comp.lang.c (date)
September 30, 2007
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Richard Heathfield, 16:11
- Re: free(): invalid pointer:, gw7rib, 16:09
- ▐ FREE ADVICE TO MAKE $1000 PER DAY ▐, cary, 16:06
- XCOMMS, mats . holti, 16:05
- free(): invalid pointer:, Cyron, 16:03
- "#pragma once" (was Re: C is too old? opinions?), Chris Torek, 15:59
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 15:51
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Richard, 15:41
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Chris Torek, 15:36
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Default User, 15:31
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Chris Torek, 15:30
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Keith Thompson, 14:56
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Chris Torek, 14:50
- Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, Malcolm McLean, 14:46
- Re: [OT]Translation for dummies [was Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes], Ben Bacarisse, 14:42
- Re: typedef with function pointers, Eric Sosman, 14:39
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: typedef with function pointers, Martin Wells, 14:32
- Re: typedef with function pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 14:31
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, $)CHarald van D)&k, 14:29
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 14:19
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Joachim Schmitz, 14:13
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Malcolm McLean, 14:13
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Chris Hills, 14:07
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 14:06
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Richard, 14:05
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 14:04
- Re: Need help in Global variable in c, Richard, 13:57
- Re: typedef with function pointers, vardhan, 13:49
- Need help reading file data, Tom, 13:49
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Philip Potter, 13:42
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Peter J. Holzer, 13:33
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Peter J. Holzer, 13:18
- Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, ben, 12:52
- Re: Need help in Global variable in c, jacob navia, 12:51
- Re: Need help in Global variable in c, jacob navia, 12:41
- Re: C program Questions, Mike Wahler, 12:38
- Re: Need help in Global variable in c, Richard, 12:35
- Re: Need help in Global variable in c, Mike Wahler, 12:28
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:22
- Need help in Global variable in c, yinglcs@xxxxxxxxx, 12:20
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Richard Harter, 12:05
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Chris Hills, 11:40
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 11:34
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Chris Hills, 11:31
- Re: how to install C on Mac, Charlton Wilbur, 11:30
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Richard, 11:24
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Kenny McCormack, 11:17
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Kenny McCormack, 11:15
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, santosh, 10:48
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Richard, 10:37
- Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, Eric Sosman, 10:25
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, CBFalconer, 10:14
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, CBFalconer, 10:10
- Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, Richard Tobin, 10:07
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Chris Hills, 10:03
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, CBFalconer, 10:03
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Richard Tobin, 09:55
- Re: definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, ben, 09:54
- definition/explanation of an unboxed array in c is ...?, ben, 09:48
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, Richard Tobin, 09:43
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Richard Tobin, 09:39
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:35
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Richard Tobin, 09:34
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Army1987, 09:30
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:29
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 09:29
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 09:26
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:20
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 09:17
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:15
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:14
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 09:13
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Chris Hills, 09:09
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Charlie Gordon, 08:56
- Re: Defect reports (was Re: what does this warning mean ?), Army1987, 08:40
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Army1987, 08:40
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Army1987, 08:40
- Re: macro help, Army1987, 08:39
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Charlie Gordon, 08:36
- Re: macro help, Army1987, 08:35
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, santosh, 08:21
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, santosh, 08:14
- Re: macro help, Charlie Gordon, 08:01
- Re: Read compressed files and deal with byte swapping., tianyf@xxxxxxxxx, 07:53
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., pete, 07:44
- Re: Multiple pipes, William Pursell, 07:37
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, tianyf@xxxxxxxxx, 07:36
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Charlie Gordon, 07:36
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, karthikbalaguru, 07:22
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, karthikbalaguru, 07:21
- Re: macro help, William Pursell, 07:14
- Re: Why does it work?, karthikbalaguru, 06:49
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, karthikbalaguru, 06:46
- Re: Read compressed files and deal with byte swapping., Charlie Gordon, 06:22
- Re: macro help, Ian Collins, 05:29
- macro help, inftoconc, 05:26
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Peter J. Holzer, 05:23
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Flash Gordon, 05:10
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Malcolm McLean, 04:56
- Re: typedef with function pointers, Tor Rustad, 04:52
- Re: learning c language, Tor Rustad, 04:50
- Re: typedef with function pointers, CBFalconer, 04:11
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, CBFalconer, 04:06
- Re: Why does it work?, CBFalconer, 04:03
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Richard Heathfield, 03:37
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Joachim Schmitz, 02:55
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., hotadvice, 02:33
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, pete, 02:19
- Re: learning c language, santosh, 02:05
- Re: C program Questions, santosh, 02:03
- Re: Multiple pipes, SM Ryan, 02:01
- Re: how to install C on Mac, SM Ryan, 02:01
- All Quick Test Professional (QTP) FAQs, netguru7575@xxxxxxxxx, 01:36
- Re: Read compressed files and deal with byte swapping., tianyf@xxxxxxxxx, 01:02
- C program Questions, sai_ch, 00:17
- typedef with function pointers, Googy, 00:09
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, borophyll, 00:09
September 29, 2007
- learning c language, anil, 23:47
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, borophyll, 23:31
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Thad Smith, 23:24
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Default User, 23:10
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Default User, 22:32
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, Ian Collins, 22:17
- Re: Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, santosh, 21:54
- Re: Why does it work?, santosh, 21:50
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Sjouke Burry, 21:45
- Re: Why does it work?, Martien verbruggen, 21:41
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, santosh, 21:31
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, santosh, 21:26
- Re: P2P Application, Roberto, 21:26
- Re: Why does it work?, santosh, 21:22
- Help ! how to get a file size larger than 2G?, zou, 21:21
- Re: what's wrong with this, santosh, 20:58
- Re: P2P Application, Tor Rustad, 20:55
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", CBFalconer, 20:46
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Tor Rustad, 20:41
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: Hexagonal grid, Tor Rustad, 20:33
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Tor Rustad, 20:21
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Tor Rustad, 20:09
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, CBFalconer, 19:54
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Harald van D)&k, 19:50
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Willem, 19:45
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Harald van D)&k, 19:38
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Sjouke Burry, 19:35
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 19:32
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Richard, 19:32
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Tor Rustad, 18:53
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, CBFalconer, 18:47
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Francine . Neary, 18:38
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Richard Heathfield, 18:34
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Richard Tobin, 18:34
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Malcolm McLean, 18:30
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Richard Heathfield, 18:29
- Re: lshift & rshift, Stephen Sprunk, 18:27
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", jacob navia, 18:27
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Malcolm McLean, 18:23
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Mark McIntyre, 18:20
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Mark McIntyre, 18:19
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Fred, 18:19
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Mike Wahler, 18:16
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", jacob navia, 18:15
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Default User, 18:15
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", Mike Wahler, 18:10
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Jack Klein, 18:10
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, CBFalconer, 17:56
- Re: Why does it work?, Mike Wahler, 17:50
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, CBFalconer, 17:50
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Jack Klein, 17:50
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Flash Gordon, 17:46
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Jack Klein, 17:45
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Ben Pfaff, 17:41
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Flash Gordon, 17:36
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, pete, 17:08
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Martien verbruggen, 17:03
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, pete, 16:59
- Re: Why does it work?, Malcolm McLean, 16:59
- Re: Why does it work?, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Ian Collins, 16:45
- Re: Definition of lvalue (was: Re: address of function's return value), pete, 16:45
- Why does it work?, Osiro, 16:45
- Re: lshift & rshift, pete, 16:33
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, pete, 16:26
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Malcolm McLean, 16:26
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Malcolm McLean, 16:03
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Malcolm McLean, 15:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: Solutions to "C Programing Language", jacob navia, 15:40
- Solutions to "C Programing Language", coolcatjon, 15:37
- Re: Definition of lvalue (was: Re: address of function's return value), Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Re: Quickly exiting from nested calls, Mark McIntyre, 15:18
- Re: Quickly exiting from nested calls, Eric Sosman, 15:05
- Re: switch on strings, Mark McIntyre, 15:05
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Mark McIntyre, 15:01
- [OT]Translation for dummies [was Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes], Wallace_78, 14:58
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Eric Sosman, 14:50
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Harald van Dijk, 14:41
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, pemo, 14:37
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Flash Gordon, 13:38
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Erik Trulsson, 13:34
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Flash Gordon, 13:11
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Tobin, 13:07
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Joachim Schmitz, 13:01
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Peter J. Holzer, 13:01
- Re: What's wrong with this code?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:57
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Peter J. Holzer, 12:57
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 12:53
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 12:42
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Stephen Sprunk, 12:28
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 12:26
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Tobin, 12:26
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, John Smith, 12:21
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Charlie Gordon, 12:14
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:08
- Re: difference for array in c and c++? [strncpy is evil], Charlie Gordon, 12:05
- Re: using 64-bit integers on 32-bit machine, Army1987, 11:59
- What's wrong with this code?, xbyte, 11:43
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:41
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Richard Heathfield, 11:25
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Justin Spahr-Summers, 11:23
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Joachim Schmitz, 11:11
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, Thad Smith, 11:04
- Re: what's wrong with this, CBFalconer, 11:02
- Re: Read compressed files and deal with byte swapping., santosh, 11:00
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Kenny McCormack, 10:52
- Read compressed files and deal with byte swapping., tianyf@xxxxxxxxx, 10:48
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, William Hughes, 10:46
- Quickly exiting from nested calls, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:45
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:42
- Re: switch on strings, santosh, 10:30
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 10:28
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Joachim Schmitz, 10:11
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, CBFalconer, 10:05
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Flash Gordon, 10:05
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., CBFalconer, 10:01
- Re: switch on strings, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:00
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, santosh, 09:56
- Re: switch on strings, santosh, 09:53
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:48
- Re: Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, santosh, 09:45
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 09:41
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 09:38
- Re: switch on strings, Fred, 09:26
- Should we broaden the topicality of this group?, Richard Heathfield, 09:16
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Mark McIntyre, 08:52
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Mark McIntyre, 08:49
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Mark McIntyre, 08:46
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Richard Heathfield, 08:39
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Mark McIntyre, 08:37
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Chris Hills, 08:34
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Mark McIntyre, 08:27
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 08:23
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, jacob navia, 08:21
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 08:18
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 08:16
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 07:56
- Re: lshift & rshift, Charlie Gordon, 07:50
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 07:48
- Re: How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, Martin Wells, 07:45
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Charlie Gordon, 07:45
- Re: switch on strings, Mark McIntyre, 07:43
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Mark McIntyre, 07:42
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 07:42
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Charlie Gordon, 07:39
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 07:38
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Charlie Gordon, 07:38
- How to write optimized/efficient C programs....?, kr, 07:34
- Re: lshift & rshift, Charlie Gordon, 07:34
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Richard Heathfield, 07:31
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Charlie Gordon, 07:29
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Charlie Gordon, 07:28
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Flash Gordon, 07:26
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Charlie Gordon, 07:26
- Re: switch on strings, Flash Gordon, 07:22
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 07:22
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Charlie Gordon, 07:17
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Flash Gordon, 07:09
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC, Guy Macon, 07:06
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Charlie Gordon, 07:04
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, borophyll, 07:02
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Flash Gordon, 07:02
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Joachim Schmitz, 06:15
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, Richard Tobin, 05:50
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Chris Hills, 05:49
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, *coffee*, 05:47
- Re: P2P Application, Martin Ambuhl, 05:10
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 05:02
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 04:43
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Army1987, 04:40
- Re: what's wrong with this, Army1987, 04:37
- Re: Which is more efficient?, Army1987, 04:34
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:21
- Definition of lvalue (was: Re: address of function's return value), Army1987, 04:20
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Army1987, 04:20
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 03:45
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC (was: About time spent have big difference in two running), Peter J. Holzer, 03:36
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Malcolm McLean, 03:35
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 03:34
- Re: P2P Application, Richard Heathfield, 03:29
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, Malcolm McLean, 03:25
- Re: P2P Application, Roberto, 03:21
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC, Peter J. Holzer, 03:20
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, borophyll, 02:26
- Re: switch on strings, santosh, 01:49
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, santosh, 01:47
- Re: Hexagonal grid, Default User, 00:39
- Re: Differing function prototypes and definitions, Jack Klein, 00:11
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Gordon Burditt, 00:03
September 28, 2007
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:51
- Re: Compiling a C program through another C program, Ajinkya, 23:47
- Re: What does it mean, karthikbalaguru, 23:46
- Re: Integer Promotions, Jack Klein, 23:46
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 23:42
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Jack Klein, 23:37
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Jack Klein, 23:33
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Ajinkya, 23:32
- Compiling a C program through another C program, Ajinkya, 23:29
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 23:09
- Re: Defect reports (was Re: what does this warning mean ?), Eric Sosman, 23:08
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, Richard Heathfield, 23:01
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Dik T. Winter, 21:30
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:36
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Gordon Burditt, 19:26
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Mark McIntyre, 19:03
- Re: Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, pete, 18:56
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, pete, 18:52
- Re: P2P Application, Ian Collins, 18:49
- Re: Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, Ian Collins, 18:48
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, pete, 18:46
- Re: switch on strings, Mark McIntyre, 18:45
- P2P Application, Roberto, 18:45
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Flash Gordon, 18:39
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 18:33
- Find the number of elements in an enumerated type?, David Mathog, 18:33
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Eric Sosman, 18:31
- Re: Meaning of __in , __out, __in_opt, Tor Rustad, 18:16
- Re: Initializing Union Structure, ciju, 18:04
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Ian Collins, 17:59
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Tor Rustad, 17:58
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 17:49
- Re: removing comment, Tor Rustad, 17:31
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 17:30
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jacob navia, 17:27
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Tor Rustad, 17:24
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Tor Rustad, 17:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Harter, 17:23
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Harald van D)&k, 17:12
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, jacob navia, 16:53
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 16:48
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, root, 16:44
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Flash Gordon, 16:41
- Re: what's wrong with this, John Gordon, 16:31
- Re: what's wrong with this, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 16:26
- Re: Is there any problem if the compile line sees two '-o' 's, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: what's wrong with this, Richard Tobin, 16:20
- Re: Loop in a linked list, Walter Roberson, 16:20
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Meaning of __in , __out, __in_opt, CBFalconer, 16:09
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 16:08
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, santosh, 16:08
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., CBFalconer, 16:07
- Handling allocation failures?, root, 16:03
- Re: strange behavior with **double, CBFalconer, 16:03
- Re: Handling allocation failures?, Richard Tobin, 16:02
- Re: Loop in a linked list, Richard Tobin, 15:58
- Re: Array Overflow Prevention, David Marsh, 15:51
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Flash Gordon, 15:48
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Ben Bacarisse, 15:42
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Flash Gordon, 15:38
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Ajinkya, 15:34
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: Dynamic includes/linking, Ben Bacarisse, 15:27
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Ben Bacarisse, 15:20
- Dynamic includes/linking, Ajinkya, 15:13
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 14:53
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 14:48
- Re: what's wrong with this, Joachim Schmitz, 14:43
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Default User, 14:37
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Default User, 14:24
- Re: what's wrong with this, rsk, 14:21
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, $)CHarald van D)&k, 14:08
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Charlie Gordon, 13:59
- Re: strange behavior with **double, William Hughes, 13:57
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Ben Bacarisse, 13:56
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Ben Bacarisse, 13:53
- Re: using 64-bit integers on 32-bit machine, Martin Ambuhl, 13:53
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 13:45
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 13:34
- Defect reports (was Re: what does this warning mean ?), Kenneth Brody, 13:34
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 13:29
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Ben Bacarisse, 13:20
- Macro for supplying memset with an unsigned char, Martin Wells, 13:09
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Charlie Gordon, 13:02
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Harald van D)&k, 13:01
- Re: Array Overflow Prevention, Ben Bacarisse, 12:54
- Re: Free E-bookSS!!, Richard Heathfield, 12:44
- Free E-bookSS!!, akira, 12:41
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Harald van D)&k, 12:32
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:28
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Ben Bacarisse, 12:11
- Re: Which is more efficient?, santosh, 11:57
- Re: Which is more efficient?, jacob navia, 11:54
- Re: Which is more efficient?, Willem, 11:51
- Re: what's wrong with this, santosh, 11:48
- Which is more efficient?, PeterOut, 11:47
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Chris Hills, 11:46
- Re: Hexagonal grid, Richard Heathfield, 11:45
- Re: Array Overflow Prevention, Tarique, 11:45
- Re: Hexagonal grid, Ben Pfaff, 11:34
- Re: what's wrong with this, Joachim Schmitz, 11:22
- Re: what's wrong with this, Joachim Schmitz, 11:21
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ben Bacarisse, 11:19
- what's wrong with this, rsk, 11:10
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 11:06
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:57
- Hexagonal grid, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:57
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, santosh, 10:56
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:54
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:53
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:52
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard, 10:51
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:48
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 10:46
- Re: Meaning of __in , __out, __in_opt, jacob navia, 10:45
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 10:43
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard, 10:43
- Meaning of __in , __out, __in_opt, rup, 10:42
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard, 10:42
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:41
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 10:34
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 10:34
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, osmium, 10:30
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 10:30
- Re: lshift & rshift, santosh, 10:28
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:28
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 10:27
- Re: Integer Promotions, Fred, 10:24
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Fred, 10:21
- Re: Integer Promotions, Ben Bacarisse, 10:20
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:19
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:19
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:18
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Richard, 10:14
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 10:13
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard, 10:13
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 10:12
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Charlie Gordon, 10:12
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 10:11
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 10:10
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:10
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Charlie Gordon, 10:06
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:05
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:58
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 09:58
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 09:57
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 09:53
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, John J . Smith, 09:49
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Steven Simpson, 09:47
- Re: lshift & rshift, Charlie Gordon, 09:46
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:46
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:43
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Ben Bacarisse, 09:37
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charles Richmond, 09:36
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 09:32
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 09:31
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:26
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Ralf Damaschke, 09:23
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:22
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Heathfield, 09:20
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard, 09:19
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Ralf Damaschke, 09:16
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 09:16
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 09:07
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 09:01
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, MisterE, 08:56
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 08:45
- Re: Integer Promotions, Philip Potter, 08:42
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 08:42
- Re: using 64-bit integers on 32-bit machine, Spoon, 08:29
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 08:16
- Re: Solaris is complaining about the following, Eric Sosman, 08:10
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Eric Sosman, 08:02
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 08:01
- Differing function prototypes and definitions, Christopher Key, 07:54
- Re: address of function's return value, Army1987, 07:48
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Eric Sosman, 07:48
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Army1987, 07:41
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 07:34
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 07:33
- Re: Structure padding, Christopher Key, 07:24
- Re: address of function's return value, Army1987, 07:14
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Army1987, 07:11
- Re: What does it mean, karthikbalaguru, 07:09
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Army1987, 06:58
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Army1987, 06:57
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Joachim Schmitz, 06:52
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, pete, 06:47
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, pete, 06:43
- Re: using 64-bit integers on 32-bit machine, Ian Collins, 06:34
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, mark_bluemel, 06:32
- Re: Integer Promotions, Richard Heathfield, 06:28
- Re: Integer Promotions, Richard Heathfield, 06:27
- Is there any problem if the compile line sees two '-o' 's, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:21
- Solaris is complaining about the following, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:18
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, mark_bluemel, 06:18
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, pete, 06:17
- using 64-bit integers on 32-bit machine, seung, 06:16
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Philip Potter, 06:10
- Re: What does it mean, Nick Keighley, 05:57
- Re: Integer Promotions, Philip Potter, 05:50
- Re: Integer Promotions, Philip Potter, 05:43
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 05:36
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Mark Bluemel, 05:31
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Barry Schwarz, 05:30
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, karthikbalaguru, 05:26
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Bos, 05:23
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Duncan Muirhead, 05:20
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Barry Schwarz, 05:16
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, karthikbalaguru, 05:14
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Barry Schwarz, 05:12
- Re: lshift & rshift, Philip Potter, 05:08
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Keith Thompson, 05:07
- Re: lshift & rshift, Philip Potter, 05:05
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Richard Tobin, 05:04
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Philip Potter, 04:50
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 04:49
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Pietro Cerutti, 04:29
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Chris Torek, 04:27
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 04:22
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Pietro Cerutti, 04:21
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 04:19
- Re: how to return multi-value from a function, Pietro Cerutti, 04:16
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Ian Collins, 04:00
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Nick Keighley, 03:54
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 03:52
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 03:52
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Joachim Schmitz, 03:49
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, jacob navia, 03:48
- Re: strange behavior with **double, William Hughes, 03:44
- Re: Integer Promotions, jacob navia, 03:40
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 03:24
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 03:21
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 03:20
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 03:20
- Re: How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Ian Collins, 03:18
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Ian Collins, 03:16
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 03:12
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 03:06
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Joachim Schmitz, 03:05
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 03:00
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 02:57
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, CBFalconer, 02:48
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Flash Gordon, 02:45
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Richard Bos, 02:33
- How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Magesh, 02:32
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Bos, 02:23
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Heathfield, 02:22
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 02:20
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 02:07
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 02:05
- How to calculate the execution time for a peace of code in Unix env?, Magesh, 02:00
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Stephen Sprunk, 01:46
- Re: Integer Promotions, Richard Heathfield, 01:38
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Jack Klein, 01:36
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Richard Heathfield, 01:33
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Ian Collins, 01:32
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, somenath, 01:29
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Richard Heathfield, 01:28
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Heathfield, 01:25
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, weidongtom@xxxxxxxxx, 01:10
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Ian Collins, 01:06
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Keith Thompson, 01:01
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Barry Schwarz, 00:58
- Re: char*, RedLars, 00:55
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, Richard Harter, 00:51
- Re: In Search for a better Algorithm, CBFalconer, 00:42
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, CBFalconer, 00:34
- Re: lshift & rshift, Stephen Sprunk, 00:34
- Re: lshift & rshift, Stephen Sprunk, 00:32
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Barry Schwarz, 00:30
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, CBFalconer, 00:27
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Barry Schwarz, 00:25
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Barry Schwarz, 00:19
- Re: lshift & rshift, Barry Schwarz, 00:07
September 27, 2007
- In Search for a better Algorithm, weidongtom@xxxxxxxxx, 23:58
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Barry Schwarz, 23:56
- Re: C structures and BIN file, Barry Schwarz, 23:52
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Jack Klein, 23:07
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Jack Klein, 22:40
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard, 22:15
- Re: char*, Barry Schwarz, 21:41
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, U, 21:19
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Keith Thompson, 21:17
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Keith Thompson, 21:12
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Richard, 21:06
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Keith Thompson, 20:52
- Re: C structures and BIN file, Wade Ward, 20:49
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 20:33
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 20:28
- Re: C structures and BIN file, Gordon Burditt, 20:05
- Re: how to return multi-value from a function, shanfeng, 19:54
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 19:48
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, CBFalconer, 19:41
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 19:41
- Re: address of function's return value, pete, 19:38
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, user923005, 19:36
- Re: Integer Promotions, pete, 19:31
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Old Wolf, 19:29
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Richard Tobin, 19:24
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., CBFalconer, 19:23
- Integer Promotions, Fred, 19:17
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, pete, 19:14
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, pete, 19:12
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 19:06
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 19:06
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 19:04
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, christian.bau, 18:59
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 18:54
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC, Ben Pfaff, 18:46
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, pete, 18:44
