comp.lang.c (date)
August 31, 2006
- Re: (Here's how to do it) Re: Please help me with algorithms !!!, goose, 16:18
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, goose, 16:07
- Re: Initializing constants, Ben Pfaff, 16:05
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Skarmander, 15:53
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Skarmander, 15:48
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Michael Mair, 15:46
- Re: Convert 00010000 to 11110000......how?, Michael Mair, 15:32
- Re: how could I write this cpp macro, Ben Pfaff, 15:29
- Re: Convert 00010000 to 11110000......how?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:28
- Re: Convert 00010000 to 11110000......how?, Eric Sosman, 15:28
- Re: Convert 00010000 to 11110000......how?, Ben Pfaff, 15:27
- Re: Redirection issue, Ed Prochak, 15:25
- Re: Initializing constants, newsposter0123, 15:20
- CERT C Programming Language Secure Coding Standard, Robert Seacord, 15:19
- Re: why still use C?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 15:19
- Re: why still use C?, Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: why still use C?, lawrence . jones, 15:17
- Re: why still use C?, SuperKoko, 15:17
- Re: why still use C?, kuyper, 15:16
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Al Balmer, 15:08
- Re: c code reusability, Chris Torek, 15:05
- Convert 00010000 to 11110000......how?, farnaz . shahed, 15:03
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Une bévue, 15:03
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Une bévue, 15:02
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 15:02
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Michael Mair, 14:58
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Eric Sosman, 14:52
- Re: how could I write this cpp macro, Eric Sosman, 14:47
- Re: Dinamically allocate array of array of structures, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Michael Mair, 14:31
- Re: c code reusability, mister catering, 14:28
- Re: Initializing constants, Ben Pfaff, 14:25
- Re: strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Une bévue, 14:24
- Re: [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., CBFalconer, 14:20
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Michael Mair, 14:13
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, CBFalconer, 14:01
- Re: how could I write this cpp macro, David Resnick, 13:58
- Re: how could I write this cpp macro, L7, 13:58
- Re: A newbie's code, CBFalconer, 13:55
- Re: strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Dang, 13:54
- Re: changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 13:48
- [newbie] strcpy, strtok and strcat problem..., Une bévue, 13:41
- Re: Redirection issue, souissipro, 13:31
- Re: Redirection issue, souissipro, 13:30
- Re: Redirection issue, souissipro, 13:23
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Ancient_Hacker, 13:22
- Re: Initializing constants, newsposter0123, 13:21
- Re: Redirection issue, souissipro, 13:17
- Re: A newbie's code, Bill Pursell, 13:16
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 13:10
- Re: changing allocated memory, CBFalconer, 13:08
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, websnarf, 12:53
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, CBFalconer, 12:52
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, websnarf, 12:49
- Re: c code reusability, mister catering, 12:47
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, websnarf, 12:41
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Jonathan Pritchard, 12:31
- Re: c code reusability, Chris Torek, 12:30
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, websnarf, 12:27
- Re: Holidays are over, Jonathan Pritchard, 12:26
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Ben Pfaff, 12:25
- Re: how could I write this cpp macro, Ben Pfaff, 12:19
- Re: c code reusability, Richard Heathfield, 12:19
- Re: Initializing constants, Ben Pfaff, 12:18
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Richard Heathfield, 12:15
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Richard Heathfield, 12:12
- how could I write this cpp macro, Bilgehan . Balban, 11:38
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, jacob navia, 11:31
- Re: c code reusability, jacob navia, 11:29
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Andrew Poelstra, 11:29
- Initializing constants, newsposter0123, 11:26
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 11:22
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 11:20
- Re: c code reusability, Richard Heathfield, 11:10
- Re: Dinamically allocate array of array of structures, Frederick Gotham, 10:55
- Re: compiling service ?, goose, 10:52
- Re: c code reusability, Michael Wojcik, 10:30
- Re: Holidays are over, jacob navia, 10:13
- Re: Holidays are over, jacob navia, 10:09
- Re: Redirection issue, Bo Yang, 10:06
- Dinamically allocate array of array of structures, valerio, 09:58
- Re: changing allocated memory, Ed Prochak, 09:36
- Re: Redirection issue, Ed Prochak, 09:24
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Richard Bos, 08:52
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Frederick Gotham, 08:41
- Re: Holidays are over, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:45
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Richard Bos, 07:34
- Re: Holidays are over, Richard Bos, 07:28
- Re: c code reusability, Richard Heathfield, 07:18
- Re: A newbie's code, Clark S. Cox III, 07:13
- Re: c code reusability, mister catering, 07:04
- Re: General advice on type casting, Olivier, 06:25
- Re: compiling service ?, Michael K., 06:23
- General advice on type casting, Olivier, 05:57
- Re: Info, Richard Heathfield, 05:45
- Re: General advice on type casting, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 05:43
- Info, Mallesh, 05:42
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 04:36
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, CBFalconer, 04:27
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 04:18
- Re: operating with binary, jaysome, 04:09
- Re: c99/c89, Chris Dollin, 03:49
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 03:43
- Re: operating with binary, Nick Keighley, 03:41
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Richard Heathfield, 03:41
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Richard Heathfield, 03:36
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Richard Heathfield, 03:33
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Richard Heathfield, 03:29
- Re: Holidays are over, Richard Heathfield, 03:23
- Re: Holidays are over, jacob navia, 03:05
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Michael Mair, 02:37
- Re: c99/c89, shaanxxx, 02:33
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, jaysome, 01:57
- Re: Syntax issue, jaysome, 01:57
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 01:21
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 01:19
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Keith Thompson, 00:39
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 00:35
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Keith Thompson, 00:33
- compiling service ?, sterten, 00:25
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, CBFalconer, 00:19
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Randall, 00:04
August 30, 2006
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 23:55
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, smnoff, 23:40
- (Here's how to do it) Re: Please help me with algorithms !!!, Randall, 23:35
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Barry Schwarz, 23:33
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 23:08
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, J. J. Farrell, 23:04
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., pete, 22:30
- Re: MD5 Hashing, Jack Klein, 22:25
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Keith Thompson, 22:24
- Re: c99/c89, pete, 22:23
- Re: Redirection issue, Barry Margolin, 22:00
- Re: operating with binary, Joe Wright, 21:44
- Re: Please help me with algorithms !!!, jmcgill, 21:13
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, CBFalconer, 21:04
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, CBFalconer, 20:56
- Re: A newbie's code, CBFalconer, 20:47
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Frederick Gotham, 20:35
- Re: little endian , big endian , big headache, Stephen Sprunk, 20:28
- Re: Holidays are over, Dik T. Winter, 20:27
- Please help me with algorithms !!!, Natasha, 20:08
- Re: General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, Ben Pfaff, 19:51
- General method for dynamically allocating memory for a string, smnoff, 19:44
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Andrew Poelstra, 19:32
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Ian Collins, 19:30
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Andrew Poelstra, 19:30
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 19:28
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Andrew Poelstra, 19:27
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Andrew Poelstra, 19:27
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 19:20
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jmcgill, 19:06
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:45
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, mospehraict, 18:43
- Re: Dynamic buffer library, Spiros Bousbouras, 18:34
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 18:33
- Re: Redirection issue, souissipro, 18:10
- Re: A newbie's code, Clark S. Cox III, 18:02
- Dynamic buffer library, Andrew Poelstra, 17:48
- Re: Holidays are over, jacob navia, 17:34
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 17:31
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Mark McIntyre, 17:30
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Spiros Bousbouras, 17:00
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 16:57
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Mark McIntyre, 16:49
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: Holidays are over, Mark McIntyre, 16:46
- Re: operating with binary, CBFalconer, 16:44
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:41
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, CBFalconer, 16:38
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Jean Guillaume Pyraksos, 16:33
- Re: A newbie's code, CBFalconer, 16:29
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, goose, 16:10
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, jacob navia, 16:05
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), goose, 16:05
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Michael Mair, 16:05
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Mr John FO Evans, 16:03
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Keith Thompson, 15:55
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Kenneth Brody, 15:40
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: c99/c89, Keith Thompson, 15:32
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Richard Heathfield, 15:19
- Re: changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 15:00
- Re: changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 15:00
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 15:00
- Re: c99/c89, Robert Gamble, 14:57
- Re: c99/c89, Harald van Dijk, 14:51
- Re: c99/c89, P.J. Plauger, 14:49
