Re: Union trouble

[Richard Bos]

"Bartc" <bc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Is there a way of using unions transparently, so that the union name doesn't 
> get in the way?
> 
> So:
> 
> union {int a,b;} u;
> 
> a=1;
> 
> instead of:
> 
> u.a=1;

No.

> In particular when the union is inside a struct.

I believe Ganuck offers this as an extension, but it's not ISO C.

Richard