comp.lang.c (date)
April 30, 2008
- Re: Mixed case?, Ben Pfaff, 22:44
- Re: Mixed case?, Eric Sosman, 22:40
- Re: Mixed case?, Default User, 22:29
- Re: Mixed case?, John Bode, 22:24
- Re: Mixed case?, fnegroni, 22:07
- Mixed case?, s0suk3, 21:59
- Re: How can i emulate sizeof(), Keith Thompson, 20:41
- hot new stories, mickey333, 20:03
- Re: taking a "word" as input, Ben Bacarisse, 19:54
- Re: How can i emulate sizeof(), Kenneth Brody, 19:26
- Re: How can i emulate sizeof(), Eric Sosman, 19:20
- Re: taking a "word" as input, arnuld, 19:20
- How can i emulate sizeof(), Eugeny Myunster, 18:56
- Re: Doubt about array's name, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: Doubt about array's name, Keith Thompson, 18:28
- Siebel Automation Test Engineer, mam, 18:25
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 18:01
- Re: taking a "word" as input, arnuld, 17:54
- Re: Doubt about array's name, nembo kid, 17:04
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, jacob navia, 16:34
- Re: Doubt about array's name, Ofloo, 16:34
- Re: C is best, santosh, 16:32
- Re: taking a "word" as input, Nick Keighley, 16:20
- Re: Doubt about array's name, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
- Re: Temporarily close stdout?, Joakim Hove, 16:07
- Re: Temporarily close stdout?, Richard Tobin, 15:56
- Re: struct versioning, Eric Sosman, 15:52
- Re: taking a "word" as input, Nick Keighley, 15:43
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 15:42
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 15:40
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Chris Torek, 15:10
- Re: Temporarily close stdout?, Richard Tobin, 15:07
- Re: Temporarily close stdout?, Willem, 14:41
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 14:36
- Temporarily close stdout?, Joakim Hove, 14:36
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, JoseMariaSola, 13:43
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:24
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 12:22
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 10:49
- Re: C is best, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 10:40
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., Nick Keighley, 10:25
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 10:23
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Nick Keighley, 10:04
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 08:18
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 08:13
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., Ricky, 07:29
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Francois Grieu, 06:36
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Francois Grieu, 06:32
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Francois Grieu, 06:00
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jim Langston, 04:59
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jim Langston, 04:56
- Re: struct versioning, shuchaoo@xxxxxxxxx, 04:24
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., Barry Schwarz, 03:34
- Re: need help with arrays, Barry Schwarz, 03:34
- Re: bitshifting, Barry Schwarz, 03:34
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Barry Schwarz, 03:34
- Re: Insert a string into a string, Keith Thompson, 03:29
- Re: C is best, William Hughes, 02:21
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Thomas J. Gritzan, 01:56
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Keith Thompson, 01:36
- Re: sorting the input, Keith Thompson, 01:30
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Peter Nilsson, 01:13
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Keith Thompson, 00:53
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Default User, 00:45
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, user923005, 00:42
- Re: value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Peter Nilsson, 00:35
- value of the constant expression 1<<(1?1:1) < 0x9999, Francois Grieu, 00:03
April 29, 2008
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, user923005, 23:56
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, Keith Thompson, 23:32
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Default User, 23:30
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 23:26
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: struct versioning, Ernie Wright, 23:02
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, cr88192, 23:01
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, jacob navia, 23:00
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 22:51
- Re: bitshifting, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 22:45
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, jacob navia, 22:43
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 22:31
- Re: Why this program fails for larger input value ?, santosh, 22:12
- Re: Integer to string conversion, santosh, 22:03
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Sean G. McLaughlin, 22:00
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Ian Collins, 21:59
- Re: Integer to string conversion, pradeep, 21:51
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 21:44
- Re: Why this program fails for larger input value ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 21:38
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Default User, 21:36
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, user923005, 21:30
- Re: Why this program fails for larger input value ?, Kenneth Brody, 21:27
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, Keith Thompson, 21:27
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:14
- Why this program fails for larger input value ?, pereges, 21:14
- Why this program fails for larger input value ?, pereges, 21:06
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, user923005, 21:04
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, user923005, 21:00
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 20:38
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, JoseMariaSola, 20:35
- Re: C is best, Richard Heathfield, 20:34
- Re: Pascal2C convertor for windows enviourment, Richard Heathfield, 20:28
- Re: Power of two alignment (bit masks), christian.bau, 20:25
- Re: need help with arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 20:10
- Pascal2C convertor for windows enviourment, Twinkle, 19:56
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Default User, 19:42
- Re: need help with arrays, pereges, 19:34
- Re: C is best, Richard Tobin, 19:22
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., Sumit, 19:22
- Re: need help with arrays, pereges, 19:20
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, Richard Tobin, 19:18
- Re: struct versioning, Chris Torek, 19:12
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 19:12
- Re: Blank Post, santosh, 19:11
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 19:07
- Re: Portable replacement, thomas . mertes, 19:07
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 19:06
- Re: C is best, santosh, 19:04
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, JoseMariaSola, 19:04
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 19:01
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 18:56
- Re: need help with arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 18:50
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, JoseMariaSola, 18:47
- Re: 128 bit integer code needed, Keith Thompson, 18:38
- Re: C is best, santosh, 18:29
- struct versioning, Pres, 18:24
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Thomas J. Gritzan, 18:17
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Himanshu Chauhan, 18:05
- Re: C is best, pereges, 17:49
- Re: string splitting, santosh, 17:43
- Blank Post, Dexter, 17:38
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Clever Monkey, 17:31
- Re: taking a "word" as input, santosh, 17:23
- Re: Portable replacement, Ben Bacarisse, 17:11
- Re: C is best, fnegroni, 17:05
- Re: C is best, Ricky, 16:49
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 16:39
- Re: need help with arrays, pereges, 16:24
- need help with arrays, pereges, 16:16
- Re: Portable replacement, Thad Smith, 15:56
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., Nick Keighley, 15:42
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 15:38
- "Change your language and you change your thoughts.", Suganya, 15:35
- Re: Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, vippstar, 14:56
- Is cast operator unary or binary? How many operands?, JoseMariaSola, 14:45
- taking a "word" as input, arnuld, 14:27
- 128 bit integer code needed, jacob navia, 14:13
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., vippstar, 14:03
- Re: string splitting, xyz, 13:44
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., xyz, 13:43
- Re: string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., gNash, 13:36
- Power of two alignment (bit masks), RazvanD, 13:34
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 13:33
- Re: string splitting, fnegroni, 13:26
- string splitting plzzzzzz help me..., xyz, 13:24
- Пояса массажеры с термо-эффектом, Золотой Клон, 13:20
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 13:11
- Re: string splitting, xyz, 13:03
- Re: string splitting, xyz, 12:52
- Re: Portable replacement, Ben Bacarisse, 12:48
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 12:47
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jim Langston, 12:47
- Re: string splitting, Ian Collins, 12:43
- string splitting, xyz, 12:41
- Re: Integer to string conversion, pradeep, 12:22
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, arnuld, 12:10
- Re: bitshifting, Ben Bacarisse, 12:10
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 11:59
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 11:53
- Re: C is best, fnegroni, 11:47
- Re: taking a "word" as input, Nick Keighley, 11:47
- Re: Help with 2-level macro expansion, Ben Bacarisse, 11:43
- Re: C is best, nembo kid, 11:38
- Re: bitshifting, Ian Collins, 11:34
- Re: bitshifting, Ben Bacarisse, 11:18
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 11:16
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 11:10
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Ian Collins, 11:05
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 11:00
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:58
- Re: Portable replacement, Noob, 10:52
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:48
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Nick Keighley, 10:30
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 10:27
- Re: C is best, fnegroni, 09:36
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 09:29
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, Ulrich Eckhardt, 09:08
- Re: C is best, Sumit, 09:05
- Re: Help with 2-level macro expansion, Peter Nilsson, 08:24
- Re: C is best, Richard Heathfield, 08:15
- Re: C is best, Ricky, 07:42
- Re: bitshifting, Ian Collins, 06:31
- Re: systematic miscompilation of volatile accesses, Chris Thomasson, 06:29
- Re: bitshifting, Thad Smith, 06:26
- Re: Portable replacement, Thad Smith, 06:17
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Walter Roberson, 05:57
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Brian, 05:43
- systematic miscompilation of volatile accesses, John Regehr, 05:30
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Richard Heathfield, 05:17
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Peter Nilsson, 05:04
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Richard Heathfield, 05:03
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Richard Heathfield, 05:01
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, user923005, 04:32
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Walter Roberson, 04:31
- Re: // comments, William Hughes, 04:30
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jack Klein, 04:24
- Re: Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, shuchaoo@xxxxxxxxx, 04:20
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jack Klein, 04:16
- Using Algorithms to Represent A List Of Words, Brian, 03:08
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Keith Thompson, 02:56
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Keith Thompson, 02:54
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, David Tiktin, 02:04
- Re: Help with 2-level macro expansion, Srinivas Mudireddy, 01:54
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Juha Nieminen, 01:49
- Re: bitshifting, Ian Collins, 01:24
- Re: bitshifting, Ian Collins, 01:20
- Re: bitshifting, Ben Bacarisse, 01:17
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 01:15
- Re: // comments, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 01:09
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, Peter Nilsson, 00:52
- Re: Integer to string conversion, ppi, 00:46
- Re: Integer to string conversion, yang cheng, 00:41
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Jim Langston, 00:21
- Re: C is best, Yep, 00:20
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, Peter Nilsson, 00:16
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Bartc, 00:13
- Re: Integer to string conversion, peter koch, 00:11
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Default User, 00:09
- Re: bitshifting, thomas . mertes, 00:01
April 28, 2008
- Re: Integer to string conversion, Ian Collins, 23:43
- Re: C is best, Alef Veld, 23:42
- Integer to string conversion, pradeep, 23:38
- Re: bitshifting, Ian Collins, 23:32
- bitshifting, Alef Veld, 23:20
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, Keith Thompson, 23:02
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, thomas . mertes, 22:54
- Re: how this works ?, Keith Thompson, 22:45
- Re: Portable replacement, thomas . mertes, 22:00
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, user923005, 21:24
- Re: Portable replacement, suresh shenoy, 20:08
- Re: Portable replacement, pete, 19:58
- Re: A school for all your C/C++ language needs, Taygun Kekec, 19:43
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, arnuld, 19:41
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 19:13
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 19:10
- Re: sorting the input, Default User, 18:51
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Antoninus Twink, 18:49
- Re: fopen() with full path affecting subsequent fopen calls, Michel Rouzic, 18:48
- Re: Help with 2-level macro expansion, Ben Bacarisse, 18:43
- Re: A school for all your C/C++ language needs, bert, 18:30
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Kenny McCormack, 18:27
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Keith Thompson, 18:09
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 18:00
- FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, arnuld, 18:00
- Re: linking problem, Noob, 16:46
- Portable replacement, Noob, 16:38
- Re: time(), Joachim Schmitz, 16:36
- Re: time(), Joachim Schmitz, 16:30
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Yannick Tremblay, 16:27
- Re: fopen() with full path affecting subsequent fopen calls, Richard Tobin, 16:05
- Re: fopen() with full path affecting subsequent fopen calls, Bill Reid, 15:55
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), santosh, 15:43
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Kenny McCormack, 15:26
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, spl, 15:24
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Alexander Mahone, 15:21
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 15:00
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 14:31
- C is best, vgnsh2, 14:26
- Re: fopen() with full path affecting subsequent fopen calls, vippstar, 14:23
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, Richard Heathfield, 14:17
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Eric Sosman, 14:15
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, santosh, 14:14
- fopen() with full path affecting subsequent fopen calls, Michel Rouzic, 14:14
- gucci prada chanel sneakers from china suppliers, cnshoes65, 13:59
- Re: Garbage collection, Stuart, 13:53
- Re: server-side http libraries?, santosh, 13:29
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Richard Tobin, 13:20
- Re: FAQ 13.8, comparing strings, vippstar, 13:11
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 12:41
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 12:25
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 12:16
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Bartc, 12:13
- Re: problem with file i/o in binary, pereges, 12:09
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 12:05
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 11:48
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Steven Woody, 11:46
- Re: time(), Bartc, 11:38
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Kenny McCormack, 11:38
- Re: problem with file i/o in binary, Barry Schwarz, 11:29
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, spl, 11:13
- Re: Garbage collection, Stuart, 11:05
- Re: const problem, santosh, 10:48
- Re: const problem, pereges, 10:05
- Re: server-side http libraries?, santosh, 10:03
- problem with file i/o in binary, pereges, 10:01
- صوت فتاه ساقطه تستهزئ بالاسلام وتطعن بالرسول, مريم, 09:57
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, arnuld, 09:53
- Re: sorting the input, santosh, 09:51
- Re: sorting the input, santosh, 09:46
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 09:41
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 09:36
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 09:25
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 09:14
- Re: Garbage collection, Friedrich Dominicus, 09:01
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, Richard Heathfield, 08:52
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 08:31
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, arnuld, 08:19
- Re: Garbage collection, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:13
- Re: Garbage collection, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:09
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, Sumit, 07:44
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 07:33
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 07:33
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard Heathfield, 07:21
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 06:46
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 06:14
- Re: const problem, Ian Collins, 05:52
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 05:49
- Re: const problem, David Thompson, 05:36
- Re: Dynamically loop through array of structures, David Thompson, 05:36
- Re: Static checking of C programs with LCLint, David Thompson, 05:36
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 05:29
- Re: time(), pete, 05:17
- Re: Help with 2-level macro expansion, Peter Nilsson, 05:11
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, cr88192, 05:11
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:10
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:08
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:04
- Re: OT - Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Keith Thompson, 05:00
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 04:52
- Re: time(), Lew Pitcher, 04:51
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 04:49
- Re: OT - Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Ben Bacarisse, 04:43
- Re: time(), pete, 04:36
- Re: OT - Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Richard Harter, 04:25
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 03:53
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, Peter Nilsson, 03:31
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Peter Nilsson, 03:09
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Peter Nilsson, 03:06
- Re: time(), pete, 02:43
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Hans Schneider, 02:35
- Re: time(), Bartc, 02:30
- Re: fclose(0), pete, 02:10
- Re: converting int values to other formats, Walter Roberson, 01:28
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 01:05
- Re: converting int values to other formats, sunny, 00:59
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 00:59
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Ian Collins, 00:54
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 00:49
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, cr88192, 00:44
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 00:35
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 00:32
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 00:27
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, Jack Klein, 00:24
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, cr88192, 00:23
- Re: #define vs typedef, Jack Klein, 00:23
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 00:17
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard Tobin, 00:15
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Paul Hsieh, 00:14
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 00:12
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 00:09
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 00:07
April 27, 2008
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 23:57
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 23:50
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 23:49
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 23:48
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 23:44
- Re: Garbage collection, Gordon Burditt, 23:43
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 23:42
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 23:38
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 23:31
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 23:29
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 23:28
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 23:28
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, Keith Thompson, 23:17
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Roland Pibinger, 23:10
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 23:07
- Re: time(), Gordon Burditt, 23:07
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 22:58
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 22:53
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 22:48
- Re: time(), Gordon Burditt, 22:44
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 22:43
- Re: Collatz Conjecture, christian.bau, 22:31
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 22:30
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, santosh, 22:29
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 22:26
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 22:19
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, chang, 22:01
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:57
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, santosh, 21:56
- Re: // comments, santosh, 21:53
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, santosh, 21:51
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:41
- Re: // comments, Harald van Dijk, 21:39
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Kenny McCormack, 21:35
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, santosh, 21:33
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 21:30
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Paul Hsieh, 21:25
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 21:23
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:23
- Re: // comments, Keith Thompson, 21:22
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 21:21
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:21
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 21:19
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 21:14
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 21:11
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, santosh, 21:05
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, santosh, 21:03
- Re: // comments, santosh, 20:56
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, Walter Roberson, 20:54
- Re: how main() is called in C programme, Antoninus Twink, 20:51
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 20:51
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Walter Roberson, 20:50
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 20:48
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 20:45
- Help with 2-level macro expansion, Srinivas Mudireddy, 20:43
- how main() is called in C programme, chang, 20:43
- Re: // comments, Harald van Dijk, 20:24
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Antoninus Twink, 20:12
- Re: fclose(0), Ben Bacarisse, 20:12
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Ben Bacarisse, 20:08
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:27
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 19:16
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Flash Gordon, 19:14
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, CBFalconer, 19:14
- Re: how this works ?, Default User, 19:11
- Re: server-side http libraries?, santosh, 19:07
- Re: // comments, CBFalconer, 18:59
- Re: server-side http libraries?, Kenny McCormack, 18:57
- Re: Is this correct..??, nembo kid, 18:55
- server-side http libraries?, garyjefferson123, 18:53
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 18:49
- Re: // comments, Flash Gordon, 18:49
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Antoninus Twink, 18:43
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 18:42
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 18:40
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 18:38
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 18:28
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, CBFalconer, 18:21
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 18:04
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, Richard, 18:00
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 17:57
- Re: Garbage collection, CBFalconer, 17:46
- OT - Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, santosh, 17:43
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Steven Woody, 17:42
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Richard Harter, 17:41
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 17:39
- Re: atoi, CBFalconer, 17:39
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 17:38
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 17:37
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 17:34
- Re: // comments, jacob navia, 17:10
- Re: Garbage collection, Eligiusz Narutowicz, 17:05
- Re: how this works ?, santosh, 16:51
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 16:49
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Bartc, 16:40
- Re: how this works ?, santosh, 16:34
- Re: // comments, santosh, 16:22
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 16:16
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 16:08
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 16:04
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Richard, 16:00
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 15:59
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 15:57
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 15:57
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, Ben Bacarisse, 15:46
- Re: // comments, santosh, 15:44
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Kenny McCormack, 15:42
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Kenny McCormack, 15:39
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Kenny McCormack, 15:35
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Kenny McCormack, 15:33
- Re: // comments, Harald van Dijk, 15:27
- Re: // comments, santosh, 15:22
- Re: // comments, Flash Gordon, 15:15
- Re: Garbage collection, George Peter Staplin, 15:06
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 14:55
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: // comments, Bartc, 14:48
- Re: // comments, Harald van Dijk, 14:42
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Richard Heathfield, 14:41
- Re: Question on Wording, Harald van Dijk, 14:38
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 14:36
- Re: // comments, Richard Heathfield, 14:36
- Re: fclose(0), pete, 14:34
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 14:34
- Re: Question on Wording, Harald van Dijk, 14:33
- Re: // comments, santosh, 14:26
- Re: Question on Wording, pete, 14:24
- Re: linking problem, santosh, 14:18
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 14:16
- Re: atoi, Harald van Dijk, 13:58
- Re: Validating a string with sscanf, Sean G. McLaughlin, 13:49
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 13:48
- обруч спортивный, купить, Золотой Клон, 13:38
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Flash Gordon, 13:37
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Flash Gordon, 13:30
- Re: fclose(0), Ben Bacarisse, 13:27
- Re: // comments, Flash Gordon, 13:23
- Re: // comments, ymuntyan, 13:07
- Re: Garbage collection, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:05
- Re: // comments, ymuntyan, 13:02
- Re: linking problem, Antoninus Twink, 13:00
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Antoninus Twink, 12:55
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 12:52
- Re: Is this correct..??, Antoninus Twink, 12:51
- linking problem, vaib, 12:48
- Re: atoi, Keith Thompson, 12:47
- Validating a string with sscanf, Richard, 12:43
- Re: // comments, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 12:34
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: // comments, santosh, 12:22
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 12:21
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 12:20
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Old Wolf, 12:13
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, jacob navia, 12:13
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Old Wolf, 12:09
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Keith Thompson, 12:08
- Re: // comments, jacob navia, 12:05
- Re: Question on Wording, Hallvard B Furuseth, 11:52
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Chris Torek, 11:46
- Re: fclose(0), santosh, 11:39
- Re: // comments, Flash Gordon, 11:26
- Re: Is this correct..??, Barry Schwarz, 11:24
- Re: fclose(0), santosh, 11:19
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Flash Gordon, 11:18
- Re: fclose(0), santosh, 11:11
- Re: Problem setting signal handler, santosh, 10:59
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Malcolm McLean, 10:50
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Flash Gordon, 10:50
- Re: // comments, vippstar, 10:30
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, jacob navia, 10:28
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, santosh, 10:28
- Re: Question on Wording, santosh, 10:18
- Re: Is this correct..??, santosh, 10:16
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Antoninus Twink, 10:06
- Re: // comments, jacob navia, 09:59
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Richard, 09:52
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Richard, 09:50
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Yep, 09:49
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, santosh, 09:49
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Richard, 09:46
- #define vs typedef, sophia, 09:44
- Re: fclose(0), Ian Collins, 09:40
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 09:37
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Øyvind Røtvold, 09:30
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Yep, 09:25
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 09:24
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 09:24
- Re: // comments, Richard Heathfield, 09:22
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Øyvind Røtvold, 09:19
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Antoninus Twink, 09:17
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Yep, 09:15
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Øyvind Røtvold, 08:57
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Herbert Rosenau, 08:56
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Ian Collins, 08:34
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 08:33
- Re: // comments, Keith Thompson, 08:25
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 08:15
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Richard Heathfield, 08:13
- Re: // comments, jacob navia, 08:11
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 08:10
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 08:07
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 08:05
- Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Yep, 08:00
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 07:52
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Richard Heathfield, 07:49
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ian Collins, 07:38
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Walter Roberson, 07:38
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 07:36
- Re: fclose(0), Ian Collins, 07:34
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 07:33
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 07:32
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 07:31
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 07:24
- Re: Is this correct..??, Richard Heathfield, 07:16
- Re: Help with pointers and absolute memory addresses, Ian Collins, 07:13
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Richard Heathfield, 07:09
- Re: // comments, Richard Heathfield, 07:08
- Re: Is this correct..??, Ian Collins, 06:58
- Re: fclose(0), Ian Collins, 06:52
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 06:50
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Ian Collins, 06:46
- American Made Circuit Exercise Equipment, liukaiyuan, 06:42
- Is this correct..??, jt, 06:20
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 06:18
- Re: converting int values to other formats, Jack Klein, 06:14
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 06:02
- Re: fclose(0), Jack Klein, 06:02
- Re: converting int values to other formats, Walter Roberson, 05:56
- Re: converting int values to other formats, Ben Bacarisse, 05:54
- Re: Question on Wording, Jack Klein, 05:54
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 05:50
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 05:47
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 05:40
- Re: fclose(0), CBFalconer, 05:34
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Chris Torek, 05:30
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, CBFalconer, 05:20
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:16
- Re: converting int values to other formats, Sunil, 05:14
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:08
- Re: time(), Bill Cunningham, 05:05
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 05:04
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, CBFalconer, 04:47
- Re: atoi, CBFalconer, 04:44
- Re: sorting the input, CBFalconer, 04:39
- Re: time(), Keith Thompson, 04:28
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 04:18
- Re: time(), Thad Smith, 03:54
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 03:53
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Chris Torek, 03:31
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Tobin, 03:20
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Tobin, 03:16
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Richard Tobin, 03:09
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard Tobin, 02:58
- Re: fclose(0), lawrence . jones, 02:42
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 02:35
- Re: // comments, Ben Bacarisse, 02:22
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 02:11
- time(), Bill Cunningham, 02:07
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 02:07
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 02:06
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 01:50
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Flash Gordon, 01:45
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Lew Pitcher, 01:14
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 01:05
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 00:56
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, ymuntyan, 00:37
- // comments, jacob navia, 00:27
- Re: fclose(0), Chris Torek, 00:27
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, Chris Torek, 00:23
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, James Harris, 00:22
- Re: fclose(0), Eric Sosman, 00:06
April 26, 2008
- Re: how this works ?, Chris Torek, 23:57
- Re: Problem setting signal handler, Antoninus Twink, 23:50
- Re: how this works ?, Default User, 23:49
- Re: Problem setting signal handler, Martin Ambuhl, 23:44
- Problem setting signal handler, pradeep, 23:41
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Torek, 23:38
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Malcolm McLean, 23:31
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 23:29
- Re: fclose(0), Ian Collins, 23:26
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 23:14
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 23:07
- Re: fclose(0), Joe Wright, 22:55
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 22:41
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Walter Roberson, 22:30
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 22:25
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Malcolm McLean, 22:13
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 22:01
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, ymuntyan, 21:55
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Walter Roberson, 21:32
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Walter Roberson, 21:28
- Re: fclose(0), Lew Pitcher, 21:25
- Re: sorting the input, Harald van Dijk, 21:24
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Walter Roberson, 21:18
- Re: fclose(0), Eric Sosman, 21:09
- Re: fclose(0), Eric Sosman, 21:07
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 21:06
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 21:01
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, Barry Schwarz, 21:01
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Barry Schwarz, 21:01
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 21:01
- Re: Question on Wording, Eric Sosman, 20:56
- Re: sorting the input, Joe Wright, 20:55
- Re: Collatz Conjecture, santosh, 20:52
- Very good CGI Programming text book, tutorialwebs, 20:43
- Re: Question on Wording, Keith Thompson, 20:37
- WebGoo 4.0.0, webgoo4, 20:34
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 20:23
- Re: Collatz Conjecture, Lew Pitcher, 20:23
- Re: Collatz Conjecture, Antoninus Twink, 20:20
- Re: fclose(0), Keith Thompson, 20:18
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Øyvind Røtvold, 20:18
- Collatz Conjecture, Dexter, 20:16
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 20:14
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 20:11
- Re: atoi, Keith Thompson, 20:08
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, osmium, 19:54
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Richard, 19:40
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Richard, 19:39
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:28
- Re: fclose(0), Ben Pfaff, 19:14
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 19:10
- Re: how this works ?, santosh, 18:56
- Re: fclose(0), Antoninus Twink, 18:55
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 18:51
- Re: fclose(0), Default User, 18:48
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Harald van Dijk, 18:47
- Re: Insert a string into a string, Default User, 18:46
- Re: how this works ?, Default User, 18:44
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Antoninus Twink, 18:43
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Default User, 18:37
- Re: fclose(0), Ben Bacarisse, 18:37
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Richard, 18:33
- Re: Question on Wording, muntyan, 18:25
- Re: fclose(0), Richard, 18:25
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 18:21
- Re: fclose(0), Bartc, 18:21
- Re: sorting the input, Harald van Dijk, 17:54
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 17:41
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Richard, 17:32
- Re: Garbage collection, Ben Bacarisse, 17:30
- Re: fclose(0), Ben Bacarisse, 17:27
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, santosh, 17:26
- Re: fclose(0), Richard, 17:23
- Re: fclose(0), santosh, 17:21
- Re: fclose(0), Richard Heathfield, 17:19
- fclose(0), Bartc, 17:06
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 16:27
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Flash Gordon, 16:09
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Flash Gordon, 16:08
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, santosh, 16:05
- Re: Insert a string into a string, Richard, 16:00
- Re: Insert a string into a string, santosh, 15:53
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Antoninus Twink, 15:39
- Re: how this works ?, santosh, 15:33
- Re: Insert a string into a string, Richard, 15:32
- Re: Question on Wording, Richard Heathfield, 15:31
- Re: Question on Wording, pete, 15:27
- Re: Insert a string into a string, santosh, 15:26
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Ben Bacarisse, 15:23
- Re: Question on Wording, Eric Sosman, 15:21
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, santosh, 15:18
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Richard, 15:16
- Re: Question on Wording, santosh, 15:13
- Re: how this works ?, pete, 15:06
- Question on Wording, Paulo Jorge de O. C. de Matos, 15:00
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Serve Laurijssen, 14:58
- Re: Insert a string into a string, Eric Sosman, 14:50
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 14:49
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Antoninus Twink, 14:43
- Insert a string into a string, HansWernerMarschke, 14:38
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Sensei, 14:30
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Malcolm McLean, 14:11
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, santosh, 14:11
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 14:06
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Richard, 13:42
- Re: how this works ?, Richard, 13:39
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Ben Bacarisse, 13:39
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, santosh, 13:37
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, jacob navia, 13:29
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 13:28
- Re: how this works ?, santosh, 13:15
- Re: C aptitude, Flash Gordon, 13:10
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 12:50
- корректирующее белье Maidenform, Золотой Клон, 12:43
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Malcolm McLean, 12:39
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 12:29
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Walter Roberson, 12:28
- Re: Garbage collection, Malcolm McLean, 12:27
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 12:26
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, santosh, 12:24
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Martin Ambuhl, 12:23
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 12:23
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, santosh, 12:16
- Re: Problem with the incrementation of pointer, santosh, 12:15
- Re: C aptitude, Malcolm McLean, 12:13
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Malcolm McLean, 12:01
- Re: Another dynamic memory doubt, Antoninus Twink, 11:59
- Re: Problem with the incrementation of pointer, HansWernerMarschke, 11:55
- Another dynamic memory doubt, pradeep, 11:46
- Re: Garbage collection, vippstar, 11:43
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard, 11:38
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:35
- Re: cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, vippstar, 11:34
- cast multi-dimension array to pointer: T[][] to T*, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:26
- Re: Garbage collection, Herbert Rosenau, 11:15
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Herbert Rosenau, 11:15
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Herbert Rosenau, 11:15
- Re: Garbage collection, Herbert Rosenau, 11:15
- Re: [OT] C programming question, Joachim Schmitz, 11:12
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 10:56
- OT - Re: C programming question, santosh, 10:06
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 10:01
- Re: C aptitude, Barry Schwarz, 09:48
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 09:16
- Re: Garbage collection, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:37
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 08:18
- Re: Garbage collection, rio, 07:57
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Ian Collins, 06:37
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), sophia, 06:30
- Re: Garbage collection, Ian Collins, 06:26
- Re: renew() an array?, Keith Thompson, 06:22
- Re: Garbage collection, Keith Thompson, 06:16
- Re: Garbage collection, user923005, 06:00
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 05:41
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Richard Heathfield, 04:58
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 04:47
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 04:40
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard Heathfield, 04:36
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), pete, 04:32
- New Donwload offer..., Chinmay, 04:31
- Re: a fanny question, Chris Torek, 04:14
- Re: sorting the input, Chris Torek, 04:02
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, user923005, 03:37
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Dann Corbit, 03:19
- Re: Garbage collection, Paul Hsieh, 03:12
- Re: C programming question, user923005, 02:52
- Re: Moronic reference site, Doug Miller, 02:42
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Torek, 02:38
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, James Harris, 02:35
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ben Bacarisse, 02:17
- Re: renew() an array?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:11
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Bartc, 02:03
- Re: Garbage collection, lawrence . jones, 02:01
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), lawrence . jones, 02:00
- Re: Garbage collection, Gordon Burditt, 01:47
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Ben Bacarisse, 01:44
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 01:42
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ian Collins, 01:32
- Re: lcc-win32 conformance question, Ian Collins, 01:32
