comp.lang.c (date)

October 31, 2006

October 30, 2006

October 29, 2006

October 28, 2006

October 27, 2006

October 26, 2006

October 25, 2006

October 24, 2006

October 23, 2006

October 22, 2006

October 21, 2006

October 20, 2006

October 19, 2006

October 18, 2006

October 17, 2006

October 16, 2006

Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 22:46
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Chris Johnson, 22:12
Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan, 21:50
Re: Garbage Collection in C, SM Ryan, 21:50
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Ian Collins, 21:38
Re: pointer arithmetic help, priyanka, 21:34
Re: please check, Andrew Poelstra, 21:19
Re: Books about computer geeks?, Chris Johnson, 21:19
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Chris Johnson, 21:18
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Thad Smith, 21:16
Re: Pointers...once again, Andrew Poelstra, 21:09
Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, Old Wolf, 20:47
Re: Pointers...once again, Richard Tobin, 20:41
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Eric Sosman, 20:35
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Walter Roberson, 20:32
Re: pointer arithmetic help, Ian Collins, 20:26
Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Gordon Burditt, 20:25
pointer arithmetic help, priyanka, 20:19
pointer arithmetic help, priyanka, 20:11
pointer arithmetic help, priyanka, 20:09
Re: multiplicative rule for asymptotic running times, john . casey, 19:58
Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, William Hughes, 19:53
[ot]Re: Books about computer geeks?, pete, 19:47
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 19:45
Re: Books about computer geeks?, Richard, 19:40
Re: Books about computer geeks?, Keith Thompson, 19:31
Books about computer geeks?, rick, 19:20
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 19:15
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 18:32
Re: number of bits for an int type, Keith Thompson, 18:29
Re: number of bits for an int type, Richard, 18:08
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 18:08
Re: number of bits for an int type, Richard Heathfield, 17:40
Re: plotting Graphs how to in C ?, dcorbit, 17:22
Re: newer to c, Ian Collins, 17:19
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Ben Pfaff, 17:18
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., dcorbit, 17:15
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart, 17:04
Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Al Balmer, 16:43
Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Keith Thompson, 16:38
Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Al Balmer, 16:38
Re: newer to c, Keith Thompson, 16:37
Re: MD5, Keith Thompson, 16:32
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson, 16:31
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 16:29
Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack, 16:25
Re: Pointers...once again, mdh, 16:23
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 16:20
Re: Pointers...once again, Keith Thompson, 16:14
Re: Does strtok require a non-null token?, Al Balmer, 16:08
Re: newer to c, mdh, 16:07
Re: newer to c, mdh, 16:05
Re: Comparing Pointer, Keith Thompson, 16:03
Re: please check, Keith Thompson, 16:02
Re: newer to c, Keith Thompson, 15:57
Re: why Typedef is storage class specifier?, Keith Thompson, 15:53
Re: number of bits for an int type, Keith Thompson, 15:49
Re: MD5, Keith Thompson, 15:47
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 15:45
Re: MD5, Keith Thompson, 15:43
Re: rolling dice, Rod Pemberton, 15:42
Re: rolling dice, Rod Pemberton, 15:39
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 15:30
Re: Pointers...once again, CBFalconer, 15:28
Re: plotting Graphs how to in C ?, santosh, 15:27
Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia, 15:21
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Keith Thompson, 15:14
A simple parser, jacob navia, 15:13
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 15:08
plotting Graphs how to in C ?, Vivek, 15:06
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard, 15:04
Re: Pointers...once again, mdh, 15:03
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Frederick Gotham, 14:55
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., dcorbit, 14:52
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson, 14:51
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Keith Thompson, 14:46
Re: XPath with Xalan-C, MV84, 14:43
Re: XPath with Xalan-C, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:39
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker, 14:30
Re: please check, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:26
XPath with Xalan-C, MV84, 14:23
Re: please check, raghu, 14:16
Re: why doesn't this recurse, Walter Roberson, 14:08
Re: please check, santosh, 13:29
Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Omats.Z, 13:19
Re: newer to c, santosh, 13:11
Re: Pointers...once again, santosh, 12:53
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 12:51
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, free4trample, 12:50
Re: A simple parser, Bob Martin, 12:45
Re: Pointers...once again, mdh, 12:38
Re: number of bits for an int type, CBFalconer, 12:37
Re: Pointers...once again, mdh, 12:36
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh, 12:31
Re: Pointers...once again, Richard, 12:28
Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer, 12:27
Re: Pointers...once again, Rg, 12:26
Re: Pointers...once again, Richard Tobin, 12:24
Re: newer to c, Richard, 12:23
Re: newer to c, santosh, 12:17
Pointers...once again, mdh, 12:10
Re: number of bits for an int type, Frederick Gotham, 12:05
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 12:03
Re: A simple parser, Frederick Gotham, 12:00
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh, 11:54
Re: MD5, CBFalconer, 11:32
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer, 11:18
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
Re: please check, Nick Keighley, 11:06
Re: why doesn't this recurse, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:00
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer, 10:54
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer, 10:52
Re: please check, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:51
Re: newer to c, John Bode, 10:50
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard, 10:49
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 10:47
Re: A simple parser, Tak-Shing Chan, 10:45
Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, John Bode, 10:45
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Heathfield, 10:39
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Richard Bos, 10:33
Re: please check, Richard, 10:32
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 10:28
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer, 10:23
Re: please check, jwalker, 10:22
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Kenneth Brody, 10:21
Re: Comparing Pointer, Richard Bos, 10:19
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard Bos, 10:10
Re: strange behaviour, Richard Bos, 10:09
Re: MD5, Richard Bos, 10:09
Re: please check, Andrew Poelstra, 10:07
please check, raghu, 09:59
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 09:50
Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra, 09:36
Comparing Pointer, sebastien . fricker, 09:35
Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra, 09:33
Re: MD5, Richard, 09:24
Re: why doesn't this recurse, Andrew Poelstra, 09:20
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 09:01
Re: MD5, Kenny McCormack, 09:01
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 08:52
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker, 08:51
Re: A simple parser, zebedee, 08:48
Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Richard, 08:37
Re: MD5, Richard, 08:32
Re: MD5, websnarf, 08:29
Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, raxitsheth2000, 08:27
Re: newer to c, Richard, 08:18
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 08:16
Re: what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Nick Keighley, 08:14
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh, 08:10
Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, santosh, 07:57
what is the meaning of "char **option"?, Omats.Z, 07:45
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ancient_Hacker, 07:42
newer to c, sudhakar@infosys india., 07:42
Re: number of bits for an int type, santosh, 07:36
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, santosh, 07:29
Re: why doesn't this recurse, Norm Mann, 07:23
why Typedef is storage class specifier?, sunny, 07:08
Re: number of bits for an int type, evangeli, 07:05
Re: stack overflow exception, santosh, 06:50
Re: number of bits for an int type, santosh, 06:44
number of bits for an int type, evangeli, 06:34
Re: MD5, Nick Keighley, 05:22
Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson, 05:07
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 05:01
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Walter Roberson, 05:00
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 04:53
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 04:48
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard, 04:44
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Bos, 04:34
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield, 04:23
Re: strange behaviour, Richard Bos, 04:23
Re: strange behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 04:21
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, shaanxxx, 04:18
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 04:07
Re: Understanding fwrite(), Keith Thompson, 04:01
Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia, 04:00
Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia, 03:59
Re: Garbage Collection in C, jacob navia, 03:50
Re: Understanding fwrite(), Sheldon, 03:48
Re: strange behaviour, Steven Kirby, 03:42
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Bob Martin, 03:41
Re: Recursive question., jacob navia, 03:39
Re: stack overflow exception, samuraign, 03:34
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Richard Bos, 03:18
Re: stack overflow exception, Walter Roberson, 03:17
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein, 03:16
Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer, 03:14
Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, raxitsheth2000, 03:08
Re: stack overflow exception, Ian Collins, 03:00
stack overflow exception, samuraign, 02:56
Re: Understanding fwrite(), Richard Bos, 02:43
Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 02:41
Re: Efficiency of the for loop, Ian Collins, 02:38
Re: strange behaviour, CBFalconer, 02:37
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Bart, 02:35
Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 02:22
Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 02:22
Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 02:22
Re: Remove extra blanks, Thad Smith, 02:18
Efficiency of the for loop, vamshi, 02:14
Re: why doesn't this recurse, kshudra, 01:46
Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:33
Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample, 01:20
Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, Keith Thompson, 00:56
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Christopher Benson-Manica, 00:53
Re: pre ANSI code and writable-strings?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 00:49
Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 00:29
Re: A simple parser, Tak-Shing Chan, 00:03
Re: Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, mkaras, 00:02

