:53
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 19:48
- Re: Is this legal C?, pete, 19:33
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: DMA in C, fnegroni, 19:27
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pete, 19:24
- Is this legal C?, Max, 19:22
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 19:22
- Re: print binary, Keith Thompson, 19:11
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 19:09
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 18:59
- Re: DMA in C, kid joe, 18:58
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 18:50
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, J. Cochran, 18:38
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 18:30
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 18:26
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:09
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 18:06
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 18:03
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 18:03
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 17:56
- Re: DMA in C, Malcolm McLean, 17:55
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 17:53
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 17:46
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 17:41
- Re: directories, Keith Thompson, 17:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:33
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Chris Peters, 17:29
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:16
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 17:16
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 17:10
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 16:40
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 16:39
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 16:36
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 16:31
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 16:29
- Re: Add items to an array, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 16:25
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 16:18
- Re: directories, Richard Tobin, 16:15
- Re: Add items to an array, viza, 16:15
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Tobin, 16:13
- Re: can u help me writing a program????, viza, 16:13
- Re: DMA in C, santosh, 16:11
- Re: can u help me writing a program????, Martin Ambuhl, 16:04
- Re: DMA in C, viza, 16:02
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, Richard Harter, 15:49
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 15:48
- DMA in C, kid joe, 15:47
- Find projects in C(For Freelancers), Jaik, 15:46
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 15:43
- Re: can u help me writing a program????, Ivar Rosquist, 15:40
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 15:33
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 15:31
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 15:30
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 15:29
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 15:24
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 15:23
- Re: directories, Walter Roberson, 15:19
- Re: can u help me writing a program????, Mike Wahler, 15:19
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 15:16
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pete, 15:11
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 15:10
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Keith Thompson, 15:00
- Re: Pedants, user923005, 14:54
- Re: directories, user923005, 14:51
- Re: can u help me writing a program????, Richard Heathfield, 14:45
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, J. Cochran, 14:42
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, Ben Bacarisse, 14:27
- can u help me writing a program????, munitech4u, 14:27
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 14:17
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, Ben Bacarisse, 14:12
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 14:11
- Re: Pedants, Mike Wahler, 14:00
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, Bartc, 13:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 13:44
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 13:34
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 13:27
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard Heathfield, 13:18
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 13:08
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 13:02
- Re: directories, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 12:53
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 12:47
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 12:41
- Re: [OT] Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Coos Haak, 12:39
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 12:39
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 12:28
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 12:23
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, vippstar, 12:16
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, vippstar, 12:14
- Re: directories, jacob navia, 11:31
- Re: directories, Ben Bacarisse, 11:08
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard Tobin, 10:35
- Re: directories, jacob navia, 10:33
- Re: how to release memory?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:29
- Re: how to release memory?, Chris Dollin, 10:16
- Re: Are anonymous unions and structs within a struct permissible ?, Ali Karaali, 10:16
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard, 10:04
- Re: directories, Ben Bacarisse, 10:03
- Re: how to release memory?, Kenny McCormack, 09:57
- Re: how to release memory?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:17
- problem with time.h, tguclu, 09:00
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Eric Sosman, 08:43
- sexy, revanth, 08:18
- Re: directories, Richard Tobin, 08:17
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard, 07:54
- Re: Not a direct question in C, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:38
- Re: directories, Chris Dollin, 07:33
- Not a direct question in C, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:24
- Re: how to release memory?, Bartc, 07:11
- Re: using realloc for a dynamically growing array, Bartc, 06:55
- Re: single if vs if else, pete, 06:46
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard Bos, 06:34
- Re: single if vs if else, Richard Bos, 06:30
- Re: Add items to an array, Richard Bos, 06:28
- using realloc for a dynamically growing array, pereges, 06:07
- Re: directories, Bob Nelson, 06:01
- Re: Are anonymous unions and structs within a struct permissible ?, Ian Collins, 05:54
- Are anonymous unions and structs within a struct permissible ?, pereges, 05:38
- Re: directories, Erik Trulsson, 05:35
- Are anonymous unions and structs within a struct permissible ?, pereges, 05:34
- Re: directories, Jens Thoms Toerring, 05:27
- Re: How to learn C ?, Bob Nelson, 05:20
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Dan, 05:02
- directories, sid, 04:51
- Re: Speeding up a program, Dan, 04:48
- Re: how to release memory?, Dan, 04:45
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, santosh, 04:26
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Tobin, 04:15
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pete, 04:06
- Re: Introduce a C Compiler ucc, soscpd, 04:05
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 03:59
- Re: Design... the right way., Richard Heathfield, 03:57
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:54
- Free Driver Detective - Fix Driver & Hardware Problems Automatically., GoodieMan, 03:48
- Re: Design... the right way., CBFalconer, 03:39
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Antoninus Twink, 03:26
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, viza, 03:25
- Re: [OT] Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, viza, 03:21
- Re: types, variable names and fields, Richard Bos, 02:49
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Bos, 02:42
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Bos, 02:38
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pereges, 02:35
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 02:29
- Re: Introduce a C Compiler ucc, Richard Heathfield, 02:19
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Heathfield, 02:17
- Re: Design... the right way., Keith Thompson, 01:53
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 01:12
- Re: Design... the right way., mike . rosset+gnus, 00:49
- Re: Introduce a C Compiler ucc, João Jerónimo, 00:27
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Barry Schwarz, 00:21
June 26, 2008
- GOOD PRICE !!! NIKE AIR FORCE ONES LOW AF1 SNEKAERS, www.urbanhotsale.net, 23:05
- Re: Oportunidad Nissan Tiida nuevo, Saku Pitkänen, 23:03
- Re: How to learn C ?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:55
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pete, 21:50
- Re: Design... the right way., pete, 21:43
- Re: Building a struct within a struct correctly, Barry Schwarz, 21:36
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 21:36
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 21:21
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, lawrence . jones, 21:11
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 21:01
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Martien Verbruggen, 20:48
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Keith Thompson, 20:35
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard, 20:25
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Chad, 20:23
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Chad, 20:20
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 20:10
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Peter Nilsson, 20:01
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:29
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:26
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Peter Nilsson, 18:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: Design... the right way., Mike Wahler, 17:14
- Re: what does libm.a contain?, Stephen Sprunk, 17:06
- Re: what does libm.a contain?, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 16:54
- Re: single if vs if else, Stephen Sprunk, 16:36
- Re: what does libm.a contain?, Antoninus Twink, 16:36
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 16:34
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, user923005, 16:28
- what does libm.a contain?, fd97207, 16:14
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:54
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:45
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 15:45
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Antoninus Twink, 15:28
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 15:26
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:15
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard, 15:15
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, student . matt, 15:13
- Re: about getch(), Kevin Handy, 15:03
- Re: How to learn C ?, vippstar, 14:57
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, santosh, 14:26
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, santosh, 14:22
- Re: how to release memory?, santosh, 14:16
- Re: How to learn C ?, Kenny McCormack, 13:51
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, vippstar, 13:34
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard, 13:14
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, vippstar, 13:13
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Richard Tobin, 13:13
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard, 13:12
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pereges, 13:09
- Re: Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, Harald van Dijk, 13:06
- Can size_t be used as a substitute to unsigned long int ?, pereges, 12:58
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:56
- Re: How to learn C ?, vippstar, 12:52
- Re: Design... the right way., mike . rosset+gnus, 12:46
- Re: types, variable names and fields, Joachim Schmitz, 12:42
- Re: how to release memory?, pereges, 12:36
- Re: How to learn C ?, vippstar, 12:34
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Tobin, 12:29
- Re: single if vs if else, Walter Roberson, 12:28
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 12:27
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 12:26
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, pereges, 12:26
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Richard Heathfield, 12:26
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
- Re: How to learn C ?, Harald van Dijk, 12:24
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 12:18
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 12:17
- Re: types, variable names and fields, Harald van Dijk, 12:14
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: single if vs if else, pete, 12:05
- Re: Design... the right way., pete, 11:30
- Re: Design... the right way., Bartc, 11:27
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, pete, 11:04
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Stephen Sprunk, 11:02
- Re: single if vs if else, Stephen Sprunk, 10:57
- It's the continue for the latest article, saifullah, 10:57
- Re: types, variable names and fields, Joachim Schmitz, 10:52
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Hahnemann, 10:14
- Re: Design... the right way., mike . rosset+gnus, 10:10
- Re: how to release memory?, Chris Dollin, 09:48
- types, variable names and fields, SRoubtsov, 09:44
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Eric Sosman, 09:26
- Re: single if vs if else, CBFalconer, 09:08
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 09:02
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 08:59
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 08:51
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, CBFalconer, 08:47
- Re: A tired question?, Bartc, 08:46
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 08:14
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard, 07:50
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 07:45
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 07:08
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Nick Keighley, 06:48
- Re: A tired question?, pete, 06:45
- Re: Convert two char into one int, Nick Keighley, 06:40
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 06:39
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Nick Keighley, 06:37
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 06:34
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Dik T. Winter, 06:31
- Re: How to learn C ?, Nick Keighley, 06:24
- Re: single if vs if else, Nick Keighley, 06:12
- Re: Design... the right way., Bartc, 06:08
- Re: Design... the right way., Nick Keighley, 06:00
- Re: how to release memory?, Bartc, 05:54
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 05:46
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 05:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 04:54
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 03:45
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 03:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Chris Torek, 03:16
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:08
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Bos, 02:51
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, Johannes Bauer, 02:10
- Re: properly using unions., Johannes Bauer, 02:07
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 02:00
- Re: A tired question?, CBFalconer, 01:33
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 01:29
- Re: A tired question?, Richard Heathfield, 01:28
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, rahul, 01:28
- Re: how to release memory?, pete, 01:26
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 01:25
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, forkazoo, 01:25
- Re: how to release memory?, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, rahul, 01:16
- Re: How to learn C ?, Keith Thompson, 01:14
- Re: how to release memory?, Richard Heathfield, 01:09
- Re: Design... the right way., Richard Heathfield, 01:07
- Re: A tired question?, rahul, 01:06
- Re: single if vs if else, rahul, 00:55
- Re: A tired question?, Richard Heathfield, 00:52
- Re: Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, rahul, 00:52
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 00:51
- Re: How to learn C ?, Richard Heathfield, 00:43
- Re: how to release memory?, rahul, 00:34
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 00:25
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 00:17
- Re: A tired question?, santosh, 00:09
June 25, 2008
- Re: single if vs if else, Mike Wahler, 23:50
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 23:49
- Re: Speeding up a program, Keith Thompson, 23:41
- Re: Send message to all client, Keith Thompson, 23:35
- Re: A tired question?, Peter Nilsson, 23:35
- Re: A tired question?, Mike Wahler, 23:34
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Walter Roberson, 23:28
- Re: how to release memory?, Mike Wahler, 23:25
- how to release memory?, mynews, 23:20
- Re: A tired question?, mdh, 23:17
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Peter Nilsson, 23:16
- Design... the right way., mike . rosset+gnus, 23:03
- Re: single if vs if else, Chad, 23:03
- Newbie Question about multiple system calls within loops, student . matt, 23:01
- Re: single if vs if else, CBFalconer, 22:59
- Re: single if vs if else, Ben Pfaff, 22:58
- Re: A tired question?, dj3vande, 22:51
- single if vs if else, Chad, 22:43
- Re: A tired question?, pete, 22:08
- A tired question?, mdh, 21:31
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Ben Bacarisse, 21:27
- Re: Convert two char into one int, pete, 21:15
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, viza, 21:02
- Re: Send message to all client, Chad, 21:00
- Re: Convert two char into one int, Fred Yu, 20:57
- Re: Send message to all client, Chad, 20:53
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, Keith Thompson, 20:06
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Keith Thompson, 19:59
- Re: Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, CBFalconer, 19:21
- Re: properly using unions., CBFalconer, 18:51
- Re: How to learn C ?, CBFalconer, 18:49
- Speeding up a program, kid joe, 18:46
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 18:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 18:42
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 18:36
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 18:25
- Representing a Sequence of Shorts in Bits, Hahnemann, 18:23
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 18:21
- Re: Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, viza, 18:17
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, CBFalconer, 18:04
- Re: Path to the current running executable, viza, 18:03
- Re: Send message to all client, Antoninus Twink, 17:57
- Macro to cause build failure if parameter not defined?, skillzero@xxxxxxxxx, 17:54
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 17:50
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 17:36
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, CBFalconer, 17:33
- Re: Permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], Tor Rustad, 17:32
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:24
- Re: [OT] obfuscation (was Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?), blmblm, 17:23
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ben Bacarisse, 17:13
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 17:08
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: [semi-OT] obfuscation (was Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?), Richard Heathfield, 17:03
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, Ben Bacarisse, 17:01
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 16:58
- Re: Path to the current running executable, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: [semi-OT] obfuscation (was Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?), blmblm, 16:52
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 16:52
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 16:41
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, Walter Roberson, 16:35
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 16:34
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Cesar Rabak, 16:26
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, pereges, 16:19
- Re: properly using unions., Bartc, 16:15
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, Harald van Dijk, 16:11
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, rio, 16:11
- Re: properly using unions., ediebur, 15:54
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, pereges, 15:52
- Re: can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, Fred, 15:31
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 15:13
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 14:57
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 14:56
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 14:53
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 14:47
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 14:36
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 14:35
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 14:18
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Cesar Rabak, 14:13
- can some one please tell me the cause of the error ?, pereges, 14:05
- Re: [semi-OT] obfuscation (was Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?), Walter Roberson, 14:02
- [semi-OT] obfuscation (was Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?), blmblm, 13:55
- Re: Permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], blmblm, 13:52
- Re: Pedants, Default User, 13:44
- Re: Path to the current running executable, Walter Roberson, 13:41
- Re: Path to the current running executable, mathieu, 13:14
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 13:09
- Re: Path to the current running executable, mathieu, 13:07
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 13:05
- Re: Building a struct within a struct correctly, Tarique, 13:00
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 12:51
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Keith Thompson, 12:39
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 12:26
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 12:15
- Re: How to learn C ?, pete, 12:14
- Re: How to learn C ?, vippstar, 12:03
- Re: Path to the current running executable, Keith Thompson, 11:52
- Re: Send message to all client, vippstar, 11:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 11:43
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ben Bacarisse, 11:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 11:38
- Re: Building a struct within a struct correctly, Ben Bacarisse, 11:32
- Re: Building a struct within a struct correctly, Fred, 11:30
- Building a struct within a struct correctly, bernd, 11:20
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 11:08
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Chris Dollin, 11:07
- Re: Path to the current running executable, Kenny McCormack, 11:05
- Re: Pedants, Kenny McCormack, 11:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 10:58
- Re: Why strdup, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:57
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 10:55
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ben Bacarisse, 10:46
- Re: Why strdup, Joachim Schmitz, 10:07
- compile BCC 4.52 ancient program, happytoday, 10:06
- Re: Path to the current running executable, mathieu, 10:04
- Re: Why strdup, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:02
- Path to the current running executable, mathieu, 09:57
- Re: Why strdup, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 09:39
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, CBFalconer, 09:22
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 09:09
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 09:08
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 08:59
- Re: Why strdup, Richard Tobin, 08:01
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 07:12
- Re: Why strdup, Chris Dollin, 06:59
- Re: Send message to all client, Nicolas Florian, 06:39
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 06:36
- Re: How to learn C ?, Nicolas Florian, 06:35
- Re: Why strdup, pete, 06:35
- Re: Why strdup, rahul, 06:21
- Re: Send message to all client, pete, 06:11
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Richard, 06:10
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 06:07
- Why strdup, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 06:02
- Re: properly using unions., Richard Tobin, 05:52
- Re: properly using unions., Johannes Bauer, 05:26
- Re: Send message to all client, Nick Keighley, 05:03
- Re: properly using unions., Chris Dollin, 05:02
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, rahul, 04:56
- Re: Send message to all client, Mariano, 04:46
- Re: properly using unions., rahul, 04:45
- Re: Add items to an array, Nick Keighley, 04:40
- Re: share a variable across two libraries, rahul, 04:30
- Re: properly using unions., santosh, 04:22
- Re: properly using unions., rahul, 04:16
- Re: properly using unions., Richard Heathfield, 03:09
- properly using unions., pereges, 02:34
- Re: permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], Richard Bos, 02:27
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 02:25
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 02:14
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Keith Thompson, 01:23
- Re: Searching a small file database, Michael Snoyman, 01:06
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Barry Schwarz, 00:23
June 24, 2008
- Re: Pedants, user923005, 23:56
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Peter Nilsson, 23:45
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, santosh, 22:35
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Bill Cunningham, 22:04
- Re: Permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], santosh, 21:38
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Keith Thompson, 21:35
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Keith Thompson, 21:33
- Re: Add items to an array, santosh, 21:28
- Re: Pedants, Kaz Kylheku, 21:22
- Re: Pedants, pete, 21:19
- Re: How to learn C ?, user923005, 20:59
- Re: Send message to all client, Kaz Kylheku, 20:54
- Re: Send message to all client, Nicolas Florian, 20:44
- Re: How to learn C ?, Nicolas Florian, 20:40
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Bill Cunningham, 20:38
- Re: permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Richard Heathfield, 20:25
- permutations [was:Re: decrementing arrays], Bill Cunningham, 20:13
- Re: Send message to all client, pete, 20:03
- Re: [Socket+thread] Send message to all client, Keith Thompson, 19:52
- Permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], Bill Cunningham, 19:51
- permutations [Re: decrementing arrays], Bill Cunningham, 19:51
- Re: Pedants, Dann Corbit, 19:47
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 19:45
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 19:09
