comp.lang.c (date)

November 30, 2006

November 29, 2006

November 28, 2006

November 27, 2006

November 26, 2006

November 25, 2006

November 24, 2006

November 23, 2006

November 22, 2006

November 21, 2006

November 20, 2006

November 19, 2006

November 18, 2006

November 17, 2006

November 16, 2006

November 15, 2006

November 14, 2006

November 13, 2006

November 12, 2006

November 11, 2006

November 10, 2006

November 09, 2006

November 08, 2006

November 07, 2006

November 06, 2006

November 05, 2006

November 04, 2006

November 03, 2006

November 02, 2006

Stairs program, bluepgt, 23:57
Re: equivalent of chomp in perl, Keith Thompson, 23:29
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 23:19
Re: equivalent of chomp in perl, Keith Thompson, 22:13
Re: equivalent of chomp in perl, CBFalconer, 22:05
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Flash Gordon, 21:59
Re: assembly in future C standard, Bill Reid, 21:55
equivalent of chomp in perl, lnatz, 21:35
Re: character byte str[i] treated as signed, I need unsigned, Old Wolf, 21:07
Re: function without an address?, CBFalconer, 21:04
Re: character byte str[i] treated as signed, I need unsigned, Peter Nilsson, 21:00
Re: get the address of a function??, CBFalconer, 20:55
Re: Long Num speed, Keith Thompson, 20:49
Re: Looking for schematic drawing sdk, james of tucson, 20:48
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Richard, 20:46
Re: Question about C Functions, Dik T. Winter, 20:42
Looking for schematic drawing sdk, TahoeKid, 20:36
Re: Long Num speed, CBFalconer, 20:25
Re: [OT] (was: Re: Question about C Functions), Dik T. Winter, 20:23
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], james of tucson, 20:16
Re: help, james of tucson, 20:11
Re: function without an address?, Richard Tobin, 19:48
Re: computer program, dcorbit, 19:46
Re: get the address of a function??, pete, 19:45
Re: help, Andrew Poelstra, 19:44
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 19:31
Re: get the address of a function??, pete, 19:22
Re: I have a problem in my study, Keith Thompson, 19:18
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], Andrew Poelstra, 19:14
Re: function without an address?, Jordan Abel, 19:08
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Richard Tobin, 18:55
Re: function without an address?, Richard Tobin, 18:53
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Mark McIntyre, 18:40
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
Re: I have a problem in my study, Mark McIntyre, 18:35
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:31
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:26
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 18:21
Re: character byte str[i] treated as signed, I need unsigned, Walter Roberson, 18:19
Re: character byte str[i] treated as signed, I need unsigned, Ian Collins, 18:19
Re: get the address of a function??, Keith Thompson, 18:19
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:17
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 18:17
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Pedro Pinto, 18:17
character byte str[i] treated as signed, I need unsigned, Susan Rice, 18:14
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Ian Collins, 18:14
Re: help, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:14
Re: case insentisive file search, Walter Roberson, 18:13
Re: bit fields pointers?, Keith Thompson, 18:12
Re: help, Ian Collins, 18:11
help, Tyana05, 18:08
Re: get the address of a function??, pete, 18:08
Re: get the address of a function??, pete, 18:05
Re: Error msg - Segmentation fault, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:03
Re: case insentisive file search, henrik . sorensen, 18:02
Re: computer program, Christopher Benson-Manica, 18:01
Re: case insentisive file search, henrik . sorensen, 18:00
Re: computer program, dcorbit, 17:58
Re: case insentisive file search, henrik . sorensen, 17:58
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 17:57
Re: case insentisive file search, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:56
Error msg - Segmentation fault, Pedro Pinto, 17:56
Re: case insentisive file search, Keith Thompson, 17:50
Re: case insentisive file search, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:49
Re: computer program, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:46
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 17:45
Re: case insentisive file search, Walter Roberson, 17:43
Re: bit fields pointers?, mazzawi, 17:41
Re: case insentisive file search, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:40
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Keith Thompson, 17:39
Re: case insentisive file search, henrik . sorensen, 17:29
Re: case insentisive file search, Ian Collins, 17:18
Re: case insentisive file search, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:16
case insentisive file search, henrik . sorensen, 16:57
[OT] (was: Re: Question about C Functions), Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:53
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Walter Roberson, 16:42
Re: function without an address?, Ian Collins, 16:32
function without an address?, Ancient_Hacker, 16:14
Re: Long Num speed, John Smith, 16:06
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Clever Monkey, 15:57
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Clark S. Cox III, 15:53
Re: get the address of a function??, Keith Thompson, 15:44
Re: Long Num speed, Keith Thompson, 15:41
Re: Long Num speed, Keith Thompson, 15:40
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Keith Thompson, 15:31
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Charlton Wilbur, 15:15
Re: assembly in future C standard, Keith Thompson, 15:14
Re: get the address of a function??, Jordan Abel, 15:09
Re: get the address of a function??, Clever Monkey, 15:00
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 14:58
Re: get the address of a function??, Walter Roberson, 14:55
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Walter Roberson, 14:41
Re: tolower() and toupper(), CBFalconer, 14:27
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 14:11
Re: get the address of a function??, Jordan Abel, 14:10
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Richard Heathfield, 14:08
Re: get the address of a function??, Clever Monkey, 14:04
Re: string search?, Default User, 14:00
Re: get the address of a function??, Herbert Rosenau, 13:51
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Herbert Rosenau, 13:51
Re: computer program, Lars Rune Nøstdal, 13:35
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 13:32
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Charlton Wilbur, 13:27
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Simon Biber, 13:21
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Roberto Waltman, 13:13
Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield, 12:52
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield, 12:41
Re: C Interview Questions, Vos, 12:30
Re: assembly in future C standard, Walter Roberson, 12:23
Re: Question about C Functions, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 12:14
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Charlton Wilbur, 12:06
Re: Question about C Functions, CBFalconer, 12:03
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Flash Gordon, 12:01
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Bill Pursell, 12:00
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Frederick Gotham, 11:56
Re: Question about C Functions, Frederick Gotham, 11:53
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 11:51
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Flash Gordon, 11:49
Re: string search?, Charlton Wilbur, 11:49
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], CBFalconer, 11:47
Re: computer program, dcorbit, 11:43
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 11:36
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, Herbert Rosenau, 11:35
Re: I have a problem in my study, Herbert Rosenau, 11:35
Re: Long Num speed, Ancient_Hacker, 11:28
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 11:20
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], Jordan Abel, 11:20
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 11:16
Re: get the address of a function??, Chris Torek, 11:13
Re: Triangular Matrix, Eric Sosman, 11:11
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], james of tucson, 11:01
Re: C / asm / long ints, Jordan Abel, 10:49
Re: Question about C Functions, Richard Heathfield, 10:37
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 10:35
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Jordan Abel, 10:16
Re: Question about C Functions, Chris Dollin, 10:15
Re: const question, Clever Monkey, 10:05
Re: assembly in future C standard [OT], Andrew Poelstra, 10:01
Re: Long Num speed, Ancient_Hacker, 10:01
Re: Question, Andrew Poelstra, 09:56
Re: Long Num speed, websnarf, 09:53
Re: Question about C Functions, Frederick Gotham, 09:39
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 09:35
Re: computer program, osmium, 09:13
Re: assembly in future C standard, Flash Gordon, 09:09
Re: Triangular Matrix2, Je-Givara, 09:09
Re: assembly in future C standard, CBFalconer, 09:08
Re: Triangular Matrix, Je-Givara, 09:00
Re: computer program, mark_bluemel, 09:00
Re: if clause, Spoon, 08:56
Re: Long Num speed, Stefan Krah, 08:43
Re: help me, CBFalconer, 08:29
Re: Long Num speed, CBFalconer, 08:23
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:13
Re: assembly in future C standard, Bob Martin, 08:04
Re: tolower() and toupper(), CBFalconer, 07:59
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Bryan, 07:56
Re: get the address of a function??, Richard Bos, 07:52
Re: C / asm / long ints, CBFalconer, 07:50
Re: get the address of a function??, Jordan Abel, 07:30
Re: about TorboC, Andreas Kochenburger, 07:15
Re: assembly in future C standard, Andreas Kochenburger, 07:13
Re: string search?, Andreas Kochenburger, 06:30
Re: assembly in future C standard, jacob navia, 06:22
Re: assembly in future C standard, jacob navia, 06:20
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Dik T. Winter, 06:12
Re: computer program, Richard Bos, 06:02
Re: Question, mark_bluemel, 05:58
Re: Question, mark_bluemel, 05:49
computer program, anuj, 05:43
Re: viewing symbol table, chandanlinster, 05:38
Re: viewing symbol table, Ico, 05:26
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, pemo, 05:15
viewing symbol table, chandanlinster, 05:12
Re: Array of strings., Nick Keighley, 05:06
Re: get the address of a function??, Richard Bos, 05:03
Re: Long Num speed, websnarf, 05:00
Re: const question, Nick Keighley, 04:59
Re: Long Num speed, websnarf, 04:40
Re: Long Num speed, Richard Heathfield, 04:17
Re: Long Num speed, Richard Heathfield, 04:02
Re: bit fields pointers?, Nick Keighley, 03:57
Re: get the address of a function??, Simon Biber, 03:46
Re: Long Num speed, Keith Thompson, 03:40
Re: Long Num speed, Chris Dollin, 03:16
Re: comparing ptrs/mmap, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 02:56
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Chris Dollin, 02:55
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Herbert Rosenau, 02:31
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Bos, 02:19
Re: Long Num speed, websnarf, 02:07
Re: Long Num speed, websnarf, 02:06
comparing ptrs/mmap, Bill Pursell, 01:57
Re: bit fields pointers?, jaysome, 01:47
Re: help me, Ian Collins, 01:41
help me, aman . kbm, 01:37
Re: Which C tool?, CBFalconer, 01:36
Re: Question, jaysome, 01:33
Re: Which C tool?, Richard Heathfield, 01:30
Re: Which C tool?, jaysome, 01:25
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield, 01:21
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 01:13
Re: Long Num speed, Samuel Stearley, 01:12
Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield, 01:06
Re: Question about C Functions, Richard Heathfield, 00:54
Re: Long Num speed, Richard Heathfield, 00:51
Re: C / asm / long ints, Chris Thomasson, 00:47
Re: get the address of a function??, Richard Heathfield, 00:44
Re: Long Num speed, Barry Schwarz, 00:17