October 15, 2006

Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 23:55
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 23:54
Re: strptime() in linux, Keith Thompson, 23:34
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 23:30
Re: A simple parser, Old Wolf, 23:18
Deallocating Local Variable used by Malloc, FireHead, 23:06
Re: rolling dice, Lane Straatman, 22:54
Re: Remove extra blanks, Thad Smith, 22:34
Re: C newbie in a jam, Old Wolf, 22:34
Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample, 22:29
Re: [OT] purge like utility in c, Tak-Shing Chan, 22:22
Re: strange behaviour, Chris Torek, 22:10
Re: sizeof without parenthesis, Dave Thompson, 22:09
Re: reading a file [OT], Dave Thompson, 22:09
Find first occurrence of string and replace, Registered User, 22:07
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 22:01
Re: rolling dice, Chris Torek, 21:59
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 21:56
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 21:42
Re: A simple parser, Dik T. Winter, 21:39
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 21:38
Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard Heathfield, 21:13
Re: rolling dice, Richard Heathfield, 21:09
Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample, 21:02
Re: Remove extra blanks, Registered User, 21:00
Re: Remove extra blanks, free4trample, 20:55
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Rod Pemberton, 20:28
Re: rolling dice, Rod Pemberton, 20:21
Re: rolling dice, Rod Pemberton, 20:09
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 19:58
Re: A simple parser, Old Wolf, 19:48
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 19:36
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 19:32
Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson, 19:09
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 18:59
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 18:58
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 18:53
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 18:49
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 18:44
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 18:38
Re: strptime() in linux, Flash Gordon, 18:38
Re: A simple parser, Ian Collins, 18:36
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 18:28
Re: A simple parser, Richard, 18:26
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
Re: A simple parser, Ian Collins, 18:17
Re: strptime() in linux, Richard, 18:09
Re: strptime() in linux, Kurt Weber, 18:00
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 17:43
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 17:30
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 17:02
Re: Remove extra blanks, jacob navia, 17:01
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson, 16:56
Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon, 16:54
Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre, 16:28
Re: A simple parser, Mark McIntyre, 16:25
Re: Garbage Collection in C, Richard Heathfield, 16:16
Re: strptime() in linux, Richard, 16:15
Re: C newbie in a jam, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
Re: Garbage Collection in C, gw7rib, 16:05
Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon, 15:59
Re: strptime() in linux, Flash Gordon, 15:53
Re: C newbie in a jam, Sheldon, 15:35
Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra, 15:30
Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard, 15:21
Re: strange behaviour, Bart, 15:16
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith, 15:14
Re: C newbie in a jam, Richard Heathfield, 14:58
Re: strange behaviour, Yevgen Muntyan, 14:52
strptime() in linux, Wavelet, 14:47
Re: C newbie in a jam, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 14:45
Re: Remove extra blanks, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 14:44
Re: C newbie in a jam, Bill Pursell, 14:35
Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 14:17
Re: Remove extra blanks, Andrew Poelstra, 13:41
C newbie in a jam, Sheldon, 13:41
Re: strange behaviour, Andrew Poelstra, 13:33
Re: Remove extra blanks, Registered User, 12:46
Type name style was Re: rolling dice, Marco, 12:24
Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard, 12:10
Re: Multiple files, Keith Thompson, 12:01
Re: function declarations, Eric Sosman, 12:00
Re: MD5, Keith Thompson, 11:53
Re: Remove extra blanks, Joe Wright, 11:53
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard, 11:46
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Keith Thompson, 11:38
Re: strange behaviour, Keith Thompson, 11:34
function declarations, conrad, 11:28
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson, 11:27
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 11:23
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 11:16
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 11:12
Re: Remove extra blanks, Richard, 10:57
Re: answer, mdh, 10:47
Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, Joe Wright, 10:47
Re: _JoyDef and _Control, Displacer, 10:30
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Frederick Gotham, 10:25
Re: strange behaviour, Ico, 10:14
Re: MD5, Richard, 09:48
Re: A simple parser, Spiro Trikaliotis, 09:42
Re: strange behaviour, CBFalconer, 09:31
Re: Recursive question., mdh, 09:14
Re: Recursive question., mdh, 09:14
Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, ehui928, 09:04
Re: Weird pointer arithmetic on argv - How can it work??, jerry, 08:58
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
Re: strange behaviour, gribouille, 08:50
Re: Remove extra blanks, CBFalconer, 08:49
Re: Recursive question., Eric Sosman, 08:48
Re: Multiple files, Simon, 08:44
Re: Recursive question., Kurt Weber, 08:38
Re: Multiple files, Kurt Weber, 08:31
Re: strange behaviour, Ancient_Hacker, 08:28
Re: A simple parser, Ben Bacarisse, 08:24
Re: A simple parser, CBFalconer, 08:24
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, CBFalconer, 08:20
Recursive question., mdh, 08:19
Re: strange behaviour, gribouille, 08:03
Re: A question about fscanf and feof !, Registered User, 08:00
A question about fscanf and feof !, ehui928, 07:57
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Frederick Gotham, 07:25
Remove extra blanks, Registered User, 07:22
Re: A simple parser, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 07:22
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Frederick Gotham, 07:21
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Frederick Gotham, 07:17
Re: strange behaviour, Ico, 06:33
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 06:18
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 06:12
Re: A simple parser, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 06:04
comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
Re: A simple parser, Roland Pibinger, 05:51
Re: Number of digits in N!, Willem, 05:35
Re: strange behaviour, gribouille, 05:31
Re: strange behaviour, Ico, 05:22
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 04:43
Re: A simple parser, Roland Pibinger, 04:39
Re: A simple parser, ArarghMail610NOSPAM, 04:36
strange behaviour, gribouille, 04:36
Re: A simple parser, Malcolm, 03:52
Re: A simple parser, Cong Wang, 03:42
Re: Help me with Concatenating strings, Chris Torek, 03:28
Re: rolling dice, Chris Torek, 03:13
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith, 02:43
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 02:42
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Thad Smith, 02:24
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 01:56
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 01:55
Re: A simple parser, jacob navia, 01:46
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 00:58
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Keith Thompson, 00:49
Re: A simple parser, Keith Thompson, 00:42
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Richard Heathfield, 00:42
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein, 00:27
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein, 00:20
Re: A simple parser, Richard Heathfield, 00:16
Re: Register keyword and "as if" rule..., Jack Klein, 00:13
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Richard Heathfield, 00:11
Re: Debugging standard C library routines, Richard Heathfield, 00:04