- lcc-win32 conformance question, teapot, 01:17
- Re: Garbage collection, Bartc, 01:02
- Re: C programming question, Erwin Lindemann, 00:56
- Re: Garbage collection, user923005, 00:56
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 00:34
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 00:33
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Flash Gordon, 00:30
- Re: renew() an array?, Walter Roberson, 00:25
- Re: renew() an array?, santosh, 00:25
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 00:20
- Re: renew() an array?, Antoninus Twink, 00:20
- Re: renew() an array?, Andrey Tarasevich, 00:18
- renew() an array?, pradeep, 00:15
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 00:13
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 00:13
April 25, 2008
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, CBFalconer, 23:48
- Re: C aptitude, Flash Gordon, 23:48
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Richard, 23:44
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 23:42
- Re: Garbage collection, CBFalconer, 23:38
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, alasham . said, 23:31
- Re: Garbage collection, Flash Gordon, 23:30
- Re: Garbage collection, Keith Thompson, 23:27
- Re: Garbage collection, Paul Hsieh, 23:23
- Re: C aptitude, santosh, 23:23
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard Tobin, 23:19
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 23:09
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Antoninus Twink, 23:09
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 23:08
- Re: atoi, CBFalconer, 23:05
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Paul Hsieh, 22:59
- Re: Garbage collection, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: Garbage collection, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Lew Pitcher, 22:30
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Ian Collins, 22:18
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Ix, 22:18
- Re: Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, Walter Roberson, 22:17
- Re: Garbage collection, Gordon Burditt, 22:15
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 22:15
- Is malloc() function provided in <stdlib.h> thread-safe?, climber . cui, 22:12
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Dann Corbit, 22:07
- Re: Garbage collection, Dann Corbit, 22:05
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, CBFalconer, 22:04
- Re: Garbage collection, Chris Thomasson, 22:01
- Re: __stdcall alternative, CBFalconer, 22:00
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 21:59
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 21:52
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Flash Gordon, 21:46
- Re: atoi, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 21:46
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 21:44
- Re: sorting the input, lawrence . jones, 21:44
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, Flash Gordon, 21:38
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 21:36
- Re: Garbage collection, William Ahern, 21:33
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, James Harris, 21:31
- Re: Garbage collection, santosh, 21:25
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Flash Gordon, 21:21
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Flash Gordon, 21:17
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 21:16
- Re: Garbage collection, Richard, 21:16
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 21:09
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 21:04
- Re: udp multicast server and client, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 21:00
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Flash Gordon, 20:50
- Re: Garbage collection, Eric Sosman, 20:47
- C aptitude, aarklon, 20:42
- Re: Garbage collection, Gordon Burditt, 20:34
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, James Harris, 20:33
- Re: Garbage collection, user923005, 20:13
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Martin Ambuhl, 19:37
- Re: Garbage collection, jacob navia, 19:36
- Re: Garbage collection, Yunzhong, 19:32
- Re: Newbie. Microsoft Visual Express 2008. Problem with Assignment, lawrence . jones, 18:59
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Kenny McCormack, 18:55
- Re: atoi, Chris Dollin, 18:53
- Re: atoi, Keith Thompson, 18:44
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Keith Thompson, 18:23
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Noob, 18:13
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 18:12
- Re: udp multicast server and client, Antoninus Twink, 18:12
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), fred . l . kleinschmidt, 18:06
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Ben Bacarisse, 18:05
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Antoninus Twink, 17:55
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, Ben Bacarisse, 17:32
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Chris Dollin, 17:14
- Re: Problem with the incrementation of pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 16:56
- Re: Problem with the incrementation of pointer, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 16:53
- Re: C programming question, Kenneth Brody, 16:53
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, adinda, 16:52
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Richard Tobin, 16:50
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, adinda, 16:48
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Eric Sosman, 16:43
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Joachim Schmitz, 16:42
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Joachim Schmitz, 16:37
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Antoninus Twink, 16:35
- Re: atoi, Ben Bacarisse, 16:35
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Antoninus Twink, 16:33
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Antoninus Twink, 16:29
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, Ben Bacarisse, 16:28
- Re: translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, dj3vande, 16:18
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Joachim Schmitz, 16:11
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Joachim Schmitz, 16:02
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, CBFalconer, 16:02
- Problem with the incrementation of pointer, HansWernerMarschke, 15:58
- Re: a fanny question, pete, 15:57
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Bartc, 15:56
- Re: sorting the input, CBFalconer, 15:53
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Bartc, 15:47
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 15:46
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 15:26
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, spl, 15:23
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Chris Dollin, 15:03
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, spl, 14:51
- Re: Garbage collection, cr88192, 14:48
- translation from matlab to C object containing matrices undefined length of object, adinda, 14:25
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, Eric Sosman, 14:18
- Garbage collection, jacob navia, 14:16
- Re: How to replace /(division) operator, jacob navia, 14:06
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Richard Heathfield, 13:59
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), Martien Verbruggen, 13:56
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 13:44
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), Barry Schwarz, 13:44
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 13:44
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Barry Schwarz, 13:44
- Re: atoi, Barry Schwarz, 13:44
- How to replace /(division) operator, spl, 13:37
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Sam, 13:11
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Bartc, 12:49
- Re: Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Ben Bacarisse, 12:32
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Richard Tobin, 12:19
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, Juha Nieminen, 12:00
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Richard Heathfield, 11:53
- Re: __stdcall alternative, vippstar, 11:43
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), CBFalconer, 11:42
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Richard Heathfield, 11:31
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), Eugeny Myunster, 11:27
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), santosh, 11:16
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Nick Keighley, 11:14
- Re: __stdcall alternative, santosh, 11:13
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), sophia, 11:12
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), santosh, 11:10
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Nick Keighley, 11:06
- Re: x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), santosh, 11:06
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 11:03
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 11:00
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Willem, 10:53
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), sophia, 10:38
- x % y = ( x -(x/y) * y), sophia, 10:30
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, sophia, 10:20
- Re: scanf("%d. %d. %d",&d,&m,&y);, santosh, 10:18
- Re: scanf("%d. %d. %d",&d,&m,&y);, Ian Collins, 10:16
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 10:15
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Ian Collins, 10:13
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 10:11
- scanf("%d. %d. %d",&d,&m,&y);, sophia, 10:09
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), santosh, 10:07
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), sophia, 10:05
- Re: printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), Ian Collins, 09:56
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, asterisc, 09:51
- printf("%d",*(&ptr2 + 2)), sophia, 09:51
- Can not `setlocale(3)' more than once in Linux, Steven Woody, 09:37
- Re: error and warning, santosh, 09:31
- Re: sorting the input, santosh, 09:24
- Re: sorting the input, santosh, 09:18
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Flash Gordon, 09:08
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Sensei, 09:01
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Willem, 08:47
- Re: atoi, Nezhate, 08:42
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 08:32
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Flash Gordon, 08:23
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, CBFalconer, 07:50
- Re: sorting the input, CBFalconer, 07:40
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, user923005, 06:47
- Re: udp multicast server and client, Ian Collins, 06:38
- Re: udp multicast server and client, Richard Heathfield, 06:30
- udp multicast server and client, skpopu, 06:18
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, kasthurirangan . balaji, 05:18
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Richard Heathfield, 04:59
- Re: Need Hashmap in C AND C++, user923005, 04:55
- Re: error and warning, mdh, 04:54
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, user923005, 04:53
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Jack Klein, 04:27
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Jack Klein, 04:21
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, flydream, 04:21
- Re: Newbie. Microsoft Visual Express 2008. Problem with Assignment, Barry Schwarz, 04:00
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 04:00
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 04:00
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Stephen Sprunk, 03:58
- Re: a fanny question, user923005, 03:38
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, user923005, 03:33
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Eric Sosman, 03:27
- Re: best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Richard Heathfield, 03:24
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 03:14
- best way to suppress "unused" warning?, Rex Mottram, 03:05
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 02:54
- Re: a fanny question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:38
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:32
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, ymuntyan, 02:29
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 02:22
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 02:17
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 02:02
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Richard Tobin, 01:48
- Re: __stdcall alternative, CBFalconer, 01:47
- Re: [OT] __stdcall alternative, CBFalconer, 01:39
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Marta Grudziñska, 01:37
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Kenny McCormack, 01:31
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Don Bruder, 00:56
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 00:54
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Ian Collins, 00:38
- Re: Newbie. Microsoft Visual Express 2008. Problem with Assignment, Walter Roberson, 00:32
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:32
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Eric Sosman, 00:26
- Newbie. Microsoft Visual Express 2008. Problem with Assignment, HansWernerMarschke, 00:26
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:23
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Walter Roberson, 00:22
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Flash Gordon, 00:21
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Richard Tobin, 00:20
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:20
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Keith Thompson, 00:20
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Bartc, 00:16
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Richard Tobin, 00:13
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:12
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Ian Collins, 00:11
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:07
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:05
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 00:04
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Ian Collins, 00:03
April 24, 2008
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Keith Thompson, 23:51
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Eric Sosman, 23:34
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 23:25
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 23:24
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Eric Sosman, 23:21
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Keith Thompson, 23:20
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Keith Thompson, 23:05
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 23:04
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Antoninus Twink, 23:02
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 22:59
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 22:58
- Re: __stdcall alternative, jacob navia, 22:56
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Jensen Somers, 22:55
- Re: What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Dann Corbit, 22:44
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Flash Gordon, 22:39
- Re: __stdcall alternative, Ian Collins, 22:37
- __stdcall alternative, Bartc, 22:31
- What the fastest algorithm for find max/min in an array of integers?, Eugeny Myunster, 22:28
- Re: Random IO Read, Antoninus Twink, 22:26
- Re: Random IO Read, Walter Roberson, 22:14
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Rui Maciel, 22:13
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Antoninus Twink, 22:08
- Re: Random IO Read, Antoninus Twink, 22:05
- Re: Using C for game development, Dann Corbit, 22:01
- Re: Using C for game development, Malcolm McLean, 21:55
- Re: Random IO Read, Walter Roberson, 21:51
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, santosh, 21:23
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Antoninus Twink, 21:23
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), santosh, 21:17
- Re: Random IO Read, Antoninus Twink, 21:13
- Re: answer this question, Antoninus Twink, 21:10
- Re: Random IO Read, Walter Roberson, 20:52
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, user923005, 20:51
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Antoninus Twink, 20:50
- Re: ubuntu and its C compiler, Walter Roberson, 20:47
- Re: dealing with huge data, user923005, 20:45
- Re: Wit-to-whine ratios, Antoninus Twink, 20:44
- Re: answer this question, Walter Roberson, 20:44
- Re: Random IO Read, Antoninus Twink, 20:34
- Re: error and warning, mdh, 20:34
- ubuntu and its C compiler, Ix, 20:32
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, Antoninus Twink, 20:31
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, user923005, 20:31
- Re: answer this question, Erik Trulsson, 20:30
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Antoninus Twink, 20:26
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, CBFalconer, 20:23
- Re: C programming question, Antoninus Twink, 20:21
- Re: error and warning, CBFalconer, 20:04
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Flash Gordon, 20:01
- Re: sorting the input, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: sorting the input, CBFalconer, 19:00
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, Victor Bazarov, 18:29
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Noob, 18:14
- Re: Are there statistics packages in ANSI C and/or ANSI C++?, jacob navia, 18:02
- Re: error and warning, Ben Bacarisse, 17:44
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Noob, 17:36
- Re: error and warning, mdh, 17:17
- Re: error and warning, mdh, 17:15
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, John Bode, 17:13
- Re: error and warning, santosh, 16:34
- Re: dealing with huge data, santosh, 16:30
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 16:29
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 16:25
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Bacarisse, 16:17
- Re: error and warning, Ben Bacarisse, 16:12
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 15:12
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 15:01
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, arnuld, 14:58
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 14:58
- error and warning, mdh, 14:55
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 14:54
- Re: dealing with huge data, pereges, 14:46
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 14:23
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 14:19
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Tobin, 14:10
- Re: Random IO Read, Ian Collins, 14:08
- Re: sorting the input, Ian Collins, 14:03
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 13:42
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 13:41
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: atoi, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: Random IO Read, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: sorting the input, Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Barry Schwarz, 13:33
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 13:25
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 13:25
- Re: ansi c & SSL, Noob, 13:10
- Овощерезка nicer dicer, Золотой Клон, 13:06
- Re: dealing with huge data, arnuld, 13:01
- Re: dealing with huge data, arnuld, 12:59
- Designer Gucci Aviatrix Large Boston Bag - Dark Coffee 186235coffee Handbags, Luxury, Fake,Inspired, blog585, 12:57
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., arnuld, 12:52
- Re: atoi, Richard Heathfield, 12:42
- Re: Wit-to-whine ratios, jacob navia, 12:36
- Re: atoi, santosh, 12:35
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 12:26
- Re: sorting the input, santosh, 12:21
- Re: sorting the input, Richard Heathfield, 12:20
- Re: atoi, Richard Heathfield, 12:18
- Re: Wit-to-whine ratios, Richard Heathfield, 12:14
- ansi c & SSL, Marta Grudziñska, 11:46
- atoi, Nezhate, 11:33
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Nick Keighley, 11:22
- Wit-to-whine ratios, James Dow Allen, 11:15
- Re: dealing with huge data, Nick Keighley, 11:12
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., santosh, 11:09
- Re: dealing with huge data, Bartc, 11:08
- Re: Random IO Read, santosh, 11:05
- Random IO Read, moonhkt, 10:48
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Mahesh, 10:41
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Mahesh, 10:40
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Chris Dollin, 09:50
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Chris Dollin, 09:38
- Re: "libdb-4.2.la" not found, santosh, 09:24
- "libdb-4.2.la" not found, Sumit, 09:07
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., santosh, 08:47
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., santosh, 08:46
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 08:39
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 08:16
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Keith Thompson, 08:04
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 08:01
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, muntyan, 07:53
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Harald van Dijk, 07:35
- Re: C programming question, CBFalconer, 07:22
- Re: dealing with huge data, CBFalconer, 07:16
- Re: dealing with huge data, Gordon Burditt, 07:11
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 06:39
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Chad, 06:19
- Re: Amazon Interview Question on Doubly Linked List, Plz help, pete, 06:18
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 06:07
- Re: While and fgets, Barry Schwarz, 05:45
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 05:45
- Re: a fanny question, pete, 05:24
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 05:22
- Re: C programming question, Walter Roberson, 05:16
- Re: dealing with huge data, pereges, 05:16
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 05:11
- Re: sorting the input, pete, 04:55
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 04:48
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 04:38
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Peter Nilsson, 04:35
- [OT] Re: C programming question, Eric Sosman, 04:35
- Re: C programming question, Marco A. Cruz Quevedo, 04:03
- Re: Using C for game development, copx, 03:39
- Re: C programming question, Gordon Burditt, 03:20
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, CBFalconer, 03:03
- Re: C programming question, user923005, 02:31
- Re: dealing with huge data, user923005, 02:30
- Re: C programming question, Joe Wright, 02:09
- Re: dealing with huge data, Richard Heathfield, 02:00
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Dann Corbit, 01:40
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Joe Wright, 01:36
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Ben Bacarisse, 01:24
- Re: answer this question, Anonymous, 01:23
- Re: answer this question, Flash Gordon, 01:08
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Walter Roberson, 01:08
- Re: C programming question, Dann Corbit, 01:03
- Re: C programming question, Walter Roberson, 00:58
- Re: dealing with huge data, CBFalconer, 00:55
- C programming question, Herr von Ribbeck aus Ribbeck im Havelland, 00:54
- Headset Mics - OEM Headset Mics Manufacturer, blog144, 00:39
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Keith Thompson, 00:34
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., CBFalconer, 00:34
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, CBFalconer, 00:27
- Re: How to know linked Files, Gordon Burditt, 00:08
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Keith Thompson, 00:07
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Keith Thompson, 00:03
April 23, 2008
- Re: answer this question, Kenny McCormack, 23:27
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Walter Roberson, 23:15
- Handheld Mics - OEM Handheld Mics Manufacturer, blog085, 23:12
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, jacob navia, 23:05
- Re: answer this question, Richard Heathfield, 23:04
- Re: answer this question, Richard, 23:01
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Richard Heathfield, 22:56
- Re: answer this question, Walter Roberson, 22:50
- Re: answer this question, Antoninus Twink, 22:36
- Re: A question of Precedence: Two functions from a C stack., Eric Sosman, 22:35
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Flash Gordon, 22:29
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Antoninus Twink, 22:28
- Re: answer this question, jacob navia, 22:27
- Re: answer this question, Antoninus Twink, 22:18
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, jon, 22:15
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Walter Roberson, 22:09
- Re: How to know linked Files, soscpd, 22:04
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, jon, 21:59
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Walter Roberson, 21:53
- Re: dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, Walter Roberson, 21:51
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), jon, 21:49
- A question of Precedence: Two functions from a C stack., benmarco7, 21:44
- Re: avl tree, Ben Pfaff, 21:37
- dragging a file to a textbox, and a filename appearing, jon, 21:31
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Pfaff, 21:18
- Re: avl tree, sophia, 21:16
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Anonymous, 21:14
- Wireless Mics - OEM Wireless Mics Manufacturer, blog680, 20:48
- China Handheld Microphone - OEM Handheld Microphone Manufacturer, blog677, 20:43
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), santosh, 19:54
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., santosh, 19:51
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Walter Roberson, 19:46
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Mahesh, 19:40
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Ben Bacarisse, 19:32
- China Headset Microphone - OEM Headset Microphone Manufacturer, blog635, 19:30
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Mahesh, 19:29
- Re: dealing with huge data, santosh, 19:25
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Ben Bacarisse, 19:09
- Re: dealing with huge data, Kenneth Brody, 18:58
- Re: dealing with huge data, pereges, 18:55
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Angus, 18:40
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Angus, 18:37
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Re: srinivas, santosh, 18:28
- dealing with huge data, pereges, 18:28
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), santosh, 18:28
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, muntyan, 18:25
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Richard Tobin, 18:19
- Re: Timer in C (like in Java), Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: How to know linked Files, Ben Bacarisse, 18:11
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Keith Thompson, 18:09
- Re: answer this question, jacob navia, 18:06
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, jacob navia, 17:58
- Conference Microphone - China Conference Microphone Manufacturer, blog585, 17:58
- Re: answer this question, Kenneth Brody, 17:55
- Re: answer this question, jacob navia, 17:55
- Re: How to know linked Files, Kenneth Brody, 17:52
- Timer in C (like in Java), Alexander Mahone, 17:45
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Ben Bacarisse, 17:45
- Re: casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Ben Bacarisse, 17:19
- Re: answer this question, Kenny McCormack, 17:08
- casting question - i64 = *((__int64*)&d);, Angus, 17:04
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Martin, 16:41
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Martin, 16:39
- Re: How to know linked Files, lithiumcat, 16:29
- Re: How to know linked Files, Eric Sosman, 16:26
- Re: answer this question, jacob navia, 16:17
- Re: answer this question, Kenny McCormack, 15:53
- Re: a fanny question, Doug Miller, 15:30
- Newest sports shoes, glof, Accept paypal or westen union,AAA quality,Low price., shoeswholeseller2005, 15:23
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Ed Prochak, 15:10
- srinivas, chinna, 15:08
- Re: How to know linked Files, rayuthar, 15:01
- Re: How to know linked Files, rayuthar, 14:57
- Re: Using C for game development, cr88192, 14:54
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Richard Tobin, 14:52
- Re: How to know linked Files, Eric Sosman, 14:50
- Re: How to know linked Files, suresh shenoy, 14:47
- How to know linked Files, rayuthar, 14:23
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Noob, 14:17
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 14:17
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 14:09
- OEM Microphone - China OEM Microphone Manufacturer, blog592, 13:53
- Wireless Microphone - China Wireless Microphone Manufacturer, blog592, 13:52
- Re: answer this question, jacob navia, 13:50
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, cr88192, 13:39
- Re: Help, vippstar, 13:24
- Re: Sliding window and wrap-around, Richard Tobin, 13:19
- Re: While and fgets, CBFalconer, 13:15
- Re: Help, Richard Heathfield, 13:12
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 13:00
- Re: Using C for game development, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Help, kimpopin, 12:51
- часы с пульсомером Beurer PM60, Золотой Клон, 12:46
- Re: Using C for game development, fnegroni, 12:34
- Sliding window and wrap-around, Noob, 12:20
- answer this question, vamsee . maha, 12:08
- Re: Unpacking 12bits integer type into 16bits, mathieu, 11:51
- Re: Using C for game development, Richard Heathfield, 11:13
- Re: a fanny question, Nick Keighley, 10:45
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 09:56
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 09:47
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 09:24
- Using C for game development, pereges, 09:05
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, arnuld, 08:54
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 08:48
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 08:43
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 08:43
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 08:42
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 08:33
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 08:31
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, user923005, 08:15
- Re: a fanny question, xinxin, 07:39
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Keith Thompson, 07:28
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 07:26
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 07:25
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 07:14
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 07:00
- Re: sorting the input, arnuld, 05:43
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 05:42
- Re: While and fgets, Nezhate, 05:39
- Re: a fanny question, Ian Collins, 03:38
- Re: a fanny question, CBFalconer, 03:23
- Re: a fanny question, Keith Thompson, 03:14
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, CBFalconer, 03:10
- Re: a fanny question, xinxin, 02:44
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Ian Collins, 02:39
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:30
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, lawrence . jones, 02:23
- Re: diff o/p, lawrence . jones, 02:23
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lawrence . jones, 02:22
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 02:19
- Re: a fanny question, Peter Nilsson, 02:17
- Re: concatenating strings, Russell Wood, 02:02
- Re: how to specify power of number, lawrence . jones, 01:47
- Re: a fanny question, Sjouke Burry, 01:35
- Re: long double, Dik T. Winter, 01:22
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, Keith Thompson, 01:19
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Keith Thompson, 01:17
- Re: 'half' floating point type, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 01:12
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, Keith Thompson, 01:10
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Pfaff, 01:10
- Re: 'half' floating point type, Dann Corbit, 00:46
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, Antoninus Twink, 00:42
- Re: long double, user923005, 00:35
- Re: long double, user923005, 00:31
- Re: 'half' floating point type, CBFalconer, 00:30
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, CBFalconer, 00:23
- Re: 'half' floating point type, Walter Roberson, 00:19
April 22, 2008
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., CBFalconer, 23:55
- 'half' floating point type, mathieu, 23:42
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, CBFalconer, 23:28
- Re: long double, CBFalconer, 23:21
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, CBFalconer, 23:17
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, Ian Collins, 23:09
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, pradeep, 23:06
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Douglas A. Gwyn, 22:11
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., m . w . kooiman, 21:22
- Re: Getting path components, Malcolm McLean, 21:20
- sorting the input, arnuld, 20:59
- Re: Getting path components, Kenneth Brody, 20:52
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Willem, 20:28
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., jacob navia, 20:26
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Pfaff, 20:22
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Bacarisse, 20:22
- Re: Getting path components, santosh, 20:21
- Re: a fanny question, santosh, 20:03
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Harald van Dijk, 19:53
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Spiros Bousbouras, 19:45
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Richard, 19:44
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Spiros Bousbouras, 19:44
- Re: avl tree, Ben Pfaff, 19:38
- Re: Getting path components, Flash Gordon, 19:37
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Bacarisse, 19:35
- Re: concatenating strings, Flash Gordon, 19:31
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, Harald van Dijk, 19:19
- Re: signals blocking, Antoninus Twink, 19:10
- Re: signals blocking, santosh, 19:04
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, santosh, 18:57
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, arnuld, 18:41
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ben Pfaff, 18:34
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 18:32
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, arnuld, 18:32
- Re: a fanny question, Bartc, 18:22
- signals blocking, wongjoekmeu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:13
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 18:08
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 18:08
- Re: is this portable?, orotvold, 17:53
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 17:50
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 17:48
- avl tree, sophia, 17:40
- Re: sorting the input, Joachim Schmitz, 17:34
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), John Bode, 17:34
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), Bartc, 17:10
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 16:52
- Re: a fanny question, Eric Sosman, 16:50
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 16:50
- Re: a fanny question, bryan-webelos, 16:48
- Re: sorting the input, Nick Keighley, 16:42
- Re: a fanny question, xinxin, 16:41
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, Richard Tobin, 16:37
- Re: Getting path components, Aaron Gray, 16:33
- Re: a fanny question, zerg, 16:30
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Walter Banks, 16:18
- Re: a fanny question, Joachim Schmitz, 16:10
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), Joachim Schmitz, 16:09
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Hallvard B Furuseth, 16:05
- a fanny question, xinxin, 16:03
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Joachim Schmitz, 16:01
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 15:21
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 15:18
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, vippstar, 14:53
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 14:17
- Re: sorting the input, Ben Bacarisse, 14:05
- Re: Getting path components, Bartc, 13:39
- Re: sorting the input, Nick Keighley, 13:33
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), Freshers Jobs, 13:00
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), vippstar, 12:44
- Re: concatenating strings, clinisbut, 12:42
- Re: Test C Skill [Online Exam), Richard Heathfield, 12:34
- Test C Skill [Online Exam), Freshers Jobs, 12:26
- Re: concatenating strings, vippstar, 12:14
- Re: Getting path components, Bartc, 12:02
- Re: Getting path components, Bartc, 12:02
- Re: While and fgets, kooladi, 11:21
- Re: Efficient strcat implementation., Ian Collins, 11:10
- Re: Getting path components, Kenny McCormack, 11:05
- concatenating strings, clinisbut, 10:48
- Re: character conversion, Richard Heathfield, 10:44
- Re: character conversion, Keith Thompson, 10:35
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, Keith Thompson, 10:28
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 10:25
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, Keith Thompson, 10:15
- While and fgets, Nezhate, 10:14
- Re: without main(), Keith Thompson, 10:11
- Efficient strcat implementation., Mahesh, 10:10
- Re: without main(), Flash Gordon, 09:34
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, Flash Gordon, 09:31
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Flash Gordon, 09:29
- Re: character conversion, Richard Heathfield, 09:13
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 08:30
- Re: without main(), harini, 07:13
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Harald van Dijk, 06:46
- Re: long double, Dann Corbit, 05:34
- Re: Getting path components, user923005, 05:17
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, user923005, 05:01
- comp.lang.c charter, moderator, 03:46
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 03:30
- Re: how to specify power of number, Eric Sosman, 03:25
- Re: Getting path components, Aaron Gray, 03:18
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Dik T. Winter, 03:15
- Re: Getting path components, Walter Roberson, 03:15
- Re: Getting path components, Bartc, 02:58
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, James Harris, 02:56
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, CBFalconer, 02:53
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, CBFalconer, 02:44
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Walter Roberson, 02:41
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, CBFalconer, 02:40
- Re: diff o/p, CBFalconer, 02:35
- Re: diff o/p, Barry Schwarz, 02:32
- Re: implementation of drand48() as given in steve summit's book, Barry Schwarz, 02:32
- Re: GDBM prototype magic., Barry Schwarz, 02:32
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Barry Schwarz, 02:32
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, CBFalconer, 02:26
- Re: character conversion, mdh, 02:17
- Re: character conversion, mdh, 02:16
- Re: character conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 02:09
- Re: character conversion, Walter Roberson, 02:08
- Re: Implementing DataBase concepts using C, user923005, 01:57
- Re: Implementing DataBase concepts using C, user923005, 01:50
- character conversion, mdh, 01:49
- Re: memset o/p not correct, CBFalconer, 01:45
- Re: compile errors. pls help, CBFalconer, 01:36
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, CBFalconer, 01:23
- Re: how to specify power of number, Peter Nilsson, 00:33
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Peter Nilsson, 00:11
April 21, 2008
- Re: Getting path components, Walter Roberson, 23:20
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Walter Roberson, 23:14
- Re: Getting path components, Walter Roberson, 22:58
- Re: Getting path components, Aaron Gray, 22:54
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Hallvard B Furuseth, 22:48
- Re: Getting path components, Antoninus Twink, 22:38
- Re: Implementing DataBase concepts using C, Default User, 22:21
- Re: Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, Antoninus Twink, 22:12
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, user923005, 22:04
- C written test for samsung, Sunil, 22:03
- Re: how to specify power of number, user923005, 21:58
- Re: Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, Walter Roberson, 21:25
- Re: Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, Walter Roberson, 21:16
- C FAQs section 20.27, arnuld, 21:07
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 20:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, user923005, 20:55
- Re: Implementing DataBase concepts using C, user923005, 20:54
- Re: Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, Antoninus Twink, 20:53
- Implementing DataBase concepts using C, Shravani, 20:33
- Re: getline() problem, Flash Gordon, 20:33
- Computer Science teaching posts at UK Colleges (Daily Feed), Dexter, 20:31
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 20:16
- Re: diff o/p, santosh, 20:06
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, santosh, 19:52
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 19:50
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 19:47
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 19:45
- Re: diff o/p, santosh, 19:42
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 19:40
- Re: diff o/p, santosh, 19:39
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard, 19:37
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 19:36
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bartc, 19:32
- Re: Getting path components, Walter Roberson, 19:25
- Re: diff o/p, Ben Bacarisse, 19:23
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 19:21
- Re: diff o/p, Ben Bacarisse, 19:20
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 19:20
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Serve Laurijssen, 19:11
- Re: Use preprocessor in header, santosh, 19:10
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 19:09
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 19:07
- Re: without main(), santosh, 19:06
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 19:06
- Re: diff o/p, santosh, 18:59
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 18:54
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 18:52
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard, 18:50
- Re: diff o/p, Richard, 18:41
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, santosh, 18:34
- Getting path components, Aaron Gray, 18:34
- Re: diff o/p, Keith Thompson, 18:28
- Re: diff o/p, santosh, 18:26
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Harald van Dijk, 18:17
- Re: diff o/p, aarklon, 18:06
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Ben Bacarisse, 18:04
- Re: diff o/p, aarklon, 18:04
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bartc, 17:59
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 17:55
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 17:42
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, jacob navia, 17:40
- Re: Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, santosh, 17:34
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, Bartc, 17:31
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, James Harris, 17:29
- Re: GDBM prototype magic., vshenoy, 17:23
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 17:21
- K&R2 , exercise 7.6, arnuld, 17:19
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 17:04
- Re: implementation of drand48() as given in steve summit's book, Eric Sosman, 16:52
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, edwin ng, 16:50
- Re: C FAQs section 20.27, Kenneth Brody, 16:27
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, James Harris, 16:24
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 16:21
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Kenneth Brody, 16:05
- Single RJ-45 with two NICs?, your name, 16:03
- Re: compile errors. pls help, beet, 15:56
- Re: constant multidimensional array in a function argument, Ben Bacarisse, 15:49
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Chris Dollin, 15:43
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, James Harris, 15:21
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Ben Bacarisse, 14:56
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, jacob navia, 14:53
- Re: GDBM prototype magic., Barry Schwarz, 14:51
- Re: implementation of drand48() as given in steve summit's book, jacob navia, 14:49
- Re: A trick question, Paul Heininger, 14:42
- implementation of drand48() as given in steve summit's book, pereges, 14:33
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Robert Gamble, 14:24
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Joachim Schmitz, 14:18
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Tobin, 14:16
- Re: Unsigned datatype, Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 14:02
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 13:57
- constant multidimensional array in a function argument, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 13:47
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, Walter Roberson, 13:43
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Richard, 13:33
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:11
- Re: A trick question, Bill Buckels, 13:09
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Hallvard B Furuseth, 12:57
- NuTemp Portable Heater Rental Nationwide, shenlishu520, 12:55
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bill Buckels, 12:51
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Joachim Schmitz, 12:36
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Chris Dollin, 12:35
- Re: Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, santosh, 12:27
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Nick Keighley, 12:25
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bill Buckels, 12:21
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bill Buckels, 12:07
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, santosh, 12:03
- Re: K&R2 , exercise 7.6, Richard Heathfield, 12:02
- Re: Unsigned datatype, Nick Keighley, 11:53
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, James Kanze, 11:23
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 11:03
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, kooladi, 11:01
