comp.lang.c
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
<prev [Thread] next>

Re: What's the deal with C99?

from [Philip Potter]
Subject: Re: What's the deal with C99?
From: Philip Potter
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:19:06 +0000
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c 


Jack Klein wrote:

And there is no disclaimer that defining "void main()" is undefined
behavior in C prior to C99 (and MS does not conform, nor claims to
conform to C99), and just plain ill-formed in C++.


void main() is undefined in C99 too.
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: cherfils, Richard Tobin
Next by Date:  Re: strtod( ), Nick Keighley
Previous by Thread:  Re: What's the deal with C99?, Ioannis Vranos
Next by Thread:  Re: What's the deal with C99?, Keith Thompson
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
Privacy Policy