November 01, 2006

Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Old Wolf, 23:38
Re: string search?, Jordan Abel, 23:12
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Flash Gordon, 22:18
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Flash Gordon, 22:15
Re: get the address of a function??, Keith Thompson, 22:12
Re: string search?, Flash Gordon, 22:07
Re: string search?, Flash Gordon, 22:00
Re: const question, Keith Thompson, 21:59
Re: string search?, Joe Wright, 21:56
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 21:51
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Jordan Abel, 21:28
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Old Wolf, 21:26
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 21:22
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 21:13
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 21:12
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Eric Sosman, 21:08
Re: get the address of a function??, Jordan Abel, 21:07
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Jordan Abel, 21:03
Re: const question, Jordan Abel, 20:59
Re: Long Num speed, fermineutron, 20:46
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Roman Mashak, 20:33
Re: bit fields pointers?, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 20:04
Re: get the address of a function??, Andrew Poelstra, 19:55
bit fields pointers?, mazzawi, 19:53
Re: string search?, Andrew Poelstra, 19:39
Re: Question about C Functions, Frederick Gotham, 19:35
Re: const question, Frederick Gotham, 19:29
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 19:26
Re: get the address of a function??, Default User, 19:23
Re: get the address of a function??, Keith Thompson, 19:16
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 19:16
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 19:12
Re: get the address of a function??, John Bode, 19:09
Re: Question about C Functions, Keith Thompson, 19:08
Re: Long Num speed, Frederick Gotham, 19:08
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Joe Wright, 19:06
Re: const question, Walter Roberson, 19:04
Re: get the address of a function??, Frederick Gotham, 19:03
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Keith Thompson, 18:58
Re: get the address of a function??, Walter Roberson, 18:57
Re: const question, Frederick Gotham, 18:57
Re: Question about C Functions, Mark McIntyre, 18:56
Re: get the address of a function??, Keith Thompson, 18:54
Re: get the address of a function??, Richard Tobin, 18:50
Re: const question, Ian Collins, 18:48
Re: const question, Keith Thompson, 18:44
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Mark McIntyre, 18:41
Re: string search?, Keith Thompson, 18:41
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:39
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Mark McIntyre, 18:36
Re: const question, Ian Collins, 18:34
Re: const question, Jordan Abel, 18:33
Re: get the address of a function??, Ian Collins, 18:33
Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield, 18:31
Re: get the address of a function??, Richard Heathfield, 18:29
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
Re: Question, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield, 18:23
Re: Array of strings., Richard Heathfield, 18:21
Re: I have a problem in my study, Mark McIntyre, 18:18
get the address of a function??, John, 18:14
Re: Long Num speed, Ian Collins, 18:12
Re: const question, James Brown, 18:06
Re: string search?, Roland Pibinger, 17:49
Re: string search?, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:41
Re: Array of strings., Kouisawang, 17:32
Long Num speed, fermineutron, 17:28
Re: const question, Walter Roberson, 17:25
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Peter Nilsson, 17:18
Re: Array of strings., Walter Roberson, 17:16
const question, James Brown, 17:12
Re: Question, CBFalconer, 17:05
Re: Stringizing, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 17:04
Re: Which C tool?, CBFalconer, 16:57
Re: UART Reception, CBFalconer, 16:50
Re: Array of strings., Kouisawang, 16:49
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 16:38
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 16:30
Re: string search?, Walter Roberson, 15:39
Re: UART Reception, Keith Thompson, 15:29
Re: Array of strings., Keith Thompson, 15:26
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 15:24
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Default User, 15:24
Re: Array of strings., futhark77@xxxxxxxxx, 15:23
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Rafael Almeida, 15:20
Re: string search?, Keith Thompson, 15:19
Re: Array of strings., John Gordon, 15:18
Re: Question, Keith Thompson, 15:18
Re: Which C tool?, Flash Gordon, 15:16
Re: Which C tool?, Keith Thompson, 15:13
Re: Array of strings., attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 15:10
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 15:08
Re: I have a problem in my study, Keith Thompson, 15:03
Re: Array of strings., Walter Roberson, 14:59
Array of strings., futhark77@xxxxxxxxx, 14:53
Re: I have a problem in my study, Flash Gordon, 14:34
Re: Which C tool?, Harald van Dĳk, 14:18