October 14, 2006

October 13, 2006

October 12, 2006

October 11, 2006

October 10, 2006

Get everything you need for a successful Marketing Campaign Today!, dinesh, 23:45
Re: obfuscated, jmcgill, 23:19
Re: char data[0], Jack Klein, 22:51
Re: corrupted double-linked list, Barry Schwarz, 22:43
Re: obfuscated, Peter Nilsson, 22:43
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 22:07
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 22:07
Re: Messing with intptr_t, SM Ryan, 22:00
Re: obfuscated, Pedro Graca, 21:17
Re: obfuscated, Keith Thompson, 21:16
Re: obfuscated, Clark S. Cox III, 21:10
Re: Messing with intptr_t, Eric Sosman, 21:06
Re: obfuscated, dcorbit, 20:58
Re: obfuscated, dcorbit, 20:46
Re: obfuscated, Clark S. Cox III, 20:40
Re: obfuscated, dcorbit, 20:10
Re: obfuscated, dcorbit, 20:08
Re: confused problem, jmcgill, 20:00
Messing with intptr_t, Richard Tobin, 19:42
Re: MD5 in C for a micro, dcorbit, 19:38
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin, 18:55
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly, 18:33
Re: obfuscated, Thomas J. Gritzan, 18:25
Re: purge like utility in c, jmcgill, 18:11
Re: purge like utility in c, jmcgill, 18:10
Re: allocate memory at predefined address, jmcgill, 18:03
Re: corrupted double-linked list, Flash Gordon, 18:02
Re: obfuscated, jmcgill, 17:51
Re: List files in current directory, Ben Voigt, 17:50
Re: obfuscated, Mark McIntyre, 17:42
Re: Multiple files, Mark McIntyre, 17:39
Re: rolling dice, Keith Thompson, 17:29
Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson, 17:24
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly, 17:19
Re: purge like utility in c, gabs, 17:14
Re: Number of digits in N!, Phil Carmody, 17:13
Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Jens Thoms Toerring, 17:12
Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Ancient_Hacker, 17:05
Re: MD5 in C for a micro, Lowell Gilbert, 17:01
Re: rolling dice, Lane Straatman, 17:00
Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker, 16:58
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly, 16:50
Re: purge like utility in c, Keith Thompson, 16:49
Re: purge like utility in c, tedu, 16:46
Re: allocate memory at predefined address, Walter Roberson, 16:41
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 16:40
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 16:39
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 16:36
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 16:32
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 16:27
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Serve Laurijssen, 16:25
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 16:24
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 16:21
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Paul Connolly, 16:14
allocate memory at predefined address, ampeloso, 16:11
Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham, 15:59
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 15:58
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 15:49
Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger, 15:48
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 15:47
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 15:44
Re: obfuscated, Flash Gordon, 15:41
Re: corrupted double-linked list, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:18
Re: purge like utility in c, Simon Biber, 15:13
Re: obfuscated, Frederick Gotham, 15:04
Re: char data[0], Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:02
Re: purge like utility in c, Frederick Gotham, 14:57
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 14:57
Re: purge like utility in c, Flash Gordon, 14:56
char data[0], aarklon, 14:56
Re: obfuscated, Ancient_Hacker, 14:54
Re: obfuscated, Simon Biber, 14:51
Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey, 14:30
Re: purge like utility in c, Walter Roberson, 14:18
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 14:13
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 14:11
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 14:06
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 14:03
Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger, 13:40
Re: Multithreading question, facugaich, 13:27
Re: purge like utility in c, James Antill, 13:13
[OT] (was: Re: What is the advantage of C?), Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:07
Re: Shift Operation, Harald van Dĳk, 13:07
Re: Multiple files, santosh, 13:00
Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham, 12:59
Re: Multiple files, galt_57, 12:53
Re: obfuscated, Flash Gordon, 12:37
Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham, 12:32
Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham, 12:30
Re: Number of digits in N!, Willem, 12:27
Re: obfuscated, Frederick Gotham, 12:27
Re: corrupted double-linked list, Flash Gordon, 12:24
MD5 in C for a micro, Ravi, 12:24
Re: rolling dice, Nelu, 12:17
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 12:16
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Bos, 12:10