- Re: [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Walter Roberson, 14:41
- Re: changing allocated memory, Ed Prochak, 14:39
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 14:31
- Re: changing allocated memory, Spiros Bousbouras, 14:30
- [Newbie] changing allocated memory, Une bévue, 14:24
- Re: operating with binary, Frederick Gotham, 14:22
- Re: Redirection issue, Ed Prochak, 14:15
- Re: Redirection issue, Spiros Bousbouras, 14:12
- Re: c99/c89, Frederick Gotham, 14:06
- Re: c code reusability, Frederick Gotham, 14:03
- Re: Architecture independant byte operations, Frederick Gotham, 13:49
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 13:46
- Redirection issue, souissipro, 13:30
- Re: A newbie's code, Kenneth Brody, 13:00
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 12:44
- Re: c99/c89, Keith Thompson, 12:40
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Keith Thompson, 12:37
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Keith Thompson, 12:24
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Al Balmer, 12:18
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, mospehraict, 12:16
- Re: different answer for same code in linux ,Eclipse IDE, Keith Thompson, 12:10
- Re: operating with binary, mospehraict, 12:08
- Re: operating with binary, mospehraict, 12:03
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Jonathan Pritchard, 12:00
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Ancient_Hacker, 11:57
- Re: operating with binary, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:51
- Re: operating with binary, Nick Keighley, 11:47
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Re: operating with binary, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:33
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Michal Nazarewicz, 11:32
- Re: different answer for same code in linux ,Eclipse IDE, Spiros Bousbouras, 11:20
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Heathfield, 11:20
- operating with binary, QQ, 11:18
- Re: A newbie's code, Charlton Wilbur, 11:17
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 10:50
- Re: MD5 Hashing, santosh, 10:34
- Re: MD5 Hashing, Clever Monkey, 10:32
- MD5 Hashing, C, 10:24
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Ancient_Hacker, 10:16
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Bos, 09:49
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, jacob navia, 09:42
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, jacob navia, 09:40
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, jacob navia, 09:38
- Re: how to send ctrl-Z in C language - modem interfacing, Richard Bos, 09:14
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Bos, 09:13
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Richard Bos, 09:09
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 09:05
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Tobin, 08:53
- Re: Holidays are over, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, jacob navia, 08:23
- Re: how to send ctrl-Z in C language - modem interfacing, Eric Sosman, 08:12
- Holidays are over, jacob navia, 07:47
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 07:46
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., pete, 07:37
- Re: Variable Argument Functions, shaanxxx, 07:19
- Re: different answer for same code in linux ,Eclipse IDE, Chris Dollin, 06:28
- Re: Architecture independant byte operations, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 06:18
- Re: Variable Argument Functions, Harald van Dijk, 06:17
- Re: Variable Argument Functions, Richard Heathfield, 06:12
- Re: Variable Argument Functions, Papastefanos Serafeim, 05:53
- Re: Architecture independant byte operations, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 05:49
- Re: c99/c89, shaanxxx, 05:07
- Variable Argument Functions, shaanxxx, 04:43
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, CBFalconer, 04:39
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., jaysome, 04:32
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Keith Thompson, 04:32
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Richard Heathfield, 04:32
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Keith Thompson, 04:30
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Richard Heathfield, 04:24
- Re: strncpy not that easy to use, Richard Heathfield, 04:18
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 04:04
- strncpy not that easy to use, smnoff, 04:02
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Keith Thompson, 03:59
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, jacob navia, 03:56
- Re: c99/c89, Keith Thompson, 03:50
- Re: different answer for same code in linux ,Eclipse IDE, manoj1978, 03:40
- different answer for same code in linux ,Eclipse IDE, khadar, 03:36
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 03:19
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 02:56
- Re: struct definition..., Chris Torek, 02:52
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Richard Bos, 02:36
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 02:25
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Richard Bos, 02:22
- Re: array of array of complex things, Bill Pursell, 02:02
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, SM Ryan, 01:43
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, lanius, 01:36
- Re: struct definition..., Harald van Dijk, 01:32
- how to send ctrl-Z in C language - modem interfacing, abhay, 00:28
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Default User, 00:28
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, websnarf, 00:12
August 29, 2006
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 23:47
- Re: c code reusability, Ben Pfaff, 23:39
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Richard Heathfield, 23:28
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Flash Gordon, 23:14
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Flash Gordon, 23:08
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., thisdayislong, 23:01
- Re: Architecture independant byte operations, Jack Klein, 22:43
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Jack Klein, 22:41
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Joe Wright, 22:41
- Re: c code reusability, Stan Milam, 22:34
- Re: Architecture independant byte operations, Ian Collins, 22:32
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Ian Collins, 22:31
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., thisdayislong, 22:28
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Ian Collins, 22:27
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Joe Wright, 22:26
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Chad, 22:22
- Architecture independant byte operations, carsonbj, 22:20
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 22:06
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Sjouke Burry, 22:01
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., lovecreatesbeauty@xxxxxxxxx, 21:56
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Chad, 21:34
- Re: OT/drift: when is a RAMdisk an appropriate solution, Tom, 21:29
- Re: How to take the size of a pointer to array., Richard Heathfield, 21:28
- Re: c code reusability, Richard Heathfield, 21:25
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, wmaple, 21:17
- How to take the size of a pointer to array., Chad, 21:14
- Re: c code reusability, Ben Pfaff, 21:10
- Re: c code reusability, Richard Heathfield, 19:50
- [ot]Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, pete, 19:45
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, CBFalconer, 19:35
- Re: array of array of complex things, dbtid, 19:32
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:19
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:16
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Knemon, 19:12
- array of array of complex things, ma740988, 18:52
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Ian Collins, 18:43
- Re: strange output, Keith Thompson, 18:32
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Fred Kleinschmidt, 18:20
- Re: OT/drift: when is a RAMdisk an appropriate solution, Thomas J. Gritzan, 18:18
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, jacob navia, 18:15
- Re: struct definition..., Chris Torek, 18:15
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:13
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jacob navia, 18:12
- Re: Am I being Stupid?!, Eric Sosman, 17:52
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Ian Collins, 17:37
- Re: Hi a strange code ...., Knemon, 17:28
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, Knemon, 17:26
- Re: why defined implicit, Knemon, 17:23
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Am I being Stupid?!, Mr John FO Evans, 17:14
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, CBFalconer, 17:13
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Kenny McCormack, 16:48
- Re: strange output, Clark S. Cox III, 16:31
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 16:26
- Re: strange output, Richard Tobin, 16:23
- Re: OT/drift: when is a RAMdisk an appropriate solution, Tom, 16:18
- Re: strange output, CBFalconer, 15:58
- Re: Hi a strange code ...., Ben Pfaff, 15:48
- Re: Hi a strange code ...., Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:48
- Re: Proper way to turn off debug macros at compile time., Harald van Dijk, 15:46
- Re: Hi a strange code ...., pibru@xxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Ben Pfaff, 15:40
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, CBFalconer, 15:25
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, Ben Pfaff, 15:24
- Re: What happens when I write struct xx_type {...}, CBFalconer, 15:23
- Re: strange output, pete, 15:20
- Re: strange output, CBFalconer, 15:19
- Re: c code reusability, Ancient_Hacker, 15:09
- Re: strange output, pete, 15:09
- Hi a strange code ...., dhaval . bhanu, 15:07
- Re: Size of malloc'd?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 15:02
- Re: strange output, Ancient_Hacker, 15:00
- Re: Size of malloc'd?, Eric Sosman, 14:53
- Re: Proper way to turn off debug macros at compile time., Eric Sosman, 14:44
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Flash Gordon, 14:28
- Re: Size of malloc'd?, bert, 14:27
- Size of malloc'd?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:20
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Flash Gordon, 14:20
- c code reusability, mister catering, 14:14
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Flash Gordon, 14:12
- Proper way to turn off debug macros at compile time., chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 13:48
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, Keith Thompson, 13:18
- Re: is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, mastermagrath, 13:11
- is the C library a wrapper for windows API?, mastermagrath, 13:01
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, grinder, 12:33
- What happens when I write struct xx_type {...}, Joakim Hove, 12:21
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), osmium, 11:18
- Re: why defined implicit, jmcgill, 11:06
- Re: strange output, Frederick Gotham, 11:06
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Chris Dollin, 11:01
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 10:55
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, jmcgill, 10:47