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 11:00
- Need help, tresnzui, 10:48
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 10:36
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 10:24
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 10:21
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Chris Dollin, 10:11
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Nick Keighley, 10:08
- Re: how to specify power of number, Noob, 10:05
- GDBM prototype magic., vshenoy, 09:35
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, Richard Heathfield, 09:11
- Re: relative ordering of static libraries, Chris Torek, 08:59
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Keith Thompson, 08:42
- Re: A trick question, Keith Thompson, 08:35
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Keith Thompson, 08:25
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, John Nagle, 08:17
- Re: getline() problem, arnuld, 07:53
- Re: getline() problem, arnuld, 07:48
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 07:47
- getline() problem, arnuld, 07:41
- Re: Unsigned datatype, Peter Nilsson, 07:27
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Peter Nilsson, 07:24
- Unsigned datatype, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 07:23
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 07:21
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, arnuld, 07:15
- Re: Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, zehra . mb, 06:44
- relative ordering of static libraries, kooladi, 06:42
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Peter Nilsson, 06:38
- Re: Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, zehra . mb, 06:26
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Andrey Tarasevich, 06:19
- Re: A trick question, Peter Nilsson, 06:04
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Barry Schwarz, 05:59
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, santosh, 04:20
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:06
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Richard, 04:00
- Re: memset o/p not correct, santosh, 03:38
- Re: long double, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: extern pointers., David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: Arrays & Pointers, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, David Thompson, 03:33
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Chris Torek, 03:13
- Re: A trick question, Andrey Tarasevich, 03:10
- Re: Time delay loop less than 1ms, Walter Roberson, 03:02
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, soscpd, 03:02
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 03:01
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Richard, 02:57
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Default User, 02:54
- Time delay loop less than 1ms, Craig Williamson, 02:52
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 02:51
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Default User, 02:49
- Re: function prototype in code block, anoncoholic, 02:19
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 01:53
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Chris Torek, 01:45
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, CBFalconer, 01:27
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Chris Torek, 01:24
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 01:22
- Re: diff o/p, CBFalconer, 01:06
- Re: A trick question, Peter Nilsson, 00:58
- Re: memset o/p not correct, CBFalconer, 00:56
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Peter Nilsson, 00:44
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, CBFalconer, 00:43
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, CBFalconer, 00:39
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Peter Nilsson, 00:36
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Robert Gamble, 00:21
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Keith Thompson, 00:07
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Richard, 00:05
April 20, 2008
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Herbert Rosenau, 23:55
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Herbert Rosenau, 23:55
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Herbert Rosenau, 23:55
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Herbert Rosenau, 23:55
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 23:54
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Bartc, 23:52
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Jack Klein, 23:44
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Flash Gordon, 23:42
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 23:31
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Keith Thompson, 23:15
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Andrey Tarasevich, 23:08
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Andrey Tarasevich, 23:04
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, Andrey Tarasevich, 23:00
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, Antoninus Twink, 22:52
- Re: Multiple inheritance doubt, dj3vande, 22:34
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, soscpd, 22:28
- Multiple inheritance doubt, pradeep, 22:27
- Re: diff o/p, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: Floating-Point Constant with Payload, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Barry Schwarz, 20:28
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 19:46
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Kenny McCormack, 19:35
- 19 usd sell nike shoes (air max 90 87 shox nz tn ltd air jordan )Your satisfactions,Our pursuit!, yuww16, 19:32
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Richard, 19:08
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard Heathfield, 19:07
- הריכמ לודג, Dexter, 19:00
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard Harter, 18:58
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Hallvard B Furuseth, 18:49
- Floating-Point Constant with Payload, Jon Sargeant, 18:49
- diff o/p, aarklon, 18:05
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Serve Laurijssen, 17:44
- Re: memset o/p not correct, aarklon, 17:06
- Re: A trick question, Bill Buckels, 16:14
- Re: compile errors. pls help, beet, 16:03
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Bill Buckels, 15:37
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 14:37
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 14:34
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 14:23
- Re: Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Bill Leary, 14:16
- xenical canada aucune prescription xenical suisse commande en ligne dans commande xenical en France corpus xenical suisse soft sans prescription acheter xenical commander en ligne xenical canada au rabais en ligne sans prescription, protonserf, 13:46
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 13:44
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 13:42
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, James Dow Allen, 13:37
- Should embedded systems compilers be trusted, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:18
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 13:15
- Re: memset o/p not correct, CBFalconer, 11:17
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Gio, 11:09
- Спортивный обруч халахуп, Золотой Клон, 11:08
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 10:14
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 10:01
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Keith Thompson, 09:34
- Re: HI........., Default User, 09:07
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Default User, 09:05
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Willem, 09:04
- Re: HI........., santosh, 08:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ian Collins, 08:03
- HI........., sandy, 07:33
- Re: Size of array too large, Harry Skelton, 07:11
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, CBFalconer, 06:15
- Re: memset o/p not correct, CBFalconer, 06:06
- Re: function prototype in code block, Richard Heathfield, 06:05
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, vippstar, 05:58
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Keith Thompson, 05:32
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Richard, 05:29
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Keith Thompson, 05:24
- Re: A trick question, Keith Thompson, 05:21
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Gio, 05:12
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ian Collins, 05:01
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ian Collins, 04:56
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 04:54
- Re: A trick question, Gio, 03:34
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ian Collins, 03:33
- Re: A trick question, Gio, 03:01
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 02:57
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Gio, 02:51
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 02:38
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Richard Heathfield, 02:34
- Re: A trick question, Richard Heathfield, 02:33
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Gio, 02:25
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Richard Tobin, 02:25
- Re: function prototype in code block, CBFalconer, 02:08
- Re: A trick question, Gio, 01:51
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Default User, 01:43
- Re: A trick question, CBFalconer, 01:26
- Re: function prototype in code block, anoncoholic, 01:18
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, CBFalconer, 01:17
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ben Bacarisse, 01:16
- Re: A trick question, Walter Roberson, 01:16
- Re: A trick question, Joe Wright, 01:00
- Re: K&R Ex 1-3, Ian Collins, 00:49
- K&R Ex 1-3, Gio, 00:36
- Re: A trick question, Richard Heathfield, 00:25
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 00:25
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 00:20
- Re: A trick question, Ioannis Vranos, 00:16
- A trick question, Gio, 00:03
April 19, 2008
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Bartc, 23:45
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Ian Collins, 23:38
- Re: memset o/p not correct, Flash Gordon, 23:36
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, magicman, 23:36
- Re: memset o/p not correct, aarklon, 23:32
- Re: memset o/p not correct, aarklon, 23:31
- memset o/p not correct, aarklon, 23:28
- Re: looking for implementation of strtok, Jensen Somers, 23:27
- looking for implementation of strtok, magicman, 23:25
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Ioannis Vranos, 22:25
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 21:06
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Richard, 20:06
- Re: UDP source port, ionic, 19:47
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Default User, 19:45
- Re: pointer normalization, Gordon Burditt, 19:01
- Re: Size of array too large, Joe Wright, 18:46
- Re: Size of array too large, Kenny McCormack, 18:24
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:14
- Re: Size of array too large, Harry Skelton, 18:11
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, Thad Smith, 17:25
- Re: how to specify power of number, Bartc, 16:54
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Spiros Bousbouras, 16:49
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Spiros Bousbouras, 16:31
- Announcement: C-code generation from statecharts, Peter Mueller, 16:16
- Re: how to specify power of number, Nick Keighley, 16:05
- Re: Subtracting strings, Topi Linkala, 15:16
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, Bartc, 13:15
- Re: pointer normalization, Bartc, 12:41
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Ben Bacarisse, 11:21
- Re: pointer normalization, sophia, 10:10
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Serve L, 10:09
- Re: string combination, santosh, 09:14
- Re: Pointer subtraction problem, source boost pic, Barry Schwarz, 09:00
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, Thad Smith, 07:01
- Re: Char buffer error in a Structure, Gordon Burditt, 06:07
- Re: Char buffer error in a Structure, Eric Sosman, 05:35
- Re: how to specify power of number, user923005, 05:30
- Re: Char buffer error in a Structure, ...vagrahb, 05:24
- Re: Char buffer error in a Structure, Gordon Burditt, 04:53
- Char buffer error in a Structure, ...vagrahb, 04:37
- Re: What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, Ian Collins, 04:12
- What are the minimum numbers of bits required to represent C std float and double components?, James Harris, 04:03
- Re: how to specify power of number, Tim Prince, 03:21
- Re: Pointer subtraction problem, source boost pic, user923005, 02:30
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Dann Corbit, 01:55
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Walter Roberson, 00:44
- Pointer subtraction problem, source boost pic, James Salisbury, 00:44
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Bartc, 00:42
- Re: how to specify power of number, Dann Corbit, 00:34
- Re: how to specify power of number, Dann Corbit, 00:29
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, spasmous, 00:22
- Re: Can a double be 32 bits?, Ian Collins, 00:19
- Can a double be 32 bits?, spasmous, 00:02
April 18, 2008
- Re: how to specify power of number, Antoninus Twink, 23:58
- Re: how to specify power of number, user923005, 23:46
- Re: how to specify power of number, Antoninus Twink, 23:23
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Ian Collins, 22:30
- Re: compile errors. pls help, Kenneth Brody, 22:26
- Re: compile errors. pls help, dj3vande, 22:24
- compile errors. pls help, beet, 22:20
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, sanjay.vasudevan@xxxxxxxxx, 21:25
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, sanjay.vasudevan@xxxxxxxxx, 21:15
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Chris Torek, 21:08
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 20:46
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:59
- Re: string combination, CBFalconer, 19:51
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Eric Sosman, 19:48
- Re: Realloc and pointer arithmetics, Flash Gordon, 19:42
- Re: sizeof in old C compilers, Ben Bacarisse, 19:32
- sizeof in old C compilers, WDS, 19:14
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Flash Gordon, 19:08
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Kenny McCormack, 18:21
- Re: out, Kenny McCormack, 17:57
- Re: pointer to string, Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: Identifiers starting with __, Walter Roberson, 17:47
- Re: pointer to string, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Identifiers starting with __, Bharat, 17:37
- Realloc and pointer arithmetics, lithiumcat, 17:33
- Re: how to specify power of number, Noob, 17:32
- Re: string combination, Bartc, 16:14
- Re: how to specify power of number, Yanb, 16:12
- Re: how to specify power of number, Yanb, 16:05
- Re: pointer to string, Chris Dollin, 15:29
- Re: how to specify power of number, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:25
- Re: string combination, CBFalconer, 15:23
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, lhommedumatch, 15:14
- Re: how to specify power of number, Yanb, 15:07
- Re: how to specify power of number, Antoninus Twink, 14:16
- Re: pointer to string, kooladi, 14:03
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, James Kuyper, 13:04
- Re: how to specify power of number, Bartc, 13:01
- Re: Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:57
- Re: pointer to string, Chris Dollin, 12:24
- Re: Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, Richard Heathfield, 12:22
- Re: how to specify power of number, Ben Bacarisse, 11:51
- Re: Sockets, Richard Bos, 11:43
- how to specify power of number, Yanb, 11:39
- Problem in writing structure to Binary file in C lang, zehra . mb, 11:35
- Re: pointer to string, sid, 11:29
- Re: pointer to string, Herbert Rosenau, 11:17
- Re: pointer to string, Nick Keighley, 11:12
- Re: string combination, Bartc, 10:52
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Richard Heathfield, 10:38
- Re: Subtracting strings, Chris Dollin, 10:07
- Re: pointer to string, santosh, 10:06
- Re: Subtracting strings, Chris Dollin, 10:05
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Chris Dollin, 10:03
- pointer to string, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:03
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, santosh, 09:58
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Walter Roberson, 09:52
- Re: Token Pasting, Rudhir, 09:43
- Re: Token Pasting, santosh, 09:08
- Re: pointer to string, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: Token Pasting, Richard Heathfield, 08:47
- pointer to string, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:03
- Token Pasting, Rudhir, 07:48
- Re: string combination, jaysome, 06:52
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Kenny McCormack, 05:31
- Брюки для похудения и против целлюлита, Золотой Клон, 05:08
- Re: Sockets, Sri Harsha Dandibhotla, 05:05
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Jack Klein, 04:29
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 04:04
- Re: Size of array too large, Ian Collins, 02:51
- Re: Size of array too large, Bartc, 02:33
- Re: Size of array too large, Ian Collins, 02:20
- Re: Size of array too large, danieleghisi, 02:17
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 01:22
- Re: Size of array too large, Ian Collins, 01:07
- Re: Size of array too large, Peter Nilsson, 01:04
- Re: Unpacking 12bits integer type into 16bits, Bartc, 01:04
- Re: Unpacking 12bits integer type into 16bits, Peter Nilsson, 01:00
- Re: Size of array too large, Richard Tobin, 00:59
- Re: Subtracting strings, CBFalconer, 00:54
- Re: Size of array too large, Ian Collins, 00:49
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, jameskuyper, 00:48
- Re: Size of array too large, Chris Thomasson, 00:42
- Re: Trigger function on shared module init, CBFalconer, 00:40
- Re: Size of array too large, Richard Tobin, 00:37
- Re: Error with fgets, CBFalconer, 00:19
- Re: Size of array too large, A. Sinan Unur, 00:12
- Re: Size of array too large, Ian Collins, 00:12
- Size of array too large, danieleghisi, 00:07
- Re: string combination, CBFalconer, 00:05
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, lawrence . jones, 00:03
April 17, 2008
- Re: Moronic reference site, Chris Thomasson, 23:54
- Re: Function pointer cast, Bartc, 23:19
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Ernie Wright, 23:08
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Richard Heathfield, 23:01
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 22:56
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 22:55
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Ernie Wright, 22:50
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ian Collins, 22:46
- Re: Sockets, jacob navia, 22:39
- Re: Function pointer cast, Eric Sosman, 22:36
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Eric Sosman, 22:25
- Re: Function pointer cast, Dann Corbit, 22:23
- Unpacking 12bits integer type into 16bits, mathieu, 22:20
- Function pointer cast, Bartc, 22:19
- Re: pointer normalization, Morris Dovey, 22:00
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Ian Collins, 21:36
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ian Collins, 21:34
- Re: Sockets, lawrence . jones, 21:26
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, lawrence . jones, 21:19
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 21:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 20:58
- Re: Subtracting strings, lawrence . jones, 20:57
- Re: pointer normalization, Charlton Wilbur, 20:47
- Re: pointer normalization, Morris Dovey, 20:26
- Re: Subtracting strings, Kenneth Brody, 20:09
- Re: Moronic reference site, Kenneth Brody, 19:58
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Flash Gordon, 19:39
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Antoninus Twink, 19:02
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Antoninus Twink, 19:01
- Re: Sockets, jacob navia, 18:43
- Re: read file help, santosh, 18:42
- Re: Sockets, jacob navia, 18:41
- Re: read file help, Walter Roberson, 18:29
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard, 18:26
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Default User, 18:18
- Re: read file help, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: UDP source port, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: Subtracting strings, Keith Thompson, 17:58
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 17:51
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Walter Roberson, 17:43
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Ernie Wright, 17:43
- Re: Sockets, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- Re: Portability, John Bode, 17:40
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, blmblm, 17:25
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Willem, 17:23
- Re: Subtracting strings, Eric Sosman, 17:18
- Re: Subtracting strings, Eric Sosman, 17:13
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, blmblm, 17:13
- Re: Subtracting strings, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 17:09
- Re: Subtracting strings, Krumble Bunk, 17:07
- Re: string combination, Eric Sosman, 16:57
- Re: pointer normalization, Erik Trulsson, 16:49
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Eric Sosman, 16:49
- Re: Subtracting strings, Jens Thoms Toerring, 16:45
- Re: Subtracting strings, Krumble Bunk, 16:43
- Re: Subtracting strings, Chris Dollin, 16:41
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:39
- Re: Moronic reference site, Kenneth Brody, 16:38
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:31
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Chris Dollin, 16:28
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 16:05
- Subtracting strings, Krumble Bunk, 15:51
- Re: pointer normalization, Charlton Wilbur, 15:41
- Re: ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, Eric Sosman, 15:22
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 15:06
- ioctl serial port and SIOCGSTAMP, lhommedumatch, 15:06
- Re: Error with fgets, vippstar, 14:31
- Re: tools to analyze the code at compile time, scholz . lothar, 14:24
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Eric Sosman, 14:17
- Re: Sockets, Richard Tobin, 13:47
- Re: pointer normalization, Richard Bos, 13:45
- Re: pointer normalization, Richard Tobin, 13:43
- Re: pointer normalization, Richard Tobin, 13:43
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 13:38
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 13:34
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ben Bacarisse, 13:26
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ben Bacarisse, 13:23
- Re: UDP source port, slaskbrev1, 13:01
- Re: tools to analyze the code at compile time, santosh, 12:48
- Re: UDP source port, Antoninus Twink, 12:43
- Re: Trigger function on shared module init, Antoninus Twink, 12:34
- tools to analyze the code at compile time, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:31
- Re: pointer normalization, Kaz Kylheku, 11:44
- UDP source port, slaskbrev1, 11:34
- Re: Portability, santosh, 11:25
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 11:23
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, lithiumcat, 11:10
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ian Collins, 11:00
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ian Collins, 10:59
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ben Bacarisse, 10:55
- Re: Sockets, Richard Bos, 10:44
- Re: Bitmask vs bitfields, Ian Collins, 10:38
- Bitmask vs bitfields, lithiumcat, 10:27
- Re: string combination, jaysome, 09:50
- Re: Sockets, jaysome, 09:39
- Re: Sockets, Richard Bos, 09:01
- Re: Puzzle Book & Answer Book, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
- Re: Moronic reference site, Willem, 07:44
- Re: Moronic reference site, Willem, 07:36
- Re: pointer normalization, santosh, 07:32
- Re: Trigger function on shared module init, Walter Roberson, 07:23
- Re: Puzzle Book & Answer Book, santosh, 07:23
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Anand Hariharan, 07:03
- Re: Link through Header Files, rayuthar, 06:59
- Trigger function on shared module init, rayuthar, 06:56
- Re: function prototype in code block, Richard, 06:42
- Re: Sockets, harsha, 06:41
- Re: function prototype in code block, Ian Collins, 06:27
- Re: Moronic reference site, CBFalconer, 06:16
- Re: function prototype in code block, CBFalconer, 06:15
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, CBFalconer, 06:09
- Re: function prototype in code block, anoncoholic, 05:47
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Richard, 05:43
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, James Kuyper, 05:37
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Anand Hariharan, 05:25
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: why this does n't works, Richard Heathfield, 04:58
- Re: Moronic reference site, Richard, 04:31
- Re: Moronic reference site, Peter Nilsson, 04:26
- Puzzle Book & Answer Book, Gio, 04:22
- Re: success! I think, Barry Schwarz, 03:52
- Re: why this does n't works, Barry Schwarz, 03:52
- Re: Sockets, Barry Schwarz, 03:52
- Re: const problem, Barry Schwarz, 03:52
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 03:43
- Re: Moronic reference site, Richard, 03:34
- Re: Sockets, Kenny McCormack, 03:28
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, user923005, 02:38
- Re: Moronic reference site, user923005, 02:34
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, user923005, 02:32
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 02:12
- Re: Moronic reference site, Ian Collins, 02:11
- Re: Sockets, Keith Thompson, 02:03
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, user923005, 02:00
- Re: pointer normalization, Kenny McCormack, 01:59
- Moronic reference site, user923005, 01:43
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Flash Gordon, 01:17
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Default User, 01:05
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, John Bode, 01:00
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 00:56
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Mark McIntyre, 00:47
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 00:40
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Morris Dovey, 00:38
- Re: function prototype in code block, Ian Collins, 00:33
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 00:29
- Re: Sockets, Martin Ambuhl, 00:28
- Re: Sockets, Ian Collins, 00:27
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Flash Gordon, 00:15
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Peter Nilsson, 00:03
April 16, 2008
- Re: Sockets, CBFalconer, 23:59
- Re: Sockets, Antoninus Twink, 23:52
- Re: function prototype in code block, Andrey Tarasevich, 23:52
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, CBFalconer, 23:45
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 23:40
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 23:35
- Re: pointer normalization, Morris Dovey, 23:21
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 23:16
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, jameskuyper, 23:11
- Re: pointer normalization, Bartc, 23:03
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 22:58
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Tobin, 22:57
- Re: function prototype in code block, lawrence . jones, 22:55
- Re: Sockets, jacob navia, 22:53
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 22:46
- Re: why this does n't works, Kenneth Brody, 22:44
- Re: Sockets, vippstar, 22:43
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: pointer normalization, anoncoholic, 22:34
- Re: Question on the FAQ, lawrence . jones, 22:27
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 22:25
- Re: function prototype in code block, Eric Sosman, 22:24
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 22:24
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 22:21
- Re: writing a makefile, Antoninus Twink, 22:11
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Antoninus Twink, 22:00
- function prototype in code block, anoncoholic, 21:59
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Antoninus Twink, 21:57
- Re: Sockets, Antoninus Twink, 21:55
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Antoninus Twink, 21:52
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard, 21:50
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 21:39
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 21:27
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, user923005, 21:24
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Willem, 21:22
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Flash Gordon, 21:18
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 21:14
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, user923005, 21:09
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:07
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Flash Gordon, 21:07
- Re: string combination, user923005, 21:06
- Re: writing a makefile, Jens Thoms Toerring, 21:01
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:00
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:57
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Flash Gordon, 20:56
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Willem, 20:56
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Heathfield, 20:54
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard, 20:49
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Willem, 20:45
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Flash Gordon, 20:45
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Heathfield, 20:41
- Re: why this does n't works, Richard, 20:38
- Re: why this does n't works, pereges, 20:27
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:25
- Re: why this does n't works, Richard Heathfield, 20:16
- writing a makefile, pereges, 20:15
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Heathfield, 20:14
- Re: why this does n't works, pereges, 20:07
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:06
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 19:58
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Heathfield, 19:54
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Bartc, 19:43
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:42
- Re: why this does n't works, Richard Heathfield, 19:21
- why this does n't works, aarklon, 19:14
- Re: pointer normalization, Bartc, 19:10
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), aarklon, 19:00
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 18:59
- [long] Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 18:56
- Re: un named bit fields, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:52
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Keith Thompson, 18:48
- un named bit fields, sophia, 18:42
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Keith Thompson, 18:36
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, James Kuyper, 18:25
- Re: success! I think, Richard Heathfield, 18:14
- Re: success! I think, Bartc, 18:04
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 17:57
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 17:42
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, John Bode, 17:37
- Natural Skin Care ( Shea Nut Butter and Organic coconut oil), Olamina, 17:30
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Andrey Tarasevich, 17:29
- Re: hi, is there any C runtime library in coff .obj format?, Walter Roberson, 17:19
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Joe Wright, 17:12
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 17:08
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Hallvard B Furuseth, 17:07
- Re: Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Morris Dovey, 17:03
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Nick Keighley, 16:49
- Re: pointer normalization, Morris Dovey, 16:44
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Eric Sosman, 16:37
- Re: success! I think, Nick Keighley, 16:35
- Re: pointer normalization, Kenneth Brody, 16:30
- Re: success! I think, Nick Keighley, 16:21
- Re: pointer normalization, Kenny McCormack, 15:46
- Re: pointer normalization, Kenny McCormack, 15:44
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, James Kuyper, 15:24
- Re: hi, is there any C runtime library in coff .obj format?, Walter Roberson, 15:23
- Re: string combination, CBFalconer, 15:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 15:05
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, CBFalconer, 15:00
- Re: pointer normalization, Richard Heathfield, 14:52
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Chris Dollin, 14:52
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 14:50
- Re: pointer normalization, Nick Keighley, 14:47
- Re: pointer normalization, sophia, 14:33
- Working with Cash and uses of Typedef, Philluminati, 14:11
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Bos, 14:05
- Re: pointer normalization, Richard Heathfield, 13:59
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, James Kuyper, 13:59
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 13:54
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Shirsoft, 13:49
- pointer normalization, sophia, 13:39
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Chris Dollin, 13:30
- Re: success! I think, Richard Heathfield, 13:07
- Re: success! I think, Bartc, 13:00
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, arnuld, 12:48
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Dik T. Winter, 12:42
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, arnuld, 12:41
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 12:31
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Bartc, 12:14
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 12:10
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 11:52
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, Richard, 11:50
- Re: string combination, Bartc, 11:49
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Martin Ambuhl, 11:44
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Richard Heathfield, 11:39
- Re: Question about a struct declaration, Richard Bos, 11:36
- odnoklassniki.ru, Золотой Клон, 11:20
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Nick Keighley, 11:18
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 11:10
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 11:06
- Question about a struct declaration, heavyz, 11:04
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Nick Keighley, 10:46
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 10:23
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 10:21
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 10:11
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Bos, 10:10
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Bos, 10:06
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 10:03
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 09:59
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 09:57
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 09:40
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 09:33
- Re: problem with rand(), Jack . Thomson . v3, 09:30
- Re: Sockets, Keith Thompson, 09:09
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Richard Heathfield, 08:57
- Re: without main(), Kaz Kylheku, 08:52
- Re: printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), Joachim Schmitz, 08:44
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Peter Nilsson, 08:43
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 08:21
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Ian Collins, 08:16
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, CBFalconer, 08:12
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 08:02
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 07:58
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Richard Heathfield, 07:46
- Re: binary tree node deletion, Richard Heathfield, 07:42
- Re: without main(), Richard Heathfield, 07:35
- Re: string combination, Richard Heathfield, 07:32
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 07:24
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Peter Nilsson, 07:20
- Re: Sockets, CBFalconer, 07:20
- Re: Error with fgets, CBFalconer, 07:17
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 07:16
- Re: printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), Peter Nilsson, 07:12
- binary tree node deletion, sophia, 07:10
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, CBFalconer, 07:09
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, CBFalconer, 06:59
- Re: printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), Ivar, 06:40
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Chad, 06:22
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, jxh, 06:13
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Ian Collins, 06:11
- Re: vague lvalue vs rvalue question, Eric Sosman, 05:38
- Re: string combination, sophia, 05:38
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, user923005, 05:34
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 05:21
- Re: Error with fgets, Peter Nilsson, 05:01
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Ian Collins, 04:57
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 04:55
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 04:49
- Re: vague lvalue vs rvalue question, Jack Klein, 04:42
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Peter Nilsson, 04:42
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 04:29
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ian Collins, 04:25
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, santosh, 04:21
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 04:20
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ben Bacarisse, 04:11
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Jack Klein, 04:08
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 04:07
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Jack Klein, 04:00
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ian Collins, 03:57
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Jack Klein, 03:53
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 03:48
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ben Bacarisse, 03:47
- Re: Error with fgets, Keith Thompson, 03:36
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 03:27
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Eric Sosman, 03:25
- vague lvalue vs rvalue question, Chad, 03:23
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ian Collins, 02:20
- Re: Error with fgets, Morris Dovey, 02:16
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 02:15
- Re: Sockets, Ian Collins, 02:14
- Sockets, 4.4.bsd, 02:08
- Re: Error with fgets, CarlosB, 02:04
- Re: Error with fgets, CarlosB, 02:01
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Ioannis Vranos, 01:56
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 01:40
- Re: Error with cc sunstudio compiler, Nikos Chantziaras, 01:31
- Re: Error with fgets, Keith Thompson, 01:27
- Re: without main(), Ian Collins, 01:24
- Re: Error with fgets, D. Power, 01:21
- Re: without main(), Peter Nilsson, 01:16
- Re: Error with fgets, Bartc, 01:14
- Re: Error with fgets, blindsey, 01:14
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Peter Nilsson, 01:13
- Re: Error with cc sunstudio compiler, Jens Thoms Toerring, 01:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ian Collins, 01:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 01:12
- Re: Error with fgets, Flash Gordon, 01:07
- Re: Error with fgets, Peter Nilsson, 01:06
- Re: without main(), ozbear, 01:05
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 01:02
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 01:00
- Re: Error with cc sunstudio compiler, Peter Nilsson, 00:58
- Error with fgets, blindsey, 00:58
- Re: Error with cc sunstudio compiler, Andrey Tarasevich, 00:55
- Re: Error with cc sunstudio compiler, Ian Collins, 00:51
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Peter Nilsson, 00:48
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 00:41
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 00:36
- Error with cc sunstudio compiler, happytoday, 00:36
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, ymuntyan, 00:31
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Peter Nilsson, 00:12
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Dann Corbit, 00:04
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, CBFalconer, 00:03
April 15, 2008
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, Kenny McCormack, 23:37
- Re: problem with rand(), CBFalconer, 23:35
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, John Bode, 23:27
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 23:10
- Re: atoi and INFINITY, Owen Jacobson, 23:09
- atoi and INFINITY, migurus, 23:00
- Re: Dynamically loop through array of structures, CBFalconer, 22:59
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, jxh, 22:59
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 22:56
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 22:51
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 22:42
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 22:31
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Antoninus Twink, 22:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 22:12
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Antoninus Twink, 22:10
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Keith Thompson, 22:07
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 22:03
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Willem, 21:48
- Re: string combination, user923005, 21:46
- Re: string combination, Willem, 21:44
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, Bartc, 21:34
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Morris Dovey, 21:32
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 21:32
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Antoninus Twink, 21:27
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Morris Dovey, 21:25
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, John Bode, 21:25
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 21:24
- Re: string combination, Bartc, 21:17
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 21:13
- Re: Vectors vs arrays, Dann Corbit, 20:54
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 20:54
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:43
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:41
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, Richard Heathfield, 20:38
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 20:32
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, pereges, 20:20
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 20:13
- Re: problem with rand(), pereges, 20:13
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 20:12
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Flash Gordon, 20:06
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., Flash Gordon, 19:56
- Re: printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), Richard Heathfield, 19:53
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 19:52
- Re: printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), Joachim Schmitz, 19:47
- printf("....%d",sizeof((int)(double)(char) i)), aarklon, 19:43
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 19:42
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Tobin, 19:37
- Re: problem with rand(), Lew Pitcher, 19:23
- Re: problem with rand(), Richard Heathfield, 19:18
- Re: problem with rand(), Joachim Schmitz, 19:14
- problem with rand(), pereges, 19:12
- Re: Vectors vs arrays, Antoninus Twink, 19:00
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Harald van Dijk, 18:56
- Re: y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), Joachim Schmitz, 18:55
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- y >> (8 * (sizeof(int) -1)), aarklon, 18:47
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 18:45
- Re: string combination, vippstar, 18:30
- citrate de Rimonabant soft en France acomplia pharmacie commander acomplia us usa en ligne acomplia generique bon marche acomplia canada a vendre acomplia canada Generique Inde, muggle21480, 18:21
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Harald van Dijk, 18:15
- Re: Question on the FAQ, lawrence . jones, 17:55
- Re: string combination, santosh, 17:53
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, lawrence . jones, 17:49
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, santosh, 17:41
- Re: string combination, Richard, 17:38
- phentermine suisse au rabais au suisse acheter phentermine canada commander comprime de phentermine en France acheter phentermine canada commander en ligne phentermine Generique Inde dans commande phentermine en France corpus, missjesse712, 17:37
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Morris Dovey, 17:22
- string combination, sophia, 17:17
- Re: without main(), Chris Dollin, 17:15
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Andrey Tarasevich, 17:13
- acheter xenical canada bon marche xenical canada le plus bon marche xenical soft generique achat xenical discret comprimes de xenical us usa comprimes de xenical, schock968, 16:45
- Re: malloc() and implicit cast, Stephen Sprunk, 16:32
- malloc() and implicit cast, arnuld, 16:29
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard, 16:28
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 16:25
- Re: Dynamically loop through array of structures, uidzer0, 16:19
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 16:19
- Re: enum, Richard, 16:18
- Re: without main(), Walter Roberson, 16:17
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 16:14
- Re: Dynamically loop through array of structures, Richard Bos, 16:13
- Dynamically loop through array of structures, uidzer0, 16:11
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Harter, 15:58
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Charlton Wilbur, 15:57
- acheter meridia canada commander en ligne meridia aucune prescription commander comprime de meridia en France citrate de SIBUTRAMINE canada meridia generique bon marche achat meridia canada, zoink546, 15:45
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Hallvard B Furuseth, 15:36
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Martin, 14:44
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Eric Sosman, 14:44
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 14:25
