comp.lang.c (date)
February 29, 2008
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Joe Wright, 17:44
- Re: size_t, Harald van Dijk, 17:38
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Kenny McCormack, 17:35
- Re: size_t, Walter Roberson, 17:34
- How do I wind this into a nested loop?, Robbie Hatley, 17:29
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster? - TPA, Xiaohan, 17:24
- size_t, Ioannis Vranos, 17:20
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Richard Tobin, 17:19
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Richard Tobin, 17:16
- Re: dual core and c, user923005, 17:14
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Richard Tobin, 17:08
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Tobin, 17:03
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Kenny McCormack, 17:03
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster? - TPA, Default User, 17:01
- WinAPI videos? how to play videos beside avi?, jon, 17:01
- Re: calculating length of an substring, William Pursell, 16:59
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Ben Pfaff, 16:48
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: calculating length of an substring - TPA, Default User, 16:33
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, Xiaohan, 16:21
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Richard Tobin, 16:12
- Re: calculating length of an substring, brasilino@xxxxxxxxx, 15:45
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, jacob navia, 15:35
- [OT] Re: Complex numbers and printf, Eric Sosman, 15:31
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Morris Dovey, 15:23
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, burton . samogradNOSP, 15:06
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Kaz Kylheku, 15:06
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, Andrey Tarasevich, 15:04
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, jacob navia, 14:58
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Kaz Kylheku, 14:56
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Morris Dovey, 14:55
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Kaz Kylheku, 14:43
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, lawrence . jones, 14:39
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, lawrence . jones, 14:38
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, Doug Miller, 14:38
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Default User, 14:30
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, jacob navia, 14:08
- Re: calculating length of an substring, Martin Ambuhl, 14:06
- Re: calculating length of an substring, burton . samogradNO, 14:04
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Paul Hsieh, 14:03
- Re: calculating length of an substring, Micah Cowan, 14:03
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Martin Ambuhl, 14:00
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Micah Cowan, 13:58
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:55
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, John Bode, 13:53
- Re: calculating length of an substring, William Pursell, 13:52
- Re: dual core and c, Walter Roberson, 13:49
- calculating length of an substring, brasilino@xxxxxxxxx, 13:43
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Micah Cowan, 13:40
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Bartc, 13:39
- Re: dual core and c, Paul Hsieh, 13:33
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, jacob navia, 13:29
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, jacob navia, 13:23
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Walter Roberson, 13:11
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Morris Dovey, 12:56
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Nelu, 12:44
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Walter Roberson, 12:38
- Re: array index and pointer, which is faster?, Richard Tobin, 12:03
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Walter Roberson, 12:01
- Re: dual core and c, Nelu, 11:48
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Keith Thompson, 11:41
- array index and pointer, which is faster?, Xiaohan, 11:41
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, CBFalconer, 11:39
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Heathfield, 11:35
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Morris Dovey, 11:24
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Keith Thompson, 11:16
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Ernie Wright, 11:15
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, lawrence . jones, 11:14
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, lawrence . jones, 11:11
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Nelu, 11:08
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Nelu, 11:08
- Re: dual core and c, Kenny McCormack, 10:58
- Re: dual core and c, Eric Sosman, 10:57
- Re: dual core and c, Antoninus Twink, 10:55
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Kenny McCormack, 10:53
- Re: dual core and c, Walter Roberson, 10:51
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Bartc, 10:31
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, CBFalconer, 10:28
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Heathfield, 10:17
- dual core and c, kerravon, 10:13
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Richard Heathfield, 10:10
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, CBFalconer, 10:09
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, jacob navia, 10:05
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Randy Howard, 10:05
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, jacob navia, 10:03
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Joachim Schmitz, 10:02
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Joachim Schmitz, 10:00
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, jacob navia, 09:50
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Kenny McCormack, 09:33
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Morris Dovey, 09:30
- Re: Link lists.., Joachim Schmitz, 09:23
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Heathfield, 08:29
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Doug Miller, 08:23
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Tobin, 08:07
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Heathfield, 08:01
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Richard Tobin, 07:26
- Re: Link lists.., johnnash, 07:17
- Re: Complex numbers and printf, Gerry Ford, 07:00
- Re: Link lists.., Joachim Schmitz, 06:58
- Re: Link lists.., Mark Bluemel, 06:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Ben Bacarisse, 06:39
- Link lists.., johnnash, 05:36
- You can find new hookups with the hottest men, women and couples., fernandena, 05:19
- One of the Greatest Earning Opportunity for Home workers, incomemoneyonline, 05:17
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 05:09
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, jacob navia, 04:43
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, santosh, 04:36
- Complex numbers and printf, jacob navia, 04:34
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 04:02
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 03:49
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Gerry Ford, 03:42
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 03:36
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, CBFalconer, 03:27
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Wade Ward, 03:19
- Re: Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Richard Bos, 03:06
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Richard Heathfield, 02:45
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 02:44
- Is there stack associated when a executing an inline function?, Mahesh, 02:37
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Bos, 02:22
- Registry and Spyware Cleaner (Free Download), stelevision, 01:49
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Keith Thompson, 01:08
- www.shopest.com - good new!,,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD, shopest002, 00:43
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Keith Thompson, 00:39
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Thad Smith, 00:29
- Re: Bounds checking functions, James Antill, 00:25
- Re: /*this meaningful?*/ #define CONST_INT(name, value) extern const int name, Thad Smith, 00:15
February 28, 2008
- Re: Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, cr88192, 23:04
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Bill Reid, 22:00
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Joe Wright, 21:34
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, CBFalconer, 20:31
- Free online Games play and free download - Intelligent games, senthilind, 20:28
- Re: Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, Bartc, 19:37
- Re: Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, cr88192, 19:20
- Re: printf("%ls"), Micah Cowan, 19:15
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Gordon Burditt, 19:13
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Amandil, 19:01
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Micah Cowan, 18:58
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Antoninus Twink, 18:51
- Re: printf("%ls"), Ioannis Vranos, 18:35
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list (long), Morris Dovey, 18:30
- Re: printf("%ls"), Walter Roberson, 18:17
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, ediebur, 18:14
- printf("%ls"), Ioannis Vranos, 18:09
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Mark McIntyre, 17:16
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 16:53
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, cr88192, 16:49
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Morris Dovey, 16:28
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, pete, 16:15
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Mark McIntyre, 16:06
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Mark McIntyre, 16:05
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Mark McIntyre, 16:03
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Ben Pfaff, 16:02
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, pete, 16:01
- Re: Bounds checking functions, William Ahern, 15:59
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, pete, 15:56
- Re: Compile time details of an 'extern variable', CBFalconer, 15:22
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Doug Miller, 15:21
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, santosh, 15:20
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 15:15
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Harald van Dijk, 15:14
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Ioan - Ciprian Tandau, 15:05
- Re: Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, santosh, 14:55
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Coos Haak, 14:54
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Morris Dovey, 14:49
- Variable-sized lines of text in linked list, Scottman, 14:45
- Re: Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, santosh, 14:44
- Re: Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, Walter Roberson, 14:39
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, santosh, 14:35
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Micah Cowan, 14:29
- Cannot optimize 64bit Linux code, legrape, 14:24
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, johnnash, 14:24
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Micah Cowan, 14:23
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, santosh, 14:20
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, johnnash, 14:16
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, santosh, 14:11
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, johnnash, 14:08
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:05
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, johnnash, 14:04
- Re: Is this code correct ?, johnnash, 14:02
- Re: why this program is wrong ?, Joachim Schmitz, 13:58
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:57
- Re: Is this code correct ?, Eric Sosman, 13:55
- why this program is wrong ?, johnnash, 13:50
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, muntyan, 13:47
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, muntyan, 13:35
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Micah Cowan, 13:32
- Re: Is this code correct ?, johnnash, 13:32
- Is this code correct ?, johnnash, 13:31
- Re: Which programming method is better?, CBFalconer, 13:23
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:18
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, CBFalconer, 13:16
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Tobin, 13:02
- Re: Compile time details of an 'extern variable', Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: Bounds checking functions, William Ahern, 12:56
- Compile time details of an 'extern variable', bg, 12:48
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:38
- Re: On macros, Nickolai Leschov, 12:34
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:33
- Re: On macros, Nickolai Leschov, 12:31
- Re: On macros, Eric Sosman, 12:19
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Micah Cowan, 12:19
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Tobin, 12:18
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Micah Cowan, 12:16
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Micah Cowan, 12:14
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Micah Cowan, 12:14
- Re: On macros, Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: function prototype declaration, Keith Thompson, 12:06
- Re: On macros, Eric Sosman, 11:55
- On macros, Nickolai Leschov, 11:53
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Kenny McCormack, 11:39
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Mark Bluemel, 11:37
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Amandil, 11:31
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
- ******************Part Time Job*****************, senthilkumar282, 11:15
- Re: /*this meaningful?*/ #define CONST_INT(name, value) extern const int name, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:57
- Re: function prototype declaration, Martin Ambuhl, 10:52
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 10:49
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Richard Bos, 10:45
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 10:40
- Re: /*this meaningful?*/ #define CONST_INT(name, value) extern const int name, Eric Sosman, 10:35
- wholesale of the sport shoes,clothing,Mobile Phones in China shop,Quality AAA www.shopbb.com, shopbb . 005, 10:26
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 10:24
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Joachim Schmitz, 10:06
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Joachim Schmitz, 09:57
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Mark Bluemel, 09:54
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Richard Tobin, 09:53
- wholesale of the shoes,clothing,electronics in china www.shopbb.com, shopbb.com, 09:52
- /*this meaningful?*/ #define CONST_INT(name, value) extern const int name, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 09:44
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, CBFalconer, 09:40
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 09:36
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 09:30
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 09:16
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 09:10
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Doug Miller, 08:37
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Richard Tobin, 08:19
- Re: what dose this float value mean ( -1.#IND0 ), Richard Bos, 08:15
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Richard Tobin, 08:15
- Re: problem with fscan, Mark Bluemel, 07:53
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., WANG Cong, 07:52
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Joachim Schmitz, 07:48
- Re: fseek on a file opened with _popen, Mark Bluemel, 07:44
- problem with fscan, orrgal, 07:43
- Re: what dose this float value mean ( -1.#IND0 ), Richard Tobin, 07:33
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Bos, 07:33
- fseek on a file opened with _popen, thomas . mertes, 07:31
- Re: what dose this float value mean ( -1.#IND0 ), Mark Bluemel, 07:28
- Re: problem with fscan, Morris Dovey, 06:51
- what dose this float value mean ( -1.#IND0 ), Car, 06:45
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, pete, 06:35
- Hii.. Friends, mini, 06:17
- Re: function prototype declaration, Sheldon, 05:16
- Re: function prototype declaration, Joachim Schmitz, 05:08
- Re: function prototype declaration, Sheldon, 05:02
- Cosmic Indulgence, Pacific freedom, 05:01
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Chris Torek, 05:01
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Nick Keighley, 04:57
- Re: function prototype declaration, Chris Dollin, 04:49
- Re: function prototype declaration, Joachim Schmitz, 04:48
- Re: function prototype declaration, Joachim Schmitz, 04:44
- function prototype declaration, Sheldon, 04:39
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Sheldon, 04:26
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Sheldon, 04:24
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, MisterE, 02:18
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Keith Thompson, 02:18
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 02:11
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 02:08
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Ben Pfaff, 01:53
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Micah Cowan, 01:41
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Micah Cowan, 01:02
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Micah Cowan, 01:00
- Re: Which programming method is better?, CBFalconer, 00:27
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 00:17
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 00:07
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Barry Schwarz, 00:02
- download ebooks,softwares,students tutorials here for free!!, priya4u, 00:00
February 27, 2008
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, CBFalconer, 23:58
- Re: Which programming method is better?, Ian Collins, 23:23
- Which programming method is better?, Amandil, 22:49
- Re: wchar_t, Micah Cowan, 22:48
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Micah Cowan, 22:22
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Gordon Burditt, 22:12
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Gordon Burditt, 21:56
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 20:54
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:53
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Bartc, 20:47
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Morris Dovey, 20:32
- Re: wchar_t, ymuntyan, 20:28
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, ymuntyan, 20:22
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 20:16
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Micah Cowan, 20:13
- Re: Bounds checking functions, user923005, 20:13
- Re: Bounds checking functions, user923005, 20:08
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Doug Miller, 20:08
- wchar_t, Ioannis Vranos, 19:52
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Gordon Burditt, 19:48
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Bartc, 19:44
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:39
- Re: Bounds checking functions, William Ahern, 19:37
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, Gordon Burditt, 19:22
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Randy Howard, 19:11
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Randy Howard, 19:10
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Micah Cowan, 19:01
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Ben Pfaff, 18:56
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 18:52
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Chris Thomasson, 18:49
- Re: Bounds checking functions, jacob navia, 18:33
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Richard Heathfield, 18:29
- Re: Bounds checking functions, muntyan, 18:26
- Re: Bounds checking functions, muntyan, 18:25
- Re: incr MACRO, Chris Thomasson, 18:11
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, pete, 17:50
- Re: printf() causes core dump, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Chris Thomasson, 17:35
- Re: Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Ben Pfaff, 17:32
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 17:18
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Crazy macro-based doubly-linked list..., Chris Thomasson, 17:09
- Re: Is My Program OK?, CBFalconer, 17:01
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Richard Tobin, 16:40
- Re: 2D const array nested functions warning question, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:36
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Harter, 16:32
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Default User, 16:26
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Ben Pfaff, 16:25
- Re: Question regarding UB, Flash Gordon, 16:24
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Richard Tobin, 16:19
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Kenneth Brody, 16:03
- Re: Bounds checking functions, William Ahern, 16:02
- Re: Is My Program OK?, William Pursell, 15:59
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Kenneth Brody, 15:57
- Re: Regarding global variables memory allocation and gtime funtion, Michael Mair, 15:56
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, William Pursell, 15:49
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Martin Ambuhl, 15:36
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Sheldon, 15:36
- Re: printf() causes core dump, Sheldon, 15:35
- Re: printf() causes core dump, David Resnick, 15:26
- Re: printf() causes core dump, jacob navia, 15:21
- printf() causes core dump, Sheldon, 15:18
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Malcolm McLean, 15:11
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, John Bode, 14:55
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Default User, 14:43
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Harter, 14:39
- Re: 2D const array nested functions warning question, Micah Cowan, 14:20
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, santosh, 14:05
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:32
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 13:25
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:24
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:24
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:15
- Re: Bounds checking functions, jacob navia, 13:13
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 13:12
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Micah Cowan, 13:11
- Re: What's the most raw networking library?, Ian Collins, 13:09
- Re: What's the most raw networking library?, Kenny McCormack, 13:07
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Keith Thompson, 13:01
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:00
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Michael Mair, 12:58
- What's the most raw networking library?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:56
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: do u know ramanujan numbers algorithm, Richard Heathfield, 12:53
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Keith Thompson, 12:50
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Keith Thompson, 12:43
- amature videos #, sexy, 12:41
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Keith Thompson, 12:37
- Re: do u know ramanujan numbers algorithm, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, Keith Thompson, 12:27
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:25
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:22
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Boltar, 12:07
- Re: incr MACRO, Keith Thompson, 12:07
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, CBFalconer, 11:54
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 11:45
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 11:41
- Re: Is My Program OK?, santosh, 11:37
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Micah Cowan, 11:36
- Re: Bounds checking functions, CBFalconer, 11:36
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 11:26
- Re: Is My Program OK?, CBFalconer, 11:21
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, CBFalconer, 11:10
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 11:01
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 10:50
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 10:43
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 10:38
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, CBFalconer, 10:34
- Re: do u know ramanujan numbers algorithm, Ben Bacarisse, 10:26
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Doug Miller, 10:25
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Ben Bacarisse, 10:15
- Re: do u know ramanujan numbers algorithm, Walter Roberson, 10:05
- do u know ramanujan numbers algorithm, emre esirik(hacettepe computer science and engineering), 09:58
- 2D const array nested functions warning question, Andres Meyer, 09:55
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Kenneth Brody, 09:51
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Kenneth Brody, 09:44
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Kenneth Brody, 09:30
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, Eric Sosman, 09:16
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, Randy Howard, 09:15
- Re: doubt regarding isprint() function!!!, santosh, 09:14
- Re: doubt regarding isprint() function!!!, Ben Bacarisse, 09:13
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, santosh, 09:09
- doubt regarding isprint() function!!!, kumarve, 09:02
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, satheesh, 09:00
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, santosh, 08:58
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, suresh shenoy, 08:56
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 08:52
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 08:51
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 08:48
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, satheesh, 08:47
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 08:47
- Re: generic linked list, pete, 08:46
- Re: generic linked list, pete, 08:45
- Re: c can protect the data in struct, santosh, 08:35
- c can protect the data in struct, satheesh, 08:32
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 08:25
- Re: Bounds checking functions, santosh, 08:24
- Re: incr MACRO, Eric Sosman, 08:12
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 07:59
- Re: Bounds checking functions, jacob navia, 07:54
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Randy Howard, 07:43
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Bartc, 07:36
- Re: computer, Nick Keighley, 06:44
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 06:40
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 06:36
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Bartc, 06:34
- Re: Bounds checking functions, santosh, 06:32
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Richard Heathfield, 06:13
- Re: Bounds checking functions, jacob navia, 05:46
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Ben Bacarisse, 05:43
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Tobin, 05:31
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, santosh, 05:28
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Bos, 05:19
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Bos, 05:17
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 04:56
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Richard Heathfield, 04:55
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Ben Bacarisse, 04:50
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Joachim Schmitz, 04:48
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Boltar, 04:48
- Re: Legal C or bug in gcc, Kenny McCormack, 04:44
- Legal C or bug in gcc, Boltar, 04:41
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Richard Heathfield, 04:38
- Regarding global variables memory allocation and gtime funtion, sunil, 04:31
- Re: Is My Program OK?, kooladi, 04:28
- Re: Is My Program OK?, santosh, 03:59
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, santosh, 03:45
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 03:18
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 03:17
- Re: Bounds checking functions, ymuntyan, 02:46
- Re: Bounds checking functions, santosh, 02:42
- Re: Is My Program OK?, jaysome, 02:41
- Re: Coding skills, santosh, 02:32
- Re: Bounds checking functions, Paul Hsieh, 02:03
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 02:03
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Mike, 01:42
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, user923005, 01:42
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Harald van Dijk, 01:36
- Re: How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Ian Collins, 01:32
- How to RUN C by Microsoft Visual Studio, Mike, 01:19
- Re: Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Ian Collins, 01:16
- Compile error at testing Function Pointer, Denny, 01:09
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Keith Thompson, 01:02
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, William Pursell, 00:57
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Keith Thompson, 00:51
- Re: incr MACRO, William Pursell, 00:31
- Re: incr MACRO, William Pursell, 00:25
- Re: generic linked list, Ravishankar S, 00:02
February 26, 2008
- computer, mirzamisamhusain, 23:40
- Re: Coding skills, mirzamisamhusain, 23:38
- Bounds checking functions, Aaron Hsu, 23:28
- Huge database of profiles with photos for all 30+ local singles., bobhereg, 22:55
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 22:45
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 22:44
- www.shopest.com.cn china shop.low price.Wholesale(sale) nike shoes,LV handbag,A&F Clothes,Etc., shopest002, 22:42
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 22:41
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, ymuntyan, 22:30
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Eric Sosman, 22:29
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Walter Roberson, 22:03
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Richard Tobin, 21:36
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 21:18
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Eric Sosman, 21:18
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 21:08
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 21:05
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Richard Tobin, 20:59
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Micah Cowan, 20:54
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Tony Giles, 20:52
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, user923005, 20:44
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Richard Heathfield, 20:22
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Micah Cowan, 20:20
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Randy Howard, 20:17
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Micah Cowan, 20:15
- Re: generic linked list, user923005, 20:11
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Kaz Kylheku, 20:10
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 20:09
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 20:06
- Re: Free C reference, user923005, 20:02
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Aaron Hsu, 20:01
- Re: Is My Program OK?, CBFalconer, 19:59
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:53
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Gordon Burditt, 19:52
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Gordon Burditt, 19:44
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Old Wolf, 19:32
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Default User, 19:27
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Gordon Burditt, 19:27
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:17
- Re: generic linked list, karthikbalaguru79, 19:13
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, jacob navia, 19:08
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:07
- Free C reference, Ioannis Vranos, 18:53
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:52
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Randy Howard, 18:40
- Re: incr MACRO, Kaz Kylheku, 18:10
- Re: incr MACRO, Kaz Kylheku, 17:59
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, CBFalconer, 17:58
- Re: incr MACRO, Paul Hsieh, 17:57
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 17:53
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 17:49
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 17:36
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Paul Hsieh, 17:36
- Re: http response parser in c, CBFalconer, 17:31
- Re: incr MACRO, Kaz Kylheku, 17:29
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, CBFalconer, 17:27
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, CBFalconer, 17:24
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, CBFalconer, 17:18
- Re: generic linked list, Michael Mair, 17:12
- Re: generic linked list, Eric Sosman, 17:08
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 17:04
- Re: generic linked list, Malcolm McLean, 17:03
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: Question regarding UB, pete, 16:48
- Re: incr MACRO, Micah Cowan, 16:42
- generic linked list, sengupta_arka123, 16:37
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, pete, 16:34
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, pete, 16:29
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, John Bode, 16:26
- Re: incr MACRO, Eric Sosman, 16:23
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Antoninus Twink, 16:00
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Michael Mair, 15:55
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Willem, 15:48
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Herbert Rosenau, 15:46
- incr MACRO, William Pursell, 15:39
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Kenneth Brody, 15:19
- Re: Question regarding UB, user923005, 15:16
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 14:30
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 14:26
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Willem, 14:12
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Harald van Dijk, 14:06
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Antoninus Twink, 13:54
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Walter Roberson, 13:31
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, vippstar, 13:30
- Re: Question regarding UB, santosh, 13:09
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:01
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 12:55
- Re: arrays as function arguments, John Bode, 12:54
- Re: Question regarding UB, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:40
- Re: Question regarding UB, santosh, 12:39
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:39
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: Question regarding UB, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:26
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Willem, 12:23
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 12:20
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Aaron Hsu, 12:19
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Default User, 12:08
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Default User, 12:05
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:04
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:01
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:58
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Richard Heathfield, 11:37
- c++, java , cobol know more, davidboon28, 11:26
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 11:19
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 10:47
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, ymuntyan, 10:29
- making money and helping others, lance kunzer, 10:25
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 09:23
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Eric Sosman, 09:22
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,Quality AAA,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 09:18
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, jacob navia, 09:09
- Re: Question regarding UB, Eric Sosman, 09:08
- Re: http response parser in c, santosh, 09:01
- Re: Question regarding UB, Philip Potter, 09:00
- Re: Question regarding UB, vippstar, 08:55
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Eric Sosman, 08:47
- Re: http response parser in c, Sachin, 08:38
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 08:37
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 08:17
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, jacob navia, 08:15
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, jacob navia, 08:14
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, jacob navia, 08:13
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 07:25
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 07:21
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 07:12
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, fnegroni, 07:09
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 07:02
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 06:58
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 06:57
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 06:54
- Re: Question regarding UB, Micah Cowan, 06:50
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, santosh, 06:49
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 06:46
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, santosh, 06:41
- Re: Question regarding UB, Micah Cowan, 06:39
- Re: Question regarding UB, santosh, 06:34
- Re: standard C site, vippstar, 05:54
- Re: Question regarding UB, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:17
- Question regarding UB, Philip Potter, 05:07
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Micah Cowan, 05:03
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Micah Cowan, 05:02
- download students tutorials,ebooks,softwares here for Free!!!!, priya4u, 04:58
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Wolfgang Riedel, 04:35
- Online Mobile Phones Catalog, DexterOnline, 04:25
- Re: [OT] standard C site, Mark Bluemel, 03:42
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Richard Heathfield, 03:03
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Ian Collins, 02:52
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Richard Bos, 02:47
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Keith Thompson, 02:47
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Ben Pfaff, 02:42
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, William Pursell, 02:37
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, William Pursell, 02:33
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 02:32
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 02:25
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 02:25
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Bos, 02:25
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Bos, 02:24
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Richard Heathfield, 02:22
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Bos, 02:19
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Bos, 02:14
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Keith Thompson, 02:03
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, user923005, 01:35
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, WANG Cong, 01:32
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Keith Thompson, 01:32
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, WANG Cong, 01:28
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Aaron Hsu, 01:27
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 01:20
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Keith Thompson, 01:15
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, user923005, 01:13
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Micah Cowan, 00:29
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, Gerry Ford, 00:08
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, santosh, 00:07
- Re: Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, santosh, 00:04
February 25, 2008
- Why atexit is limited to 32 functions?, lak, 23:55
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 23:23
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Jack Klein, 22:53
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Jack Klein, 22:49
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, CBFalconer, 22:30
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, CBFalconer, 22:19
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, santosh, 22:14
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Ian Collins, 22:07
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Ian Collins, 22:04
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Heathfield, 22:02
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 21:58
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Ian Collins, 21:54
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Richard Heathfield, 21:42
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, Richard Heathfield, 21:28
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 21:24
- Re: Secure version of I/O functions, santosh, 21:16
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, santosh, 21:04
- Secure version of I/O functions, Ioannis Vranos, 21:01
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Peter Nilsson, 20:58
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Gerry Ford, 20:45
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Ioannis Vranos, 19:59
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Default User, 19:42
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Ben Pfaff, 19:29
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, John Bode, 18:24
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Gerry Ford, 18:19
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, John Bode, 18:16
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, J. J. Farrell, 18:07
- Re: [OT] standard C site, Gerry Ford, 18:05
- Re: Is My Program OK?, CBFalconer, 18:04
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, J. J. Farrell, 18:01
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, CBFalconer, 17:52
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Harald van Dijk, 17:40
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Wolfgang Draxinger, 17:40
- Re: [OT] standard C site, Sjouke Burry, 17:37
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, CBFalconer, 17:34
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Tobin, 17:21
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, CBFalconer, 17:16
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Gerry Ford, 17:15
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Richard Tobin, 17:15
- Re: http response parser in c, Richard Tobin, 17:12
- [OT] standard C site, Bill Cunningham, 17:12
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 17:07
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 17:06
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, CBFalconer, 17:03
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, CBFalconer, 16:59
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:57
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:54
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 16:37
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Serve Laurijssen, 16:31
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 16:12
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Default User, 16:09
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, user923005, 16:00
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Harter, 15:51
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, Andrey Tarasevich, 15:50
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Gerry Ford, 15:49
- Re: program with external print, Gerry Ford, 15:31
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 15:08
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, William Pursell, 15:01
- Re: Sorting, Antoninus Twink, 14:28
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Antoninus Twink, 14:26
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Antoninus Twink, 14:25
- Re: Sorting, Richard Heathfield, 14:23
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 14:14
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 14:09
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Harald van Dijk, 14:08
- Re: Sorting, Willem, 14:02
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 13:56
- Re: http response parser in c, Paul Hsieh, 13:50
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Ian Collins, 13:42
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, santosh, 13:38
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Harald van Dijk, 13:31
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Wolfgang Draxinger, 13:29
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Harald van Dijk, 13:27
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Ian Collins, 13:14
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, johnnash, 13:12
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, Richard Heathfield, 13:11
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 13:08
- Re: http response parser in c, Ian Collins, 13:07
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Kenneth Brody, 13:00
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 12:57
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenny McCormack, 12:56
- Re: Is this tutorial good ?, johnnash, 12:56
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenny McCormack, 12:53
- Is this tutorial good ?, johnnash, 12:52
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:50
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenneth Brody, 12:49
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Default User, 12:49
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 12:46
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Keith Thompson, 12:43
- http response parser in c, Sachin, 12:39
- Re: Sorting, Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 12:18
- Re: Sorting, Willem, 12:14
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:13
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 12:12
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:47
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 11:34
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 11:30
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Mark McIntyre, 11:05
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Mark McIntyre, 11:04
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Martin, 10:12
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, Wolfgang Draxinger, 08:47
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Bartc, 08:41
- Re: Sorting, Speed, 07:37
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Bartc, 07:19
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Martien Verbruggen, 06:38
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Richard Heathfield, 06:35
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, WANG Cong, 06:33
- Re: Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, MisterE, 06:25
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, MisterE, 06:24
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, jacob navia, 06:19
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, santosh, 06:13
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Bartc, 06:02
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, WANG Cong, 06:00
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:46
- Re: Sorting, Willem, 05:42
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 05:41
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Richard Tobin, 05:39
- Calling C++ functions in C function through function pointers, D3|\\||\\|!$, 05:38
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:36
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 05:29
- Re: Rounding a floating point number, Richard Heathfield, 05:28
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 05:24
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Vijay Kumar R. Zanvar, 05:18
- Rounding a floating point number, jacob navia, 05:18
- Re: Sorting, Speed, 05:13
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Mark McIntyre, 05:11
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, karthikbalaguru, 04:49
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Paul Hsieh, 04:32
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Nick Keighley, 04:23
- Re: Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, Mark Bluemel, 04:18
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,Quality AAA,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 04:15
- Freeing memory - will it be available immediately, karthikbalaguru, 04:10
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Keith Thompson, 03:51
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, david, 03:08
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, Amandil, 01:46
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, Amandil, 01:39
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 01:22
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, david, 00:19
February 24, 2008
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, David Thompson, 23:28
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, CBFalconer, 23:21
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Jack Klein, 22:58
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 21:26
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, CBFalconer, 21:11
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 20:14
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Ben Bacarisse, 20:12
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, pete, 18:59
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:56
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:54
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 18:23
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, J. J. Farrell, 17:14
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, J. J. Farrell, 16:56
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Eric Sosman, 16:52
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 16:42
- Re: execute command line arguments, William Pursell, 15:43
- Re: execute command line arguments, Mark McIntyre, 15:01
- Re: cpmmand line arguments, dj3vande, 14:24
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, Barry Schwarz, 14:08
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Keith Thompson, 13:57
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Keith Thompson, 13:54
- Re: execute command line arguments, santosh, 13:45
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:28
- Re: Coding skills, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:27
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Martin Ambuhl, 13:20
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, david, 13:07
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, david, 13:04
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, Ben Bacarisse, 12:59
- Re: execute command line arguments, Malcolm McLean, 12:42
- Re: function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, Ulrich Eckhardt, 12:37
- execute command line arguments, neha_chhatre, 12:36
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Harald van Dijk, 12:13
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Tobin, 12:09
- function returning pointer, could not change data it points to, david, 12:07
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Richard Tobin, 12:01
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Richard Tobin, 11:50
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Harald van Dijk, 11:39
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Serve Laurijssen, 11:38
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard, 10:38
- Wholesale nike max nike shox,jordan shoes! handbags! jeans! coat! LV Hot sell Nike max nike shox Jordan shoes!, shopbb.com, 10:07
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, CBFalconer, 09:36
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, CBFalconer, 09:24
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:24
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Harald van Dijk, 09:11
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, santosh, 09:04
- Re: Converting unsigned long to string in C, Ben Bacarisse, 08:50
- Converting unsigned long to string in C, bmshivaraj, 08:15
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Richard Heathfield, 08:00
- Re: program with external print, Richard Heathfield, 07:57
- Re: Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, jacob navia, 07:08
- Utility to ensure appropriate headers were included, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:02
- Re: program with external print, vippstar, 06:13
- Re: Writting Excel file, Oleksandr Gavenko, 06:08
- Re: cpmmand line arguments, santosh, 05:51
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Flash Gordon, 04:27
- Download 9000 Satellite TV Channels on PC or Laptop - TV for PC, kanaka38, 04:13
- Re: cpmmand line arguments, Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Harald van Dijk, 04:07
- cpmmand line arguments, neha_chhatre, 03:58
- Re: arrays as function arguments, fkater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 03:27
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Antoninus Twink, 03:23
- Re: program with external print, Martin Ambuhl, 02:48
- program with external print, Gerry Ford, 01:07
February 23, 2008
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Keith Thompson, 23:44
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Kenny McCormack, 21:40
- Re: telnet from c application using libcurl ??, Richard, 21:38
- unlock iphone, unlockiphone, 20:49
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ben Bacarisse, 20:44
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 20:30
- Re: Wide character input/output, CBFalconer, 20:23
- Re: Wide character input/output, CBFalconer, 20:21
- Re: telnet from c application using libcurl ??, CBFalconer, 20:10
- Portugal, phishstory@xxxxxxxxx, 19:58
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, CBFalconer, 19:56
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 19:45
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 19:44
- Re: hash from long url to short url - TPA, Antoninus Twink, 19:30
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ben Bacarisse, 19:29
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 19:19
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 19:07
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 19:03
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ben Bacarisse, 18:50
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ben Bacarisse, 18:43
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 18:25
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 18:14
- Re: telnet from c application using libcurl ??, Ben Bacarisse, 17:53
- Re: Wide character input/output, Ben Bacarisse, 17:45
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Eric Sosman, 17:36
- Wide character input/output, Ioannis Vranos, 17:25
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Bartc, 17:25
- telnet from c application using libcurl ??, Jake, 17:21
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Old Wolf, 17:08
- Re: hash from long url to short url - TPA, Richard, 15:37
- VTD-XML 2.3, jimmy Zhang, 15:24
- Re: Sorting, Eric Sosman, 15:21
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: wierd behavior in program, newbiegalore, 15:04
- Re: Sorting, Willem, 15:03
- Re: Sorting, Eric Sosman, 14:57
- Sorting, Speed, 14:39
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 13:12
- Re: run c precompiler alone, Daniel Kraft, 13:02
- Re: run c precompiler alone, rembremading, 12:32
- Re: run c precompiler alone, Remo D., 11:59
- run c precompiler alone, rembremading, 11:39
- Re: arrays as function arguments, christian.bau, 10:28
- Prophet Muhammad the last Messenger in the Bible, dawa-dawa, 10:16
- ►Website to make HUGE MONEY online playing GAMES ◄, C. Pa, 09:08
- Re: Is My Program OK?, santosh, 08:59
- Re: wierd behavior in program, Flash Gordon, 08:50
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:24
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:20
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenny McCormack, 08:19
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Ben Bacarisse, 08:17
- Re: Is My Program OK?, vippstar, 08:14
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Kenny McCormack, 08:10
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 08:05
- do business on the internet.want buy much popular and inexpensive price go www.clothserver-yhnetstore.cn, yww004, 07:39
- Re: Is My Program OK?, santosh, 07:33
- Re: Is My Program OK?, vippstar, 07:07
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Roberto V., 06:45
- Re: arrays as function arguments, fkater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:33
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Bartc, 06:13
- Re: Is My Program OK?, Vitillo Roberto, 06:07
- Re: wierd behavior in program, newbiegalore, 04:58
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Antoninus Twink, 04:44
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Keith Thompson, 04:28
- Make others look at you with envy!!!, nkavitha551, 04:17
- Re: wierd behavior in program, newbiegalore, 03:57
- Re: malloc, Willem, 03:44
- Re: malloc, Willem, 03:37
- Re: Is My Program OK?, vippstar, 03:35
- Is My Program OK?, Andy G., 03:26
- Best Prometric (like Microsoft, Sun Microsystems, Dell, HP) Test center In Bangalore, Prometric Test center, 02:44
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Harald van Dijk, 02:40
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 02:27
- wierd behavior in program, newbiegalore, 01:12
February 22, 2008
- wholesale sport shoes,clothing,electronics in china www.fashion-sky.com (NEW UGG shoes=40USD,GHD MK4=55USD), fashion-sky.com, 23:55
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Keith Thompson, 23:01
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Keith Thompson, 22:55
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Paul Hsieh, 22:13
- Re: arrays as function arguments, karthikbalaguru, 22:02
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 20:54
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, CBFalconer, 20:16
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 20:09
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 20:04
- Re: .h files, CBFalconer, 19:56
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenny McCormack, 19:53
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Ben Bacarisse, 19:35
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Randy Howard, 19:33
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 19:16
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ioannis Vranos, 19:04
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ioannis Vranos, 19:01
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:56
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Mark McIntyre, 18:56
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Default User, 18:56
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Default User, 18:46
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ioannis Vranos, 18:45
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Joe Wright, 18:41
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Richard Tobin, 18:38
- ♥♥GOOD NEWS ! DVDS and Software FACTORY SALE! good quality and cheap price! AND FREE SHIPPING!♣♣, jojoghgh, 18:33
- Re: arrays as function arguments, fkater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:17
- Re: compare two float values, christian.bau, 18:16
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Default User, 18:05
- Re: Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, christian.bau, 18:04
- Re: arrays as function arguments, Ioannis Vranos, 18:03
- arrays as function arguments, fkater@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 17:58
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Bartc, 17:45
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Kenneth Brody, 17:18
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Malcolm McLean, 17:10
- Re: Writting Excel file, Kenneth Brody, 17:10
- Re: .h files, Kenneth Brody, 17:03
- Re: hash from long url to short url - TPA, Default User, 17:01
- Re: Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, Ioannis Vranos, 16:54
- Re: hash from long url to short url, joe, 16:38
- Why not provide a standard non-busy waiting method?, mike3, 16:30
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Flash Gordon, 16:06
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Flash Gordon, 15:57
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Tobin, 15:56
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Flash Gordon, 15:55
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Tobin, 15:54
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Flash Gordon, 15:52
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Tobin, 15:52
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 15:40
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Richard Tobin, 15:36
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 15:31
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 15:25
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 15:18
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Bartc, 15:12
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, CBFalconer, 14:38
- Re: hash from long url to short url, CBFalconer, 14:31
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, CBFalconer, 14:25
- Re: malloc, CBFalconer, 14:03
- Re: malloc, santosh, 13:58
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 13:50
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 13:29
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, CBFalconer, 13:27
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 13:23
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 13:09
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 13:00
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Keith Thompson, 12:45
- Re: malloc, aarklon, 12:44
- Re: malloc, Keith Thompson, 12:27
- Re: malloc, Duncan Muirhead, 12:13
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 11:56
- Re: malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 10:33
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Eric Sosman, 10:33
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, Malcolm McLean, 10:28
- Re: malloc, Chris Dollin, 10:26
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Malcolm McLean, 10:23
- Re: Pointer to small amount of storage, vippstar, 10:21
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Tobin, 10:13
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Ben Bacarisse, 10:11
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 10:06
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Ben Bacarisse, 09:49
- Pointer to small amount of storage, Old Wolf, 09:37
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Martin Vuille, 09:29
- Re: hash from long url to short url, santosh, 09:15
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 09:13
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Willem, 09:07
- Re: hash from long url to short url, Malcolm McLean, 09:07
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Richard, 09:05
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 09:03
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 08:56
- Re: malloc, Richard, 08:52
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Flash Gordon, 08:47
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:47
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:45
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 08:43
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:42
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:37
- Re: malloc, aarklon, 08:35
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:32
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 08:30
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Tobin, 08:29
- hash from long url to short url, joe, 08:26
- Re: malloc, Bartc, 08:25
- Re: malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 08:24
- Re: Coding skills, Ark Khasin, 08:21
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 08:14
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Willem, 08:09
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Flash Gordon, 08:09
- Re: malloc, vippstar, 08:07
- Re: malloc, Joachim Schmitz, 08:02
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Old Wolf, 07:55
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Richard Bos, 06:45
- Re: Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, Richard Bos, 06:45
- Re: changing const variables, Richard Bos, 06:35
- Re: malloc, Mark Bluemel, 06:32
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Antoninus Twink, 06:24
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Richard Tobin, 06:24
- Re: malloc, Bartc, 06:21
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Bartc, 06:13
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Richard Heathfield, 05:56
- Re: /* #include <someyhing.h> */ => include it or do not include it? That is the question ...., Andreas Bogenberger, 05:53
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Bartc, 05:49
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Nick Keighley, 05:47
- Re: calloc interposing issue, Nick Keighley, 05:43
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Heathfield, 05:43
- Re: Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, Nick Keighley, 05:36
- calloc interposing issue, reachanil, 05:30
- Re: malloc, Ian Collins, 05:24
- http://www.iq-test.pl/?d=3784, pantomek11, 05:21
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Ian Collins, 05:21
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Ian Collins, 05:19
- Re: changing const variables, santosh, 04:42
- changing const variables, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:18
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, MisterE, 04:13
- Re: malloc, MisterE, 04:11
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, MisterE, 04:06
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 04:00
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Aaron Hsu, 03:54
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 03:34
- hai, gopi . suda, 03:30
- Re: malloc, David T. Ashley, 03:23
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, santosh, 03:17
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, santosh, 03:06
- Re: compare two float values, Keith Thompson, 02:59
- Re: How to integrate two c files, santosh, 02:51
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Richard Bos, 02:44
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, CBFalconer, 02:20
- Re: Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, CBFalconer, 02:09
- Re: malloc, CBFalconer, 02:07
- Re: /* #include <someyhing.h> */ => include it or do not include it? That is the question ...., Keith Thompson, 02:05
- Re: Checking param string, CBFalconer, 01:59
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Richard Heathfield, 01:37
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, MAx, 01:15
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Randy Howard, 00:49
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, Ian Collins, 00:46
- Re: malloc, David T. Ashley, 00:39
- Re: where the storage will be allocated, David T. Ashley, 00:36
- Re: Writting Excel file, Randy Howard, 00:30
- where the storage will be allocated, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:11
- wholesale all laptops,mobile phone http://www.fashion-sky.com Apple MacBook (MA699CH/A) 580$, fashion-sky.com, 00:06
February 21, 2008
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, mb, 23:53
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,Quality AAA,nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,ALL NLF = 15USD, Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 12USD,MK4=55USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 23:22
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Jack Klein, 22:42
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Jack Klein, 22:31
- Re: compare two float values, Jack Klein, 22:20
- Re: Checking param string, vippstar, 21:57
- Re: Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, toe, 20:42
- Using exact-size structs to go thru raw byte buffers, toe, 20:28
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 20:25
- Re: /* #include <someyhing.h> */ => include it or do not include it? That is the question ...., Ben Bacarisse, 19:42
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 18:54
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 18:52
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:43
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 18:25
- /* #include <someyhing.h> */ => include it or do not include it? That is the question ...., Andreas Bogenberger, 18:24
- Re: malloc, Eric Sosman, 18:11
- Re: Is this a syntax error in pthreadtypes.h -- Thank you for your helpful answers, Andreas Bogenberger, 18:07
- Re: How to integrate two c files, jacob navia, 18:02
- Re: malloc, pete, 16:55
- Re: "pointer to char" address restoring problem, pete, 16:46
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, pete, 16:40
- Re: malloc, aarklon, 16:39
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Mark McIntyre, 16:10
- Re: compare two float values, Mark McIntyre, 16:05
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, William Pursell, 16:00
- Re: compare two float values, Harald van Dijk, 14:57
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Bartc, 14:55
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 14:55
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 14:53
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 14:43
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Flash Gordon, 14:26
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Flash Gordon, 14:19
- Re: malloc, Eric Sosman, 13:48
- Re: Writting Excel file, Antoninus Twink, 13:44
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Antoninus Twink, 13:41
- Re: RTSP source Code, Antoninus Twink, 13:39
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Antoninus Twink, 13:38
- malloc, aarklon, 13:16
- Re: compare two float values, karthikbalaguru, 13:05
- Re: How to integrate two c files, David T. Ashley, 12:45
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, ymuntyan, 12:41
- Re: compiler option for g++, Keith Thompson, 12:12
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Hyuga, 11:27
- Re: Writting Excel file, Björn Paetzel, 11:05
- all programmings languages, jammy, 10:47
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, vippstar, 10:10
- Re: Writting Excel file, Kenny McCormack, 09:42
- Re: Writting Excel file, CBFalconer, 09:26
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Mark Bluemel, 09:07
- Re: .h files, CBFalconer, 08:56
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, CBFalconer, 08:53
- Re: Writting Excel file, Malcolm McLean, 08:43
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 08:42
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Willem, 08:35
- Re: compare two float values, CBFalconer, 08:32
- Re: Invalid values for integers, CBFalconer, 08:24
- Re: compiler option for g++, santosh, 08:05
- Re: How to integrate two c files, santosh, 08:05
- Re: Writting Excel file, santosh, 08:03
- Re: Writting Excel file, jacob navia, 07:45
- Re: Writting Excel file, jacob navia, 07:42
- Re: .h files, Malcolm McLean, 07:32
- Writting Excel file, Abhay, 07:28
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Nick Keighley, 07:04
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Mark Bluemel, 06:48
- Re: compiler option for g++, Joachim Schmitz, 06:39
- compiler option for g++, poornimamprabhu@xxxxxxxxx, 06:34
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 06:21
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 06:19
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 05:55
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 05:38
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Richard Heathfield, 05:33
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, muntyan, 05:14
- Re: How to integrate two c files, santosh, 05:01
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Joachim Schmitz, 05:00
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Nick Keighley, 04:50
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 04:43
- Re: How to integrate two c files, MisterE, 04:39
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, MisterE, 04:34
- Re: compare two float values, Joachim Schmitz, 04:34
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, vippstar, 04:34
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, Nick Keighley, 04:29
- Re: help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, MAx, 04:24
- help needed on coversin of an char array to an integer, MAx, 04:21
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Martin Ambuhl, 04:14
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Mark Bluemel, 03:56
- Re: "pointer to char" address restoring problem, Mahesh, 03:31
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Keith Thompson, 03:21
- post your classifieds for free at, sajana, 03:18
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Richard Heathfield, 03:00
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 02:56
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 02:49
- Re: How to integrate two c files, Michael Mair, 02:43
- Re: "pointer to char" address restoring problem, Michael Mair, 02:37
- Re: compare two float values, Richard Bos, 02:25
- Re: Additions to C90, Ian Collins, 02:16
- MAKE MONEY FAST USING EGOLD!, elfrida8, 02:11
- How to integrate two c files, neha_chhatre, 02:07
- "pointer to char" address restoring problem, Mahesh, 01:13
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Martin Ambuhl, 01:04
- Re: .h files, Barry Schwarz, 00:47
- Re: compare two float values, Keith Thompson, 00:37
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, David T. Ashley, 00:12
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, David T. Ashley, 00:11
- Re: yacc/bison help, SM Ryan, 00:10
- .h files, johnnash, 00:01
February 20, 2008
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, muntyan, 23:48
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, muntyan, 23:45
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, CBFalconer, 23:33
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, dj3vande, 23:22
- Re: suprising output !!, santosh, 22:36
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 22:30
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, santosh, 22:25
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, Peter Nilsson, 22:24
- Re: printf() Specification for size_t?, dj3vande, 22:12
- printf() Specification for size_t?, David T. Ashley, 21:51
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Ben Bacarisse, 21:27
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 21:23
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 20:59
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, user923005, 20:56
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 20:53
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 20:50
- Additions to C90, Ioannis Vranos, 20:47
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 20:45
- Re: Checking param string, CBFalconer, 20:40
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Bartc, 20:32
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, CBFalconer, 20:26
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 20:24
- Re: Checking param string, CBFalconer, 20:14
- Re: Checking param string, CBFalconer, 20:10
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,nike shoes =30USD,bags = 27USD,NLF = 18USD, Jeans = 27USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 15USD,MK4=60USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.com, 20:08
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Bartc, 20:06
- Re: Checking param string, CBFalconer, 20:05
- Re: compare two float values, CBFalconer, 20:00
- Re: compare two float values, CBFalconer, 19:48
- Re: RTSP source Code, CBFalconer, 19:36
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, muntyan, 19:32
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, CBFalconer, 19:29
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 19:07
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 19:00
- Re: Checking param string, Default User, 18:59
- Re: ugly construct, Mark McIntyre, 18:49
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 18:32
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 18:32
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Peter Nilsson, 17:30
- ugly construct, mbrown, 17:18
- ugly construct, mbrown, 17:05
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 17:03
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 16:53
- Re: suprising output !!, Peter Nilsson, 16:52
- Re: compare two float values, Mark McIntyre, 16:40
- Re: Checking param string, Flash Gordon, 16:39
- Re: compare two float values, user923005, 16:18
- Re: Checking param string, Malcolm McLean, 15:46
- Re: file bug, Default User, 15:36
- Re: Checking param string, Flash Gordon, 15:29
- Re: Checking param string, Flash Gordon, 15:26
- Re: Checking param string, david, 14:59
- Re: suprising output !!, Malcolm McLean, 14:57
- Re: Checking param string, Amandil, 14:48
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, user923005, 14:18
- Re: Checking param string, david, 14:17
- Re: suprising output !!, Kenneth Brody, 14:16
- Re: Checking param string, Flash Gordon, 14:15
- Re: Checking param string, Kenny McCormack, 14:04
- Re: suprising output !!, John Bode, 13:57
- Re: RTSP source Code, Antoninus Twink, 13:50
- suprising output !!, onkar, 13:49
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Ben Bacarisse, 13:48
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Ben Bacarisse, 13:45
- Re: Checking param string, Ben Bacarisse, 13:40
- Re: Is this a syntax error in pthreadtypes.h, Ben Pfaff, 13:27
- Re: Is this a syntax error in pthreadtypes.h, Harald van Dijk, 13:26
- Re: Checking param string, david, 13:25
- Re: compare two float values, Eric Sosman, 13:20
- Is this a syntax error in pthreadtypes.h, Andreas Bogenberger, 13:18
- Re: Checking param string, Malcolm McLean, 13:00
- Re: RTSP source Code, osmium, 12:56
- Checking param string, david, 12:50
- Re: Cast problem / serial interface, Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Keith Thompson, 12:37
- Re: compare two float values, neha_chhatre, 12:36
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Keith Thompson, 12:25
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Keith Thompson, 11:56
- Re: compare two float values, CBFalconer, 11:51
- Re: compare two float values, Pietro Cerutti, 11:50
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, gw7rib, 11:50
- Re: compare two float values, Pietro Cerutti, 11:50
- Re: Cast problem / serial interface, CBFalconer, 11:33
- Re: compare two float values, santosh, 11:29
- Re: Invalid values for integers, CBFalconer, 11:29
- Re: compare two float values, Kenneth Brody, 11:27
- Re: RTSP source Code, CBFalconer, 11:22
- Re: search a string in file handling in c, CBFalconer, 11:09
- Re: compare two float values, Joachim Schmitz, 10:43
- Re: compare two float values, Mark Bluemel, 10:41
- Re: compare two float values, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:29
- Re: compare two float values, neha_chhatre, 10:14
- wholesale all laptops,mobile phone http://www.fashion-sky.com Apple MacBook (MA699CH/A) 580$, fashion-sky.com, 09:55
- Re: compare two float values, Joachim Schmitz, 09:54
- Re: compare two float values, Joachim Schmitz, 09:47
- compare two float values, neha_chhatre, 09:42
- Re: Is this notation correct, Richard Tobin, 09:00
- Re: Cast problem / serial interface, MVennebusch, 08:55
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Martin Ambuhl, 08:31
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Ben Bacarisse, 08:24
- Re: Cast problem / serial interface, vippstar, 08:22
- Re: Cast problem / serial interface, Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Cast problem / serial interface, MVennebusch, 08:06
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Richard Bos, 08:01
- Re: char array Q, vippstar, 07:59
- Re: Invalid values for integers, Ben Bacarisse, 07:59
- Re: Coding skills, Kelsey Bjarnason, 07:44
- Invalid values for integers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:30
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 07:28
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Ben Bacarisse, 07:19
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Richard Heathfield, 06:59
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Bartc, 06:49
- Re: char array Q, Richard Heathfield, 06:42
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Richard Heathfield, 06:40
- Re: RTSP source Code, keith, 06:34
- char array Q, suresh shenoy, 06:34
- help others or, rpriya94, 06:26
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Bartc, 06:10
- RTSP source Code, kalpesh, 06:01
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Bartc, 05:59
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, Richard Heathfield, 05:32
- Re: 2 D Array Prob Please Help, santosh, 05:24
- Re: file bug, Nick Keighley, 04:56
- Re: file bug, Nick Keighley, 04:49
- test, Bankster, 04:39
- 2 D Array Prob Please Help, sachinv1821@xxxxxxxxx, 04:26
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 04:03
- Re: yacc/bison help, Chris Dollin, 03:27
- Re: file bug, Joachim Schmitz, 03:16
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, William Pursell, 00:33
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Peter Nilsson, 00:00
February 19, 2008
- Re: file bug, Randy Howard, 20:24
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, vippstar, 19:34
- Re: yacc/bison help, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: shared memory and multidimensional arrays..., ppi, 18:45
- Re: sorting array of objects..., pete, 18:34
- Re: sorting array of objects..., CBFalconer, 18:33
- Re: shared memory and multidimensional arrays..., oopsatwork, 18:32
- shared memory and multidimensional arrays..., oopsatwork, 18:22
- Re: file bug, Default User, 18:20
- Re: yacc/bison help, Christopher Benson-Manica, 18:16
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 17:45
- Re: dynamic binding, user923005, 17:34
- Re: file bug, Randy Howard, 17:31
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, Peter Nilsson, 17:29
- Re: file bug, William Pursell, 17:11
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, William Pursell, 17:04
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 17:03
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 16:53
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 16:48
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:18
- Re: dynamic binding, cr88192, 16:13
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 16:09
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, user923005, 15:53
- Re: Increment operator precedence, lawrence . jones, 15:47
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Eric Sosman, 15:43
- Re: yacc/bison help, thomas, 15:32
- Re: yacc/bison help, Flash Gordon, 15:23
- Re: yacc/bison help, Walter Roberson, 15:09
- yacc/bison help, thomas, 14:55
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, dj3vande, 14:48
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Ben Bacarisse, 14:47
- Re: header file size effect, J. J. Farrell, 14:28
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 14:16
- Re: Is this notation correct, Flash Gordon, 13:57
- Re: header file size effect, Kenneth Brody, 13:47
- Re: file bug, Default User, 13:36
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Kenneth Brody, 13:35
- Re: Is this notation correct, Ben Bacarisse, 13:30
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Kenneth Brody, 13:08
- Re: Is this notation correct, Eric Sosman, 13:05
- Re: Is this notation correct, johnnash, 12:52
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Eric Sosman, 12:48
- Re: Is this notation correct, Richard Heathfield, 12:48
- Re: Is this notation correct, johnnash, 12:40
- Re: Is this notation correct, Richard Heathfield, 12:37
- Re: header file size effect, Malcolm McLean, 12:37
- Re: Is this notation correct, Eric Sosman, 12:34
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, Duncan Muirhead, 12:31
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: Is this notation correct, johnnash, 12:23
- Is this notation correct, johnnash, 12:22
- Re: header file size effect, Bartc, 12:07
- Re: header file size effect, osmium, 12:01
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, Bartc, 11:36
- Re: header file size effect, bobby, 11:29
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 11:26
- Re: header file size effect, Malcolm McLean, 11:13
- header file size effect, bobby, 10:58
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, Lew Pitcher, 10:49
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, johnnash, 10:48
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:42
- Re: doubt about passing values by address, Malcolm McLean, 10:38
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- doubt about passing values by address, johnnash, 10:33
- Re: where are system standard include directories in Ubuntu, bobby, 10:30
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 10:19
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 10:06
- Re: sorting array of objects..., Richard Heathfield, 09:00
- Re: sorting array of objects..., Ben Bacarisse, 08:40
- Re: sorting array of objects..., Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: sorting array of objects..., Pedro Graca, 07:40
- sorting array of objects..., spl, 07:38
- Re: dynamic binding, Ben Bacarisse, 07:12
- Re: dynamic binding, Malcolm McLean, 06:55
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: file bug, Nick Keighley, 05:23
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, Chris Dollin, 05:03
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 04:23
- Re: Testing gethostbyname() blocking, raseelbhagat@xxxxxxxxx, 04:16
- Re: Testing gethostbyname() blocking, Richard Bos, 04:11
- Testing gethostbyname() blocking, raseelbhagat@xxxxxxxxx, 04:06
- Re: file bug, Richard Heathfield, 03:44
- dynamic binding, aarklon, 03:39
- Re: file bug, MisterE, 03:31
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Flash Gordon, 03:17
- Re: Coding skills, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:52
- Re: where are system standard include directories in Ubuntu, Keith Thompson, 02:41
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, TerryP, 02:20
- Re: data type for decimal number, Keith Thompson, 01:10
- Re: data type for decimal number, Keith Thompson, 00:46
February 18, 2008
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Jack Klein, 22:35
- Re: TUTORIAL, bjarne, 20:58
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, CBFalconer, 19:57
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Ben Bacarisse, 19:44
- Re: file bug, Gordon Burditt, 19:37
- Re: file bug, Richard Heathfield, 19:06
- Re: file bug, vippstar, 18:44
- Re: where are system standard include directories in Ubuntu, CBFalconer, 18:40
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, CBFalconer, 18:35
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Pedro Graca, 18:31
- Re: Coding skills, CBFalconer, 18:26
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Ben Bacarisse, 18:13
- Re: N-dimensional mathematical functions, user923005, 18:11
- Re: data type for decimal number, lawrence . jones, 18:09
- Re: regex.h question, CBFalconer, 18:03
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 17:45
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Pedro Graca, 17:32
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Bartc, 17:20
- Re: file bug, MisterE, 17:06
- Re: file bug, MisterE, 17:04
- Re: getopt help required, Antoninus Twink, 17:03
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 17:01
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, MisterE, 17:00
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, MisterE, 16:57
- Re: file bug, Gordon Burditt, 16:53
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Gordon Burditt, 16:40
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 16:29
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 16:24
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Flash Gordon, 16:19
- Re: Coding skills, William Pursell, 16:15
- Re: Coding skills, Serve Laurijssen, 15:37
- Re: calculations in the preprocessing stage, Michael Mair, 15:34
- Re: Coding skills, John Bode, 15:11
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, Michael Mair, 15:09
- Re: Coding skills, John Bode, 14:52
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, John Bode, 14:24
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Flash Gordon, 14:23
- Re: file bug, Martin Ambuhl, 14:15
- Re: file bug, Bill Cunningham, 14:05
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 14:04
- Re: Coding skills, Flash Gordon, 14:01
- file bug, Bill Cunningham, 13:59
- Who is this person?? This is Mohammad, dawa-dawa, 13:55
- Re: data type for decimal number, ymuntyan, 13:53
- Re: data type for decimal number, Ben Pfaff, 13:42
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Bartc, 13:39
- Re: data type for decimal number, Walter Roberson, 13:32
- Re: data type for decimal number, ymuntyan, 13:28
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Tobin, 13:27
- Re: data type for decimal number, ymuntyan, 13:22
- Re: Coding skills, Ian Collins, 13:14
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Malcolm McLean, 13:09
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: data type for decimal number, Harald van Dijk, 12:46
- Re: regex.h question, Keith Thompson, 12:46
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Keith Thompson, 12:41
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 12:40
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: where are system standard include directories in Ubuntu, Joachim Schmitz, 12:35
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Richard Tobin, 12:24
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 12:22
- Re: getopt help required, Keith Thompson, 12:21
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Tobin, 12:14
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Bartc, 12:09
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Malcolm McLean, 12:04
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Richard Tobin, 12:00
- Re: data type for decimal number, Keith Thompson, 11:57
- Re: data type for decimal number, Mark Bluemel, 11:55
- Re: data type for decimal number, Keith Thompson, 11:49
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Malcolm McLean, 11:47
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 11:35
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Richard Tobin, 11:35
- where are system standard include directories in Ubuntu, bobby, 11:29
- Re: getopt help required, Mark Bluemel, 11:23
- Re: Increment operator precedence, John Bode, 11:14
- Re: data type for decimal number, John Bode, 11:08
- calculations in the preprocessing stage, Pedro Graca, 11:05
- Re: getopt help required, Malcolm McLean, 11:03
- N-dimensional mathematical functions, jacek . strzelczyk, 10:38
- Re: search a string in file handling in c, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 10:32
- Re: Interested in coding., Mike Wahler, 10:16
- Re: getopt help required, Kenny McCormack, 10:06
- brilliant, bux.toin, 09:22
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, lawrence . jones, 09:00
- Re: Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, pete, 08:59
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:53
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Richard Tobin, 07:59
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Tobin, 07:51
- Re: search a string in file handling in c, srimks11@xxxxxxxxx, 07:45
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Bartc, 07:12
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Walter Roberson, 06:58
- Re: Coding skills, Malcolm McLean, 06:40
- Re: getopt help required, Daniel Kraft, 06:35
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Chris Dollin, 06:33
- Re: Coding skills, Malcolm McLean, 06:32
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Malcolm McLean, 06:21
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, vippstar, 06:19
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Guillaume Dargaud, 05:40
- Re: Coding skills, William Pursell, 05:31
- Interested in coding., vhanwaribrahim, 05:23
- Re: Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, Chris Dollin, 05:18
- Read/copy/call a functions machine code?, MisterE, 05:12
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- getopt help required, Rishi, 05:03
- Re: Coding skills, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 04:59
- Re: data type for decimal number, vhanwaribrahim, 04:53
- Re: data type for decimal number, Nick Keighley, 04:15
- Re: data type for decimal number, Antoninus Twink, 03:43
- Re: Coding skills, Flash Gordon, 03:34
- In www.housinghouse.com you can check the quality before you pay, reyes129, 01:03
February 17, 2008
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 22:26
- Re: data type for decimal number, Kenny McCormack, 22:22
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, David Thompson, 22:18
- Re: TUTORIAL, David Thompson, 22:18
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, David Thompson, 22:18
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., David Thompson, 22:18
- Re: data type for decimal number, osmium, 21:55
- Re: Coding skills, dj3vande, 21:54
- Re: Coding skills, Ian Collins, 21:38
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Richard Heathfield, 20:48
- Re: Coding skills, Ben Bacarisse, 20:48
- Re: Coding skills, Richard Heathfield, 20:45
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 20:43
- Re: Coding skills, aarklon, 20:24
- Re: Coding skills, CBFalconer, 19:37
- Re: Coding skills, Malcolm McLean, 17:45
- Re: Coding skills, Ivar Rosquist, 17:33
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Peter Nilsson, 17:19
- Re: Coding skills, Mark McIntyre, 17:11
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Old Wolf, 16:36
- Re: Coding skills, Ark Khasin, 16:22
- Re: Coding skills, Flash Gordon, 15:32
- Re: data type for decimal number, Robert W Hand, 15:17
- Re: Coding skills, Antoninus Twink, 14:55
- WORK FROM HOME WITH INTERNET?HER THE ANSWER, mezdek2, 14:38
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Harald van Dijk, 14:24
- Re: tricky output ???, Richard Heathfield, 14:24
- Re: Coding skills, Serve Laurijssen, 14:13
- Re: tricky output ???, Kenneth Brody, 14:08
- Re: tricky output ???, Kenneth Brody, 14:05
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Kenneth Brody, 14:00
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Kenneth Brody, 13:53
- Re: new member, Malcolm McLean, 13:36
- Re: Coding skills, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:20
- Re: Coding skills, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:11
- Re: Coding skills, Malcolm McLean, 13:08
- Re: Coding skills, Flash Gordon, 12:28
- Re: Coding skills, Serve Laurijssen, 10:52
- Re: extra comma, aarklon, 09:04
- Re: Coding skills, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: Coding skills, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: Coding skills, Morris Dovey, 08:35
- Re: Coding skills, Serve Laurijssen, 08:04
- Re: Coding skills, Serve Laurijssen, 08:01
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument, ThomasW, 07:39
- Re: extra comma, Army1987, 06:34
- Re: extra comma, William Pursell, 06:32
- new member, mr . bhoot . ji, 06:31
- Re: Coding skills, Richard Heathfield, 06:29
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Army1987, 06:27
- Re: extra comma, Harald van Dijk, 06:23
- Re: extra comma, Army1987, 06:15
- Re: Coding skills, Malcolm McLean, 05:32
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, Herbert Rosenau, 05:16
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, karthikbalaguru, 04:27
- Re: Coding skills, Richard Heathfield, 03:18
- Coding skills, sophia . agnes, 02:49
- Womens Plus Size Clothing Style Guide, astraumax, 02:39
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Keith Thompson, 00:13
February 16, 2008
- wholesale all laptops,mobile phone http://www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky.com, 23:42
- Re: extra comma, Jack Klein, 22:38
- Re: tricky output ???, santosh, 21:52
- Re: extra comma, karthikbalaguru, 21:03
- Re: extra comma, Ian Collins, 20:18
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: extra comma, SM Ryan, 20:13
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, CBFalconer, 20:12
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, CBFalconer, 20:08
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, CBFalconer, 20:02
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, CBFalconer, 19:58
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, CBFalconer, 19:53
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: extra comma, Mark McIntyre, 19:11
- Re: extra comma, Malcolm McLean, 17:47
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Ian Collins, 17:39
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, MisterE, 17:32
- Re: Cass object returning a value by name?, Niels Dekker - no return address, 17:30
- Re: extra comma, Ben Pfaff, 17:12
- Re: Cass object returning a value by name?, Niels Dekker - no return address, 16:46
- Re: How can I read CAD files into my C program ?, Bartc, 16:36
- Re: data type for decimal number, Malcolm McLean, 16:24
- Re: extra comma, Malcolm McLean, 15:49
- Re: embedded programming in C, EventHelix.com, 15:45
- Re: extra comma, Thad Smith, 15:40
- Re: How can I read CAD files into my C program ?, Ian Collins, 15:30
- Re: How can I read CAD files into my C program ?, Malcolm McLean, 15:20
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, Michael Mair, 15:15
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Antoninus Twink, 14:42
- How can I read CAD files into my C program ?, johnnash, 13:59
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, DanielJohnson, 13:54
- Re: data type for decimal number, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: extra comma, Keith Thompson, 13:46
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Richard Heathfield, 13:41
- data type for decimal number, neha_chhatre, 13:40
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, Richard Heathfield, 13:40
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Malcolm McLean, 13:35
- Re: extra comma, Ben Pfaff, 13:35
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, DanielJohnson, 13:31
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, Richard Heathfield, 13:26
- Re: Binary Tree 2 Linked List, DanielJohnson, 13:25
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 13:23
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 13:17
- Re: extra comma, Ben Pfaff, 13:15
- Binary Tree 2 Linked List, DanielJohnson, 13:13
- Re: extra comma, rzed, 13:03
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: extra comma, Ben Pfaff, 13:01
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, Keith Thompson, 12:55
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Thad Smith, 12:53
- Re: extra comma, Ben Pfaff, 12:38
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, Michael Mair, 12:37
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 12:33
- Re: extra comma, Martin, 12:26
- Re: extra comma, vippstar, 12:21
- Re: extra comma, Richard Heathfield, 12:14
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Keith Thompson, 12:07
- Re: tricky output ???, Richard, 12:02
- extra comma, aarklon, 11:55
- Re: tricky output ???, Randy Howard, 11:12
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Mark McIntyre, 11:06
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, vippstar, 10:57
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, Ben Bacarisse, 10:16
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, Mark McIntyre, 10:11
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, Bartc, 08:36
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Malcolm McLean, 08:29
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Army1987, 08:08
- how to pass a file to a c program, neha_chhatre, 07:58
- how to pass a file to a c program, neha_chhatre, 07:58
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, neha_chhatre, 07:23
- Re: problem in a code with filehandling, Mark McIntyre, 07:17
- Re: tricky output ???, Bartc, 07:15
- Re: how to pass a file to a c program, Morris Dovey, 07:04
- problem in a code with filehandling, neha_chhatre, 07:02
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Richard Tobin, 06:57
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Richard Heathfield, 02:48
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Peter Nilsson, 02:41
- Re: tricky output ???, Martin Ambuhl, 02:33
- Re: tricky output ???, Richard Heathfield, 02:26
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:24
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:17
- Re: tricky output ???, Ian Collins, 02:04
- Re: tricky output ???, Keith Thompson, 02:01
- Re: tricky output ???, Richard Heathfield, 01:31
- Re: tricky output ???, Richard Heathfield, 01:17
- Re: tricky output ???, onkar, 01:16
- tricky output ???, onkar, 01:09
- HI GUYS AND GALS DO YOU BELIEVE IN OPEN City: HI GUYS AND GALS DO YOU BELIEV Details:, baminebaminebritto, 00:40
February 15, 2008
- Re: ABOUT C, santosh, 22:45
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Jack Klein, 22:30
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, Ian Collins, 20:59
- Re: Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, MisterE, 20:14
- Should a compiler produce a warning/error for this?, MisterE, 20:13
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, MisterE, 20:08
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Martin Ambuhl, 19:45
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Ian Collins, 19:32
- Re: regex.h question, Walter Roberson, 19:11
- Re: Funny results with increment decrement operators, Glenn Hutchings, 19:10
- Re: regex.h question, Knight, 19:09
- Funny results with increment decrement operators, cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx, 19:00
- regex.h question, Knight, 19:00
- Re: xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, Michael Mair, 18:08
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Army1987, 15:20
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Army1987, 15:13
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Army1987, 15:08
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Paul Hsieh, 13:24
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Paul Hsieh, 13:20
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Keith Thompson, 12:46
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Martin Golding, 12:26
- xmalloc.c - my xmalloc, vippstar, 11:39
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, vippstar, 11:29
- بنت من السعوديه بتتناك هى وامها فى الاستراحه مقطع جنسى جاامد صوت وصوره ممتازين, haba, 10:53
- فضيحة بنت فى البال توك على الكاميرا بتتناك من صاحبها, haba, 10:49
- Re: Increment operator precedence, John Bode, 10:22
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Chris Dollin, 10:01
- Re: ABOUT C, Randy Howard, 09:56
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Malcolm McLean, 09:51
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Mark Bluemel, 09:24
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:23
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:21
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Mark Bluemel, 09:21
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Mark Bluemel, 09:16
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 09:09
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 09:04
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:48
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Army1987, 08:37
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, jacob navia, 08:29
- Re: ABOUT C, Malcolm McLean, 08:26
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Mark Bluemel, 08:24
- ABOUT C, prabhu, 08:03
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Malcolm McLean, 07:36
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Malcolm McLean, 07:29
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:26
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:19
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:14
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 07:13
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:04
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Chris Dollin, 06:49
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Old Wolf, 06:42
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: C99 restrict and function parameters?, santosh, 05:43
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Nick Keighley, 03:57
- Re: Increment operator precedence, Ian Collins, 03:26
- Re: Increment operator precedence, raghu, 03:25
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,nike shoes =30USD,bags = 27USD,NLF = 18USD, Jeans = 27USD,Coat = 33USD,T-shirt = 15USD,MK4=60USD,Nokia N95=260USD, shopbb.003, 02:19
- Re: level order traversal of binary tree, Kaz Kylheku, 02:10
- Increment operator precedence, nl, 02:09
- Re: level order traversal of binary tree, Kaz Kylheku, 01:39
February 14, 2008
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Kenneth Brody, 22:43
- C99 restrict and function parameters?, Sune, 22:10
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Keith Thompson, 21:51
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Ben Bacarisse, 21:47
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Ark Khasin, 21:23
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Kaz Kylheku, 20:53
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 20:47
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Richard Heathfield, 20:44
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Keith Thompson, 20:34
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Joe Wright, 20:18
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Keith Thompson, 19:56
- CFP: DTVCS 2008 - Design, Testing and Formal Verification Techniques for Integrated Circuits and Systems, ss . dtvcs, 19:48
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Malcolm McLean, 19:26
- Re: You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:08
- You're appointed as Portability Advisor, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:05
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Army1987, 18:32
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Old Wolf, 17:31
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument - TPA, Antoninus Twink, 16:03
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument, John Bode, 16:01
- Re: File handling code, Bartc, 15:58
- Re: question on union, dj3vande, 15:56
- Re: question on union, dj3vande, 15:46
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument, ThomasW, 14:37
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument - TPA, Default User, 14:25
- Re: question on union, Martin Ambuhl, 14:22
- Re: question on union, Roman Mashak, 14:03
- Re: File handling code, Keith Thompson, 13:53
- Re: File handling code, santosh, 13:42
- Re: pointer to two-dimensional array as argument, monkeyflip, 13:20
- Re: File handling code, Walter Roberson, 12:52
- File handling code, neha_chhatre, 12:37
- pointer to two-dimensional array as argument, ThomasW, 12:32
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard, 12:07
- Re: level order traversal of binary tree, Ben Bacarisse, 10:44
- Re: question on union, Martin, 10:26
- Re: Which is the best software for downloading, Kenneth Brody, 09:55
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Army1987, 09:27
- level order traversal of binary tree, sophia . agnes, 09:01
- Re: Implicit conversion to uint8_t, Eric Sosman, 08:41
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Army1987, 08:36
- Implicit conversion to uint8_t, Spoon, 08:20
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Ben Bacarisse, 08:18
- Re: IEEE754 fp, Army1987, 08:17
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 07:47
- Re: preprocessor in c, Ben Bacarisse, 07:22
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 07:17
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 07:17
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 07:16
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 06:54
- Re: question on union, Ben Bacarisse, 06:53
- Re: preprocessor in c, Malcolm McLean, 06:49
- china cheap wholesale sport shoes,Handbag,clothing,electronics, ec21i3, 06:42
- Re: search a string in file handling in c, Friedrich Dominicus, 06:19
- Re: search a string in file handling in c, Malcolm McLean, 06:18
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 05:58
- search a string in file handling in c, neha_chhatre, 05:56
- Why do they accept the Islam ?, kalfa . 10, 04:49
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Spoon, 04:01
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 03:59
- Re: Which is the best software for downloading, Ark Khasin, 03:12
- Re: Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, Richard Bos, 02:48
- Re: Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, Ark Khasin, 02:27
- Re: IEEE754 fp, Martin Ambuhl, 02:25
- Re: preprocessor in c, Martin Ambuhl, 02:17
- Re: question on union, Martin Ambuhl, 02:09
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Chris Thomasson, 02:02
- Re: IEEE754 fp, Ben Pfaff, 01:12
- IEEE754 fp, Ravishankar S, 00:29
- Re: Which is the best software for downloading, Walter Roberson, 00:04
February 13, 2008
- Which is the best software for downloading, zuoxingdong@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:44
- Re: c, Robbie Hatley, 23:02
- Re: preprocessor in c, Keith Thompson, 21:19
- Re: embedded programming in C, Paul Heininger, 21:03
- preprocessor in c, DotKu, 20:42
- SETP-08 Draft paper submission deadline is just few days from now, john, 20:07
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, jacob navia, 19:53
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Army1987, 19:09
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Army1987, 19:00
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Army1987, 18:55
- Re: question on union, Roman Mashak, 18:32
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Ben Bacarisse, 17:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 16:33
- Re: c, Malcolm McLean, 16:33
- Re: question on union, Michael Mair, 16:25
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 16:15
- Re: question on union, Ben Bacarisse, 16:02
- embedded programming in C, elf, 16:01
- Re: question on union, Roman Mashak, 15:43
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Ben Bacarisse, 15:39
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Morris Dovey, 15:39
- Re: OK to disguise a macro function as a function?, Army1987, 15:38
- Re: embedded programming in C, Morris Dovey, 15:33
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Kaz Kylheku, 15:09
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Morris Dovey, 14:28
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Willem, 14:26
- Re: void* question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:16
- question on union, Roman Mashak, 14:05
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 14:04
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 13:51
- Re: c, santosh, 13:42
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, santosh, 13:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:20
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Ian Collins, 13:01
- Re: question on union, Martin Ambuhl, 12:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:30
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Keith Thompson, 12:20
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Malcolm McLean, 12:03
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:00
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:57
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Malcolm McLean, 11:41
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 11:24
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Morris Dovey, 11:13
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Morris Dovey, 09:13
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 08:40
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, Mark Bluemel, 08:38
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, santosh, 07:56
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 07:54
- Re: c, santosh, 07:51
- Re: Faster way to write in a file, santosh, 07:47
- Faster way to write in a file, LilacSkin, 07:29
- Re: question on union, Martin, 07:18
- Re: c, Malcolm McLean, 07:14
- Re: c, Martin, 07:01
- Re: Strings macro, Duncan Muirhead, 06:55
- Re: c, Mark Bluemel, 06:38
- Re: question on union, Mark Bluemel, 06:36
- c, tsandeeppatil@xxxxxxxxx, 06:23
- Re: Strings macro, Martin, 06:18
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Martin, 06:06
- A Sweet gift on our friendship, vannan17@xxxxxxxxx, 05:42
- Re: question on union, Martin Ambuhl, 05:31
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Kaz Kylheku, 05:01
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Kaz Kylheku, 04:50
- Re: question on union, Mark Bluemel, 04:33
- Re: void* question, Ian Collins, 04:17
- Re: void* question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:06
- Re: question on union, Martin Ambuhl, 03:50
- Re: question on union, Arthur, 02:59
- Hear Everthing!!!!!!!!! Talk something!!!!!!!!!, grazzy.cool@xxxxxxxxx, 02:53
- Re: Strings macro, Ian Collins, 01:56
- Strings macro, Kalle Anka, 01:43
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.003, 01:34
- Use Your Computer To Make Money Online, Samantha, 01:06
- Re: question on union, Arthur, 01:02
- Re: question on union, Arthur, 00:59
- Re: question on union, user923005, 00:19
February 12, 2008
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Ian Collins, 22:42
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Anand Hariharan, 21:41
- Re: opinions of error functions, Peter Nilsson, 21:21
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, Kaz Kylheku, 21:14
- Re: OK to disguise a macro function as a function?, Kaz Kylheku, 21:06
- Re: opinions of error functions, Bill Reid, 20:57
- Re: OK to disguise a macro function as a function?, Peter Nilsson, 20:51
- Re: opinions of error functions, Bill Cunningham, 20:45
- Part Time Jobs, nanda, 20:39
- Re: question on union, Morris Dovey, 20:32
- Re: opinions of error functions, Keith Thompson, 20:20
- Re: OK to disguise a macro function as a function?, user923005, 20:04
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Thad Smith, 19:57
- Re: opinions of error functions, Bill Cunningham, 19:47
- Re: Free Certifications from www.Brainbeez.com, Ioannis Vranos, 19:43
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Default User, 18:29
- Re: Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 18:14
- OK to disguise a macro function as a function?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:13
- Linking a C program to a C++ library which uses STL, Joe . pHsiao, 18:03
- Re: opinions of error functions, Martin Ambuhl, 17:55
- Re: Free Certifications from www.Brainbeez.com, Antoninus Twink, 17:16
- Re: addresses, Antoninus Twink, 17:15
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Bartc, 16:50
- Re: opinions of error functions, Eric Sosman, 16:46
- Re: opinions of error functions, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, Eric Sosman, 16:41
- opinions of error functions, Bill Cunningham, 16:29
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, alsmeirelles@xxxxxxxxx, 16:27
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, jacob navia, 16:16
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 16:09
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, alsmeirelles@xxxxxxxxx, 15:57
- A #define that I´m not used to, alsmeirelles@xxxxxxxxx, 15:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 14:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 14:51
- Re: A #define that I´m not used to, Morris Dovey, 14:47
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 14:39
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, ymuntyan, 14:36
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Keith Thompson, 14:27
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, lawrence . jones, 14:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, lawrence . jones, 13:58
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 13:51
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:40
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 13:33
- Re: addresses, Default User, 13:24
- Re: Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, Walter Roberson, 13:10
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:06
- Re: Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:03
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:56
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 12:15
- c lang, davi, 11:01
- Re: What does this code do?, Kenny McCormack, 10:56
- Re: Free Certifications from www.Brainbeez.com, Mark Bluemel, 10:13
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:54
- Re: addresses, Richard Bos, 09:47
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard Bos, 09:45
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Richard Bos, 09:38
- cheap prada handbag prada shoes prada jacket prada sunglasses prada sandals china wholesale, globwholesale, 09:27
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Thad Smith, 09:20
- Cheap Fashion Shoes & Clothing & Mobile Phones & Handbags & laptops Wholesale on www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky.com, 09:06
- Re: Free Certifications from www.Brainbeez.com, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:55
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:53
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Chris Dollin, 08:31
- Free Certifications from www.Brainbeez.com, Ria, 08:00
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Old Wolf, 07:51
- hi hi hi its about your life, toddsalim, 07:40
- Mind Control "mailteam" works-- victims work trends, soleilmavis, 07:33
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Sébastien de Mapias, 07:26
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, jacob navia, 07:19
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Chris Dollin, 06:49
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Kenny McCormack, 06:25
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, jacob navia, 06:21
- Re: Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, jbroquefere, 06:18
- Implementation of recursion in different languages: what happens in the background ?, Sébastien de Mapias, 06:13
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Marc Boyer, 06:09
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Richard Bos, 05:25
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 04:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 04:38
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Antoninus Twink, 04:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Randy Howard, 03:21
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 02:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 01:41
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Thad Smith, 01:40
- Can 'aberic' be abbreviation of 'Eric Abraham'?, zuoxingdong@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:39
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, chandru . simple, 01:37
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Thad Smith, 01:23
February 11, 2008
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 23:58
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 23:50
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Kenny McCormack, 22:36
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Stephen Sprunk, 22:32
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Peter Nilsson, 22:05
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Default User, 21:40
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Randy Howard, 21:40
- Re: void* question, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 21:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Douglas A. Gwyn, 21:36
- Re: routines in structures ?, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 21:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:51
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Peter Nilsson, 20:33
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 20:32
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, user923005, 20:00
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, jacob navia, 19:09
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Keith Thompson, 19:06
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 19:01
- is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Hans Schneider, 18:16
- Re: beginners problem, SM Ryan, 17:42
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Malcolm McLean, 17:34
- Re: libtiff question, James Sumners, 17:16
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Walter Roberson, 17:08
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Randy Howard, 17:04
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Randy Howard, 17:04
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Bartc, 15:54
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Bartc, 15:47
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:14
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, vippstar, 15:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 14:59
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, CJ, 14:53
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:52
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Malcolm McLean, 14:47
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:45
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Herbert Rosenau, 14:35
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, vippstar, 14:28
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:15
- Re: The order of block declaration, CJ, 14:00
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 13:42
- Re: Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Malcolm McLean, 13:36
- Dereference an array pointer... UB?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:21
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Keith Thompson, 12:08
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Martin, 11:51
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Ralf Damaschke, 11:37
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Robert Gamble, 11:26
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Walter Roberson, 11:07
- Re: Newbie: Linked list, irqbreaker, 11:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 10:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 10:32
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Joachim Schmitz, 10:20
- Re: void* question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:15
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 10:01
- Re: void* question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:50
- Re: Newbie: Linked list, Malcolm McLean, 09:17
- Re: The order of block declaration, Bill Leary, 09:04
- Re: is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Martin, 08:47
- is this compiler diagnostic legal?, Rainer Zufall, 08:38
- Rationale for Inviting Non-Muslims to Tawhid, small giant, 07:52
- Newbie: Linked list, irqbreaker, 07:47
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Wolfgang Riedel, 07:46
- Re: void* question, Malcolm McLean, 07:44
- Re: Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Martin, 06:26
- Re: Padding Bits, Ike Naar, 06:01
- Re: beginners problem, Randy Howard, 05:56
- Re: Padding Bits, Randy Howard, 05:51
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Ben Bacarisse, 05:49
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Randy Howard, 05:22
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Army1987, 04:40
- Re: Padding Bits, Richard Heathfield, 04:31
- Re: Padding Bits, Army1987, 04:30
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard, 04:26
- Re: beginners problem, Lars, 04:06
- Re: void* question, Janet, 03:54
- Re: beginners problem, Ian Collins, 03:47
- Re: Padding Bits, John Messenger, 03:30
- Re: Padding Bits, Keith Thompson, 03:13
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Keith Thompson, 02:56
- Re: beginners problem, Martin Ambuhl, 02:45
- Re: beginners problem, Richard Bos, 02:45
- u like me.., arulprakash456, 02:39
- Re: Padding Bits, Richard Heathfield, 02:38
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Richard Bos, 02:30
- Re: Padding Bits, John Messenger, 02:23
- Re: What does this code do?, James Dow Allen, 02:07
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:55
- Re: What does this code do?, James Dow Allen, 01:54
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:49
- Re: beginners problem, Lars, 01:49
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Harald van Dijk, 01:48
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:46
- Re: beginners problem, Ian Collins, 01:42
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:39
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:38
- Re: beginners problem, Lars, 01:37
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Harald van Dijk, 01:36
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 01:34
- Re: beginners problem, Ian Collins, 01:32
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 01:30
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 01:27
- beginners problem, Lars, 01:25
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Harald van Dijk, 01:18
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ian Collins, 01:08
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 00:42
February 10, 2008
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 23:51
- What's wrong with this code?, Chris Thomasson, 23:29
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Kenny McCormack, 23:25
- Re: Name to method?, Kenny McCormack, 23:23
- Re: Name to method?, Jack Klein, 23:06
- libtiff question, James Sumners, 23:03
- Re: void* question, Jack Klein, 23:03
- Re: Name to method?, superheathen, 23:01
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Jack Klein, 22:58
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 22:57
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 22:32
- Re: Name to method?, Walter Roberson, 21:45
- Re: Name to method?, superheathen, 20:30
- Re: Name to method?, superheathen, 20:27
- Re: other than pragma, Randy Howard, 20:20
- Re: other than pragma, Kenny McCormack, 20:12
- Re: Name to method?, ts . death . angel, 19:59
- Re: Name to method?, superheathen, 19:44
- Re: other than pragma, Walter Roberson, 19:33
- Re: void* question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:17
- Re: other than pragma, J. J. Farrell, 19:16
- Re: Name to method?, Walter Roberson, 19:12
- Name to method?, superheathen, 19:02
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 18:26
- Re: void* question, Flash Gordon, 17:41
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, David Thompson, 17:35
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., David Thompson, 17:35
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, David Thompson, 17:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 17:08
- Re: void* question, Eric Sosman, 16:49
- Re: void* question, Ben Pfaff, 16:47
- Re: void* question, Malcolm McLean, 16:43
- void* question, Janet, 16:32
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Harald van Dijk, 16:11
- Re: book, Martin Ambuhl, 15:40
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: The order of block declaration, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, Flash Gordon, 15:23
- Re: enum safety, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- Re: book, Walter Roberson, 14:32
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Gene, 14:28
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Gene, 14:18
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, christian.bau, 14:04
- book, Kambojia, 14:00
- Re: other than pragma, christian.bau, 13:54
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Morris Dovey, 13:49
- Re: other than pragma, Martin Ambuhl, 13:25
- Re: enum safety, Ian Collins, 13:07
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Philipp Klaus Krause, 13:03
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:39
- Re: I am getting odd compiler warnings, Tim Prince, 11:52
- Re: other than pragma, Tim Prince, 11:50
- Re: other than pragma, Eric Sosman, 11:46
- Re: enum safety, Eric Sosman, 11:40
- Re: enum safety, Serve Laurijssen, 11:29
- I am getting odd compiler warnings, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:26
- Re: other than pragma, Walter Roberson, 11:23
- Re: other than pragma, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 11:17
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, DanielJohnson, 11:09
- Re: other than pragma, Eric Sosman, 11:09
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, yeti, 11:08
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion [rambling], Morris Dovey, 10:55
- other than pragma, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:54
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Morris Dovey, 09:36
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Willem, 08:26
- Re: The order of block declaration, Bill Leary, 08:19
- Re: Padding Bits, Ike Naar, 07:31
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Morris Dovey, 07:09
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Willem, 07:07
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, pmp, 06:24
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), pmp, 06:21
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Serve Laurijssen, 05:53
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Serve Laurijssen, 05:49
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Joachim Schmitz, 05:02
- Re: sizeof(struct emp) = 0, Harald van Dijk, 04:56
- sizeof(struct emp) = 0, sophia . agnes, 04:30
- Padding Bits, John Messenger, 03:57
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Kaz Kylheku, 02:27
- Re: addresses, Kaz Kylheku, 02:04
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Chris Thomasson, 00:29
February 09, 2008
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Gene, 23:52
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, J. J. Farrell, 23:29
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 22:52
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Morris Dovey, 21:09
- FREE LINKS, haba, 20:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 20:13
- Re: enum safety, Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: routines in structures ?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:46
- Re: addresses, Mark McIntyre, 19:25
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 18:36
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 17:58
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, cr88192, 17:27
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:39
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Bart, 16:35
- Re: addresses, Serve Laurijssen, 16:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:21
- Re: enum safety, Anonymous, 16:20
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:11
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:07
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:05
- Re: routines in structures ?, Malcolm McLean, 15:53
- Re: routines in structures ?, Walter Roberson, 15:42
- routines in structures ?, Skybuck Flying, 15:36
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Army1987, 15:16
- Re: Reverse a linked list using Recursion, Ian Collins, 14:43
- Re: enum safety, Ian Collins, 14:32
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Kaz Kylheku, 14:18
- Reverse a linked list using Recursion, DanielJohnson, 13:48
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, christian.bau, 13:41
- Re: addresses, Randy Howard, 13:12
- Re: addresses, Bart, 13:08
- Re: The order of block declaration, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 12:33
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 12:29
- Re: addresses, Bill Cunningham, 12:24
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Harald van Dijk, 12:05
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Chris Thomasson, 11:59
- Re: addresses, Joe Wright, 11:58
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Walter Roberson, 11:40
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, CJ, 11:34
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 11:25
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Chris Thomasson, 10:55
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eoghan, 10:42
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Malcolm McLean, 10:41
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, CJ, 10:25
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, CJ, 10:23
- Re: addresses, Bill Cunningham, 10:18
- Re: addresses, Bill Cunningham, 10:17
- Re: The order of block declaration, CJ, 10:16
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:19
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Richard Heathfield, 09:08
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, CJ, 09:00
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Eric Sosman, 08:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 08:45
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eric Sosman, 08:42
- (WWW.CN-CIRCLE.COM) cheap wholesaleair max 90, 95, 97 ,180, 360, tn ,ltd, nike shox nz r3 r4 r5,, tt, 08:11
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: addresses, pete, 07:40
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 07:39
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 07:37
- Re: enum safety, Army1987, 07:07
- Indian Hill, Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 07:02
- Re: addresses, Mark McIntyre, 06:39
- Tokyo Medical NetBook Health Research and Training, rogerkolsson@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:33
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Ben Bacarisse, 06:30
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Gerry Ford, 05:22
- troika 2008, bots, 03:36
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Harald van Dijk, 03:36
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Old Wolf, 03:10
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Harald van Dijk, 03:10
- Re: addresses, Default User, 02:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 02:11
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Kaz Kylheku, 00:42
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Kaz Kylheku, 00:37
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 00:14
- Re: addresses, Kaz Kylheku, 00:13
February 08, 2008
- Re: addresses, santosh, 23:45
- Re: addresses, santosh, 23:42
- Re: addresses, Ian Collins, 23:42
- Re: addresses, Bill Cunningham, 23:32
- Re: addresses, Bill Cunningham, 23:32
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Jack Klein, 23:15
- Re: addresses, Kaz Kylheku, 23:00
- Re: addresses, Ian Collins, 22:50
- addresses, Bill Cunningham, 22:37
- Re: addresses, Morris Dovey, 21:59
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, pete, 21:53
- Re: What does this code do?, Kaz Kylheku, 20:52
- Re: What does this code do?, Kaz Kylheku, 20:47
- Re: Who likes short shorts?, user923005, 20:03
- Who likes short shorts?, Tubular Technician, 19:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 19:32
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Harter, 18:56
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Ben Bacarisse, 18:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 18:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 18:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 17:59
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Walter Roberson, 17:55
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:55
- Re: What does this code do?, Dave Hansen, 17:51
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 17:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Randy Howard, 17:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:47
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eoghan, 17:44
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 17:36
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:30
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 17:21
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 17:20
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Default User, 17:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 17:16
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Default User, 17:14
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eric Sosman, 17:12
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 17:12
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 17:09
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eoghan, 17:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 17:00
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eoghan, 16:56
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 16:56
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Eric Sosman, 16:51
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 16:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 16:36
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), J. J. Farrell, 16:31
- Re: enum safety, Eric Sosman, 16:06
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Bartc, 16:00
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Default User, 15:58
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Kenneth Brody, 15:57
- Re: enum safety, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Willem, 15:53
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 15:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 15:35
- [OT] Feeding trolls (and others), Morris Dovey, 15:29
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Martin Ambuhl, 15:28
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 15:09
- Re: The order of block declaration, Army1987, 14:50
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, Eric Sosman, 14:46
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 14:41
- Re: enum safety, Ian Collins, 14:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 14:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 14:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 14:28
- Re: enum safety, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 14:26
- Re: The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 14:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 14:23
- enum safety, Sard, 14:22
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Randy Howard, 14:20
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 14:15
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 14:13
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 14:09
- The comma operator, and assigning twice between sequence points, ais523, 14:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 14:09
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Ben Bacarisse, 14:09
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Malcolm McLean, 14:07
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 14:01
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Harald van Dijk, 13:59
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Richard Heathfield, 13:59
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 13:51
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Malcolm McLean, 13:47
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Walter Roberson, 13:46
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Eric Sosman, 13:46
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 13:45
- Re: "sorting the news", Default User, 13:45
- Re: Two questions about a program in C, Dave Hansen, 13:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 13:42
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 13:40
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Antoninus Twink, 13:39
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Randy Howard, 13:34
- Two questions about a program in C, Eoghan, 13:31
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Richard Heathfield, 13:26
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Malcolm McLean, 13:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 13:23
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Richard Heathfield, 13:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Randy Howard, 13:13
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 13:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Randy Howard, 13:05
- Re: The order of block declaration, Keith Thompson, 13:01
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Randy Howard, 13:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:56
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Bartc, 12:50
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard Harter, 12:45
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Harter, 12:28
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Keith Thompson, 12:24
- Re: "sorting the news", dj3vande, 12:14
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 12:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 12:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 12:07
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:02
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, santosh, 11:50
- Re: The order of block declaration, santosh, 11:48
- Re: The order of block declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:46
- Re: "sorting the news", Morris Dovey, 11:39
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Willem, 11:26
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Malcolm McLean, 11:20
- Re: The order of block declaration, santosh, 11:13
- The order of block declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 11:09
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Kenny McCormack, 11:08
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 11:07
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 11:06
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, santosh, 11:06
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 11:00
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 10:57
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, santosh, 10:51
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Malcolm McLean, 10:48
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, santosh, 10:46
- Re: Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Willem, 10:43
- Unsigned Long Long Overflow, Tarique, 10:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 10:25
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, Kenneth Brody, 10:23
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, santosh, 10:19
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 10:10
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 10:04
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, santosh, 09:54
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 09:50
- Re: Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, Army1987, 09:48
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Antoninus Twink, 09:48
- Proper Initialization of Pointer to Pointer, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 09:44
- Re: "sorting the news", Morris Dovey, 09:42
- Re: hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?, fnegroni, 09:36
- Re: hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?, Hyuga, 09:28
- Re: malloc for struct, Malcolm McLean, 09:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Robert Latest, 09:20
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 09:18
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 09:16
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 09:12
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 09:11
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 09:06
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 09:04
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 08:36
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 08:34
- Re: malloc for struct, pete, 08:21
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 08:17
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Neil Booth, 08:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 08:14
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 08:03
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 08:02
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 07:45
- u like me, arulprakash456, 07:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Herbert Rosenau, 06:51
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Herbert Rosenau, 06:51
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 06:26
- Re: [newbie] Not specifying the dynamic library?, Gilles Ganault, 06:24
- (WWW.CN-CIRCLE.COM) cheap wholesale prada Shoes,Customized Gucci Shoes,Lacoste trainers ,jordan 23 outlet shoes, and hoodies ,jeans., huangcba6, 06:07
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Robert Latest, 05:52
- Re: Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Army1987, 05:45
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, santosh, 05:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 04:43
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, shivleeaggarwal, 04:38
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Herbert Rosenau, 04:33
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Chris Dollin, 04:23
- Re: Doubt, Richard Heathfield, 04:20
- Re: ANSI C?, Robert Latest, 04:20
- Re: Doubt, Martin Ambuhl, 04:18
- Re: Doubt, santosh, 04:15
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Robert Latest, 04:14
- Re: Doubt, Chris Dollin, 04:12
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 03:51
- Doubt, vhanwaribrahim, 03:41
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 03:33
- Re: ANSI C?, Richard Heathfield, 03:21
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 03:12
- Re: What does this code do?, James Dow Allen, 03:12
- Re: malloc for struct, jimgardener, 03:07
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 03:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 02:55
- Re: ANSI C?, pete, 02:42
- Re: ANSI C?, Billy Bong, 02:25
- Re: hai, Richard Heathfield, 02:22
- hai, babu4u4evr@xxxxxxxxx, 02:16
- Re: malloc for struct, pete, 02:10
- Re: malloc for struct, pete, 01:45
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: malloc for struct, vaneric001, 01:37
- Re: malloc for struct, pete, 01:21
- malloc for struct, vaneric001, 00:19
February 07, 2008
- Re: Textual data files in C, Barry Schwarz, 23:53
- i m viji, vijaya944, 23:43
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, ymuntyan, 23:21
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 22:55
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Stephen Sprunk, 22:11
- Re: Bounds checking, Stephen Sprunk, 22:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 21:29
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 21:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Old Wolf, 20:59
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Old Wolf, 20:55
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 20:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 20:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Old Wolf, 20:27
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 20:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 20:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ian Collins, 20:18
- Re: hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?, santosh, 20:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 20:03
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:34
- Re: "sorting the news", pete, 19:11
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 19:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ioannis Vranos, 18:56
- Re: hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?, Wesley Mesquita, 18:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:23
- hi, can anyone tell me if this software can be done in C?, João Gomes, 18:14
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 17:47
- Re: "sorting the news", John Bode, 17:45
- Re: Bounds checking, Peter Nilsson, 16:46
- Re: TUTORIAL, Richard, 16:21
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:14
- Re: TUTORIAL, candide, 16:03
- Re: Handy tool for mass-replacement?, Robert Latest, 15:56
- Re: TUTORIAL, Herbert Rosenau, 15:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Herbert Rosenau, 15:31
- Re: Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Andrey Tarasevich, 15:27
- Hello members!, haba, 15:07
- Re: Handy tool for mass-replacement?, SM Ryan, 14:21
- Re: Handy tool for mass-replacement?, jacob navia, 14:05
- Re: string compare, Harald van Dijk, 14:01
- Re: Handy tool for mass-replacement?, Walter Roberson, 13:42
- Handy tool for mass-replacement?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:35
- Future plan in your life :, sahilla, 11:11
- Re: Delievering signals to daemon process, Walter Roberson, 11:11
- Re: "sorting the news", Default User, 10:52
- Here,computer oriented programs only., notybab, 10:38
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 10:11
- Re: Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Thad Smith, 10:06
- Re: Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Richard Bos, 09:55
- Treating 'char' Structure Members as Contiguous Bytes, Martin, 09:48
- Re: "sorting the news", John Bode, 09:31
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Army1987, 08:19
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), Mark Bluemel, 08:18
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), Army1987, 08:01
- Re: "sorting the news", pete, 07:41
- Re: Bounds checking, polas, 07:29
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 07:24
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 07:21
- Re: Delievering signals to daemon process, Richard Bos, 07:04
- Delievering signals to daemon process, rahul, 06:59
- Re: TUTORIAL, josephhallett@xxxxxxxxx, 05:24
- Re: What does this code do?, Kenny McCormack, 04:22
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard Heathfield, 04:00
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:59
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:43
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:27
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:25
- Re: string compare, James Antill, 01:51
- Re: "sorting the news", Ian Collins, 01:49
- Re: What does this code do?, CBFalconer, 01:22
- Re: "sorting the news", Martin Ambuhl, 00:18
February 06, 2008
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 23:11
- Re: Thank You, CBFalconer, 22:00
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 21:17
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 21:16
- Re: Thank You, user923005, 21:05
- Thank You, pete, 21:00
- Re: "sorting the news", user923005, 21:00
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: "sorting the news", pete, 20:41
- Expert Style Tips To Instantly Transform Your Figure, xikom03, 20:37
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), CBFalconer, 20:27
- Re: TUTORIAL, CBFalconer, 20:21
- Re: "sorting the news", CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: "sorting the news", Ivica, 19:58
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 19:55
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, user923005, 19:53
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 19:40
- Re: "sorting the news", Default User, 19:32
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 19:32
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 19:29
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Ben Pfaff, 19:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Herbert Rosenau, 19:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Herbert Rosenau, 19:22
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Herbert Rosenau, 19:22
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 19:15
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 19:13
- Re: "sorting the news", Ivica, 19:11
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Morris Dovey, 19:10
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 19:08
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 18:51
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, user923005, 18:26
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 18:18
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 18:10
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Richard Tobin, 18:03
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), Walter Roberson, 18:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 17:59
- Re: interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), Eric Sosman, 17:54
- Re: What does this code do?, christophe . 4 . news, 17:50
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 17:35
- Re: "sorting the news", Default User, 17:30
- 400 videos and pix of college girls and girlfriends at dorm parties, haba, 17:30
- interesting foo question (CHAR_BITS == 12), Hans Schneider, 17:28
- Re: "sorting the news", Randy Howard, 17:27
- Re: "sorting the news", Randy Howard, 17:25
- Re: "sorting the news", Malcolm McLean, 17:15
- importance request, tygryskacz, 17:13
- Re: "sorting the news", John Bode, 16:56
- Re: "sorting the news", John Bode, 16:43
- Re: "sorting the news", John Bode, 16:39
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Richard, 16:26
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard, 16:24
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard, 16:21
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard, 16:20
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard, 16:18
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 16:11
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 16:10
- Re: "sorting the news", Antoninus Twink, 16:09
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 16:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 15:44
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Richard Heathfield, 15:42
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard Heathfield, 15:37
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Malcolm McLean, 15:36
- Re: TUTORIAL, Richard Heathfield, 15:35
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 15:25
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Michal Nazarewicz, 15:21
- Re: "sorting the news", Johannes Bauer, 14:59
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Army1987, 14:58
- Re: "sorting the news", Default User, 14:50
- Re: TUTORIAL, jacob navia, 14:14
- TUTORIAL, sheart . ltd, 14:11
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 13:39
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 13:31
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Keith Thompson, 13:09
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 13:06
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 12:36
- Re: ANSI C?, Keith Thompson, 12:23
- Re: "sorting the news", CBFalconer, 12:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 12:04
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Randy Howard, 12:01
- Re: "sorting the news", Randy Howard, 11:53
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, Flash Gordon, 11:49
- Re: "sorting the news", Randy Howard, 11:48
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard Bos, 11:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 11:37
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., CBFalconer, 11:32
- Re: CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Antoninus Twink, 11:17
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Antoninus Twink, 11:14
- Re: What does this code do?, Kenny McCormack, 11:10
- Re: 4 BITS RLE IN BMP, Jack Klein, 11:00
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Kenneth Brody, 10:33
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 10:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, Richard Tobin, 08:56
- Re: Textual data files in C, pete, 08:34
- Re: "sorting the news", Johannes Bauer, 08:33
- CBF: The Larry Craig of the CLC clique., Kenny McCormack, 08:28
- Re: "sorting the news", Johannes Bauer, 08:27
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 08:26
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 08:25
- Re: "sorting the news", Kenny McCormack, 08:23
- Re: "sorting the news", Mark Bluemel, 08:22
- Re: "sorting the news", pete, 08:17
- Re: What does this code do?, CBFalconer, 08:16
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, CBFalconer, 08:14
- Re: Bounds checking, Kenny McCormack, 08:04
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 07:49
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 07:37
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Bartc, 07:28
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, pete, 07:08
- Re: "sorting the news", Ivica, 06:56
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Heathfield, 06:55
- Re: ANSI C?, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 06:49
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Army1987, 06:42
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard Bos, 06:37
- Re: "sorting the news", Mark Bluemel, 06:28
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Army1987, 06:24
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Army1987, 06:21
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Army1987, 06:13
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard Bos, 06:04
- Re: "sorting the news", Ben Bacarisse, 06:03
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Army1987, 04:56
- Re: "sorting the news", Ivica, 04:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Herbert Rosenau, 04:19
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:32
- Re: ANSI C?, santosh, 03:23
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 03:21
- Re: ANSI C?, Richard Heathfield, 03:21
- Re: What does this code do?, Richard Heathfield, 03:14
- Re: "sorting the news", Richard Heathfield, 02:39
- Re: ANSI C?, Billy Bong, 02:08
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, Richard Bos, 02:05
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, Ian Collins, 02:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:50
- Re: Bounds checking, Stephen Sprunk, 01:41
- 4 BITS RLE IN BMP, Gurjant, 01:16
- Re: What does this code do?, Anand Hariharan, 00:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Peter Nilsson, 00:33
- Re: What does this code do?, CBFalconer, 00:20
- Re: Textual data files in C, user923005, 00:10
February 05, 2008
- What does this code do?, James Dow Allen, 23:58
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, William Ahern, 23:37
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, Ian Collins, 23:35
- make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, checoo, 23:33
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, CBFalconer, 23:25
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, santosh, 23:14
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 23:13
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, Jack Klein, 23:11
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 23:09
- Re: "sorting the news", CBFalconer, 23:06
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Jack Klein, 23:04
- Re: Textual data files in C, CBFalconer, 23:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 22:56
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Jack Klein, 22:40
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, user923005, 22:39
- Re: ANSI C?, Jack Klein, 22:15
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, Walter Roberson, 22:14
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, Peter Blues, 21:59
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 21:53
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, William Ahern, 21:29
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 21:27
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 21:24
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 21:20
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 21:15
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 21:10
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 21:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 21:02
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 21:01
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, Peter Nilsson, 20:47
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, santosh, 20:43
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:40
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, Ben Bacarisse, 20:33
- Re: stdin (keyboard) to file, vippstar, 20:28
- stdin (keyboard) to file, Peter Blues, 20:14
- Re: Textual data files in C, pete, 20:09
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 20:05
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Richard Tobin, 20:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:01
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, A. Sinan Unur, 19:43
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 19:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 19:39
- Re: Confused by compiler warning, Peter Nilsson, 19:38
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Peter Nilsson, 19:34
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Walter Roberson, 19:32
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 19:27
- Help with a Music Technology Project, surveysniper, 19:24
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, William Ahern, 19:22
- Re: "sorting the news", Ben Bacarisse, 19:21
- Confused by compiler warning, James H. Newman, 19:16
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 19:14
- Re: Compiler error, Keith Thompson, 19:13
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, William Ahern, 19:09
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Keith Thompson, 19:08
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 18:48
- Re: Compiler error, Richard, 18:33
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, vippstar, 18:30
- Re: Compiler error, Walter Roberson, 18:27
- Re: Compiler error, dj3vande, 18:25
- Re: Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Army1987, 18:24
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 18:17
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:47
- Neatest way to get the end pointer?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:40
- Re: make content's of file in binary form to zero and convert them back, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:40
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, CBFalconer, 17:17
- Re: Need help with memcpy_rom funtion, CBFalconer, 17:14
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], CBFalconer, 17:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 16:48
- "sorting the news", Ivica, 16:37
- Re: need some help, Bartc, 16:37
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, SM Ryan, 16:24
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, Army1987, 15:24
- Re: void * in ANSC, Harald van Dijk, 15:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 15:19
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, Default User, 15:07
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, santosh, 14:54
- Re: Bounds checking, santosh, 14:35
- Another episode of... CLC regulars eating their own!, Kenny McCormack, 14:32
- Re: Interview, Kenny McCormack, 14:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 13:40
- Re: Interview, Default User, 13:24
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, david, 13:22
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, Malcolm McLean, 12:51
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, fnegroni, 12:38
- Re: Problem with pointers, require some help, david, 12:26
- Problem with pointers, require some help, david, 12:22
- uVme, derossobockmann, 12:04
- Re: void * in ANSC, Army1987, 11:46
- Re: need some help, Malcolm McLean, 11:29
- Re: Bounds checking, William Ahern, 11:27
- Re: need some help, Richard Heathfield, 11:14
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Randy Howard, 09:39
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Randy Howard, 09:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 09:23
- Re: Interview, johnnash, 09:21
- Re: need some help, johnnash, 08:47
- Re: need some help, johnnash, 08:29
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Army1987, 08:24
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 08:23
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Army1987, 08:01
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Robert Latest, 08:01
- Re: Bounds checking, Richard Heathfield, 08:00
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Army1987, 07:59
- Bounds checking, polas, 07:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 07:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 07:41
- Re: ANSI C?, Mark Bluemel, 07:28
- Re: ANSI C?, santosh, 07:14
- Re: Interview, santosh, 07:11
- Re: ANSI C?, Malcolm McLean, 07:08
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Bos, 06:44
- Re: Textual data files in C, Malcolm McLean, 06:43
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Bartc, 06:23
- Re: Need help with memcpy_rom funtion, pete, 06:20
- Re: Interview, sophia . agnes, 05:54
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 05:24
- Re: Need help with memcpy_rom funtion, Rudolf . Erasmus, 05:10
- Re: ANSI C?, Richard, 04:28
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Richard, 04:28
- Re: ANSI C?, Ian Collins, 04:23
- RE: Need help with memcpy_rom funtion, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:14
- Re: need some help, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- RE: Need help with memcpy_rom funtion, Rudolf . Erasmus, 04:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:06
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:04
- Re: need some help, Billy Bong, 03:22
- ANSI C?, Billy Bong, 03:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 02:57
- need some help, johnnash, 02:47
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 02:28
- Re: struct having pointers's object being passed by value to a function..., Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: struct having pointers's object being passed by value to a function..., Ian Collins, 02:00
- struct having pointers's object being passed by value to a function..., Rahul, 01:56
- Re: void * in ANSC, Harald van Dijk, 00:41
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 00:19
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Ravishankar S, 00:09
February 04, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Peter Nilsson, 22:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 21:33
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Morris Dovey, 21:01
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Richard Heathfield, 20:59
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 20:40
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: Textual data files in C, user923005, 20:17
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Keith Thompson, 20:13
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Textual data files in C, Franz Hose, 20:05
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Bartc, 19:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 19:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 19:02
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 18:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 18:50
- Re: void * in ANSC, CBFalconer, 18:46
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Richard Heathfield, 18:35
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 18:26
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], CBFalconer, 18:20
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, CBFalconer, 18:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 18:08
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, CBFalconer, 18:02
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Walter Roberson, 17:59
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, CBFalconer, 17:51
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, M.Caggiano, 17:50
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Flash Gordon, 17:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:39
- Re: void * in ANSC, Walter Roberson, 17:38
- Re: void * in ANSC, Peter Nilsson, 17:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: void * in ANSC, Harald van Dijk, 17:25
- Re: void * in ANSC, Harald van Dijk, 17:23
- Re: void * in ANSC, Walter Roberson, 17:21
- Re: void * in ANSC, Peter Nilsson, 17:08
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 16:35
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 16:23
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 16:12
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: chunk, Richard, 15:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 15:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 15:39
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 15:34
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 15:32
- Re: Interview, Richard, 15:24
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, SM Ryan, 15:21
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard, 15:20
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard, 15:18
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 15:18
- Re: chunk, Walter Roberson, 15:15
- CTC Education, john, 15:08
- Re: chunk, Antoninus Twink, 15:02
- Re: chunk, Default User, 15:02
- Re: C99 (TC3) and 'official' discussions., Doug, 15:00
- Re: chunk, Default User, 14:55
- Re: chunk, Kenny McCormack, 14:53
- Re: chunk, Antoninus Twink, 14:27
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Kenneth Brody, 14:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Antoninus Twink, 14:24
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Antoninus Twink, 14:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Antoninus Twink, 14:20
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 14:17
- Re: chunk, Walter Roberson, 14:10
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Richard Heathfield, 14:05
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], John Bode, 14:02
- Re: chunk, Walter Roberson, 14:01
- Re: chunk, Bill Cunningham, 13:59
- Re: chunk, Bill Cunningham, 13:57
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Flash Gordon, 13:54
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Nikhil Bokare, 13:46
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Keith Thompson, 13:46
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Ben Pfaff, 13:43
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Walter Roberson, 13:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 13:31
- Re: C99 (TC3) and 'official' discussions., lawrence . jones, 13:30
- Output of the printf(a,*a,**a) where a is of type int [][][], Nikhil Bokare, 13:25
- Re: Interview, Ian Collins, 13:15
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Walter Roberson, 13:10
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Ulrich Eckhardt, 13:02
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 13:00
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Ulrich Eckhardt, 13:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:59
- Finding invalid pointers, TDB, 12:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:53
- Re: chunk, Default User, 12:51
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:50
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:49
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:41
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Bartc, 12:30
- Re: C99 (TC3) and 'official' discussions., Walter Roberson, 12:29
- Pool for pointers, vardhan, 12:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 12:26
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Antoninus Twink, 12:24
- Re: C99 (TC3) and 'official' discussions., Keith Thompson, 12:24
- Re: Finding invalid pointers, Morris Dovey, 12:14
- Re: Pool for pointers, Morris Dovey, 11:53
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Eric Sosman, 11:46
- C99 (TC3) and 'official' discussions., Doug, 11:45
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 11:44
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Willem, 11:43
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Tricky, 11:41
- Re: Interview, sophia . agnes, 11:40
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Eric Sosman, 11:31
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Mark Bluemel, 11:28
- Re: Converting Char array to Int array, Malcolm McLean, 11:19
- Re: regexec from regex.h Segmentation fault, Mark Bluemel, 11:03
- Converting Char array to Int array, Tricky, 11:02
- Re: regexec from regex.h Segmentation fault, Ben Bacarisse, 11:00
- Re: Why no reset() function?, dj3vande, 10:52
- Re: Why no reset() function?, testdemo, 10:50
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:30
- Re: regexec from regex.h Segmentation fault, Malcolm McLean, 10:24
- regexec from regex.h Segmentation fault, al . moorthi, 10:17
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Randy Howard, 09:43
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, runner, 09:33
- Re: string compare, jameskuyper, 09:21
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Eric Sosman, 08:50
- Re: chunk, vippstar, 08:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:08
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 06:58
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 06:50
- Re: void * in ANSC, Army1987, 06:39
- Re: void * in ANSC, Army1987, 06:38
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:32
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Army1987, 06:29
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Remo D., 06:01
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 05:46
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Robert Latest, 05:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:38
- Re: Compiler error, Robert Latest, 05:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 04:09
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:57
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Ian Collins, 03:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:45
- Re: Interview, Tim Smith, 03:10
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Tim Smith, 02:59
- Re: chunk, Martin Ambuhl, 00:46
- Re: Today best message :, Chris Thomasson, 00:19
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, Chris Thomasson, 00:06
- Re: void * in ANSC, Peter Nilsson, 00:05
- Re: chunk, Keith Thompson, 00:00
February 03, 2008
- Re: chunk, Walter Roberson, 23:51
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 23:35
- Re: chunk, Ian Collins, 22:53
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Ian Collins, 22:41
- Re: chunk, Bill Cunningham, 21:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 21:37
- Re: chunk, Bill Cunningham, 21:35
- Re: chunk, Walter Roberson, 21:23
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: prototyping?, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: Complex question, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: why bar and foo, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: string compare, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: How do header files work?, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: Function Pointers, David Thompson, 21:21
- Re: main() in C90, David Thompson, 21:21
- chunk, Bill Cunningham, 21:13
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, CBFalconer, 20:55
- Today best message :, kayal20, 20:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 19:55
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 19:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 19:23
- Re: void * in ANSC, Army1987, 19:20
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 19:16
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 19:12
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 19:07
- Re: void * in ANSC, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 18:39
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: void * in ANSC, Jack Klein, 18:18
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 18:17
- Converting a string formula to TeX, humberto . bortolossi, 18:15
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: Compiler error, Richard Heathfield, 18:08
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 18:08
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Mark McIntyre, 18:01
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 17:56
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 17:55
- Re: Socket: bind error...why??, M.Caggiano, 17:55
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 17:55
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Flash Gordon, 17:47
- Re: Socket: bind error...why??, Walter Roberson, 17:45
- Re: C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, vippstar, 17:43
- Re: Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 17:19
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Richard Heathfield, 17:19
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Keith Thompson, 17:18
- Socket: bind error...why??, M.Caggiano, 17:16
- Re: Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 16:58
- Re: [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, jacob navia, 16:39
- Re: Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 16:34
- [OT] C90 IDE+compiler for Windows / educational purposes, Ioannis Vranos, 16:30
- Re: Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 16:24
- Re: Compiler error, Morris Dovey, 16:09
- Re: Compiler error, Keith Thompson, 15:44
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: Compiler error, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:27
- Re: Compiler error, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 14:35
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Richard Harter, 14:08
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 13:53
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 13:52
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 13:51
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 13:49
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Richard Tobin, 13:41
- Re: Compiler error, Richard Heathfield, 13:09
- Re: Interview, Eugene A. Pallat, 12:37
- Re: Compiler error, Walter Roberson, 12:26
- Re: Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 11:52
- Re: Compiler error, Harald van Dijk, 11:22
- Re: Linking library, Wolfgang Draxinger, 11:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 10:54
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, runner, 10:34
- Re: Compiler error, Mark McIntyre, 10:28
- wholesaler sport shoes,clothing,electrons mobile phone (sport shoes=28USD) www.fashion-sky.com, ng, 10:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ed Jensen, 10:04
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 09:51
- Re: Compiler error, Kenny McCormack, 09:20
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, christian.bau, 08:44
- Re: Interview question?, Army1987, 08:01
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Bartc, 07:27
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, Flash Gordon, 07:26
- Re: Compiler error, Flash Gordon, 07:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 07:08
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Mamluk Caliph, 07:02
- Compiler error, M.Caggiano, 06:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 06:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 06:50
- Re: void * in ANSC, Harald van Dijk, 06:47
- Hot sell gucci coach handbag ca hoody-tshirts mp3 cap nokia n95 mobile phone at www.cheapforwholesale.com, cheapforwholesale, 06:47
- Re: Good websites on C programming interview questions, vippstar, 06:37
- Good websites on C programming interview questions, sun, 06:33
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, pete, 06:32
- Re: void * in ANSC, vippstar, 06:31
- Re: void * in ANSC, pete, 06:27
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Remo D., 05:47
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Remo D., 05:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:09
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:02
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:50
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Paul Hsieh, 03:33
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 03:29
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Keith Thompson, 02:57
- Re: Interview, Ian Collins, 02:45
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Remo D., 02:38
- Interview, sophia . agnes, 02:34
- Re: void * in ANSC, Keith Thompson, 02:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 02:23
- Re: Advice on how to return a list of values, Ian Collins, 02:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 01:57
- Advice on how to return a list of values, Remo D., 01:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 01:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 01:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 01:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Jeffrey Stedfast, 01:09
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, Walter Roberson, 01:03
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 00:04
February 02, 2008
- Re: sizeof size_t, CBFalconer, 23:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 23:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 23:48
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, CBFalconer, 23:42
- Re: void * in ANSC, Mark Jiao, 22:30
- Re: void * in ANSC, frog, 22:24
- Re: sizeof size_t, vippstar, 22:23
- Re: sizeof size_t, frog, 22:23
- Re: void * in ANSC, vippstar, 22:22
- void * in ANSC, Mark Jiao, 22:13
- Re: sizeof size_t, Martin Ambuhl, 22:06
- Re: sizeof size_t, Martin Ambuhl, 22:05
- Re: sizeof size_t, Bill Cunningham, 21:29
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, MisterE, 21:23
- Re: sizeof size_t, MisterE, 21:20
- Re: sizeof size_t, Ian Collins, 21:07
- sizeof size_t, Bill Cunningham, 21:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 21:00
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 20:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 20:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 20:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 19:53
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:40
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Richard Tobin, 19:12
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Ian Collins, 18:40
- Why no reset() function?, Prad, 18:33
- Re: Why no reset() function?, Morris Dovey, 18:24
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 18:19
- Re: scanf and ampersand, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:02
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: Linking library, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, Keith Thompson, 16:37
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Harald van Dijk, 16:35
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Keith Thompson, 16:17
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: Interview question?, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Thad Smith, 12:26
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, Randy Howard, 12:06
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, Ben Bacarisse, 11:32
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, yeti, 11:31
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, yeti, 11:10
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, santosh, 10:55
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, vippstar, 10:53
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Chris Thomasson, 10:44
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, Bartc, 10:41
- Re: Traversing an array spirally, Chris Thomasson, 10:37
- Re: Interview question?, Army1987, 10:08
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, Army1987, 10:00
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Mamluk Caliph, 09:57
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:38
- Re: Interview question?, Kenny McCormack, 09:10
- Re: Interview question?, Army1987, 09:03
- Re: Interview question?, Army1987, 08:59
- Traversing an array spirally, Praveen, 08:51
- Re: Integer multiplication truncation, Harald van Dijk, 08:02
- Integer multiplication truncation, Mamluk Caliph, 07:46
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Morris Dovey, 07:00
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Harald van Dijk, 06:56
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Morris Dovey, 06:48
- Re: creating a 2D array, Ben Bacarisse, 06:44
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:39
- Re: Interview question?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:36
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Malcolm McLean, 06:00
- Re: creating a 2D array, Malcolm McLean, 05:53
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 05:43
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Chris Dollin, 04:50
- Re: Interview question?, Antoninus Twink, 04:18
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Flash Gordon, 04:14
- creating a 2D array, oswald . harry, 03:43
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, vaneric001, 02:52
- Re: What's the meaning of the macro 'OF', Ian Collins, 02:35
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Ulrich Eckhardt, 02:35
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, henry, 02:15
- Re: What's the meaning of the macro 'OF', Ben Pfaff, 02:11
- Re: What's the meaning of the macro 'OF', StdNewer, 02:11
- Re: What's the meaning of the macro 'OF', Ian Collins, 01:42
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Ben Pfaff, 01:32
- What's the meaning of the macro 'OF', StdNewer, 01:02
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 01:00
February 01, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 23:53
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, sid, 23:35
- Re: Urgent Help : fork(), AK, 21:03
- Re: bit manipulation..newbie doubt, Walter Roberson, 19:42
- Re: Interview question?, Flash Gordon, 19:28
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, CBFalconer, 19:20
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 19:14
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 18:57
- bit manipulation..newbie doubt, vaneric001, 18:55
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Malcolm McLean, 18:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:46
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:37
- Re: Interview question?, pete, 17:05
- Re: Interview question?, Ian Collins, 16:56
- Re: Interview question?, Remo D., 16:52
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Kenny McCormack, 16:43
- Re: Interview question?, Kenny McCormack, 16:41
- Re: Interview question?, Kenny McCormack, 16:39
- Re: Interview question?, Remo D., 16:38
- Re: Interview question?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:32
- Re: Interview question?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:30
- Re: Interview question?, pete, 16:25
- Re: Interview question?, Antoninus Twink, 16:20
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Martin Ambuhl, 16:20
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, bobby, 15:57
- Re: what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, Walter Roberson, 15:52
- what does "for( ; ; )" mean in C program, bobby, 15:48
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 15:46
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 15:41
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: Interview question?, Kenny McCormack, 15:35
- Re: Interview question?, Martin Ambuhl, 15:30
- Interview question?, Padmat, 15:21
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Keith Thompson, 15:18
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., lawrence . jones, 14:47
- Re: Radix Sort, Tarique, 14:19
- Re: Radix Sort, Leonardo Korndorfer, 14:10
- Re: Radix Sort, Tarique, 13:45
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 13:37
- Re: Why does this compile?, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Keith Thompson, 12:33
- Re: Linkage Error, Kenneth Brody, 12:25
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Kenneth Brody, 12:19
- Re: Linkage Error, Walter Roberson, 12:10
- Linkage Error, Tricky, 11:56
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Mark Bluemel, 11:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 11:43
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Joachim Schmitz, 11:26
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, dbr, 11:21
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, dbr, 11:20
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, dbr, 11:18
- Re: Linkage Error, Morris Dovey, 11:12
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 11:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 11:02
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Joachim Schmitz, 10:46
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Joachim Schmitz, 10:43
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, Richard Tobin, 10:41
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, mach7, 10:38
- Re: c programs & shell conditionals, dj3vande, 10:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- c programs & shell conditionals, Hul Tytus, 10:29
- Radix Sort, Tarique, 09:56
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 09:47
- Re: Why does this compile?, Army1987, 09:03
- Re: Why does this compile?, Malcolm McLean, 08:14
- Re: My solution to allocating memory, pete, 08:02
- Re: Why does this compile?, vippstar, 07:21
- Re: Why does this compile?, Mark Bluemel, 06:25
- Re: Help with Make, Joachim Schmitz, 06:07
- Why does this compile?, g36130, 06:04
- Help with Make, Tricky, 06:02
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, user923005, 05:34
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 05:31
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Mark Bluemel, 05:11
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Richard Bos, 05:05
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, ot_007_2001, 04:53
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Nick Keighley, 04:40
- Re: My solution to allocating memory, santosh, 04:40
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, Mark Bluemel, 04:34
- Re: A Stupid Question about Structure, James Dow Allen, 04:31
- A Stupid Question about Structure, ot_007_2001, 04:23
- http://AdSenseTaiko.com/?ref=rosh9040, rosenaza9040, 03:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 03:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 03:32
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Flash Gordon, 03:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 03:29
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 03:27
- Re: Question on accessing structure, Flash Gordon, 03:25
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 03:22
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Keith Thompson, 03:02
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Richard Bos, 02:16
- Re: Type conversion, Mark L Pappin, 02:14
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:46
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 01:36
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Gordon Burditt, 00:47
January 31, 2008
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, Jack Klein, 23:25
- Re: Type conversion, Jack Klein, 23:17
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Jack Klein, 23:12
- Re: Question on accessing structure, Sid, 22:58
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Paul Hsieh, 22:33
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Walter Roberson, 22:05
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: Urgent Help : fork(), Keith Thompson, 21:40
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, user923005, 21:31
- Re: why bar and foo, Charles Richmond, 21:28
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), Keith Thompson, 21:22
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 21:15
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Gordon Burditt, 20:56
- Re: Urgent Help : fork(), AK, 20:40
- Re: Urgent Help : fork(), Walter Roberson, 20:38
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, pete, 20:33
- Urgent Help : fork(), AK, 20:24
- Re: Question on accessing structure, CBFalconer, 20:23
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:17
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:05
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Walter Roberson, 19:51
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Pedro Graca, 19:51
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, pete, 19:50
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, vippstar, 19:41
- Re: Question on accessing structure, CBFalconer, 19:36
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, major, 19:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 19:19
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), CBFalconer, 19:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 19:13
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Walter Roberson, 19:08
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 19:08
- Re: int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, Walter Roberson, 19:07
- int 1[3] = {10,10,10};, mauro, 19:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 19:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 18:58
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, CBFalconer, 18:50
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:43
- Re: What is the yadda, Mark McIntyre, 18:31
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Mark McIntyre, 18:30
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, christian.bau, 18:27
- Re: translating oo features to C, Roberto Waltman, 18:19
- Re: What is the yadda, Richard, 18:19
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Richard, 18:18
- Re: Question on accessing structure, Richard, 18:13
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 18:11
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:06
- Re: translating oo features to C, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:47
- Re: My solution to allocating memory, vippstar, 17:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 17:22
- Re: linked list, Walter Roberson, 17:12
- linked list, MJK, 17:07
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, Walter Roberson, 16:59
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 16:48
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Mark McIntyre, 16:39
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Herbert Rosenau, 15:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: translating oo features to C, user923005, 15:16
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, John Bode, 15:14
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 15:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 14:58
- Re: #define, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Flash Gordon, 14:48
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Paul Hsieh, 14:40
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:15
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Morris Dovey, 14:03
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Flash Gordon, 13:47
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Paul Hsieh, 13:47
- Re: Question on accessing structure, Default User, 13:38
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Flash Gordon, 13:36
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, Eric Sosman, 13:36
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Flash Gordon, 13:26
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, santosh, 13:23
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, vippstar, 13:18
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 13:18
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, dj3vande, 13:13
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Harald van Dijk, 13:06
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 13:03
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, christophe . 4 . news, 12:58
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, Eric Sosman, 12:48
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Walter Roberson, 12:45
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Willem, 12:38
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 12:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 12:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 12:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 12:27
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 12:23
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 12:21
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:17
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 11:52
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 11:46
- Re: translating oo features to C, ppi, 11:44
- Re: translating oo features to C, Joachim Schmitz, 11:42
- Re: Strange C operator, Lew Pitcher, 11:41
- Re: translating oo features to C, Mark Bluemel, 11:32
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, Eric Sosman, 11:22
- translating oo features to C, dvanguard, 11:20
- Re: Strange C operator, Eric Sosman, 11:14
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 10:58
- Re: Reverse biwise operation and xor?, Walter Roberson, 10:58
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:57
- Reverse biwise operation and xor?, Mrki [MCAD], 10:32
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Walter Roberson, 10:21
- Re: Type conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 10:20
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Army1987, 10:11
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Mark McIntyre, 10:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ralf Damaschke, 09:48
- Re: #define, Malcolm McLean, 09:34
- Re: #define, vippstar, 09:33
- Re: Type conversion, Eric Sosman, 09:29
- Re: #define, Richard Bos, 09:24
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Walter Roberson, 09:23
- #define, Ivan, 09:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Bos, 09:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 08:55
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 08:50
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 08:48
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ido Yehieli, 08:27
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, jacob navia, 08:21
- Re: Type conversion, Richard Tobin, 08:21
- INTEGRITY CAN MAKE YOU EASY MONEY!!, 12345678, 07:59
- Re: Question on accessing structure, Richard Tobin, 07:31
- Re: Strange C operator, Richard Tobin, 07:18
- Re: Question on accessing structure, vippstar, 06:58
- Question on accessing structure, Sid, 06:52
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Bos, 06:51
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Bos, 06:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 06:28
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, toe, 05:54
- Re: Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, vippstar, 05:48
- Quick check on signed promotion of bytes, toe, 05:45
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, somenath, 05:33
- Re: My solution to allocating memory, vippstar, 05:21
- My solution to allocating memory, vippstar, 05:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 05:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 04:58
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, santosh, 04:49
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 04:29
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, jacob navia, 04:23
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:15
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:06
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:02
- Re: Kelsey admits Linux SW is fatally flawed, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:54
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Kaz Kylheku, 03:51
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Nick Keighley, 03:50
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:50
- فيلم سارة المصريه الاسكندرانيه وصديقها كامل 50 دقيقة, haba, 03:49
- خدرت أختي و نيكتها 5 مرات في طيزها ( القصة الحقيقية ), haba, 03:45
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Mark Bluemel, 03:39
- I women looking for a man the usual Haley, haba, 03:38
- Only Free is one of the best and old xxx sites!, haba, 03:35
- Re: Type conversion, santosh, 03:26
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, santosh, 03:20
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, santosh, 03:16
- Type conversion, manik, 03:15
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Ian Collins, 03:00
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:51
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:43
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:40
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:33
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:28
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, DDD, 02:10
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 01:52
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, DDD, 01:47
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Walter Roberson, 01:41
- declaration of variable in for loop, poornimamprabhu, 01:25
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), Keith Thompson, 00:54
January 30, 2008
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 23:29
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 23:23
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Jack Klein, 23:21
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 23:15
- Re: Strange C operator, Walter Roberson, 22:56
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 22:50
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 22:43
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Walter Roberson, 22:42
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Roman Mashak, 22:40
- Getting user input in Linux?, Zach, 22:17
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, Walter Roberson, 22:10
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, santosh, 21:58
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 21:24
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), CBFalconer, 21:17
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, CBFalconer, 21:11
- Re: Linking library, CBFalconer, 21:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Morris Dovey, 20:40
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:38
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Randy Howard, 20:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:03
- conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, christophe . 4 . news, 19:56
- Re: Strange C operator, Keith Thompson, 19:38
- comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Roman Mashak, 19:29
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Joe Wright, 19:19
- assigning pointer to NULL, Roman Mashak, 19:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 19:05
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 18:50
- Re: Strange C operator, Richard Tobin, 18:42
- Re: string compare, jameskuyper, 18:32
- Re: Strange C operator, Eric Sosman, 18:30
- Re: Strange C operator, Richard Tobin, 18:20
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 17:43
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Peter Nilsson, 16:17
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Eric Sosman, 16:15
- Re: Need info on "Safe C library", Army1987, 16:14
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, user923005, 16:11
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, dj3vande, 16:10
- Re: Strange C operator, Eric Sosman, 16:05
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Walter Roberson, 16:01
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Army1987, 15:55
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:50
- comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 15:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:43
- Re: Strange C operator, Walter Roberson, 15:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:28
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Malcolm McLean, 15:25
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Strange C operator, email7373388, 15:18
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 15:15
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 15:04
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 14:55
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Flash Gordon, 14:42
- Re: scanf and ampersand, vlsidesign, 14:37
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, KKL, 14:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 14:29
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 14:13
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, Lew Pitcher, 14:06
- Casting Function Pointers, KKL, 13:57
- Re: time in threaded programs, Keith Thompson, 13:55
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), Robert Gamble, 13:46
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Chris Dollin, 13:41
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 13:40
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Chris Dollin, 13:38
- Question on while(!feof(fp)), Willem, 13:27
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, David Tiktin, 13:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 13:24
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, karthikbalaguru, 13:19
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, ymuntyan, 13:11
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Bartc, 13:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 13:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 12:56
- Re: Need info on "Safe C library", Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Eric Sosman, 12:44
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Ambuhl, 12:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 12:30
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 12:28
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, dj3vande, 12:25
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Kenny McCormack, 12:12
- Re: Linking library, santosh, 12:04
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 12:02
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, dj3vande, 11:44
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Paul Hsieh, 11:35
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 11:13
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 10:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 10:49
- Re: why bar and foo, dj3vande, 10:45
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Eric Sosman, 10:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:41
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 10:35
- Re: rename according to time, stmilam, 10:33
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, GRain, 10:30
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Kenneth Brody, 10:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 10:21
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:20
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 10:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:14
- Re: What happens to this memory, Kenneth Brody, 10:13
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Mark Bluemel, 10:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:09
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kenneth Brody, 10:07
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 10:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 10:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 09:55
- Need info on "Safe C library", Erwin Lindemann, 09:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:51
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Mark Bluemel, 09:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Tobin, 09:41
- Re: time in threaded programs, Joachim Schmitz, 09:41
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Morris Dovey, 09:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 09:34
- Function with unspecified number of arguments, somenath, 09:34
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:31
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Morris Dovey, 09:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Bos, 09:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Bos, 09:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:16
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, vippstar, 08:53
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Morris Dovey, 08:46
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Randy Howard, 08:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 08:38
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, vippstar, 08:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Tobin, 07:52
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Bos, 07:32
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 07:32
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, John Bode, 07:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Bos, 07:29
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 06:44
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 06:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:43
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 06:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:41
- Re: Linking library, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:28
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, fnegroni, 05:21
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Malcolm McLean, 05:17
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Malcolm McLean, 05:13
- Re: Linking library, Erfan, 04:54
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 04:40
- gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 04:30
- Re: Linking library, Mark Bluemel, 04:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 04:27
- Linking library, Erfan, 04:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 04:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 04:11
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:04
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Richard Bos, 04:01
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, santosh, 03:57
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Richard Bos, 03:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Mark Bluemel, 03:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 03:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 03:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 03:28
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Ian Collins, 03:11
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, h03Ein, 02:59
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Ian Collins, 02:43
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Ian Collins, 02:38
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 02:13
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., santosh, 01:45
- www.fashion-sky.com good new!nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 30USD,T-shirt = 12USD,Nokia N95=260USD, ng, 01:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:33
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:39
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:07
January 29, 2008
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, oswald . harry, 23:40
- How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, grbgooglefan, 23:19
- How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, grbgooglefan, 23:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Stan Milam, 22:47
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Keith Thompson, 22:32
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Keith Thompson, 22:26
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Pfaff, 22:15
- Re: why bar and foo, Ian Collins, 21:25
- Re: why bar and foo, Martin Golding, 21:21
- Telenet nieuwsgroepen mededeling: nieuwsserver adres aanpassen/Attention: modification de l'adresse du serveur de newsgroup, info, 21:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 20:11
- va_list undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 20:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 19:29
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 19:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 19:11
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 19:07
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, CBFalconer, 18:58
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, David Tiktin, 18:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 18:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 18:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 18:50
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., CBFalconer, 18:49
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:45
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., CBFalconer, 18:42
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:41
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 18:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 18:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:30
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Martien Verbruggen, 18:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:23
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, John Bode, 18:22
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Richard Tobin, 18:20
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 18:19
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 18:18
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Antoninus Twink, 18:14
- Re: What happens to this memory, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Mark McIntyre, 18:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:56
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Walter Roberson, 17:56
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 17:52
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: memset, CBFalconer, 17:39
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 17:38
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, William Pursell, 17:37
- -►5 Magical Herbs to Improve Your Life◄-, C Pac, 17:32
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 17:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 17:25
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kenny McCormack, 17:19
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:17
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Ben Pfaff, 17:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:04
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kenneth Brody, 16:52
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ediebur, 16:52
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 16:50
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 16:40
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Harald van Dijk, 16:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 16:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Jack Klein, 16:35
- Re: What happens to this memory, Jack Klein, 16:32
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Walter Roberson, 16:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 16:24
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 16:24
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 16:12
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Malcolm McLean, 16:06
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 16:03
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, jacob navia, 15:56
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Harald van Dijk, 15:55
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 15:44
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kaz Kylheku, 15:41
- [OT] Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 15:12
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Ben Pfaff, 15:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:06
- Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 15:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 14:58
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 14:52
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, santosh, 14:51
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, user923005, 14:50
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, santosh, 14:48
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, vippstar, 14:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 14:43
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 14:40
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Martin Ambuhl, 14:37
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, mach7sonic, 14:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 14:29
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 14:27
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Leonardo Korndorfer, 14:27
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, vippstar, 14:26
- Executing and Monitoring External Programs, mach7sonic, 14:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 14:16
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 13:55
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Walter Roberson, 13:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 13:45
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, santosh, 13:45
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Kenny McCormack, 13:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 13:23
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 13:22
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Keith Thompson, 13:13
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 13:10
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 13:09
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:02
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Tobin, 13:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, William Ahern, 13:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 12:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Serve Laurijssen, 12:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 12:09
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, vippstar, 12:08
- putting values into array-newbie doubt, oswald . harry, 12:00
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 11:58
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 11:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 11:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 11:43
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Default User, 11:42
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 11:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 11:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 11:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Kenneth Brody, 11:09
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Walter Roberson, 10:56
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Philip Potter, 10:43
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 10:41
- Re: memset, Army1987, 10:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 10:27
- Re: memset, Spoon, 10:23
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 10:19
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 09:55
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Philip Potter, 09:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 09:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 09:14
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ido Yehieli, 08:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:35
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 08:31
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Mark McIntyre, 08:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 08:10
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 08:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 08:07
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 07:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 07:46
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Bos, 07:45
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 07:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, vippstar, 07:38
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, santosh, 07:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, cr88192, 07:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CJ, 07:29
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, vippstar, 07:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 07:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 06:54
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Mark McIntyre, 06:49
- A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 06:47
- Re: What is the yadda, Mark McIntyre, 06:44
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Richard Tobin, 06:38
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Richard Tobin, 06:35
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:32
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, cr88192, 06:06
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 05:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 05:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:14
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 05:09
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:06
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 05:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 04:58
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:55
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:54
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.Apple Ipods Nano,Mobile Phones Nokia . Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 04:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 04:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 04:23
- Re: Copy memory (array), Willem, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 03:59
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 03:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 03:54
- Re: scanf and ampersand, santosh, 03:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:34
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 03:34
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., santosh, 03:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 03:25
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 03:24
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 03:23
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:20
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Richard Bos, 03:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 03:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Bos, 02:47
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Joakim Hove, 02:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:38
- How Do You Pronounce char?, Billy Bong, 02:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:24
- Re: memset, Billy Bong, 02:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 02:12
- Re: What happens to this memory, Joakim Hove, 00:59
- Re: What happens to this memory, Walter Roberson, 00:56
- What happens to this memory, Joakim Hove, 00:50
January 28, 2008
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 23:39
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:33
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 23:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:16
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 23:11
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 23:03
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Jack Klein, 22:35
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Jack Klein, 22:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Syren Baran, 21:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:57
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 20:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:29
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Richard, 20:24
- WATCH your favorate hero&HEROINES HERE, narraswarna8@xxxxxxxxx, 20:22
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 20:14
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Ben Pfaff, 20:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 20:09
- Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., VijaKhara, 20:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 19:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 19:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 19:36
- Re: Copy memory (array), SM Ryan, 19:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 19:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 19:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 18:53
- Re: Copy memory (array), VijaKhara, 18:50
- Re: scanf and ampersand, user923005, 18:49
- scanf and ampersand, vlsidesign, 18:43
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 18:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 18:38
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Default User, 18:35
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 18:30
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Michal Nazarewicz, 18:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 18:22
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 18:17
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, pete, 17:54
- Re: time in threaded programs, CBFalconer, 17:29
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Ivar Rosquist, 17:25
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 17:16
- What is the Quraan?, ياهادي أهدنا وأهدي بنا (أم نادر), 17:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:14
- Re: why bar and foo, Charles Richmond, 17:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 17:05
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 16:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 16:50
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 16:49
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Mark McIntyre, 16:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 16:09
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 16:06
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 16:00
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 15:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Tim Streater, 15:58
- Re: memory address of *char, Martin Ambuhl, 15:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Martin Ambuhl, 15:55
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Tim Streater, 15:52
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Flash Gordon, 15:51
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 15:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:02
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Army1987, 15:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 14:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, christian.bau, 14:18
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Eric Sosman, 14:14
- Re: Why do signals exist?, santosh, 14:10
- [OT] Re: why bar and foo, ais523, 14:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:08
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Paul Hsieh, 13:58
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:55
- Re: Copy memory (array), santosh, 13:54
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:48
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:46
- Re: Copy memory (array), Ben Bacarisse, 13:44
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 13:40
- Re: Copy memory (array), Eric Sosman, 13:39
- Re: Why do signals exist?, santosh, 13:37
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Eric Sosman, 13:34
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 13:30
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 13:29
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 13:25
- Copy memory (array), VijaKhara, 13:22
- Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:09
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 13:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:59
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Bacarisse, 12:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 12:37
- Re: why bar and foo, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: swap using pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 12:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, dj3vande, 12:11
- Re: rename according to time, Geoff, 12:01
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Antoninus Twink, 11:41
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Richard Heathfield, 11:33
- Re: why bar and foo, dj3vande, 11:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 11:26
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 11:19
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 11:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 11:12
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:11
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Jensen Somers, 11:08
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 10:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Bacarisse, 10:54
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Kenneth Brody, 10:50
- Re: memory address of *char, ppi, 10:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:47
- Re: rename according to time, Bill Reid, 10:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:43
- Re: why bar and foo, Eugene A. Pallat, 10:36
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:27
- Re: string compare, James Antill, 10:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 10:21
- Re: rename according to time, Joachim Schmitz, 10:20
- tutorials about c and c++, blog . martani, 10:18
- Re: rename according to time, Philip Potter, 10:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:36
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:33
- Re: pragma directive, Ravishankar S, 09:07
- Re: rename according to time, Joachim Schmitz, 09:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 08:56
- Re: rename according to time, Jensen Somers, 08:54
- Re: Not specifying the dynamic library?, vippstar, 08:45
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 08:43
- Re: rename according to time, vippstar, 08:42
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:39
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:33
- Re: rename according to time, erfan, 08:30
- Re: rename according to time, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: swap using pointers, pete, 08:17
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Army1987, 08:11
- Re: rename according to time, Army1987, 08:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Army1987, 08:05
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:05
- Re: rename according to time, Jensen Somers, 07:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, erfan, 07:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Mark Bluemel, 07:54
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, fnegroni, 07:54
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Joachim Schmitz, 07:53
- rename according to time, byte, 07:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 07:47
- Array of pointer and pointer of array, erfan, 07:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Army1987, 07:43
- Re: linked list question, pete, 07:41
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Army1987, 07:32
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Tobin, 07:26
- Re: pragma directive, Army1987, 07:19
- Re: pragma directive, santosh, 07:19
- Re: linked list question, pete, 07:18
- Re: pragma directive, Mark Bluemel, 07:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 07:14
- pragma directive, aleemakhtar1@xxxxxxxxx, 07:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 06:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 06:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 05:38
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Randy Howard, 05:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 05:31
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 05:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 04:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Richard Heathfield, 04:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Mark Bluemel, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:06
- Re: swap using pointers, santosh, 03:59
- Re: memory address of *char, Richard Bos, 03:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: [newbie] Not specifying the dynamic library?, santosh, 03:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 03:35
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark Bluemel, 03:32
- WATCH your favorate hero&HEROINES HERE, zyrva2007@xxxxxxxxx, 03:21
- read your favorate hero&HEROINE, zyrva2007@xxxxxxxxx, 03:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 03:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 03:10
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: memory address of *char, Martin Ambuhl, 02:38
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Ambuhl, 02:31
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 02:30
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Randy Howard, 02:29
- Re: memory address of *char, Richard Heathfield, 02:20
- Indians Earn Rs.250000 monthly. Easy form filling jobs(it really works), diwakar, 02:18
- Earning for reading SMS, diwakar, 02:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Richard Heathfield, 02:16
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 02:11
- memory address of *char, DDD, 02:08
- Re: time in threaded programs, Ian Collins, 01:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 01:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 01:47
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Paul Hsieh, 01:29
- Re: time in threaded programs, CBFalconer, 01:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 01:09
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,cheapnes price , good service, fashion-sky.com, 00:59
- Re: time in threaded programs, Keith Thompson, 00:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 00:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 00:19
- [newbie] Not specifying the dynamic library?, Gilles Ganault, 00:12
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Golding, 00:11
- swap using pointers, Zach, 00:09
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 00:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 00:06
January 27, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 23:57
- Re: time in threaded programs, Walter Roberson, 23:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 23:42
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Keith Thompson, 23:26
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 23:21
- time in threaded programs, JLeidel, 23:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 23:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 23:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 22:58
- Re: Storing data structure, CBFalconer, 22:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 22:45
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 22:42
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 22:36
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 22:34
- Re: why bar and foo, CBFalconer, 22:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:25
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 22:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 22:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 22:16
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 22:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 21:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 21:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 21:41
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 21:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 21:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 21:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 21:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 20:54
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Randy Howard, 20:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Old Wolf, 20:41
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 20:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, cr88192, 20:13
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, EventHelix.com, 20:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Bartc, 18:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:54
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kenny McCormack, 18:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 18:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 18:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 18:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 18:08
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 18:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 17:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 17:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 17:38
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 17:36
- Re: Storing data structure, cr88192, 17:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 17:29
- Re: CHAR_BIT < 8?, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 17:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 17:10
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 17:02
- Re: CHAR_BIT < 8?, santosh, 17:00
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 16:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- CHAR_BIT < 8?, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 16:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 16:44
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 16:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Flash Gordon, 16:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:18
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 16:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 15:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 15:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 15:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 15:34
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 15:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 15:10
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:58
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 14:52
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, henry, 14:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 14:44
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Coos Haak, 14:42
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 14:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:20
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 14:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 13:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 13:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, vippstar, 13:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:23
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Pierre Asselin, 13:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 12:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 12:53
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, santosh, 12:51
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 12:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 12:22
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark McIntyre, 12:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 12:09
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Flash Gordon, 11:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 11:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 11:34
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Flash Gordon, 11:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 11:24
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 11:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 10:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Eric Sosman, 10:56
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 10:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Willem, 10:51
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:49
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:42
- Thoughts on file organisation, David Mearsen, 10:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 10:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:24
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 10:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:18
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 10:00
- xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 09:31
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 09:17
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 09:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 09:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:58
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:51
- Re: memset, Army1987, 08:30
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Army1987, 08:28
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Army1987, 08:24
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 07:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Richard, 07:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 07:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 07:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 07:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 06:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:50
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:44
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:21
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:14
- Re: Storing data structure, Friedrich Dominicus, 05:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:10
- Re: Storing data structure, santosh, 05:09
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:08
- Re: Storing data structure, Malcolm McLean, 05:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 05:03
- Re: Storing data structure, Willem, 05:01
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:53
- Re: Storing data structure, Keith Thompson, 04:48
- Re: Storing data structure, Richard Heathfield, 04:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 04:38
- Re: Storing data structure, jacob navia, 04:36
- Re: Storing data structure, santosh, 04:31
- Storing data structure, TDB, 04:25
- www.fashion-sky.com wholesale cheap Nike Air Jordan shoes jean belt handbag coat watch mobile phones, fashion-sky . 003, 04:12
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Antoninus Twink, 03:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: why bar and foo, santosh, 03:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 03:21
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 03:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 03:12
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 02:48
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Martin Ambuhl, 02:44
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Kojak, 02:14
- Here is something crazy ... maybe., Morlaath, 01:44
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Gordon Burditt, 00:08
January 26, 2008
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 22:19
- Re: why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 22:15
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Hans Schneider, 22:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 22:09
- DOWNLOAD free games....., baminebritto, 21:50
- Re: Complex question, Thad Smith, 21:45
- Re: variable, Keith Thompson, 21:34
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, John J . Smith, 21:10
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:35
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:11
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, CBFalconer, 17:38
- Re: Is Chris Hills a pixe?, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: memset, Pedro Graca, 17:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 17:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 17:21
- Re: memset, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: memset, William Ahern, 16:38
- Re: memset, Jack Klein, 16:31
- Re: memset, Martin Ambuhl, 16:28
- Re: memset, Martin Vuille, 16:24
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 16:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 16:07
- memset, Gaijinco, 16:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ben Pfaff, 15:51
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 15:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 15:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 15:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 15:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 15:15
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Bartc, 15:12
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 15:02
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Joe Wright, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 14:52
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 14:50
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Ben Bacarisse, 14:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Malcolm McLean, 14:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 14:36
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Keith Thompson, 14:34
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 14:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:00
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Paul Hsieh, 13:58
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:41
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:40
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:36
- Re: Beyond doubt, Default Loser is a troll, Antoninus Twink, 13:34
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, santosh, 13:31
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Mark McIntyre, 12:49
- Re: Is whoever a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Mark McIntyre, 12:46
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 12:27
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 12:25
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 12:20
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Default User, 11:53
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 09:44
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Kaz Kylheku, 09:40
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 09:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 08:46
- Is Mark McIntyre a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Chris Hills, 08:33
- nayanthara nake out, sathish . suray, 08:29
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Michal Nazarewicz, 08:18
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 08:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:51
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Army1987, 07:38
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Army1987, 07:32
- Re: if and switch, Army1987, 07:27
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 07:20
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 07:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 06:58
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 06:37
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 06:33
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Bart C, 06:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Mark McIntyre, 06:26
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Mark McIntyre, 06:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Bacarisse, 06:24
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 06:24
- Re: safe version of sprintf, vippstar, 06:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, santosh, 05:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:50
- Re: GREP, Chris Hills, 05:46
- Is cbfalconer a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 05:38
- Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 05:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 05:22
- Is Chris Hills a gremlin?, Chris Hills, 05:21
- Is Chris Hills a pixe?, Chris Hills, 05:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Francine . Neary, 05:08
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 05:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Francine . Neary, 05:05
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 04:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 04:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 04:37
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, santosh, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 04:30
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 04:23
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, santosh, 04:02
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 03:44
- Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 02:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 02:36
- good new!nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 30USD,T-shirt = 12USD,Nokia N95=260USD.www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky . 003, 01:01
- Re: Complex question, Martin Ambuhl, 00:01
January 25, 2008
- Where do two linked lists merge?, Richard Harter, 23:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, user923005, 23:00
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 22:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 21:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:50
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:45
- Re: Complex question, Pierre Asselin, 20:31
- Re: if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 20:30
- Re: if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 20:29
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, SM Ryan, 20:27
- Re: if and switch, santosh, 20:24
- Re: why bar and foo, Peter Nilsson, 20:09
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Bacarisse, 20:02
- Re: why bar and foo, Ben Bacarisse, 19:52
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Peter Nilsson, 19:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:40
- Re: why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 19:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 19:10
- Re: why bar and foo, Kenji Neoh, 18:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 18:50
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 18:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 18:38
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 18:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 18:36
- Re: GREP, Keith Thompson, 18:19
- Re: if and switch, Eric Sosman, 18:17
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 18:13
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 18:12
- Re: if and switch, Default User, 18:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 17:59
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Flash Gordon, 17:55
- if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 17:51
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 17:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, CBFalconer, 17:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Default User, 17:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 17:24
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Walter Roberson, 17:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Keith Thompson, 17:12
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Pfaff, 17:12
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 17:12
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Ben Pfaff, 17:11
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Ben Pfaff, 17:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 17:03
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Richard Heathfield, 16:59
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Richard Tobin, 16:57
- Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 16:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 16:55
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 16:47
- How to declare structures that reference each other?, Andre, 16:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Randy Howard, 16:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 16:30
- Re: bit bashing, CBFalconer, 16:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, ymuntyan, 16:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 16:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:06
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Flash Gordon, 16:02
- Re: Complex question, Keith Thompson, 15:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a hobit?, CBFalconer, 15:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 15:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 15:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 14:56
- [OT] Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Army1987, 14:55
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 14:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 14:35
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 14:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 14:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 14:06
- Re: Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Nathan, 13:19
- Re: safe version of sprintf, SM Ryan, 13:13
- Re: The Way to Paradise, SM Ryan, 13:13
- Re: Complex question, Keith Thompson, 13:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 13:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Randy Howard, 12:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 12:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 12:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Randy Howard, 12:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:17
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 12:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Malcolm McLean, 12:02
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bart C, 12:02
- Re: bit bashing, Kaz Kylheku, 11:56
- [please ignore previous post] Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:55
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:48
- Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 11:36
- Is Chris Hills a hobit?, Chris Hills, 11:28
- Is Chris Hills a real person?, Chris Hills, 11:26
- Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 11:25
- Is Chris Hills a small furry animal?, Chris Hills, 11:23
- Re: Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Eric Sosman, 11:19
- Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 11:19
- Re: Complex question, Philip Potter, 11:18
- Re: why bar and foo, John Bode, 10:48
- Re: prototyping?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:43
- Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Nathan, 10:41
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:32
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 10:27
- Re: why bar and foo, Michal Nazarewicz, 10:17
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 10:05
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 10:01
- Multi-byte characters in C, was Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 09:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 09:40
- Re: prototyping?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:32
- Re: prototyping?, Mark Bluemel, 09:29
- Re: prototyping?, Richard Heathfield, 09:17
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Eric Sosman, 09:16
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 09:15
- Re: prototyping?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:40
- Re: prototyping?, Randy Howard, 08:38
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:34
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:29
- Re: bit bashing, Willem, 08:28
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:27
- Re: prototyping?, Ed Prochak, 08:18
- Re: prototyping?, Mark Bluemel, 08:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:08
- Find a man at www.SexDatingPoint.com, de_drummer, 08:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:04
- prototyping?, Zach, 08:01
- Re: why bar and foo, Nick Keighley, 07:56
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 07:52
- safe version of sprintf, Olaf, 07:48
- Re: why bar and foo, Remo D., 07:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:34
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Richard Tobin, 07:24
- Re: linked list question, Richard Tobin, 07:11
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, santosh, 07:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 07:02
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Ben Bacarisse, 07:01
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Tobin, 06:59
- Re: why bar and foo, Martien Verbruggen, 06:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:21
- Just Fun, kaki, 05:44
- Re: why bar and foo, Sjouke Burry, 05:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 05:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:30
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 05:28
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 05:21
- Re: linked list question, Ike Naar, 05:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:16
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:15
- Re: GREP, Chris Hills, 05:12
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Nick Keighley, 05:07
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 05:06
- Re: why bar and foo, Nick Keighley, 04:54
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 04:42
- Re: Complex question, Laurent Deniau, 04:41
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 04:41
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:32
- Re: bit bashing, Nick Keighley, 04:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Nick Keighley, 04:01
- Re: bit bashing, Randy Howard, 03:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 03:40
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Randy Howard, 03:37
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark Bluemel, 03:36
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.Mobile Phones Nokia .Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 03:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 03:30
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, santosh, 03:23
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, MisterE, 03:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 03:08
- Cheap Fashion Shoes & Clothing & Mobile Phones & Handbags Wholesale on www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky . 003, 03:08
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 02:39
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, A. Farber, 02:34
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 02:33
- Re: bit bashing, santosh, 02:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 02:05
- Re: bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 01:55
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Sjouke Burry, 01:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:33
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 01:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 01:20
- Method for intracardiac therapy using sensor for heart wall thickness, Barathi, 01:15
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, santosh, 01:13
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thad Smith, 00:40
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Richard Heathfield, 00:36
- progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, kotlakirankumar, 00:29
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 00:05
January 24, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 23:53
- Re: why bar and foo, Keith Thompson, 22:08
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 22:03
- Re: Complex question, Pierre Asselin, 21:11
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Peter Nilsson, 21:08
- why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 21:07
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Peter Nilsson, 20:55
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Gordon Burditt, 19:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 19:26
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 19:24
- Re: Complex question, Martin Ambuhl, 19:24
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Ben Bacarisse, 19:23
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 19:02
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Bart C, 18:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 18:22
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 18:06
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 18:05
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 17:56
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 17:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 17:27
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Malcolm McLean, 17:26
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 17:24
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Randy Howard, 17:21
- Re: bit bashing, Peter Nilsson, 17:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 17:11
- Printing a hex dump of a buffer, A. Farber, 17:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 17:08
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Fumeur, 17:08
- Complex question, jacob navia, 17:03
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:36
- Re: bit bashing, Kaz Kylheku, 16:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 16:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 16:01
- Re: void pointer, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 15:53
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 15:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:29
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, vippstar, 15:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 15:28
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Harald van Dijk, 15:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 15:19
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 15:18
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 15:13
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 15:13
- Re: linked list question, Ike Naar, 15:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 15:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 15:06
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 14:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 14:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 14:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:20
- Re: number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 13:44
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, qaiser . mohammad, 12:59
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 12:32
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Philip Potter, 12:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 12:18
- Clive Feather's Schildt review has moved, Richard Heathfield, 12:10
- Re: GREP, Willem, 12:08
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 12:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 12:03
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 11:41
- Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 11:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 11:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 11:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 10:55
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 10:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 10:47
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 10:43
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 10:40
- Re: void pointer, Army1987, 10:35
- Re: number of semicolons, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Philip Potter, 10:27
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 10:15
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 10:09
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Keith Thompson, 10:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 10:06
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 10:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Syren Baran, 09:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 09:47
- Re: void pointer, Mark Bluemel, 09:38
- Re: void pointer, Mark Bluemel, 09:36
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 09:18
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 09:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 08:53
- void pointer, harshal, 08:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 08:38
- Re: GREP, Willem, 08:27
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 08:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, vippstar, 08:06
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 08:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 07:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 07:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 07:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 07:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Willem, 07:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 07:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 07:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Tobin, 07:02
- Re: number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 07:00
- Re: number of semicolons, Malcolm McLean, 06:58
- number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 06:52
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 06:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 06:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 06:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 06:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 06:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:17
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thomas Troeger, 06:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 06:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Randy Howard, 06:03
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:00
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:58
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Richard Bos, 05:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:56
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Ben Bacarisse, 05:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 05:47
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, santosh, 05:44
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:41
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, polas, 05:36
- Re: bit bashing, Willem, 05:34
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 05:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:20
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 05:10
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 05:02
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 05:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thomas Troeger, 04:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:45
- Re: bit bashing, Ian Collins, 04:40
- Re: bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 04:32
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 04:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 04:09
- Re: bit bashing, jacob navia, 04:09
- The Way to Paradise, abdo911, 04:07
- Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Billy Bong, 04:05
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Thomas Troeger, 03:59
- bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 03:52
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 03:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 03:29
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 03:07
- Re: c basics, Richard Heathfield, 02:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 02:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 02:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 02:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:42
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 02:11
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 01:47
January 23, 2008
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Harter, 23:58
- Re: string compare, James Kuyper, 23:32
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Martin Ambuhl, 22:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 22:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 22:02
- Re: How do header files work?, Bill Reid, 21:57
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Randy Howard, 21:57
- Re: fread(), CBFalconer, 21:11
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 21:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:55
- Re: string compare, CBFalconer, 20:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: Alignment of a structure., William Ahern, 20:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 20:16
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 20:06
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), EventHelix.com, 20:05
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 20:03
- Re: Alignment of a structure., EventHelix.com, 20:02
- Re: General question about shared libraries on Solaris, Walter Roberson, 19:57
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Amandil, 19:30
- General question about shared libraries on Solaris, JNLSeb, 19:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Stephen Sprunk, 18:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 17:50
- Re: string compare, Army1987, 16:03
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 15:50
- Re: ansi c, Army1987, 15:48
- Re: c basics, Army1987, 15:33
- Re: fread(), dj3vande, 15:30
- Re: fread(), Army1987, 15:30
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, user923005, 15:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 15:26
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Pedro Graca, 15:13
- ▬►SEX Guide which Could Change your Life◄▬, C Pac, 15:13
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Walter Roberson, 15:07
- Re: fread(), santosh, 14:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:28
- Re: fread(), Malcolm McLean, 14:23
- Re: fread(), santosh, 14:23
- Re: ansi c, Martin Ambuhl, 14:12
- fread(), h03Ein, 14:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 14:08
- Re: ansi c, dj3vande, 14:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 13:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 13:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:37
- Re: ansi c, santosh, 13:37
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 13:35
- Re: linked list question, Flash Gordon, 13:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:28
- Re: c basics, Keith Thompson, 13:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 13:28
- Re: string compare, Flash Gordon, 13:24
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 13:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:17
- Re: ansi c, santosh, 13:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:11
- Re: ansi c, Rachael, 13:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:09
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Harald van Dijk, 13:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 12:59
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 12:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 12:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, jameskuyper, 12:39
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, jameskuyper, 12:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 12:33
- Re: ansi c, Philip Potter, 12:30
- Re: GREP, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: string question, Default User, 12:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 12:28
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: c basics, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Keith Thompson, 12:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:11
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Tobin, 12:06
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:58
- c basics, lawryy, 11:56
- Re: ansi c, Mark Bluemel, 11:44
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:40
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:37
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 11:31
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 11:29
- Re: ansi c, Jensen Somers, 11:11
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 11:08
- Re: ansi c, Mark Bluemel, 11:06
- Re: linked list question, dj3vande, 11:01
- ansi c, yqyq22, 11:00
- Re: ansi c, Richard Bos, 10:57
- Re: linked list question, Richard Bos, 10:43
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, joe4702, 10:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 10:15
- Re: GREP, Walter Roberson, 10:15
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Richard Tobin, 10:15
- Re: GREP, David Resnick, 10:13
- Re: GREP, Mark Bluemel, 10:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 10:07
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 10:07
- GREP, Rishi, 10:02
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Army1987, 09:24
- Re: string compare, David Resnick, 08:56
- Re: string compare, David Resnick, 08:48
- Alignment of a structure., Thomas Troeger, 08:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:41
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:39
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, santosh, 08:38
- New Jersey Pedophile Warning, Pedo . Watch . 2008, 08:33
- Re: string compare, Mark Bluemel, 08:14
- Re: string compare, James Kuyper, 08:08
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Richard Tobin, 08:01
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, James Kuyper, 08:01
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 07:58
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Spoon, 07:56
- Re: linked list question, James Kuyper, 07:55
- Re: linked list question, Benoît Vertut, 07:47
- Re: linked list question, Army1987, 07:11
- <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:10
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Richard Bos, 07:03
- Re: string compare, Mark Bluemel, 06:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Bart C, 06:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 06:27
- Re: string compare, Malcolm McLean, 06:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 06:18
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 06:03
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 06:02
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, santosh, 05:48
- Re: linked list question, guanjun, 05:36
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 05:28
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 05:25
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Mark Bluemel, 05:16
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Randy Howard, 05:07
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, santosh, 05:02
- ※Cheap AK APE CHL EVS ed hardy D&G DG BBC AF LRG POLO COACH lv ggg wallets Wholesale $29.99※, cheng, 04:58
- ************************, meetmanisamy, 04:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 04:48
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Philip Potter, 04:44
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, Mark Bluemel, 04:39
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, Spoon, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Joseph Huber, 04:04
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Martin Ambuhl, 03:56
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 03:38
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 03:33
- Re: linked list question, Flash Gordon, 03:32
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 03:32
- Re: string compare, jacob navia, 03:24
- Re: string compare, CBFalconer, 03:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 02:55
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 02:33
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Billy Bong, 02:17
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Keith Thompson, 02:15
- Re: string compare, yeti, 02:08
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Ian Collins, 01:53
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, santosh, 01:51
- Re: string compare, santosh, 01:48
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 01:42
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:18
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:16
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:13
- string compare, yeti, 00:42
- beginner qn..malloc, nodrogbrown, 00:08
January 22, 2008
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 23:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 23:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Old Wolf, 23:27
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 23:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 23:09
- Re: linked list question, James Kuyper, 22:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 22:34
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 22:21
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Jack Klein, 22:21
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Jack Klein, 22:01
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Bart C, 21:59
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, santosh, 21:47
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Willy Wijaya, 21:04
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., user923005, 20:55
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ben Bacarisse, 20:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Joe Wright, 20:15
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Pedro Graca, 20:02
- Re: linked list question, Peter Nilsson, 20:00
- Re: linked list question, christian.bau, 19:54
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., user923005, 19:42
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:37
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., vippstar, 19:36
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 19:30
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, user923005, 19:27
- Re: linked list question, Peter Nilsson, 19:26
- Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., JNLSeb, 19:20
- Re: Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, Kaz Kylheku, 19:16
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Flash Gordon, 19:11
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 18:52
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Randy Howard, 18:41
- Re: [OT] Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, Randy Howard, 18:36
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Walter Roberson, 18:31
- Re: linked list question, gw7rib, 18:24
- Where is the error in this code?, Erwin Lindemann, 18:19
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 18:19
- Re: variable, Army1987, 18:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: string question, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:48
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, vippstar, 17:47
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: linked list question, Ben Pfaff, 17:40
- Re: string question, Default User, 17:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 16:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:48
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 16:47
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 16:45
- Re: superseded by c++?, CBFalconer, 16:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 16:22
- Re: pointers to functions question, ram, 16:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 15:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 15:15
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 15:11
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, Syren Baran, 14:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 14:40
- Re: How do header files work?, Walter Roberson, 14:28
- Re: How do header files work?, santosh, 14:27
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 14:16
- How do header files work?, vijay, 14:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 13:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 13:41
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 13:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Harter, 13:26
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, pete142, 13:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:22
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, jameskuyper, 13:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:14
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, jameskuyper, 13:02
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 13:02
- C++ Sample Programs (Source Code), pmp, 12:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 12:20
- pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, pete142, 12:16
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), pmp, 12:16
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:08
- Re: const qualifier, jameskuyper, 12:04
- Re: string question, Default User, 11:47
- Make-Up For Color Contact Lenses - Expert Secrets, jeckychai, 11:14
- Make-Up For Color Contact Lenses - Expert Secrets, jeckychai, 11:14
- Re: variable, guanjun, 11:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 10:47
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 10:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 10:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 10:28
- Re: const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 10:25
- Re: const qualifier, James Kuyper, 10:05
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Nick Keighley, 10:02
- Re: using 32bit glibc/libgcc on a 64bit machine, Walter Roberson, 10:00
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Coos Haak, 09:52
- using 32bit glibc/libgcc on a 64bit machine, Morfys, 09:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 09:48
- Re: const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:33
- Re: const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:30
- Re: const qualifier, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:18
- Re: const qualifier, Malcolm McLean, 09:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 09:09
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Bart C, 09:07
- const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:02
- bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 09:00
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:00
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 08:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 08:59
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 08:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 08:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, christian.bau, 08:40
- Re: superseded by c++?, James Kuyper, 08:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 08:20
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:44
- earn by click here &&&&********&&&&&&, zraj82008, 07:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:38
- earn by click here &&&&********&&&&&&, zraj82008, 07:35
- come FOR ME, zraj82008, 07:34
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 07:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:17
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:10
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., christian.bau, 07:06
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 07:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 06:59
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 06:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 06:50
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:48
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Ben Bacarisse, 06:47
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 06:45
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 06:44
- Re: linked list question, Ravishankar S, 06:44
- Re: Three C questions, dontspam, 06:41
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Mark Bluemel, 06:36
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:35
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Pravin Paratey, 06:17
- Re: linked list question, santosh, 06:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 05:57
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., user923005, 05:52
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:49
- Re: linked list question, micans, 05:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 05:27
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 05:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Robert Latest, 05:20
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 05:19
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Wade Ward, 05:13
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.all models of nokia .Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, nike shoes, 05:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Robert Latest, 05:03
- Re: linked list question, micans, 04:55
- Re: linked list question, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:50
- Re: linked list question, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Heathfield, 04:33
- Re: linked list question, Ravishankar S, 03:49
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 03:33
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, borkhuis, 03:26
- folder parsing (newbie)problem, oswald . harry, 03:13
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 03:11
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 03:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Keith Thompson, 02:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Steffen Buehler, 02:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 02:32
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 02:24
- linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:19
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:16
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 01:40
- Electronic and Computer Science video courses, No login, No fee, AK444, 01:35
- Linux Kernel Source, Billy Bong, 01:19
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 01:13
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 01:08
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:56
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 00:53
- Re: string question, James Kuyper, 00:41
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Peter Nilsson, 00:40
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:32
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:24
- Re: Error while reading .pem file., David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: superseded by c++?, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:16
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 00:12
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Willy Wijaya, 00:03
January 21, 2008
- late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 23:47
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Thad Smith, 23:23
- Error: A referral was returned from the server, Shadow of Socrates, 23:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Randy Howard, 23:14
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Randy Howard, 23:10
- [C#] How to measure the time of your code's execution, Shadow of Socrates, 22:52
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 22:13
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:57
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 21:28
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Peter Nilsson, 20:55
- Re: Keyboard handling in C, CBFalconer, 20:47
- Re: Function Pointers, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 20:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:27
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 19:35
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 19:33
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 19:29
- Re: string question, Default User, 19:29
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 19:27
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Peter Nilsson, 19:11
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 18:59
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 18:46
- [OT] Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, CBFalconer, 18:41
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 18:30
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 18:28
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 18:21
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Antoninus Twink, 18:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Harter, 18:20
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 18:19
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, jacob navia, 18:03
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 17:56
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Pierre Asselin, 17:49
- Re: Function Pointers, Army1987, 17:37
- Re: Keyboard handling in C, user923005, 17:34
- Re: Function Pointers, dj3vande, 17:34
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 17:29
- Keyboard handling in C, anon856525, 17:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 17:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 17:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 17:13
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 17:10
- Re: parsing directory, user923005, 17:09
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 17:06
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 16:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 15:56
- Re: parsing directory, Flash Gordon, 15:51
- Re: Three C questions, Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 15:32
- Re: Function Pointers, gw7rib, 15:24
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Kaz Kylheku, 15:07
- Re: return string from datalayer, psion, 15:07
- Re: Function Pointers, Flash Gordon, 15:05
- Re: return string from datalayer, Martin Ambuhl, 14:56
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 14:25
- Re: return string from datalayer, Wolfgang Draxinger, 14:25
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 14:25
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 14:20
- Re: return string from datalayer, Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:06
- return string from datalayer, psion, 14:01
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 13:28
- Re: string question, Default User, 13:26
- Re: parsing directory, oswald . harry, 13:17
- Re: main() in C90, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:31
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: variable, Chris Dollin, 12:28
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Chris Dollin, 12:19
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 12:17
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 12:03
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 11:28
- Re: parsing directory, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
- Re: parsing directory, Malcolm McLean, 11:19
- Re: parsing directory, Mark Bluemel, 11:16
- Re: parsing directory, Mark Bluemel, 11:14
- Re: parsing directory, Jensen Somers, 11:14
- parsing directory, oswald . harry, 10:55
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Malcolm McLean, 10:53
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 10:49
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Bos, 09:39
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Fumeur, 09:37
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Joachim Schmitz, 09:25
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Mark Bluemel, 09:13
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Richard Tobin, 09:05
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:04
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jacob navia, 09:04
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 09:00
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, jacob navia, 08:54
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 08:50
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), jacob navia, 08:48
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Kenny McCormack, 07:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:21
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 06:37
- Re: quick sort, Ben Bacarisse, 06:32
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Joachim Schmitz, 06:23
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Bos, 06:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:57
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Ravishankar S, 05:54
- Re: quick sort, Richard Bos, 05:51
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 05:50
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 05:45
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), jacob navia, 05:37
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Jensen Somers, 05:37
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard, 05:29
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Bos, 05:21
- Re: Function Pointers, Nick Keighley, 05:20
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 05:05
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 05:03
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Vimal Aravindashan, 05:02
- Re: Function Pointers, Vimal Aravindashan, 04:51
- error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 04:48
- Re: Three C questions, Joachim Schmitz, 04:06
- Re: Three C questions, CJ, 03:59
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Richard Heathfield, 03:53
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 03:50
- Re: Three C questions, Flash Gordon, 03:41
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Martin Ambuhl, 03:24
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Kaz Kylheku, 03:15
- Get $5us if you regiter on housinghouse.com, tony, 02:43
- Re: Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:40
- Re: Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, santosh, 02:37
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Randy Howard, 02:31
- Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, flexiatmega8, 02:24
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Joachim Schmitz, 02:14
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Randy Howard, 02:12
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Martien Verbruggen, 02:02
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, friendfish, 01:50
- Re: Function Pointers, Wang Jiaji, 01:25
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 01:21
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), William Ahern, 01:15
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 00:36
January 20, 2008
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, CBFalconer, 22:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 22:45
- About Kerala, Jayu, 21:57
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:47
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:32
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, CBFalconer, 21:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:23
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:23
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Stephen Sprunk, 21:04
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 20:49
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Tobin, 20:36
- Re: string question, vippstar, 20:35
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 20:29
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 20:27
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 20:26
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, vippstar, 20:19
- Is this program standard conform?, Fumeur, 20:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 20:04
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 20:00
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:41
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Kenny McCormack, 19:40
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 19:35
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:23
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 19:19
- Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:10
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 18:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: Three C questions, Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Antoninus Twink, 18:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 18:27
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CJ, 18:15
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 18:15
- setlocale, LC_MONETARY, ISO-4217, remi.chateauneu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bill Reid, 17:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:48
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:45
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Upload-Service for young programmers, emptemp, 17:35
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 17:32
- Re: main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 17:27
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 17:25
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- string question, Bill Cunningham, 17:07
- Re: fflush and stdin, Randy Howard, 16:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Philip Potter, 16:25
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 15:51
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 15:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Martien Verbruggen, 15:40
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Gordon Burditt, 15:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 15:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 15:06
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Gordon Burditt, 14:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 14:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 14:18
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 14:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: main() in C90, Chris Hills, 14:04
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:14
Privacy Policy