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, J. J. Farrell, 18:42
- Re: __FUNCTION__, CBFalconer, 18:37
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC (was: About time spent have big difference in two running), Keith Thompson, 18:34
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, pete, 18:31
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Tor Rustad, 18:30
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Richard Tobin, 18:20
- Re: Warnings in lcc-win, Eric Sosman, 18:18
- Re: lshift & rshift, Tor Rustad, 18:14
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, CBFalconer, 17:54
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., cr88192, 17:54
- Re: lshift & rshift, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 17:50
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 17:48
- Re: lshift & rshift, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Keith Thompson, 17:36
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Tor Rustad, 17:35
- Warnings in lcc-win, jacob navia, 17:33
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Keith Thompson, 17:32
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Keith Thompson, 17:30
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 17:24
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., cr88192, 17:16
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 17:10
- Re: switch on strings, Default User, 17:07
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 17:06
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: strange behavior with **double, J. J. Farrell, 17:02
- Re: __FUNCTION__, Walter Roberson, 17:00
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Default User, 16:56
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- __FUNCTION__, Ravi, 16:49
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, user923005, 16:29
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 16:07
- Re: lshift & rshift, user923005, 15:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Kenneth Brody, 15:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 15:52
- Re: how to return multi-value from a function, Robert Gamble, 15:50
- Re: switch on strings, Richard Heathfield, 15:32
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 15:19
- Re: how to return multi-value from a function, jacob navia, 15:16
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 15:14
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 15:10
- how to return multi-value from a function, shanfeng, 15:09
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 15:06
- Re: switch on strings, Richard, 15:01
- Re: switch on strings, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 14:40
- Re: lshift & rshift, Charlie Gordon, 14:37
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 14:34
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 14:30
- Re: switch on strings, Default User, 14:27
- Re: Structure padding, Walter Roberson, 14:20
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 14:19
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 14:18
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Chris Torek, 14:14
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard, 14:12
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 13:57
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 13:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:52
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 13:51
- Re: lshift & rshift, karthikbalaguru, 13:44
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 13:43
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 13:42
- Re: Structure padding, karthikbalaguru, 13:40
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 13:39
- Immediate Hiring_Lead Programmer Analyst_Direct Client_sranade@xxxxxxxxxxx, sheetal, 13:38
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 13:36
- Re: CLOCKS_PER_SEC, Sjouke Burry, 13:34
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 13:33
- Re: lshift & rshift, karthikbalaguru, 13:30
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Francine . Neary, 13:29
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 13:29
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 13:24
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 13:24
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 13:22
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 13:22
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 13:21
- Re: Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Joachim Schmitz, 13:19
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Francine . Neary, 13:18
- Middle parameter to memset that will achieve UCHAR_MAX, Martin Wells, 13:13
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 13:12
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 13:12
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 13:08
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Francine . Neary, 13:07
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 13:04
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 13:01
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 12:54
- Re: switch on strings, Richard, 12:52
- Re: switch on strings, Richard, 12:52
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard, 12:47
- Re: Structure padding, Christopher Key, 12:46
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Chris Hills, 12:35
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, J. J. Farrell, 12:07
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:00
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, J. J. Farrell, 11:59
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Charlie Gordon, 11:47
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., CBFalconer, 11:47
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 11:41
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 11:39
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 11:37
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Mark Bluemel, 11:35
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:35
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Al Balmer, 11:33
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., let_the_best_man_win, 11:32
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 11:31
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 11:24
- Re: undefined behavior in "macro-based" single-linked list impl..., Eric Sosman, 11:24
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 11:22
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 11:20
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 11:19
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 11:12
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 11:10
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:57
- Re: strange behavior with **double, CBFalconer, 10:55
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Joachim Schmitz, 10:53
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:50
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:50
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Bos, 10:50
- Re: [socket] test socket descriptor state, CBFalconer, 10:48
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 10:46
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:45
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:45
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 10:44
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:43
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., CBFalconer, 10:42
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Bos, 10:41
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 10:41
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 10:41
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:39
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Mark Bluemel, 10:36
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Don Bruder, 10:35
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard Tobin, 10:35
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Hyuga, 10:35
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 10:33
- Re: switch on strings, Kenny McCormack, 10:21
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Duncan Muirhead, 10:20
- Re: Float as Infinity, Eric Sosman, 10:16
- Re: Typedefing structs as arrays of size 1, Kenneth Brody, 10:11
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 10:11
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:10
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 10:08
- CLOCKS_PER_SEC (was: About time spent have big difference in two running), Peter J. Holzer, 10:03
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 10:03
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Martin Wells, 10:03
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:59
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Martin Wells, 09:57
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Kenneth Brody, 09:56
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Martin Wells, 09:56
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:51
- Re: switch on strings, Charlie Gordon, 09:51
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Richard, 09:49
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Joachim Schmitz, 09:44
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:36
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Ivan Gotovchits, 09:36
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Francine . Neary, 09:36
- Re: Typedefing structs as arrays of size 1, Richard Tobin, 09:31
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Mark Bluemel, 09:28
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Richard Tobin, 09:27
- Re: Typedefing structs as arrays of size 1, Mark Bluemel, 09:26
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Martin Wells, 09:24
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Mark Bluemel, 09:20
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, karthikbalaguru, 09:20
- Re: Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:19
- Re: Typedefing structs as arrays of size 1, Richard Bos, 09:18
- Re: Array Overflow Prevention, David Marsh, 09:16
- Set all bits to 1 in an array of raw bytes, Martin Wells, 09:15
- Typedefing structs as arrays of size 1, Fred, 09:08
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:07
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Mark Bluemel, 09:06
- Re: What does it mean, karthikbalaguru, 09:05
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, karthikbalaguru, 09:02
- Re: strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 09:00
- Re: What does it mean, Army1987, 08:54
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Martien verbruggen, 08:54
- Re: lshift & rshift, Mark Bluemel, 08:54
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Philip Potter, 08:53
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 08:50
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Eric Sosman, 08:48
- Re: lshift & rshift, karthikbalaguru, 08:45
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Bos, 08:43
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Bos, 08:42
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:38
- Re: strange behavior with **double, Army1987, 08:38
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 08:37
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Mark Bluemel, 08:35
- Re: char*, Richard Bos, 08:33
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Kenny McCormack, 08:29
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Chris Thomasson, 08:27
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 08:26
- Re: Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., Chris Thomasson, 08:25
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Army1987, 08:21
- Re: char*, RedLars, 08:14
- Re: switch on strings, CBFalconer, 08:11
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Lew Pitcher, 08:06
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard, 08:04
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:57
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:52
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Joachim Schmitz, 07:51
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Martin Ambuhl, 07:49
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: char*, Joachim Schmitz, 07:45
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Richard, 07:43
- Re: char*, RedLars, 07:42
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Bos, 07:40
- Array Overflow Prevention, Tarique, 07:35
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Martin Ambuhl, 07:33
- Creating anonymous local variables on-the-fly and more..., giuseppe . greco, 07:30
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Heathfield, 07:29
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Francine . Neary, 07:25
- Re: What does it mean, jacob navia, 07:21
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 07:15
- What does it mean, rsk, 07:11
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 07:11
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Martin Ambuhl, 07:08
- Re: address of function's return value, Army1987, 07:06
- Re: address of function's return value, Army1987, 06:55
- strange behavior with **double, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:50
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Frank Liebelt, 06:50
- Re: lshift & rshift, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 06:47
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:46
- Re: lshift & rshift, Army1987, 06:46
- Re: lshift & rshift, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 06:44
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Army1987, 06:43
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ravishankar S, 06:43
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 06:43
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Joachim Schmitz, 06:40
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 06:35
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 06:34
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Tobin, 06:30
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:30
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Frank Liebelt, 06:30
- Re: [socket] test socket descriptor state, Ian Collins, 06:24
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:23
- Re: lshift & rshift, Joachim Schmitz, 06:21
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:16
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:15
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 06:12
- [socket] test socket descriptor state, mbm, 06:11
- Re: lshift & rshift, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 06:03
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Tobin, 06:00
- Re: undefined behavior in "macro-based" single-linked list impl..., Chris Thomasson, 05:59
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Ian Collins, 05:57
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., let_the_best_man_win, 05:56
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Joachim Schmitz, 05:54
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Nick Keighley, 05:54
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., let_the_best_man_win, 05:53
- Re: lshift & rshift, karthikbalaguru, 05:52
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Charlie Gordon, 05:52
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., Ian Collins, 05:52
- Re: pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., let_the_best_man_win, 05:51
- Re: HELP: assembly & C linking woes...., jacob navia, 05:51
- Re: Convert int array to char array, Mark Bluemel, 05:51
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ian Collins, 05:50
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Bos, 05:49
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:47
- pointer to string and then back to pointer on a 64 bit machine., let_the_best_man_win, 05:46
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ian Collins, 05:45
- Re: lshift & rshift, Mark Bluemel, 05:42
- Convert int array to char array, Frank Liebelt, 05:41
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:41
- Re: lshift & rshift, pete, 05:40
- Re: Float as Infinity, Charlie Gordon, 05:36
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ian Collins, 05:33
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:31
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ian Collins, 05:28
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:24
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:23
- Re: lshift & rshift, Mark Bluemel, 05:23
- Re: lshift & rshift, karthikbalaguru, 05:19
- Re: lshift & rshift, Ian Collins, 05:14
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Martin Ambuhl, 05:10
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 05:10
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Bos, 05:08
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 05:07
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Martin Ambuhl, 05:07
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Bos, 05:03
- Re: switch on strings, Richard Bos, 05:01
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Richard Bos, 04:59
- Re: lshift & rshift, Mark Bluemel, 04:56
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 04:53
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 04:49
- Re: lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 04:45
- Re: lshift & rshift, Philip Potter, 04:40
- Re: lshift & rshift, Richard Heathfield, 04:40
- undefined behavior in "macro-based" single-linked list impl..., Chris Thomasson, 04:36
- Re: switch on strings, Francine . Neary, 04:34
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Francine . Neary, 04:27
- lshift & rshift, iesvs@xxxxxxx, 04:26
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 04:10
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:10
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Philip Potter, 04:10
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:07
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 04:05
- Re: char*, Joachim Schmitz, 04:04
- Re: Count number of bits set in a number, Joachim Schmitz, 03:57
- Count number of bits set in a number, Mack, 03:49
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 03:40
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Heathfield, 03:40
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 03:36
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 03:31
- Re: address of function's return value, Philip Potter, 03:30
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, jacob navia, 03:22
- Re: Translating c code help required, lombardm, 03:18
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:17
- Re: char*, RedLars, 03:12
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Flash Gordon, 03:09
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 02:41
- Re: char*, Richard Bos, 02:34
- Re: switch on strings, $)CHarald van D)&k, 02:19
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 02:18
- C structures and BIN file, karthikeyarajan, 02:12
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Martin Ambuhl, 01:52
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 01:48
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Old Wolf, 01:37
- char*, RedLars, 01:13
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 01:08
- Loop in a linked list, Rohit kumar Chandel, 01:00
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, pete, 00:58
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 00:42
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, Barry Schwarz, 00:05
September 26, 2007
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 23:32
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 23:31
- Re: address of function's return value, Ben Bacarisse, 23:24
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Eric Sosman, 23:08
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:06
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Heathfield, 23:03
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Keith Thompson, 23:01
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 22:51
- Re: address of function's return value, pete, 22:50
- Re: what does this warning mean ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:47
- Re: address of function's return value, pete, 22:45
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Eric Sosman, 22:41
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 22:37
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard Heathfield, 22:34
- what does this warning mean ?, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 22:24
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Heathfield, 22:24
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 22:21
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Thad Smith, 22:15
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Kenny McCormack, 22:00
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 21:39
- Re: address of function's return value, Joe Wright, 21:38
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Richard Harter, 21:36
- Re: switch on strings, CBFalconer, 21:34
- Check it out:If you want to buy tickets,you can check this page,very easy and fast:, braz, 21:32
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, CBFalconer, 21:25
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Jack Klein, 21:24
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, CBFalconer, 21:20
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 21:11
- Re: removing comment, Keith Thompson, 20:46
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Dik T. Winter, 20:04
- Re: removing comment, Gordon Burditt, 20:02
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Dik T. Winter, 20:00
- Re: removing comment, Tor Rustad, 19:51
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Philip Potter, 19:42
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Dik T. Winter, 19:40
- Put me on your mailing list, Lawrence, 19:38
- Re: removing comment, Tor Rustad, 19:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 19:17
- Re: Enums, Chris Thomasson, 19:12
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tor Rustad, 19:00
- Re: switch on strings, Keith Thompson, 18:49
- Re: address of function's return value, jacob navia, 18:47
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 18:46
- Re: address of function's return value, jacob navia, 18:25
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Tobin, 18:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jacob navia, 18:21
- Re: address of function's return value, Old Wolf, 18:14
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, pete, 18:12
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Old Wolf, 18:12
- Re: switch on strings, Old Wolf, 18:09
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 18:04
- Re: about c, pete, 18:04
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 17:46
- Re: Enums, Chris Thomasson, 17:44
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, pete, 17:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Flash Gordon, 17:41
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, Keith Thompson, 17:36
- --!!! FREE GUIDE TO MAKE $555 PER DAY !!!--, Nic Clark, 16:46
- Re: removing comment, Richard Heathfield, 16:30
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Richard, 16:28
- Re: switch on strings, Richard, 16:26
- Re: about c, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Martin Wells, 16:16
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard, 16:16
- Re: removing comment, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: removing comment, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: Translating c code help required, Kevin Bagust, 16:04
- Re: switch on strings, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: removing comment, Lew Pitcher, 15:52
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Flash Gordon, 15:50
- Re: address of function's return value, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard, 15:33
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: address of function's return value, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 15:14
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Army1987, 14:57
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Army1987, 14:48
- Re: removing comment, Walter Roberson, 14:47
- Re: function definitions, Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 14:43
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 14:32
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: about c, vin, 14:12
- Re: about c, osmium, 14:08
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, osmium, 14:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jacob navia, 13:58
- Re: address of function's return value, Ben Bacarisse, 13:45
- Get unlimited visitors to your website, ashishmundhara108, 13:37
- Make money to share your videos, sweetboy36, 13:34
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard, 13:34
- Re: about c, J. J. Farrell, 13:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tor Rustad, 13:21
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, Tor Rustad, 13:09
- Re: removing comment, Tor Rustad, 12:59
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Richard Tobin, 12:56
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Charlie Gordon, 12:37
- Re: address of function's return value, Martin Wells, 12:32
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Martin Wells, 12:23
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Martin Wells, 12:22
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Sjouke Burry, 12:17
- Re: address of function's return value, Pietro Cerutti, 12:14
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, Joachim Schmitz, 12:11
- Re: Enums, Al Balmer, 12:09
- Re: Optimization Problem, Richard Harter, 12:08
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Al Balmer, 12:07
- Re: address of function's return value, Richard Heathfield, 12:05
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, osmium, 12:03
- Re: address of function's return value, Pietro Cerutti, 12:02
- address of function's return value, Pietro Cerutti, 11:58
- How to organise a composition analyzer in C??, jyck91, 11:47
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ben Pfaff, 11:46
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Charlie Gordon, 11:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Joachim Schmitz, 11:38
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 11:26
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jacob navia, 11:26
- Re: removing comment, Eric Sosman, 11:12
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Charlie Gordon, 11:08
- Re: about c, osmium, 11:08
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 11:07
- Re: Float as Infinity, Eric Sosman, 10:58
- Re: about c, DDD, 10:55
- Re: Float as Infinity, Charlie Gordon, 10:53
- Re: Float as Infinity, Eric Sosman, 10:51
- about c, beginers of c, 10:39
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 10:29
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Army1987, 10:28
- Re: removing comment, Richard Heathfield, 10:17
- Re: removing comment, Walter Roberson, 10:07
- Re: removing comment, CBFalconer, 10:05
- Re: Optimization Problem, CBFalconer, 10:02
- Re: removing comment, xianwei, 10:02
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Army1987, 10:00
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 09:58
- Re: Packed array in C, Richard Tobin, 09:52
- Re: removing comment, vim, 09:47
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, Army1987, 09:46
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, c, 09:39
- Re: function definitions, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:22
- Re: Structure padding, rameshnaga8, 09:18
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:17
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Thad Smith, 09:16
- Re: removing comment, David Marsh, 09:14
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:06
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 09:04
- Re: Packed array in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:02
- Re: switch on strings, Richard, 09:00
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Peter J. Holzer, 08:56
- removing comment, daskumardilip, 08:55
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, CBFalconer, 08:43
- Re: Translating c code help required, CBFalconer, 08:31
- Re: Translating c code help required, CBFalconer, 08:29
- Re: Translating c code help required, lombardm, 08:23
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, CBFalconer, 08:15
- Re: Optimization Problem, Barry Schwarz, 08:10
- Re: switch on strings, CBFalconer, 08:08
- Re: Translating c code help required, Ben Bacarisse, 07:39
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Mark Bluemel, 07:25
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 07:21
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Ben Bacarisse, 07:13
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, keith, 06:55
- Re: Translating c code help required, lombardm, 06:25
- Re: Packed array in C, Richard Tobin, 06:15
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, Richard, 06:07
- Re: Translating c code help required, Army1987, 06:05
- Re: Structure padding, Spade, 05:50
- Re: Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), Army1987, 05:50
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Ian Collins, 05:46
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:43
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, Army1987, 05:42
- Re: About different versions of the same header files, Ian Collins, 05:38
- Re: help on this text file i/o code, Mark Bluemel, 05:33
- About different versions of the same header files, parag_paul@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:33
- Re: Packed array in C, karthikbalaguru, 05:31
- help on this text file i/o code, c, 05:23
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 05:21
- Re: Structure padding, karthikbalaguru, 05:19
- Re: Float as Infinity, Richard Heathfield, 05:18
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 05:15
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 05:10
- Re: function definitions, Keith Thompson, 05:09
- Re: Structure padding, Mark Bluemel, 05:00
- Is a bug? About MaxSubsequenceSum(), xianwei, 04:53
- Re: Structure padding, Rohit kumar Chandel, 04:42
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Bos, 04:16
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Richard Bos, 04:11
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Joachim Schmitz, 04:10
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 03:28
- Re: function definitions, pete, 03:19
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Flash Gordon, 03:19
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 03:13
- Re: switch on strings, karthikbalaguru, 02:33
- Re: Translating c code help required, Walter Roberson, 02:08
- Translating c code help required, lombardm, 02:01
- Re: Structure padding, Richard Heathfield, 01:46
- Re: Optimization Problem, Richard Heathfield, 01:42
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Malcolm McLean, 01:32
- Structure padding, Rohit kumar Chandel, 01:28
- Re: Optimization Problem, CBFalconer, 00:48
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, CBFalconer, 00:42
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 00:23
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Old Wolf, 00:18
- Re: how to install C on Mac, Friedrich Dominicus, 00:05
September 25, 2007
- Re: how to install C on Mac, michau, 23:45
- Re: Multiple pipes, Jack Klein, 22:51
- Multiple pipes, ZhukovL@xxxxxxxxx, 22:16
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Ian Collins, 22:04
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 22:04
- Re: Float as Infinity, Keith Thompson, 22:04
- Re: Optimization Problem, user923005, 21:56
- Re: function definitions, borophyll, 21:40
- Re: Float as Infinity, Barry Schwarz, 21:39
- Re: Float as Infinity, Barry Schwarz, 21:37
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Richard Heathfield, 21:33
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Barry Schwarz, 21:28
- Re: array size, Barry Schwarz, 21:21
- Re: function definitions, John Bode, 21:04
- Re: function definitions, Keith Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 20:25
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Richard Heathfield, 20:23
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Keith Thompson, 20:22
- function definitions, borophyll, 20:08
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: Enums, Keith Thompson, 20:05
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Richard Heathfield, 20:05
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 19:49
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 19:46
- Re: Enums, Richard, 19:44
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Old Wolf, 19:44
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Old Wolf, 19:42
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Old Wolf, 19:29
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, pete, 18:46
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 18:44
- Re: Enums, Richard, 18:44
- Re: Float as Infinity, pete, 18:31
- Re: Enums, Ben Bacarisse, 18:23
- Re: Optimization Problem, Ben Bacarisse, 18:10
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Keith Thompson, 18:03
- Re: Enums, CBFalconer, 18:02
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, CBFalconer, 17:51
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, CBFalconer, 17:40
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Army1987, 17:40
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 17:37
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Army1987, 17:34
- Re: Packed array in C, Army1987, 17:31
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Mark McIntyre, 17:23
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Harald van D)&k, 17:11
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 17:04
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 17:00
- Re: The usage of %p in C, $)CHarald van D)&k, 16:56
- Re: Optimization Problem, Willem, 16:54
- money making opportunity, holida0255@xxxxxxxxx, 16:50
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Ian Collins, 16:46
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, user923005, 16:46
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 16:45
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 16:41
- Re: switch on strings, Richard Tobin, 16:13
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Tobin, 16:11
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 16:08
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Keith Thompson, 16:03
- Re: switch on strings, Kenny McCormack, 15:46
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Keith Thompson, 15:44
- Re: switch on strings, Keith Thompson, 15:42
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Flash Gordon, 15:40
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark McIntyre, 15:32
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Walter Roberson, 15:32
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark McIntyre, 15:30
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Mark McIntyre, 15:28
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Mark McIntyre, 15:25
- PP, Wade Ward, 15:23
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Mark McIntyre, 15:21
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Mark McIntyre, 15:18
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Kenneth Brody, 15:18
- Re: Packed array in C, Keith Thompson, 15:11
- Re: process of learning C language, Keith Thompson, 15:05
- Re: Float as Infinity, Mark McIntyre, 14:58
- Re: Float as Infinity, Richard Heathfield, 14:57
- Re: Optimization Problem, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Keith Thompson, 14:55
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 14:53
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Keith Thompson, 14:51
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 14:50
- Re: Optimization Problem, user923005, 14:47
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Mark McIntyre, 14:46
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, user923005, 14:46
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 14:43
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Stephen Sprunk, 14:39
- Survey about Visual Annotations for Software Models, Joerg Rech, 14:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 14:24
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Flash Gordon, 14:09
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Default User, 13:53
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Chris Torek, 13:43
- Re: Enums, Kenneth Brody, 13:29
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 13:25
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 13:25
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Tor Rustad, 13:20
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard, 13:10
- Re: Packed array in C, Jack Klein, 13:08
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Jack Klein, 13:02
- Re: https and openssl, opexoc, 12:56
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Jack Klein, 12:47
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Jack Klein, 12:34
- Re: switch on strings, Jack Klein, 12:30
- Re: how can I return nothing?, CBFalconer, 12:17
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Jack Klein, 12:17
- Re: https and openssl, Tor Rustad, 12:15
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Eric Sosman, 12:12
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard, 12:10
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Tobin, 12:06
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Bos, 11:43
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:35
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Ivan Gotovchits, 11:29
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Richard Heathfield, 11:27
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
- Re: implementing tail command, Sjouke Burry, 11:23
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard, 11:20
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Army1987, 11:18
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Martin Wells, 11:14
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Army1987, 11:11
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark Bluemel, 11:05
- Re: Packed array in C, Richard Bos, 11:05
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark Bluemel, 11:04
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Bos, 11:04
- Re: Packed array in C, Pietro Cerutti, 11:02
- Re: switch on strings, michel . gareil, 11:02
- Re: Float as Infinity, Eric Sosman, 10:55
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Army1987, 10:53
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Pietro Cerutti, 10:48
- Re: Benefits of c over c++, Kenny McCormack, 10:46
- Packed array in C, Sikandar, 10:45
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 10:24
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Gilles Chehade, 10:16
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Gilles Chehade, 10:16
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Heathfield, 10:13
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Denis Kasak, 10:11
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark Bluemel, 10:08
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark Bluemel, 10:03
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Mark Bluemel, 10:01
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Gilles Chehade, 09:54
- Re: The usage of %p in C, jacob navia, 09:49
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:45
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Richard Bos, 09:44
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Richard Bos, 09:40
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Bos, 09:39
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Bos, 09:38
- Re: The usage of %p in C, Pietro Cerutti, 09:38
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Bos, 09:37