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 12:10
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 12:07
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 12:06
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 12:05
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Heathfield, 12:04
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield, 12:02
Re: Multithreading question, Ancient_Hacker, 12:00
Re: obfuscated, Richard Bos, 11:49
Re: obfuscated, jmcgill, 11:41
Re: obfuscated, jmcgill, 11:39
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, jmcgill, 11:30
Re: obfuscated, aarklon, 11:22
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Ancient_Hacker, 11:19
Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin, 11:16
Re: obfuscated, Papastefanos Serafeim, 11:15
Re: obfuscated, Cong Wang, 11:13
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble, 11:11
Re: purge like utility in c, jacob navia, 11:10
Re: corrupted double-linked list, Ancient_Hacker, 11:10
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble, 11:08
Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey, 11:07
Re: obfuscated, Chris Dollin, 11:05
Re: obfuscated, Ancient_Hacker, 11:04
Re: obfuscated, Clever Monkey, 11:02
Re: obfuscated, Mike Wahler, 10:55
obfuscated, aarklon, 10:52
Re: Multiple files, Cong Wang, 10:51
Re: corrupted double-linked list, mark_bluemel, 10:38
Multiple files, galt_57, 10:37
Re: Best libc implementation, Richard Bos, 10:35
Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin, 10:32
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Chris Dollin, 10:27
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Tobin, 10:27
Re: purge like utility in c, Richard Tobin, 10:24
Re: rolling dice, Bill Reid, 10:23
Re: purge like utility in c, Roland Pibinger, 10:19
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton, 10:18
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton, 10:17
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Rod Pemberton, 10:07
corrupted double-linked list, oskar, 10:04
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Tobin, 09:56
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Robert Gamble, 09:53
Re: Shift Operation, Richard Tobin, 09:53
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Rod Pemberton, 09:50
Re: Number of digits in N!, Chris Uppal, 09:46
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton, 09:30
Re: Shift Operation, Ancient_Hacker, 09:30
Re: Shift Operation, Richard Tobin, 09:11
Re: Shift Operation, Chris Dollin, 08:50
Re: Symbolic links, TK, 08:40
Re: Shift Operation, Nishu, 08:30
Re: Symbolic links, Cong Wang, 08:07
Re: Symbolic links, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:06
Re: Symbolic links, Jens Thoms Toerring, 08:06
Re: Best libc implementation, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:04
Re: purge like utility in c, Eric Sosman, 08:00
Re: Shift Operation, Peter Nilsson, 07:51
Symbolic links, TK, 07:39
Re: Number of digits in N!, Dik T. Winter, 07:22
Re: Multithreading question, Jordan Abel, 07:21
Re: purge like utility in c, Chris Dollin, 07:17
Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker, 07:17
Re: purge like utility in c, Ancient_Hacker, 07:12
Re: confused problem, Jordan Abel, 07:11
Re: Multithreading question, Ancient_Hacker, 07:06
Re: Multithreading question, av, 06:58
Re: Number of digits in N!, Stuart, 06:51
confused problem, freegnu, 06:15
Re: Number of digits in N!, makc.the.great@xxxxxxxxx, 06:07
Re: Artificial Mind - Part One - Basic Architecture and Cognitive Structure 1st Edition is now available (free download for Evaluation Edition), Chris Dollin, 06:04
Artificial Mind - Part One - Basic Architecture and Cognitive Structure 1st Edition is now available (free download for Evaluation Edition), tommak, 06:00
purge like utility in c, ramasubramanian.rahul@xxxxxxxxx, 05:39
Re: Question on Register variables, pete, 05:16
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Richard Heathfield, 05:01
Re: print struct automaticly, Chris Dollin, 04:57
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Roland Pibinger, 04:49
Re: Question on Register variables, Samuel Stearley, 04:24
Re: Best libc implementation, Anders Arnholm, 03:38
Re: Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, jmcgill, 03:32
Re: text to binary, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 03:07
Help with a A Perverse Standard C Program, Jerret Johnson, 03:06
Re: Number of digits in N!, Phil Carmody, 03:03
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 03:01
Re: Number of digits in N!, Phil Carmody, 03:00
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Neil, 03:00
Re: text to binary, santosh, 02:59
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Walter Roberson, 02:58
Re: text to binary, jmcgill, 02:56
Re: text to binary, raghu, 01:41
Re: Number of digits in N!, Logan Shaw, 01:36
Re: Number of digits in N!, Logan Shaw, 01:30
Re: text to binary, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 01:02

