comp.lang.c (date)
January 31, 2008
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, santosh, 03:16
- Type conversion, manik, 03:15
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Ian Collins, 03:00
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:51
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:43
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Joachim Schmitz, 02:40
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:33
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:28
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, DDD, 02:10
- www.shopbb.com from china Wholesale Footwear, Apparel,Bag,NFL Jersey,,mobile phones,shop.Best Service,Best Pruce,Best Items, shopbb.com, 01:52
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, DDD, 01:47
- Re: declaration of variable in for loop, Walter Roberson, 01:41
- declaration of variable in for loop, poornimamprabhu, 01:25
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), Keith Thompson, 00:54
January 30, 2008
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 23:23
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Jack Klein, 23:21
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 23:15
- Re: Strange C operator, Walter Roberson, 22:56
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 22:50
- Re: Strange C operator, email7373388, 22:43
- Re: Getting user input in Linux?, Walter Roberson, 22:42
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Roman Mashak, 22:40
- Getting user input in Linux?, Zach, 22:17
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, Walter Roberson, 22:10
- Re: conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, santosh, 21:58
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 21:24
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), CBFalconer, 21:17
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, CBFalconer, 21:11
- Re: Linking library, CBFalconer, 21:05
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Morris Dovey, 20:40
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 20:38
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Randy Howard, 20:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 20:03
- conversion ELF -> .EXE windows, christophe . 4 . news, 19:56
- Re: Strange C operator, Keith Thompson, 19:38
- comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Roman Mashak, 19:29
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Joe Wright, 19:19
- assigning pointer to NULL, Roman Mashak, 19:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 19:05
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 18:50
- Re: Strange C operator, Richard Tobin, 18:42
- Re: string compare, jameskuyper, 18:32
- Re: Strange C operator, Eric Sosman, 18:30
- Re: Strange C operator, Richard Tobin, 18:20
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 17:43
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Peter Nilsson, 16:17
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Eric Sosman, 16:15
- Re: Need info on "Safe C library", Army1987, 16:14
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, user923005, 16:11
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, dj3vande, 16:10
- Re: Strange C operator, Eric Sosman, 16:05
- Re: comparison function for qsort() question, Walter Roberson, 16:01
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Army1987, 15:55
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:50
- comparison function for qsort() question, David Mathog, 15:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:43
- Re: Strange C operator, Walter Roberson, 15:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:28
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Malcolm McLean, 15:25
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Strange C operator, email7373388, 15:18
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 15:15
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 15:04
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 14:55
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Flash Gordon, 14:42
- Re: scanf and ampersand, vlsidesign, 14:37
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, KKL, 14:34
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 14:29
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 14:13
- Re: Casting Function Pointers, Lew Pitcher, 14:06
- Casting Function Pointers, KKL, 13:57
- Re: time in threaded programs, Keith Thompson, 13:55
- Re: Question on while(!feof(fp)), Robert Gamble, 13:46
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Chris Dollin, 13:41
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ymuntyan, 13:40
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Chris Dollin, 13:38
- Question on while(!feof(fp)), Willem, 13:27
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, David Tiktin, 13:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Ed Jensen, 13:24
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, karthikbalaguru, 13:19
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, ymuntyan, 13:11
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Bartc, 13:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 13:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 12:56
- Re: Need info on "Safe C library", Keith Thompson, 12:48
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Eric Sosman, 12:44
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Ambuhl, 12:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 12:30
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 12:28
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, dj3vande, 12:25
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Kenny McCormack, 12:12
- Re: Linking library, santosh, 12:04
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 12:02
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, dj3vande, 11:44
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Paul Hsieh, 11:35
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 11:13
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 10:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 10:49
- Re: why bar and foo, dj3vande, 10:45
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Eric Sosman, 10:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:41
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 10:35
- Re: rename according to time, stmilam, 10:33
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, GRain, 10:30
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Kenneth Brody, 10:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Morris Dovey, 10:21
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:20
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kenneth Brody, 10:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:14
- Re: What happens to this memory, Kenneth Brody, 10:13
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Mark Bluemel, 10:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:09
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kenneth Brody, 10:07
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, vippstar, 10:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 10:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 09:55
- Need info on "Safe C library", Erwin Lindemann, 09:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:51
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Mark Bluemel, 09:45
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Tobin, 09:41
- Re: time in threaded programs, Joachim Schmitz, 09:41
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Morris Dovey, 09:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 09:34
- Function with unspecified number of arguments, somenath, 09:34
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:31
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Morris Dovey, 09:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Bos, 09:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Bos, 09:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:16
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, vippstar, 08:53
- Re: Function with unspecified number of arguments, Morris Dovey, 08:46
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Randy Howard, 08:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 08:38
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, vippstar, 08:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Tobin, 07:52
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Bos, 07:32
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 07:32
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, John Bode, 07:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Bos, 07:29
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 06:44
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 06:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:43
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 06:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:41
- Re: Linking library, Wolfgang Draxinger, 05:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:28
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, fnegroni, 05:21
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Malcolm McLean, 05:17
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Malcolm McLean, 05:13
- Re: Linking library, Erfan, 04:54
- Re: gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 04:40
- gcc compiling for profiler question, Boltar, 04:30
- Re: Linking library, Mark Bluemel, 04:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 04:27
- Linking library, Erfan, 04:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 04:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 04:11
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:04
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Richard Bos, 04:01
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, santosh, 03:57
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Richard Bos, 03:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, Mark Bluemel, 03:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 03:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 03:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 03:28
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Ian Collins, 03:11
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, h03Ein, 02:59
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQ, question 4.8, Ian Collins, 02:43
- Re: assigning pointer to NULL, Ian Collins, 02:38
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 02:13
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., santosh, 01:45
- www.fashion-sky.com good new!nike shoes =28USD,LV bags = 25USD,Jeans = 25USD,Coat = 30USD,T-shirt = 12USD,Nokia N95=260USD, ng, 01:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:33
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 01:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:39
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:07
January 29, 2008
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, oswald . harry, 23:40
- How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, grbgooglefan, 23:19
- How to call function whose function call with arguments is in a string Options, grbgooglefan, 23:19
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Stan Milam, 22:47
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Keith Thompson, 22:32
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Keith Thompson, 22:26
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Pfaff, 22:15
- Re: why bar and foo, Ian Collins, 21:25
- Re: why bar and foo, Martin Golding, 21:21
- Telenet nieuwsgroepen mededeling: nieuwsserver adres aanpassen/Attention: modification de l'adresse du serveur de newsgroup, info, 21:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 20:11
- va_list undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 20:01
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 19:29
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 19:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 19:11
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CBFalconer, 19:07
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, CBFalconer, 18:58
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, David Tiktin, 18:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 18:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 18:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 18:50
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., CBFalconer, 18:49
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:45
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., CBFalconer, 18:42
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 18:41
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 18:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 18:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:30
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Martien Verbruggen, 18:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:23
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, John Bode, 18:22
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Richard Tobin, 18:20
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 18:19
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 18:18
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Antoninus Twink, 18:14
- Re: What happens to this memory, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Mark McIntyre, 18:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:56
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Walter Roberson, 17:56
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 17:52
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: memset, CBFalconer, 17:39
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 17:38
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, William Pursell, 17:37
- -►5 Magical Herbs to Improve Your Life◄-, C Pac, 17:32
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 17:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 17:25
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kenny McCormack, 17:19
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:17
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Ben Pfaff, 17:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 17:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:04
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kenneth Brody, 16:52
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, ediebur, 16:52
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 16:50
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 16:40
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Harald van Dijk, 16:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 16:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Jack Klein, 16:35
- Re: What happens to this memory, Jack Klein, 16:32
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Walter Roberson, 16:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 16:24
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 16:24
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 16:12
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Malcolm McLean, 16:06
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 16:03
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, jacob navia, 15:56
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Harald van Dijk, 15:55
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 15:44
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Kaz Kylheku, 15:41
- [OT] Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 15:12
- Re: Prepend name to function names?, Ben Pfaff, 15:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:06
- Prepend name to function names?, dspfun, 15:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 14:58
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 14:52
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, santosh, 14:51
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, user923005, 14:50
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, santosh, 14:48
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, vippstar, 14:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 14:43
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 14:40
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, Martin Ambuhl, 14:37
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, mach7sonic, 14:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 14:29
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 14:27
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Leonardo Korndorfer, 14:27
- Re: Executing and Monitoring External Programs, vippstar, 14:26
- Executing and Monitoring External Programs, mach7sonic, 14:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 14:16
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 13:55
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, Walter Roberson, 13:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 13:45
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, santosh, 13:45
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Kenny McCormack, 13:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 13:23
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 13:22
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Keith Thompson, 13:13
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 13:10
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 13:09
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:02
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Tobin, 13:01
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, William Ahern, 13:00
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 12:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Serve Laurijssen, 12:24
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 12:09
- Re: putting values into array-newbie doubt, vippstar, 12:08
- putting values into array-newbie doubt, oswald . harry, 12:00
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 11:58
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 11:57
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Eric Sosman, 11:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 11:43
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Default User, 11:42
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Tobin, 11:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 11:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 11:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Kenneth Brody, 11:09
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Walter Roberson, 10:56
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Philip Potter, 10:43
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 10:41
- Re: memset, Army1987, 10:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 10:27
- Re: memset, Spoon, 10:23
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 10:19
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 09:55
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Philip Potter, 09:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 09:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 09:14
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Ido Yehieli, 08:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:35
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 08:31
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Mark McIntyre, 08:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 08:10
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Bartc, 08:09
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Malcolm McLean, 08:07
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 07:49
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, santosh, 07:46
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Bos, 07:45
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 07:42
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, vippstar, 07:38
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, santosh, 07:37
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, cr88192, 07:31
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, CJ, 07:29
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, vippstar, 07:26
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Richard Tobin, 07:12
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Malcolm McLean, 06:54
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Mark McIntyre, 06:49
- A solution for the allocation failures problem, jacob navia, 06:47
- Re: What is the yadda, Mark McIntyre, 06:44
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Richard Tobin, 06:38
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Richard Tobin, 06:35
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:32
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, cr88192, 06:06
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 05:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 05:43
- Re: A solution for the allocation failures problem, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:14
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 05:09
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 05:06
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 05:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 04:58
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:55
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:54
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.Apple Ipods Nano,Mobile Phones Nokia . Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 04:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 04:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 04:23
- Re: Copy memory (array), Willem, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 03:59
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Nick Keighley, 03:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 03:54
- Re: scanf and ampersand, santosh, 03:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:34
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 03:34
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., santosh, 03:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 03:25
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 03:24
- Re: memset, Richard Heathfield, 03:23
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:20
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Richard Bos, 03:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 03:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Richard Bos, 02:47
- Re: How Do You Pronounce char?, Joakim Hove, 02:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:38
- How Do You Pronounce char?, Billy Bong, 02:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:24
- Re: memset, Billy Bong, 02:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 02:12
- Re: What happens to this memory, Joakim Hove, 00:59
- Re: What happens to this memory, Walter Roberson, 00:56
- What happens to this memory, Joakim Hove, 00:50
January 28, 2008
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 23:39
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:33
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 23:32
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 23:16
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 23:11
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 23:03
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Jack Klein, 22:35
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Jack Klein, 22:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Syren Baran, 21:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:57
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., user923005, 20:46
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 20:29
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Richard, 20:24
- WATCH your favorate hero&HEROINES HERE, narraswarna8@xxxxxxxxx, 20:22
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 20:14
- Re: Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., Ben Pfaff, 20:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 20:09
- Fopen to create a file in a sub-folder (such as "Mygoal")., VijaKhara, 20:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 19:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 19:42
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 19:36
- Re: Copy memory (array), SM Ryan, 19:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 19:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 19:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 18:53
- Re: Copy memory (array), VijaKhara, 18:50
- Re: scanf and ampersand, user923005, 18:49
- scanf and ampersand, vlsidesign, 18:43
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 18:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 18:38
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Default User, 18:35
- Re: xmalloc string functions, ymuntyan, 18:30
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Michal Nazarewicz, 18:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, dj3vande, 18:22
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 18:17
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, pete, 17:54
- Re: time in threaded programs, CBFalconer, 17:29
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:26
- Re: What is the Quraan?, Ivar Rosquist, 17:25
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 17:16
- What is the Quraan?, ياهادي أهدنا وأهدي بنا (أم نادر), 17:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:14
- Re: why bar and foo, Charles Richmond, 17:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 17:05
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 16:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 16:50
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 16:49
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Mark McIntyre, 16:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: memset, dj3vande, 16:09
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 16:06
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 16:00
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 15:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Tim Streater, 15:58
- Re: memory address of *char, Martin Ambuhl, 15:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Martin Ambuhl, 15:55
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Tim Streater, 15:52
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Flash Gordon, 15:51
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 15:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 15:02
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Army1987, 15:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 14:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, christian.bau, 14:18
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Eric Sosman, 14:14
- Re: Why do signals exist?, santosh, 14:10
- [OT] Re: why bar and foo, ais523, 14:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:08
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Paul Hsieh, 13:58
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:55
- Re: Copy memory (array), santosh, 13:54
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:48
- Re: Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:46
- Re: Copy memory (array), Ben Bacarisse, 13:44
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 13:40
- Re: Copy memory (array), Eric Sosman, 13:39
- Re: Why do signals exist?, santosh, 13:37
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Eric Sosman, 13:34
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 13:30
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 13:29
- Re: Why do signals exist?, Walter Roberson, 13:25
- Copy memory (array), VijaKhara, 13:22
- Why do signals exist?, vippstar, 13:09
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 13:00
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard, 12:59
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Bacarisse, 12:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 12:37
- Re: why bar and foo, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: swap using pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:22
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 12:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, dj3vande, 12:11
- Re: rename according to time, Geoff, 12:01
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Antoninus Twink, 11:41
- Re: tutorials about c and c++, Richard Heathfield, 11:33
- Re: why bar and foo, dj3vande, 11:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 11:26
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:25
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 11:19
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 11:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 11:12
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:11
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Jensen Somers, 11:08
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Al Balmer, 10:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ben Bacarisse, 10:54
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Kenneth Brody, 10:50
- Re: memory address of *char, ppi, 10:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:47
- Re: rename according to time, Bill Reid, 10:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:43
- Re: why bar and foo, Eugene A. Pallat, 10:36
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 10:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:27
- Re: string compare, James Antill, 10:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 10:21
- Re: rename according to time, Joachim Schmitz, 10:20
- tutorials about c and c++, blog . martani, 10:18
- Re: rename according to time, Philip Potter, 10:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:36
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:33
- Re: pragma directive, Ravishankar S, 09:07
- Re: rename according to time, Joachim Schmitz, 09:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 08:56
- Re: rename according to time, Jensen Somers, 08:54
- Re: Not specifying the dynamic library?, vippstar, 08:45
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 08:43
- Re: rename according to time, vippstar, 08:42
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:39
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:33
- Re: rename according to time, erfan, 08:30
- Re: rename according to time, Richard Heathfield, 08:23
- Re: swap using pointers, pete, 08:17
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Army1987, 08:11
- Re: rename according to time, Army1987, 08:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Army1987, 08:05
- Re: rename according to time, Mark Bluemel, 08:05
- Re: rename according to time, Jensen Somers, 07:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, erfan, 07:57
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Mark Bluemel, 07:54
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, fnegroni, 07:54
- Re: Array of pointer and pointer of array, Joachim Schmitz, 07:53
- rename according to time, byte, 07:48
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 07:47
- Array of pointer and pointer of array, erfan, 07:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Army1987, 07:43
- Re: linked list question, pete, 07:41
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Army1987, 07:32
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Tobin, 07:26
- Re: pragma directive, Army1987, 07:19
- Re: pragma directive, santosh, 07:19
- Re: linked list question, pete, 07:18
- Re: pragma directive, Mark Bluemel, 07:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 07:14
- pragma directive, aleemakhtar1@xxxxxxxxx, 07:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, pete, 06:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 06:19
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 06:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Richard Heathfield, 05:38
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Randy Howard, 05:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 05:31
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 05:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 04:30
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 04:21
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Richard Heathfield, 04:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Mark Bluemel, 04:15
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:06
- Re: swap using pointers, santosh, 03:59
- Re: memory address of *char, Richard Bos, 03:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: [newbie] Not specifying the dynamic library?, santosh, 03:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 03:35
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark Bluemel, 03:32
- WATCH your favorate hero&HEROINES HERE, zyrva2007@xxxxxxxxx, 03:21
- read your favorate hero&HEROINE, zyrva2007@xxxxxxxxx, 03:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 03:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 03:10
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: memory address of *char, Martin Ambuhl, 02:38
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Ambuhl, 02:31
- Re: time in threaded programs, Randy Howard, 02:30
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Randy Howard, 02:29
- Re: memory address of *char, Richard Heathfield, 02:20
- Indians Earn Rs.250000 monthly. Easy form filling jobs(it really works), diwakar, 02:18
- Earning for reading SMS, diwakar, 02:18
- Re: swap using pointers, Richard Heathfield, 02:16
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 02:11
- memory address of *char, DDD, 02:08
- Re: time in threaded programs, Ian Collins, 01:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 01:53
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 01:47
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Paul Hsieh, 01:29
- Re: time in threaded programs, CBFalconer, 01:14
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 01:09
- www.shopbb.com from china shop,cheapnes price , good service, fashion-sky.com, 00:59
- Re: time in threaded programs, Keith Thompson, 00:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 00:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 00:19
- [newbie] Not specifying the dynamic library?, Gilles Ganault, 00:12
- Re: time in threaded programs, Martin Golding, 00:11
- swap using pointers, Zach, 00:09
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 00:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 00:06