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, jmcgill, 10:45
- Re: strange output, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:39
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, jmcgill, 10:38
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., John Tsiombikas, 10:35
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., wmaple, 10:35
- Re: strange output, Bart Rider, 10:19
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, William Hughes, 10:17
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Stephen Sprunk, 09:53
- Re: struct definition..., werasm, 09:43
- Re: struct definition..., tjay, 09:20
- Re: strange output, CBFalconer, 09:13
- Re: struct definition..., werasm, 09:06
- Re: strange output, Frederick Gotham, 09:05
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Frederick Gotham, 09:01
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Frederick Gotham, 09:00
- Re: struct definition..., tjay, 08:40
- Re: struct definition..., tjay, 08:38
- Re: struct definition..., CBFalconer, 08:34
- struct definition..., werasm, 08:20
- Re: why defined implicit, Bart Rider, 08:10
- Re: strange output, CBFalconer, 07:55
- Re: strange output, Ancient_Hacker, 07:39
- Re: strange output, ramasubramanian . rahul, 07:31
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 07:29
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, websnarf, 07:27
- Re: why defined implicit, Ian Collins, 07:17
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, visitmani, 07:15
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, bali, 07:13
- Re: strange output, manoj1978, 07:13
- strange output, dis_is_eagle, 07:00
- Re: why defined implicit, Philip Potter, 06:58
- Re: why defined implicit, manoj1978, 06:23
- why defined implicit, Bart Rider, 05:19
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., lovecreatesbeauty, 04:35
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Nick Keighley, 03:58
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, ozbear, 03:55
- OT/drift: when is a RAMdisk an appropriate solution, Chris Torek, 03:39
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, CBFalconer, 03:27
- Re: Text to string program, Bill Reid, 02:59
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., shaanxxx, 02:55
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Michael Mair, 02:53
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, SM Ryan, 02:18
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:17
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Skarmander, 01:36
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 01:24
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Ian Collins, 00:50
- Re: A newbie's code, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:23
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Kelsey Bjarnason, 00:23
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 00:06
August 28, 2006
- Re: Use macro parameter in string; Find type definition, Robert Gamble, 23:55
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, jmcgill, 23:47
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, jmcgill, 23:41
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 23:27
- Re: Use macro parameter in string; Find type definition, Flash Gordon, 23:20
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Flash Gordon, 22:59
- Use macro parameter in string; Find type definition, leo . hou, 22:58
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, Ben Pfaff, 22:10
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, pete, 21:38
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Tom, 21:16
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Tom, 20:55
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 20:29
- Re: reguarding scientific notation, Knemon, 20:12
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Frederick Gotham, 19:35
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Al Balmer, 18:16
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Kenny McCormack, 17:56
- reguarding scientific notation, grinder, 17:52
- Re: Help me/...., Ian Collins, 17:49
- Re: Help me/...., osmium, 17:19
- Re: int main()?, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, CBFalconer, 17:15
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Default User, 17:15
- Re: int main()?, Default User, 17:13
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 16:58
- Re: Help me/...., Bill Pursell, 16:23
- Re: Help me/...., toch3, 16:14
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, toch3, 15:43
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Michael Mair, 15:33
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, Michael Mair, 15:16
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Flash Gordon, 15:04
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Flash Gordon, 14:55
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Flash Gordon, 14:49
- Re: int main()?, Default User, 14:47
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Default User, 14:44
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Flash Gordon, 14:37
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, jmcgill, 14:34
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Flash Gordon, 14:33
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, Jonathan Pritchard, 14:33
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, jmcgill, 14:29
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 14:18
- Re: int main()?, jmcgill, 14:06
- Re: C IDE Recommendations, ed, 13:59
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, jmcgill, 13:55
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, jmcgill, 13:50
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, jmcgill, 13:48
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 13:41
- Re: int main()?, Jonathan Pritchard, 13:36
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Simon Biber, 13:31
- Re: int main()?, Spiros Bousbouras, 13:26
- Re: int main()?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:15
- Re: int main()?, Michael Mair, 13:15
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, toch3, 13:00
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Flash Gordon, 13:00
- C IDE Recommendations, Jonathan Pritchard, 12:46
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, websnarf, 12:45
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., dice, 12:35
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Ico, 12:33
- Re: int main()?, Jonathan Pritchard, 12:27
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, osmium, 12:24
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 12:14
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., shaanxxx, 11:59
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., Flash Gordon, 11:40
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", jmcgill, 11:31
- Re: Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, jmcgill, 11:27
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Flash Gordon, 11:19
- Re: Generated function, Philip Potter, 11:10
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 11:02
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Dik T. Winter, 10:58
- Re: int main()?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:56
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Eric Sosman, 10:52
- Re: int main()?, Flash Gordon, 10:42
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Spiros Bousbouras, 10:02
- Re: FAQ Submition frequency, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:59
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:46
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:45
- Re: int main()?, Spiros Bousbouras, 09:38
- , Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Philip Potter, 09:00
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Kenny McCormack, 08:55
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Kenny McCormack, 08:55
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Kenny McCormack, 08:45
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Ancient_Hacker, 08:25
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, xenonysf, 08:13
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Ico, 07:58
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Richard Bos, 07:54
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Simon Biber, 07:53
- Re: Text to string program, Richard Bos, 07:50
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Richard Bos, 07:48
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, pete, 07:48
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, Gordon Burditt, 07:48
- Re: Generated function, Richard Bos, 07:48
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Tom, 07:13
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Richard Bos, 07:05
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 07:03
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Tom, 07:00
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Simon Biber, 06:30
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., John Tsiombikas, 06:24
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 05:38
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 05:12
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Chris Hills, 05:08
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 05:04
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 05:03
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 04:53
- Re: does the output depends on the compiler, arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 04:53
- does the output depends on the compiler, sunny, 04:21
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Richard Bos, 02:50
- Re: Text to string program, av, 02:42
- Re: Structure Pointers & Encapsulation & 'ting, Herbert Rosenau, 02:34
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., "Nils O. Selåsdal", 02:26
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., sid, 02:25
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:21
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 01:56
- Re: int* ptr=10;.......issue., arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 01:50
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Knemon, 01:45
- int* ptr=10;.......issue., sid, 01:40
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: float? double?, Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: Opaque pointers, Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, Dave Thompson, 01:38
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Bill Pursell, 01:37
- Re: Buffer or Realloc?, Michael Mair, 01:37
- Re: How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, jmcgill, 01:32
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, Bill Pursell, 01:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 01:17
- How can I create a Ram Disk within C/C++ program?, Tom, 01:10
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Jonathan Pritchard, 01:05
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, toch3, 00:58
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 00:34
- Re: int main()?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 00:17
August 27, 2006
- Re: int main()?, Flash Gordon, 23:29
- int main()?, Jonathan Pritchard, 23:00
- Re: Creating a shared library and loading it, abhi147, 22:18
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, Old Wolf, 22:14
- Structure Pointers & Encapsulation & 'ting, ballpointpenthief, 19:52
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Old Wolf, 19:16
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Mark McIntyre, 19:02
- Re: Text to string program, Malcolm, 18:47
- Buffer or Realloc?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:37
- Re: Text to string program, pete, 18:30
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, Barry Schwarz, 17:50
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), David Wade, 17:48
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why?, Gordon Burditt, 17:46
- Re: CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, Default User, 17:45
- CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why? ANSI-C, toch3, 17:12
- CANNOT RUN!!!!! any idea why?, toch3, 17:07
- Re: Text to string program, Barry Schwarz, 16:58
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, J. J. Farrell, 16:57
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Chris Hills, 16:42
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 15:53
- Re: Generated function, spibou, 15:51
- Re: Text to string program, spibou, 15:42
- Text to string program, Malcolm, 15:15
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), websnarf, 15:13
- Re: A newbie's code, Michael Mair, 15:10
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), mensanator@xxxxxxx, 14:45
- Re: A newbie's code, Herbert Rosenau, 14:39
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Herbert Rosenau, 14:39
- Re: Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, jacob navia, 14:36
- Re: Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, Flash Gordon, 14:33
- Re: Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, ThM, 14:31
- Re: Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, jacob navia, 14:21
- Visual C++ 1.5 and Win2K, ThM, 13:32
- Re: help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Flash Gordon, 12:47
- Re: Generated function, Ben Pfaff, 12:34
- help with changing C light bulb (regulars please read), Chris Hills, 11:10
- Re: Help me/...., osmium, 08:48
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Ancient_Hacker, 08:03
- Re: Help me/...., Bill Pursell, 07:25
- Help me/...., toch3, 07:04
- OT Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 07:02
- Re: Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, Frederick Gotham, 07:01
- Re: Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, Michal Nazarewicz, 06:59
- Re: data stucture using c, Frederick Gotham, 06:43
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 06:38
- Re: puts() vs printf(), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 04:13
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Chris Torek, 03:56
- Re: Generated function, shaanxxx, 03:45
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Bill Pursell, 03:43
- Re: Generated function, shaanxxx, 03:43
- Re: int i ='abcd';, shaanxxx, 03:34
- Re: Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, Bill Pursell, 03:18
- Re: Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, Malcolm, 02:55
- Re: Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, Michael Mair, 02:46
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:32
- Re: A newbie's code, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:15
- Re: Where could I find function bodies... OT: Linux distros, Andrew Poelstra, 02:06
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:06
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:05
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Kelsey Bjarnason, 02:02
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 01:22
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, ena8t8si, 01:20
August 26, 2006
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Flash Gordon, 23:48
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Chen Shusheng, 23:41
- Re: basic doubt on shared libraries, Gordon Burditt, 23:35
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen Shusheng, 23:23
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 22:40
- Re: int i ='abcd';, Cong Wang, 22:18
- Re: Generating random seeds for simulation, Intiha, 21:24
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, Jack Klein, 21:20
- Re: basic doubt on shared libraries, hzmonte, 21:17
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, pete, 21:04
- Dilemma of const-ifying a function parameter, hzmonte, 20:58
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Thad Smith, 19:04
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Harald van Dijk, 18:58
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Harald van Dijk, 18:40
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, ena8t8si, 18:00
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 17:48
- Re: Waring for string is absent., Simon Biber, 17:38
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Default User, 17:13
- Re: Generated function, Mark McIntyre, 17:06
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mabden, 17:03
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Mark McIntyre, 17:00
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Mark McIntyre, 16:55
- Re: FAQ Submition frequency, levogiro.infinito, 16:29
- Re: data stucture using c, Ian Collins, 16:01
- Re: data stucture using c, Ben Pfaff, 15:52
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Ben Pfaff, 15:50
- Re: Generated function, Ben Pfaff, 15:46
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, ena8t8si, 15:40
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 15:39
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 15:37
- OT: Re: Learning C for the third time?, ena8t8si, 15:33
- Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 15:31
- Re: Waring for string is absent., Eric Sosman, 15:28
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, Eric Sosman, 15:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, ena8t8si, 15:18
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, ena8t8si, 15:17
- Re: Waring for string is absent., Simon Biber, 13:29
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Flash Gordon, 13:28
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 13:11
- Re: Waring for string is absent., shaanxxx, 12:52
- Re: When does msg queue fails??, Skarmander, 12:45
- Re: WAV to BMP, Skarmander, 12:41
- Re: basic doubt on shared libraries, Walter Roberson, 12:38
- Re: Generated function, Flash Gordon, 12:37
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Walter Roberson, 12:29
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Walter Roberson, 11:51
- Re: data stucture using c, Frederick Gotham, 11:27
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Bill Pursell, 11:23
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, ragi, 11:19
- basic doubt on shared libraries, ragi, 11:10
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, ragi, 10:30
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", jmcgill, 10:26
- Re: data stucture using c, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 10:05
- Re: data stucture using c, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:57
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Flash Gordon, 09:54
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, Bill Pursell, 09:52
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Flash Gordon, 09:33
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Flash Gordon, 09:19
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, Michal Nazarewicz, 09:04
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, shan, 08:44
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Chris Torek, 08:44
- data stucture using c, enrique, 08:44
- Re: Waring for string is absent., Eric Sosman, 08:26
- Re: Is it Nesting structure within itself, Eric Sosman, 08:10
- Re: Generated function, Lars Rune Nøstdal, 07:44
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, CBFalconer, 07:43
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Ancient_Hacker, 07:41
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, shaanxxx, 07:00
- Waring for string is absent., shaanxxx, 06:54
- Generated function, shaanxxx, 06:29
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, J. J. Farrell, 06:23
- Is it Nesting structure within itself, shan, 06:20
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, shaanxxx, 06:10
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Bill Pursell, 05:33
- Re: String to integer, shaanxxx, 05:31
- Re: Creating a shared library and loading it, Bill Pursell, 05:18
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Coos Haak, 05:13
- Re: Creating a shared library and loading it, spibou, 04:37
- Creating a shared library and loading it, abhi147, 04:31
- Creating a shared library and loading it, abhi147, 04:30
- Re: FAQ Submition frequency, Michael Mair, 03:59
- Re: alignment/zero length arrays, Michael Mair, 03:52
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, spibou, 03:45
- FAQ Submition frequency, levogiro.infinito, 03:17
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", spibou, 03:00
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Bill Pursell, 02:55
- Re: alignment/zero length arrays, Bill Pursell, 02:33
- Re: strange question, spibou, 02:32
- Re: strange question, boa, 02:26
- Re: strange question, manoj1978, 02:25
- strange question, Jack, 02:02
- Re: The type of "Point to array", arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 01:28
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen Shusheng, 01:10
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Chen Shusheng, 01:07
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Flash Gordon, 00:34
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen shuSheng, 00:08
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, CBFalconer, 00:07
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, CBFalconer, 00:03
- Re: Assertion before definitions, Peter Nilsson, 00:02
August 25, 2006
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen shuSheng, 23:57
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 23:47
- Re: A newbie's code, pete, 22:34
- Re: Assertion before definitions, SM Ryan, 22:30
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 22:28
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, Rich Townsend, 22:09
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, Frederick Gotham, 22:04
- Re: pointer to structure from pointer to member, Frederick gotham, 22:03
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Dik T. Winter, 22:01
- pointer to structure from pointer to member, sieg1974, 21:52
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 21:45
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, Ben Pfaff, 20:47
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 20:45
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Joe Wright, 19:46
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, Terence, 19:29
- Re: alignment/zero length arrays, Barry Schwarz, 19:21
- Re: Array for speed or..., Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 19:05
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Ancient_Hacker, 18:45
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Malcolm, 17:27
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Clever Monkey, 17:16
- Re: String to integer, CBFalconer, 17:13
- Re: Syntax issue, Walter Roberson, 16:14
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Frederick Gotham, 16:13
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 16:10
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Frederick Gotham, 16:08