October 09, 2006

Re: text to binary, santosh, 23:30
Re: Multithreading question, Ian Collins, 23:17
Re: Multithreading question, santosh, 23:11
Re: Order of evaluation, Thad Smith, 22:36
Re: How to access the stdout file, santosh, 22:36
Re: Scoping rules, Chad, 22:16
Re: Scoping rules, Snis Pilbor, 22:04
Re: How to access the stdout file, Andrew, 21:38
Re: Multithreading question, facugaich, 21:31
Re: Scoping rules, Chad, 21:24
Re: Qry strlen ?, Peter Nilsson, 21:23
Re: Scoping rules, Keith Thompson, 20:40
Re: Multithreading question, Keith Thompson, 20:39
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Heathfield, 20:39
Re: Order of evaluation, pete, 20:33
Re: What is the advantage of C?, William Hughes, 20:26
Re: print struct automaticly, Rod Pemberton, 20:13
Multithreading question, facugaich, 20:07
Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin, 20:06
Re: What is the advantage of C?, CptDondo, 20:04
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson, 19:50
Re: Qry strlen ?, Joe Wright, 19:29
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 19:24
Re: What is the advantage of C?, CptDondo, 19:18
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Joe Wright, 19:09
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Joe Wright, 19:06
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre, 18:22
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre, 18:19
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 18:06
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 18:03
Re: text to binary, Keith Thompson, 17:25
Re: Dealing with source code, Keith Thompson, 17:22
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Keith Thompson, 17:20
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Keith Thompson, 17:19
Re: print struct automaticly, Keith Thompson, 17:15
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson, 17:01
Re: Scoping rules, Keith Thompson, 16:52
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 16:49
Re: Shift Operation, Flash Gordon, 16:49
Re: Number of digits in N!, Keith Thompson, 16:47
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 16:38
Re: Number of digits in N!, Willem, 16:00
Re: text to binary, Fred Kleinschmidt, 15:48
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 15:47
Re: Shift Operation, Frederick Gotham, 15:43
Re: Number of digits in N!, Willem, 15:43
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 15:34
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 15:27
Re: text to binary, osmium, 14:46
Re: text to binary, raghu, 14:36
Re: print struct automaticly [OT], Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:00
Re: text to binary, Richard Heathfield, 13:57
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Richard Heathfield, 13:54
text to binary, raghu, 13:52
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Serve Laurijssen, 13:49
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid, 13:40
Re: print struct automaticly [OT], jacob navia, 13:39
Re: Dealing with source code, Coos Haak, 13:36
Re: print struct automaticly [OT], Andrew Poelstra, 13:30
Re: print struct automaticly, Ancient_Hacker, 12:45
Re: Number of digits in N!, jmcgill, 12:33
Re: Scoping rules, Ancient_Hacker, 12:32
Re: Qry strlen ?, James Antill, 12:17
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, Richard Heathfield, 12:00
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid, 11:52
Re: DOS Program to Change File Associations, James Reid, 11:51
Re: Number of digits in N!, Andrey Tarasevich, 11:43
Re: Get Pedia, Al Balmer, 11:34
Re: print struct automaticly, jacob navia, 11:23
Re: What are the sequence points in a full expression?, Cong Wang, 11:19
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Charles Richmond, 11:19
What are the sequence points in a full expression?, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 11:05
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Charles Richmond, 11:04
Re: print struct automaticly, Richard Bos, 11:04
Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:01
Re: print struct automaticly, Cong Wang, 10:56
Re: print struct automaticly, mark_bluemel, 10:53
