|
|
Herbert Rosenau wrote:
> The standard says nothing about linker, does not even mention how to
get a program in a state that it can be accessed by one or more
CPU(s). The standard does not even requires that there must be a
Compiler.
Wow. OK No linker, no compiler, no CPU.
C can be interpreted in runtime using an C interpreter. It
is possible to use a comiler that does nothing than compile C to a
bytecode to optimise the runtime the interpreter needs to interpret
that. So no linker is needed. No stavk is needed, no BSS is needed,
not even something that you names segments are needed.
Of course. If there is no CPU, I would be surprised
that a stack would exist
:-)
C is a programming language that is defined by syntax, semantik and
behavior of an abstract mashine, whereas the behavior of the abstract
mashine itself is defined exactly, leaving open anything only a real
implementation can know.
Yeah.
Sure.
No CPU Herbert. No stack, no compiler, no linker.
No nothing. We are in the "regulars daydreams"...
Nothing exists all is illusion.
--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32
|
|