- Re: Add items to an array, s0suk3, 18:48
- Re: Send message to all client, Mariano, 18:32
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), Antoninus Twink, 18:23
- Re: Searching a small file database, Martien Verbruggen, 18:19
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 18:12
- Re: Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 17:58
- Re: Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), CBFalconer, 17:53
- Re: How to learn C ?, user923005, 17:50
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 17:45
- Re: The Cephes Mathematical Library, Eric Sosman, 17:11
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 17:08
- Re: Pedants, Ralf Damaschke, 16:51
- Re: Searching a small file database, drhowarddrfine, 16:14
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 15:51
- Re: Searching a small file database, soscpd, 15:45
- Re: Searching a small file database, drhowarddrfine, 14:51
- Re: Searching a small file database, Bartc, 14:50
- Re: About += and ++, Harald van Dijk, 14:29
- Re: About += and ++, John Bode, 14:13
- Re: Searching a small file database, Eric Sosman, 14:02
- Re: Send message to all client, Mariano, 13:56
- Re: [Socket+thread] Send message to all client, Antoninus Twink, 13:48
- [Socket+thread] Send message to all client, Mariano, 13:20
- Re: Christmas trees, pete, 13:19
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 12:54
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, BigRelax, 12:51
- How to learn C ?, BigRelax, 12:49
- Re: Searching a small file database, drhowarddrfine, 12:47
- Re: Searching a small file database, Eric Sosman, 12:42
- Searching a small file database, drhowarddrfine, 12:35
- Re: About += and ++, Richard, 11:31
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, pete, 11:28
- Re: About += and ++, John Bode, 11:15
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, Eric Sosman, 11:06
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, pete, 11:02
- Re: Pedants, Eric Sosman, 10:49
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, pete, 10:46
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, badc0de4, 10:45
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, Chris Dollin, 10:40
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, zaheer031@xxxxxxxxx, 10:38
- Re: Writing a structure into a file, pete, 10:36
- Writing a structure into a file, zaheer031@xxxxxxxxx, 10:13
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 09:51
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 09:36
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 09:25
- Re: open stdin a second time, Walter Roberson, 08:54
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 08:42
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Richard Tobin, 07:32
- Re: share a variable across two libraries, Richard Heathfield, 07:22
- share a variable across two libraries, guddu, 07:14
- Re: Add items to an array, vippstar, 07:00
- Re: Pedants, vippstar, 06:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Dik T. Winter, 06:42
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, pete, 06:22
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Bartc, 06:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 05:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 05:40
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 05:20
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 05:13
- Re: Christmas trees, Richard Heathfield, 05:11
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: Add items to an array, Nick Keighley, 05:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 05:03
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 05:02
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 04:58
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Joachim Schmitz, 04:44
- Re: Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), Nick Keighley, 04:38
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Joachim Schmitz, 04:33
- Re: Christmas trees, Bert, 03:46
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Nick Keighley, 03:45
- Re: open stdin a second time, Richard Tobin, 03:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 03:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 03:38
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 03:31
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 03:31
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 03:28
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 03:24
- Re: About += and ++, David Thompson, 02:39
- Re: open stdin a second time, David Thompson, 02:39
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, David Thompson, 02:39
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 02:06
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 02:02
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 01:46
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 00:41
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 00:40
- Re: Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), santosh, 00:38
June 23, 2008
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, William Ahern, 23:15
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, William Ahern, 22:42
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 22:22
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 21:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 20:38
- Re: Add items to an array, Bartc, 20:15
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 20:04
- Re: Pedants, christian.bau, 20:02
- Denigrating Jacob (was: Pedants), CBFalconer, 19:41
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Dann Corbit, 19:25
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, soscpd, 19:20
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Keith Thompson, 18:52
- Re: The Cephes Mathematical Library, jacob navia, 18:50
- The Cephes Mathematical Library, jacob navia, 18:37
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:37
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, CBFalconer, 18:36
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, CBFalconer, 18:34
- Re: Add items to an array, viza, 18:30
- Re: Pedants, Ben Bacarisse, 18:22
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Harald van Dijk, 18:22
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, CBFalconer, 18:21
- Re: Pedants, Eric Sosman, 18:18
- Re: Address Book, CBFalconer, 18:14
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 18:11
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Joe Wright, 18:04
- Re: Add items to an array, vippstar, 18:02
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Tor Rustad, 18:02
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 17:59
- Re: Add items to an array, Ali Karaali, 17:58
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Antoninus Twink, 17:51
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: Pedants, vippstar, 17:42
- Re: Add items to an array, vippstar, 17:35
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Bartc, 17:31
- Re: Add items to an array, viza, 17:30
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 17:30
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 17:27
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 17:20
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ben Bacarisse, 17:14
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 17:11
- Re: Pedants, Eric Sosman, 17:06
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 16:54
- Re: A question about fputs(), Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Antoninus Twink, 16:43
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 16:35
- Re: A question about fputs(), Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 16:30
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Antoninus Twink, 16:29
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 16:26
- Re: Add items to an array, vippstar, 16:22
- Re: Pedants, vippstar, 16:20
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Harald van Dijk, 16:15
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, Harald van Dijk, 16:09
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Add items to an array, viza, 16:06
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 15:54
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 15:52
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Keith Thompson, 15:52
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 15:36
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, Kenny McCormack, 15:17
- Re: Pedants, Ralf Damaschke, 15:10
- Re: Add items to an array, Default User, 14:38
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 14:17
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Eric Sosman, 14:06
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 14:00
- Re: Add items to an array, Richard, 13:56
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 13:54
- Add items to an array, Kevin Walzer, 13:43
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:36
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 13:23
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Johannes Bauer, 13:06
- Re: Pedants, Kenny McCormack, 12:46
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, arcadio, 12:42
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, arcadio, 12:28
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, arcadio, 12:28
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, pete, 12:15
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, Richard Heathfield, 12:04
- Re: Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, Lew Pitcher, 11:59
- Array has incomplete element type. GCC bug?, arcadio, 11:52
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 11:24
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Lew Pitcher, 11:19
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 11:08
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Dik T. Winter, 10:58
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ben Bacarisse, 10:44
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 10:22
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 10:22
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, John Bode, 10:16
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Nick Keighley, 10:13
- Re: independent string functions, Nick Keighley, 09:32
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 09:24
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Kenny McCormack, 09:08
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Richard Bos, 08:59
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 08:48
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 08:43
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Kenny McCormack, 08:34
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Richard, 08:27
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, YarvinG Liu, 08:25
- Re: does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Nick Keighley, 08:07
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 07:59
- Re: A question about fputs(), rahul, 07:45
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, rahul, 07:42
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, rahul, 07:39
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 07:25
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 07:09
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 06:53
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 06:53
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 06:52
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 06:46
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 06:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 06:44
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Joe Wright, 06:31
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Ben Bacarisse, 06:22
- does not contain debug information. Press OK to Continue, Karthik, 06:19
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Bartc, 06:11
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 05:37
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 05:29
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 05:18
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Ali Karaali, 05:17
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 04:33
- Re: Christmas trees, redraiment, 04:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Nick Keighley, 04:18
- Re: Address Book, Antoninus Twink, 04:16
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 03:59
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 03:58
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Bos, 03:35
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Nick Keighley, 03:12
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Nick Keighley, 03:08
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 02:41
- Re: Address Book, Ujjwol लामिछाने[UNIX], 01:15
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Barry Schwarz, 01:12
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 01:00
- Re: Address Book, Ujjwol लामिछाने[UNIX], 00:30
- Re: what is this declaration?, rahul, 00:24
June 22, 2008
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, santosh, 23:21
- Re: decrementing arrays, Barry Schwarz, 22:58
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, Ben Bacarisse, 22:35
- Re: Pedants, Ben Bacarisse, 22:19
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, santosh, 22:09
- Re: Pedants, Erwin Lindemann, 21:56
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 21:47
- Re: C Text/Binary Files, pete, 21:46
- Re: A question about fputs(), santosh, 21:45
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 21:42
- Re: A question about fputs(), pete, 21:40
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 21:38
- Re: A question about fputs(), pete, 21:27
- Re: A question about fputs(), pete, 21:22
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 21:22
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 21:13
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, pete, 21:08
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:02
- Re: A question about fputs(), santosh, 20:57
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, CBFalconer, 20:44
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 20:40
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 20:33
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Ben Bacarisse, 20:10
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 19:46
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Joe Wright, 19:35
- Re: The type of argv in K&R2, Daniel Pitts, 19:08
- The type of argv in K&R2, candide, 18:56
- C Text/Binary Files, Bartc, 18:46
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Chris Torek, 18:39
- Re: A question about fputs(), Bartc, 17:48
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 17:37
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 17:29
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 17:25
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 16:23
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Anna, 16:15
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Eric Sosman, 16:04
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:53
- Re: Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Martin Ambuhl, 15:51
- Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Anna, 15:30
- Re: A question about fputs(), Chad, 15:28
- Re: Embarresingly simple struct question, Cromulent, 15:25
- Array of struct & segmentation fault :-(, Anna, 15:24
- Re: A question about fputs(), Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: A question about fputs(), Joe Wright, 15:12
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 14:59
- Re: A question about fputs(), Richard Heathfield, 14:54
- Re: Embarresingly simple struct question, Richard Heathfield, 14:52
- Re: A question about fputs(), Richard Heathfield, 14:49
- zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, an old friend, 14:36
- Re: A question about fputs(), Daniel Pitts, 14:34
- Re: Addicted to Pronography, KB9RQZ, 14:33
- Re: A question about fputs(), Daniel Pitts, 13:29
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Bartc, 13:06
- Re: Embarresingly simple struct question, Cromulent, 13:05
- Re: Embarresingly simple struct question, Richard Tobin, 12:56
- Re: Embarresingly simple struct question, Johannes Bauer, 12:55
- Re: A question about fputs(), Bartc, 12:52
- Re: A question about fputs(), CBFalconer, 12:51
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Kenny McCormack, 12:48
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Kenny McCormack, 12:45
- Embarresingly simple struct question, Cromulent, 12:43
- Re: A question about fputs(), Raymond Martineau, 12:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, John Bode, 12:32
- Re: A question about fputs(), Chad, 12:31
- Re: A question about fputs(), Joe Wright, 12:23
- Re: A question about fputs(), Chad, 12:21
- Re: A question about fputs(), Chad, 12:18
- Re: A question about fputs(), Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: A question about fputs(), vippstar, 12:10
- Re: A question about fputs(), Chad, 12:03
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 12:02
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, marika, 11:59
- Re: A question about fputs(), Richard Heathfield, 11:58
- A question about fputs(), Chad, 11:46
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 11:03
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Walter Roberson, 10:59
- Re: [OT] Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 10:56
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Keith Thompson, 10:52
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 10:50
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 10:48
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Keith Thompson, 10:45
- Re: Address Book, luka, 10:42
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 10:37
- Re: what is this declaration?, Old Wolf, 10:36
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Tor Rustad, 10:26
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 10:18
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 10:12
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Kenny McCormack, 10:05
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Kenny McCormack, 10:03
- Re: Pedants, Kenny McCormack, 10:01
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Malcolm McLean, 09:22
- Re: Pedants, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:49
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Richard Heathfield, 08:21
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 08:13
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 08:06
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 07:59
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 07:50
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Wolfgang Draxinger, 07:45
- Re: Pedants, Antoninus Twink, 07:43
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 07:33
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 07:26
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 06:44
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 06:38
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Bartc, 06:28
- Re: Address Book, Rui Maciel, 06:20
- Re: Address Book, Dan, 06:18
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Tor Rustad, 05:35
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 04:34
- Re: Bit Padding and other questions, vippstar, 04:18
- Address Book, Ujjwol लामिछाने[UNIX], 03:27
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 02:29
- Earn 25 US$ in just 5 minutes . . ., Sushmeeta, 01:41
- Re: what is this declaration?, pete, 01:40
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 01:33
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 01:10
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Chris Thomasson, 00:41
- Re: Pedants, Chris Thomasson, 00:39
- Re: decrementing arrays, Barry Schwarz, 00:33
- what is this declaration?, 1230987za, 00:31
June 21, 2008
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 23:53
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Keith Thompson, 23:26
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 23:19
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Richard Heathfield, 23:15
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard Heathfield, 23:10
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, forkazoo, 22:47
- Re: Pedants, Keith Thompson, 22:33
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 22:26
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Keith Thompson, 22:24
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 22:20
- Re: Christmas trees, Bert, 22:04
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 22:03
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 22:00
- Re: Christmas trees, Bert, 21:59
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard Heathfield, 21:57
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 21:47
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:33
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 21:28
- Re: Pedants, Ben Bacarisse, 21:18
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 21:01
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 20:55
- Re: Christmas trees, Barry Schwarz, 20:49
- Re: Pedants, Bob Nelson, 20:41
- Re: Christmas trees, Ben Bacarisse, 20:32
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:22
- Christmas trees, Bert, 20:13
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 20:04
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 20:04
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 20:03
- Re: Help avoid goto, Walter Banks, 19:45
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 19:30
- Re: Pedants, Bob Nelson, 19:27
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 19:23
- Re: Bit Padding and other questions, Ben Bacarisse, 19:20
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 19:17
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 19:12
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 19:06
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Tor Rustad, 18:33
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Tor Rustad, 18:30
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: Addicted to Pronography, \"Reb\" Ruster, 18:24
- Re: Bit Padding and other questions, lawrence . jones, 18:16
- Re: Pedants, Bartc, 18:15
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Heathfield, 18:02
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 17:53
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 17:49
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 17:49
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:41
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 17:38
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 17:37
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 17:34
- Re: Bit Padding and other questions, Barry Schwarz, 17:30
- Re: Pedants, Ian Collins, 17:02
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, lawrence . jones, 16:33
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:19
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:16
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, santosh, 15:48
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 15:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 15:37
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 15:33
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 15:30
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 15:15
- Re: Pedants, Bob Nelson, 15:14
- Re: Addicted to Pronography, Viking, 15:11
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Malcolm McLean, 14:53
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, santosh, 14:49
- Re: Pedants, Malcolm McLean, 14:49
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 14:32
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ralf Damaschke, 14:08
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 14:01
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 13:53
- Re: Bit Padding and other questions, santosh, 13:47
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 13:39
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Bartc, 13:21
- Re: Pedants, Tony Quinn, 13:14
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 13:06
- Re: Addicted to Pronography, thajix, 13:04
- Re: Addicted to Pronography, thajix, 13:01
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 12:58
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 12:48
- Addicted to Pronography, melphablue, 12:47
- Bit Padding and other questions, vippstar, 12:45
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 12:45
- Re: Pedants, Bartc, 12:39
- Re: Pedants, Serve Lau, 12:37
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Malcolm McLean, 12:36
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 12:33
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 12:23
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 12:22
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 12:18
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 12:13
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 12:05
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bartc, 11:55
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 11:53
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Richard Heathfield, 11:52
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Malcolm McLean, 11:39
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 11:35
- Re: Pedants, Malcolm McLean, 11:34
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Bartc, 11:29
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 11:18
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 11:14
- Re: Pedants, santosh, 11:10
- Re: Pedants, Walter Roberson, 11:00
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 10:52
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Serve Lau, 10:48
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 10:45
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 10:26
- Re: Pedants, Joachim Schmitz, 10:04
- Re: Pedants, Ben Bacarisse, 09:44
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Malcolm McLean, 09:31
- Re: Pedants, Richard, 09:03
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 08:57
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 08:55
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 08:36
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, Henry Law, 08:32
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:06
- Re: Help avoid goto, Bill Leary, 07:52
- Re: Help avoid goto, Bill Leary, 07:31
- Re: Pedants, Richard Heathfield, 07:29
- Re: Help avoid goto, Øyvind Røtvold, 07:28
- Re: Pedants, CBFalconer, 07:26
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Richard Heathfield, 07:25
- Re: Help avoid goto, CBFalconer, 07:17
- Re: Pedants, Tor Rustad, 07:05
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, vippstar, 06:59
- Re: Pedants, vippstar, 06:57
- Re: Help avoid goto, Walter Banks, 06:30
- Re: Pedants, jacob navia, 06:19
- Pedants, jacob navia, 06:11
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Malcolm McLean, 06:08
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Bartc, 04:15
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Bert, 03:51
- Re: independent string functions, pete, 01:44
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 01:19
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, user923005, 01:09
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Barry Schwarz, 00:52
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Keith Thompson, 00:50
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Keith Thompson, 00:47
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Keith Thompson, 00:44
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Martin Ambuhl, 00:34
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard Heathfield, 00:14
June 20, 2008
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 23:47
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 23:23
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 23:17
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, copx, 23:14
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, copx, 23:08
- Re: Problem with UNIX/Linux Shared Libraries and Global variables ..., Jack Klein, 23:07
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Eric Sosman, 21:39
- Re: independent string functions, Eric Sosman, 21:30
- Problem with UNIX/Linux Shared Libraries and Global variables ..., viraj . kadakia, 21:01
- Re: Why no generic function pointers?, Nick Bowler, 21:00
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 20:57
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 20:56
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 20:55
- Why no generic function pointers?, copx, 20:54
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 20:53
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 20:38
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 20:35
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard, 20:34
- Re: is -pedantic bad flag?, Richard Heathfield, 20:31
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 20:31
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Ike Naar, 20:23
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 20:17
- is -pedantic bad flag?, new to c, 20:10
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 19:56
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Help avoid goto, Kaz Kylheku, 19:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 19:42
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 19:27
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 19:18
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 19:13
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 19:11
- Re: Help avoid goto, Ben Bacarisse, 19:04
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard, 18:47
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Tobin, 18:34
- Re: Help avoid goto, CBFalconer, 18:33
- Re: Help avoid goto, Mike Wahler, 18:32
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 18:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Ian Collins, 18:27
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, christian.bau, 18:26
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 18:25
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 18:21
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 18:20
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Richard Tobin, 18:18
- Re: decrementing arrays, Keith Thompson, 18:17
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, christian.bau, 18:10
- Re: Help avoid goto, Eric Sosman, 18:09
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:39
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 17:38
- Re: Help avoid goto, Ben Bacarisse, 17:31
- Re: Help avoid goto, Kaz Kylheku, 17:30
- Re: Help avoid goto, Daniel Pitts, 17:30
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 17:28
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Chris Peters, 17:22
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 17:20
- Re: Help avoid goto, Kaz Kylheku, 17:18
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 17:15
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 17:11
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:03
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 17:03
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Help avoid goto, Kaz Kylheku, 16:56
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 16:45
- Re: Help avoid goto, Walter Roberson, 16:44
- Re: decrementing arrays, Richard, 16:41
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:37
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:34
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Dann Corbit, 16:29
- Re: Help avoid goto, spasmous, 16:26
- Re: decrementing arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 16:24
- Re: Help avoid goto, Eric Sosman, 16:23
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Dann Corbit, 16:22
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:21
- Re: Help avoid goto, spasmous, 16:18
- Re: Help avoid goto, Ben Bacarisse, 16:12
- Re: decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 16:06
- Re: decrementing arrays, santosh, 15:59
- Re: Help avoid goto, pete, 15:34
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 15:30
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 15:28
- Re: Help avoid goto, Walter Roberson, 15:28
- decrementing arrays, Bill Cunningham, 15:21
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Tor Rustad, 15:19
- Help avoid goto, spasmous, 15:19
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 14:49
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Kenneth Brody, 14:48
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Tor Rustad, 14:47
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Kenneth Brody, 14:43
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Flash Gordon, 14:42
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Herbert Rosenau, 14:37
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, santosh, 14:26
- Re: library design, Minimiscience, 14:19
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 14:14
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, mingyanguo, 13:49
- Re: independent string functions, pete, 13:38
- Re: print binary, Flash Gordon, 13:34
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 13:29
- Re: Memory allocation for array, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:27
- Re: seg fault, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 12:41
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Harald van Dijk, 12:40
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Harter, 12:37
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 12:25
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Daniel Pitts, 12:23
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 12:17
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 12:13
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 12:08
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 12:05
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Johannes Bauer, 12:04
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, CBFalconer, 12:01
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 12:00
- Re: print binary, Chris Torek, 11:44
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Walter Roberson, 11:40
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 11:39
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, Joachim Schmitz, 11:32
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Walter Roberson, 11:30
- Re: Getting the file name from a FILE *, vippstar, 11:28
- Getting the file name from a FILE *, jacob navia, 11:11
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, soscpd, 11:08
- Re: independent string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:49
- Re: independent string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:46
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Eric Sosman, 10:34
- Re: Pointer to functions, Richard, 10:29
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Richard, 10:09
- Re: Pointer to functions, Remo D., 10:06
- Re: independent string functions, pete, 09:52
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, vippstar, 09:46
- Re: independent string functions, pete, 09:44
- SEXY__AUNTY__NEED__HARD__SEX, Lilly, 09:40
- Re: independent string functions, Cartoper, 09:36
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Richard, 09:33
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:31
- Re: independent string functions, Cartoper, 09:31
- Re: independent string functions, Eric Sosman, 09:29
- Re: independent string functions, pete, 09:27
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Bartc, 09:22
- Re: independent string functions, Ben Bacarisse, 09:21
- Re: independent string functions, Joachim Schmitz, 09:19
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Bartc, 09:14
- Re: print binary, pete, 09:12
- Re: independent string functions, jacob navia, 09:12
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Kenny McCormack, 09:09
- Re: print binary, pete, 09:08
- independent string functions, Cartoper, 09:04
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, vippstar, 09:02
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 08:56
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Guillaume Dargaud, 08:46
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Johannes Bauer, 08:34
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Wolfgang Draxinger, 08:24
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Richard Bos, 08:14
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Johannes Bauer, 08:14
- Re: print binary, Wolfgang Draxinger, 08:14
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Johannes Bauer, 08:11
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Bartc, 07:29
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, rahul, 07:21
- Clever hints & tips., srividya, 06:48
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Bartc, 06:41
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Richard Heathfield, 06:24
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Bartc, 06:17
- Re: In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Bartc, 06:12
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Antoninus Twink, 06:07
- Re: Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, Nick Keighley, 06:05
- Re: print binary, Antoninus Twink, 06:04
- Re: print binary, Joachim Schmitz, 06:01
- Re: print binary, Joachim Schmitz, 05:52
- Re: print binary, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:45
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 05:43
- Re: library design, Joachim Schmitz, 05:42
- In 3 moves, where can the knight go?, Bert, 05:38
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 05:34
- Interesting problem dynamically forming func names ??, onkar . n . mahajan, 05:29
- the secrets of exam success, mynicesneakers6, 05:28
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 05:20
- Re: library design, Ian Collins, 05:17
- Re: library design, Ian Collins, 05:16
- Re: print binary, Joachim Schmitz, 05:11
- Re: library design, Joachim Schmitz, 05:10
- Re: print binary, Bartc, 05:04
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, vippstar, 05:04
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 04:59
- Re: print binary, Antoninus Twink, 04:58
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Antoninus Twink, 04:43
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, Antoninus Twink, 04:41
- Re: print binary, CBFalconer, 04:41
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, CBFalconer, 04:34
- Earn 25 US$ in just 5 mins . . ., sweta, 04:34
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 04:32
- Re: Pointer to functions, CBFalconer, 04:30
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Nick Keighley, 04:28
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Kenny McCormack, 04:12
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Kenny McCormack, 04:11
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 04:11
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 04:05
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 04:04
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 04:02
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 04:01
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 03:57
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Nick Keighley, 03:52
- library design, Frank Fischer, 03:41
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, CBFalconer, 03:19
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, CBFalconer, 03:13
- Re: Pointer to functions, Richard Bos, 03:08
- Re: seg fault, Joachim Schmitz, 03:08
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Bos, 03:05
- Re: fopen, Richard Bos, 03:04
- Re: print binary, Joachim Schmitz, 03:00
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Richard Bos, 02:53
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 02:45
- Re: PC-Lint: undeclared funtion, Chris H, 02:42
- Re: print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 02:22
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 02:05
- Re: print binary, Flash Gordon, 01:54
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, sunil, 01:32
- Re: print binary, Robert Gamble, 01:19
- Re: print binary, Don Bruder, 01:13
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Harter, 00:59
- Re: fopen, Serve Lau, 00:55
- print binary, Kapteyn's Star, 00:49
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, rahul, 00:30
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, rahul, 00:26
June 19, 2008
- 20-6-2008 –walkin,IT FRESHER,IT EXP OPENINGS, careerbirds, 23:18
- Online Career resources study on careerbirds.com, careerbirds, 23:04
- Re: PC-Lint: undeclared funtion, Barry Schwarz, 21:33
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:40
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, Flash Gordon, 19:17
- Re: writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, pete, 19:01
- writev() on a SOCK_STREAM socket, kid joe, 18:50
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, CBFalconer, 18:47
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, CBFalconer, 18:31
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, CBFalconer, 18:19
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Antoninus Twink, 18:16
- Re: fopen, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: seg fault, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Re: newbee help : parser in C, Eric Sosman, 17:37
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Ben Bacarisse, 17:31
- newbee help : parser in C, vaib, 17:27
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Flash Gordon, 17:17
- Re: Pointer to functions, Chris Torek, 16:38
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Bartc, 16:38
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 16:37
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, gw7rib, 16:36
- Re: Pointer to functions, Eric Sosman, 16:08
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 15:50
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 15:45
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, Bartc, 15:40
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Dann Corbit, 15:30
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, santosh, 15:19
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, rio, 15:11
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Harter, 15:07
- Re: Pointer to functions, Stephen Sprunk, 15:01
- Re: PC-Lint: undeclared funtion, user923005, 14:56
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Harald van Dijk, 14:27
- Re: seg fault, Joachim Schmitz, 14:20
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 13:46
- Re: [OT, link] PC-Lint: undeclared funtion, Mike Wahler, 13:33
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, sinbad, 13:28
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Tejas Kokje, 13:23
- Re: fopen, Serve Lau, 13:15
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 13:15
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 13:07
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, evanevankan2, 12:47
- Re: Using a link list over an array., pereges, 12:41
- Re: Pointer to functions, Remo D., 12:29
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Chris Thomasson, 12:28
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
- Re: Pointer to functions, Remo D., 12:18
- Re: Pointer to functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:12
- Re: Pointer to functions, vippstar, 12:04
- Re: Pointer to functions, vippstar, 11:57
- Re: Pointer to functions, Remo D., 11:51
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 11:46
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, Angelo Chen, 11:38
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 11:27
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 11:17
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, santosh, 11:09
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, viza, 11:06
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, viza, 11:00
- Re: Pointer to functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:50
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, Angelo Chen, 10:45
- Pointer to functions, Remo D., 10:40
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, evanevankan2, 10:35
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Linonut, 10:07
- PC-Lint: undeclared funtion, suppamax, 10:02
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, santosh, 09:57
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, Angelo Chen, 09:41
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 09:35
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, Thad Smith, 09:34
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, santosh, 09:29
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bartc, 09:21
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, CBFalconer, 09:20
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, santosh, 09:19
- Re: looking for a checksum routine in C, Richard Bos, 08:56
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 08:53
- looking for a checksum routine in C, Angelo Chen, 08:50
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Richard, 08:20
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Bartc, 08:00
- Re: Using a link list over an array., Ben Bacarisse, 08:00
- Using a link list over an array., pereges, 07:36
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Heathfield, 07:12
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, jacob navia, 07:11
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Heathfield, 07:09
- Re: Bitwise operators, den2k, 06:37
- CD DVD Recovery Toolbox Free, GoodieMan, 06:25
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Bos, 06:24
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, viza, 06:10
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Nick Keighley, 06:07
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, vippstar, 06:04
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, den2k, 06:00
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Ravindra.B, 05:59
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, jacob navia, 05:45
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Chris Dollin, 05:45
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Richard Heathfield, 05:37
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, den2k, 05:37
- Re: Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, vippstar, 05:34
- Re: Bitwise operators, Richard Heathfield, 05:32
- Do memory allocations need to be freeed every time?, Ravindra.B, 05:23
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 05:07
- Re: Bitwise operators, den2k, 05:06
- Re: seg fault, Nick Keighley, 04:41
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Antoninus Twink, 04:41
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 04:40
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Re: seg fault, Nick Keighley, 04:11
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 03:49
- Re: seg fault, jacob navia, 03:09
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Bos, 02:38
- Re: Bitwise operators, rahul, 02:35
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, somenath, 02:29
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 02:16
- Re: Bitwise operators, santosh, 02:02
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 01:55
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Harald van Dijk, 01:24
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, somenath, 01:21
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Harald van Dijk, 01:16
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Daniel Pitts, 01:12
- Re: Bitwise operators, onkar . n . mahajan, 01:10
- Re: Bitwise operators, onkar . n . mahajan, 01:07
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, rahul, 00:51
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, sinbad, 00:47
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 00:13
June 18, 2008
- Re: Bitwise operators, Walter Roberson, 22:48
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 22:20
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 22:07
- Re: Bitwise operators, Richard Heathfield, 21:40
- Re: Bitwise operators, Johannes Bauer, 21:27
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 20:53
- Re: Bitwise operators, Johannes Bauer, 20:48
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 19:16
- Re: Bitwise operators, Richard Heathfield, 19:09
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Daniel Pitts, 19:07
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, user923005, 18:58
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Antoninus Twink, 18:29
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, CBFalconer, 18:28
- Re: Bitwise operators, Antoninus Twink, 18:19
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:13
- Re: Bitwise operators, Walter Roberson, 18:09
- Re: Bitwise operators, Peter Nilsson, 18:05
- Re: Bitwise operators, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:52
- Re: Bitwise operators, Walter Roberson, 17:41
- Bitwise operators, Santhosh, 17:32
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 17:31
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Harald van Dijk, 17:31
- Re: Problems using getaddrinfo and friends using c99 standard, Nathan, 17:28
- Re: Problems using getaddrinfo and friends using c99 standard, Antoninus Twink, 17:17
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, user923005, 17:07
- Re: extract all hotmail email addresses in a file and store in separate file, Bartc, 16:44
- Re: Problems using getaddrinfo and friends using c99 standard, Harald van Dijk, 16:37
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Flash Gordon, 16:34
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Antoninus Twink, 16:26
- Re: Memory allocation for array, Antoninus Twink, 16:23
- Re: Problems using getaddrinfo and friends using c99 standard, Antoninus Twink, 16:17
- Re: seg fault, Joachim Schmitz, 15:40
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 15:01
- Problems using getaddrinfo and friends using c99 standard, Nathan, 14:54
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Eric Sosman, 14:16
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, sinbad, 14:03
- Re: seg fault, Serve Lau, 13:29
- Re: seg fault, Serve Lau, 13:28
- Re: Convert two char into one int, Eric Sosman, 13:25
- Re: Convert two char into one int, Kenny McCormack, 13:19
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Kenny McCormack, 13:17
- Convert two char into one int, Mariano, 13:13
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, lawrence . jones, 12:49
- Re: Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:45
- Re: Memory allocation for array, Tejas Kokje, 12:31
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Harald van Dijk, 12:24
- Reading .ini files in ANSI C, Guillaume Dargaud, 12:24
- Re: seg fault, Bartc, 12:23
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Herbert Rosenau, 12:18
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 12:12
- Re: seg fault, Antoninus Twink, 12:08
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Kaz Kylheku, 11:11
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 11:02
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Kaz Kylheku, 10:59
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 10:17
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 10:01
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 09:50
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 09:44
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 09:25
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Willem, 09:22
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 09:19
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 09:15
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Tobin, 09:14
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 09:14
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 09:11
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 08:53
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, CBFalconer, 08:48
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 08:47
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, CBFalconer, 08:44
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Bos, 08:18
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, Richard Bos, 08:15
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 08:13
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 08:12
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, somenath, 08:10
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 07:54
- Re: error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', rahul, 07:43
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, santosh, 07:42
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 07:37
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:36
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 07:20
- Re: seg fault, Ben Bacarisse, 07:16
- Re: seg fault, Bartc, 07:16
- Re: seg fault, Bartc, 07:11
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 07:08
- Re: error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', santosh, 06:58
- Re: Memory allocation for array, santosh, 06:53
- Re: seg fault, Richard Tobin, 06:46
- Memory allocation for array, somenath, 06:24
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, pete, 06:05
- Re: seg fault, Joachim Schmitz, 06:03
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 05:50
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 05:48
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, Bartc, 05:43
- Re: seg fault, Johannes Bauer, 05:41
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, rahul, 05:35
- Re: seg fault, Bartc, 05:25
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Boon, 05:14
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Tobin, 05:10
- Re: seg fault, Richard Tobin, 05:06
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Boon, 05:06
- Re: seg fault, Nick Keighley, 04:34
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, thomas . mertes, 04:31
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, Nick Keighley, 04:20
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Heathfield, 03:59
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, vippstar, 03:57