- The usage of %p in C, Tak, 09:33
- Benefits of c over c++, shantibhushan.sale@xxxxxxxxx, 09:19
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, xianwei, 08:49
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, xianwei, 08:42
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Laurent Deniau, 08:42
- Optimization Problem, weidongtom@xxxxxxxxx, 08:38
- Re: Enums, Pietro Cerutti, 08:26
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Charlie Gordon, 08:18
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, Eric Sosman, 08:15
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 08:11
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 08:11
- Re: process of learning C language, Eric Sosman, 08:09
- Re: Enums, Richard, 08:07
- Enums, borophyll, 07:38
- Re: private structure, karthikbalaguru, 07:14
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 07:14
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Richard Heathfield, 07:13
- Re: What does it mean, karthikbalaguru, 07:10
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 07:10
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Thomas Dickey, 07:09
- Re: [OT] Re: C is too old? opinions?, Roberto Waltman, 07:09
- Re: implementing tail command, Richard, 07:08
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, karthikbalaguru, 07:05
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Richard Heathfield, 07:05
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Richard, 07:04
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard Heathfield, 07:02
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, karthikbalaguru, 07:02
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Richard, 07:02
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Platonic Solid, 07:02
- I had a bad day, Wade Ward, 06:47
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 06:45
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Laurent Deniau, 06:42
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Martin Wells, 06:38
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, karthikbalaguru, 06:27
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 06:27
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 06:15
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, karthikbalaguru, 06:15
- Re: switch on strings, karthikbalaguru, 06:04
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 06:03
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 05:53
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 05:52
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Ivan Gotovchits, 05:50
- Re: looking for the fastest complex number arithmetics..., Wade Ward, 05:40
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 05:23
- ,anti- ,registry tweaks,compter tricks, e.expelliarmus, 05:22
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 05:20
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 05:20
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 05:19
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 05:17
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 05:12
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Martin Wells, 05:11
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: Float as Infinity, Richard Heathfield, 05:06
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 05:01
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard Heathfield, 04:58
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 04:37
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Wade Ward, 04:35
- Re: looking for the fastest complex number arithmetics..., Wade Ward, 04:25
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 04:22
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 04:20
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 04:15
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 04:13
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, user923005, 04:10
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 04:03
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Richard Bos, 03:58
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Gordon Burditt, 03:38
- Re: looking for the fastest complex number arithmetics..., Wade Ward, 03:37
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 03:30
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Keith Thompson, 03:27
- Re: array size, Keith Thompson, 03:25
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 03:25
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 03:25
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Ian Collins, 03:21
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 03:21
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 03:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 03:18
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, Richard Heathfield, 03:06
- Re: array size, Joachim Schmitz, 03:06
- Re: switch on strings, Martin Ambuhl, 02:49
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 02:47
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, Martin Ambuhl, 02:45
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Joachim Schmitz, 02:40
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Keith Thompson, 02:39
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, user923005, 02:37
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Keith Thompson, 02:33
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 02:30
- Re: difference for array in c and c++?, user923005, 02:29
- Re: how to call a variable without reference in c, user923005, 02:25
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 02:23
- difference for array in c and c++?, anto frank, 02:20
- Re: switch on strings, user923005, 02:20
- switch on strings, sinbad, 02:19
- how to call a variable without reference in c, anto frank, 02:19
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, user923005, 02:18
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Peter J. Holzer, 02:14
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, user923005, 02:14
- Re: https and openssl, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:02
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, user923005, 02:02
- Re: how to install C on Mac, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:00
- Re: array size, RedLars, 01:59
- Re: About time spent have big difference in two running, CBFalconer, 01:53
- Re: process of learning C language, CBFalconer, 01:51
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 01:49
- Re: process of learning C language, user923005, 01:36
- Re: how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, user923005, 01:29
- how #define a main() function and call our own main function?, ravi, 01:03
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Keith Thompson, 00:48
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 00:45
- Re: implementing tail command, Keith Thompson, 00:41
- About time spent have big difference in two running, xianwei, 00:39
- process of learning C language, somenath, 00:39
- Re: looking for the fastest complex number arithmetics..., John Harper, 00:30
September 24, 2007
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, user923005, 23:57
- how to install C on Mac, michau, 23:48
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Stephen Sprunk, 23:31
- [OT] Re: C is too old? opinions?, Eric Sosman, 23:24
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Jack Klein, 22:51
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Jack Klein, 22:47
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Barry Schwarz, 22:46
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Jack Klein, 22:42
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 21:59
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 21:12
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Keith Thompson, 21:00
- Re: array size, Barry Schwarz, 20:47
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Gordon Burditt, 20:41
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, user923005, 20:41
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., CBFalconer, 20:32
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, CBFalconer, 20:15
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Old Wolf, 20:12
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:02
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, CBFalconer, 19:58
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, CBFalconer, 19:53
- Re: implementing tail command, CBFalconer, 19:47
- Re: Float as Infinity, CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Richard Heathfield, 19:42
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, user923005, 19:39
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, Martin Wells, 19:36
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Keith Thompson, 19:35
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., John Bode, 19:32
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, user923005, 19:25
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Platonic Solid, 19:22
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, user923005, 19:20
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, John J . Smith, 19:06
- Re: A plan for Jacob, CBFalconer, 19:01
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard Heathfield, 19:00
- Re: array size, pete, 18:57
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Richard Tobin, 18:55
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 18:51
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Flash Gordon, 18:51
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 18:39
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Eric Sosman, 18:32
- Re: returning error from main(), Eric Sosman, 18:27
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Eric Sosman, 18:24
- Re: Callling a function from another file..., Francine . Neary, 18:09
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, CBFalconer, 18:02
- Callling a function from another file..., sagar, 18:01
- Re: how can I return nothing?, CBFalconer, 17:45
- Re: returning error from main(), Al Balmer, 17:30
- Re: https and openssl, William Ahern, 17:28
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Harald van D)&k, 17:28
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, user923005, 17:27
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Army1987, 17:26
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Richard Tobin, 17:26
- Re: how can I return nothing?, CBFalconer, 17:21
- Re: array size, Tor Rustad, 17:17
- Re: array size, Army1987, 17:11
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Tor Rustad, 17:06
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Richard, 17:03
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 16:55
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Martin Wells, 16:43
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 16:39
- Re: array size - TPA, Default User, 16:39
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 16:38
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 16:37
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 16:33
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Michal Nazarewicz, 16:30
- Re: returning error from main(), Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 16:29
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 16:26
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Richard Tobin, 16:17
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Keith Thompson, 16:16
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard Tobin, 16:13
- Re: https and openssl, Tor Rustad, 16:12
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: private structure, Richard Heathfield, 15:59
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Al Balmer, 15:55
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 15:51
- Re: What does it mean, Tor Rustad, 15:44
- Re: private structure, Malcolm McLean, 15:32
- Re: Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Harald van D)&k, 15:26
- Re: Float as Infinity, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, $)CHarald van D)&k, 15:18
- Any preprocessor definition to tell if inline is supported?, Martin Wells, 15:18
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Chris Torek, 15:16
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Al Balmer, 15:12
- Re: returning error from main(), Al Balmer, 15:10
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Tor Rustad, 15:09
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Chris Hills, 15:02
- Re: Include, André Gillibert, 14:57
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Keith Thompson, 14:54
- Re: A plan for Jacob, user923005, 14:46
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Martin Wells, 14:43
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Tor Rustad, 14:42
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 14:42
- Re: array size, RedLars, 14:36
- Re: Float as Infinity, user923005, 14:35
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Harter, 14:34
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Martin Wells, 14:26
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Ben Bacarisse, 14:18
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 14:18
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Tor Rustad, 14:14
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Tor Rustad, 14:14
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, osmium, 14:10
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Martin Wells, 14:10
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Martin Wells, 14:05
- Re: returning error from main(), Keith Thompson, 14:02
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Don, 13:59
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:47
- Re: [ot]Re: A plan for Jacob, Al Balmer, 12:39
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Harter, 12:34
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Eric Sosman, 12:29
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 12:29
- Re: array declarators, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:28
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Al Balmer, 12:25
- Re: returning error from main(), Al Balmer, 12:19
- Re: alignment using malloc, digz, 12:16
- Re: alignment using malloc, digz, 12:15
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:15
- Re: alignment using malloc, digz, 12:15
- Re: alignment using malloc, digz, 12:13
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Charlie Gordon, 11:34
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, lawrence . jones, 11:10
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, lawrence . jones, 11:06
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), lawrence . jones, 11:01
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Eliot, 11:00
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Clever Monkey, 10:59
- Re: array size, Mark Bluemel, 10:54
- Re: array size, Gilles Chehade, 10:52
- Re: array size, Gilles Chehade, 10:50
- Re: array size, Ivan Gotovchits, 10:48
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Eric Sosman, 10:48
- Re: array size, Ivan Gotovchits, 10:47
- array size, RedLars, 10:31
- Re: https and openssl, William Ahern, 10:18
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Richard Tobin, 09:48
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Richard, 09:43
- Re: implementing tail command, Mark Bluemel, 09:38
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, r6144, 09:30
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Roberto Waltman, 09:30
- How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Eliot, 09:27
- Re: How do I force a compiler error if two #defines exist?, Richard Tobin, 09:19
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard Bos, 09:08
- Re: Float as Infinity, Eric Sosman, 09:07
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Thad Smith, 09:01
- Re: implementing tail command, Lew Pitcher, 08:59
- Re: Float as Infinity, Tim Prince, 08:58
- implementing tail command, lak, 08:56
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Eric Sosman, 08:51
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard, 08:44
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard, 08:43
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard, 08:41
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Ivan Gotovchits, 08:40
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard, 08:38
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Richard Heathfield, 08:34
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Thomas Dickey, 08:33
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Ivan Gotovchits, 08:28
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Ivan Gotovchits, 08:22
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Gordon Burditt, 08:13
- Re: pointers arithmetics, Richard Heathfield, 08:12
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- pointers arithmetics, Ivan Gotovchits, 07:49
- Re: Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 07:42
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Ben Bacarisse, 07:31
- Re: How to use it?, Francois Grieu, 07:20
- Re: How to use it?, r6144, 07:20
- Re: Float as Infinity, r6144, 07:15
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Chris Hills, 07:13
- Re: How to use it?, Richard Tobin, 07:10
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 07:04
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Tobin, 07:01
- Float as Infinity, The87Boy, 06:47
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Mark McIntyre, 06:45
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Ian Collins, 06:45
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 06:39
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Mark McIntyre, 06:39
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Willem, 06:34
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Mark McIntyre, 06:31
- How to use it?, rsk, 06:30
- How to use it?, rsk, 06:27
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Mark McIntyre, 06:22
- Re: What does it mean, Richard Tobin, 05:54
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, kkirtac, 05:41
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, Army1987, 05:40
- Re: private structure, Army1987, 05:25
- Re: What does it mean, Army1987, 05:22
- https and openssl, opexoc, 05:12
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, CBFalconer, 04:57
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Albert, 04:33
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Martin Wells, 04:24
- Re: private structure, CBFalconer, 04:18
- Re: What does it mean, Martin Wells, 04:16
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, CBFalconer, 04:13
- the AIM of LIFE, abdo911, 03:38
- the AIM of LIFE, abdo911, 03:36
- Re: private structure, Richard Heathfield, 03:32
- Re: What does it mean, Richard Heathfield, 03:31
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Flash Gordon, 03:27
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Flash Gordon, 03:22
- Re: What does it mean, mdler, 03:15
- Re: private structure, Joachim Schmitz, 03:13
- What does it mean, rsk, 02:57
- private structure, shantibhushan.sale@xxxxxxxxx, 02:54
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Richard Bos, 02:52
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Bos, 02:42
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Bos, 02:31
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Richard Bos, 02:20
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard Heathfield, 01:51
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Karl Heinze, 01:36
- heathfield, Wade Ward, 01:29
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, pete, 00:22
September 23, 2007
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Jack Klein, 22:44
- Re: array declarators, Jack Klein, 22:42
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, Pierre Asselin, 22:34
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, r6144, 21:39
- Re: array declarators, borophyll, 20:34
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, Barry Schwarz, 20:19
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Keith Thompson, 19:55
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Albert, 19:55
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Doug, 19:53
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, Old Wolf, 19:44
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Keith Thompson, 19:43
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Kenny McCormack, 19:31
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Doug, 19:24
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, RezaRob, 19:22
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Charles Richmond, 19:20
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:12
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Ben Bacarisse, 19:12
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Martin Ambuhl, 18:59
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, pete, 18:55
- Re: ~ operator returns signed value, pete, 18:47
- ~ operator returns signed value, RezaRob, 18:34
- Re: strftime() behaviour, David Thompson, 18:01
- Re: Problem with atoi(), David Thompson, 18:01
- Re: need assingment to teach, David Thompson, 18:01
- Re: A challenging file to parse, David Thompson, 18:01
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Ben Bacarisse, 18:00
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Malcolm McLean, 17:58
- Re: Open source project on C++ to compare XML as ExamXML., Flash Gordon, 17:23
- FAST CASH $6 PAYPAL as seen on OPRAH, dsilvab13, 17:20
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Ben Bacarisse, 17:18
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Flash Gordon, 17:17
- Re: A plan for Jacob, J. J. Farrell, 17:09
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 16:53
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Kenny McCormack, 16:36
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 16:32
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 16:19
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, Chris Torek, 16:09
- Open source project on C++ to compare XML as ExamXML., alapick, 15:58
- Re: why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Richard Tobin, 15:47
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 15:44
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 15:32
- Re: Ode to Keith, Patrick Karl, 15:31
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 15:28
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 15:26
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 15:25
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Willem, 15:10
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Peter J. Holzer, 15:06
- Re: Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), jacob navia, 14:43
- Re: A plan for Jacob, John Smith, 14:38
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, jacob navia, 14:30
- Re: Memory allocation problem, TBass, 14:13
- Amount of bits needed (as a compile time constant), Martin Wells, 14:09
- Re: new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, Malcolm McLean, 14:08
- Re: Memory allocation problem, Eric Sosman, 14:01
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity, Ben Bacarisse, 13:58
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Chris Torek, 13:54
- Re: Memory allocation problem, TBass, 13:38
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Eric Sosman, 13:37
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Malcolm McLean, 13:35
- Free C++ books!, akira, 13:29
- Re: Memory allocation problem, TBass, 13:24
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Malcolm McLean, 13:22
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, jacob navia, 13:21
- Re: Memory allocation problem, Richard Tobin, 13:11
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard Tobin, 13:04
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Flash Gordon, 13:02
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 13:01
- Re: Memory allocation problem, Eric Sosman, 12:59
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 12:58
- Re: Memory allocation problem, TBass, 12:55
- Turn 12 dollars into thousands, Sam, 12:49
- Re: Memory allocation problem, Ben Pfaff, 12:47
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, sped . vind, 12:40
- Memory allocation problem, TBass, 12:32
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Tor Rustad, 12:18
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, stephenwvickers, 12:04
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Tor Rustad, 12:01
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Tor Rustad, 11:48
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 11:40
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 11:31
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 11:30
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Keith Thompson, 11:14
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, JohnF, 11:09
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Keith Thompson, 11:07
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, CBFalconer, 11:03
- Re: why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, CBFalconer, 10:54
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Kenny McCormack, 09:48
- Re: how can I return nothing?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 09:45
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 09:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 09:30
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, pete, 09:25
- [ot]Re: A plan for Jacob, pete, 09:21
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Army1987, 08:58
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Peter J. Holzer, 08:54
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Charlie Gordon, 08:37
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 08:25
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, jacob navia, 08:25
- Re: Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, borophyll, 08:19
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Richard, 08:05
- Re: A plan for Jacob, borophyll, 08:05
- Re: array declarators, $)CHarald van D)&k, 07:51
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Friedrich Dominicus, 07:47
- Using C99 "restrict" with newly allocated and initialized arrays/structures, rainy6144, 07:45
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Doug, 07:43
- Re: A plan for Jacob, Ian Collins, 07:36
- new programs for Window, WEB, and for good RAD - Rapid Application Development,, ola@xxxxxxx, 07:34
- A plan for Jacob, Everyman, 07:20
- Re: array declarators, borophyll, 07:14
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Flash Gordon, 07:12
- array declarators, borophyll, 07:10
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 06:57
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 06:48
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, Ian Collins, 06:47
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 06:44
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, kkirtac, 06:40
- Re: Check this Out!!!, Army1987, 06:39
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, Ian Collins, 06:33
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Wade Ward, 06:32
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Willem, 06:29
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, kkirtac, 06:24
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Peter J. Holzer, 06:23
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Peter J. Holzer, 06:22
- Re: Linked List Library, Roland Pibinger, 06:20
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Army1987, 06:08
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Roland Pibinger, 06:08
- Re: why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, Army1987, 05:51
- Re: Problem on using a casted void pointer, borophyll, 05:50
- Re: Error compiling file using lcc compiler, jacob navia, 05:42
- Error compiling file using lcc compiler, Albert, 05:22
- Problem on using a casted void pointer, kkirtac, 05:14
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), jacob navia, 04:21
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, jacob navia, 04:12
- Re: Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, Joachim Schmitz, 03:59
- Re: why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, Keith Thompson, 03:45
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Richard Heathfield, 03:39
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Malcolm McLean, 03:36
- Re: why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, Walter Roberson, 03:34
- Re: Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, Malcolm McLean, 03:29
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Malcolm McLean, 03:22
- why is the backslash-space combo a escape sequence 040, vlsidesign, 03:05
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., pete, 02:57
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 02:34
- Finding and Replacing Substrings In A String, DarthBob88, 02:22
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., hotadvice, 02:18
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Ben Pfaff, 02:15
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Chris Torek, 01:53
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 01:16
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Ben Pfaff, 00:46
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Keith Thompson, 00:28
- Re: the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Ian Collins, 00:27
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 00:21
- the gotoxy(int x, int y) function, Albert, 00:10
September 22, 2007
- Re: Linked List Library, pete, 23:54
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 22:16
- Re: Introduction to C language, spidertiger@xxxxxxxxx, 20:36
- Re: Introduction to C language, Barry Schwarz, 19:51
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), jacob navia, 19:32
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Ben Bacarisse, 19:31
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Ben Bacarisse, 19:29
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Everyman, 19:18
- Re: alignment using malloc, christian.bau, 18:43
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, stephenwvickers, 18:40
- Re: Boolean data type?, Roberto Waltman, 18:39
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Malcolm McLean, 18:10
- Re: Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: Introduction to C language, Keith Thompson, 18:02
- Re: Introduction to C language, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Mark McIntyre, 17:52
- Re: Boolean data type?, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- Re: Boolean data type?, Keith Thompson, 17:26
- Re: on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), jacob navia, 17:23
- on buffer overflows and insecurity (was returning error from main()), Chris Torek, 16:46
- Re: Introduction to C language, Jack Klein, 15:56
- Re: Check this Out!!!, Jack Klein, 15:53
- Re: Introduction to C language, Vivek, 15:11
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Malcolm McLean, 14:41
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 14:14
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., hotadvice, 14:13
- Re: Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, Ben Bacarisse, 13:46
- Re: Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, Joachim Schmitz, 13:41
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Peter J. Holzer, 13:35
- Re: Ode to Keith, Malcolm McLean, 13:19
- Re: Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, Malcolm McLean, 13:18
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Malcolm McLean, 13:07
- Unknown Storage Size Error for union semun, kvnsmnsn, 12:50
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 12:49
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., hotadvice, 12:33
- Re: returning error from main(), Ben Bacarisse, 12:03
- Introduction to C language, piyush, 12:02
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Joe Wright, 11:11
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Tor Rustad, 10:50
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Ben Bacarisse, 10:36
- Re: returning error from main(), Malcolm McLean, 10:29
- Re: Handy hint, length of string scanfed., pete, 10:18
- Re: Boolean data type?, Roberto Waltman, 10:09
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 09:02
- Re: Build a new system, borophyll, 08:49
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Michal Nazarewicz, 08:28
- Handy hint, length of string scanfed., Malcolm McLean, 08:15
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Tobin, 07:55
- Re: Boolean data type?, pete, 07:26
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, pete, 07:14
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, jacob navia, 06:56
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Heathfield, 06:42
- Re: Struct size, Army1987, 06:36
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Tobin, 06:35
- Re: X11 trouble, Malcolm McLean, 06:30
- Check this Out!!!, aslamhenry, 06:30
- Re: Logical XOR, Malcolm McLean, 06:26
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Tor Rustad, 06:23
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Malcolm McLean, 06:22
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Heathfield, 06:21
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Army1987, 06:19
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Tobin, 06:18
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Richard Tobin, 06:13
- Re: Boolean data type?, Army1987, 06:11
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Army1987, 06:07
- Re: Boolean data type?, Malcolm McLean, 06:07
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Tor Rustad, 05:58
- Re: Build a new system, Joachim Schmitz, 05:54
- Re: Build a new system, Malcolm McLean, 05:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 04:34
- Build a new system, my love ++, 04:32
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Casper H . S . Dik, 04:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Torek, 04:11
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 03:57
- Re: facing problem during compilation, jaysome, 03:54
- Re: Boolean data type?, Peter J. Holzer, 03:06
- Re: Ode to Keith, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 02:39
- Re: looking at parsing procedures, Wade Ward, 02:35
- Re: do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., Ian Collins, 01:59
- Re: looking at parsing procedures, Keith Thompson, 01:32
- Re: looking at parsing procedures, Wade Ward, 01:31
- do structure definitions go in data area or in code area..., hotadvice, 01:16
September 21, 2007
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 23:44
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Dik T. Winter, 23:04
- Re: Boolean data type?, Ark Khasin, 22:32
- Worldwide Precious Gem Stone Development, Goteborgbank, 22:19
- Re: X11 trouble, Jack Klein, 22:11
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Dik T. Winter, 22:03
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Keith Thompson, 22:03
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Dik T. Winter, 22:00
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:00
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Heathfield, 21:47
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Dik T. Winter, 21:45
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Dik T. Winter, 21:43
- Re: Boolean data type?, CBFalconer, 21:43
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Dik T. Winter, 21:39
- Re: Boolean data type?, Martin Ambuhl, 21:06
- Re: Boolean data type?, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Keith Thompson, 20:46
- Re: facing problem during compilation, CBFalconer, 20:41
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, user923005, 20:11
- Re: Boolean data type?, user923005, 20:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 19:56
- Re: Boolean data type?, Ian Collins, 19:53
- Re: facing problem during compilation, jacob navia, 19:42
- Re: Boolean data type?, pete, 19:36
- Boolean data type?, Martin Wells, 19:22
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Keith Thompson, 19:22
- Re: Logical XOR, Martin Wells, 19:16
- Re: Logical XOR, Michal Nazarewicz, 19:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 19:00
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Keith Thompson, 18:54
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, pete, 18:50
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, JohnF, 18:50
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
- [ot]Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, pete, 18:38
- Re: Logical XOR, Martin Wells, 18:37
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 18:36
- Re: Request for help, Mark McIntyre, 18:32
- Re: Logical XOR, pete, 18:30
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Ian Collins, 18:17
- Re: facing problem during compilation, jacob navia, 18:17
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, pete, 18:14
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Tor Rustad, 18:10
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 17:49
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: Logical XOR, CBFalconer, 16:52
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Richard Tobin, 16:43
- Re: qsort semantics, Tor Rustad, 16:41
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Richard Tobin, 16:39
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Richard Tobin, 16:26
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Tor Rustad, 16:26
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Army1987, 16:12
- Re: facing problem during compilation, jacob navia, 16:10
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, Army1987, 16:00
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Tor Rustad, 15:53
- Re: Logical XOR, Army1987, 15:51
- Re: about shifting, Tor Rustad, 15:51
- Re: Logical XOR, Tor Rustad, 15:49
- Re: Logical XOR, Keith Thompson, 15:39
- Re: EOF, Peter J. Holzer, 15:38
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, Army1987, 15:37
- Re: Logical XOR, Michal Nazarewicz, 15:17
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, CBFalconer, 15:17
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: facing problem during compilation, CBFalconer, 15:08
- Re: Logical XOR, Martin Wells, 15:03
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, CBFalconer, 15:01
- Re: Logical XOR, fred . l . kleinschmidt, 14:53
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Keith Thompson, 14:46
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, CBFalconer, 14:45
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Keith Thompson, 14:41
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Keith Thompson, 14:38
- Re: Logical XOR, Martin Wells, 14:30
- Logical XOR, Martin Wells, 14:28
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Keith Thompson, 14:27
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, iRo, 14:02
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Flash Gordon, 13:55
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, Keith Thompson, 13:54
- Re: sizeof and VLAs (was Re: Another sizeof question), Keith Thompson, 13:46
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Ralf Damaschke, 13:45
- Re: Another sizeof question, Keith Thompson, 13:20
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Default User, 13:20
- Re: pass pointer by reference, André Gillibert, 13:16
- Re: Nit-pick non-UB (was Re: about shifting), Ben Bacarisse, 12:43
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 12:36
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Walter Roberson, 12:28
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 12:25
- Re: redirect system() stdout to buffer, Walter Roberson, 12:22
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Al Balmer, 12:11
- Re: [OT] Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), Al Balmer, 12:03
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ben Bacarisse, 12:00