Re: Order of evaluation, mark_bluemel, 10:50
Re: Number of digits in N!, Andrey Tarasevich, 10:48
Re: Order of evaluation, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:40
Re: print struct automaticly, Chris Dollin, 10:34
Re: print struct automaticly, Richard Bos, 10:22
print struct automaticly, katysei, 10:09
Re: Order of evaluation, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 09:31
Re: Get Pedia, Richard Heathfield, 09:01
Re: Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, Flash Gordon, 08:58
Re: Order of evaluation, Richard Tobin, 08:54
Re: Order of evaluation, int main(void), 08:54
Re: Order of evaluation, int main(void), 08:52
Re: Order of evaluation, Chris Dollin, 08:48
Re: Order of evaluation, mark_bluemel, 08:45
Order of evaluation, int main(void), 08:33
Re: Precedence of sizeof, xdevel, 08:32
Re: Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, mark_bluemel, 08:24
Re: Qry strlen ?, Ancient_Hacker, 08:05
Re: Get Pedia, Rod Pemberton, 07:34
Problem in executing dynamic query with context in PRO *C program, chets, 07:32
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Rod Pemberton, 07:22
Re: Question on Register variables, Richard Bos, 07:11
Re: p or ~p, Richard Bos, 07:06
Re: Regarding system function, Richard Bos, 07:05
Re: Qry strlen ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:00
Re: Qry strlen ?, raxitsheth2000, 06:59
Re: Qry strlen ?, pete, 06:53
Re: Qry strlen ?, Igmar Palsenberg, 06:52
Re: Qry strlen ?, Richard Tobin, 06:38
Re: Question on Register variables, pete, 06:33
Qry strlen ?, raxitsheth2000, 06:17
Re: Shift Operation, mark_bluemel, 06:13
Re: Number of digits in N!, makc . the . great, 05:55
Re: Number of digits in N!, Richard Bos, 05:46
Re: Shift Operation, Nishu, 05:38
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson, 05:37
Re: Shift Operation, Richard Heathfield, 05:16
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Keith Thompson, 05:10
Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Keith Thompson, 04:57
Re: What is the advantage of C?, squigs, 04:45
Re: Question on Register variables, Richard Tobin, 04:45
Re: Scoping rules, Richard Tobin, 04:39
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 04:37
Re: Question on Register variables, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 04:34
Re: Portable C code, Bertrand Augereau, 04:10
Re: Shift Operation, Walter Roberson, 04:09
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 04:08
Re: Shift Operation, Richard Bos, 04:07
Re: Number of digits in N!, Phil Carmody, 04:03
Re: Number of digits in N!, Phil Carmody, 03:58
Re: strange behaviour geteuid(), Igmar Palsenberg, 03:49
Re: [OT] Re: NULL and zeros, Chris Dollin, 03:45
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 03:42
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 03:37
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 03:37
Re: Number of digits in N!, Pascal Bourguignon, 03:33
Re: Question on Register variables, Nishu, 03:32
Re: Precedence of sizeof, Chris Dollin, 03:30
Re: Shift Operation, Nishu, 03:19
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Bos, 03:14
Re: Number of digits in N!, Jon Slaughter, 03:09
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Ark, 03:04
Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest, 02:57
Re: NULL and zeros, Robert Latest, 02:55
Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Richard Bos, 02:55
Re: Number of digits in N!, Andrey Tarasevich, 02:52
Re: rolling dice, Richard Bos, 02:51
Question on Register variables, int main(void), 02:43
Re: What is the advantage of C?, Richard Heathfield, 02:25
Re: Shift Operation, Richard Heathfield, 02:15
Re: Number of digits in N!, Proginoskes, 01:58
Shift Operation, Nishu, 01:44
Re: Scoping rules, Snis Pilbor, 01:06
Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], jmcgill, 01:00
Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Old Wolf, 00:58
Re: Scoping rules, CBFalconer, 00:38
Re: Help analyse [ char *--*++ptr + 3 ], Old Wolf, 00:10
Re: Scoping rules, Chad, 00:05
Re: What is the advantage of C?, CBFalconer, 00:03

