Re: sizeofx

[Ioannis Vranos]

Eric Sosman wrote:
> Ioannis Vranos wrote:
>> Ian Collins wrote:
>>> Ioannis Vranos wrote:
>>>> Ioannis Vranos wrote:
>>>>> I first saw that only sizeof x is valid at the pdf hosted at
>>>>> http://cprog.tomsweb.net.
>>>> More specifically the above writes:
>>>>
>>>> "sizeof      Returns size of operand in bytes; two forms:
>>>>                               1) sizeof(type)
>>>>                               2) sizeof expression"
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Did you read what Harald said: "(x) is a perfectly valid expression"?
>>
>> ... right. However sizeofx doesn't compile and if (x) was considered an
>> expression it should be sizeof (x), and sizeof(x) shouldn't compile.
> 
>     Try sizeof(((((((((((((((((((((x)))))))))))))))))))))
> and perhaps the answer will come to you.


Yes, it had already arrived. :-) Thanks anyway.