- Re: enum, Ian Collins, 13:43
- Re: understanding getopt_long()'s hasarg setting, Ben Bacarisse, 13:30
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., jacob navia, 13:08
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Ioannis Vranos, 13:02
- Re: Vectors vs arrays, arnuld, 12:37
- understanding getopt_long()'s hasarg setting, ff0000, 12:29
- Re: without main(), Bartc, 12:28
- Re: struct/union pointer/address stuff., Chris Torek, 12:28
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Nick Keighley, 12:22
- Re: without main(), Ben Bacarisse, 12:14
- Re: Vectors vs arrays, Nick Keighley, 11:59
- Re: without main(), Bartc, 11:56
- Re: I was wrong [Was: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function], Richard, 11:46
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 11:45
- Re: I was wrong [Was: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function], Nick Keighley, 11:35
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 11:35
- Re: I was wrong [Was: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function], Richard Heathfield, 11:32
- I was wrong [Was: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function], Nick Keighley, 11:23
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Richard Heathfield, 11:04
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 10:40
- Re: Vectors vs arrays, Richard Heathfield, 10:33
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Nick Keighley, 10:31
- [ANN] Data Plotting Library DISLIN 9.3, Helmut Michels, 10:29
- Vectors vs arrays, jacox, 10:27
- Re: without main(), Chris Dollin, 10:20
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 10:19
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., uvbaz, 10:09
- Re: without main(), Ian Collins, 10:06
- Re: success! I think, Nick Keighley, 10:03
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 10:01
- Re: without main(), mariz, 10:01
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Antoninus Twink, 09:49
- Re: without main(), Ian Collins, 09:44
- Trekking in Nepal, rathnepal@xxxxxxxxx, 09:40
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Shirsoft, 09:39
- without main(), mariz, 09:37
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Kaz Kylheku, 09:31
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 08:09
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 07:45
- Re: const problem, arnuld, 07:44
- Re: const problem, Ian Collins, 07:32
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 07:14
- Re: const problem, arnuld, 07:14
- Re: const problem, Ian Collins, 07:12
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, CBFalconer, 07:12
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 07:01
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard Heathfield, 06:54
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 06:44
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 06:40
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 05:43
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, jxh, 05:12
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Peter Nilsson, 05:05
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Jack Klein, 05:01
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Jack Klein, 04:59
- Re: Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Jack Klein, 04:44
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, user923005, 04:21
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, user923005, 04:15
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 04:04
- Re: Organization of Structs, Gordon Burditt, 03:33
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 03:20
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, jxh, 03:18
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Dik T. Winter, 03:15
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Dik T. Winter, 03:12
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 03:01
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ben Bacarisse, 02:56
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Dann Corbit, 02:52
- Re: Organization of Structs, Ben Bacarisse, 02:21
- Re: Organization of Structs, Ian Collins, 02:16
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 02:13
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ben Bacarisse, 02:10
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 02:10
- Re: Use preprocessor in header, Thad Smith, 02:08
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 02:07
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 01:55
- Re: How to design a program in C?, Gordon Burditt, 01:45
- Organization of Structs, pradeep, 01:45
- Use preprocessor in header, Bryan Parkoff, 01:45
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Keith Thompson, 01:45
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 01:42
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 01:39
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ben Bacarisse, 01:31
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 01:28
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Default User, 01:19
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ben Bacarisse, 01:17
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Charlton Wilbur, 01:15
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, Keith Thompson, 01:11
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ben Bacarisse, 01:10
- Re: translating oo features to C, Chris Thomasson, 01:05
- Re: Network modules, Richard Tobin, 01:01
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Hallvard B Furuseth, 01:00
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Richard Tobin, 00:56
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 00:52
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 00:52
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Keith Thompson, 00:46
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 00:43
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 00:43
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, user923005, 00:36
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 00:24
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, ymuntyan, 00:20
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, I, 00:20
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Antoninus Twink, 00:09
April 14, 2008
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 23:59
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Bartc, 23:57
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 23:55
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, jacob navia, 23:54
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 23:51
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:50
- Re: why cant functions return arrays, Walter Roberson, 23:41
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 23:39
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, lawrence . jones, 23:38
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 23:35
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, John Bode, 23:32
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 23:32
- why cant functions return arrays, sanjay.vasudevan@xxxxxxxxx, 23:25
- Re: Network modules, Keith Thompson, 23:19
- Re: Network modules, Richard, 22:49
- Re: Network modules, Keith Thompson, 22:15
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 22:11
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 22:04
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 22:03
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 22:02
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Harald van Dijk, 22:01
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 21:56
- Re: linked list, gw7rib, 21:51
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, user923005, 21:48
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, CBFalconer, 21:44
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 21:44
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, harsha, 21:36
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 21:35
- Re: Static checking of C programs with LCLint, user923005, 21:28
- Re: Static checking of C programs with LCLint, Richard Heathfield, 21:18
- Re: Static checking of C programs with LCLint, user923005, 21:10
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, Robert Gamble, 20:59
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, user923005, 20:50
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, user923005, 20:36
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, user923005, 20:23
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, user923005, 20:13
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, user923005, 20:11
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, pereges, 20:11
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, Gordon Burditt, 20:09
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 20:08
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, user923005, 20:05
- Re: Link through Header Files, Richard Heathfield, 20:04
- Re: problem with double data in exponential form, user923005, 20:00
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, Gordon Burditt, 19:54
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, aspinall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:49
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, Antoninus Twink, 19:47
- problem with double data in exponential form, pereges, 19:44
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, Sanchit, 19:39
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 19:37
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 19:35
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Richard, 19:35
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Bartc, 19:27
- Re: Regarding extern, Pradeep, 19:25
- Re: How to determine curreent date and time/, Antoninus Twink, 19:21
- Re: Recursion Basics, Ben Bacarisse, 19:17
- How to determine curreent date and time/, Sanchit, 19:14
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., Antoninus Twink, 19:14
- Re: Network modules, Antoninus Twink, 19:08
- Re: Function return value doubt, Bartc, 19:07
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 18:55
- Re: Network modules, Kenny McCormack, 18:45
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Keith Thompson, 18:42
- Re: Recursion Basics, smallcool21, 18:28
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Keith Thompson, 18:23
- Re: Link through Header Files, Keith Thompson, 18:15
- Re: Network modules, Keith Thompson, 18:09
- Re: const problem, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: const problem, Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: const problem, Bartc, 17:41
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Heathfield, 17:36
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Bartc, 17:18
- Re: Static checking of C programs with LCLint, Richard Heathfield, 17:04
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:53
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 16:50
- Static checking of C programs with LCLint, aarklon, 16:44
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Nick Keighley, 16:24
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., uvbaz, 16:13
- Re: success! I think, Richard, 15:56
- Маникюрный набор, Золотой Клон, 15:51
- Ambiguous errata solutions for K&R2, Ioannis Vranos, 15:48
- Re: GetCommState failed with error 87., Nick Keighley, 15:47
- Re: const problem, Chris Dollin, 15:32
- Re: const problem, arnuld, 15:28
- const problem, arnuld, 15:12
- Re: const problem, Eric Sosman, 15:10
- Re: linked list, harsha, 15:03
- Re: linked list, Chris Dollin, 14:54
- GetCommState failed with error 87., uvbaz, 14:52
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Andrew Haley, 14:52
- linked list, sophia, 14:46
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Eric Sosman, 14:39
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 14:35
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Andrew Haley, 14:33
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Nick Keighley, 13:50
- Re: Recursion Basics, Ben Bacarisse, 13:48
- Re: Function return value doubt, Chris Dollin, 13:16
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Heathfield, 13:03
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Bartc, 12:51
- Re: How to design a program in C?, Bartc, 12:10
- acomplia canada le plus bon marche acomplia soft bon marche citrate de Rimonabant soft en France commander comprime de acomplia acomplia commande en ligne acomplia canada bon marche Sans Prescription, starture419, 12:06
- Please help me where the failure is, cooklooks, 11:53
- Re: success! I think, Nick Keighley, 11:50
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 11:47
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:37
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 11:35
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, ymuntyan, 11:34
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 11:33
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Richard Tobin, 11:21
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 11:19
- Re: Sliding window, Richard Tobin, 11:18
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Ian Collins, 11:16
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Bos, 11:16
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Nick Keighley, 11:15
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Nick Keighley, 11:02
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Bos, 11:01
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Nick Keighley, 10:49
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:30
- Re: Link through Header Files, Richard Heathfield, 10:30
- Re: Link through Header Files, Ian Collins, 10:29
- Link through Header Files, rayuthar, 10:21
- Re: Network modules, Ian Collins, 10:05
- Re: Network modules, Nick Keighley, 10:03
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 09:59
- Re: Network modules, InuY4sha, 09:37
- Re: Network modules, InuY4sha, 09:36
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 09:10
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 08:58
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 08:31
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Richard Heathfield, 08:26
- Re: How to design a program in C?, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: Struct/Union pointer stuff, Peter Nilsson, 08:01
- Re: Struct/Union pointer stuff, CBFalconer, 07:53
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, CBFalconer, 07:51
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 07:50
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Peter Nilsson, 07:49
- Re: Recursion Basics, Richard Heathfield, 07:46
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Richard Heathfield, 07:32
- struct/union pointer/address stuff., Kenneth Bull, 07:32
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 07:31
- Struct/Union pointer stuff, Kenneth Bull, 07:29
- Re: Recursion Basics, CBFalconer, 06:42
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Ian Collins, 06:41
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 06:40
- Re: Recursion Basics, smartbeginner, 06:35
- Re: Question on the FAQ, CBFalconer, 06:25
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, CBFalconer, 06:19
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, CBFalconer, 06:16
- Re: [OT] Re: Strange I/O error, CBFalconer, 05:59
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Peter Nilsson, 05:52
- Re: Replacing fgets Problem solved., Peter Nilsson, 05:46
- Re: Sliding window, CBFalconer, 05:46
- Re: Replacing fgets Problem solved., Peter Nilsson, 05:45
- Re: Replacing fgets Problem solved., Ian Collins, 05:39
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, CBFalconer, 05:34
- Replacing fgets Problem solved., FireHead, 05:27
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Ian Collins, 05:05
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Peter Nilsson, 04:56
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Bill Reid, 04:24
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Chris McDonald, 04:18
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Bryan Parkoff, 04:18
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Barry Schwarz, 04:17
- Re: success! I think, Barry Schwarz, 04:17
- Re: How to design a program in C?, Anonymous, 03:44
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 03:41
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Peter Nilsson, 03:19
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, I, 02:42
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Chris Torek, 01:52
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Bartc, 01:50
- Re: success! I think, lawrence . jones, 01:49
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, soscpd, 01:48
- Re: How to design a program in C?, Bartc, 01:37
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Coos Haak, 01:34
- Re: Write two separated objects?, Ian Collins, 01:33
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Andrey Tarasevich, 01:23
- Write two separated objects?, Bryan Parkoff, 01:18
- Re: "row major" - technically no such thing in C?, Andrey Tarasevich, 01:17
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 01:15
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ben Bacarisse, 01:15
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Ben Bacarisse, 01:10
- How to design a program in C?, istillshine, 01:07
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: C source code line count function, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: qsort problem, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: Recursion Basics, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: success! I think, Bartc, 01:02
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Peter Nilsson, 00:47
- Re: Strange I/O error, Bartc, 00:32
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 00:06
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 00:01
April 13, 2008
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, John Doe, 23:36
- Using C as target language, thomas . mertes, 23:31
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ian Collins, 23:27
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, lawrence . jones, 23:19
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Richard Heathfield, 23:17
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 23:09
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Robert Gamble, 23:00
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 22:53
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, Eric Sosman, 22:40
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Martin Ambuhl, 22:37
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Joe Wright, 22:35
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Flash Gordon, 22:33
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Anand Hariharan, 22:28
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Willem, 22:19
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Flash Gordon, 22:16
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Malcolm McLean, 22:14
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Robert Gamble, 22:10
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, Martin Ambuhl, 22:08
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, Richard Heathfield, 22:01
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Heathfield, 21:59
- Re: Strange I/O error, Robert Newson, 21:58
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Ian Collins, 21:57
- Re: How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Ian Collins, 21:56
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 21:48
- Re: Sliding window, Eric Sosman, 21:45
- Re: Question on the FAQ, Robert Gamble, 21:41
- Question on the FAQ, Topi Linkala, 21:33
- Re: is this portable?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 21:27
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 21:10
- Re: #define for very small numbers ?, Walter Roberson, 20:52
- Re: Recursion Basics, Richard Heathfield, 20:47
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Richard Heathfield, 20:45
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 20:43
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 20:35
- Re: Sliding window, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 20:03
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 20:03
- #define for very small numbers ?, pereges, 20:01
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Eric Sosman, 19:49
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Eric Sosman, 19:46
- Re: Sliding window, Eric Sosman, 19:44
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Anand Hariharan, 19:42
- How do I create a function in my library for passing user callback function, Angus, 19:39
- Re: Sliding window, Richard, 19:22
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Chad, 19:22
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 19:15
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Richard, 19:00
- Re: Problem with atoi and strlod, Morris Dovey, 18:56
- Problem with atoi and strlod, Sanchit, 18:50
- Re: Sliding window, Richard, 18:49
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 18:39
- Re: Sliding window, Willem, 18:31
- Re: Sliding window, Walter Roberson, 18:22
- [OT] Re: Strange I/O error, Harald van Dijk, 18:21
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 18:19
- Re: Sliding window, Bartc, 18:17
- Re: C Books and algorithm books [OT], Morris Dovey, 18:12
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Bartc, 18:07
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 18:02
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Willem, 17:57
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Keith Thompson, 17:54
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, santosh, 17:51
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 17:49
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, santosh, 17:46
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Willem, 17:46
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Harald van Dijk, 17:44
- Re: C source code line count function, Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, santosh, 17:40
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Keith Thompson, 17:37
- Re: An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, Walter Roberson, 17:35
- Re: qsort problem, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard, 17:35
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 17:33
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 17:31
- Re: '__setvideomode': unresolved external, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: Strange I/O error, CBFalconer, 17:26
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- An array of function pointers - generated parametrically, a, 17:25
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 17:04
- Recursion Basics, smartbeginner, 17:00
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Eric Sosman, 16:57
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 16:56
- Re: Sliding window, Walter Roberson, 16:56
- [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 16:55
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, Morris Dovey, 16:51
- Re: `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, Bartc, 16:41
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, istillshine, 16:33
- `if (!p ? i++ : 0) break;' == `if (!p){ i++; break;}' ?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 16:30
- Re: qsort problem, istillshine, 16:25
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 16:21
- Re: Library Function for converrting double to string, Eric Sosman, 16:11
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Bartc, 16:08
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 16:05
- Re: Sliding window, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Library Function for converrting double to string, Sanchit, 15:45
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 14:51
- Re: qsort problem, Harald van Dijk, 14:31
- Re: qsort problem, Ioannis Vranos, 14:31
- Re: qsort problem, istillshine, 14:10
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 13:27
- Re: Strange I/O error, Bartc, 13:24
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, Richard, 13:19
- Re: Strange I/O error, Harald van Dijk, 13:02
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Ben Bacarisse, 12:57
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, istillshine, 12:45
- Re: Strange I/O error, Bartc, 12:21
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Richard Tobin, 12:10
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Bartc, 12:05
- Best Prometric Test center in Bangalore (like Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Exin - ITIL, Dell, HP), Prometric Test center, 11:30
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Anonymous, 11:16
- Re: '__setvideomode': unresolved external, Emerald Saint, 10:47
- Re: Sliding window, Anonymous, 10:33
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, Flash Gordon, 10:11
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, Robert S, 09:36
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Kenny McCormack, 09:28
- Re: K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Richard Heathfield, 09:27
- K&R2 Exercise 4-12, Lax, 09:14
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: success! I think, Barry Schwarz, 07:24
- Re: success! I think, Barry Schwarz, 06:55
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, santosh, 06:23
- Re: [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Anand Hariharan, 06:08
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 05:41
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 05:41
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Anonymous, 05:35
- Re: Strange I/O error, Richard Heathfield, 05:28
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Richard, 05:28
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Anonymous, 05:27
- Strange I/O error, Larry, 05:02
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Keith Thompson, 04:31
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 04:23
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Chad, 04:22
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Two-Horned Unicorn, 03:50
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Kenny McCormack, 03:30
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Michael, 03:14
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Richard Heathfield, 03:09
- Re: is this portable?, Øyvind Røtvold, 02:31
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Richard, 02:30
- Re: Sliding window, Ben Bacarisse, 02:29
- Re: Sliding window, Bartc, 01:50
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Default User, 01:46
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, CBFalconer, 01:34
- Re: "row major" - technically no such thing in C?, Richard Tobin, 01:22
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, Robert S, 01:22
- Re: When to use macros., Herbert Rosenau, 01:16
- Re: "row major" - technically no such thing in C?, Kenny McCormack, 01:12
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 01:03
- Re: "row major" - technically no such thing in C?, Richard Heathfield, 01:02
- Re: Sliding window, filia&sofia, 00:59
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Richard Heathfield, 00:57
- Re: success! I think, Richard, 00:54
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Richard Tobin, 00:50
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 00:35
- Re: success! I think, Richard, 00:26
- Re: Sliding window, Richard, 00:25
- Re: success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 00:23
- Re: Sliding window, Bartc, 00:06
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Mark McIntyre, 00:01
April 12, 2008
- Re: success! I think, Bartc, 23:56
- Sliding window, filia&sofia, 23:51
- success! I think, Bill Cunningham, 23:43
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, Flash Gordon, 23:40
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, Gordon Burditt, 23:18
- Re: ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, jacob navia, 23:16
- "row major" - technically no such thing in C?, Lax, 23:16
- ow to prevent macro expansion in C/C++?, 3mwn8tbfrd19ph0, 22:52
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 22:26
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 22:16
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, blmblm, 22:16
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, blmblm, 22:01
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 21:53
- Re: Test the validity of each argument in a function, Malcolm McLean, 21:43
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 21:35
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Bartc, 21:29
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Malcolm McLean, 21:26
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, Malcolm McLean, 21:24
- [OT] Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 21:21
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Malcolm McLean, 21:16
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Malcolm McLean, 21:13
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 21:06
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 20:56
- Re: Test the validity of each argument in a function, Richard Harter, 20:53
- Re: When to use macros., Default User, 20:47
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Gordon Burditt, 20:42
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Gordon Burditt, 20:39
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, Richard, 20:31
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, blmblm, 20:13
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard, 20:05
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard, 19:59
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard, 19:57
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard, 19:56
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Default User, 19:49
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:27
- Re: local variables in a recursive program, Richard Heathfield, 19:21
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, istillshine, 19:21
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Flash Gordon, 19:18
- local variables in a recursive program, pereges, 19:14
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Antoninus Twink, 19:11
- Re: case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Bartc, 18:51
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Ben Bacarisse, 18:48
- Re: case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Richard Heathfield, 18:23
- Re: case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Richard Heathfield, 18:21
- Re: Test the validity of each argument in a function, Morris Dovey, 18:15
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 18:10
- Re: case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Pradeep, 18:07
- Re: C Books and algorithm books, Eric Sosman, 18:02
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Flash Gordon, 17:57
- C Books and algorithm books, istillshine, 17:54
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 17:30
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Bill Reid, 17:30
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Yunzhong, 17:17
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 16:51
- Re: Function return value doubt, Eric Sosman, 16:50
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Eric Sosman, 16:46
- Re: Variable declaration followed by colon?, Richard Heathfield, 16:43
- Re: Test the validity of each argument in a function, Richard Heathfield, 16:42
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Eric Sosman, 16:40
- Variable declaration followed by colon?, saverio . post, 16:36
- Test the validity of each argument in a function, istillshine, 16:13
- Re: Function return value doubt, Antoninus Twink, 15:34
- Function return value doubt, pradeep, 15:24
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, istillshine, 15:16
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 15:07
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Eric Sosman, 15:04
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, istillshine, 15:00
- Re: case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Malcolm McLean, 14:49
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:13
- Re: C source code line count function, Morris Dovey, 14:10
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Flash Gordon, 13:58
- Re: working of drand48(), Antoninus Twink, 13:52
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Pradeep, 13:51
- case label does not reduce to an integer constant, Rex Mottram, 13:49
- Re: How much fast is C++ than Java?, Malcolm McLean, 13:37
- Re: Regarding extern, Harald van Dijk, 13:27
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Antoninus Twink, 13:25
- How much fast is C++ than Java?, Sanny, 13:10
- Re: When to use macros., Richard Heathfield, 13:09
- Re: When to use macros., Ben Bacarisse, 12:23
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Bartc, 12:20
- Re: How to test the correctness of a function?, Malcolm McLean, 12:02
- Re: writing structure to a file, Pradeep, 11:54
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Malcolm McLean, 11:48
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Malcolm McLean, 11:43
- Re: writing structure to a file, Malcolm McLean, 11:37
- Re: writing structure to a file, Richard Heathfield, 11:37
- Re: writing structure to a file, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 11:34
- Re: When to use macros., Malcolm McLean, 11:33
- TESTING SPAM FILTER cklee@xxxxxxxxxx, CKLee1868, 11:27
- Re: Regarding extern, Pradeep, 11:24
- writing structure to a file, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 11:20
- Re: heathfield vs navia, Malcolm McLean, 11:04
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:00
- Re: C source code line count function, Richard Heathfield, 11:00
- Re: C source code line count function, Ian Collins, 10:49
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, CBFalconer, 10:46
- Re: C source code line count function, Richard Heathfield, 10:45
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, CBFalconer, 10:38
- Re: C source code line count function, Keith Thompson, 10:31
- Re: lint still useful?, jaysome, 10:00
- Re: When to use macros., Richard Heathfield, 09:40
- Re: When to use macros., Ian Collins, 09:24
- Re: is this portable?, Øyvind Røtvold, 09:20
- When to use macros., prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 09:19
- Re: Regarding extern, Richard Heathfield, 08:58
- Re: Regarding extern, Harald van Dijk, 08:56
- Regarding extern, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 08:49
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard Heathfield, 08:47
- Re: callback functions, Richard Heathfield, 08:32
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 08:24
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, user923005, 08:21
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Harald van Dijk, 08:09
- Re: is this portable?, Thad Smith, 07:51
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 07:38
- Re: C source code line count function, Gordon Burditt, 07:35
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 07:23
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Ian Collins, 07:16
- Re: working of drand48(), Ian Collins, 07:13
- working of drand48(), pereges, 07:06
- Re: How to return two values in a function?, Barry Schwarz, 07:00
- Re: How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, Barry Schwarz, 07:00
- Re: How to test the correctness of a function?, user923005, 06:56
- Re: C source code line count function, Barry Schwarz, 06:47
- Re: How to test the correctness of a function?, Ian Collins, 06:40
- Re: How to test the correctness of a function?, istillshine, 06:34
- How to eliminate this global variable, silent?, istillshine, 06:31
- How to return two values in a function?, istillshine, 06:23
- Re: How to test the correctness of a function?, Ian Collins, 06:18
- How to test the correctness of a function?, istillshine, 06:14
- Re: 'static' to make object accessible by file, Walter Roberson, 06:08
- Re: the static identifier in the global scope, Jack Klein, 05:59
- Re: callback functions, Jack Klein, 05:55
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Ian Collins, 05:53
- Re: 'static' to make object accessible by file, Ian Collins, 05:50
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Ian Collins, 05:49
- 'static' to make object accessible by file, Lax, 05:45
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, pereges, 05:44
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, istillshine, 05:41
- Re: What is the use of qualifier const, Ian Collins, 05:33
- What is the use of qualifier const, istillshine, 05:27
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, user923005, 04:34
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard Harter, 04:23
- Re: is this portable?, copx, 04:17
- Re: is this portable?, copx, 04:06
- Re: How to make it faster?, user923005, 03:35
- Re: is this portable?, Thad Smith, 03:31
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, user923005, 03:25
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, user923005, 03:13
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Eric Sosman, 03:06
- Re: is this portable?, Ben Pfaff, 02:44
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Kaz Kylheku, 02:42
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, user923005, 02:37
- is this portable?, copx, 01:53
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Flash Gordon, 01:30
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Martin, 01:29
- Re: How to make it faster?, christian.bau, 00:56
- Re: How to make it faster?, christian.bau, 00:35
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Joe Wright, 00:04
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Gordon Burditt, 00:03
April 11, 2008
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Default User, 23:59
- Re: does C allow this ?, christian.bau, 23:56
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, christian.bau, 23:52
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Bartc, 23:40
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, christian.bau, 23:35
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Gordon Burditt, 23:01
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Gordon Burditt, 22:27
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, Eric Sosman, 22:22
- Re: C source code line count function, user923005, 22:09
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Eric Sosman, 22:09
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, William Pursell, 22:03
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Walter Roberson, 21:55
- Re: C source code line count function, user923005, 21:49
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Ian Collins, 21:49
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, user923005, 21:48
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 21:40
- Re: C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:38
- C source code line count function, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:35
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard Heathfield, 21:34
- Re: programming disucssion group, Richard Heathfield, 21:26
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Gordon Burditt, 21:20
- [long] Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 21:20
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Bartc, 21:13
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Default User, 21:10
- population and industrial?, kaki, 21:10
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, user923005, 21:03
- Re: lint still useful?, user923005, 20:58
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, John Bode, 20:53
- programming disucssion group, technica, 20:38
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, lawrence . jones, 20:34
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, user923005, 20:32
- Re: spin_lock, Kaz Kylheku, 20:13
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, jacob navia, 20:08
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Walter Roberson, 20:08
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Kenny McCormack, 20:00
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Kenny McCormack, 19:57
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Antoninus Twink, 19:53
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Walter Roberson, 19:38
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Antoninus Twink, 18:57
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 18:55
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Paul Hsieh, 18:50
- Re: Network modules, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Keith Thompson, 18:45
- Re: spin_lock, Keith Thompson, 18:37
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: lint still useful?, Eric Sosman, 18:16
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard Harter, 18:15
- Re: lint still useful?, Richard Tobin, 18:11
- Re: lint still useful?, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:02
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard, 17:58
- Re: lint still useful?, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:58
- Re: extern pointers., Ben Bacarisse, 17:54
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Default User, 17:53
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Noob, 17:43
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, Kenneth Brody, 17:27
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, jacob navia, 17:25
- Re: Storing integer values in a void*, Ben Bacarisse, 16:59
- Re: scanf, Robert Gamble, 16:57
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Joachim Schmitz, 16:56
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, pereges, 16:52
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Joachim Schmitz, 16:50
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Richard Tobin, 16:46
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Antoninus Twink, 16:44
- Re: Network modules, Antoninus Twink, 16:43
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Kenneth Brody, 16:37
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Kenneth Brody, 16:29
- Re: Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, Richard Heathfield, 16:15
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Richard Tobin, 16:14
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, jacob navia, 16:13
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, jacob navia, 16:11
- Re: Network modules, InuY4sha, 16:10
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Just another C hacker, 16:03
- Why do people say 'extern' is error prone ?, pereges, 16:01
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Richard Tobin, 15:59
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, pereges, 15:55
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Joachim Schmitz, 15:45
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Thad Smith, 15:37
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Richard Tobin, 15:28
- Re: lint still useful?, Eric Sosman, 15:26
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, osmium, 15:21
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, Antoninus Twink, 14:55
- Re: Network modules, Antoninus Twink, 14:52
- Re: Storing integer values in a void*, Sebastian Morawietz, 14:39
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.3, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 14:28
- lint still useful?, copx, 14:27
- Re: Dealing with illegal instruction, jacob navia, 14:20
- Network modules, InuY4sha, 14:19
- Dealing with illegal instruction, Just another C hacker, 14:10
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Eric Sosman, 13:53
- Re: scanf, Eric Sosman, 13:48
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, Ben Bacarisse, 13:41
- Re: extern pointers., pereges, 13:39
- Re: extern pointers., pereges, 13:27
- Storing integer values in a void*, lithiumcat, 13:12
- Re: "ab" mode in fopen, Nick Keighley, 13:01
- Re: extern pointers., Philip Potter, 12:26
- Re: callback functions, Antoninus Twink, 12:20
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, Irrwahn Grausewitz, 12:01
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Joachim Schmitz, 11:46
- extern pointers., pereges, 11:39
- Re: C90 long long, Noob, 11:38
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Joachim Schmitz, 11:37
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Bartc, 11:23
- Re: "ab" mode in fopen, Joachim Schmitz, 11:22
- Re: callback functions, Richard Heathfield, 11:05
- Re: the static identifier in the global scope, Richard Heathfield, 11:03
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, pereges, 11:00
- Re: the static identifier in the global scope, Ian Collins, 10:57
- Re: callback functions, Ian Collins, 10:56
- Re: callback functions, Chris Thomasson, 10:54
- Re: callback functions, Richard Heathfield, 10:49
- the static identifier in the global scope, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:46
- Re: callback functions, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 10:43
- Re: callback functions, Ian Collins, 10:41
- callback functions, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 10:25
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, jacob navia, 10:02
- Re: What is wrong in this program ?, Martin, 09:58
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Philip Potter, 09:42
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Richard Heathfield, 09:30
- Re: function pointer and pointer to function, Philip Potter, 09:30
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, pereges, 09:20
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, pereges, 09:17
- Re: function pointer and pointer to function, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 09:12
- Re: spin_lock, Chris Thomasson, 09:07
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 09:06
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Richard Heathfield, 09:05
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, pereges, 08:54
- What is wrong in this program ?, pereges, 08:48
- What is wrong in this program ?, pereges, 08:43
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, user923005, 08:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, user923005, 08:14
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Peter Nilsson, 08:12
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, user923005, 08:10
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Peter Nilsson, 08:08
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, user923005, 08:03
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Richard Heathfield, 07:50
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Willem, 07:43
