Re: ?: as an lvalue

[Andrey Tarasevich]

Richard wrote:
> > ...
> > I mean I'm OK personally with the way it works in C. I just like to
> > know what is it exactly in '(c?x:y)=v' that triggers a "I don't really
> > know what to say" reaction from some people.
>
> because its not a macro? it returns a value. I dont know the legalise
> words but it seems "obvious" enough to me, but again it might be because
> I am tainted.

Well, unary '*' operator is also not a macro. Yet it evaluates to an 
lvalue. Same for '[]' operator (by definition). Do you find this strange 
as well?

--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich