comp.lang.c (date)
December 31, 2007
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 17:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 17:34
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, هنداوى, 17:22
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: Secure C programming, Randy Howard, 15:52
- Re: Table based programming., user923005, 15:49
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 15:02
- Re: References and pointers, jacob navia, 15:00
- Re: Secure C programming, Walter Roberson, 14:57
- Re: Making a program pause, user923005, 14:47
- Re: Secure C programming, Golden California Girls, 14:46
- Re: function returning days of the week, user923005, 14:38
- Re: References and pointers, Alexey Stepanyan, 14:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 14:33
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, Walter Roberson, 14:32
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, user923005, 14:21
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, user923005, 14:16
- Re: References and pointers, Martin Ambuhl, 14:13
- Re: Table based programming., user923005, 14:13
- Re: Table based programming., jacob navia, 14:12
- Re: Table based programming., CJ, 14:08
- Re: References and pointers, Simon Saize, 14:07
- Re: function returning days of the week, Martin Ambuhl, 14:04
- Re: Table based programming., jacob navia, 14:02
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, Lothar Behrens, 14:00
- Re: Programming in standard c, Syren Baran, 13:58
- Re: Table based programming., Joe Wright, 13:47
- Re: confused..again, Default User, 13:42
- Re: References and pointers, Richard Heathfield, 13:40
- Re: confused..again, Default User, 13:40
- Re: confused..again, Default User, 13:39
- References and pointers, Simon Saize, 13:31
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, Lothar Behrens, 13:12
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, jameskuyper, 13:00
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, jameskuyper, 12:48
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, Harald van Dijk, 12:31
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, jameskuyper, 12:30
- Re: Redirect stdin ?, William Pursell, 12:24
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Harald van Dijk, 12:20
- Re: Table based programming., Lothar Behrens, 12:03
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Joe Wright, 11:55
- Table based programming., Malcolm McLean, 11:43
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, هنداوى, 11:43
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, jacob navia, 11:25
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, هنداوى, 11:17
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, dmtabs12@xxxxxxxxx, 11:16
- Re: How to deal with big-size files??, jacob navia, 11:10
- Re: confused..again, Serve Lau, 11:04
- How to deal with big-size files??, هنداوى, 10:59
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Ulrich Eckhardt, 09:02
- Re: Bandwidth stealing, Kenny McCormack, 08:59
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 08:57
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, James Kuyper, 08:50
- Redirect stdin ?, Lothar Behrens, 08:40
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Ulrich Eckhardt, 08:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kenny McCormack, 08:26
- Re: time and srand, James Kuyper, 08:21
- Re: function reading hour register either in 12 or 24 hour formats and returning properly, Gordon Burditt, 08:17
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Ben Bacarisse, 08:06
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, Spiros Bousbouras, 08:02
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Richard Tobin, 07:28
- Re: Uninitialised fields in structures, vippstar, 06:34
- Re: Secure C programming, jacob navia, 06:01
- Uninitialised fields in structures, Ulrich Eckhardt, 05:58
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 05:57
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 05:54
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 05:37
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Ulrich Eckhardt, 05:32
- Re: function returning days of the week, Richard Bos, 05:27
- Re: Bandwidth stealing, Richard Bos, 05:25
- Re: Secure C programming, Rico Secada, 05:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 05:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, Chris Torek, 05:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Bos, 05:03
- Re: Secure C programming, jacob navia, 04:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 04:54
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 04:53
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 04:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 04:19
- Re: function reading hour register either in 12 or 24 hour formats and returning properly, ssylee, 04:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 04:11
- function returning days of the week, ssylee, 04:10
- Re: function reading hour register either in 12 or 24 hour formats and returning properly, Nick Keighley, 04:10
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Hills, 04:06
- function reading hour register either in 12 or 24 hour formats and returning properly, ssylee, 03:56
- Bandwidth stealing, mani, 03:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Paul Hsieh, 03:33
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 03:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 03:17
- Re: Secure C programming, frido, 03:10
- Re: Secure C programming, Chris Thomasson, 02:50
- [COMMERCIAL] Help required - www.progforent.com, ksswzza, 02:39
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 02:17
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Walter Roberson, 02:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 02:04
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Ravishankar S, 01:51
- Re: Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Harald van Dijk, 01:45
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Walter Roberson, 01:44
- Cannot compile with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS = 64, Scott.zhou, 01:25
- Re: Making a program pause, Keith Thompson, 01:12
- Re: confused..again, Randy Howard, 01:11
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 00:38
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Thad Smith, 00:01
December 30, 2007
- Re: Making a program pause, Chris Saunders, 23:17
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, raghu, 22:51
- Re: Secure C programming, Rico Secada, 21:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 21:33
- Re: Secure C programming, Ivan Novick, 21:07
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Golden California Girls, 20:16
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 20:14
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 20:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, Golden California Girls, 20:07
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 19:58
- Re: confused..again, Mark McIntyre, 19:46
- Re: confused..again, Mark McIntyre, 19:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 19:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 19:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 19:25
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Barry Schwarz, 19:23
- Re: Secure C programming, Robert Gamble, 19:23
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 19:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 19:17
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 19:16
- Re: Secure C programming, Randy Howard, 19:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 18:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 18:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:48
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 18:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 18:16
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 18:15
- Re: confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 18:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ben Pfaff, 17:53
- Re: Secure C programming, Walter Roberson, 17:45
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Serve Lau, 17:40
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 17:28
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:27
- Re: Programming in standard c, Harald van Dijk, 17:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 17:22
- Re: Secure C programming, Harald van Dijk, 17:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 17:16
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:15
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: Secure C programming, jacob navia, 17:11
- Re: Secure C programming, jacob navia, 17:08
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, David Thompson, 17:08
- Re: Repository of C code, David Thompson, 17:08
- Re: main, David Thompson, 17:08
- Re: Is SIGALRM getting masked ???, David Thompson, 17:08
- Re: Automatic struct initialization, David Thompson, 17:08
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 17:06
- Re: Programming in standard c, Harald van Dijk, 17:02
- Re: Secure C programming, Walter Roberson, 17:00
- Re: Using const qualifier, Chris Torek, 17:00
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 16:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 16:51
- Re: confused..again, Default User, 16:37
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 16:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 16:34
- Secure C programming, Rico Secada, 16:30
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 16:29
- Re: confused..again, Serve Lau, 16:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Army1987, 16:24
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Army1987, 16:21
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 16:19
- Re: debug msgs, Army1987, 16:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 16:16
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 16:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 15:54
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 15:53
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 15:41
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:37
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 15:33
- Re: confused..again, Walter Roberson, 15:32
- Re: confused..again, Eric Sosman, 15:32
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 15:28
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve Lau, 15:26
- confused..again, Bill Cunningham, 15:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 15:18
- Re: Using const qualifier, gw7rib, 15:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:40
- Re: The Tears Of Finding The Truth, Default User, 14:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:24
- c language, rommy, 13:48
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Randy Howard, 13:34
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Randy Howard, 13:28
- Re: Making a program pause, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:14
- Re: time and srand, Geoff, 13:03
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Harald van Dijk, 12:46
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Thad Smith, 12:39
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Thad Smith, 12:11
- Re: Positive random number, Army1987, 11:57
- Re: time and srand, Army1987, 11:40
- Re: Using const qualifier, Eric Sosman, 11:30
- Re: Using const qualifier, amvoiepd, 11:05
- Re: Behavior of the code, Army1987, 11:02
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Army1987, 10:39
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Army1987, 10:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., James Kuyper, 10:19
- Re: The Tears Of Finding The Truth, Totti, 10:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 09:37
- The Tears Of Finding The Truth, abdo911, 08:28
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, itsolution, 08:08
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 07:58
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Wolfgang Draxinger, 07:15
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., dspfun, 07:01
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, jacob navia, 06:58
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Wolfgang Draxinger, 06:53
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, jacob navia, 06:35
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, vippstar, 06:03
- Re: malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, Malcolm McLean, 05:35
- malloc beyond 20MB fails. Why so limited?, itsolution, 05:30
- Test your C++ Skill(Online test C++), preeto50, 04:24
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Chris Torek, 03:52
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, Thad Smith, 03:06
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 02:52
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Ernie Wright, 02:33
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, Malcolm McLean, 02:22
- Re: const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Richard Heathfield, 02:03
- const type qualifier and external linkage (term.?), Ben Petering, 01:34
December 29, 2007
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Golden California Girls, 22:19
- Re: structure alignment, Richard Tobin, 21:17
- Re: Using const qualifier, Peter Nilsson, 20:11
- www.coogoshoes.com Wholesale Cheap Nike Sneaker,Air Force One 25th,Dunk,Air Jordan ..., polly . ch, 20:11
- Re: ♀♀♀★ cheap jordan shox j1--j23 shoes clothes jeans watches coat shirt belt handbag【$19.99】www.netfashion2008.cn★♀♀♀, polly . ch, 20:10
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, CBFalconer, 19:55
- Using const qualifier, amvoiepd, 19:42
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 19:34
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Chris Torek, 18:29
- Re: Why is there 'div()' in the standard lib, Chris Torek, 18:26
- :::@@==>>3 FREE LIVE CAMS<<==@@:::, giselleee sexy, 18:03
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Chris Torek, 17:48
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Rico Secada, 17:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 17:09
- Re: debug msgs, Ivan Novick, 17:06
- SynFlood mitigation tool on linux, Inas, 17:06
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, Ivan Novick, 17:03
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Chris Torek, 16:43
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Army1987, 16:14
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Tim Smith, 16:08
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Army1987, 15:49
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Default User, 15:13
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Question about CLC, Army1987, 15:06
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 15:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 14:59
- Re: Programming in standard c, dj3vande, 14:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 14:33
- Re: Programming in standard c, dj3vande, 14:17
- Re: Programming in standard c, William Pursell, 14:16
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Mark McIntyre, 14:15
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, Mark McIntyre, 14:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 14:11
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Keith Thompson, 14:03
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Mark McIntyre, 14:02
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 13:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 13:56
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Gordon Burditt, 13:56
- Re: debug msgs, Flash Gordon, 13:46
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 13:40
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, William Hughes, 13:36
- Re: Mix different C source files into a single one, Malcolm McLean, 13:33
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., manisha, 13:21
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Golden California Girls, 13:15
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Flash Gordon, 13:07
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Stephen Sprunk, 13:06
- Mix different C source files into a single one, Horacius ReX, 13:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve La, 12:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 12:29
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., Harald van Dijk, 12:19
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 11:52
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., James Kuyper, 11:40
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, William Hughes, 11:30
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Golden California Girls, 11:18
- Re: generic pointer question, spaglia, 11:17
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Golden California Girls, 11:14
- Re: Definition of expression and statement., osmium, 11:14
- Re: debug msgs, Malcolm McLean, 11:09
- debug msgs, Khookie, 10:58
- Definition of expression and statement., dspfun, 10:53
- Re: Question about CLC, Army1987, 10:42
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Harter, 10:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Laudedale, 10:40
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Army1987, 10:30
- Re: Question about CLC, James Kuyper, 10:20
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, James Kuyper, 10:09
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 09:49
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Ivan Novick, 09:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 08:26
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 08:18
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Chris Dollin, 08:17
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Flash Gordon, 07:12
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 06:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), merl the perl, 06:11
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 06:06
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 06:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 06:04
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 05:59
- Re: Regarding standared i/o functions, Army1987, 05:52
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 05:37
- Re: Programming in standard c, CJ, 05:32
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 05:31
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Laudedale, 05:25
- OT: risc vs cisc (was Re: Programming in standard c), Walter Roberson, 05:13
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 04:53
- Re: Programming in standard c, Joachim Schmitz, 04:53
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Keith Thompson, 04:48
- Earn $5000 and more per month, tropics, 04:22
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, James Fang, 04:19
- Re: A form of arithmetic based on source code, Malcolm McLean, 04:15
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 03:54
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 03:52
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 03:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Malcolm McLean, 03:04
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Malcolm McLean, 02:54
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Malcolm McLean, 02:46
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, CBFalconer, 02:44
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Malcolm McLean, 02:42
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Chris Torek, 02:35
- Re: Reg:Memory allocation, Randy Howard, 02:33
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Keith Thompson, 02:30
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Keith Thompson, 02:28
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, CBFalconer, 02:24
- Re: Question about CLC, Keith Thompson, 02:21
- Re: Question about CLC, CBFalconer, 02:17
- Re: structure alignment, Chris Torek, 02:08
- Reg:Memory allocation, raghu, 01:48
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Randy Howard, 01:45
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Default User, 00:39
- Re: Question about CLC, Default User, 00:36
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Peter Nilsson, 00:22
December 28, 2007
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Golden California Girls, 23:59
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Keith Thompson, 23:58
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, user923005, 23:53
- Re: generic pointer question, Keith Thompson, 23:38
- Welcome to my webside that provides help in English Study for Chinese.., nonamehuang, 23:37
- Re: merge sort, user923005, 23:36
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, ssylee, 21:53
- Would you like to learn Chinese Learn Chinese ,chinese instrument and travel in Beijing, Julia, 21:36
- Re: Question about CLC, ymuntyan, 21:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 21:15
- Re: Behavior of the code, Chris Torek, 21:12
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Chris McDonald, 20:39
- Re: Behavior of the code, Harald van Dijk, 20:26
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Ivan Novick, 20:18
- Re: setjump and longjump, steve . pagliarulo, 20:14
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 20:07
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 20:02
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Chris Torek, 19:52
- Re: Behavior of the code, Army1987, 19:52
- Re: Question about CLC, CBFalconer, 19:48
- Re: Behavior of the code, Army1987, 19:37
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Charlton Wilbur, 19:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 19:33
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, Flash Gordon, 19:33
- Re: Behavior of the code, Army1987, 19:32
- Re: getting around lack of bool type support, vippstar, 19:27
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Flash Gordon, 19:23
- Re: Question about CLC, Mark McIntyre, 19:22
- getting around lack of bool type support, ssylee, 19:21
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 19:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Chris Torek, 19:16
- Re: Question about CLC, jacob navia, 19:02
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 18:49
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kenny McCormack, 18:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 18:44
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: Question about CLC, ymuntyan, 18:39
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 18:37
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Marco van de Voort, 18:30
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Rick, 18:29
- Re: Happy christmas, CBFalconer, 18:26
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Rick, 18:25
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 18:18
- Re: setjump and longjump, Richard Heathfield, 18:16
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Richard Heathfield, 18:11
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 18:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve La, 18:09
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 18:09
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, christian.bau, 17:34
- Re: setjump and longjump, Eric Sosman, 17:33
- Re: conveyor non-stop, CBFalconer, 17:32
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 17:31
- Re: generic pointer question, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: generic pointer question, CBFalconer, 17:28
- Re: Programming in standard c, dj3vande, 17:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 17:22
- Re: setjump and longjump, J. J. Farrell, 17:22
- Re: merge sort, mooon33358, 17:22
- Re: merge sort, CBFalconer, 17:17
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:15
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, CBFalconer, 17:13
- Re: Question about CLC, CBFalconer, 17:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 17:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 17:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:01
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 16:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 16:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 16:31
- Re: setjump and longjump, steve . pagliarulo, 16:31
- Re: merge sort, steve . pagliarulo, 16:24
- Re: generic pointer question, steve . pagliarulo, 16:19
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve La, 16:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ben Pfaff, 16:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Serve La, 16:01
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kaz Kylheku, 15:59
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:52
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:50
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Harald van Dijk, 15:44
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kaz Kylheku, 15:40
- Re: Question about CLC, jacob navia, 15:38
- Re: Question about CLC, user923005, 15:38
- Re: merge sort, user923005, 15:34
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, user923005, 15:32
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 15:27
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Keith Thompson, 15:23
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Flash Gordon, 15:17
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 15:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Flash Gordon, 14:57
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 14:54
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Harald van Dijk, 14:51
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kenny McCormack, 14:50
- Re: typedef question, Harald van Dijk, 14:46
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 14:45
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Rick, 14:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jameskuyper, 14:37
- Re: typedef question, Keith Thompson, 14:30
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 14:28
- Re: Programming in standard c, dj3vande, 14:19
- Re: typedef question, Eric Sosman, 14:13
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Harald van Dijk, 14:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Charlton Wilbur, 14:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 13:50
- Re: Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, Walter Roberson, 13:48
- Re: Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, Ben Pfaff, 13:37
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 13:25
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 13:24
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Default User, 13:14
- Re: typedef question, Keith Thompson, 13:12
- Re: Question about CLC, Default User, 13:12
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Harald van Dijk, 13:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 13:07
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Rod Pemberton, 13:05
- Re: generic pointer question, Richard Heathfield, 13:02
- Re: Happy christmas, Bob Doherty, 13:01
- Re: generic pointer question, Keith Thompson, 12:54
- Re: Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, Richard Heathfield, 12:53
- Re: <OT> Iraq war., Keith Thompson, 12:46
- Re: Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, Walter Roberson, 12:31
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Eric, 12:24
- Re: Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, Flash Gordon, 12:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 12:04
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 11:57
- Searchable text of Kernagan and Richie?, just another hacker, 11:56
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, christian.bau, 11:43
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Richard Harter, 11:37
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Tony Mc, 11:12
- Re: A form of arithmetic based on source code, Richard Harter, 10:56
- Cheap price, the electronics product of high technology, yoyo00, 10:43
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ben Bacarisse, 10:41
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kenny McCormack, 10:34
- Two kinds of people in this country today, Kenny McCormack, 10:28
- (www.shoessuperstar.com)Wholesale jordan/nike basketball shoe,handbag,MP3/MP4,sunglasses,coat,jean,hat,watch, and so on, swukong34, 10:22
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 10:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, Robert Latest, 10:08
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 09:58
- <OT> Iraq war., jameskuyper, 09:46
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 09:45
- Re: Linked List, Ivan Novick, 09:36
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 09:33
- Re: conveyor non-stop, Andrew Wingorodov, 09:21
- Re: typedef question, Eric Sosman, 09:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, jameskuyper, 09:16
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 09:02
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 08:50
- Re: conveyor non-stop, Flash Gordon, 08:46
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 08:44
- News in this site:, Sergio Laranja, 08:09
- conveyor non-stop, Andrew Wingorodov, 07:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Laudedale, 07:46
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Randy Howard, 07:43
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 07:40
- Re: Programming in standard c, Chris Torek, 07:32
- Re: Question about CLC, James Kuyper, 07:30
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 07:29
- Re: generic pointer question, James Kuyper, 07:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Robert Latest, 07:21
- Re: Programming in standard c, Robert Latest, 07:20
- Re: generic pointer question, Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: generic pointer question, Joachim Schmitz, 06:55
- Re: Question about CLC, Serve La, 06:48
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, James Kuyper, 06:47
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 06:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 06:27
- Re: Programming in standard c, Robert Latest, 06:25
- Re: generic pointer question, Logan Lee, 06:20
- Re: Linked List, Richard Heathfield, 06:17
- Re: generic pointer question, Richard Heathfield, 06:12
- Re: Linked List, Randy Howard, 06:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 06:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 06:01
- Re: generic pointer question, Richard Heathfield, 06:00
- Linked List, dmp, 06:00
- Re: generic pointer question, Logan Lee, 06:00
- Re: Programming in standard c, Randy Howard, 05:59
- generic pointer question, Logan Lee, 05:50
- Re: merge sort, Richard Heathfield, 05:45
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Flash Gordon, 05:24
- Re: merge sort, mooon33358, 05:16
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Andrew Wan, 05:10
- Re: Question about CLC, Chris Hills, 04:45
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 04:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 04:32
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 04:31
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 04:30
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 04:27
- Re: A form of arithmetic based on source code, Malcolm McLean, 04:22
- Re: Question about CLC, jaysome, 04:15
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 04:14
- Re: merge sort, Richard Heathfield, 03:59
- merge sort, mooon33358, 03:16
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Ernie Wright, 03:13
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 03:02
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 03:00
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, CBFalconer, 02:51
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 02:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 02:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 02:33
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Malcolm McLean, 02:32
- Re: typedef question, Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 02:19
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Chris Dollin, 02:03
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Ernie Wright, 02:01
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 01:58
- Re: Question about CLC, Default User, 01:30
- Re: Question about CLC, Default User, 01:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ravishankar S, 00:33
- Re: typedef question, Ben Bacarisse, 00:27
December 27, 2007
- typedef question, Logan Lee, 23:52
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, user923005, 23:41
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: Question about CLC, Golden California Girls, 23:04
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Keith Thompson, 22:39
- Re: Emulating nested function behaviour, Thad Smith, 22:08
- Re: Programming in standard c, Dann Corbit, 21:58
- Re: Question about CLC, Andy, 21:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, ymuntyan, 21:12
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 20:49
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Bruce McFarling, 20:34
- Re: Happy christmas, Dann Corbit, 20:20
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Dann Corbit, 20:15
- Re: Fun with scope of variables, Johannes Bauer, 19:49
- Re: Positive random number, gusanner, 19:47
- Re: Happy christmas, jameskuyper, 19:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 19:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, Dann Corbit, 19:17
- Re: Happy christmas, Walter Roberson, 19:16
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Flash Gordon, 19:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 19:12
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 19:02
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 19:02
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 18:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 18:51
- Re: how free() works, Flash Gordon, 18:45
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 18:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:37
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 18:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, vippstar, 18:34
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 18:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, Mark McIntyre, 18:31
- Re: Question about CLC, Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Kaz Kylheku, 18:27
- Re: Question about CLC, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:23
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 18:19
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 18:17
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 18:08
- Re: Question about CLC, Kaz Kylheku, 18:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 18:01
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 17:52
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:51
- Re: Question about CLC, Philip Potter, 17:45
- Re: Fun with scope of variables, Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: A form of arithmetic based on source code, Jack Klein, 17:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 17:38
- Re: Question about CLC, CBFalconer, 17:33
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:25
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, BobR, 17:23
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 17:20
- Open source copy protection, Thad Smith, 17:20
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, user923005, 17:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 17:17
- Fun with scope of variables, Logan Lee, 17:13
- Re: Happy christmas, Richard Heathfield, 17:12
- oops the original URL should be http://static.scribd.com/docs/7frgxnt1j75ao.swf?INITIAL_VIEW=width, Logan Lee, 17:12
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 17:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:10
- Fun with scope of variables, Logan Lee, 17:09
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, CBFalconer, 17:07
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 17:07
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Programming in standard c, jameskuyper, 16:59
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:58
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: Emulating nested function behaviour, Harald van Dijk, 16:41
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 16:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 16:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 16:32
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 16:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 16:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:24
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 16:21
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 16:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, army1987, 16:18
- Re: Happy christmas, Walter Roberson, 16:18
- Re: how free() works, CBFalconer, 16:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 16:11
- Re: Emulating nested function behaviour, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: Emulating nested function behaviour, Wolfgang Draxinger, 15:56
- Re: Question about CLC, Serve La, 15:53
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 15:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:50
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 15:48
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Flash Gordon, 15:39
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 15:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:32
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:21
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 15:18
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jameskuyper, 15:12
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Malcolm McLean, 15:08
- Re: Emulating nested function behaviour, Harald van Dijk, 15:04
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Flash Gordon, 15:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jameskuyper, 14:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 14:54
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 14:54
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 14:54
- Re: Programming in standard c, Erik Trulsson, 14:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 14:30
- Re: Programming in standard c, CJ, 14:18
- Emulating nested function behaviour, Wolfgang Draxinger, 14:14
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 14:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Keith Thompson, 13:59
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Malcolm McLean, 13:59
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Stephen . Schoenberger, 13:58
- Re: Question about CLC, Kenny McCormack, 13:04
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 13:04
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Ben Pfaff, 12:58
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 12:50
- Re: Programming in standard c, Ben Pfaff, 12:46
- Re: read image from url, Francine . Neary, 12:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, Francine . Neary, 12:39
- Re: Question about CLC, Ben Pfaff, 12:38
- Re: Question about CLC, jacob navia, 12:35
- Re: Question about CLC, Ben Pfaff, 12:34
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 12:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Joachim Schmitz, 12:09
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, DiAvOl, 12:08
- Re: Question about CLC, Antoninus Twink, 11:58
- Re: Programming in standard c, Malcolm McLean, 11:57
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 11:54
- Re: Question about CLC, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:46
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Robert Latest, 11:42
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 11:42
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 11:41
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 11:38
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 11:33
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), David Resnick, 11:29
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Flash Gordon, 11:13
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Kenneth Brody, 11:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 11:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 11:04
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 11:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 10:56
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 10:54
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard, 10:54
- Re: High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Jason Burgon, 10:50
- Re: Question about CLC, jameskuyper, 10:39
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, vippstar, 10:39
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Ernie Wright, 10:36
- Re: Porting Windows program to BSD, drhowarddrfine, 10:35
- Re: Porting Windows program to BSD, drhowarddrfine, 10:29
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 10:28
- Re: Happy christmas, jameskuyper, 10:24
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 10:23
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 10:09
- Re: Programming in standard c, army1987, 10:06
- Re: Question about CLC, Julienne Walker, 09:59
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jameskuyper, 09:58
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 09:58
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Ben Bacarisse, 09:57
- Re: Question about CLC, Martin Ambuhl, 09:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Joachim Schmitz, 09:41
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 09:40
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, murali . marimekala, 09:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 09:15
- Re: Happy christmas, army1987, 09:01
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, army1987, 08:54
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 08:37
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 08:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 08:13
- SEX, SEX, AND SEX, jordirojas2451, 08:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 08:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 07:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 07:44
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Ravishankar S, 07:26
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, DiAvOl, 07:22
- Re: Programming in standard c, Malcolm McLean, 07:21
- Re: Happy christmas, Keith Thompson, 07:21
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Richard Heathfield, 07:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, Malcolm McLean, 07:12
- Re: Is a[i] = i++ correct?, Keith Thompson, 07:12
- Re: Happy christmas, Bart C, 07:06
- Re: Question about CLC, Malcolm McLean, 07:06
- High Speed IRQ Timer/Clock in C, Andrew Wan, 07:02
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 07:00
- Re: setjump and longjump, Ravishankar S, 06:57
- Is a[i] = i++ correct?, jeniffer, 06:45
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, jeniffer, 06:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 06:39
- Re: Question about CLC, jacob navia, 06:33
- Re: Question about CLC, Richard Heathfield, 06:29
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Richard Heathfield, 06:23
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, army1987, 06:07
- Re: question about declaration - pointers, Joachim Schmitz, 06:03
- Question about CLC, Masood, 05:52
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Richard Heathfield, 05:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Masood, 05:48
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- question about declaration - pointers, jeniffer, 05:37
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 05:37
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Malcolm McLean, 05:29
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, DiAvOl, 05:22
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 05:19
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Malcolm McLean, 05:15
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Paul Hsieh, 04:45
- Re: Making a program pause, Joachim Schmitz, 04:43
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Paul Hsieh, 04:34
- Re: Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, Richard Heathfield, 03:45
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 03:39
- Question about pointers and multi-dimension arrays, DiAvOl, 02:51
- setjump and longjump, pal, 01:51
- Re: How memory function free() knows how much memory to free., Keith Thompson, 01:01
- Re: question about void typecast, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:59
- Re: Problem passing a string to a function, Shashank, 00:55
- Re: question about void typecast, Keith Thompson, 00:54
- Re: [OT] Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 00:35
- Re: Porting Windows program to BSD, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 00:31
- Re: Porting Windows program to BSD, Tim Prince, 00:20
- A form of arithmetic based on source code, Logan Lee, 00:12
December 26, 2007
- Re: Porting Windows program to BSD, MisterE, 23:50
- Re: How memory function free() knows how much memory to free., MisterE, 23:46
- Re: Callback Function Stack Overflow, jack113256, 23:36
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:35
- Re: Callback Function Stack Overflow, Ben Pfaff, 23:33
- How memory function free() knows how much memory to free., Panduranga Chary, 23:30
- Re: Programming in standard c, backslash null, 23:11
- Re: Callback Function Stack Overflow, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 23:10
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 22:31
- Callback Function Stack Overflow, jack113256, 22:14
- Re: [OT] Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Harter, 22:09
- Re: question about void typecast, Jack Klein, 22:05
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:52
- Re: Programming in standard c, Stephen Montgomery-Smith, 21:50
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), backslash null, 21:21
- Porting Windows program to BSD, drhowarddrfine, 21:15
- Re: Problem passing a string to a function, Ivan Novick, 21:15
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 21:02
- Re: OT - Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (Updated; also compiler suggestion?), cr88192, 20:56
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), cr88192, 20:46
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 20:46
- Re: Problem passing a string to a function, user923005, 20:42
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 20:41
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 20:37
- Re: Making a program pause, user923005, 20:32
- Re: Programming in standard c, Gordon Burditt, 20:30
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 20:25
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 20:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 20:01
- Problem passing a string to a function, Shashank, 19:58
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 19:53
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, user923005, 19:44
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 19:39
- Re: Making a program pause, Keith Thompson, 19:38
- Re: Programming in standard c, Julienne Walker, 19:35
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 19:33
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Keith Thompson, 19:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 19:18
- Re: Linked list allocation, Richard Harter, 19:03
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard Heathfield, 18:48
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Flash Gordon, 18:34
- Re: Programming in standard c, Bart C, 18:32
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:25
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, CBFalconer, 18:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 18:13
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 18:10
- Re: how free() works, Flash Gordon, 18:09
- Re: Making a program pause, SM Ryan, 18:09
- Re: [OT] Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 18:07
- Re: Programming in standard c, CBFalconer, 18:05
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, jameskuyper, 17:54
- Re: Happy christmas, Joe Wright, 17:48
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 17:43
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Harter, 17:38
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 17:36
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 17:34
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, Stephen . Schoenberger, 17:31
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:27
- Re: Advice on using FFTW, user923005, 17:24
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 17:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 17:20
- Advice on using FFTW, Stephen . Schoenberger, 17:15
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 17:14
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:12
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 17:12
- Re: question about void typecast, Keith Thompson, 17:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ben Pfaff, 17:06
- Re: Programming in standard c, Julienne Walker, 17:03
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 17:01
- Re: Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 17:00
- Re: Programming in standard c, user923005, 16:59
- Re: Programming in standard c, Richard, 16:57
- Re: question about void typecast, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: Programming in standard c, Eric Sosman, 16:42
- Re: Programming in standard c, jameskuyper, 16:39
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Stephen . Schoenberger, 16:34
- Re: Making a program pause, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ben Pfaff, 16:30
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Keith Thompson, 16:26
- Re: Programming in standard c, Flash Gordon, 16:25
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Eric Sosman, 16:20
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 16:18
- Re: Programming in standard c, Walter Roberson, 16:12
- Re: how free() works, CBFalconer, 16:11
- Re: question about void typecast, Jack Klein, 16:08
- Re: how free() works, Richard, 16:07
- Re: Making a program pause, CBFalconer, 16:06
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:55
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 15:55
- Programming in standard c, jacob navia, 15:54
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:49
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:45
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 15:41
- [OT] Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Harald van Dijk, 15:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:38
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 15:32
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 15:27
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:24
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Flash Gordon, 15:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Antoninus Twink, 15:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:20
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 15:17
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 15:12
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:12
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), user923005, 15:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 15:09
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 15:07
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 15:04
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 15:03
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 14:56
- Re: Happy christmas, jaysome, 14:55
- Re: read image from url, CBFalconer, 14:53
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, CBFalconer, 14:49
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 14:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 14:40
- Re: Making a program pause, dave.zoltan@xxxxxxxxx, 14:30
- Re: Linked list allocation, henry, 14:20
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 13:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jameskuyper, 13:39
- Re: question about void typecast, Mark McIntyre, 13:06
- Re: structure alignment, Mark McIntyre, 13:02
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 13:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Paul Hsieh, 12:56
- Re: while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, ramana, 12:52
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Paul Hsieh, 12:50
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 12:41
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 12:39
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 11:52
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 11:50
- Re: read image from url, Honest Jon, 11:50
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 11:43
- Re: question about void typecast, Harald van Dijk, 11:36
- question about void typecast, brad2000, 11:25
- Re: structure alignment, Thad Smith, 10:55
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 10:43
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 10:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 10:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Eric Sosman, 10:31
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 10:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 10:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 10:20
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 10:17
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 10:13
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 10:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 10:09
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 10:08
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 10:07
- Re: read image from url, Honest Jon, 10:06
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 10:05
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Honest Jon, 10:03
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 10:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 09:57
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 09:49
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 09:48
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Charlton Wilbur, 09:35
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:29
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:28
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:27
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:24
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:22
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 09:18
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 09:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 09:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Eric Sosman, 09:03
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Eric Sosman, 08:39
- Geodetic software development, info, 08:33
- Re: Behavior of the code, Ben Bacarisse, 08:20
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 08:00
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Harald van Dijk, 08:00
- Re: read image from url, Joachim Schmitz, 07:43
- Re: Behavior of the code, James Kuyper, 07:26
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 07:23
- The computer of the most sophisticated science and technology, in our websites, yoyo00, 07:21
- Re: Making a program pause, Joachim Schmitz, 07:07
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 07:00
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 06:56
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 06:46
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Richard Heathfield, 06:45
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mark McIntyre, 06:41
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 06:38
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 05:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 05:15
- Re: Behavior of the code, somenath, 05:11
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 05:09
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 05:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Malcolm McLean, 04:54
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Richard Heathfield, 04:50
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 04:48
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 04:47
- Re: Making a program pause, Keith Thompson, 04:47
- Re: Happy christmas, Keith Thompson, 04:43
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- structure alignment, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:41
- Re: developing x applications, Malcolm McLean, 04:37
- Re: how free() works, Malcolm McLean, 04:32
- M`I 5`Persecut ion . Molestation durin g Travel, feiefmvm, 04:30
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 04:28
- Re: Making a program pause, Richard Heathfield, 04:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 04:22
- Re: Happy christmas, Richard Heathfield, 04:22
- Re: Happy christmas, Richard Heathfield, 04:17
- M-I,5.Persec ution . BBC Newscaste rs L ie & D eny Theyre Watchin g Me, eivemi, 04:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 04:10
- M'I-5'Pe rsecution F our Year s of MI5 Pe rsecution Po sts on Intern et New sgroups, mfevev, 04:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 03:56
- Re: Making a program pause, Joachim Schmitz, 03:46
- M,I-5'Persecut ion ' MI 5 Waste T axpayer Mi llions on Pointle ss Hat e-Campaign, fifve, 03:45
- Re: Happy christmas, jaysome, 03:42
- M I.5'Persecutio n , Com paring th e M I5 Persecution wit h German Final So lution, vmvevfvfe, 03:33
- Re: how free() works, Keith Thompson, 03:05
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 03:01
- Re: how free() works, Chris Dollin, 02:49
- Re: how free() works, Vinay, 02:16
- Re: Happy christmas, Keith Thompson, 02:07
- Re: how free() works, Zara, 01:56
- ♀♂wholesale cheap canvas【$150】www.cheapest-sell.cn♂♀, xiaoshifeng026, 01:24
- how free() works, riva, 01:16
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, Ivan Novick, 00:53
- Re: Really don't know how to use recursion, Thad Smith, 00:52
December 25, 2007
- Re: How to map a subroutine to a particular address in rom?, Jack Klein, 23:54
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Chris Torek, 23:37
- Re: How to map a subroutine to a particular address in rom?, Gordon Burditt, 23:30
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Golden California Girls, 23:01
- How to map a subroutine to a particular address in rom?, Dinesh P, 22:57
- Re: Happy christmas, vippstar, 22:52
- Re: Happy christmas, CBFalconer, 21:52
- Re: Happy christmas, CBFalconer, 21:48
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 21:41
- Re: Happy christmas, Joe Wright, 21:19
- Re: hi, what does over−indexd mean?, Martin Golding, 20:56
- Re: Really don't know how to use recursion, a, 20:55
- Re: Making a program pause, Geoff, 20:41
- Re: while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, Martin Ambuhl, 20:28
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 20:26
- Re: read image from url, Flash Gordon, 20:18
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ian Collins, 20:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Martin Ambuhl, 20:08
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 20:05
- Re: Happy christmas, vippstar, 20:04
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Harald van Dijk, 19:53
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 19:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 19:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 19:32
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, santosh, 19:16
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ian Collins, 19:14
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Golden California Girls, 19:05
- Re: Behavior of the code, Chris Torek, 18:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Sjouke Burry, 18:53
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 18:44
- Re: while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, Mark McIntyre, 18:44
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 18:30
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: developing x applications, santosh, 18:16
- Re: while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, santosh, 18:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 18:12
- Re: while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 18:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 18:03
- Re: developing x applications, Ian Collins, 18:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 18:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ian Collins, 17:58
- Re: Happy christmas, Joe Wright, 17:56
- developing x applications, timo . bsdmail, 17:50
- while(!FP.eof()) is reading the last data point of the file twice, ramana, 17:39
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 17:33
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ben Bacarisse, 17:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ben Bacarisse, 17:21
- Have a Happy Holiday Season, Somerford, 17:17
- Re: Behavior of the code, Joe Wright, 16:50
- Re: Making a program pause, Kenny McCormack, 16:33
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 16:27
- Re: Happy christmas, vippstar, 16:17
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: Happy christmas, Paul Hsieh, 15:28
- Re: read image from url, Francine . Neary, 15:26
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ian Collins, 15:25
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Paul Hsieh, 15:19
- Hi, search many reference for C language | download now | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-language-ebook.html, Tony Andreas, 15:18
- Re: Happy christmas, jacob navia, 15:14
- Re: Help: for loop doesn't work?, CBFalconer, 15:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Mark McIntyre, 14:57
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 14:56
- Re: Happy christmas, CBFalconer, 14:51
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Mark McIntyre, 14:47
- Re: Making a program pause, CBFalconer, 14:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 14:42
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 14:38
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Mike Wahler, 14:28
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, CBFalconer, 14:28
- Re: Flex / Yacc sources for C parser, George Peter Staplin, 14:19
- c language, jo, 14:13
- Re: Behavior of the code, Joe Wright, 14:11
- Re: Happy christmas, Ian Collins, 13:57
- Re: Really don't know how to use recursion, Thad Smith, 13:56
- Re: Behavior of the code, Thomas Lumley, 13:54
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 13:50
- Re: Behavior of the code, Joe Wright, 13:42
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Golden California Girls, 13:35
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 13:06
- Re: Help: for loop doesn't work?, Thad Smith, 12:54
- Re: Behavior of the code, Joe Wright, 12:54
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Chris Dollin, 12:49
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 12:48
- Re: Behavior of the code, Thad Smith, 12:35
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Martin Ambuhl, 12:32
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Martin Ambuhl, 12:30
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 11:59
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 11:52
- Re: Behavior of the code, Joe Wright, 11:47
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 11:17
- Re: Behavior of the code, jacob navia, 11:14
- Re: Behavior of the code, santosh, 11:09
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Rico Secada, 11:05
- Re: Flex / Yacc sources for C parser, santosh, 11:04
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Harald van Dijk, 10:45
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Harald van Dijk, 10:41
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Bruce McFarling, 10:25
- Re: Happy christmas, publicforme@xxxxxxxxx, 08:34
- Re: Question related to printf, James Kuyper, 08:24
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, NicoleaSW, 08:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 08:13
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 08:02
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 08:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 08:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 07:59
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 07:49
- Flex / Yacc sources for C parser, Wolfgang Draxinger, 07:33
- Re: Behavior of the code, Harald van Dijk, 07:33
- Re: Difference between while and do while, James Kuyper, 07:26
- Re: Behavior of the code, somenath, 07:23
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), James Kuyper, 07:13
- Re: Behavior of the code, Harald van Dijk, 07:13
- Re: Behavior of the code, santosh, 06:52
- Re: Happy christmas, santosh, 06:17
- Re: Happy christmas, jacob navia, 06:13
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Chris Torek, 06:11
- Re: Happy christmas, jacob navia, 06:07
- Re: Behavior of the code, santosh, 06:04
- Re: Happy christmas, jacob navia, 06:00
- Re: Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, santosh, 05:56
- Re: Behavior of the code, somenath, 05:55
- Unexpected answer, compiler bug?, Port Pirie, 05:46
- Re: OT - Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (Updated; also compiler suggestion?), Nickolai Leschov, 05:31
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Chris Dollin, 04:27
- Re: Behavior of the code, Malcolm McLean, 04:27
- Re: Happy christmas, Malcolm McLean, 04:15
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), cr88192, 03:20
- Re: read image from url, Default User, 02:04
- led护栏管-耐明光电, suxueming, 01:35
- Re: Behavior of the code, somenath, 01:25
- Re: Behavior of the code, Old Wolf, 01:25
- Re: Happy christmas, Old Wolf, 01:22
- Re: Happy christmas, santosh, 01:09
- Re: Happy christmas, Ian Collins, 01:04
- Re: Behavior of the code, santosh, 00:57
- Re: Happy christmas, santosh, 00:52
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), santosh, 00:49
- Re: Behavior of the code, Thomas Lumley, 00:45
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Gordon Burditt, 00:01
December 24, 2007
- Behavior of the code, somenath, 23:57
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Ben Pfaff, 23:28
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Ben Pfaff, 23:26
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 23:25
- Re: Happy christmas, vippstar, 23:22
- Really don't know how to use recursion, a, 22:56
- Re: Happy christmas, santosh, 22:35
- Re: Difference between while and do while, santosh, 22:32
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 22:25
- Re: Happy christmas, vippstar, 22:15
- $$$, khaled, 22:12
- OT - Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (Updated; also compiler suggestion?), santosh, 22:11
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Joe Wright, 21:56
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, Ivan Novick, 21:32
- Re: Making a program pause, Ivan Novick, 21:24
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Golden California Girls, 21:16
- Re: It was just a memory aid when reading C code, Thad Smith, 21:01
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Joe Wright, 20:59
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Mark McIntyre, 20:48
- Re: Happy christmas, Flash Gordon, 20:46
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Mark McIntyre, 20:38
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 20:34
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 20:29
- Re: Happy christmas, Joe Wright, 20:07
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, CBFalconer, 20:07
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, CBFalconer, 19:38
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 19:22
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Randy Howard, 19:22
- Re: read image from url, CBFalconer, 19:04
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Roman Mashak, 18:59
- Re: read image from url, CBFalconer, 18:59
- Re: read image from url, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: read image from url, CBFalconer, 18:47
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Ahmed Samieh, 18:47
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Randy Howard, 18:43
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Randy Howard, 18:40
- Re: Happy christmas, jacob navia, 18:39
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Default User, 18:37
- Happy christmas, jacob navia, 18:37
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Randy Howard, 18:27
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 18:00
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 17:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 17:37
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 17:27
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 17:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 16:51
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 16:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 16:46
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (Updated; also compiler suggestion?), Nickolai Leschov, 16:42
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 16:33
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Keith Thompson, 16:27
- lvalue required as increment operand, Roman Mashak, 16:24
- Re: hi, what does over−indexd mean?, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), ymuntyan, 16:14
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 15:08
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 15:03
- Re: Problem with inserting nodes on Binary trees, Nikos Chantziaras, 14:55
- Re: Question related to printf, Harald van Dijk, 14:46
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Frank Buss, 14:42
- Re: read image from url, Golden California Girls, 14:42
- Problem with inserting nodes on Binary trees, Blondeamon, 14:38
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Jeff Higgins, 14:26
- ⊙ ⊙Attractive and practical thing, ultra small advantage, yhnetstore1, 13:46
- Re: Making a program pause, Richard Heathfield, 13:34
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 13:31
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 13:27
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Lew, 13:26
- buy cheap shoes ( www.shoes-ec.com), hongfeng05, 13:25
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Lew, 13:23
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 13:22
- Making a program pause, dave.zoltan@xxxxxxxxx, 13:18
- Re: Question related to printf, jameskuyper, 13:12
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 13:12
- Re: read image from url, Default User, 13:10
- Re: trollish, Default User, 13:04
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 12:55
- Re: read image from url, Antoninus Twink, 12:52
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 12:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Paul Hsieh, 12:21
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Lew, 11:39
- Re: read image from url, Kenny McCormack, 11:34
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Stephen Pelc, 11:26
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 11:25
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 11:16
- Re: read image from url, Antoninus Twink, 11:09
- Re: Coding practice, Jack Klein, 10:52
- Re: Coding practice, Jack Klein, 10:45
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Jack Klein, 10:41
- Re: Coding practice, Thad Smith, 10:35
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 10:32
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Brad Eckert, 10:25
- Re: hi, what does over-indexd mean?, Thad Smith, 10:24
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Kenny McCormack, 10:15
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 10:13
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Kenny McCormack, 10:13
- Re: Difference between while and do while, osmium, 09:51
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 09:42
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 09:20
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 09:13
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Eric Sosman, 09:06
- Re: Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, Eric Sosman, 09:02
- Re: A method of static code analysis, Mark McIntyre, 08:57
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 08:50
- Re: read image from url, Flash Gordon, 08:49
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), astrobe, 08:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 08:05
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 07:52
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Bart C, 07:27
- Re: hi, what does over−indexd mean?, shaanxxx, 07:16
- Re: Coding practice, Richard Bos, 07:16
- Re: Coding practice, shaanxxx, 07:09
- Re: read image from url, Doug, 06:48
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Doug, 06:43
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), jacob navia, 06:32
- aunty videos, kamla, 06:28
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 06:24
- hi, what does over−indexd mean?, beijihuhu, 06:23
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Bos, 06:14
- Re: Coding practice, Richard Bos, 06:07
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Richard Bos, 06:06
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Richard Bos, 06:04
- Re: read image from url, Joachim Schmitz, 06:03
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 05:54
- Re: read image from url, Joachim Schmitz, 05:47
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), jacob navia, 05:40
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 05:38
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 05:36
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Ernie Wright, 05:25
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Nickolai Leschov, 05:22
- Coding practice, shaanxxx, 04:57
- Re: Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Frank Buss, 04:55
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 04:36
- Re: Regarding standared i/o functions, Richard Bos, 04:26
- Re: Regarding standared i/o functions, Keith Thompson, 04:26
- Re: Repository of C code, Richard Bos, 04:23
- Dynamically loading a static C library (compiler suggestion?), Nickolai Leschov, 04:21
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard, 04:12
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Flash Gordon, 04:11
- Regarding standared i/o functions, venkat, 03:59
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 03:55
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Roedy Green, 03:54
- Re: read image from url, Richard, 03:53
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 03:48
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 03:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Chris Hills, 03:43
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard, 03:41
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Richard, 03:39
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Richard, 03:35
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, William Pursell, 03:32
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 03:25
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Sean, 03:20
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Sean, 03:15
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Keith Thompson, 03:12
- Re: I've retyped this and stored in URL so look if you want, Remo D., 03:11
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Keith Thompson, 03:04
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Ian Collins, 02:54
- Re: Difference between while and do while, Dinesh P, 02:52
- Re: Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, Richard Bos, 02:44
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Sean, 02:43
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Richard Bos, 02:36
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 02:35
- Re: Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 02:32
- Re: Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, Harald van Dijk, 02:31
- Re: trollish, Richard Bos, 02:02
- Need advice on selecting a development environment, Ramon F Herrera, 02:01
- Difference between while and do while, Logan Lee, 01:28
- Re: Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, somenath, 01:06
- Re: Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, Ian Collins, 00:54
- To make it clearer pdf file, Logan Lee, 00:50
- It was just a memory aid when reading C code, Logan Lee, 00:32
- Question regarding scope and lifetime of variable, somenath, 00:26
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Eric Sosman, 00:17
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, Ivan Novick, 00:12
- Novo formato de perguntas da prova de certificação PMP comentadas, Sergio Laranja, 00:11
December 23, 2007
- Re: lvalue required as increment operand, Ben Pfaff, 23:57
- I've retyped this and stored in URL so look if you want, Logan Lee, 21:24
- Re: read image from url, Gordon Burditt, 21:09
- Sorry but 'F' stands for 'for', Logan Lee, 21:07
- Re: read image from url, Gordon Burditt, 20:59
- More comprehensive example, Logan Lee, 20:53
- A method of static code analysis, Logan Lee, 20:39
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), CBFalconer, 20:21
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, CBFalconer, 20:03
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: Determine the maximum of two integers., David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: Question related to printf, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: how the macro works, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: operators similar to functions?, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: page 120 K&R, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: C and Algol68, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: self destructing programs, David Thompson, 19:57
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 19:52
- Re: read image from url, Keith Thompson, 19:13
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 17:42
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 17:36
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 17:08
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 16:56
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 15:54
- Re: read image from url, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Tim Smith, 15:46
- Re: read image from url, Tim Smith, 15:43
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Antoninus Twink, 15:42
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 15:39
- Re: read image from url, Keith Thompson, 15:12
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 15:05
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 15:05
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 14:58
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Keith Thompson, 14:10
- Re: read image from url, Keith Thompson, 14:02
- Re: How to utilize internal file., Keith Thompson, 13:55
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Keith Thompson, 13:37
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Jack Klein, 13:22
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Martin Ambuhl, 13:21
- Re: How to utilize internal file., SM Ryan, 13:19
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Walter Roberson, 13:11
- OT Rant was Re: object file size is reduced after build, Golden California Girls, 13:06
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), jacob navia, 12:52
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 12:50
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Default User, 12:45
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), vippstar, 12:35
- Re: read image from url, vippstar, 12:33
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Eric Sosman, 12:07
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Julienne Walker, 12:00
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 11:53
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Joe Wright, 11:51
- Re: read image from url, quickcur, 11:51
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, Joe Wright, 11:42
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, santosh, 11:08
- Re: How to utilize internal file., santosh, 11:06
- Re: read image from url, santosh, 11:03
- Re: Making C better (by borrowing from C++), santosh, 10:57
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, Mark McIntyre, 10:32
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 10:30
- Making C better (by borrowing from C++), Masood, 10:29
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 07:57
- Re: read image from url, jacob navia, 07:51
- Re: A reasonable project., James Fang, 07:29
- Re: read image from url, vippstar, 07:23
- read image from url, quickcur, 07:20
- Re: How to utilize internal file., Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- How to utilize internal file., monari, 07:11
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, pete, 06:56
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Flash Gordon, 06:40
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, James Kuyper, 06:39
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 06:17
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, vippstar, 06:12
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Bart C, 06:01
- Re: Difference between if if and if if else, Logan Lee, 05:36
- Difference between if if and if if else, Logan Lee, 05:34
- Re: Question related to sizeof and pointer arithmetic, Kalle Olavi Niemitalo, 05:28
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, jari . toukkari, 05:22
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, MisterE, 05:02
- The courier font in TCPL, Yu-ning, 04:41
- Question related to sizeof and pointer arithmetic, somenath, 04:36
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Malcolm McLean, 03:58
- Re: trollish, Richard Heathfield, 03:42
- Get $349,859.00 For A One-Time Fee Of $29.99! Bucks for nothing, joberndtsson, 03:37
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 03:36
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Chris McDonald, 02:47
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), backslash null, 02:45
- Re: trollish, RoS, 02:35
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, RoS, 02:35
- ♀♂wholesale cheap jordan shoxj1-j23 shoes clothes jeans handbags【$19.99】www.cheapest-sell.cn♂♀, xiaoshifeng026, 02:19
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, h03Ein, 01:53
- Re: A reasonable project., santosh, 00:38
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:33
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:33
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:33
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:33
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
- Re: A reasonable project., kiranshadow, 00:32
December 22, 2007
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Gordon Burditt, 23:34
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Walter Roberson, 22:49
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:01
- Re: working with bitmaps in C, Richard Heathfield, 21:59
- Re: Hi, i have information about C, C++ and Java language, download now for free | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/, snnn, 20:50
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, CBFalconer, 20:47
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Kaz Kylheku, 20:34
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard, 20:18
- working with bitmaps in C, Stephen . Schoenberger, 19:41
- Re: Doubt on Device Driver ?, Joe Wright, 17:57
- Doubt on Device Driver ?, P Shetty, 17:47
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Golden California Girls, 17:36
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, Ivan Novick, 14:53
- Re: the return value of a process, Gordon Burditt, 14:47
- Send and receive information between Excel/VBA and C, jari . toukkari, 13:19
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, lawrence . jones, 12:01
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, SM Ryan, 09:09
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Spiros Bousbouras, 07:38
- Re: Multi precision floating point, P.J. Plauger, 07:32
- Understanding Islaam, الهادي, 06:34
- Re: some strange for me (addition), Mark McIntyre, 05:38
- Re: Print a signel octal, Philip Potter, 05:35
December 21, 2007
- Re: some strange for me (addition), Keith Thompson, 22:04
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Keith Thompson, 22:01
- Re: some strange for me (addition), Thad Smith, 21:59
- Re: some strange for me (addition), Jack Klein, 21:58
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Jack Klein, 21:51
- Re: Hi, i have information about C, C++ and Java language, download now for free | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/, Lew, 21:08
- some strange for me (addition), profjwang, 21:00
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Bart C, 19:48
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Dik T. Winter, 19:43
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 19:42
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Richard Heathfield, 19:21
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 19:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 19:00
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, christian.bau, 18:56
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Ian Collins, 18:55
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 18:49
- Re: Print a signel octal, Joe Wright, 18:49
- Re: Currant status of iostream.h, CBFalconer, 18:28
- Re: some strange for me, CBFalconer, 18:20
- Re: Initialization of Static variables, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, user923005, 18:06
- Re: Repository of C code, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Joe Wright, 17:58
- Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 17:55
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: Repository of C code, user923005, 17:43
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 17:31
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 17:30
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 17:25
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, jameskuyper, 17:18
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, root, 17:12
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: Currant status of iostream.h, Martin Ambuhl, 17:01
- Re: Repository of C code, Malcolm McLean, 16:49
- Re: time and srand, cr88192, 16:43
- Re: Repository of C code, Richard Heathfield, 16:42
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 16:39
- Re: Repository of C code, user923005, 16:31
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, pete, 16:20
- Re: Currant status of iostream.h, Flash Gordon, 16:16
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 16:11
- Re: Currant status of iostream.h, user923005, 16:04
- Hi, i have information about C, C++ and Java language, download now for free | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/, Tony Andreas, 16:02
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, David Mathog, 15:59
- Currant status of iostream.h, Tom Picket, 15:59
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Ben Pfaff, 15:40
- Re: some strange for me, jameskuyper, 15:05
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Flash Gordon, 14:25
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, lawrence . jones, 14:13
- Re: main, Flash Gordon, 14:10
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, Walter Roberson, 14:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, lawrence . jones, 14:09
- Re: FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, jameskuyper, 14:07
- FD_SET compiler warning, why that particular warniing?, David Mathog, 13:59
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Kenneth Brody, 13:48
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 13:44
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, dj3vande, 13:39
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Kenneth Brody, 13:36
- Re: some strange for me, santosh, 13:31
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Neil Cerutti, 13:21
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, root, 13:08
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, dj3vande, 13:07
- Re: some strange for me, Keith Thompson, 13:07
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 12:57
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 12:55
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 12:53
- Re: some strange for me, Mark McIntyre, 12:48
- Re: some strange for me, Walter Roberson, 12:46
- some strange for me, profjwang, 12:39
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Philip Potter, 12:10
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, SM Ryan, 11:57
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Harter, 11:52
- Re: main, santosh, 11:37
- Re: the return value of a process, Chris Dollin, 11:37
- Re: Positive random number, santosh, 11:36
- Re: time and srand, jameskuyper, 11:35
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Philip Potter, 11:34
- Re: the return value of a process, santosh, 11:34
- Re: Initialization of Static variables, Chris Dollin, 11:27
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, SM Ryan, 11:25
- Re: the return value of a process, SM Ryan, 11:25
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, harsha, 11:15
- Re: the return value of a process, Walter Roberson, 11:01
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Eric Sosman, 10:48
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Harter, 10:30
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Philip Potter, 10:20
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Heathfield, 09:34
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Philip Potter, 09:25
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, James Kuyper, 09:19
- Re: main, Chris Hills, 09:17
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Heathfield, 08:59
- Re: Positive random number, James Kuyper, 08:50
- Re: main, Philip Potter, 08:40
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Philip Potter, 08:32
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 08:25
- Supply NIKE.ADIDAS. Sports shoes. Basketball shoes, tom, 08:24
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, gw7rib, 08:12
- Re: trollish, Kelsey Bjarnason, 07:54
- Re: time and srand, James Kuyper, 07:42
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, pete, 07:35
- Re: main, pete, 07:17
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Tobin, 07:03
- Re: main, Richard Heathfield, 07:01
- Re: main, pete, 07:01
- Re: Repository of C code, Chris Hills, 06:56
- Re: main, Chris Hills, 06:44
- Re: main, Richard Heathfield, 05:43
- Re: main, Chris Hills, 05:19
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Paul Hsieh, 05:14
- Wonderful!!!!good news!!! newest nike shoes,clothing, mobile phones at www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky . 001, 05:12
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, Ian Collins, 04:58
- Re: Repository of C code, Paul Hsieh, 04:57
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, harsha, 04:56
- Re: Repository of C code, Richard Heathfield, 04:55
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, harsha, 04:54
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, santosh, 04:52
- Re: Repository of C code, santosh, 04:46
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, vippstar, 04:41
- Re: Latest Usenet C Argument, santosh, 04:40
- Re: Repository of C code, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Latest Usenet C Argument, Richard Heathfield, 04:35
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Richard Heathfield, 04:34
- Re: main, santosh, 04:06
- Re: Repository of C code, Owen Jacobson, 04:05
- Re: main, Flash Gordon, 03:56
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 03:42
- Re: Repository of C code, Paul Hsieh, 03:40
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 03:38
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 03:33
- Re: Repository of C code, santosh, 03:28
- Re: the return value of a process, santosh, 03:27
- Re: Initialization of Static variables, Richard Heathfield, 03:16
- the return value of a process, rakesh uv, 03:07
- Re: Initialization of Static variables, user923005, 02:55
- Initialization of Static variables, riva, 02:37
- ShopBB Co.,Ltd wholesaler Nice Goods from china http://www.shopbb.com, shopbb.com, 02:28
- Re: time and srand, Keith Thompson, 02:26
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, RoS, 02:22
- Repository of C code, Khookie, 00:05
December 20, 2007
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Robert Gamble, 22:43
- Re: time and srand, Jack Klein, 22:34
- Hi to all, kirbylawa@xxxxxxxxx, 22:28
- Re: Positive random number, Joe Wright, 21:36
- Novo! Respostas da prova PMP respondidas e comentadas pelo autor do Blog., Sergio Laranja, 21:34
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Ian Collins, 21:31
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 20:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 20:14
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 20:09
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 19:57
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Gordon Burditt, 19:51
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 19:46
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Gordon Burditt, 19:43
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, jameskuyper, 19:29
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Peter Nilsson, 19:08
- Re: main, pete, 19:07
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, jameskuyper, 18:38
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Paul Hsieh, 18:03
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:42
- Re: main, Malcolm McLean, 17:42
- Re: Positive random number, santosh, 17:29
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 17:24
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, jacob navia, 17:17
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 17:14
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 17:07
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Default User, 17:01
- Re: traversing a stack, CBFalconer, 16:54
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 16:52
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Robert Gamble, 16:52
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Richard Heathfield, 16:39
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 16:27
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Walter Roberson, 16:25
- Re: main, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Ben Pfaff, 16:07
- Re: time and srand, cr88192, 16:07
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Walter Roberson, 15:47
- Re: Positive random number, Malcolm McLean, 15:42
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Heathfield, 15:41
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, jameskuyper, 15:34
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, CBFalconer, 15:15
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 15:08
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 14:58
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 14:52
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 14:50
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 14:47
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 14:37
- Re: traversing a stack, CBFalconer, 14:25
- Re: time and srand, Richard Heathfield, 14:21
- Re: time and srand, jameskuyper, 14:09
- Re: time and srand, jameskuyper, 14:06
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, dj3vande, 13:28
- Re: main, vippstar, 13:05
- Access the site, Sergio Laranja, 12:51
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, David DeLaney, 12:39
- buy cheap shoes ( www.shoes-ec.com), hongfeng09, 12:22
- Re: time and srand, Keith Thompson, 12:21
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 12:16
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, jameskuyper, 12:10
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Ben Pfaff, 12:06
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Chris Dollin, 12:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Chris Dollin, 12:00
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, harsha, 11:53
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Mark McIntyre, 11:49
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, pete, 11:40
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, pete, 11:32
- Re: Positive random number, Philip Potter, 11:23
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, jameskuyper, 11:18
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, pete, 11:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, pete, 10:54
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, Richard Harter, 10:42
- Re: character array as bits, prakash437, 10:42
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, pete, 10:39
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard Heathfield, 10:29
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Robert Latest, 10:24
- Re: Positive random number, Tim Prince, 10:24
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Harter, 10:23
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, pete, 10:17
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, santosh, 10:11
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, santosh, 10:08
- Re: Positive random number, Dik T. Winter, 09:58
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, santosh, 09:53
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Richard Heathfield, 09:39
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, santosh, 09:39
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, James Kuyper, 09:36
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 09:25
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 09:24
- Re: time and srand, santosh, 09:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 09:16
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, santosh, 09:15
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Eric Sosman, 09:14
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, Philip Potter, 09:13
- Re: Print a signel octal, Philip Potter, 09:10
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, James Kuyper, 09:09
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, James Kuyper, 09:04
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 09:02
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Philip Potter, 09:01
- Re: Positive random number, Philip Potter, 08:55
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Richard Heathfield, 08:55
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, James Kuyper, 08:40
- Re: Is const really const?, James Kuyper, 08:40
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Ben Bacarisse, 08:38
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Richard Heathfield, 08:36
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, James Kuyper, 08:23
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard Heathfield, 08:22
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 08:20
- Re: stack frame size on linux/solaris of a running application stack, Richard Bos, 08:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Bos, 08:12
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, James Kuyper, 08:12
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 08:07
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 08:00
- Re: time and srand, James Kuyper, 07:45
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 07:33
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, James Kuyper, 07:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 07:17
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, James Kuyper, 07:16
- Re: Is const really const?, Rohit kumar Chandel, 07:14
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Ben Bacarisse, 06:39
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Tobin, 06:37
- Re: A question on for loop, Spiro Trikaliotis, 06:14
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Gerry Ford, 06:00
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Flash Gordon, 03:41
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Chris Torek, 03:39
- Re: إخلع ملابس زوجتك الداخليه بنفسك أيها الزوج بطريقه مثيره, Richard Bos, 03:30
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Chris Torek, 03:30
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, Richard Bos, 03:24
- Re: time and srand, Keith Thompson, 03:13
- ♀♀♀★ cheap jordan shox j1--j23 shoes clothes jeans watches coat shirt belt handbag【$19.99】www.netfashion2008.cn★♀♀♀, xiaoshifeng011, 02:31
- Re: time and srand, Richard Heathfield, 01:41
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Gordon Burditt, 01:41
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Richard Heathfield, 01:35
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 01:34
- Re: Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, Ben Pfaff, 01:16
- Re: time and srand, santosh, 00:53
December 19, 2007
- time and srand, conrad, 23:53
- Can we have "Guru of the week" on comp.lang.c?, harsha, 23:42
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Walter Roberson, 23:40
- Hi to all, snowflakejonat@xxxxxxxxx, 22:55
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Barry Schwarz, 22:43
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, CBFalconer, 22:31
- Re: Positive random number, Golden California Girls, 22:30
- Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 22:20
- Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 22:17
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 22:10
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, CBFalconer, 21:57
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Ian Collins, 21:45
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Kenny McCormack, 21:22
- OT Re: Optimiser question, Kevin D . Quitt, 21:12
- Re: Function pointer dereference security, Kevin D . Quitt, 21:03
- ANN:ICON COLLECTION 3-DAY SALE, JFMoreno, 20:52
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Bob, 20:29
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 20:19
- Re: main, phao, 19:59
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 19:26
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 19:24
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 19:14
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 19:13
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, pete, 19:06
- Re: [ot]Re: Positive random number, jacob navia, 18:38
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: char* argv[], Flash Gordon, 18:16
- [ot]Re: Positive random number, pete, 18:16
- إخلع ملابس زوجتك الداخليه بنفسك أيها الزوج بطريقه مثيره, فواز, 18:03
- Re: main, Tor Rustad, 17:54
- Re: main, Tor Rustad, 17:50
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Tor Rustad, 17:43
- Re: main, pete, 17:29
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Richard, 17:28
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Tobin, 17:25
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 17:10
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 17:07
- Re: Positive random number, jameskuyper, 16:30
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Heathfield, 16:18
- Re: Positive random number, user923005, 16:04
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Flash Gordon, 16:00
- Re: Positive random number, Keith Thompson, 15:57
- Re: Positive random number, Walter Roberson, 15:50
- Re: Positive random number, Ben Pfaff, 15:41
- Re: main, Keith Thompson, 15:17
- Re: main, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: Positive random number, Walter Roberson, 15:04
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Keith Thompson, 15:02
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Keith Thompson, 14:51
- Re: Positive random number, jameskuyper, 14:44
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 14:44
- Re: char* argv[], William Pursell, 14:34
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, dj3vande, 14:22
- Re: main, santosh, 13:50
- Re: main, santosh, 13:48
- Re: main, Richard Heathfield, 13:47
- Re: main, Joachim Schmitz, 13:46
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, santosh, 13:44
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Heathfield, 13:41
- Re: main, Shadowman, 13:38
- Re: main, phao, 13:35
- ⊙ ⊙free free free, cheapeshopcn4, 13:33
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, David Tiktin, 13:31
- Re: main, Richard Heathfield, 13:26
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Joachim Schmitz, 13:23
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 13:23
- Re: small doubt, Martin Ambuhl, 13:22
- Re: main, Chris Hills, 13:20
- Re: Positive random number, santosh, 13:18
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:17
- Re: main, santosh, 13:15
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, Martin Ambuhl, 13:14
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 13:11
- Re: main, Richard Heathfield, 13:06
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, phao, 13:03
- Re: a buggy TCP client program, Ed Prochak, 12:59
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 12:55
- Re: main, santosh, 12:54
- Re: main, Chris Hills, 12:54
- Re: main, Joachim Schmitz, 12:53
- Re: main, Joachim Schmitz, 12:52
- Re: main, Walter Roberson, 12:51
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Joachim Schmitz, 12:51
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 12:50
- main, nick, 12:45
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, phao, 12:38
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 12:15
- Re: Positive random number, Tor Rustad, 11:50
- Re: Print a signel octal, Tor Rustad, 11:34
- Re: Positive random number, Philip Potter, 11:25
- Re: Positive random number, Golden California Girls, 11:19
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 10:48
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 10:18
- Re: Positive random number, James Kuyper, 10:14
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 10:11
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 09:54
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Richard Bos, 09:49
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, pete, 09:40
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, James Kuyper, 09:37
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 09:35
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 09:30
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 09:26
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 09:16
- Re: small doubt, santosh, 09:10
- Re: small doubt, Philip Potter, 09:03
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, santosh, 08:55
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Philip Potter, 08:52
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 08:51
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 08:51
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 08:51
- Re: small doubt, loudking, 08:49
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Richard Heathfield, 08:49
- Re: small doubt, user1, 08:47
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Robert Latest, 08:45
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Heathfield, 08:42
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 08:42
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Robert Latest, 08:41
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 08:40
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Richard Heathfield, 08:39
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, Richard Heathfield, 08:38
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, James Kuyper, 08:37
- Re: Positive random number, James Kuyper, 08:36
- Re: small doubt, Richard Heathfield, 08:35
- Re: Positive random number, Spoon, 08:28
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Robert Latest, 08:28
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 08:28
- Re: character array as bits, pete, 08:13
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, John Smith, 08:06
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, pete, 08:04
- Re: small doubt, santosh, 08:01
- Re: small doubt, Johannes Bauer, 08:01
- Re: small doubt, pete, 07:58
- Re: Annoying compiler warning, pete, 07:52
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 07:50
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 07:46
- small doubt, yashu21985@xxxxxxxxx, 07:45
- Annoying compiler warning, Bob, 07:40
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Heathfield, 07:36
- Re: Positive random number, pete, 07:29
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, Philip Potter, 07:27
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 07:26
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 05:17
- Re: Signed Unsigned problem, Richard Heathfield, 05:08
- Re: char* argv[], Keith Thompson, 05:01
- Re: Positive random number, Johannes Bauer, 04:57
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Johannes Bauer, 04:54
- Signed Unsigned problem, candy_init, 04:39
- Re: Print a signel octal, Philip Potter, 04:26
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 03:43
- Re: Positive random number, Joachim Schmitz, 03:36
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Keith Thompson, 03:36
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Richard Heathfield, 03:32
- Re: char* argv[], Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, santosh, 03:26
- Re: Positive random number, santosh, 03:25
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, jaysome, 03:05
- Re: Positive random number, jaysome, 02:47
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 02:36
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Kaz Kylheku, 02:07
- Re: char* argv[], William Pursell, 01:22
- Re: char* argv[], Keith Thompson, 00:40
December 18, 2007
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Barry Schwarz, 23:48
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 23:47
- Re: A question regarding argv, Barry Schwarz, 23:35
- Re: char* argv[], Barry Schwarz, 23:33
- Re: char* argv[], Barry Schwarz, 23:19
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 21:51
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 21:51
- Re: Positive random number, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 21:30
- Re: Positive random number, Jack Klein, 21:30
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Keith Thompson, 21:20
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Keith Thompson, 21:10
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Keith Thompson, 21:07
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, George Peter Staplin, 20:42
- Re: c calling c++ functions, Pierre Asselin, 20:41
- Re: Linked list allocation, George Peter Staplin, 20:31
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Gordon Burditt, 20:20
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, jameskuyper, 19:50
- Re: Searching for Happiness ?, CBFalconer, 19:46
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, CBFalconer, 19:42
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, CBFalconer, 19:35
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, jameskuyper, 19:33
- Re: Positive random number, CBFalconer, 19:21
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, CBFalconer, 19:12
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, CBFalconer, 18:45
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 18:41
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 18:34
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Tor Rustad, 18:11
- Re: Positive random number, Tor Rustad, 17:52
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Paul Hsieh, 17:50
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Tor Rustad, 17:36
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Keith Thompson, 17:18
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Keith Thompson, 17:16
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: Print a signel octal, Martin Ambuhl, 14:53
- Re: Print a signel octal, Martin Ambuhl, 14:51
- Re: c calling c++ functions, Default User, 14:16
- stack frame size on linux/solaris of a running application stack, Surinder Singh, 14:04
- Re: Searching for Happiness ?, John B. Coarsey, PE, 13:38
- Re: Positive random number, divyank.rastogi@xxxxxxxxx, 13:36
- ▒▒▒▒www.cheapeshop.cn▒▒▒▒only 27 usd ▒▒▒▒ shoes and cloth████, cheapeshopcn4, 13:09
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 13:05
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Searching for Happiness ?, aassime abdellatif, 12:27
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, jameskuyper, 12:00
- Re: Print a signel octal, Philip Potter, 11:52
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 11:45
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 11:42
- Re: character array as bits, Ben Pfaff, 11:40
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 11:39
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Eric Sosman, 11:31
- Re: Print a signel octal, Richard Heathfield, 10:42
- Selling brand mobile phones, swukong38, 10:29
- Re: Print a signel octal, Ali Karaali, 10:25
- Print a signel octal, laurent . pauloin, 10:06
- Re: UTC string -> time_t, Nick Keighley, 09:47
- Re: c calling c++ functions, santosh, 09:32
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 09:25
- Re: c calling c++ functions, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 09:22
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 09:04
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 08:52
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 08:48
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 08:45
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 08:45
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 08:44
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 08:43
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 08:41
- UTC string -> time_t, Nick Keighley, 08:41
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 08:40
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, santosh, 08:39
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 08:36
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 08:36
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, pete, 08:36
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, James Kuyper, 08:31
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 08:30
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 08:27
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, pete, 08:24
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 08:19
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 08:18
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 08:17
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 08:12
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, jayapal, 08:11
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 08:11
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 08:04
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 07:47
- Re: character array as bits, pete, 07:42
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, James Kuyper, 07:37
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, Thad Smith, 07:28
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 07:24
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 07:16
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Philip Potter, 07:15
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Philip Potter, 07:00
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 06:41
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 06:19
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, santosh, 06:04
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 05:59
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, santosh, 05:54
- Re: function prototype vs function declaration, Richard Heathfield, 05:44
- function prototype vs function declaration, Ravishankar S, 05:37
- Re: A question on for loop, santosh, 05:14
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Nick Keighley, 05:09
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, santosh, 05:07
- free XXXX boys & girls, smile, 05:01
- earn more than 25,000 dollars, smile, 05:00
- Re: Is const really const?, Ravishankar S, 04:59
- Re: A question on for loop, Spiro Trikaliotis, 04:58
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 04:56
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, santosh, 04:52
- Re: A question on for loop, santosh, 04:33
- Re: object file size is reduced after build, santosh, 04:30
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 04:29
- Re: Positive random number, santosh, 04:27
- Re: Is const really const?, Ravishankar S, 04:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, santosh, 04:23
- Re: Is const really const?, Ravishankar S, 04:16
- Re: Is const really const?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:15
- Re: Is const really const?, Ravishankar S, 04:11
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Richard Heathfield, 04:10
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 03:59
- Re: Positive random number, Richard Heathfield, 03:47
- Positive random number, deepak, 03:43
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 03:42
- Re: [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 03:41
- Re: C Unleashed Chapter 18: Hamming Codes, Richard Heathfield, 03:25
- [1/2OT] a buggy TCP client program, RoS, 03:20
- object file size is reduced after build, jayapal, 03:20
- Re: A question on for loop, Geoff, 03:16
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Keith Thompson, 02:29
- Re: character array as bits, Keith Thompson, 02:23
- object file size is reduced after build, jayapal, 02:19
- Re: A question on for loop, Ben Pfaff, 02:18
- Re: A question on for loop, srinivas . upadhya, 02:12
- Re: A question on for loop, user923005, 02:11
- Re: character array as bits, user923005, 02:06
- Daddy Day Camp (2007 كوميدي, فواز, 02:00
- Re: C Unleashed Chapter 18: Hamming Codes, Jack Klein, 01:31
- Re: character array as bits, Keith Thompson, 01:01
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 00:58
- C Unleashed Chapter 18: Hamming Codes, jaysome, 00:55
- Re: Linked list allocation, Richard Harter, 00:34
- wholesale sport shoes,clothing,electronics in china www.fashion-sky.com, fashion-sky . 003, 00:00
December 17, 2007
- wholesaler sport shoes,clothing,electrons mobile phone (Nokia N95=260USD)(sport shoes=28USD), fashion-sky . 003, 23:59
- Re: Array and function question - FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Ian Collins, 23:54
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 23:53
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 23:48
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Barry Schwarz, 23:47
- Re: c calling c++ functions, Ian Collins, 23:45
- Re: Array and function question - FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Barry Schwarz, 23:39
- Re: c calling c++ functions, Peter Nilsson, 23:33
- Re: c++ calling c functions, teju, 23:33
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, Martin Ambuhl, 23:26
- Re: character array as bits, Jack Klein, 23:25
- c calling c++ functions, teju, 23:24
- Re: Linked list allocation, Gene, 23:19
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 23:08
- Hot Job Search, aju41vgj, 23:02
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, James Kuyper, 22:57
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Geoff, 22:49
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 22:48
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Ian Collins, 22:42
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Geoff, 22:36
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard Heathfield, 22:20
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ian Collins, 22:17
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Walter Roberson, 22:15
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 22:13
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 22:12
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Geoff, 21:56
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, Peter Nilsson, 21:18
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 20:58
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 20:57
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, berte, 20:35
- Re: character array as bits, Peter Nilsson, 20:21
- Re: character array as bits, prakashraovaddina, 20:01
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 19:56
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark McIntyre, 19:52
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, Richard Tobin, 19:43
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Old Wolf, 19:43
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Peter Nilsson, 19:36
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Tobin, 19:36
- Re: How to use dinamic struct, Walter Roberson, 19:25
- Re: character array as bits, Walter Roberson, 19:18
- How to use dinamic struct, berte, 19:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CJ, 19:15
- Re: Large Files, Tor Rustad, 19:11
- Re: Multi precision floating point, James Kuyper, 19:07
- Re: character array as bits, Martin Ambuhl, 19:06
- Re: A question on for loop, Tor Rustad, 19:04
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:48
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 18:48
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 18:45
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:38
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:35
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:33
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:31
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:29
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 18:28
- Re: character array as bits, pete, 18:22
- Re: A question on for loop, Geoff, 18:15
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:15
- Re: Linked list allocation, pete, 18:11
- Re: Large Files, Roland Pibinger, 18:08
- Re: Structure size directives, J. J. Farrell, 18:05
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:54
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 17:53
- Re: A question on for loop, Ben Pfaff, 17:47
- Re: Is const really const?, Peter Nilsson, 17:40
- Re: Is const really const?, Mark McIntyre, 17:40
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Old Wolf, 17:37
- Re: Is const really const?, Peter Nilsson, 17:37
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Tobin, 17:36
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Old Wolf, 17:35
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:27
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:24
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:22
- Re: A question on for loop, Richard Tobin, 17:19
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CJ, 17:18
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 17:13
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 17:12
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 17:10
- Re: character array as bits, user923005, 17:10
- A question on for loop, Logan Lee, 17:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:08
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 17:08
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:06
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Tobin, 17:04
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 17:00
- Re: character array as bits, Walter Roberson, 16:59
- Re: character array as bits, Ali Karaali, 16:59
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 16:58
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 16:58
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 16:57
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 16:50
- character array as bits, prakash437, 16:42
- Re: Is const really const?, quasimodo, 16:32
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, John Bode, 16:31
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: Is const really const?, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: Is const really const?, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Large Files, Walter Roberson, 16:07
- Re: Large Files, Malcolm McLean, 16:02
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 15:58
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Flash Gordon, 15:54
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ben Pfaff, 15:53
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 15:48
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 15:43
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 15:39
- Re: Linked list allocation, Ben Pfaff, 15:36
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 15:36
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 15:27
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Philip Potter, 15:26
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 15:23
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 15:11
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 15:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 15:01
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 14:57
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 14:13
- Re: Linked list allocation, Willem, 14:04
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 14:01
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CJ, 13:54
- Linked list allocation, Jeff Bown, 13:51
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 13:34
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 13:24
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ed Jensen, 13:22
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 13:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 12:51
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ed Jensen, 12:46
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, SM Ryan, 12:41
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ed Jensen, 12:20
- "Suite of the imaginary beings" now complete for free download!, ubumusic, 11:09
- Re: Is const really const?, Golden California Girls, 11:03
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Richard Tobin, 10:38
- Free LINUX Tips and Triks - Building Interactive Movie With Ming, rada . lambretha, 10:34
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Lew Pitcher, 09:39
- $$$$$$$www.200836.com ,Senior official calls for utmost efforts in weather forecasting during Olympics, allen23456, 09:37
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 09:29
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Nick Keighley, 09:14
- Is SIGALRM getting masked ???, apoorva.groups@xxxxxxxxx, 09:01
- Re: Is const really const?, pete, 08:41
- Re: Multi precision floating point, pete, 08:20
- Re: Is const really const?, James Kuyper, 07:48
- Re: Is const really const?, JimS, 07:33
- Re: Is const really const?, Rohit kumar Chandel, 07:17
- trollish, RoS, 07:03
- Re: Optimiser question, Philip Potter, 06:47
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Mark Bluemel, 06:25
- #### How To Turn Your Dull Website into Money Making Website####, 4571singh@xxxxxxxxx, 06:23
- Re: Optimiser question, Nick Keighley, 06:11
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Nick Keighley, 05:51
- Re: Is const really const?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:48
- Re: Is const really const?, Sheth Raxit, 05:34
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Robert Latest, 05:27
- Re: Is const really const?, Keith Thompson, 05:24
- Re: Is const really const?, Ian Collins, 05:11
- Re: Is const really const?, Rohit kumar Chandel, 04:49
- Re: Is const really const?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:43
- Re: Is const really const?, Keith Thompson, 04:25
- free video lessons on 12 computer Science Courses, AK444, 04:11
- Re: Is const really const?, Ian Collins, 04:07
- Is const really const?, Rohit kumar Chandel, 03:45
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Dow Allen, 02:54
- Re: greatest of two numbers, aarklon, 02:18
- Re: Large Files, Paul Hsieh, 02:12
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Richard Bos, 02:09
- Re: Large Files, santosh, 02:07
- Re: C Variables Length, santosh, 02:02
- Re: fgets() equivalent?, CBFalconer, 01:59
- Re: Large Files, Ben Pfaff, 01:15
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Tim Prince, 01:14
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 00:54
December 16, 2007
- Re: C Variables Length, Peter Nilsson, 21:28
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: __FILE__ + __DATE__, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Multi precision floating point, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Multi precision floating point, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: traversing a stack, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: fgets() equivalent?, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, David Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Tor Rustad, 20:33
- Re: Large Files, Tor Rustad, 18:53
- Re: Large Files, Tor Rustad, 18:39
- Re: Large Files, Eric Sosman, 18:11
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Chris Thomasson, 17:55
- Re: Large Files, Ian Collins, 17:47
- Re: Large Files, Malcolm McLean, 17:42
- Re: Large Files, James Kuyper, 17:42
- Re: C Variables Length, Francine . Neary, 17:28
- Large Files, raj, 17:24
- Re: volatile + threads, Chris Thomasson, 17:02
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Philip Potter, 15:53
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Bill Reid, 13:30
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 Have Systematically Destroyed My Life (32132), MI5-Victim, 13:12
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Philip Potter, 12:59
- MI5-Persecution: No Justice for the Victims of MI5 (29949), MI5-Victim, 12:32
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 are Afraid to Admit Theyre Behind the Persecution (27766), MI5-Victim, 12:02
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Philip Potter, 12:00
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Richard, 11:51
- MI5-Persecution: Molestation during Travel (25583), MI5-Victim, 11:32
- MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny Theyre Watching Me (23400), MI5-Victim, 11:02
- MI5-Persecution: Four Years of MI5 Persecution Posts on Internet Newsgroups (21217), MI5-Victim, 10:33
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Joe Wright, 10:20
- Re: calculating sha1sum, Tor Rustad, 10:15
- MI5-Persecution: MI5 Waste Taxpayer Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign (19034), MI5-Victim, 10:03
- MI5-Persecution: Comparing the MI5 Persecution with German Final Solution (16851), MI5-Victim, 09:35
- Re: calculating sha1sum, Flash Gordon, 09:14
- MI5-Persecution: Browse the Website (14668), MI5-Victim, 09:07
- calculating sha1sum, reubendb, 08:54
- MI5-Persecution: How to Identify the Persecutors (12485), MI5-Victim, 08:40
- MI5-Persecution: BBC Newscasters Spying on my Home (10302), MI5-Victim, 08:16
- MI5-Persecution: .net Magazine Applauds my Website (8119), MI5-Victim, 07:51
- MI5-Persecution: Why would they be doing this to you, sir? (5936), MI5-Victim, 07:27
- MI5-Persecution: Why do you think MI5 are responsible? (3753), MI5-Victim, 06:58
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 06:51
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Willem, 06:21
- MI5-Persecution: How Could It Be True? (1570), MI5-Victim, 06:12
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', William Pursell, 06:11
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Mark McIntyre, 05:39
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Philip Potter, 05:22
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Philip Potter, 05:22
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Philip Potter, 05:12
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Philip Potter, 04:57
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Keith Thompson, 04:54
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, pete, 04:27
- Re: Optimiser question, Willem, 04:11
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, pete, 03:38
- Re: volatile + threads, Chris Thomasson, 03:37
- Re: volatile + threads, Chris Thomasson, 03:34
- ♀♂cheap Air Max shox 87,90,95,97,180,360,2003,2006,2007shoes coat shirt belt watches【$19.99】www.cheapest-sell.cn♂♀, xiaoshifeng026, 03:09
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, pete, 02:58
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Logan Lee, 01:57
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', William Pursell, 01:40
- Re: Automatic struct initialization, Jack Klein, 01:29
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Logan Lee, 01:13
- Re: volatile + threads, Kaz Kylheku, 00:54
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, CBFalconer, 00:31
- Automatic struct initialization, dj3vande, 00:09
December 15, 2007
- PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card, shopbb.com, 23:49
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Ed Prochak, 23:24
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Rod Pemberton, 21:48
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Peter Nilsson, 21:34
- Re: Cast to an array type, Barry Schwarz, 21:34
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Barry Schwarz, 21:25
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Jack Klein, 21:16
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Jack Klein, 21:14
- Re: internet, Jack Klein, 21:02
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, Barry Schwarz, 21:01
- Re: Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Logan Lee, 20:57
- Please check the content of my web page on 'A note on Pointer Operation', Logan Lee, 20:55
- Re: Can someone help with this? Linux GTK / Ncurses, Jack Klein, 20:54
- Re: volatile + threads, Tor Rustad, 20:52
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Tor Rustad, 20:42
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Logan Lee, 20:22
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Flash Gordon, 19:57
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CBFalconer, 19:34
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, pete, 19:30
- Silentbob?, Why Tea, 18:51
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Golden California Girls, 18:45
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 18:27
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Fumeur, 18:13
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Stephen Sprunk, 18:13
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, William Pursell, 18:09
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, William Pursell, 17:58
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Ian Collins, 17:56
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, cr88192, 17:50
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: Optimiser question, lawrence . jones, 17:46
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Logan Lee, 17:34
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Ian Collins, 17:28
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Logan Lee, 17:20
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Geoff, 17:08
- Re: A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Tomasz bla Fortuna, 16:48
- A question regarding Q20.1 from c-faq.com, Logan Lee, 16:37
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 16:30
- Re: volatile + threads, Gene, 15:31
- Re: convert unsigned to char, Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Thad Smith, 15:18
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: volatile + threads, Thad Smith, 14:48
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Tobin, 14:07
- best service lowest price, cheapeshopcn4, 13:51
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Malcolm McLean, 13:41
- Re: char* argv[], Joe Wright, 13:18
- Excuse me!!, mossab00019, 13:18
- Re: C Variables Length, Ben Pfaff, 12:04
- Re: volatile + threads, Flash Gordon, 11:58
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Ben Bacarisse, 11:56
- Re: volatile + threads, Mark F. Haigh, 11:32
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Harald van Dijk, 11:17
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Thad Smith, 11:09
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Thad Smith, 10:58
- Re: volatile + threads, Johannes Bauer, 10:48
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, James Kuyper, 10:22
- Re: Pointer to array inside a struct, pete, 10:05
- Re: Pointer increment, Ben Bacarisse, 10:03
- Re: Pointer increment, Eric Sosman, 10:01
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, CBFalconer, 10:00
- [ot]Re: internet, pete, 09:58
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 09:50
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 09:48
- Re: volatile + threads, Mark F. Haigh, 09:47
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 09:46
- Re: volatile + threads, santosh, 09:26
- volatile + threads, CJ, 09:04
- Re: Pointer increment, santosh, 08:18
- Pointer increment, braton, 08:02
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Richard, 08:01
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Chris Dollin, 07:21
- Re: convert unsigned to char, James Kuyper, 07:18
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Rod Pemberton, 06:50
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, santosh, 06:40
- Re: Need help with this program, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 06:33
- Re: C Variables Length, santosh, 06:33
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Flash Gordon, 06:09
- Re: ARP packet network program, Mark McIntyre, 06:06
- Re: internet, Flash Gordon, 06:05
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: ARP packet network program, Flash Gordon, 05:59
- Re: convert unsigned to char, Philip Potter, 05:58
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, jkohen@xxxxxxxxx, 05:49
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Flash Gordon, 05:38
- argent, giomaf, 05:32
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Tony Jackson, 05:18
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 05:13
- Re: Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, pete, 04:59
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 04:55
- Avoiding dereference of NULL pointer, Tony Jackson, 04:52
- internet, brijeshmalasi, 04:41
- Re: convert unsigned to char, Keith Thompson, 04:36
- Re: Optimiser question, Philip Potter, 04:34
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, pete, 04:29
- Re: Pointer to array inside a struct, pete, 04:16
- Re: C Variables Length, Malcolm McLean, 04:01
- Re: char* argv[], pete, 03:50
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, krishan, 03:44
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, krishan, 03:40
- Re: char* argv[], srikrishanmalik, 03:30
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 03:29
- Re: C Variables Length, jaysome, 03:18
- ARP packet network program, AngreGanon@xxxxxxxxx, 02:48
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 02:39
- Re: Reverse a string in place, ozbear, 02:31
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Tor Rustad, 02:01
- Re: Optimiser question, Willem, 01:50
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Willem, 01:47
December 14, 2007
- wholesaler sport shoes,clothing,electrons mobile phone (Nokia N95=260USD)(www.shopbb.com), shopbb.com, 23:57
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 23:51
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 23:45
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, James Kuyper, 22:58
- Re: String manipulation program not returning expected output, Logan Lee, 21:50
- String manipulation program not returning expected output, Logan Lee, 21:08
- Re: Another pointer to array inside struct, drhowarddrfine, 20:58
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Joe Wright, 20:47
- Re: Another pointer to array inside struct, Ben Pfaff, 20:42
- Re: Reverse a string in place, ozbear, 20:37
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Keith Thompson, 20:25
- Another pointer to array inside struct, drhowarddrfine, 20:07
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Keith Thompson, 20:04
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Tobin, 19:45
- Re: I want o use the function alternate to a MACRO, Peter Nilsson, 19:38
- Re: Pointer to array inside a struct, drhowarddrfine, 19:37
- Re: A question regarding argv, CBFalconer, 19:33
- Re: C Variables Length, CBFalconer, 19:28
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 19:21
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 18:59
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Franz Hose, 18:46
- Re: char* argv[], Ben Pfaff, 18:40
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 18:36
- Re: char* argv[], Ben Pfaff, 18:35
- Re: C Variables Length, Default User, 18:34
- Re: char* argv[], Default User, 18:33
- Re: char* argv[], Logan, 18:30
- Re: char* argv[], Richard Heathfield, 18:30
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Ben Pfaff, 18:28
- Re: C Variables Length, Richard Heathfield, 18:27
- A question regarding argv, Logan, 18:23
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Harald van Dijk, 18:23
- char* argv[], Logan, 18:20
- Re: Pointer to array inside a struct, user923005, 18:16
- Re: C Variables Length, Eric Sosman, 18:14
- Re: C Variables Length, Ben Pfaff, 18:07
- Re: C Variables Length, user923005, 18:00
- Pointer to array inside a struct, drhowarddrfine, 17:55
- Re: A function is an address, Wojtek Lerch, 17:54
- C Variables Length, lak, 17:53
- Re: Meaning of the warning, CBFalconer, 17:52
- Re: Meaning of the warning, CBFalconer, 17:48
- Re: Copying strings, Chris Torek, 17:46
- Re: Optimiser question, CBFalconer, 17:37
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, CBFalconer, 17:34
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 17:25
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 17:18
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 17:12
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, pete, 17:11
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 17:08
- Re: I want o use the function alternate to a MACRO, pete, 16:54
- Re: Can volatile be added through declarations, Eric Sosman, 16:50
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Eric Sosman, 16:37
- I want o use the function alternate to a MACRO, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:36
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 16:11
- C programming reference | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/search/label/C%20Language%20e-book, yuni . wijayanti, 16:02
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jameskuyper, 16:00
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Brian, 15:58
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, lawrence . jones, 15:52
- Re: Reverse a string in place, RoS, 15:50
- Re: Reverse a string in place, RoS, 14:53
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Ben Pfaff, 14:31
- Re: smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, Ben Pfaff, 14:23
- Re: Can volatile be added through declarations, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 14:12
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Harald van Dijk, 14:11
- Everybody does not buy also comes to have a look www.cheapeshop.cn, cheapeshopcn5, 14:05
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Flash Gordon, 14:02
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Stephen Sprunk, 13:53
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 13:51
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Richard Tobin, 13:50
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Stephen Sprunk, 13:40
- Re: Optimiser question, Stephen Sprunk, 13:31
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 13:30
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Stephen Sprunk, 13:22
- Re: Meaning of the warning, pete, 13:16
- c programming reviews, raae, 13:10
- Re: Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, santosh, 13:04
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Chris Dollin, 13:03
- Re: Array and function question, Ben Bacarisse, 13:01
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 12:56
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, Ben Bacarisse, 12:49
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Brian, 12:41
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Richard Heathfield, 12:31
- Re: Meaning of the warning, somenath, 12:05
- smuggling data in and out of alarm handlers and the like, David Mathog, 12:03
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Richard Tobin, 11:58
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, jameskuyper, 11:43
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Joachim Schmitz, 11:35
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Richard Heathfield, 11:29
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Richard Heathfield, 11:27
- Can someone help with this? Linux GTK / Ncurses, ChuckB, 11:21
- Re: Meaning of the warning, CBFalconer, 11:19
- Re: Optimiser question, Chris Dollin, 11:14
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Richard Tobin, 11:12
- Re: Meaning of the warning, CBFalconer, 11:09
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, CBFalconer, 11:02
- Re: convert unsigned to char, CBFalconer, 10:52
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Charlton Wilbur, 10:27
- Re: Meaning of the warning, pete, 09:40
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Chris Dollin, 09:34
- Re: Meaning of the warning, pete, 09:31
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Richard Heathfield, 09:28
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, Willem, 09:24
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Willem, 09:23
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, Chris Dollin, 09:22
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, Asbjørn Sæbø, 09:21
- Re: Meaning of the warning, Asbjørn Sæbø, 09:18
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, Eric Sosman, 09:17
- Re: Increment and order of evaluation, pete, 09:15
- Meaning of the warning, somenath, 09:09
- Increment and order of evaluation, Asbjørn Sæbø, 08:57
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, pete, 08:53
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Eric Sosman, 08:30
- Re: Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, pete, 08:07
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 08:06
- Re: convert unsigned to char, James Kuyper, 07:52
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, pete, 07:47
- Re: convert unsigned to char, pete, 07:36
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, James Kuyper, 07:13
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., JimS, 07:13
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Mark Bluemel, 07:11
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Mark Bluemel, 07:09
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Mark Bluemel, 07:08
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Logan, 07:02
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation. FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Logan, 06:55
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Logan, 06:51
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., jacob navia, 06:42
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Mark Bluemel, 06:40
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., Logan, 06:33
- Re: Segmentation error for array operation., jacob navia, 06:23
- Segmentation error for array operation., Logan, 06:18
- Re: Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, Joachim Schmitz, 06:13
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Bart C, 05:57
- Re: convert unsigned to char, Mark Bluemel, 05:52
- Re: Array and function question, Richard Tobin, 05:39
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Richard Tobin, 05:35
- convert unsigned to char, AGRAJA, 05:30
- Re: Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, somenath, 05:24
- Re: Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, Chris Dollin, 05:19
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, karancuteboy277, 05:12
- Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, somenath, 05:01
- Question regarding sequence point in case of conditional operator, somenath, 04:51
- Re: Array and function question, karancuteboy277, 04:50
- Re: Optimiser question, Chris Dollin, 04:17
- Re: Optimiser question, Robert Latest, 04:08
- Re: Optimiser question, Robert Latest, 04:00
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Ian Collins, 03:45
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 03:37
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Richard Bos, 03:24
- Re: Array and function question - FIXED SAMPLE CODE, Logan, 03:12
- Re: Array and function question, Chris Dollin, 02:28
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Chris Dollin, 02:24
- Re: Array and function question, Keith Thompson, 02:23
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Chris Dollin, 02:20
- Re: Array and function question, Joachim Schmitz, 02:18
- Array and function question, Logan, 01:44
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, Ian Collins, 01:17
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, CBFalconer, 01:15
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, somenath, 01:11
- Re: Question regarding the short circuit behavior, user923005, 01:05
- Question regarding the short circuit behavior, somenath, 00:56
- Re: Copying strings, CBFalconer, 00:22
December 13, 2007
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Thad Smith, 22:38
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Keith Thompson, 22:07
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Stephen Sprunk, 22:01
- Re: Optimiser question, Stephen Sprunk, 21:53
- Re: Optimiser question, Stephen Sprunk, 21:53
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 21:37
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Chris Torek, 20:30
- Re: Copying strings, Khookie, 20:13
- Re: Copying strings, pete, 20:08
- replacement for 'pow()' function, Roman Mashak, 19:43
- EngSim: Engineering Simulation/Graphics Library for MS VC++, Will, 19:38
- Re: Copying strings, Ben Pfaff, 19:32
- Re: Copying strings, Default User, 19:26
- Copying strings, Khookie, 19:18
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 19:18
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Alok Singhal, 19:07
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Old Wolf, 18:50
- Re: nanosleep mystery, CBFalconer, 18:34
- Re: Optimiser question, CBFalconer, 18:28
- Re: Optimiser question, christian.bau, 18:07
- Re: Optimiser question, Jack Klein, 18:03
- Re: Optimiser question, Mark F. Haigh, 18:00
- Re: How to print 80 col name-pairs?, CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, jameskuyper, 17:53
- Re: Optimiser question, Dave S, 17:01
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Peter Nilsson, 16:54
- Re: Global structure variable initialization, Dann Corbit, 16:51
- Re: Global structure variable initialization, koffee, 16:16
- Re: Global structure variable initialization, Eric Sosman, 16:08
- Re: Optimiser question, Flash Gordon, 16:00
- www.nikepopularshoes.com cheap wholesale Nike,Air,Jordan,Af1,max,Nike, shoes9966, 15:52
- www.nikepopularshoes.com cheap wholesale Nike,Air,Jordan,Af1,max,Nike, shoes9966, 15:52
- Re: Global structure variable initialization, koffee, 15:42
- Global structure variable initialization, koffee, 15:40
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Flash Gordon, 15:36
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, cr88192, 15:33
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Jack Klein, 15:27
- Re: Question related to printf, Jack Klein, 15:22
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, user923005, 14:55
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Al Balmer, 14:54
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Stephen Sprunk, 14:45
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, jameskuyper, 14:42
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Kaz Kylheku, 14:35
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Harold Weissman, 14:24
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Willem, 14:18
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 14:14
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Mark Bluemel, 14:05
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Harald van Dijk, 14:04
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 13:59
- Re: Macro substitution conundrum, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:58
- Macro substitution conundrum, Harold Weissman, 13:55
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Chris Torek, 13:49
- OFF-TOPIC Re: how the macro works, Ben Bacarisse, 13:45
- Re: pointer and array, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: nanosleep mystery, Mark Bluemel, 13:40
- Re: nanosleep mystery, Kenny McCormack, 13:32
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Keith Thompson, 13:28
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Keith Thompson, 13:28
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Keith Thompson, 13:27
- Re: Optimiser question, Ben Bacarisse, 13:26
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Chris Hills, 13:23
- nanosleep mystery, chandanlinster, 13:23
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Keith Thompson, 13:19
- Re: How to print 80 col name-pairs?, beagle197, 13:10
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:06
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Keith Thompson, 13:04
- Re: how the macro works, Philip Potter, 12:51
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:48
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 12:44
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, William Xu, 12:42
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 12:12
- Re: Optimiser question, Philip Potter, 11:55
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Neil Cerutti, 11:38
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Gus Gassmann, 11:28
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 11:20
- Re: Question related to printf, Philip Potter, 11:12
- Re: Optimiser question, Chris Dollin, 11:06
- Re: Optimiser question, CBFalconer, 11:01
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 10:57
- Re: Optimiser question, Dave S, 10:53
- Re: Optimiser question, Dave S, 10:51
- Re: Optimiser question, Eric Sosman, 10:47
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, jameskuyper, 10:40
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 10:37
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Eric Sosman, 10:33
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Ben Bacarisse, 10:24
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 10:17
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 10:15
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 10:13
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 10:11
- Re: Optimiser question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:11
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Chris Dollin, 10:08
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, CBFalconer, 10:05
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, tonnitielens, 10:02
- Re: Optimiser question, Chris Dollin, 10:01
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Mark Bluemel, 10:00
- Re: Optimiser question, Mark Bluemel, 09:56
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 09:56
- Re: Optimiser question, Johannes Bauer, 09:49
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, William Xu, 09:49
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Johannes Bauer, 09:43
- Optimiser question, Dave S, 09:41
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Chris Dollin, 09:36
- typedef function with void parameters, William Xu, 09:31
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Johannes Bauer, 09:31
- Re: typedef function with void parameters, Chris Dollin, 09:30
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Duncan Muirhead, 09:26
- Re: pointer and array, Robert Latest, 09:17
- Re: Question related to printf, Robert Latest, 09:14
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 09:07
- Re: Question related to printf, Richard, 08:58
- Re: Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, jacob navia, 08:53
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 08:51
- Re: Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, Mark Bluemel, 08:44
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Chris Dollin, 08:41
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Chris Dollin, 08:37
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, pete, 08:26
- Re: Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, Nickolai Leschov, 08:25
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, pete, 08:19
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 08:13
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Khookie, 07:58
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, James Kuyper, 07:50
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Thad Smith, 07:49
- this is a test, Nickolai Leschov, 07:47
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Thad Smith, 07:43
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Richard Bos, 07:43
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Bos, 07:43
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Dik T. Winter, 07:38
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 07:37
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, James Kuyper, 07:32
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 07:31
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 07:28
- Re: pointer and array, Richard Bos, 07:27
- Re: Question related to printf, Richard Bos, 07:26
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 07:25
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 07:24
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 07:23
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Richard Bos, 07:22
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, James Kuyper, 07:20
- Re: Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, jacob navia, 07:19
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, pete, 07:18
- Porting libmodbus to 16-bit DOS, nleschov, 07:10
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, James Kuyper, 07:08
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, James Kuyper, 07:06
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, James Kuyper, 07:02
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, James Kuyper, 06:57
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 06:55
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 06:50
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Mark Bluemel, 06:48
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 06:35
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Chris Hills, 06:26
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 06:00
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, ymuntyan, 05:54
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 05:45
- Very beautiful girls and many useful resources and more,please check it out, joncampbell3@xxxxxxxxx, 05:45
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Keith Thompson, 05:31
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Philip Potter, 05:20
- Re: how the macro works, Philip Potter, 05:14
- Re: Question related to printf, Philip Potter, 04:55
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Ian Collins, 04:42
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, llothar, 04:38
- Re: Favourite C tools, llothar, 04:27
- Re: Favourite C tools, jacob navia, 04:11
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 04:03
- Re: pointer and array, Chris Dollin, 03:42
- Re: replacement for 'pow()' function, Flash Gordon, 03:39
- Re: is it ever necessary to free memory if you are about to call exit anyway?, Flash Gordon, 03:35
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Ian Collins, 03:28
- Re: Print 64 bit with a char buffer, laurent . pauloin, 03:27
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Flash Gordon, 03:26
- Re: Cast to an array type, Asbjørn Sæbø, 03:05
- Re: Regarding regular expressions in Solaris, Ian Collins, 02:54
- Regarding regular expressions in Solaris, sunil, 02:47
- Re: how the macro works, Richard Bos, 02:14
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, cr88192, 01:59
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, cr88192, 01:56
- Re: assert must take int?, jaysome, 01:47
- Favourite C tools, lg, 01:20
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Martin Ambuhl, 01:11
- PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card(www.shopbb.com), shopbb.com, 01:06
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 00:57
- Re: string buffer, Keith Thompson, 00:55
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Ian Collins, 00:49
- Re: string buffer, Peter Nilsson, 00:26
- Re: is it ever necessary to free memory if you are about to call exit anyway?, Peter Nilsson, 00:08
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Peter Nilsson, 00:00
December 12, 2007
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 23:05
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, CBFalconer, 23:04
- Re: Question related to printf, CBFalconer, 22:54
- Re: Question related to printf, CBFalconer, 22:49
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, CBFalconer, 22:44
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, CBFalconer, 22:28
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., CBFalconer, 22:13
- Re: string buffer, CBFalconer, 21:59
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, CBFalconer, 21:54
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Chris Torek, 21:52
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 21:34
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Peter Nilsson, 21:31
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 21:28
- Re: pointer and array, Joe Wright, 21:19
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 21:05
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, James Kuyper, 21:02
- www.200836.com- Peking 2008 Olympic Games if you dream ,you can do, feiallen, 20:54
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, user923005, 20:52
- www.200836.com - Peking 2008 Olympic Games Commemorative souvenir/Memorial product, feiallen, 20:38
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Gene, 20:16
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Ian Collins, 20:10
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Doug, 20:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Steve Thompson, 19:59
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Tor Rustad, 19:58
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 19:54
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 19:53
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Default User, 19:46
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Peter Nilsson, 19:46
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, pete, 19:43
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 19:27
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, pete, 19:07
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 19:06
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 19:05
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Ben Pfaff, 18:58
- Re: Ommiting frame pointer, Richard Tobin, 18:57
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, user923005, 18:54
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jameskuyper, 18:52
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Francine . Neary, 18:51
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 18:45
- Ommiting frame pointer, Brian, 18:44
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 18:41
- Re: Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, Richard Tobin, 18:35
- Help me, a friend of mine wrote a program in C# and I wrote the same program in C..His is faster than mine on the same machine...How Come ?, c, 18:23
- Re: pointer and array, Tor Rustad, 17:59
- Re: is it ever necessary to free memory if you are about to call exit anyway?, Tor Rustad, 17:54
- Re: pointer and array, Ben Pfaff, 17:52
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Flash Gordon, 17:49
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Flash Gordon, 17:31
- Re: pointer and array, Tor Rustad, 17:28
- Re: Question related to printf, Harald van Dijk, 17:14
- Re: flex for windows, Tor Rustad, 17:02
- setup write compile and run GMP progs in cygwin, dot, 17:02
- Re: Question related to printf, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 16:50
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Tor Rustad, 16:48
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, Francine . Neary, 16:35
- Re: how the macro works, Ben Bacarisse, 16:28
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, jacob navia, 16:12
- Re: #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 16:09
- #pragma once in ISO standard yet?, Rick, 16:07
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, jacob navia, 16:05
- Re: String parsing, Malcolm McLean, 15:52
- Re: Question related to printf, Harald van Dijk, 15:45
- Re: Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 15:39
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:34
- Re: Question related to printf, Martien Verbruggen, 15:32
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:31
- Re: Question related to printf, Keith Thompson, 15:28
- Re: An Uncomfortable Christmas Card For Unbelievers, Kenny McCormack, 15:26
- Re: pointer and array, Keith Thompson, 15:15
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Default User, 15:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Default User, 15:06
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Default User, 15:05
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., dj3vande, 15:03
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, Dann Corbit, 15:01
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, Amandil, 14:57
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, dj3vande, 14:53
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, Walter Roberson, 14:51
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, user923005, 14:45
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, Martin Ambuhl, 14:42
- Re: why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, jameskuyper, 14:42
- Re: Print 64 bit with a char buffer, Martin Ambuhl, 14:26
- Re: Question related to printf, Keith Thompson, 14:19
- why the printf is not typecasting the int to float, jayapal, 14:12
- (www.globwholesale.com) Best Price, Best Products, CHEAP WHOLESALE AND HOT SELL Football Shoes, Sport Shoes, Replica Designers Handbag, Children Shoes,Coogi JEANS-HOODY, Burberry T-shirts, Bape Cap, Jacket,A&F Coat, UQQ Boots,Watch, Belts,Women Boots, Replica Designers Fendi Prada Handbag, Apple Iphone, MP4, MP3 Player, globwholesale15, 14:02
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Kaz Kylheku, 14:02
- Re: A function is an address, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:50
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Keith Thompson, 13:29
- Re: Question related to printf, Kenneth Brody, 13:29
- Re: pointer and array, Lew Pitcher, 13:24
- Re: Question related to printf, harsha, 13:18
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Keith Thompson, 13:14
- Re: pointer and array, Ben Pfaff, 13:05
- Re: Question related to printf, Al Balmer, 13:04
- Re: Question related to printf, pete, 12:57
- Re: operators and type promotion, swansnow, 12:56
- Re: Question related to printf, Ben Pfaff, 12:53
- Re: Question related to printf, Ben Pfaff, 12:52
- Re: ANSI C confimance test suite available ?, Chris Hills, 12:49
- pointer and array, sumitverma1680, 12:45
- Re: Question related to printf, Ben Pfaff, 12:43
- Re: Question related to printf, Philip Potter, 12:37
- Re: Question related to printf, harsha, 12:36
- Print 64 bit with a char buffer, laurent . pauloin, 12:36
- Re: Question related to printf, Philip Potter, 12:34
- Re: Question related to printf, somenath, 12:26
- Re: Question related to printf, Philip Potter, 12:26
- Re: how the macro works, Philip Potter, 12:16
- Re: Question related to printf, Martin Ambuhl, 12:14
- Re: Question related to printf, Richard Heathfield, 12:09
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Philip Potter, 12:08
- Re: Question related to printf, somenath, 11:59
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Richard, 11:44
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:40
- Re: Cast to an array type, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 11:39
- Re: Question related to printf, Mark Bluemel, 11:38
- Re: Question related to printf, jameskuyper, 11:38
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, jacob navia, 11:37
- Re: Question related to printf, pete, 11:35
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, jacob navia, 11:35
- Re: Question related to printf, somenath, 11:33
- Re: Cast to an array type, Martin Ambuhl, 11:30
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Philip Potter, 11:29
- Re: Question related to printf, Mark Bluemel, 11:22
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Marc Boyer, 11:19
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Charlton Wilbur, 11:12
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 11:09
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Richard Heathfield, 11:07
- Re: deletion in link list, ratika, 11:05
- Question related to printf, somenath, 11:05
- Re: Question related to printf, Richard Bos, 11:04
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Marc Boyer, 11:02
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Philip Potter, 10:59
- Re: is it ever necessary to free memory if you are about to call exit anyway?, Richard Tobin, 10:58
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Richard Bos, 10:57
- Re: how the macro works, Philip Potter, 10:56
- Re: Problem with eclipse and a simple c program, pete, 10:56
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Richard, 10:52
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, Kaz Kylheku, 10:49
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, Ben Bacarisse, 10:46
- Re: Cast to an array type, Eric Sosman, 10:44
- is it ever necessary to free memory if you are about to call exit anyway?, viza, 10:41
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, pete, 10:39
- Re: pointer confusion., Ben Bacarisse, 10:39
- Cast to an array type, Asbjørn Sæbø, 10:30
- wholesaler sport shoes,clothing,electrons mobile phone (Nokia N95=260USD), fashion-sky, 10:18
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Mark Bluemel, 10:11
- Trouble with integer floating point conversion, rembremading, 10:09
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Eric Sosman, 09:46
- Re: Problem with eclipse and a simple c program, Eric Sosman, 09:42
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Nick Keighley, 09:27
- Re: What is considered macro abuse?, Duncan Muirhead, 09:01
- Re: how the macro works, hakuna, 08:55
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, jacob navia, 08:52
- [OFF-TOPIC] Win 3.11, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:36
- Re: how the macro works, Mark Bluemel, 08:30
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Mark Bluemel, 08:28
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:19
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Chris Dollin, 08:14
- Re: how the macro works, Chris Dollin, 08:11
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Erik Trulsson, 08:11
- new computer coming on 2008 lang -c, ashik, 08:06
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, cr88192, 08:05
- Opening for Chief Architect(Sr.Director) with World's No1 Email Service & Search Engine Company, Subhendu, 07:56
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., James Kuyper, 07:43
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:37
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., James Kuyper, 07:33
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Mark Bluemel, 07:20
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Nick Keighley, 07:01
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:59
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:56
- Re: how the macro works, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:44
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Nick Keighley, 06:43
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Chris Dollin, 06:41
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 06:22
- Re: how the macro works, Richard Heathfield, 06:13
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Richard Heathfield, 06:10
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 06:07
- how the macro works, George2, 06:04
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:02
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 06:00
- What is considered macro abuse?, Khookie, 05:57
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 05:53
- Need to support for unicode to socket programming, raghupise, 05:49
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 05:46
- Re: C closures & lexical scoping, Richard Tobin, 05:40
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 05:40
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Richard Tobin, 05:37
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Ian Collins, 05:30
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 05:29
- C closures & lexical scoping, Khookie, 05:28
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Nick Keighley, 05:17
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Ian Collins, 05:14
- Re: Problem with eclipse and a simple c program, jacob navia, 05:12
- WORLD SEX free free, g, 04:50
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 04:50
- Problem with eclipse and a simple c program, lionelgreenstreet, 04:43
- Re: String parsing, Chris Dollin, 04:00
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 03:54
- Re: pointer confusion., user923005, 03:02
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 02:43
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, ramif, 00:42
- t shirt Handbag bags IPOD MP3 MP4 PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses(www.shopbb.com), shopbb.com, 00:13
- Re: string buffer, Keith Thompson, 00:10
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Keith Thompson, 00:09
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., somenath, 00:08
- www.nikepopularshoes.com cheap wholesale Shox,Du,US,UK,ipod,nike shox,psp, shoes9966, 00:01
- www.nikepopularshoes.com cheap nike jordan jordan shoes jordan7 jordan22, shoes9966, 00:00
December 11, 2007
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 23:56
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 23:52
- Re: pointer confusion., Ryan Knopp, 23:49
- Re: A function is an address, Wojtek Lerch, 23:30
- Re: pointer confusion., William Pursell, 23:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, William Pursell, 23:10
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, William Pursell, 23:03
- Re: Reverse a string in place, ozbear, 22:03
- Re: operators and type promotion, James Kuyper, 21:31
- Re: operators and type promotion, Peter Nilsson, 21:24
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Ian Collins, 20:49
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, user923005, 20:42
- Re: operators and type promotion, James Kuyper, 20:42
- Re: A function is an address, Douglas A. Gwyn, 20:36
- operators and type promotion, swansnow, 20:33
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 20:27
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 20:22
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Christopher Benson-Manica, 20:08
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 19:49
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., CBFalconer, 19:33
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 19:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 19:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 19:24
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 19:21
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 19:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 19:17
- Re: konstanten variieren, CBFalconer, 19:16
- Re: string buffer, CBFalconer, 19:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 19:11
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, CBFalconer, 19:03
- Re: String parsing, user923005, 19:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 19:01
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jameskuyper, 18:49
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 18:48
- String parsing, dimasteg, 18:44
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Default User, 18:36
- pointer confusion., Ryan Knopp, 18:27
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Mark McIntyre, 18:01
- Re: modify txt file in C, Mark McIntyre, 17:58
- *** glibc detected *** ./a.out: double free or corruption, ramif, 17:56
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 17:33
- Re: Problem with reading procfs, Flash Gordon, 17:31
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., cr88192, 17:15
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Flash Gordon, 17:15
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Keith Thompson, 17:14
- Re: Problem with reading procfs, Walter Roberson, 17:14
- Re: return char pointer which is malloc'ed in function, regis, 17:10
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 17:10
- Re: #if constant expression, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Julienne Walker, 16:58
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, user923005, 16:57
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 16:46
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Problem with reading procfs, Simone, 16:29
- Re: Need help with this program, Chris Dollin, 16:08
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Kenneth Brody, 16:05
- Re: Need help with this program, Phoenix, 15:47
- Re: A function is an address, Wojtek Lerch, 15:43
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., user923005, 15:40
- Re: A function is an address, David R Tribble, 15:26
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 15:12
- Re: Structure size directives, Ben Pfaff, 15:11
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Martin Ambuhl, 15:07
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 15:07
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 15:02
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Default User, 14:59
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, dspfun, 14:56
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Ian Collins, 14:56
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 14:53
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 14:47
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 14:25
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., jacob navia, 14:24
- Re: Need help with this program, dj3vande, 14:19
- Need help with this program, wdandrews1, 14:12
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Martin Ambuhl, 13:58
- Re: As a programmer of both languages..., Richard Heathfield, 13:52
- Re: How to print 80 col name-pairs?, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- As a programmer of both languages..., Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:31
- How to print 80 col name-pairs?, beagle197, 13:30
- Re: modify txt file in C, Lew Pitcher, 13:23
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 13:14
- modify txt file in C, chaobrenda, 13:10
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, jameskuyper, 12:45
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jameskuyper, 12:37
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, dspfun, 12:10
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 12:04
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 11:57
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:24
- shirt Handbag bags IPOD MP3 MP4 PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia(www.fashion-sky.com), fashion-sky . 001, 11:03
- Re: Structure size directives, Stephen Sprunk, 10:57
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Kenneth Brody, 10:52
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Thomas Maier-Komor, 10:14
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, SM Ryan, 09:52
- Re: #if constant expression, SM Ryan, 09:51
- Re: C GUI libraries, SM Ryan, 09:51
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 09:48
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Joachim Schmitz, 09:47
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 08:44
- Re: Can volatile be added through declarations, Eric Sosman, 08:17
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Doug, 08:03
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 07:30
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 07:07
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 06:55
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Keith Thompson, 06:46
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 06:44
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 06:26
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 06:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 06:21
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, James Kuyper, 06:19
- Re: string buffer, Keith Thompson, 06:18
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Richard Tobin, 06:15
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Richard Tobin, 06:14
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Khookie, 06:08
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Keith Thompson, 06:06
- Re: #if constant expression, Keith Thompson, 06:05
- Re: #if constant expression, Keith Thompson, 06:04
- Re: C and Algol68, Richard Tobin, 06:02
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Keith Thompson, 05:45
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Wouter Bergmann Tiest, 04:57
- Re: OT: Dynamic-CC, GC, Dynamic Types, and Prototype OO in C, cr88192, 04:42
- Re: query in reccursion, Chris Dollin, 04:37
- Re: konstanten variieren, Joachim Schmitz, 04:32
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 04:28
- Re: konstanten variieren, Zottel, 04:01
- Can volatile be added through declarations, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 03:59
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Zottel, 03:58
- Re: OT: Dynamic-CC, GC, Dynamic Types, and Prototype OO in C, Blake McBride, 03:13
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Ian Collins, 02:59
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Zottel, 02:54
- www.silkonroad.com cheap AK APE CHL EVS ed hardy D&G DG BBC AF LRG POLO COACH lv ggg caps hats Wholesale $29.99, xiaoshifeng021, 02:50
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Richard Heathfield, 02:44
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Ian Collins, 02:44
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Richard Heathfield, 02:40
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Zottel, 02:38
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, dspfun, 02:36
- Re: alternative to fstat ?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:34
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Zottel, 02:31
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, CBFalconer, 02:24
- alternative to fstat ?, solarisss, 02:24
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Richard Heathfield, 02:20
- Re: How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Ian Collins, 02:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 02:16
- www.silkonroad.com cheap AK APE CHL EVS ed hardy D&G DG BBC AF LRG POLO COACH lv ggg handbags Wholesale $29.99, xiaoshifeng016, 02:14
- How is it possible to use a constant in a variegate way?, Zottel, 02:08
- konstanten variieren, Zottel, 01:53
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 01:51
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 01:47
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 01:32
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 01:27
- ※★buy cheap jordan shoxj12/j13/j14/j17/j18/j19/j21/j23 clothe jean handbag【$19.99】www.cheapest-sell.cn★※, xiaoshifeng012, 01:12
- Re: Structure size directives, Ben Pfaff, 01:08
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 00:31
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Keith Thompson, 00:12
- Supply basketball shoe, football shoes, clothes, hat and so onv, hello, 00:12
- Supply basketball shoe, football shoes, clothes, hat and so onv, hello, 00:11
- Call for Papers - EPHAM 2008 (Workshop on Exploiting Parallelism with Transactional Memory and other Hardware Assisted Methods), yonghong . song, 00:10
- Re: ANSI C confimance test suite available ?, Keith Thompson, 00:03
December 10, 2007
- ANSI C confimance test suite available ?, prem, 23:10
- Re: query in reccursion, Golden California Girls, 23:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Joe Wright, 22:34
- Re: query in reccursion, Eric Sosman, 22:29
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Eric Sosman, 22:17
- query in reccursion, bnslpayal, 22:07
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Khookie, 21:06
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 20:54
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, Tor Rustad, 20:41
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Ian Collins, 20:41
- Re: Structure size directives, Ben Pfaff, 20:36
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Tor Rustad, 20:31
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 20:13
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Charlton Wilbur, 19:53
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 19:52
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Antoninus Twink, 19:34
- Re: C and Algol68, NevilleDNZ, 19:28
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 19:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 19:05
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 18:57
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 18:44
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Mark McIntyre, 18:32
- Re: page 120 K&R, Tor Rustad, 18:30
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Khookie, 18:29
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 18:27
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, Tor Rustad, 18:26
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 18:22
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 18:22
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 18:20
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 18:17
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 18:12
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 18:11
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, jameskuyper, 18:10
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 18:03
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, rosewater, 17:56
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, CBFalconer, 17:51
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 17:46
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Default User, 17:42
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 17:40
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:25
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Charlton Wilbur, 17:24
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, K. Jennings, 17:11
- Re: #if constant expression, pete, 17:08
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Antoninus Twink, 17:05
- Re: Questions about C90 vs C99, Default User, 16:55
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Charlton Wilbur, 16:47
- Questions about C90 vs C99, dspfun, 16:45
- Re: string buffer, CBFalconer, 16:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Antoninus Twink, 16:14
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Antoninus Twink, 16:10
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, CBFalconer, 16:09
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 16:06
- Re: Which max() is faster?, CBFalconer, 15:59
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 15:58
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, William Pursell, 15:40
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 15:28
- Re: Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: self destructing programs, Keith Thompson, 14:38
- Re: C GUI libraries, Roberto Waltman, 14:38
- Re: Which max() is faster?, user923005, 14:36
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Malcolm McLean, 14:36
- Re: C GUI libraries, Simon Gerber, 14:26
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, user923005, 14:26
- JESUS in the QURAN, aassime abdellatif, 14:20
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Flash Gordon, 14:16
- Re: Which max() is faster?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:59
- Re: Which max() is faster?, Philip Potter, 13:47
- Re: Which max() is faster?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:36
- Re: #if constant expression, Keith Thompson, 13:24
- Re: Trivial question about storing floats, pete, 12:42
- New Forum For People Who Love To Discuss On Technical Topics, support, 12:41
- Re: checksum correction, Johannes Bauer, 11:12
- Re: A function is an address, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:10
- Re: string buffer, Johannes Bauer, 11:09
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Spoon, 10:58
- Re: string buffer, Mark Bluemel, 10:44
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Kenneth Brody, 10:33
- Re: string buffer, vicks, 10:27
- Re: An exercise in fread optimisation, Mark Bluemel, 10:25
- Re: self destructing programs, Kenneth Brody, 10:25
- Re: checksum correction, Richard Tobin, 10:22
- Re: string buffer, Johannes Bauer, 10:16
- Re: return char pointer which is malloc'ed in function, Chris Dollin, 10:12
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Kenneth Brody, 10:11
- Re: Structure size directives, Kenneth Brody, 10:04
- checksum correction, Imran, 10:02
- An exercise in fread optimisation, Khookie, 09:55
- Re: return char pointer which is malloc'ed in function, Joachim Schmitz, 09:36
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Eric Sosman, 09:05
- Re: "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Eric Sosman, 08:58
- Re: return char pointer which is malloc'ed in function, Chris Dollin, 08:50
- Re: Which max() is faster?, James Kuyper, 08:31
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 08:29
- Re: C and Algol68, Richard Tobin, 08:03
- Re: Which max() is faster?, Khookie, 07:52
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Philip Potter, 07:49
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 07:45
- return char pointer which is malloc'ed in function, Khookie, 07:41
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, O_TEXT, 07:31
- Re: string buffer, pete, 07:16
- string buffer, George2, 07:03
- Re: very much new to c need ur help, pete, 06:59
- Re: Trivial question about storing floats, Mark Bluemel, 06:31
- Re: Trivial question about storing floats, pete, 06:29
- **DESI MASALA VIDEOS**HOT PICS**, Sexy Eliza, 06:27
- Re: Trivial question about storing floats, Jim, 06:14
- Re: Trivial question about storing floats, Martien Verbruggen, 06:06
- "Homemade" C99 prototype?, Robert Latest, 05:49
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 05:42
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Kenny McCormack, 05:32
- Trivial question about storing floats, Jim, 05:29
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 05:15
- Re: array elements, somenath, 04:50
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, CBFalconer, 04:19
- Re: page 120 K&R, CBFalconer, 04:15
- Re: #if constant expression, Fancois Grieu, 04:14
- Re: Which max() is faster?, Fancois Grieu, 03:32
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Kenny McCormack, 03:28
- Which max() is faster?, Sing, 03:21
- ###### How To Turn Your Dull Website into Money Making Website######, qre, 03:01
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, Sarath, 02:24
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, Sarath, 02:23
- Re: assert must take int?, Malcolm McLean, 01:45
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Malcolm McLean, 01:35
- Re: bits for floating value and converting, Tim Prince, 01:18
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, give_me_chance, 01:15
- Re: bits for floating value and converting, Tim Prince, 01:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, William Pursell, 01:09
- Re: C GUI libraries, William Pursell, 00:49
- Re: C GUI libraries, harsha, 00:47
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Peter Nilsson, 00:42
- Re: #if constant expression, quarkLore, 00:19
December 09, 2007
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Ben Pfaff, 23:57
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 23:27
- Re: very much new to c need ur help, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: page 120 K&R, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: operators similar to functions?, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: operators similar to functions?, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: bits for floating value and converting, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: what's the different between the %x and %c, David Thompson, 23:21
- Re: Sending Float values..., James Fang, 23:16
- Re: Sending Float values..., James Fang, 23:15
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, Chris Torek, 23:01
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, vicks, 22:43
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, Ian Collins, 22:38
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, pete, 22:38
- Re: sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, Chris Torek, 22:30
- Re: #if constant expression, pete, 22:11
- Re: #if constant expression, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 22:09
- Re: #if constant expression, James Kuyper, 22:03
- Re: #if constant expression, vicks, 21:56
- #if constant expression, kerravon, 21:45
- sizeof(<function name>); return wht??, vicks, 21:38
- C GUI libraries, Khookie, 21:25
- Re: assert must take int?, Keith Thompson, 21:22
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Peter Nilsson, 21:16
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 21:14
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 21:13
- Re: assert must take int?, Peter Nilsson, 20:47
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, pete, 20:38
- Re: Array address arithmetic, vjay, 20:35
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, pete, 20:29
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, pete, 20:18
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 20:06
- Re: Array address arithmetic, pete, 20:03
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 19:43
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Bart C, 19:41
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:25
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:24
- Re: C and Algol68, NevilleDNZ, 19:23
- Re: C and Algol68, NevilleDNZ, 19:19
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, pete, 18:30
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, CBFalconer, 18:26
- Re: assert must take int?, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Ben Pfaff, 18:09
- Iding Richard Heathfield (was: Exceptions in C/C++), CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:00
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Thad Smith, 17:59
- Re: C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, pete, 17:58
- Re: Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, Thad Smith, 17:45
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 17:32
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Barry Schwarz, 17:18
- C89: Compile-time constant required for initialiser?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 17:14
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 16:35
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 16:32
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 16:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 16:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Kenny McCormack, 16:07
- cheap LG Mobile Motorola Mobile Nokia Mobile Philips Mobile Sony-ericsson Mobile, yuwenwu004, 16:02
- cheap LG Mobile Motorola Mobile Nokia Mobile Philips Mobile Sony-ericsson Mobile, yuwenwu004, 16:02
- Re: Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), gw7rib, 15:18
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 15:06
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 14:38
- Re: A function is an address, Nick Keighley, 14:33
- Re: C and Algol68, Chris Dollin, 14:20
- Re: Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, Jack Klein, 14:07
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, William Pursell, 14:02
- Re: assert must take int?, Golden California Girls, 13:58
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 13:31
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 13:28
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Flash Gordon, 13:27
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 13:05
- Re: assert must take int?, Harald van Dijk, 12:59
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 12:59
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 12:58
- Re: C and Algol68, Chris Dollin, 12:58
- Re: assert must take int?, Harald van Dijk, 12:57
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 12:44
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 12:39
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 12:33
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 12:29
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, James Kuyper, 12:29
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 12:28
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 12:23
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Tobin, 12:14
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, ramif, 12:12
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 12:04
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 12:03
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, James Kuyper, 12:01
- Re: linux coreutils 'basename' program question, otavio . ribeiro, 11:57
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, James Kuyper, 11:50
- Re: assert must take int?, Malcolm McLean, 11:48
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, Malcolm McLean, 11:42
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, Richard, 11:40
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, ramif, 11:29
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Joe Wright, 11:11
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 11:03
- Re: Array address arithmetic, pete, 10:59
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, James Kuyper, 10:48
- Re: Memory Leaks related question, Richard Heathfield, 10:47
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Anthony Fremont, 10:44
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 10:39
- Memory Leaks related question, ramif, 10:35
- Re: Array address arithmetic, James Kuyper, 10:18
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 10:17
- Re: Array address arithmetic, James Kuyper, 10:13
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Noé Falzon, 10:00
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Anthony Fremont, 09:58
- Re: Array address arithmetic, James Fang, 09:56
- Re: Array address arithmetic, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:55
- Re: self destructing programs, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 09:49
- Array address arithmetic, vjay, 09:43
- Re: self destructing programs, James Fang, 09:39
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard, 09:32
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Mamluk Caliph, 09:18
- Re: Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, Eric Sosman, 08:58
- Re: assert must take int?, Flash Gordon, 08:29
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 08:13
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 08:07
- Re: A function is an address, pete, 07:29
- Re: A function is an address, pete, 06:55
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 06:55
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 06:31
- Re: Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, Richard Tobin, 06:19
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Tobin, 06:07
- Why in some compilers if a function is not declared, the compiler gives out a "warning" and not an "error"??, lostlander, 06:05
- Re: A function is an address, RoS, 04:56
- Re: assert must take int?, RoS, 04:56
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, RoS, 04:40
- Re: self destructing programs, KVT, 04:05
- Re: assert must take int?, Harald van Dijk, 03:51
- Re: assert must take int?, William Pursell, 03:16
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, William Pursell, 03:10
- Re: Sending Float values..., Malcolm McLean, 03:06
- Re: self destructing programs, Richard Heathfield, 02:42
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, Richard Heathfield, 02:39
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 02:35
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 02:29
- Re: assert must take int?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 02:23
- Re: assert must take int?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 02:17
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Keith Thompson, 02:14
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, RoS, 01:51
- Re: self destructing programs, Keith Thompson, 01:50
- ※★buy cheap nike shox NZ OZ R2 R3 R4 R5 TN RIFT shoes clothe jean handbag【$19.99】www.cheapest-sell.cn★※, xiaoshifeng011, 01:41
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 01:36
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 01:35
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 01:32
- Sending Float values..., swetha, 00:41
- self destructing programs, kvt, 00:28
- www.nikepopularshoes.com sell psp,Clothes,puma,wholesale,nike,air,mp4,ipod,glasses,psp,Clothes,nike shox,dunk, shoes9966, 00:18
- www.nikepopularshoes.com sell psp,Clothes,puma,wholesale,nike,air,mp4,ipod,glasses,psp,Clothes,nike shox,dunk, shoes9966, 00:17
December 08, 2007
- Islamic Manners (1): Sidq (Truthfulness, abdo911, 23:57
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 23:50
- Re: Trouble accessing data with pointer to structure, drhowarddrfine, 23:30
- Re: Trouble accessing data with pointer to structure, James Kuyper, 23:18
- Re: array elements, James Kuyper, 23:15
- Trouble accessing data with pointer to structure, drhowarddrfine, 22:53
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, Tor Rustad, 22:30
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Tor Rustad, 21:47
- Re: Strange syntax, Tor Rustad, 21:14
- Re: Unexpected Results, Tor Rustad, 20:52
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Tor Rustad, 20:45
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Tor Rustad, 20:40
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Tor Rustad, 20:26
- Re: C and Algol68, Richard Tobin, 20:17
- Re: assert must take int?, Martin Ambuhl, 20:04
- Re: A function is an address, William Ahern, 19:58
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:58
- Re: C and Algol68, Ben Bacarisse, 19:43
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:42
- Re: C and Algol68, Ben Bacarisse, 19:37
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:36
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 19:29
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Lew Pitcher, 19:14
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Thad Smith, 19:10
- Re: C and Algol68, Ben Bacarisse, 18:56
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Tobin, 18:21
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 17:55
- Re: assert must take int?, Keith Thompson, 17:32
- Re: assert must take int?, pete, 17:31
- Re: assert must take int?, CJ, 17:15
- Re: A function is an address, pete, 17:07
- Re: assert must take int?, Golden California Girls, 17:04
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Joachim Schmitz, 15:52
- Re: array elements, Harald van Dijk, 15:44
- Re: assert must take int?, Harald van Dijk, 15:28
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: C and Algol68, Chris Dollin, 15:01
- Re: assert must take int?, Martin Ambuhl, 14:37
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 14:29
- Re: increase in spams, Default User, 13:47
- Re: array elements, Barry Schwarz, 13:22
- Re: C and Algol68, Richard Tobin, 13:09
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Kuyper, 12:51
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 12:29
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 11:55
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Flash Gordon, 11:52
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 11:51
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Flash Gordon, 11:24
- Re: what is 'foo.c'?, Mark McIntyre, 11:15
- what is 'foo.c'?, A2B, 11:10
- Re: C and Algol68, Ben Bacarisse, 11:03
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Roland Pibinger, 10:56
- Christmas big ritual, cheapeshopcn4, 10:50
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 10:45
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Tobin, 10:43
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 10:35
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 10:35
- Re: C and Algol68, CBFalconer, 10:21
- Re: greatest of two numbers, CBFalconer, 10:17
- Re: relations/identities, ptkmartin, 10:09
- Re: relations/identities, aarklon, 10:00
- Re: handling large data, Gordon, 09:56
- Re: increase in spams, Mark McIntyre, 09:48
- Re: greatest of two numbers, ptkmartin, 09:46
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Heathfield, 09:46
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 09:46
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 09:35
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 09:32
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 09:16
- Re: Read-only outside translation unit, Eric Sosman, 09:04
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 08:55
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 08:49
- Re: A function is an address, Eric Sosman, 08:44
- Re: Read-only outside translation unit, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 08:42
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 08:33
- Re: Read-only outside translation unit, James Kuyper, 08:33
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Kuyper, 08:25
- Re: relations/identities, James Kuyper, 08:02
- Re: relations/identities, Richard Heathfield, 07:57
- Re: A function is an address, James Kuyper, 07:56
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Flash Gordon, 07:44
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Ben Bacarisse, 07:36
- Re: assert must take int?, Richard Heathfield, 07:31
- Re: assert must take int?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:31
- Re: Read-only outside translation unit, Richard, 07:27
- Re: A function is an address, pete, 07:27
- Re: assert must take int?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:23
- Read-only outside translation unit, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 07:19
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 07:18
- Re: relations/identities, aarklon, 07:07
- assert must take int?, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 06:57
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Flash Gordon, 06:22
- Re: increase in spams, santosh, 06:17
- increase in spams, rakesh uv, 06:07
- Re: C and Algol68, Richard Tobin, 05:52
- /~/~/~/~/ Ways to make money online / Earn $ 10000 per Month /~/~/~/~/, staly . 786, 05:48
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Tobin, 05:48
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, santosh, 05:42
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Malcolm McLean, 05:30
- ##### How To Turn Your Dull Website into Money Making Website######, jyoti81733@xxxxxxxxx, 04:17
- Re: C and Algol68, Chris Dollin, 03:51
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 02:41
- Re: A function is an address, Peter Nilsson, 02:40
- Re: A function is an address, user923005, 02:36
- Re: relations/identities, Peter Nilsson, 02:30
- Re: relations/identities, aarklon, 00:52
- Re: how the following two code parts same, James Kuyper, 00:41
- Re: c++ calling c functions, James Kuyper, 00:21
December 07, 2007
- Re: A function is an address, James Kuyper, 23:51
- Re: A function is an address, Charlton Wilbur, 23:28
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 23:23
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Fang, 23:20
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", Keith Thompson, 22:31
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", Jack Klein, 22:22
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Richard, 22:21
- Re: A function is an address, Jack Klein, 22:15
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Kenny McCormack, 22:07
- Re: how the following two code parts same, Keith Thompson, 21:57
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 21:52
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 21:49
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Golden California Girls, 21:42
- Re: Reverse a string in place, CBFalconer, 20:39
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", Ben Pfaff, 20:23
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Gordon Burditt, 20:19
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Chris Dollin, 20:14
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Chris Dollin, 20:05
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", benn686, 20:01
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Richard, 19:56
- Re: Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, CBFalconer, 19:55
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 19:53
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", Ben Pfaff, 19:44
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Kenny McCormack, 19:43
- Re: C and Algol68, CBFalconer, 19:39
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Lew Pitcher, 19:38
- Re: greatest of two numbers, CBFalconer, 19:34
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, dj3vande, 19:31
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, CBFalconer, 19:23
- Re: Can this be done with "Union", Dave Hansen, 19:20
- Re: How split 1 array in two, ric, 19:17
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, CBFalconer, 19:14
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 18:56
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Gordon Burditt, 18:55
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 18:50
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 18:45
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 18:45
- Re: C and Algol68, Dik T. Winter, 18:43
- Re: System() question, Gordon Burditt, 18:42
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, opexoc, 18:29
- Re: System() question, Richard Tobin, 18:26
- Can this be done with "Union", benn686, 18:17
- Re: Reverse a string in place, pete, 17:56
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Flash Gordon, 17:53
- Re: what is a statement and expression?, vlsidesign, 17:34
- Re: A function is an address, Eric Sosman, 17:26
- Re: how the following two code parts same, jameskuyper, 17:16
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Eric Sosman, 17:10
- Re: A function is an address, jameskuyper, 17:09
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 17:08
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:07
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 17:05
- Re: how the following two code parts same, jameskuyper, 17:04
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, J. J. Farrell, 17:01
- Re: Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, Richard Heathfield, 16:59
- Re: how the following two code parts same, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 16:57
- Re: A function is an address, jameskuyper, 16:52
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: how the following two code parts same, Default User, 16:44
- Re: A function is an address, Charlton Wilbur, 16:40
- Re: Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, dj3vande, 16:37
- Re: Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, Ben Pfaff, 16:33
- Re: how the following two code parts same, Default User, 16:31
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Default User, 16:28
- Re: how the following two code parts same, saipathakota, 16:27
- Re: A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 16:25
- Re: A function is an address, Keith Thompson, 16:25
- Re: Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, Keith Thompson, 16:20
- Re: how the following two code parts same, Lew Pitcher, 16:13
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 16:11
- Re: how the following two code parts same, saipathakota, 16:07
- Re: A function is an address, Chris Torek, 16:05
- Re: how the following two code parts same, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 16:03
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Richard Heathfield, 16:02
- how the following two code parts same, saipathakota, 16:00
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 15:59
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 15:58
- Re: A function is an address, jameskuyper, 15:58
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Richard, 15:56
- Re: A function is an address, Eric Sosman, 15:54
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 15:53
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Kenny McCormack, 15:49
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 15:47
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Mamluk Caliph, 15:45
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Willem, 15:29
- A function is an address, Julienne Walker, 15:28
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Flash Gordon, 15:22
- Re: greatest of two numbers, user923005, 15:18
- Re: System() question, Bob, 15:17
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:16
- Free C++ Ebook | http://freepdf-ebook.blogspot.com/2007/12/c-unleashed-ebook.html, solik, 15:06
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Default User, 15:04
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Keith Thompson, 14:58
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 14:50
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, jameskuyper, 14:45
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 14:32
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Chris Torek, 14:28
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Kenneth Brody, 14:10
- Rent XXX ADULT DVDs ONLINE - Try this great new service for free!, drentals173, 13:58
- Who is Jesus?, aassime abdellatif, 13:56
- Re: relations/identities, Richard Tobin, 13:42
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Chris Torek, 13:39
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, santosh, 13:30
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Joachim Schmitz, 13:11
- relations/identities, aarklon, 12:43
- Re: greatest of two numbers, aarklon, 12:34
- Re: C and Algol68, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 12:26
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Richard Heathfield, 12:16
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, ramsatishv, 12:16
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 12:12
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, ramsatishv, 12:10
- $$$$$$ INTERNET CASH MAKING SOLUTIONS $$$$$$, gracyrobert, 12:09
- Re: facing problem while using regexec, Ben Bacarisse, 12:07
- Re: C and Algol68, Ben Bacarisse, 11:50
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 11:50
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 11:43
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Ben Bacarisse, 11:10
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Golden California Girls, 11:10
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Chris Dollin, 10:59
- Re: String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), Mark Bluemel, 10:54
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Neil Cerutti, 10:53
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Kenneth Brody, 10:45
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Richard Tobin, 10:36
- String Concatenation Using Pointers No strcat(), raidvvan, 10:36
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Kenneth Brody, 10:35
- Re: Sign preserving Vs value preserving, sophia . agnes, 10:14
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, dj3vande, 10:14
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 10:01
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 10:00
- Thanks: Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 09:58
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Francine . Neary, 09:55
- Re: C and Algol68, Tim Prince, 09:52
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Nagrik, 09:50
- Re: C and Algol68, Bartc, 09:49
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, opexoc, 09:43
- Re: C and Algol68, Bartc, 09:41
- Re: C and Algol68, Chris Dollin, 09:21
- Re: C and Algol68, Tim Prince, 09:16
- Re: C and Algol68, Mark Bluemel, 09:10
- Re: facing problem while using regexec, Mark Bluemel, 09:06
- C and Algol68, Bartc, 09:02
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, CBFalconer, 09:00
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, jacob navia, 08:59
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 08:56
- Re: char change to int, so weird., Bryan, 08:56
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, opexoc, 08:52
- Re: char change to int, so weird., Ben Bacarisse, 08:44
- facing problem while using regexec, apoorva.groups@xxxxxxxxx, 08:24
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Kenny McCormack, 08:15
- Re: keyboard/mouse programming, Mark Bluemel, 08:08
- Re: greatest of two numbers, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 07:52
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Richard Tobin, 07:33
- Re: Code problem, Richard Heathfield, 07:10
- Re: greatest of two numbers, James Kuyper, 06:26
- Re: Code problem, James Kuyper, 06:11
- Re: what is a statement and expression?, Chris Dollin, 06:10
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Thomas X. Iverson, 05:52
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Marco Manfredini, 05:50
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Chris Dollin, 05:44
- Java Requierment, pavani.c2c@xxxxxxxxx, 05:37
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Chris Dollin, 05:34
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Marco Manfredini, 05:30
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Klutz_wd, 04:19
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 04:10
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Joachim Schmitz, 04:02
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, jaysome, 03:59
- Re: greatest of two numbers, jaysome, 03:35
- Free Discount Prescription Cards, efp90uzd, 02:50
- Re: greatest of two numbers, Richard Heathfield, 02:46
- Re: System() question, Keith Thompson, 02:45
- Re: what is a statement and expression?, vlsidesign, 02:42
- Re: char change to int, so weird., Martin Ambuhl, 02:17
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 01:45
- Re: Structure size directives, those who know me have no need of my name, 01:10
- Re: Code problem, somenath, 01:07
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 01:04
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 01:02
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 00:53
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 00:50
- greatest of two numbers, aarklon, 00:33
- Re: what is a statement and expression?, Jack Klein, 00:03
December 06, 2007
- Re: char change to int, so weird., Jack Klein, 23:57
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 23:50
- Re: Code problem, Jack Klein, 23:46
- Re: mingw socket programming, diksa2005, 23:42
- Re: char change to int, so weird., zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 23:36
- Re: Structure size directives, santosh, 23:18
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Jack Klein, 23:09
- Re: char change to int, so weird., Ben Bacarisse, 22:38
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, SM Ryan, 22:36
- Re: System() question, Gordon Burditt, 22:34
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, SM Ryan, 22:25
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Pierre Asselin, 22:05
- Re: System() question, James Kuyper, 21:59
- Re: what is a statement and expression?, Dik T. Winter, 21:53
- Re: c++ calling c functions, James Kuyper, 21:47
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, vlsidesign, 21:43
- what is a statement and expression?, vlsidesign, 21:37
- char change to int, so weird., zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 21:31
- Re: Code problem, Eric Sosman, 21:08
- Re: Code problem, Eric Sosman, 21:03
- Los Angeles Movers - moving in Los Angeles, movers, 20:51
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, CBFalconer, 20:40
- Re: System() question, Gordon Burditt, 20:30
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 20:22
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Dik T. Winter, 20:17
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Gordon Burditt, 20:09
- Re: Exceptions in C/C++, Tor Rustad, 19:58
- Exceptions in C/C++, opexoc, 19:30
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 19:26
- Re: System() question, Flash Gordon, 19:25
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Flash Gordon, 19:08
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 19:06
- Re: System() question, Richard Tobin, 19:03
- Re: System() question, Richard Tobin, 18:58
- Re: Code problem, Richard Tobin, 18:53
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 18:52
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Malcolm McLean, 18:51
- Re: Code problem, Richard Tobin, 18:50
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 18:48
- Re: Code problem, Richard Heathfield, 18:45
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Al Balmer, 18:44
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 18:43
- Re: Code problem, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: System() question, Flash Gordon, 18:40
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, CBFalconer, 18:36
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 18:33
- Re: Code problem, jacob navia, 18:32
- Re: Code problem, jameskuyper, 18:31
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 18:30
- Re: Code problem, jacob navia, 18:28
- Re: strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 18:28
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ben Bacarisse, 18:26
- Re: Code problem, jacob navia, 18:25
- strlcpy and strlcat, dj3vande, 18:24
- Re: Code problem, jacob navia, 18:21
- Re: Code problem, Eric Sosman, 18:20
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 18:16
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 18:16
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, CBFalconer, 18:14
- Re: Code problem, Ben Pfaff, 18:02
- Re: Code problem, jameskuyper, 17:58
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Tor Rustad, 17:57
- Re: Code problem, Richard Heathfield, 17:54
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Ben Bacarisse, 17:53
- Re: Code problem, Ben Pfaff, 17:52
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Flash Gordon, 17:35
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 17:30
- Re: a silent error, Harald van Dijk, 17:30
- Re: System() question, santosh, 17:20
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Default User, 17:20
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Default User, 17:19
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, santosh, 17:15
- System() question, Bob, 17:14
- Code problem, jacob navia, 17:09
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, jameskuyper, 17:05
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 17:05
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Francine . Neary, 17:04
- Re: How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, santosh, 16:55
- Re: strange test question, CBFalconer, 16:54
- How to disassemble with objdump and recompile the program ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 16:51
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, jameskuyper, 16:51
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 16:49
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 16:45
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Al Balmer, 16:34
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Charlton Wilbur, 16:29
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, jacob navia, 16:24
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Willem, 16:18
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 16:08
- Re: a silent error, Flash Gordon, 16:00
- Re: Reverse a string in place, rajash, 15:57
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Malcolm McLean, 15:49
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Lew Pitcher, 15:46
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, Harald van Dijk, 15:40
- Re: a silent error, Harald van Dijk, 15:38
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Lew Pitcher, 15:33
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Flash Gordon, 15:32
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, aj, 15:28
- Re: Reverse a string in place, Lew Pitcher, 15:28
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Richard Heathfield, 15:27
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Mark McIntyre, 15:26
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, aj, 15:25
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, John Gordon, 15:25
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Mark McIntyre, 15:24
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Lew Pitcher, 15:22
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Flash Gordon, 15:21
- Re: strange test question, Richard Heathfield, 15:18
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Flash Gordon, 15:15
- Reverse a string in place, rajash, 15:15
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Flash Gordon, 14:59
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, aj, 14:59
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Keith Thompson, 14:56
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Flash Gordon, 14:48
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Ian Collins, 14:47
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:39
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:33
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 14:31
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Joachim Schmitz, 14:30
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Lew Pitcher, 14:27
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 14:26
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Flash Gordon, 14:24
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Flash Gordon, 14:24
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Ben Bacarisse, 14:23
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, aj, 14:23
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, Lew Pitcher, 14:14
- Re: gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 14:13
- Re: strange test question, Mark McIntyre, 13:55
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 13:53
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 13:50
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Julienne Walker, 13:45
- Re: is this newsgroup for newbies, Antoninus Twink, 13:43
- gethostbyname() ---- Delete Resulting Pointer?, aj, 13:36
- is this newsgroup for newbies, A2B, 13:31
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Philip Potter, 13:25
- Re: strange test question, Doug, 13:22
- Re: Unexpected Results, Paul Sinnett, 12:41
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Ben Pfaff, 12:03
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Joachim Schmitz, 12:03
- Re: Regarding malloc memory alignment, Ben Pfaff, 12:03
- Re: Regarding multiple inclusion of files, Joachim Schmitz, 12:00
- Regarding multiple inclusion of files, ramsatishv, 11:51
- Regarding malloc memory alignment, ramsatishv, 11:50
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 11:35
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Ben Pfaff, 11:35
- Re: strange test question, Richard Heathfield, 11:24
- PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card(fashion-sky@xxxxxxxxxxx), fashion-sky, 10:52
- Re: Unexpected Results, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:44
- Re: The Muslim's Creed, Ivar Rosquist, 10:32
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Philip Potter, 10:08
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Mark Bluemel, 09:52
- Re: C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, jacob navia, 09:41
- C style: private functions, function docstrings & style, Khookie, 09:22
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, jameskuyper, 09:13
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 08:52
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Philip Potter, 08:14
- Re: pointer to an array of pointers, Barry Schwarz, 07:25
- Re: c++ calling c functions, James Fang, 07:13
- Re: a silent error, Barry Schwarz, 07:07
- Re: wchar_t to char[128], those who know me have no need of my name, 07:07
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 06:35
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 06:31
- Re: Unexpected Results, James Kuyper, 06:27
- Re: Structure size directives, those who know me have no need of my name, 06:20
- FFT on PIC16F877A?, Slickuser, 06:16
- Re: c++ calling c functions, James Kuyper, 06:15
- Re: mingw socket programming, Khookie, 05:52
- Re: mingw socket programming, dj3vande, 05:33
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 05:25
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 05:24
- mingw socket programming, Khookie, 05:22
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 05:09
- Re: Strange syntax, Chris Dollin, 04:55
- Re: strange test question, Doug, 04:53
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Richard Heathfield, 04:39
- OT : bit order in xx-endian system, Nick Keighley, 04:19
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Mark McIntyre, 04:15
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Mark Bluemel, 03:39
- Re: strange test question, Richard Heathfield, 02:36
- wchar_t to char[128], Manoj Jangid, 02:20
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 01:43
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Ian Collins, 01:18
- Re: Unexpected Results, Keith Thompson, 01:17
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Barry Schwarz, 01:06
- The Muslim's Creed, الهادي, 00:52
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 00:21
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 00:20
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, Manoj Jangid, 00:07
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Kaz Kylheku, 00:01
December 05, 2007
- romance is a symbal of love......., Barathi, 23:53
- Re: Unexpected Results, arpit, 23:32
- Re: Sign preserving Vs value preserving, Jack Klein, 23:09
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 22:52
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Jack Klein, 22:44
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Harter, 22:13
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 22:11
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, Barry Schwarz, 21:47
- Re: Structure size directives, James Kuyper, 21:46
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, Barry Schwarz, 21:32
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Barry Schwarz, 21:25
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Barry Schwarz, 21:14
- Very beautiful girls and many useful resources and more,please check it out, campbelljon8@xxxxxxxxx, 20:13
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 20:04
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Tobin, 19:42
- Re: c++ calling c functions, jameskuyper, 19:27
- Re: Structure size directives, Mark McIntyre, 18:53
- Re: Strange syntax, Dik T. Winter, 18:52
- Re: traversing a stack, Mark McIntyre, 18:46
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: strange test question, Doug, 18:40
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 18:19
- Re: traversing a stack, Tor Rustad, 18:19
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 18:04
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Philip Potter, 17:58
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Kaz Kylheku, 17:43
- Re: Unexpected Results, Keith Thompson, 17:32
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 17:29
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Peter Nilsson, 17:16
- Re: Sign preserving Vs value preserving, Peter Nilsson, 17:11
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 16:27
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, Praetorian, 16:15
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, Praetorian, 16:10
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, Praetorian, 16:07
- Re: Structure size directives, REH, 15:38
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Flash Gordon, 15:37
- Re: Structure size directives, Flash Gordon, 15:32
- Re: Structure size directives, REH, 15:23
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Flash Gordon, 15:18
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 14:45
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 14:39
- find a man at www.SexDatingPoint.com, itayka3, 14:29
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Default User, 14:24
- Re: strange test question, Default User, 14:23
- Re: Strange syntax, santosh, 14:12
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, William Pursell, 14:12
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Tobin, 14:03
- Re: Strange syntax, Chris Torek, 14:02
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:56
- Re: Freeing memory allocated by another function, Eric Sosman, 13:46
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Kaz Kylheku, 13:42
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:40
- Freeing memory allocated by another function, Praetorian, 13:39
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 13:10
- Re: Unexpected Results, Ben Pfaff, 13:08
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Guillaume Dargaud, 12:37
- Re: operators similar to functions?, RoS, 12:37
- Re: array elements, Ben Bacarisse, 12:31
- Ubú : Suite of the imaginary beings, Gabriel, 11:54
- Re: address change, Ben Bacarisse, 11:54
- Re: Strange syntax, santosh, 11:47
- Re: Confused by const, Ben Bacarisse, 11:23
- Re: Structure size directives, Kenneth Brody, 11:13
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard, 11:10
- Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card Mobile Phones etc(www.shopbb.com), shopbb.com, 11:05
- Re: Question about (Optional)? header files., Charlton Wilbur, 10:47
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Tobin, 10:47
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, echo.sj, 10:35
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Richard Tobin, 10:33
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Heathfield, 10:19
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Bill Reid, 10:15
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Neil Booth, 10:01
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, James Kuyper, 09:25
- Re: C editor and debugger - Linux, Richard Tobin, 09:25
- Re: C editor and debugger - Linux, Richard, 09:20
- Re: Structure size directives, santosh, 09:15
- Re: Confused by const, Mikhail Teterin, 09:14
- Re: Confused by const, Mikhail Teterin, 09:05
- Re: C editor and debugger - Linux, santosh, 09:04
- Re: Structure size directives, James Kuyper, 09:04
- Re: C editor and debugger - Linux, vippstar, 09:02
- C editor and debugger - Linux, j.smith2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 09:00
- Re: Confused by const, santosh, 09:00
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, vippstar, 08:59
- Re: Confused by const, vippstar, 08:57
- Re: strange test question, santosh, 08:52
- Confused by const, Mikhail Teterin, 08:52
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Jalapeno, 08:51
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, santosh, 08:43
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, santosh, 08:42
- Re: Unexpected Results, CBFalconer, 08:20
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, CBFalconer, 08:18
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Richard Tobin, 07:59
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Tobin, 07:55
- Re: Strange syntax, Kenny McCormack, 07:48
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, Björn Paetzel, 07:37
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 07:35
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 07:32
- Re: strange test question, Chris Dollin, 07:28
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Harter, 07:21
- Java Requierment, pavani . c2c, 07:11
- Re: strange test question, Doug, 07:11
- Re: address change, ais523, 07:08
- Re: take input char from keyboard, Mark Bluemel, 07:08
- Java Requierment, pavani . c2c, 07:06
- Java Requierment, pavani . c2c, 07:05
- Java Requierment, pavani . c2c, 07:03
- Java Requierment, pavani . c2c, 07:00
- Re: take input char from keyboard, j.smith2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 06:58
- Re: Sign preserving Vs value preserving, vippstar, 06:57
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 06:56
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Ido Yehieli, 06:51
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 06:50
- Sign preserving Vs value preserving, sophia . agnes, 06:44
- Re: On use of C99 __func__ macro, vippstar, 06:39
- On use of C99 __func__ macro, Guillaume Dargaud, 06:29
- Re: Unexpected Results, santosh, 06:23
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, santosh, 06:22
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Ben Bacarisse, 06:16
- Re: make & nmake, cl & gcc, Khookie, 06:15
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Mark Bluemel, 06:11
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Ido Yehieli, 05:49
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Ido Yehieli, 05:40
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 05:38
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 05:35
- Re: Unexpected Results, Mark Bluemel, 05:34
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Mark Bluemel, 05:31
- Re: Strange syntax, Mark Bluemel, 05:29
- Re: Signed & unsigned types, Chris Dollin, 05:25
- Unexpected Results, arpit, 05:18
- Signed & unsigned types, Ido Yehieli, 05:11
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Philip Potter, 04:49
- Re: strange test question, Chris Dollin, 04:03
- Re: Strange syntax, Chris Dollin, 04:00
- Re: c++ calling c functions, CBFalconer, 03:52
- [OT] Re: strange test question, CBFalconer, 03:43
- Re: What is the proper Syntax for this Pointer?, Neil, 03:38
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, CBFalconer, 03:37
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, CBFalconer, 03:31
- advance computer language c, leo . redrose, 03:26
- Supply jordan/nike basketball shoe, handbag, sunglasses,clothes, hat and so on, wei chen, 03:16
- Supply jordan/nike basketball shoe, handbag, sunglasses,clothes, hat and so on, tom, 03:01
- Re: defining the size_t type, Chris Torek, 01:42
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Heathfield, 01:18
- Re: Strange syntax, Gene, 01:14
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Heathfield, 01:11
- Re: Strange syntax, Richard Heathfield, 01:05
- Strange syntax, seenutn, 00:33
- Re: defining the size_t type, somenath, 00:17
- Re: strange test question, Martin Ambuhl, 00:03
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Sheth Raxit, 00:01
December 04, 2007
- Re: c++ calling c functions, Sheth Raxit, 23:34
- c++ calling c functions, teju, 23:20
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, Barry Schwarz, 23:01
- Re: strange test question, Joel Haugen, 22:26
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 21:44
- Re: Question about (Optional)? header files., CBFalconer, 20:38
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, EventHelix.com, 20:37
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:33
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 20:30
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:28
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 20:17
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Chris Torek, 20:16
- Re: take input char from keyboard, Ben Bacarisse, 20:00
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 19:54
- Re: strange test question, Mark P, 19:50
- Re: strange test question, U, 19:50
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:44
- Re: take input char from keyboard, j.smith2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:44
- Re: take input char from keyboard, Mike Wahler, 19:29
- Re: traversing a stack, Tor Rustad, 19:29
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 19:17
- take input char from keyboard, j.smith2c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, 19:08
- Re: Hex to int, CBFalconer, 18:58
- strange test question, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 18:52
- Re: Hex to int, Harald van Dijk, 18:51
- Re: Hex to int, jameskuyper, 18:20
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Flash Gordon, 18:19
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Flash Gordon, 18:10
- Re: Hex to int, Harald van Dijk, 18:09
- Re: Structure size directives, jameskuyper, 18:00
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jameskuyper, 17:46
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 17:44
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Harald van Dijk, 17:33
- Re: operators similar to functions?, CJ, 17:26
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 17:19
- Re: Hex to int, rajash, 17:08
- Re: Structure size directives, Chris Torek, 17:07
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 17:07
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Malcolm McLean, 17:06
- Re: Hex to int, Keith Thompson, 16:59
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, jameskuyper, 16:51
- Re: Question about (Optional)? header files., mdh, 16:51
- Re: operators similar to functions?, CJ, 16:46
- Re: Question about (Optional)? header files., Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, John Gordon, 16:40
- Re: Hex to int, rajash, 16:39
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Keith Thompson, 16:38
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Chris Torek, 16:31
- Re: Question about (Optional)? header files., santosh, 16:16
- Re: Structure size directives, Flash Gordon, 16:07
- Re: Structure size directives, Al Balmer, 15:59
- Re: [OT] Structure size directives, Ben Bacarisse, 15:57
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: Hex to int, Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 15:46
- Question about (Optional)? header files., mdh, 15:44
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 15:41
- Re: Hex to int, Flash Gordon, 15:31
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 15:29
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Harald van Dijk, 15:18
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 15:14
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Eric Sosman, 15:08
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Martin Ambuhl, 15:07
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 15:02
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Eric Sosman, 14:54
- Re: Hex to int, rajash, 14:40
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 14:40
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Roberto Waltman, 14:24
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 14:23
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jacob navia, 14:08
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, jacob navia, 14:03
- Re: Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Walter Roberson, 13:57
- Re: [OT] Structure size directives, jacob navia, 13:56
- Re: Hex to int, Lew Pitcher, 13:30
- Newbie needing some help with segmentation fault, Hendrik Maryns, 13:25
- Re: sscanf error for unsign int type., Martin Ambuhl, 13:03
- Re: traversing a stack, Walter Roberson, 12:56
- Re: Structure size directives, santosh, 12:49
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 12:41
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: operators similar to functions?, jameskuyper, 12:34
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 12:34
- Re: about string and character, Eric Sosman, 12:26
- Re: Structure size directives, REH, 12:25
- Re: Structure size directives, Richard Heathfield, 12:19
- Re: Hex to int, jameskuyper, 12:14
- Re: Structure size directives, REH, 12:12
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 12:11
- Re: [OT] Structure size directives, Spoon, 12:06
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 12:02
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 11:50
- Re: Structure size directives, santosh, 11:45
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard, 11:43
- Re: Structure size directives, REH, 11:42
- Re: Structure size directives, Richard, 11:36
- Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card Mobile Phones (fashion-sky@xxxxxxxxxxx), fashion-sky, 11:06
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Harter, 11:03
- Re: defining the size_t type, lubomir dobsik, 10:57
- Re: [OT] Structure size directives, jacob navia, 10:49
- Re: sscanf error for unsign int type., Joachim Schmitz, 10:30
- Re: using of * &, Paul Sinnett, 10:16
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 10:15
- Re: using of * &, santosh, 09:55
- Re: sscanf error for unsign int type., Joachim Schmitz, 09:53
- Re: Hex to int, Lew Pitcher, 09:51
- Re: sscanf error for unsign int type., santosh, 09:51
- sscanf error for unsign int type., loudking, 09:37
- [OT] Structure size directives, Ben Bacarisse, 09:35
- Re: using of * &, Richard Heathfield, 09:28
- Re: using of * &, pete, 09:27
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 09:22
- Re: using of * &, vippstar, 09:20
- using of * &, Burak, 09:16
- Re: void datatype, santosh, 09:14
- Re: void datatype, James Kuyper, 09:10
- Re: void datatype, Mark Bluemel, 09:00
- Re: void datatype, vippstar, 08:59
- void datatype, remember . sail, 08:55
- Re: Structure size directives, James Kuyper, 08:41
- Re: White space at the end of a line, vippstar, 08:26
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 08:24
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, tfelb, 08:12
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, pete, 07:50
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 07:42
- %%%%% MAKE HUNDRED OF DOLLAR ONLINE %%%%%, sd, 07:34
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Joachim Schmitz, 07:30
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Joachim Schmitz, 07:26
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, CBFalconer, 07:17
- Re: White space at the end of a line, CBFalconer, 07:03
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, vippstar, 06:44
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Joachim Schmitz, 06:32
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 06:32
- Re: Hex to int, James Kuyper, 06:29
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Joachim Schmitz, 06:29
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Joachim Schmitz, 06:28
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Duncan Muirhead, 06:24
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, James Kuyper, 06:19
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Laurent Deniau, 06:14
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Laurent Deniau, 06:11
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, vippstar, 05:47
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, santosh, 05:43
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Philip Potter, 05:40
- Re: deletion in link list, Mark Bluemel, 05:13
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Richard Heathfield, 05:11
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Sheth Raxit, 05:11
- Re: deletion in link list, Mark Bluemel, 05:09
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Sheth Raxit, 05:01
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Joachim Schmitz, 04:57
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, jacob navia, 04:56
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, Laurent Deniau, 04:31
- Re: calloc crashing -- dump core, jacob navia, 04:26
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 04:20
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, Manoj Jangid, 04:18
- calloc crashing -- dump core, Sheth Raxit, 04:06
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, Martin Ambuhl, 03:59
- Re: Dynamic Array Size, vippstar, 03:58
- Re: deletion in link list, ratika, 03:55
- Re: deletion in link list, ratika, 03:53
- Dynamic Array Size, Manoj Jangid, 03:14
- Re: memcat fn, Kaz Kylheku, 01:18
December 03, 2007
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Barry Schwarz, 23:51
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Walter Roberson, 23:33
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 23:12
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 22:47
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 22:43
- Re: C Pointers, Barry Schwarz, 21:32
- Re: memcat fn, Barry Schwarz, 21:18
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, CBFalconer, 21:07
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 21:01
- make money with bux!!, beronz, 20:59
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:57
- Re: about string and character, Keith Thompson, 20:50
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:48
- Re: about string and character, Joe Wright, 20:45
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: Structure size directives, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 20:35
- Re: Structure size directives, Keith Thompson, 20:31
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 20:22
- Re: pointer to an array of pointers, CBFalconer, 20:20
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 20:19
- Re: operators similar to functions?, pete, 20:09
- Re: about string and character, CBFalconer, 20:07
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, freepsps77, 19:59
- Anyone yet at MateCube.com? C++, freepsps77, 19:58
- MateCube - Social Network, freepsps77, 19:57
- Re: C Pointers, Martien Verbruggen, 19:45
- Re: expression types, pete, 19:44
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Dik T. Winter, 19:15
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 19:13
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 19:04
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 18:56
- Re: Structure size directives, jameskuyper, 18:50
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, juerg . lemke, 18:39
- Re: about string and character, Richard Heathfield, 18:35
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Eric Sosman, 18:32
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:30
- Re: White space at the end of a line, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Structure size directives, Richard Tobin, 18:23
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:20
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 18:14
- Re: Structure size directives, Al Balmer, 18:13
- Re: address change, CBFalconer, 18:13
- Re: Structure size directives, CJ, 18:07
- Re: Structure size directives, Al Balmer, 18:06
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 18:03
- Re: about string and character, Joe Wright, 18:00
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 17:51
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 17:51
- Re: *generic* pointer to function(s)?, Peter Nilsson, 17:51
- Re: about string and character, Joe Wright, 17:49
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 17:46
- *generic* pointer to function(s)?, juerg . lemke, 17:45
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Peter Nilsson, 17:43
- Re: Structure size directives, CJ, 17:35
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Chris Torek, 17:35
- Re: Structure size directives, Al Balmer, 17:32
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 17:30
- Re: Structure size directives, Tor Rustad, 17:24
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 17:23
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 17:19
- Re: Structure size directives, Kenneth Brody, 17:12
- Re: Structure size directives, CJ, 17:07
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 17:01
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 16:52
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 16:48
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 16:48
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: pointer to an array of pointers, vippstar, 16:28
- Re: Structure size directives, CJ, 16:23
- Re: pointer to an array of pointers, Malcolm McLean, 16:20
- Re: Structure size directives, jacob navia, 16:11
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 15:50
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 15:39
- Re: Hex to int, rajash, 15:39
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Eric Sosman, 15:34
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Chris Torek, 15:20
- Re: address change, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: Structure size directives, Walter Roberson, 14:57
- Re: traversing a stack, Tor Rustad, 14:50
- Structure size directives, jacob navia, 14:45
- Re: format for double for printf, Walter Roberson, 14:42
- Re: format for double for printf, Keith Thompson, 14:24
- YOU MUST KNOW THIS MAN, aassime abdellatif, 14:24
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Al Balmer, 14:21
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Keith Thompson, 14:14
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 14:10
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Keith Thompson, 14:07
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Walter Roberson, 13:53
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Richard Harter, 13:49
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 13:45
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: about string and character, Keith Thompson, 13:38
- Re: about string and character, Keith Thompson, 13:37
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Eric Sosman, 13:14
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:08
- Re: White space at the end of a line, Richard Tobin, 13:06
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:05
- Re: White space at the end of a line, vippstar, 12:58
- White space at the end of a line, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:52
- Re: a silent error, RoS, 12:49
- Re: how to think about parentheses, Richard Tobin, 12:32
- Re: how to think about parentheses, jameskuyper, 12:31
- Re: pointer to an array of pointers, vippstar, 12:20
- Re: expression types, jameskuyper, 12:20
- pointer to an array of pointers, ramu, 12:13
- Re: a silent error, santosh, 12:11
- Re: a silent error, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 12:04
- Re: a silent error, santosh, 11:58
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 11:51
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, Ben Bacarisse, 11:45
- Re: how to think about parentheses, vippstar, 11:40
- Re: address change, santosh, 11:34
- Re: address change, Philip Potter, 11:33
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Richard Harter, 11:28
- Re: expression types, santosh, 11:27
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Eberhard Schefold, 11:25
- Re: a silent error, RoS, 11:23
- Re: a silent error, santosh, 11:23
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, RoS, 11:21
- a silent error, RoS, 11:21
- Re: Hex to int, RoS, 11:21
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, James Fang, 11:13
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Golden California Girls, 11:12
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, John Bode, 11:03
- expression types, sophia . agnes, 10:56
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 10:54
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, Bartc, 10:51
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, John Bode, 10:45
- Re: address change, aarklon, 10:44
- Clothing Shirt Cap Nike Jordans puma bape gucci prada Sport shoes Bape Dunk jean(www.shopbb.com), shopbb . 002, 10:38
- Re: address change, Chris Dollin, 10:30
- Re: address change, Philip Potter, 10:28
- Re: address change, vippstar, 10:26
- Re: how to think about parentheses, Philip Potter, 10:22
- Re: Hex to int, vippstar, 10:20
- address change, aarklon, 10:16
- Re: format for double for printf, vippstar, 10:14
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, Lew Pitcher, 10:13
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, Lew Pitcher, 10:08
- 35 to 75 percent off electronics at EBAY, nbeyjr, 10:07
- Re: How split 1 array in two, James Fang, 10:05
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 09:53
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, O_TEXT, 09:47
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 09:41
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 09:39
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Chris Dollin, 09:38
- Re: deletion in link list, Thomas X. Iverson, 09:21
- Re: OT - Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 09:14
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, O_TEXT, 09:09
- Re: how to think about parentheses, pete, 09:08
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 09:08
- Re: OT - Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, santosh, 08:59
- Re: deletion in link list, Eric Sosman, 08:56
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, CBFalconer, 08:55
- Re: OT - Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 08:54
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 08:53
- Re: __FILE__ + __DATE__, santosh, 08:51
- Re: deletion in link list, Chris Dollin, 08:50
- Re: about string and character, santosh, 08:49
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 08:49
- Re: format for double for printf, pete, 08:49
- Re: deletion in link list, santosh, 08:47
- OT - Re: Playing MIDI File in C, santosh, 08:42
- OT - Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, santosh, 08:38
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, O_TEXT, 08:35
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 08:24
- Re: traversing a stack, James Fang, 08:23
- __FILE__ + __DATE__, Zero, 08:16
- Re: traversing a stack, James Fang, 08:13
- Re: Hex to int, Ben Bacarisse, 08:11
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Philip Potter, 08:08
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Spoon, 08:00
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 07:49
- Re: about string and character, Dik T. Winter, 07:37
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 07:34
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, James Kuyper, 07:29
- Re: deletion in link list, ravi, 06:51
- Re: deletion in link list, Chris Dollin, 06:50
- Re: deletion in link list, Mark Bluemel, 06:46
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 06:42
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, ravi, 06:41
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, ravi, 06:40
- deletion in link list, ratika, 06:36
- Re: how to think about parentheses, Richard Tobin, 06:31
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, ravi, 06:30
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard Tobin, 06:27
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, ravi, 05:57
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, O_TEXT, 05:40
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, jacob navia, 05:39
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, jacob navia, 05:30
- Re: how to think about parentheses, Chris Dollin, 05:10
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, jacob navia, 05:10
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 05:06
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 05:06
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, santosh, 05:02
- Re: about string and character, Charlie Gordon, 04:53
- Re: about string and character, Charlie Gordon, 04:49
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Nick Keighley, 04:49
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, O_TEXT, 04:48
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 04:33
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, O_TEXT, 04:27
- Re: Need of type "FILE", BiGYaN, 04:16
- Re: is this correct C? (char*)spm += spm->partitionMapLength;, O_TEXT, 04:16
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Philip Potter, 03:58
- Re: is this correct C? (char*)spm += spm->partitionMapLength;, O_TEXT, 03:46
- Re: traversing a stack, Ian Collins, 03:43
- Re: interesting C program, RoS, 03:35
- Re: traversing a stack, RoS, 03:35
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 03:13
- Re: format for double for printf, Ian Collins, 02:57
- Re: format for double for printf, Thomas X. Iverson, 02:51
- Re: traversing a stack, jacob navia, 02:40
- format for double for printf, RoS, 02:21
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, RoS, 02:21
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., CBFalconer, 01:16
- Re: Looking for Fortran command to get file names from arg lists in executable, David Thompson, 01:15
- Re: fgets() equivalent?, CBFalconer, 01:11
- Re: fgets() equivalent?, CBFalconer, 01:10
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Golden California Girls, 00:53
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Default User, 00:38
- Re: bit order in xx-endian system, Walter Roberson, 00:20
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 00:18
December 02, 2007
- bit order in xx-endian system, zhangsonglovexiaoniuniu@xxxxxxxxx, 23:45
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 22:45
- Re: Question about variable scope conflict, Kaz Kylheku, 22:23
- Re: how to think about parentheses, Eric Sosman, 21:49
- Re: Why is there 'div()' in the standard lib, Peter Nilsson, 21:34
- Re: Question about variable scope conflict, Barry Schwarz, 20:49
- Re: traversing a stack, Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Joe Wright, 19:34
- how to think about parentheses, vlsidesign, 19:30
- THE GAME, THE HARD, 19:13
- Re: is this correct C? (char*)spm += spm->partitionMapLength;, Barry Schwarz, 19:12
- Re: traversing a stack, Mark McIntyre, 19:06
- Re: is this correct C? (char*)spm += spm->partitionMapLength;, Barry Schwarz, 18:58
- Re: Hex to int, Keith Thompson, 18:54
- Re: Determine the maximum of two integers., dj3vande, 18:50
- Re: "Criticism of the C programming language ??????", David Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Garbage collection problems, David Thompson, 18:20
- Re: questions, David Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Is it legal to return a local variable from function., David Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Determine the maximum of two integers., David Thompson, 18:20
- Re: Hex to int, Flash Gordon, 18:17
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, Bill Reid, 17:38
- Re: Opened files, Walter Roberson, 17:34
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, Bill Reid, 17:32
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Keith Thompson, 17:26
- Re: How split 1 array in two, CBFalconer, 17:24
- Hex to int, rajash, 17:01
- Opened files, KnUser, 16:57
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Thad Smith, 16:49
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 16:39
- Re: Why is there 'div()' in the standard lib, Chris Torek, 16:39
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: traversing a stack, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: traversing a stack, Joe Wright, 15:37
- Re: traversing a stack, Ben Pfaff, 15:36
- Re: is this correct C? (char*)spm += spm->partitionMapLength;, Barry Schwarz, 14:55
- Laptops - iPods - Mobile Phones, karen.systems@xxxxxxxxx, 14:38
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, Barry Schwarz, 14:38
- Re: Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Harald van Dijk, 14:32
- Re: traversing a stack, Flash Gordon, 14:29
- Re: How split 1 array in two, Thad Smith, 14:13
- Re: How split 1 array in two, ric, 14:07
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Thad Smith, 14:02
- Re: How split 1 array in two, ricardoramoscabral, 14:02
- Re: about string and character, Richard Heathfield, 13:52
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Flash Gordon, 13:41
- Re: Multi precision floating point, santosh, 13:34
- Re: traversing a stack, Keith Thompson, 13:34
- Re: about string and character, Willem, 13:33
- Re: about string and character, Chris Torek, 13:26
- Re: traversing a stack, Keith Thompson, 13:26
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Ben Bacarisse, 13:25
- Re: How split 1 array in two, Martin Ambuhl, 13:11
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, santosh, 13:01
- Re: Playing MIDI File in C, santosh, 12:52
- Re: Reading a table, Chris Torek, 12:50
- Playing MIDI File in C, ravi, 12:38
- Re: What is the proper Syntax for this Pointer?, Barry Schwarz, 12:19
- Preprocessor issue - token spacing, Mamluk Caliph, 12:13
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Erik Trulsson, 11:59
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Richard Heathfield, 11:55
- Re: A reasonable project., Robin Kåveland Hansen, 11:31
- c basics, jim, 11:28
- Re: An intereting rider in C, erfan, 11:20
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 11:09
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 11:01
- How split 1 array in two, ricardoramoscabral, 10:57
- Re: Missing removeStr and substr function, tfelb, 10:56
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., pete, 10:48
- Re: traversing a stack, CBFalconer, 10:36
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 10:20
- Re: An intereting rider in C, Don Bruder, 10:19
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 10:16
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, santosh, 10:04
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 09:49
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Mark McIntyre, 09:40
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, santosh, 09:39
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, rajash, 09:39
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, santosh, 09:37
- Re: traversing a stack, jacob navia, 09:04
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, Mark McIntyre, 09:00
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Richard Heathfield, 08:58
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Richard Heathfield, 08:55
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, somenath, 08:53
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, somenath, 08:45
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Mark McIntyre, 08:30
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, santosh, 08:30
- Re: Need of type "FILE", James Kuyper, 08:29
- Re: Need of type "FILE", santosh, 08:27
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, James Kuyper, 08:24
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, santosh, 08:21
- Re: New to C, "Undefined reference's", Mark McIntyre, 08:20
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, somenath, 08:18
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 08:17
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, Mark McIntyre, 08:15
- Need of type "FILE", BiGYaN, 08:13
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 08:07
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 08:05
- Re: Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, James Kuyper, 07:53
- Re: traversing a stack, Richard, 07:36
- Re: make & nmake, cl & gcc, Roland Pibinger, 07:36
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 07:27
- Re: traversing a stack, santosh, 07:25
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, santosh, 07:20
- Re: C Pointers, Harald van Dijk, 07:17
- SEO Services you can Trust..., nc3bj6yp, 07:03
- Re: I want to list data by alphabetic, vippstar, 06:48
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Paul Sinnett, 06:26
- Re: traversing a stack, jacob navia, 05:37
- I want to list data by alphabetic, emre esirik(hacettepe computer science and engineering), 05:35
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, santosh, 05:23
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, ramif, 05:13
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Flash Gordon, 05:10
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Keith Thompson, 05:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, santosh, 05:08
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Willem, 05:03
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 05:02
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 04:56
- Re: hello alls , a newbie here, Thomas X. Iverson, 04:54
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 04:45
- Re: C Pointers, Flash Gordon, 04:43
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Keith Thompson, 04:42
- Re: traversing a stack, CBFalconer, 04:31
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 04:26
- Re: bus error [OT], CBFalconer, 04:20
- Re: array of arrys, santosh, 04:08
- Re: chance of stack overflow, Martin Ambuhl, 04:03
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 03:56
- Re: chance of stack overflow, Richard Heathfield, 03:52
- Re: Counting blanks, Richard Heathfield, 03:44
- Re: Counting blanks, santosh, 03:44
- Re: chance of stack overflow, asit, 03:43
- Re: New to C, "Undefined reference's", santosh, 03:41
- Re: New to C, "Undefined reference's", Richard Heathfield, 03:40
- Re: chance of stack overflow, Richard Heathfield, 03:34
- Re: Computer Security Information and What You Can Do To Keep Your System Safe!, santosh, 03:30
- Re: hello alls , a newbie here, santosh, 03:24
- chance of stack overflow, asit, 03:16
- Re: An intereting rider in C, santosh, 03:16
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 03:12
- \\\\\\\\\\\\\\ EARN MONEY WITHOUT INVESTMENT\\\\\\\\\\\\\\, singh6361, 02:44
- The new computer-language+c in 2008, ashik, 02:40
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Peter Nilsson, 02:36
- Re: make & nmake, cl & gcc, Barry Schwarz, 02:22
- Re: Memory address and Pointer, Barry Schwarz, 02:19
- An intereting rider in C, erfan, 02:14
- shirt Handbag bags IPOD MP3 MP4 PSP PS2 PS3 Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia, shopbb.com, 02:01
- Re: mystery of calloc with #define, Barry Schwarz, 01:30
- hello alls , a newbie here, Thomas X. Iverson, 01:15
- i need true friend like u......., Barathi, 01:12
- Re: Computer Security Information and What You Can Do To Keep Your System Safe!, Thomas X. Iverson, 01:00
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, somenath, 00:23
- Re: Question regarding malloc casing, Peter Nilsson, 00:02
- Re: New to C, "Undefined reference's", steve, 00:01
December 01, 2007
- Question regarding implementation details of malloc in K&R2, somenath, 23:37
- Question regarding malloc casing, somenath, 23:36
- Computer Security Information and What You Can Do To Keep Your System Safe!, Anand . Bhaskar . group . com, 23:34
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, Peter Nilsson, 23:27
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, Kaz Kylheku, 23:21
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, sashi, 23:11
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Richard Heathfield, 23:04
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, Minimiscience, 22:53
- Re: New to C, "Undefined reference's", Richard Heathfield, 22:53
- Re: array of arrys, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 22:43
- New to C, "Undefined reference's", steve, 22:31
- Re: C Pointers, Gordon Burditt, 21:32
- Re: bus error [OT], Tor Rustad, 21:29
- Re: Counting blanks, James Fang, 21:13
- Re: traversing a stack, Tor Rustad, 21:11
- Re: A reasonable project., Tor Rustad, 21:06
- Re: C Pointers, Walter Roberson, 20:57
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Tor Rustad, 20:51
- Re: C Pointers, Tor Rustad, 20:47
- array of arrys, Bill Cunningham, 20:03
- Re: C Pointers, cr88192, 19:46
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Dik T. Winter, 19:41
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, James Kuyper, 19:39
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, CBFalconer, 19:29
- Re: C Pointers, cr88192, 19:28
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Dik T. Winter, 19:15
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 19:05
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, James Kuyper, 19:02
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 18:53
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., James Kuyper, 18:49
- Re: A reasonable project., Mark McIntyre, 18:49
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, CBFalconer, 18:41
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, CBFalconer, 18:39
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., James Kuyper, 18:35
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 18:25
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Joe Wright, 18:04
- Re: A reasonable project., Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Chad, 17:57
- Re: C Pointers, Justin Spahr-Summers, 17:57
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 17:43
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Johannes Bauer, 17:43
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Keith Thompson, 17:26
- Re: A reasonable project., cr88192, 17:23
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Eric Sosman, 17:21
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, Keith Thompson, 17:19
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Chad, 17:16
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 17:12
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 17:07
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, rajash, 17:02
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, Jack Klein, 16:56
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Don Bruder, 16:47
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Willem, 16:42
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Chad, 16:40
- Re: real time printf-like logging, Yossi Kreinin, 16:38
- Re: C Pointers, cr88192, 16:22
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., James Kuyper, 16:20
- Re: OT - Re: malloc realloc and pointers, cr88192, 16:11
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Re: C Pointers, Martien Verbruggen, 16:10
- Re: A reasonable project., santosh, 16:07
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: real time printf-like logging, Yossi Kreinin, 16:03
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, cr88192, 16:00
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: main function, Thad Smith, 15:55
- Re: A reasonable project., Eric Sosman, 15:52
- Re: real time printf-like logging, Ian Collins, 15:33
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Don Bruder, 15:32
- Re: A reasonable project., Ian Collins, 15:28
- Re: A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Thad Smith, 15:25
- real time printf-like logging, Yossi Kreinin, 15:24
- Re: A reasonable project., Antoninus Twink, 15:21
- Re: A reasonable project., Default User, 15:11
- A question about 13.9 from the c faq., Chad, 15:06
- Stats for comp.lang.c (last 7 days), CLC stats, 15:06
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, James Kuyper, 14:57
- A reasonable project., Robin Kåveland Hansen, 14:45
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Default User, 14:42
- >>>>>Earn $10,000 A Month From Your Bedroom!<<<<<, daina . rony, 14:39
- Re: C Pointers, santosh, 14:34
- Re: enums ain't no good, Eric Sosman, 14:33
- Re: traversing a stack, ravi, 14:32
- Re: C Pointers, Tor Rustad, 14:31
- Re: real time printf-like logging, jacob navia, 14:31
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, santosh, 14:30
- Re: How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, Mark McIntyre, 14:24
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 14:22
- Re: enums ain't no good, kar1107@xxxxxxxxx, 14:20
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Martin Ambuhl, 14:18
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Harald van Dijk, 14:13
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, Harald van Dijk, 14:08
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Tor Rustad, 14:01
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, Tomás Ó hÉilidhe, 13:57
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, santosh, 13:57
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, Ben Pfaff, 13:56
- Re: make & nmake, cl & gcc, Spiro Trikaliotis, 13:54
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, CBFalconer, 13:30
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, santosh, 13:28
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 13:23
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, santosh, 13:23
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Richard Heathfield, 13:18
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, CBFalconer, 13:14
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, sashi, 13:11
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 13:10
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 13:03
- Re: stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, santosh, 12:56
- [OT] Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 12:53
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, santosh, 12:42
- Re: How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, CBFalconer, 12:37
- Re: Counting blanks, CBFalconer, 12:32
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 12:29
- stuck real bad .......HELPPPPPPPP!!!!!!, sashi, 12:28
- Re: Histogram of character frequencies, Johannes Bauer, 12:25
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Mark McIntyre, 12:22
- Histogram of character frequencies, rajash, 12:21
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Harald van Dijk, 12:07
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 12:05
- Re: OT - Re: malloc realloc and pointers, CBFalconer, 11:42
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, CBFalconer, 11:37
- Re: How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, vippstar, 11:28
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, James Kuyper, 11:10
- Nokia N95 Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card Mobile Phones, fashion-sky, 11:09
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Richard Harter, 11:04
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Flash Gordon, 10:55
- Re: Multi precision floating point, santosh, 10:54
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, santosh, 10:48
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Flash Gordon, 10:45
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Richard Harter, 10:43
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Joe Wright, 10:42
- Re: unpredictable deterministic behaviour again, Barry Schwarz, 10:38
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, santosh, 10:33
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Flash Gordon, 10:32
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, James Kuyper, 10:30
- Re: traversing a stack, Flash Gordon, 10:27
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, James Kuyper, 10:24
- Re: traversing a stack, santosh, 10:21
- Re: Multi precision floating point, santosh, 10:20
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, cr88192, 10:18
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, James Kuyper, 10:16
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Erik Trulsson, 10:08
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Bart, 10:04
- traversing a stack, asit, 10:01
- Re: Reading a table, CBFalconer, 09:53
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, Harald van Dijk, 09:51
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, vippstar, 09:50
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 09:41
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, santosh, 09:41
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 09:40
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 09:37
- Re: C Pointers, Harald van Dijk, 09:32
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Flash Gordon, 09:12
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Richard Heathfield, 09:12
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Richard Heathfield, 09:07
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Flash Gordon, 09:05
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, vippstar, 09:02
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Flash Gordon, 08:54
- Re: Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, Harald van Dijk, 08:46
- Actual type of intmax_t and uintmax_t, santosh, 08:34
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Flash Gordon, 08:31
- Re: OT - Re: malloc realloc and pointers, cr88192, 08:30
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, santosh, 08:28
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 08:27
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, santosh, 08:15
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Flash Gordon, 07:56
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Flash Gordon, 07:50
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Richard Heathfield, 07:42
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 07:32
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Bart, 07:27
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, Richard Heathfield, 07:23
- Re: Reading a table, pete, 07:22
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 07:18
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Flash Gordon, 07:17
- Re: C Pointers, Harald van Dijk, 07:13
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Flash Gordon, 07:10
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 07:06
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, Simon Gerber, 07:02
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Richard Heathfield, 07:01
- Re: Multi precision floating point, James Kuyper, 06:59
- Re: Some newbie casting issues, SabaUd, 06:52
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 06:47
- Re: Reading a table, James Kuyper, 06:44
- Some newbie casting issues, SabaUd, 06:39
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, santosh, 06:25
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 06:22
- Re: C Pointers, vippstar, 06:21
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 06:20
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 06:18
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Mark McIntyre, 06:14
- Re: bus error, Mark McIntyre, 06:11
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Mark McIntyre, 06:08
- Re: Reading a table, pete, 06:08
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 06:07
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 06:06
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Mark McIntyre, 06:01
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: Can A Macro Do This?, pete, 05:52
- Re: C Pointers, pete, 05:41
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, ramif, 05:36
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, santosh, 05:25
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, ramif, 05:24
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 05:24
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Keith Thompson, 05:24
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, Richard Heathfield, 05:15
- Re: C Pointers, santosh, 05:07
- Re: Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, santosh, 05:05
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Harald van Dijk, 05:02
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 05:01
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, jacob navia, 04:59
- Print Extended ASCII in ANSI C, ramif, 04:53
- Re: C Pointers, aarklon, 04:48
- Re: Counting blanks, santosh, 04:07
- Re: C Pointers, santosh, 04:04
- Re: Memory address and Pointer, santosh, 04:03
- Re: Counting blanks, abhiman . max, 03:57
- OT - Re: malloc realloc and pointers, santosh, 03:55
- Re: How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, Richard Heathfield, 03:32
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, CBFalconer, 03:20
- Re: Multi precision floating point, santosh, 03:14
- Re: C Pointers, Friedrich Dominicus, 03:07
- Re: C Pointers, CBFalconer, 02:50
- << HUNDSOME GAIN WITHOUT INVEST ON NET>>, et, 02:44
- Re: malloc realloc and pointers, cr88192, 02:41
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, CBFalconer, 02:41
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Podi, 02:41
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, santosh, 02:24
- Re: C Pointers, erfan, 02:21
- Re: Memory address and Pointer, erfan, 02:12
- Re: Global Variables : Where are they stored ?, Podi, 01:39
- Hoodies Sunglasses Nokia N93 Nokia N70 Sony memory card Mobile Phones etc, shopbb.com, 01:04
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Barry Schwarz, 00:58
- Re: main function, Golden California Girls, 00:27
- Re: What is the proper Syntax for this Pointer?, Barry Schwarz, 00:15
- Re: Counting blanks, Jack Klein, 00:11
- Re: 25 MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM, Jack Klein, 00:08
- Re: Generalized function for deallocating and setting pointer to NULL, Barry Schwarz, 00:05
November 30, 2007
- Re: conditional compile..., Jack Klein, 23:59
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Jack Klein, 23:47
- Re: How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, honey, 23:30
- Re: LDBL_MAX -1.#QNAN0e+000 with MinGW?, Keith Thompson, 22:44
- Re: enums ain't no good, Keith Thompson, 22:16
- Re: Reading a table, Keith Thompson, 22:13
- Re: operators similar to functions?, Gordon Burditt, 22:06
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 21:44
- Re: C Pointers, Ian Collins, 21:44
- C Pointers, pateldm15, 21:30
- How To Turn On Your PC In Just 10 Seconds, John Napzter, 21:27
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 21:22
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Keith Thompson, 21:20
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, CBFalconer, 20:37
- Re: Print lines longer than 80 chars, Ian Collins, 20:30
- Re: partial initialized array, Barry Schwarz, 20:25
- Re: Multi precision floating point, user923005, 19:52
- Re: enums ain't no good, kar1107@xxxxxxxxx, 19:40
- Re: Reading a table, Bill Reid, 19:26
- Print lines longer than 80 chars, rajash, 19:07
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 18:57
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 18:55
- Re: bus error, Richard Tobin, 18:55
- Re: TypeDef array of size 1, Tor Rustad, 18:54
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 18:54
- Re: enums ain't no good, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: 25 MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT ISLAM, Kenny McCormack, 18:53
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 18:52
- Re: Reading a table, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: Multi precision floating point, jacob navia, 18:49
- Re: Question about variable scope conflict, Dave Hansen, 18:35
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Flash Gordon, 18:34
- Re: conditional compile..., pete, 18:26
- Re: Counting blanks, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Marco Manfredini, 18:19
- Re: Reading a table, pete, 18:14
- Re: bus error, CBFalconer, 18:13
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Harald van Dijk, 18:07
- Re: Question about variable scope conflict, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 18:00
- Re: Multi precision floating point, CBFalconer, 17:59
- Re: Reading a table, CBFalconer, 17:54
- Re: Multi precision floating point, Ian Collins, 17:51
- Re: Very interesting GC discussion, CBFalconer, 17:50
Privacy Policy