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, arnuld, 07:41
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Jason20005, 07:10
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Chris McDonald, 07:07
- Re: Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Richard Heathfield, 06:59
- Re: How to generate random numbers in C, Ian Collins, 06:59
- How to generate random numbers in C, pereges, 06:54
- Why C dont allow the name of a variable start with a digit?, Jason20005, 06:42
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Peter Nilsson, 06:14
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Walter Roberson, 06:05
- Re: Debug statements, Peter Nilsson, 06:02
- Re: How to get more precision in C ?, Gordon Burditt, 06:02
- How to get more precision in C ?, pereges, 05:53
- Re: scanf, sulekhasweety, 05:43
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Richard, 05:41
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, Peter Nilsson, 05:38
- heathfield vs navia, Gerry Ford, 05:35
- Re: Extract en recognize barcode from image file., Kaz Kylheku, 04:43
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, Jack Klein, 04:35
- Re: Extract en recognize barcode from image file., Kaz Kylheku, 04:27
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Jack Klein, 04:22
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, ozbear, 04:17
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Stephen Sprunk, 03:57
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard, 03:42
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, Richard Heathfield, 03:42
- Re: lost. Help, Bill Cunningham, 03:33
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Kenny McCormack, 03:31
- Re: lost. Help, Bill Cunningham, 03:27
- Re: Extract en recognize barcode from image file., kurapix, 03:12
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 02:44
- Re: How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 02:42
- How to be a better C programmer?, istillshine, 02:37
- How to be a better C programmer?, xikouhui, 02:36
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Richard Tobin, 01:58
- Re: Problem with hdparam - TPA, Default User, 01:48
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, jxh, 01:48
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Richard Tobin, 01:38
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Richard Heathfield, 01:26
- Re: Debug statements, Robbie Hatley, 01:21
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 01:06
- Re: lost. Help, Lew Pitcher, 01:01
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 00:51
- Re: [OpenCV] Extract en recognize barcode from image file., Antoninus Twink, 00:47
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Mark Berry, 00:42
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 00:39
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Morris Dovey, 00:33
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Gordon Burditt, 00:33
- Re: Extract en recognize barcode from image file., kurapix, 00:32
- [OpenCV] Extract en recognize barcode from image file., kurapix, 00:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 00:23
- lost. Help, Bill Cunningham, 00:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jacob navia, 00:10
April 10, 2008
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 23:59
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 23:44
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, christian.bau, 23:33
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, mattia, 23:25
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, christian.bau, 23:19
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, vega_lope, 23:18
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Walter Roberson, 23:16
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Keith Thompson, 23:10
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, lawrence . jones, 22:56
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Morris Dovey, 22:55
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, mattia, 22:50
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Walter Roberson, 22:47
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, christian.bau, 22:45
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Antoninus Twink, 22:41
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Richard Tobin, 22:35
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, jxh, 22:32
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Tobin, 22:29
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 22:29
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Kenneth Brody, 22:26
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Walter Roberson, 22:24
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Paul Brettschneider, 22:20
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Keith Thompson, 22:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Paul Brettschneider, 22:14
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Paul Brettschneider, 22:13
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Walter Roberson, 22:02
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Morris Dovey, 22:00
- Re: Parentheses and compiler optimzation, Willem, 21:54
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Erik Wikström, 21:51
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Kenneth Brody, 21:49
- Parentheses and compiler optimzation, spasmous, 21:48
- Re: Problem with hdparam, Walter Roberson, 21:46
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Erik Wikström, 21:46
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, Martin, 21:42
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, vega_lope, 21:24
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Kenneth Brody, 21:17
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 21:12
- Problem with hdparam, Mark Berry, 21:06
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 21:05
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 20:56
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Paul Brettschneider, 20:54
- Re: scanf, Eric Sosman, 20:53
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, Ben Bacarisse, 20:47
- scanf, sulekhasweety, 20:46
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Antoninus Twink, 20:45
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, .rhavin grobert, 20:41
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, jxh, 20:25
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 20:24
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, Harald van Dijk, 20:18
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, Walter Roberson, 20:16
- Re: #define a macro that #includes, jxh, 20:15
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Walter Roberson, 20:12
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 20:09
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 20:02
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Erik Wikström, 19:46
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Walter Roberson, 19:42
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Flash Gordon, 19:41
- #define a macro that #includes, .rhavin grobert, 19:41
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 19:29
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 19:28
- Re: spin_lock, Rahul, 19:27
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Tobin, 19:26
- Re: "ab" mode in fopen, pereges, 19:25
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 19:21
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, vega_lope, 19:21
- Re: "ab" mode in fopen, Kenneth Brody, 19:18
- "ab" mode in fopen, pereges, 19:03
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, Martin, 18:55
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Erik Wikström, 18:55
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 18:53
- Re: spin_lock, Antoninus Twink, 18:53
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 18:51
- Re: does C allow this ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:47
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 18:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 18:35
- Re: volatile const, Richard Tobin, 18:32
- Re: algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, Walter Roberson, 18:28
- Re: function pointer, Philip Potter, 18:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: function pointer, lawrence . jones, 17:58
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Kenneth Brody, 17:57
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: C elements of style, Philip Potter, 17:56
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Kenneth Brody, 17:51
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Keith Thompson, 17:44
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 17:44
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Kenneth Brody, 17:43
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Morris Dovey, 17:36
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Martin Ambuhl, 17:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lawrence . jones, 17:29
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Stephen Sprunk, 17:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 17:02
- Re: function pointer, Bartc, 17:01
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 16:42
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 16:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 16:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 16:16
- algorithms, tips or info on dfa correction, vega_lope, 16:10
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 16:06
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Nick Keighley, 16:05
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Eric Sosman, 15:55
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Lew Pitcher, 15:54
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Lew Pitcher, 15:51
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, Ben Bacarisse, 15:43
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Nick Keighley, 15:42
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, bjarne, 15:27
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Joachim Schmitz, 15:07
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Ben Bacarisse, 15:04
- Re: does C allow this ?, Chris Dollin, 15:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Alf P. Steinbach, 14:53
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Morris Dovey, 14:50
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, arnuld, 14:44
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Martin, 14:43
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Joachim Schmitz, 14:36
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 14:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lbonafide, 14:25
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lbonafide, 14:23
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Morris Dovey, 14:16
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 14:12
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.5, Ben Bacarisse, 14:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jacob navia, 14:09
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jacob navia, 14:08
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Morris Dovey, 14:05
- Re: does C allow this ?, Eric Sosman, 14:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 14:01
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 14:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jacob navia, 13:51
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jacob navia, 13:47
- Re: volatile const, Joachim Schmitz, 13:47
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Joachim Schmitz, 13:44
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Lloyd Bonafide, 13:39
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Lloyd Bonafide, 13:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Lloyd Bonafide, 13:26
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 13:24
- does C allow this ?, pereges, 13:24
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Ben Bacarisse, 13:20
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Morris Dovey, 13:18
- Re: function pointer and pointer to function, Philip Potter, 13:17
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Ben Bacarisse, 13:16
- K&R2, exercise 5.5, arnuld, 13:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Nick Keighley, 13:06
- Re: function pointer, Philip Potter, 12:59
- Re: what is NULL pointer dereferencing, Morris Dovey, 12:55
- function pointer and pointer to function, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 12:49
- what is NULL pointer dereferencing, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 12:48
- Re: it is not printing the right values, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 12:47
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Ben Bacarisse, 12:36
- Re: extra character when writing file, Bartc, 12:26
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:25
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Philip Potter, 12:15
- Re: function pointer, Bartc, 12:14
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Nick Keighley, 12:13
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Richard, 12:12
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 12:12
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Ian Collins, 12:04
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 12:03
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Richard, 12:01
- Re: it is not printing the right values, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 11:54
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Morris Dovey, 11:45
- Re: function pointer, Philip Potter, 11:41
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 11:32
- Re: Reading words from a text file, mattia, 11:27
- Re: volatile const, Richard Bos, 11:25
- Re: volatile const, Andrey Tarasevich, 11:24
- Re: extra character when writing file, Willem, 11:22
- volatile const, Rahul, 11:16
- Re: extra character when writing file, Bartc, 11:09
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 11:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 10:39
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, ymuntyan, 10:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 10:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 10:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 10:26
- Re: K&R2, page 106 <strcmp>, Bartc, 10:25
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Richard, 10:24
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 10:21
- Re: it is not printing the right values, Chris McDonald, 10:19
- Re: '__setvideomode': unresolved external, Sjouke Burry, 10:19
- Re: function pointer, Bartc, 10:19
- it is not printing the right values, prashant.khade1623@xxxxxxxxx, 10:16
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 10:16
- K&R2, page 106 <strcmp>, arnuld, 10:11
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Ian Collins, 10:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 09:45
- Re: producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, Richard, 09:32
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 09:29
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 09:24
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 09:14
- '__setvideomode': unresolved external, Emerald Saint, 09:14
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 09:13
- Re: C elements of style, William Pursell, 09:03
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 08:48
- Re: Cleaning Up, Mucking Out and Paranoid Programming, Richard Bos, 08:45
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 08:41
- Re: Cleaning Up, Mucking Out and Paranoid Programming, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- producing the memory layout you really want is non-portable and deprecated, aarklon, 08:12
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Anand Hariharan, 08:11
- Cleaning Up, Mucking Out and Paranoid Programming, aarklon, 07:52
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 07:49
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, ymuntyan, 07:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 07:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 07:26
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 07:24
- Re: print output, aarklon, 07:19
- Re: spin_lock, Chris Thomasson, 07:12
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Alf P. Steinbach, 07:09
- Re: help needed with if- else cases, Barry Schwarz, 07:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 06:58
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 06:45
- Re: extra character when writing file, Richard Heathfield, 06:30
- Re: extra character when writing file, Jim, 06:15
- Re: extra character when writing file, Peter Nilsson, 06:12
- Re: extra character when writing file, Richard Heathfield, 06:03
- extra character when writing file, Jim, 05:33
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Falcon Kirtaran, 04:51
- Re: function pointer, Jack Klein, 04:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 03:41
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, CBFalconer, 03:26
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, CBFalconer, 03:23
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Peter Nilsson, 03:10
- Re: Reading words from a text file, CBFalconer, 03:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, user923005, 02:26
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 02:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, christian.bau, 02:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 02:15
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Keith Thompson, 02:03
- Re: How to make it faster?, Paul Hsieh, 01:54
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 01:52
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Peter Nilsson, 01:48
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 01:44
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 01:44
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 01:36
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 01:35
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 01:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lbonafide, 01:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 01:28
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 01:24
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 01:21
- Re: How to make it faster?, Peter Nilsson, 01:20
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 01:20
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 01:18
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 01:16
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 01:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 01:11
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Keith Thompson, 01:09
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 00:59
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 00:58
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 00:58
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Kenneth Brody, 00:55
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:51
- Re: Questions about mmap(), ppl, 00:48
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, jxh, 00:47
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Peter Nilsson, 00:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 00:16
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 00:01
April 09, 2008
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Lax, 23:59
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 23:57
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 23:50
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 23:46
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 23:46
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Dann Corbit, 23:43
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 23:41
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 23:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 23:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 23:35
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Eric Sosman, 23:31
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Falcon Kirtaran, 23:26
- Re: print output, Default User, 23:24
- Re: x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Walter Roberson, 23:22
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lawrence . jones, 23:11
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 23:11
- x&(x-1) ... why only 2's complement system?, Lax, 23:09
- Re: print output, Walter Roberson, 23:04
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 23:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 23:02
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 23:01
- Re: print output, Default User, 22:57
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Default User, 22:56
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 22:53
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 22:51
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Keith Thompson, 22:50
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, mattia, 22:45
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Keith Thompson, 22:44
- Re: How to make it faster?, Keith Thompson, 22:42
- Re: function pointer, gw7rib, 22:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 22:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Willem, 22:06
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 22:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 21:42
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ian Collins, 21:36
- Re: How to optimize?, Eric Sosman, 21:35
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 21:34
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 21:32
- Re: How to optimize?, Eric Sosman, 21:32
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Philip Potter, 21:13
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 21:04
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 21:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Willem, 21:01
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 20:59
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 20:57
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Kenny McCormack, 20:55
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 20:54
- Re: How to make it faster?, Paul Hsieh, 20:50
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 20:48
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 20:48
- Re: print output, Walter Roberson, 20:47
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 20:47
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 20:44
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 20:33
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 20:29
- print output, aarklon, 20:26
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Paul Hsieh, 20:23
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Hallvard B Furuseth, 20:20
- How to optimize?, filia&sofia, 20:19
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Philip Potter, 20:18
- Re: Public Access Compilers, topherwheeler, 20:15
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 20:15
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Flash Gordon, 20:10
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Ben Bacarisse, 20:10
- Re: How to make it faster?, Paul Hsieh, 20:01
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Antoninus Twink, 19:59
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:54
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:52
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard, 19:48
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 19:47
- Re: How to make it faster?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:44
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Philip Potter, 19:42
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Philip Potter, 19:39
- Re: How to make it faster?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:35
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Richard, 19:31
- Stainless Steel Bracelet KB1110 Jewelers, jewelry011, 19:23
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:20
- Re: How to make it faster?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:19
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:17
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 19:16
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Diego Martins, 19:16
- Re: How to make it faster?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 19:14
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Antoninus Twink, 19:12
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:09
- Re: help needed with if- else cases, Ben Bacarisse, 19:03
- Re: spin_lock, Antoninus Twink, 18:53
- help needed with if- else cases, pereges, 18:49
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Keith Thompson, 18:45
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Richard Heathfield, 18:41
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Kaz Kylheku, 18:38
- Re: #ifdef __cplusplus, Walter Roberson, 18:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lawrence . jones, 18:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lawrence . jones, 18:33
- #ifdef __cplusplus, mattia, 18:26
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Philip Potter, 18:25
- Re: Kernel modules syntaxes, Antoninus Twink, 18:20
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 18:17
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: Reading words from a text file, mattia, 18:14
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: Reading words from a text file, mattia, 18:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 17:52
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Philip Potter, 17:45
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: Reading words from a text file, Barry Schwarz, 17:20
- Re: recursion., Ben Bacarisse, 17:11
- Re: Reading words from a text file, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 17:10
- Re: recursion., Chris Dollin, 17:08
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Ben Bacarisse, 16:54
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Morris Dovey, 16:52
- Stainless Steel with Rubber Bangle KB432 Jewelers, jewelry066, 16:42
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Martin, 16:27
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Martin, 16:15
- Re: recursion., pereges, 16:15
- Re: int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) ??, John Bode, 16:06
- Re: Reading words from a text file, mattia, 15:21
- Re: spin_lock, Thad Smith, 15:12
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 15:11
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 15:07
- Re: recursion., Chris Dollin, 14:51
- Re: int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) ??, Chris Dollin, 14:49
- int main(int argc, const char * argv[]) ??, significantBit, 14:40
- spin_lock, InuY4sha, 14:34
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 14:31
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 14:30
- Re: Reading words from a text file, Eric Sosman, 14:29
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 14:27
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 14:25
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Richard Heathfield, 14:24
- Re: Reading words from a text file, Ben Bacarisse, 14:22
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 14:05
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 14:05
- Re: How to make it faster?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:00
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, Philip Potter, 13:59
- recursion., pereges, 13:57
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 13:53
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Morris Dovey, 13:49
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 13:44
- K&R2, exercise 5.4, arnuld, 13:18
- Kernel modules syntaxes, InuY4sha, 13:08
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Philip Potter, 12:55
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, Martin, 12:55
- Re: Arrays & Pointers, Philip Potter, 12:51
- Reading words from a text file, mattia, 12:14
- Re: C FAQs 6.12, arnuld, 11:34
- C FAQs 6.12, arnuld, 11:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 10:59
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 10:39
- www.jerseynflstore.com china custom JORDAN STAAL NHL JERSEY Nfl Super Bowl Jersey, nflstore98, 10:30
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Keith Thompson, 10:16
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Richard Heathfield, 10:10
- Re: function pointer, Richard Heathfield, 10:08
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Nick Keighley, 10:05
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Keith Thompson, 09:59
- function pointer, skim218, 09:50
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 09:50
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Richard Heathfield, 09:41
- Arrays & Pointers, arnuld, 09:34
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Walter Roberson, 09:13
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, arnuld, 08:57
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 08:18
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 07:53
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Bill Reid, 07:49
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Chris Thomasson, 07:39
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 07:37
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 07:28
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Thad Smith, 07:25
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Gordon Burditt, 07:09
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 07:08
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 06:58
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Ben Bacarisse, 06:57
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Richard Heathfield, 06:53
- Re: Reading a table, Chris Torek, 06:49
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 06:32
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 06:24
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 06:12
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 05:52
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, ozbear, 05:11
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 04:44
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Jack Klein, 04:39
- Re: inline, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 04:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 04:22
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, CBFalconer, 04:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 04:05
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 04:05
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, CBFalconer, 04:04
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 03:38
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 03:37
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, Bill Reid, 03:22
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 03:17
- Re: Information hiding, CBFalconer, 03:11
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Chris McDonald, 02:41
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 02:34
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 02:14
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Peter Nilsson, 02:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 01:47
- Re: Reading a table, Bill Reid, 01:31
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 01:16
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 01:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 01:01
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:37
- Re: detect non reentrant function, Antoninus Twink, 00:31
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:31
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:26
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, CBFalconer, 00:25
- Re: problem with multiple source file, CBFalconer, 00:19
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, CBFalconer, 00:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 00:06
April 08, 2008
- detect non reentrant function, SHP, 23:59
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 23:58
- Re: How to make it faster?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Tobin, 23:30
- Re: How to make it faster?, Eric Sosman, 23:28
- Re: Information hiding, Richard Tobin, 23:20
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Gordon Burditt, 23:20
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 23:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 23:14
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 23:09
- Re: Information hiding, Walter Roberson, 22:59
- Re: Information hiding, mattia, 22:57
- Re: Reading a table, Kenny McCormack, 22:48
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ben Bacarisse, 22:44
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 22:38
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Antoninus Twink, 22:34
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Keith Thompson, 22:32
- Re: Information hiding, Keith Thompson, 22:29
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Antoninus Twink, 22:18
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Dann Corbit, 22:18
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Flash Gordon, 22:09
- Re: Questions about mmap(), Dann Corbit, 22:08
- Re: Information hiding, Richard Heathfield, 22:00
- Questions about mmap(), Unknown Soldier, 21:50
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 21:45
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Kenny McCormack, 21:44
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Malcolm McLean, 21:42
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 21:40
- Re: Information hiding, Harald van Dijk, 21:28
- Re: Information hiding, Richard Heathfield, 21:17
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Dann Corbit, 20:56
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 20:48
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Willem, 20:44
- Re: C90 long long, Dann Corbit, 20:43
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Flash Gordon, 20:37
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Anand Hariharan, 20:35
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Keith Thompson, 20:29
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, Walter Roberson, 20:28
- Re: How to make it faster?, Bart, 20:26
- Re: How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 20:22
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 20:21
- Re: How to make it faster?, jacob navia, 20:17
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Keith Thompson, 20:16
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 20:14
- How to use qsort function of C library ?, pereges, 20:13
- Re: Information hiding, Keith Thompson, 20:11
- Re: Portability, Flash Gordon, 20:10
- Re: tools for C and C++, copx, 20:05
- Re: Reading a table, Richard Heathfield, 20:04
- Re: How to make it faster?, Eric Sosman, 19:59
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Richard Heathfield, 19:54
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, lbonafide, 19:50
- Re: Information hiding, Richard Heathfield, 19:50
- Re: Information hiding, Richard Heathfield, 19:47
- Re: How to make it faster?, Flash Gordon, 19:47
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, peter koch, 19:45
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 19:37
- Re: Information hiding, mattia, 19:23
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:20
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:16
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:08
- Re: inline, D. Webb, 19:07
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Keith Thompson, 18:52
- Re: Information hiding, mattia, 18:50
- Re: How to make it faster?, Eric Sosman, 18:35
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kaz Kylheku, 18:34
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:25
- jordan shoes(paypal payment) www.cnbbiz.com drop shiping, www.cnbbiz.com, 18:22
- Re: How to make it faster?, jacob navia, 18:16
- Re: Information hiding, dan, 18:15
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Philip Potter, 18:14
- Re: problem with multiple source file, Ben Bacarisse, 18:09
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 18:00
- Re: How to make it faster?, Walter Roberson, 17:58
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 17:57
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 17:54
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 17:53
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Harter, 17:51
- Re: How to make it faster?, Willem, 17:51
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 17:47
- Re: Information hiding, John Bode, 17:45
- Re: Using GCC as a Front-End, Noob, 17:07
- Re: How to make it faster?, Eric Sosman, 17:04
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Tobin, 16:51
- Re: inline, Malcolm McLean, 16:50
- Re: inline, InuY4sha, 16:49
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Tobin, 16:42
- inline, InuY4sha, 16:41
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Fei Liu, 16:37
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Malcolm McLean, 16:32
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, dj3vande, 16:31
- Re: problem with multiple source file, pereges, 16:27
- Re: How to make it faster?, Paul Hsieh, 16:25
- Re: Reading a table, Bill Reid, 16:08
- Re: problem with multiple source file, Ben Bacarisse, 16:05
- Re: How to make it faster?, Bart, 15:51
- Information hiding, mattia, 15:35
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Charlton Wilbur, 15:28
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ben Bacarisse, 15:27
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:20
- Using GCC as a Front-End, pingu219, 15:18
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, Barry Schwarz, 15:16
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Barry Schwarz, 15:16
- Re: problem with multiple source file, Barry Schwarz, 15:16
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 15:14
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 15:07
- Re: C90 long long, Ben Bacarisse, 14:54
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Doug Miller, 14:37
- Re: tools for C and C++, Kenny McCormack, 14:19
- Re: problem with multiple source file, pereges, 13:46
- problem with multiple source file, pereges, 13:42
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Richard Heathfield, 13:16
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 13:12
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 12:59
- sizeof()'s strange behviour, arnuld, 12:58
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Philip Potter, 12:57
- Re: C90 long long, Richard, 12:56
- Re: tools for C and C++, Richard, 12:54
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Malcolm McLean, 12:54
- Re: sizeof()'s strange behviour, Richard Bos, 12:52
- c sharp definition, yetomer, 12:37
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Tobin, 12:30
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.3, Philip Potter, 12:27
- Re: K&R2, exercise 5.3, Irrwahn Grausewitz, 12:19
- Re: K&R2 , section 5.4, Philip Potter, 12:14
- K&R2, exercise 5.3, arnuld, 12:04
- Re: K&R2 , section 5.4, Irrwahn Grausewitz, 11:52
- Re: How to make it faster?, Bart, 11:49
- K&R2 , section 5.4, arnuld, 11:34
- 全香港最濺IT Manager http://geocities.com/it_super_manager/, it_super_manager, 11:33
- Re: C90 long long, Bart, 11:33
- Re: C90 long long, Ian Collins, 11:24
- Re: long double, Richard Bos, 11:09
- Re: C90 long long, ymuntyan, 11:08
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 11:07
- Re: out, Richard Bos, 11:05
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Richard Heathfield, 11:03
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ian Collins, 11:03
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:56
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ian Collins, 10:55
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Richard Heathfield, 10:48
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 10:42
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 10:35
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ian Collins, 10:02
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 09:57
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Joachim Schmitz, 09:55
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, Keith Thompson, 09:52
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, Philip Potter, 09:51
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Philip Potter, 09:43
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Philip Potter, 09:40
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Martin Ambuhl, 09:31
- Re: tools for C and C++, Antoninus Twink, 09:31
- Re: C90 long long, user923005, 09:30
- Re: long double, Philip Potter, 09:25
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, user923005, 09:21
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, Richard Heathfield, 09:20
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 09:16
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, 2005, 09:00
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, Richard Heathfield, 08:47
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Richard Heathfield, 08:43
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Richard Heathfield, 08:41
- Re: C90 long long, user923005, 08:36
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, lector, 08:24
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, lector, 08:23
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Heathfield, 08:18
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, lector, 08:18
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, 2005, 08:11
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, William Pursell, 08:09
- Re: What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, Peter Nilsson, 08:06
- Re: tools for C and C++, William Pursell, 08:04
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, lector, 08:03
- Re: Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, Peter Nilsson, 08:02
- What are the differences in EOF & FEOF in the, 2005, 08:00
- Any idea why this program is not generating an output ?, lector, 07:53
- Re: How to make it faster?, user923005, 07:46
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, user923005, 07:44
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Don Bruder, 07:41
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, user923005, 07:41
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ian Collins, 07:39
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, Ian Collins, 07:37
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, 2005, 07:36
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, lector, 07:25
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, Ian Collins, 07:01
- Re: Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, 2005, 06:57
- Why would someone use c++ compiler on a C code?, 2005, 06:56
- Re: How to make it faster?, Keith Thompson, 06:30
- Re: How to make it faster?, Keith Thompson, 06:23
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 05:31
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 04:47
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kaz Kylheku, 04:14
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Dann Corbit, 04:07
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Dann Corbit, 03:31
- Re: C90 long long, Dann Corbit, 03:23
- Re: C90 long long, Dann Corbit, 03:14
- Re: Prog question, Eric Sosman, 03:01
- Re: Prog question, Walter Roberson, 02:58
- Re: Problem with dlopen, jxh, 02:31
- Prog question, 2005, 02:15
- Re: Portability, Ioannis Vranos, 02:13
- Re: How to make it faster?, Wolfgang Draxinger, 01:56
- tools for C and C++, mbrown, 01:54
- Re: Portability, Walter Roberson, 01:43
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Tobin, 01:02
- Re: How to make it faster?, Richard Tobin, 01:00
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Richard, 00:54
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Keith Thompson, 00:50
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:46
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 00:40
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Antoninus Twink, 00:35
- Re: long double, Eric Sosman, 00:30
April 07, 2008
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 23:52
- Re: long double, Philip Potter, 23:45
- Re: How to make it faster?, Walter Roberson, 23:39
- Re: How to make it faster?, Walter Roberson, 23:34
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Fei Liu, 23:34
- Re: How to make it faster?, Fei Liu, 23:31
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Keith Thompson, 23:23
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Eric Sosman, 23:10
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 22:57
- Re: How to make it faster?, jacob navia, 22:54
- Re: Portability, Ioannis Vranos, 22:51
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 22:47
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 22:43
- Re: out, Keith Thompson, 22:25
- Re: out, Keith Thompson, 22:23
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 22:21
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 22:20
- Re: Sharing a variable across multiple files, Antoninus Twink, 22:17
- Re: Union trouble, Bartc, 22:10
- Re: Portability, Ian Collins, 21:51
- Re: out, Flash Gordon, 21:36
- Re: How to make it faster?, Flash Gordon, 21:32
- Re: long double, Eric Sosman, 21:23
- Re: Sharing a variable across multiple files, Morris Dovey, 21:19
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, user923005, 21:17
- Re: long double, Bartc, 21:13
- Sharing a variable across multiple files, aruna . mysore, 21:11
- Re: out, Walter Roberson, 21:07
- Re: Portability, Flash Gordon, 21:06
- Re: How to make it faster?, Eric Sosman, 21:04
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 20:58
- Re: out, Richard, 20:51
- Re: long double, Eric Sosman, 20:40
- Re: How to make it faster?, Bartc, 20:36
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Unknown Soldier, 20:33
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 20:32
- Re: How to make it faster?, Walter Roberson, 20:27
- Re: How to make it faster?, Willem, 20:03
- Re: out, Kenny McCormack, 20:01
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 19:54
- Re: Problem with dlopen, dj3vande, 19:53
- Re: How to make it faster?, Malcolm McLean, 19:50
- Re: out, Richard, 19:47
- Re: How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:43
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 19:42
- How to make it faster?, istillshine, 19:39
- Re: out, Richard, 19:37
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Malcolm McLean, 19:37
- Re: out, Walter Roberson, 19:31