- redirect system() stdout to buffer, JohnF, 12:00
- Re: EOF, Peter J. Holzer, 11:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:06
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, Mark Bluemel, 11:00
- sizeof and VLAs (was Re: Another sizeof question), Kenneth Brody, 10:59
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Peter J. Holzer, 10:59
- Re: Another sizeof question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:57
- Re: Another sizeof question, Ben Bacarisse, 10:54
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Michal Nazarewicz, 10:38
- Re: pass by value, Kenneth Brody, 10:31
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 10:21
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, Ben Pfaff, 10:13
- Re: X11 trouble, Kenny McCormack, 10:10
- Re: Struct size, Army1987, 10:04
- X11 trouble, fj, 09:49
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 09:47
- Re: X11 trouble, Richard Tobin, 09:45
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 09:40
- Re: comparison between signed and unsigned int, Tim Prince, 09:33
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Army1987, 09:22
- Re: Linked List Library, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:16
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Mark Bluemel, 09:16
- comparison between signed and unsigned int, compcreator, 09:16
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Martien verbruggen, 09:12
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Army1987, 09:12
- Re: Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, CBFalconer, 09:05
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, CBFalconer, 09:01
- Re: facing problem during compilation, Joachim Schmitz, 08:54
- facing problem during compilation, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:50
- Re: facing problem during compilation, jacob navia, 08:47
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Thad Smith, 08:40
- Any search pattern method recommed for mmap memory, Owen Zhang, 08:26
- Re: qsort semantics, Barry Schwarz, 07:53
- Re: Nit-pick non-UB (was Re: about shifting), Army1987, 07:26
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, Army1987, 07:11
- Re: Linked List Library, pete, 06:55
- Re: Linked List Library, Duncan Muirhead, 06:47
- Re: Random-numbers...?, LPoD, 05:28
- Re: Random-numbers...?, Mark Bluemel, 05:00
- Random-numbers...?, Koppe74, 04:56
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 04:06
- Re: Request for help, Flash Gordon, 03:55
- Re: Struct size, Flash Gordon, 03:42
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Flash Gordon, 03:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 03:12
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Bos, 02:58
- Re: Ode to Keith, Wade Ward, 01:19
- Parsing?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 01:15
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, CBFalconer, 01:01
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 01:00
- Re: Ode to Keith, Wade Ward, 00:51
- Re: qsort semantics, gauss010, 00:39
- Re: Linked List Library, Ian Collins, 00:37
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 00:33
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 00:28
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, Ark Khasin, 00:22
- Re: Struct size, Ben Pfaff, 00:09
September 20, 2007
- Re: Linked List Library, Ben Pfaff, 23:49
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 23:44
- Re: Struct size, Thad Smith, 23:39
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 23:36
- Re: qsort semantics, Barry Schwarz, 23:27
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, mike3, 23:22
- Re: Linked List Library, Ben Pfaff, 23:22
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, mike3, 23:22
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, Ben Pfaff, 23:14
- Re: Is there a better way to do this?, Ark Khasin, 23:10
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Thad Smith, 23:09
- Re: Confused at newline requirement for printf, Eric Sosman, 23:07
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 23:05
- Re: complex pointer declaration, John Bode, 23:04
- Re: Linked List Library, TBass, 23:02
- Re: about shifting, Ark Khasin, 23:00
- Re: Linked List Library, Ben Pfaff, 22:34
- Is there a better way to do this?, mike3, 22:34
- Confused at newline requirement for printf, linq936, 22:22
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Michal Nazarewicz, 22:21
- Re: qsort semantics, user923005, 22:10
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Jack Klein, 22:09
- Re: Linked List Library, user923005, 21:58
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Old Wolf, 21:44
- Linked List Library, TBass, 21:33
- Re: Request for help, user923005, 21:26
- Re: Struct size, Eric Sosman, 21:20
- Re: qsort semantics, pete, 21:15
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Charlie Gordon, 21:10
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Harter, 21:09
- Re: about shifting, Charlie Gordon, 21:05
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Dik T. Winter, 20:59
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 20:54
- Re: [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Richard Heathfield, 20:52
- Re: qsort semantics, Barry Schwarz, 20:50
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Dik T. Winter, 20:48
- Re: about shifting, Ark Khasin, 20:42
- Re: [OT] Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), Barry Schwarz, 20:41
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, pete, 20:40
- Re: Struct size, Eric Sosman, 20:38
- Re: alignment using malloc, Barry Schwarz, 20:37
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Keith Thompson, 20:37
- Re: Request for help, Keith Thompson, 20:33
- Re: Another sizeof question, Keith Thompson, 20:24
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 20:22
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, pete, 20:15
- [OT] Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Army1987, 19:54
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 19:52
- Re: Scope question, Army1987, 19:46
- Re: Request for help, Mark McIntyre, 19:43
- Re: qsort semantics, Army1987, 19:40
- Re: Request for help, Al Balmer, 19:37
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 19:37
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Army1987, 19:36
- Re: Request for help, Mark McIntyre, 19:35
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Mark McIntyre, 19:34
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 19:32
- Re: Struct size, Charlie Gordon, 19:31
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 19:29
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 19:26
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 19:24
- Re: returning error from main(), Mark McIntyre, 19:21
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 19:20
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
- Re: Struct size, jacob navia, 19:11
- Re: Request for help: Problem solved, jacob navia, 19:09
- Re: Request for help, A . N . Other, 19:06
- Re: Request for help, Walter Roberson, 19:03
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Old Wolf, 19:02
- Re: Request for help, Richard Tobin, 19:01
- Re: Nit-pick non-UB (was Re: about shifting), Charlie Gordon, 18:58
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 18:57
- Re: Request for help, Francine . Neary, 18:55
- Re: Struct size, Richard Tobin, 18:52
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 18:48
- Re: Request for help, CBFalconer, 18:46
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 18:45
- Re: Struct size, Richard Tobin, 18:41
- Re: Request for help, A . N . Other, 18:41
- Re: Struct size, Charlie Gordon, 18:40
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, CBFalconer, 18:35
- Re: Request for help, Richard Tobin, 18:35
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 18:32
- Re: Struct size, CBFalconer, 18:26
- Re: Request for help, jacob navia, 18:25
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 18:24
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 18:21
- Re: Request for help, A . N . Other, 18:11
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 17:45
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, aslamhenry, 17:31
- Re: Struct size, user923005, 17:17
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Alf P. Steinbach, 17:14
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, John Bode, 16:47
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Willem, 16:44
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Michal Nazarewicz, 16:35
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Flash Gordon, 16:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 16:28
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Bo Persson, 16:27
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 16:24
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Alf P. Steinbach, 16:23
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Richard Tobin, 16:18
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 16:14
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Keith Thompson, 16:09
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, John Bode, 16:06
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, $)CHarald van D)&k, 16:06
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 16:03
- Re: Struct size, Richard Tobin, 16:00
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Richard Heathfield, 15:46
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Peter J. Holzer, 15:45
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 15:44
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Keith Thompson, 15:39
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Clever Monkey, 15:37
- Re: Struct size, user923005, 15:35
- c tips, jim, 15:31
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Keith Thompson, 15:23
- Re: Struct size, user923005, 15:21
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Peter J. Holzer, 15:19
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, user923005, 15:18
- Re: Nit-pick non-UB (was Re: about shifting), user923005, 15:15
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Keith Thompson, 15:12
- Re: qsort semantics, user923005, 15:02
- Re: lint warning, user923005, 14:55
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 14:36
- Re: pass by value, Richard Heathfield, 14:33
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 14:29
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Harald van D)&k, 14:28
- Re: Another sizeof question, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:16
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Flash Gordon, 14:06
- Re: about shifting, CBFalconer, 13:48
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Flash Gordon, 13:35
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Clever Monkey, 10:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 10:23
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, John Bode, 10:16
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Eberhard Schefold, 09:59
- Re: String concatenation, Charlie Gordon, 09:52
- Re: EOF, CBFalconer, 09:51
- Re: about shifting, Pietro Cerutti, 09:45
- Re: returning error from main(), CBFalconer, 09:42
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, CBFalconer, 09:39
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 09:28
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 09:25
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Army1987, 09:09
- Re: Scope question, Army1987, 09:07
- Re: Scope question, Army1987, 09:04
- Re: [OT] Re: Ode to Keith, Philip Potter, 08:57
- Re: about shifting, Charlie Gordon, 08:51
- [OT] Re: Ode to Keith, Army1987, 08:47
- Re: qsort semantics, Army1987, 08:46
- Re: about shifting, Richard Bos, 08:32
- Re: Alignment puzzle, Lew Pitcher, 08:27
- Re: Scope question, Richard, 08:21
- Re: Struct size, Army1987, 08:17
- Re: Alignment puzzle, JFG, 08:13
- Re: Struct size, Army1987, 08:10
- Re: about shifting, Pietro Cerutti, 08:10
- about shifting, lak, 08:01
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Martien verbruggen, 07:57
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Army1987, 07:48
- Re: Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Chris Hills, 07:46
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Richard Heathfield, 07:44
- Re: Scope question, Richard Heathfield, 07:38
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Army1987, 07:34
- Suggest microcontroller and compiler, Martin Wells, 07:32
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Mark Bluemel, 07:24
- Re: Scope question, Philip Potter, 07:20
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Philip Potter, 07:18
- Re: Scope question, jacob navia, 07:17
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, Army1987, 07:10
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: Scope question, polas, 07:03
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Army1987, 06:57
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Bos, 06:45
- Re: returning error from main(), Richard Bos, 06:39
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Dik T. Winter, 06:36
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Bos, 06:29
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Ralf Damaschke, 06:28
- Re: The canonical clc malloc idiom, Duncan Muirhead, 06:00
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 05:57
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard Tobin, 05:49
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, MAx, 05:41
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Coos Haak, 05:38
- Re: EOF, Coos Haak, 05:31
- Re: Scope question, Richard Heathfield, 05:21
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 05:21
- Scope question, polas, 05:16
- Re: Scope question, jacob navia, 05:15
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx>, Joachim Schmitz, 05:14
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 05:11
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Mark Bluemel, 04:51
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, MAx, 04:49
- Re: Struct size, Joachim Schmitz, 04:46
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Charlie Gordon, 04:28
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Every Man, 04:27
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Mark Bluemel, 04:10
- Re: returning error from main(), Keith Thompson, 04:08
- Re: Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, Ian Collins, 04:00
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Keith Thompson, 03:57
- Re: complex pointer declaration, Mark Bluemel, 03:56
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: EOF, Charlie Gordon, 03:33
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Chris Torek, 03:30
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jaysome, 03:28
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Keith Thompson, 03:19
- qsort semantics, gauss010, 03:09
- Re: returning error from main(), jacob navia, 03:04
- Difference between a MACRO and a FUNCTION, MAx, 03:04
- Re: Struct size, jaysome, 02:44
- Re: sob..Someone can help me????plsss, aslamhenry, 02:41
- sob..Someone can help me????plsss, aslamhenry, 02:39
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Charlie Gordon, 02:29
- Re: returning error from main(), Flash Gordon, 02:26
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Flash Gordon, 02:14
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx>, Charlie Gordon, 02:08
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Flash Gordon, 02:07
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Charlie Gordon, 02:03
- Re: how can I return nothing?, jaysome, 01:59
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 01:48
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, jaysome, 01:43
- Re: Question on device driver ?, jacob navia, 01:35
- Re: lint warning, jaysome, 01:35
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 01:30
- Re: returning error from main(), jacob navia, 01:12
- Income for life, gdi . promote, 00:59
- Re: Struct size, CBFalconer, 00:40
- Re: [OT] Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), CBFalconer, 00:30
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 00:26
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, CBFalconer, 00:20
- The canonical clc malloc idiom, Keith Thompson, 00:20
September 19, 2007
- Re: how can I return nothing?, C. Benson Manica, 23:58
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Keith Thompson, 23:52
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Barry Schwarz, 23:47
- Re: Struct size, C. Benson Manica, 23:46
- Re: [OT] Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), Keith Thompson, 23:46
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 23:44
- Re: Struct size, Keith Thompson, 23:42
- Re: Struct size, Keith Thompson, 23:34
- Re: Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), C. Benson Manica, 23:32
- Re: complex pointer declaration, CBFalconer, 23:31
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: About tree -- some code in C Primer - I don't understand, xianwei, 23:13
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 23:12
- Re: EOF, Keith Thompson, 23:06
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 23:02
- Re: Struct size, Eric Sosman, 22:56
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Keith Thompson, 22:54
- Re: Ode to Keith, santosh, 22:50
- Re: Question on device driver ?, CBFalconer, 22:48
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 22:43
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 22:38
- Re: alignment using malloc, Jack Klein, 22:36
- Re: alignment using malloc, Richard, 22:28
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Alexei A. Frounze, 22:28
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 22:25
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 22:22
- [OT] Legal statements / disclaimers in signatures. (Was: Struct size), Roberto Waltman, 22:18
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, U, 22:18
- Re: Struct size, Richard, 22:16
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, CBFalconer, 22:09
- alignment using malloc, digz, 22:08
- Re: Struct size, Eric Sosman, 21:49
- Re: EOF, Richard Heathfield, 21:31
- Re: Struct size, Richard Heathfield, 21:28
- Re: Struct size, Richard, 21:26
- Re: Struct size, C. Benson Manica, 21:19
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Richard Heathfield, 21:18
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 21:10
- Re: pass by value, Barry Schwarz, 21:00
- Re: Struct size, Ian Collins, 20:47
- Struct size, Jeff P. Syverson, 20:44
- Alignment puzzle, JFG, 20:16
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Old Wolf, 19:48
- Re: EOF, Ben Pfaff, 19:43
- Re: EOF, Keith Thompson, 19:42
- Re: EOF, Martin Ambuhl, 19:39
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, pete, 19:34
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Michal Nazarewicz, 19:31
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 19:25
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Old Wolf, 19:16
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Old Wolf, 19:13
- Re: pass by value, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 19:07
- Re: Another sizeof question, Richard Tobin, 19:06
- Re: lint warning, Army1987, 19:02
- Re: EOF, bluey, 18:56
- Re: how can I return nothing?, 7atim.Ld@xxxxxxxxx, 18:53
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Keith Thompson, 18:53
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Mark McIntyre, 18:51
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 18:50
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Mark McIntyre, 18:50
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 18:50
- Re: complex pointer declaration, Keith Thompson, 18:46
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Flash Gordon, 18:43
- Re: returning error from main(), Army1987, 18:40
- Re: complex pointer declaration, Keith Thompson, 18:40
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Tor Rustad, 18:37
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Flash Gordon, 18:37
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, Tor Rustad, 18:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Malcolm McLean, 18:32
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 18:30
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: returning error from main(), Keith Thompson, 18:15
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Chris Torek, 18:09
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Tor Rustad, 17:57
- Re: Abstract Interpretation for C, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Rob Kendrick, 17:38
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Coos Haak, 17:17
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Malcolm McLean, 17:16
- Re: how can I return nothing?, jacob navia, 17:14
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 17:13
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 17:10
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: how can I return nothing?, user923005, 17:05
- Re: Another sizeof question, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Ben Pfaff, 16:56
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 16:55
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 16:54
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Army1987, 16:49
- Re: how can I return nothing?, jacob navia, 16:46
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 16:43
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 16:43
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Richard, 16:35
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 16:34
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 16:31
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Army1987, 16:29
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 16:28
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 16:25
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Keith Thompson, 16:24
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 16:24
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 16:21
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Rob Kendrick, 16:13
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 16:08
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 15:55
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 15:51
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 15:47
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Eric Sosman, 15:42
- Re: how can I return nothing?, user923005, 15:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Heathfield, 15:35
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Richard Heathfield, 15:30
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Keith Thompson, 15:06
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, ramu, 15:02
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Rob Kendrick, 14:47
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Richard, 14:37
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 14:35
- Re: how can I return nothing?, C. Benson Manica, 14:34
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Walter Roberson, 14:27
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, osmium, 14:24
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Walter Roberson, 14:22
- Re: EOF, Martin Ambuhl, 14:20
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:20
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Dale Ess, 14:19
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:17
- Re: how can I return nothing?, C. Benson Manica, 14:16
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Eric Sosman, 14:13
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Walter Roberson, 14:13
- Re: sizeof and VLAs (was Re: Another sizeof question), Richard Tobin, 14:12
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 14:08
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., blytkerchan, 14:04
- Re: Abstract Interpretation for C, Walter Roberson, 14:04
- Re: how can I return nothing?, Richard Tobin, 14:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Victor Bazarov, 14:03
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Eric Sosman, 14:03
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Tor Rustad, 13:57
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 13:56
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Kenneth Brody, 13:49
- Re: pass by value, Kenneth Brody, 13:42
- sizeof and VLAs (was Re: Another sizeof question), Kenneth Brody, 13:31
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard, 13:30
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Richard, 13:28
- Re: returning error from main(), Ben Bacarisse, 13:28
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard, 13:24
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 13:24
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Coos Haak, 13:18
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 13:10
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Coos Haak, 13:10
- how can I return nothing?, xicloid, 13:06
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 13:06
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Coos Haak, 13:03
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Willem, 13:01
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Default User, 13:00
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], jacob navia, 12:57
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 12:56
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Richard, 12:54
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, ramu, 12:53
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Harald van D)&k, 12:51
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, $)CHarald van D)&k, 12:49
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 12:38
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard, 12:35
- Re: lint warning, somenath, 12:32
- Re: GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, Richard, 12:31
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, osmium, 12:16
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Old Wolf, 12:16
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
- Re: problem with removing spaces in the string, Ralf Damaschke, 12:14
- Re: About tree -- some code in C Primer - I don't understand, Ben Bacarisse, 12:10
- Re: lint warning, user923005, 12:06
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, user923005, 12:04
- Re: lint warning, Tor Rustad, 12:00
- Re: Ode to Keith, user923005, 11:58
- problem with removing spaces in the string, ramu, 11:56
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Ben Bacarisse, 11:49
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Richard, 11:49
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 11:47
- Re: Ode to Keith, Clever Monkey, 11:36
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 11:36
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Eric Sosman, 11:28
- Re: Question on device driver ?, jacob navia, 11:24
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 11:22
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 11:21
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Ark Khasin, 11:16
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:46
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 10:44
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 10:32
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 10:17
- Re: complex pointer declaration, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:08
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 10:05
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Charlie Gordon, 09:59
- Re: complex pointer declaration, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:58
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 09:54
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, CBFalconer, 09:53
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 09:49
- Re: Another sizeof question, Charlie Gordon, 09:49
- Re: complex pointer declaration, Mark Bluemel, 09:45
- Re: EOF, CBFalconer, 09:43
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, CBFalconer, 09:35
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, CBFalconer, 09:33
- Re: complex pointer declaration, Richard Heathfield, 09:29
- complex pointer declaration, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:21
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 09:21
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 09:14
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Dmitriy Vyukov, 09:11
- About tree -- some code in C Primer - I don't understand, xianwei, 09:10
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Charlie Gordon, 09:07
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Markus Elfring, 09:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 08:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 08:54
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 08:48
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Tobin, 08:23
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, problem., 08:12
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Richard Bos, 08:03
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Bos, 08:01
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, jacob navia, 08:00
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Prayag Narula, 07:57
- Re: Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, Ivan Gotovchits, 07:56
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 07:49
- Hi guys~ i wonder that why this simple code error!!, problem., 07:45
- Re: Ode to Keith, Richard Bos, 07:44
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, Eric Sosman, 07:44
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, CBFalconer, 07:43
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Bos, 07:39
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx>, Richard Bos, 07:38
- Re: I don't find the keyword "volatile" in C99.............., CBFalconer, 07:35
- Re: GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 07:35
- Re: EOF, Mark Bluemel, 07:32
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Richard Tobin, 07:29
- Re: returning error from main(), Richard Tobin, 07:16
- EOF, lak, 07:15
- Re: EOF, Richard Tobin, 07:09
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 07:04
- Re: Another sizeof question, Richard Tobin, 07:03
- Re: pass by value, Barry Schwarz, 07:01
- Re: Initializing Union Structure, Army1987, 07:00
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], CBFalconer, 06:57
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Army1987, 06:54
- Re: Another sizeof question, Richard Tobin, 06:54
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard Bos, 06:49
- Re: pass by value, Richard Heathfield, 06:49
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 06:49
- Re: lint warning, Army1987, 06:42
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 06:36
- Re: Ode to Keith, Army1987, 06:31
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, Barry Schwarz, 06:27
- Re: returning error from main(), jacob navia, 06:25
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, Nick Keighley, 06:25
- Re: Another sizeof question, Army1987, 06:22
- Re: returning error from main(), Army1987, 06:18
- Re: Abstract Interpretation for C, Tim Frink, 06:17
- Re: returning error from main(), jacob navia, 06:07
- Re: I don't find the keyword "volatile" in C99.............., Barry Schwarz, 06:05
- Re: returning error from main(), Army1987, 05:58
- Re: Abstract Interpretation for C, Army1987, 05:51
- Re: pass by value, Army1987, 05:42
- pass by value, somenath, 05:36
- wholesale all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.com, zhushao888, 05:26
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:26
- wholesale all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.com, zhushao888, 05:26
- wholesale all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.com, zhushao888, 05:25
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:19
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:05
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:44
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Charlie Gordon, 04:39
- Re: Another sizeof question, christian.bau, 04:38
- Re: question related to passing variable number of arguments, jaysome, 04:35
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 04:23
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 04:23
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Ian Collins, 04:20
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 04:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:10
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Flash Gordon, 04:01
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Martin Ambuhl, 03:59
- Re: lint warning, jaysome, 03:59
- question related to passing variable number of arguments, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 03:55
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 03:55
- Re: Abstract Interpretation for C, jacob navia, 03:54
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Flash Gordon, 03:48
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Casper H . S . Dik, 03:44
- Re: returning error from main(), Keith Thompson, 03:38
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 03:32
- Abstract Interpretation for C, Tim Frink, 03:31
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 03:24
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Keith Thompson, 03:23
- Re: c,c++, Charlie Gordon, 03:10
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Keith Thompson, 03:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 03:03
- Re: GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, Richard Heathfield, 02:56
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx>, Wade Ward, 02:43
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 02:19
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, aslamhenry, 01:57
- Re: returning error from main(), Ben Pfaff, 00:41
- returning error from main(), junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 00:34
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., blytkerchan, 00:20
- Re: I don't find the keyword "volatile" in C99.............., Ian Collins, 00:02
September 18, 2007
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 23:57
- I don't find the keyword "volatile" in C99.............., lostlander, 23:37
- Re: Initializing Union Structure, Jack Klein, 22:47
- Re: C Preprocessor val##LL, Keith Thompson, 22:13
- Re: Another sizeof question, Keith Thompson, 22:09
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Keith Thompson, 22:06
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 22:04
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 21:54
- C Preprocessor val##LL, cybernerdsx2, 21:28
- SOFTWARE ENGINEER/ C/ UNIX/ CONTRACT/ MI, TOM GUGGER, 21:10
- Re: Ode to Keith, Keith Thompson, 21:08
- Re: Ode to Keith, C. Benson Manica, 20:49
- Re: GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ben Bacarisse, 20:47
- Re: lint warning, user923005, 20:27
- Another sizeof question, Richard Tobin, 20:16
- Re: Question on device driver ?, CBFalconer, 20:14
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard Tobin, 20:11
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, user923005, 19:59
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:57
- Re: Ode to Keith, user923005, 19:57
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, user923005, 19:52
- Re: A N Other anonymous coward, jacob navia, 19:47
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, CBFalconer, 19:34
- Re: GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, A N Other, 19:22
- Re: c,c++, Old Wolf, 19:21
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 19:19
- Re: Ode to Keith, Old Wolf, 19:15
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Old Wolf, 19:14
- Re: Ode to Keith, Old Wolf, 19:02
- Re: Ode to Keith, pete, 18:54
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 18:36
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 18:36
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 18:34
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, Walter Roberson, 18:34
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 18:32
- GCC Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 18:32
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 18:27
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, aslamhenry, 18:01
- Re: Ode to Keith, Richard Harter, 18:00
- buy any tthing from the web free without creditcards.. true .. simple .. legal, blade, 17:57
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rob Kendrick, 17:51
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 17:50
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:48
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:47
- Re: Ode to Keith, Richard Heathfield, 17:44
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 17:40
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Flash Gordon, 17:36
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rob Kendrick, 17:34
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 17:33
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 17:31
- Re: Ode to Keith, Army1987, 17:25
- Re: Rounding during division, CBFalconer, 17:10
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 17:09
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 17:09
- Re: Ode to Keith, John Bode, 17:04
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 16:59
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, CBFalconer, 16:57
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Junmin H., 16:35
- Re: Ode to Keith, C. Benson Manica, 16:35
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 16:33
- Re: static or non static, Szabolcs Nagy, 16:17
- Re: Ode to Keith, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:09
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:00
- Re: Ode to Keith, Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: Ode to Keith, Default User, 15:48
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Walter Roberson, 15:46
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Al Balmer, 15:44
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Kenny McCormack, 15:38
- Re: writing a code for both windows and linux, user923005, 15:35
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Default User, 15:26
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, William Ahern, 15:11
- Re: static or non static, Eric Sosman, 15:07
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, William Ahern, 15:04
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, John Smith, 14:36
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Peter J. Holzer, 14:15
- Re: static or non static, Szabolcs Nagy, 14:09
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Flash Gordon, 14:06
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 14:05
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 14:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 14:05
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 14:02
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Flash Gordon, 13:55
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Flash Gordon, 13:51
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Ivar Rosquist, 13:47
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, William Hughes, 13:34
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Michal Nazarewicz, 13:32
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Ben Bacarisse, 13:14
- Re: computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Eric Sosman, 13:10
- Re: Where is the value getting initialized in this case, Ben Bacarisse, 13:02
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:01
- computerworld.com: C Programming, one of The top 10 dead (or dying) computer skills, Junmin H., 12:59
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:59
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Santiago Urueña, 12:34
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Santiago Urueña, 12:26
