|
|
Eric wrote:
) Dave Hansen wrote:
)> Consider that it parses as
)>
)> (1>0)?(aa):(b=10);
)
) Would you care to place a small wager on that?
)
) You could refer to the formal grammar in the Standard
) to settle the question, or you could ask informally which
) of = and ?: "binds more tightly." The parse you suggest
) would follow if = binds more tightly, in which case
Technically, it would also follow if = binds equally tightly.
Left-to-right and all that.
) x = a ? b : c;
)
) would parse as
)
) (x = a) ? b : c;
Again, purely technically, it would not if = were to bind equally tightly.
) Since we know that it actually parses as
)
) x = (a ? b : c);
)
) you may be about to lose some money ...
I'm not going to bet on it though.
SaSW, Willem
--
Disclaimer: I am in no way responsible for any of the statements
made in the above text. For all I know I might be
drugged or something..
No I'm not paranoid. You all think I'm paranoid, don't you !
#EOT
|
|