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Walter Roberson, 19:22
- Re: Problem with dlopen, Antoninus Twink, 19:18
- Re: out, Richard, 19:15
- Problem with dlopen, Unknown Soldier, 19:13
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, CBFalconer, 19:05
- Re: out, Harald van Dijk, 18:56
- Re: long double, Bartc, 18:54
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Keith Thompson, 18:51
- Re: long double, jacob navia, 18:50
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, lawrence . jones, 18:44
- Re: long double, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: long double, jacob navia, 18:31
- Re: Portability, Walter Roberson, 18:30
- Re: C90 long long, Malcolm McLean, 18:29
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Re: long double, jacob navia, 18:27
- Re: long double, Malcolm McLean, 18:04
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: long double, Ioannis Vranos, 16:43
- long double, broli, 16:19
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Dik T. Winter, 15:58
- Re: writing to pipe [++OT], Morris Dovey, 15:57
- Re: Portability, Ioannis Vranos, 15:30
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 14:55
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Philip Potter, 14:53
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Richard Tobin, 14:53
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 14:52
- Re: Portability, Ioannis Vranos, 14:44
- Re: Portability, Richard Heathfield, 14:31
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 14:30
- Re: Portability, Ben Bacarisse, 14:29
- Re: Portability, Richard, 14:12
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 14:09
- Re: Portability, Ioannis Vranos, 13:45
- Бесплатная медицинская консультация врача, Золотой Клон, 13:30
- Re: Portability, Malcolm McLean, 13:18
- Re: Portability, Ian Collins, 12:59
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 12:52
- Re: Portability, Ian Collins, 12:45
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 11:55
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 11:47
- Re: C90 long long, Bartc, 11:28
- Re: bus error, Richard Tobin, 11:23
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 10:50
- Re: C90 long long, Bartc, 10:43
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 10:24
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, Nick Keighley, 10:08
- Re: C90 long long, Bartc, 10:07
- Re: [Spam], Default User, 08:49
- Re: Portability, Ian Collins, 08:30
- Re: case labels, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Richard Heathfield, 08:20
- Re: case labels, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: compiling multiple source files, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: void * vs. T *, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: bus error, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: writing to pipe, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: How to eliminate multiple declaration error for a symbol present in both libs( without modifying libs), David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: printf and cout, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: strtod( ), David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, David Thompson, 08:00
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, jacob navia, 07:46
- Re: Portability, jacob navia, 07:43
- Re: Portability, Richard Heathfield, 07:37
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 07:23
- Re: Portability, Jack Klein, 07:21
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Kaz Kylheku, 07:21
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, Richard, 07:17
- Re: out, Richard, 07:15
- Re: out, Jack Klein, 06:43
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 06:39
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, osmium, 05:03
- Re: C90 long long, Keith Thompson, 03:12
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, CBFalconer, 03:08
- Re: C elements of style, Chris Thomasson, 02:49
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 01:15
- Re: C90 long long, Bartc, 01:01
- Re: Thanks all for help help help, Emerald Saint, 00:59
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Keith Thompson, 00:12
April 06, 2008
- Re: Portability, Eric Sosman, 23:50
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Eric Sosman, 23:28
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 23:24
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Eric Sosman, 22:56
- Re: [Spam], Richard, 22:43
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Don Bruder, 22:41
- Re: Ambiguous/debatable errata, Eric Sosman, 22:41
- Re: [Spam], Joachim Schmitz, 22:39
- Re: Portability, Morris Dovey, 22:30
- Re: Portability, Flash Gordon, 22:21
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Gordon Burditt, 22:18
- Ambiguous/debatable errata, Ioannis Vranos, 22:06
- Re: C90 long long, Flash Gordon, 22:05
- Re: Portability, Ian Collins, 22:03
- Re: C90 long long, Morris Dovey, 21:55
- Re: help help help, Kenny McCormack, 21:51
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, jacob navia, 21:43
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, osmium, 21:41
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, jacob navia, 21:39
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, lector, 21:39
- Re: help help help, Antoninus Twink, 21:39
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, lector, 21:36
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 21:34
- Re: storing 1,000,000 records, jacob navia, 21:32
- storing 1,000,000 records, lector, 21:27
- Portability, jacob navia, 21:14
- Re: C90 long long, Richard, 20:41
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 20:36
- Re: C90 long long, Keith Thompson, 20:34
- Re: [Spam], Kenny McCormack, 20:11
- Re: [Spam], Joachim Schmitz, 19:46
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 19:35
- Re: C90 long long, Richard Heathfield, 19:33
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Malcolm McLean, 19:08
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Malcolm McLean, 19:04
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 18:57
- Re: A* algorithm, Barry Schwarz, 18:50
- Re: C90 long long, Barry Schwarz, 18:50
- Re: A* algorithm, Barry Schwarz, 18:50
- Re: C90 long long, jacob navia, 18:09
- Re: C90 long long, Harald van Dijk, 17:48
- C90 long long, Bartc, 17:37
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard, 16:24
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 16:14
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 15:08
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:47
- Re: help help help, Richard Heathfield, 14:15
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 14:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:08
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Sensei, 13:54
- Re: A* algorithm, sulekhasweety, 13:46
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, arnuld, 13:21
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Lloyd Bonafide, 13:03
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 12:56
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Juha Nieminen, 11:59
- help help help, Emerald Saint, 11:10
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 10:47
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, arnuld, 10:37
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, arnuld, 10:34
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, arnuld, 10:30
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 10:11
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 10:00
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 09:56
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 09:53
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, bc1891, 09:24
- Re: A* algorithm, Joachim Schmitz, 09:20
- Re: A* algorithm, Joachim Schmitz, 09:17
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Joachim Schmitz, 09:08
- Re: A* algorithm, Barry Schwarz, 09:04
- Re: qsort problem, Barry Schwarz, 09:04
- Re: A* algorithm, Barry Schwarz, 09:04
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 08:55
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Richard Heathfield, 08:28
- Re: const char *const * ??, copx, 08:21
- Re: [Q]const char *const * ??, copx, 08:13
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 07:58
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 07:45
- Re: preprocessor question, Keith Thompson, 07:12
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Keith Thompson, 07:03
- Re: C++ more efficient than C?, Ian Collins, 06:56
- C++ more efficient than C?, copx, 06:46
- Re: preprocessor question, Robbie Hatley, 06:07
- Re: out, Martin Ambuhl, 05:38
- Re: padding and enums, Robbie Hatley, 05:35
- Re: const char *const * ??, itsolution, 05:34
- Re: How to show accuracy differences?, Robbie Hatley, 05:00
- Re: out, Default User, 04:51
- Re: out, Bill Cunningham, 04:50
- Re: out, Bill Cunningham, 04:49
- Re: out, Robbie Hatley, 04:38
- Re: out, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Re: out, Robbie Hatley, 04:17
- [Q]const char *const * ??, itsolution, 04:10
- Re: qsort problem, Ioannis Vranos, 04:06
- Re: qsort problem, Ioannis Vranos, 04:04
- Re: out, Keith Thompson, 04:03
- Re: out, Keith Thompson, 03:56
- Re: enum, Robbie Hatley, 03:51
- Re: [Spam], CBFalconer, 03:49
- Re: qsort problem, Ioannis Vranos, 03:48
- Re: qsort problem, istillshine, 03:45
- Revenue and Technology of Clandestine Organizations, , 03:37
- Re: qsort problem, Ioannis Vranos, 03:37
- qsort problem, istillshine, 03:27
- Re: out, Richard Heathfield, 03:24
- Re: [Makefile]How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Robbie Hatley, 03:19
- Re: out, Ian Collins, 01:40
- Re: out, Bill Cunningham, 01:33
- Re: out, Default User, 01:32
- Re: out, vippstar, 01:24
- Re: out, Ian Collins, 01:19
- out, Bill Cunningham, 01:09
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Chad, 00:55
- Re: [Spam], Flash Gordon, 00:45
April 05, 2008
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Keith Thompson, 23:17
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Kenny McCormack, 23:14
- [Spam], Spmbstr, 22:36
- hand made art carft, el sanatlari, www.bizimelimiz.com, 22:25
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:20
- Re: how this works ?, Keith Thompson, 21:06
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 21:06
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Kenny McCormack, 21:02
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Keith Thompson, 20:58
- Re: Not a number problem, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: how this works ?, Willem, 19:50
- Re: Not a number problem, Gordon Burditt, 19:16
- Re: A* algorithm, sulekhasweety, 18:00
- Re: C elements of style, Tony Mc, 17:39
- Re: how this works ?, lector, 17:29
- Re: how this works ?, Willem, 16:37
- Re: Can 'gprof' show profile info on lib routines such as 'malloc'?, Kenny McCormack, 16:22
- Re: padding and enums, CBFalconer, 16:02
- Re: how this works ?, lector, 16:01
- Re: Not a number problem, istillshine, 15:17
- Re: Not a number problem, istillshine, 15:14
- Re: Can 'gprof' show profile info on lib routines such as 'malloc'?, Flash Gordon, 15:01
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:29
- Re: Can 'gprof' show profile info on lib routines such as 'malloc'?, Antoninus Twink, 14:02
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Richard Heathfield, 13:53
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Kenny McCormack, 13:51
- Can 'gprof' show profile info on lib routines such as 'malloc'?, Terry, 13:35
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Kenny McCormack, 13:34
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Joachim Schmitz, 13:08
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Joachim Schmitz, 13:02
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Malcolm McLean, 12:32
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Joachim Schmitz, 12:15
- Re: padding and enums, Richard Tobin, 12:09
- Re: A* algorithm, Joachim Schmitz, 12:06
- Re: Not a number problem, Richard Tobin, 11:45
- Re: using the shm_open() function for shared memory access in linux -- regarding, Keith Thompson, 11:36
- Re: padding and enums, Keith Thompson, 11:30
- Re: using the shm_open() function for shared memory access in linux -- regarding, Antoninus Twink, 11:22
- using the shm_open() function for shared memory access in linux -- regarding, gunasingh, 10:58
- Re: A* algorithm, Barry Schwarz, 10:45
- How to show accuracy differences?, Sensei, 10:44
- Re: padding and enums, Andrey Tarasevich, 09:39
- New Air Force 1, Jordan Combination,AF1 + J3,AF1 + J4,,AF1 + J5,AF1+ J12,AF1 + J23,J10 + J12(all Price 30USD) - Sunrise East Asia Sporting Goods Co.,LTD, tradeinputian . 002, 09:23
- Re: how this works ?, Default User, 09:19
- Re: Not a number problem, Gordon Burditt, 08:22
- Re: padding and enums, CBFalconer, 07:57
- Re: how this works ?, lector, 07:56
- Re: how this works ?, lector, 07:44
- Re: how this works ?, lector, 07:37
- Re: Not a number problem, istillshine, 06:46
- Re: Not a number problem, istillshine, 06:18
- Re: C elements of style, lawrence . jones, 05:40
- Re: strings, Dann Corbit, 05:24
- Re: strings, Bill Cunningham, 02:51
- Re: strings, Bill Cunningham, 02:37
- Re: strings, Keith Thompson, 02:36
- Re: padding and enums, Keith Thompson, 02:11
- Re: strings, Keith Thompson, 02:07
- Re: strings, Dann Corbit, 02:02
- Re: strings, Bill Cunningham, 01:52
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 01:13
- Re: strings, Dann Corbit, 01:13
- Re: Not a number problem, Keith Thompson, 01:04
- Re: strings, Bill Cunningham, 00:52
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Keith Thompson, 00:46
- Re: strings, Dann Corbit, 00:34
- Re: extern declaration, Joe Wright, 00:30
- Re: Not a number problem, jacob navia, 00:22
- Re: Not a number problem, christian.bau, 00:20
- strings, Bill Cunningham, 00:20
- Re: Not a number problem, Walter Roberson, 00:16
- Re: Not a number problem, jacob navia, 00:12
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, jacob navia, 00:08
- Re: padding and enums, CBFalconer, 00:04
April 04, 2008
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, CBFalconer, 23:57
- Re: enum, bc1891, 23:36
- Re: Not a number problem, Walter Roberson, 23:35
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Flash Gordon, 23:35
- Re: enum, Walter Roberson, 23:19
- Re: Not a number problem, istillshine, 23:14
- enum, Bill Cunningham, 23:10
- Re: Union trouble, Ben Pfaff, 22:59
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Antoninus Twink, 22:51
- Re: Union trouble, Keith Thompson, 22:50
- Re: padding and enums, Andrey Tarasevich, 22:35
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 22:26
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 22:23
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 22:18
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 22:03
- Re: padding and enums, Keith Thompson, 22:02
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 22:01
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 21:54
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, dj3vande, 21:25
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Dann Corbit, 21:23
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Rui Maciel, 20:35
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Rui Maciel, 20:23
- Re: padding and enums, Default User, 20:05
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 19:40
- Re: padding and enums, Walter Roberson, 19:35
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, jacob navia, 19:32
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 19:23
- Re: padding and enums, aarklon, 19:14
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Richard Heathfield, 19:10
- Re: padding and enums, Keith Thompson, 18:38
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Keith Thompson, 18:23
- padding and enums, aarklon, 18:16
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Bartc, 18:13
- A* algorithm, sulekhasweety, 18:11
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Hallvard B Furuseth, 18:10
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: Not a number problem, Philip Potter, 18:01
- Re: C elements of style, Chris Thomasson, 17:59
- Re: Multithreading Books, Richard, 17:51
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Richard, 17:47
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Bartc, 17:47
- Re: how this works ?, Lew Pitcher, 17:33
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ben Bacarisse, 17:32
- Re: Not a number problem, vippstar, 17:31
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., John Bode, 17:31
- Re: C elements of style, Chris Thomasson, 17:30
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., vippstar, 17:26
- Re: how this works ?, Richard Heathfield, 17:26
- Re: Debug statements, vippstar, 17:19
- how this works ?, lector, 17:08
- Re: Not a number problem, Nick Keighley, 17:02
- SEO, programming discussion Forum, technica, 16:59
- Re: Not a number problem, Nick Keighley, 16:55
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, danzona, 16:44
- Not a number problem, istillshine, 16:43
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Owen Jacobson, 16:25
- Re: Which function header do you prefer?, Martin Ambuhl, 16:10
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, CBFalconer, 16:08
- Re: C elements of style, Kenneth Brody, 15:39
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Barry Schwarz, 15:24
- Re: Which function header do you prefer?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 15:12
- Re: Which function header do you prefer?, Ben Bacarisse, 15:09
- Re: Macro constants, Ben Bacarisse, 15:04
- Re: Macro constants, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:59
- Re: Macro constants, Ioannis Vranos, 14:57
- Which function header do you prefer?, istillshine, 14:50
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:37
- Re: Macro constants, Ben Bacarisse, 14:14
- Re: -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, Nick Keighley, 14:08
- Re: Debug statements, Philip Potter, 13:50
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 13:45
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 13:43
- Re: Reading BSD system code, Richard Tobin, 13:42
- Re: Macro constants, Ioannis Vranos, 13:32
- Re: C elements of style, Joachim Schmitz, 12:58
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Rui Maciel, 12:49
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Rui Maciel, 12:45
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Bartc, 12:11
- Re: Multithreading Books, Chris Thomasson, 12:09
- Re: preprocessor question, Keith Thompson, 10:58
- Re: Multithreading Books, Piotr, 10:36
- preprocessor question, Nathan Moinvaziri, 10:22
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Richard Bos, 09:22
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 09:20
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, James Dow Allen, 09:18
- -atof- function , example from section 4.2 K&R2, arnuld, 09:12
- Re: C elements of style, Joachim Schmitz, 08:44
- Re: C elements of style, Joachim Schmitz, 08:42
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, CBFalconer, 08:22
- Re: Multithreading Books, Keith Thompson, 08:15
- Re: Debug statements, Keith Thompson, 08:13
- Re: Software tools in Pascal: did I make a mistake?, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 08:11
- Re: Multithreading Books, Antoninus Twink, 08:11
- Re: Reading BSD system code, Antoninus Twink, 08:06
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 07:39
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:33
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, arnuld, 06:53
- Re: Software tools in Pascal: did I make a mistake?, Friedrich Dominicus, 06:34
- Multithreading Books, DanielJohnson, 06:10
- Re: Debug statements, Robbie Hatley, 05:52
- Re: Debug statements, Robbie Hatley, 05:34
- Re: Reading BSD system code, Walter Roberson, 05:00
- Re: Reading BSD system code, Ian Collins, 04:53
- Reading BSD system code, istillshine, 04:41
- Re: Macro constants, Walter Roberson, 03:35
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, santosh, 03:02
- Re: Macro constants, Ioannis Vranos, 02:59
- Re: Macro constants, Thad Smith, 02:45
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Keith Thompson, 01:27
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Default User, 01:24
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 01:19
- Macro constants, Ioannis Vranos, 01:15
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Gordon Burditt, 00:51
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, christian.bau, 00:38
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., christian.bau, 00:24
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, CBFalconer, 00:06
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Bartc, 00:04
April 03, 2008
- Re: Software tools in Pascal: did I make a mistake?, CBFalconer, 23:59
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, jacob navia, 23:57
- Re: TCP File Transfer behind NAT, Antoninus Twink, 23:52
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Robbie Hatley, 23:51
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: TCP File Transfer behind NAT, Richard Tobin, 23:44
- Re: Debug statements, Ben Bacarisse, 23:39
- Re: Debug statements, Ben Bacarisse, 23:37
- Re: TCP File Transfer behind NAT, Antoninus Twink, 23:27
- Re: Debug statements, Robbie Hatley, 23:25
- Re: Debug statements, Keith Thompson, 23:12
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, CBFalconer, 23:11
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Kenneth Brody, 22:51
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Dann Corbit, 22:32
- Re: C compiler version check, Dann Corbit, 22:14
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Keith Thompson, 22:13
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Dann Corbit, 22:06
- Re: C elements of style, Kenneth Brody, 22:05
- Re: Debug statements, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: Optimization, Andrey Tarasevich, 22:00
- Re: C elements of style, Kenneth Brody, 22:00
- Re: C elements of style, Kenneth Brody, 21:57
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ian Collins, 21:46
- Re: C elements of style, Kenneth Brody, 21:46
- Re: C elements of style, Default User, 21:40
- Re: ftp connection through C., Kenny McCormack, 21:38
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ian Collins, 21:37
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ian Collins, 21:34
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, jacob navia, 20:46
- Re: Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Ben Pfaff, 20:45
- Not quite standard... but socially acceptable, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:38
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ben Pfaff, 20:29
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Bartc, 20:23
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Richard, 20:21
- Re: Software tools in Pascal: did I make a mistake?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 20:10
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 19:36
- Re: ftp connection through C., jacob navia, 19:35
- Software tools in Pascal: did I make a mistake?, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 19:32
- Re: ftp connection through C., Kenny McCormack, 19:23
- Re: C elements of style, Eric Sosman, 19:04
- Re: C elements of style, Eric Sosman, 19:00
- Re: C elements of style, Keith Thompson, 18:48
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 18:43
- Re: C elements of style, Walter Roberson, 18:40
- Re: Debug statements, Ben Bacarisse, 18:38
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 18:36
- Re: Optimization, John Bode, 18:34
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 18:33
- Re: C elements of style, Walter Roberson, 18:32
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ben Bacarisse, 18:31
- Re: Debug statements, jacob navia, 18:30
- Re: C elements of style, Walter Roberson, 18:28
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 18:25
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Default User, 18:23
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 18:18
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 18:12
- Re: C compiler version check, Default User, 18:12
- Re: Debug statements, Ben Pfaff, 18:11
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 18:07
- Re: Debug statements, vippstar, 18:04
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 18:04
- Re: C elements of style, Default User, 17:59
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: C elements of style, Eric Sosman, 17:58
- Debug statements, vivek, 17:58
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., vippstar, 17:56
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Bacarisse, 17:55
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 17:52
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 17:51
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 17:47
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Hallvard B Furuseth, 17:47
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 17:42
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 17:28
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., vippstar, 17:26
- Re: Optimization, Ben Pfaff, 17:20
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Hallvard B Furuseth, 17:17
- Re: Optimization, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 17:08
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., vippstar, 17:00
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, arnuld, 16:47
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Richard Heathfield, 16:34
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Ben Bacarisse, 16:20
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, arnuld, 16:18
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 16:16
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Hallvard B Furuseth, 16:08
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Ben Bacarisse, 16:04
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, arnuld, 16:01
- Re: would C be easier to read if..., Chris Dollin, 15:55
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Richard Heathfield, 15:53
- Re: K&R2, exercise 4-2, Richard Heathfield, 15:52
- would C be easier to read if..., Robert Smith, 15:47
- K&R2, exercise 4-2, arnuld, 15:44
- Re: TCP File Transfer behind NAT, Walter Roberson, 15:42
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Andrew Haley, 15:09
- Re: Optimization, vippstar, 13:46
- Re: point classes, design of class relation, Richard Heathfield, 13:43
- Re: K&R2 section 4.1 example, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:05
- Re: point classes, design of class relation, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:01
- point classes, design of class relation, Brice Rebsamen, 12:51
- Re: Optimization, Richard Heathfield, 12:35
- K&R2 section 4.1 example, arnuld, 12:33
- Optimization, InuY4sha, 12:20
- TCP File Transfer behind NAT, Saurabh, 12:11
- Re: A conundrum in C: found this fragment in Steve McConnell's CODE COMPLETE, Ben Bacarisse, 12:05
- Re: C elements of style, Himanshu Chauhan, 12:02
- Re: A conundrum in C: found this fragment in Steve McConnell's CODE COMPLETE, Philip Potter, 11:59
- Re: C elements of style, Joachim Schmitz, 11:40
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 11:35
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Tobin, 10:42
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Tobin, 10:39
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Tobin, 10:33
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, santosh, 10:29
- Re: C elements of style, santosh, 10:21
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 09:25
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 09:22
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, James Dow Allen, 08:34
- Re: extern declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 08:17
- Re: extern declaration, Andrey Tarasevich, 08:15
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Keith Thompson, 08:01
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Black Barry, 08:01
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 07:57
- Re: C elements of style, schiller1800, 07:49
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 07:47
- Re: C elements of style, schiller1800, 07:37
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Ben Pfaff, 07:28
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Ben Pfaff, 07:25
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Gerry Ford, 07:24
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 07:23
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Harald van Dijk, 07:21
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Morris Dovey, 06:55
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Keith Thompson, 06:51
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 06:41
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 06:35
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Morris Dovey, 06:23
- Re: A conundrum in C: found this fragment in Steve McConnell's CODE COMPLETE, Robbie Hatley, 05:43
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 05:30
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 05:30
- Re: Recursive function won't compile, Robbie Hatley, 05:28
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Mike, 05:17
- Re: Naming question, Gregory Pietsch, 05:08
- Re: C elements of style, Keith Thompson, 05:05
- Re: C elements of style, Keith Thompson, 05:02
- Re: C elements of style, Keith Thompson, 04:56
- Re: C elements of style, Keith Thompson, 04:46
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Jack Klein, 04:43
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Heathfield, 04:23
- Re: any error in the code, santosh, 04:20
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, santosh, 04:11
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Keith Thompson, 04:09
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Keith Thompson, 04:03
- Re: C compiler version check [OT], Morris Dovey, 03:59
- Re: C compiler version check, Keith Thompson, 03:58
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Kenny McCormack, 03:56
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Kenny McCormack, 03:56
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Anonymous, 03:45
- Re: C compiler version check, Tim Prince, 03:38
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., CBFalconer, 03:32
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 02:41
- C compiler version check, Denny, 02:39
- Re: C elements of style, Mark McIntyre, 02:30
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Mark McIntyre, 02:28
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, Mark McIntyre, 02:26
- Re: dont read heathfield book, Mark McIntyre, 02:26
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Tobin, 01:25
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 01:19
- Re: C elements of style, Dann Corbit, 01:06
- Re: Strange sintax, Dann Corbit, 01:01
- Re: ftp connection through C., Antoninus Twink, 00:41
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Tobin, 00:34
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Pfaff, 00:28
- Re: Accent problem, Antoninus Twink, 00:27
- Re: const confusion, Richard Heathfield, 00:26
- Re: ftp connection through C., jacob navia, 00:24
- Re: Printing simple shapes on screen, Antoninus Twink, 00:23
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Wolfgang Draxinger, 00:20
- const confusion, spasmous, 00:18
- Re: ftp connection through C., Antoninus Twink, 00:17
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Heathfield, 00:16
- Re: Regular expressions (multiple match problem), Antoninus Twink, 00:14
April 02, 2008
- A conundrum in C: found this fragment in Steve McConnell's CODE COMPLETE, benmarco7, 23:35
- Re: More bit shifting issues, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:21
- Re: C elements of style, Flash Gordon, 23:14
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 22:35
- Re: C elements of style, Default User, 22:34
- Re: C elements of style, Walter Roberson, 22:34
- Re: C elements of style, Ben Pfaff, 22:27
- Re: Strange sintax, Ben Pfaff, 22:25
- Re: C elements of style, aarklon, 22:15
- Re: C elements of style, Flash Gordon, 22:10
- Re: C elements of style, Richard Tobin, 22:09
- Re: C elements of style, Eric Sosman, 21:58
- Re: Strange sintax, user923005, 21:57
- Re: C elements of style, user923005, 21:55
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Ioannis Vranos, 21:51
- Re: Accent problem, Ben, 21:42
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, lawrence . jones, 21:40
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 21:39
- C elements of style, aarklon, 21:26
- Re: ftp connection through C., jacob navia, 21:08
- Re: Accent problem, Flash Gordon, 20:24
- Re: ftp connection through C., Kenny McCormack, 20:11
- Re: Regular expressions (multiple match problem), Flash Gordon, 20:05
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Kenny McCormack, 19:58
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Default User, 19:53
- Re: How to become a good programmer like jacob navia ?, Kenny McCormack, 19:50
- Re: ftp connection through C., Kenny McCormack, 19:48
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 19:46
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Kenny McCormack, 19:46
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Flash Gordon, 19:44
- Re: Accent problem, Ben, 19:13
- Accent problem, Ben, 19:11
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Gordon Burditt, 18:50
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, David Tiktin, 18:40
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, Ben Pfaff, 18:31
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Keith Thompson, 18:30
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Ben Pfaff, 18:12
- Re: extern declaration, Kenneth Brody, 18:12
- Re: Strange sintax, Ben Pfaff, 18:06
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Ben Pfaff, 18:05
- Re: my doubts in C, Kenneth Brody, 17:59
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Richard, 17:58
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 17:41
- Re: How to become a good programmer like jacob navia ?, vippstar, 17:31
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Eric Sosman, 17:16
- Re: ftp connection through C., Richard, 17:09
- Re: ftp connection through C., Friedrich Dominicus, 16:53
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., broli, 16:50
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, John Bode, 16:47
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Joachim Schmitz, 16:46
- Re: my doubts in C, John Bode, 16:45
- Re: extern declaration, Richard Heathfield, 16:43
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Richard Heathfield, 16:40
- Re: my doubts in C, John Bode, 16:39
- Re: extern declaration, Magic.Yang, 16:36
- Re: any error in the code, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:34
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 16:26
- Re: legality of signature changes of callback functions, regis, 16:25
- Re: my doubts in C, CBFalconer, 16:24
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, arnuld, 16:23
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., broli, 16:23
- Re: dont read heathfield book, broli, 16:07
- Re: How to become a good programmer like jacob navia ?, broli, 16:06
- Re: 调用createwindow函数程序自动退出(calling createwindow function the system exit), Wolfgang Draxinger, 15:57
- Re: extern declaration, Richard Heathfield, 15:53
- Re: dont read heathfield book, jacob navia, 15:51
- Re: How to become a good programmer like jacob navia ?, jacob navia, 15:48
- Re: 调用createwindow函数程序自动退出(calling createwindow function the system exit), Hyuga, 15:44
- extern declaration, Rahul, 15:35
- Re: my doubts in C, Chris Dollin, 14:57
- Re: any error in the code, Joachim Schmitz, 14:56
- my doubts in C, geese786, 14:49
- dont read heathfield book, geese786, 14:47
- Re: opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, geese786, 14:42
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, geese786, 14:34
- opinion poll: who is better programmer navia or heathfield ?, geese786, 14:31
- How to become a good programmer like jacob navia ?, geese786, 14:30
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, Philip Potter, 14:15
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Ioannis Vranos, 14:09
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Philip Potter, 14:09
- Re: ftp connection through C., jacob navia, 14:02
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, jacob navia, 13:50
- Re: ftp connection through C., rkpopuri, 13:44
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Ioannis Vranos, 13:32
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Ioannis Vranos, 13:28
- Re: strange calling convention?, Richard Bos, 12:37
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 12:28
- Re: Printing simple shapes on screen, Richard Bos, 12:17
- Re: any error in the code, Bartc, 12:13
- Re: Printing simple shapes on screen, Richard Heathfield, 12:07
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Nick Keighley, 12:00
- Printing simple shapes on screen, C++ Newbie, 11:40
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Bartc, 11:37
- Re: Strange sintax, Ben Bacarisse, 11:24
- Re: Strange sintax, Walter Roberson, 11:09
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Bartc, 11:05
- Strange sintax, InuY4sha, 10:58
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Tobin, 10:54
- Re: Question about function "settimeofday", Walter Roberson, 10:51
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Boltar, 10:38
- Re: Regular expressions (multiple match problem), mikko.n, 10:37
- Re: ftp connection through C., Antoninus Twink, 10:29
- Re: calling createwindow function the program exit, jacob navia, 10:25
- Question about function "settimeofday", Martin.Dong, 10:11
- Re: Regular expressions (multiple match problem), Antoninus Twink, 10:01
- Re: any error in the code, Nick Keighley, 09:57
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 09:53
- Re: ftp connection through C., Walter Roberson, 09:50
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, Walter Roberson, 09:45
- Re: ftp connection through C., Antoninus Twink, 09:43
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 09:39
- Re: any error in the code, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:29
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, CBFalconer, 09:26
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, santosh, 09:18
- Re: Regular expressions (multiple match problem), Walter Roberson, 09:01
- Re: any error in the code, CBFalconer, 08:59
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, Walter Roberson, 08:58
- Re: ftp connection through C., Walter Roberson, 08:51
- Regular expressions (multiple match problem), mikko.n, 08:20
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Don Bruder, 07:53
- Re: ????createwindow??????????????????calling createwindow function the system exit??, Barry Schwarz, 07:26
- Re: ftp connection through C., Friedrich Dominicus, 07:24
- Re: any error in the code, Harald van Dijk, 07:23
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Keith Thompson, 06:57
- Re: any error in the code, Keith Thompson, 06:54
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Thad Smith, 06:53
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Ian Collins, 06:23
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, richard kenny twink, 06:18
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 06:17
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Jack Klein, 06:08
- Stainless Steel Bracelet with Wire KB4621 Retailer, handbags016, 06:07
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Dann Corbit, 06:07
- Stainless Steel Pendant KP0559 Retailer, handbags016, 06:07
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Jack Klein, 06:02
- ftp connection through C., rkpopuri, 05:50
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 05:49
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Ian Collins, 05:08
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Don Bruder, 05:03
- Re: any error in the code, Jack Klein, 05:02
- Re: calling createwindow function the program exit, Walter Roberson, 04:52
- Re: Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Ian Collins, 04:36
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 04:30
- Can we do regular expression processing in C ?, Mahendra Kutare, 04:25
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Harald van Dijk, 04:18
- calling createwindow function the program exit, infobox0531, 04:11
- Re: any error in the code, Ian Collins, 03:06
- Re: any error in the code, Joe Wright, 03:03
- Re: any error in the code, Eric Sosman, 03:01
- lactating women, izurewakaru, 02:50
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, blmblm, 02:37
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Thad Smith, 02:07
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 01:40
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Ioannis Vranos, 01:15
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Ben Pfaff, 01:11
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Richard, 01:03
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Ioannis Vranos, 00:58
- Re: More bit shifting issues, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 00:58
- Re: fgets() and fopen() with "w", vippstar, 00:48
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, jacob navia, 00:43
- Re: Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 00:37
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, CBFalconer, 00:33
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, ymuntyan, 00:16
- Makes it sense to get a copy of the ANSI standard documents?, Wolfgang Draxinger, 00:14
- Re: fgets() and fopen() with "w", Walter Roberson, 00:13
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Ioannis Vranos, 00:08
- fgets() and fopen() with "w", vippstar, 00:05
April 01, 2008
- Re: More bit shifting issues, CBFalconer, 23:58
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:51
- Re: strange calling convention?, CBFalconer, 23:42
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, CBFalconer, 23:34
- Re: srand with big numbers, CBFalconer, 23:20
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Kaz Kylheku, 23:15
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Ed Prochak, 23:15
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Richard, 23:10
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Antoninus Twink, 23:08
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Spaka, 23:07
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 22:51
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Kaz Kylheku, 22:51
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Tobin, 22:50
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Ben Pfaff, 22:48
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 22:45
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 22:38
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, ymuntyan, 22:37
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Harald van Dijk, 22:35
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Harald van Dijk, 22:26
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 22:22
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 22:22
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 22:22
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 22:22
- beautiful milk, izurewakaru, 22:19
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Walter Roberson, 22:18
- Re: Variable arguments of enum type, Ben Pfaff, 22:13
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Flash Gordon, 22:05
- Re: srand with big numbers, Bill Cunningham, 22:04
- Variable arguments of enum type, Harald van Dijk, 21:48
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:47
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:34
- Re: Help! Need prime number program!, Don, 21:33
- Re: strange calling convention?, Flash Gordon, 21:23
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 21:13
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Flash Gordon, 21:07
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Antoninus Twink, 21:07
- Re: Undefined behaviour in expressions, Dann Corbit, 21:06
- Undefined behaviour in expressions, Ioannis Vranos, 20:59
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Philip Potter, 20:53
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 20:31
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:27
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:23
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 20:06
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Ben Bacarisse, 20:05
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 19:51
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, santosh, 19:37
- Re: any error in the code, Bartc, 19:35
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Mingliang Liu, 19:28
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 19:18
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Philip Potter, 19:06
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 19:05
- Re: any error in the code, Keith Thompson, 18:55
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Keith Thompson, 18:48
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 18:47
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Keith Thompson, 18:44
- Re: More bit shifting issues, lawrence . jones, 18:44
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Harald van Dijk, 18:39
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 18:38
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, rCs, 18:28
- Re: any error in the code, Harald van Dijk, 18:27
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: any error in the code, Richard, 18:21
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Walter Roberson, 18:20
- lactating tities, izurewakaru, 18:20
- Re: any error in the code, lawrence . jones, 18:11
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Richard, 18:11
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 18:10
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 18:09
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Boltar, 18:08
- Re: any error in the code, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Keith Thompson, 17:55
- Re: Word alignment - Why doesn't this crash?, Stephen Sprunk, 17:45
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Stephen Sprunk, 17:43
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Bartc, 17:43
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Philip Potter, 17:43