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:56
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:21
- Re: writing a code for both windows and linux, keith, 11:19
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, Mark Bluemel, 11:07
- Re: HI can give suggesstion, Walter Roberson, 11:07
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, William Ahern, 11:06
- Re: writing a code for both windows and linux, Mark Bluemel, 11:05
- Re: writing a code for both windows and linux, Walter Roberson, 11:04
- HI can give suggesstion, aslamhenry, 10:59
- writing a code for both windows and linux, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 10:51
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Kenneth Brody, 10:43
- Re: Ode to Keith, Tak-Shing Chan, 10:31
- HI can give suggesstion, aslamhenry, 10:11
- Re: union find, Mark Bluemel, 09:48
- union find, carmelo, 09:35
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 09:34
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:30
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard Bos, 09:15
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Spiros Bousbouras, 08:46
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 08:34
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Rui Maciel, 08:34
- Re: lint warning, Chris Hills, 08:26
- Re: Ode to Keith, Chris Thomasson, 08:25
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 08:06
- Re: Rounding during division, Charlie Gordon, 08:03
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 08:02
- lint warning, somenath, 08:01
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 07:59
- Re: Coding style, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:53
- Re: Where is the value getting initalized in this case, Charlie Gordon, 07:50
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:40
- Re: Ode to Keith, Chris Thomasson, 07:39
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Charlie Gordon, 07:36
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, Charlie Gordon, 07:28
- Re: Coding style, Richard Heathfield, 07:23
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- Re: Rounding during division, Christopher Key, 07:14
- Re: Rounding during division, Christopher Key, 07:06
- Re: Ode to Keith, Richard Bos, 07:05
- Re: Coding style, Christopher Key, 07:02
- Re: Redundant statement in the Standard?, Richard Bos, 07:02
- Re: Coding style, Christopher Key, 06:59
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Charlie Gordon, 06:52
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Charlie Gordon, 06:48
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Charlie Gordon, 06:38
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, Erik Trulsson, 06:29
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Charlie Gordon, 06:27
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 06:27
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, Charlie Gordon, 06:22
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 06:12
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Charlie Gordon, 06:10
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 06:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Charlie Gordon, 06:05
- Ode to Keith, Wade Ward, 06:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Charlie Gordon, 06:00
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 05:53
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 05:38
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:32
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 05:20
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 04:27
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, anders, 04:20
- Re: problem of graphics., Keith Thompson, 04:15
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 04:12
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 04:08
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 03:52
- Re: problem of graphics., Flash Gordon, 03:44
- Re: Rounding during division, Charlie Gordon, 03:39
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Flash Gordon, 03:33
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 03:27
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Keith Thompson, 03:25
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Charlie Gordon, 03:24
- Re: problem of graphics., LPoD, 03:14
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Charlie Gordon, 03:05
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 02:34
- Redundant statement in the Standard?, Martin Wells, 02:32
- Re: Question about declaring const pointer to const value, Richard Bos, 02:27
- Re: c,c++, Charlie Gordon, 02:26
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Thomasson, 02:23
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 02:19
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Richard Bos, 02:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 02:08
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Martin Ambuhl, 02:04
- Re: Question about declaring const pointer to const value, CBFalconer, 01:58
- Re: C Array declaration with const, Ben Pfaff, 01:57
- Re: Initializing Union Structure, Martin Ambuhl, 01:56
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 01:50
- problem of graphics., vicky, 01:43
- Re: C Array declaration with const, Olaf, 01:32
- Re: Where is the value getting initalized in this case, CBFalconer, 01:23
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 01:09
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 00:58
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Thomasson, 00:52
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 00:50
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 00:47
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 00:47
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 00:40
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 00:27
- Question about declaring const pointer to const value, linq936, 00:24
- Re: Where is the value getting initialized in this case, Richard Heathfield, 00:14
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 00:04
September 17, 2007
- Re: Where is the value getting initialized in this case, Ben Bacarisse, 23:53
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Walter Roberson, 23:18
- Where is the value getting initialized in this case, Chad, 22:44
- Where is the value getting initalized in this case, Chad, 22:32
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 22:31
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 22:22
- Re: problem about C program design., Jack Klein, 21:21
- Re: C Array declaration with const, Jack Klein, 21:19
- Re: static or non static, Eric Sosman, 21:15
- [OT] Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Eric Sosman, 21:11
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 21:01
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, user923005, 20:47
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Walter Roberson, 20:31
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Ben Bacarisse, 20:27
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Ben Bacarisse, 20:15
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 20:08
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 20:01
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 19:56
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Joe Wright, 19:54
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, pete, 19:51
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, CBFalconer, 19:49
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Keith Thompson, 19:44
- Re: Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 19:41
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:36
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:35
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 19:31
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 19:27
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 19:21
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Santiago Urueña, 19:18
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Santiago Urueña, 19:06
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Gordon Burditt, 19:04
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, pete, 19:04
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, JimS, 18:57
- Re: How can I nest variadic functions?, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, Keith Thompson, 18:55
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, pete, 18:55
- Re: A Portable C Compiler, user923005, 18:52
- Re: static or non static, CBFalconer, 18:49
- Re: Returning a pointer to a constant string, Walter Roberson, 18:45
- Re: Nesting variadic functions, CBFalconer, 18:43
- Returning a pointer to a constant string, Santiago Urueña, 18:38
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, CBFalconer, 18:24
- Re: file of exact size, Army1987, 18:21
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Flash Gordon, 18:10
- Initializing Union Structure, benn686, 18:08
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, user923005, 18:00
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, user923005, 17:54
- A Portable C Compiler, jacob navia, 17:53
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 17:51
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, user923005, 17:45
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 17:45
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 17:42
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 17:38
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 17:24
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Re: Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, Tor Rustad, 17:09
- Re: file of exact size, user923005, 17:07
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tim Hagan, 17:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 17:02
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Mark McIntyre, 17:00
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 16:58
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 16:58
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 16:55
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: Rounding during division, Justin Spahr-Summers, 16:45
- Re: How can I nest variadic functions?, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Tor Rustad, 16:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 16:27
- Re: file of exact size, Tor Rustad, 16:18
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 16:15
- Re: file of exact size, Erik Trulsson, 16:12
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:58
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 15:57
- Re: is there any minor project that can be built using c language, user923005, 15:51
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., user923005, 15:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, user923005, 15:41
- Re: static or non static, Richard, 15:02
- Re: Coding style, harsha, 15:00
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 15:00
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:56
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: static or non static, Ben Pfaff, 14:37
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Flash Gordon, 14:35
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 14:32
- Re: Coding style, harsha, 14:23
- Re: c,c++, Flash Gordon, 14:19
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:18
- Re: static or non static, jacob navia, 14:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Flash Gordon, 13:59
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Hills, 13:55
- static or non static, Szabolcs Nagy, 13:54
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:06
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Szabolcs Nagy, 12:51
- Re: Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, Philip Potter, 12:47
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Walter Roberson, 12:19
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx>, Coos Haak, 12:15
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:10
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, James Antill, 12:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:02
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:40
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:25
- Re: Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, Ben Bacarisse, 11:13
- Re: Nesting variadic functions, Richard Tobin, 11:11
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Charlie Gordon, 11:00
- c programming video tutorials for network security, vivek.securitywizard@xxxxxxxxx, 10:58
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, Charlie Gordon, 10:49
- Re: c,c++, Charlie Gordon, 10:37
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, Ben Bacarisse, 10:35
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Andre Kostur, 10:24
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 10:22
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, John Bode, 09:52
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, Charlie Gordon, 09:43
- Re: Nesting variadic functions, Boltar, 09:11
- Re: c,c++, Army1987, 09:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Army1987, 09:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Army1987, 09:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 09:05
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:35
- Re: Nesting variadic functions, Richard Heathfield, 08:20
- Re: Coding style, Richard Heathfield, 08:09
- Nesting variadic functions, Boltar, 08:07
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer??, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:06
- How can I nest variadic functions?, Boltar, 08:05
- Make money to share your videos, joshihitesh2002, 07:52
- Make money to share your videos, joshihitesh2002, 07:49
- Coding style, Christopher Key, 07:48
- wholesale all laptops http://www.new-nikeshoes.com, zhushao888, 07:26
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 07:19
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, pete, 07:05
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx>, Willem, 06:47
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer??, Army1987, 06:43
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 06:39
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 06:38
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 06:26
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 06:13
- Re: file of exact size, Army1987, 06:11
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, CBFalconer, 06:05
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 05:54
- Re: file of exact size, Charlie Gordon, 05:41
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx>, Richard Bos, 05:39
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Willem, 05:31
- Buffer Overflow Tool <May be OT>, Sheth Raxit, 05:27
- Re: Rounding during division, Christopher Key, 05:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 05:15
- Re: C Array declaration with const, Richard Tobin, 05:12
- informatique, chocolat974, 05:09
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 05:07
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Tobin, 05:05
- problem about C program design., Readon Shaw, 05:03
- Re: Trying Something New To Experiment with, Army1987, 05:02
- C Array declaration with const, Olaf, 05:01
- Re: Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 04:57
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 04:53
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, Christopher Key, 04:46
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Default User, 04:43
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 04:37
- Atomically Thread-Safe Mostly Lock-Free Reference Counted Pointer For C..., Chris Thomasson, 04:26
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 04:19
- Trying Something New To Experiment with, joebenjamin, 04:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 04:14
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 03:52
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 03:50
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Ian Collins, 03:48
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 03:41
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 03:29
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Richard Bos, 02:38
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Richard Bos, 02:36
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 02:32
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 02:30
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Bos, 02:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 02:24
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Ian Collins, 01:28
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 00:36
- Re: file of exact size, Keith Thompson, 00:22
- Re: file of exact size, Chris Thomasson, 00:21
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 00:13
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 00:00
September 16, 2007
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Keith Thompson, 23:49
- Re: file of exact size, Richard Heathfield, 23:44
- Re: is there any minor project that can be built using c language, borophyll, 23:35
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 22:36
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 22:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 22:07
- Re: file of exact size, Tor Rustad, 22:05
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, LR, 21:38
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, LR, 21:36
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 21:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 21:14
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 21:09
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 21:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 20:41
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, LR, 20:40
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 20:39
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Sjouke Burry, 20:34
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, CBFalconer, 20:31
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, Pierre Asselin, 20:29
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 20:25
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 20:19
- Mangled article (was: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>), Peter J. Holzer, 20:19
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Pierre Asselin, 20:17
- is there any minor project that can be built using c language, piyushd . ganj, 20:17
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 20:15
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, pete, 19:55
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, rafaelc, 19:54
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Thad Smith, 19:52
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 19:45
- Re: Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, pete, 19:36
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Tobin, 19:35
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, jacob navia, 19:15
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Old Wolf, 19:14
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 19:09
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Thad Smith, 19:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 18:45
- Re: Question on device driver ?, CBFalconer, 18:43
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 18:38
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Eric Sosman, 18:31
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Mark McIntyre, 18:27
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Old Wolf, 18:26
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Is there any suggestion to rewrite these simple codes?, Junmin H., 18:20
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 18:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 18:18
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 18:17
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 18:14
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Old Wolf, 18:13
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Tobin, 18:06
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Mark McIntyre, 17:59
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, rafaelc, 17:59
- Re: Question on device driver ? [OT], Tor Rustad, 17:57
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Mark McIntyre, 17:55
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Mark McIntyre, 17:50
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 17:46
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, David Thompson, 17:45
- Re: writing into file using structures, David Thompson, 17:45
- Re: difference between date & time, David Thompson, 17:45
- Re: size_t problems, David Thompson, 17:45
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 17:40
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Erik Wikström, 17:39
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Mark McIntyre, 17:37
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, Mark McIntyre, 17:33
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 17:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 17:19
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, Ian Collins, 17:11
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 17:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard, 17:07
- Re: How to organise a composition analyzer??, Tor Rustad, 17:03
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard, 17:02
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Peter J. Holzer, 17:02
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, Ben Pfaff, 16:59
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 16:51
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 16:51
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 16:50
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard, 16:49
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Peter J. Holzer, 16:49
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 16:47
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 16:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:39
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, James Kanze, 16:37
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, gw7rib, 16:35
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Gordon Burditt, 16:19
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Walter Roberson, 16:18
- Re: Question on device driver ?, runner, 16:16
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, philbo30, 16:13
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, LR, 16:12
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Flash Gordon, 16:11
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Tor Rustad, 16:05
- Re: Question on device driver ?, gw7rib, 16:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Tor Rustad, 16:02
- Re: Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, gw7rib, 15:57
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 15:52
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Hills, 15:44
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 15:30
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Richard, 15:26
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 15:22
- Re: Question on device driver ?, P Shetty, 15:21
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard, 15:06
- Newbie quesiton: Mix C and C++, philbo30, 15:05
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Hills, 14:58
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Kenny McCormack, 14:51
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Kenny McCormack, 14:49
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob navia, 14:17
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Walter Roberson, 13:59
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 13:45
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jerry Coffin, 13:42
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joe Wright, 13:33
- Re: help. i dont know how to solve this loop program...using turbo c, osmium, 13:30
- Re: unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:23
- help. i dont know how to solve this loop program...using turbo c, mika_ella258, 13:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:54
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:46
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, werasm, 12:38
- Re: Question on device driver ?, Jack Klein, 12:24
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 12:20
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Richard, 12:09
- Re: file of exact size, Peter J. Holzer, 12:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard, 11:44
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Army1987, 11:25
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Army1987, 11:11
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, babuswift@xxxxxxxxx, 10:28
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 09:20
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 09:09
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 09:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 09:00
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 08:52
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Willem, 08:42
- Question on device driver ?, P Shetty, 08:21
- Re: file of exact size, JimS, 08:13
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Heathfield, 08:13
- Arts and entertainment, anishshrestha56, 08:12
- Make money to share your videos, earnclick, 07:41
- Re: file of exact size, Erik Trulsson, 07:22
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 07:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Flash Gordon, 07:12
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 07:11
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 07:07
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 07:04
- Re: file of exact size, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:04
- serigopseitgopseitgpositgopstipsoiopsridrophi, Sims, 06:58
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 06:53
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 06:53
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 06:43
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 06:42
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Harald van D)&k, 06:36
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Joachim Schmitz, 06:31
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 06:30
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 06:29
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 06:27
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 06:27
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Jim Langston, 06:27
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 06:26
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Harald van D)&k, 06:24
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 06:24
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 06:23
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Harald van D)&k, 06:21
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Hills, 06:13
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 06:13
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 06:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 06:10
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 06:03
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, $)CHarald van D)&k, 06:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Wade Ward, 06:00
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 06:00
- Re: code to verify a number is valid network mask, Willem, 05:59
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 05:48
- Re: file of exact size, Charlie Gordon, 05:47
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 05:41
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 05:37
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Joachim Schmitz, 05:34
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 05:23
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Peter J. Holzer, 05:08
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Keith Thompson, 04:43
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, Keith Thompson, 04:39
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 04:33
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Flash Gordon, 04:27
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 04:18
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Flash Gordon, 04:15
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:00
- How to organise a composition analyzer??, jyck91, 03:54
- Re: file of exact size, Keith Thompson, 03:44
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 03:38
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 03:27
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 02:46
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, pete, 01:41
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Gianni Mariani, 00:41
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Walter Roberson, 00:17
September 15, 2007
- Re: Won't work without useless declarations, William Hughes, 23:42
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Wade Ward, 23:26
- Won't work without useless declarations, Lars Eighner, 23:18
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 23:16
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 23:11
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Gianni Mariani, 22:50
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, CBFalconer, 22:45
- Re: file of exact size, Walter Roberson, 22:37
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 22:36
- code to verify a number is valid network mask, pacman2050, 22:35
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 22:25
- Re: unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, Ark Khasin, 22:09
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 22:02
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Ark Khasin, 21:50
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 21:49
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Phlip, 21:46
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Ark Khasin, 21:40
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 21:36
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Chris Thomasson, 21:14
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Coos Haak, 21:04
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Karl Heinze, 21:02
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Richard Tobin, 21:00
- Re: comparing two structures, Tor Rustad, 20:58
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., CBFalconer, 20:45
- Re: comparing two structures, Tor Rustad, 20:43
- Re: comparing two structures, Tor Rustad, 20:32
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Richard Tobin, 20:31
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Peter Nilsson, 20:28
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 20:09
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], $)CHarald van D)&k, 19:52
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Duane Hebert, 19:30
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob, 19:23
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, pete, 19:11
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 19:02
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Alf P. Steinbach, 18:59
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Tobin, 18:53
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, rafaelc, 18:50
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Mark McIntyre, 18:49
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Other , AN, 18:46
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, P.J. Plauger, 18:46
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Mark McIntyre, 18:46
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Richard Tobin, 18:45
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], rafaelc, 18:43
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Richard Tobin, 18:43
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Mark McIntyre, 18:42
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 18:38
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Mark McIntyre, 18:37
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], $)CHarald van D)&k, 18:29
- Re: file of exact size, Flash Gordon, 18:25
- Re: C/C++ guidelines, Ian Collins, 18:24
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Sam Harris, 18:21
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Martin Ambuhl, 18:19
- C/C++ guidelines, Robbie Marshall, 18:18
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Ian Collins, 18:16
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, christian.bau, 18:16
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 18:15
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Flash Gordon, 18:13
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], christian.bau, 18:04
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], $)CHarald van D)&k, 17:47
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Peter J. Holzer, 17:46
- Patent application, canadaimmigrationlaw, 17:45
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 17:41
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Duane Hebert, 17:38
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, jacob navia, 17:33
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob navia, 17:26
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Richard Heathfield, 17:25
- Re: Looking for excellent C example code book, pete, 17:23
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Walter Roberson, 17:22
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, pete, 17:19
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Harald van D)&k, 17:13
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Matt Brandt, 17:12
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Harald van D)&k, 17:09
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT) <dea950a7f449b494db5bd497f1306826@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1189433217.388017.39040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6880987.0f43t3U4RP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <_smdnZxud4s7jXvbnZ2dnUVZ8vydnZ2d@xxxxxx> <23329532.6p8ZhdKUJb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <lnk5qx544s.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <46e7a479$0$32072$426a74cc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <p18ge39g2r65ni4gve807jmnfprif1i9jl@xxxxxxx> <HuudnfYeHbZTvHXbnZ2dnUVZ8sXinZ2d@xxxxxx> <ntgge317f3aboe3s27r3ipdssqk0b083n2@xxxxxxx> <9KOdnXbdurd71HXbnZ2dnUVZ8qeknZ2d@xxxxxx>, Peter J. Holzer, 17:08
- Re: file of exact size, Peter J. Holzer, 17:05
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, $)CHarald van D)&k, 17:01
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 16:48
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Richard Tobin, 16:42
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Harald van D)&k, 16:42
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Richard Tobin, 16:39
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Richard Tobin, 16:34
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, rafaelc, 16:33
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Chris Torek, 16:28
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], rafaelc, 16:24
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 16:23
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Ian Collins, 16:22
- Re: file of exact size, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 16:19
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 16:10
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Flash Gordon, 16:05
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 15:52
- Re: file of exact size, Peter J. Holzer, 15:52
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 15:38
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Keith Thompson, 15:37
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joe Wright, 15:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Peter J. Holzer, 15:20
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: file of exact size, Walter Roberson, 15:16
- Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, Flash Gordon, 15:06
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 15:04
- Re: file of exact size, Walter Roberson, 14:40
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 14:35
- Re: file of exact size, Keith Thompson, 14:35
- Re: c,c++, Peter J. Holzer, 14:23
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Flash Gordon, 14:23
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:22
- Make money to share photos, ashishmundhara108, 14:15
- Re: file of exact size, Flash Gordon, 14:12
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 14:00
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 13:59
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:41
- Re: unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:34
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 13:26
- Re: file of exact size, Richard Heathfield, 13:18
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 13:15
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 13:13
- Re: file of exact size, Walter Roberson, 13:10
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 13:08
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 13:08
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 13:05
- Re: file of exact size, Charlie Gordon, 12:52
- Re: Parsing?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 12:49
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, CBFalconer, 12:46
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, CBFalconer, 12:44
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Charlie Gordon, 12:42
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, CBFalconer, 12:40
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 12:28
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 12:25
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 12:11
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 12:00
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 11:42
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 11:29
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Joachim Schmitz, 11:25
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 11:24
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, santosh, 11:22
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 11:11
- Re: susbtring function, santosh, 11:11
- Re: comparing two structures, CBFalconer, 11:08
- Re: x +1 > x, Richard Heathfield, 10:54
- Re: x +1 > x, Thomas Lumley, 10:46
- Re: file of exact size, Richard Heathfield, 10:32
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Ben Bacarisse, 10:23
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 10:00
- x +1 > x, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:41
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 09:40
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 09:34
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 09:32
- Make money to share your videos, ashishmundhara108, 09:31
- Re: susbtring function, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:31
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:23
- Make money to share your videos, ashishmundhara108, 09:23
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 09:23
- Re: file of exact size, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:22
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Francine . Neary, 09:07
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 09:07
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Francine . Neary, 09:06
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 09:02
- FRee E-Books, ralqaraleh@xxxxxxxxx, 08:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 08:49
- Re: [ot]Re: c,c++, Joachim Schmitz, 08:43
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 08:42
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Joachim Schmitz, 08:40
- Re: file of exact size, Charlie Gordon, 08:32
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 08:24
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Francine . Neary, 08:17
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 08:16
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Joachim Schmitz, 08:15
- Re: [ot]Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 08:09
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 08:08
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Rolf Magnus, 08:06
- Re: file of exact size, Charlie Gordon, 08:01
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Charlie Gordon, 07:57
- Re: susbtring function, Charlie Gordon, 07:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:28
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Ron AF Greve, 07:25
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 07:20
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob navia, 07:17
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 07:07
- Re: file of exact size, Erik Trulsson, 06:48
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Army1987, 06:32
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 06:21
- Re: Nested declarations, Army1987, 06:20
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 06:18
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 06:13
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Joachim Schmitz, 06:09
- Re: Parsing?, Malcolm McLean, 06:08
- Re: comparing two structures, pete, 06:06
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 05:56
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Martin Wells, 05:52
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, pete, 05:51
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Flash Gordon, 05:43
- Re: file of exact size, Flash Gordon, 05:41
- Re: [ot]Re: c,c++, Joachim Schmitz, 05:36
- Re: file of exact size, Wade Ward, 05:34
- Re: file of exact size, Richard Heathfield, 05:25
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Joachim Schmitz, 05:05
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, Michal Nazarewicz, 05:02
- Re: susbtring function, Michal Nazarewicz, 04:58
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Flash Gordon, 04:43
- Re: file of exact size, Flash Gordon, 04:39
- Re: pass by reference is valid?, Flash Gordon, 04:34
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], goacross, 04:33
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob navia, 04:21
- Make money to share photos, earnclick, 04:18
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 04:10
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Tor Rustad, 04:02
- Nested declarations, borophyll, 04:02
- pass by reference is valid?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 03:55
- Re: file of exact size, Michal Nazarewicz, 03:48
- Re: unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, Ark Khasin, 03:38
- file of exact size, Wade Ward, 03:32
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 02:55
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 02:52
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 02:51
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 02:35
- Re: comparing two structures, Tor Rustad, 02:28
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 02:26
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Richard Heathfield, 02:23
- Re: [ot]Re: c,c++, Richard Heathfield, 02:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 01:40
- Re: altering an av_list variable, Chris Torek, 00:50
- Re: need assingment to teach, Chris Torek, 00:02
September 14, 2007
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Jack Klein, 23:37
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Jack Klein, 23:25
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Jack Klein, 23:21
- Re: unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, Jack Klein, 23:19
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Chris Torek, 23:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 22:48
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Chris Torek, 22:38
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, $)CHarald van D)&k, 22:35
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 22:31
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 22:26
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 22:17
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 22:14
- Re: susbtring function, Keith Thompson, 22:07
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Charlie Gordon, 21:54
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Sam Harris, 21:46
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 21:42
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 21:41
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, Ian Collins, 21:41
- Re: susbtring function, Ian Collins, 21:39
- Re: Thread-safe file locking, CBFalconer, 21:38
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 21:38
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 21:28
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, CBFalconer, 21:19
- Thread-safe file locking, Matt Brandt, 21:13
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, CBFalconer, 21:13
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 21:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 21:05
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Martien verbruggen, 21:02
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., CBFalconer, 20:57
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., CBFalconer, 20:54
- Re: susbtring function, Charlie Gordon, 20:50
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, Keith Thompson, 20:46
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Charlie Gordon, 20:33
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 20:32
- Re: susbtring function, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Charlie Gordon, 20:26
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Army1987, 20:17
- Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, Justin Spahr-Summers, 20:17
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Army1987, 20:14
- Re: [ot]Re: c,c++, Keith Thompson, 20:04
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, pete, 19:59
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 19:50
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, christian.bau, 19:50
- problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 19:47
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Flash Gordon, 19:47
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 19:43
- Re: problem with sizeof in while loop reading a file, Richard Tobin, 19:41
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Keith Thompson, 19:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 19:41
- Re: susbtring function, CBFalconer, 19:40
- Downloading www.c-faq.com ?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 19:38
- Re: c,c++, Flash Gordon, 19:32
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Charlie Gordon, 19:31
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 19:26
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 19:25
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:20
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 19:19
- Re: Parsing?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 19:18
- Re: susbtring function, Ian Collins, 19:17
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 19:07
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 19:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:59
- Re: typedefing a struct, pete, 18:57
- susbtring function, HSeganfredo, 18:47
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 18:43
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, pete, 18:37
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, Charlie Gordon, 18:36
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 18:31
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 18:24
- Re: comparing two structures, CBFalconer, 18:21
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, pete, 18:20
- [ot]Re: c,c++, pete, 18:15
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 18:06
- Re: Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), Richard Tobin, 18:06
- Re: sizeof for extern struct, Ian Collins, 17:53
- Re: altering an av_list variable, Ian Collins, 17:49
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Ian Collins, 17:39
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Barry Schwarz, 17:38
- Re: creating multidimensional array at runtime and passing it as parameter to a function, Barry Schwarz, 17:30
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Keith Thompson, 17:29
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 17:26
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 17:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, lawrence . jones, 17:20
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Barry Schwarz, 17:18
- Re: Duration Conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 17:15
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Barry Schwarz, 17:14
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Barry Schwarz, 17:10
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Martin Wells, 17:07
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Martin Wells, 17:06
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], jacob navia, 17:00
- Re: altering an av_list variable, Kenny McCormack, 16:59
- Re: altering an av_list variable, Punkie, 16:53
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 16:49
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Richard Heathfield, 16:37
- Re: typedefing a struct, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: strftime() behaviour, Tor Rustad, 16:22
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: strftime() behaviour, Tor Rustad, 16:07
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: c,c++, Keith Thompson, 15:53
- Re: altering an av_list variable, Tor Rustad, 15:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 15:42
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, CBFalconer, 15:40
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], CBFalconer, 15:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, CBFalconer, 15:19
- Re: sizeof for extern struct, Ian Collins, 15:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, $)CHarald van D)&k, 15:13
- Re: sizeof for extern struct, Punkie, 15:11
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, CBFalconer, 15:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Harter, 15:05
- Re: comparing two structures, CBFalconer, 15:03
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., CBFalconer, 14:55
- strftime() behaviour, HSeganfredo, 14:45
- sizeof for extern struct, CptDondo, 14:41
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 14:33
- Re: comparing two structures, Tor Rustad, 14:32
- Re: security of static linking, Tor Rustad, 14:18
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, christian.bau, 14:18
- Re: comparing two structures, John Gordon, 14:15
- Re: application developement, Flash Gordon, 14:05
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], christian.bau, 14:01
- Re: typedefing a struct, Tor Rustad, 13:45
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Charlie Gordon, 13:45
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 13:44
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 13:42
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Punkie, 13:39
- altering an av_list variable, Punkie, 13:36
- c tutorial, jo, 13:35
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Charlie Gordon, 13:31
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Charlie Gordon, 13:25
- Re: creating multidimensional array at runtime and passing it as parameter to a function, Punkie, 13:22
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Charlie Gordon, 13:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 13:08
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 12:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 12:56
- Re: Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), mdh, 12:56
- Re: Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), mdh, 12:55
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 12:54
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Charlie Gordon, 12:54
- Re: dynamic array through sockets(network), Tor Rustad, 12:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 12:47
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 12:40
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 12:38
- Re: Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), Richard Heathfield, 12:38
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, Ben Pfaff, 12:33
- Re: strtok and strtok_r, jacob navia, 12:23
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Harald van D)&k, 12:23
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], jacob navia, 12:04
- Re: Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), Richard Tobin, 12:01
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Richard Tobin, 11:59
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Lafatus, 11:53
- strtok and strtok_r, siddhu, 11:50
- Etymology of subscript in C ( OT), mdh, 11:49
- Re: Eventual undefined behaviour, Ravi, 11:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:29
- Re: tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], Lew Pitcher, 11:25
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:17
- tryick use of sizeof again[Explaination Wanted], goacross, 11:16
- Re: opaque types without malloc?, Richard Tobin, 11:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 11:12
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 11:02
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 11:00
- Re: c,c++, Shadowman, 10:46
- Re: typedefing a struct, Charlie Gordon, 10:42
- Eventual undefined behaviour, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:34
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 10:29
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Joachim Schmitz, 10:25
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Richard Heathfield, 10:18
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, CBFalconer, 10:10
- Re: security of static linking, Thad Smith, 10:04
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, yeah, 10:01
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 10:00
- Re: comparing two structures, CBFalconer, 09:57
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Joachim Schmitz, 09:48
- Re: opaque types without malloc?, CBFalconer, 09:46
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Joachim Schmitz, 09:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 09:45
- Re: Duration Conversion, CBFalconer, 09:33
- rg, fireprabu, 09:25
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, yeah, 09:22
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Mark Bluemel, 09:19
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Chris Dollin, 09:07
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Chris Dollin, 09:05
- Re: implicit declaration of function???, Richard Heathfield, 09:04
- unable to compile and link application in Debug mode with library in Release mode, sujeet, 09:02
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Chris Dollin, 08:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 08:56
- implicit declaration of function???, yeah, 08:56
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, Richard Heathfield, 08:50
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Philip Potter, 08:44
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 08:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 08:22
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Francis Glassborow, 08:17
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Richard Heathfield, 07:48
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 07:35
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Richard Bos, 07:24
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 07:12
- Oracle Key Concepts - Make Sure You Know All!, takveen@xxxxxxxxx, 07:11
- Re: Duration Conversion, Richard Bos, 07:11
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Joachim Schmitz, 07:10
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Joachim Schmitz, 07:06
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Mark Bluemel, 06:59
- Re: Duration Conversion, Richard, 06:54
- Re: typedefing a struct, Richard, 06:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 06:50
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Army1987, 06:43
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Army1987, 06:35
- Re: typedefing a struct, Richard Heathfield, 06:35
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Friar Tuck, 06:32
- Re: minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, Richard Heathfield, 06:31
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Mark Bluemel, 06:31
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Friar Tuck, 06:28
- Re: typedefing a struct, Army1987, 06:28
- Re: Parsing?, Mark Bluemel, 06:28
- Re: Parsing?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 06:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 06:20
- Re: application developement, Richard Bos, 06:18
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Army1987, 06:16
- Re: Duration Conversion, Richard Bos, 06:16
- minimum and maximum values of an object of type int, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 06:15
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Bos, 06:13
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Bos, 06:12
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Army1987, 06:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 05:46
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 05:44
- Re: Parsing?, Nick Keighley, 05:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 05:41
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Charlie Gordon, 05:30
- Re: c,c++, Richard, 05:29
- Re: Duration Conversion, Richard, 05:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 05:18
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 05:07
- Re: comparing two structures, Richard Heathfield, 04:55
- Re: comparing two structures, Joachim Schmitz, 04:53
- Re: Duration Conversion, Charlie Gordon, 04:49
- comparing two structures, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:48
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:12
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 04:01
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 03:59
- Re: Print new line from String to file, meendar, 03:53
- Make money to share your videos, ashu, 03:50
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Joachim Schmitz, 03:44
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Chris Dollin, 03:41
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Mark Bluemel, 03:29
- security of static linking, Mohsen A. Momeni, 03:24
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 03:15
- Re: Print new line from String to file, jaysome, 03:14
- Re: Duration Conversion, Richard Bos, 03:11
- Re: c,c++, Richard Bos, 03:07
- Re: Duration Conversion, jaysome, 03:06
- Print new line from String to file, meendar, 02:44
- Print new line from String to file, meendar, 02:41
- Re: opaque types without malloc?, Richard Heathfield, 02:38
- Re: typedefing a struct, jaysome, 02:27
- opaque types without malloc?, Ark Khasin, 02:27
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Heathfield, 01:38
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, shaanxxx, 01:18
- Re: sizeof and character arrays?, Richard Heathfield, 00:18
September 13, 2007
- creating multidimensional array at runtime and passing it as parameter to a function, nitinm, 23:40
- Re: sizeof and character arrays?, CBFalconer, 23:34
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Harter, 23:31
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Golden California Girls, 23:24
- Re: Duration Conversion, CBFalconer, 23:24
- Re: application developement, user923005, 23:12
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 22:48
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Barry Schwarz, 22:38
- Re: typedefing a struct, Chris Thomasson, 22:30
- Re: Duration Conversion, Barry Schwarz, 22:25
- Re: typedefing a struct, Richard Heathfield, 21:53
- Re: typedefing a struct, Richard Heathfield, 21:52
- Re: typedefing a struct, Chris Thomasson, 21:47
- Re: typedefing a struct, Keith Thompson, 21:18
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:09
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Keith Thompson, 21:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Giorgos Keramidas, 21:03
- Re: typedefing a struct, Keith Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., Lafatus, 20:58
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 20:53
- Re: Sorry for the NOOB question.., user923005, 20:50
- Re: need assingment to teach, Keith Thompson, 20:41
- Re: sizeof and character arrays?, Barry Schwarz, 20:41
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Richard Heathfield, 20:40
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Ben Pfaff, 20:39
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 20:32
- Sorry for the NOOB question.., Zach Heath, 20:32
- Re: c,c++, Sjouke Burry, 20:29
- Re: Duration Conversion, Barry Schwarz, 20:23
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 20:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:16
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Barry Schwarz, 20:06
- Looking for excellent C example code book, linq936, 20:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 20:02
- Re: c,c++, Richard Heathfield, 20:00
- Re: typedefing a struct, Richard Tobin, 19:50
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Tobin, 19:46
- typedefing a struct, David Marsh, 19:43
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Friar Tuck, 19:39
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: Why Hatspin is a better language than C, Old Wolf, 19:29
- Re: need assingment to teach, Old Wolf, 19:29
- Re: Duration Conversion, Old Wolf, 19:24
- Re: c,c++, Kenneth Brody, 19:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 19:16
- [ot]Re: c,c++, pete, 19:08
- Re: pass pointer by reference, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 18:58
- Parsing?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 18:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:54
- sizeof and character arrays?, lisp9000@xxxxxxxxx, 18:54
- Re: pass pointer by reference, Martin Wells, 18:51
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Keith Thompson, 18:46
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, pete, 18:43
- Re: OT - Re: Malcolm's new book - Chapter 1 review, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:32
- Re: Duration Conversion, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, pete, 18:20
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Francine . Neary, 18:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 18:11
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, pete, 18:11
- Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, Flash Gordon, 18:07
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 18:07
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 17:47
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Tor Rustad, 17:43
- Re: application developement [OT], Tor Rustad, 17:40
- Re: Duration Conversion, braam . vanheerden, 17:27
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Flash Gordon, 17:27
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Tor Rustad, 17:19
- Re: application developement, Flash Gordon, 17:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 17:08
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 17:00
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Harald van D)&k, 16:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ed Jensen, 16:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 16:53
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, CBFalconer, 16:52
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 16:45
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:40
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 16:36
- Re: Problem in the C Structure code - pls help me., John Bode, 16:34
- Re: dynamic array through sockets(network), Chris Dollin, 16:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 16:29
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Mark McIntyre, 16:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 16:26
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 16:16
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Mark McIntyre, 16:14
- dynamic array through sockets(network), Gurur, 16:13
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 16:13
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 15:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 15:54
- Re: c,c++, osmium, 15:52
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 15:46
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:28
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 15:23
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:22
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Al Balmer, 15:11
- Re: Problem in the C Structure code - pls help me., Kenneth Brody, 15:04
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 14:53
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 14:52
- Re: Duration Conversion, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:43
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 14:42
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 14:39
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 14:37
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Kenny McCormack, 14:32
- Re: Problem in the C Structure code - pls help me., Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:29
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 14:25
- ghjgjhghjg, Iwan, 14:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 14:18
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 14:16
- Re: Duration Conversion, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, lawrence . jones, 13:53
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Ben Bacarisse, 13:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:35
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:23
- Re: need assingment to teach, Duncan Muirhead, 13:23
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:11
- Re: pass pointer by reference, HSeganfredo, 13:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:01
- Re: c,c++, Kenneth Brody, 13:00
- Re: c,c++, Kenneth Brody, 12:58
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 12:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:56
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], goacross, 12:51
- Problem in the C Structure code - pls help me., Vasu, 12:50
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:47
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 12:44
- Re: pass pointer by reference, Willem, 12:41
- Re: application developement, jacob navia, 12:39
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:37
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:22
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:20
- application developement, ashu, 12:20
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Ben Bacarisse, 12:18
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:10
- Re: need assingment to teach, Charlton Wilbur, 11:53
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, David Mathog, 11:44
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Ben Pfaff, 11:34
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 11:26
- Duration Conversion, bcpkh, 11:25
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 11:17
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 11:15
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 11:14
- Re: pass pointer by reference, Denis Kasak, 11:12
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Chris Dollin, 11:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 11:06
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Joachim Schmitz, 10:59
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Old Wolf, 10:54
- Re: c,c++, Chris Dollin, 10:53
- Re: c,c++, Joachim Schmitz, 10:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 10:48
- Re: c,c++, Richard Heathfield, 10:47
- Re: c,c++, Richard Tobin, 10:40
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 10:40
- Re: c,c++, Kenneth Brody, 10:36
- Re: c,c++, Richard Tobin, 10:28
- Re: pass pointer by reference, Willem, 10:28
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Joachim Schmitz, 10:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 10:17
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 10:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 10:08
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 10:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 10:02
- Re: c,c++, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Francis Glassborow, 09:51
- Re: c,c++, Mark Bluemel, 09:50
- Make money to share your videos, earnclick, 09:47
- Test-Driven Development for Embedded Software with C sample project, martinig, 09:46
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 09:41
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 09:40
- Re: c,c++, Joachim Schmitz, 09:35
- Re: c,c++, fireprabu, 09:32
- Re: socket: write a jpeg, runner, 09:25
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 09:25
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Joachim Schmitz, 09:14
- Re: c,c++, Charlie Gordon, 09:14
- Re: c,c++, osmium, 09:13
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Charlie Gordon, 09:10
- Re: Include, Joachim Schmitz, 09:06
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 08:58
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Chris Dollin, 08:57
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 08:38
- Re: Include, jacob navia, 08:34
- Re: Include, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- Re: Include, Joachim Schmitz, 08:13
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Kenny McCormack, 08:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 08:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 08:10
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 08:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 08:08
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Joachim Schmitz, 08:05
- Include, x01001x, 08:01
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 07:57
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 07:56
- Re: Include, Richard Tobin, 07:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 07:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 07:52
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Mark Bluemel, 07:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 07:51
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 07:48
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Erik Wikström, 07:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 07:36
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 07:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 07:32
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 07:32
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 07:26
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, shaanxxx, 07:20
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 07:20
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 07:18
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Richard Tobin, 07:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 07:14
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 07:13
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Heathfield, 07:10
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Tobin, 07:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 07:01
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 06:57
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Malcolm McLean, 06:54
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 06:51
- Make money to share photos, amit, 06:46
- Re: c,c++, Chris Hills, 06:43
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, pete, 06:30
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Joachim Schmitz, 06:24
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Charlie Gordon, 06:17
- Why Hatspin is a better language than C, hatspin, 06:16
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Philip Potter, 06:14
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 06:09
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Philip Potter, 06:06
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Joachim Schmitz, 06:02
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Joachim Schmitz, 06:00
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Charlie Gordon, 05:55
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Charlie Gordon, 05:49
- Re: c,c++, Ian Collins, 05:48
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Charlie Gordon, 05:46
- Re: c,c++, Mark Bluemel, 05:45
- c,c++, faheem . jmi001, 05:43
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Chris Hills, 05:38
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Charlie Gordon, 05:28
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Bos, 05:20
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Mark Bluemel, 05:18
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Charlie Gordon, 05:15
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, karthikbalaguru, 05:15
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, Charlie Gordon, 05:10
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Dollin, 05:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 05:01
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, Charlie Gordon, 04:58
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Philip Potter, 04:55
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Mark Bluemel, 04:47
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 04:43
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Keith Thompson, 04:22
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 04:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 04:15
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 04:15
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Keith Thompson, 04:14
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 04:13
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Martin Ambuhl, 04:09
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 04:06
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 04:00
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 03:56
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Richard Bos, 03:46
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Flash Gordon, 03:46
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, karthikbalaguru, 03:45
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 03:44
- Re: 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, Ian Collins, 03:43
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Malcolm McLean, 03:40
- 010 is 8 and not 10 :(, karthikbalaguru, 03:40
- Re: need assingment to teach, Malcolm McLean, 03:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 03:25
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Bos, 03:22
- Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, Malcolm McLean, 03:21
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), jaysome, 03:10
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 02:55
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, shaanxxx, 02:55
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Heathfield, 02:54
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 02:41
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Flash Gordon, 02:40
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Bos, 02:40
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, jaysome, 02:39
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 02:38
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Bos, 02:37
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 02:30
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 02:18
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], Zara, 02:00
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 01:59
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Richard Heathfield, 01:55
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Old Wolf, 01:52
- Default compiler action (was: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread), CBFalconer, 01:49
- Re: Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, borophyll, 01:46
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, CBFalconer, 01:37
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, CBFalconer, 01:32
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, CBFalconer, 01:30
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), CBFalconer, 01:22
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:07
- Is it very important to know bitwise operator well?, Junmin H., 00:59
- Sell Nike shoes,Jordan shoes,Air force ones,Adidas shoes air nike shox air max air jordan air bape shoes gucci shoes, leadnike, 00:57
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, Even, 00:55
- Re: tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], goacross, 00:35
- tricky use of sizeof [explanation wanted], goacross, 00:34
- Re: Rounding during division, Old Wolf, 00:07
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Old Wolf, 00:00
September 12, 2007
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Ben Bacarisse, 23:38
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 23:07
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, Ben Bacarisse, 22:45
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 22:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 22:21
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 22:18
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, pete, 22:04
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Ben Bacarisse, 22:04
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Keith Thompson, 21:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 21:38
- Re: socket: write a jpeg, Jack Klein, 21:31
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Jack Klein, 21:28
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, pete, 21:18
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 21:16
- Re: pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 21:11
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., user923005, 21:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Giorgos Keramidas, 21:07
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 20:56
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 20:50
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 20:49
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, pete, 20:47
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, CBFalconer, 20:44
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 20:35
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, pete, 20:31
- Re: new comer, pete, 20:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 20:26
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Richard Heathfield, 20:22
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Richard Heathfield, 20:14
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., pete, 20:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 20:06
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Junmin H., 20:01
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:53
- Re: pass pointer by reference, pete, 19:52
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:51
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:50
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Charlie Gordon, 19:48
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, pete, 19:47
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:47
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Charlie Gordon, 19:42
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Walter Roberson, 19:37
- Re: [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 19:30
- Re: [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 19:27
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Walter Roberson, 19:25
- Re: pointer assignment, Charlie Gordon, 19:23
- Re: Code optimization about array iteration, Martin Wells, 19:23
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 19:10
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Heathfield, 19:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 19:07
- Re: pass pointer by reference, HSeganfredo, 18:58
- Re: pass pointer by reference, Martin Wells, 18:58
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Charlie Gordon, 18:56
- Re: pointer assignment, Old Wolf, 18:37
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, A N Other, 18:29
- Re: Rounding during division, Mark McIntyre, 18:27
- Re: [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Mark McIntyre, 18:25
- Re: pass pointer by reference, André Gillibert, 18:24
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Al Balmer, 18:20
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Mark McIntyre, 18:14
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 18:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 18:09
- pass pointer by reference, HSeganfredo, 18:07
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Mark McIntyre, 18:05
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Tor Rustad, 18:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 18:03
- Re: need assingment to teach, Mark McIntyre, 18:01
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Mark McIntyre, 17:58
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Tor Rustad, 17:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 17:48
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Default User, 17:47
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Junmin H., 17:16
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Malcolm McLean, 17:03
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Walter Roberson, 16:56
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Ian Collins, 16:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 16:53
- Re: function call optimization question, Malcolm McLean, 16:47
- Re: [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 16:35
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Coos Haak, 16:28
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Malcolm McLean, 16:22
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Heathfield, 16:22
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, Army1987, 16:18
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 16:13
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 16:12
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Al Balmer, 16:05
- Software fille!!!, Sims, 16:03
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 15:51
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 15:45
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:43
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 15:37
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 15:34
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 15:22
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 15:20
- Re: non conformance?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 15:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 14:56
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 14:51
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 14:46
- Re: [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 14:45
- Re: Very big numbers, Keith Thompson, 14:43
- Re: pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 14:41
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, user923005, 14:37
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, Walter Roberson, 14:35
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:34
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:31
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:23
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:20
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:10
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Martin Ambuhl, 14:09
- Re: function call optimization question, Szabolcs Nagy, 14:07
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:07
- Re: Assignment without using the C library, jacob navia, 14:06
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Friar Tuck, 13:59
- Assignment without using the C library, James H. Newman, 13:58
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Keith Thompson, 13:57
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 13:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 13:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 13:48
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 13:44
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Harald van D)&k, 13:41
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:29
- Re: casting away constness, $)CHarald van D)&k, 13:26
- Re: Error: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status, jacob navia, 13:23
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Al Balmer, 13:22
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:17
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 13:17
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 13:11
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ben Pfaff, 13:02
- Re: function call optimization question, Richard Tobin, 12:55
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 12:54
- Re: Error: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status, Lew Pitcher, 12:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:49
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 12:45
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:44
- Re: efficient search on the array, Richard Harter, 12:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:40
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 12:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:21
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:20
- Re: function call optimization question, Szabolcs Nagy, 12:04
- Re: efficient search on the array, lawrence . jones, 11:47
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Chris Hills, 11:43
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Error: collect2: ld returned 1 exit status, Navaneet, 11:36
- Re: efficient search on the array, Chris Hills, 11:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 11:32
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, CBFalconer, 11:10
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., CBFalconer, 11:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 10:48
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 10:08
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Chris Hills, 09:40
- gg, fireprabu, 09:36
- Re: casting away constness, Laurent Deniau, 09:33
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Bos, 09:27
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Richard Bos, 09:22
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 09:19
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Richard Bos, 09:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, David Spencer, 09:15
- Re: Rounding during division, Army1987, 09:13
- Re: Noob stuck on first compile - stdio.h no such file, Army1987, 09:11
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, christian.bau, 08:57
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Charlie Gordon, 08:47
- Noob stuck on first compile - stdio.h no such file, streagan, 08:40
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, shaanxxx, 08:39
- Rounding during division, Christopher Key, 08:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 08:11
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 08:00
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 07:56
- [OT] Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 07:49
- Make money to share your videos, kabindrashah, 07:46
- Re: function call optimization question, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:37
- Re: Very big numbers, Army1987, 07:36
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 07:33
- Re: casting away constness, Michal Nazarewicz, 07:31
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Tobin, 07:16
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 07:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 07:08
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, jacob navia, 07:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 07:04
- Re: malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, Ian Collins, 07:03
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Army1987, 06:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 06:58
- casting away constness, Laurent Deniau, 06:56
- malloc(allocator) aligned by 8 or 16 byte, shaanxxx, 06:52
- Re: function call optimization question, Army1987, 06:43
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Army1987, 06:26
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Army1987, 06:23
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Joachim Schmitz, 06:19
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, André Gillibert, 06:18
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Richard Bos, 06:17
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 06:12
- Re: efficient search on the array, Pasalic Zaharije, 06:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 06:02
- Re: pointer assignment, Charlie Gordon, 06:01
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, pratap, 06:01
- function call optimization question, Szabolcs Nagy, 06:01
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Philip Potter, 05:58
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Richard Heathfield, 05:50
- Re: amount of memory allocated to a pointer, Mark Bluemel, 05:37
- amount of memory allocated to a pointer, pratap, 05:32
- Re: Restrict qualifiers (Was: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?), André Gillibert, 05:30
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 05:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Charlie Gordon, 04:56
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one..... (OT), Charlie Gordon, 04:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 04:31
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 04:21
- efficient search on the array, Rahul, 04:17
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, Christopher Key, 04:15
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 04:14
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 04:10
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Richard Bos, 04:07
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Bos, 04:05
- socket: write a jpeg, alcool, 04:04
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 04:00
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Heathfield, 03:59
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., CBFalconer, 03:04
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Martin Ambuhl, 03:03
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, jaysome, 02:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 02:47
- Re: Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Keith Thompson, 02:34
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Ark Khasin, 02:29
- new comer, senthi, 02:20
- new comer, senthi, 02:20
- new commer, senthi, 02:20
- Re: Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, Walter Roberson, 01:56
- Printing the range s of unsigned char and unsigned int., Junmin H., 01:50
- Re: pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 01:22
- Atomic statements execute more than once inside a thread, juanpolotto, 01:10
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 00:58
- Re: pointer assignment, Old Wolf, 00:15
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 00:10
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ian Collins, 00:04
September 11, 2007
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), buuuuuum, 23:34
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Stan Milam, 22:41
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Yin Zhu, 22:28
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Keith Thompson, 22:15
- Re: Code optimization about array iteration, Keith Thompson, 22:01
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 21:59
- Re: pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 21:46
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bill Reid, 21:17
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, user923005, 21:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 21:01
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:44
- Code optimization about array iteration, zaeminkr, 20:42
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:39
- Re: pointer assignment, Old Wolf, 20:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 20:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 20:23
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Al Balmer, 19:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 19:57
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 19:55
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 19:43
- Re: Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Ben Pfaff, 19:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 19:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 19:09
- Re: Restrict qualifiers (Was: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?), Keith Thompson, 18:59
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Stephen Sprunk, 18:59
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, christian.bau, 18:58
- Bug in SosMan's getline_test, Friar Tuck, 18:58
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:36
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:23
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 18:14
- Re: strlen, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:12
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, CBFalconer, 17:58
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., user923005, 17:28
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Default User, 17:16
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Mark McIntyre, 17:16
- Re: need assingment to teach, Mark McIntyre, 17:11
- Re: need assingment to teach, Mark McIntyre, 17:00
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Walter Roberson, 16:58
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 16:50
- Re: Very big numbers, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Restrict qualifiers (Was: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?), André Gillibert, 16:41
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Keith Thompson, 16:38
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Al Balmer, 16:17
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 16:15
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 16:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, user923005, 16:04
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, André Gillibert, 16:02
- Re: macros that build macros, Dave Hansen, 16:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, christian.bau, 15:50
- Re: stream video images, Malcolm McLean, 15:41
- Re: Pointer / Const Warnings, user923005, 15:27
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Kenny McCormack, 15:17
- Re: Integer promotion, ¬a\\/b, 15:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 15:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 15:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 15:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 15:03
- Re: c relation tool, user923005, 14:42
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, lawrence . jones, 14:29
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Stephen Sprunk, 14:17
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 14:14
- Re: Integer promotion, Jack Klein, 13:52
- Re: non conformance?, Jack Klein, 13:39
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Tor Rustad, 13:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Harald van D)&k, 13:33
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Willem, 13:26
- Pointer / Const Warnings, Christopher Key, 13:23
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:43
- stream video images, alcool, 12:40
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:36
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 12:27
- Re: non conformance?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 12:11
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 11:59
- Integer promotion, Spoon, 11:56
- Re: non conformance?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:46
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:37
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:31
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:30
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Charlton Wilbur, 11:13
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 10:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 10:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 10:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, André Gillibert, 10:41
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Nick Keighley, 10:38
- Make money to share photos, anky, 10:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, David Spencer, 10:18
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, jacob navia, 10:17
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 10:17
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Peter J. Holzer, 10:06
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 10:01
- Re: OT - Re: Malcolm's new book - Chapter 1 review, Peter J. Holzer, 09:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 09:43
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:23
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:21
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Yin Zhu, 09:21
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, jacob navia, 09:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 09:09
- Re: How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Kenny McCormack, 09:08
- How to use read() system call to read an 32bit integer, Yin Zhu, 09:05
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 08:28
- Re: macros that build macros, Thant Tessman, 08:24
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 08:14
- Re: non conformance?, borophyll, 08:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 08:09
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Bos, 08:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 08:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 07:58
- Re: x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 07:06
- x == 0 && (x & -1) != 0 for negative zero?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 06:56
- ..DO YOU W.A.N.T. TO BUY C.H.E.A.P...M.A.R.L.B.O.R.O?____EdOo7lPE, Sgt. Major U. A. Black, MFA, 06:55
- Re: Structure memory allocation, uday, 06:53
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, André Gillibert, 06:21
- Re: Byte parity question..., Michal Nazarewicz, 06:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 05:58
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 05:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 05:47
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 05:38
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Army1987, 05:25
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Willem, 05:22
- Re: __cxa_throw () from libcxa.so.5 intel lib on LINUX, Army1987, 05:17
- Re: Very big numbers, Army1987, 05:14
- Re: Input control moves to next line automatically without using cout function, Army1987, 05:09
- Re: C newbie problem, Nick Keighley, 05:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 05:00
- Re: Very big numbers, LPoD, 04:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, André Gillibert, 04:29
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Keith Thompson, 04:26
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 04:19
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Boudewijn Dijkstra, 04:11
- Re: Q: Best way to do this?, Phoenix, 03:54
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Chris Hills, 03:54
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 03:52
- Re: non conformance?, Flash Gordon, 03:50
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 03:49
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 03:26
- Re: macros that build macros, borkhuis, 03:13
- Re: Best way to do this?, Charlie Gordon, 02:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 02:26
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: macros that build macros, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 02:11
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, James Dow Allen, 01:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 01:26
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 01:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 01:09
- Re: c relation tool, Sheth Raxit, 00:56
- Re: c relation tool, Sheth Raxit, 00:53
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 00:46
- Re: need assingment to teach, Peter Nilsson, 00:36
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 00:20
- Re: C newbie problem, Richard Heathfield, 00:06
September 10, 2007
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:59
- Re: macros that build macros, Jack Klein, 23:57
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Richard Heathfield, 23:53
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Jerry Coffin, 23:44
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 23:01
- Re: can't replace define to const - TPA, xianwei, 22:56
- Re: can't replace define to const, xianwei, 22:10
- Re: need assingment to teach, Ben Bacarisse, 21:43
- Re: macros that build macros, borophyll, 21:39
- Re: non conformance?, Jack Klein, 21:39
- Re: can't replace define to const, Jack Klein, 21:27
- Re: can't replace define to const, Jack Klein, 21:25
- Re: Problem with atoi(), CBFalconer, 21:14
- macros that build macros, Thant Tessman, 21:08
- non conformance?, borophyll, 21:01
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, CBFalconer, 20:55
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, CBFalconer, 20:43
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 20:35
- Re: UB / sequence points, CBFalconer, 20:34
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 20:29
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Keith Thompson, 20:26
- Re: Byte parity question..., Thad Smith, 20:19
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Keith Thompson, 20:17
- MISRA basis (was: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?), CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: C newbie problem, Keith Thompson, 20:15
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, CBFalconer, 20:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 20:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 20:12
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 20:12
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 20:12
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Francine . Neary, 20:03
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Joe Wright, 20:01
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Antoninus Twink, 20:00
- Re: C newbie problem, Junmin H., 19:52
- Re: C newbie problem, Junmin H., 19:49
- Re: C newbie problem, Miguel Guedes, 19:46
- Re: C newbie problem, Junmin H., 19:44
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, pete, 19:42
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Flash Gordon, 19:41
- Re: C newbie problem, Junmin H., 19:38
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, pete, 19:30
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 19:28
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Keith Thompson, 19:21
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, pete, 19:19
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Richard, 18:46
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, Martin Wells, 18:45
- Re: Q: Best way to do this?, pete, 18:41
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Martin Wells, 18:35
- Re: need assingment to teach, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: Q: Best way to do this?, Martin Wells, 18:19
- Re: Byte parity question..., Richard Tobin, 18:18
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Charles Richmond, 18:11
- Re: Byte parity question..., Tor Rustad, 18:07
- Re: Best way to do this?, Malcolm McLean, 18:03
- Re: Byte parity question..., Tor Rustad, 17:50
- Re: need assingment to teach, Mark McIntyre, 17:48
- Q: Best way to do this?, scooby . doo, 17:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Mark McIntyre, 17:36
- Re: need assingment to teach, Malcolm McLean, 17:27
- Re: Question related to string functions, Malcolm McLean, 17:04
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Malcolm McLean, 16:47
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Bart van Ingen Schenau, 16:34
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Keith Thompson, 16:32
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: C newbie problem, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 16:25
- Re: Automatically generate variables, Malcolm McLean, 16:22
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Wojtek Lerch, 16:18
- Re: C newbie problem, Malcolm McLean, 16:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Harald van Dijk, 16:01
- Re: C newbie problem, Martin Ambuhl, 15:48
- Re: Is there a test suite for C ?, user923005, 15:16
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Kenneth Brody, 15:15
- Re: Need examples of C program, user923005, 15:14
- Re: Structure memory allocation, Tor Rustad, 15:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 15:12
- Re: C newbie problem, Miguel Guedes, 15:08
- Re: can't replace define to const, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:59
- Re: Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), Miguel Guedes, 14:53
- Re: MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:50
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Harald van Dijk, 14:41
- Re: Question related to string functions, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 14:31
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Harald van Dijk, 14:15
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 13:59
- Re: c relation tool, husterk, 13:58
- Re: Need examples of C program, Kevin Handy, 13:57
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 13:44
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:36
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:31
- Re: c relation tool, Maxim Yegorushkin, 13:31
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Flash Gordon, 13:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:29
- Re: Problem with atoi(), André Gillibert, 13:28
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Harald van Dijk, 13:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:16
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Harald van Dijk, 13:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 13:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:10
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Harald van Dijk, 13:08
- Re: __cxa_throw () from libcxa.so.5 intel lib on LINUX, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:58
- Re: Automatically generate variables, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:52
- Re: Is there a test suite for C ?, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:49
- Re: can't replace define to const - TPA, Default User, 12:42
- Re: need assingment to teach, Al Balmer, 12:34
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 12:26
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one.....Thanks tolkien, joebenjamin, 12:22
- Another Tricky Problem I am Messing With (Not Homework), joebenjamin, 12:20
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 12:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 11:54
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Adam, 11:50
- Re: Very big numbers, Ben Bacarisse, 11:44
- Re: can't replace define to const, Chris Dollin, 11:18
- Re: can't replace define to const, xianwei, 11:07
- Re: need assingment to teach, Ben Bacarisse, 10:50
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 10:49
- Re: Input control moves to next line automatically without using cout function, Chris Dollin, 10:42
- Re: UB / sequence points, Rainer Weikusat, 10:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 10:39
- Re: can't replace define to const, Chris Dollin, 10:38
- Re: can't replace define to const, jacob navia, 10:36
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 10:32
- can't replace define to const, xianwei, 10:26
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Richard Bos, 10:10
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., tolkien, 10:06
- Re: Very big numbers, tolkien, 09:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 09:49
- UB / sequence points (was Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?), Kenneth Brody, 09:42
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Input control moves to next line automatically without using cout function, srini4vasan, 09:35
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Richard Heathfield, 09:27
- Re: Very big numbers, Tim Prince, 09:26
- Very big numbers, tolkien, 09:14
- Re: __cxa_throw () from libcxa.so.5 intel lib on LINUX, Kenny McCormack, 08:29
- Re: Problem with atoi(), André Gillibert, 07:24
- Re: initializing an int variable with all F's, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 07:22
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 07:22
- Re: Problem with atoi(), André Gillibert, 07:20
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 07:19
- Re: is this prog stdc?, André Gillibert, 07:13
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Charlie Gordon, 07:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 07:06
- Re: Anyone have any ideas on this one....., Michal Nazarewicz, 07:03
- Enjoy complete book online FREE: Oracle SQL in 10 Minutes, takveen@xxxxxxxxx, 06:58
- Re: Problem with atoi(), pete, 06:57
- Re: Structure memory allocation, pete, 06:40
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Charlie Gordon, 06:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 06:31
- Re: Problem with atoi(), pete, 06:29
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Charlie Gordon, 06:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 06:19
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 06:18
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 06:17
- Re: Ordering local variables, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 06:14
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Keith Thompson, 06:05
- Re: Where to find embedded c programmers, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 06:02
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 06:01
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 06:00
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 05:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 05:55
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 05:50
- Re: __cxa_throw () from libcxa.so.5 intel lib on LINUX, Keith Thompson, 05:46
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Richard Bos, 05:45
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Army1987, 05:42
- Re: Structure memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 05:35
- Re: Structure memory allocation, Army1987, 05:35
- Re: Structure memory allocation, Army1987, 05:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Bos, 05:33
- Re: Structure memory allocation, p_cricket_guy, 05:27
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Army1987, 05:26
- Re: need assingment to teach, Army1987, 05:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 05:00
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 04:50
- Re: Byte parity question..., Charlie Gordon, 04:50
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Joachim Schmitz, 04:48
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 04:44
- c relation tool, sinbad, 04:37
- Re: is this prog stdc?, Charlie Gordon, 04:34
- Re: need assingment to teach, vikram Bhuskute, 04:31
- Re: Byte parity question..., junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:30
- Re: need assingment to teach, Chris Dollin, 04:26
- __cxa_throw () from libcxa.so.5 intel lib on LINUX, CoL, 04:24
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 04:05
- Re: merging multiple static library, frakie, 03:47
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 03:44
- Re: how much memory to free?, Flash Gordon, 03:42
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Richard Heathfield, 03:26
- MISRA-C:2010 (version 3), Chris Hills, 03:21
- C newbie problem, Junmin H., 03:19
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 03:15
- Re: Structure memory allocation, uday, 02:57
- Re: need assingment to teach, CBFalconer, 02:41
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Bos, 02:35
- Re: Structure memory allocation, Ian Collins, 02:31
- Re: strlen, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 02:25
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 02:16
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 02:10
- Structure memory allocation, uday, 01:49
- [ot]Re: need assingment to teach, pete, 00:53
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 00:49
- Re: Question related to string functions, Keith Thompson, 00:30
- Re: Question related to string functions, Richard Heathfield, 00:22
- Re: need assingment to teach, Ben Bacarisse, 00:15
- Re: Question related to string functions, Keith Thompson, 00:12
- Re: Question related to string functions, Richard Heathfield, 00:11
- Re: Question related to string functions, somenath, 00:04
September 09, 2007
- Re: Question related to string functions, somenath, 23:51
- Re: Question related to string functions, Richard Heathfield, 23:33
- Question related to string functions, somenath, 22:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 22:56
- is this prog stdc?, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 22:43
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 22:34
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 22:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 22:14
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 21:52
- Re: Need Help with a program I am creating...., Richard Heathfield, 21:46
- Re: A challenging file to parse, Richard Heathfield, 21:31
- Re: Need Help with a program I am creating...., Chris Johnson, 21:24
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 21:17
- Need Help with a program I am creating...., joebenjamin, 20:28
- Anyone have any ideas on this one....., joebenjamin, 20:22
- Re: Byte parity question..., cr88192, 19:53
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Jerry Coffin, 19:48
- Re: how much memory to free?, Richard Tobin, 19:40
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Charlie Gordon, 19:28
- Re: Pointer question, Ben Bacarisse, 19:15
- Byte parity question..., philbo30, 19:13
- Re: A challenging file to parse, Ben Bacarisse, 18:59
- Re: initializing an int variable with all F's, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: HeathField Strange Ideas!, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Need to implement a calendar clock with millisecond resolution, please help., David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Function prototypes, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Function prototypes, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: OT - Re: Malcolm's new book - Chapter 1 review, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Function prototypes, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: A challenging file to parse, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Creating an interface to variables, David Thompson, 18:32
- Re: how much memory to free?, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, CBFalconer, 18:07
- Pointer question, amjadcsu, 18:02
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Thad Smith, 17:19
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:19
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 17:17
- Re: how much memory to free?, Flash Gordon, 17:17
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Malcolm McLean, 17:05
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 17:03
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Malcolm McLean, 16:58
- Re: Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, Malcolm McLean, 16:17
- Re: Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, Keith Thompson, 15:55
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, christian.bau, 15:44
- Re: strlen, Rob Kendrick, 15:24
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Peter J. Holzer, 14:54
- Re: Ordering local variables, adam.wieckowski@xxxxxxxxx, 13:39
- Re: need assingment to teach, Ben Bacarisse, 13:39
- Re: how much memory to free?, Default User, 13:17
- Re: how much memory to free?, Malcolm McLean, 13:02
- Re: Ordering local variables, Malcolm McLean, 12:59
- Re: Ordering local variables, Harald van Dijk, 12:58
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Francine . Neary, 12:54
- Re: how much memory to free?, Harald van Dijk, 12:53
- Ordering local variables, Bob Pratchett, 12:51
- how much memory to free?, siddhu, 12:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Justin.SpahrSummers@xxxxxxxxx, 12:36
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 12:35
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Harald van Dijk, 12:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:43
- Re: Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, Malcolm McLean, 11:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:19
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Ben Bacarisse, 11:07
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Peter J. Holzer, 11:03
- Re: Problem with atoi(), tolkien, 10:55
- Re: Problem with atoi(), runner, 10:48
- Re: Need examples of C program, osmium, 10:41
- Re: Problem with atoi(), tolkien, 10:41
- Re: Need examples of C program, Richard Weeks, 10:15
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, CBFalconer, 10:07
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Joe Wright, 09:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 09:01
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Army1987, 09:00
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Harald van Dijk, 08:56
- Re: Problem with atoi(), Army1987, 08:53
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Army1987, 08:49
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 08:41
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 08:35
- Problem with atoi(), tolkien, 08:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 08:22
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Peter J. Holzer, 08:19
- Re: Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, Army1987, 08:06
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Army1987, 07:51
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, christian.bau, 07:37
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 07:29
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, christian.bau, 07:28
- Send/Receive using MPI_Type_struct, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 06:58
- Re: need assingment to teach, Army1987, 06:53
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Army1987, 06:47
- Re: Need examples of C program, CBFalconer, 06:19
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, CBFalconer, 06:15
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Peter J. Holzer, 05:24
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Harald van Dijk, 05:16
- Re: hello, Amy Lee, 05:02
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Keith Thompson, 04:50
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 04:50
- Need examples of C program, dmp, 04:50