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 14:05
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack, 14:04
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack, 14:03
Re: Which C tool?, Flash Gordon, 13:53
Re: How to compile c to dll, Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
Re: I have a problem in my study, Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
Re: Which C tool?, Kenneth Brody, 13:51
Stringizing, Ravi, 13:42
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Jordan Abel, 13:26
Re: splitting two arrays., Default User, 13:15
Re: UART Reception, Default User, 12:45
Re: Question about C Functions, Richard Heathfield, 12:38
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 12:37
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 12:36
Re: Which C tool?, Roland Pibinger, 12:30
[OT] Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Clever Monkey, 12:25
Re: How to compile c to dll, Flash Gordon, 12:25
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 12:25
Re: How to compile c to dll, Bill Medland, 12:23
Re: How to compile c to dll, Barry Schwarz, 12:12
Re: string search?, Flash Gordon, 12:11
Re: Which C tool?, Barry Schwarz, 11:45
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), Barry Schwarz, 11:45
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), Barry Schwarz, 11:45
How to compile c to dll, aze, 11:41
Off-topic: proton-neutron, kuyper, 11:29
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 11:13
Re: Question about C Functions, Frederick Gotham, 10:43
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 10:41
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 10:38
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 10:34
Re: Question, mark_bluemel, 10:34
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:29
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 10:29
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Chris Dollin, 10:28
Re: Question about C Functions, Simon Biber, 10:27
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Jordan Abel, 10:23
Re: Question about C Functions, Frederick Gotham, 10:13
Re: need for an extra variable., Jordan Abel, 10:13
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 10:11
Re: Which C tool?, Simon Biber, 10:09
Re: Question, Andrew Poelstra, 10:09
Re: UART Reception, Al Balmer, 10:05
Re: splitting two arrays., Simon Biber, 10:01
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Pierre Asselin, 09:59
Re: splitting two arrays., mark_bluemel, 09:53
Re: Question about C Functions, Simon Biber, 09:50
Re: splitting two arrays., Pedro Pinto, 09:40
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 09:29
Re: string search?, CBFalconer, 09:21
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield, 08:51
Re: string search?, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
Re: string search?, Bertram Trabant, 08:46
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Kenny McCormack, 08:46
Re: string search?, Bertram Trabant, 08:43
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Charlton Wilbur, 08:29
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Flash Gordon, 08:29
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 07:31
Re: Incrementing in C, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:31
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 07:28
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Richard Bos, 07:18
Re: Which C tool?, John Bode, 07:10
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 06:55
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 06:52
Re: string search?, pete, 06:34
Re: Question, Richard Bos, 06:23
Re: string search?, Flash Gordon, 06:06
Question, CodeBlaster, 06:04
comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
Re: Which C tool?, Roland Pibinger, 05:56
Re: tolower() and toupper(), Harald van Dĳk, 05:44
Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Tobin, 05:31
tolower() and toupper(), Roman Mashak, 05:26
Re: need for an extra variable., Keith Thompson, 05:09
Re: string search?, Roland Pibinger, 04:45
Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Tobin, 04:41
Re: how to design an testing example, Nick Keighley, 04:03
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, J. J. Farrell, 04:02
Re: Incrementing in C, Chris Dollin, 03:48
Re: string search?, Bertram Trabant, 03:37
Re: Which C tool?, john . bradshaw, 03:16
Re: I have a problem in my study, Herbert Rosenau, 03:12
Re: Triangular Matrix2, Flash Gordon, 03:11
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Richard Heathfield, 02:41
Re: assembly in future C standard, Richard Heathfield, 02:35
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield, 02:32
Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Bos, 02:27
Re: splitting two arrays., Simon Biber, 01:55
Re: Incrementing in C, T.M. Sommers, 01:50
Incrementing in C, jobo, 01:31
Re: Triangular Matrix2, Je-Givara, 01:10
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), Simon Biber, 01:03
Re: Question about C Functions, Keith Thompson, 00:23
Re: Question about C Functions, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 00:23
Re: Question about C Functions, T.M. Sommers, 00:17