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 17:39
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, fnegroni, 17:36
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Boltar, 17:31
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Boltar, 17:29
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 17:26
- Re: any error in the code, Richard, 17:22
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 17:19
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Martin Ambuhl, 17:19
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Richard Heathfield, 17:11
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Antoninus Twink, 17:09
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 17:07
- Re: any error in the code, Antoninus Twink, 17:04
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Chris Dollin, 17:02
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Richard Bos, 17:00
- Re: More bit shifting issues, Richard, 17:00
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 16:57
- More bit shifting issues, Boltar, 16:56
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 16:55
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Philip Potter, 16:54
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Martin Ambuhl, 16:48
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Ben Bacarisse, 16:46
- Re: strange calling convention?, Richard Bos, 16:45
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 16:41
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Spaka, 16:38
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 16:35
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 16:34
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Ben Bacarisse, 16:30
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 16:27
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 16:24
- Re: strange calling convention?, Bill Leary, 16:20
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Ben Bacarisse, 16:16
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 16:16
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 16:12
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 15:48
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Willem, 15:38
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 15:26
- Re: any error in the code, Chris Dollin, 15:22
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 15:21
- Re: srand with big numbers, Ben Bacarisse, 15:19
- 调用createwindow函数程序自动退出(calling createwindow function the system exit), infobox0531, 15:14
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 15:11
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Philip Potter, 15:03
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Julienne Walker, 15:03
- Re: warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Ben Bacarisse, 15:00
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Rui Maciel, 15:00
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Rui Maciel, 15:00
- warning: use of C99 long long integer constant, Sebastian Faust, 14:39
- Re: any error in the code, Kenny McCormack, 14:39
- Re: any error in the code, Richard Heathfield, 14:36
- Re: any error in the code, Jack . Thomson . v3, 14:27
- Re: How can I deal with multi-dirs?, fnegroni, 14:20
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 14:15
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Bartc, 14:05
- Re: srand with big numbers, Philip Potter, 13:53
- Re: strange calling convention?, vippstar, 13:42
- Re: why do the following crash, Philip Potter, 13:32
- Re: strange calling convention?, Bill Leary, 13:26
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 13:13
- Re: any error in the code, Kenny McCormack, 12:57
- Re: srand with big numbers, Bartc, 12:49
- Re: any error in the code, Martin Ambuhl, 12:34
- Re: [Makefile]How can I deal with multi-dirs?, Antoninus Twink, 12:16
- Re: any error in the code, Antoninus Twink, 12:12
- any error in the code, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:47
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Tony Giles, 11:35
- Best Prometric Test center in Bangalore (like Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Exin - ITIL, Dell, HP), Prometric Test center, 10:36
- [Makefile]How can I deal with multi-dirs?, M.Liang Liu, 10:05
- Re: Experiences using "register", Keith Thompson, 09:59
- strange calling convention?, Friedrich Dominicus, 09:53
- Re: case labels, Flash Gordon, 09:38
- Madam,Lactation 27, izurewakaru, 09:35
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 09:22
- Re: Experiences using "register", Flash Gordon, 09:20
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Richard Heathfield, 08:31
- Re: case labels, Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Ben Pfaff, 08:01
- Re: Naming question, Ben Pfaff, 07:46
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Jack . Thomson . v3, 07:13
- Re: Naming question, user923005, 05:45
- Re: writing to pipe, C. Gordon Liddy, 05:17
- Re: Word alignment - Why doesn't this crash?, Sune, 05:12
- Re: writing to pipe, C. Gordon Liddy, 05:02
- Re: writing to pipe, Morris Dovey, 04:54
- Re: case labels, santosh, 04:36
- Re: srand with big numbers, Bill Cunningham, 04:09
- Re: srand with big numbers, Bill Cunningham, 04:04
- Re: why do the following crash, Jack Klein, 04:01
- Naming question, evanevankan2, 03:59
- Re: srand with big numbers, vippstar, 03:21
- Re: srand with big numbers, Sjouke Burry, 03:08
- Re: srand with big numbers, Ian Collins, 03:05
- Re: srand with big numbers, Bill Cunningham, 03:02
- Re: srand with big numbers, Ian Collins, 02:58
- Re: srand with big numbers, Dann Corbit, 02:40
- Re: case labels, John J . Smith, 02:33
- Re: why do the following crash, Old Wolf, 02:24
- srand with big numbers, Bill Cunningham, 02:21
- Re: we need some data on line, Dann Corbit, 01:47
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, c gordon liddy, 01:39
- Re: we need some data on line, Bartc, 01:33
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 01:20
- Re: I very happy!, gedau, 00:55
- Re: why do the following crash, Mark McIntyre, 00:48
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 00:40
- Re: sizeof(x), Richard Tobin, 00:39
- milk drinking, izurewakaru, 00:38
- Re: why do the following crash, Antoninus Twink, 00:36
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 00:34
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Bill Cunningham, 00:21
- Re: Experiences using "register", Flash Gordon, 00:20
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 00:07
March 31, 2008
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 23:59
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 23:56
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 23:48
- Re: why do the following crash, CBFalconer, 23:37
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, CBFalconer, 23:29
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Bartc, 23:24
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 23:13
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 23:12
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 23:12
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 23:11
- Re: Experiences using "register", Eric Sosman, 23:07
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 23:06
- Re: why do the following crash, Default User, 22:59
- Re: Experiences using "register", Flash Gordon, 22:56
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 22:44
- Re: why do the following crash, Dann Corbit, 22:40
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 22:29
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 22:27
- Re: why do the following crash, Morris Dovey, 22:14
- Re: why do the following crash, Richard Heathfield, 22:11
- Re: why do the following crash, Morris Dovey, 22:10
- Re: why do the following crash, Richard, 22:06
- Re: why do the following crash, Morris Dovey, 22:00
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, lawrence . jones, 21:58
- Re: Word alignment - Why doesn't this crash?, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:53
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Serve L, 21:51
- Re: why do the following crash, Serve L, 21:49
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 21:44
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Willem, 21:30
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Tobin, 21:29
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:28
- Re: we need some data on line, Richard Tobin, 21:27
- Re: Experiences using "register", Herbert Rosenau, 21:22
- Re: why do the following crash, Richard, 21:22
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 21:21
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 21:20
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Tobin, 21:17
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:06
- Re: why do the following crash, Willem, 21:03
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 21:01
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 20:59
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Willem, 20:59
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:57
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Willem, 20:56
- Re: why do the following crash, Ed Prochak, 20:55
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 20:54
- Re: case labels, Richard, 20:52
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:52
- Re: User defined stack for threads in Linux 2.6.11 + glibc 2.3.5, Flash Gordon, 20:47
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 20:47
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Eric Sosman, 20:43
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Dave Hansen, 20:27
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:20
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 20:19
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Bartc, 19:45
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Default User, 18:56
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 18:55
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Bartc, 18:51
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, lawrence . jones, 18:39
- Re: why do the following crash, Philip Potter, 18:38
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, santosh, 18:37
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 18:34
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, santosh, 18:33
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 18:28
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, bert, 18:20
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, lawrence . jones, 18:14
- Re: why do the following crash, Bartc, 18:03
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Martin, 17:30
- Re: we need some data on line, Bartc, 17:29
- Re: why do the following crash, Kenny McCormack, 17:22
- Re: why do the following crash, Willem, 17:06
- Re: why do the following crash, Noob, 16:20
- Re: why do the following crash, Morris Dovey, 16:13
- Re: why do the following crash, Richard, 16:10
- Re: why do the following crash, Ed Prochak, 16:05
- Re: why do the following crash, Richard, 15:56
- Re: why do the following crash, Philip Potter, 15:39
- Re: how is the do loop in the switch code, Eric Sosman, 15:33
- why do the following crash, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:32
- how is the do loop in the switch code, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 15:17
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 14:14
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Hallvard B Furuseth, 13:52
- Re: we need some data on line, Richard Heathfield, 13:45
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, vippstar, 13:43
- Re: Word alignment - Why doesn't this crash?, Philip Potter, 13:34
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Bill Cunningham, 13:33
- Re: Fedup with SPAM, Richard Heathfield, 13:33
- Re: we need some data on line, Bartc, 13:31
- Re: we need some data on line, Richard Heathfield, 13:29
- Re: Backtrace function, Dik T. Winter, 13:24
- Fedup with SPAM, dk, 13:05
- Re: How do linkers work?, Dik T. Winter, 13:04
- Re: [ot]Re: printf and cout, Philip Potter, 12:49
- Word alignment - Why doesn't this crash?, ollemblomgren, 12:46
- Re: case labels, Richard Bos, 12:20
- we need some data on line, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 12:17
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Bartc, 12:05
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Bartc, 11:47
- Re: A plea for sanity!, C. Gordon Liddy, 11:44
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, Barry Schwarz, 11:22
- Re: Why are variables stored on the stack?, Barry Schwarz, 11:22
- Re: case labels, Chris Dollin, 11:04
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Tony Giles, 09:52
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 09:23
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 09:22
- Festivals in Tibet, magicalnepal, 09:07
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Keith Thompson, 09:02
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 08:30
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Gerry Ford, 08:26
- User defined stack for threads in Linux 2.6.11 + glibc 2.3.5, mysterious . ashish, 07:50
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 07:40
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Gordon Burditt, 07:27
- Hot Pregnant Woman, izurewakaru, 07:21
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 07:21
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Keith Thompson, 06:59
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 06:57
- Re: bunch of pedants, David Thompson, 06:27
- Re: legality of signature changes of callback functions, David Thompson, 06:27
- Re: Why are variables stored on the stack?, David Thompson, 06:27
- Re: The stack and longjmp/setjmp, David Thompson, 06:27
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, C. Gordon Liddy, 06:26
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 06:11
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 06:06
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), C. Gordon Liddy, 05:59
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, pete, 05:37
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: writing to pipe, C. Gordon Liddy, 05:04
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Douglas A. Gwyn, 05:00
- Re: A plea for sanity!, C. Gordon Liddy, 04:49
- Re: writing to pipe, Morris Dovey, 04:46
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Gordon Burditt, 04:45
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 04:43
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Gordon Burditt, 04:38
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Gordon Burditt, 04:28
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, CBFalconer, 04:24
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Richard, 04:22
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, CBFalconer, 04:21
- Re: Doubts about pointers, ymuntyan, 04:13
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 04:11
- Re: [ot]Re: printf and cout, pete, 04:09
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 04:04
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., CBFalconer, 04:01
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, pete, 03:57
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 03:43
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 03:40
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, santosh, 03:32
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, C. Gordon Liddy, 03:19
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), Barry Schwarz, 03:12
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, Bill Cunningham, 02:59
- Re: Doubts about pointers, ymuntyan, 02:49
- Re: strcat strncat and strlen, santosh, 02:47
- strcat strncat and strlen, Bill Cunningham, 02:38
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, C. Gordon Liddy, 02:21
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, C. Gordon Liddy, 02:20
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Mike, 02:18
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Heathfield, 01:45
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, lawrence . jones, 01:39
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, lawrence . jones, 01:37
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 01:28
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, Richard Heathfield, 01:27
- Re: sizeof(x), Kaz Kylheku, 01:17
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, Gerry Ford, 00:52
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Heathfield, 00:38
March 30, 2008
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, lawrence . jones, 23:56
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, lawrence . jones, 23:54
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, lawrence . jones, 23:43
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, jacob navia, 23:40
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 23:31
- Re: sizeof(x), Keith Thompson, 23:30
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 23:28
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 23:23
- Re: sizeof(x), Ioannis Vranos, 23:22
- Re: sizeof(x), Eric Sosman, 23:21
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Bartc, 23:20
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Keith Thompson, 23:20
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Eric Sosman, 23:18
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, Keith Thompson, 23:14
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Eric Sosman, 23:12
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Boltar, 22:50
- Re: Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, jacob navia, 22:37
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Kenny McCormack, 22:34
- Re: sizeof(x), Harald van Dijk, 22:15
- Re: sizeof(x), Harald van Dijk, 22:13
- Re: sizeof(x), Ioannis Vranos, 22:11
- Re: Public Access Compilers, Dr. Dimitris Zois, 22:11
- Re: sizeof(x), Ian Collins, 22:10
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 22:08
- Re: sizeof(x), Ioannis Vranos, 22:08
- Re: sizeof(x), Ioannis Vranos, 22:07
- milking boobs, izurewakaru, 22:06
- Re: sizeof(x), Harald van Dijk, 22:04
- sizeof(x), Ioannis Vranos, 21:50
- Strange bit shifting result with gcc - am I missing something obvious?, Boltar, 21:48
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 21:45
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Morris Dovey, 21:27
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 21:20
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, santosh, 21:00
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, santosh, 20:50
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Richard, 20:47
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Morris Dovey, 20:47
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, Martin Golding, 20:46
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:32
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 20:14
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard, 20:11
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 20:09
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 20:05
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, bert, 20:02
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 20:02
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 19:54
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:50
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:28
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:24
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:16
- Re: Experiences using "register", santosh, 19:13
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:02
- Re: Backtrace function, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:59
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:48
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, CBFalconer, 18:35
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 18:17
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Willem, 18:10
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 18:05
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 18:02
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:59
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 17:59
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 17:58
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 17:55
- Re: Experiences using "register", santosh, 17:54
- Re: Experiences using "register", santosh, 17:49
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Richard, 17:48
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 17:42
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 17:40
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 17:35
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Heathfield, 17:33
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 17:33
- Re: Experiences using "register", santosh, 17:29
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 17:25
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 17:22
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 17:21
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Willem, 17:20
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 17:17
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 17:16
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 17:12
- Re: Experiences using "register", Harald van Dijk, 17:08
- stockings, izurewakaru, 17:07
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 17:01
- Re: Experiences using "register", Harald van Dijk, 16:59
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 16:59
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 16:57
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Richard, 16:56
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 16:55
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 16:51
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Eric Sosman, 16:51
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Harald van Dijk, 16:45
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Bartc, 16:39
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Morris Dovey, 16:37
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 16:14
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, CBFalconer, 16:11
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Philip Potter, 16:02
- Re: creating a testfile for catv, santosh, 16:01
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 16:00
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Eric Sosman, 15:57
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, santosh, 15:56
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 15:56
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Rahul, 15:52
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 15:51
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Ben Bacarisse, 15:42
- Re: Reentrant functions and memory allocation, Flash Gordon, 15:08
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Flash Gordon, 15:04
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 14:55
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 14:46
- Reentrant functions and memory allocation, fmassei, 14:45
- Re: parsing tree help, Bartc, 14:29
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Richard Heathfield, 14:19
- Re: ?: as an lvalue, Kenny McCormack, 14:01
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 13:40
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 13:31
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 13:30
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 13:10
- ?: as an lvalue, Rahul, 13:05
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 13:02
- Festivals in Bhutan, magicalnepal, 12:36
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 12:25
- lactation, izurewakaru, 11:53
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Andrew Haley, 11:34
- Re: case labels, Flash Gordon, 11:31
- creating a testfile for catv, c gordon liddy, 11:22
- Re: parsing tree help, Malcolm McLean, 11:10
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,Quality AAA,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 10:49
- Re: restrict keyword questions, Andrey Tarasevich, 10:31
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 09:49
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 09:46
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 09:36
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 09:33
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 09:30
- Re: [OT] Re: case labels, Harald van Dijk, 08:04
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Harald van Dijk, 07:55
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), c gordon liddy, 07:36
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Anand Hariharan, 07:10
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 07:09
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 06:59
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 06:56
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 06:55
- Orgasm at the Station, izurewakaru, 06:41
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 06:40
- Re: [OT] Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 06:32
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 06:13
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 06:08
- Re: Backtrace function, Keith Thompson, 05:53
- Re: Experiences using "register", CBFalconer, 05:53
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Morris Dovey, 04:48
- parsing tree help, uche, 04:40
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 04:29
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster? - TPA, pete, 04:28
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 04:21
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 03:33
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Morris Dovey, 03:24
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, santosh, 03:11
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 03:02
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:57
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Chris McDonald, 01:54
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 01:51
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Ian Collins, 01:45
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:40
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 01:36
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Chris McDonald, 01:29
- Re: Doubts about pointers, ymuntyan, 01:21
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), c gordon liddy, 01:15
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", Stephen Sprunk, 01:15
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 01:12
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Ian Collins, 00:53
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Chris McDonald, 00:52
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 00:52
- Re: Doubts about pointers, ymuntyan, 00:29
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 00:19
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Stephen Sprunk, 00:14
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Stephen Sprunk, 00:02
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:01
March 29, 2008
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 23:40
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Anand Hariharan, 23:37
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 23:20
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Anand Hariharan, 22:52
- Re: case labels, Richard Tobin, 22:52
- Re: Doubts about pointers, jacob navia, 22:52
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ben Bacarisse, 22:50
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard Tobin, 22:48
- Re: case labels, Ben Pfaff, 22:28
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 22:27
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 22:27
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Gordon Burditt, 22:15
- Re: case labels, lawrence . jones, 22:13
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, lawrence . jones, 22:10
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 22:10
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 22:08
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 22:06
- Re: Experiences using "register", Keith Thompson, 21:52
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Anand Hariharan, 21:39
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Willem, 21:35
- Re: I very happy!, santosh, 21:25
- Re: I very happy!, Antoninus Twink, 21:21
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 21:16
- Re: Backtrace function, Philip Potter, 21:10
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Herbert Rosenau, 21:10
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Herbert Rosenau, 21:10
- Re: case labels, Ben Pfaff, 21:08
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 21:06
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 21:01
- Re: Dynamic (as in Reflective) Programming in C?, Ian Collins, 20:57
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 20:56
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 20:54
- milk boobies, izurewakaru, 20:51
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 20:47
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 20:35
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 20:31
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 20:28
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 20:12
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 20:06
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:59
- Re: Backtrace function, Philip Potter, 19:56
- hello friends new way for u, rosha, 19:45
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Default User, 19:44
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:39
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:33
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:24
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:18
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 19:16
- Re: case labels, jacob navia, 19:16
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:15
- Re: case labels, Richard Tobin, 19:13
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:12
- Re: Experiences using "register", santosh, 19:12
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 19:11
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 19:10
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 19:07
- Re: Experiences using "register", Walter Roberson, 19:05
- Re: Experiences using "register", Richard, 19:00
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 18:57
- Re: Experiences using "register", Willem, 18:50
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 18:48
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 18:46
- Re: case labels, Eric Sosman, 18:44
- Re: Experiences using "register", Ioannis Vranos, 18:44
- Re: Inline initialization of a struct containing a string array, Antti Karanta, 18:33
- Re: Inline initialization of a struct containing a string array, Antti Karanta, 18:32
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 18:32
- [OT] Re: case labels, Harald van Dijk, 18:26
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 18:22
- Re: Experiences using "register", Kenny McCormack, 18:19
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Harald van Dijk, 18:18
- Re: case labels, Flash Gordon, 18:16
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 18:13
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, santosh, 18:06
- Re: I very happy!, Morris Dovey, 17:54
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 17:15
- Re: How do linkers work?, Antoninus Twink, 17:12
- Re: How do linkers work?, Antoninus Twink, 17:11
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 17:07
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", Antoninus Twink, 17:07
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 17:04
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Antoninus Twink, 17:04
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:00
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 16:38
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 16:27
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 16:27
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 16:22
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 16:16
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 16:13
- Re: [ot]Re: printf and cout, Richard, 16:09
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 16:08
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 16:06
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 15:58
- Mysterious Chinese martial arts, yingyu516, 15:48
- Re: [ot]Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 15:31
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:08
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:59
- [ot]Re: printf and cout, pete, 14:52
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 14:44
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 14:39
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Morris Dovey, 14:33
- Re: Dynamic (as in Reflective) Programming in C?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:31
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 14:27
- Re: case labels, Flash Gordon, 14:21
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:18
- Re: simple PRNG?, Richard, 14:09
- Re: Dynamic (as in Reflective) Programming in C?, Eric Sosman, 14:07
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 14:03
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 14:01
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 13:57
- Re: case labels, Eric Sosman, 13:57
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 13:51
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 13:24
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Nick Keighley, 13:24
- Re: printf and cout, Kenny McCormack, 13:01
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Harald van Dijk, 12:57
- Re: How do linkers work?, Bartc, 12:38
- Re: Backtrace function, Philip Potter, 12:38
- Re: Backtrace function, Philip Potter, 12:33
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Philip Potter, 12:25
- Re: A Problem with Batch Compiling using Makefile, James Kanze, 12:13
- Re: simple PRNG?, Richard Tobin, 12:12
- Re: printf and cout, Philip Potter, 12:09
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, Ben Bacarisse, 11:55
- I very happy!, yushumao65, 11:46
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 11:37
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 11:34
- Re: Dynamic (as in Reflective) Programming in C?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:33
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:28
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:28
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 10:50
- adult, izurewakaru, 10:17
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 10:16
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 10:14
- Re: Backtrace function, Flash Gordon, 09:50
- Re: Backtrace function, Flash Gordon, 09:44
- Re: case labels, Flash Gordon, 09:22
- Re: How do linkers work?, Herbert Rosenau, 09:14
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 09:10
- Re: A Problem with Batch Compiling using Makefile, Jim Langston, 08:55
- Re: A Problem with Batch Compiling using Makefile, Z.L., 08:46
- Re: case labels, Harald van Dijk, 08:15
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Harald van Dijk, 08:05
- Re: case labels, Peter Nilsson, 07:49
- Re: case labels, Harald van Dijk, 07:43
- Re: Dynamic (as in Reflective) Programming in C?, Edoules, 07:32
- Re: A Problem with Batch Compiling using Makefile, Tim H, 07:30
- Re: case labels, James Dow Allen, 07:29
- Re: valid static-initializer list values..., Chris Thomasson, 07:28
- A Problem with Batch Compiling using Makefile, Z.L., 07:24
- Re: valid static-initializer list values..., Chris Thomasson, 07:22
- Re: simple PRNG?, pete, 07:13
- Re: valid static-initializer list values..., Chris Thomasson, 07:06
- Re: bitwise operators, pete, 06:57
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup? - TPA, Richard, 06:35
- Re: bitwise operators, pete, 06:29
- Re: case labels, ozbear, 06:21
- Re: order of array subscripts, pete, 06:10
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, santosh, 05:50
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 05:41
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 05:39
- Re: even or odd, pete, 05:18
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 05:06
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 05:00
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., santosh, 05:00
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, pete, 04:45
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Peter Nilsson, 04:43
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, Keith Thompson, 04:35
- Re: sizeof a relative pointer in a struct, pete, 04:31
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., broli, 04:22
- Re: case labels, Keith Thompson, 04:15
- Re: How does printf() works, pete, 04:05
- Re: simple PRNG?, Keith Thompson, 04:02
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Keith Thompson, 03:56
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:48
- Re: Strings and arrays, Thad Smith, 03:42
- Re: printf and cout, pete, 03:40
- Re: simple PRNG?, Walter Roberson, 03:34
- [ot]Re: How do linkers work?, pete, 03:13
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 03:12
- Re: bitwise operators, Peter Nilsson, 03:03
- Re: simple PRNG?, pete, 02:54
- Re: bitwise operators, Keith Thompson, 02:46
- Re: case labels, Keith Thompson, 02:43
- Re: void * vs. T *, Ark Khasin, 02:41
- Re: restrict keyword questions, Tim Prince, 02:37
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Thad Smith, 02:32
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 02:27
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 02:25
- restrict keyword questions, copx, 02:24
- Re: Public Access Compilers, santosh, 02:22
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 02:18
- Re: case labels, lawrence . jones, 02:17
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Keith Thompson, 02:16
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Dann Corbit, 02:12
- Re: Public Access Compilers, CBFalconer, 02:04
- Re: case labels, Keith Thompson, 02:02
- Re: Backtrace function, CBFalconer, 01:59
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 01:47
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, CBFalconer, 01:39
- Re: bitwise operators, CBFalconer, 01:32
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Joe Wright, 01:29
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 01:29
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", CBFalconer, 01:24
- Re: simple PRNG?, CBFalconer, 01:21
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 01:04
- Re: Function pointer tables, Ben Pfaff, 00:58
- Re: Public Access Compilers, Mark McIntyre, 00:47
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Eric Sosman, 00:47
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Morris Dovey, 00:45
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Mark McIntyre, 00:43
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, pete, 00:41
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, raphfrk, 00:39
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Mark McIntyre, 00:36
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 00:32
- Re: bitwise operators, pete, 00:31
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 00:30
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 00:24
- Re: case labels, christian.bau, 00:24
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 00:16
- Re: Any Method to Determine Endianness at Compile Time ?, pete, 00:11
- Re: Backtrace function, Ian Collins, 00:10
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 00:05
March 28, 2008
- Re: Strings and arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 23:59
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Richard Heathfield, 23:59
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard Heathfield, 23:56
- Re: simple PRNG?, pete, 23:56
- Re: Union trouble, Bartc, 23:54
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 23:49
- Re: Macro to indicate directories in filenames, Ian Collins, 23:48
- Re: Backtrace function, Ian Collins, 23:46
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, Ben Bacarisse, 23:46
- Re: Function pointer tables, pete, 23:45
- Re: case labels, Ian Collins, 23:41
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 23:40
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 23:31
- Re: case labels, Ben Pfaff, 23:29
- Macro to indicate directories in filenames, raphfrk, 23:23
- Re: Public Access Compilers, jacob navia, 23:22
- Re: case labels, jacob navia, 23:20
- Public Access Compilers, topherwheeler, 23:20
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, pete, 23:16
- Re: Backtrace function, Flash Gordon, 23:13
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 23:06
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 23:02
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 22:58
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Harald van Dijk, 22:56
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 22:54
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, Harald van Dijk, 22:47
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 22:47
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, pete, 22:44
- Re: Backtrace function, jacob navia, 22:39
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard Heathfield, 22:34
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 22:29
- Re: Backtrace function, Kaz Kylheku, 22:28
- Re: Strings and arrays, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, CBFalconer, 22:01
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, CBFalconer, 21:59
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 21:57
- Re: How do linkers work?, Kenny McCormack, 21:51
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, CBFalconer, 21:43
- Re: void * vs. T *, CBFalconer, 21:37
- Re: simple PRNG?, pete, 21:35
- Re: How do linkers work?, Antoninus Twink, 21:34
- Re: case labels, lawrence . jones, 21:19
- Re: How do linkers work?, Herbert Rosenau, 21:18
- Re: How do linkers work?, Herbert Rosenau, 21:18
- Mature Woman's Pleasure, izurewakaru, 21:18
- Re: Function pointer tables, user923005, 21:14
- Re: void * vs. T *, lawrence . jones, 21:07
- Re: Function pointer tables, pete, 21:00
- Re: Strings and arrays, Jim, 20:50
- [ot]Re: cherfils, pete, 20:48
- Re: Backtrace function, Keith Thompson, 20:47
- Re: Enum type check in function call, Ian Collins, 20:37
- Re: Backtrace function, Richard Heathfield, 20:36
- Re: void * vs. T *, Antoninus Twink, 20:15
- Re: Backtrace function, dj3vande, 20:11
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup? - TPA, Antoninus Twink, 20:11
- Backtrace function, sophia, 20:04
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, jxh, 19:59
- Re: error handlling in C, Flash Gordon, 19:57
- Re: void * vs. T *, Richard Heathfield, 19:55
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 19:51
- Re: case labels, jacob navia, 19:36
- Re: printf and cout, Keith Thompson, 19:33
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 19:15
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup? - TPA, Kenny McCormack, 19:10
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 19:09
- Re: printf and cout, jacob navia, 19:00
- Re: printf and cout, Ben Bacarisse, 19:00
- Re: case labels, Richard Tobin, 18:57
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:54
- Re: printf and cout, Kenneth Brody, 18:53
- Re: Strings and arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 18:50
- Re: case labels, aarklon, 18:48
- Re: even or odd, Kenneth Brody, 18:45
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 18:40
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ben Bacarisse, 18:37
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup? - TPA, Default User, 18:37
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 18:35
- Re: printf and cout, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: case labels, lawrence . jones, 18:31
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard, 18:16
- Re: Strings and arrays, Jim, 18:13
- Re: Strings and arrays, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 18:09
- Re: best way to manage the headers.., Kaz Kylheku, 18:06
- Re: Strings and arrays, Jim, 18:06
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Strings and arrays, Jim, 18:02
- Re: case labels, CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 17:58
- Re: How do linkers work?, lawrence . jones, 17:57
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, CBFalconer, 17:56
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard, 17:56
- Re: void * vs. T *, Eric Sosman, 17:52
- Re: Union trouble, David Mathog, 17:40
- Re: void * vs. T *, CBFalconer, 17:35
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Walter Banks, 17:24
- best way to manage the headers.., broli, 17:23
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Kenny McCormack, 17:10
- Re: void * vs. T *, Ark Khasin, 17:10
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 17:09
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 17:08
- Padding bits and char, unsigned char, signed char, Ioannis Vranos, 16:53
- Re: Doubts about pointers, dj3vande, 16:46
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard, 16:36
- Re: printf and cout, jacob navia, 16:36
- Re: printf and cout, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 16:21
- Re: error handlling in C, vippstar, 16:20
- Re: case labels, Eric Sosman, 16:17
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Scatologic ,incestuous family, izurewakaru, 16:09
- error handlling in C, broli, 16:02
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 15:51
- Re: Doubts about pointers, dj3vande, 15:50
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Eric Sosman, 15:50
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 15:26
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Kenny McCormack, 15:23
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard, 15:19
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, vippstar, 15:19
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Willem, 15:13
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Chris Dollin, 15:10
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 15:08
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Philip Potter, 15:00
- Re: case labels, Chris Dollin, 15:00
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 14:58
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, jacob navia, 14:57
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Willem, 14:56
- Re: Enum type check in function call, Chris Dollin, 14:51
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:42
- Re: case labels, Eric Sosman, 14:35
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 14:32
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Antoninus Twink, 14:29
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Antoninus Twink, 14:28
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 14:25
- Re: Enum type check in function call, Richard, 14:24
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 14:23
- Re: case labels, Bartc, 14:20
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 14:18
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:18
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 14:17
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 14:16
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Antoninus Twink, 14:12
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:09
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard Tobin, 13:49
- Re: printf and cout, pete, 13:46
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Noob, 13:45
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Tobin, 13:44
- Re: even or odd, pete, 13:43
- Re: why i am getting error ??, Ben Bacarisse, 13:40
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Eric Sosman, 13:35
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard Tobin, 13:30
- Re: void * vs. T *, Eric Sosman, 13:26
- Re: printf and cout, jacob navia, 13:22
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 13:22
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Kenny McCormack, 13:21
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 13:20
- Re: even or odd, pete, 13:11
- Re: printf and cout, pete, 13:08
- Re: Union trouble, Richard Bos, 13:04
- Re: Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Richard Heathfield, 12:46
- Convert native character string to ASCII array of integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:19
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
- Re: Union trouble, Bartc, 12:14
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 12:03
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 11:47
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Nick Keighley, 11:22
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Philip Potter, 11:20
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Richard Tobin, 11:19
- Re: why i am getting error ??, Richard Heathfield, 10:42
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Warren Tang, 10:38
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
- why i am getting error ??, broli, 10:30
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Philip Potter, 10:22
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 10:21
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Philip Potter, 10:17
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 09:58
- Re: compiling multiple source files, santosh, 09:52
- Re: compiling multiple source files, jacob navia, 09:50
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 09:20
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Dann Corbit, 09:03
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 09:02
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Dann Corbit, 09:01
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 08:53
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Dann Corbit, 08:37
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), c gordon liddy, 08:28
- Re: compiling multiple source files, Bill Reid, 08:28
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 08:22
- Re: compiling multiple source files, Richard Heathfield, 08:17
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Dann Corbit, 08:06
- Re: case labels, user923005, 07:59
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 07:58
- compiling multiple source files, broli, 07:57
- ( WWW.SNEAKERS-IN-CHINA.COM) Air Jordan Retro XIII/X Collezione Package china outlet, sneakers_in_china, 07:39
- Re: case labels, Keith Thompson, 07:33
- Re: || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), Keith Thompson, 07:22
- Re: Enum type check in function call, Ian Collins, 07:20
- Re: case labels, Ian Collins, 07:18
- New Air Force 1, Jordan Combination,AF1 + J3,AF1 + J4,,AF11 + J5,AF1 + J12,AF1 + J23,J10 + J12 - Sunrise East Asia Sporting Goods Co.,Ltd, tradeinputian . 002, 07:14
- Enum type check in function call, Pritam, 07:07
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Keith Thompson, 07:01
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Warren Tang, 06:59
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 06:47
- Re: case labels, sumsin, 06:41
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Barry Schwarz, 06:27
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Barry Schwarz, 06:23
- Madam,Lactation 30, izurewakaru, 06:14
- Re: case labels, Ian Collins, 06:03
- case labels, aarklon, 05:59
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,Quality AAA,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 05:49
- || putchar(ch == '\177' ? '?' : ch | 0100) == EOF), c gordon liddy, 05:42
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, santosh, 05:13
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Gordon Burditt, 05:02
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, santosh, 04:53
- Re: void * vs. T *, Ark Khasin, 04:47
- Re: What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Ian Collins, 04:46
- What's the server address of the comp.lang.c newsgroup?, Warren Tang, 04:40
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Andrey Tarasevich, 04:22
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Dann Corbit, 04:21
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Dann Corbit, 04:19
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 04:18
- Union trouble, Bartc, 03:56
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ian Collins, 03:35
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, Kaz Kylheku, 03:30
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, santosh, 03:22
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 03:18
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 03:14
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, Eric Sosman, 03:14
- Re: Implementation-defined behaviour, santosh, 03:06
- Implementation-defined behaviour, Ioannis Vranos, 03:03
- Re: simple file compression program, Barry Schwarz, 02:48
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, santosh, 02:34
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 02:28
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Dann Corbit, 01:27
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Gerry Ford, 01:22
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, user923005, 01:16
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard, 01:10
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard, 01:07
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard Heathfield, 01:02
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 00:56
- Re: void * vs. T *, Keith Thompson, 00:53
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Default User, 00:50
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Richard Heathfield, 00:49
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 00:48
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 00:42
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard Heathfield, 00:40
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard Heathfield, 00:32
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 00:30
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, Gary, 00:27
- Re: void * vs. T *, Richard Heathfield, 00:19
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 00:15
March 27, 2008
- Re: How do linkers work?, Herbert Rosenau, 23:57
- Re: How do linkers work?, Herbert Rosenau, 23:57
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 23:55
- Re: Doubts about pointers, John Bode, 23:34
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Flash Gordon, 23:27
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Peter Nilsson, 23:23
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, Eric Sosman, 23:20
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 23:15
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 23:13
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 23:11
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Antoninus Twink, 23:09
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, Richard, 23:08
- Re: assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, vippstar, 23:03
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, jacob navia, 23:00
- Re: void * vs. T *, CBFalconer, 22:48
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 22:41
- assigment statement can use an expression when declaring a variable?, vlsidesign, 22:32
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 22:22
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard, 22:06
- Re: How to group objects from static library in a section?, Jack Klein, 22:03
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Default User, 22:01
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Default User, 21:59
- Re: void * vs. T *, Flash Gordon, 21:50
- Re: void * vs. T *, CBFalconer, 21:46
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 21:40
- Re: void * vs. T *, CBFalconer, 21:36
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 21:30
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 21:29
- Re: void * vs. T *, Flash Gordon, 21:21
- Re: How to group objects from static library in a section?, jacob navia, 21:18
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 21:10
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Ian Collins, 21:04
- Re: How to group objects from static library in a section?, wyse03br, 20:46
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Keith Thompson, 20:08
- Re: void * vs. T *, Keith Thompson, 20:03
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Wim, 20:00
- Re: void * vs. T *, lawrence . jones, 19:22
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 19:19
- Re: How to group objects from static library in a section?, jacob navia, 18:14
- Re: void * vs. T *, jacob navia, 18:09
- Re: void * vs. T *, jacob navia, 18:06
- How to group objects from static library in a section?, wyse03br, 18:02
- OT: Portable build systems for portable programs was: Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, dj3vande, 18:01
- Re: void * vs. T *, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- Re: void * vs. T *, Flash Gordon, 17:41
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard, 17:40
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard Tobin, 17:09
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard, 16:56
- Re: How do linkers work?, Ed Prochak, 16:55
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Antoninus Twink, 16:38
- Re: void * vs. T *, jacob navia, 16:37
- Re: void * vs. T *, Richard Tobin, 16:33
- Re: what this program do, Richard, 16:23
- Re: void * vs. T *, Ed Prochak, 16:22
- Re: what this program do, Richard Bos, 16:16
- Re: Inline initialization of a struct containing a string array, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:13
- Re: what this program do, Richard Tobin, 16:05
- Re: what this program do, Morris Dovey, 15:43
- Re: Inline initialization of a struct containing a string array, Eric Sosman, 15:23
- Re: void * vs. T *, Eric Sosman, 15:16
- Re: what this program do, Dik T. Winter, 15:05
- Re: what this program do, Dik T. Winter, 14:29
- Re: what this program do, Morris Dovey, 14:25
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Dik T. Winter, 14:23
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Kenneth Brody, 14:06
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 14:03
- Re: what this program do, Dik T. Winter, 14:03
- Re: bitwise operators, Philip Potter, 13:39
- Re: what this program do, Richard Tobin, 13:36
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Dik T. Winter, 12:44
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Flash Gordon, 12:33
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 12:20
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Bartc, 12:13
- Re: void * vs. T *, jacob navia, 12:11
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Nick Keighley, 12:10
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 12:05
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Bartc, 12:02
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Antoninus Twink, 11:43
- Inline initialization of a struct containing a string array, Antti Karanta, 11:37
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Jack . Thomson . v3, 11:36
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 11:34
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, santosh, 11:15
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, Richard Heathfield, 11:14
- Re: simple file compression program, santosh, 11:13
- Re: How do linkers work?, Flash Gordon, 10:54
- Re: simple file compression program, sophia, 10:45
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Nick Keighley, 10:33
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Gerry Ford, 10:30
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Chris Dollin, 10:26
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Nick Keighley, 10:11
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, santosh, 10:02
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 09:58
- Re: void * vs. T *, santosh, 09:53
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, Richard Heathfield, 09:24
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 09:05
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Chris McDonald, 08:48
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 08:38
- 马英九:民主再造工程──台湾民主第二阶段改革宣言, woshanzhimu, 08:28
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 08:26
- Re: what this program do, CBFalconer, 08:25
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., broli, 08:19
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Chris McDonald, 08:16
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, CBFalconer, 08:15
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Chris McDonald, 07:44
- Re: interesting examples to learn C., Richard Heathfield, 07:37
- void * vs. T *, Ark Khasin, 07:30
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard Heathfield, 07:26
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, Harald van Dijk, 07:26
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard Heathfield, 07:10
- interesting examples to learn C., Mike, 07:00
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, Richard Heathfield, 06:58
- Re: ext4 file structure, Jack . Thomson . v3, 06:15
- Re: simple file compression program, Barry Schwarz, 06:11
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Ian Collins, 04:48
- Re: what this program do, Three Headed Monkey, 04:35
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, santosh, 04:08
- Re: Doubts about pointers, santosh, 03:39
- Re: How do linkers work?, Keith Thompson, 03:36
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard Harter, 03:19
- Re: what this program do, Peter Nilsson, 03:16
- Re: How do linkers work?, João Jerónimo, 03:06
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 03:05
- Re: How a linker works (continued), lawrence . jones, 03:01
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard Harter, 02:55
- Re: Function pointer tables, João Jerónimo, 02:22
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Ben Bacarisse, 02:07
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 02:00
- Re: what this program do, Morris Dovey, 01:52
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 01:39
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Eric Sosman, 01:35
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 01:33
- Re: what this program do, Richard Tobin, 01:33
- Re: SHA1 algorithm -- fully portable, Bill Reid, 01:28
- Re: learning from an existing project's code, Bill Reid, 01:28
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, João Jerónimo, 01:26
- Re: what this program do, jacob navia, 01:09
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 01:07
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 01:04
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, João Jerónimo, 00:54
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, João Jerónimo, 00:50
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard, 00:43
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Ian Collins, 00:31
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Mark McIntyre, 00:31
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 00:23
- Re: printf and cout, Mark McIntyre, 00:22
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Mark McIntyre, 00:20
- Re: what this program do, Mark McIntyre, 00:16
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 00:14
March 26, 2008
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Richard, 23:46
- Re: Doubts about pointers, jacob navia, 23:45
- Re: Doubts about pointers, CBFalconer, 23:44
- Re: A plea for sanity!, Richard, 23:44
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Keith Thompson, 23:40
- Re: bitwise operators, CBFalconer, 23:37
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 23:33
- Re: How a linker works (continued), CBFalconer, 23:26
- Re: A plea for sanity!, jacob navia, 23:23
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 23:19
- A plea for sanity!, Ian Collins, 23:19
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 23:17
- Re: How a linker works (continued), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:16
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Ian Collins, 23:15
- Re: simple file compression program, Bartc, 23:15
- Re: size limits for string literals, CBFalconer, 23:15
- Re: simple file compression program, Malcolm McLean, 23:14
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Simon, 23:11
- Re: How do linkers work?, Peter Nilsson, 23:05
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 23:05
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 22:59
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 22:54
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Flash Gordon, 22:53
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy, CBFalconer, 22:36
- CFP: ALTA 2008 at ISCA 2008, josh . fryman, 22:31
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 22:17
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 22:12
- Re: How a linker works (continued), lawrence . jones, 22:10
- Re: How do linkers work?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 22:02
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 21:55
- Re: simple file compression program, Walter Roberson, 21:40
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 21:36
- Re: Doubts about pointers, jacob navia, 21:32
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 21:25
- Re: simple file compression program, mstorkamp, 21:24
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 21:24
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Ian Collins, 21:20
- Re: Doubts about pointers, Walter Roberson, 21:17
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 21:16
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 21:14
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 21:10
- simple file compression program, sophia, 21:09
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 21:07
- Doubts about pointers, Simon, 21:03
- Re: bus error, Ulrich Eckhardt, 20:54
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Ben Bacarisse, 20:44
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Antoninus Twink, 20:34
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Antoninus Twink, 20:26
- Re: How do linkers work?, Ed Prochak, 20:13
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Dann Corbit, 20:09
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Kenny McCormack, 20:00
- Re: How a linker works (continued), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 19:54
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Sensei, 19:53
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Kaz Kylheku, 19:41
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 19:26
- Re: {} in assignment, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:22
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 19:20
- Re: How do linkers work?, Ed Prochak, 19:16
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Flash Gordon, 19:11
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Default User, 19:06
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Bartc, 18:34
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Ben Bacarisse, 18:32
- Re: bitwise operators, Eric Sosman, 18:29
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 18:22
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 18:13
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: bitwise operators, Ben Bacarisse, 18:08
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: Memory adress of screen, santosh, 17:59
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 17:55
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Kaz Kylheku, 17:53
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Richard Heathfield, 17:51
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Kenneth Brody, 17:46
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Richard Bos, 17:45
- Re: files in c++, Kenneth Brody, 17:35
- Re: printf and cout, Kenneth Brody, 17:33
- Re: bitwise operators, Philip Potter, 17:30
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Richard Heathfield, 17:29
- Re: Memory adress of screen, jacob navia, 17:28
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 17:21
- Re: Memory adress of screen, Walter Roberson, 17:19
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Paulo Jorge de O. C. de Matos, 17:18
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 17:11
- Re: bitwise operators, Ben Pfaff, 17:05
- Re: bitwise operators, Eric Sosman, 16:57
- Re: How a linker works (continued), vippstar, 16:40
- Re: bus error, Richard Tobin, 16:38
- Re: bitwise operators, Chris Dollin, 16:34
- Re: Career in C, John Bode, 16:30
- bitwise operators, Rahul, 16:26
- Re: Making a C Refactoring Program, Chris Dollin, 16:23
- Re: bus error, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- bus error, Rahul, 16:10
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Eric Sosman, 16:10
- Re: Making a C Refactoring Program, pingu219, 15:51
- Re: How a linker works (continued), Eric Sosman, 15:45
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 15:42
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 15:36
- Re: Making a C Refactoring Program, Chris Dollin, 15:28
- How a linker works (continued), jacob navia, 15:13
- Noah's ArcLength (Parametric Curves), Dexter, 14:51
- Re: simple PRNG?, Thad Smith, 14:44
- Re: Career in C, Ivan Vecerina, 14:19
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:10
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 14:10
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, broli, 14:05
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, santosh, 13:58
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 13:57
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, santosh, 13:51
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 13:46
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 13:43
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Bartc, 13:40
- Re: Making a C Refactoring Program, santosh, 13:38
- Making a C Refactoring Program, pingu219, 13:26
- Re: {} in assignment, santosh, 13:25
- Re: files in c++, santosh, 13:18
- {} in assignment, slashman, 13:14
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard, 13:11
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Kenny McCormack, 13:09
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 13:08
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Richard, 13:06
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard -last call for reviewers], Richard, 13:05
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 13:02
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Chris Dollin, 13:01
- files in c++, prabuxx, 13:00
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 12:48
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, santosh, 12:46
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Bartc, 12:39
- Re: Online C tests, Jack . Thomson . v3, 12:35
- Re: How do linkers work?, Dik T. Winter, 12:35
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 12:33
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 12:31
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 12:29
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 12:28
- Re: printf and cout, Chris Dollin, 12:28
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 12:26
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Bartc, 12:20
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Chris Dollin, 12:17
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, broli, 12:14
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 12:04
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 12:02
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Martin, 12:01
- Re: question on structures., broli, 11:59
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Antoninus Twink, 11:56
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Antoninus Twink, 11:55
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 11:51
- Re: question on structures., broli, 11:50
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 11:49
- Re: question on structures., broli, 11:47
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 11:46
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 11:46
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 11:45
- Re: LCC bug fix poilicy, Antoninus Twink, 11:42
- Re: printf and cout, santosh, 11:39
- Re: How do linkers work?, Antoninus Twink, 11:39
- Don't Just Dream About an Exciting New Career in booming telecom industry...Make it Happen with India's Top Telecom Management program at Aegis School of Telecommunication and Business, Mumbai., telecom news, 11:37
- Re: printf and cout, santosh, 11:34
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 11:33
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 11:29
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 11:27
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Chris Dollin, 11:26
- Re: printf and cout, santosh, 11:25
- Re: printf and cout, santosh, 11:10
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 11:01
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, jacob navia, 11:00
- Re: Online C tests, santosh, 10:51
- Re: question on structures., santosh, 10:48
- Hi iam bavani, bee, 10:37
- Re: Online C tests, Jack . Thomson . v3, 10:35
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 10:35
- Re: question on structures., Nick Keighley, 10:26
- Re: printf and cout, laikon, 10:18
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard Heathfield, 10:11
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 10:06
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Chris Dollin, 10:04
- Re: question on structures., broli, 10:02
- Re: printf and cout, Bernhard Schauer, 10:01
- Re: printf and cout, Richard Heathfield, 09:51
- Re: Online C tests, broli, 09:50
- printf and cout, laikon, 09:40
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Nick Keighley, 09:26
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, santosh, 09:13
- Re: Simple doubt about blocks, Richard Heathfield, 08:52
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, santosh, 08:47
- Re: Online C tests, santosh, 08:44
- Re: order of array subscripts, Keith Thompson, 08:43
- Simple doubt about blocks, Sensei, 08:43
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 08:40
- Re: order of array subscripts, Flash Gordon, 08:38
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, santosh, 08:36
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], santosh, 08:17
- Re: Online C tests, Richard Heathfield, 08:02
- Re: order of array subscripts, Jim Langston, 07:59
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, Richard Heathfield, 07:55
- Re: Online C tests, Gerry Ford, 07:50
- Re: size limits for string literals, Richard Heathfield, 07:45
- Re: question on structures., broli, 07:09
- Re: How do linkers work?, Tony Giles, 06:58
- Re: question on structures., Peter Nilsson, 06:56
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Harald van Dijk, 06:53
- Online C tests, sophia, 06:06
- 4GB USB flash drives for only $14.49, jimtruck, 05:30
- question on structures., broli, 05:07
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 05:00
- Re: size limits for string literals, copx, 04:57
- Re: How do linkers work?, Keith Thompson, 04:50
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 04:33
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 04:28
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 04:07
- 4gb USB Flash drive for $14.49, craigtrucko, 03:56
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", CBFalconer, 03:53
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], c gordon liddy, 03:23
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 03:19
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 03:15
- For Jeff Bailey: The distribution of the articles/content in clc, Kenny McCormack, 03:12
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 02:54
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 02:49
- Re: writing to pipe, c gordon liddy, 02:28
- Re: writing to pipe [OT], Morris Dovey, 02:08
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, rCs, 02:08
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 02:00
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, rCs, 01:52
- Re: simple PRNG?, Chris Torek, 01:49
- Re: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers, rCs, 01:49
- Re: size limits for string literals, CBFalconer, 01:26
- what this program do, Three Headed Monkey, 01:26
- Re: Career in C, CBFalconer, 01:22
- Re: strtod( ), Morris Dovey, 01:15
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, CBFalconer, 01:15
- Re: strtod( ), Bill Cunningham, 01:05
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 01:00
- Re: How do linkers work?, Tony Giles, 00:59
- Re: How do linkers work?, CBFalconer, 00:48
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 00:44
- Re: How do linkers work?, CBFalconer, 00:44
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 00:36
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Walter Banks, 00:35
- Re: How do linkers work?, Flash Gordon, 00:30
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 00:27
- Re: How do linkers work?, Mark McIntyre, 00:27
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], CBFalconer, 00:24
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, user923005, 00:23
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, user923005, 00:22
- Re: SHA1 algorithm -- fully portable, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:20
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Ben Bacarisse, 00:12
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard -last call for reviewers], CBFalconer, 00:05
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Bartc, 00:01
March 25, 2008
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 23:59
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Richard Heathfield, 23:56
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 23:55
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: strtod( ), Bill Cunningham, 23:50
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:45
- Re: strtod( ), Bill Cunningham, 23:45
- Re: writing to pipe, Walter Roberson, 23:33
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 23:26
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Eric Sosman, 23:25
- Re: writing to pipe, vippstar, 23:24
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Morris Dovey, 23:19
- Re: writing to pipe, santosh, 23:19
- Re: writing to pipe, Keith Thompson, 23:17
- Re: writing to pipe, Richard Tobin, 23:12
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Walter Banks, 23:04
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 23:03
- writing to pipe, Brian Darcey, 23:00
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 22:56
- Re: How do linkers work?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 22:37
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Philip Potter, 22:26
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard -last call for reviewers], Morris Dovey, 22:01
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], santosh, 21:55
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 21:51
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Antoninus Twink, 21:51
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 21:50
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], jacob navia, 21:40
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, Eric Sosman, 21:33
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, lawrence . jones, 21:22
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 21:22
- Re: Career in C, lawrence . jones, 21:19
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 21:17
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 21:13
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Jeff P. Bailey, 21:09
- Re: order of array subscripts, Eric Sosman, 20:55
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Ian Collins, 20:51
- Re: strtod( ), Default User, 20:50
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Eric Sosman, 20:44
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, Harald van Dijk, 20:42
- Re: How do I use bsearch() ?, santosh, 20:39
- How do I use bsearch() ?, Amandil, 20:25
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Flash Gordon, 20:10
- Re: How to eliminate multiple declaration error for a symbol present in both libs( without modifying libs), santosh, 20:08
- Re: order of array subscripts, Andrey Tarasevich, 20:03
- Re: How to eliminate multiple declaration error for a symbol present in both libs( without modifying libs), Flash Gordon, 19:58
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ian Collins, 19:58
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 19:55
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ian Collins, 19:54
- Re: order of array subscripts, vippstar, 19:49
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, santosh, 19:43
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Flash Gordon, 19:38
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 19:36
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 19:32
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Walter Roberson, 19:30
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 19:29
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 19:27
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 19:24
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Antoninus Twink, 19:23
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 19:20
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 19:18
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", Flash Gordon, 19:14
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 19:12
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 19:11
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 19:10
- Re: How do linkers work?, user923005, 19:08
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Eric Sosman, 19:03
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 19:01
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, carl . feynman, 18:58
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:58
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Richard Heathfield, 18:56
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 18:46
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, carl . feynman, 18:34
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Ben Pfaff, 18:28
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Eric Sosman, 18:28
- Re: Career in C, santosh, 18:24
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, carl . feynman, 18:20
- Re: Career in C, Ioannis Vranos, 18:17
- Re: Comments 'ok'?, Richard Heathfield, 18:15
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Willem, 18:12
- Re: size limits for string literals, Walter Roberson, 18:04
- Re: How do i increase the size of the program stack?, João Jerónimo, 17:57
- Re: Career in C, Richard, 17:56
- Comments 'ok'?, carl . feynman, 17:56
- Re: How do i increase the size of the program stack?, João Jerónimo, 17:55
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 17:53
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Morris Dovey, 17:41
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 17:38
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, Richard Heathfield, 17:28
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 17:28
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 17:25
- Re: strtod( ), Nick Keighley, 17:23
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Philip Potter, 17:19
- Re: cherfils, Richard Tobin, 17:17
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:15
- Re: acceptable use of goto?, João Jerónimo, 17:14
- Re: Suggestion for theme treatment was: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 17:13
- Re: How do linkers work?, lawrence . jones, 17:12
- Re: OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Keith Thompson, 17:08
- Re: ext4 file structure, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: size limits for string literals, Richard Heathfield, 17:01
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 17:01
- Re: order of array subscripts, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: size limits for string literals, Richard Bos, 16:55
- size limits for string literals, copx, 16:48
- Re: Suggestion for theme treatment was: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Walter Roberson, 16:39
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 16:35
- Re: Career in C, Morris Dovey, 16:27
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 16:19
- Re: Career in C, Bartc, 16:10
- Re: Career in C, Eric Sosman, 16:07
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 16:04
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ed Prochak, 15:59
- Re: cherfils, Morris Dovey, 15:58
- Career in C, broli, 15:23
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 15:14
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 14:58
- cherfils, ayat1303, 14:48
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 14:45
- Re: simple PRNG?, Noob, 14:43
- OT: LCC bug fix poilicy [Was: CERT C Secure Coding Standard - last call for reviewers], Nick Keighley, 14:30
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Ben Bacarisse, 13:47
- ext4 file structure, Rishi, 13:45
- Re: whats happening here, Eric Sosman, 13:41
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Paulo Jorge de O. C. de Matos, 11:55
- Re: Suggestion for theme treatment was: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 11:24
- Re: How do linkers work?, Bartc, 11:15
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 11:11
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 09:59
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, santosh, 09:58
- Re: how to explain this, zhangyefei.yefei@xxxxxxxxx, 09:52
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", Leslie Sanford, 09:48
- Re: Very strange command-line argument handling of /?, santosh, 09:42
- Re: How do linkers work?, Flash Gordon, 09:39
- Re: How do linkers work?, Flash Gordon, 09:29
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 09:24
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Flash Gordon, 09:19
- Re: whats happening here, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:12
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Flash Gordon, 09:09
- Re: order of array subscripts, Alf P. Steinbach, 09:06
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", Flash Gordon, 08:49
- Re: On VLAs and incomplete types, Sensei, 08:44
- Re: whats happening here, bdsatish, 08:43
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 08:42
- whats happening here, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:23
- Re: Suggestion for theme treatment was: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:06
- Re: Suggestion for theme treatment was: Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:05
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Morris Dovey, 08:02
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 07:47
- Re: How do linkers work?, Tony Giles, 07:46
- فتوى مصرية تـبيــح القبلات بين الشباب و الشابات الغير متزوجين !, دارين, 07:40
- Re: Help porting app from HP-UX to Linux, Keith Thompson, 07:35
- Call for Freshers, Prometric Test center, 07:33
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, santosh, 07:32
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, santosh, 07:25
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 07:16
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, William Pursell, 07:08
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Keith Thompson, 07:01
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, Peter Michaux, 07:00
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", jaysome, 06:56
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, Jack . Thomson . v3, 06:55
- Re: what to do when malloc returns NULL?, Harald van Dijk, 06:46
- what to do when malloc returns NULL?, Peter Michaux, 06:39
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 06:30
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, William Pursell, 06:26
- Re: strtod( ), Barry Schwarz, 06:25
- Re: How do linkers work?, jacob navia, 06:21
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 06:14
- Re: how to explain this, Peter Nilsson, 06:01
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", santosh, 06:01
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", jaysome, 05:43
- Re: How to eliminate multiple declaration error for a symbol present in both libs( without modifying libs), santosh, 05:37
- how to explain this, zhangyefei.yefei@xxxxxxxxx, 05:33
- How to eliminate multiple declaration error for a symbol present in both libs( without modifying libs), Raman, 05:21
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, user923005, 05:12
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 05:05
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 05:03
- Re: Query about " warning parameter names (without types) in function declaration", prix prad, 05:02
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard, 04:57
- Re: How do linkers work?, Richard, 04:55
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Richard, 04:53
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, santosh, 04:49
- Re: Help porting app from HP-UX to Linux, user923005, 04:48
- Re: Help porting app from HP-UX to Linux, Richard Heathfield, 04:33
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Jack Klein, 04:26
- Help porting app from HP-UX to Linux, James Egan, 04:24
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Jack Klein, 04:01
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Anand Hariharan, 03:57
- Re: Very strange command-line argument handling of /?, Walter Roberson, 03:34
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, user923005, 03:26
- Re: Very strange command-line argument handling of /?, Kaz Kylheku, 03:14
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Anand Hariharan, 03:09
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Anand Hariharan, 03:05
- Re: strtod( ), Ian Collins, 02:53
- Re: strtod( ), Ian Collins, 02:52
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ian Collins, 02:51
- Re: strtod( ), nospam, 02:47
- Re: strtod( ), Bill Cunningham, 02:43
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Ben Bacarisse, 02:27
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Peter Nilsson, 02:20
- Re: strtod( ), Ian Collins, 02:19
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Richard Heathfield, 02:11
- strtod( ), Bill Cunningham, 02:06
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, Ben Bacarisse, 02:04
- Re: How do linkers work?, user923005, 01:37
- Re: How do linkers work?, user923005, 01:32
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 01:31
- Re: learning from an existing project's code, user923005, 01:28
- Re: How do linkers work?, Bartc, 01:23
- Re: Very strange command-line argument handling of /?, Kenny McCormack, 01:20
- Re: Clearing Padding in Structure, user923005, 01:18
- Re: Very strange command-line argument handling of /?, Joe Wright, 01:16
- Re: Function pointer tables, Bartc, 01:01
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, CBFalconer, 00:49
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 00:42
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ben Pfaff, 00:40
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ian Collins, 00:33
- Clearing Padding in Structure, Martin, 00:28
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Paul Hsieh, 00:18
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Malcolm McLean, 00:16
- Re: Function pointer tables, vippstar, 00:02
- Re: Function pointer tables, Peter Nilsson, 00:00
March 24, 2008
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 23:59
- Re: Function pointer tables, myheartinamerica, 23:59
- Re: On VLAs and incomplete types, user923005, 23:58
- Re: How do linkers work?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:54
- Re: Function pointer tables, myheartinamerica, 23:52
- Re: polymorphic structs with "methods", CBFalconer, 23:46
- Function pointer tables, Bartc, 23:44
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 23:33
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 23:27
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos, 23:24
- Re: On VLAs and incomplete types, Old Wolf, 23:22
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Flash Gordon, 23:14
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Flash Gordon, 22:59
- Re: learning from an existing project's code, Morris Dovey, 22:51
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 22:46
- Re: How do linkers work?, Flash Gordon, 22:46
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ian Collins, 22:37
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Malcolm McLean, 22:36
- Re: learning from an existing project's code, Chris McDonald, 22:33
- learning from an existing project's code, myheartinamerica, 22:22
- Re: How do linkers work?, John Bode, 22:17
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, jacob navia, 22:16
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson, 22:07
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 22:07
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 21:47
- Re: What's the deal with C99?, lawrence . jones, 21:36
- Re: The problems in comp.lang.c, CBFalconer, 12:54