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, rahul, 03:48
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Angelo Chen, 03:47
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, Richard Heathfield, 03:46
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:45
- Re: check if a double is odd or not, rahul, 03:44
- check if a double is odd or not, Angelo Chen, 03:19
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ian Collins, 02:49
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, rahul, 02:45
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Daniel Pitts, 02:44
- Re: error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', rahul, 02:30
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, rahul, 02:23
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Mike Wahler, 01:49
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 01:47
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 01:46
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, somenath, 01:30
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Chris Thomasson, 01:22
- Re: seg fault, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: seg fault, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, sinbad, 00:40
- Re: seg fault, Sensei, 00:28
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 00:25
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 00:14
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Richard Heathfield, 00:09
June 17, 2008
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 23:27
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, santosh, 23:18
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 23:13
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Richard Heathfield, 23:12
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 23:12
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Richard Heathfield, 23:11
- FREE SOFTWARE DOWNLOAD, nancygroup1, 23:07
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 23:06
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Eric Sosman, 23:06
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 23:05
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 23:04
- Re: concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, Chris Thomasson, 23:01
- Re: seg fault, Richard Heathfield, 22:57
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 22:54
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:53
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 22:43
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 22:43
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 22:39
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 22:38
- concatenate a constant to constant string using macros, sinbad, 22:35
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 22:31
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 22:26
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 22:05
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, CBFalconer, 21:49
- C/C++ flow chart prepartaion and quality testing, surana, 21:48
- Re: Mathew Hendry's macro for binary integer literals, Kaz Kylheku, 20:42
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bartc, 20:24
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, CBFalconer, 20:11
- Re: Reentrant code, vippstar, 20:10
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, santosh, 20:00
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 19:53
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Ben Bacarisse, 19:52
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, viza, 19:36
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:31
- Re: seg fault, Lew Pitcher, 19:30
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 19:23
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, santosh, 19:17
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 18:52
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 18:48
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Flash Gordon, 18:43
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 18:40
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 18:39
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 18:38
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 18:32
- Re: error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 18:29
- Re: seg fault, Richard Tobin, 18:26
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 18:26
- New secret was found, saifullah, 18:25
- Re: Mathew Hendry's macro for binary integer literals, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:20
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 18:09
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 18:05
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 17:58
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 17:57
- Re: seg fault, Kenny McCormack, 17:55
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 17:53
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 17:51
- Re: Compiling problem, santosh, 17:51
- Re: error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', santosh, 17:50
- Re: seg fault, Kenny McCormack, 17:50
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 17:48
- Re: seg fault, user923005, 17:48
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 17:47
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 17:41
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Tor Rustad, 17:39
- Re: Compiling problem, Bill Cunningham, 17:39
- error: implicit declaration of function `func_name', DanielJohnson, 17:37
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 17:35
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, christian.bau, 17:18
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 17:15
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 17:13
- Re: seg fault, Richard, 17:09
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 17:06
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 17:06
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 17:02
- Re: seg fault, Johannes Bauer, 16:54
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Tor Rustad, 16:45
- Re: seg fault, santosh, 16:42
- Re: seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 16:36
- Re: Compiling problem, santosh, 16:33
- Re: seg fault, Malcolm McLean, 16:29
- Re: Compiling problem, Bill Cunningham, 16:28
- seg fault, Bill Cunningham, 16:22
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Flash Gordon, 16:14
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Malcolm McLean, 15:47
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Chris Torek, 15:38
- Re: Reentrant code, Eric Sosman, 15:36
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Ian Collins, 15:11
- Re: Reentrant code, Walter Roberson, 14:51
- Re: Reentrant code, Kaz Kylheku, 14:43
- Re: Compiling problem, santosh, 14:40
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 14:33
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Mike Wahler, 14:32
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Mike Wahler, 14:28
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 14:27
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, pereges, 14:23
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 14:17
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 14:12
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 14:06
- Re: Mathew Hendry's macro for binary integer literals, Kaz Kylheku, 13:51
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Kenny McCormack, 13:27
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Mike Wahler, 13:21
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, santosh, 13:18
- Re: Reentrant code, Walter Roberson, 12:49
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 12:33
- Re: Reentrant code, rio, 12:29
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:13
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, Walter Roberson, 12:08
- Re: how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 11:59
- how to organize my main file ?, pereges, 11:56
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bartc, 11:33
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, Krumble Bunk, 11:28
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 11:27
- Re: fgets behaviour with strncmp, David Resnick, 11:14
- fgets behaviour with strncmp, Krumble Bunk, 11:01
- Re: Reentrant code, Eric Sosman, 11:01
- Authentic Designer Handbags at www. yoyobag.com, kalra . shrut, 10:48
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, santosh, 10:40
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, santosh, 10:32
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Nick Keighley, 09:53
- Re: Mathew Hendry's macro for binary integer literals, badc0de4, 09:51
- Re: Reentrant code, Bit Byte, 09:42
- Mathew Hendry's macro for binary integer literals, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:13
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 08:46
- Re: Reentrant code, Eric Sosman, 08:37
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Nick Keighley, 08:07
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 08:04
- GNU strerror_r(), Linonut, 07:57
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ??, Richard Bos, 07:53
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 07:47
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 07:45
- Re: need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, rahul, 07:39
- need review on "computer systems: a programmer's perspective" by bryant and o'hallaron, pereges, 07:02
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ??, pereges, 06:54
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ??, Keith Thompson, 06:43
- Re: Reentrant code, jacob navia, 06:25
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, viza, 06:06
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 06:02
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, viza, 06:01
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Ben Bacarisse, 06:01
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ??, pereges, 05:28
- Re: Reentrant code, Keith Thompson, 05:02
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bart, 05:00
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Keith Thompson, 04:58
- Re: Reentrant code, vippstar, 04:40
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 04:36
- Re: Reentrant code, rahul, 04:33
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 04:29
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 04:29
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, rahul, 04:24
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bart, 04:13
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, CBFalconer, 04:11
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 03:33
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 03:28
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 03:27
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, soscpd, 03:22
- Reentrant code, Bit Byte, 03:10
- Re: fopen, CBFalconer, 02:59
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, CBFalconer, 02:50
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 00:31
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, rahul, 00:30
- Re: More on alignment, rahul, 00:20
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, rahul, 00:17
- Re: fopen, Chris Thomasson, 00:13
- Re: fopen, rahul, 00:05
June 16, 2008
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ??, lawrence . jones, 23:43
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 23:35
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 22:58
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 22:57
- Re: fopen, Walter Roberson, 22:52
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, ban-ubuntu, 22:42
- Re: fopen, Richard Heathfield, 22:37
- Re: fopen, Richard Heathfield, 22:36
- Re: fopen, Richard, 22:35
- Re: fopen, Richard, 22:33
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 22:27
- Re: fopen, Richard Heathfield, 22:25
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 22:18
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 21:57
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 21:45
- Re: Complex Style, Fumeur, 21:21
- Re: Question, santosh, 21:16
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Eric Sosman, 20:46
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 20:01
- Re: fopen, Bill Cunningham, 19:57
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, christian.bau, 19:33
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, christian.bau, 19:21
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Keith Thompson, 19:19
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Keith Thompson, 19:19
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 19:14
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 18:58
- Re: fopen, CBFalconer, 18:36
- Re: fopen, vippstar, 18:27
- Prep Courses for International Certifications by QAI,USA, Vijay, 18:21
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Bart, 18:15
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 18:04
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 18:02
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 18:01
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: Question, utilisateur de lcc-win32, 17:50
- Re: Complex Style, Serve Lau, 17:48
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, CBFalconer, 17:46
- Re: fopen, Serve Lau, 17:45
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:38
- Re: Complex Style, Fumeur, 17:33
- Re: OT: Roma, Mark McIntyre, 17:20
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Martin Ambuhl, 17:09
- Re: fopen, Walter Roberson, 17:07
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Tobin, 17:04
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Willem, 16:49
- fopen, Bill Cunningham, 16:44
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", vippstar, 16:19
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", vippstar, 16:18
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, santosh, 16:16
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Willem, 16:09
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, gw7rib, 16:03
- Re: How to transfer an address value without using pointers, vippstar, 15:47
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Flash Gordon, 15:42
- How to transfer an address value without using pointers, Horacius ReX, 15:39
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:35
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Bart, 15:34
- vmware job vacancy!, Mr Shore, 15:34
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, vippstar, 15:17
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 15:00
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, santosh, 14:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 14:34
- Re: More on alignment, Richard Heathfield, 13:56
- Re: More on alignment, santosh, 13:52
- Re: More on alignment, Kenny McCormack, 13:51
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Richard Tobin, 13:43
- More on alignment, H.K. Kingston-Smith, 13:29
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Keith Thompson, 13:18
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Eric Sosman, 13:09
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Keith Thompson, 13:06
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Harald van Dijk, 12:57
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 12:51
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Eric Sosman, 12:44
- Re: Complex Style, Serve Lau, 12:41
- Re: Accessing array elements within a structure, Mike Wahler, 12:40
- Accessing array elements within a structure, bernd, 12:34
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., John Bode, 12:31
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:42
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:43
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 10:35
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:32
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Yannick Tremblay, 10:11
- Re: CPU temperature, Chris H, 10:08
- Re: OT: Roma, Richard, 10:03
- Re: OT: Roma, Kenny McCormack, 09:55
- Re: OT: Roma, Kenny McCormack, 09:54
- Re: OT: Roma, santosh, 09:46
- Re: OT: Roma, Richard, 09:44
- Re: OT: Roma, rabid . lurker, 09:28
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, rabid . lurker, 09:21
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, sunil, 09:00
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:43
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Eric Sosman, 08:41
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:39
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, sunil, 08:38
- Re: Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:28
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:23
- Unable to resolve the symbols in shared library, sunil, 08:20
- Re: OT: Roma, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:04
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", shantanu, 07:56
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., shantanu, 07:38
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Bart, 06:51
- Re: OT: Roma, Richard, 06:00
- OT: Roma, Nick Keighley, 05:52
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tim Prince, 05:40
- GANHE R$500,00 POR MÊS COM SEU CELULAR, SHAOLIN, 05:29
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 05:15
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Richard, 05:12
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 03:30
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Old Wolf, 03:17
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., vippstar, 03:06
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Chris Dollin, 03:04
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 03:04
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Chris Dollin, 02:57
- Re: How can I print a red "Hello world", Gestorm, 02:53
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Richard Heathfield, 02:52
- Re: Understanding a function declaration., Chris McDonald, 02:36
- Re: [OT] CPU temperature, viza, 02:30
- Understanding a function declaration., Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 02:24
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Heathfield, 02:14
- Re: Question, Richard Bos, 02:14
- Re: How can I print a red "Hello world", viza, 02:10
- Re: Complex Style, Flash Gordon, 02:01
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, CBFalconer, 00:09
- Re: Complex Style, Keith Thompson, 00:05
June 15, 2008
- Re: How can I print a red "Hello world", Keith Thompson, 23:01
- Re: Complex Style, Gestorm, 22:57
- How can I print a red "Hello world", Gestorm, 22:38
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, CBFalconer, 21:00
- Re: Complex Style, Keith Thompson, 20:47
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 20:34
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 20:34
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, vippstar, 20:14
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 20:05
- Re: Complex Style, Flash Gordon, 19:20
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, vippstar, 19:15
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Flash Gordon, 19:12
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Flash Gordon, 19:03
- Complex Style, Fumeur, 18:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Flash Gordon, 18:43
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 18:39
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:56
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Heathfield, 17:28
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Kenny McCormack, 17:26
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 17:00
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 16:58
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, vippstar, 16:43
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:33
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Bart, 16:28
- Re: CPU temperature, Keith Thompson, 16:01
- Re: CPU temperature, Ralf Damaschke, 16:01
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 15:53
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 15:51
- Re: Addition for 'short' unsigned integer types, badc0de4, 15:19
- Re: Addition for 'short' unsigned integer types, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:16
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:55
- Re: Addition for 'short' unsigned integer types, Barry Schwarz, 14:53
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Barry Schwarz, 14:53
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 14:36
- Addition for 'short' unsigned integer types, badc0de4, 14:26
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, santosh, 14:26
- Re: CPU temperature, Gestorm, 14:15
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 14:00
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Heathfield, 13:57
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Gestorm, 13:53
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Richard Heathfield, 13:48
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, christian.bau, 13:20
- Re: Alignment on stack arrays, Richard Tobin, 13:02
- Alignment on stack arrays, H.K. Kingston-Smith, 12:41
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:27
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, ben mitch, 11:59
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:52
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 11:45
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 11:40
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 11:35
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Antoninus Twink, 11:33
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Malcolm McLean, 11:30
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Malcolm McLean, 11:27
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type"char", Joe Wright, 11:25
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 11:14
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:11
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:10
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type"char", Joachim Schmitz, 11:08
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Tobin, 10:51
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Tobin, 10:49
- lily thai, thai sex, thai massage, lucy thai, lilly thai, schexlov, 10:29
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Serve Lau, 10:28
- Re: CPU temperature, Bart, 10:25
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Bart, 10:22
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard, 10:19
- Re: [OT] CPU temperature, viza, 10:16
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type"char", CBFalconer, 10:11
- Re: CPU temperature, CBFalconer, 10:05
- Re: CPU temperature, santosh, 09:50
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, santosh, 09:46
- Re: CPU temperature, Eric Sosman, 09:39
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, James Kanze, 09:37
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, James Kanze, 09:34
- Re: CPU temperature, Kenny McCormack, 09:27
- Re: CPU temperature, kid joe, 09:24
- Re: CPU temperature, Eric Sosman, 09:17
- Re: CPU temperature, Kenny McCormack, 08:08
- Re: CPU temperature, Joachim Schmitz, 07:48
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:39
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", viza, 07:33
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:17
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 06:48
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 06:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Antoninus Twink, 06:43
- Re: CPU temperature, Antoninus Twink, 06:29
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Ben Bacarisse, 06:20
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 06:00
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Ben Bacarisse, 05:52
- how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 05:46
- how to put 8 "int" => 10100010 into one character of type "char", Anna, 05:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ben Bacarisse, 05:31
- Re: CPU temperature, Malcolm McLean, 05:30
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 04:18
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 03:45
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Ian Collins, 03:41
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 03:38
- Re: open stdin a second time, Herbert Rosenau, 02:40
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ian Collins, 02:06
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 01:31
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 01:27
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Heathfield, 00:26
- Re: CPU temperature, Richard, 00:22
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ian Collins, 00:10
June 14, 2008
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, vippstar, 23:56
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Richard Heathfield, 23:50
- Re: Slightly OT: Compilation question, Richard Heathfield, 23:46
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 22:27
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ian Collins, 21:52
- Re: CPU temperature, MisterE, 21:41
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:18
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:51
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Ian Collins, 20:50
- OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tor Rustad, 20:45
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ian Collins, 20:35
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, viza, 20:30
- Re: strtod valiation - beat it up, Bob Nelson, 19:42
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Ian Collins, 19:16
- Re: Structure initialization, none, 19:01
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Ian Collins, 18:51
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, badc0de4, 18:43
- Re: Slightly OT: Compilation question, James Kanze, 18:38
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Lew Pitcher, 18:36
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:34
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, pereges, 18:20
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Richard Tobin, 18:17
- Re: Proficient at C, Malcolm McLean, 18:05
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, Thomas Lumley, 17:58
- Re: How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, EventHelix.com, 17:51
- How come C allow structure members to be addressed like an array ?, pereges, 17:37
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, James Kanze, 17:20
- Re: About += and ++, Willem, 17:14
- Re: About += and ++, Richard Tobin, 17:13
- Re: About += and ++, CBFalconer, 17:10
- Re: CPU temperature, Bart, 17:02
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Eric Sosman, 17:01
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: CPU temperature, Default User, 15:44
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:07
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, jurij, 14:49
- Re: CPU temperature, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:31
- Re: About += and ++, Willem, 14:24
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Bart, 14:19
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Serve Lau, 13:44
