comp.lang.c (date)
July 31, 2007
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 16:08
- Re: How to create a standalone C program?, Keith Thompson, 16:00
- Re: How to create a standalone C program?, Malcolm McLean, 15:46
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Peter J. Holzer, 15:38
- Re: How to create a standalone C program?, santosh, 15:22
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Kenneth Brody, 15:19
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, Kenneth Brody, 15:15
- How to create a standalone C program?, dspfun, 15:08
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 15:05
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 14:56
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Keith Thompson, 14:49
- Re: Structure having pointers, Chris Dollin, 14:38
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, John Bode, 14:32
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Walter Roberson, 14:14
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 13:53
- Re: Structure having pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 13:47
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, jacob navia, 13:11
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Default User, 12:53
- Re: Malcolm's new book, jacob navia, 12:51
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, William Hughes, 12:48
- Re: Unused arguments, Richard Tobin, 12:36
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Richard Tobin, 12:34
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Walter Roberson, 12:13
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Al Balmer, 12:13
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Mark Bluemel, 10:54
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, santosh, 10:53
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 10:52
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Ram Prasad, 10:46
- Re: Unused arguments, Dave Vandervies, 10:37
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Mark Bluemel, 10:33
- CERT C Programming Language Secure Coding Standard, Robert Seacord, 10:28
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Ram Prasad, 10:24
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, santosh, 10:15
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Richard, 10:15
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Lew Pitcher, 09:55
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Ram Prasad, 09:51
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Flash Gordon, 09:47
- Re: Deamon Process, Mark Bluemel, 08:55
- Re: Deamon Process, santosh, 08:53
- Deamon Process, Roy, 08:51
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Eric Sosman, 08:25
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, santosh, 08:12
- Re: circular shift array, Duncan Muirhead, 08:10
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Richard, 07:55
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Ram Prasad, 07:27
- Re: error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Richard, 06:55
- error: expected ')' before '*' token -- What is this ?, Ram Prasad, 06:31
- Re: Nick Ludgater the Quantity Surveyor from Nottingham, Bo Persson, 06:28
- Re: Staic array de allocation, santosh, 06:13
- Re: printf, Pietro Cerutti, 06:12
- Re: Staic array de allocation, santosh, 06:10
- Re: Nick Ludgater the Quantity Surveyor from Nottingham, Roedy Green, 05:45
- Re: circular shift array, Richard Heathfield, 05:33
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Richard, 05:27
- Re: Calling a function with a literal list of strings?, Joakim Hove, 05:11
- Re: circular shift array, Richard, 05:07
- Re: Unused arguments, Serve Lau, 05:05
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 05:00
- Re: circular shift array, Chris Torek, 04:58
- Nick Ludgater the Quantity Surveyor from Nottingham, psparkes, 04:58
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Richard, 04:55
- Re: Calling a function with a literal list of strings?, Chris Torek, 04:49
- Re: circular shift array, Richard Heathfield, 04:30
- Re: printf, Richard Heathfield, 04:27
- Re: circular shift array, sam_cit, 04:26
- Re: circular shift array, Richard Heathfield, 04:14
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Little guy, 04:03
- Re: printf, Keith Thompson, 03:55
- Re: printf, Ian Collins, 03:47
- Re: printf, Shane, 03:41
- Re: printf, Mohan, 03:41
- Re: printf, Shane, 03:40
- Calling a function with a literal list of strings?, Joakim Hove, 03:39
- Re: printf, Pietro Cerutti, 03:37
- Re: printf, Ian Collins, 03:34
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 03:33
- Re: bytes calculation, Mark Bluemel, 03:31
- Re: Declaring variables in "case" blocks?, Keith Thompson, 03:30
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Bos, 03:09
- Re: printf, Shane, 02:28
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, websnarf, 02:12
- Re: printf, Ian Collins, 02:02
- Re: printf, Shane, 01:54
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, paktsardines, 01:51
- Re: printf, dan, 01:45
- Re: circular shift array, dan, 01:43
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, Ian Collins, 01:07
- Re: bytes calculation, Old Wolf, 01:06
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, Ian Collins, 01:05
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, Justin Spahr-Summers, 00:56
- Declaring variables in "case" blocks?, Robbie Hatley, 00:49
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, paktsardines, 00:41
- Re: bytes calculation, somenath, 00:28
- Re: Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, Ian Collins, 00:04
- Staic array de allocation, somenath, 00:00
July 30, 2007
- Re: Staic array de allocation, Ian Collins, 23:53
- Re: printf, Shane, 23:41
- Re: circular shift array, Barry Schwarz, 23:36
- Problems with function that returns a pointer to array of strings, paktsardines, 23:34
- Re: Unused arguments, Old Wolf, 23:32
- Re: printf, Barry Schwarz, 23:25
- Staic array de allocation, somenath, 23:23
- Re: const array, Barry Schwarz, 23:22
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, regis, 23:21
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Robert Gamble, 23:21
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 23:19
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, regis, 23:16
- circular shift array, Bint, 23:10
- circular shift array, Bint, 23:04
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Barry Schwarz, 22:41
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 22:37
- printf, Shane, 22:33
- Re: bytes calculation, Jack Klein, 21:49
- Re: bytes calculation, Jack Klein, 21:40
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 21:36
- Re: const array, Ian Collins, 20:43
- Re: Increment operator, Old Wolf, 20:41
- Re: const array, Martin Ambuhl, 20:40
- Re: const array, Barry Schwarz, 20:38
- www.cerocom.com, Natalia, 20:35
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 19:54
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Keith Thompson, 19:38
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Pietro Cerutti, 19:17
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Richard Heathfield, 19:07
- Re: const array, Ian Collins, 18:32
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 18:24
- Re: bytes calculation, Charles Bailey, 18:22
- [OT] Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Eric Sosman, 18:14
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Alan Curry, 18:09
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 18:01
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 17:59
- Re: Catching the product's weight sent via RS32 from a balance, jacob navia, 17:57
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Serve Lau, 17:55
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 17:48
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 17:39
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Pietro Cerutti, 17:37
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 17:34
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 17:30
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Peter J. Holzer, 17:29
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 17:29
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 17:24
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 17:17
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 17:16
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 17:16
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 17:13
- Re: bytes calculation, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:08
- Re: bytes calculation, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 17:07
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Richard Heathfield, 17:06
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Durduran, 17:03
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 16:56
- Re: Structure having pointers, Malcolm McLean, 16:49
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Chris Torek, 16:47
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Tobin, 16:43
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 16:40
- Re: Catching the product's weight sent via RS32 from a balance, Default User, 16:29
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Walter Roberson, 16:27
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Pfaff, 16:26
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 16:25
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 16:24
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Rui Maciel, 16:21
- Re: Malcolm's new book, santosh, 16:20
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, John Gordon, 16:20
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 16:20
- Re: A good compiler, JT, 16:19
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 16:17
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Walter Roberson, 16:13
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Harald van Dijk, 16:09
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Benoit Lefebvre, 16:07
- Catching the product's weight sent via RS32 from a balance, AMOS, 16:05
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Rui Maciel, 16:05
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Richard Heathfield, 15:57
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 15:55
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ed Jensen, 15:53
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Malcolm McLean, 15:52
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Chris Dollin, 15:46
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Harald van Dijk, 15:45
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, FBM, 15:40
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 15:37
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Kenneth Brody, 15:36
- Re: bytes calculation, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Roberto Waltman, 15:32
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, santosh, 15:24
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, jacob navia, 15:22
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Eric Sosman, 15:17
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, santosh, 15:17
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, Harald van Dijk, 15:17
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, FBM, 15:13
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Walter Roberson, 15:12
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: const array, Keith Thompson, 15:02
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, jacob navia, 14:57
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, FBM, 14:55
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Al Balmer, 14:55
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 14:54
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 14:53
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 14:53
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, dan, 14:52
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 14:44
- Re: strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, Harald van Dijk, 14:43
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 14:41
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Eric Sosman, 14:41
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 14:36
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:32
- Re: A good compiler, Flash Gordon, 14:29
- strange behavior: sockaddr_in makes gdb fail, FBM, 14:23
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Eric Sosman, 14:21
- excuse me, hachami_18, 14:16
- Re: Increment operator, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:09
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Richard Heathfield, 14:05
- searching for happiness?, hachami_18, 14:05
- Re: A good compiler, JT, 14:00
- Re: Increment operator, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:59
- Re: A good compiler, JT, 13:59
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 13:58
- Re: Increment operator, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:57
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Robert Gamble, 13:56
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:54
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 13:48
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 13:46
- Re: Limits on compilers and UB (was Re: Increment operator), Harald van Dijk, 13:45
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 13:43
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:43
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, santosh, 13:38
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, santosh, 13:36
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:34
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Flash Gordon, 13:34
- Re: bytes calculation, Ben Pfaff, 13:34
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Kenneth Brody, 13:33
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:32
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 13:31
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Richard Heathfield, 13:31
- Limits on compilers and UB (was Re: Increment operator), Kenneth Brody, 13:28
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Pietro Cerutti, 13:24
- Re: Weird. malloc() fails in spite of having enough virtual memory..., Clever Monkey, 13:24
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:15
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, ¬a\\/b, 13:15
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Harald van Dijk, 13:14
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, JT, 13:09
- Re: Increment operator, Harald van Dijk, 13:09
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:04
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Mark Bluemel, 13:01
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:00
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Flash Gordon, 13:00
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Kenny McCormack, 12:59
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:59
- Re: A good compiler, Harald van Dijk, 12:58
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:56
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, jacob navia, 12:55
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Kenny McCormack, 12:54
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 12:53
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 12:52
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:51
- Re: Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Richard Heathfield, 12:51
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, Pietro Cerutti, 12:50
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 12:48
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, SM Ryan, 12:46
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, SM Ryan, 12:46
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, JT, 12:45
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 12:45
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, santosh, 12:44
- Re: Preserving the value of errno, santosh, 12:42
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ivar Rosquist, 12:41
- Re: A good compiler, JT, 12:38
- Creative uses for variable argument list functions, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:38
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 12:38
- Preserving the value of errno, Spiros Bousbouras, 12:34
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 12:34
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 12:31
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 12:28
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 12:27
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Al Balmer, 12:24
- Re: bytes calculation, John Smith, 12:21
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: Malcolm's new book, ¬a\\/b, 12:17
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, ¬a\\/b, 12:16
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Al Balmer, 12:16
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Tobin, 12:12
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 12:10
- Re: bytes calculation, Charles Bailey, 12:10
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 12:08
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Serve Lau, 12:05
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 12:04
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 12:00
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 12:00
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 11:57
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Durduran, 11:52
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 11:51
- Re: bytes calculation, Mark Bluemel, 11:50
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 11:49
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 11:48
- Re: bytes calculation, Ben Pfaff, 11:47
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 11:45
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 11:45
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 11:43
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 11:42
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 11:37
- Re: bytes calculation, Mark Bluemel, 11:36
- Re: bytes calculation, Nick Keighley, 11:35
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 11:34
- Re: Increment operator, Kenneth Brody, 11:29
- Re: bytes calculation, Spoon, 11:27
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 11:19
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 11:19
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 11:18
- Re: Increment operator, Kenneth Brody, 11:12
- Re: bytes calculation, Mark Bluemel, 11:10
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 11:08
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 11:02
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 11:00
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 10:55
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 10:55
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 10:53
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 10:49
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 10:48
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 10:44
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 10:42
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 10:25
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Chris Dollin, 10:24
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, rsk, 10:13
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Richard, 10:11
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Mark Bluemel, 10:06
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, rsk, 10:04
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 10:00
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 09:53
- Re: bytes calculation, Mark Bluemel, 09:47
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 09:41
- Re: bytes calculation, Spoon, 09:39
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard, 09:38
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:32
- Re: Problem in using fscanf, Mark Bluemel, 09:27
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:27
- Re: bytes calculation, Richard, 09:26
- Re: Unused arguments, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:25
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", lvirden, 09:25
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 09:23
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:21
- Problem in using fscanf, rsk, 09:20
- Re: bytes calculation, Pietro Cerutti, 09:15
- Re: bytes calculation, jacob navia, 09:13
- Re: A good compiler, Flash Gordon, 09:05
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 08:57
- bytes calculation, seema, 08:55
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Flash Gordon, 08:54
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Flash Gordon, 08:39
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 08:25
- Re: Increment operator, Spoon, 08:24
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Serve Lau, 08:23
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Spoon, 08:20
- Re: Increment operator, Robert Gamble, 08:19
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard, 08:06
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Chris Dollin, 08:03
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Tobin, 07:59
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Kenny McCormack, 07:52
- Re: Structure having pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 07:45
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Pietro Cerutti, 07:21
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, CryptiqueGuy, 07:10
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard, 07:08
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Spoon, 06:52
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, pete, 06:51
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, pete, 06:41
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Spoon, 06:37
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 06:37
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Pietro Cerutti, 06:32
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 06:06
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Mark Bluemel, 05:57
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Spoon, 05:53
- Re: String functions and overlapping objects, Jean-François Lemaire, 05:52
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 05:40
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 05:36
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Bos, 05:32
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Richard Tobin, 05:29
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Spoon, 05:16
- Re: const array, Ian Collins, 05:10
- Re: const array, jackymaillist, 04:57
- Re: String functions and overlapping objects, santosh, 04:57
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Keith Thompson, 04:53
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, santosh, 04:46
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 04:31
- Re: const array, Default User, 04:29
- Re: Uninitialized auto variables, Chris Dollin, 04:16
- Uninitialized auto variables, Spoon, 04:09
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Heathfield, 04:05
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Serve Lau, 04:01
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, sushi boi, 03:56
- Re: const array, jackymaillist, 03:54
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 03:45
- const array, jackymaillist, 03:44
- Re: String functions and overlapping objects, Default User, 03:33
- String functions and overlapping objects, Jean-François Lemaire, 03:06
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 02:40
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Keith Thompson, 02:24
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Richard Bos, 02:19
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 02:03
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 01:41
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 01:10
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 01:07
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, ¬a\\/b, 00:59
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, SM Ryan, 00:42
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 00:15
July 29, 2007
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, dan, 23:10
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, John Bode, 22:51
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Chris Torek, 22:37
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 22:12
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 22:02
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 21:58
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 21:49
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, dan, 21:43
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 21:19
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 20:31
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 20:31
- Re: Structure having pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 20:29
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 20:13
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 20:09
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 20:03
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:56
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:49
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 19:49
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, William Hughes, 19:47
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:46
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:42
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:41
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, dan, 19:39
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Old Wolf, 19:37
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:37
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 19:36
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 19:34
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Ben Bacarisse, 19:33
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:29
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:28
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Keith Thompson, 19:27
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:26
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 19:23
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Guillaume, 19:21
- Re: Increment operator, Old Wolf, 19:21
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 19:20
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Ian Collins, 19:17
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 19:14
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard, 19:12
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 19:12
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Old Wolf, 19:11
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 19:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Old Wolf, 19:05
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:52
- Re: Bounds checking and safety in C, Richard, 18:52
- Bounds checking and safety in C, jacob navia, 18:43
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 18:34
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ed Jensen, 18:26
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 18:21
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 18:20
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 18:19
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 18:17
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 18:14
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 18:09
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 18:07
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 18:05
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Richard Heathfield, 17:58
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 17:56
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 17:53
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 17:48
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 17:47
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 17:46
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 17:44
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 17:42
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 17:40
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 17:39
- Re: Increment operator, Keith Thompson, 17:37
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 17:36
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 17:36
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 17:32
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 17:31
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 17:29
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 17:21
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 17:17
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 17:09
- Re: Structure having pointers, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 16:58
- Re: Weird. malloc() fails in spite of having enough virtual memory..., Richard Tobin, 16:54
- Re: Structure having pointers, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 16:42
- Re: Structure having pointers, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, pete, 16:22
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 16:17
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, santosh, 16:15
- Weird. malloc() fails in spite of having enough virtual memory..., itsolution, 15:10
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, santosh, 15:06
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, santosh, 15:01
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 14:51
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, santosh, 14:50
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 14:49
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 14:49
- Re: OT - Re: Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:47
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 14:46
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 14:46
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Malcolm McLean, 14:43
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 14:40
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, SM Ryan, 14:40
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 14:39
- Re: Unused arguments, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:39
- Re: Timers & socket select, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:34
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 14:30
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, pete, 14:27
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 14:25
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:22
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:21
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:21
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 14:15
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:07
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard, 14:07
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 14:07
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 14:05
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 14:05
- Re: Structure having pointers, pete, 14:03
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ed Jensen, 14:02
- Re: Session management, jacob navia, 14:01
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:56
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 13:53
- Re: Session management, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:43
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:39
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:34
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:30
- Re: Increment operator, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:19
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:14
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, jacob navia, 13:10
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Malcolm McLean, 13:06
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 13:00
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Gene, 12:59
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:50
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 12:49
- Re: Structure having pointers, Malcolm McLean, 12:47
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard, 12:45
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Walter Roberson, 12:43
- Re: Structure having pointers, Kenny McCormack, 12:43
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:41
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 12:36
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Malcolm McLean, 12:34
- Re: Structure having pointers, Malcolm McLean, 12:30
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Peter J. Holzer, 12:28
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 12:23
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Walter Roberson, 12:17
- Re: Structure having pointers, Kenny McCormack, 11:56
- Re: New well tested makepp snapshot released, Keith Thompson, 11:52
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Peter J. Holzer, 11:49
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Keith Thompson, 11:47
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Keith Thompson, 11:40
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Keith Thompson, 11:23
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 11:18
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 11:15
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Rui Maciel, 11:03
- New well tested makepp snapshot released, Daniel Pfeiffer, 11:02
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Kenny McCormack, 10:53
- Re: Structure having pointers, regis, 10:52
- Re: Structure having pointers, regis, 10:42
- Re: Structure having pointers, regis, 10:34
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 10:23
- Re: Structure having pointers, santosh, 10:21
- Re: Structure having pointers, santosh, 10:19
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 10:16
- Re: Structure having pointers, Harald van Dijk, 10:16
- Re: Structure having pointers, regis, 10:09
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 10:01
- Why Is This The Best Program Online ?, roberts325, 09:52
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:46
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard, 09:41
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Richard, 09:39
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 09:38
- Re: Structure having pointers, Ben Bacarisse, 09:23
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, santosh, 09:22
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 09:18
- Re: Structure having pointers, pete, 09:17
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 09:13
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Xu Weijiang, 09:11
- Re: Structure having pointers, AnticitizenOne, 09:02
- Re: Structure having pointers, santosh, 08:53
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Ben Bacarisse, 08:45
- Re: Structure having pointers, AnticitizenOne, 08:41
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard Heathfield, 08:39
