|
|
CBFalconer said:
<snip>
> Certainly functions
> can be written in other languages, however there are penalties, and
> the result is not portable.
Right.
> I maintain that writing portable C
> requires writing code in C, not using non-standard functions unless
> std C source is given, and a few other minor niggling points.
Right.
So you appear to agree, now, that the code is standard, non-portable C.
Well done - you now agree with Jacob *and* me. This is quite possibly a
first in the history of comp.lang.c.
--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: - www">http://www. +rjh@
Google users: < www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php">http://www.cpax.org.uk/prg/writings/googly.php>
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
|
|