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Army1987, 04:43
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Malcolm McLean, 04:14
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Keith Thompson, 04:13
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Tommy Vercetti, 04:10
- Re: need assingment to teach, Malcolm McLean, 03:18
- Re: need assingment to teach, Charlie Gordon, 03:16
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Richard Heathfield, 03:13
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 02:45
- Re: need assingment to teach, Richard Heathfield, 02:00
- Re: need assingment to teach, Scudder Consulting, 01:42
- need assingment to teach, vikram Bhuskute, 01:22
- req.in Unix/SQL/Oracle/JAVA - Work Location US, TechRecruit Consultants, 00:16
September 08, 2007
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 23:08
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 22:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 20:13
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Harald van Dijk, 18:45
- Re: Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Malcolm McLean, 18:41
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Greg Comeau, 18:40
- Undefined behavior - 2 queries, Tommy Vercetti, 18:31
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 18:21
- Re: inconsistencies with mktime(), John Hanley, 18:17
- Re: strlen, Tor Rustad, 18:12
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 17:47
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 17:22
- Re: inconsistencies with mktime(), Ian Collins, 17:20
- inconsistencies with mktime(), John Hanley, 16:59
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 15:48
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Army1987, 15:38
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 14:45
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Flash Gordon, 12:14
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 12:06
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Walter Bright, 11:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 11:31
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Ben Bacarisse, 11:25
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Hills, 11:23
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 11:22
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Chris Dollin, 11:05
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, kuyper, 11:04
- Re: Automatically generate variables, Tor Rustad, 10:23
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Joe Wright, 10:03
- Re: SQL using C [OT], Tor Rustad, 09:51
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 09:51
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Adam, 08:52
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 08:42
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Guy Macon, 08:30
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Guy Macon, 08:19
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 06:03
- Antique 1912-1949 Porcelain teapot 528 chinaware 400, invitation visit, jxx5188, 05:49
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Richard Heathfield, 01:41
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 01:09
- Re: Is this leagal?, Keith Thompson, 01:05
- Re: Is this leagal?, Chris Thomasson, 00:59
- Re: warning with const array in header, Ian Collins, 00:59
- Re: Is this leagal?, Chris Thomasson, 00:58
September 07, 2007
- warning with const array in header, Xavier Serrand, 23:34
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 23:13
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Barry Margolin, 23:07
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Jerry Coffin, 22:29
- Re: SQL using C, user923005, 22:03
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 21:51
- We urgently require SAP consultant with 5 year of SAP experience, HR Head, 21:41
- Re: C programs based on Numerical Computation, user923005, 21:34
- Re: Is there a test suite for C ?, user923005, 21:18
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, kuyper, 21:06
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 20:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Scott Lurndal, 20:53
- Re: merging multiple static library, Jack Klein, 19:33
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Flash Gordon, 19:28
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 19:13
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 18:51
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Hills, 18:50
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 18:49
- Re: strlen, Richard Tobin, 18:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Anand Hariharan, 18:45
- Re: Automatically generate variables, Richard Heathfield, 18:45
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 18:42
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 18:34
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, kuyper, 18:11
- Re: Automatically generate variables, Scott J. McCaughrin, 18:08
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 17:56
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 17:56
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 17:55
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Richard Heathfield, 17:54
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 17:52
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 17:52
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 17:49
- Re: C Programs, Default User, 17:48
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 17:44
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 17:41
- Re: C Programs, Keith Thompson, 17:41
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 17:38
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Default User, 17:32
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 17:30
- Re: C Programs, Default User, 17:27
- Re: C Programs, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, kuyper, 17:10
- Re: union find, CBFalconer, 17:03
- Re: hello, Malcolm McLean, 17:02
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:58
- Re: C Programs, CBFalconer, 16:56
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 16:41
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 16:34
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, CBFalconer, 16:32
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Kenny McCormack, 16:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 16:21
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, CBFalconer, 16:17
- Re: Is this leagal?, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, CBFalconer, 16:14
- Re: Is this leagal?, Chris Dollin, 16:10
- Re: C Programs, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, CBFalconer, 15:54
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 15:46
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, christian.bau, 15:43
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Asbjørn Sæbø, 15:33
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Keith Thompson, 15:32
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: Is there a test suite for C ?, Guy Macon, 14:56
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 14:54
- c language, jo, 14:49
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Guy Macon, 14:46
- Re: Is this leagal?, Walter Roberson, 14:39
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Jonathan Leffler, 14:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:52
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:45
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:38
- Re: Is this leagal?, jacob navia, 13:34
- Is this leagal?, Owen Zhang, 13:29
- Is this leagal?, Owen Zhang, 13:29
- Re: C Programs, Al Balmer, 13:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:26
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Rainer Weikusat, 13:09
- Re: SQL using C, Tor Rustad, 12:42
- Re: C Programs, Default User, 12:37
- Re: Where to find embedded c programmers, Richard Tobin, 12:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 12:25
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Tobin, 12:24
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Walter Roberson, 12:05
- Re: What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Ben Pfaff, 12:02
- Re: Where to find embedded c programmers, Dave Hansen, 11:55
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Kenneth Brody, 11:28
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 11:24
- merging multiple static library, frakie, 11:21
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 11:19
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 11:11
- Re: suitable data structure, John Gordon, 11:10
- Re: suitable data structure, Ben Bacarisse, 11:09
- Is there a test suite for C ?, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:54
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Walter Roberson, 10:49
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 10:45
- Re: strlen, Charles Richmond, 10:42
- Re: C Programs, Chris Hills, 10:39
- Re: suitable data structure, Nick Keighley, 10:37
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Dollin, 10:37
- What is this noalias thing Dennis Ritchie is railing about ?, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:31
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Guy Macon, 10:29
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 10:25
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Dollin, 10:13
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, osmium, 10:05
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Spoon, 09:52
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard, 09:52
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Spoon, 09:46
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Dollin, 09:36
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard, 09:33
- Re: C Programs, Boudewijn Dijkstra, 09:28
- Re: union find, SM Ryan, 09:28
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Spoon, 09:25
- hello, comp.lang.programmer, 09:15
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 09:14
- Re: union find, Chris Dollin, 09:11
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Dollin, 09:08
- Re: C Programs, Chad, 09:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 09:03
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 08:53
- Re: C Programs, Eric Sosman, 08:20
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 08:20
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:17
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard, 08:16
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 08:11
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Joachim Schmitz, 08:04
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Philip Potter, 07:57
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 07:43
- Re: C Programs, Richard, 07:35
- union find, carmelo, 07:30
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Hills, 07:30
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 07:19
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 07:11
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Bos, 07:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 07:05
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 07:02
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Richard, 06:55
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Army1987, 06:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard, 06:50
- Re: C Programs, Chris Hills, 06:46
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Chris Hills, 06:41
- Re: fixed width format, Barry Schwarz, 06:41
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 06:40
- Re: Where to find embedded c programmers, Chris Hills, 06:35
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Barry Schwarz, 06:33
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Chris Dollin, 06:30
- Re: pointer assignment, Army1987, 06:18
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Army1987, 06:15
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 05:53
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 05:46
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 05:45
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Richard Heathfield, 05:42
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 05:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 05:38
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 05:32
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 05:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 05:10
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 04:52
- suitable data structure, Rahul, 04:51
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 04:49
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Willem, 04:37
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Nick Keighley, 04:36
- Re: fixed width format, karthikbalaguru, 04:33
- Re: pointer assignment, somenath, 04:25
- Re: pointer assignment, karthikbalaguru, 04:09
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Casper H . S . Dik, 04:08
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 04:05
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Richard Bos, 03:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 03:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 03:32
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 03:27
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 03:18
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 02:48
- Re: C Programs, Richard Bos, 02:48
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Keith Thompson, 02:19
- Re: pointer assignment, Richard Heathfield, 02:13
- Re: C programs based on Numerical Computation, richard . melikson, 02:04
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, georgerxz, 01:39
- Re: C Programs, Keith Thompson, 01:32
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 01:29
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 01:25
- C programs based on Numerical Computation, georgerxz, 01:20
- pointer assignment, somenath, 01:15
- Re: Timer functions for DOS box program?, Joe Schmo', 01:15
- source codes in C for learning Data structure and Files., georgerxz, 01:15
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 01:14
- C Programs, georgerxz, 01:12
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, user923005, 00:26
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, user923005, 00:24
September 06, 2007
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 23:55
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, user923005, 23:41
- Twelve Proofs that Muhammad is a True Prophet, ahmedcoco333, 22:52
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 22:46
- Re: size_t problems, pete, 22:33
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 22:32
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Jack Klein, 22:24
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Jack Klein, 22:20
- Re: Where to find embedded c programmers, Ahmed Samieh, 22:18
- Re: size_t problems, Keith Thompson, 22:13
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 22:10
- Re: A challenging file to parse, user923005, 22:05
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 21:56
- Re: SQL using C, user923005, 21:54
- Re: size of structure, Barry Schwarz, 21:51
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, pete, 21:44
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Barry Schwarz, 21:44
- Re: fixed width format, CBFalconer, 21:16
- Re: How to implement a Hash Table in C, CBFalconer, 21:13
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Walter Roberson, 20:55
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 20:46
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, osmium, 20:11
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Al Balmer, 20:01
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Keith Thompson, 19:37
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 19:30
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Mark McIntyre, 19:28
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Mark McIntyre, 19:27
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Mark McIntyre, 19:24
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Antoninus Twink, 19:19
- Re: size_t problems, A N Other, 19:15
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Gordon Burditt, 19:12
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 18:45
- Re: fixed width format, Walter Roberson, 17:53
- Re: fixed width format, Malcolm McLean, 17:49
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 17:48
- Re: size_t problems, Keith Thompson, 16:59
- Re: fixed width format, Walter Roberson, 16:57
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, Eric Sosman, 16:39
- fixed width format, gokhalen, 16:34
- Re: size_t problems, Army1987, 16:27
- Re: Timer functions for DOS box program?, Keith Thompson, 16:21
- Re: size_t problems, Army1987, 16:19
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:03
- Timer functions for DOS box program?, Dave, 16:00
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, Army1987, 15:58
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Malcolm McLean, 15:58
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 15:45
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Army1987, 15:40
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 15:29
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Army1987, 15:24
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Walter Roberson, 15:23
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Army1987, 15:21
- Re: size of structure, Keith Thompson, 15:18
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 15:16
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Keith Thompson, 15:11
- Re: size of structure, Army1987, 15:06
- Re: SQL using C, Tor Rustad, 14:56
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Adam, 14:56
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Sherm Pendley, 14:53
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 14:51
- Re: mbtowc question, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:30
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, jacob navia, 14:27
- Re: How to implement a Hash Table in C, Julienne Walker, 14:23
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Default User, 14:20
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Walter Roberson, 14:12
- Re: mbtowc recovery, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 14:02
- Re: Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Kenneth Brody, 14:02
- Re: A challenging file to parse, Eric Sosman, 13:44
- Qry : Behaviour of fgets -- ?, Sheth Raxit, 13:38
- Re: HeathField Strange Ideas!, Walter Roberson, 13:17
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Robert Gamble, 13:01
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Rob Hoelz, 12:50
- Re: On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Walter Roberson, 12:41
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Alexei A. Frounze, 12:23
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Adam, 12:06
- Re: HeathField Strange Ideas!, Ernie Wright, 11:45
- On unix.. Know if the user is in a specific system group ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 11:43
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Joachim Schmitz, 11:24
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Joachim Schmitz, 11:21
- Re: Problem in reading datafile, Chris Dollin, 10:53
- Re: Problem in reading datafile, John Gordon, 10:47
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, borkhuis, 10:02
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Richard, 09:52
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Thad Smith, 09:34
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Thad Smith, 09:25
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, CBFalconer, 09:23
- Re: Problem in reading datafile, Mark Bluemel, 08:50
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 08:46
- Problem in reading datafile, rsk, 08:42
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Martin Wells, 08:34
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Joachim Schmitz, 07:44
- mbtowc question, Neil Booth, 07:36
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Richard, 07:28
- Re: newbie question, Adam Chapman, 07:10
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, jacob navia, 06:57
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 06:56
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 06:35
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 05:58
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Philip Potter, 05:50
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 05:47
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Chris Hills, 05:44
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 05:34
- Re: how to return an integer array from functions, rsk, 05:30
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Duncan Muirhead, 05:26
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, James Kanze, 05:25
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Richard Heathfield, 05:24
- Re: ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, jacob navia, 04:59
- Re: size of structure, Chris McDonald, 04:57
- Re: size_t problems, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:46
- size of structure, Anonymous, 04:45
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 04:36
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32, jacob navia, 04:27
- Re: initializing an int variable with all F's, pemo, 04:26
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Spoon, 04:15
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Chris Torek, 03:51
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Richard Bos, 03:46
- Re: HeathField Strange Ideas!, Richard Bos, 03:35
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, karthikbalaguru, 03:30
- Re: newbie question, jacob navia, 03:24
- Re: SQL using C, karthikbalaguru, 03:23
- Re: newbie question, jacob navia, 03:20
- Re: c without usin any graphics function, Richard Heathfield, 02:55
- c without usin any graphics function, shaanxxx, 02:50
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, Richard Bos, 02:41
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, Joe Schmo', 02:23
- Sell beautiful handbags, ryhuj, 01:00
September 05, 2007
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Walter Roberson, 23:30
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Thad Smith, 23:29
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, pete, 22:13
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 22:09
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, Barry Schwarz, 22:04
- Re: Preprocessor - Generate enumeration from two macros, Ark Khasin, 21:58
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Eric Sosman, 21:45
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Eric Sosman, 21:41
- Re: (void**)&ppval, Barry Schwarz, 21:21
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 21:20
- Re: draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, Walter Roberson, 21:13
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, CBFalconer, 21:06
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, user923005, 20:48
- Re: Minimum size of void *, CBFalconer, 20:42
- Re: SQL using C, Al Balmer, 20:35
- Re: newbie question, Adam Chapman, 20:29
- draw a rectangular grid having 10 rows and 10 columns, yugas, 20:27
- Re: newbie question, Keith Thompson, 20:21
- Re: How to i write in JAVA this problem?, pete, 20:21
- ANN: Long-overdue CU bug-fix, Richard Heathfield, 20:18
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 20:15
- mbtowc recovery, kyuupi, 20:13
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Martin Wells, 20:13
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, pete, 20:05
- Re: newbie question, Adam Chapman, 19:58
- Re: SQL using C, user923005, 19:55
- Re: How to start learning C?, pete, 19:49
- Re: A challenging file to parse, user923005, 19:43
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 19:34
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32 (was: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?), Old Wolf, 19:33
- Re: newbie question, Old Wolf, 19:24
- Re: (void**)&ppval, Justin Spahr-Summers, 19:24
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Gordon Burditt, 19:04
- Re: size_t problems, jacob navia, 18:49
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, A. Bolmarcich, 18:38
- Re: size_t problems, A N Other, 18:37
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Default User, 18:36
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Mark McIntyre, 18:30
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Richard Tobin, 18:27
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: newbie question, Mark McIntyre, 18:19
- Re: Preprocessor - Generate enumeration from two macros, SM Ryan, 18:15
- Re: SQL using C, SM Ryan, 18:15
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Mark McIntyre, 18:14
- Re: Returning a string array from a function, Adam, 18:12
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, christian.bau, 17:33
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Ben Pfaff, 17:17
- Re: SQL using C, Al Balmer, 17:11
- Re: Fresh Programmers Required Visual Foxpro, Al Balmer, 17:09
- Re: size_t problems, Ben Pfaff, 17:07
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, James Antill, 17:05
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 16:56
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Ben Pfaff, 16:52
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Flash Gordon, 16:49
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 16:17
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 16:17
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 16:08
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Flash Gordon, 16:04
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: Preprocessor - Generate enumeration from two macros, Dave Hansen, 15:54
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Erik Trulsson, 15:52
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 15:43
- Re: newbie question, Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Walter Roberson, 15:40
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Flash Gordon, 15:40
- Re: Minimum size of void *, jacob navia, 15:33
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Flash Gordon, 15:27
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Ben Pfaff, 15:20
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 15:17
- Re: SQL using C, Tor Rustad, 15:16
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Walter Roberson, 15:15
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 15:15
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 15:14
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Bob Timpkinson, 15:13
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 15:12
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Flash Gordon, 15:08
- Re: newbie question, jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Mark McIntyre, 15:06
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Mark McIntyre, 14:55
- Re: newbie question, Mark McIntyre, 14:51
- Re: newbie question, Mark McIntyre, 14:49
- Preprocessor - Generate enumeration from two macros, R Pradeep Chandran, 14:46
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Pietro Cerutti, 14:43
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, Flash Gordon, 14:43
- Re: Minimum size of void *, jacob navia, 14:39
- Re: SQL using C, Mark McIntyre, 14:39
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 14:38
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 14:37
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 14:37
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 14:37
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Mark McIntyre, 14:32
- Re: How to start learning C?, Flash Gordon, 14:32
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Mark McIntyre, 14:28
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Walter Roberson, 14:26
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Flash Gordon, 14:24
- Re: strlen, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Flash Gordon, 14:20
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 14:10
- Re: comparison on non-integer types, Pietro Cerutti, 14:08
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 14:02
- comparison on non-integer types, Pietro Cerutti, 13:59
- Re: newbie question, jacob navia, 13:59
- newbie question, Adam Chapman, 13:51
- Re: SQL using C, Sharath, 13:45
- Re: SQL using C, Sharath, 13:44
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Walter Roberson, 13:31
- Re: SQL using C, jacob navia, 13:24
- Re: How to start learning C?, Junmin H., 13:22
- Re: SQL using C, Kenneth Brody, 13:14
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:00
- Re: size_t problems, jacob navia, 12:48
- Re: size_t problems, Ed Jensen, 12:40
- Re: A challenging file to parse, Walter Roberson, 12:30
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Ben Pfaff, 12:20
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading, jacob navia, 12:18
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Richard Tobin, 12:00
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Rob Hoelz, 12:00
- Re: fetestexcept fails, rembremading, 11:58
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 11:53
- SQL using C, MJK, 11:19
- Re: fetestexcept fails, jacob navia, 11:10
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 11:08
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 11:08
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 11:06
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Richard Heathfield, 10:51
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Willem, 10:44
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Richard Heathfield, 10:39
- Re: Minimum size of void *, Richard Tobin, 10:31
- Minimum size of void *, Rob Hoelz, 10:25
- Re: A challenging file to parse, Willem, 10:23
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 10:00
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, Spoon, 09:50
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Spoon, 09:30
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 09:13
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 08:58
- Re: strlen, CBFalconer, 08:52
- Re: size_t problems, Peter J. Holzer, 08:49
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, CBFalconer, 08:43
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 08:36
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Dave Dunfield, 08:28
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Eric Sosman, 08:12
- Re: Calling a FORTRAN function that returns a complex, Klaas Vantournhout, 08:08
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, Cric, 08:01
- Re: Calling a FORTRAN function that returns a complex, SM Ryan, 07:37
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, SM Ryan, 07:37
- Re: How to i write in JAVA this problem?, Mark Bluemel, 07:09
- How to i write in JAVA this problem?, problem., 07:03
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Rob Kendrick, 06:51
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 06:14
- Re: Calling a FORTRAN function that returns a complex, Jim Langston, 06:07
- fetestexcept fails, rembremading, 06:02
- Calling a FORTRAN function that returns a complex, Klaas Vantournhout, 05:51
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, Rob Kendrick, 05:45
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Army1987, 04:59
- Re: how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, Army1987, 04:50
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Erik Wikström, 04:39
- Re: const qualifier - in declaration, definition or both?, Asbjørn Sæbø, 04:38
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, Keith Thompson, 04:20
- Re: Faulty claims for lcc-win32, jacob navia, 04:07
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Richard Tobin, 03:56
- Re: Sizes of Integer Types, jacob navia, 03:22
- Sizes of Integer Types, Bob Timpkinson, 03:18
- Re: Fresh Programmers Required Visual Foxpro, Richard Heathfield, 03:11
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Ark Khasin, 03:05
- Re: how to return an integer array from functions, Richard Heathfield, 02:57
- Fresh Programmers Required Visual Foxpro, HR Head, 02:56
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 02:18
- Sell handbags, ryhuj, 02:16
- how to return an integer array from functions, rsk, 02:11
- Re: File contents, rsk, 02:05
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 01:17
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 01:17
- Re: strlen, Gordon Burditt, 01:05
- Re: (void**)&ppval, Ark Khasin, 00:49
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Richard Heathfield, 00:35
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Ark Khasin, 00:30
- how to define this complex declaration and how to use it, Cric, 00:08
September 04, 2007
- Re: (void**)&ppval, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: strlen, Keith Thompson, 23:19
- Re: size_t problems, Keith Thompson, 23:11
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Peter Nilsson, 23:07
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 22:34
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 22:24
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Jack Klein, 22:14
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 22:00
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 21:52
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 21:51
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Ben Bacarisse, 21:42
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Gordon Burditt, 21:32
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Eric Sosman, 21:18
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Keith Thompson, 21:12
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, pete, 20:52
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Keith Thompson, 20:52
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 20:29
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, CBFalconer, 20:26
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 20:26
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 20:24
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 20:04
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Marjancek, 20:02
- Re: strlen, Kelsey Bjarnason, 20:01
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 19:55
- Re: size_t problems, Mark McIntyre, 19:54
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 19:50
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:49
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Mark McIntyre, 19:49
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 19:40
- Re: size_t problems, CBFalconer, 19:33
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Old Wolf, 19:32
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Old Wolf, 19:25
- Re: String concatenation, Richard Tobin, 19:04
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 18:32
- Re: size_t problems, jacob navia, 18:25
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, jacob navia, 18:23
- Re: File contents, CBFalconer, 18:17
- Re: size_t problems, Martin Wells, 18:17
- Re: size_t problems, jacob navia, 18:15
- Re: String concatenation, CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, smohideen, 17:54
- Faulty claims for lcc-win32 (was: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?), CBFalconer, 17:49
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, CBFalconer, 17:37
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Flash Gordon, 17:05
- Re: size_t problems, Ian Collins, 17:04
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 17:01
- Re: size_t problems, Ian Collins, 16:58
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:58
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:56
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 16:56
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 16:51
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Eric Sosman, 16:51
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:46
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:44
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:39
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 16:37
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:36
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, SM Ryan, 16:33
- Re: size_t problems, Malcolm McLean, 16:24
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 16:24
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 16:12
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, user923005, 16:11
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, jacob navia, 16:06
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 15:59
- Re: GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, Flash Gordon, 15:54
- Re: (void**)&ppval, Chris Torek, 15:50
- GLIBCXX - Selectively picking up the version, smohideen, 15:48
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Harald van Dijk, 15:48
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 15:46
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Harald van Dijk, 15:42
- Re: size_t problems, Flash Gordon, 15:40
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Flash Gordon, 15:37
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 15:32
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Sherm Pendley, 15:27
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Army1987, 15:18
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 15:17
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Harald van Dijk, 15:13
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Ron Peterson (012ED25E), 14:58
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Ron Peterson (012ED25E), 14:57
- Re: size_t problems, jacob navia, 14:54
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 14:46
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 14:45
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:38
- Re: size_t problems, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:27
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, jacob navia, 14:26
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading, Flash Gordon, 14:17
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Tim Prince, 14:13
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, Stephen Sprunk, 14:09
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Harald van Dijk, 14:06
- Re: size_t problems, Tor Rustad, 14:05
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Flash Gordon, 14:02
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:57
- Re: Compile Time Error Checking?, Flash Gordon, 13:53
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 13:53
- Re: strlen, ¬a\\/b, 13:50
- Re: How to start learning C?, Flash Gordon, 13:49
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, jacob navia, 13:48
- Re: ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, jacob navia, 13:44
- ++x is more optimised than x++ ???, karthikbalaguru, 13:42
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Richard, 13:30
- Re: HeathField Strange Ideas!, Al Balmer, 13:29
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, Bo Persson, 13:15
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, mark, 13:13
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Bart van Ingen Schenau, 13:01
- Re: size_t problems, Richard, 12:57
- Re: Visual C++ Express Edition or lcc-win32?, John Smith, 12:56
- Re: Specifications for operator overloading, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:51
- Re: size_t problems, Richard, 12:51
- Re: How to start learning C?, Tejas Kokje, 12:46
- Re: size_t problems, Craig Gullixson, 12:44
- Re: Looking for free memory pool software, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:41
- Re: Creation and destruction responsibilities, Miguel Guedes, 12:32
- Re: Creation and destruction responsibilities, Walter Roberson, 12:30
- Creation and destruction responsibilities, Miguel Guedes, 12:26
- Re: one element array as name of struct typedef, Richard Tobin, 12:19