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 08:37
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 08:35
- Re: Structure having pointers, AnticitizenOne, 08:31
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard, 08:31
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard, 08:29
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard, 08:23
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 08:21
- Re: Structure having pointers, Richard Heathfield, 08:18
- Re: Structure having pointers, Malcolm McLean, 08:06
- Re: Structure having pointers, santosh, 08:04
- Re: Structure having pointers, santosh, 07:57
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Peter J. Holzer, 07:48
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Rui Maciel, 07:43
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Peter J. Holzer, 07:34
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 07:31
- Re: Structure having pointers, AnticitizenOne, 07:26
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Peter J. Holzer, 07:14
- Structure having pointers, sam_cit, 06:20
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ian Collins, 05:47
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 04:42
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ian Collins, 04:41
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ian Collins, 04:36
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 04:18
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Malcolm McLean, 03:48
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Heathfield, 03:45
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 03:40
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, ¬a\\/b, 03:39
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Richard Heathfield, 03:38
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Malcolm McLean, 03:36
- Re: can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, Chris Thomasson, 03:25
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Chris Thomasson, 03:21
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 02:55
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Chris Torek, 02:41
- can preprocessor automatically make N array elements?, dan, 02:27
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Default User, 01:35
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Harter, 00:56
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Bacarisse, 00:38
- <OT> correction Was: Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Bacarisse, 00:35
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Bacarisse, 00:22
July 28, 2007
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Harter, 23:59
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ian Collins, 23:06
- Re: Session management, Richard, 23:04
- Re: Session management, Richard, 23:02
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 22:43
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 22:42
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 22:41
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 22:38
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Pfaff, 21:26
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, nsa . usa, 21:18
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, nsa . usa, 21:16
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ben Pfaff, 21:08
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Ben Bacarisse, 20:58
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 20:50
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, Xu Weijiang, 20:49
- Re: double to int weirdness, regis, 20:48
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ed Jensen, 20:29
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Thomas Dickey, 20:20
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, nsa . usa, 20:19
- Re: function for clockticks since 1980?, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 19:59
- function for clockticks since 1980?, nsa . usa, 19:52
- Re: double to int weirdness, nsa . usa, 19:47
- Re: double to int weirdness, Martin Ambuhl, 19:25
- Re: double to int weirdness, Martin Ambuhl, 19:22
- Re: double to int weirdness, regis, 19:13
- Re: double to int weirdness, William Hughes, 19:11
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kelsey Bjarnason, 19:08
- Re: double to int weirdness, Tim Prince, 18:59
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 18:34
- Re: Session management, Richard Heathfield, 18:24
- Re: Session management, Malcolm McLean, 18:13
- Re: double to int weirdness, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: call by value, Richard Heathfield, 17:45
- Re: double to int weirdness, regis, 17:45
- double to int weirdness, nsa . usa, 17:37
- Re: call by value, Kenny McCormack, 17:32
- Re: call by value, mdh, 17:29
- Re: call by value, Kenny McCormack, 17:03
- great new site for IT GURUS - www.itkong.com, itkong, 17:02
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 16:59
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ben Bacarisse, 16:57
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Default User, 16:57
- Re: call by value, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Keith Thompson, 16:48
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 16:45
- Re: call by value, Malcolm McLean, 16:44
- Re: Session management, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Serve Lau, 16:38
- Re: Session management, Keith Thompson, 16:38
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ian Collins, 16:38
- Re: call by value, Richard Heathfield, 16:36
- Re: joining args ?, Malcolm McLean, 16:35
- Re: Session management, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 16:31
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 16:15
- Re: call by value, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Peter J. Holzer, 15:39
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Walter Roberson, 15:26
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 15:23
- Re: Session management, Walter Roberson, 15:22
- Re: Session management, Malcolm McLean, 15:21
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Chris Torek, 15:19
- Re: Session management, santosh, 15:17
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, SM Ryan, 15:14
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Harter, 15:09
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 15:09
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Malcolm McLean, 15:05
- Re: Session management, Antoninus Twink, 15:02
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, santosh, 14:59
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 14:53
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 14:52
- Re: Passing literals to union arguments, regis, 14:49
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:30
- Passing literals to union arguments, Richard Harter, 14:28
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Serve Lau, 14:26
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 14:24
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 14:16
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 14:12
- Re: Session management, Antoninus Twink, 14:04
- Re: COMPILER, Richard, 13:55
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 13:51
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 13:40
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Walter Roberson, 13:33
- Re: COMPILER, Kenny McCormack, 13:29
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, John Smith, 13:22
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Default User, 13:20
- Re: COMPILER, Default User, 13:14
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Kenny McCormack, 12:56
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Gene, 12:54
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 12:45
- Re: call by value, christian.bau, 12:38
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Serve Lau, 12:31
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 12:31
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, christian.bau, 12:30
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 12:26
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, santosh, 12:25
- Re: Session management, Malcolm McLean, 12:03
- Re: Unusal problem with variables in a global structure, Gokul, 12:00
- Re: Session management, Kenny McCormack, 11:48
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Malcolm McLean, 11:45
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Kenny McCormack, 11:45
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Kenny McCormack, 11:42
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Marco, 11:32
- Re: COMPILER, Malcolm McLean, 11:26
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 11:24
- Re: Session management, Walter Roberson, 11:23
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 11:21
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 11:21
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 11:19
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Malcolm McLean, 11:09
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 11:09
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 11:08
- Session management, Antoninus Twink, 11:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 11:07
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 11:03
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 10:56
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 10:55
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 10:50
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 10:48
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 10:47
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 10:46
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 10:39
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Peter J. Holzer, 10:37
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 10:34
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, jacob navia, 10:26
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 10:21
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, osmium, 10:08
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 10:06
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 10:00
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 09:57
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 09:47
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Kenny McCormack, 09:46
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 09:42
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, santosh, 09:41
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 09:35
- Re: run a shell command with C code in OS X, santosh, 09:35
- Re: joining args ?, santosh, 09:31
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, osmium, 09:25
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Joe Wright, 09:21
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, jacob navia, 09:12
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Chris Dollin, 09:12
- Re: Unused arguments, Serve Lau, 09:07
- Re: joining args ?, Harvey, 09:00
- run a shell command with C code in OS X, sushi boi, 08:32
- Re: [OT] Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, pete, 08:14
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 08:10
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 07:21
- Re: COMPILER, Richard, 07:18
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard, 07:17
- Re: call by value, Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: call by value, mdh, 07:03
- Re: call by value, mdh, 06:57
- Re: call by value, Richard Heathfield, 06:51
- Re: Unusal problem with variables in a global structure, santosh, 06:43
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, Richard Heathfield, 06:41
- Re: Unusal problem with variables in a global structure, Doug, 06:38
- call by value, mdh, 06:38
- Unusal problem with variables in a global structure, Gokul, 06:16
- Re: OT - Re: COMPILER, jacob navia, 05:22
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Chris Torek, 05:13
- OT - Re: COMPILER, santosh, 05:12
- Re: A good compiler, Joachim Schmitz, 05:11
- Re: COMPILER, jacob navia, 04:57
- Re: COMPILER, Default User, 03:43
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Richard Tobin, 03:43
- Re: A good compiler, santosh, 03:12
- Re: A good compiler, MOUNTAIN KING, 03:06
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, santosh, 03:05
- COMPILER, MOUNTAIN KING, 03:04
- Re: A good compiler, MOUNTAIN KING, 02:57
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 02:48
- Re: [OT] Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Malcolm McLean, 02:14
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 01:31
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, ¬a\\/b, 01:20
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 01:18
July 27, 2007
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Jack Klein, 23:09
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Jack Klein, 23:05
- Re: Unused arguments, Peter J. Holzer, 21:34
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 19:56
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:42
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 19:36
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 19:34
- C, Brandon, 19:23
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:15
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:11
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:09
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:09
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", Ben Bacarisse, 18:59
- Re: joining args ?, Default User, 18:34
- Re: joining args ?, Eric Sosman, 18:12
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Chris Torek, 17:42
- Re: suppressing warnings in boost header files, santosh, 17:19
- Re: joining args ?, Default User, 17:12
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:11
- Re: joining args ?, santosh, 17:04
- Re: joining args ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 16:50
- Re: How can get random number in your range, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Al Balmer, 16:47
- Re: Text files, Roberto Waltman, 16:43
- Re: joining args ?, santosh, 16:43
- Re: joining args ?, santosh, 16:39
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:34
- Re: joining args ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 16:34
- Re: joining args ?, Benoit Lefebvre, 16:32
- Re: joining args ?, santosh, 16:27
- Re: joining args ?, Walter Roberson, 16:25
- joining args ?, benoit . lefebvre, 16:15
- Re: Unused arguments, C. Benson Manica, 15:15
- Re: How can get random number in your range, Walter Roberson, 15:11
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, C. Benson Manica, 15:10
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Roland Pibinger, 15:03
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: How can get random number in your range, Keith Thompson, 14:58
- Re: A good compiler, Harald van Dijk, 14:52
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Al Balmer, 14:45
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Robert Gamble, 14:30
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Default User, 14:29
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Walter Roberson, 14:21
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, santosh, 14:19
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Roberto Waltman, 14:10
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, C. Benson Manica, 14:10
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Ben Pfaff, 14:07
- Re: repeated code before multiple return statements, Kenneth Brody, 14:00
- repeated code before multiple return statements, Alexander Stoyakin, 13:51
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Martin Ambuhl, 13:50
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", lvirden, 13:40
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", lvirden, 13:37
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", Roberto Waltman, 12:58
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 12:52
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Ben Bacarisse, 12:44
- Re: A good compiler, mmcconnell17704, 12:43
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", Ben Bacarisse, 12:33
- Re: Unused arguments, Serve Lau, 12:28
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 12:24
- Re: Timers & socket select, Kenny McCormack, 12:24
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Serve Lau, 12:19
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Clever Monkey, 12:15
- Re: A good compiler, Ben Bacarisse, 12:02
- Re: How can get random number in your range, Ben Bacarisse, 11:46
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Richard Heathfield, 11:44
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 11:37
- Re: (USB) Win sends request for unknown descriptor when trying to enumerate my CDC class device, Walter Roberson, 11:25
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Richard, 11:14
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard, 11:08
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Charlton Wilbur, 10:57
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", lvirden, 10:57
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Richard Heathfield, 10:55
- Re: [OT] Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Roberto Waltman, 10:48
- Re: expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", Roberto Waltman, 10:33
- Re: Is this return UB ?, @$|-|. DUBEY, 10:31
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Thomas Dickey, 10:27
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard, 10:16
- expanding c code to be "more cross-platform", lvirden, 10:09
- Re: Timers & socket select, Kenny McCormack, 10:06
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Tim Prince, 09:49
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ivar Rosquist, 09:45
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 09:32
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard Heathfield, 09:31
- Wikicodia - The code snippets wiki, Wikicodia Admin, 09:08
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 08:46
- Re: Timers & socket select, InuY4sha, 08:43
- (USB) Win sends request for unknown descriptor when trying to enumerate my CDC class device, vishnu, 08:43
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard, 08:42
- Re: A good compiler, Ben Bacarisse, 08:33
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard Heathfield, 08:32
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 08:21
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard, 08:04
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard Heathfield, 07:54
- [OT] Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Eric Sosman, 07:51
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 07:41
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard, 07:33
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard, 07:30
- Re: The chart of comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 07:01
- Re: how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Richard Heathfield, 06:48
- Re: Timers & socket select, Richard Heathfield, 06:47
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 06:44
- The chart of comp.lang.c, jacob navia, 06:38
- how to suppress "indent" from performing functions not specified in the options?, Divya, 06:37
- Re: Timers & socket select, InuY4sha, 06:32
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 06:25
- Re: A good compiler, Rui Maciel, 06:23
- Re: A good compiler, Rui Maciel, 06:23
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 06:18
- Re: Timers & socket select, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:16
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 06:15
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 06:13
- Re: How can get random number in your range, Peter J. Holzer, 06:07
- Re: Timers & socket select, santosh, 06:07
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 06:05
- Re: How can get random number in your range, jacob navia, 06:02
- Timers & socket select, InuY4sha, 06:00
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 05:48
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Spoon, 05:45
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Christopher Benson-Manica, 05:43
- How can get random number in your range, bipi, 05:38
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Christopher Benson-Manica, 05:34
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Tobin, 05:27
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 05:08
- Re: if in a interrupt rountine with a 80c51, zweitakt1973, 05:06
- Re: LaTeX-Like Parsing in C, Chris Dollin, 04:56
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 04:40
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 04:17
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 04:14
- Re: A good compiler, Ian Collins, 04:03
- Re: if in a interrupt rountine with a 80c51, jacob navia, 03:50
- Re: if in a interrupt rountine with a 80c51, Martin Ambuhl, 03:50
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 03:47
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 03:45
- Re: if in a interrupt rountine with a 80c51, Keith Thompson, 03:44
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 03:43
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 03:42
- Re: beginners, pete, 03:39
- if in a interrupt rountine with a 80c51, zweitakt1973, 03:27
- Re: Pointer Question, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 03:10
- Re: A good compiler, santosh, 02:42
- Re: beginners, santosh, 02:30
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 02:28
- beginners, aman firoz, 02:25
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 02:23
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 01:10
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 00:08
July 26, 2007
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 23:11
- Re: A good compiler, Denis Kasak, 22:35
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Charlton Wilbur, 22:32
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 22:17
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 22:03
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 21:53
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Richard Heathfield, 21:20
- Re: A good compiler, pete, 21:12
- Re: A good compiler, Shawn the Rock, 21:12
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, Ben Bacarisse, 20:45
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 20:30
- Re: Is this return UB ?, dada, 19:48
- Re: A good compiler, Denis Kasak, 19:45
- Re: Is this return UB ?, Richard Heathfield, 19:38
- Is this return UB ?, dada, 19:26
- Re: A good compiler, Default User, 19:07
- Re: A good compiler, Ian Collins, 18:43
- Re: A good compiler, Ian Collins, 18:42
- Re: String intersection, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Mark McIntyre, 18:34
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Kenny McCormack, 18:18
- Re: Increment operator, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 18:18
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Kenny McCormack, 18:13
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 18:07
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 18:03
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 17:54
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 17:51
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 17:40
- Re: Malcolm's new book, regis, 17:39
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Ian Collins, 17:37
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 17:19
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 17:09
- Re: Increment operator, Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 16:53
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:52
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 16:49
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 16:46
- Re: A good compiler, Flash Gordon, 16:43
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 16:41
- Re: A good compiler, Flash Gordon, 16:38
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 16:37
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:35
- Re: Increment operator, Eric Sosman, 16:32
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Doug, 16:29
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 16:24
- Re: Malcolm's new book, REH, 16:23
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 16:18
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 16:18
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 16:16
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 16:14
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 16:12
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:05
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Doug, 15:52
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:49
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 15:49
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:40
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Doug, 15:34
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 15:33
- Re: LaTeX-Like Parsing in C, Richard Heathfield, 15:27
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Kenneth Brody, 15:26
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Kenneth Brody, 15:24
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, santosh, 15:16
- LaTeX-Like Parsing in C, nedelm, 15:14
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 15:13
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, tguclu, 14:58
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Kenny McCormack, 14:56
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Kenny McCormack, 14:53
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Doug, 14:33
- Re: A good compiler, user923005, 14:29
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 14:19
- Re: Increment operator, Robert Gamble, 14:16
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Doug, 14:15
- Re: String intersection, pete, 14:13
- Re: Malcolm's new book, regis, 14:07
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Durduran, 14:02
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Durduran, 14:00
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 13:47
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Default User, 13:44
- Re: A good compiler, santosh, 13:29
- Re: Increment operator, Manuel T, 13:29
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:23
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, santosh, 13:19
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:06
- Re: A good compiler, Harald van Dijk, 13:00
- Re: String intersection, James Antill, 12:57
- Re: Increment operator, Kenneth Brody, 12:40
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:30
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 12:24
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, lawrence . jones, 12:17
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 12:14
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 12:12
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:08
- Re: A good compiler, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:08
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:06
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:02
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:44
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, Spoon, 11:44
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Ralf Damaschke, 11:38
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 11:24
- Re: how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Mark Bluemel, 11:23
- how to debug this error? /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.2/../../../../lib/crt1.o, Durduran, 11:14
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 10:47
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, santosh, 10:47
- Re: Increment operator, Chris Dollin, 10:46
- Re: Increment operator, Keith Thompson, 10:40
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 10:36
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 09:55
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Mark Bluemel, 09:53
- Re: Signal to noise ratios, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:46
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 09:42
- Re: Increment operator, Kenny McCormack, 09:42
- Re: A good compiler, Kenny McCormack, 09:40
- Signal to noise ratios, Mark Bluemel, 09:38
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 09:36
- Re: A good compiler, Martin Ambuhl, 09:34
- Turn your computer to cash machine, SFI, 09:33
- I made $2500 last weak, SFI, 09:31
- Re: A good compiler, Kenny McCormack, 09:28
- Re: Increment operator, Chris Dollin, 09:18
- Re: Increment operator, Manuel T, 08:55
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 08:45
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 08:44
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Mark Bluemel, 08:25
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard, 08:14
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 08:12
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 08:09
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 08:07
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:58
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Bos, 07:50
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:45
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 07:44
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Richard Bos, 07:42
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Bos, 07:42
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ivar Rosquist, 07:09
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:44
- Re: Malcolm's new book, regis, 06:42
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Matt, 06:29
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 06:01
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard, 05:59
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 05:52
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 05:42
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard Heathfield, 05:41
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 05:39
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 05:31
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 05:27
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard, 05:21
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard, 05:20
- Re: Increment operator, Richard, 05:19
- Re: Increment operator, Richard Heathfield, 05:18
- Re: Creating array of data types, Mark Bluemel, 03:41
- Re: How to import a data to executable program?, dmtabs12@xxxxxxxxx, 03:26
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 02:54
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Alan Curry, 02:28
- Re: gcc + gprof : basic bloc counting, Richard, 02:11
- Re: Increment operator, Ben Pfaff, 00:42
- Re: Increment operator, Ian Collins, 00:38
- Increment operator, deepak, 00:32
July 25, 2007
- Re: Bitwise right shift, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 23:55
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Keith Thompson, 23:44
- Re: How much memory for C program ?, Keith Thompson, 23:01
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 22:52
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 21:50
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Barry Schwarz, 21:24
- Re: view the code, gaodongchen, 20:55
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, Joe Wright, 20:22
- Re: String intersection, pete, 20:15
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: Malcolm's new book, regis, 19:33
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:14
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, Martin Ambuhl, 18:42
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, pete, 17:54
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Tobin, 17:44
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 17:42
- Re: gcc + gprof : basic bloc counting, Flash Gordon, 17:38
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, REH, 17:32
- gcc + gprof : basic bloc counting, Nicolas Hervé, 17:08
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Serve Lau, 16:51
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Carramba, 16:12
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult - TPA, Keith Thompson, 15:37
- Re: Random number in a range - speed problem, Walter Roberson, 14:58
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 14:49
- Re: Creating array of data types, Default User, 14:31
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult - TPA, Flash Gordon, 14:26
- Random number in a range - speed problem, Mirek, 14:26
- Re: How much memory for C program ?, Walter Roberson, 14:10
- Re: Creating array of data types, santosh, 14:00
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, santosh, 13:54
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Richard Heathfield, 13:51
- FREE ACCESS ►Satellite TV on your PC or Laptop, jis, 13:50
- Re: How much memory for C program ?, santosh, 13:46
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Carramba, 13:43
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult - TPA, jacob navia, 13:31
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult - TPA, Default User, 13:29
- Re: Creating array of data types, John Bode, 12:57
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Matt, 12:55
- This One is ULTIMATE. (Dont' Miss), Sachin, 12:44
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Matt, 12:36
- Re: argv Value Swapping, Matt, 12:35
- argv Value Swapping, Matt, 12:31
- http://s4.metaldamage.onet.pl/c.php?uid=144980, Uloveme, 12:28
- wow w000t !, Uloveme, 12:26
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 12:25
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Richard Tobin, 12:13
- Re: String intersection, Christopher Benson-Manica, 12:09
- Re: Malcolm's new book, osmium, 11:17
- Re: Malcolm's new book, mstorkamp, 10:56
- Re: How much memory for C program ?, Chris Dollin, 10:36
- Re: String intersection, bahadir . balban, 10:35
- How much memory for C program ?, bipi, 10:29
- Re: String intersection, Bilgehan . Balban, 10:25
- Re: String intersection, Bilgehan . Balban, 10:22
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Mark Bluemel, 09:53
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, William Hughes, 09:53
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 09:31
- Re: String intersection, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:18
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, Thad Smith, 08:58
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Ben Bacarisse, 08:48
- Re: String intersection, regis, 08:42
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, Spoon, 08:38
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Ben Bacarisse, 08:37
- Re: Calling vfprintf with too few arguments in the va_list, those who know me have no need of my name, 08:31
- Re: String intersection, Spoon, 08:31
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 08:05
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 08:03