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 16:05
- Re: WAV to BMP, Default User, 15:48
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Kenny McCormack, 15:46
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Al Balmer, 15:36
- Re: WAV to BMP, CBFalconer, 15:32
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 15:28
- Re: String to integer, santosh, 14:40
- Re: easy question about free(), Herbert Rosenau, 14:32
- Re: array initialization, Herbert Rosenau, 14:32
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Herbert Rosenau, 14:32
- alignment/zero length arrays, Bill Pursell, 14:28
- Re: little endian , big endian , big headache, Lew Pitcher, 14:20
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Eric Sosman, 14:10
- Re: String to integer, Default User, 13:54
- Re: little endian , big endian , big headache, Default User, 13:39
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 13:38
- Re: External functions, Default User, 13:37
- Re: i'm a little confused, Default User, 13:27
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Flash Gordon, 13:18
- Re: WAV to BMP, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:15
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 13:15
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 13:12
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Flash Gordon, 13:08
- Re: WAV to BMP, ***** charles, 13:05
- Re: Syntax issue, Robert Gamble, 13:04
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Flash Gordon, 13:03
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Charles Richmond, 12:53
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 12:53
- Re: array initialization, Flash Gordon, 12:50
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Flash Gordon, 12:26
- Re: String to integer, Flash Gordon, 12:25
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, jmcgill, 12:16
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Flash Gordon, 12:14
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", jmcgill, 12:07
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Eric Sosman, 12:06
- Re: Syntax issue, Frederick Gotham, 12:06
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 12:05
- Re: String to integer, Simon Biber, 12:04
- Re: Doing homework, Frederick Gotham, 12:04
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 12:00
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Simon Biber, 12:00
- Re: String to integer, Simon Biber, 11:48
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, red floyd, 11:46
- Re: String to integer, shaanxxx, 11:45
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Andrew Poelstra, 11:42
- Re: linked lists, shaanxxx, 11:39
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:37
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Andrew Poelstra, 11:36
- Re: Doing homework, Andrew Poelstra, 11:35
- Re: String to integer, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:31
- Re: String to integer, goose, 11:28
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 11:26
- Re: String to integer, goose, 11:25
- Re: Syntax issue, Robert Gamble, 11:13
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 11:12
- Re: String to integer, shaanxxx, 11:11
- Re: array initialization, Eric Sosman, 11:10
- Re: array initialization, Robert Gamble, 11:08
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, shaanxxx, 11:03
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, shaanxxx, 11:03
- Which one is efficient !!, ragi, 10:43
- Re: String to integer, ragi, 10:32
- Re: A newbie's code, Chris Dollin, 10:29
- Re: Syntax issue, Frederick Gotham, 10:27
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Chris Dollin, 10:24
- Re: Doing homework (Was: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?), Frederick Gotham, 10:23
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chris Dollin, 10:21
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", CBFalconer, 10:19
- Re: array initialization, Frederick Gotham, 10:16
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Kevin Handy, 10:15
- String to integer, Freaker85, 10:15
- Re: Array for speed or..., Eric Sosman, 10:14
- Assertion before definitions, Frederick Gotham, 10:13
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 10:09
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Chen shuSheng, 10:06
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen shuSheng, 10:04
- Re: Which one is efficient !!, Kevin Handy, 09:57
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", CBFalconer, 09:39
- Re: array initialization, CBFalconer, 09:26
- Re: array initialization, assiss, 09:18
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, greg michael, 09:09
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, CBFalconer, 09:05
- Re: easy question about free(), Kevin Handy, 08:59
- Re: Generating random seeds for simulation, websnarf, 08:41
- Re: Generating random seeds for simulation, Eric Sosman, 08:39
- Re: Some one help if this attached code could be compiled?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:37
- Re: Generating random seeds for simulation, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:31
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 08:26
- Re: array initialization, Eric Sosman, 08:22
- Re: Array for speed or..., Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 08:06
- Re: Generating random seeds for simulation, Shashank, 08:04
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", spibou, 07:32
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", Ancient_Hacker, 07:19
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen shuSheng, 07:08
- Re: new one to c, annai, 07:05
- Re: SPEC CPU2006 announced, Richard Tobin, 07:04
- Re: When does msg queue fails??, spibou, 07:02
- Re: When does msg queue fails??, Ico, 07:01
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 06:57
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, pete, 06:48
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, pete, 06:26
- Re: program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", assiss, 06:16
- program doesn't "seem" to print "hello-out", saurabhnsit2001, 06:08
- When does msg queue fails??, venky, 06:07
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chris Dollin, 06:02
- Re: The type of "Point to array", arajak@xxxxxxxxx, 05:58
- Re: int i ='abcd';, spibou, 05:56
- Re: Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", spibou, 05:47
- Where could I find function body of "fseek()" and "ftell()", Chen ShuSheng, 05:33
- int i ='abcd';, shaanxxx, 05:29
- Re: managed string library, websnarf, 04:28
- Re: array initialization, arne . muller, 04:17
- Re: External functions, Chris Dollin, 03:48
- Re: Doing homework (Was: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?), Mabden, 03:42
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Alex, 03:29
- Re: External functions, Roland Csaszar, 03:27
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mabden, 03:26
- Re: array initialization, CBFalconer, 03:10
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, CBFalconer, 03:02
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Michael Mair, 03:00
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Ulrich Eckhardt, 03:00
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Roland Csaszar, 02:57
- Re: Hash function for float., shaanxxx, 02:54
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 02:48
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Alex, 02:47
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Roland Csaszar, 02:47
- Re: Bitshifting independant of signedness, Michael Mair, 02:45
- Re: The type of "Point to array", Alex, 02:44
- Re: A newbie's code, CBFalconer, 02:43
- Re: The type of "Point to array", "Nils O. Selåsdal", 02:40
- The type of "Point to array", Alex, 02:37
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Chris Torek, 02:32
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", CBFalconer, 02:30
- Generating random seeds for simulation, Intiha, 02:21
- Re: why still use C?, Brian Inglis, 01:36
- Re: why still use C?, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 01:34
- Re: why still use C?, Mark McIntyre, 01:34
- Re: why still use C?, Malcolm, 01:34
- Re: why still use C?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 01:34
- Re: array initialization, assiss, 01:34
- Re: why still use C?, Clark S. Cox III, 01:33
- Re: why still use C?, kuyper, 01:33
- Re: why still use C?, Keith Thompson, 01:33
- Re: why still use C?, Flash Gordon, 01:33
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Harald van Dijk, 01:31
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jmcgill, 01:25
- Re: puts() vs printf(), robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 00:09
- Re: Syntax issue, Robert Gamble, 00:06
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Malcolm, 00:05
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Malcolm, 00:02
- Re: Syntax issue, spibou, 00:01
August 24, 2006
- Re: i'm a little confused, osmium, 23:34
- Re: array initialization, Robert Gamble, 23:23
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Dik T. Winter, 23:07
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Alex, 23:04
- Re: array initialization, Eric Sosman, 23:03
- Re: array initialization, assiss, 22:57
- Re: Looping question, Len Philpot, 22:53
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 22:44
- Re: little endian , big endian , big headache, manishster, 22:43
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Alex, 22:38
- Re: little endian , big endian , big headache, manishster, 22:26
- little endian , big endian , big headache, manishster, 22:23
- Re: easy question about free(), Robert Gamble, 22:11
- Re: easy question about free(), Jack Klein, 22:02
- Re: easy question about free(), Barry Schwarz, 21:56
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 21:54
- Re: Syntax issue, Barry Schwarz, 21:53
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., websnarf, 21:52
- Re: A newbie's code, Sjouke Burry, 21:41
- Re: Syntax issue, Frederick Gotham, 21:41
- easy question about free(), Michael, 21:40
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 21:39
- Re: Syntax issue, J. J. Farrell, 21:32
- Re: Bitshifting independant of signedness, Frederick Gotham, 21:30
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 21:28
- Re: Syntax issue, Eric Sosman, 21:25
- Re: External functions, Eric Sosman, 21:20
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 21:14
- Re: SPEC CPU2006 announced, Al Balmer, 20:26
- Re: SPEC CPU2006 announced, Richard Tobin, 20:18
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Joe Wright, 20:13
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 20:10
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 19:50
- Re: A newbie's code, Clark S. Cox III, 19:49
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, Robert Gamble, 19:45
- Re: Bitshifting independant of signedness, pete, 19:40
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 19:28
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, jacob navia, 19:21
- Re: VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, jacob navia, 19:13
- Re: array initialization, pete, 19:10
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 18:56
- Re: i'm a little confused, porky008, 18:53
- Re: WAV to BMP, Default User, 18:50
- array initialization, arne . muller, 18:49