- Re: CPU temperature, Lew Pitcher, 13:22
- Re: CPU temperature, Richard Heathfield, 13:11
- Re: CPU temperature, Keith Thompson, 12:42
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Richard, 12:30
- Re: CPU temperature, Antoninus Twink, 12:28
- CPU temperature, kid joe, 12:21
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Antoninus Twink, 12:01
- Re: Proficient at C, Chris H, 12:01
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Richard Tobin, 11:23
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Keith Thompson, 11:23
- Re: About += and ++, Richard Tobin, 11:22
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, vippstar, 10:41
- Re: Proficient at C, Serve Lau, 09:09
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Eric Sosman, 09:08
- Re: Proficient at C, Malcolm McLean, 09:01
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Serve Lau, 08:49
- Re: About += and ++, A. F. McClelland, 08:40
- Re: OT: GNU libc linking problem on Linux, Tim Prince, 08:22
- Re: About += and ++, Flash Gordon, 08:13
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Joachim Schmitz, 07:23
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Richard, 07:20
- Re: Slightly OT: Compilation question, Ian Collins, 07:08
- Re: About += and ++, Malcolm McLean, 05:40
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Gestorm, 05:04
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Gestorm, 04:55
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Keith Thompson, 02:41
- Re: problem about const member in a struct, Ian Collins, 02:22
- problem about const member in a struct, Gestorm, 01:57
- Re: Proficient at C, jaysome, 00:39
June 13, 2008
- Re: mount() function problem !, Barry Schwarz, 20:33
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Chris Thomasson, 20:10
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Ian Collins, 19:57
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 19:31
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, ben mitch, 19:26
- Re: Question, utilisateur de lcc-win32, 19:09
- Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), user923005, 18:56
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Ian Collins, 18:48
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 18:08
- Re: Proficient at C, Ed Prochak, 17:47
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Ian Collins, 17:32
- Re: Proficient at C, Keith Thompson, 17:28
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 17:26
- Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), CBFalconer, 17:01
- Re: Proficient at C, Bartc, 16:48
- Re: Wanted: C AST generator, David Given, 16:37
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Ian Collins, 16:36
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Kevin D . Quitt, 15:36
- Re: average true range, user923005, 15:09
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), user923005, 15:03
- Re: destroying objects, Harald van Dijk, 14:49
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Erik Wikström, 14:45
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Bartc, 14:37
- Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), vippstar, 14:00
- Re: Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), jzakiya, 13:37
- Ultimate Prime Sieve -- Sieve Of Zakiya (SoZ), jzakiya, 13:27
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Keith Thompson, 13:07
- Re: destroying objects, Keith Thompson, 12:49
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Bartc, 12:40
- Re: About += and ++, Ben Bacarisse, 12:39
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Default User, 12:38
- Re: destroying objects, Harald van Dijk, 12:13
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Bartc, 12:07
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 12:04
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Erik Wikström, 12:01
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Erik Wikström, 11:59
- Re: About += and ++, Stephen Sprunk, 11:51
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, Keith Thompson, 11:38
- Re: Proficient at C, Antoninus Twink, 11:38
- Re: About += and ++, Richard Heathfield, 10:24
- Re: About += and ++, CBFalconer, 10:17
- Re: propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, jacob navia, 10:14
- Re: Proficient at C, CBFalconer, 10:10
- Re: const and compiler warning, Ben Bacarisse, 09:16
- propagation of exceptions over module/language boundaries, ben mitch, 09:07
- Re: Proficient at C, ediebur, 08:09
- Re: average true range, Joachim Schmitz, 07:52
- Re: About += and ++, Willem, 07:49
- Re: About += and ++, santosh, 07:42
- Re: About += and ++, Richard, 06:57
- Re: About += and ++, Richard Tobin, 06:57
- Re: strtod valiation - beat it up, Richard, 06:46
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Richard, 06:39
- Re: About += and ++, Antoninus Twink, 06:38
- Re: About += and ++, Antoninus Twink, 06:36
- Re: mount() function problem !, Richard, 06:36
- Re: About += and ++, santosh, 06:30
- Re: About += and ++, santosh, 06:27
- Re: About += and ++, Chris Dollin, 06:27
- Re: About += and ++, Richard Tobin, 06:21
- About += and ++, s0suk3, 06:11
- Re: mount() function problem !, Kenny McCormack, 05:40
- Re: mount() function problem !, Antoninus Twink, 05:15
- Re: Proficient at C, Nick Keighley, 05:02
- Re: mount() function problem !, Kenny McCormack, 04:55
- Re: Proficient at C, Ron Ford, 03:58
- Re: Strange compiler warnings, Ron Ford, 03:53
- Re: mount() function problem !, Antoninus Twink, 03:40
- Re: doubt on char *, Fastro, 03:06
- Re: mount() function problem !, Keith Thompson, 02:57
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Keith Thompson, 02:54
- Re: destroying objects, Keith Thompson, 02:39
- mount() function problem !, onkar . n . mahajan, 02:34
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Serve Lau, 02:17
- Re: about getch(), Bill Reid, 01:36
- Re: Wanted: C AST generator, user923005, 01:32
- Re: Structure initialization, santosh, 00:04
June 12, 2008
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Kenny McCormack, 23:49
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Kenny McCormack, 23:48
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Kenny McCormack, 23:43
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Bob Nelson, 23:28
- Re: destroying objects, CBFalconer, 22:59
- Re: strtod valiation - beat it up, Bob Nelson, 22:52
- Re: const and compiler warning, bacbacdinner, 22:37
- Re: const and compiler warning, bacbacdinner, 22:35
- Re: about getch(), santosh, 22:30
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Keith Thompson, 22:29
- Re: strtod valiation - beat it up, Eric Sosman, 22:28
- Re: about getch(), vippstar, 22:18
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:13
- strtod valiation - beat it up, Bob Nelson, 22:06
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Kenny McCormack, 21:11
- Re: destroying objects, Keith Thompson, 21:02
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Keith Thompson, 20:43
- Re: Proficient at C, Keith Thompson, 20:41
- Re: about getch(), Bill Reid, 20:34
- Re: Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:31
- Suggest USB to RS232 that works perfectly, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:20
- Wanted: C AST generator, David Given, 20:05
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 20:03
- Re: destroying objects, Chris Thomasson, 19:37
- Re: flowchart, Antoninus Twink, 19:31
- Re: destroying objects, Chris Thomasson, 19:23
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
- Re: destroying objects, CBFalconer, 18:30
- Re: average true range, user923005, 18:16
- Re: ultra-fast loop unrolling with g++ -O3, CBFalconer, 18:15
- Re: const and compiler warning, CBFalconer, 18:02
- Re: destroying objects, Chris Thomasson, 17:44
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, Chris Thomasson, 17:41
- Re: Proficient at C, lawrence . jones, 17:03
- Re: Strange compiler warnings, Eric Sosman, 16:57
- Strange compiler warnings, Chris Peters, 16:39
- Re: const and compiler warning, christian.bau, 15:49
- Re: const and compiler warning, santosh, 15:23
- Re: const and compiler warning, Ian Collins, 15:10
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Richard, 15:04
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Richard, 15:02
- Re: Simple Compilation question, A. Bolmarcich, 15:02
- Re: Proficient at C, Ian Collins, 15:01
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Coos Haak, 14:52
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Antoninus Twink, 14:48
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, JoseMariaSola, 14:38
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Mark McIntyre, 14:37
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Mark McIntyre, 14:36
- Re: Simple Compilation question, Fred, 14:27
- Re: Simple Compilation question, santosh, 14:25
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Antoninus Twink, 14:12
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Antoninus Twink, 14:10
- Simple Compilation question, Ashik, 14:06
- Re: Question, santosh, 13:38
- Re: Question, Richard, 13:32
- Re: const and compiler warning, bacbacdinner, 13:22
- Re: Question, santosh, 13:21
- Re: ultra-fast loop unrolling with g++ -O3, santosh, 13:14
- Re: Proficient at C, Chris H, 13:06
- Re: ultra-fast loop unrolling with g++ -O3, Richard Heathfield, 13:00
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 12:47
- Re: ultra-fast loop unrolling with g++ -O3, Johannes Bauer, 12:46
- Re: Question, Richard Heathfield, 12:45
- ultra-fast loop unrolling with g++ -O3, mark, 12:44
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 12:43
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Richard Heathfield, 12:41
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 12:36
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, Harald van Dijk, 12:16
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, JoseMariaSola, 12:13
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, Keith Thompson, 12:11
- Re: Querry on pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:09
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Default User, 12:06
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Keith Thompson, 12:03
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, Harald van Dijk, 12:02
- Re: Question, Default User, 11:59
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Default User, 11:55
- Re: about getch(), Keith Thompson, 11:43
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, viza, 11:34
- Re: Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, viza, 11:25
- Struct declaration with no tag and no init-declarator-list, JoseMariaSola, 11:19
- Re: about getch(), vippstar, 10:52
- Re: about getch(), Ben Bacarisse, 10:39
- Re: about getch(), Bill Reid, 10:10
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, Kenny McCormack, 09:59
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Kenny McCormack, 09:58
- Re: Querry on pointers, Chris Dollin, 09:58
- Re: Question, Kenny McCormack, 09:57
- Re: about getch(), vippstar, 09:44
- Re: Querry on pointers, vippstar, 09:41
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, CBFalconer, 09:36
- Re: Querry on pointers, Chris Dollin, 09:27
- Re: Querry on pointers, Chris Dollin, 09:25
- Re: Querry on pointers, Nick Keighley, 09:23
- Re: Proficient at C, Tony Mc, 09:18
- Re: Querry on pointers, vippstar, 09:14
- Re: Querry on pointers, Barry Schwarz, 09:07
- Re: Querry on pointers, vippstar, 08:52
- Re: Querry on pointers, santosh, 08:49
- Re: Querry on pointers, Chris Dollin, 08:38
- Re: Question, santosh, 08:38
- Re: Proficient at C, santosh, 08:11
- Querry on pointers, abhaybhat, 08:09
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Serve Lau, 07:32
- Re: const and compiler warning, viza, 07:32
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, santosh, 07:06
- Re: Proficient at C, Ian Collins, 07:06
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 07:06
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 06:36
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Richard Heathfield, 06:35
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Dik T. Winter, 06:32
- Re: Proficient at C, Old Wolf, 06:19
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Old Wolf, 06:17
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Richard Bos, 05:25
- Re: Proficient at C, Serve Lau, 05:00
- Re: average true range, Nick Keighley, 04:55
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Noob, 04:54
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Kaz Kylheku, 04:51
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, Nick Keighley, 04:42
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Nick Keighley, 04:32
- Re: Proficient at C, Ian Collins, 04:18
- Re: destroying objects, Nick Keighley, 04:16
- Re: Proficient at C, Ian Collins, 04:15
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Serve Lau, 04:10
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, Antoninus Twink, 04:10
- Re: about getch(), Antoninus Twink, 04:07
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Antoninus Twink, 04:00
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Mark McIntyre, 03:51
- Re: about getch(), Mark McIntyre, 03:49
- Re: Proficient at C, Chris H, 03:36
- Re: flowchart, Chris Dollin, 03:06
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Chris Dollin, 02:49
- Re: Question, Richard Bos, 02:32
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Richard Bos, 02:20
- Re: about getch(), CBFalconer, 02:13
- Re: destroying objects, Barry Schwarz, 02:07
- Re: about getch(), Keith Thompson, 02:04
- Re: about getch(), Keith Thompson, 02:00
- Re: destroying objects, pete, 01:47
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), rahul, 01:27
- Re: Question, Harald van Dijk, 01:15
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Peter Nilsson, 01:07
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), rahul, 01:00
- Re: about getch(), Peter Nilsson, 00:57
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, rahul, 00:51
- Re: flowchart, rahul, 00:44
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, rahul, 00:27
- Re: about getch(), rahul, 00:08
- Re: about getch(), Eric Sosman, 00:04
June 11, 2008
- about getch(), fuzhen, 23:56
- Re: Question, Richard Heathfield, 23:52
- Re: Question, pete, 23:39
- Re: Question, pete, 23:34
- Re: doubt on char *, pete, 23:02
- [OT] Re: Question, Falcon Kirtaran, 22:08
- Re: Question, Falcon Kirtaran, 22:05
- Re: Question, Falcon Kirtaran, 22:03
- const and compiler warning, bacbacdinner, 22:00
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Eric Sosman, 21:38
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Keith Thompson, 21:33
- Re: Proficient at C, Eric Sosman, 21:31
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Steven, 21:21
- Re: Question, CBFalconer, 21:15
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 21:06
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, CBFalconer, 20:58
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), CBFalconer, 20:23
- Re: Question, user923005, 20:19
- Re: average true range, user923005, 20:17
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: flowchart, CBFalconer, 20:08
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: Question, Richard Heathfield, 20:06
- Re: Question, Richard Heathfield, 20:03
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 19:59
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, CBFalconer, 19:58
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, CBFalconer, 19:50
- Re: Proficient at C, Paul Hsieh, 19:48
- Re: Question, Harald van Dijk, 19:48
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Eddie, 19:44
- Re: Question, Ben Bacarisse, 19:35
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 19:32
- Re: Question, Walter Roberson, 19:29
- Re: Question, Antoninus Twink, 19:23
- Re: Question, Antoninus Twink, 19:20
- Re: Question, Default User, 19:16
- Re: Question, Walter Roberson, 19:12
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, Antoninus Twink, 19:11
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 18:57
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win - TPA, Default User, 18:50
- Re: average true range, Antoninus Twink, 18:47
- Re: Question, Max, 18:45
- Re: Question, Antoninus Twink, 18:44
- Re: Proficient at C, Malcolm McLean, 18:44
- Re: average true range, Ben Bacarisse, 18:37
- Re: average true range, Ben Bacarisse, 18:34
- Wanted - Software Developer - Bellevue, WA, stephbt, 18:33
- Re: Question, Malcolm McLean, 18:30
- Re: destroying objects, Malcolm McLean, 18:28
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Malcolm McLean, 18:24
- Re: Question, Harald van Dijk, 18:20
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 18:15
- Re: getting -0.0 output ?, user923005, 17:53
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 17:47
- Re: Question, user923005, 17:42
- Re: Writing to text segment, Harald van Dijk, 17:37
- Re: Question, vippstar, 17:24
- Re: Question, Richard Tobin, 17:23
- Re: getting -0.0 output ?, Richard Tobin, 17:22
- Question, Max, 17:09
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx, 16:57
- Re: average true range, Default User, 16:43
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Default User, 16:39
- Re: Writing to text segment, Walter Roberson, 16:30
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 16:19
- Re: getting -0.0 output ?, lawrence . jones, 16:19
- Re: main - argv lowercase strings, lawrence . jones, 16:16
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 16:08
- Re: Writing to text segment, Flash Gordon, 15:52
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: average true range, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, dj3vande, 15:42
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, santosh, 15:41
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Gabriel, 15:36
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Gabriel, 15:32
- Parallel multithreading for I/O operation in linux ?, jurij, 15:26
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 15:23
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 15:19
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Serve Lau, 15:16
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Ian Collins, 15:09
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 15:05
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 15:03
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Keith Thompson, 15:00
- Re: average true range, Walter Roberson, 14:30
- Re: average true range, user923005, 14:27
- Re: average true range, Fred, 14:25
- Re: Re-use the argument?, lawrence . jones, 14:24
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), compiler_newbie, 14:17
- Re: average true range, Bill Cunningham, 14:13
- average true range, Bill Cunningham, 14:11
- destroying objects, pereges, 14:11
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Eric Sosman, 13:54
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Default User, 13:54
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, squaretriangle, 13:39
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Ben Pfaff, 13:27
- Re: Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), Walter Roberson, 13:26
- Question on gcc -O3 optimization (bug or feature), compiler_newbie, 13:21
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Sjouke Burry, 13:20
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Eric Sosman, 13:13
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Keith Thompson, 13:00
- Re: flowchart, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Barry Schwarz, 12:58
- Re: array problem, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, squaretriangle, 12:51
- Re: flowchart, Eric Sosman, 12:45
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 12:44
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, squaretriangle, 12:40
- Re: flowchart, Harald van Dijk, 12:34
- Re: array problem, Walter Roberson, 12:31
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 12:25
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, Keith Thompson, 12:24
- Re: flowchart, Walter Roberson, 12:08
- Re: array problem, Keith Thompson, 12:07
- Re: Proficient at C, Ben Bacarisse, 11:57
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Øyvind Røtvold, 11:51
- Re: flowchart, santosh, 11:50
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Willem, 11:42
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, Chris Torek, 11:37
- Re: Proficient at C, Paul Hsieh, 11:36
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 11:35
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Eric Sosman, 11:30
- Re: doubt on char *, Eric Sosman, 11:22
- Re: getting -0.0 output ?, Noob, 11:13
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, CBFalconer, 11:12
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Willem, 11:07
- Re: Re-use the argument?, CBFalconer, 11:03
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Willem, 11:02
- Re: Proficient at C, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 10:47
- getting -0.0 output ?, pereges, 10:30
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Andrew Haley, 10:23
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Krumble Bunk, 10:12
- Re: the de-facto way to "parse" input, Chris Dollin, 09:46
- Re: doubt on char *, Chris Dollin, 09:39
- the de-facto way to "parse" input, Krumble Bunk, 09:38
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Hyuga, 09:23
- Re: doubt on char *, CD1, 09:15
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx, 09:04
- Re: How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, viza, 08:48
- Re: flowchart, Eric Sosman, 08:47
- Re: Proficient at C, Eric Sosman, 08:41
- How to get the pid of a process that send a signal to my program, hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx, 08:34
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Chris Dollin, 08:30
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Dik T. Winter, 08:28
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Richard, 08:27
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Chris Dollin, 08:27
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Dave, 08:24
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Richard Heathfield, 08:24
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), MisterE, 08:15
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, Thad Smith, 08:12
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Thad Smith, 08:06
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, santosh, 07:40
- Re: Writing to text segment, santosh, 07:33
- Re: p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), Richard Heathfield, 07:30
- Re: fgets question, fuzhen, 07:18
- Re: flowchart, santosh, 07:14
- Re: array problem, santosh, 07:10
- p=(char *)malloc((sizeof(float))["\000\006\010\013\015\100"]), fuzhen, 07:03
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 06:37
- Re: Proficient at C, Antoninus Twink, 05:51
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Antoninus Twink, 05:48
- Re: doubt on char *, Joachim Schmitz, 05:40
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, manu, 05:09
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, rahul, 04:45
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 04:39
- Re: Writing to text segment, Willem, 04:36
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Willem, 04:32
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Nick Keighley, 04:16
- Re: array problem, Richard Heathfield, 03:58
- Re: array problem, Richard Heathfield, 03:56
- Re: array problem, mark_bluemel, 03:48
- Re: main - argv lowercase strings, Walter Roberson, 03:45
- Re: array problem, Walter Roberson, 03:39
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, Barry Schwarz, 03:39
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, Richard Heathfield, 03:31
- main - argv lowercase strings, Bob Nelson, 03:27
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard Heathfield, 03:24
- Re: Proficient at C, Dan, 03:19
- array problem, Banni, 03:11
- Re: flowchart, Chris Dollin, 02:51
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, rahul, 02:47
- Re: flowchart, Joachim Schmitz, 02:46
- flowchart, sameer, 02:44
- Re: about operation of unsigned type, CBFalconer, 02:40
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Keith Thompson, 02:40
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, rahul, 02:39
- Re: Proficient at C, Walter Roberson, 02:33
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, CBFalconer, 02:30
- Re: Proficient at C, Richard, 02:29
- Proficient at C, jaysome, 02:21
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 02:15
- Re: Re-use the argument?, CBFalconer, 02:10
- Re: How to log execution of batch file in a txt file, rahul, 01:56
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Chris Thomasson, 01:53
- about operation of unsigned type, Steven, 01:32
- Re: Writing to text segment, Ian Collins, 01:24
- Re: Writing to text segment, rahul, 01:18
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 01:00
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, Richard Heathfield, 00:55
- Re: Writing to text segment, pete, 00:49
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Richard Heathfield, 00:49
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, Richard Heathfield, 00:47
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 00:39
- Re: How to log execution of batch file in a txt file, Ian Collins, 00:32
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:32
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, Ian Collins, 00:31
- How to log execution of batch file in a txt file, abhaybhat, 00:30
- Re: Writing to text segment, Ian Collins, 00:29
- Re: Writing to text segment, rahul, 00:16
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, rahul, 00:04
June 10, 2008
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Bob Nelson, 23:45
- Re: Dynamic no. of arguments, user923005, 23:35
- Dynamic no. of arguments, squaretriangle, 23:29
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:27
- Re: printig effort, santosh, 22:18
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Barry Schwarz, 22:14
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, CBFalconer, 21:58
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Joe Wright, 21:29
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, EventHelix.com, 21:11
- Re: printig effort, concerned c . l . c reader, 21:09
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, Barry Schwarz, 21:07
- Re: Structure initialization, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: Structure initialization, CBFalconer, 20:26
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, CBFalconer, 20:00
- Re: Structure initialization, pete, 19:20
- Re: Structure initialization, pete, 19:14
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, CBFalconer, 18:54
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 18:16
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 18:15
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, santosh, 18:06
- Re: Structure initialization, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 17:44