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 07:58
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Richard Heathfield, 07:56
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:50
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:46
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 07:46
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 07:43
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Tobin, 07:41
- Re: A good compiler, Ben Bacarisse, 07:40
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard, 07:37
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, Mark Bluemel, 07:33
- Re: String intersection, Eric Sosman, 07:31
- Re: Creating array of data types, santosh, 07:25
- Re: Bitwise right shift, santosh, 07:23
- String intersection, bahadir . balban, 07:18
- Re: view the code, santosh, 07:13
- Re: A good compiler, santosh, 07:06
- Re: initializing a number in binary form, santosh, 07:03
- initializing a number in binary form, tguclu, 07:00
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 06:55
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 06:53
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 06:52
- Re: view the code, Richard, 06:51
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Ian Collins, 06:39
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 06:35
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Cubanan, 06:25
- Re: view the code, Chris Hills, 06:23
- Re: Bitwise right shift, Mark Bluemel, 06:16
- Re: Bitwise right shift, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 06:12
- Re: view the code, Mark Bluemel, 06:03
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Cubanan, 06:03
- view the code, gaodongchen, 05:51
- Re: Bitwise right shift, Mark Bluemel, 05:37
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Mark Bluemel, 05:35
- Re: Calling vfprintf with too few arguments in the va_list, jacob navia, 05:33
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 05:29
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 05:12
- Re: A good compiler, Ian Collins, 05:03
- Calling vfprintf with too few arguments in the va_list, Spoon, 04:59
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 04:56
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 04:54
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 04:46
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 04:44
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 04:41
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, crox, 04:27
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 04:19
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 04:18
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Chris Dollin, 04:07
- Bitwise right shift, lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 04:06
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 04:02
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 04:00
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 03:59
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 03:53
- Re: Makefile Help, Mark Bluemel, 03:29
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 02:56
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 02:54
- Re: A good compiler, Keith Thompson, 02:46
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 01:20
July 24, 2007
- Re: Creating array of data types, Madhur, 23:55
- Re: Unused arguments, Christopher Benson-Manica, 23:52
- Re: Makefile Help, pycraze, 23:49
- Re: Makefile Help, pycraze, 23:49
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Ben Pfaff, 23:40
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 23:35
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 23:30
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 23:12
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 22:59
- Re: Malcolm's new book, pete, 22:47
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Ben Pfaff, 22:45
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Ian Collins, 22:30
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Old Wolf, 22:25
- Re: Unused arguments, Dave Vandervies, 22:12
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Kenny McCormack, 22:02
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 21:09
- Re: Unused arguments, Old Wolf, 19:55
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 19:28
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Tobin, 19:05
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Mark McIntyre, 19:01
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 18:55
- comp.lang.c, Nooby, 18:43
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Flash Gordon, 18:36
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 17:47
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, jacob navia, 17:40
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Clever Monkey, 17:38
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Richard Heathfield, 17:33
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Keith Thompson, 17:27
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Kenneth Brody, 17:15
- Re: Malcolm's new book, Eric Sosman, 16:56
- Re: Real pain with SegFoult, Richard Heathfield, 16:56
- Re: Why do we need "->"?, Flash Gordon, 16:55
- Real pain with SegFoult, Cubanan, 16:29
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Malcolm McLean, 16:23
- Re: Unused arguments, Flash Gordon, 16:23
- Malcolm's new book, Malcolm McLean, 16:18
- Re: How to import a data to executable program?, Malcolm McLean, 15:56
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 15:52
- Re: Creating array of data types, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 15:12
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Ben Pfaff, 14:58
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 14:54
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Keith Thompson, 14:53
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 14:31
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Ben Pfaff, 14:15
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, santosh, 14:08
- Re: Eight queen problem, user923005, 13:48
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Martin Ambuhl, 13:42
- Re: A good compiler, Martin Ambuhl, 13:39
- Re: A good compiler, user923005, 13:38
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 13:33
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Martin Ambuhl, 13:26
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Harald van Dijk, 13:04
- Re: Is this program legal C89?, Harald van Dijk, 13:00
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:48
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 12:46
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 12:46
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Serve Lau, 12:39
- Re: Is this program legal C89?, Eric Sosman, 12:34
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 12:17
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 12:08
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 12:05
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 12:05
- Re: Makefile Help, jacob navia, 11:48
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 11:46
- Re: A good compiler, jacob navia, 11:38
- Re: Makefile Help, Ben Pfaff, 11:36
- Re: Unused arguments, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:36
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Kenneth Brody, 11:36
- Re: A good compiler, Ben Pfaff, 11:36
- Re: Unused arguments, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:33
- Makefile Help, pycraze, 11:30
- Re: A good compiler, Frodo Baggins, 11:25
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Enzo Canuzzi, 11:20
- New Pinoy Adult site-- FREE Download, Root Canal, 11:07
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Heathfield, 08:46
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Heathfield, 08:41
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Army1987, 08:10
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard, 07:58
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard, 07:57
- Free Ebooks - Web Development and Programming Topics, Free Ebooks, 07:55
- Re: A good compiler, Rui Maciel, 07:54
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Army1987, 07:45
- Greetings, Daniel, 07:15
- Re: long long and long, santosh, 07:15
- Re: Creating array of data types, Mark Bluemel, 07:12
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Heathfield, 07:05
- Is this program legal C89?, Army1987, 07:01
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Heathfield, 07:00
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Mark Bluemel, 06:41
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 06:36
- Re: Undefined behavior, Richard, 06:32
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard, 06:32
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard, 06:30
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Richard, 06:27
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:07
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Mark Bluemel, 06:02
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Nick Keighley, 05:58
- Re: Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', Kenny McCormack, 05:53
- Re: Creating array of data types, Madhur, 05:47
- Re: long long and long, Army1987, 05:44
- Undefined reference to 'S_ISLINK', gaganpreet . nospam, 05:35
- Re: Unused arguments, Duncan Muirhead, 05:25
- Re: Creating array of data types, Mark Bluemel, 05:24
- Re: A good compiler, Carramba, 05:19
- Re: Creating array of data types, Richard Heathfield, 04:46
- Re: Creating array of data types, Madhur, 04:45
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Richard Heathfield, 04:41
- Re: Creating array of data types, Mark Bluemel, 04:34
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Mark Bluemel, 04:30
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Mark Bluemel, 04:27
- Creating array of data types, Madhur, 04:25
- Re: Will it leak the memory?, Chris Dollin, 04:23
- Will it leak the memory?, KG, 04:17
- Re: Undefined behavior, Richard Bos, 02:27
July 23, 2007
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 23:45
- C-C++ books and tutorial, Free Ebooks, 23:29
- Re: wow, Eric Sosman, 22:57
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 22:55
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 22:48
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 22:40
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Barry Schwarz, 22:27
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Barry Schwarz, 22:17
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 21:22
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Old Wolf, 21:05
- Re: Unused arguments, Old Wolf, 20:56
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 20:54
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 20:24
- Re: Unused arguments, Mark McIntyre, 19:48
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Mark McIntyre, 19:39
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 19:38
- Re: A good compiler, Mark McIntyre, 19:30
- wow, Nooby, 19:22
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 18:26
- Re: Need Help with base64, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: opening a file, Ben Pfaff, 18:14
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 18:12
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 18:12
- Re: opening a file, nikhil, 17:53
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 17:51
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 17:46
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, santosh, 17:10
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 17:08
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ben Pfaff, 17:01
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Keith Thompson, 16:38
- Re: opening a file, user923005, 16:32
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 16:31
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 16:17
- Undefined behavior, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Pointer Question, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: opening a file, Default User, 15:52
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Keith Thompson, 15:42
- Re: opening a file, Kenneth Brody, 15:40
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: opening a file, santosh, 15:17
- opening a file, nikhil, 15:12
- Re: How to import a data to executable program?, santosh, 15:07
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, tedu, 14:59
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 14:54
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 14:10
- Re: Need Help with base64, Roland Pibinger, 14:09
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Richard Heathfield, 13:32
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 13:31
- Re: Pointer Question, Martin Ambuhl, 13:13
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 12:53
- Re: Pointer Question, Default User, 12:39
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Ben Bacarisse, 12:31
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Richard Tobin, 12:13
- Re: Need Help with base64, Mark Bluemel, 12:00
- Re: Unused arguments, Serve Lau, 11:59
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Ben Bacarisse, 11:59
- Re: Need Help with base64, Mark Bluemel, 11:58
- Re: Need Help with base64, pycraze, 11:57
- Re: How to import a data to executable program?, fobus, 11:52
- Re: Need Help with base64, Mark Bluemel, 11:46
- Re: Need Help with base64, pycraze, 11:41
- Re: Need Help with base64, Mark Bluemel, 11:38
- Re: Need Help with base64, Mark Bluemel, 11:33
- Re: Need Help with base64, Roland Pibinger, 11:29
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Peter J. Holzer, 11:06
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:55
- Header dependencies, eric, 10:35
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 10:16
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 10:16
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 10:15
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 10:15
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Peter J. Holzer, 09:58
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Manish Tomar, 09:48
- Re: Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, santosh, 09:29
- Re: Pointer Question, Patrick, 09:17
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, Tim Slattery, 09:14
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 09:02
- Re: How important is software maintenance?, Richard Heathfield, 08:54
- Need Help with base64, pycraze, 08:37
- Re: Pointer Question, Mark Bluemel, 08:03
- Pointer Question, Patrick, 07:50
- Re: OT: Help finding a newsgroup, Roberto Waltman, 07:49
- Re: OT: Help finding a newsgroup, Richard Bos, 07:29
- OT: Help finding a newsgroup, still, 07:21
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 07:15
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 07:14
- Re: Linux X demo, Richard Bos, 06:23
- Re: Text files, Peter J. Holzer, 06:04
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Bos, 05:56
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 05:32
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 05:32
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 05:05
- Re: Linux X demo, Chris Dollin, 04:33
- Redefine fprintf for debugging purposes, Prayag Narula, 04:23
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 04:20
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 04:14
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 04:13
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Chris Thomasson, 03:58
- Re: Unused arguments, Richard Bos, 03:52
- Re: Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, pete, 03:37
- Re: Why do we need "->"?, not . here . now, 02:56
- Re: About c programing, Richard Heathfield, 02:26
- Re: Why do we need "->"?, Default User, 02:19
- Re: About c programing, Default User, 02:18
- Re: About c programing, Richard Heathfield, 02:09
- Re: About c programing, Default User, 01:29
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Alan Curry, 01:04
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Harald van Dijk, 00:55
- Conversion rules between unsigned operands and signed operand, somenath, 00:45
- Why do we need "->"?, not . here . now, 00:35
July 22, 2007
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Ian Collins, 23:42
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 23:33
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Dik T. Winter, 22:58
- Re: How to import a data to executable program?, Jack Klein, 22:24
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Keith Thompson, 22:10
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 21:50
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, pete, 21:31
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Keith Thompson, 21:26
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 21:03
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 20:44
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Ben Bacarisse, 20:41
- Re: hello, world, Sjouke Burry, 20:11
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Martin Ambuhl, 20:05
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 19:54
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, pete, 19:46
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 19:24
- How to import a data to executable program?, fobus, 19:22
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 19:16
- Re: A good compiler, Richard Heathfield, 19:15
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 19:07
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Flash Gordon, 19:05
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Old Wolf, 18:58
- Re: A good compiler, Joe Wright, 18:55
- Re: Source code reading list, Ben Pfaff, 18:55
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Barry Schwarz, 18:52
- Re: regex, Azazel, 18:51
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 18:50
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 18:48
- Re: Source code reading list, Old Wolf, 18:46
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 18:45
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 18:45
- حصريا مرجان احمد مرجان احلى صوت وصوره حصري هنا بس في ديدي ديفيدي, دارين, 18:44
- Re: regex, gert, 18:37
- Re: A good compiler, Malcolm McLean, 18:22
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, pete, 18:02
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 17:51
- Re: About c programing, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: About c programing, Richard Heathfield, 16:58
- Re: Question on epoch time, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 16:49
- Re: hello, world, Keith Thompson, 16:40
- Re: regex, Keith Thompson, 16:38
- Re: A good compiler, Richard, 16:31
- Re: Linux X demo, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: A good compiler, Flash Gordon, 16:26
- Re: A good compiler, Malcolm McLean, 16:20
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Flash Gordon, 16:19
- Re: Source code reading list, Malcolm McLean, 16:17
- Re: SEXY AND NAUGHTY PICS of paris hilton and pamela, Richard, 16:10
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Harald van Dijk, 16:08
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 16:05
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 15:53
- Re: sizeof 'A', David Thompson, 15:43
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, David Thompson, 15:43
- Re: use of volatile ?, David Thompson, 15:43
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, David Thompson, 15:43
- Re: storing related structs, David Thompson, 15:43
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ian Collins, 15:41
- Re: SEXY AND NAUGHTY PICS of paris hilton and pamela, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: Source code reading list, Default User, 15:37
- Re: hello, world, Malcolm McLean, 15:34
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Flash Gordon, 15:33
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Malcolm McLean, 15:30
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Bernhard Müller, 15:24
- Re: Read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image., Malcolm McLean, 15:19
- Re: Read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image., Roberto Waltman, 15:18
- Re: A good compiler, Chris Hills, 15:18
- Re: I want unsigned char * string literals, Eric Sosman, 15:02
- Re: regex, gert, 15:02
- About c programing, shawn, 14:55
- Read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image., Speed, 14:51
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 14:44
- Re: A good compiler, Tim Prince, 14:41
- Re: A good compiler, santosh, 14:38
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Eric Sosman, 14:36
- A good compiler, Ajinkya, 14:33
- I want unsigned char * string literals, Michael B Allen, 14:32
- Re: algorithm for file shredding, Kelsey Bjarnason, 13:46
- Re: Problems with realloc(), Barry Schwarz, 13:28
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Barry Schwarz, 13:02
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, Thad Smith, 13:01
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 13:00
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 12:53
- Re: Learning pointers, Markus, 12:49
- Re: Problems with realloc(), pete, 12:29
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, pete, 12:11
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Michael B Allen, 12:07
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Charlton Wilbur, 11:58
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Charlton Wilbur, 11:51
- Re: Problems with realloc(), pete, 11:43
- Re: Problems with realloc(), lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 11:11
- Re: Problems with realloc(), lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 11:10
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., santosh, 10:16
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Abdo Haji-Ali, 09:53
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, MikeC, 09:33
- Re: Justification for "->"?, pete, 09:19
- Re: Middle of a link list, Barry, 09:16
- Re: Problems with realloc(), DingDong, 09:16
- Re: Middle of a link list, pete, 09:14
- Re: Source code reading list, pete, 09:10
- Re: Middle of a link list, ravi, 09:07
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, pete, 08:50
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, pete, 08:44
- Re: Linux X demo, pete, 08:39
- Re: Learning pointers, pete, 08:35
- Re: Linux X demo, Ben Bacarisse, 08:32
- Re: Question on epoch time, Kai-Uwe Bux, 08:21
- Re: Problems with realloc(), Barry, 07:49
- Re: Middle of a link list, gw7rib, 07:34
- Re: *^*^*^*^8=====> Sexy Bikini Video Downloads <=====8*^*^*^*^*^*, MikeC, 07:28
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, MikeC, 07:26
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Nehil, 07:09
- Re: printf() width specifier in text fields, Flash Gordon, 06:54
- printf() width specifier in text fields, MikeC, 06:29
- Re: Learning pointers, jacob navia, 06:22
- Re: SEXY AND NAUGHTY PICS of paris hilton and pamela, MikeC, 06:17
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 06:01
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 05:59
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 05:58
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 05:46
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 05:42
- Re: Question on epoch time, James Kanze, 05:41
- Problems with realloc(), lancer6238@xxxxxxxxx, 05:38
- Re: Linux X demo, Flash Gordon, 05:24
- Re: Linux X demo, Flash Gordon, 05:17
- Learning pointers, Markus, 05:11
- Re: hello, world, rwxrxrx, 04:56
- Re: Linux X demo, Malcolm McLean, 04:25
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 03:47
- Re: Linux X demo, Herbert Kleebauer, 03:44
- Re: Linux X demo, Herbert Kleebauer, 03:44
- Re: regex, Malcolm McLean, 03:41
- Re: regex, Malcolm McLean, 03:38
- Re: get a FREE 150$ sign up bonus without deposit!!! ( http://ataja.es/free150 or http://fon.gs/free150 ), smartchenwei, 03:04
- Re: hello, world, smartchenwei, 02:58
- Re: regex, Martin Ambuhl, 02:30
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Heathfield, 02:13
- hello, world, zhouweiyue, 01:15
- Re: regex, gert, 01:05
- Re: Eight queen problem, Charles Richmond, 00:45
July 21, 2007
- new compiler website, 落人村, 23:43
- Re: Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Robert Gamble, 23:38
- regex, gert, 23:29
- Re: Linux X demo, J. J. Farrell, 23:14
- Suppressing Compiler Warning About Tricky Macro, Michael B Allen, 22:52
- Re: Linux X demo, Keith Thompson, 21:07
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Kenny McCormack, 20:35
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 18:42
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 18:02
- Re: Source code reading list, Ben Pfaff, 17:49
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 17:48
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 17:46
- Re: K&R style declaration, westymatt, 17:44
- Re: Source code reading list, Malcolm McLean, 17:41
- Re: Unused arguments, Flash Gordon, 17:35
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 17:34
- Re: Source code reading list, Richard Heathfield, 17:19
- Re: Unused arguments, Malcolm McLean, 17:04
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 16:53
- Re: Source code reading list, Malcolm McLean, 16:32
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 14:51
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 14:23
- Re: K&R style declaration, Ben Pfaff, 14:15
- Re: K&R style declaration, westymatt, 14:09
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., Thad Smith, 13:58
- Re: K&R style declaration, Tim Prince, 13:50
- ►►Get FREE Satellite TV on your PC or Laptop◄◄, Ana James, 13:41
- K&R style declaration, westymatt, 13:36
- ╔◙ GET PAID UPTO $3000 FOR YOUR OPINION ◙╗, Ana James, 13:24
- Source code reading list, David Delony, 12:08
- Re: Eight queen problem, pete, 09:56
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, pete, 09:44
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Chris Dollin, 09:33
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., pete, 09:10
- Re: Linker Error, Eric Sosman, 08:43
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Kenny McCormack, 08:35
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, Ian Collins, 07:27
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 07:25
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 06:26
- Re: is malloc thread-safe??, jacob navia, 06:25
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, max . trinitron, 06:18
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 06:14
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., rsk, 06:13
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 06:12
- is malloc thread-safe??, Nehil, 05:40
- Re: C tutorials geared towards maintaining existing code, Roland Pibinger, 05:14
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., Malcolm McLean, 05:01
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., rsk, 04:58
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., Thad Smith, 04:55
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., rsk, 04:53
- Re: Sorting a doubly link list, Ben Pfaff, 04:24
- Re: Cleanup code & malloc wrapper, gw7rib, 04:05
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 03:29
- Re: Sorting a doubly link list, santosh, 03:07
- Re: Sorting a doubly link list, pete, 02:56
- Re: Eight queen problem, santosh, 02:53
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., santosh, 02:37
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 02:29
- Eight queen problem, ravi, 02:27
- Sorting a doubly link list, ravi, 02:26
- Middle of a link list, ravi, 02:23
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 02:03
- Re: Unused arguments, santosh, 01:04
- Re: Linker Error, santosh, 00:57
- C tutorials geared towards maintaining existing code, David Delony, 00:50
July 20, 2007
- Re: getopt: how to carry more than one argument?, Jack Klein, 23:51
- Re: Fork does not return control back, SM Ryan, 23:10
- Re: Methods for fast binary file output?, SM Ryan, 23:10
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, SM Ryan, 23:10
- Re: file handling operation, SM Ryan, 23:10
- getopt: how to carry more than one argument?, zwylinux, 23:09
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 20:51
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 19:42
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 19:39
- Re: Unused arguments, Ian Collins, 19:24
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 19:16
- Re: Unused arguments, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 19:00
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 18:45
- Re: Unused arguments, jacob navia, 18:36
- Re: Linker Error, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Ian Collins, 18:11
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 18:08
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 18:06
- Re: Unused arguments, Ian Collins, 17:58
- Re: Linker Error, Kenny McCormack, 17:53
- Re: Linux X demo, Malcolm McLean, 17:47
- Re: Linker Error, santosh, 17:33
- Re: Unused arguments, jacob navia, 17:32
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, Keith Thompson, 17:28
- Linker Error, Santosh, 17:27
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 17:24
- Re: Question on epoch time, Clever Monkey, 17:02
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 16:58
- Re: Unused arguments, Ian Collins, 16:54
- Re: Question on epoch time, lawrence . jones, 16:50
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, lawrence . jones, 16:47
- Re: Unused arguments, Harald van Dijk, 16:47
- Re: Unused arguments, Richard Heathfield, 16:45
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 16:44
- Re: Unused arguments, Flash Gordon, 16:40
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, GeekBoy, 16:25
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, Jim Barlow, 16:18
- Re: Question on epoch time, Stephen Sprunk, 16:12
- Re: Unused arguments, Dave Hansen, 16:11
- Unused arguments, jacob navia, 15:58
- Re: Question on epoch time, Generic Usenet Account, 15:55
- Question on epoch time, usenet, 15:48
- Re: Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, GeekBoy, 15:48
- Re: Justification for "->"?, user923005, 15:35
- Handling daylight savings with standard time functions?, Generic Usenet Account, 15:27
- Re: Linux X demo, Flash Gordon, 14:56
- Re: file, Kenneth Brody, 14:34
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 14:06
- Re: MISRA-C & TC example suite released, santosh, 14:01
- Re: Linux X demo, Keith Thompson, 13:35
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Mark McIntyre, 13:32
- Re: Text files, santosh, 10:56
- Re: Text files, Nick Keighley, 10:47
- Re: Text files, Roberto Waltman, 10:10
- Re: Text files, santosh, 10:03
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., rsk, 09:45
- Re: Text files, osmium, 09:41
- Re: Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., santosh, 09:32
- Re: Help structuring my program (arrays of function pointers/ passing variables to functions), Eric Sosman, 09:25
- Re: Help structuring my program (arrays of function pointers/ passing variables to functions), santosh, 09:10
- Problem in reading a Hex file and then....., rsk, 09:10
- Re: Fork does not return control back, Urs Beeli, 09:06
- Re: Functors, osmium, 08:58
- Re: probleme de compilation sous AIX, jacob navia, 08:46
- Re: Text files, Richard Heathfield, 08:45
- Re: Help structuring my program (arrays of function pointers/ passing variables to functions), Nick Keighley, 08:45
- Re: Text files, santosh, 08:34
- Re: Text files, Richard, 08:21
- Re: file handling operation, Richard, 08:18
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, Richard, 08:13
- Re: Functors, Richard Bos, 08:03
- Re: Linux X demo, T.M. Sommers, 07:58
- Re: Functors, Ian Collins, 07:21
- Re: Functors, Richard Bos, 07:18
- Re: Functors, Chris Dollin, 07:16
- Re: Linux X demo, Chris Dollin, 07:05
- Re: Functors, Ian Collins, 06:56
- Re: Functors, Richard Bos, 06:53
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Chris Dollin, 06:52
- Functors, raghu, 06:44
- Re: probleme de compilation sous AIX, Richard Bos, 06:39
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Richard Bos, 06:38
- Re: probleme de compilation sous AIX, santosh, 06:34
- probleme de compilation sous AIX, jaakou . driss, 06:30
- Re: Linux X demo, Richard Heathfield, 06:18
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, santosh, 06:06
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Bos, 06:03
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Richard Bos, 05:55
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Richard Bos, 05:53
- Re: Linux X demo, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: Linux X demo, Chris Dollin, 05:07
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, santosh, 03:48
- Re: file, santosh, 03:38
- Re: Text files, Flash Gordon, 03:18
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Flash Gordon, 03:04
- Re: file, Guru Jois, 02:20
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Robert Gamble, 01:27
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard, 00:12
July 19, 2007
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Lew Pitcher, 21:33
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Gordon Burditt, 21:10
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Dik T. Winter, 20:57
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Bart, 20:28
- Re: Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Keith Thompson, 20:21
- Re: Simple Rotation and bitmasking problem, Old Wolf, 20:11
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Al Balmer, 19:43
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Old Wolf, 19:32
- Re: Text files, Keith Thompson, 19:06
- Re: Fork does not return control back, Old Wolf, 19:04
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, Old Wolf, 18:57
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Mark McIntyre, 18:47
- Re: Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Mark McIntyre, 18:44
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 18:35
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ian Collins, 18:34
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Mark McIntyre, 18:34
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ian Collins, 18:27
- Re: float, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: file handling operation, Mark McIntyre, 18:22
- Re: CRC32 residue, Mark McIntyre, 18:20
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 18:14
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, August Karlstrom, 18:06
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Pfaff, 18:05
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 17:53
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, santosh, 17:36
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 17:34
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 17:23
- Help structuring my program (arrays of function pointers/ passing variables to functions), googlinggoogler@xxxxxxxxxxx, 17:18
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 17:18
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, August Karlstrom, 17:16
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., s_dubrovich, 17:15
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, mmcconnell17704, 16:44
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, santosh, 16:41
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 16:38
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 16:27
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, santosh, 16:26
- Re: Text files, Flash Gordon, 16:21
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Malcolm McLean, 16:20
- Re: Methods for fast binary file output?, Malcolm McLean, 16:14
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Malcolm McLean, 16:08
- Re: Text files, santosh, 16:06
- Re: Text files, Malcolm McLean, 15:59
- Re: float, Keith Thompson, 15:49
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, Charles Bailey, 15:48
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: tree data structure: incomplete type error, xuthee, 15:06
- Re: Text files, Barry, 14:49
- Re: Text files, santosh, 14:24
- file, ashu, 14:11
- Re: Text files, Kenneth Brody, 14:03
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Kelsey Bjarnason, 12:58
- Text files, rafal_, 12:48
- Re: Fork does not return control back, santosh, 12:22
- Re: I need a general idea how to attack this problem., Default User, 12:21
- Re: Fork does not return control back, Richard Heathfield, 12:21
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, Kenny McCormack, 12:20
- Fork does not return control back, rohitsagar, 12:11
- Re: binary no, Thad Smith, 12:10
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, Chip Coldwell, 11:54
- Re: Sudden doubt, Kenneth Brody, 11:46
- CRC32 residue, alivingstone, 11:30
- Re: Detect internet reachable, Kenneth Brody, 11:20
- Re: Methods for fast binary file output?, santosh, 10:53
- Methods for fast binary file output?, email . ttindustries, 10:47
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, santosh, 10:42
- Re: file, santosh, 10:36
- Re: file, Pietro Cerutti, 10:29
- Re: Strange Error after printing argv values, Kenny McCormack, 10:28
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, Kenny McCormack, 10:25
- file, ashu, 10:23
- Strange Error after printing argv values, Matt, 10:08
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Mark Bluemel, 10:03
- Re: float, Chip Coldwell, 10:02
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard, 09:52
- Re: cast to pointer to function, etienne, 09:48
- Re: binary no, Chris Dollin, 09:20
- Re: Self referencing function prototype typedef, Thomas Dickey, 09:18
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Mark Bluemel, 08:57
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Eric Sosman, 08:56
- Re: Justification for "->"?, David Trallero, 08:36
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, Mark Bluemel, 08:15
- Re: binary no, santosh, 08:10
- binary no, Nehil, 07:54
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, Richard, 07:29
- Re: Indexing array..., santosh, 07:22
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, santosh, 07:18
- Re: Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, santosh, 07:10
- Re: float, ditiem, 07:10
- Re: Justification for "->"?, jacob navia, 07:08
- Re: Indexing array..., ditiem, 07:05
- Problem Outputting Command Line Arguments from argv, Matt, 07:04
- Re: Array of function pointers - help!, Charles Bailey, 07:00
- Re: sin (M_PI), Dik T. Winter, 06:59
- Re: Justification for "->"?, jacob navia, 06:50
- Array of function pointers - help!, M Turo, 06:42
- Re: Bitmask question, Patrick, 06:35
- Re: Justification for "->"?, santosh, 06:33
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Heathfield, 06:22
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, Chris Dollin, 06:19
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Richard Bos, 06:16
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Chris Dollin, 06:10
- Re: Why Case Sensitive?, santosh, 06:07
- Bitmask question, Patrick, 06:01
- Simple Rotation and bitmasking problem, Patrick, 05:53
- Why Case Sensitive?, Bart, 05:49
- Re: Justification for "->"?, jacob navia, 05:40
- Re: tree data structure: incomplete type error, Ben Bacarisse, 05:32
- Re: Indexing an array, ditiem, 05:17
- Re: Indexing an array, Chris Dollin, 05:12
- Re: Indexing an array, ditiem, 05:03
- Re: Indexing an array, ditiem, 05:01
- Re: Indexing an array, ditiem, 04:55
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 04:30
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 04:28
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Richard Bos, 04:23
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Richard Bos, 04:23
- Why does "->" exist?, not . here . now, 04:02
- Re: sizeof 'A', Dietmar Schindler, 03:45
- Re: Hi friends see my webpage and open the weblinks in that page it consists of 1.latest antivirussoftware 2.library softwares 3.software projects 4.software cracks 5.download accelerator plus 6.mobile themes 7.mobile softwares(for nokia,samsung,sonyericsson) 8.mobile videos(.3gp) 9...........ALL SOFTWARES PROVIDED BY GOOGLE IN SEPERATE ICONS and many more useful.................. ....................................open it and make use of it www.freewebs.com/usefulsite, santosh, 03:43
- Re: cast to pointer to function, Charles Bailey, 03:30
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Flash Gordon, 03:17
- Re: Hi friends see my webpage and open the weblinks in that page it consists of 1.latest antivirussoftware 2.library softwares 3.software projects 4.software cracks 5.download accelerator plus 6.mobile themes 7.mobile softwares(for nokia,samsung,sonyericsson) 8.mobile videos(.3gp) 9...........ALL SOFTWARES PROVIDED BY GOOGLE IN SEPERATE ICONS and many more useful.................. ....................................open it and make use of it www.freewebs.com/usefulsite, praveen, 03:03
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, praveen, 02:57
- Re: Justification for "->"?, Chris Torek, 02:54
- Urgent Requirement for Freshers - (0 - 2 Years) ---- (19th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 02:50
- Re: file handling operation, santosh, 02:46
- cast to pointer to function, etienne, 02:46
- Re: getting symbol information from elf binary, santosh, 02:40
- Re: file handling operation, santosh, 02:32
- Why does "->" exist?, not . here . now, 02:31
- Re: Flash Programmer || Long Beach || California, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: I need a general idea how to attack this problem., santosh, 02:20
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, santosh, 02:10
- Re: Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Roberto Waltman, 01:59
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, Daniel Rudy, 01:48
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, Daniel Rudy, 01:42
- getting symbol information from elf binary, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 01:41
- file handling operation, fazulu deen, 01:16
- Re: Simple Bitmask problem, Thad Smith, 00:49
- Justification for "->"?, not . here . now, 00:46
July 18, 2007
- Re: Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Kenny McCormack, 21:48
- Re: Sudden doubt, Barry Schwarz, 21:24
- I need a general idea how to attack this problem., Chad, 20:41
- Re: Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Gordon Burditt, 20:34
- Re: Pointer to matrix example, Anolethron, 20:03
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Richard, 19:18
- Unix time (predating epoch of Jan-1970), Grey Alien, 19:08
- Re: Simple Bitmask problem, pete, 19:04
- Re: Pointer to matrix example, Eric Sosman, 18:34
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Richard, 18:26
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Flash Gordon, 18:20
- Re: How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Default User, 18:12
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 18:11
- How to read a 8-bit grayscale JPEG image using C?, Speed, 18:06
- Re: float, Barry, 17:51
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 17:50
- Re: Simple Bitmask problem, pete, 17:24
- Re: Pointer to matrix example, Anolethron, 17:20
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 17:02
- Re: Need Help, msaugat, 16:49
- Re: Simple Bitmask problem, Eric Sosman, 16:20
- Re: float, Chip Coldwell, 16:17
- Re: Flash Programmer || Long Beach || California, Clever Monkey, 16:12
- Re: What does this cast do?, Default User, 15:38
- Simple Bitmask problem, Patrick, 15:04
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, Roberto Waltman, 14:29
- Re: Indexing array..., Default User, 14:24
- Re: Pointer to matrix example, Eric Sosman, 14:22
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Al Balmer, 14:07
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Flash Gordon, 14:05
- xmalloc() [was: Cleanup code & malloc wrapper], Chris Torek, 14:03
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Flash Gordon, 13:59
- tree data structure: incomplete type error, xuthee, 13:55
- Re: What does this cast do?, santosh, 13:48
- Re: What does this cast do?, Harald van Dijk, 13:42
- Re: What does this cast do?, santosh, 13:42
- Flash Programmer || Long Beach || California, Madhulika, 13:37
- Re: Pointer to matrix example, Anolethron, 13:32
- Re: Google looking for new recruitment agent, madhulika . baranwal, 13:32
- Pointer to matrix example, Anolethron, 13:32
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 13:17
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Carramba, 13:11
- What does this cast do?, robert, 13:10
- Re: Some odd place to declare, Harald van Dijk, 12:39
- Re: float, Tim Prince, 12:14
- Re: float, Duncan Muirhead, 11:49
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 11:36
- Re: Self referencing function prototype typedef, Eric Sosman, 11:28
- Self referencing function prototype typedef, Fatz, 11:21
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 10:40
- Re: float, santosh, 10:32
- float, bhawna great, 10:26
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., santosh, 10:07
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Keith Thompson, 10:02
- Re: cast to pointer to function, regis, 09:46
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 09:45
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 09:34
- Re: pointer dereference, Anurag, 09:33
- Re: Indexing array..., Coos Haak, 09:33
- Re: Indexing array..., santosh, 09:26
- Indexing array..., ditiem, 09:21
- Re: algorithm for file shredding, John Bode, 08:53
- Re: Cleanup code & malloc wrapper, Ben Bacarisse, 08:52
- Re: Sudden doubt, santosh, 08:40
- Re: Sudden doubt, Richard Bos, 08:38
- Sudden doubt, K. Jennings, 08:27
- Re: cast to pointer to function, Eric Sosman, 08:26
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Richard Bos, 08:20
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 08:19
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., santosh, 08:08
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Richard Bos, 08:02
- Re: cast to pointer to function, SM Ryan, 07:59
- Re: Detect internet reachable, SM Ryan, 07:59
- Re: Cleanup code & malloc wrapper, santosh, 07:48
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 07:47
- Re: Some odd place to declare, Kenny McCormack, 07:10
- Re: cast to pointer to function, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:02
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Bacarisse, 06:59
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Richard Bos, 06:59
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, santosh, 06:58
- Re: long long and long, Mohan, 06:40
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Bacarisse, 06:40
- Re: cast to pointer to function, santosh, 06:35
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, Richard Heathfield, 06:01
- cast to pointer to function, etienne, 05:55
- Re: pls explain this macro, santosh, 05:48
- Re: Some odd place to declare, santosh, 05:44
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, jacob navia, 05:44
- Re: pls explain this macro, Richard Heathfield, 05:42
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- Re: pls explain this macro, santosh, 05:29
- Re: pls explain this macro, Ian Collins, 04:38
- Re: Some odd place to declare, Ian Collins, 04:32
- Cleanup code & malloc wrapper, Petr Pavlu, 04:29
- pls explain this macro, Ravi, 04:23
- Some odd place to declare, Ravi, 04:17
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, santosh, 04:07
- Re: Preprocessor Directives, Richard Heathfield, 04:04
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Doug, 04:04
- Preprocessor Directives, Daniel Rudy, 03:51
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Daniel Rudy, 03:45
- Re: Detect internet reachable, Daniel Rudy, 03:39
- Re: Working with NON-NULL terminated strings, santosh, 03:29
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Flash Gordon, 03:24
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 03:22
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 02:40
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Phil Carmody, 02:35
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Phil Carmody, 02:31
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 02:16
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, firenet, 01:44
- Re: Detect internet reachable, Bill Reid, 01:19
- Urgent Openings for FRESHERS - (0 - 3 Years) (18th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 00:10
July 17, 2007
- Re: Indexing an array, Barry Schwarz, 23:47
- Re: Detect internet reachable, Keith Thompson, 23:39
- Detect internet reachable, Ke Tao, 23:10
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, user923005, 21:52
- Re: preprocessor and macros, SM Ryan, 21:39
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ian Collins, 19:37
- A new Classifieds Website has been Launched., Anmolads, 19:31
- A new Classifieds Website has been Launched., Anmolads, 19:31
- Re: Camapign for 64-bit T-shirt., Keith Thompson, 19:21
- Re: Camapign for 64-bit T-shirt., jacob navia, 19:07
- Camapign for 64-bit T-shirt., Malcolm McLean, 18:21
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 18:19
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 18:18
- www.cerocom.com, Natalia, 18:09
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Eric Sosman, 17:41
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Keith Thompson, 17:28
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 17:06
- Re: switch statement, was compiler, status..., Ben Pfaff, 16:59
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 16:48
- Re: Options for GNU Indent, Jonathan M. Rose, 16:46
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Harald van Dijk, 16:38
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: Indexing an array, Malcolm McLean, 16:28
- * * * Hot Deals On eBooks * * *, yalogin2qu, 16:26
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Keith Thompson, 16:20
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Al Balmer, 15:29
- Re: What does this cast do?, Chris Dollin, 14:50
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Carramba, 14:21
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Flash Gordon, 14:19
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Kenny McCormack, 14:15
- Re: MAKEWORD( ), Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:10
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Default User, 14:08
- What does this cast do?, robert, 13:56
- MAKEWORD( ), asit, 13:52
- MAKEWORD( ), asit, 13:52
- Re: Indexing an array, Chris Dollin, 13:22
- Indexing an array, ditiem, 13:06
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Flash Gordon, 12:59
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Thad Smith, 12:16
- Re: Working with NON-NULL terminated strings, Thad Smith, 12:12
- Re: long long and long, santosh, 11:28
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Bryan Harris, 11:12
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Urs Beeli, 11:06
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 10:39
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, santosh, 10:30
- Block threats from USB storage device, zhensoftware, 10:08
- Re: sin (M_PI), Dik T. Winter, 10:02
- Re: sizeof 'A', Dik T. Winter, 10:01
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 09:54
- Re: sizeof 'A', Dietmar Schindler, 09:44
- Re: sin (M_PI), Dik T. Winter, 09:40
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, Tim Prince, 09:32
- Re: malloc and functions, Ben Bacarisse, 09:31
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 09:21
- long long and long, Mathieu Dutour, 09:20
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, santosh, 09:15
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Thomas, 08:58
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Chris Dollin, 08:35
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Thomas, 08:24
- Re: sizeof 'A', Dik T. Winter, 08:22
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Dik T. Winter, 08:17
- Re: Windows optimization tricks, Richard, 08:09
- Re: OT - Re: Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), Richard, 08:01
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Urs Beeli, 07:39
- Re: OT - Re: Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), Richard Heathfield, 07:24
- OT - Re: Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), santosh, 07:05
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), borkhuis, 06:49
- Re: How to make malloc() fail ?, santosh, 06:42
- How to make malloc() fail ?, niranjan.singh@xxxxxxxxx, 06:36
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Heathfield, 06:36
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 06:21
- Re: >> operator, Chris Dollin, 05:08
- >> operator, Sonam, 05:00
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, mark_bluemel, 04:57
- Re: char *query[], santosh, 04:56
- Re: malloc and functions, santosh, 04:40
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, santosh, 04:17
- Re: preprocessing issues, gaetanoortisi, 04:15
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Richard Heathfield, 03:57
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Igmar Palsenberg, 03:37
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, Keith Thompson, 03:09
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 02:21
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Mohan, 01:58
- C Jokes, Jokeslide, 01:32
- Urgent Requirement of Testing Engineers in GENPACT (17th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 01:29
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, Martin Ambuhl, 01:08
- Re: char *query[], crox, 00:39
July 16, 2007
- Re: compile a file with openmp ,but failed, Christopher Benson-Manica, 23:47
- Re: malloc and functions, Christopher Benson-Manica, 23:37
- compile a file with openmp ,but failed, firenet, 22:23
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Barry Schwarz, 21:43
- Re: algorithm for file shredding, Eric Sosman, 21:34
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 20:46
- Re: malloc and functions, Old Wolf, 20:32
- Re: malloc and functions, Keith Thompson, 20:14
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Bacarisse, 20:13
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Keith Thompson, 20:09
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Barry Schwarz, 20:08
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Barry Schwarz, 20:08
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, user923005, 19:59
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Richard, 19:55
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Richard Heathfield, 19:46
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 19:39
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 19:33
- Re: malloc and functions, Ben Bacarisse, 19:31
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Ben Bacarisse, 19:11
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 18:53
- Re: Basic question about pointers, pete, 18:46
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 18:43
- www.cerocom.com, Natalia, 18:29
- [Music Movies Soft] Free binaries search & download = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 18:18
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Joe Wright, 18:04
- Re: algorithm for file shredding, Keith Thompson, 18:01
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 17:50
- Re: algorithm for file shredding - TPA, Default User, 17:43
- Re: algorithm for file shredding, Manny, 17:40
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:01
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Default User, 17:00
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 16:56
- Re: preprocessing issues, Jean-Marc Lienher, 16:53
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, user923005, 16:13
- Re: comparing mantissa, user923005, 16:03
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:59
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Richard, 15:58
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, user923005, 15:51
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, user923005, 15:50
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 15:39
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:37
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, user923005, 15:34
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Keith Thompson, 15:33
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 15:32
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:31
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, Keith Thompson, 15:30
- Re: Compute the number of words needed?, Malcolm McLean, 15:29
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 15:17
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 15:14
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Richard Heathfield, 14:36
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 14:31
- Re: Compute the number of words needed?, Kenneth Brody, 14:17
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 14:07
- Re: malloc and functions, Eric Sosman, 14:05
- Re: malloc and functions, Flash Gordon, 13:44
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Default User, 13:27
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 13:21
- Re: malloc and functions, Martin Ambuhl, 13:18
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Ben Bacarisse, 12:54
- Re: malloc and functions, raphfrk, 12:44
- Re: Compute the number of words needed?, Martin Ambuhl, 12:37
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 12:16
- THE LORD OF DOWNLOADS: MP3,Movies,Soft = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 12:13
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, Martin Ambuhl, 11:57
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 11:47
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, mark_bluemel, 11:16
- Re: preprocessing issues, Laurent Deniau, 11:04
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Chris Dollin, 10:54
- Re: Compute the number of words needed?, Richard Bos, 10:53
- Re: Compute the number of words needed?, Eric Sosman, 10:50
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:49
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:47
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, mark_bluemel, 10:46
- Compute the number of words needed?, sumedh....., 10:34
- Re: preprocessing issues, Jean-MArc Lienher, 10:29
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Jean-MArc Lienher, 10:19
- preprocessing issues, gaetanoortisi, 10:16
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, santosh, 10:00
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 09:57
- Re: Handling Circular Dependency, joshc, 09:44
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 09:42
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, Chris Dollin, 09:15
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 09:14
- Re: Handling Circular Dependency, joshc, 09:10
- Re: *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, mark_bluemel, 09:04
- *** glibc detected *** ./test: realloc(): invalid old size: 0x00007fff49779070 ***, gert, 08:48
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Victor Bazarov, 08:20
- Re: char *query[], Ben Bacarisse, 07:16
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Lionel B, 07:11
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Bo Persson, 06:44
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Mohan, 06:42
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Richard Bos, 06:30
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 06:19
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard Bos, 06:10
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, Mohan, 05:55
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, santosh, 05:53
- Re: Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, mark_bluemel, 05:48
- Will somebody help assist me about the pointer issue?, sxzong, 05:35
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 05:13
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Chris Dollin, 04:30
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Richard Heathfield, 04:29
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Chris Dollin, 04:27
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, santosh, 04:23
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, James Kanze, 04:16
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, James Kanze, 04:11
- Re: pointers, santosh, 04:04
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Keith Thompson, 04:03
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 04:03
- Re: Basic question about pointers, santosh, 03:56
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Keith Thompson, 03:47
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, kwikius, 03:47
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 03:46
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 03:39
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Flash Gordon, 03:36
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Flash Gordon, 03:12
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 03:03
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Richard Heathfield, 01:59
- Re: char *query[], crox, 01:21
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Barry Schwarz, 00:36
- Re: pointers, Christopher Benson-Manica, 00:36
- Re: pointers, Barry Schwarz, 00:27
- Re: Handling Circular Dependency, Barry Schwarz, 00:20
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Barry Schwarz, 00:04
- Re: Handling Circular Dependency, Chris Torek, 00:03
July 15, 2007
- Re: Basic question about pointers, Chris Johnson, 23:55
- Re: pointers, Ben Pfaff, 23:34
- Basic question about pointers, Aarti, 23:14
- pointers, sid, 23:13
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 23:06
- Handling Circular Dependency, joshc, 22:33
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, GeekBoy, 22:32
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 21:12
- Re: char *query[], Barry Schwarz, 21:03
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Nehil, 20:53
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 19:17
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Bacarisse, 19:12
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Old Wolf, 18:51
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Old Wolf, 18:47
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Dave Vandervies, 18:37
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 18:28
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Kenny McCormack, 18:17
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, red floyd, 18:13
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Coos Haak, 18:11
- Re: sin (M_PI), Mark McIntyre, 18:08
- Re: sin (M_PI), Mark McIntyre, 18:07
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Roland Pibinger, 17:56
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Mark McIntyre, 17:32
- Earn Money Online, muppets05, 17:32
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Mark McIntyre, 17:30
- get a free 150$ sign up bonus without deposit!!! tinyurl.com/ysmfw8, playrambo.blogspot.com, 17:24
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Kenny McCormack, 17:19
- Re: PLEASE HELP - Kernel panic problem, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:19
- PLEASE HELP - Kernel panic problem, cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx, 17:06
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Eric Sosman, 16:52
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: malloc and functions, Keith Thompson, 16:17
- Re: char *query[], Jens Thoms Toerring, 16:05
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Barry Schwarz, 15:55
- Re: char *query[], Richard Heathfield, 15:51
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Default User, 15:40
- Re: malloc and functions, Chris Torek, 15:38
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 15:36
- Re: char *query[], Flash Gordon, 15:29
- Re: How to convert currency from numbers to words, Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:21
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard Heathfield, 15:18
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Keith Thompson, 15:15
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard Heathfield, 15:15
- Re: malloc and functions, raphfrk, 15:05
- Re: malloc and functions, Thad Smith, 15:03
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Keith Thompson, 14:56
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Keith Thompson, 14:54
- Re: char *query[], Army1987, 14:38
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Army1987, 14:29
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Army1987, 14:22
- Re: char *query[], Barry Schwarz, 14:18
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Barry Schwarz, 14:03
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Bacarisse, 13:56
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, CryptiqueGuy, 13:56
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, jacob navia, 13:52
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Ben Bacarisse, 13:45
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Barry Schwarz, 13:42
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard, 13:36
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard, 13:29
- Re: malloc and functions, Martin Ambuhl, 13:27
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Kenny McCormack, 13:26
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Chris Dollin, 13:21
- Re: char *query[], Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:20
- Re: char *query[], gert, 13:12
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard, 13:05
- Re: char *query[], gert, 12:57
- Re: char *query[], gert, 12:47
- www.eBankGame.com Buy WoW gold RS gold WG k gold Lotro gold, www.ebankgame.com, 12:45
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Roland Pibinger, 12:43
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard, 12:41
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, santosh, 12:29
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Army1987, 12:11
- Re: malloc and functions, Richard, 12:07
- Re: malloc and functions, Robert Gamble, 12:05
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Army1987, 11:50
- Re: malloc and functions, Kenny McCormack, 11:48
- Re: malloc and functions, rzed, 11:40
- Re: malloc and functions, Richard, 11:38
- Re: malloc and functions, Robert Gamble, 11:34
- Re: malloc and functions, raphfrk, 11:19
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:18
- Re: malloc and functions, Richard, 11:09
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Charlton Wilbur, 11:05
- Re: char *query[], Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:57
- malloc and functions, raphfrk, 10:57
- Re: char *query[], Richard, 10:48
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- char *query[], gert, 10:30
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Chris Dollin, 10:28
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Robert Gamble, 10:08
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 09:58
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Matt, 09:34
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Matt, 09:31
- Re: pgm, Richard Heathfield, 09:30
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Richard Heathfield, 09:22
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 09:19
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard Heathfield, 09:19
- Re: pgm, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:11
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Richard, 09:06
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Nehil, 09:06
- Re: C : Call by value or reference, Kenny McCormack, 09:00
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 08:57
- C : Call by value or reference, Nehil, 08:56
- ◙►Instantly Turn your Computer into a Super TV ◄◙, cutee, 08:54
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Eric Sosman, 08:53
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 08:53
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Nehil, 08:34
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard, 08:01
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, Ben Bacarisse, 07:37
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik Wikström, 07:04
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 06:59
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Army1987, 06:48
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 06:44
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik Wikström, 06:43
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik Wikström, 06:42
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Flash Gordon, 06:26
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Flash Gordon, 06:22
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Flash Gordon, 06:02
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, jacob navia, 05:37
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Rolf Magnus, 05:34
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Rolf Magnus, 05:30
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Army1987, 05:19
- Re: Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Malcolm McLean, 05:18
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 05:17
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Army1987, 05:10
- Can isspace('\0') ever be true?, Army1987, 05:00
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Bo Persson, 04:59
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Bo Persson, 04:54
- Re: problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, santosh, 04:36
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Malcolm McLean, 04:33
- problems using fgets() and sscanf() while modifying file contents, allpervasive, 03:54
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Richard Heathfield, 03:51
- Re: How to convert currency from numbers to words, venkat . yara, 03:09
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Martin Ambuhl, 02:55