- Re: WAV to BMP, Tony Quinn, 18:42
- Syntax issue, Chief, 18:38
- c, teresa.greene@xxxxxxxxxxx, 18:21
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 18:18
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., CBFalconer, 18:12
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 18:05
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 18:02
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", CBFalconer, 17:57
- VLA and goto -- diagnostic required?, Man with Oscilloscope, 17:49
- Re: Bitshifting independant of signedness, Michael Mair, 17:33
- Re: declaring functions moving input pointer, Michael Mair, 17:19
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 17:15
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 17:12
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 17:10
- Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 16:58
- Re: WAV to BMP, ***** charles, 16:49
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Harald van Dijk, 16:45
- Bitshifting independant of signedness, Frederick Gotham, 16:23
- Re: WAV to BMP, Jack Klein, 16:20
- WAV to BMP, virtualadepts, 16:10
- Re: A newbie's code, Clark S. Cox III, 16:10
- Re: A newbie's code, Bill Pursell, 16:06
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 15:39
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, spibou, 14:49
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 14:45
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 14:43
- declaring functions moving input pointer, Ilya N. Golubev, 14:39
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Racaille, 14:37
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 14:34
- Re: External functions, Bill Pursell, 14:30
- Re: External functions, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:22
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Ancient_Hacker, 14:21
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 14:10
- Re: External functions, jacob navia, 13:43
- Re: new one to c, Andrew Poelstra, 13:25
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Default User, 13:18
- Re: Looping question, Default User, 13:14
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Default User, 13:10
- Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 12:55
- Re: c99/c89, Robert Gamble, 12:51
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Kenneth Brody, 12:44
- Re: Hash function for float., Eric Sosman, 12:42
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Kenneth Brody, 12:42
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 12:37
- Re: External functions, osmium, 12:37
- Re: c99/c89, Bill Pursell, 12:28
- Re: A newbie's code, Flash Gordon, 12:26
- Re: A newbie's code, Bill Pursell, 12:25
- Re: c99/c89, shaanxxx, 12:09
- Re: Array for speed or..., Ancient_Hacker, 12:08
- Re: External functions, Flash Gordon, 11:59
- Re: Array for speed or..., Eric Sosman, 11:51
- Re: c99/c89, Simon Biber, 11:50
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., websnarf, 11:48
- Re: new one to c, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:45
- Re: c99/c89, Frederick Gotham, 11:43
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:42
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:39
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:38
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:35
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:34
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 11:33
- Re: Hash function for float., Walter Roberson, 11:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 11:21
- Re: Hash function for float., websnarf, 11:15
- Re: External functions, Chris Dollin, 11:04
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Flash Gordon, 11:01
- Re: intern ??, Olivier, 10:55
- Re: Opaque pointers, ena8t8si, 10:48
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 10:47
- External functions, ampeloso, 10:41
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, zebedee, 10:36
- Re: Hash function for float., shaanxxx, 10:32
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Flash Gordon, 10:27
- Re: Hash function for float., shaanxxx, 10:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 10:14
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:03
- Re: new one to c, CBFalconer, 10:03
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 10:00
- [newbie] intern ??, Olivier, 09:43
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 09:38
- Re: intern ??, David Resnick, 09:24
- Re: intern ??, Ancient_Hacker, 09:23
- Re: [newbie] intern ??, Walter Roberson, 09:23
- Re: Question about change of "fp" in function "fseek"and "ftell", Ancient_Hacker, 08:57
- Re: Hash function for float., Eric Sosman, 08:50
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 08:42
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., SM Ryan, 08:37
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, SM Ryan, 08:37
- Re: Hash function for float., Michel Bardiaux, 08:33
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Eric Sosman, 08:33
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Robert Gamble, 08:29
- Re: Hash function for float., Eric Sosman, 08:11
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Eric Sosman, 08:07
- Re: Looping question, Eric Sosman, 08:02
- Re: Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, benben, 08:01
- Re: Need help with audio library on DOS..., martoncho, 07:48
- Re: new one to c, abhi, 07:39
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., Gordon Burditt, 07:34
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 07:20
- Re: Question about change of "fp" in function "fseek"and "ftell", Chen ShuSheng, 07:07
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., CBFalconer, 07:03
- Re: Opaque pointers, websnarf, 06:49
- Re: Question about change of "fp" in function "fseek"and "ftell", Ancient_Hacker, 06:40
- Here you can read books free and buy all tickets, greatsee, 06:28
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., anachronic_individual, 06:22
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jaapsch, 05:46
- Question about change of "fp" in function "fseek"and "ftell", Chen ShuSheng, 05:36
- Re: c99/c89, shaanxxx, 05:27
- Re: Insert characters into a text stream., Richard Bos, 05:23
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Richard Bos, 05:13
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 05:11
- Re: c99/c89, jaysome, 05:11
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Mallesh, 05:07
- Re: puts() vs printf(), jaysome, 05:05
- Insert characters into a text stream., anachronic_individual, 04:57
- Re: c99/c89, Chris Dollin, 03:54
- Re: c99/c89, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 03:45
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 03:41
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 03:38
- Re: c99/c89, CBFalconer, 03:37
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Richard Bos, 03:32
- c99/c89, shaanxxx, 03:25
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Richard Bos, 03:24
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Richard Bos, 03:23
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, ena8t8si, 03:08
- Re: Hash function for float., Michael Mair, 02:39
- Re: Need help with audio library on DOS..., Walter Roberson, 02:29
- Re: Hash function for float., shaanxxx, 02:07
- Re: new one to c, shaanxxx, 01:52
- Re: A newbie's code, Herbert Rosenau, 01:49
- new one to c, annai, 01:43
- new one to c, annai, 01:40
- Re: weird code., jmcgill, 01:23
- Need help with audio library on DOS..., martoncho, 00:46
August 23, 2006
- Re: Looping question, Eigenvector, 23:56
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], websnarf, 23:38
- Re: typedef, osmium, 23:24
- Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 23:22
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, ena8t8si, 23:21
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, ena8t8si, 23:20
- Re: i'm a little confused, osmium, 23:19
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, ena8t8si, 23:18
- Re: A newbie's code, ena8t8si, 23:13
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 23:12
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 23:11
- Re: typedef, ena8t8si, 23:10
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, ena8t8si, 23:08
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), ena8t8si, 23:06
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), ena8t8si, 23:05
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, ena8t8si, 23:03
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, ena8t8si, 23:02
- Re: Opaque pointers, ena8t8si, 23:00
- Re: Opaque pointers, ena8t8si, 22:58
- Re: Looping question, Eigenvector, 22:54
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, Jim Showalter, 22:52
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Flash Gordon, 22:38
- Re: puts() vs printf(), CBFalconer, 22:37
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, Jim Showalter, 22:33
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", CBFalconer, 22:27
- Re: weird code., Dik T. Winter, 22:25
- Re: Looping question, CBFalconer, 22:22
- Re: i'm a little confused, pete, 22:17
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Stephen Sprunk, 22:13
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Barry Schwarz, 21:38
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Eric Sosman, 21:33
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, pete, 21:32
- Re: puts() vs printf(), Walter Roberson, 21:22
- Re: Is it legal?, J. J. Farrell, 21:08
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, pete, 20:59
- Re: weird code., Barry Schwarz, 20:53
- Re: i'm a little confused, nutsnduts, 20:39
- Re: Looping question, Debaser, 20:26
- puts() vs printf(), Debaser, 20:23
- Re: Looping question, Eigenvector, 20:14
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Knemon, 20:12
- Re: weird code., jmcgill, 20:05
- Re: weird code., jmcgill, 20:03
- Re: to access the large page(2112 bytes) NAND Flash from the bootloader, David Ashley, 19:54
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Walter Roberson, 19:51
- Re: Stop an SDL_sound stream, or possibly kill the fork?, Poly-poly man, 19:50
- Re: Array for speed or..., tedu, 19:46
- Re: Stop an SDL_sound stream, or possibly kill the fork?, Walter Roberson, 19:46
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Gary, 19:37
- Stop an SDL_sound stream, or possibly kill the fork?, Poly-poly man, 19:27
- Re: Array for speed or..., Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 19:05
- Re: end-of-file problem, Richard Tobin, 19:01
- Re: Array for speed or..., Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 18:59
- Re: end-of-file problem, Richard Tobin, 18:52
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Olivier, 18:49
- Re: Array for speed or..., Walter Roberson, 18:49
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Dik T. Winter, 18:45
- Re: Array for speed or..., Eric Sosman, 18:31
- Re: Is it legal?, xhungab, 18:15
- i'm a little confused, porky008, 18:15
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, Walter Roberson, 18:14
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, Jim Showalter, 17:55
- Array for speed or..., Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 17:44
- Re: end-of-file problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:41
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", CBFalconer, 17:30
