Re: ?: as an lvalue

[Andrey Tarasevich]

Dave Hansen wrote:
> I believe the syntax is legal.  

Legal where? In C? No, it is not.

> It just doesn't do what the OP wanted
> it to.

It doesn't do anything. It is illegal in C.

> Consider that it parses as
>
>    (1>0)?(aa):(b=10);

But it doesn't parse like that in C.

> Change it to 1<0?aa:b=10; and see the result...

The result will be the same: a diagnostic message triggered by the 
attempt to assign to a non-lvalue.

--
Best regards,
Andrey Tarasevich