January 27, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 23:57
- Re: time in threaded programs, Walter Roberson, 23:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 23:42
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Keith Thompson, 23:26
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 23:21
- time in threaded programs, JLeidel, 23:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 23:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 23:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), David Thompson, 23:12
- Re: xmalloc string functions, CBFalconer, 22:58
- Re: Storing data structure, CBFalconer, 22:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 22:45
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 22:42
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 22:36
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 22:34
- Re: why bar and foo, CBFalconer, 22:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:25
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 22:20
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 22:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 22:16
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 22:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 22:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 21:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:43
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 21:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 21:41
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 21:40
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 21:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 21:29
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 21:28
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 20:54
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Keith Thompson, 20:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Randy Howard, 20:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Old Wolf, 20:41
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 20:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, cr88192, 20:13
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, EventHelix.com, 20:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Bartc, 18:57
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:56
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:54
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 18:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kenny McCormack, 18:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 18:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 18:31
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Randy Howard, 18:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 18:08
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 18:03
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 17:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 17:47
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 17:38
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 17:36
- Re: Storing data structure, cr88192, 17:33
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 17:29
- Re: CHAR_BIT < 8?, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- Re: xmalloc string functions, William Ahern, 17:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 17:10
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 17:02
- Re: CHAR_BIT < 8?, santosh, 17:00
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Ian Collins, 16:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- CHAR_BIT < 8?, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 16:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 16:44
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 16:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Flash Gordon, 16:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:18
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 16:07
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 15:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, cr88192, 15:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 15:37
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Yevgen Muntyan, 15:34
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 15:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 15:10
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:58
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Ian Collins, 14:52
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, henry, 14:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 14:44
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Coos Haak, 14:42
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 14:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:20
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bartc, 14:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 13:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 13:44
- Re: xmalloc string functions, vippstar, 13:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:23
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Pierre Asselin, 13:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 12:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 12:53
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, santosh, 12:51
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:28
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Malcolm McLean, 12:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 12:22
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark McIntyre, 12:12
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, fnegroni, 12:09
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Flash Gordon, 11:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 11:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 11:34
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Flash Gordon, 11:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 11:24
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 11:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 10:59
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Eric Sosman, 10:56
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, santosh, 10:55
- Re: Thoughts on file organisation, Willem, 10:51
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:49
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 10:42
- Thoughts on file organisation, David Mearsen, 10:38
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 10:27
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Eric Sosman, 10:24
- Re: xmalloc string functions, santosh, 10:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 10:18
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 10:00
- xmalloc string functions, Malcolm McLean, 09:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Harald van Dijk, 09:31
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 09:17
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 09:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 09:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:58
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 08:51
- Re: memset, Army1987, 08:30
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Army1987, 08:28
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Army1987, 08:24
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 07:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Richard, 07:51
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 07:48
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 07:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 07:05
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:48
- Re: xmalloc string functions, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 06:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:50
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:44
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:21
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:14
- Re: Storing data structure, Friedrich Dominicus, 05:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:10
- Re: Storing data structure, santosh, 05:09
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:08
- Re: Storing data structure, Malcolm McLean, 05:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 05:03
- Re: Storing data structure, Willem, 05:01
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:53
- Re: Storing data structure, Keith Thompson, 04:48
- Re: Storing data structure, Richard Heathfield, 04:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 04:38
- Re: Storing data structure, jacob navia, 04:36
- Re: Storing data structure, santosh, 04:31
- Storing data structure, TDB, 04:25
- www.fashion-sky.com wholesale cheap Nike Air Jordan shoes jean belt handbag coat watch mobile phones, fashion-sky . 003, 04:12
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 04:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Antoninus Twink, 03:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: why bar and foo, santosh, 03:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 03:21
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 03:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 03:12
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 02:48
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Martin Ambuhl, 02:44
- Re: Here is something crazy ... maybe., Kojak, 02:14
- Here is something crazy ... maybe., Morlaath, 01:44
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Gordon Burditt, 00:08
January 26, 2008
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 22:19
- Re: why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 22:15
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Hans Schneider, 22:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 22:09
- DOWNLOAD free games....., baminebritto, 21:50
- Re: Complex question, Thad Smith, 21:45
- Re: variable, Keith Thompson, 21:34
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, John J . Smith, 21:10
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Andrey Tarasevich, 19:35
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:11
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, CBFalconer, 17:38
- Re: Is Chris Hills a pixe?, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: memset, Pedro Graca, 17:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 17:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: memset, Eric Sosman, 17:21
- Re: memset, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: memset, William Ahern, 16:38
- Re: memset, Jack Klein, 16:31
- Re: memset, Martin Ambuhl, 16:28
- Re: memset, Martin Vuille, 16:24
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 16:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 16:07
- memset, Gaijinco, 16:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ben Pfaff, 15:51
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 15:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 15:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 15:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 15:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 15:15
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Bartc, 15:12
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 15:02
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Joe Wright, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 14:52
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 14:50
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Ben Bacarisse, 14:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Malcolm McLean, 14:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 14:36
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Keith Thompson, 14:34
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 14:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:00
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Paul Hsieh, 13:58
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:41
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:40
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:36
- Re: Beyond doubt, Default Loser is a troll, Antoninus Twink, 13:34
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, santosh, 13:31
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 13:01
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Mark McIntyre, 12:49
- Re: Is whoever a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Mark McIntyre, 12:46
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 12:27
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 12:25
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 12:20
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Default User, 11:53
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 09:44
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Kaz Kylheku, 09:40
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 09:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 08:46
- Is Mark McIntyre a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Chris Hills, 08:33
- nayanthara nake out, sathish . suray, 08:29
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Michal Nazarewicz, 08:18
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 08:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:51
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Army1987, 07:38
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Army1987, 07:32
- Re: if and switch, Army1987, 07:27
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Army1987, 07:20
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 07:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 06:58
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 06:37
- Re: Yet another User Input Question, Richard Heathfield, 06:33
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Bart C, 06:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll? - apparently he is determined to demonstrate that he is, Mark McIntyre, 06:26
- Re: Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Mark McIntyre, 06:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Bacarisse, 06:24
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 06:24
- Re: safe version of sprintf, vippstar, 06:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, santosh, 05:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:50
- Re: GREP, Chris Hills, 05:46
- Is cbfalconer a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 05:38
- Is Mark McIntyre a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 05:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 05:22
- Is Chris Hills a gremlin?, Chris Hills, 05:21
- Is Chris Hills a pixe?, Chris Hills, 05:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Francine . Neary, 05:08
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 05:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Francine . Neary, 05:05
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Malcolm McLean, 04:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 04:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 04:37
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, santosh, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 04:30
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 04:23
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, santosh, 04:02
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 03:44
- Yet another User Input Question, Tarique, 02:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 02:36
- Re: Complex question, Martin Ambuhl, 00:01
January 25, 2008
- Where do two linked lists merge?, Richard Harter, 23:59
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, user923005, 23:00
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 22:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 21:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:50
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:45
- Re: Complex question, Pierre Asselin, 20:31
- Re: if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 20:30
- Re: if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 20:29
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, SM Ryan, 20:27
- Re: if and switch, santosh, 20:24
- Re: why bar and foo, Peter Nilsson, 20:09
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Bacarisse, 20:02
- Re: why bar and foo, Ben Bacarisse, 19:52
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Peter Nilsson, 19:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:40
- Re: why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 19:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 19:10
- Re: why bar and foo, Kenji Neoh, 18:54
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 18:50
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 18:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 18:38
- Re: why bar and foo, Mark McIntyre, 18:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 18:36
- Re: GREP, Keith Thompson, 18:19
- Re: if and switch, Eric Sosman, 18:17
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 18:13
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 18:12
- Re: if and switch, Default User, 18:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 17:59
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Flash Gordon, 17:55
- if and switch, Bill Cunningham, 17:51
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 17:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, CBFalconer, 17:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Default User, 17:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 17:24
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Walter Roberson, 17:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Keith Thompson, 17:12
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Ben Pfaff, 17:12
- Re: Putting logical limitations on types, Eric Sosman, 17:12
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Ben Pfaff, 17:11
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Ben Pfaff, 17:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 17:03
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Richard Heathfield, 16:59
- Re: How to declare structures that reference each other?, Richard Tobin, 16:57
- Putting logical limitations on types, Ido Yehieli, 16:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 16:55
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, CBFalconer, 16:47
- How to declare structures that reference each other?, Andre, 16:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Randy Howard, 16:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 16:30
- Re: bit bashing, CBFalconer, 16:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, ymuntyan, 16:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 16:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:06
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Flash Gordon, 16:02
- Re: Complex question, Keith Thompson, 15:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a hobit?, CBFalconer, 15:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 15:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 15:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 15:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 14:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 14:56
- [OT] Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Army1987, 14:55
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 14:37
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, lawrence . jones, 14:35
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 14:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 14:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills an elf?, Richard Heathfield, 14:06
- Re: Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Nathan, 13:19
- Re: safe version of sprintf, SM Ryan, 13:13
- Re: The Way to Paradise, SM Ryan, 13:13
- Re: Complex question, Keith Thompson, 13:08
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 13:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 12:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Randy Howard, 12:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 12:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 12:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a god?, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Randy Howard, 12:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:17
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 12:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Malcolm McLean, 12:02
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Bart C, 12:02
- Re: bit bashing, Kaz Kylheku, 11:56
- [please ignore previous post] Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:55
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:48
- Is Chris Hills an elf?, Chris Hills, 11:36
- Is Chris Hills a hobit?, Chris Hills, 11:28
- Is Chris Hills a real person?, Chris Hills, 11:26
- Is Chris Hills the next pope ?, Chris Hills, 11:25
- Is Chris Hills a small furry animal?, Chris Hills, 11:23
- Re: Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Eric Sosman, 11:19
- Is Chris Hills a god?, Chris Hills, 11:19
- Re: Complex question, Philip Potter, 11:18
- Re: why bar and foo, John Bode, 10:48
- Re: prototyping?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:43
- Eclipse tags/cscope support (other solutions welcome), Nathan, 10:41
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:32
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 10:27
- Re: why bar and foo, Michal Nazarewicz, 10:17
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 10:05
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 10:01
- Multi-byte characters in C, was Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 09:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 09:40
- Re: prototyping?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:32
- Re: prototyping?, Mark Bluemel, 09:29
- Re: prototyping?, Richard Heathfield, 09:17
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Eric Sosman, 09:16
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 09:15
- Re: prototyping?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:40
- Re: prototyping?, Randy Howard, 08:38
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:34
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:29
- Re: bit bashing, Willem, 08:28
- Re: prototyping?, Zach, 08:27
- Re: prototyping?, Ed Prochak, 08:18
- Re: prototyping?, Mark Bluemel, 08:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:08
- Find a man at www.SexDatingPoint.com, de_drummer, 08:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:04
- prototyping?, Zach, 08:01
- Re: why bar and foo, Nick Keighley, 07:56
- Re: safe version of sprintf, Malcolm McLean, 07:52
- safe version of sprintf, Olaf, 07:48
- Re: why bar and foo, Remo D., 07:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:34
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Richard Tobin, 07:24
- Re: linked list question, Richard Tobin, 07:11
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, santosh, 07:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 07:02
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Ben Bacarisse, 07:01
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Tobin, 06:59
- Re: why bar and foo, Martien Verbruggen, 06:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:21
- Just Fun, kaki, 05:44
- Re: why bar and foo, Sjouke Burry, 05:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 05:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:30
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 05:28
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 05:21
- Re: linked list question, Ike Naar, 05:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:16
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Chris Hills, 05:15
- Re: GREP, Chris Hills, 05:12
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Nick Keighley, 05:07
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 05:06
- Re: why bar and foo, Nick Keighley, 04:54
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 04:42
- Re: Complex question, Laurent Deniau, 04:41
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 04:41
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:32
- Re: bit bashing, Nick Keighley, 04:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Nick Keighley, 04:01
- Re: bit bashing, Randy Howard, 03:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 03:40
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Randy Howard, 03:37
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Mark Bluemel, 03:36
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.Mobile Phones Nokia .Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 03:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 03:30
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, santosh, 03:23
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, MisterE, 03:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 03:08
- Cheap Fashion Shoes & Clothing & Mobile Phones & Handbags Wholesale on www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky . 003, 03:08
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 02:39
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, A. Farber, 02:34
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 02:33
- Re: bit bashing, santosh, 02:28
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 02:05
- Re: bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 01:55
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Sjouke Burry, 01:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:33
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 01:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 01:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 01:20
- Method for intracardiac therapy using sensor for heart wall thickness, Barathi, 01:15
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, santosh, 01:13
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thad Smith, 00:40
- Re: progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, Richard Heathfield, 00:36
- progrm for converting integers to roman numerals using files in c language, kotlakirankumar, 00:29
- Re: why bar and foo, Richard Heathfield, 00:05
January 24, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 23:53
- Re: why bar and foo, Keith Thompson, 22:08
- Re: why bar and foo, Randy Howard, 22:03
- Re: Complex question, Pierre Asselin, 21:11
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Peter Nilsson, 21:08
- why bar and foo, Hans Schneider, 21:07
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Peter Nilsson, 20:55
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Gordon Burditt, 19:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 19:26
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 19:24
- Re: Complex question, Martin Ambuhl, 19:24
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Ben Bacarisse, 19:23
- Re: Complex question, Army1987, 19:02
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Bart C, 18:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 18:22
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 18:06
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 18:05
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 17:56
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: Complex question, jacob navia, 17:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 17:27
- Re: Printing a hex dump of a buffer, Malcolm McLean, 17:26
- Re: Complex question, user923005, 17:24
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Randy Howard, 17:21
- Re: bit bashing, Peter Nilsson, 17:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Michal Nazarewicz, 17:11
- Printing a hex dump of a buffer, A. Farber, 17:10
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 17:08
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Fumeur, 17:08
- Complex question, jacob navia, 17:03
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:02
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 16:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:36
- Re: bit bashing, Kaz Kylheku, 16:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 16:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 16:01
- Re: void pointer, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 15:53
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 15:32
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 15:29
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, vippstar, 15:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 15:28
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Harald van Dijk, 15:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 15:19
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 15:18
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 15:13
- Re: Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 15:13
- Re: linked list question, Ike Naar, 15:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 15:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 15:06
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 14:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 14:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 14:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 14:20
- Re: number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 13:44
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, qaiser . mohammad, 12:59
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 12:32
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Philip Potter, 12:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 12:18
- Clive Feather's Schildt review has moved, Richard Heathfield, 12:10
- Re: GREP, Willem, 12:08
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 12:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 12:03
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 11:41
- Printing a char* which is not a string: I do not understand this, Hendrik Maryns, 11:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 11:14
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 11:06
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 11:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 10:55
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 10:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 10:47
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Army1987, 10:43
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 10:40
- Re: void pointer, Army1987, 10:35
- Re: number of semicolons, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:30
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Philip Potter, 10:27
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 10:15
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, santosh, 10:09
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Keith Thompson, 10:07
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 10:06
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 10:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Syren Baran, 09:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 09:47
- Re: void pointer, Mark Bluemel, 09:38
- Re: void pointer, Mark Bluemel, 09:36
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 09:18
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 09:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 08:53
- void pointer, harshal, 08:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 08:38
- Re: GREP, Willem, 08:27
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 08:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, vippstar, 08:06
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 08:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 07:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 07:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 07:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 07:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Willem, 07:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 07:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 07:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Tobin, 07:02
- Re: number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 07:00
- Re: number of semicolons, Malcolm McLean, 06:58
- number of semicolons, Pietro Cerutti, 06:52
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 06:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 06:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 06:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Bos, 06:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 06:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 06:17
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thomas Troeger, 06:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 06:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Randy Howard, 06:03
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:00
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:58
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Richard Bos, 05:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:56
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:53
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Ben Bacarisse, 05:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 05:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 05:47
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, santosh, 05:44
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 05:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 05:41
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, polas, 05:36
- Re: bit bashing, Willem, 05:34
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 05:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:20
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 05:10
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 05:02
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 05:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Thomas Troeger, 04:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 04:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:45
- Re: bit bashing, Ian Collins, 04:40
- Re: bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 04:32
- Re: bit bashing, Mark Bluemel, 04:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 04:09
- Re: bit bashing, jacob navia, 04:09
- The Way to Paradise, abdo911, 04:07
- Linux Kernel Source--Unquestionably Undefined Behavior, Billy Bong, 04:05
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Thomas Troeger, 03:59
- bit bashing, Rohit kumar Chandel, 03:52
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 03:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 03:29
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 03:07
- Re: c basics, Richard Heathfield, 02:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 02:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Chris Hills, 02:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:47
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 02:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 02:42
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 02:11
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 01:47
January 23, 2008
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Harter, 23:58
- Re: string compare, James Kuyper, 23:32
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Martin Ambuhl, 22:50
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 22:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 22:02
- Re: How do header files work?, Bill Reid, 21:57
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Randy Howard, 21:57
- Re: fread(), CBFalconer, 21:11
- Re: GREP, CBFalconer, 21:05
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:55
- Re: string compare, CBFalconer, 20:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:53
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 20:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: Alignment of a structure., William Ahern, 20:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 20:16
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 20:06
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), EventHelix.com, 20:05
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 20:03
- Re: Alignment of a structure., EventHelix.com, 20:02
- Re: General question about shared libraries on Solaris, Walter Roberson, 19:57
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Amandil, 19:30
- General question about shared libraries on Solaris, JNLSeb, 19:22
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Stephen Sprunk, 18:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 17:50
- Re: string compare, Army1987, 16:03
- Re: GREP, Army1987, 15:50
- Re: ansi c, Army1987, 15:48
- Re: c basics, Army1987, 15:33
- Re: fread(), dj3vande, 15:30
- Re: fread(), Army1987, 15:30
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, user923005, 15:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 15:26
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Pedro Graca, 15:13
- ▬►SEX Guide which Could Change your Life◄▬, C Pac, 15:13
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Walter Roberson, 15:07
- Re: fread(), santosh, 14:36
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:29
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 14:28
- Re: fread(), Malcolm McLean, 14:23
- Re: fread(), santosh, 14:23
- Re: ansi c, Martin Ambuhl, 14:12
- fread(), h03Ein, 14:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 14:08
- Re: ansi c, dj3vande, 14:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 13:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 13:39
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:37
- Re: ansi c, santosh, 13:37
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 13:35
- Re: linked list question, Flash Gordon, 13:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:28
- Re: c basics, Keith Thompson, 13:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Al Balmer, 13:28
- Re: string compare, Flash Gordon, 13:24
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 13:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:17
- Re: ansi c, santosh, 13:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:11
- Re: ansi c, Rachael, 13:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 13:09
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Harald van Dijk, 13:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 12:59
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 12:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Dollin, 12:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, jameskuyper, 12:39
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, jameskuyper, 12:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 12:33
- Re: ansi c, Philip Potter, 12:30
- Re: GREP, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: string question, Default User, 12:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 12:28
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Keith Thompson, 12:26
- Re: c basics, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Keith Thompson, 12:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:11
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Tobin, 12:06
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:58
- c basics, lawryy, 11:56
- Re: ansi c, Mark Bluemel, 11:44
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:40
- Re: ansi c, yqyq22, 11:37
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 11:31
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 11:29
- Re: ansi c, Jensen Somers, 11:11
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 11:08
- Re: ansi c, Mark Bluemel, 11:06
- Re: linked list question, dj3vande, 11:01
- ansi c, yqyq22, 11:00
- Re: ansi c, Richard Bos, 10:57
- Re: linked list question, Richard Bos, 10:43
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, joe4702, 10:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 10:15
- Re: GREP, Walter Roberson, 10:15
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Richard Tobin, 10:15
- Re: GREP, David Resnick, 10:13
- Re: GREP, Mark Bluemel, 10:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 10:07
- Re: GREP, Malcolm McLean, 10:07
- GREP, Rishi, 10:02
- Re: Alignment of a structure., Army1987, 09:24
- Re: string compare, David Resnick, 08:56
- Re: string compare, David Resnick, 08:48
- Alignment of a structure., Thomas Troeger, 08:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:41
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:39
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, santosh, 08:38
- New Jersey Pedophile Warning, Pedo . Watch . 2008, 08:33
- Re: string compare, Mark Bluemel, 08:14
- Re: string compare, James Kuyper, 08:08
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Richard Tobin, 08:01
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, James Kuyper, 08:01
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 07:58
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Spoon, 07:56
- Re: linked list question, James Kuyper, 07:55
- Re: linked list question, Benoît Vertut, 07:47
- Re: linked list question, Army1987, 07:11
- <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:10
- Re: <OT> interpreting dwarf sections form elf binary, Richard Bos, 07:03
- Re: string compare, Mark Bluemel, 06:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Bart C, 06:35
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, santosh, 06:27
- Re: string compare, Malcolm McLean, 06:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 06:18
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 06:03
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 06:02
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, santosh, 05:48
- Re: linked list question, guanjun, 05:36
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 05:28
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 05:25
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Mark Bluemel, 05:16
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Randy Howard, 05:07
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, santosh, 05:02
- ※Cheap AK APE CHL EVS ed hardy D&G DG BBC AF LRG POLO COACH lv ggg wallets Wholesale $29.99※, cheng, 04:58
- ************************, meetmanisamy, 04:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 04:48
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Philip Potter, 04:44
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, Mark Bluemel, 04:39
- Re: lcc-win and windows 98, Spoon, 04:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Joseph Huber, 04:04
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Martin Ambuhl, 03:56
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 03:38
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 03:33
- Re: linked list question, Flash Gordon, 03:32
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 03:32
- Re: string compare, jacob navia, 03:24
- Re: string compare, CBFalconer, 03:00
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 02:55
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 02:33
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Billy Bong, 02:17
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Keith Thompson, 02:15
- Re: string compare, yeti, 02:08
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, Ian Collins, 01:53
- Re: beginner qn..malloc, santosh, 01:51
- Re: string compare, santosh, 01:48
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 01:42
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:18
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:16
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 01:13
- string compare, yeti, 00:42
- beginner qn..malloc, nodrogbrown, 00:08
January 22, 2008
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 23:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 23:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Old Wolf, 23:27
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 23:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 23:09
- Re: linked list question, James Kuyper, 22:54
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 22:34
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 22:21
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Jack Klein, 22:21
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Jack Klein, 22:01
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Bart C, 21:59
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, santosh, 21:47
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Willy Wijaya, 21:04
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., user923005, 20:55
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ben Bacarisse, 20:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Joe Wright, 20:15
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., Pedro Graca, 20:02
- Re: linked list question, Peter Nilsson, 20:00
- Re: linked list question, christian.bau, 19:54
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., user923005, 19:42
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:37
- Re: Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., vippstar, 19:36
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 19:30
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, user923005, 19:27
- Re: linked list question, Peter Nilsson, 19:26
- Please explain this issue with array of char pointers., JNLSeb, 19:20
- Re: Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, Kaz Kylheku, 19:16
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Flash Gordon, 19:11
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 18:52
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Randy Howard, 18:41
- Re: [OT] Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, Randy Howard, 18:36
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: Where is the error in this code?, Walter Roberson, 18:31
- Re: linked list question, gw7rib, 18:24
- Where is the error in this code?, Erwin Lindemann, 18:19
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 18:19
- Re: variable, Army1987, 18:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: string question, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:48
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, vippstar, 17:47
- Re: linked list question, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: linked list question, Ben Pfaff, 17:40
- Re: string question, Default User, 17:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 16:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 16:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:48
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: linked list question, user923005, 16:47
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 16:45
- Re: superseded by c++?, CBFalconer, 16:43
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 16:22
- Re: pointers to functions question, ram, 16:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 15:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 15:15
- Re: bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, Flash Gordon, 15:11
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, Syren Baran, 14:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 14:40
- Re: How do header files work?, Walter Roberson, 14:28
- Re: How do header files work?, santosh, 14:27
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 14:16
- How do header files work?, vijay, 14:12
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 13:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 13:41
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Kaz Kylheku, 13:36
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Harter, 13:26
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, pete142, 13:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:22
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, jameskuyper, 13:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, santosh, 13:14
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, jameskuyper, 13:02
- Re: pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, Ben Bacarisse, 13:02
- C++ Sample Programs (Source Code), pmp, 12:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, dj3vande, 12:20
- pointer to a member of a struct which is in turn a member of an array of structs, pete142, 12:16
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), pmp, 12:16
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Malcolm McLean, 12:08
- Re: const qualifier, jameskuyper, 12:04
- Re: string question, Default User, 11:47
- Make-Up For Color Contact Lenses - Expert Secrets, jeckychai, 11:14
- Make-Up For Color Contact Lenses - Expert Secrets, jeckychai, 11:14
- Re: variable, guanjun, 11:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 10:47
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Syren Baran, 10:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 10:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 10:28
- Re: const qualifier, Ben Bacarisse, 10:25
- Re: const qualifier, James Kuyper, 10:05
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Nick Keighley, 10:02
- Re: using 32bit glibc/libgcc on a 64bit machine, Walter Roberson, 10:00
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Coos Haak, 09:52
- using 32bit glibc/libgcc on a 64bit machine, Morfys, 09:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 09:48
- Re: const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:33
- Re: const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:30
- Re: const qualifier, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:18
- Re: const qualifier, Malcolm McLean, 09:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 09:09
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Bart C, 09:07
- const qualifier, Marc van Dongen, 09:02
- bare bones file encrypter/decrypter using 128 bit Serpent algorithm, makobu, 09:00
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:00
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 08:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 08:59
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 08:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 08:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, christian.bau, 08:40
- Re: superseded by c++?, James Kuyper, 08:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 08:20
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 08:17
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:44
- earn by click here &&&&********&&&&&&, zraj82008, 07:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 07:38
- earn by click here &&&&********&&&&&&, zraj82008, 07:35
- come FOR ME, zraj82008, 07:34
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 07:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 07:17
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:10
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., christian.bau, 07:06
- Re: linked list question, Ben Bacarisse, 07:01
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 06:59
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 06:52
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Bos, 06:50
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:48
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Ben Bacarisse, 06:47
- Re: linked list question, Richard Harter, 06:45
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 06:44
- Re: linked list question, Ravishankar S, 06:44
- Re: Three C questions, dontspam, 06:41
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Mark Bluemel, 06:36
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:35
- Re: folder parsing (newbie)problem, Pravin Paratey, 06:17
- Re: linked list question, santosh, 06:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 05:57
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., user923005, 05:52
- Re: linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:49
- Re: linked list question, micans, 05:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 05:27
- Re: linked list question, Robert Latest, 05:23
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Robert Latest, 05:20
- Re: linked list question, Malcolm McLean, 05:19
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Wade Ward, 05:13
- Wholesale all NIKE shoes.all models of nokia .Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, nike shoes, 05:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:05
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Robert Latest, 05:03
- Re: linked list question, micans, 04:55
- Re: linked list question, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:50
- Re: linked list question, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Richard Heathfield, 04:33
- Re: linked list question, Ravishankar S, 03:49
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 03:33
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, borkhuis, 03:26
- folder parsing (newbie)problem, oswald . harry, 03:13
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 03:11
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 03:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Keith Thompson, 02:52
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Steffen Buehler, 02:45
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Ian Collins, 02:32
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, santosh, 02:24
- linked list question, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:19
- Re: Linux Kernel Source, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:16
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 01:40
- Electronic and Computer Science video courses, No login, No fee, AK444, 01:35
- Linux Kernel Source, Billy Bong, 01:19
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 01:13
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 01:08
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:56
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 00:53
- Re: string question, James Kuyper, 00:41
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Peter Nilsson, 00:40
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:32
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 00:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:24
- Re: Error while reading .pem file., David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: superseded by c++?, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, David Thompson, 00:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 00:16
- Re: late night confusion with -> and ., Ben Pfaff, 00:12
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Willy Wijaya, 00:03
January 21, 2008
- late night confusion with -> and ., Ark Khasin, 23:47
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Thad Smith, 23:23
- Error: A referral was returned from the server, Shadow of Socrates, 23:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Randy Howard, 23:14
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Randy Howard, 23:10
- [C#] How to measure the time of your code's execution, Shadow of Socrates, 22:52
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 22:13
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:57
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 21:28
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Peter Nilsson, 20:55
- Re: Keyboard handling in C, CBFalconer, 20:47
- Re: Function Pointers, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 20:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 20:27
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 19:35
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 19:33
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 19:29
- Re: string question, Default User, 19:29
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 19:27
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Peter Nilsson, 19:11
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 18:59
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 18:46
- [OT] Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, CBFalconer, 18:41
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 18:30
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 18:28
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 18:21
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Antoninus Twink, 18:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Harter, 18:20
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 18:19
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, jacob navia, 18:03
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 17:56
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Pierre Asselin, 17:49
- Re: Function Pointers, Army1987, 17:37
- Re: Keyboard handling in C, user923005, 17:34
- Re: Function Pointers, dj3vande, 17:34
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Army1987, 17:29
- Keyboard handling in C, anon856525, 17:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 17:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 17:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 17:13
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 17:10
- Re: parsing directory, user923005, 17:09
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 17:06
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 16:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 15:56
- Re: parsing directory, Flash Gordon, 15:51
- Re: Three C questions, Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 15:32
- Re: Function Pointers, gw7rib, 15:24
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Kaz Kylheku, 15:07
- Re: return string from datalayer, psion, 15:07
- Re: Function Pointers, Flash Gordon, 15:05
- Re: return string from datalayer, Martin Ambuhl, 14:56
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 14:25
- Re: return string from datalayer, Wolfgang Draxinger, 14:25
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 14:25
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 14:20
- Re: return string from datalayer, Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:06
- return string from datalayer, psion, 14:01
- Re: Function Pointers, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: Function Pointers, vippstar, 13:28
- Re: string question, Default User, 13:26
- Re: parsing directory, oswald . harry, 13:17
- Re: main() in C90, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:31
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: variable, Chris Dollin, 12:28
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Chris Dollin, 12:19
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 12:17
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Keith Thompson, 12:03
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 11:28
- Re: parsing directory, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
- Re: parsing directory, Malcolm McLean, 11:19
- Re: parsing directory, Mark Bluemel, 11:16
- Re: parsing directory, Mark Bluemel, 11:14
- Re: parsing directory, Jensen Somers, 11:14
- parsing directory, oswald . harry, 10:55
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Malcolm McLean, 10:53
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 10:49
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Bos, 09:39
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Fumeur, 09:37
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Joachim Schmitz, 09:25
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Mark Bluemel, 09:13
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Richard Tobin, 09:05
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 09:04
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jacob navia, 09:04
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 09:00
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, jacob navia, 08:54
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 08:50
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), jacob navia, 08:48
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 07:41
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Kenny McCormack, 07:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:21
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 06:37
- Re: quick sort, Ben Bacarisse, 06:32
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Joachim Schmitz, 06:23
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Bos, 06:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:57
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Ravishankar S, 05:54
- Re: quick sort, Richard Bos, 05:51
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 05:50
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Bos, 05:45
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), jacob navia, 05:37
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Jensen Somers, 05:37
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard, 05:29
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Bos, 05:21
- Re: Function Pointers, Nick Keighley, 05:20
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 05:05
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 05:03
- Re: error while using fuction log2f(), Vimal Aravindashan, 05:02
- Re: Function Pointers, Vimal Aravindashan, 04:51
- error while using fuction log2f(), neha_chhatre, 04:48
- Re: Three C questions, Joachim Schmitz, 04:06
- Re: Three C questions, CJ, 03:59
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Richard Heathfield, 03:53
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 03:50
- Re: Three C questions, Flash Gordon, 03:41
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Martin Ambuhl, 03:24
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Kaz Kylheku, 03:15
- Get $5us if you regiter on housinghouse.com, tony, 02:43
- Re: Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:40
- Re: Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, santosh, 02:37
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Randy Howard, 02:31
- Cool Electronics Platform with C based Development Environment, flexiatmega8, 02:24
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Joachim Schmitz, 02:14
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Randy Howard, 02:12
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Martien Verbruggen, 02:02
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, friendfish, 01:50
- Re: Function Pointers, Wang Jiaji, 01:25
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 01:21
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), William Ahern, 01:15
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 00:36
January 20, 2008
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, CBFalconer, 22:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 22:45
- About Kerala, Jayu, 21:57
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:47
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:32
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, CBFalconer, 21:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:26
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:23
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 21:23
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Stephen Sprunk, 21:04
- Re: string question, Ben Bacarisse, 20:49
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, Richard Tobin, 20:36
- Re: string question, vippstar, 20:35
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 20:29
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 20:27
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 20:26
- Re: Is this program standard conform?, vippstar, 20:19
- Is this program standard conform?, Fumeur, 20:13
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 20:11
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 20:04
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 20:00
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:41
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Kenny McCormack, 19:40
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 19:35
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:23
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 19:19
- Function Pointers, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:10
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 18:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: Three C questions, Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Antoninus Twink, 18:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 18:27
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CJ, 18:15
- Re: string question, Malcolm McLean, 18:15
- setlocale, LC_MONETARY, ISO-4217, remi.chateauneu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bill Reid, 17:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:48
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:45
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 17:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 17:40
- Upload-Service for young programmers, emptemp, 17:35
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 17:32
- Re: main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 17:27
- Re: string question, Bill Cunningham, 17:25
- Re: string question, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- string question, Bill Cunningham, 17:07
- Re: fflush and stdin, Randy Howard, 16:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Philip Potter, 16:25
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 15:51
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 15:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Martien Verbruggen, 15:40
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Herbert Rosenau, 15:29
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Gordon Burditt, 15:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 15:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 15:06
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Gordon Burditt, 14:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 14:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Bacarisse, 14:18
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 14:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: main() in C90, Chris Hills, 14:04
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bart C, 13:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 13:19
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 12:58
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, CBFalconer, 12:56
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, CBFalconer, 12:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 12:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 12:49
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Serve Laurijssen, 12:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 12:29
- Re: String literal, Harald van Dijk, 12:26
- Re: String literal, Walter Roberson, 12:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 12:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 12:19
- String literal, h03Ein, 12:12
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 12:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 11:57
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:51
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:48
- Online eBooks @ jumbooks.com, Deepak.Verma3441@xxxxxxxxx, 11:39
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:26
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 11:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 10:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 10:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 10:16
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 10:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:12
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, vippstar, 09:11
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Harald van Dijk, 09:08
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:07
- Re: fflush and stdin, Army1987, 09:04
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, vippstar, 08:55
- Re: main() in C90, Army1987, 08:44
- Re: main() in C90, Army1987, 08:42
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 08:37
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 08:26
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 08:17
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 08:11
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 08:01
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 07:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bill Reid, 07:57
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 07:55
- Re: main() in C90, Ben Bacarisse, 07:45
- Re: Three C questions, Willem, 07:43
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 07:29
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 07:22
- Re: main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 07:07
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Tobin, 07:01
- (WW.CN-CIRCLE.COM) cheape wholesale tupac, gucci, timberland, parade, NBA shoes, N, H, UGG,Ice bream,4us,bape outlet shoes, discount hoodies, jeans, mm, 06:53
- Wholesale nike max nike shox,jordan shoes!Hot sell Nike max nike shox Jordan shoes!, swukong33, 06:49
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 06:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bart C, 06:46
- Bill Gates try´s to sell Microsoft, a . schoeni, 06:35
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 06:33
- Re: effect of b = a++ + a++, Vimal Aravindashan, 06:33
- effect of b = a++ + a++, Ravi, 06:04
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 06:03
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 06:02
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Richard Tobin, 05:58
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Richard Tobin, 05:56
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Flash Gordon, 05:50
- Re: Three C questions, Mark McIntyre, 05:40
- Re: main() in C90, Chris Hills, 05:37
- Re: main() in C90, Chris Hills, 05:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 05:18
- CGI Programming text book, tutorialwebs, 05:16
- Re: variable, digger, 05:12
- Re: variable, digger, 05:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 05:08
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 05:03
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 04:53
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 04:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Joachim Schmitz, 04:26
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 04:21
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 03:58
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, pete, 03:58
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Keith Thompson, 03:56
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 03:55
- Re: how run c program in protect mode with out OS, santosh, 03:46
- Re: variable, santosh, 03:43
- variable, wilson, 03:26
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Ian Collins, 03:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 03:20
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 03:20
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Jack, 02:53
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ben Pfaff, 02:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 02:42
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ben Pfaff, 02:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 02:33
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 02:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 02:08
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 01:52
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 01:47
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Kaz Kylheku, 01:28
- Re: When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Ian Collins, 01:15
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 01:12
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 01:07
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 00:55
- When will exit(0) fail to exit?, Jack, 00:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Gordon Burditt, 00:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Harald van Dijk, 00:22
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 00:16
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 00:14
January 19, 2008
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 23:55
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 23:49
- Re: main() in C90, Hans Schneider, 23:46
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 23:45
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 23:38
- Re: Three C questions, Regan Revised, 23:32
- Re: main() in C90, dj3vande, 23:11
- Re: how run c program in protect mode with out OS, YinMinHong, 23:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 22:56
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 22:49
- Re: [OT] Compiler optimizations, Keith Thompson, 22:36
- how run c program in protect mode with out OS, YinMinHong, 22:33
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 22:30
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Heathfield, 21:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:37
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 21:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 21:17
- Re: Good development practices, Jerry Coffin, 21:16
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 21:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:13
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, Randy Howard, 21:05
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:01
- Re: Three C questions, CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 20:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard, 20:38
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:34
- Re: Three C questions, Syren Baran, 20:18
- Re: Three C questions, Syren Baran, 20:08
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 20:07
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 20:02
- Re: Three C questions, Ioannis Vranos, 19:57
- Re: Three C questions, Syren Baran, 19:47
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, JimS, 19:41
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, ediebur, 19:26
- Re: Functions implemented as macros?, James Kuyper, 19:24
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, Jack Klein, 19:02
- open source C/C++ program doing FPU calculations, kot . behemotspam, 18:49
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 18:26
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Harter, 18:25
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Randy Howard, 18:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 18:09
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Ian Collins, 18:00
- Re: GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), dj3vande, 17:59
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 17:58
- GCC Broken on Leopard (OSX), Imok20, 17:46
- Re: Functions implemented as macros?, pete, 17:40
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 17:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 17:21
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Rob Hiddink, 17:10
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:51
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 16:42
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Harter, 16:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:33
- Re: Functions implemented as macros?, Pedro Graca, 16:25
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 16:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 16:11
- Re: Functions implemented as macros?, Army1987, 15:59
- Re: Functions implemented as macros?, James Kuyper, 15:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Army1987, 15:47
- Functions implemented as macros?, Pedro Graca, 15:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 15:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 14:58
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 14:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 14:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 14:27
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 14:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 14:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 14:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 13:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 13:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, James Kuyper, 13:05
- Re: main() in C90, James Kuyper, 12:52
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard, 12:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, gw7rib, 12:22
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Harter, 12:07
- Population @ Industrial, kaki, 12:05
- Re: need help with gcc, Pierre Asselin, 12:02
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 11:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 11:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 10:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 10:48
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 10:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 10:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 10:22
- Re: need help with gcc, Flash Gordon, 10:08
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Army1987, 10:08
- Re: Use gets Safely, Army1987, 09:45
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 09:43
- Re: return from a function, Army1987, 09:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 09:34
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 09:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 09:22
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Harald van Dijk, 09:20
- Re: need help with gcc, jimgardener, 09:16
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 08:51
- Re: Assume program under constant attack, CBFalconer, 08:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 08:44
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 08:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 08:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 08:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 08:31
- Re: Who is Muhammad?, Kenny McCormack, 08:27
- [OT] Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Army1987, 08:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 08:23
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 08:19
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 08:17
- Re: Good development practices, CBFalconer, 08:10
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 08:02
- Re: need help with gcc, Flash Gordon, 07:57
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 07:43
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Flash Gordon, 07:40
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Army1987, 07:34
- the God that never was, small giant, 07:10
- Re: Good development practices, James Kanze, 06:51
- Assume program under constant attack, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:43
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 06:34
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 06:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 06:01
- Re: Three C questions, Mark McIntyre, 05:57
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 05:54
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Malcolm McLean, 05:47
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Bart C, 05:45
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 05:17
- Re: Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Walter Roberson, 05:17
- Re: Who is Muhammad?, Keith Thompson, 05:07
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 04:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ulrich Eckhardt, 04:51
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 04:44
- Re: Watcom C, HT-Lab, 03:54
- Help me about segmentation fault (core dump), Willy Wijaya, 03:42
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, William Pursell, 03:34
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 03:34
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Philip Potter, 03:33
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, William Pursell, 03:14
- need help with gcc, jimgardener, 02:45
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 02:04
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kaz Kylheku, 02:03
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 02:02
- i am earning $150 per day without work. read me, zyrva2007@xxxxxxxxx, 01:24
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 01:17
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 01:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 00:43
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 00:41
January 18, 2008
- Re: quick sort, Dann Corbit, 23:56
- Re: quick sort, user923005, 23:47
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 23:46
- Re: quick sort, Dann Corbit, 23:44
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, dj3vande, 23:29
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, user923005, 23:23
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 23:19
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Jack Klein, 23:04
- Re: Urgent C Questions, James Kuyper, 22:55
- Re: Three C questions, Jack Klein, 22:53
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 22:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 22:37
- Re: All programs are undefined, Keith Thompson, 22:34
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 22:27
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, CBFalconer, 22:26
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 22:26
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 22:22
- Re: Three C questions, Kaz Kylheku, 22:12
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 22:12
- Re: Who is Muhammad?, CBFalconer, 22:12
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 22:02
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 22:02
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:55
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:47
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:44
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 21:37
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 21:32
- Re: Three C questions, CBFalconer, 21:17
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 21:09
- Re: Good development practices, CBFalconer, 21:09
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Ian Collins, 21:07
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 20:41
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 20:38
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 20:31
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Richard Tobin, 20:28
- pls see my free online dating with actresses movies website,Fun & Enjoy, juli, 20:28
- Re: Three C questions, Coos Haak, 20:05
- Re: quick sort, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 20:01
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 19:51
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 19:38
- Re: main() in C90, Walter Roberson, 19:34
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Gordon Burditt, 19:31
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 19:26
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 19:19
- Re: main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 19:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 19:14
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, jameskuyper, 19:12
- Re: Signed only index?, Peter Nilsson, 19:10
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 19:09
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 19:05
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, jameskuyper, 18:53
- Re: Three C questions, Randy Howard, 18:46
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 18:43
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, pete, 18:38
- Re: Three C questions, Mark McIntyre, 18:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 18:24
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 18:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 18:22
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Paul Hsieh, 18:19
- Re: Three C questions, Ian Collins, 18:19
- Re: Three C questions, anon856525, 18:12
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, jacob navia, 18:11
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Keith Thompson, 17:54
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 17:50
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kaz Kylheku, 17:49
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 17:45
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 17:45
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Eric Sosman, 17:38
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Paul Hsieh, 17:35
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 17:23
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Kaz Kylheku, 17:18
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 17:13
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Peter Nilsson, 17:11
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 16:59
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Ian Collins, 16:47
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 16:41
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Randy Howard, 16:38
- Re: Three C questions, Kaz Kylheku, 16:34
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Ian Collins, 16:32
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, fnegroni, 16:28
- Re: Three C questions, Kaz Kylheku, 16:28
- Re: When to check the return value of malloc, Default User, 16:25
- When to check the return value of malloc, Marty James, 16:21
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 16:14
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 16:11
- Re: Bit Fields, Walter Roberson, 16:05
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 15:34
- Re: main() in C90, jameskuyper, 15:21
- Re: Bit Fields, Martin Ambuhl, 15:14
- Re: All programs are undefined, Joe Wright, 15:01
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 15:01
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 14:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Charles Richmond, 14:55
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jameskuyper, 14:50
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 14:50
- Re: main() in C90, jameskuyper, 14:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 14:43
- Re: main() in C90, Kenny McCormack, 14:40
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jameskuyper, 14:38
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jxh, 14:34
- Re: See your home on your computer through google earth, kieran . hogan1, 14:22
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, JosephSlomka, 14:14
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 14:13
- Re: quick sort, spaglia, 14:06
- Re: Three C questions, anon856525, 13:57
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Paul Hsieh, 13:56
- Re: Good development practices, James Kanze, 13:56
- Re: Good development practices, James Kanze, 13:54
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: main() in C90, jameskuyper, 13:44
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 13:39
- Re: main() in C90, Walter Roberson, 13:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 13:30
- Re: main() in C90, Walter Roberson, 13:21
- Re: Good development practices, jameskuyper, 13:19
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 13:16
- Re: Bit Fields, Tarique, 13:11
- Re: main() in C90, Antoninus Twink, 13:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 13:05
- Re: quick sort, Malcolm McLean, 13:02
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Willem, 13:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 12:59
- Re: quick sort, osmium, 12:48
- Re: quick sort, smartwhizguy_t, 12:41
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 12:25
- Re: Who is Muhammad?, Malcolm McLean, 12:10
- Re: All programs are undefined, Keith Thompson, 12:07
- Who is Muhammad?, ياهادي أهدنا وأهدي بنا (أم نادر), 12:05
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 12:02
- Re: Memory dump, Army1987, 11:50
- Re: Bit Fields, vippstar, 11:44
- Re: Bit Fields, Mark Bluemel, 11:43
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Army1987, 11:43
- Re: Bit Fields, Walter Roberson, 11:41
- Re: question, Keith Thompson, 11:40
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 11:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 11:28
- Bit Fields, Tarique, 11:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 11:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 11:09
- Re: Good development practices, jacob navia, 11:05
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, jacob navia, 11:03
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, CBFalconer, 10:59
- Re: dumping current stack, CBFalconer, 10:49
- c buzz, rommy, 10:44
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 10:43
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, CBFalconer, 10:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 10:21
- java script tutorials, tutorial, 10:18
- Re: Good development practices, CBFalconer, 10:17
- Re: Good development practices, CBFalconer, 10:10
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Barry Schwarz, 09:58
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 09:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 09:54
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Flash Gordon, 09:41
- New free programs software - useful link, bajagu, 09:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 09:36
- Re: [OT] Good development practices, Lionel B, 09:36
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 09:31
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 09:18
- Re: quick sort, pete, 09:18
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 09:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 09:14
- Re: quick sort, pete, 09:05
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 09:01
- Re: quick sort, Eric Sosman, 08:52
- Re: quick sort, Mark Bluemel, 08:50
- See your home on your computer through google earth, service2online, 08:47
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 08:45
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 08:42
- Re: Good development practices, James Kuyper, 08:41
- Re: quick sort, Richard Heathfield, 08:39
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 08:37
- Re: Good development practices, Flash Gordon, 08:33
- Re: Good development practices, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 08:25
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 08:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 08:23
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 08:22
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Joseph Huber, 08:22
- Re: Good development practices, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 08:15
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, James Kuyper, 08:14
- Re: main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 08:10
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 08:07
- Re: Good development practices, James Kuyper, 08:01
- Re: quick sort, Malcolm McLean, 07:59
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, pete, 07:58
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, euler70, 07:58
- Re: Good development practices, Lionel B, 07:52
- quick sort, sophia . agnes, 07:46
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 07:41
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Richard Tobin, 07:39
- Wholesale All shoes .Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 07:38
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 07:33
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Tobin, 07:32
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 07:32
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Richard Tobin, 07:31
- Re: Good development practices, James Kuyper, 07:21
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, pete, 07:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 07:20
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 07:19
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, James Kuyper, 07:07
- Re: Good development practices, Flash Gordon, 06:53
- (www.shoessuperstar.com)Wholesale world famous handbag-CHANEL/CHLOE/LV/GUCCI/Feidi and so on, jim, 06:40
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 06:32
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Philip Potter, 06:30
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Richard Heathfield, 06:29
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:19
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 06:16
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Philip Potter, 06:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Nick Keighley, 06:14
- Re: Good development practices, jkherciueh, 06:13
- Re: Good development practices, Philip Potter, 06:04
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Bart C, 06:03
- (WWW.CN-CIRCLE.COM) cheap wholesale nike jordan, adidas,puma,lacoste ,gucci,parada,lv,bape,tupac.outlet shoe, and hoodies,jean, jacket, sunglass,handbags, watch, mp4.iphone, mm, 05:58
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Flash Gordon, 05:55
- Re: Good development practices, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 05:47
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 05:44
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, fnegroni, 05:35
- A different syntax for error checking, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 05:21
- Re: A different syntax for error checking, Richard Bos, 05:15
- Re: Use gets Safely, Regan Revised, 05:10
- Re: Good development practices, Nickolai Leschov, 05:01
- Re: Good development practices, Nickolai Leschov, 04:51
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 04:48
- Re: Watcom C, Regan Revised, 04:46
- Re: Three C questions, Regan Revised, 04:39
- Re: Memory dump, Richard Heathfield, 04:16
- Re: Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, Malcolm McLean, 04:09
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Philip Potter, 04:01
- Re: Watcom C, FreeRTOS.org, 03:45
- Memory dump, erfan, 03:39
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 03:30
- Re: Good development practices, Michael DOUBEZ, 03:21
- Re: Watcom C, Nickolai Leschov, 03:20
- dumping current stack, SNagar78, 03:09
- Re: dumping current stack, Richard Bos, 03:08
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 02:53
- Re: need help in reading jpeg, devnew@xxxxxxxxx, 00:59
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Tarique, 00:40
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 00:12
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 00:04
January 17, 2008
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 23:44
- Dream technical jobs, gks . sanjay, 23:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 23:10
- Re: Boost your business with Quality Web and Design Services at Bargain Prices, sindy.WOSG@xxxxxxxxx, 23:01
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Ark Khasin, 22:48
- Re: C Macro questions, J. J. Farrell, 22:32
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Peter Nilsson, 22:26
- Re: Three C questions, CBFalconer, 22:25
- Re: Good development practices, CBFalconer, 22:22
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 22:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, CBFalconer, 21:56
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 21:53
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 21:44
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 21:39
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 21:11
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Peter Nilsson, 20:44
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 20:26
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 19:21
- Re: main() in C90, Al Balmer, 18:58
- Re: Three C questions, user923005, 18:49
- Standard integer types vs <stdint.h> types, euler70, 18:49
- Re: Three C questions, jacob navia, 18:26
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Kaz Kylheku, 18:25
- Three C questions, anon856525, 18:15
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 18:10
- Re: question, Antoninus Twink, 18:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 18:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 17:49
- Re: main() in C90, jameskuyper, 17:42
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 17:30
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, jacob navia, 17:30
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 17:28
- Re: Good development practices, Martin Ambuhl, 17:23
- Re: question, Default User, 17:20
- Re: question, Eric Sosman, 17:16
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, pete, 17:06
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 17:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 17:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 17:00
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 16:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 16:55
- Re: All programs are undefined, pete, 16:47
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 16:29
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 16:28
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 16:26
- Re: question, Eric Sosman, 16:15
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 16:14
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 16:02
- Re: main() in C90, Charlton Wilbur, 15:51
- Re: Good development practices, Malcolm McLean, 15:47
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 15:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 15:42
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 15:41
- Re: main() in C90, Walter Roberson, 15:38
- Re: Watcom C, HT-Lab, 15:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, jameskuyper, 15:21
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 15:21
- Re: rotate bmp (Xlib), Malcolm McLean, 15:17
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 15:05
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, user923005, 15:04
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 15:02
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 15:01
- Re: Watcom C, Flash Gordon, 14:52
- Re: Good development practices, Lew Pitcher, 14:52
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 14:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 14:46
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard, 14:45
- Re: Good development practices, Victor Bazarov, 14:32
- Re: Watcom C, Arlet Ottens, 14:25
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Walter Roberson, 14:14
- important, carlos.cuenta2@xxxxxxxxx, 14:10
- Good development practices, Nickolai Leschov, 14:03
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenny McCormack, 13:55
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:55
- Watcom C, Nickolai Leschov, 13:51
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:51
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:49
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Default User, 13:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:48
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Chris Hills, 13:46
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Paul Hsieh, 13:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Randy Howard, 13:35
- Re: question, Mark McIntyre, 13:34
- Re: Signed only index?, Randy Howard, 13:34
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Heathfield, 13:28
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 13:25
- Re: All programs are undefined, Harald van Dijk, 13:12
- Re: main() in C90, Bart C, 13:04
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:03
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 13:00
- Re: main() in C90, Al Balmer, 12:56
- Re: main() in C90, Harald van Dijk, 12:56
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Charlton Wilbur, 12:37
- Re: Parsing Doubt, CBFalconer, 12:35
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Ben Pfaff, 12:30
- Re: A Newbie Question, CBFalconer, 12:28
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Eric Sosman, 12:27
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, CBFalconer, 12:26
- Re: Signed only index?, Flash Gordon, 12:23
- Re: Signed only index?, Charlton Wilbur, 12:22
- Re: rotate bmp (Xlib), Ben Pfaff, 12:18
- Re: question, Default User, 12:17
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Tobin, 12:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kaz Kylheku, 12:14
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Charlton Wilbur, 12:10
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 12:07
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Tobin, 12:05
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 12:04
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Richard Tobin, 12:00
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 11:57
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Richard Tobin, 11:53
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 11:50
- Re: Signed only index?, Richard Tobin, 11:50
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Kaz Kylheku, 11:48
- Re: All programs are undefined, CBFalconer, 11:46
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Richard Heathfield, 11:44
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 11:37
- Re: main() in C90, Bart C, 11:37
- Re: Signed only index?, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: A Newbie Question, Martin Ambuhl, 11:32
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Richard Heathfield, 11:32
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 11:29
- Re: main() in C90, jacob navia, 11:28
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Kenneth Brody, 11:27
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Kenneth Brody, 11:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kenneth Brody, 11:05
- Re: main() in C90, Randy Howard, 11:02
- Re: question, Kenneth Brody, 10:58
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Keith Thompson, 10:57
- Re: arguments question, Flash Gordon, 10:51
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Keith Thompson, 10:51
- Re: Parsing Doubt, dj3vande, 10:44
- Re: Parsing Doubt, Mark Bluemel, 10:43
- Re: arguments question, Mark Bluemel, 10:40
- Re: All programs are undefined, Keith Thompson, 10:40
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 10:35
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 10:30
- Parsing Doubt, Tarique, 10:19
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, Charlton Wilbur, 10:15
- Re: Signed only index?, Charlton Wilbur, 10:08
- arguments question, parshin . da, 09:58
- rotate bmp (Xlib), Dariusz . Donimirski, 09:55
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Randy Howard, 09:46
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 09:37
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 09:01
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:55
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:53
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:53
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:50
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:48
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:48
- tutorials, akhileshek, 08:46
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 08:38
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 08:19
- Re: NULL pointers, James Kuyper, 07:52
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, James Kuyper, 07:18
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Bos, 07:18
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Bos, 07:11
- Re: All programs are undefined, pete, 07:02
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, pete, 06:40
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 06:31
- Re: NULL pointers, Ark Khasin, 06:18
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Ark Khasin, 06:13
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 06:07
- Re: Restricting the access of a Global variable, Mark Bluemel, 05:55
- Re: Restricting the access of a Global variable, Malcolm McLean, 05:52
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 05:50
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 05:48
- Re: need help in reading jpeg, Malcolm McLean, 05:41
- Re: need help in reading jpeg, Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Richard Tobin, 05:37
- Re: main() in C90, Chris Hills, 05:36
- need help in reading jpeg, devnew@xxxxxxxxx, 05:21
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Kaz Kylheku, 05:10
- Re: NULL pointers, Kaz Kylheku, 05:01
- Re: NULL pointers, Richard Heathfield, 05:00
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Ark Khasin, 04:36
- Re: NULL pointers, Mark Bluemel, 04:26
- Re: Signed only index?, Flash Gordon, 04:22
- Restricting the access of a Global variable, sant . tarun, 04:21
- NULL pointers, Ark Khasin, 04:18
- Re: A Newbie Question, Mark Bluemel, 04:09
- Re: A Newbie Question, crackedh, 04:05
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 04:03
- Re: A Newbie Question, crackedh, 04:03
- Re: A Newbie Question, Joachim Schmitz, 04:02
- Re: A Newbie Question, Richard Heathfield, 04:01
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Ark Khasin, 03:56
- A Newbie Question, crackedh, 03:49
- Re: array type has incomplete element type, Richard Bos, 03:42
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Bos, 03:39
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Bos, 03:25
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Willem, 03:13
- Re: main() in C90, CBFalconer, 03:03
- Boost your business with Quality Web and Design Services at Bargain Prices, services . wosg, 03:00
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, CBFalconer, 02:55
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Kaz Kylheku, 02:54
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 02:54
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 02:47
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Kaz Kylheku, 02:28
- Re: main() in C90, Billy Bong, 02:22
- Re: main() in C90, Billy Bong, 02:08
- array type has incomplete element type, shrav4ever, 02:06
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, William Ahern, 01:52
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Peter Nilsson, 00:54
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, James Kuyper, 00:02
January 16, 2008
- Re: How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Jack Klein, 23:43
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., dj3vande, 23:26
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Peter Nilsson, 23:23
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Gene, 23:05
- How to make (ptr + len) > lim safe?, Michael B Allen, 23:02
- Re: getline - sort of, Richard Heathfield, 22:55
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Randy Howard, 22:51
- Re: getline - sort of, Keith Thompson, 22:42
- Re: Urgent C Questions, James Kuyper, 22:25
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 22:24
- Re: getline - sort of, Richard Heathfield, 22:13
- Re: getline - sort of, Keith Thompson, 21:56
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., CJ LaVelle, 21:56
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., CJ LaVelle, 21:56
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Peter Nilsson, 21:42
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Keith Thompson, 21:34
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Richard Heathfield, 21:34
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 21:29
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 21:20
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 21:15
- Re: Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., CJ LaVelle, 21:12
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 21:08
- Re: getline - sort of, Richard Heathfield, 21:07
- Need a GURU! I'm stuck...., Chris LaVelle, 21:00
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Ernie Wright, 20:50
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: Is Chris Hills a troll?, user923005, 19:53
- Is Chris Hills a troll?, Antoninus Twink, 19:09
- Re: Signed only index?, Richard Tobin, 19:08
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 19:06
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, jameskuyper, 19:00
- Re: Use gets Safely, Antoninus Twink, 18:51
- Re: Compiler optimizations, CJ, 18:43
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 18:34
- Re: question, Default User, 18:28
- Re: getline - sort of, pete, 18:20
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 18:03
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 17:54
- Re: getline - sort of, Bill Waddington, 17:53
- Re: Signed only index?, Eric Sosman, 17:43
- Re: getline - sort of, CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: getline - sort of, pete, 17:42
- Re: main() in C90, Jack Klein, 17:37
- Re: getline - sort of, CBFalconer, 17:24
- Re: getline - sort of, CBFalconer, 17:22
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jacob navia, 17:20
- Re: main() in C90, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- Re: Signed only index?, Peter Nilsson, 17:17
- Re: getline - sort of, Bart C, 17:06
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Chris Dollin, 17:04
- Re: C Macro questions, CBFalconer, 17:02
- Re: Use gets Safely, Chris Dollin, 17:00
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 16:59
- Re: Compiler optimizations, user923005, 16:48
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 16:43
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, CBFalconer, 16:36
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree, CBFalconer, 16:21
- Re: main() in C90, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kenneth Brody, 15:52
- Re: getline - sort of, Flash Gordon, 15:39
- Re: getline - sort of, Bill Waddington, 15:36
- Re: main() in C90, Walter Roberson, 15:35
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 15:28
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Keith Thompson, 15:24
- Re: Why this works???, Kenneth Brody, 15:24
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jacob navia, 15:21
- Re: C Macro questions, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- main() in C90, Ioannis Vranos, 15:15
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Mark McIntyre, 15:14
- Re: Urgent C Questions, John Bode, 15:05
- Re: writing alarm function, Greg, 14:58
- Re: getline - sort of, Eric Sosman, 14:47
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 14:39
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 14:37
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Randy Howard, 14:34
- Re: getline - sort of, Malcolm McLean, 14:16
- Re: getline - sort of, Randy Howard, 13:59
- Re: getline - sort of, Flash Gordon, 13:59
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Randy Howard, 13:58
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Randy Howard, 13:57
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Randy Howard, 13:52
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Randy Howard, 13:49
- Re: getline - sort of, Malcolm McLean, 13:42
- Re: getline - sort of, Flash Gordon, 13:35
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree - TPA, Default User, 13:16
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Stephen Sprunk, 13:04
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Walter Roberson, 12:54
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Charles Richmond, 12:48
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Walter Roberson, 12:44
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: getline - sort of, Malcolm McLean, 12:39
- getline - sort of, Bill Waddington, 12:24
- Re: Urgent C Questions, jameskuyper, 11:38
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Al Balmer, 11:33
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Al Balmer, 11:06
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:55
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Eric Sosman, 10:54
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 10:40
- Re: Bitwise operators., Philip Potter, 10:30
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, CBFalconer, 10:29
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jacob navia, 10:26
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, John Bode, 10:25
- Re: Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Ben Bacarisse, 10:23
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, CBFalconer, 10:19
- Re: Signed only index?, Malcolm McLean, 10:19
- Re: Bitwise operators., Joachim Schmitz, 09:58
- Preprocessing directive in the middle of macro arguments, Francois Grieu, 09:57
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 09:50
- Re: Bitwise operators., pete, 09:31
- Re: Urgent C Questions, William Pursell, 09:31
- Re: Bitwise operators., pete, 09:10
- tutorials textbooks,ebooks,seminar topics,seminars, akhileshek, 09:01
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 08:56
- Re: C Macro questions, James Kuyper, 08:50
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Malcolm McLean, 08:33
- Re: Urgent C Questions, James Kuyper, 08:18
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Rui Maciel, 07:47
- Re: Urgent C Questions, James Kuyper, 07:40
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Ben Bacarisse, 07:36
- Re: Urgent C Questions, James Kuyper, 07:33
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Philip Potter, 07:10
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Richard Bos, 07:07
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Francis Glassborow, 07:05
- Re: Bitwise operators., Joachim Schmitz, 06:58
- Re: typedef and static, pete, 06:52
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 06:51
- Re: Use gets Safely, Richard Bos, 06:51
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Marco van de Voort, 06:43
- Relevant comic, Richard Bos, 06:39
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 06:36
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 06:34
- Re: question, Barry Schwarz, 06:34
- Re: Bitwise operators., pete, 06:29
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Andrew Wan, 06:29
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Joachim Schmitz, 06:24
- Re: Compiler optimizations, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:06
- Re: Bitwise operators., Joachim Schmitz, 05:53
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 05:46
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Nick Keighley, 05:32
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Nick Keighley, 05:26
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Philip Potter, 05:25
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 05:18
- Re: return from a function, Richard Bos, 05:17
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Philip Potter, 05:14
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Bos, 05:13
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Chris Hills, 05:05
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 05:03
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Richard Bos, 05:03
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Nick Keighley, 04:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Bos, 04:56
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Philip Potter, 04:53
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:47
- Re: Use gets Safely, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:45
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:41
- Re: Bitwise operators., Philip Potter, 04:37
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Philip Potter, 04:28
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 04:27
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:25
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Philip Potter, 04:20
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 04:15
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 04:10
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Mark Bluemel, 04:05
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 03:58
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 03:55
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Mark Bluemel, 03:44
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Joachim Schmitz, 02:42
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Richard Heathfield, 02:21
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 02:08
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree, Crooter, 02:02
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree, Crooter, 01:57
- Re: C Macro questions, Jack Klein, 01:57
- Re: C Macro questions, Billy Bong, 01:22
- Re: C Macro questions, gouqizi.lvcha@xxxxxxxxx, 01:06
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Ravishankar S, 01:05
- Re: C Macro questions, CBFalconer, 00:31
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Walter Roberson, 00:29
- Re: C Macro questions, CBFalconer, 00:28
- Re: Compiler optimizations, CBFalconer, 00:25
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 00:20
- Re: Urgent C Questions, andreyvul, 00:09
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, CBFalconer, 00:08
- Re: storage class static of functions, Ravishankar S, 00:03
January 15, 2008
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Ravishankar S, 23:55
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 23:44
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, user923005, 23:40
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 23:39
- Re: Compiler optimizations, user923005, 23:31
- Re: C Macro questions, user923005, 23:28
- Re: Urgent C Questions, ppi, 23:21
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Jack Klein, 23:04
- C Macro questions, gouqizi.lvcha@xxxxxxxxx, 23:02
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree, user923005, 23:00
- Re: return from a function, user923005, 22:56
- Re: Urgent C Questions, andreyvul, 22:37
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, woshanzhimu, 22:34
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Hans Schneider, 21:57
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Ben Pfaff, 21:05
- Re: Urgent C Questions, andreyvul, 20:35
- Re: return from a function, Eric Sosman, 20:33
- Re: writing alarm function, ppi, 20:31
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:14
- Re: All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, Kaz Kylheku, 20:13
- Re: writing alarm function, Antoninus Twink, 20:04
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jameskuyper, 19:51
- Re: Attribute Setting Methods, Martin Ambuhl, 19:48
- writing alarm function, Greg, 19:43
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:41
- Re: Urgent C Questions, J. J. Farrell, 19:38
- Re: storage class static of functions, jameskuyper, 19:38
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jameskuyper, 19:27
- Re: Attribute Setting Methods, Ben Bacarisse, 19:26
- Re: Attribute Setting Methods, Al Balmer, 19:26
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, CBFalconer, 19:16
- Attribute Setting Methods, kjell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:13
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jameskuyper, 19:13
- Re: Signed only index?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:10
- Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:07
- Re: Compiler optimizations, jameskuyper, 19:06
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Josh Sebastian, 19:00
- Compiler optimizations, sammy, 18:43
- Re: typedef and static, Walter Roberson, 18:14
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:01
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Antoninus Twink, 17:57
- Re: typedef and static, pete, 17:56
- Re: Urgent C Questions, pete, 17:49
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, CBFalconer, 17:48
- Re: return from a function, Malcolm McLean, 17:35
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Default User, 17:34
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 17:33
- All programs are undefined, Re: Why this works???, pete, 17:27
- Re: Urgent C Questions, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Chris Dollin, 17:24
- Re: storage class static of functions, Chris Dollin, 17:20
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Philip Potter, 17:20
- Re: Use gets Safely, Antoninus Twink, 17:20
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, CBFalconer, 17:19
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, CBFalconer, 17:11
- Re: typedef and static, Walter Roberson, 17:09
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, CBFalconer, 17:02
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Heathfield, 16:58
- Re: typedef and static, DiAvOl, 16:54
- Re: storage class static of functions, Walter Roberson, 16:53
- Re: typedef and static, pete, 16:49
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Eric Sosman, 16:49
- Re: storage class static of functions, Willem, 16:42
- Re: typedef and static, Chris Dollin, 16:40
- Re: storage class static of functions, Chris Dollin, 16:36
- Re: Use gets Safely, Chris Dollin, 16:33
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Antoninus Twink, 16:33
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Keith Thompson, 16:32
- Re: typedef and static, Antoninus Twink, 16:30
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Chris Dollin, 16:27
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Default User, 16:26
- Re: typedef and static, Default User, 16:22
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Walter Roberson, 16:11
- typedef and static, asit, 16:09
- Re: storage class static of functions, asit, 16:08
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, jacob navia, 16:07
- Re: storage class static of functions, jacob navia, 16:06
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, CJ, 15:57
- storage class static of functions, asit, 15:56
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Antoninus Twink, 15:55
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, jacob navia, 15:51
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Kenneth Brody, 15:47
- Re: question, Kenneth Brody, 15:44
- Re: question, Kenneth Brody, 15:38
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 15:38
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 15:37
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Chris Hills, 15:35
- Re: return from a function, Pedro Graca, 15:33
- Re: segmentation fault in recursion, vippstar, 15:32
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Paul Hsieh, 15:27
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Flash Gordon, 15:27
- Re: return from a function, Walter Roberson, 15:25
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Paul Hsieh, 15:20
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Flash Gordon, 15:18
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Bart C, 15:13
- segmentation fault in recursion, asit, 15:09
- return from a function, asit, 15:06
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Flash Gordon, 15:05
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Kenny McCormack, 15:04
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, Flash Gordon, 14:57
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Default User, 14:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Flash Gordon, 14:47
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, anon856525, 14:35
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kenneth Brody, 14:33
- Re: Use gets Safely, Antoninus Twink, 14:31
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 14:29
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Ben Pfaff, 14:27
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Ben Pfaff, 14:26
- Re: Use gets Safely, Kenny McCormack, 14:16
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Keith Thompson, 14:12
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Walter Roberson, 14:05
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 14:03
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Flash Gordon, 13:56
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Chris Dollin, 13:50
- Re: Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, Chris Hills, 13:44
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 13:42
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 13:37
- Re: linked list, Chris Dollin, 13:21
- Re: Use gets Safely, Chris Dollin, 13:15
- Re: Urgent C Questions, John Bode, 12:19
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Gotch@, 12:17
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jameskuyper, 12:04
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Joachim Schmitz, 11:51
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Richard Bos, 11:34
- Re: Urgent C Questions, jameskuyper, 11:29
- Re: what's the error ??, J. J. Farrell, 11:17
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Mark Bluemel, 11:13
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Chris Hills, 11:00
- Re: Why this works???, Kenneth Brody, 10:34
- Re: Why this works???, Kenneth Brody, 10:23
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Mark Bluemel, 10:12
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Al Balmer, 10:06
- Re: parse C source flow to extract program tree, Joachim Schmitz, 10:05
- Need Two More---C/ Unix---Contract---MI, TOM GUGGER, 10:03
- parse C source flow to extract program tree, Crooter, 09:26
- Re: Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, jacob navia, 08:45
- Eclipse CDT, cygwin and linking problems, Gotch@, 08:27
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 07:28
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, James Kuyper, 07:26
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 07:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Philip Potter, 06:55
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, pete, 06:38
- Re: Use gets Safely, Bart C, 06:22
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, pete, 06:21
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Mark Bluemel, 05:59
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 05:43
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 05:40
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 05:37
- Re: Use gets Safely, Malcolm McLean, 05:26
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Chris Hills, 05:03
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Philip Potter, 04:31
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Mark Bluemel, 04:31
- Re: print 19 on screen, Kenny McCormack, 04:29
- Re: Use gets Safely, Kenny McCormack, 04:18
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 04:16
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 04:15
- Re: print 19 on screen, Antoninus Twink, 04:10
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Joachim Schmitz, 03:53
- hai,free dollars read this, narraswarna8@xxxxxxxxx, 03:53
- Re: error and warning, Joachim Schmitz, 03:49
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, Keith Thompson, 03:41
- Re: what's the error ??, Mark Bluemel, 03:39
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Wolfgang Draxinger, 03:39
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Keith Thompson, 03:38
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Mark Bluemel, 03:38
- i am earning $150 per day without work. read me, narraswarna8@xxxxxxxxx, 03:33
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, Keith Thompson, 03:32
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Joachim Schmitz, 03:21
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Keith Thompson, 03:09
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Richard Bos, 03:07
- Re: what's the error ??, Richard Bos, 03:05
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, Richard Bos, 03:02
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 02:59
- Re: Use gets Safely, Richard Heathfield, 02:30
- Re: fflush and stdin, Harald van Dijk, 02:13
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, borkhuis, 02:07
- Re: switch case level, Chris Dollin, 01:14
- Re: Use gets Safely, Chris Dollin, 01:10
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, henry, 01:05
- Re: Use gets Safely, Walter Roberson, 00:40
- Re: fflush and stdin, Keith Thompson, 00:34
- Re: Use gets Safely, user923005, 00:29
- Use gets Safely, Billy Bong, 00:27
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Peter Nilsson, 00:27
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 00:02
January 14, 2008
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 23:56
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, William Ahern, 23:29
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Jack Klein, 22:57
- Re: Urgent C Questions, Walter Roberson, 22:16
- Urgent C Questions, Hans Schneider, 21:41
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 21:18
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:22
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, Richard Heathfield, 20:22
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:22
- Re: Beginner post-increment question, DiAvOl, 20:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 20:04
- Beginner post-increment question, Stang1, 20:03
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, CBFalconer, 19:51
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 19:50
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Al Balmer, 19:23
- Re: re-Write printf(), pete, 19:20
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Al Balmer, 19:13
- Re: error and warning, Flash Gordon, 19:08
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 18:52
- Re: print 19 on screen, Kenny McCormack, 18:51
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, jameskuyper, 18:49
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Walter Roberson, 18:44
- Re: fflush and stdin, pete, 18:28
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Ben Pfaff, 18:27
- Re: re-Write printf(), J. J. Farrell, 18:25
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Martin Ambuhl, 18:22
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Martin Ambuhl, 18:21
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 18:21
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:11
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, anon856525, 17:55
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:23
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Harald van Dijk, 17:22
- Re: fflush and stdin, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:22
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 17:21
- Re: error and warning, user923005, 17:19
- Re: switch case level, Randy Howard, 17:19
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, jacob navia, 17:16
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Martin Ambuhl, 17:12
- Re: switch case level, Martin Ambuhl, 17:08
- Re: fflush and stdin, Martin Ambuhl, 17:02
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, jacob navia, 16:59
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 16:56
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 16:52
- Re: switch case level, jameskuyper, 16:51
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Randy Howard, 16:50
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 16:45
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 16:43
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 16:40
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 16:34
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 16:27
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Walter Roberson, 16:17
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Malcolm McLean, 16:16
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Malcolm McLean, 16:10
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Willem, 15:55
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 15:49
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Lew Pitcher, 15:47
- Re: how to get binary representation of c objects ?, Eric Sosman, 15:46
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, Randy Howard, 15:42
- how to get binary representation of c objects ?, davidComSee, 15:39
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Willem, 15:38
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, CJ, 15:29
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, jacob navia, 15:15
- Re: Shareware C Compiler, user923005, 15:14
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 15:13
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: what's the error ??, Charlton Wilbur, 14:53
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Lew Pitcher, 14:52
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Willem, 14:42
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 14:41
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 14:40
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Lew Pitcher, 14:28
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 14:14
- Re: switch case level, Amandil, 14:08
- Re: Bitwise operators., CBFalconer, 14:07
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Kaz Kylheku, 14:01
- Re: what's the error ??, Default User, 14:00
- Re: Bitwise operators., christian.bau, 13:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 13:57
- Re: what's the error ??, Ben Pfaff, 13:45
- Re: fflush and stdin, John Bode, 13:41
- Re: fflush and stdin, Lew Pitcher, 13:26
- Re: switch case level, Willem, 13:23
- what's the error ??, asit, 13:22
- Re: fflush and stdin, Harald van Dijk, 13:18
- Re: fflush and stdin, asit, 13:14
- Re: fflush and stdin, Lew Pitcher, 13:09
- Re: fflush and stdin, Randy Howard, 13:03
- Re: switch case level, jameskuyper, 13:01
- Re: switch case level, dj3vande, 12:52
- Re: error and warning, Keith Thompson, 12:49
- Re: fflush and stdin, Richard Tobin, 12:48
- Re: switch case level, Richard Tobin, 12:47
- Re: fflush and stdin, jameskuyper, 12:46
- Re: print 19 on screen, Keith Thompson, 12:43
- Re: fflush and stdin, asit, 12:39
- switch case level, asit, 12:36
- Re: fflush and stdin, jameskuyper, 12:33
- Re: union size, Keith Thompson, 12:28
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 12:24
- fflush and stdin, asit, 12:13
- Re: ~♥* Babbies Veds *♥*Hot Sex*♥~, alllfyu, 12:10
- Re: Bitwise operators., Willem, 11:23
- Re: Bitwise operators., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:10
- jokes and funny pictures, Karthick, 10:59
- Re: Bitwise operators., Eric Sosman, 10:43
- Re: error and warning, Joachim Schmitz, 10:18
- Re: error and warning, Richard Heathfield, 10:17
- Re: error and warning, jameskuyper, 10:13
- Re: linked list, Ben Bacarisse, 10:09
- Re: error and warning, Lew Pitcher, 10:08
- Re: error and warning, dj3vande, 10:07
- Re: error and warning, Joachim Schmitz, 10:03
- error and warning, asit, 09:47
- Re: print 19 on screen, asit, 09:45
- Re: print 19 on screen, Kenny McCormack, 09:14
- Re: print 19 on screen, Mark Bluemel, 09:02
- Re: print 19 on screen, asit, 08:57
- Re: print 19 on screen, Mark Bluemel, 08:56
- Re: print 19 on screen, Mark Bluemel, 08:55
- Re: print 19 on screen, Richard Tobin, 08:52
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, CBFalconer, 08:36
- Re: print 19 on screen, asit, 08:33
- Re: print 19 on screen, Richard Tobin, 08:29
- Re: print 19 on screen, asit, 08:25
- Re: Bitwise operators., CBFalconer, 08:23
- Re: print 19 on screen, Mark Bluemel, 08:19
- print 19 on screen, asit, 08:16
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, James Kuyper, 08:12
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, pete, 07:54
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:48
- Re: Bitwise operators., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:46
- Re: linked list, Richard Heathfield, 07:46
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, pete, 07:45
- Re: Bitwise operators., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:40
- Re: linked list, vippstar, 07:38
- linked list, Vilas, 07:27
- Re: union size, Victor Blood, 07:10
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, James Kuyper, 07:07
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 06:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Wolfgang Draxinger, 06:33
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, James Kuyper, 06:32
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Mark Bluemel, 06:29
- Re: Bitwise operators., Robert Latest, 06:25
- Re: Why this works?!, James Kuyper, 06:22
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, James Kuyper, 06:20
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, dSpam@xxxxxxxx, 05:31
- Wholesale Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, nike shoes, 05:15
- Re: Bitwise operators., Philip Potter, 05:15
- Re: Bitwise operators., Philip Potter, 05:07
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, Ben Bacarisse, 05:05
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Laurent Deniau, 05:05
- Re: Bitwise operators., Philip Potter, 04:51
- Re: question, Philip Potter, 04:37
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, jacob navia, 04:25
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, Robert Latest, 04:01
- Re: Bitwise operators., Robert Latest, 03:54
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Mark Bluemel, 03:35
- Thinking of your next holiday, magicalnepal, 02:47
- Re: Browsing C library in Linux, William Ahern, 01:57
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, J. J. Farrell, 01:07
- Re: question, J. J. Farrell, 01:04
- Browsing C library in Linux, Madhusudhanan Chandrasekaran, 00:52
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Type of expression, David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Table based programming., David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: how is a struct represented internally., David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Regarding standared i/o functions, David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Thompson, 00:42
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, David Thompson, 00:42
January 13, 2008
- Re: Why this works?!, Bill Reid, 23:54
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Pengjun Jia, 23:01
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Keith Thompson, 22:36
- Re: re-Write printf(), pete, 21:15
- Re: Bitwise operators., Eric Sosman, 21:08
- Re: Bitwise operators., Walter Roberson, 20:42
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:41
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:37
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 20:28
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: Bitwise operators., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:34
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: Pointer conversions, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Harter, 18:38
- Re: Bitwise operators., dspfun, 18:17
- Re: Bitwise operators., Ben Pfaff, 18:08
- Bitwise operators., dspfun, 17:53
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 17:02
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 17:01
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 16:54
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 16:42
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Harter, 15:53
- Re: question, Default User, 15:49
- Re: question, Kenny McCormack, 15:47
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 15:46
- Re: question, James Kuyper, 15:41
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, gw7rib, 15:37
- Re: union size, James Kuyper, 15:27
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 15:22
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 15:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Harter, 15:05
- Re: question, Serve Lau, 14:51
- Re: union size, Serve Lau, 14:46
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 14:39
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Serve Lau, 14:39
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 14:34
- Re: re-Write printf(), Chris Dollin, 14:18
- Re: union size, Chris Dollin, 14:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Flash Gordon, 14:13
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 12:55
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Chris Hills, 12:46
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Martin Ambuhl, 12:37
- Re: Pointer conversions, Barry Schwarz, 12:36
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 12:05
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 11:57
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 11:46
- Re: question, Mark McIntyre, 11:43
- Re: union size, Keith Thompson, 11:37
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Keith Thompson, 11:27
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 11:23
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 11:21
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 11:18
- Re: Extern redefinition, Ulrich Eckhardt, 11:04
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Keith Thompson, 11:04
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Keith Thompson, 11:00
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 11:00
- Re: Who sends me a copy of c function manual, Nick Keighley, 10:54
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Nick Keighley, 10:46
- Re: re-Write printf(), Malcolm McLean, 10:41
- Re: re-Write printf(), vippstar, 10:39
- Re: re-Write printf(), vippstar, 10:34
- Extern redefinition, Mapisto, 10:24
- Re: re-Write printf(), Malcolm McLean, 10:24
- Re: re-Write printf(), Nick Keighley, 10:19
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 10:11
- Re: re-Write printf(), Eric Sosman, 10:07
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Serve Lau, 10:00
- re-Write printf(), riva, 09:26
- Re: union size, Harald van Dijk, 09:15
- Re: union size, Chris Dollin, 09:00
- Re: why it's not ar error...., Harald van Dijk, 08:41
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 08:32
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Ben Bacarisse, 08:30
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Kenny McCormack, 08:27
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 08:26
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 08:16
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Chris Hills, 08:13
- Re: union size, James Kuyper, 08:09
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), James Kuyper, 08:02
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), James Kuyper, 07:53
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 07:47
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 07:45
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, James Kuyper, 07:33
- Re: Preprocessor directive, vippstar, 07:20
- Re: question, vippstar, 06:43
- Re: Who sends me a copy of c function manual, jacob navia, 06:39
- Re: union size, Ulrich Eckhardt, 06:17
- Re: chars, Reagan Revision, 05:59
- union size, asit, 05:45
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Reagan Revision, 05:39
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Chris Hills, 05:39
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Reagan Revision, 05:15
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Serve Lau, 04:59
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Serve Lau, 04:55
- Re: Preprocessor directive, Joachim Schmitz, 04:54
- Re: Who sends me a copy of c function manual, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 04:52
- Re: question, Serve Lau, 04:50
- Preprocessor directive, asit, 04:49
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Antoninus Twink, 04:28
- hai friends, vadivel59, 03:55
- Re: question, Default User, 03:39
- Re: Who sends me a copy of c function manual, Martin Ambuhl, 01:39
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, Martin Ambuhl, 01:33
- Who sends me a copy of c function manual, arsir walker, 00:48
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, arsir walker, 00:38
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Ark Khasin, 00:34
January 12, 2008
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Chris Torek, 23:19
- Re: question, Keith Thompson, 22:39
- Re: question, Bill Cunningham, 22:37
- Re: question, J. J. Farrell, 22:28
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Justin Spahr-Summers, 22:23
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 22:17
- question, Bill Cunningham, 22:11
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Keith Thompson, 22:10
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Default User, 22:02
- HONESTO AND VERY EASY MONEY!!!!!what to in a year and did so in less than a month, gustarmas, 20:55
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Pierre Asselin, 20:42
- Re: Please give quick reply, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:15
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Richard Heathfield, 20:09
- Re: comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Richard Heathfield, 20:04
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Keith Thompson, 19:53
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 19:41
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, CBFalconer, 19:30
- Re: why it's not ar error...., CBFalconer, 19:22
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), dj3vande, 19:20
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Tim Smith, 19:12
- Re: Please give quick reply, Coos Haak, 19:10
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), James Kuyper, 18:47
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, J. J. Farrell, 18:45
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Flash Gordon, 18:30
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Richard Heathfield, 18:05
- Re: comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Joachim Schmitz, 17:46
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 17:44
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 17:44
- Re: Parsing?, user923005, 17:44
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 17:32
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:25
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Tor Rustad, 17:15
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Harald van Dijk, 17:07
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:57
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:44
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Willem, 16:40
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Richard Heathfield, 16:37
- Re: Please give quick reply, Harald van Dijk, 16:29
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Hills, 16:18
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Default User, 16:17
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 16:16
- Re: Why this works???, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:13
- Re: Why this works???, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:12
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 16:07
- Re: Please give quick reply, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:07
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Eric Sosman, 15:45
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Ben Pfaff, 15:31
- Re: The machine stack and the C language, Malcolm McLean, 15:26
- Re: Please give quick reply, Martien Verbruggen, 15:14
- The machine stack and the C language, jacob navia, 15:13
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Martien Verbruggen, 15:10
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- fun and relax, Lagas Team, 14:44
- Re: Why this works???, Joachim Schmitz, 14:25
- Re: why it's not ar error...., Harald van Dijk, 14:25
- Re: Please give quick reply, Joachim Schmitz, 14:18
- why it's not ar error...., asit, 14:16
- Re: Please give quick reply, Harald van Dijk, 13:46
- Re: Please give quick reply, Johannes Bauer, 13:32
- Re: Please give quick reply, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:26
- Please give quick reply, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:24
- Re: Why this works???, Johannes Bauer, 13:16
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, Martin Ambuhl, 13:03
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 13:00
- Re: Why this works???, Joachim Schmitz, 12:57
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 12:56
- Re: Why this works???, Dave Null, 12:48
- Re: Why this works???, Mark McIntyre, 12:46
- Re: Why this works???, Tom��h�lidhe, 12:32
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Richard Tobin, 12:03
- what did the bible say about Mohammad?, small giant, 11:38
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard, 10:50
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Richard, 10:46
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 10:38
- Re: Why this works???, Richard, 09:45
- Re: Why this works???, Richard, 09:43
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, Joachim Schmitz, 09:22
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, vippstar, 08:53
- Buy Cheap Jeans Hoodies T-shirts Jacket on (www.shoessuperstar.com), swukong34, 07:49
- Wholesale nike max nike shox,jordan shoes!Hot sell Nike max nike shox Jordan shoes!, swukong36, 07:44
- hot sex, sinthiyarani@xxxxxxxxx, 07:41
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, suresh shenoy, 07:37
- Re: char format specifier and segmentation fault, Richard Heathfield, 07:37
- char format specifier and segmentation fault, asit, 07:26
- Re: Why this works???, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:17
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Mark F. Haigh, 07:07
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Richard Tobin, 06:58
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Mark F. Haigh, 06:32
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Paul Hsieh, 05:33
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, CBFalconer, 05:14
- Final call for papers, john, 05:04
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 04:34
- Re: Signed only index?, Keith Thompson, 03:59
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Keith Thompson, 03:55
- Re: Signed only index?, jaysome, 02:20
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Richard Heathfield, 02:08
- ~♥* Babbies Veds *♥*Hot Sex*♥~, Agathiyan8@xxxxxxxxx, 02:05
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 00:29
- Re: Why this works???, Keith Thompson, 00:21
- Re: Why this works???, user923005, 00:19
January 11, 2008
- Re: Why this works???, Walter Roberson, 23:46
- Re: Signed only index?, Jack Klein, 22:33
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Tor Rustad, 22:12
- Re: Why this works???, CBFalconer, 22:01
- Re: Why this works???, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:09
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 20:48
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 20:46
- Re: Why this works???, user923005, 20:34
- Re: how to free this, Barry Schwarz, 20:34
- Re: Quines, Barry Schwarz, 20:30
- Re: Why this works???, Mark McIntyre, 20:29
- Re: Why this works???, user923005, 20:28
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 20:18
- Re: Why this works???, Kenny McCormack, 20:06
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 19:46
- Re: Why this works???, Walter Roberson, 19:36
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Ark Khasin, 19:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 19:32
- Re: Why this works???, Harald van Dijk, 19:22
- Re: Why this works???, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:05
- Re: Quines, Harald van Dijk, 18:50
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, Default User, 18:40
- Why this works???, Kenny McCormack, 18:35
- Re: Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, jacob navia, 18:17
- Problems reserving memory with the 'malloc' command, anon856525, 18:10
- Re: Quines, Kenneth Brody, 17:52
- Re: Signed only index?, J. J. Farrell, 17:37
- Re: Quines, Army1987, 17:26
- Re: Signed only index?, Malcolm McLean, 17:25
- Re: Beginner array question, Malcolm McLean, 17:16
- Re: Signed only index?, Walter Roberson, 17:00
- Re: debug msgs, Malcolm McLean, 17:00
- Re: Signed only index?, Ben Pfaff, 16:55
- Re: Signed only index?, Malcolm McLean, 16:49
- Re: Signed only index?, Walter Roberson, 16:45
- Re: Signed only index?, Richard, 16:37
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Walter Roberson, 15:06
- Re: Beginner array question, Walter Roberson, 15:04
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Malcolm McLean, 14:59
- Re: Signed only index?, Walter Roberson, 14:59
- Beginner array question, Stang1, 14:58
- Re: Signed only index?, Malcolm McLean, 14:52
- Re: help, Bart C, 13:48
- Re: Why this works?!, J. J. Farrell, 13:29
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jameskuyper, 13:16
- Re: sizeof and structure, Roman Mashak, 13:02
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Francois Grieu, 12:59
- Re: Why this works?!, Ben Bacarisse, 12:58
- Re: help, Chris Dollin, 12:50
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, David Tiktin, 12:39
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, David Tiktin, 12:30
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:14
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Ben Pfaff, 12:10
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Walter Roberson, 12:09
- Re: more portable compile-time assert(), Laurent Deniau, 12:07
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 12:00
- Re: help, Army1987, 11:58
- more portable compile-time assert(), Francois Grieu, 11:44
- Re: help, Army1987, 11:04
- Re: help, Army1987, 11:02
- Re: Event Handling using Design Patterns & some hard questions, Al Balmer, 11:00
- Re: Why this works?!, Army1987, 10:21
- Re: Signed only index?, jameskuyper, 10:14
- Re: Signed only index?, Richard Tobin, 10:12
- watch santhiya nake out,trisha bathing,nayanthara ing, vikram . suray, 10:05
- Re: Signed only index?, Mark Bluemel, 10:03
- Re: Signed only index?, vippstar, 10:00
- Re: Signed only index?, Ben Pfaff, 09:59
- Signed only index?, Vijay Kumar R. Zanvar, 09:52
- Re: Programming in standard c, Rui Maciel, 08:27
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Richard Tobin, 08:25
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, Richard Tobin, 08:19
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, James Kuyper, 08:09
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, James Kuyper, 07:57
- Re: help, Bart C, 06:12
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Mark Bluemel, 05:17
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Nickolai Leschov, 04:59
- Re: year information not displayed properly, dSpam@xxxxxxxx, 04:43
- Re: Error while reading .pem file., CBFalconer, 03:00
- Re: Why this works?!, CBFalconer, 02:58
- Re: Why this works?!, Martin Ambuhl, 02:30
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:23
- Re: Why this works?!, Ben Bacarisse, 01:55
- Re: Why this works?!, user923005, 01:23
- Error while reading .pem file., khalil.jibran@xxxxxxxxx, 01:22
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Gordon Burditt, 01:12
- Why this works?!, v4vijayakumar, 01:10
- Flavored Coffee Syrup Adds A New Dimension To Beans, bs866806, 01:10
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Ben Bacarisse, 01:07
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Gordon Burditt, 00:54
- Re: help, spaglia, 00:22
January 10, 2008
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Randy Howard, 22:15
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Jack Klein, 22:12
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Jack Klein, 22:10
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Keith Thompson, 22:00
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Tor Rustad, 21:15
- Re: Event Handling using Design Patterns & some hard questions, Chris Thomasson, 21:10
- Re: Event Handling using Design Patterns & some hard questions, Chris Thomasson, 21:08
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, David Tiktin, 20:54
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, CBFalconer, 20:53
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, David Tiktin, 20:49
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 20:44
- Event Handling using Design Patterns & some hard questions, firehead . satish, 20:43
- Re: help, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Ben Pfaff, 20:33
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Flash Gordon, 20:21
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, Ben Pfaff, 20:19
- Re: Regarding restrict qualifier, christian.bau, 20:01
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:52
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Chris Torek, 19:46
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, pete, 19:27
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Ian Collins, 19:13
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 19:11
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, William Ahern, 19:03
- Re: free causes core-dump, Keith Thompson, 19:01
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 19:01
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 19:00
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack - TPA, Default User, 18:55
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 18:43
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, sandysimons53, 18:42
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Randy Howard, 18:34
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Randy Howard, 18:33
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 18:32
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Randy Howard, 18:32
- Re: Lex / Yacc problem, Flash Gordon, 18:31
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 18:29
- Re: Lex / Yacc problem, dj3vande, 18:00
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:46
- Lex / Yacc problem, Xose Lois Castro, 17:25
- Re: Does this code executes properly ??????????, J. J. Farrell, 17:21
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jameskuyper, 17:02
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, Default User, 17:02
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Tor Rustad, 16:57
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Tor Rustad, 16:52
- Re: function pointers, J. J. Farrell, 16:52
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, Francine . Neary, 16:27
- Re: Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, Richard Heathfield, 16:24
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Flash Gordon, 16:22
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, gw7rib, 16:20
- Allocating memory for a pointer passed from another function, Adam Baker, 16:10
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 16:05
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Walter Roberson, 16:02
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, jacob navia, 15:44
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 15:39
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, sandysimons53, 15:27
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, jacob navia, 15:27
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, David Tiktin, 15:11
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, dj3vande, 14:56
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, Eric Sosman, 14:50
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Al Balmer, 14:33
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Lew Pitcher, 14:29
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, dj3vande, 14:05
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, David Mathog, 14:00
- Re: Recovering from out of memory on the stack, Lew Pitcher, 13:55
- Re: help, spaglia, 13:38
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Tor Rustad, 13:35
- Recovering from out of memory on the stack, sandysimons53, 13:31
- Re: Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, Ed Prochak, 13:05
- Re: sizeof and structure, Roman Mashak, 13:04
- Compendiums of compiler warning/error messages mapped to actual code problems?, David Mathog, 12:53
- Re: chars, Keith Thompson, 12:13
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Mark Bluemel, 11:48
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:48
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Mark Bluemel, 11:46
- Re: function pointers, Richard, 11:33
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, David Mathog, 11:29
- Re: Does this code executes properly ??????????, karthikbalaguru, 11:20
- Re: question on globals, dj3vande, 11:18
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:05
- Re: Which Visual C++?, dj3vande, 10:37
- Programming contest @ kurukshetra08, jollylyphe, 10:29
- Re: help, Bart C, 10:04
- Re: C - Video conferencing SDK?, vippstar, 09:57
- Re: help, Richard Heathfield, 09:51
- Re: Obfuscated, trilingual, Richard Tobin, 09:49
- Re: help, Thad Smith, 09:47
- Re: help, Richard Tobin, 09:45
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Richard Tobin, 09:42
- Buy Cheap Jeans Hoodies T-shirts Jacket on (www.shoessuperstar.com)Buy Cheap Jeans Hoodies T-shirts Jacket on (www.shoessuperstar.com), swukong29, 09:39
- Re: Obfuscated, trilingual, vippstar, 09:36
- Re: help, Bart C, 09:33
- Re: help, osmium, 09:12
- Re: help, Joachim Schmitz, 09:03
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Eric Sosman, 08:52
- Re: help, Bart C, 08:48
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Flash Gordon, 08:46
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, James Kuyper, 08:41
- Re: help, Bart C, 08:38
- wellcome to best home job, josearokia, 08:28
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Flash Gordon, 08:26
- Wholesale all NIKE.shox.Air max.AF1.TN.Jordan.shoes.Apple Ipods Nano, Xbox 360, Sony PS3, Sony PSP.wii.all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.cn, 008, 07:42
- Re: Does this code executes properly ??????????, pete, 07:27
- Re: Does this code executes properly ??????????, Mark Bluemel, 07:26
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 07:23
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 07:20
- Does this code executes properly ??????????, csbyadgi, 07:19
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Flash Gordon, 07:16
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, James Kuyper, 07:14
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Flash Gordon, 07:07
- Re: help, Flash Gordon, 06:55
- Re: year information not displayed properly, James Kuyper, 06:55
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, pete, 06:42
- Re: How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, Richard Tobin, 06:42
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ben Bacarisse, 06:42
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Flash Gordon, 06:39
- Re: How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Mark Bluemel, 06:36
- How to make local variable's address is 8 byte alignment?, Pengjun Jia, 06:09
- Re: C - Video conferencing SDK?, Antoninus Twink, 04:13
- Re: Regarding restrict qualifier, karthikbalaguru, 04:03
- Regarding restrict qualifier, venkat, 03:45
- Re: Obfuscated, trilingual, Richard Bos, 03:40
- Re: help, user923005, 03:34
- Re: question on globals, Richard Bos, 03:29
- Re: help, user923005, 03:18
- Obfuscated, trilingual, aarklon, 03:07
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, cr88192, 02:36
- Re: year information not displayed properly, ssylee, 02:12
- Re: help, Ravishankar S, 01:51
- Re: help, Ian Collins, 01:50
- Re: help, user923005, 01:39
- Re: help, luvraghu, 01:37
- Re: help, Ravishankar S, 01:22
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Jerry Newsome, 01:08
- Re: help, karthikbalaguru, 01:04
- Re: help, Ravishankar S, 00:44
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Thad Smith, 00:33
- Re: help, Richard Heathfield, 00:07
January 09, 2008
- Re: function pointers, Ark Khasin, 23:13
- Re: help, Ian Collins, 23:02
- help, luvraghu, 22:39
- Re: C - Video conferencing SDK?, Jack Klein, 22:09
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Jack Klein, 22:08
- sizeof and structure, Roman Mashak, 21:36
- Re: function pointers, Ark Khasin, 21:30
- Re: Which Visual C++?, William Ahern, 21:16
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Peter Nilsson, 21:00
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 20:48
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Peter Nilsson, 20:38
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 20:37
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Peter Nilsson, 20:30
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 20:27
- C - Video conferencing SDK?, blanko, 20:21
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 20:16
- Re: C Bibliography, Tor Rustad, 20:13
- Re: C Bibliography, Tor Rustad, 20:07
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Tor Rustad, 20:07
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Gordon Burditt, 19:40
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, CBFalconer, 19:40
- Re: Renaissance Games, Randy Howard, 19:35
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Walter Roberson, 19:02
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Walter Roberson, 18:47
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Walter Roberson, 18:43
- Re: chars, Joe Wright, 18:32
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ben Bacarisse, 18:18
- Re: How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, Antoninus Twink, 18:15
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, William Ahern, 18:15
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Antoninus Twink, 18:13
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, jameskuyper, 18:09
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Antoninus Twink, 18:09
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Antoninus Twink, 18:02
- Re: Pointer conversions, CBFalconer, 17:52
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, CBFalconer, 17:48
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Walter Roberson, 17:48
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 17:45
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Eric Sosman, 17:39
- Re: free causes core-dump, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, user923005, 17:31
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Flash Gordon, 17:16
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Ben Pfaff, 17:14
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, Flash Gordon, 17:08
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Asbjørn Sæbø, 16:41
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Asbjørn Sæbø, 16:37
- Re: Use of Long and Long Long, vippstar, 16:03
- Use of Long and Long Long, Bart C, 15:33
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:46
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Mark McIntyre, 14:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:38
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Kaz Kylheku, 13:59
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, jameskuyper, 13:34
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, jameskuyper, 13:26
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, Syren Baran, 13:25
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, Harald van Dijk, 13:23
- Renaissance Games, RenGamesSupport@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 13:07
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, vippstar, 12:56
- Re: function prototypes and function addresses, Walter Roberson, 12:53
- function prototypes and function addresses, Syren Baran, 12:43
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard Heathfield, 12:18
- Re: How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, Richard Heathfield, 12:13
- Re: Pointer conversions, Keith Thompson, 12:12
- Re: C Bibliography, jacob navia, 12:10
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Keith Thompson, 12:05
- Re: How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, vippstar, 12:03
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Ben Pfaff, 12:01
- Re: question on globals, Ben Pfaff, 12:00
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, CBFalconer, 11:54
- Re: Pointer conversions, CBFalconer, 11:46
- Re: How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, Richard Heathfield, 11:17
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, pete, 10:44
- How are organizations adopting agile software development approaches?, SoftDevJobs, 10:40
- Re: Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Mark Bluemel, 10:36
- Re: small string question, Nick Keighley, 10:22
- Macro that allocates storage and "returns" value, Asbjørn Sæbø, 10:09
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Thad Smith, 09:15
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Eric Sosman, 09:06
- Re: sizeof and structure, suresh shenoy, 08:57
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Bos, 08:14
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 07:54
- Re: question on globals, James Kuyper, 07:51
- Re: question on globals, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: question on globals, Pietro Cerutti, 07:45
- Re: Which Visual C++?, fnegroni, 07:44
- question on globals, srblinux@xxxxxxxxx, 07:27
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ben Bacarisse, 07:27
- Re: free causes core-dump, James Kuyper, 07:22
- Re: C Bibliography, James Kuyper, 07:08
- Re: C Bibliography, James Kuyper, 07:04
- Re: Which Visual C++?, user1, 06:57
- Re: Which Visual C++?, James Kuyper, 06:55
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ben Bacarisse, 06:35
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard Heathfield, 06:34
- Re: free causes core-dump, Joachim Schmitz, 06:31
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ben Bacarisse, 06:26
- free causes core-dump, loudking, 06:25
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard Heathfield, 06:25
- Re: Too much current, Nick Keighley, 06:15
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Nick Keighley, 06:06
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 06:06
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ravishankar S, 05:46
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Nick Keighley, 05:38
- Re: sizeof and structure, fnegroni, 05:28
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ravishankar S, 05:24
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Joachim Schmitz, 05:23
- Re: sizeof and structure, Ravishankar S, 05:20
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Spiros Bousbouras, 05:16
- Re: C Bibliography, Friedrich Dominicus, 04:46
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Richard Tobin, 04:46
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 04:44
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 04:39
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Friedrich Dominicus, 04:36
- Re: C Bibliography, Richard Bos, 04:34
- Re: year information not displayed properly, MisterE, 04:15
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Hills, 03:39
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Reagan Revision, 03:29
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard Heathfield, 03:20
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, CBFalconer, 03:08
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Hills, 03:04
- Re: C Bibliography, Reagan Revision, 02:59
- Re: Pointer conversions, CBFalconer, 02:56
- Re: Pointer conversions, CBFalconer, 02:52
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Keith Thompson, 02:40
- Re: chars, Keith Thompson, 02:32
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Joachim Schmitz, 02:10
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Richard Heathfield, 01:51
- year information not displayed properly, ssylee, 01:30
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, jacob navia, 00:21
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Chris McDonald, 00:14
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Why Tea, 00:07
January 08, 2008
- Re: Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Chris McDonald, 23:43
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Citizen C, 23:40
- Re: Is this printf okay?, James Kuyper, 23:37
- Re: Is this printf okay?, James Kuyper, 23:30
- Re: chars, James Kuyper, 23:25
- Arithmetic for 32-bit and 64-bit machines, Why Tea, 23:21
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Jerry Newsome, 23:21
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Citizen C, 23:17
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Jerry Newsome, 22:54
- Re: function pointers, Ian Collins, 22:45
- Re: function pointers, cr88192, 22:12
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Jack Klein, 21:38
- Re: Which Visual C++?, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 21:25
- Re: chars, Joe Wright, 21:20
- Re: C Bibliography, Eric Sosman, 20:59
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 20:46
- Re: C Bibliography, Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:05
- Re: chars, Bill Cunningham, 19:43
- Re: chars, cr88192, 19:30
- Re: function pointers, jacob navia, 19:22
- Re: function pointers, Ian Collins, 19:02
- Re: function pointers, cr88192, 19:00
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: C Bibliography, Roland Pibinger, 17:35
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 17:25
- Re: C Bibliography, jacob navia, 17:24
- Re: Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 17:23
- Re: how to free this, Flash Gordon, 17:11
- Re: Linked List, pete, 17:08
- Re: Linked List, pete, 16:57
- Re: Linked List, pete, 16:50
- Re: Linked List, pete, 16:40
- Re: Linked List, pete, 16:32
- Re: C Bibliography, osmium, 15:34
- Re: Casts for srand? (FAQ 13.17), Harald van Dijk, 15:25
- Re: Casts for srand? (FAQ 13.17), dj3vande, 15:21
- Re: chars, jameskuyper, 15:12
- Casts for srand? (FAQ 13.17), Mara Guida, 15:08
- Re: chars, Harald van Dijk, 15:04
- Re: chars, user923005, 14:48
- Re: how to free this, Flash Gordon, 14:48
- Re: C Bibliography, Flash Gordon, 14:47
- Re: C Bibliography, Eric Sosman, 14:40
- Re: C Bibliography, jacob navia, 13:57
- Re: C Bibliography, Eric Sosman, 13:53
- C Bibliography, jacob navia, 13:47
- Re: chars, Bill Cunningham, 13:40
- Re: problems with fread, Eric Sosman, 12:31
- Re: problems with fread, vippstar, 12:22
- problems with fread, steve005, 12:03
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Eric Sosman, 11:26
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, jameskuyper, 11:26
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, rudolf, 11:18
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 10:59
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 10:52
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Szabolcs Nagy, 10:30
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Jensen Somers, 10:30
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Richard Tobin, 10:28
- Re: Errors on parameter passing, Mark Bluemel, 10:02
- Re: regarding socket programming, Randy Howard, 09:59
- Re: Quines, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:36
- Errors on parameter passing, frakie, 09:27
- Re: Is this printf okay?, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Hot clips,great clips:, bullism2@xxxxxxxxx, 08:54
- Re: aunty videos, zilzil166, 08:35
- Re: Quines, James Kuyper, 08:06
- Re: Which Visual C++?, Friedrich Dominicus, 08:01
- Re: Quines, James Kuyper, 07:46
- Re: Quines, James Kuyper, 07:44
- Re: C questions, James Kuyper, 07:37
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Spoon, 07:28
- Re: Which Visual C++?, user1, 07:25
- Re: Linked List, mekaju2001, 06:53
- Re: how to free this, Richard Heathfield, 06:51
- Which Visual C++?, noagbodjivictor@xxxxxxxxx, 06:36
- Re: superseded by c++?, cr88192, 06:32
- Re: superseded by c++?, cr88192, 06:04
- Professional Seminar - Linux Kernel Debugging, Concepts Systems, 05:33
- Re: regarding socket programming, cr88192, 05:09
- Re: regarding socket programming, Michal Nazarewicz, 05:05
- regarding socket programming, Anand, 03:39
- Re: function pointers, dSpam@xxxxxxxx, 03:36
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Keith Thompson, 03:10
- Re: how to free this, Keith Thompson, 02:56
- Re: chars, Keith Thompson, 02:44
- Re: Quines, Keith Thompson, 02:35
- Re: Quines, Tarique, 02:34
- Re: Quines, Tarique, 02:31
- Re: C questions, Keith Thompson, 02:25
- Re: C questions, Harald van Dijk, 02:01
- Re: C questions, sophia . agnes, 01:48
- Re: Pointer conversions, CBFalconer, 01:40
- Re: More C questions from the same book, Ravishankar S, 01:39
- C signature programs, sophia . agnes, 01:39
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Barry Schwarz, 01:37
- Re: More C questions from the same book, sophia . agnes, 01:25
- Re: small string question, Jack Klein, 01:06
- Re: Stack, Barry Schwarz, 01:01
- Re: C questions, Ravishankar S, 00:30
January 07, 2008
- Re: C questions, Thad Smith, 23:41
- Re: strtok but only want the last field, William Ahern, 23:20
- Re: strtok but only want the last field, Jack Klein, 23:17
- Re: Quines, Jack Klein, 23:11
- Re: Pointer conversions, Thad Smith, 23:08
- Re: Is this printf okay?, James Kuyper, 22:46
- Re: chars, James Kuyper, 22:40
- Is this printf okay?, Jerry Newsome, 22:18
- Re: strtok but only want the last field, dj3vande, 22:10
- strtok but only want the last field, vijay, 21:54
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 21:19
- Re: how to free this, vippstar, 20:52
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 20:52
- Re: chars, user923005, 20:33
- Re: variable storage, user923005, 20:29
- Re: Quines, user923005, 19:45
- Re: how to free this, Al Balmer, 19:05
- Re: chars, Default User, 18:46
- Re: how to free this, copx, 18:36
- Re: chars, Michal Nazarewicz, 18:13
- Re: superseded by c++?, Bart C, 18:01
- Re: Question about va_list, CBFalconer, 17:12
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, CBFalconer, 17:04
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, CBFalconer, 16:57
- Re: Quines, JimS, 16:54
- Re: how to free this, Eric Sosman, 16:52
- how to free this, copx, 16:41
- Re: chars, Default User, 16:19
- Re: chars, Bill Cunningham, 16:06
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Syren Baran, 15:50
- Re: chars, Default User, 15:47
- Re: chars, Bill Cunningham, 15:45
- Re: Quines, jameskuyper, 15:41
- Re: chars, Bill Cunningham, 15:40
- Re: chars, user923005, 15:35
- Re: [Urgent]: How To Accessing C++ Class objects in C : getting error fatal error C1189: #error : "eh.h is only for C++!", SM Ryan, 15:32
- Re: chars, Default User, 15:31
- Re: Quines, user923005, 15:28
- chars, Bill Cunningham, 15:20
- Re: C questions, jameskuyper, 15:13
- Quines, Tarique, 15:07
- Re: ffs function, user923005, 14:39
- Re: superseded by c++?, Lew Pitcher, 14:26
- Re: superseded by c++?, Paul Hsieh, 14:16
- Re: variable storage, Randy Howard, 14:13
- Re: C questions, Randy Howard, 14:11
- Re: C questions, Chris Hills, 14:09
- Re: C questions, Ben Bacarisse, 13:41
- Re: C questions, Randy Howard, 13:33
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, John Bode, 13:30
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Flash Gordon, 13:28
- Re: C questions, Richard Heathfield, 13:25
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Flash Gordon, 13:12
- Re: C questions, Richard Tobin, 13:01
- Re: C questions, Ben Bacarisse, 12:59
- Re: C questions, Chris Torek, 12:48
- Re: C questions, sophia . agnes, 12:48
- Re: C questions, jameskuyper, 12:46
- Re: C questions, Eric Sosman, 12:44
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Stephen Sprunk, 12:33
- Re: C questions, Richard Heathfield, 12:33
- Re: C questions, jacob navia, 12:30
- Re: C questions, Richard Tobin, 12:27
- Re: C questions, Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: C questions, Harald van Dijk, 12:07
- C questions, sophia . agnes, 11:50
- Re: What's the meaning of (void) cast?, J. J. Farrell, 11:31
- Re: Question about va_list, J. J. Farrell, 11:23
- Re: superseded by c++?, Richard Bos, 11:18
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Richard Bos, 11:18
- Re: variable storage, Keith Thompson, 10:42
- Re: superseded by c++?, Bart C, 09:58
- Re: Question about va_list, Ben Bacarisse, 08:28
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Philip Potter, 08:17
- Re: Question about va_list, Ben Bacarisse, 08:07
- Re: Question about va_list, James Kuyper, 07:52
- Re: variable storage, Wang Jiaji, 07:36
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard Bos, 07:15
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Richard Bos, 07:11
- Re: : How To Accessing C++ Class objects in C : getting error fatal error C1189: #error : "eh.h is only for C++!", sachinv1821@xxxxxxxxx, 06:14
- Re: [Urgent]: How To Accessing C++ Class objects in C : getting error fatal error C1189: #error : "eh.h is only for C++!", Ben Bacarisse, 06:10
- [Urgent]: How To Accessing C++ Class objects in C : getting error fatal error C1189: #error : "eh.h is only for C++!", sachinv1821@xxxxxxxxx, 05:58
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, cr88192, 05:57
- Re: variable storage, santosh, 05:41
- Re: function pointers, cr88192, 05:25
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Hills, 05:01
- Re: function pointers, Michal Nazarewicz, 04:40
- Re: function pointers, Michal Nazarewicz, 04:38
- Re: Question about va_list, Fred, 04:04
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Ravishankar S, 04:02
- Re: What's the meaning of (void) cast?, Ian Collins, 03:43
- What's the meaning of (void) cast?, alex, 03:38
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Francois Grieu, 03:18
- **Hot Actress Videos**Sexy Lesbian**, richardelisha, 03:17
- Re: function pointers, Richard Heathfield, 03:09
- Re: ffs function, CBFalconer, 03:00
- Re: function pointers, Ian Collins, 02:56
- Re: function pointers, CBFalconer, 02:52
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 02:46
- Re: ffs function, jacob navia, 02:46
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, CBFalconer, 02:42
- Re: ffs function, jacob navia, 02:40
- Re: variable storage, Ian Collins, 02:39
- Re: superseded by c++?, CBFalconer, 02:38
- variable storage, kanalkannan, 02:35
- Re: ffs function, jacob navia, 02:34
- Re: [OT] Too much current, CBFalconer, 02:20
- Re: [OT] Too much current, CBFalconer, 02:17
- *♥♥♥* star keanni lei analsex ing ,Hot anime tit ed and jizzed. *♥♥♥*, suryarajas, 02:08
- Re: Question about va_list, Keith Thompson, 01:57
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 01:49
- Are you looking for a software job in CA -> 123CareerChanger.com, 123careerchanger.com, 01:38
- Re: Question about va_list, Ark Khasin, 01:35
- Question about va_list, Fred, 00:43
- Re: function pointers, cr88192, 00:40
- Re: function/variable references in c, Ravishankar S, 00:38
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, cr88192, 00:13
January 06, 2008
- Re: function pointers, Ian Collins, 23:57
- Re: function pointers, cr88192, 23:44
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, mrdarrett, 23:43
- Re: Pointer conversions, Keith Thompson, 23:42
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, mrdarrett, 23:40
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Keith Thompson, 23:30
- Re: function pointers, Ark Khasin, 23:21
- Re: Pointer conversions, cr88192, 23:20
- Re: small string question, Thad Smith, 23:13
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, cr88192, 23:11
- Re: ffs function, Keith Thompson, 22:59
- Re: ffs function, Thad Smith, 22:37
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Keith Thompson, 22:36
- Re: small string question, cr88192, 22:36
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Keith Thompson, 22:35
- 99 GB free online storage, Mr Smart, 22:24
- Free and Reliable Web Hosting information, Mr Smart, 22:23
- Re: Question related to printf, David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: some strange for me (addition), David Thompson, 21:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 21:48
- Re: small string question, Jack Klein, 21:46
- Re: small string question, cr88192, 20:38
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:33
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:26
- Re: ffs function, Terminal Crazy, 20:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:03
- Re: small string question, Bill Cunningham, 20:02
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Ben Bacarisse, 19:59
- Re: ffs function, Randy Howard, 19:58
- Re: ffs function, Chris Torek, 19:55
- Re: small string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:51
- Re: small string question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:39
- small string question, Bill Cunningham, 19:34
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:34
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Ben Bacarisse, 19:22
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Flash Gordon, 19:00
- Re: Function Name Mungling, SM Ryan, 18:53
- ffs function, jacob navia, 18:47
- Re: [OT] Too much current, jacob navia, 18:26
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, andreyvul, 18:21
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 18:18
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Antoninus Twink, 18:11
- Fight Global Warming, Climate Change, Food Shortages and Desertification with the Magic Tree, xik, 18:01
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 17:31
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: Pointer conversions, cr88192, 17:17
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, jacob navia, 16:10
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Serve Lau, 15:17
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 14:46
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Ben Bacarisse, 14:15
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Ben Bacarisse, 14:12
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Ben Bacarisse, 14:07
- Re: function pointers, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:40
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 13:35
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:33
- Re: function pointers, Richard Harter, 13:32
- Re: Secure C programming, Tor Rustad, 13:20
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:19
- Re: function pointers, spaglia, 13:16
- Re: function pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:16
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:12
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 12:40
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Al Balmer, 12:30
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Harald van Dijk, 12:26
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Harald van Dijk, 12:25
- Re: function pointers, Keith Thompson, 12:19
- Re: function pointers, vippstar, 11:40
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, CBFalconer, 11:38
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, vippstar, 11:36
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 11:28
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, CBFalconer, 11:24
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Harald van Dijk, 11:23
- Re: superseded by c++?, CBFalconer, 11:19
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, vippstar, 10:46
- function pointers, hifrnds007, 10:40
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Mark McIntyre, 10:40
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Bart C, 10:02
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Tim Smith, 09:30
- Re: Pointer conversions, Harald van Dijk, 09:25
- Re: [OT] Too much current, Philip Potter, 09:23
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Serve Lau, 09:22
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Tim Smith, 09:20
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Tim Smith, 09:18
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Eric Sosman, 09:11
- Re: Pointer conversions, Army1987, 08:53
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:40
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Harald van Dijk, 08:34
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Army1987, 08:30
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Army1987, 08:18
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, Randy Howard, 08:01
- Success Or Failure: There Is No Such Thing As Failure, bs866806, 06:41
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, jacob navia, 05:33
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, JimS, 05:29
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Serve Lau, 04:32
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Serve Lau, 04:26
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Chris Torek, 04:15
- **********ssssssssssssssex with needsssssssssssss**, vadivel59, 03:20
- Re: A function is an address, Wojtek Lerch, 01:43
- Re: superseded by c++?, cr88192, 00:39
- Re: superseded by c++?, cr88192, 00:24
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 00:05
January 05, 2008
- Re: Function Name Mungling, SM Ryan, 23:37
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, SM Ryan, 23:37
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CBFalconer, 22:56
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Sjouke Burry, 22:28
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:11
- Re: pointers to functions question, Barry Schwarz, 21:46
- Re: function/variable references in c, Jack Klein, 21:29
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Ian Collins, 21:26
- Re: Secure C programming, James Kuyper, 20:59
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Richard Tobin, 20:52
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Thad Smith, 20:49
- Re: function/variable references in c, Flash Gordon, 20:49
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Gordon Burditt, 20:47
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Flash Gordon, 20:45
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ian Collins, 20:43
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, James Kuyper, 20:42
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Thad Smith, 20:36
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Mark McIntyre, 20:31
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 20:23
- Re: superseded by c++?, Paul Hsieh, 20:09
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:03
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Chad, 20:02
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 19:53
- Re: Pointer conversions, Pierre Asselin, 19:39
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 19:29
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Harald van Dijk, 19:23
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Mark McIntyre, 19:18
- Re: Function Name Mungling, Ian Collins, 19:06
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Tor Rustad, 19:05
- Function Name Mungling, Jim Mackellan, 19:02
- Re: Pointer conversions, pete, 18:58
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Mark McIntyre, 18:57
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 18:40
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 18:38
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 18:31
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Mark McIntyre, 18:27
- Re: Question about CLC, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Harald van Dijk, 18:04
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 17:56
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Tor Rustad, 17:41
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, christian.bau, 17:36
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Richard Tobin, 17:34
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Eric Sosman, 17:29
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ian Collins, 17:21
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Tor Rustad, 17:11
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Harald van Dijk, 16:57
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 16:52
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Syren Baran, 16:46
- Re: User Input, Eric Sosman, 16:37
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Coos Haak, 16:33
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Chad, 16:24
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Coos Haak, 16:15
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Eric Sosman, 16:10
- Re: RotateLeft, what does it do?, Don Porges, 16:09
- RotateLeft, what does it do?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:01
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 15:59
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Tor Rustad, 15:55
- Re: User Input, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Walter Roberson, 15:40
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: User Input, hltbra@xxxxxxxxx, 15:23
- Re: User Input, hltbra@xxxxxxxxx, 15:18
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- A question about taking the absolute value of an integer, Chad, 14:36
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Harter, 14:33
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Harter, 14:19
- 2008 new year,2008 new business, 2008 new life, much =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_cheap_and_beautiful_product_will_help_you_which_r_u_like_??= ⊙ ⊙http://www.shoesserver-yhnetstore.cn/⊙ ⊙, yhnetstore5, 14:17
- Re: function/variable references in c, jacob navia, 14:05
- Re: Secure C programming, Walter Roberson, 14:04
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 13:59
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Ben Bacarisse, 13:54
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 13:52
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Richard Tobin, 13:51
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Walter Roberson, 13:50
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Tobin, 13:48
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, lawrence . jones, 13:36
- Re: Secure C programming, Tor Rustad, 13:18
- Re: inclusione file, Joachim Schmitz, 13:07
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Thad Smith, 13:04
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 13:00
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 12:51
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Harald van Dijk, 12:48
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Tor Rustad, 12:44
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Willem, 12:28
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Tor Rustad, 12:27
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Willem, 12:26
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 12:26
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 12:24
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Willem, 12:21
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 12:21
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 12:18
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Willem, 12:12
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, CBFalconer, 12:06
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 12:05
- Re: Stack, Tarique, 12:03
- Re: inclusione file, CBFalconer, 12:02
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:02
- User Input, Tarique, 12:02
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:58
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 11:54
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, CBFalconer, 11:54
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, CBFalconer, 11:45
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Harald van Dijk, 11:39
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, vippstar, 11:37
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Harald van Dijk, 11:36
- Re: Question about CLC, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 11:29
- Lazy evaluation question, Boltar, 11:26
- Re: Secure C programming, Richard Heathfield, 11:02
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 11:02
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 11:02
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 10:48
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 10:45
- Re: Secure C programming, Tor Rustad, 10:43
- Self contained 2D plotting library in C, Glenn MacGougan, 10:33
- Re: Secure C programming, Richard Heathfield, 10:18
- Pointer conversions, Ioannis Vranos, 10:18
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Chris Dollin, 09:02
- Re: inclusione file, Joachim Schmitz, 08:28
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 08:17
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, Xiaoning He, 08:10
- Re: Question about CLC, Julienne Walker, 07:55
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, Flash Gordon, 07:53
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Flash Gordon, 07:50
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Flash Gordon, 07:38
- Re: Some questions, tfelb, 07:29
- Re: can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, Ulrich Eckhardt, 07:10
- can my program requires 4GB memory in debian?, Xiaoning He, 06:51
- Re: inclusione file, Remo D., 06:44
- Re: inclusione file, Remo D., 06:43
- Re: inclusione file, Army1987, 06:42
- Re: Question about CLC, Serve Lau, 06:36
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Richard Heathfield, 06:23
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Serve Lau, 06:22
- inclusione file, mary, 06:22
- Re: function/variable references in c, Rahul, 06:12
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, copx, 06:11
- Re: problem with sizeof, christian.bau, 06:06
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Willem, 05:52
- Re: Question about CLC, jacob navia, 05:43
- Re: function/variable references in c, jacob navia, 05:42
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 05:40
- function/variable references in c, Rahul, 05:35
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, jacob navia, 05:30
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Ian Collins, 05:23
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, jacob navia, 05:22
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, jacob navia, 05:18
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Richard Heathfield, 05:16
- Re: Secure C programming, Richard Heathfield, 05:15
- Re: min/max in stdlib.h?!, Ian Collins, 05:13
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, CBFalconer, 05:05
- min/max in stdlib.h?!, copx, 04:58
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, vippstar, 04:39
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 04:28
- Re: Some questions, jameschen, 03:34
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, santosh, 03:03
- Re: question on register data type, santosh, 03:00
- Re: timers, jameschen, 02:52
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Pfaff, 00:25
- Re: problem with sizeof, Barry Schwarz, 00:15
January 04, 2008
- Re: problem with sizeof, Barry Schwarz, 23:53
- Re: cast pointer to int, cr88192, 22:29
- Re: Reg:Structures, Al Balmer, 22:18
- Re: superseded by c++?, cr88192, 21:42
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 20:54
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, user923005, 20:36
- Who is Allaah?, ياهادي أهدنا وأهدي بنا (أم نادر), 20:33
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, christian.bau, 20:27
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, christian.bau, 20:24
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 20:15
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Thomasson, 20:11
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Ian Collins, 20:10
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Keith Thompson, 20:06
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 20:02
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 19:48
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 19:37
- Re: OT: postings quoted without attributions, user923005, 19:30
- Re: Stack, user923005, 19:29
- Re: Question about CLC, nbaker2328, 19:24
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Flash Gordon, 18:29
- Re: standard functions as macros, Harald van Dijk, 18:12
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Eric Sosman, 17:50
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Wolfgang Draxinger, 17:38
- Re: standard functions as macros, pete, 17:30
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ian Collins, 17:25
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, user923005, 17:16
- Re: Secure C programming, Tor Rustad, 17:07
- Re: superseded by c++?, user923005, 17:05
- Re: cast pointer to int, SM Ryan, 17:02
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, SM Ryan, 17:01
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 16:58
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Serve Lau, 16:50
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 16:49
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 16:43
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 16:40
- OT: postings quoted without attributions, Walter Roberson, 16:35
- Re: Some questions, gw7rib, 16:30
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tor Rustad, 16:22
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Francois Grieu, 16:22
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, jameskuyper, 16:15
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Harald van Dijk, 16:14
- Re: Some questions, CBFalconer, 16:14
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, CBFalconer, 16:05
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 16:01
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 15:55
- Re: Answer to question 4.8 from the FAQ, Jean-François Lemaire, 15:51
- Re: timers, Richard Heathfield, 15:49
- timers, raghu, 15:44
- Re: Reg:Structures, Flash Gordon, 15:42
- Too much current, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:33
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, lawrence . jones, 15:26
- Re: Answer to question 4.8 from the FAQ, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: Stack, Tarique, 15:22
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- This works, FZ, 15:11
- ⊙_⊙do business by internet ⊙_⊙ www ⊙_⊙ elecserver-yhnetstore ⊙ ⊙ cn, yhnetstore11, 14:58
- Re: superseded by c++?, Ian Collins, 14:36
- Re: cast pointer to int, Keith Thompson, 14:23
- Re: cast pointer to int, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: Stack, spaglia, 14:02
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, Eric Sosman, 13:32
- Re: Stack, Walter Roberson, 13:31
- Re: Stack, Tarique, 13:26
- ~/~/~/~ A Powerful, Safe and Economical Alternative to VIAGRA ~/~/~/~, avriljohon, 13:22
- Re: alignment when allocating an array of struct, jameskuyper, 13:19
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 13:03
- Re: Stack, Tarique, 13:02
- alignment when allocating an array of struct, Francois Grieu, 12:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ben Bacarisse, 12:45
- Re: References and pointers, J. J. Farrell, 12:32
- Re: Stack, John Gordon, 12:30
- Stack, Tarique, 12:07
- Re: Question about CLC, Hallvard B Furuseth, 11:56
- Re: superseded by c++?, santosh, 11:56
- Re: cast pointer to int, Walter Roberson, 11:54
- Re: Answer to question 4.8 from the FAQ, Jean-François Lemaire, 11:52
- Re: superseded by c++?, jameskuyper, 11:32
- Re: Answer to question 4.8 from the FAQ, Eric Sosman, 11:28
- Re: superseded by c++?, Charlton Wilbur, 11:27
- Answer to question 4.8 from the FAQ, Jean-François Lemaire, 11:15
- Re: superseded by c++?, Paul Hsieh, 11:07
- Some questions, tfelb, 10:58
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, Chris Dollin, 10:30
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Spiro Trikaliotis, 10:17
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), Kenneth Brody, 10:01
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Army1987, 09:23
- Re: cast pointer to int, Army1987, 09:06
- Re: cast pointer to int, Army1987, 08:34
- Re: cast pointer to int, Army1987, 08:30
- Re: standard functions as macros, Army1987, 08:19
- Re: standard functions as macros, James Kuyper, 08:07
- Re: superseded by c++?, Randy Howard, 08:04
- Re: pointers to functions question, Randy Howard, 08:00
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Randy Howard, 07:59
- Re: cast pointer to int, James Kuyper, 07:52
- Re: standard functions as macros, vippstar, 07:50
- Re: cast pointer to int, James Kuyper, 07:40
- Re: pointers to functions question, Mark F. Haigh, 07:32
- Re: superseded by c++?, James Kuyper, 07:29
- Re: standard functions as macros, Richard Bos, 07:18
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, none, 07:14
- Re: standard functions as macros, vippstar, 07:09
- Re: superseded by c++?, James Kuyper, 07:08
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, Ravishankar S, 07:03
- standard functions as macros, vippstar, 07:02
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, Ravishankar S, 06:58
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, James Kuyper, 06:57
- Re: C style multidimentionel arrays, none, 06:55
- Re: pointers to functions question, Mark F. Haigh, 06:53
- Re: cast pointer to int, Ravishankar S, 06:47
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Bart C, 06:45
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Hills, 06:40
- C style multidimentionel arrays, none, 06:37
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Richard Tobin, 06:35
- Re: pointers to functions question, Richard Heathfield, 06:29
- Re: pointers to functions question, Richard Heathfield, 06:26
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Richard Tobin, 06:25
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Richard Heathfield, 06:24
- Re: question on register data type, Nick Keighley, 06:13
- Re: question on register data type, Ian Collins, 06:08
- Re: question on register data type, Richard Bos, 06:06
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Philip Potter, 06:04
- Re: superseded by c++?, Richard Bos, 06:03
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Richard Bos, 06:02
- Re: pointers to functions question, Nick Keighley, 06:00
- question on register data type, srblinux@xxxxxxxxx, 05:52
- Re: superseded by c++?, user923005, 05:49
- Re: cast pointer to int, Mark F. Haigh, 05:41
- Re: cast pointer to int, santosh, 05:29
- Re: pointers to functions question, Mark F. Haigh, 05:29
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Chris Hills, 05:25
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Hills, 05:23
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Hills, 05:20
- Re: cast pointer to int, somenath, 05:14
- Re: superseded by c++?, Paul Hsieh, 05:06
- Re: pointers to functions question, Joachim Schmitz, 04:59
- Re: superseded by c++?, user923005, 04:56
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Mark F. Haigh, 04:52
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Mark Bluemel, 04:46
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Ravishankar S, 04:34
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Ravishankar S, 04:31
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Mark McIntyre, 04:18
- Re: fill in array, user923005, 04:13
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Hills, 04:12
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", user923005, 04:10
- fill in array, cmk128, 04:10
- Re: Howto "goto address_x;", Mark McIntyre, 04:08
- Howto "goto address_x;", Frank, 03:49
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Aditya, 03:23
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 03:22
- Re: Secure C programming, Friedrich Dominicus, 03:15
- Re: cast pointer to int, CBFalconer, 03:15
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 03:11
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, CBFalconer, 03:05
- Re: Reg:Structures, CBFalconer, 02:54
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, CBFalconer, 02:50
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 02:40
- Re: cast pointer to int, user923005, 02:34
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Ulrich Eckhardt, 02:18
- Re: cast pointer to int, cr88192, 02:16
- Re: cast pointer to int, Jack Klein, 01:34
- Re: Reg:Structures, Golden California Girls, 01:12
- Re: cast pointer to int, Walter Roberson, 00:38
- Re: function returning days of the week, J. J. Farrell, 00:32
- cast pointer to int, somenath, 00:16
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 00:01
January 03, 2008
- i want to share my secrets with u........., aquorang, 23:50
- Re: Behavior of the code, Dan Henry, 23:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 22:50
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:25
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Tobin, 22:18
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Keith Thompson, 22:12
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Keith Thompson, 22:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 22:04
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Eric Sosman, 22:04
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Keith Thompson, 22:03
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Ian Collins, 21:55
- lucas ares, lucas, 21:32
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Gordon Burditt, 21:28
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, CBFalconer, 21:10
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Gordon Burditt, 21:04
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), CBFalconer, 21:02
- Re: fread to a struct, Keith Thompson, 20:57
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, CBFalconer, 20:53
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Keith Thompson, 20:42
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, user923005, 20:41
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 20:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 20:22
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, dj3vande, 20:21
- Re: creating a function to test bits in a byte, and it returns, Peter Nilsson, 20:14
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 20:12
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, jxh, 20:10
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, dj3vande, 20:07
- creating a function to test bits in a byte, and it returns, DJ, 20:00
- Re: A function is an address, Douglas A. Gwyn, 19:59
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 19:58
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:53
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Default User, 19:46
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Pfaff, 19:46
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Walter Roberson, 19:44
- Re: Question about CLC, Default User, 19:33
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 19:33
- parentheses in logic operands, Roman Mashak, 19:32
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Default User, 19:28
- Re: how is a struct represented internally., Walter Roberson, 19:27
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 19:22
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 19:13
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tor Rustad, 19:06
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 19:04
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, jameskuyper, 18:56
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, jameskuyper, 18:50
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Tobin, 18:49
- Re: fread to a struct, Tor Rustad, 18:48
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 18:45
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Walter Roberson, 18:41
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 18:37
- Call for Papers - EPHAM 2008 (Workshop on Exploiting Parallelism with Transactional Memory and other Hardware Assisted Methods), yonghong . song, 18:33
- Re: how is a struct represented internally., Martien Verbruggen, 18:31
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Disgruntled Customer, 18:23
- Re: parentheses in logic operands, SM Ryan, 18:23
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Walter Roberson, 18:18
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 17:54
- Re: Question about CLC, user923005, 17:54
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Tor Rustad, 17:53
- Re: how is a struct represented internally., Walter Roberson, 17:50
- Re: how is a struct represented internally., Nick Keighley, 17:40
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Default User, 17:32
- how is a struct represented internally., xpika, 17:21
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 16:50
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 16:29
- Re: Question about CLC, Al Balmer, 16:24
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Pfaff, 16:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, Al Balmer, 16:19
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, jameskuyper, 16:17
- Re: Question about CLC, jameskuyper, 16:08
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, spaglia, 16:04
- Re: Question about CLC, user923005, 15:41
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Eric Sosman, 15:40
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 15:38
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 15:37
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Eric Sosman, 15:33
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 15:20
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, jameskuyper, 15:18
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, jameskuyper, 15:16
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 15:15
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 15:14
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 15:05
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, jameskuyper, 15:02
- Re: superseded by c++?, user923005, 14:57
- Re: pointers to functions question, Richard Heathfield, 14:49
- Re: maximse the use of cache in code, user923005, 14:48
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Heathfield, 14:47
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 14:47
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Heathfield, 14:46
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Randy Howard, 14:44
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, andreyvul, 14:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 14:23
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Charles Richmond, 14:22
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 14:22
- Re: Question about CLC, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:22
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, andreyvul, 14:16
- Re: Question about CLC, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:08
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 14:06
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, andreyvul, 14:03
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Chris Dollin, 13:45
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Aditya, 13:41
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Chris Dollin, 13:40
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 13:34
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 13:32
- Re: How to recognize the binary file is in Release mode or in Debug mode from the core file., andreyvul, 13:26
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, andreyvul, 13:22
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), mrdarrett, 13:17
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 13:13
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 13:02
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 12:53
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Gus Gassmann, 12:52
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 12:51
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Ben Pfaff, 12:48
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 12:46
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:42
- Re: How to recognize the binary file is in Release mode or in Debug mode from the core file., CBFalconer, 12:28
- Re: pointers to functions question, CBFalconer, 12:25
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 12:19
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Jim, 12:15
- Re: function returning days of the week, slingerland3g, 12:14
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Stephen Sprunk, 12:09
- Re: Secure C programming, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:08
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 12:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:56
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 11:45
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, CBFalconer, 11:43
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), CBFalconer, 11:38
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Keith Thompson, 11:36
- Re: References and pointers, Joachim Schmitz, 11:32
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), mrdarrett, 11:22
- Re: Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Randy Howard, 11:13
- Re: Reg:Structures, CBFalconer, 11:12
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 11:05
- Re: pointers to functions question, Keith Thompson, 11:02
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Al Balmer, 11:01
- Re: Programming in standard c, Nick Keighley, 11:01
- Re: pointers to functions question, Keith Thompson, 11:00
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Tobin, 11:00
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), CBFalconer, 10:56
- Re: References and pointers, Al Balmer, 10:55
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Aditya, 10:51
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Heathfield, 10:46
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:40
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Walter Roberson, 10:39
- Re: How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 10:35
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Kenny McCormack, 10:32
- How to insert node in Linked list without temp pointer, Aditya, 10:17
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Richard Heathfield, 10:13
- Newbie - Reading and Parsing from Text File, Mojo, 09:48
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Hills, 09:38
- Re: How to recognize the binary file is in Release mode or in Debug mode from the core file., Mark Bluemel, 09:33
- Re: Problem with scanf()/gets(), Mark Bluemel, 09:33
- How to recognize the binary file is in Release mode or in Debug mode from the core file., prajakta143, 09:31
- Problem with scanf()/gets(), subratasinha2006, 09:24
- Re: pointers to functions question, Ben Bacarisse, 08:55
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Richard, 08:50
- Re: Secure C programming, Nick Keighley, 08:32
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 08:27
- Re: Secure C programming, Randy Howard, 08:01
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Randy Howard, 07:57
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Randy Howard, 07:55
- Re: References and pointers, Philip Potter, 06:39
- Re: Secure C programming, Richard Bos, 06:27
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Thomasson, 05:54
- Re: Type of expression, vippstar, 05:38
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 05:36
- Re: Type of expression, Walter Roberson, 05:23
- Type of expression, somenath, 05:18
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Thomasson, 04:34
- Re: pointers to functions question, Richard Heathfield, 04:04
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Chris Torek, 04:02
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 03:50
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 03:46
- Re: pointers to functions question, Keith Thompson, 03:40
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, pete, 03:24
- Re: References and pointers, Joachim Schmitz, 03:20
- Re: parentheses in logic operands, vippstar, 03:18
- Re: Behavior of the code, Chris Torek, 03:13
- Re: Secure C programming, Friedrich Dominicus, 03:08
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), Richard Heathfield, 02:57
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 02:51
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 02:46
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 02:44
- Re: C and ADA, Jerry, 02:38
- Re: Linked List, pete, 02:27
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Martin Ambuhl, 02:12
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, pete, 02:08
- Re: References and pointers, Golden California Girls, 02:06
- Re: References and pointers, Golden California Girls, 02:04
- Re: Secure C programming, Golden California Girls, 02:00
- Re: superseded by c++?, Chris Dollin, 01:32
- Re: maximse the use of cache in code, Ravishankar S, 01:25
- Re: maximse the use of cache in code, Walter Roberson, 01:24
- www.fashion-sky.com wholesale cheap Nike Air Jordan shoes jean belt handbag coat watch mobile phones, fashion-sky . 002, 01:16
- Re: Secure C programming, Golden California Girls, 01:14
- maximse the use of cache in code, zaheer031@xxxxxxxxx, 01:12
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., pete, 01:12
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 01:04
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Ulrich Eckhardt, 00:57
- Re: Reg:Structures, raghu, 00:36
- Re: superseded by c++?, Tim Smith, 00:26
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 00:25
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Ravishankar S, 00:25
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Golden California Girls, 00:19
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Ravishankar S, 00:18
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Golden California Girls, 00:15
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 00:09
January 02, 2008
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Jack Klein, 23:50
- Re: pointers to functions question, WaterWalk, 23:49
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Jack Klein, 23:46
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Peter Nilsson, 23:18
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Keith Thompson, 23:04
- Re: function returning days of the week, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 22:38
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), mrdarrett, 22:26
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Thad Smith, 22:03
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 22:01
- Re: pointers to functions question, Ivan Novick, 22:01
- Re: function returning days of the week, Ivan Novick, 21:58
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), andreyvul, 21:54
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 21:26
- pointers to functions question, Logan Lee, 21:22
- Re: References and pointers, Chad, 21:22
- Re: Constrained Optimization Problem in C, Eric Sosman, 21:16
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 21:14
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Army1987, 21:13
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Dan Henry, 21:10
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Joe Wright, 21:06
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Peter Nilsson, 20:58
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 20:58
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Dan Henry, 20:48
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 20:31
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Tobin, 20:25
- Re: Behavior of the code, Dan Henry, 20:24
- Re: enum-type anonymous structs, Peter Nilsson, 20:03
- Re: miscompilation of volatiles?, Peter Nilsson, 19:58
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Harter, 19:21
- enum-type anonymous structs, andreyvul, 19:12
- miscompilation of volatiles?, John Regehr, 19:02
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 18:49
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), Martin Ambuhl, 18:26
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), Kenny McCormack, 18:20
- Re: OT: Re: Programming in standard c, Kenny McCormack, 18:18
- Re: C and ADA, Lucretia, 18:09
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), mrdarrett, 18:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 18:00
- Re: Reason # %ld not to use void main(), Martin Ambuhl, 17:55
- Reason # %ld not to use void main(), mrdarrett, 17:50
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: C and ADA, Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: C and ADA, Harald van Dijk, 17:44
- Re: References and pointers, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- C and ADA, Brian, 17:33
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: References and pointers, Al Balmer, 17:28
- Re: function returning days of the week, Keith Thompson, 17:28
- Re: Constrained Optimization Problem in C, user923005, 17:26
- Re: References and pointers, Harald van Dijk, 17:22
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 17:22
- Re: References and pointers, jacob navia, 17:13
- Re: Productive C, Al Balmer, 17:13
- OT: Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:09
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 17:07
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 17:03
- Re: Question about CLC, Ico, 16:53
- Re: Sequence point violation?, Harald van Dijk, 16:52
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 16:51
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:47
- Constrained Optimization Problem in C, Explore_Imagination, 16:44
- Re: Problem with fork inside a thread and execv(), suresh shenoy, 16:42
- Re: fread to a struct, SM Ryan, 16:42
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, John Bode, 16:38
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 16:38
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, jameskuyper, 16:37
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 16:36
- Re: superseded by c++?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:30
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, jameskuyper, 16:29
- Re: Posix Threads and select(), suresh shenoy, 16:23
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Richard Heathfield, 16:22
- Re: merge sort, pete, 16:21
- Re: superseded by c++?, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:14
- Re: Question about CLC, pete, 15:57
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 15:49
- Earn $5000 and more per month, tropics, 15:39
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, CBFalconer, 15:31
- Re: function returning days of the week, Keith Thompson, 15:24
- Re: References and pointers, Kenny McCormack, 15:23
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, CBFalconer, 15:20
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: Sequence point violation?, Flash Gordon, 15:17
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 14:51
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Keith Thompson, 14:48
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 14:46
- Re: problem with sizeof, Roman Mashak, 14:45
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Torek, 14:43
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 14:43
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 14:36
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 14:30
- Re: Posix Threads and select(), Walter Roberson, 14:28
- Re: problem with sizeof, Roman Mashak, 14:26
- Re: Sequence point violation?, Keith Thompson, 14:25
- Posix Threads and select(), Richard Cranium, 14:24
- Re: Sequence point violation?, Chris Torek, 14:24
- Re: function returning days of the week, Keith Thompson, 14:21
- Re: problem with sizeof, Roman Mashak, 14:18
- Re: References and pointers, Keith Thompson, 14:11
- Re: References and pointers, Keith Thompson, 14:08
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:06
- Re: fread to a struct, Keith Thompson, 13:48
- Re: superseded by c++?, Martin Ambuhl, 13:44
- Re: References and pointers, Antoninus Twink, 13:42
- Re: superseded by c++?, Mike Wahler, 13:30
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 13:22
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Pfaff, 13:21
- Re: Suffix allowed on expressions?, Ben Pfaff, 13:20
- Suffix allowed on expressions?, dspfun, 13:07
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 13:05
- Re: superseded by c++?, Rico Secada, 13:02
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 13:02
- Re: References and pointers, Martin Ambuhl, 12:53
- Re: Sequence point violation?, Ben Pfaff, 12:48
- superseded by c++?, alansnow, 12:47
- http://www.clothserver-yhnetstore.cn/ cheap parada shoes lv shoes gucci shoes nike shox, air, yhnetstore12, 12:27
- Re: Programming in standard c, santosh, 12:18
- Re: problem with sizeof, Roman Mashak, 12:17
- Re: References and pointers, jameskuyper, 12:09
- problem with sizeof, Roman Mashak, 12:04
- Re: Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), Mark Bluemel, 11:37
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Bruce McFarling, 11:34
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Army1987, 11:07
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 10:58
- Re: Using const qualifier, Army1987, 10:57
- Re: function returning days of the week, Army1987, 10:50
- Re: References and pointers, Army1987, 10:45
- Re: References and pointers, Army1987, 10:39
- Re: References and pointers, Army1987, 10:36
- Re: References and pointers, Army1987, 10:28
- Re: References and pointers, Army1987, 10:18
- Sequence point violation?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:16
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 10:03
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:46
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Randy Howard, 09:29
- Re: Problem with fork inside a thread and execv(), Kenny McCormack, 09:21
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Kenny McCormack, 09:21
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:15
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:11
- Re: Secure C programming, Richard Bos, 08:33
- Re: problem with sizeof, Ben Bacarisse, 08:28
- Re: time and srand, merl the perl, 08:03
- Re: function returning days of the week, merl the perl, 07:49
- Re: References and pointers, Bart C, 07:41
- Re: fread to a struct, Richard Heathfield, 07:40
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 07:33
- Re: fread to a struct, vippstar, 07:33
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., James Kuyper, 07:10
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 07:04
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 06:53
- Re: fread to a struct, Richard Heathfield, 06:51
- Re: problem with sizeof, Richard Tobin, 06:49
- Re: problem with sizeof, Richard Tobin, 06:48
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 06:42
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 06:34
- Re: fread to a struct, Ravishankar S, 06:04
- fread to a struct, vippstar, 05:56
- Re: Productive C, Rico Secada, 05:45
- Re: Table based programming., Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:36
- Re: Secure C programming, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:25
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Chris Torek, 05:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 05:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:07
- Re: Making a program pause, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:00
- Re: Table based programming., Richard Bos, 04:42
- Re: Compiling source code out of the blue, Randy Howard, 04:36
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Chris Hills, 04:27
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 04:25
- Re: Secure C programming, Randy Howard, 04:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 04:11
- Re: Secure C programming, Randy Howard, 04:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:58
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:48
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:40
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 03:27
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., somenath, 03:23
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Walter Roberson, 03:08
- Re: Problem with fork inside a thread and execv(), Walter Roberson, 03:01
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Chris Torek, 02:53
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, SM Ryan, 02:25
- Problem with fork inside a thread and execv(), CMorgan, 02:20
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: confused..again, Richard Bos, 02:06
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., somenath, 01:55
- Re: Secure C programming, Golden California Girls, 01:11
- Re: Secure C programming, Golden California Girls, 01:07
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Golden California Girls, 00:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, dj3vande, 00:34
- Re: problem with sizeof, Ravishankar S, 00:23
January 01, 2008
- Compiling source code out of the blue, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 23:47
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Eric Sosman, 22:47
- Re: pointer addition with structs, andreyvul, 22:26
- Re: pointer addition with structs, Martin Ambuhl, 22:18
- Re: pointer addition with structs, andreyvul, 22:16
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), cr88192, 22:13
- Re: pointer addition with structs, Martin Ambuhl, 22:04
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 21:59
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 21:43
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 21:13
- Re: References and pointers, Keith Thompson, 21:12
- Re: problem with sizeof, Dinesh P, 21:00
- OT: DJGPP vs MinGW, Joe Wright, 20:51
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, cr88192, 20:41
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 20:31
- Re: pointer addition with structs, Ben Pfaff, 20:30
- Re: pointer addition with structs, cr88192, 20:28
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Randy Howard, 20:27
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 20:14
- pointer addition with structs, andreyvul, 20:00
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Thad Smith, 19:58
- Re: problem with sizeof, Mike Wahler, 19:56
- Re: problem with sizeof, Walter Roberson, 19:48
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Walter Roberson, 19:33
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, CBFalconer, 19:24
- Re: Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Keith Thompson, 18:42
- Re: Reg:Structures, Keith Thompson, 18:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 18:33
- Re: Productive C, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: References and pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:25
- Re: References and pointers, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:22
- Access to a ridiculous computer? :-D, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 18:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 18:05
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 18:04
- Re: Productive C, William Hughes, 17:57
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:51
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 17:39
- Re: Reg:Structures, Old Wolf, 17:21
- Re: Reg:Structures, Keith Thompson, 17:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:17
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", CBFalconer, 17:12
- Re: References and pointers, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 17:07
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Thad Smith, 17:03
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 17:02
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Web Designing and Hosting Packages, karen.systems@xxxxxxxxx, 16:53
- Re: Table based programming., CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: Programming in standard c, Harald van Dijk, 16:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 16:17
- Re: Table based programming., SM Ryan, 15:49
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 15:10
- Re: Is pointer malloc'ed?, Ivan Novick, 15:08
- Re: Productive C, Mike Wahler, 15:00
- Re: Productive C, Ivan Novick, 14:55
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Chris Hills, 14:07
- Re: Productive C, Marc, 13:44
- Re: References and pointers, jacob navia, 13:09
- Re: Reg:Structures, Martin Ambuhl, 13:00
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Philip Potter, 13:00
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Randy Howard, 12:51
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 12:35
- Re: Productive C, Chris Hills, 12:22
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Chris Hills, 12:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, Army1987, 12:08
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Army1987, 12:06
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Army1987, 11:55
- Re: Productive C, Thad Smith, 11:49
- Re: confused..again, Army1987, 11:43
- Re: Productive C, Eric Sosman, 11:05
- Productive C, Khookie, 10:49
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Richard Tobin, 10:42
- Re: Reg:Structures, Richard Heathfield, 10:27
- Re: Is pointer malloc'ed?, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
- Reg:Structures, raghu, 10:19
- Is pointer malloc'ed?, Khookie, 10:12
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 09:39
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 08:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, James Kuyper, 08:12
- Re: References and pointers, jacob navia, 08:06
- Re: Table based programming., cr88192, 07:49
- Re: References and pointers, James Kanze, 07:26
- Re: Table based programming., Bart C, 07:23
- Re: function returning days of the week, Keith Thompson, 07:08
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, James Kuyper, 07:06
- Re: static question, copx, 07:01
- Re: static question, Citizen C, 06:52
- Re: static question, Ben Bacarisse, 06:48
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Keith Thompson, 06:40
- Re: function returning days of the week, Paul Heininger, 06:31
- static question, copx, 06:26
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 06:03
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, William Pursell, 05:10
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 04:52
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Chris Hills, 04:33
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, vippstar, 04:30
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", Flash Gordon, 04:19
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 04:18
- Re: function returning days of the week, Default User, 04:05
- Re: confused..again, Default User, 04:05
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 03:52
- Re: Table based programming., Malcolm McLean, 03:39
- Re: Table based programming., Chris Dollin, 02:34
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 02:08
- Re: function returning days of the week, user923005, 01:51
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 01:37
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Chris Torek, 01:23
- Re: function returning days of the week, ssylee, 01:03
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), Kris Kringle, 00:17
- Re: debug msgs, Richard Heathfield, 00:15
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", Martin Ambuhl, 00:06
December 31, 2007
- Re: debug msgs, Peter Nilsson, 23:28
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 23:18
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 23:00
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, user923005, 22:56
- Re: SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, user923005, 22:53
- SHA-1 in fully-portable C89?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:31
- Re: function reading hour register either in 12 or 24 hour formats and returning properly, Thad Smith, 22:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 22:06
- Re: debug msgs, Richard Heathfield, 22:05
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Keith Thompson, 21:51
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 21:47
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Richard Tobin, 21:42
- Re: Bandwidth stealing, SM Ryan, 21:38
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, SM Ryan, 21:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, SM Ryan, 21:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, SM Ryan, 21:38
- Re: debug msgs, SM Ryan, 21:38
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 21:10
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 21:08
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Richard Heathfield, 21:04
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 20:42
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 20:33
- Re: References and pointers, CBFalconer, 20:30
- Re: confused..again, Flash Gordon, 20:24
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, William Pursell, 20:13
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", bananaguyc, 20:10
- Re: confused..again, CBFalconer, 20:06
- Re: What's the deal with "long double", Walter Roberson, 19:59
- What's the deal with "long double", bananaguyc, 19:47
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, CBFalconer, 19:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 19:17
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 19:16
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 19:03
- Re: confused..again, Randy Howard, 18:22
- Re: confused..again, Mark McIntyre, 18:16
- Re: confused..again, Mark McIntyre, 18:14
- Re: References and pointers, cr88192, 18:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 18:07
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last month), CLC stats, 18:06
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Mark McIntyre, 18:02
- Re: Question about CLC, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 10:16
Privacy Policy