October 31, 2006

Question about C Functions, jobo, 23:52
Re: Which C tool?, doug turnbull, 23:39
Re: Which C tool?, Jack Klein, 22:58
Re: need for an extra variable., Keith Thompson, 22:50
Re: Which C tool?, Michael, 22:40
Re: need for an extra variable., Andrew Poelstra, 22:37
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Eric Sosman, 22:37
Re: need for an extra variable., Jordan Abel, 22:13
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 21:52
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 21:52
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 21:50
Re: how to design an testing example, Barry Schwarz, 21:48
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, CBFalconer, 21:46
Re: Out-of-bounds nonsense, Keith Thompson, 21:45
Re: UART Reception, Rod Pemberton, 21:37
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, J. J. Farrell, 21:37
Re: how to use bit operation to do \sqrt(n), pete, 21:29
Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton, 21:25
Re: UART Reception, Kenny McCormack, 21:25
Re: Which C tool?, Adam Shea, 21:24
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, J. J. Farrell, 21:21
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 21:19
Out-of-bounds nonsense, Frederick Gotham, 21:14
Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton, 21:12
Re: Out-of-bounds Restrictions?, Frederick Gotham, 20:51
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 20:46
Re: need for an extra variable., Richard Tobin, 20:42
Re: Which C tool?, Rafael Almeida, 20:41
Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton, 20:36
Re: assembly in future C standard, Rod Pemberton, 20:33
Which C tool?, john . bradshaw, 20:17
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 20:12
Re: C Interview Questions, Kenneth Brody, 19:32
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Keith Thompson, 19:18
Re: UART Reception, Keith Thompson, 19:11
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Andrew Poelstra, 18:36
Re: Unicode conversion, Richard Tobin, 18:34
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Gordon Burditt, 18:08
Re: C exe on winXP memory limitation, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:54
Re: C Interview Questions, Eric Sosman, 17:45
Re: splitting two arrays., John Gordon, 17:44
Re: C Interview Questions, Chris Torek, 17:39
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), John Bode, 17:37
Re: C Interview Questions, Richard Heathfield, 17:36
Re: C Interview Questions, Ben Pfaff, 17:31
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), Jordan Abel, 17:06
Re: C Interview Questions, Jordan Abel, 17:04
Re: splitting two arrays., Walter Roberson, 16:51
Re: EOF vs. feof() and ferror(), Mark McIntyre, 16:49
Re: C Interview Questions, Ben Pfaff, 16:42
Re: UART Reception, John Bode, 16:30
Re: I have a problem in my study, Mark McIntyre, 16:28
Re: functions arguments, Sheldon, 16:28
Re: splitting two arrays., John Gordon, 16:23
Re: assembly in future C standard, fermineutron, 16:18
Re: C Interview Questions, Keith Thompson, 16:15
Re: UART Reception, Keith Thompson, 16:11