October 08, 2006

October 07, 2006

Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, Erik de Castro Lopo, 23:42
Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, dfeustel, 23:29
Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 23:01
Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, Gordon Burditt, 22:40
Re: why does C standard allow this declaration, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 22:35
Re: Regarding system function, Simon Biber, 22:30
Re: SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, Robert Gamble, 21:49
SSE[23] intrinsics for gcc?, dfeustel, 21:21
Re: Implementation of Kahan sum algorithm, Eric Sosman, 19:46
Re: p or ~p, Walter Roberson, 18:41
Re: List files in current directory, Andrew Poelstra, 17:57
Re: Dealing with source code, Walter Roberson, 17:52
Re: Dealing with source code, pete, 17:50
Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Barry Schwarz, 17:18
Re: Portable C code, Keith Thompson, 17:09
Re: List files in current directory, Keith Thompson, 17:03
Re: p or ~p, Keith Thompson, 16:53
Re: rolling dice, Frederick Gotham, 16:53
Re: rolling dice, Keith Thompson, 16:50
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Keith Thompson, 16:47
Re: p or ~p, jmcgill, 14:26
Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, jacob navia, 14:23
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Default User, 13:43
Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Default User, 13:32
Re: Portable C code, Alexander Grigoriev, 13:21
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Mike Wahler, 12:12
Re: NULL and zeros, Flash Gordon, 11:46
Re: Portable C code, Abdo Haji-Ali, 11:42
Re: Precedence of sizeof, Richard Tobin, 11:09
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Tobin, 11:02
Re: NULL and zeros, Richard Tobin, 10:53
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Frederick Gotham, 10:43
Re: Number of digits in N!, John Smith, 10:41
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Joe Wright, 10:34
Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Richard Heathfield, 10:23
Re: C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam, 10:10
Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 10:10
Re: rolling dice, Frederick Gotham, 10:01
Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham, 09:58
Re: rolling dice, Charlton Wilbur, 09:48
Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham, 09:47
Re: p or ~p, Frederick Gotham, 09:45
Re: The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, Richard Heathfield, 09:42
The inconsistent between BSD and c-faq on precedence, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 09:38
Re: List files in current directory, Joe Wright, 09:29
p or ~p, Elijah Cardon, 09:02
Re: Dealing with source code, mistral, 08:26
Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], fiocco, 07:38
Re: parsing a command, Samuel Stearley, 07:23
Re: rolling dice, Frederick Gotham, 07:20
Re: rolling dice, Mark McIntyre, 07:14
Re: rolling dice, Frederick Gotham, 06:54
Re: rolling dice, Malcolm, 06:40
Re: Pointers to dead objects, pete, 06:35
Re: rolling dice, Frederick Gotham, 06:13
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Frederick Gotham, 06:05
Re: Precedence of sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 05:51
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, pete, 05:45
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Cong Wang, 04:23
Re: C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam, 04:17
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Richard Heathfield, 03:41
Re: NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton, 03:39
Re: parsing a command, Cong Wang, 03:36
Re: rolling dice, Malcolm, 03:25
Re: C structure reset , not C++, Cong Wang, 03:22
parsing a command, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 02:52
Re: Pointers to dead objects, Harald van Dĳk, 02:41
C structure reset , not C++, devaraj . takhellambam, 02:40
Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Keith Thompson, 02:39
Re: Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Cong Wang, 02:30
Re: [OT] NULL and zeros, Rod Pemberton, 02:11
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:30
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, lovecreatesbea...@xxxxxxxxx, 01:25
Re: Precedence of sizeof, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho, 01:24
Re: problem reading/writing structures from and to files, Barry Schwarz, 01:20
Off-topic? Do I care? [Was: Re: strange behaviour geteuid()], Yevgen Muntyan, 00:58
Re: Amusing C, amusing compiler, Christopher Benson-Manica, 00:34

October 06, 2006

October 05, 2006

October 04, 2006

October 03, 2006

October 02, 2006

October 01, 2006

September 30, 2006