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Default User, 02:46
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Neelesh Bodas, 01:53
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, ¬a\\/b, 01:43
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Chris Dollin, 01:42
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Robert Gamble, 01:31
- Re: compile error for exit(1), Barry Schwarz, 01:16
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, red floyd, 01:10
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 00:41
- compile error for exit(1), Peter, 00:32
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Ark Khasin, 00:23
July 14, 2007
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Alf P. Steinbach, 23:37
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, srimks11@xxxxxxxxx, 23:06
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Dave Vandervies, 22:59
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Ark Khasin, 22:56
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Dave Vandervies, 22:26
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Alf P. Steinbach, 22:22
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Ark Khasin, 22:17
- Re: Is it just me or just Microsoft?, GeekBoy, 22:09
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Default User, 22:00
- Is it just me or just Microsoft?, Ark Khasin, 21:59
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 21:38
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Tim Prince, 21:38
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard Heathfield, 20:47
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard Heathfield, 20:40
- Re: How to literate a const char*, Christopher Benson-Manica, 20:29
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Martin Ambuhl, 20:22
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Matt, 20:22
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Matt, 20:15
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 19:47
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard, 19:42
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Flash Gordon, 19:36
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Richard Heathfield, 19:22
- Re: Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, pete, 19:08
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 19:04
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard Heathfield, 19:03
- Installing the GNU C Library in Windows, Matt, 18:47
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 18:30
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, pete, 18:26
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, pete, 18:08
- Re: Working with NON-NULL terminated strings, Barry Schwarz, 17:57
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, pete, 17:55
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, Richard, 17:50
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 17:47
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Nehil, 17:47
- Re: fscanf hangs, Barry Schwarz, 17:47
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Richard, 17:33
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Eric Sosman, 17:30
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 17:28
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 17:24
- Re: Pointing outside the heap, Eric Sosman, 17:21
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Eric Sosman, 17:19
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Nehil, 17:13
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 17:07
- Re: Bitwise manipulation, Malcolm McLean, 17:02
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Flash Gordon, 17:01
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Martin Ambuhl, 17:01
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 16:52
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 16:43
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Jens Thoms Toerring, 16:42
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 16:33
- Bitwise manipulation, Nehil, 16:27
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Malcolm McLean, 16:19
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 16:16
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 16:11
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Malcolm McLean, 15:58
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Harald van Dijk, 15:53
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 15:49
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 15:43
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 15:41
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 15:40
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Jens Thoms Toerring, 15:35
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Keith Thompson, 15:33
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 15:27
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Default User, 15:25
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 15:22
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Thad Smith, 15:15
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 15:05
- Re: Need Windows tool to see DebugMsg in dll, Richard, 14:58
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Keith Thompson, 14:52
- Re: Pointing outside the heap, Malcolm McLean, 14:36
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Jens Thoms Toerring, 14:32
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Tim Prince, 14:29
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 14:29
- Re: MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Kenny McCormack, 14:27
- MinGW: How do I temporarily disable stderr in a C(++) program, Vince C., 13:59
- Re: Working with NON-NULL terminated strings, Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:58
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 13:34
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 13:34
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 13:33
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 13:33
- Working with NON-NULL terminated strings, Grey Alien, 13:27
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Richard Heathfield, 13:24
- Re: Pointing outside the heap, Chris Dollin, 12:15
- Re: Pointing outside the heap, Ben Pfaff, 12:12
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Chris Dollin, 12:09
- Re: Pointing outside the heap, Harald van Dijk, 12:09
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 12:04
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Harald van Dijk, 11:59
- Pointing outside the heap, Jon Harrop, 11:56
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, osmium, 10:59
- Re: how to calculate value of pi, Joe Wright, 10:22
- how to calculate value of pi, Thomas, 09:40
- Re: fscanf hangs, PeterOut, 09:24
- Re: unclosed token expat, gert, 09:09
- Re: How to convert currency from numbers to words, Joe Wright, 08:55
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ben Bacarisse, 08:43
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 08:31
- Re: unclosed token expat, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:28
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Richard Heathfield, 08:27
- Re: How to convert currency from numbers to words, Malcolm McLean, 08:25
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Ben Bacarisse, 08:16
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Ben Bacarisse, 08:12
- unclosed token expat, gert, 07:41
- Re: Preprocessor harder to write than parser?, Jean-MArc Lienher, 06:49
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Chris Dollin, 06:43
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Roland Pibinger, 06:37
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Flash Gordon, 06:36
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, somenath, 06:27
- Re: How to convert currency from numbers to words, Flash Gordon, 06:06
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Roland Pibinger, 05:57
- How to convert currency from numbers to words, venkat . yara, 05:57
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Flash Gordon, 05:37
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Harald van Dijk, 05:29
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Army1987, 05:25
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Army1987, 05:21
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Harald van Dijk, 05:18
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Army1987, 05:03
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 04:58
- Re: pgm, Army1987, 04:58
- Re: comparing mantissa, Army1987, 04:55
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Stephen Sprunk, 04:54
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Richard Heathfield, 04:52
- Re: Tasks in linux, Keith Thompson, 04:47
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Harald van Dijk, 04:42
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 04:34
- Re: Tasks in linux, Malcolm McLean, 04:15
- Preprocessor harder to write than parser?, Peter Ammon, 03:31
- Re: How to literate a const char*, Ben Pfaff, 03:11
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Ralf Kunz, 02:52
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, somenath, 02:48
- How to literate a const char*, silverburgh.meryl@xxxxxxxxx, 02:48
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Harald van Dijk, 02:43
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Malcolm McLean, 02:29
- Re: return the start of a substring in a string in c, Richard Heathfield, 02:17
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Richard Heathfield, 02:16
- return the start of a substring in a string in c, yinglcs@xxxxxxxxx, 02:11
- Latest Job Vacancies (14th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 01:55
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Malcolm McLean, 01:05
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Default User, 01:03
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 01:01
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Malcolm McLean, 00:54
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, somenath, 00:50
July 13, 2007
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 18:26
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Keith Thompson, 17:02
- Re: Options for GNU Indent, Robert Gamble, 16:48
- Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Keith Thompson, 16:24
- Re: pgm, Richard Heathfield, 16:20
- Re: comparing mantissa, Keith Thompson, 16:16
- Re: pgm, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: pgm, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: pgm, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: pgm, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: pgm, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: pgm, Martin Ambuhl, 15:56
- Re: pointer dereference, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: pointer dereference, Army1987, 15:43
- Re: sin (M_PI), Army1987, 15:30
- www.cerocom.com, Natalia, 15:28
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: sin (M_PI), Army1987, 15:26
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:17
- Options for GNU Indent, Jonathan M. Rose, 15:11
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Army1987, 15:08
- Re: pgm, Army1987, 15:06
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Default User, 14:50
- Re: sin (M_PI), Adam, 14:44
- Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Chris Torek, 14:40
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Richard Heathfield, 14:32
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Al, 14:31
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 14:23
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Torek, 14:10
- Re: pgm, Richard, 14:02
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Ben Bacarisse, 13:48
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 13:38
- money, william, 13:12
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Flash Gordon, 13:10
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:55
- Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Daniel Rudy, 12:54
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, gert, 12:42
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, somenath, 12:35
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 12:27
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Dave Vandervies, 12:23
- Re: sin (M_PI), Mark McIntyre, 12:20
- Re: sin (M_PI), Mark McIntyre, 12:18
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Kenneth Brody, 12:17
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Jens Thoms Toerring, 12:15
- Re: pgm, Kenneth Brody, 12:13
- Re: compilation of malloc using c++, Flash Gordon, 12:13
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Kenneth Brody, 12:08
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, David T. Ashley, 12:00
- compilation of malloc using c++, somenath, 11:52
- www.cerocom.com, Natalia, 11:47
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:46
- Re: Need Help, Army1987, 11:40
- Re: [OT] Re: pointer dereference, Army1987, 11:36
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Army1987, 11:30
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Thad Smith, 11:21
- Re: putting quotes around macro, Thad Smith, 11:13
- Re: about array declare with parenthesis mark, Jack Klein, 11:07
- Re: pointer dereference, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:27
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, gert, 09:58
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Re: [OT] Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 08:56
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 08:31
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Army1987, 08:31
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Army1987, 08:31
- Re: sizeof 'A', Army1987, 08:31
- Re: pgm, Army1987, 08:30
- [OT] Re: pointer dereference, Army1987, 08:30
- Re: comparing mantissa, Army1987, 08:25
- Re: pgm, Army1987, 08:00
- [OT] Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Army1987, 07:56
- Re: How does this swap() work?, osmium, 07:50
- Re: How does this swap() work?, Army1987, 07:16
- Re: Quoting style in C, Ralf Damaschke, 07:04
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Richard Bos, 06:58
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Richard Bos, 06:55
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Pietro Cerutti, 06:52
- Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., mark_bluemel, 06:28
- Re: Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Mohan, 06:22
- Compiler warning on struct initialization..., Daniel Rudy, 05:59
- Re: Quoting style in C, Richard Bos, 05:48
- Re: pgm, Martin Ambuhl, 05:47
- Re: How does this swap() work?, Richard Bos, 05:45
- Re: pgm, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 05:43
- Re: pgm, Martin Ambuhl, 05:42
- Re: Tasks in linux, Mohan, 05:39
- Re: How does this swap() work?, Chris Dollin, 05:31
- Re: Tasks in linux, raghu, 05:30
- Re: How does this swap() work?, Chris McDonald, 05:23
- Re: How does this swap() work?, xuyao, 05:16
- Quoting style in C, mathieu, 05:16
- Re: putting quotes around macro, Mohan, 05:09
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Daniel Rudy, 05:06
- Re: Tasks in linux, Mohan, 04:59
- Re: How does this swap() work?, santosh, 04:43
- Re: comparing mantissa, Carramba, 04:42
- Re: pgm, Richard Bos, 04:42
- Re: pgm, Richard Heathfield, 04:42
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Richard Bos, 04:40
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 04:37
- Re: pgm, Richard Heathfield, 04:35
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Dietmar Schindler, 04:34
- Re: pgm, santosh, 04:33
- Re: Tasks in linux, santosh, 04:25
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 04:24
- Re: pgm, Richard Heathfield, 04:10
- How does this swap() work?, xuyao, 04:09
- Re: Why don't C comments nest?, Richard Heathfield, 04:07
- Re: pgm, Sharath, 04:01
- Re: pgm, xuyao, 04:00
- MP3 AVI DIVX MPEG SOFT = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 04:00
- Re: preprocessor and macros, Al, 03:59
- pgm, rahnap2000, 03:51
- preprocessor and macros, mosfet, 03:43
- Why don't C comments nest?, Al, 03:33
- Re: Excuse me,It'only a test, xuyao, 03:17
- Re: Tasks in linux, xuyao, 03:13
- Tasks in linux, raghu, 03:01
- Re: pointer dereference, Keith Thompson, 02:56
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: about array declare with parenthesis mark, Richard Heathfield, 02:52
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 02:52
- Re: about array declare with parenthesis mark, Walter Roberson, 02:50
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Heathfield, 02:50
- about array declare with parenthesis mark, anson, 02:48
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 02:40
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 02:39
- Re: pointer dereference, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 02:23
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Richard Bos, 02:20
- Re: sin (M_PI), Adam, 02:06
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Daniel Rudy, 01:49
- Testing Job Vacancies for 1+ years Experience(13th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 01:34
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Daniel Rudy, 01:33
- putting quotes around macro, rparimi, 01:31
- Re: Need Help, pycraze, 01:28
- Re: Excuse me,It'only a test, Dave Vandervies, 01:23
- Excuse me,It'only a test, xuyao, 01:04
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, Stephen Sprunk, 00:25
July 12, 2007
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, Richard Heathfield, 23:36
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, gert, 21:41
- Re: I figured this out now :-), Barry Schwarz, 21:19
- Re: array question...again...., Barry Schwarz, 21:12
- Re: is it really that complicated ?, user923005, 20:49
- is it really that complicated ?, gert, 20:22
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 20:15
- Re: comparing mantissa, user923005, 19:55
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 19:53
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 19:49
- Re: comparing mantissa, Keith Thompson, 19:47
- Re: sin (M_PI), Joe Wright, 19:31
- Re: sin (M_PI), Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:28
- Re: Need Help, Army1987, 19:17
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Heathfield, 19:14
- Re: comparing mantissa, user923005, 19:13
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 19:12
- Re: comparing mantissa, Army1987, 19:06
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Jens Thoms Toerring, 19:03
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Keith Thompson, 18:59
- Re: sin (M_PI), Jens Thoms Toerring, 18:58
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Walter Roberson, 18:47
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 18:46
- Re: shutil.copy in c, Pietro Cerutti, 18:45
- shutil.copy in c, yinglcs@xxxxxxxxx, 18:34
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 18:34
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Ben Pfaff, 18:33
- Re: sizeof 'A', Army1987, 18:32
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Malcolm McLean, 18:25
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Walter Roberson, 17:55
- Re: Style question: #include, Dave Hansen, 17:49
- [OT] Re: sin (M_PI), Eric Sosman, 17:38
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: sin (M_PI), Mark McIntyre, 17:18
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, user923005, 17:17
- Re: pointer dereference, Mark McIntyre, 17:16
- Re: Need Windows tool to see DebugMsg in dll, Mark McIntyre, 17:14
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:08
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 17:08
- Re: sin (M_PI), Eric Sosman, 17:05
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Flash Gordon, 17:04
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Keith Thompson, 16:59
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 16:42
- Re: sin (M_PI), Army1987, 16:39
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 16:34
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Heathfield, 16:31
- Re: sin (M_PI), Malcolm McLean, 16:28
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 16:18
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, Richard Heathfield, 16:08
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:57
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, user923005, 15:56
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:55
- Re: comparing mantissa, user923005, 15:46
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 15:41
- Re: sin (M_PI), ¬a\\/b, 15:41
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 15:39
- Re: sin (M_PI), user923005, 15:38
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, santosh, 15:28
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 15:18
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:18
- Re: sin (M_PI), Keith Thompson, 15:16
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Nehil, 15:15
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 15:07
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Nehil, 15:06
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Walter Roberson, 14:54
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, santosh, 14:45
- Re: pointer dereference, Keith Thompson, 14:42
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, santosh, 14:38
- Re: pointer dereference, Keith Thompson, 14:38
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Flash Gordon, 14:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 14:36
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 14:24
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, Keith Thompson, 14:23
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Nehil, 14:22
- Re: comparing mantissa, Carramba, 13:48
- Re: comparing mantissa, Walter Roberson, 13:41
- Re: Style question: #include, Al Balmer, 13:40
- Re: comparing mantissa, Carramba, 13:36
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Army1987, 13:29
- Re: Need Help, Jens Thoms Toerring, 13:12
- Re: sin (M_PI), Dale Henderson, 12:58
- Re: Breaking a node of link list, Walter Roberson, 12:39
- Re: comparing mantissa, Walter Roberson, 12:22
- Re: pointer dereference, Richard Heathfield, 12:10
- Breaking a node of link list, Nehil, 12:02
- Re: comparing mantissa, Matthew Hicks, 11:57
- Re: comparing mantissa, Carramba, 11:55
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, David T. Ashley, 11:35
- Re: comparing mantissa, Walter Roberson, 11:32
- Need Help, pycraze, 11:26
- Re: sizeof 'A', Eric Sosman, 11:07
- Re: comparing mantissa, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:26
- Re: comparing mantissa, Matthew Hicks, 10:06
- Re: comparing mantissa, Tim Prince, 09:52
- Re: sin (M_PI), Chris Dollin, 09:37
- Re: sin (M_PI), Chris Dollin, 09:37
- Re: pointer dereference, mark_bluemel, 09:34
- Re: sin (M_PI), Chris Dollin, 09:34
- comparing mantissa, Carramba, 09:30
- Re: sin (M_PI), osmium, 09:30
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 09:29
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Bos, 09:24
- Re: sin (M_PI), Richard Heathfield, 09:24
- Re: sin (M_PI), jacob navia, 09:20
- Re: sin (M_PI), osmium, 09:16
- Re: sin (M_PI), Tim Prince, 09:15
- Re: pointer dereference, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:01
- Re: pointer dereference, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:46
- MP3,AVI,DIVX,MPEG,SOFT = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 08:34
- Re: sin (M_PI), Eric Sosman, 08:16
- Re: pointer dereference, santosh, 08:08
- Re: pointer dereference, Richard Bos, 08:03
- Re: pointer dereference, somenath, 07:47
- Re: sin (M_PI), santosh, 07:41
- Re: sin (M_PI), Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:40
- Re: sin (M_PI), santosh, 07:36
- Re: sin (M_PI), Adam, 07:17
- Re: pointer dereference, Chris Dollin, 07:17
- Re: pointer dereference, santosh, 06:45
- Re: Memory allocation for Kernel and commit, santosh, 06:36
- Re: pointer dereference, Richard Heathfield, 06:34
- Re: sin (M_PI), santosh, 06:32
- Re: sin (M_PI), mark_bluemel, 06:31
- Re: sin (M_PI), mark_bluemel, 06:26
- Re: pointer dereference, santosh, 06:18
- sin (M_PI), Adam, 06:14
- Re: pointer dereference, santosh, 06:11
- Re: I figured this out now :-), Jens Thoms Toerring, 06:03
- Re: free handy serial tool needed, Sachin Gole, 05:59
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard, 05:57
- Re: pointer dereference, mark_bluemel, 05:53
- Re: pointer dereference, mark_bluemel, 05:49
- Re: pointer dereference, mark_bluemel, 05:45
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Chris Dollin, 05:13
- Re: pointer dereference, Anurag, 05:01
- I figured this out now :-), michael, 05:00
- Send funny sms, fazi, 04:59
- pointer dereference, somenath, 04:55
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Malcolm McLean, 04:22
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Malcolm McLean, 04:21
- array question...again...., michael, 04:19
- Memory allocation for Kernel and commit, Sachin Gole, 03:26
- Re: simple array question, Flash Gordon, 03:15
- Re: Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, amit_9933, 03:07
- Re: simple array question, santosh, 02:50
- Re: Need Windows tool to see DebugMsg in dll, santosh, 02:18
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, santosh, 02:17
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Spiros Bousbouras, 02:15
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, Richard Heathfield, 02:07
- Re: How to use EOF in C, santosh, 01:51
- Need Windows tool to see DebugMsg in dll, Anurag, 01:50
- Hot Vacancies (12th July 2007), jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 01:35
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, linq936, 01:25
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Dr Shaft, 00:57
July 11, 2007
- Re: simple array question, Spiros Bousbouras, 23:57
- Re: simple array question, Barry Schwarz, 23:31
- Re: Style question: #include, Francine . Neary, 22:59
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 22:52
- Re: simple array question, firenet, 22:49
- simple array question, michael, 22:32
- Re: sizeof 'A', Peter Nilsson, 22:06
- The Patent Pending System. Your Success is GUARANTEED!, sogdgx@xxxxxxxxx, 21:15
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 21:08
- Re: sizeof 'A', Ben Pfaff, 21:07
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 20:59
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 20:58
- Re: sizeof 'A', Ben Pfaff, 20:47
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, Keith Thompson, 20:33
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 20:32
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, pete, 20:18
- Re: strstr crashes on NULL, Walter Roberson, 20:11
- strstr crashes on NULL, linq936, 19:52
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard, 18:40
- Re: [ot]Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Flash Gordon, 18:36
- Re: sizeof 'A', Old Wolf, 18:28
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Keith Thompson, 18:20
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:14
- Re: [ot]Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Richard Heathfield, 18:10
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Flash Gordon, 17:55
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: How to use EOF in C, santosh, 17:39
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 17:39
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Walter Roberson, 17:33
- Re: How to use EOF in C, santosh, 17:29
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Malcolm McLean, 17:20
- Re: code C program to access ibm db2, user923005, 17:12
- [ot]Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, pete, 17:05
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Kelsey Bjarnason, 17:04
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, pete, 16:49
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 16:29
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 16:23
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Al Balmer, 16:19
- Re: problem with structure, Walter Roberson, 15:49
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, bert, 15:45
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 15:42
- problem with structure, ramu, 15:37
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, ¬a\\/b, 15:28
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Walter Roberson, 15:25
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Richard Heathfield, 15:17
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Chris Hills, 15:11
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Kenneth Brody, 14:59
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Malcolm McLean, 14:58
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Default User, 14:11
- Re: reply the answer, Flash Gordon, 14:06
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Flash Gordon, 13:57
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Default User, 13:55
- Re: sizeof 'A', Flash Gordon, 13:44
- Re: Style question: #include, Manish Tomar, 13:17
- Re: Another one for the list, Harald van Dijk, 12:56
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, santosh, 12:50
- Re: sizeof 'A', santosh, 12:47
- Re: free handy serial tool needed, Steven Woody, 12:27
- Re: Genuine Lifetime Income!! Earn 5000 US Dollars per month without Investment., Richard, 12:07
- Re: sizeof 'A', David T. Ashley, 11:59
- Re: Genuine Lifetime Income!! Earn 5000 US Dollars per month without Investment., Keith Thompson, 11:53
- Re: Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Darko, 11:50
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 11:47
- Killing people with C - sourcecode???, Lucas J. Riesau, 11:22
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Heathfield, 10:51
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 10:45
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Richard Heathfield, 10:38
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Richard, 10:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Chris Dollin, 10:34
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 10:30
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Bos, 10:21
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, santosh, 10:21
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard, 10:03
- Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C, Kenny McCormack, 09:15
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Spoon, 09:12
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Chris Dollin, 09:12
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Chris Hills, 08:41
- Urgent Requirement - Hot Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 08:35
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Darko, 08:27
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Darko, 08:24
- Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C, Richard, 08:22
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard, 08:17
- Re: sizeof 'A', Eric Sosman, 08:05
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Army1987, 08:00
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Richard, 07:56
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard, 07:52
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard, 07:51
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Richard Heathfield, 07:44
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Darko, 07:22
- Re: need an optimized method, Duncan Muirhead, 06:36
- Re: free handy serial tool needed, Sachin Gole, 06:20
- Re: fscanf hangs, Richard Heathfield, 05:52
- Re: need an optimized method, jacob navia, 05:49
- Re: need an optimized method, santosh, 05:42
- Re: need an optimized method, Keith Thompson, 04:27
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 04:26
- Re: How to use EOF in C, Keith Thompson, 04:23
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 04:19
- Re: sizeof 'A', CryptiqueGuy, 04:06
- Re: fscanf hangs, Flash Gordon, 02:32
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 02:26
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 02:25
- Re: fscanf hangs, Flash Gordon, 02:25
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 02:23
- Re: code C program to access ibm db2, santosh, 02:17
- Re: How to use EOF in C, santosh, 02:12
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, CBFalconer, 01:58
- Re: need an optimized method, lakshmiram . saikia, 01:58
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, santosh, 01:56
- Re: fscanf hangs, CBFalconer, 01:53
- Re: How to use EOF in C, sumedh, 01:51
- code C program to access ibm db2, Laurence, 01:41
- How to use EOF in C, Ramesh, 01:41
- Re: sizeof 'A', pete, 01:04
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Keith Thompson, 00:57
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 00:40
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, bobby, 00:38
- free handy serial tool needed, Steven Woody, 00:28
- Re: const c string in data section?, Steven Woody, 00:24
July 10, 2007
- Re: fscanf hangs, Ben Pfaff, 22:28
- Re: fscanf hangs, PeterOut, 22:28
- Re: const c string in data section?, Eric Sosman, 22:02
- Re: sizeof 'A', Eric Sosman, 21:55
- Re: fscanf hangs, PeterOut, 21:11
- Re: need an optimized method, J. J. Farrell, 20:57
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Heathfield, 20:34
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 20:16
- Re: sizeof 'A', Peter Nilsson, 19:57
- Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C, CBFalconer, 19:44
- Re: need an optimized method, Keith Thompson, 19:32
- Re: need an optimized method, Walter Roberson, 19:19
- Using Multiple Source Files with Plato3 in C, Matt, 19:02
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, pete, 18:51
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 18:45
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, user923005, 18:34
- Re: Another one for the list, Keith Thompson, 18:27
- Re: need an optimized method, jacob navia, 17:53
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 17:24
- Re: Another one for the list, Ben Pfaff, 17:21
- Re: need an optimized method, CBFalconer, 17:19
- Re: const c string in data section?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:15
- Re: const c string in data section?, CBFalconer, 17:12
- Re: Another one for the list, CBFalconer, 17:07
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: Another one for the list, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 16:48
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 16:43
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 16:40
- Re: Prophet Mohammad pbuh in his last sermon, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: sizeof 'A', Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: fread/fwrite, Flash Gordon, 16:03
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 15:53
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 15:49
- Re: need an optimized method, Dave Vandervies, 15:34
- need an optimized method, lakshmiram . saikia, 14:57
- Re: Another one for the list, Richard, 14:29
- Re: Another one for the list, Richard, 14:28
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard, 14:27
- Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer, redux, Eric Sosman, 14:23
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Walter Roberson, 14:09
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Kenneth Brody, 13:52
- Re: const c string in data section?, Eric Sosman, 13:49
- Re: Another one for the list, Harald van Dijk, 13:41
- Re: sizeof 'A', Mark McIntyre, 13:37
- dereferencing type-punned pointer, redux, David Mathog, 13:29
- Re: const c string in data section?, Walter Roberson, 13:28
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Walter Roberson, 13:23
- const c string in data section?, Steven Woody, 13:19
- Re: Another one for the list, Barry, 13:15
- Re: Another one for the list, Walter Roberson, 13:14
- Re: Another one for the list, Ben Pfaff, 13:04
- Re: Another one for the list, Eric Sosman, 12:54
- Re: Another one for the list, santosh, 12:54
- MP3 AVI DIVX MPEG SOFT = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 12:54
- Re: Another one for the list, Richard, 12:50
- Re: sizeof 'A', Eric Sosman, 12:46
- Re: Another one for the list, Richard, 12:38
- Re: Another one for the list, Harald van Dijk, 12:23
- Re: Another one for the list, santosh, 11:24
- Re: Another one for the list, sumedh, 11:13
- Re: Another one for the list, Ben Pfaff, 11:04
- Re: C question...little OT, Richard Bos, 11:03
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Bos, 11:00
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard Heathfield, 10:52
- Another one for the list, Dave Vandervies, 10:39
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Richard, 10:37
- Re: fread/fwrite, santosh, 10:36
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Nick Keighley, 10:34
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:24
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard, 10:21
- Re: sizeof 'A', Jean-Marc Bourguet, 10:00
- Re: Prophet Mohammad pbuh in his last sermon, Ivar Rosquist, 09:46
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Richard Heathfield, 09:42
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Richard Heathfield, 09:42
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Shadowman, 09:38
- Re: sizeof 'A', santosh, 09:34
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, santosh, 09:29
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, santosh, 09:21
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Xavier Serrand, 09:19
- Re: fread/fwrite, Guru Jois, 09:16
- Re: help in accessing system information, santosh, 09:09
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Harnden, 09:05
- Re: re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, santosh, 09:03
- Re: fread/fwrite, Guru Jois, 09:01
- re online c expression to print 1-100 numbers, Xavier Serrand, 08:56
- Re: sizeof 'A', jacob navia, 08:40
- Muhammed The Prophet of God, ab214, 08:38
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Army1987, 08:37
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, merve, 08:32
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, @$|-|. DUBEY, 08:27
- Re: Style question: #include, August Karlstrom, 08:24
- help in accessing system information, @$|-|. DUBEY, 08:18
- Re: Serial port programming in WinXP, @$|-|. DUBEY, 08:16
- Hot Testing Jobs - Freshers & Experienced, jyothi.priya143@xxxxxxxxx, 08:07
- Re: sizeof 'A', Eric Sosman, 08:05
- Prophet Mohammad pbuh in his last sermon, ab214, 07:51
- Re: reply the answer, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 07:08
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Darko, 07:03
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Xu Weijiang, 06:42
- Re: sizeof 'A', santosh, 06:02
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Richard Heathfield, 06:01
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 05:59
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Army1987, 05:52
- Re: sizeof 'A', Nishu, 05:48
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Chris McDonald, 05:38
- Re: sizeof 'A', mark_bluemel, 05:37
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, santosh, 05:31
- Re: sizeof 'A', santosh, 05:28
- Re: sizeof 'A', Richard Bos, 05:23
- Re: sizeof 'A', mark_bluemel, 05:20
- Re: sizeof 'A', jacob navia, 05:17
- Re: sizeof 'A', Nishu, 05:13
- Re: sizeof 'A', Pietro Cerutti, 05:07
- sizeof 'A', Nishu, 05:01
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 03:56
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Richard Heathfield, 03:39
- ?Hi Hi Hi.....ARE YOU Searching for Happiness, abdo911, 03:35
- Re: one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, Ben Pfaff, 01:14
- one line c expression to print 1 -100 num, bobby, 01:09
July 09, 2007
- Re: Serial port programming in WinXP, Dave Vandervies, 23:42
- Serial port programming in WinXP, Ani, 23:18
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:46
- Re: fread/fwrite, Barry Schwarz, 20:58
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Kenny McCormack, 20:45
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Keith Thompson, 19:50
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Ben Bacarisse, 19:50
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 19:45
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Old Wolf, 19:34
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 19:12
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 19:08
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Mark McIntyre, 19:04
- Re: Style question: #include, Old Wolf, 19:04
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, CBFalconer, 18:55
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, John Bode, 17:40
- Re: Genuine Lifetime Income!! Earn 5000 US Dollars per month without Investment., CBFalconer, 17:20
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, CBFalconer, 17:16
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, websnarf, 17:12
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, CBFalconer, 17:03
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, CBFalconer, 16:58
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, CBFalconer, 16:51
- Re: fread/fwrite, CBFalconer, 16:45
- Re: fread/fwrite, CBFalconer, 16:42
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, user923005, 16:31
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Malcolm McLean, 15:40
- MP3 AVI DIVX MPEG SOFT = www.GEGEREKA.com, GEGEREKA!, 15:31
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 15:23
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Flash Gordon, 15:19
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Keith Thompson, 15:11
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Chris Hills, 15:09
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 14:54
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:42
- Re: The 4th commandment, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Charles Richmond, 14:17
- Re: fread/fwrite, santosh, 14:00
- Re: fread/fwrite, Walter Roberson, 13:15
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard Heathfield, 13:05
- Re: fread/fwrite, ¬a\\/b, 12:55
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Default User, 12:54
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Richard Heathfield, 12:35
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Harald van Dijk, 12:31
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Harald van Dijk, 12:30
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Kenneth Brody, 12:19
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 12:00
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 11:15
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Chris Hills, 11:08
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Chris Hills, 11:07
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Eric Sosman, 10:58
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, August Karlstrom, 10:49
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, David T. Ashley, 10:39
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, santosh, 10:07
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, John Bode, 09:45
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Pietro Cerutti, 09:39
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Richard, 09:30
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, CryptiqueGuy, 09:07
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Pietro Cerutti, 09:02
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Eric Sosman, 08:56
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Richard Heathfield, 08:51
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Pietro Cerutti, 08:37
- Looking for a Scholarship for your studies?), Allin Sex..., 08:27
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, Eric Sosman, 08:25
- Re: controlling expressions evaluation, CryptiqueGuy, 08:24
- controlling expressions evaluation, Pietro Cerutti, 08:04
- Re: fread/fwrite, santosh, 07:44
- Re: domino, Richard Bos, 07:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard, 06:49
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard, 06:44
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard, 06:37
- Re: PLS Logistic regression in C, Richard, 06:26
- Re: how to use struct sk_buff, mark_bluemel, 06:25
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard, 06:23
- Re: how to use struct sk_buff, Richard, 06:12
- Re: Style question: #include, pete, 05:49
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 05:48
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Army1987, 05:43
- Re: Function Pointers, pete, 05:39
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 05:24
- Re: how to use struct sk_buff, mark_bluemel, 05:03
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Grey Alien, 04:52
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, praetorian.selena@xxxxxxxxx, 04:51
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, jacob navia, 04:47
- Re: Function Pointers, Daniel Rudy, 04:35
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard Heathfield, 04:31
- how to use struct sk_buff, balasam, 04:27
- Re: fread/fwrite, ¬a\\/b, 04:19
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Hills, 03:47
- Re: fread/fwrite, Flash Gordon, 03:19
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 03:13
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard Heathfield, 03:05
- Re: Function Pointers, Flash Gordon, 02:52
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Thad Smith, 02:49
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, ¬a\\/b, 02:42
- Re: fread/fwrite, ¬a\\/b, 02:42
- Re: fread/fwrite, Richard Heathfield, 02:41
- Re: fread/fwrite, santosh, 02:25
- Re: fread/fwrite, Guru Jois, 02:17
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 02:16
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Pfaff, 01:09
- Re: Function Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 00:54
- Re: The 4th commandment, Richard Heathfield, 00:51
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 00:46
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 00:40
July 08, 2007
- Re: sample for base64 encoding in c language, aruna, 23:55
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Pfaff, 23:20
- Re: Function Pointers, Daniel Rudy, 22:58
- Re: Function Pointers, santosh, 22:53
- Re: The 4th commandment, Ben Pfaff, 22:52
- Re: The 4th commandment, Daniel Rudy, 22:51
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Daniel Rudy, 22:34
- Re: Function Pointers, Ben Pfaff, 22:30
- Re: The 4th commandment, Daniel Rudy, 22:18
- Function Pointers, Daniel Rudy, 22:10
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:48
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:44
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 21:43
- Re: Global array., Robert Gamble, 21:08
- Re: memory pool library ?, Thad Smith, 21:03
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Keith Thompson, 20:52
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Keith Thompson, 20:48
- Re: Global array., Richard, 20:26
- Re: Global array., rsprawls, 20:19
- Global array., rsprawls, 20:17
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, CBFalconer, 20:11
- Re: reply the answer, Dave Vandervies, 20:06
- Re: Style question: #include, Old Wolf, 19:54
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Old Wolf, 19:40
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 19:35
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Old Wolf, 19:30
- Re: The 4th commandment, Keith Thompson, 19:28
- Re: PLS Logistic regression in C, Barry Schwarz, 19:27
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Barry Schwarz, 19:25
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 19:12
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Gordon Burditt, 18:51
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Kenny McCormack, 18:48
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Ben Bacarisse, 18:38
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Harald van Dijk, 18:37
- Re: PLS Logistic regression in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:37
- Re: reply the answer, Dave Vandervies, 18:37
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 18:35
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Mark McIntyre, 18:31
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, J. J. Farrell, 18:23
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Dave Vandervies, 18:07
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Flash Gordon, 17:46
- Re: The 4th commandment, Stephen Sprunk, 17:26
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 17:04
- Re: The 4th commandment, Harald van Dijk, 17:00
- Re: The 4th commandment, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: The 4th commandment, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Harald van Dijk, 16:00
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 15:49
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 15:45
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Default User, 14:49
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, jacob navia, 14:27
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Malcolm McLean, 14:16
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Kenny McCormack, 14:13
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, santosh, 14:11
- Re: If Jesus was GOD, Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, 9GB, 13:35
- Re: Creating DLL from .a files, Tim Prince, 13:32
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Ben Bacarisse, 13:25
- Creating DLL from .a files, 9GB, 13:17
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Malcolm McLean, 12:44
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Malcolm McLean, 12:37
- Re: The 4th commandment, Harald van Dijk, 12:34
- PLS Logistic regression in C, vincent64@xxxxxxxxx, 12:16
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:48
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Mark McIntyre, 11:29
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Mark McIntyre, 11:26
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, CBFalconer, 11:16
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Default User, 11:09
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Default User, 11:06
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Hills, 10:46
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Hills, 10:45
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Harald van Dijk, 10:38
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Barry Schwarz, 10:26
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Barry Schwarz, 10:24
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Ben Bacarisse, 10:16
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, santosh, 10:15
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, santosh, 10:00
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Nehil, 09:44
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, santosh, 09:38
- Re: The 4th commandment, Harald van Dijk, 09:34
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, Dave Vandervies, 09:06
- Re: Dynamic Memory Allocation, Eric Sosman, 09:05
- Dynamic Memory Allocation, Nehil, 08:36
- Re: [ot] Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, pete, 08:33
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, August Karlstrom, 08:31
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Eric Sosman, 08:27
- Re: The 4th commandment, Eric Sosman, 08:26
- Re: The 4th commandment, Barry, 08:16
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Kenny McCormack, 07:52
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 07:41
- If Jesus was GOD, ab214, 07:37
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), CBFalconer, 07:11
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Hills, 07:11
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, CBFalconer, 07:08
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Hills, 07:04
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 07:03
- Re: fread/fwrite, CBFalconer, 07:03
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 07:01
- [ot] Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, pete, 07:01
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), santosh, 06:59
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 06:57
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Rui Maciel, 06:49
- Re: Heap Vs Stack, santosh, 06:45
- Heap Vs Stack, Nehil, 06:30
- Re: Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Nehil, 06:26
- Process and its memory Limit. (Linux biased), Nehil, 06:23
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 05:57
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Army1987, 05:54
- Re: The 4th commandment, santosh, 05:39
- Re: fread/fwrite, santosh, 05:36
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, santosh, 05:32
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, santosh, 05:27
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 05:24
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Army1987, 05:19
- Re: fread/fwrite, Guru Jois, 05:03
- Re: how to use PI in c99, J. J. Farrell, 04:46
- Re: The 4th commandment, Chris Torek, 03:37
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Richard Heathfield, 03:36
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Erik de Castro Lopo, 03:23
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, Richard Heathfield, 03:17
- Re: The 4th commandment, Richard Heathfield, 03:16
- Re: The 4th commandment, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 02:58
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, ravi, 02:35
- Re: int a = -2147483648;, methione, 02:29
- int a = -2147483648;, Skybuck Flying, 02:03
- Re: The 4th commandment, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:57
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, CBFalconer, 01:33
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Default User, 01:25
- Re: to test whether a number is a power of 2, Martin Ambuhl, 01:22
- Re: The 4th commandment, Ben Pfaff, 01:17
- Re: bsearch() with dynamic array, Barry Schwarz, 01:13
- to test whether a number is a power of 2, ravi, 00:16
- Re: The 4th commandment, Stephen Sprunk, 00:03
July 07, 2007
- Re: bsearch() with dynamic array, pete, 23:33
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 22:48
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Default User, 22:12
- The 4th commandment, Francine . Neary, 21:49
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 20:16
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Ben Pfaff, 19:56
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 19:19
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, U, 19:06
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, pete, 18:29
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, pete, 18:26
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Ben Bacarisse, 18:12
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 16:41
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Francine . Neary, 16:40
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Francine . Neary, 16:28
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, osmium, 16:12
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 16:11
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 16:06
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 16:02
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 15:48
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Default User, 15:22
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 15:16
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 15:15
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Flash Gordon, 13:13
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 13:10
- Re: memory pool library (repost), CBFalconer, 11:00
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 10:51
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Ben Bacarisse, 10:42
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 10:28
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, osmium, 09:40
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, osmium, 09:35
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 09:31
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 09:01
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, pete, 08:44
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Eric Sosman, 08:36
- Re: fread/fwrite, Joe Wright, 08:31
- Re: memory pool library (repost), CBFalconer, 08:11
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, CBFalconer, 08:01
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 06:02
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 05:56
- Re: how to use PI in c99, santosh, 05:31
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 05:25
- Re: C question...little OT, Army1987, 05:21
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Barry Schwarz, 05:08
- Re: how to use PI in c99, pete, 05:04
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, Army1987, 04:56
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Army1987, 04:43
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Grey Alien, 04:30
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Serve Lau, 04:22
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Szabolcs Nagy, 04:17
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Stephen Sprunk, 04:10
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 03:43
- Re: float encoding algorithm, aruna, 03:23
- float encoding algorithm, aruna, 03:12
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Chris Dollin, 03:11
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 03:03
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Serve Lau, 02:52
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Serve Lau, 02:50
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 02:45
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 02:39
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 02:38
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 02:29
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 02:25
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 02:17
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:34
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:33
- Re: fread/fwrite, Barry Schwarz, 00:54
July 06, 2007
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Frodo Baggins, 23:48
- Re: fread/fwrite, empriser, 23:04
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, CBFalconer, 21:19
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 20:59
- Re: memory pool library (repost), Ben Bacarisse, 20:54
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Gordon Burditt, 20:36
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 20:34
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Gordon Burditt, 20:31
- Re: how to use PI in c99, J. J. Farrell, 19:56
- Re: memory pool library ?, J. J. Farrell, 19:47
- memory pool library (repost), Grey Alien, 19:32
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Stephen Sprunk, 19:28
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 19:25
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, user923005, 18:54
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: why this crash?, linq936, 18:43
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Keith Thompson, 18:37
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Keith Thompson, 18:33
- Re: how to use PI in c99, user923005, 18:33
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Flash Gordon, 18:28
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 17:53
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 17:47
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 17:46
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Mark McIntyre, 17:39
- Re: how to use PI in c99, jacob navia, 17:35
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:31
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Eric Sosman, 17:25
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Flash Gordon, 17:19
- Re: how to use PI in c99, CBFalconer, 17:03
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, CBFalconer, 16:59
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, CBFalconer, 16:53
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Serve Lau, 16:52
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 16:39
- Re: C question...little OT, Flash Gordon, 16:33
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 16:17
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: how to use PI in c99, J. J. Farrell, 16:01
- Re: Style question: #include, Dave Hansen, 15:57
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, J. J. Farrell, 15:56
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 15:20
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Eric Sosman, 15:11
- Re: C question...little OT, Army1987, 15:08
- Re: char * signedness, Keith Thompson, 14:57
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Keith Thompson, 14:52
- Re: Style question: #include, Roland Pibinger, 14:36
- Re: C question...little OT, Keith Thompson, 14:26
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Eric Sosman, 14:22
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 14:21
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 14:11
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, Keith Thompson, 14:05
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Bacarisse, 13:58
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Keith Thompson, 13:57
- Re: char * signedness, CryptiqueGuy, 13:56
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Flash Gordon, 13:52
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, John Bode, 13:52
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 13:49
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Martin Ambuhl, 13:48
- Re: Linker error in compilation, Default User, 13:44
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 13:42
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 13:42
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Default User, 13:41
- Re: char * signedness, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:39
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, Harald van Dijk, 13:33
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Eric Sosman, 13:31
- Re: Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, Dave Vandervies, 13:30
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Flash Gordon, 13:29
- Re: char * signedness, Harald van Dijk, 13:28
- Re: pointer cast UB?, Harald van Dijk, 13:23
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Harald van Dijk, 13:19
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, Richard Heathfield, 13:16
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 13:15
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 13:14
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Harald van Dijk, 13:11
- Re: how to use PI in c99, Kenneth Brody, 13:11
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Kenneth Brody, 13:04
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 13:01
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Kenneth Brody, 13:00
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 12:59
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Bacarisse, 12:55
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 12:54
- Re: Style question: #include, tguclu, 12:48
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 12:47
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 12:40
- pointer cast UB?, Serve Lau, 12:38
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 12:34
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 12:32
- Re: Linker error in compilation, Martin Ambuhl, 12:27
- Re: how to use PI in c99, jacob navia, 12:22
- Re: C question...little OT, David T. Ashley, 12:19
- how to use PI in c99, Szabolcs Nagy, 12:14
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, jacob navia, 12:12
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 11:57
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, CBFalconer, 11:55
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:54
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:49
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:46
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 11:45
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 11:42
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 11:42
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 11:31
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:13
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 11:11
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:10
- Re: C question...little OT, shadowman, 11:08
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 11:05
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Keith Thompson, 11:05
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 11:00
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:59
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 10:57
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:49
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 10:40
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, polas, 10:37
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, polas, 10:37
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, Ben Bacarisse, 10:34
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:30
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:29
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
- Re: Style question: #include, Dave Hansen, 10:23
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, polas, 10:19
- Re: Using a variable which is a pointer, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:15
- Using a variable which is a pointer, polas, 10:13
- Re: C question...little OT, Army1987, 09:57
- Re: char * signedness, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:51
- Re: memory pool library ?, Grey Alien, 09:48
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Tak-Shing Chan, 09:47
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Pietro Cerutti, 09:45
- Re: memory pool library ?, Grey Alien, 09:43
- Re: function parameters, Army1987, 09:33
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 09:30
- Re: char * signedness, Ben Bacarisse, 09:26
- Can "all bits zero" be a trap representation for integral types?, Army1987, 09:12
- Re: C question...little OT, bjarne, 09:07
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, CBFalconer, 08:44
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Chris Dollin, 08:41
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, CBFalconer, 08:39
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, CBFalconer, 08:37
- Re: memory pool library ?, CBFalconer, 08:34
- Re: char * signedness, Joe Wright, 07:53
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 07:21
- Re: C question...little OT, Chris Hills, 07:05
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Bos, 07:05
- Re: C question...little OT, Richard Bos, 06:53
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Bos, 06:52
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 06:25
- Re: Casts, Richard Heathfield, 06:21
- [OT] Re: pure virtual constructors and distructors..., Johan Bengtsson, 06:17
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Richard Heathfield, 06:15
- Re: reply the answer, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 06:06
- Re: Royalty Free PDF Chart Creator Dynamic Link Library (DLL), Johan Bengtsson, 05:53
- Re: Casts, Johan Bengtsson, 05:51
- Re: Linker error in compilation, Sheth Raxit, 05:40
- Re: Linker error in compilation, jacob navia, 05:26
- Linker error in compilation, srini4vasan, 05:24
- Re: when to use ; and when to use ,, Johan Bengtsson, 05:23
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, J. J. Farrell, 05:10
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 05:01
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 04:59
- Re: memory pool library ?, jaysome, 04:54
- Re: memory pool library ?, Sheth Raxit, 04:54
- Re: memory pool library ?, Sheth Raxit, 04:51
- Re: Redirecting input from file, William Pursell, 04:45
- Re: Style question: #include, William Pursell, 04:30
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Flash Gordon, 03:44
- Re: Incremental linking WITHOUT creating relocatable objects, bocadillodeatun@xxxxxxxxx, 03:35
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Keith Thompson, 02:33
- Re: char * signedness, ranjeet . gupta, 02:28
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Denis Kasak, 02:13
- Re: Style question: #include, ranjeet . gupta, 01:51
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, ranjeet . gupta, 01:45
- Re: function parameters, Thad Smith, 01:36
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Keith Thompson, 01:34
- Re: memory pool library ?, Thad Smith, 01:34
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:32
- Re: function parameters, ranjeet . gupta, 01:22
- Re: function parameters, ranjeet . gupta, 01:22
- Re: function parameters, ranjeet . gupta, 01:21
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Thad Smith, 01:18
- Re: Style question: #include, CBFalconer, 00:46
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, CBFalconer, 00:42
- Re: memory pool library ?, CBFalconer, 00:39
- Re: char * signedness, CBFalconer, 00:33
- Re: Style question: #include, Mike Wahler, 00:24
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, CBFalconer, 00:22
- Re: Style question: #include, Xu Weijiang, 00:10
July 05, 2007
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Francine . Neary, 23:57
- Style question: #include, Francine . Neary, 23:51
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, Robert Gamble, 23:43
- Re: Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 23:28
- Is i = i++; bad style?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 23:25
- Re: function parameters, Robert Gamble, 23:10
- Re: Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, user923005, 23:09
- function parameters, drurjen, 22:58
- Avoid memory corruption in shared memory used by several processes?, Sune, 22:50
- Re: function conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 22:18