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 17:31
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 17:28
- Re: [OT] Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Malcolm McLean, 17:24
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 17:21
- Re: Structure initialization, Richard Heathfield, 17:15
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 17:04
- Re: What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, mb, 16:57
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 16:46
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 16:36
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 16:33
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, Stephen Sprunk, 16:25
- Re: Structure initialization, Walter Roberson, 16:05
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 15:58
- Re: Structure initialization, santosh, 15:57
- Re: doubt on char *, santosh, 15:52
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 15:49
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, viza, 15:44
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Flash Gordon, 15:35
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, pete, 15:29
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: Structure initialization, pete, 15:24
- Re: range for int, santosh, 15:10
- Re: Structure initialization, Keith Thompson, 15:06
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 15:00
- Re: doubt on char *, pete, 14:57
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, badc0de4, 14:57
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 14:50
- Re: Structure initialization, Harald van Dijk, 14:48
- Re: doubt on char *, Eric Sosman, 14:40
- Re: Structure initialization, Andrey Tarasevich, 14:39
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, user923005, 14:38
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, viza, 14:36
- Re: Stupid or clever hack?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:35
- Re: What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, user923005, 14:31
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:30
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:27
- Stupid or clever hack?, badc0de4, 14:25
- Re: Structure initialization, Yunzhong, 14:10
- Re: Structure initialization, Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 14:05
- Re: Structure initialization, John Bode, 14:01
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Sjouke Burry, 14:01
- Re: doubt on char *, Walter Roberson, 13:58
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 13:55
- Structure initialization, jb . simon, 13:53
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 13:51
- Re: fgets question, Bill Cunningham, 13:47
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 13:44
- Re: doubt on char *, Joachim Schmitz, 13:31
- Re: What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, Walter Roberson, 13:30
- Re: What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, Owen Jacobson, 13:28
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 13:27
- Re: What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, Antoninus Twink, 13:24
- Re: doubt on char *, Barry Schwarz, 13:22
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Barry Schwarz, 13:22
- What are the standard network functions provided in standard C?, disappearedng, 13:13
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 13:10
- Re: Header file with function implementation problem, Keith Thompson, 12:47
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Keith Thompson, 12:39
- Header file with function implementation problem, bcpkh, 12:36
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 12:18
- Re: range for int, pete, 12:05
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Bob Nelson, 12:04
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, pete, 12:02
- Re: range for int, Keith Thompson, 11:58
- Re: String function problem, pete, 11:56
- Re: open stdin a second time, Walter Roberson, 11:37
- Re: doubt on char *, santosh, 11:34
- Re: doubt on char *, Richard, 11:23
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:16
- Re: doubt on char *, santosh, 11:03
- Re: doubt on char *, Richard, 11:03
- Re: doubt on char *, Joachim Schmitz, 10:55
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, Ben Bacarisse, 10:55
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, vippstar, 10:33
- Re: (void) pointer arithmetic, Chris Dollin, 10:29
- (void) pointer arithmetic, viza, 10:17
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:14
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:13
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, James Kuyper, 10:00
- Re: oscillator, Ben Bacarisse, 09:57
- Re: oscillator, santosh, 09:56
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 09:55
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Nick Keighley, 09:35
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, santosh, 09:34
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 09:31
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 09:19
- Re: oscillator, Ben Bacarisse, 09:15
- Re: oscillator, Antoninus Twink, 09:05
- Re: Writing to text segment, santosh, 09:05
- Re: fgets question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:03
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 09:01
- Re: oscillator, Richard Heathfield, 09:00
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 08:59
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 08:58
- Re: oscillator, santosh, 08:50
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Richard Heathfield, 08:49
- Re: oscillator, santosh, 08:44
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 08:29
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:21
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Eric Sosman, 08:18
- Re: range for int, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:15
- Re: doubt on char *, Chris Dollin, 08:15
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:14
- Re: doubt on char *, santosh, 08:05
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:59
- Re: doubt on char *, rams, 07:55
- Re: range for int, santosh, 07:49
- Re: range for int, rams, 07:44
- Re: range for int, Iman S. H. Suyoto, 07:41
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:39
- Re: oscillator, Ben Bacarisse, 07:38
- range for int, pereges, 07:21
- Re: open stdin a second time, Chris Dollin, 07:08
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Richard Tobin, 07:06
- Re: Writing to text segment, rahul, 07:06
- Re: open stdin a second time, Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 06:59
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Richard Heathfield, 06:57
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 06:57
- Re: String function problem, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:57
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 06:55
- Re: Writing to text segment, rahul, 06:53
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Richard Bos, 06:51
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Serve Lau, 06:48
- Re: open stdin a second time, Richard Tobin, 06:42
- Re: Writing to text segment, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:42
- Re: Writing to text segment, Antoninus Twink, 06:17
- Re: One for the language lawyers, vippstar, 06:15
- Re: open stdin a second time, Antoninus Twink, 06:10
- Re: open stdin a second time, Richard Tobin, 06:07
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Antoninus Twink, 05:59
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?, Ron Ford, 05:58
- Re: open stdin a second time, Chris Dollin, 05:23
- Re: Writing to text segment, Ian Collins, 05:11
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Ian Collins, 05:08
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Jens Thoms Toerring, 04:59
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Nick Keighley, 04:58
- Re: open stdin a second time, Richard Tobin, 04:54
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Nick Keighley, 04:54
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, pete, 04:54
- Re: oscillator, Nick Keighley, 04:42
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 04:42
- Re: String function problem, pete, 04:39
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, rahul, 04:37
- Writing to text segment, rahul, 04:29
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:25
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 04:18
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 04:16
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 04:09
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:51
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Dave, 03:49
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 03:46
- Re: String function problem, rahul, 03:46
- Re: open stdin a second time, Chris Dollin, 03:40
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Nick Keighley, 03:38
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Chris Ridd, 03:35
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Chris Dollin, 03:34
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Dave, 03:28
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Keith Thompson, 03:21
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Keith Thompson, 03:09
- Re: String function problem, Keith Thompson, 03:01
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 02:57
- Re: Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Chris Ridd, 02:54
- Re: L_tmpnam macro, Bob Nelson, 02:44
- Re: Re-use the argument?, rio, 02:42
- Is this code in gcc 4.3.1 valid C or is Sun compiler wrong ??, Dave, 02:37
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rio, 02:35
- Re: fgets question, Richard Heathfield, 02:30
- Re: String function problem, Walter Roberson, 02:29
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Richard Heathfield, 02:26
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 02:23
- C/DataDraw smokes C++/STL on EDA-like benchmarks, Bill Cox, 02:21
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 02:18
- L_tmpnam macro, Bob Nelson, 02:17
- String function problem, Vijay, 02:11
- Re: Challenging Logic, akbar, 01:56
- Re: Challenging Logic, akbar, 01:56
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, CBFalconer, 01:29
- Re: fgets question, rahul, 01:27
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, CBFalconer, 01:25
- Re: Re-use the argument?, jaysome, 01:14
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, rahul, 01:11
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, rahul, 01:03
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, rahul, 00:58
- Re: open stdin a second time, rahul, 00:43
- Re: oscillator, Keith Thompson, 00:41
- Re: doubt on char *, rahul, 00:32
- Re: One for the language lawyers, rahul, 00:30
- Re: oscillator, Keith Thompson, 00:27
- Re: finding color of bits, harryos, 00:24
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 00:14
June 09, 2008
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, pete, 23:49
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:30
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, pete, 23:29
- Re: oscillator, Ben Bacarisse, 23:27
- Re: oscillator, Don Bruder, 23:19
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Richard, 23:11
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:02
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 23:00
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?, pete, 22:58
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Richard, 22:57
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Jack Klein, 22:57
- Re: oscillator, Walter Roberson, 22:57
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 22:53
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 22:51
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 22:37
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 21:59
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, nospam, 21:48
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, nospam, 21:48
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 21:23
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 21:08
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 20:56
- Re: fgets question, Richard Heathfield, 20:53
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 20:51
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, CBFalconer, 20:04
- Re: empty macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 20:02
- Re: fgets question, Richard, 19:33
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 19:31
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:28
- Re: How to left pad a string with spaces?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:17
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 19:11
- Re: empty macro arguments, Walter Roberson, 19:08
- How to left pad a string with spaces?, nospam, 18:57
- Re: empty macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 18:50
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Jens Thoms Toerring, 18:46
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Chris Torek, 18:30
- Re: fgets question, Ben Bacarisse, 18:28
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 18:03
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Flash Gordon, 17:53
- Re: fgets question, Richard Tobin, 17:32
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Tobin, 17:24
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 17:20
- Re: fgets question, Bill Cunningham, 17:17
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Flash Gordon, 17:11
- Re: doubt on char *, CBFalconer, 17:07
- Re: open stdin a second time, CBFalconer, 17:04
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Flash Gordon, 16:53
- Re: fgets question, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: empty macro arguments, Flash Gordon, 16:41
- Re: is order urgent doubt, John J . Smith, 16:37
- Re: printig effort, CBFalconer, 16:34
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, lawrence . jones, 16:29
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 16:25
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 15:57
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, lawrence . jones, 15:46
- Re: fgets question, Mark McIntyre, 15:05
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 14:40
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 14:28
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:45
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:35
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 13:32
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Walter Roberson, 13:31
- Re: One for the language lawyers, Harald van Dijk, 13:29
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Walter Roberson, 13:27
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Paul Hsieh, 13:17
- One for the language lawyers, Kenny McCormack, 13:08
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 12:41
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 12:34
- Re: printig effort, Eric Sosman, 12:32
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: printig effort, Harald van Dijk, 12:23
- Re: doubt on char *, Kenny McCormack, 12:06
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 12:04
- Re: doubt on char *, Eric Sosman, 11:52
- doubt on char *, Fastro, 11:49
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bob Nelson, 11:22
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:00
- Re: finding color of bits, Ernie Wright, 10:50
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Richard Heathfield, 10:46
- Re: Finally one site with all the C fundas, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:43
- Re: C_INCLUDE_PATH and gcc -I option, Ben Bacarisse, 10:37
- Re: open stdin a second time, Eric Sosman, 10:34
- Re: C_INCLUDE_PATH and gcc -I option, Madhur, 10:19
- Re: C_INCLUDE_PATH and gcc -I option, Antoninus Twink, 10:04
- open stdin a second time, fbertasso, 09:46
- C_INCLUDE_PATH and gcc -I option, Madhur, 09:46
- Finally one site with all the C fundas, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:13
- [OT] Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Eric Sosman, 08:33
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Richard Tobin, 08:29
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Richard, 08:21
- Re: printig effort, Ben Bacarisse, 08:16
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 08:15
- Re: finding color of bits, Willem, 08:15
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Bartc, 08:12
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Kenny McCormack, 08:03
- Re: printig effort, Kenny McCormack, 08:00
- Re: empty macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 07:40
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, rahul, 07:25
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:24
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Chris Dollin, 07:20
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, sachin, 07:13
- Re: finding color of bits, Bartc, 06:58
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Antoninus Twink, 06:56
- Re: quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Richard Heathfield, 06:56
- Re: oscillator, Nick Keighley, 06:40
- quarry: Infinite loop without using for , while, do-while, Tinku, 06:34
- Re: printig effort, Bartc, 06:24
- Re: input a string in gcc, Nick Keighley, 06:18
- Re: printig effort, Bartc, 06:10
- Re: fgets question, Ben Bacarisse, 05:55
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Raman, 05:41
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Chris Torek, 05:19
- Re: printig effort, Nick Keighley, 05:16
- Re: printig effort, Nick Keighley, 05:12
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 05:09
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- Re: printig effort, Nick Keighley, 05:06
- Re: printig effort, Nick Keighley, 04:59
- Re: fgets question, Richard, 04:49
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 04:47
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 04:44
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 04:43
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard, 04:42
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Nick Keighley, 04:34
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, whirlwindkevin, 04:34
- Re: Re-use the argument?, thomas . mertes, 04:21
- Re: [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 04:18
- Re: fgets question, pete, 04:18
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Tobin, 04:14
- Re: finding color of bits, pete, 04:13
- [ot]Re: Re-use the argument?, pete, 04:04
- finding color of bits, harryos, 04:00
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Nick Keighley, 03:40
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 03:39
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Heathfield, 03:31
- Re: Defining variable in C header file related doubt, Richard Heathfield, 03:27
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Heathfield, 03:07
- Avast - Free Antivirus, GoodieMan, 03:05
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Bos, 02:49
- Defining variable in C header file related doubt, whirlwindkevin, 02:44
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Richard Bos, 02:18
- Re: printig effort, CBFalconer, 01:12
- Re: printig effort, Harald van Dijk, 01:04
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 00:56
- Re: fgets question, Keith Thompson, 00:54
- Re: empty macro arguments, Keith Thompson, 00:49
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 00:47
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 00:43
June 08, 2008
- Re: Accessing flags, Walter Roberson, 23:18
- Re: fgets question, Bill Cunningham, 22:42
- Re: fgets question, Bill Cunningham, 22:36
- Re: Lookup PID from Port., Kenny McCormack, 22:28
- Re: fgets question, Jack Klein, 22:26
- Re: fgets question, Ben Bacarisse, 22:23
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 22:19
- fgets question, Bill Cunningham, 21:54
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Ron Ford, 21:52
- Re: empty macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 20:38
- Re: printig effort, Bartc, 20:23
- Re: Assigning a pointer to an array, Chris Saunders, 20:21
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:01
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 19:58
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 19:46
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 19:45
- Re: empty macro arguments, Thad Smith, 19:17
- Re: printig effort, Jens Thoms Toerring, 18:45
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 18:39
- Re: how can i large divide?, Lew Pitcher, 18:35
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 18:29
- Re: printig effort, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Tobin, 18:10
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 18:09
- Re: empty macro arguments, Hallvard B Furuseth, 18:08
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 17:57
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 17:53
- empty macro arguments, Two-Horned Unicorn, 17:41
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Tobin, 17:30
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 17:30
- Re: printing effort, Bill Cunningham, 16:53
- Ryhmän sfnet.harrastus.ilmailu virallinen kuvaus, Reino, 16:43
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Keith Thompson, 15:52
- Re: send email, Antoninus Twink, 15:52
- Re: printig effort, Harald van Dijk, 15:08
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 15:06
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 15:05
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, soscpd, 15:02
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Herbert Rosenau, 14:49
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 14:07
- Re: printing effort, Keith Thompson, 13:58
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Keith Thompson, 13:48
- Re: printig effort, Keith Thompson, 13:43
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 13:38
- Re: input a string in gcc, Bartc, 13:18
- Re: printig effort, Ben Bacarisse, 12:59
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Hallvard B Furuseth, 12:40
- Re: input a string in gcc, Willem, 12:39
- Re: input a string in gcc, Ben Bacarisse, 12:35
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Jack Klein, 12:31
- Re: how can i large divide?, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 12:26
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Hallvard B Furuseth, 12:14
- Re: input a string in gcc, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:09
- Re: send email, Chad, 12:00
- Re: input a string in gcc, Flash Gordon, 11:55
- Re: input a string in gcc, Richard, 11:34
- Re: printing effort, Ben Bacarisse, 11:22
- Re: C history - peek()?, Walter Banks, 11:08
- Re: input a string in gcc, yogicoder, 10:46
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 10:46
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, soscpd, 10:33
- Re: input a string in gcc, pete, 10:17
- Re: input a string in gcc, Richard Tobin, 10:05
- Re: input a string in gcc, Filipe Cabecinhas, 09:54
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, pete, 09:39
- Re: input a string in gcc, Richard, 09:24
- Re: input a string in gcc, Bartc, 09:23
- Re: input a string in gcc, Joe Wright, 09:15
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, soscpd, 08:56
- Re: input a string in gcc, yogicoder, 08:54
- Re: printig effort, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:59
- Re: C history - peek()?, Spiro Trikaliotis, 07:47
- Re: printig effort, Bartc, 07:37
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard, 07:16
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 07:16
- Re: printig effort, Richard, 07:15
- Re: input a string in gcc, Richard, 07:13
- Re: input a string in gcc, Bartc, 07:10
- Re: input a string in gcc, Richard Tobin, 06:46
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Tobin, 06:41
- Re: input a string in gcc, Filipe Cabecinhas, 04:58
- Re: Compiling problem, Filipe Cabecinhas, 04:54
- Re: input a string in gcc, Harald van Dijk, 03:48
- Re: input a string in gcc, Walter Roberson, 03:38
- input a string in gcc, yogicoder, 03:31
- Re: Compiling problem, s0suk3, 02:31
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 01:46
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: printig effort, Richard Heathfield, 01:31
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Heathfield, 01:24
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 01:22
June 07, 2008
- Re: printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 23:47
- Re: printing effort, Bill Cunningham, 23:42
- Re: printig effort, Barry Schwarz, 23:28
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bob Nelson, 23:03
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bob Nelson, 22:53
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bob Nelson, 22:42
- printig effort, Bill Cunningham, 22:14
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Ian Collins, 20:54
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Dan, 20:46
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 19:25
- Re: Compiling problem, Mark McIntyre, 18:22
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Tobin, 18:01
- Re: Compiling problem, Richard Tobin, 17:56
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 17:43
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Flash Gordon, 17:39
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Chris Torek, 17:25
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Flash Gordon, 17:24
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Stephen Sprunk, 17:23
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Ben Bacarisse, 17:23
- Re: Compiling problem, Filipe Cabecinhas, 17:16
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 16:56
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Ben Bacarisse, 16:52
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, soscpd, 16:52
- Re: How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, Lew Pitcher, 16:43
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 16:41
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 16:35
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Ben Bacarisse, 16:13
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: warning while making cast, lawrence . jones, 16:01
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Keith Thompson, 15:57
- Re: How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, lawrence . jones, 15:57
- Re: Assigning a pointer to an array, Mark McIntyre, 15:35
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bartc, 15:25
- Re: Compiling problem, Bartc, 15:20
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Flash Gordon, 14:01
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Flash Gordon, 13:53
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, gw7rib, 12:42
- Re: Compiling problem, Filipe Cabecinhas, 12:33
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Malcolm McLean, 12:28
- Re: Compiling problem, Richard Tobin, 12:27
- Re: Compiling problem, Kenny McCormack, 12:14
- Re: Compiling problem, Richard Tobin, 11:47
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Tobin, 11:42
- Re: Assigning a pointer to an array, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:40
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Antoninus Twink, 11:10
- Assigning a pointer to an array, Chris Saunders, 11:03
- Re: Compiling problem, suresh shenoy, 11:03
- Re: Compiling problem, Filipe Cabecinhas, 11:01
- Compiling problem, s0suk3, 10:53
- Re: Re-use the argument?, CBFalconer, 10:29
- Re: send email, Antoninus Twink, 10:24
- Re: send email, vippstar, 10:06
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 09:59
- Re: send email, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:57
- Re: How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, Louis, 09:55
- Re: send email, Walter Roberson, 09:51
- send email, Carachi, 09:37
- Re: how can i large divide?, Johannes Bauer, 08:22
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Walter Banks, 08:20
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Heathfield, 08:08
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bartc, 07:54
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Ben Bacarisse, 07:49
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Chris Thomasson, 07:38
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Heathfield, 07:38
- Re: How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:29
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, nembo kid, 07:17
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:13
- Re: Accessing flags, Walter Banks, 07:13
- Re: How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, Ben Bacarisse, 07:03
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Chris Thomasson, 06:56
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Flash Gordon, 06:24
- How to avoid including C files in other C files in an old code base, Raman, 05:33
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Tobin, 05:31
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Flash Gordon, 05:24
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Ron Ford, 05:23
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), pete, 05:21
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Malcolm McLean, 05:19
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Tobin, 05:16
- Re: warning while making cast, Richard Tobin, 05:13
- Re: Re-use the argument?, vippstar, 05:02
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Keith Thompson, 04:49
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Keith Thompson, 04:46
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 04:40
- Re: warning while making cast, Mark McIntyre, 04:36
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Harald van Dijk, 04:35
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Mark McIntyre, 04:34
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Mark McIntyre, 04:31
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), user923005, 04:12
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:10
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:09
- Re: A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Ron Ford, 04:09
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:05
- Re: pointer variable vs reference variables, santosh, 04:02
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:59
- Re: Re-use the argument?, CBFalconer, 03:40
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:35
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 03:29
- Re: Re-use the argument?, Richard Heathfield, 03:26
- pointer variable vs reference variables, sulekhasweety, 03:25
- A CT&P excursion - beat it up!, Bob Nelson, 03:08
- Re-use the argument?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:48
- Best Prometric Test center in Bangalore (like Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, CISCO, Exin - ITIL, Dell, HP), Prometric Test center, 02:40
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), pcauchon, 02:30
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), user923005, 02:19
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), user923005, 02:14
- 100 Tools For Blogging, GoodieMan, 02:09
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), pcauchon, 02:09
- Re: Accessing flags, rio, 02:05
- Re: Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), bigcaterpillar@xxxxxxxxx, 01:52
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Chris Thomasson, 01:14
- Invalid results from exp2 function (C math library), pcauchon, 01:13
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, user923005, 00:50
- Re: C history - peek()?, user923005, 00:38
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Dann Corbit, 00:23
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, CBFalconer, 00:15
June 06, 2008
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, user923005, 23:46
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Jack Klein, 23:12
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, lxu4net, 23:06
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, lxu4net, 23:06
- Re: warning while making cast, Jack Klein, 23:06
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 22:25
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Richard Heathfield, 22:22
- Re: Accessing flags, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 20:55
- Re: how can i large divide?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:36
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, copx, 20:34
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 20:33
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Chris Thomasson, 20:31
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Bartc, 20:14
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Keith Thompson, 20:14
- Re: Turbo C Strange Problem, Bartc, 20:08
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, copx, 20:06
- Re: Accessing flags, CBFalconer, 20:02
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, CBFalconer, 19:55
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 19:41
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, CBFalconer, 19:31
- Re: Lookup PID from Port., Keith Thompson, 19:24
- Re: Lookup PID from Port., Antoninus Twink, 19:15
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 19:12
- Turbo C Strange Problem, Gabriel, 19:08
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 19:01
- Lookup PID from Port., Jason8, 18:49
- Re: oscillator, Martin Ambuhl, 18:49
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 18:38
- Re: Segmentation Fault at fwrite... Help, vasu_7799@xxxxxxxxx, 18:37
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 18:26
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 18:24
- Re: replace substring, Flash Gordon, 18:19
- Re: oscillator, Richard Tobin, 18:19
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, lawrence . jones, 18:19
- Re: Accessing flags, Eric Sosman, 18:17
- Re: warning while making cast, lawrence . jones, 18:16
- Re: Accessing flags, Antoninus Twink, 18:15
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 17:59
- Re: Accessing flags, Barry Schwarz, 17:54
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 17:54
- Re: Accessing flags, Walter Roberson, 17:53
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 17:45
- Accessing flags, kid joe, 17:36
- Re: oscillator, Richard, 17:19
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 17:07
- Re: oscillator, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: replace substring, Paul Hsieh, 16:35
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 16:19
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 16:17
- Re: oscillator, Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Re: oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 16:09
- Re: warning while making cast, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: C history - peek()?, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: warning while making cast, Richard Tobin, 16:06
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Flash Gordon, 16:02
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, Keith Thompson, 16:01
- Re: oscillator, Walter Roberson, 16:00
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: C history - peek()?, Mike Smith, 15:55
- oscillator, Bill Cunningham, 15:54
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: Example Needed, Flash Gordon, 15:45
- Re: FAQ question (1.13), Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, user923005, 15:29
- Re: C history - peek()?, user923005, 15:24
- Re: replace substring, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Antoninus Twink, 15:03
- Re: how can i large divide?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:44
- Re: Executing data, Lew Pitcher, 14:33
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Richard, 14:33
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, rio, 14:33
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, rio, 14:32
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Kenneth Brody, 14:30
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Richard Heathfield, 14:23
- Re: Converting #define value to a variable, Barry Schwarz, 14:20
- Re: Executing data, Barry Schwarz, 14:20
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Harald van Dijk, 13:57
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Eric Sosman, 13:55
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Richard Tobin, 13:52
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Serve Lau, 13:46
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Tobin, 13:45
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Richard Tobin, 13:37
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Eric Sosman, 13:31
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, CBFalconer, 13:16
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Cromulent, 13:16
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Keith Thompson, 13:06
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, CBFalconer, 13:05
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Keith Thompson, 13:02
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, CBFalconer, 12:58
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Antoninus Twink, 12:55
- Re: warning while making cast, lawrence . jones, 12:54
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, jacob navia, 12:46
- Re: how can i large divide?, Keith Thompson, 12:45
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, jacob navia, 12:45
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, jacob navia, 12:43
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 12:43
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Keith Thompson, 12:36
- Re: how can i large divide?, Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: how can i large divide?, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, Keith Thompson, 12:21
- Re: Executing data, Keith Thompson, 12:15
- Re: how can i large divide?, Bartc, 12:14
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Eric Sosman, 12:07
- Re: how can i large divide?, Keith Thompson, 11:57
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Keith Thompson, 11:52
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, crisgoogle, 11:50
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, crisgoogle, 11:44
- Re: What would be the right warning/error?, Bartc, 11:41
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Bartc, 11:34
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 11:25
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Richard, 11:23
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Kenneth Brody, 11:17
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
- What would be the right warning/error?, jacob navia, 11:09
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard, 10:59
- Re: Converting #define value to a variable, Serve Lau, 10:54
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Ben Pfaff, 10:44
- Re: C history - peek()?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:33
- Re: how can i large divide?, Johannes Bauer, 10:22
- Re: Converting #define value to a variable, CBFalconer, 10:17
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, jacob navia, 10:17
- Re: Is this a valid Struct in C, CBFalconer, 10:10
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, CBFalconer, 10:09
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 09:55
- Re: replace substring, Ben Bacarisse, 09:54
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, muks, 09:45
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Bartc, 09:35
- Re: Example Needed, Hans Schneider, 09:15
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Ben Bacarisse, 09:10
- Re: memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, lxu4net, 09:07
- memory measurement : different value between top/ps and mallinfo, lxu4net, 08:46
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:45
- Re: C history - peek()?, Mike Smith, 08:25
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- Re: Converting #define value to a variable, Ben Bacarisse, 08:05
- Re: C history - peek()?, Walter Banks, 08:04
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Flash Gordon, 07:56
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, Ben Bacarisse, 07:54
- Re: Converting #define value to a variable, rahul, 07:33
- Re: Executing data, rahul, 07:19
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Tobin, 07:18
- Re: Executing data, Richard Tobin, 07:08
- Re: how can i large divide?, Bartc, 07:06
- Re: FAQ question (1.13), Antoninus Twink, 07:02
- Re: Executing data, Bartc, 06:36
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 06:34
- Converting #define value to a variable, maker . rain1, 06:28
- Re: Is this a valid Struct in C, nembo kid, 06:24
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Bos, 06:24
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, rahul, 06:17
- Executing data, rahul, 06:15
- Re: how can i large divide?, Bartc, 06:12
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, rahul, 05:55
- Re: Is this a valid struct declaration, rahul, 05:51
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Dan, 05:49
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Chris Dollin, 05:39
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Dan, 05:35
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Richard Tobin, 05:34
- Re: Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Dan, 05:33
- Is this a valid struct declaration, Raman, 05:32
- Re: FAQ question (1.13), Dan, 05:31
- Is this a valid Struct in C, Raman, 05:26
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, santosh, 05:19
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Martin Ambuhl, 05:04
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 04:58
- Middle of a singly linked list of unknown length, Himanshu Chauhan, 04:48
- Re: warning while making cast, Richard Tobin, 03:31
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, jacob navia, 03:27
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Richard Tobin, 03:26
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, jaysome, 03:16
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Keith Thompson, 03:10
- Cast to pointer to multidimensional array, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 02:59
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, copx, 02:54
- Re: warning while making cast, jaysome, 02:41
- Re: warning while making cast, Richard Bos, 02:35
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, copx, 02:33
- Re: Example Needed, jaysome, 02:23
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, copx, 02:18
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Walter Roberson, 02:14
- Re: warning while making cast, akbar, 02:00
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 02:00
- sqrt() double trouble, copx, 01:59
- Re: warning while making cast, CBFalconer, 01:57
- Re: how can i large divide?, Owen Jacobson, 01:53
- Re: warning while making cast, Roman Mashak, 00:03
June 05, 2008
- Re: warning while making cast, Roman Mashak, 23:54
- Re: reporting typedef errors automatically, Roman Mashak, 23:12
- warning while making cast, Roman Mashak, 23:04
- Re: Example Needed, John J . Smith, 22:45
- Re: warning while making cast, Jack Klein, 22:39
- Re: FAQ question (1.13), Jack Klein, 22:32
- Re: FAQ question (1.13), Eric Sosman, 22:21
- FAQ question (1.13), Eric, 22:05
- Re: replace substring, Paul Hsieh, 21:59
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Ben Pfaff, 21:48
- Re: replace substring, Joe Wright, 21:41
- Re: replace substring, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 21:12
- Re: how can i large divide?, Bartc, 20:39
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: C history - peek()?, CBFalconer, 20:24
- Re: replace substring, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: is order urgent doubt, lawrence . jones, 20:11
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 19:46
- Re: how can i large divide?, Richard Heathfield, 19:29
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Joe Wright, 19:26
- Re: replace substring, Barry Schwarz, 18:59
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Walter Roberson, 18:57
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Tim Prince, 18:55
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Antoninus Twink, 18:45
- Re: how can i large divide?, Malcolm McLean, 18:44
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Walter Roberson, 18:42
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, christian.bau, 18:35
- Re: C history - peek()?, Richard Tobin, 18:32
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Peter Nilsson, 18:21
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: C history - peek()?, Default User, 17:58
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 17:31
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Keith Thompson, 17:22
- Re: C history - peek()?, Walter Banks, 17:15
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, David Tiktin, 17:07
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Herbert Rosenau, 17:02
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Jeff, 16:56
- Re: How to printf 'n' characters from a char* to a file?, Harald van Dijk, 16:43
- Re: How to printf 'n' characters from a char* to a file?, Jonathan, 16:38
- Re: How to printf 'n' characters from a char* to a file?, Richard Heathfield, 16:27
- Re: How to printf 'n' characters from a char* to a file?, Walter Roberson, 16:21
- How to printf 'n' characters from a char* to a file?, Jonathan, 16:11
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Flash Gordon, 15:56
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Walter Roberson, 15:44
- Re: fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Ben Pfaff, 15:42
- fwrite, fgets binary file readback problem, Jeff, 15:27
- Re: example program, Richard Harter, 14:58
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, Ron Eggler, 14:57
- Re: C history - peek()?, Dann Corbit, 14:57
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, Ron Eggler, 14:54
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, Ron Eggler, 14:51
- Re: calling conventions, christian.bau, 14:03
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, christian.bau, 13:58
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, christian.bau, 13:55
- Re: strcmp() fooling me? :o, Eric Sosman, 13:43
- strcmp() fooling me? :o, Ron Eggler, 13:18
- Re: replace substring, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:08
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Walter Roberson, 13:08
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Walter Roberson, 13:05
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Richard, 12:41
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 12:39
- Re: warning while making cast, Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Antoninus Twink, 12:28
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Antoninus Twink, 12:18
- Re: Portable printf extension ?, Keith Thompson, 12:16
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Richard, 12:12
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Walter Roberson, 12:06
- Re: replace substring, Keith Thompson, 12:01
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Antoninus Twink, 11:54
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Antoninus Twink, 11:49
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Antoninus Twink, 11:45
- Re: example program, Richard Harter, 11:32
- Re: sqrt() double trouble, Tim Prince, 10:33
- Re: is order urgent doubt, lawrence . jones, 09:49
- Re: example program, CBFalconer, 09:48
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Jens Thoms Toerring, 09:22
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Kenny McCormack, 08:55
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Kenny McCormack, 08:51
- Re: warning while making cast, vippstar, 08:48
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, sachin, 08:44
- Re: warning while making cast, blockstack, 08:34
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Richard Tobin, 08:30
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Richard Tobin, 08:25
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Bartc, 08:18
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Richard, 08:07
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, Richard Tobin, 07:54
- Re: Including compiled C source file in array, santosh, 07:45
- Re: warning while making cast, Richard Tobin, 07:41
- sexy nayanthara, meg, 07:30
- Re: Portable printf extension ?, Richard Bos, 07:29
- Re: warning while making cast, vippstar, 07:27
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Richard Tobin, 07:11
- Including compiled C source file in array, sachin, 06:36
- Re: printing error messages, Nick Keighley, 05:41
- Re: Portable printf extension ?, lithiumcat, 05:21
- Re: example program, Richard Harter, 02:31
- Re: replace substring, Richard Harter, 02:31
- Re: Example Needed, Ron Ford, 00:32
June 04, 2008
- C history - peek()?, Bob Nelson, 23:43
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Eric Sosman, 22:15
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Old Wolf, 21:49
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Bartc, 21:30
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Richard Heathfield, 20:54
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Kenny McCormack, 20:35
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard, 20:17
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Pie Squared, 20:14
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Pie Squared, 20:13
- Re: is order urgent doubt, lawrence . jones, 20:02
- Re: what is the output of this program?, lawrence . jones, 19:56
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, jacob navia, 19:29
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:23
- Re: Marking a Page of Memory Executable, dj3vande, 19:10
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 18:42
- Marking a Page of Memory Executable, Pie Squared, 18:36
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 18:32
- Re: calling conventions, Eric Sosman, 18:00
- Re: calling conventions, jacob navia, 18:00
- Re: calling conventions, Richard Tobin, 17:37
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: reinitialization an array, Herbert Rosenau, 16:44
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Herbert Rosenau, 16:44
- Re: calling conventions, santosh, 16:44
- Re: calling conventions, Kenneth Brody, 16:34
- [OT] stuff (was: is order urgent doubt), CBFalconer, 16:30
- Re: calling conventions, jacob navia, 16:21
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 15:54
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 15:45
- Re: calling conventions, Flash Gordon, 15:41
- Re: Example Needed, user923005, 14:52
- Re: Job request, user923005, 14:49
- Re: Example Needed, user923005, 14:46
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Default User, 14:28
- Re: calling conventions, Richard Tobin, 13:44
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: Job request, Serve Lau, 12:47
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, Walter Roberson, 12:43
- Re: calling conventions, Walter Roberson, 12:35
- Re: calling conventions, santosh, 12:35
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, vippstar, 12:30
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Keith Thompson, 12:27
- calling conventions, sulekhasweety, 12:20
- Re: Job request, santosh, 12:19
- Re: how can i large divide?, santosh, 12:14
- Job request, marwen, 12:06
- Re: how can i large divide?, Johannes Bauer, 12:05
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 12:04
- Re: how can i large divide?, Johannes Bauer, 12:03
- how can i large divide?, jty0734, 11:54
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, Ben Bacarisse, 11:21
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, santosh, 10:58
- Re: Naive parallel implementation of Mersenne Twister random number generator, pete, 10:55
- Re: what is the output of this program?, santosh, 10:51
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, pete, 10:47
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, digital . pardoe, 10:47
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, Chris McDonald, 10:40
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, vippstar, 10:35
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, Bartc, 10:23
- Re: Example Needed, Lew Pitcher, 10:19
- Naive parallel implementation of Mersenne Twister random number generator, mjm2114, 09:58
- Re: Example Needed, Charlton Wilbur, 09:56
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Chris Dollin, 09:56
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, digital . pardoe, 09:40
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), micans, 09:23
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Richard Heathfield, 09:17
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 09:11
- Re: Bug in memory, but not revealed, Richard Tobin, 09:09
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Martin, 09:07
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, digital . pardoe, 09:06
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 09:05
- Bug in memory, but not revealed, Stefan Istrate, 08:53
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, Richard Tobin, 08:40
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, David Resnick, 08:35
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Bartc, 08:33
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 08:32
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 08:31
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Eric Sosman, 08:30
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 08:26
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, santosh, 08:24
- Re: printing error messages, Eric Sosman, 08:22
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 08:15
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 08:11
- Re: Iterating Through Variable Names, Antoninus Twink, 07:56
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 07:56
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jacob navia, 07:54
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 07:38
- Iterating Through Variable Names, digital . pardoe, 07:34
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 07:23
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 07:22