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Ian Collins, 17:19
- Re: use of control87 and floating point underflow, jacob navia, 17:14
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Default User, 17:12
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Michael Mair, 17:10
- Re: the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Michael Mair, 17:05
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Al Balmer, 17:03
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Al Balmer, 16:58
- Re: weird code., Bill Pursell, 16:55
- Re: how to copy strings into a linked list?, Walter Roberson, 16:54
- how to copy strings into a linked list?, Jim Showalter, 16:46
- Re: A newbie's code, Bill Pursell, 16:37
- the difference between "const char* s" and "char* const s", Gary, 16:37
- Re: A newbie's code, Ian Collins, 16:13
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Malcolm, 16:07
- Re: end-of-file problem, Joe Wright, 16:05
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Ancient_Hacker, 15:46
- Re: use of control87 and floating point underflow, Walter Roberson, 15:45
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 15:44
- Re: weird code., syn1kk, 15:42
- Re: A newbie's code, Walter Roberson, 15:41
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Keith Thompson, 15:39
- Re: Floating point load-store behaviour., Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Walter Roberson, 15:32
- use of control87 and floating point underflow, jobs239, 15:30
- Re: weird code., syn1kk, 15:26
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Eric Sosman, 15:26
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 15:24
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Ian Collins, 15:24
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 15:23
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Walter Banks, 15:16
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 15:12
- Re: weird code., Bill Pursell, 15:10
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Ben Pfaff, 15:08
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Walter Roberson, 15:08
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 15:07
- Re: Why does this not fail?, sgadag, 15:07
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 15:00
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 14:59
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Ancient_Hacker, 14:54
- Re: weird code., Eric Sosman, 14:49
- Re: A newbie's code, Keith Thompson, 14:47
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Ancient_Hacker, 14:43
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 14:38
- Re: Why does this not fail?, sgadag, 14:34
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Ben Pfaff, 14:28
- Re: Why does this not fail?, Walter Roberson, 14:27
- Re: Is it legal?, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:25
- Re: weird code., jmcgill, 14:24
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: weird code., "Nils O. Selåsdal", 14:14
- Why does this not fail?, sgadag, 14:02
- Floating point load-store behaviour., thisismyidentity, 14:00
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Flash Gordon, 13:55
- weird code., syn1kk, 13:55
- Re: Is it legal?, xhungab, 13:54
- Re: A newbie's code, Flash Gordon, 13:36
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 13:29
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ben Pfaff, 13:18
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Eric Sosman, 13:11
- Re: Hash function for float., Eric Sosman, 13:04
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Ancient_Hacker, 12:53
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 12:47
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 12:47
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Eric Sosman, 12:40
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 12:17
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Harald van Dijk, 12:14
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 12:13
- Re: A newbie's code, Frederick Gotham, 12:11
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Al Balmer, 12:07
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Ancient_Hacker, 12:04
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Olivier, 12:02
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Ancient_Hacker, 11:53
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Ancient_Hacker, 11:45
- Hash function for float., shaanxxx, 11:32
- Re: A newbie's code, Ancient_Hacker, 11:31
- Re: Is it legal?, Konstantin Miller, 11:18
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, Flash Gordon, 11:11
- Re: A newbie's code, Kenneth Brody, 11:08
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, George, 11:07
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Kenneth Brody, 11:06
- Re: Is it legal?, Konstantin Miller, 11:02
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Kenneth Brody, 11:00
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 10:51
- Re: Is it legal?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:51
- Re: Is it legal?, xhungab, 10:46
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, Flash Gordon, 10:41
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, Bill Reid, 10:39
- Re: Is it legal?, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 10:38
- Re: A newbie's code, Flash Gordon, 10:37
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Flash Gordon, 10:17
- Re: memory allocation problems, Flash Gordon, 10:10
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Dale Pennington, 09:34
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, Olivier, 09:23
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, kilter, 09:05
- Re: Is it legal?, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 09:03
- Re: routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 09:01
- routine to return number of rows and columns in a matrix, kilter, 09:00
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:36
- Re: calculation of cpu idle time, ranjayap, 08:35
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Eric Sosman, 08:23
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 08:17
- Re: A newbie's code, spibou, 08:14
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Eric Sosman, 07:58
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 07:46
- Re: A newbie's code, Richard Bos, 07:40
- Re: A newbie's code, pete, 07:39
- calculation of cpu idle time, ram . ragu, 07:38
- calculation of cpu idle time, ram . ragu, 07:36
- Is it legal?, xhungab, 07:05
- A newbie's code, main(), 06:52
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 06:32
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Richard Bos, 06:10
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Richard Bos, 06:09
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 05:38
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Jun Woong, 05:29
- Re: How to implement sizeof operator, Ian Collins, 05:20
- How to implement sizeof operator, Mallesh, 05:19
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Keith Thompson, 05:09
- How to catch a user interruption?, Olivier, 05:09
- Re: How to catch a user interruption?, spibou, 04:53
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Richard Tobin, 04:36
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, jaysome, 04:33
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Nick Keighley, 04:11
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, Ian Collins, 04:07
- Re: _POSIX_C_SOURCE redefined (Problems with Python.h?), Nick Keighley, 04:00
- Re: Looping question, Nick Keighley, 03:56
- Re: end-of-file problem, Richard Bos, 03:54
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 03:53
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, spibou, 03:42
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, CBFalconer, 03:37
- Re: Please participate in a non-profit academic research, CBFalconer, 03:35
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 03:31
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 03:28
- Re: end-of-file problem, CBFalconer, 03:25
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Richard Bos, 02:47
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Michael Mair, 02:47
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Richard Bos, 02:45
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Richard Bos, 02:34
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Bill Pursell, 02:33
- Re: assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Keith Thompson, 02:32
- assigning a pointer the address of local variable, Sourav, 02:26
- Re: end-of-file problem, jmcgill, 02:13
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, spibou, 01:54
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Neil, 01:33
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Kenneth Brody, 01:12
- Re: memory allocation problems, Bill Pursell, 00:35
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Bill Pursell, 00:25
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Ian Collins, 00:18
August 22, 2006
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Frederick Gotham, 23:57
- Re: fork defunct process, already forked twice, Lew Pitcher, 23:31
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, William Hughes, 23:10
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, kuyper, 23:06
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Chris Torek, 23:01
- fork defunct process, already forked twice, vduber6er, 22:52
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Flash Gordon, 22:50
- Re: Looping question, Eigenvector, 22:45
- memory allocation problems, robannexs, 22:20
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Roman Mashak, 22:10
- Re: end-of-file problem, Lew Pitcher, 22:07
- Re: linked lists, Jim Showalter, 21:59
- Re: Looping question, CBFalconer, 21:58
- Re: linked lists, Jim Showalter, 21:56
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, CBFalconer, 21:52
- Re: linked lists, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 21:42
- Re: Looping question, Eigenvector, 21:34
- Re: end-of-file problem, Keith Thompson, 21:22
- Re: linked lists, CBFalconer, 20:56
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 20:54
- Re: Looping question, Eric Sosman, 20:48
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 20:46
- Re: Looping question, Barry Schwarz, 20:39
- Re: Looping question, pete, 20:38
- Re: Looping question, EventHelix.com, 20:33
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Eigenvector, 20:26
- Looping question, Eigenvector, 20:22
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Michal Nazarewicz, 20:13
- Re: end-of-file problem, Joe Wright, 19:45
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 19:35
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 19:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 19:25
- _POSIX_C_SOURCE redefined (Problems with Python.h?), irfanhab, 19:17
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Keith Thompson, 19:16
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 19:14
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 18:56
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Martin Ambuhl, 18:53
- Re: end-of-file problem, Keith Thompson, 18:45
- linked lists, Jim Showalter, 18:30
- Re: end-of-file problem, Joe Wright, 18:24
- [OT] (was: Re: Plzz Explain !!), Christopher Benson-Manica, 18:13
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Ben Pfaff, 17:56