- Re: char * signedness, Pietro Cerutti, 21:43
- Re: fread/fwrite, Peter Nilsson, 21:42
- Re: char * signedness, Peter Nilsson, 21:35
- Re: C question...little OT, lawrence . jones, 21:10
- Re: fread/fwrite, Barry Schwarz, 20:52
- Re: function conversion, Keith Thompson, 20:19
- Re: function conversion, Richard Heathfield, 20:06
- Re: char * signedness, Pietro Cerutti, 20:02
- Re: function conversion, Keith Thompson, 19:47
- Re: memory pool library ?, Grey Alien, 19:30
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 19:26
- Re: memory pool library ?, Ben Pfaff, 19:02
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Ben Bacarisse, 19:00
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 19:00
- Re: Redirecting input from file, J. J. Farrell, 18:58
- Re: function conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 18:55
- memory pool library ?, Grey Alien, 18:53
- Hi Hi Hi are you Searching for Happiness, abdo911, 18:44
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 18:42
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 18:33
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Keith Thompson, 18:28
- Re: char * signedness, Harald van Dijk, 18:27
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- char * signedness, Pietro Cerutti, 18:12
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 17:58
- Re: Redirecting input from file, David Moran, 17:50
- Re: Socket Question, CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 17:40
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 17:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Joe Wright, 17:22
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 17:21
- Re: Redirecting input from file, William Pursell, 17:19
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 17:18
- Re: Socket Question, Walter Roberson, 17:14
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 17:11
- Re: function conversion, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: Socket Question, Default User, 17:08
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Flash Gordon, 17:08
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 17:07
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 17:07
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Pfaff, 17:03
- Socket Question, Stuart, 16:58
- EARN Money DAILY IN $200-250 FOR HOME TOWN, preesh.001@xxxxxxxxx, 16:50
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 16:41
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Pfaff, 16:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 16:29
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 16:29
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Pfaff, 16:22
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 16:21
- Re: Parse variable names from string, Malcolm McLean, 16:14
- Re: why this crash?, Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 15:18
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Bacarisse, 14:34
- Re: ISAM file opening error, user923005, 14:27
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Flash Gordon, 14:05
- Re: why this crash?, Default User, 13:03
- Re: function conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 13:02
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Default User, 12:59
- Re: problem with linklist, Martin Ambuhl, 12:02
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, CBFalconer, 11:54
- Re: why this crash?, CBFalconer, 11:49
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 11:41
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 11:35
- Re: Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:23
- Re: problem with linklist, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:19
- Re: problem with linklist, Thomas Lumley, 11:10
- Re: Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, Ralf Damaschke, 11:05
- problem with linklist, sunilsomanna, 11:05
- Re: Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:53
- Re: Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, Eric Sosman, 10:49
- Re: Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, Jens Thoms Toerring, 10:44
- Re: Incremental linking WITHOUT creating relocatable objects, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:28
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:25
- Does *&s1 refer to the first member of structure variable s1, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:24
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:16
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, marvinla, 10:07
- Re: sample for base64 encoding in c language, Lew Pitcher, 09:45
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, osmium, 09:42
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, mark_bluemel, 09:27
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 09:04
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 08:59
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 08:57
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 08:51
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 08:45
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Richard Heathfield, 08:43
- Re: C question...little OT, Army1987, 08:40
- [OT] Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 08:35
- Re: C question...little OT, Army1987, 08:26
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Army1987, 08:18
- Re: ISAM file opening error, Kenny McCormack, 08:18
- Re: fread/fwrite, Eric Sosman, 08:13
- Re: sample for base64 encoding in c language, aruna . eies . eng, 07:48
- Re: ISAM file opening error, Jens Thoms Toerring, 07:45
- Re: ISAM file opening error, santosh, 07:33
- Re: sample for base64 encoding in c language, aruna . eies . eng, 07:29
- Re: sample for base64 encoding in c language, aruna . eies . eng, 07:26
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Herhor, 07:25
- ISAM file opening error, amit . atray, 07:06
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Richard Bos, 06:20
- Re: function conversion, Richard Bos, 06:19
- Re: why this crash?, Chris Dollin, 05:52
- Re: use of volatile ?, Richard Bos, 05:48
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Ben Bacarisse, 05:41
- Re: why this crash?, tguclu, 05:31
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Bos, 05:16
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 05:08
- Re: fscanf hangs, Chris Torek, 03:56
- Re: C question...little OT, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 03:39
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Keith Thompson, 03:21
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Manish Tomar, 02:52
- Re: fscanf hangs, Richard Heathfield, 02:42
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), CBFalconer, 02:32
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Richard Heathfield, 02:31
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Keith Thompson, 02:20
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Flash Gordon, 02:03
- Re: fscanf hangs, Chris Torek, 01:31
- Re: fread/fwrite, empriser, 01:00
July 04, 2007
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Default User, 21:55
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 21:54
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Default User, 21:51
- Re: pread() function declaration is not in <unistd.h>, Robert Gamble, 21:30
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Old Wolf, 21:11
- pread() function declaration is not in <unistd.h>, Mike, 20:47
- Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules, Chris Torek, 20:04
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Keith Thompson, 20:03
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Joe Wright, 19:58
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), CBFalconer, 19:53
- Re: C question...little OT, CBFalconer, 19:48
- Re: C question...little OT, CBFalconer, 19:45
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, CBFalconer, 19:43
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Herhor, 19:41
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, CBFalconer, 19:39
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Keith Thompson, 19:36
- Re: function conversion, CBFalconer, 19:31
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 19:26
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Herhor, 18:45
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, J. J. Farrell, 18:29
- Re: why this crash?, Old Wolf, 17:48
- Re: Tips and Tricks . Discussion and interest around Computers & Mobiles for People who are Crazy, manicrow, 17:36
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Harald van Dijk, 17:32
- Re: C question...little OT, Chris Hills, 17:31
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Old Wolf, 17:29
- Re: function conversion, Michael Brennan, 17:24
- Re: C question...little OT, mdh, 17:12
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, christian.bau, 17:09
- Re: C question...little OT, Chris Hills, 16:54
- Re: # character in macros, Keith Thompson, 16:48
- Re: C question...little OT, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: C question...little OT, pete, 16:02
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 15:48
- Re: # character in macros, SM Ryan, 15:39
- Re: C question...little OT, August Karlstrom, 15:14
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, pete, 15:05
- Re: loop for all values of ushort ports using ushort index .... with caution., pete, 15:04
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 15:00
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Barry Schwarz, 14:39
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Flash Gordon, 14:39
- Re: Parse variable names from string, Victor Lagerkvist, 14:38
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Walter Roberson, 14:36
- Re: size of an array (number of elements), Harald van Dijk, 14:34
- size of an array (number of elements), Grey Alien, 14:24
- Re: C question...little OT, Richard Heathfield, 13:55
- Re: C question...little OT, Roland Pibinger, 13:33
- Re: C question...little OT, mdh, 13:07
- Re: C question...little OT, Richard Heathfield, 13:04
- C question...little OT, mdh, 12:54
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Dave Vandervies, 12:46
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Dave Vandervies, 12:24
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 12:16
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 12:10
- Re: macros, deepak, 11:54
- Re: macros, Walter Roberson, 11:43
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Flash Gordon, 11:21
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Flash Gordon, 11:16
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Barry Schwarz, 10:58
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:40
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:38
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, marvinla, 10:27
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 10:19
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Duncan Muirhead, 10:15
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Duncan Muirhead, 10:09
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Barry Schwarz, 10:09
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Spade, 10:09
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, marvinla, 10:00
- Re: Type of Pointer, osmium, 09:51
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 09:50
- Re: Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, Flash Gordon, 09:22
- Re: Editing a File in C, osmium, 09:13
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 09:08
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Flash Gordon, 08:50
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Stephen Sprunk, 08:37
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Chris Dollin, 08:37
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 08:36
- Pointer-to-pointer realloc problem, marvinla, 08:29
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 08:11
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 08:10
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Manish Tomar, 07:40
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Army1987, 07:12
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Army1987, 07:08
- Re: Njoy, Army1987, 07:05
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Army1987, 07:01
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 06:58
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 06:49
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Army1987, 06:45
- Re: void *, Richard, 06:38
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, Army1987, 06:35
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Army1987, 06:29
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Army1987, 06:25
- Re: [OT] Re: use of volatile ?, Army1987, 06:15
- Re: # character in macros, Cedric Roux, 05:47
- Re: # character in macros, Laurent Deniau, 05:38
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Subra, 04:14
- Re: # character in macros, Spade, 03:53
- macros, raghu, 03:42
- Re: Editing a File in C, Sanchit, 03:29
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Pietro Cerutti, 03:29
- Re: Editing a File in C, jacob navia, 03:17
- Re: Editing a File in C, Default User, 03:11
- Re: Incremental linking WITHOUT creating relocatable objects, bocadillodeatun@xxxxxxxxx, 03:09
- Re: Editing a File in C, Sanchit, 03:05
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- Re: Editing a File in C, jacob navia, 02:45
- # character in macros, Venky, 02:44
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 02:36
- Editing a File in C, Sanchit, 02:32
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 02:31
- Re: Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, Sheth Raxit, 02:16
- Re: Njoy, Richard Heathfield, 02:14
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Walter Roberson, 01:27
- Re: loop for all values of ushort ports using ushort index .... with caution., Peter Nilsson, 01:16
- Re: void *, pete, 01:00
- Re: void *, Barry Schwarz, 00:40
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Keith Thompson, 00:38
- Re: void *, Keith Thompson, 00:36
- Re: loop for all values of ushort ports using ushort index .... with caution., pete, 00:32
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Robert Gamble, 00:32
- Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules, Barry Schwarz, 00:26
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Subra, 00:21
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Martin Ambuhl, 00:07
- Re: memcpy vs memmove, pete, 00:03
July 03, 2007
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Keith Thompson, 23:57
- Re: Incremental linking WITHOUT creating relocatable objects, Jack Klein, 23:47
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Barry, 23:42
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Jack Klein, 23:41
- Re: void *, pete, 23:36
- Re: loop for all values of ushort ports using ushort index .... with caution., pete, 23:26
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, pete, 23:20
- Re: Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, Peter Nilsson, 23:07
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, pete, 23:02
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Peter Nilsson, 22:46
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Dave Vandervies, 22:39
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Kenny McCormack, 22:31
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Peter Nilsson, 22:20
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 22:11
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Keith Thompson, 22:05
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Robert Gamble, 22:00
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Keith Thompson, 21:58
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Barry Schwarz, 21:48
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Barry Schwarz, 21:40
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Subra, 21:38
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, regis, 21:23
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 21:18
- Re: Why #pragma pack not take effect?, Kenny McCormack, 20:57
- Re: Njoy, Kenny McCormack, 20:52
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Ben Bacarisse, 20:43
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 20:38
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Pietro Cerutti, 20:34
- Re: Display C in HTML, SM Ryan, 20:33
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 20:25
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Keith Thompson, 20:22
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Pietro Cerutti, 20:22
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Keith Thompson, 20:18
- Re: ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Lew Pitcher, 20:18
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 20:12
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, Keith Thompson, 20:02
- Re: Newbie Question, Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 19:54
- ctime(3) gives incorrect results, Pietro Cerutti, 19:48
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Keith Thompson, 19:39
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 19:36
- Re: Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, Arquitecto, 19:31
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, Walter Roberson, 19:27
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, CBFalconer, 19:04
- Re: Newbie Question, CBFalconer, 19:01
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, CBFalconer, 18:55
- Re: Why #pragma pack not take effect?, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: Type of Pointer, Keith Thompson, 18:53
- Re: Njoy, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: use of volatile ?, CBFalconer, 18:41
- Re: function conversion, Chris Torek, 18:40
- Re: Type of Pointer, CBFalconer, 18:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 18:27
- Re: Session Adapter, Clever Monkey, 18:27
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 18:25
- Re: convert wint_t to wchar_t?, those who know me have no need of my name, 18:25
- Re: Display C in HTML, CBFalconer, 18:22
- Re: Parse variable names from string, user923005, 18:18
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, tguclu, 18:08
- Re: Pointing past valid memory, Scott Fluhrer, 18:04
- Re: Session Adapter, Keith Thompson, 18:01
- Re: Type of Pointer, Chris Torek, 17:57
- Re: swprintf declaration inconsistencies?, Rui Maciel, 17:48
- Re: Parse variable names from string, Victor Lagerkvist, 17:47
- Pointing past valid memory, jois . de . vivre, 17:46
- Re: Session Adapter, Clever Monkey, 17:30
- Re: dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules, Robert Gamble, 17:30
- Re: swprintf declaration inconsistencies?, Robert Gamble, 17:22
- Re: Parse variable names from string, user923005, 17:21
- Re: swprintf declaration inconsistencies?, jacob navia, 17:13
- dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules, David Mathog, 17:01
- Re: Model Facade, Dave Vandervies, 16:54
- Re: Model Facade, Richard Heathfield, 16:41
- Re: Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, William Pursell, 16:37
- Re: Model Facade, J. J. Farrell, 16:35
- swprintf declaration inconsistencies?, Rui Maciel, 16:31
- Re: Model Facade, Al Balmer, 16:24
- Re: Newbie Question, nk, 16:18
- Parse variable names from string, Victor Lagerkvist, 15:53
- Re: Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, jacob navia, 15:51
- Re: [OT] Re: use of volatile ?, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 15:46
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, trbosjek, 15:39
- Re: [OT] Re: use of volatile ?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:37
- [OT] Re: use of volatile ?, Army1987, 15:27
- Re: Display C in HTML, Army1987, 15:18
- Re: Model Facade, Keith Thompson, 15:17
- Re: Newbie Question, Army1987, 15:15
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 15:12
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Army1987, 15:09
- Re: use of volatile ?, Keith Thompson, 15:06
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 15:01
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: Model Facade, Richard Heathfield, 14:52
- Re: convert wint_t to wchar_t?, Keith Thompson, 14:50
- Session Adapter, Clover Wyatt, 14:40
- Virtual Adapter, Florentina Hatch, 14:38
- Re: Notation, Keith Thompson, 14:37
- Re: Model Facade, Dave Vandervies, 14:36
- Business Abstract, Vin Sanner, 14:33
- Re: use of volatile ?, Chris Dollin, 14:32
- Model Facade, Amyas Williams, 14:28
- Re: C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Robert Gamble, 14:24
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Keith Thompson, 14:15
- Re: Njoy, Kenny McCormack, 14:12
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 14:11
- Call a hidden function, is it possible ?, Arquitecto, 14:09
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Keith Thompson, 14:07
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, David Resnick, 14:00
- Re: Njoy, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:59
- Re: Njoy, user923005, 13:57
- Re: use of volatile ?, Flash Gordon, 13:44
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Christopher Benson-Manica, 12:37
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 12:35
- Re: Newbie Question, Sharath, 12:26
- Re: Newbie Question, Mike Wahler, 12:14
- Re: Struct assignment, CryptiqueGuy, 12:13
- Re: use of volatile ?, Joe Wright, 12:12
- Re: Variable arguments func (how to), Christopher Benson-Manica, 12:01
- Re: Newbie Question, nk, 11:53
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, John Bode, 11:47
- C tricky problem or gcc preprocessor bug ???, Subra, 11:18
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Sharath, 11:17
- Re: [OT] Usenet, ¬a\\/b, 11:15
- Re: Variable arguments func (how to), Grey Alien, 10:59
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:44
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:42
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:41
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:37
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Spoon, 10:36
- Re: Struct assignment, Old Wolf, 10:35
- Re: print unsigned long long right justified, Sharath, 10:33
- Re: use of volatile ?, Richard Bos, 10:23
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Bos, 10:22
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Richard Bos, 10:20
- Re: use of volatile ?, Clever Monkey, 10:14
- print unsigned long long right justified, trbosjek, 10:11
- convert wint_t to wchar_t?, Rui Maciel, 10:06
- convert wint_t to wchar_t?, Rui Maciel, 10:06
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 10:03
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 10:01
- Re: use of volatile ?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:48
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 09:42
- Re: Variable arguments func (how to), Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:41
- Re: Variable arguments func (how to), Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:36
- Re: Variable arguments func (how to), Army1987, 09:29
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Army1987, 09:26
- Re: Newbie Question, Army1987, 09:23
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Barry Schwarz, 09:17
- Re: function conversion, Ben Bacarisse, 09:14
- Newbie Question, nk, 09:13
- Notation, Mark L Pappin, 08:59
- Variable arguments func (how to), Grey Alien, 08:57
- Re: Type of Pointer, Barry Schwarz, 08:51
- Re: size of int and char, cr88192, 08:44
- Re: Njoy, Kenny McCormack, 08:13
- Re: use of volatile ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:30
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 07:29
- Incremental linking WITHOUT creating relocatable objects, bocadillodeatun, 07:28
- Re: Why #pragma pack not take effect?, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 07:09
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, those who know me have no need of my name, 07:04
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, cr88192, 06:34
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, cr88192, 06:24
- Re: Struct assignment, Keith Thompson, 05:39
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, Army1987, 05:39
- Re: Why #pragma pack not take effect?, Army1987, 05:34
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Army1987, 05:31
- Re: why this crash?, Army1987, 05:18
- Re: Struct assignment, Army1987, 05:14
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Chris Dollin, 05:14
- Re: Njoy, Richard Heathfield, 05:13
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: why this crash?, Army1987, 05:05
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, Keith Thompson, 05:03
- Re: Njoy, Keith Thompson, 04:59
- Re: size of int and char, Army1987, 04:58
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, mark_bluemel, 04:53
- Re: [OT] Usenet, Keith Thompson, 04:47
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, CryptiqueGuy, 04:40
- Re: Giving an address value to a pointer, sharath . ee, 04:22
- Giving an address value to a pointer, Akanksha, 04:18
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 04:06
- Re: Why #pragma pack not take effect?, Keith Thompson, 03:55
- Re: Njoy, Richard Heathfield, 03:39
- Re: [OT] Usenet, Joel Mayes, 03:37
- Re: Njoy, Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, mark_bluemel, 03:31
- Re: [OT] Usenet, Joel Mayes, 03:26
- Re: Struct assignment, Keith Thompson, 03:22
- Re: function conversion, xdevel, 03:21
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Jorgen Grahn, 03:15
- Why #pragma pack not take effect?, Jimmy, 03:14
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 02:34
- Njoy, matyax, 02:32
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Barry Schwarz, 02:10
- Re: Struct assignment, Barry Schwarz, 01:56
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Keith Thompson, 01:52
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, Barry Schwarz, 01:52
- Re: stray"\26" in program, Martin Ambuhl, 01:42
- Re: why this crash?, Default User, 01:34
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 01:33
- Re: Struct assignment, Richard Heathfield, 01:30
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 01:28
- stray"\26" in program, Grzesiek, 01:07
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, cr88192, 00:39
- Re: size of int and char, Keith Thompson, 00:24
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, Keith Thompson, 00:23
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 00:18
July 02, 2007
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, J. J. Farrell, 23:55
- Re: why this crash?, J. J. Farrell, 23:40
- Re: size of int and char, Stephen Sprunk, 23:18
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Peter Nilsson, 23:15
- Re: why this crash?, Robert Gamble, 23:05
- Re: size of int and char, sid, 23:04
- Re: why this crash?, Martin Ambuhl, 23:03
- Re: why this crash?, sid, 23:01
- Re: Struct assignment, Peter Nilsson, 22:38
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, !truth, 22:28
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, !truth, 22:21
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Harald van Dijk, 21:26
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, cr88192, 21:24
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, SM Ryan, 21:15
- Re: read from file question, SM Ryan, 21:15
- Re: Type of Pointer, SM Ryan, 21:15
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 21:09
- Re: why this crash?, Keith Thompson, 21:04
- Re: Struct assignment, Keith Thompson, 21:01
- Re: why this crash?, Harald van Dijk, 20:59
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 20:58
- Re: Struct assignment, Keith Thompson, 20:56
- why this crash?, linq936, 20:37
- Re: Struct assignment, Robert Gamble, 20:18
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 20:17
- Re: Struct assignment, Old Wolf, 20:02
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Keith Thompson, 19:34
- Re: size of int and char, Keith Thompson, 19:30
- Re: How to check if a server is alive?, Kevin Handy, 19:26
- Re: file shredding, Kevin Handy, 19:09
- Re: size of int and char, Mark McIntyre, 19:07
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 19:06
- Re: function conversion, Michael Brennan, 19:05
- Re: file shredding, Kevin Handy, 19:03
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, Mark McIntyre, 19:02
- Re: read from file question, CBFalconer, 18:57
- Re: size of int and char, Peter Nilsson, 18:51
- Re: read from file question, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: size of int and char, Peter Nilsson, 18:26
- Re: size of int and char, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: read from file question, Arquitecto, 18:17
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, CBFalconer, 18:15
- Re: size of int and char, CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: K&R hash table question, CBFalconer, 18:06
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 18:03
- Announce: TCL Development Tools - Eclipse Europa Release., Patrick Finnegan, 17:55
- Re: size of int and char, rafal_, 17:34
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, Eric Sosman, 16:53
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, smartie, 16:25
- Re: /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, Martin Ambuhl, 16:12
- /usr/bin/ld: Undefined symbols with openssl on Mac OS X 10.4, smartie, 15:39
- Re: read from file question, Army1987, 15:18
- Re: size of int and char, Army1987, 15:10
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 15:07
- Re: function conversion, Flash Gordon, 14:54
- Re: read from file question, osmium, 14:24
- Re: read from file question, CBFalconer, 14:10
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 14:06
- Re: How to check if a server is alive?, CBFalconer, 14:02
- Re: use of volatile ?, CBFalconer, 13:57
- Re: file shredding, Al Balmer, 13:57
- Re: Type of Pointer, Mark McIntyre, 13:54
- Re: Type of Pointer, CBFalconer, 13:52
- Re: K&R hash table question, Mark McIntyre, 13:52
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 13:49
- Re: Redirecting input from file, CBFalconer, 13:43
- Re: size of int and char, Martin Ambuhl, 13:33
- Re: size of int and char, Eric Sosman, 13:20
- Re: use of volatile ?, Keith Thompson, 13:17
- size of int and char, rafal_, 13:13
- Re: function conversion, Pietro Cerutti, 13:05
- PC programm, Sims, 12:58
- Re: use of volatile ?, satish, 12:56
- Re: function conversion, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: read from file question, Keith Thompson, 12:49
- Re: function conversion, Keith Thompson, 12:43
- Re: function conversion, Pietro Cerutti, 12:38
- Re: How to check if a server is alive?, Guillaume Charhon, 12:36
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Keith Thompson, 12:34
- Re: K&R hash table question, Keith Thompson, 12:31
- [OT] Usenet, ¬a\\/b, 12:23
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 12:05
- How to check if a server is alive?, Guillaume Charhon, 12:04
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 12:02
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:44
- Re: Type of Pointer, Martin Ambuhl, 11:43
- Re: How to check if a server is alive?, Richard Heathfield, 11:28
- Re: K&R hash table question, Richard Heathfield, 11:27
- Re: K&R hash table question, ¬a\\/b, 11:09
- Re: Struct assignment, Eric Sosman, 10:59
- Re: read from file question, osmium, 10:30
- Re: read from file question, Ian Malone, 10:26
- Re: function conversion, Mike Wahler, 10:16
- Re: How to check if a server is alive?, Richard Heathfield, 10:09
- read from file question, Arquitecto, 10:05
- Re: C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, Estevao Rohr, 09:46
- Re: function conversion, xdevel, 09:46
- Re: function conversion, Pietro Cerutti, 09:23
- Re: void *, Manish Tomar, 09:18
- function conversion, xdevel, 09:17
- Re: use of volatile ?, Army1987, 09:03
- Re: use of volatile ?, Matthew Hicks, 08:58
- Re: Type of Pointer, Barry Schwarz, 08:43
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, Barry Schwarz, 08:23
- Re: use of volatile ?, Chris Dollin, 08:22
- use of volatile ?, parasprajapati2001@xxxxxxxxx, 08:15
- Re: Type of Pointer, Chris Dollin, 08:12
- Re: Type of Pointer, Richard Heathfield, 07:50
- Opportunities for Linux/Kernel Developers - AppLabs - Hyderabad, Vijay, 07:46
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, mark_bluemel, 07:22
- Re: Type of Pointer, atif, 07:15
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, !truth, 07:06
- Re: a confusing way to get a pointer's address, !truth, 07:01
- a confusing way to get a pointer's address, !truth, 06:56
- Type of Pointer, atif, 06:50
- Re: Type of Pointer, Chris Dollin, 06:48
- Re: printf unsigned long long as hex, Army1987, 06:10
- Re: some tricky questions, Army1987, 06:04
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Bos, 05:42
- Re: printf unsigned long long as hex, Army1987, 05:41
- Re: K&R hash table question, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 05:36
- Re: K&R hash table question, Richard Heathfield, 04:44
- Re: how to use __iomem and __user, mark_bluemel, 04:28
- Re: K&R hash table question, ¬a\\/b, 04:16
- Re: Floating point rounding error, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:11
- Re: how to use __iomem and __user, J. J. Farrell, 03:41
- Re: how to use __iomem and __user, Kenny McCormack, 03:26
- Re: file shredding, Richard Bos, 03:25
- Re: some tricky questions, Richard Bos, 03:04
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 00:48
- Re: how to use __iomem and __user, CBFalconer, 00:00
July 01, 2007
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Dave Vandervies, 23:50
- how to use __iomem and __user, !truth, 22:01
- Re: WHY doesn't C know anything about directories?, Dik T. Winter, 21:07
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, helloguys, 21:05
- [Now Making $1000+ a day is easy.], AShopper.net, 20:55
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Old Wolf, 19:12
- Re: typedef of array compiling problems in functions call, Old Wolf, 19:09
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Old Wolf, 19:05
- Re: printf unsigned long long as hex, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 17:50
- funny story, Wade Ward, 17:30
- Re: typedef of array compiling problems in functions call, Flash Gordon, 17:23
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, regis, 16:36
- typedef of array compiling problems in functions call, Rufus, 16:24
- Re: printf unsigned long long as hex, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Display C in HTML, Flash Gordon, 15:53
- Re: printf unsigned long long as hex, Martin Ambuhl, 15:38
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 14:34
- Re: Display C in HTML, SM Ryan, 14:24
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Denis Kasak, 14:22
- Re: C89 Standard for Britons, CBFalconer, 14:19
- Re: Casting int'** to 'const int * const * const' dosn't work, why?, lawrence . jones, 14:16
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, J. J. Farrell, 14:15
- Re: Display C in HTML, SM Ryan, 14:14
- Re: Display C in HTML, SM Ryan, 14:14
- printf unsigned long long as hex, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 14:08
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 14:01
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Flash Gordon, 13:46
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Flash Gordon, 13:36
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Flash Gordon, 13:25
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 13:07
- Re: Display C in HTML, Roland Pibinger, 13:01
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Harald van Dijk, 12:52
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Richard Tobin, 12:42
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Malcolm McLean, 12:38
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Mark McIntyre, 12:21
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 11:50
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Kevin Bagust, 11:50
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Army1987, 11:39
- Re: Portably determine endianness?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:04
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Harald van Dijk, 10:48
- Re: C89 Standard for Britons, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 10:46
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 10:38
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Heathfield, 10:36
- Re: Casting int'** to 'const int * const * const' dosn't work, why?, Ben Bacarisse, 10:06
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 09:43
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 09:22
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, cr88192, 09:16
- Portably determine endianness?, Army1987, 09:05
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 09:04
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 08:42
- Re: extern "C" in library header, CBFalconer, 08:36
- Re: C89 Standard for Britons, Richard Heathfield, 08:36
- Re: Display C in HTML, Flash Gordon, 07:33
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Flash Gordon, 07:21
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 07:00
- Re: file shredding, Chris Hills, 06:06
- Re: C89 Standard for Britons, Chris Hills, 06:01
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Army1987, 05:10
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Army1987, 05:04
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 04:59
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Army1987, 04:47
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Tobin, 04:43
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 04:40
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Chris Dollin, 04:37
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, CBFalconer, 04:37
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 04:36
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Tobin, 04:33
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Army1987, 04:32
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 04:29
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Army1987, 04:28
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Richard Tobin, 04:27
- Re: WHY doesn't C know anything about directories?, Richard Tobin, 04:20
- Re: trying to assign function pointers, Richard Heathfield, 04:15
- Re: Display C in HTML, Flash Gordon, 04:15
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Richard Heathfield, 04:13
- Re: Display C in HTML, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- Re: Struct assignment, Army1987, 04:03
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Flash Gordon, 03:55
- Re: Function pointers and NULL, Malcolm McLean, 03:43
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Malcolm McLean, 03:41
- Re: Greatest of three numbers, Flash Gordon, 03:37
- Re: trying to assign function pointers, Harald van Dijk, 03:29
- Re: Function pointers and NULL, Harald van Dijk, 03:25
- Greatest of three numbers, Amar Kumar Dubedy, 02:36
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Denis Kasak, 02:32
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, J. J. Farrell, 02:31
- Re: Display C in HTML, Malcolm McLean, 02:24
- Re: Function pointers and NULL, Malcolm McLean, 02:18
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, deepak, 01:49
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Martin Ambuhl, 01:30
- Re: Display C in HTML, Ed Jensen, 00:30
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Default User, 00:17
June 30, 2007
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 23:23
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 23:15
- Re: help w/ c/c++ problem, Richard Heathfield, 23:04
- Re: [OT] Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?, Richard Heathfield, 23:02
- Re: Display C in HTML, Richard Heathfield, 22:57
- help w/ c/c++ problem, Heinrich Pumpernickel, 22:38
- Re: [OT] Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?, CBFalconer, 22:32
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 22:28
- Re: Display C in HTML, Richard Heathfield, 22:19
- Re: Mixing C and C++, CBFalconer, 22:19
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, CBFalconer, 22:15
- Re: Display C in HTML, Walter Roberson, 21:48
- Re: some C questions, Keith Thompson, 21:29
- Re: cast struct question, Stephen Sprunk, 21:24
- Re: Display C in HTML, Wade Ward, 21:14
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: [OT] Re: Why leave the error handling to the caller?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Floating point rounding error, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: How many levels of pointers can you have?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: cast struct question, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: trying to assign function pointers, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: #line, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: WHY doesn't C know anything about directories?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: WHY doesn't C know anything about directories?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: C's compromise and recognition to the new C++, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: some tricky questions, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Casting int'** to 'const int * const * const' dosn't work, why?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: struct / typedef confusion, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Reallocate an array (pointers), David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: What is wrong? I can't add..., David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Address of a constant, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: some C questions, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Cipher Lab / Syntech, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Pointer arithmetics in 2D arrays, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: is this legal declaration/not correct output, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Question about mixed scalar type operation, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: What is wrong with this code?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: unions as function args, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: scanf() quesion?, David Thompson, 21:00
- Re: Function pointers and NULL, Richard Heathfield, 20:43
- Re: Display C in HTML, SM Ryan, 20:31
- Re: C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, SM Ryan, 20:31
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Wade Ward, 20:22
- Re: Function pointers and NULL, Harald van Dijk, 20:20
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Grey Alien, 20:13
- Function pointers and NULL, Richard Heathfield, 20:11
- Re: Mixing C and C++, Wade Ward, 20:08
- Mixing C and C++, Grey Alien, 19:56
- Re: file shredding, CBFalconer, 19:19
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Wade Ward, 19:14
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Flash Gordon, 19:14
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 19:06
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, CBFalconer, 18:54
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Heathfield, 18:48
- Re: Casts, CBFalconer, 18:44
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 18:42
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 18:41
- Re: file shredding, CBFalconer, 18:40
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 18:37
- Re: Struct assignment, Richard Heathfield, 18:29
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 18:26
- Re: Struct assignment, Flash Gordon, 18:19
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Flash Gordon, 18:17
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Keith Thompson, 18:10
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Dave Vandervies, 18:02
- Re: [OT] Re: Display C in HTML, Richard Tobin, 17:49
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 17:48
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Tobin, 17:45
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Tobin, 17:42
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Tobin, 17:33
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Joe Wright, 17:28
- Re: Casts, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Mark McIntyre, 17:04
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Mark McIntyre, 17:02
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 17:01
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Keith Thompson, 16:59
- Re: file shredding, Mark McIntyre, 16:58
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Flash Gordon, 16:56
- Re: Struct assignment, Flash Gordon, 16:53
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Harald van Dijk, 16:41
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 16:36
- Re: reply the answer, Harald van Dijk, 16:30
- Re: Struct assignment, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 16:25
- Re: reply the answer, Harald van Dijk, 16:25
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Harald van Dijk, 16:21
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Harald van Dijk, 16:19
- Re: file shredding, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 16:08
- Re: Training courses for CMMI and Software Estimation techniques @ Hyderabad, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: fscanf hangs, Richard Heathfield, 16:03
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 16:01
- Re: [OT] Re: Display C in HTML, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: Struct assignment, Richard Heathfield, 15:56
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, CBFalconer, 15:55
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 15:53
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 15:51
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 15:39
- Re: Struct assignment, Flash Gordon, 15:20
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: segmentation fault, CBFalconer, 15:04
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Serve Lau, 14:55
- Re: Struct assignment, Serve Lau, 14:53
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool - TPA, CBFalconer, 14:43
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 14:38
- Re: fscanf hangs, PeterOut, 14:11
- Re: storing related structs, Martin Ambuhl, 13:53
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool - TPA, p . s . bijpost, 13:37
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Eric Sosman, 13:32
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Flash Gordon, 13:18
- Re: Struct assignment, Thomas Lumley, 13:14
- Re: Struct assignment, Flash Gordon, 13:12
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Serve Lau, 13:12
- Re: reply the answer, Harald van Dijk, 13:10
- Re: Struct assignment, Malcolm McLean, 13:05
- Re: segmentation fault, Malcolm McLean, 12:46
- Struct assignment, Grey Alien, 12:43
- Re: reply the answer, Joe Wright, 12:32
- Re: file shredding, Default User, 12:01
- Re: segmentation fault, Harald van Dijk, 11:46
- Re: segmentation fault, Army1987, 11:43
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Army1987, 11:31
- Re: Display C in HTML, Malcolm McLean, 11:31
- segmentation fault, sid, 11:30
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Tobin, 11:26
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Army1987, 11:16
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Tobin, 11:13
- Re: storing related structs, Grey Alien, 11:12
- Re: Display C in HTML, Flash Gordon, 11:06
- Re: storing related structs, Chris Dollin, 11:05
- Re: storing related structs, Grey Alien, 10:51
- Re: Machine epsilon: conclusion, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
- Re: Display C in HTML, Adam, 10:34
- Re: Display C in HTML, Adam, 10:32
- [OT] Re: Display C in HTML, Army1987, 10:09
- Re: Display C in HTML, Army1987, 10:07
- Re: reply the answer, Harald van Dijk, 09:57
- Machine epsilon: conclusion, jacob navia, 09:54
- Re: Display C in HTML, Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Re: storing related structs, Flash Gordon, 09:38
- Re: storing related structs, Chris Dollin, 09:15
- Re: storing related structs, Army1987, 09:12
- Re: storing related structs, Grey Alien, 09:04
- Re: storing related structs, Grey Alien, 09:00
- Re: storing related structs, CBFalconer, 08:51
- Re: Display C in HTML, CBFalconer, 08:50
- Re: Training courses for CMMI and Software Estimation techniques @ Hyderabad, CBFalconer, 08:48
- Re: Display C in HTML, Flash Gordon, 08:43
- Re: storing related structs, Flash Gordon, 08:40
- Re: file shredding, CBFalconer, 08:39
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool - TPA, CBFalconer, 08:35
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 08:25
- Re: storing related structs, gw7rib, 08:25
- Re: storing related structs, Army1987, 08:15
- [OT] Re: Display C in HTML, Army1987, 08:09
- storing related structs, Gray Alien, 07:28
- Display C in HTML, Adam, 07:08
- Re: call back functions..., Flash Gordon, 06:34
- Re: The machine epsilon, JT, 06:00
- Re: The machine epsilon, Harald van Dijk, 05:50
- Re: reply the answer, Harald van Dijk, 05:48
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 05:35
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool - TPA, p . s . bijpost, 05:33
- Re: Monitor microphone input, Army1987, 05:28
- Re: reply the answer, Army1987, 05:24
- Re: reply the answer, Army1987, 05:12
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 05:08
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 04:44
- Re: call back functions..., Malcolm McLean, 04:41
- Re: C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, Malcolm McLean, 04:38
- Re: C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, Rui Maciel, 04:35
- Re: C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, Rui Maciel, 04:35
- Re: free functions design, Malcolm McLean, 04:32
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 04:00
- Re: Return pointer from function, Army1987, 03:38
- Re: Help on Parsing, Malcolm McLean, 03:31
- Re: file shredding, Keith Thompson, 03:06
- Re: file shredding, Wade Ward, 02:53
- Free usefull article.Do you need contents to add to your web site?, mostselect, 02:34
- Monitor microphone input, sr, 02:05
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Heathfield, 02:03
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 01:47
- Re: Return pointer from function, Richard Heathfield, 01:38
- Re: Video Podcasts- Bjarne Stroustrup,Herb Sutter, Scott Meyers, Stephen Dewhurst, Richard Heathfield, 01:29
- Re: file shredding, Richard Heathfield, 01:12
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Heathfield, 01:01
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Heathfield, 01:00
- Re: file shredding, Jack Klein, 00:47
June 29, 2007
- Send funny sms, fazi, 23:59
- Re: file shredding, Keith Thompson, 23:41
- Re: file shredding, Jack Klein, 23:08
- Re: call back functions..., Eric Sosman, 22:26
- Training courses for CMMI and Software Estimation techniques @ Hyderabad, Vijay, 21:43
- Re: The machine epsilon, Keith Thompson, 20:30
- Re: The machine epsilon, Keith Thompson, 20:23
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Barry Schwarz, 20:10
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Keith Thompson, 20:00
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Wade Ward, 19:49
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Barry Schwarz, 19:39
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool - TPA, Default User, 19:29
- Re: Casts, Mark L Pappin, 19:12
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Keith Thompson, 19:10
- C struct to XML, XML Schema conversion, Estevao Rohr, 19:07
- Re: Return pointer from function, CBFalconer, 18:54
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Wade Ward, 18:52
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Thomas Dickey, 18:43
- Re: file shredding, CBFalconer, 18:42
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 18:28
- Re: file shredding, Gordon Burditt, 18:15
- Re: void *, Keith Thompson, 18:12
- Re: void *, Keith Thompson, 18:08
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: undefined reference to a function, Mark McIntyre, 18:05
- Re: The machine epsilon, Mark McIntyre, 18:03
- Re: reply the answer, Mark McIntyre, 18:00
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Mark McIntyre, 17:55
- Re: file shredding, Mark McIntyre, 17:52
- Re: file shredding, Mark McIntyre, 17:49
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Mark McIntyre, 17:42
- Re: The machine epsilon, Flash Gordon, 17:30
- Re: The machine epsilon, Walter Roberson, 17:23
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, David Tiktin, 17:17
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 17:07
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Thomas Dickey, 16:23
- Re: Return pointer from function, Army1987, 16:01
- Re: Return pointer from function, Walter Roberson, 15:51
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 15:49
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 15:46
- Re: The machine epsilon, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: void *, Roman Mashak, 15:45
- Re: Return pointer from function, Army1987, 15:41
- Re: C89 Standard for Britons, Kelsey Bjarnason, 15:34
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 15:23
- Re: Return pointer from function, Walter Roberson, 15:20
- Re: The machine epsilon, Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: can i use bioscom to manipulate serial port on winxp, Walter Roberson, 15:18
- Re: Return pointer from function, Army1987, 15:17
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: can i use bioscom to manipulate serial port on winxp, Army1987, 15:06
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Keith Thompson, 14:59
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, p . s . bijpost, 14:59
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 14:51
- Re: The machine epsilon, Joe Wright, 14:51
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, CBFalconer, 14:50
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Keith Thompson, 14:49
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Walter Roberson, 14:38
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Army1987, 14:37
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 14:25
- Re: The machine epsilon, CBFalconer, 14:12
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 14:10
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 14:07
- Re: Video Podcasts- Bjarne Stroustrup,Herb Sutter, Scott Meyers, Stephen Dewhurst, Al Balmer, 14:04
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 14:01
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Army1987, 13:58
- Re: The machine epsilon, Walter Roberson, 13:55
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 13:44
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 13:43
- Video Podcasts- Bjarne Stroustrup,Herb Sutter, Scott Meyers, Stephen Dewhurst, EDG, 13:40
- Re: void *, Walter Roberson, 13:30
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, CBFalconer, 13:08
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Clever Monkey, 13:00
- Re: void *, Dave Vandervies, 12:57
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, CBFalconer, 12:47
- Re: The machine epsilon, CBFalconer, 12:40
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, David Tiktin, 12:39
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Joe Wright, 12:36
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Richard Tobin, 12:33
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Walter Roberson, 12:22
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Thomas Dickey, 12:21
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 12:16
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, CBFalconer, 12:08
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Walter Roberson, 12:06
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Walter Roberson, 12:00
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Richard Tobin, 11:58
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Richard Tobin, 11:53
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Kenny McCormack, 11:51
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Thomas Dickey, 11:49
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Eric Sosman, 11:41
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 11:38
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 11:25
- Re: call back functions..., Richard Tobin, 11:12
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 11:12
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Army1987, 11:11
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Army1987, 11:05
- Re: undefined reference to a function, Chris Dollin, 11:02
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 10:56
- undefined reference to a function, rockymaxdeemann, 10:54
- Re: file shredding, Chris Hills, 10:50
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 10:47
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), mark_bluemel, 10:46
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 10:46
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Eric Sosman, 10:43
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 10:39
- Re: call back functions..., Clever Monkey, 10:37
- Re: file shredding, Thad Smith, 10:31
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 10:29
- Re: greatest multiple algorithm, Thad Smith, 10:25
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Clever Monkey, 10:22
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Eric Sosman, 10:21
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 10:17
- Re: reply the answer, Peter 'Shaggy' Haywood, 10:14
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Army1987, 10:13
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 10:08
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 10:07
- Re: void *, Chris Dollin, 10:01
- Re: file shredding, jacob navia, 09:59
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 09:56
- Re: void *, Army1987, 09:52
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Army1987, 09:44
- Re: reply the answer, Chris Hills, 09:30
- Re: The machine epsilon, Army1987, 09:06
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, p . s . bijpost, 09:04
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Army1987, 09:01
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 08:53
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Army1987, 08:51
- Re: greatest multiple algorithm, Army1987, 08:48
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Roland Pibinger, 08:43
- file shredding, prachi983@xxxxxxxxx, 08:38
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Lew Pitcher, 08:36
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 08:35
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Dollin, 08:31
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, Eric Sosman, 08:12
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Richard Tobin, 07:56
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Spade, 07:51
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 07:47
- Re: problem with a casted pointer, mark_bluemel, 07:32
- Re: The machine epsilon, Eric Sosman, 07:31
- problem with a casted pointer, praveen, 07:10
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Hills, 06:54
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Heathfield, 06:40
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 06:40
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Richard Bos, 06:22
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 06:19
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), mark_bluemel, 06:10
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Dollin, 05:58
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Verbal Kint, 05:53
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, mark_bluemel, 05:53
- Re: when to use ; and when to use ,, Chris Dollin, 05:50
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), mark_bluemel, 05:48
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 05:44
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Heathfield, 05:40
- Re: when to use ; and when to use ,, Richard Heathfield, 05:37
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Hills, 05:36
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Heathfield, 05:33
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 05:28
- Re: when to use ; and when to use ,, Army1987, 05:27
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Bos, 05:21
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Verbal Kint, 05:20
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 05:20
- Re: compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, jacob navia, 05:13
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Tobin, 05:09
- Re: The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 05:08
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 05:06
- Re: change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), mark_bluemel, 04:48
- Re: The machine epsilon, Richard Heathfield, 04:39
- Re: free() performance question, websnarf, 04:38
- Re: how to redirect my output in a new terminal, Default User, 04:24
- change standard deviation of normal or Gaussian distribution (faq 13.20), Verbal Kint, 04:21
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Dollin, 04:16
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Chris Dollin, 04:10
- compiling c application to prc (palm) tool, p . s . bijpost, 04:09
- The machine epsilon, jacob navia, 04:08
- how to redirect my output in a new terminal, sriparna, 04:06
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Charles Bailey, 03:52
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, sayansayan@xxxxxxxxx, 03:50
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, jacob navia, 03:40
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, Richard Bos, 03:27
- Re: opening a new terminal and output it there, santosh, 03:25
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, santosh, 03:22
- opening a new terminal and output it there, sayansayan@xxxxxxxxx, 02:55
- Re: reply the answer, Dave Vandervies, 01:46
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 01:32
- Re: extern "C" in library header, Richard Heathfield, 01:24
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Heathfield, 01:16
- extern "C" in library header, William Pursell, 01:02
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 00:09
June 28, 2007
- Re: application of pointers to functions, Charles Richmond, 23:42
- Re: reply the answer, Charles Richmond, 23:35
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Keith Thompson, 23:03
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Wade Ward, 21:39
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Barry Schwarz, 21:21
- Re: void *, Roman Mashak, 21:11
- Re: void *, Roman Mashak, 20:53
- Re: void *, Roman Mashak, 20:47
- Re: free() performance question, CBFalconer, 19:57
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 18:50
- Re: greatest multiple algorithm, Eric Sosman, 18:30
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, William Pursell, 18:23
- Re: greatest multiple algorithm, Walter Roberson, 18:05
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Martin Ambuhl, 17:54
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Tejas Kokje, 17:49
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Roland Pibinger, 17:44
- greatest multiple algorithm, Bronson, 17:40
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, osmium, 17:12
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 16:54
- Re: void *, Roman Mashak, 16:35
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Eric Sosman, 15:43
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Chris Hills, 15:22
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Chris Hills, 15:20
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Flash Gordon, 15:19
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, user923005, 15:15
- Re: little endian or big endian ???, Walter Roberson, 15:14
- little endian or big endian ???, guthena, 15:01
- Re: void *, Flash Gordon, 14:58
- void *, Roman Mashak, 14:05
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 14:03
- Re: free() performance question, Barry, 14:00
- Re: call back functions..., Richard Tobin, 13:40
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 13:29
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 13:00
- Re: Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 12:56
- Re: void *, Kenny McCormack, 12:46
- Re: call back functions..., Clever Monkey, 12:37
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Richard Heathfield, 12:29
- Re: dlls containing functions with same names problems, CBFalconer, 12:25
- Re: void *, CBFalconer, 12:22
- Re: Redirecting input from file, Eric Sosman, 12:21
- Re: Redirecting input from file, AG, 12:21
- Re: free() performance question, CBFalconer, 12:13
- Re: free() performance question, CBFalconer, 12:10
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 12:01
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 11:59
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Heathfield, 11:40
- Re: dlls containing functions with same names problems, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 11:35
- Redirecting input from file, dmoran21@xxxxxxx, 11:30
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Chris Dollin, 11:16
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Lew Pitcher, 11:11
- Re: void *, Jens Thoms Toerring, 11:03
- Re: dlls containing functions with same names problems, stenasc, 10:55
- Re: program resource usege, Eric Sosman, 10:53
- Re: dlls containing functions with same names problems, Roberto Waltman, 10:02
- Re: free() performance question, Richard Bos, 09:56
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 09:32
- Re: free() performance question, Richard Tobin, 09:29
- Re: about structures memory allocation, Army1987, 09:26
- Re: free() performance question, Barry, 09:14
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 08:57
- Re: program resource usege, Chris Dollin, 08:44
- Re: free() performance question, jacob navia, 08:43
- Re: call back functions..., Sharath, 08:42
- Re: call back functions..., Chris Dollin, 08:39
- Re: dlls containing functions with same names problems, Chris Dollin, 08:36
- Re: free functions design, Richard Bos, 08:34
- program resource usege, Carramba, 08:34
- Re: reply the answer, Chris Dollin, 08:33
- Re: free() performance question, Barry, 08:29
- Re: call back functions..., Carramba, 08:16
- Re: call back functions..., Barry Schwarz, 07:50
- Re: free functions design, Duncan Muirhead, 07:49
- Re: call back functions..., Eric Sosman, 07:41
- Re: void *, Barry Schwarz, 07:33
- Re: void *, Manish Tomar, 07:13
- Re: free functions design, Manish Tomar, 07:00
- Re: void *, Richard, 06:58
- Re: void *, Richard, 06:55
- call back functions..., sameer.oak@xxxxxxxxx, 05:57
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Tobin, 05:52
- dlls containing functions with same names problems, stenasc, 05:29
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 05:24
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 05:19
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 04:46
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Bos, 04:43
- Re: void *, Richard Heathfield, 04:20
- Re: can i use bioscom to manipulate serial port on winxp, user923005, 04:08
- Re: about argc and argv, Richard Heathfield, 04:07
- Re: Help on Parsing, user923005, 04:03
- Re: void *, Keith Thompson, 04:01
- Re: reply the answer, Richard Heathfield, 04:01
- Re: free functions design, Roland Pibinger, 03:51
- Re: free functions design, Roland Pibinger, 03:47
- Help on Parsing, K . Z . Zamli, 03:41
- Re: void *, user923005, 03:26
- Re: void *, Flash Gordon, 02:53
- Re: K&R hash table question, merrittr, 01:53
- Re: c interface with c++ implementation, Malcolm McLean, 01:45
- Re: free() performance question, jacob navia, 00:39
- Re: void *, Barry Schwarz, 00:18
- Re: Time api, Keith Thompson, 00:17
June 27, 2007
- Re: free() performance question, Barry, 23:29
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 23:28
- Re: about argc and argv, Keith Thompson, 23:25
- Re: void *, TJ, 23:21
- Re: Time api, Joe Wright, 22:56
- Re: free() performance question, CBFalconer, 22:40
- Re: returning function pointer, J. J. Farrell, 22:30
- Re: free() performance question, CBFalconer, 22:28
- Re: free() performance question, websnarf, 22:27
- Re: Out of memory compilation, CBFalconer, 22:18
- Re: reply the answer, CBFalconer, 22:12
- Re: c interface with c++ implementation, Barry Schwarz, 21:53
- Re: application of pointers to functions, user923005, 21:52
- Re: about argc and argv, Barry Schwarz, 21:48
- can i use bioscom to manipulate serial port on winxp, helloguys, 21:46
- Re: A tcp connetion question, Jimmy, 21:46
- Re: about argc and argv, Eric Sosman, 21:45
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, Barry Schwarz, 21:38
- Re: appropriate caller and print specifier, user923005, 21:32
- Re: A tcp connetion question, Gordon Burditt, 21:20
- Re: c interface with c++ implementation, Keith Thompson, 21:20
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, Gordon Burditt, 21:16
- c interface with c++ implementation, zade, 20:40
- Re: reply the answer, Old Wolf, 20:31
- Re: free() performance question, Keith Thompson, 20:11
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 20:08
- Re: free() performance question, pandaj, 20:07
- Re: reply the answer, Keith Thompson, 20:01
- Re: free() performance question, Spiros Bousbouras, 19:58
- Re: free() performance question, pandaj, 19:51
- Re: reply the answer, Spiros Bousbouras, 19:51
- Re: free() performance question, pandaj, 19:30
- Re: free() performance question, Keith Thompson, 19:27
- Re: reply the answer, Old Wolf, 19:25
- Re: reply the answer, Old Wolf, 19:24
- Re: Data acquisition Card- How to use with C?, CBFalconer, 11:12
Privacy Policy