- Re: Example Needed, Richard Heathfield, 07:01
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 06:59
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard Heathfield, 06:58
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 06:57
- Re: Portable printf extension ?, Richard Bos, 06:54
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Nick Keighley, 06:20
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 05:58
- Re: When to use const modifier?, santosh, 05:47
- Re: Example Needed, Ron Ford, 05:42
- Re: Example Needed, Bartc, 05:32
- Re: Example Needed, Fred Yu, 05:16
- Re: Portable printf extension ?, rahul, 04:59
- Re: Example Needed, Ian Collins, 04:55
- Re: Example Needed, rahul, 04:53
- Re: Segmentation Fault at fwrite... Help, Richard Tobin, 04:52
- Re: example program, rahul, 04:50
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard Bos, 04:47
- Re: bit position, rahul, 04:36
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 04:35
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 04:30
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Antoninus Twink, 04:29
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard Heathfield, 04:26
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Serve Lau, 04:25
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Antoninus Twink, 04:19
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Ian Collins, 04:18
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Ian Collins, 04:13
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 04:13
- Re: example program, CBFalconer, 03:27
- Re: is order urgent doubt, CBFalconer, 03:23
- Portable printf extension ?, lithiumcat, 02:51
- Re: main exit/return, Chris Dollin, 02:39
- Re: main exit/return, Chris Dollin, 02:38
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard Bos, 02:26
- #####SOUTH INDIAN GIRLS SEX######, gopapoz, 02:22
- Re: Segmentation Fault at fwrite... Help, Martin Ambuhl, 02:13
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 01:55
- Re: Example Needed, Keith Thompson, 01:52
- Re: Example Needed, vippstar, 01:51
- Re: base64 decode help needed, David Thompson, 01:49
- Re: C standard question?, David Thompson, 01:49
- Example Needed, Thompson Reed, 01:45
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Richard Harter, 01:45
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Ron Ford, 00:36
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 00:34
- Re: example program, pete, 00:29
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Ian Collins, 00:26
- Re: example program, pete, 00:25
- Re: When to use const modifier?, pete, 00:20
- www.iseeshoe.com paypaldiscountshoppingjordanshoesdunkmaxshoxshoesjerseyt-shirt, fdsafdsag5w, 00:00
June 03, 2008
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Peter Nilsson, 23:30
- Re: When to use const modifier?, CBFalconer, 23:16
- Re: example program, Chris Thomasson, 22:59
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Peter Nilsson, 22:55
- Re: printing error messages, CBFalconer, 22:50
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 22:14
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 22:08
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 22:02
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 22:00
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 21:59
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 21:53
- Re: Segmentation Fault at fwrite... Help, Peter Nilsson, 21:33
- Re: pointer confusion - any hints?, Barry Schwarz, 21:31
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Peter Nilsson, 21:26
- Segmentation Fault at fwrite... Help, vasu_7799@xxxxxxxxx, 21:04
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, Bartc, 20:44
- Re: printing error messages, Eric Sosman, 20:41
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 20:27
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 20:21
- Re: printing error messages, Baboon, 20:17
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Richard Heathfield, 20:02
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, santosh, 20:02
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Keith Thompson, 19:37
- Re: [OT] is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 19:23
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 19:11
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Malcolm McLean, 19:01
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Walter Roberson, 18:57
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 18:47
- Re: bit position, Peter Nilsson, 18:41
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 18:34
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Harald van Dijk, 18:31
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 18:30
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 18:28
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Bartc, 18:24
- Re: example program, Richard Heathfield, 18:20
- Re: pointer confusion - any hints?, Peter Nilsson, 18:15
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Pietro Cerutti, 18:11
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Harald van Dijk, 18:11
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Eric Sosman, 18:05
- Re: Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, Walter Roberson, 18:03
- Re: example program, Paul Hsieh, 18:03
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:37
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Harald van Dijk, 17:36
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 17:34
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 17:32
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, CBFalconer, 17:27
- Re: Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, imailz, 17:17
- Re: example program, Paul Hsieh, 17:15
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jameskuyper, 17:11
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 17:09
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: When to use const modifier?, CBFalconer, 16:57
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jacob navia, 16:55
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 16:39
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Antoninus Twink, 16:35
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Antoninus Twink, 16:33
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 16:29
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jacob navia, 16:24
- Re: Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, Walter Roberson, 16:20
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Walter Roberson, 16:18
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jacob navia, 16:16
- Re: Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, imailz, 16:16
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 16:07
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Flash Gordon, 16:03
- Re: Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, Malcolm McLean, 16:01
- Re: main exit/return, Chris Torek, 15:57
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Flash Gordon, 15:45
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Implicit loop and reading in an unknown number of variables, imailz, 15:33
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Malcolm McLean, 15:28
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Flash Gordon, 15:10
- Re: bit position, user923005, 15:01
- Re: bit position, Richard Harter, 14:57
- Re: bit position, Eric Sosman, 14:56
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, jacob navia, 14:38
- Re: Bug/problem with lcc-win, Lew Pitcher, 14:36
- pointer confusion - any hints?, Ron Eggler, 14:29
- Bug/problem with lcc-win, Eddie, 14:19
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 14:03
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 13:52
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 13:38
- Re: bit position, vippstar, 13:22
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 13:18
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Antoninus Twink, 13:17
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Richard, 13:13
- Re: Automated source builds...including downloading?, Antoninus Twink, 13:08
- Re: Eiffel - Compiler, Antoninus Twink, 13:06
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 13:03
- Re: bit position, Eric Sosman, 12:54
- Re: main exit/return, Richard Heathfield, 12:44
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 12:36
- Re: main exit/return, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: bit position, Richard Harter, 12:18
- [OT] Re: Determine the size of malloc, Harald van Dijk, 12:11
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, santosh, 12:02
- Re: bit position, Eric Sosman, 12:00
- Re: Automated source builds...including downloading?, santosh, 11:56
- Re: main exit/return, santosh, 11:49
- Re: Eiffel - Compiler, santosh, 11:45
- Re: main exit/return, Keith Thompson, 11:36
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 11:28
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Amandil, 11:20
- Re: bit position, vippstar, 11:11
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Chris Dollin, 11:08
- Re: When to use const modifier?, santosh, 10:58
- Re: When to use const modifier?, santosh, 10:52
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 10:51
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Richard, 10:36
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 10:03
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Richard, 09:57
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 09:41
- Re: bit position, Chris Dollin, 09:34
- Re: When to use const modifier?, vippstar, 09:26
- Re: Automated source builds...including downloading?, Walter Roberson, 09:20
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 09:13
- Re: Automated source builds...including downloading?, viza, 09:04
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Leonardo Korndorfer, 08:53
- Automated source builds...including downloading?, flux505, 08:48
- Re: bit position, Chris Dollin, 08:43
- Re: main exit/return, Chris Dollin, 08:37
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Chris Dollin, 08:35
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 08:31
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 08:15
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Ben Bacarisse, 08:11
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:09
- Re: bit position, rahul, 08:01
- Re: Eiffel - Compiler, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:00
- Re: bit position, Chris Thomasson, 08:00
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Robert Spykerman, 07:54
- Re: example program, Chris Thomasson, 07:49
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: main exit/return, vippstar, 05:55
- Re: main exit/return, christian.bau, 05:50
- Re: main exit/return, Chris Dollin, 05:46
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), christian.bau, 05:45
- Re: bit position, Chris Dollin, 05:41
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, Richard Tobin, 05:40
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Tobin, 05:36
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Richard Tobin, 05:29
- bit position, Ivan, 05:16
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, Nick Keighley, 05:11
- Re: Linked list, Rahul, 04:56
- main exit/return, Rahul, 04:55
- Eiffel - Compiler, okyanushulya, 04:38
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Chris Dollin, 04:33
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, Antoninus Twink, 04:25
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, Nick Keighley, 04:09
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Richard Heathfield, 03:56
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Chris Dollin, 03:45
- Re: example program, Chris Thomasson, 03:16
- Re: Linked list, Chris Thomasson, 03:08
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 02:59
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, Richard Bos, 02:55
- Re: is order urgent doubt, jacob navia, 02:21
- Re: storing data in file instead of memory, vippstar, 02:07
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Bos, 02:04
- storing data in file instead of memory, pereges, 01:57
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Ike Naar, 01:46
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, vippstar, 01:09
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, Keith Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Martin Ambuhl, 00:31
June 02, 2008
- Best Prometric Test center in Bangalore (like Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, CISCO, Exin - ITIL, Dell, HP), Prometric Test center, 23:58
- www.iseeshoe.com www.iseeshoe.com www.iseeshoe.com www.iseeshoe.com www.iseeshoe.com, gkjgk8l8olihlk, 23:51
- Re: Make Money Home Now!, Fred Yu, 23:39
- www.sbshoe.com paypaldunkjordansumberclothing, gkjgk8l8olihlk, 23:33
- Re: parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:28
- Re: Four or Two Bytes?, Bill Leary, 22:59
- Re: valid code, stumpedatwork, 22:59
- Re: preprocessor #include, Thad Smith, 22:50
- parsing variable arg lists via va_list pointers (any gurus here?), Jesse Ziser, 22:23
- Re: Linked list, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:06
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Eric Sosman, 20:03
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Ben Bacarisse, 20:02
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Keith Thompson, 19:55
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 19:51
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Walter Roberson, 19:35
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 19:24
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 19:15
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Antoninus Twink, 19:11
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, pete, 19:07
- Re: OT: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Keith Thompson, 19:00
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, user923005, 18:52
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Richard Tobin, 18:52
- Re: is order urgent doubt, new to c, 18:51
- Re: Parameter order for Struct, Pietro Cerutti, 18:48
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:44
- Parameter order for Struct, kid joe, 18:43
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Eric Sosman, 18:32
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard Heathfield, 18:23
- Re: OT: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:18
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Tobin, 18:17
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:14
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard Heathfield, 18:13
- Re: OT: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, CBFalconer, 18:03
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Walter Roberson, 17:36
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Bartc, 17:22
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Andrew Kerr, 17:10
- Re: reinitialization an array, Walter Roberson, 16:57
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Keith Thompson, 16:35
- Re: reinitialization an array, Mark McIntyre, 16:32
- Re: example program, CBFalconer, 16:30
- Re: reinitialization an array, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, CBFalconer, 16:23
- shoes DIESEL shoes paypal cnbbiz2008@xxxxxxxxxxx ( http://photo.163.com/photos/nikeallstar#p1 ), cnbbiz2008, 16:15
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., CBFalconer, 16:15
- Re: printing error messages, santosh, 16:12
- Re: printing error messages, santosh, 16:10
- Re: Pointer to qualified poitner to qualified object, Herbert Rosenau, 16:06
- Re: reinitialization an array, Herbert Rosenau, 16:06
- Re: How to trace function calls?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:06
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:04
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Tobin, 15:59
- Re: When to use const modifier?, santosh, 15:48
- Re: When to use const modifier?, santosh, 15:46
- Re: When to use const modifier?, Ian Collins, 15:20
- When to use const modifier?, Leonardo Korndorfer, 15:11
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, user923005, 15:11
- Re: Freshening the FAQ, Flash Gordon, 15:08
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Flash Gordon, 14:54
- Make Money Home Now!, JMT, 13:10
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard Tobin, 13:05
- Re: example program, Paul Hsieh, 12:57
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Bartc, 12:17
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 11:52
- Re: example program, vamsi.krishnak@xxxxxxxxx, 11:47
- Re: time problems, MaXy, 11:46
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Keith Thompson, 11:42
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Bartc, 11:36
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Keith Thompson, 11:31
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Keith Thompson, 11:29
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Chris Dollin, 11:12
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:03
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:53
- The most comprehensive furniture information .You will find the most suitable for you!, shoubiao189, 10:10
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, santosh, 09:42
- Re: definations of built in library functions, Richard Heathfield, 09:34
- Re: example program, Eric Sosman, 09:28
- Re: definations of built in library functions, vippstar, 09:28
- Re: preprocessor #include, pete, 09:24
- definations of built in library functions, rams, 09:23
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Richard Bos, 09:17
- Re: Linked list, pete, 09:13
- Re: example program, pete, 09:10
- Re: Determine the size of malloc, Richard Bos, 09:10
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, pete, 08:59
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, pete, 08:53
- Re: Linked list, nembo kid, 08:48
- Re: preprocessor #include, vippstar, 08:45
- preprocessor #include, vippstar, 08:40
- Re: is order urgent doubt, santosh, 08:33
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, vippstar, 08:24
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, rahul, 08:05
- Re: Freshening the FAQ, rahul, 08:00
- Re: example program, rahul, 07:57
- Re: example program, Barry Schwarz, 07:53
- Re: Linked list, rahul, 07:51
- Re: example program, Richard Heathfield, 07:43
- Re: is order urgent doubt, new to c, 07:35
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, Richard Heathfield, 07:34
- Linked list, dmp, 07:21
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Bartc, 07:01
- Re: example program, Bartc, 06:44
- example program, aarklon, 06:29
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., vippstar, 06:18
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ian Collins, 06:06
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard, 05:54
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Nick Keighley, 04:58
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, James Dow Allen, 04:51
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Ian Collins, 03:57
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Peter Nilsson, 02:37
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 02:27
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Peter Nilsson, 01:47
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard Heathfield, 01:40
- Re: Freshening the FAQ, Richard Heathfield, 01:32
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., CBFalconer, 00:58
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., CBFalconer, 00:55
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Keith Thompson, 00:32
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Barry Schwarz, 00:26
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Barry Schwarz, 00:26
- Re: Four or Two Bytes?, Barry Schwarz, 00:26
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Barry Schwarz, 00:26
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Keith Thompson, 00:24
- Freshening the FAQ, Bob Nelson, 00:22
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., vippstar, 00:07
June 01, 2008
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, vippstar, 23:56
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Aereshaa, 23:48
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., kongweize@xxxxxxxxx, 23:47
- Re: I think this is a problem in gcc., Chris McDonald, 23:42
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 23:42
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, vippstar, 23:39
- I think this is a problem in gcc., Aereshaa, 23:38
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 23:36
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Keith Thompson, 23:14
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Keith Thompson, 23:03
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 23:03
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 22:55
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Thad Smith, 22:53
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 22:49
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Thad Smith, 22:40
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Peter Nilsson, 22:25
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 22:03
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Bartc, 21:12
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Ben Bacarisse, 21:08
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Bartc, 21:00
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:43
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 20:41
- Re: Four or Two Bytes?, Bill Leary, 19:56
- Re: static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, Barry Schwarz, 19:31
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ian Collins, 19:21
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler? THANKS, Charles Sullivan, 19:20
- static and initialization rules or 0 is 0.0 is NULL, copx, 18:58
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Bartc, 18:47
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Eric Sosman, 18:23
- Re: is order urgent doubt, new to c, 18:11
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., CBFalconer, 17:26
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: function, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, santosh, 16:53
- Re: time problems, santosh, 16:28
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 16:26
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Eric Sosman, 16:20
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Thad Smith, 16:20
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Thad Smith, 16:10
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, Barry Schwarz, 16:02
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:47
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Kenny McCormack, 15:47
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Charles Sullivan, 15:44
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, jacob navia, 15:35
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, jacob navia, 15:34
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, jacob navia, 15:32
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Sohijb Edrisy, 15:32
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Willem, 15:24
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Gene, 15:22
- Re: Bad code or bad compiler?, Bartc, 14:52
- Bad code or bad compiler?, Charles Sullivan, 14:27
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard, 12:43
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, Kenny McCormack, 12:16
- Re: printing error messages, Joe Wright, 11:40
- A découvrir - Sudoku , sudolettre, Pendu , Motus,..., funmeninges, 11:21
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 10:53
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 10:49
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:39
- Re: passing copy of a pointer to a variable vs passing the copy, pereges, 10:36
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Joachim Schmitz, 10:09
- Re: strtok question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:51
- Re: strtok question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:21
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:16
- Re: strtok question, Richard, 08:44
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard, 08:42
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 08:08
- Re: strtok question, Antoninus Twink, 08:02
- Re: how to read integers from a text file, nembo kid, 07:33
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Richard, 06:58
- Re: printing error messages, Richard, 06:57
- how to read integers from a text file, rohit, 06:56
- Re: function, Richard, 06:55
- Re: time problems, MaXy, 06:49
- Re: printing error messages, CBFalconer, 06:44
- Re: function, Joachim Schmitz, 06:13
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?, Joachim Schmitz, 06:02
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: printing error messages, santosh, 05:45
- Re: time problems, Harald van Dijk, 03:45
- Re: algorithm for finding Pi in C, aarklon, 03:44
- time problems, MaXy, 03:41
- Re: private functions, Richard Heathfield, 02:42
- Re: printing error messages, vippstar, 02:05
- Re: private functions, jacob navia, 01:16
May 31, 2008
- Re: function, Bill Cunningham, 23:11
- Re: Four or Two Bytes?, pete, 22:13
- Re: is order urgent doubt, teapot, 22:02
- Re: function, Barry Schwarz, 21:56
- Re: the difference between \r and \n, Richard Heathfield, 21:50
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Richard Heathfield, 21:44
- Re: private functions, Richard Heathfield, 21:34
- Re: strtok question, CBFalconer, 21:24
- Re: printing error messages, Keith Thompson, 21:19
- Re: private functions, Keith Thompson, 21:17
- Re: function, CBFalconer, 21:13
- Re: function, Keith Thompson, 21:10
- Re: the difference between \r and \n, Dan, 21:00
- Re: what is the output of this program?, Dan, 20:57
- Re: function, Lew Pitcher, 20:40
- Re: function, Bill Cunningham, 20:36
- Re: private functions, CBFalconer, 20:21
- Re: printing error messages, CBFalconer, 20:06
- Re: malloc()/realloc() - have I got this right?, CBFalconer, 20:00
- Re: strtok question, Ben Bacarisse, 19:37
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., Ben Bacarisse, 19:22
- Re: How to send a key event to another process?, Mirxon, 19:11
- Re: How to send a key event to another process?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 18:51
- Re: How to send a key event to another process?, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: is order urgent doubt, Keith Thompson, 18:30
- Re: function, Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: OK, I'm stumped, couldn't free string pointer list..., Bill Reid, 18:12
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:06
- Re: struct padding ???, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- How to send a key event to another process?, Mirxon, 18:05
- Re: private functions, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:55
- Re: printing error messages, Keith Thompson, 17:54
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 17:28
- Re: How to print an array of char backward., CBFalconer, 13:44
Privacy Policy