Re: sizeofx

[Eric Sosman]

Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
> > Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> > > Ioannis Vranos wrote:
> > > > I first saw that only sizeof x is valid at the pdf hosted at
> > > > http://cprog.tomsweb.net.
> > > More specifically the above writes:
> > >
> > > "sizeof      Returns size of operand in bytes; two forms:
> > >                               1) sizeof(type)
> > >                               2) sizeof expression"
> > Did you read what Harald said: "(x) is a perfectly valid expression"?
>
> ... right. However sizeofx doesn't compile and if (x) was considered an
> expression it should be sizeof (x), and sizeof(x) shouldn't compile.

    Try sizeof(((((((((((((((((((((x)))))))))))))))))))))
and perhaps the answer will come to you.

--
Eric Sosman
esosman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx