|
|
In article <fsiico$a0j$1@xxxxxxxx>, Jeff P. Bailey <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote
much good stuff, indicating that he sees this NG for what it really is:
(when on 27/3/2008 11:05, Richard Heathfield barfed up his usual crap)
...
...
>In summary, I find your evidence wafer thin. Only one of the examples
>shows definite dishonesty on your part, but all of the others show every
>sign of being a deliberate attempt on your part to misconstrue what
>jacob has said for the purposes of presenting him in a negative light.
I think you're beginning to see just what a lying sack of crap
Heathfield is. Good show, old man!
>Your examples have only confirmed my belief that you have a personal
>agenda to undermine him.
No sh*t, Sherlock?
|
|