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Eric Sosman, 17:50
- Re: Getting a File Name from a FILE *, sjdevnull, 17:50
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 17:28
- Getting a File Name from a FILE *, Dale Pennington, 17:14
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 17:07
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Walter Roberson, 16:58
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Eric Sosman, 16:37
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Schizoid Man, 16:34
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, lawrence . jones, 16:15
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Herbert Rosenau, 16:03
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Michael Mair, 15:52
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Al Balmer, 15:39
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:34
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Harald van Dijk, 15:27
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 15:23
- groups.google abuse? [Re: The most powerful computer security tools], Michael Heiming, 15:20
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Ancient_Hacker, 15:20
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Clark S. Cox III, 15:17
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Richard Tobin, 15:07
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 15:02
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Martin Ambuhl, 14:56
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Walter Roberson, 14:55
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Keith Thompson, 14:55
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Harald van Dijk, 14:51
- Re: Constructing/modifying va_lists, Keith Thompson, 14:39
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: The most powerful computer security tools, ynotssor, 14:26
- Re: secure integer library, Robert Seacord, 14:16
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, lawrence . jones, 14:15
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Eric Sosman, 14:13
- Re: scanf question using %[^$], Walter Roberson, 14:12
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Herbert Rosenau, 14:12
- scanf question using %[^$], john, 13:38
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Ben Pfaff, 13:35
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Simon Biber, 13:34
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 13:33
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Andrew Poelstra, 13:21
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Francis Glassborow, 13:15
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Francis Glassborow, 13:13
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Sensei, 13:12
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Philip Potter, 13:09
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:08
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Douglas A. Gwyn, 13:07
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, kuyper, 13:00
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Wojtek Lerch, 13:00
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Harald van Dijk, 12:21
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Eric Sosman, 12:03
- Re: Constructing/modifying va_lists, goose, 11:46
- Re: secure integer library, Walter Roberson, 11:39
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 11:33
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Walter Roberson, 11:32
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Eric Sosman, 11:27
- Re: Constructing/modifying va_lists, shaanxxx, 11:01
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 10:52
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Ancient_Hacker, 10:36
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Tom St Denis, 10:35
- Re: remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Ancient_Hacker, 10:34
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Flash Gordon, 10:31
- remove decimal but show cents with sprintf, Chad, 10:22
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Chris Dollin, 10:17
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Jordan Abel, 10:10
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 10:06
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Jordan Abel, 10:05
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Richard Bos, 10:04
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Wojtek Lerch, 10:02
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Jordan Abel, 10:00
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Jordan Abel, 09:56
- Re: %u printf, Jordan Abel, 09:53
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Chris Dollin, 09:49
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 09:39
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 09:19
- Re: float? double?, Jordan Abel, 08:55
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Richard Bos, 08:21
- Re: float? double?, William Hughes, 08:14
- Re: Constructing/modifying va_lists, Eric Sosman, 07:37
- Re: %u printf, Eric Sosman, 07:29
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 07:28
- Constructing/modifying va_lists, Ross, 06:48
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Sensei, 06:43
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Sensei, 06:40
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Keith Thompson, 06:11
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Francis Glassborow, 05:42
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, CBFalconer, 05:41
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Francis Glassborow, 05:39
- Re: float? double?, av, 05:01
- Re: float? double?, av, 05:01
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Martin Ambuhl, 04:42
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Keith Thompson, 04:20
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], boa, 04:19
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Roman Mashak, 04:13
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], pete, 04:13
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], Roman Mashak, 04:12
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Keith Thompson, 04:06
- Re: tools.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `VAR_1', Student, 04:06
- Re: get random number in range [10..50], boa, 03:55
- get random number in range [10..50], Roman Mashak, 03:35
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Henryk, 03:32
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Keith Thompson, 03:29
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Walter Roberson, 03:05
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, dev_cool, 03:04
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Simon Biber, 02:31
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, spibou, 02:29
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Ian Collins, 02:22
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Bill Pursell, 02:05
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, dev_cool, 01:59
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, spibou, 01:55
- Re: declaration shadows a parameter, Chris Torek, 01:48
- Re: Function argument as char [], Keith Thompson, 01:28
- Re: %u printf, Clark S. Cox III, 01:26
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Keith Thompson, 01:07
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Herbert Rosenau, 01:05
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Herbert Rosenau, 01:05
- Re: secure integer library, Herbert Rosenau, 01:05
- Re: %u printf, Herbert Rosenau, 01:05
- Re: float? double?, Clark S. Cox III, 00:52
- declaration shadows a parameter, main(), 00:31
August 21, 2006
- Re: The most powerful computer security tools, CBFalconer, 23:42
- Re: tools.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `VAR_1', Jack Klein, 21:48
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 21:34
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Dik T. Winter, 21:29
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, CBFalconer, 21:16
- Re: Function argument as char [], CBFalconer, 21:14
- Re: Function argument as char [], Dik T. Winter, 21:01
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: float? double?, Gordon Burditt, 20:11
- Re: malloc() and limitations, Keith Thompson, 19:42
- Re: malloc() and limitations, Gordon Burditt, 19:33
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Douglas A. Gwyn, 19:09
- Re: Portable EOL?, Joe Wright, 18:56
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: Function argument as char [], CBFalconer, 18:01
- Re: float? double?, Joe Wright, 17:59
- Re: Simple problem?, CBFalconer, 17:57
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Walter Roberson, 17:55
- Re: float? double?, CBFalconer, 17:46
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Ancient_Hacker, 17:43
- Re: end-of-file problem, Keith Thompson, 17:41
- Doing homework (Was: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?), CBFalconer, 17:41
- Re: Function argument as char [], Keith Thompson, 17:37
- Re: Function argument as char [], Frederick Gotham, 17:13
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Mark McIntyre, 17:12
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 17:09
- Re: end-of-file problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:09
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Malcolm, 17:09
- Re: Function argument as char [], Keith Thompson, 17:07
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, goose, 17:06
- Re: secure integer library, Mark McIntyre, 17:06
- Re: switch error, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, jacob navia, 16:50
- Re: Function argument as char [], Frederick Gotham, 16:49
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Keith Thompson, 16:37
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Michael Mair, 16:36
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: Function argument as char [], Eric Sosman, 16:24
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:21
- Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 16:19
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Walter Roberson, 16:18
- Re: Function argument as char [], Frederick Gotham, 16:13
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 15:56
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 15:47
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Andrew Poelstra, 15:30
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 15:20
- Re: Floating Point and Wide Registers, Robert Gamble, 15:07
- Re: Simple problem?, Shel Sherman, 14:50
- Re: float? double?, Eric Sosman, 14:14
- Re: float? double?, William Hughes, 14:09
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Harald van Dijk, 14:04
- Re: float? double?, av, 13:38
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Sensei, 13:26
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Al Balmer, 13:25
- Re: Simple problem?, Martin Ambuhl, 13:25
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Al Balmer, 13:23
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Martin Ambuhl, 13:15
- Re: Function argument as char [], Robert Gamble, 13:14
- Re: Function argument as char [], Walter Roberson, 13:09
- Re: Function argument as char [], Eric Sosman, 13:06
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Flash Gordon, 13:00
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Kenneth Brody, 12:55
- Function argument as char [], shalakasan, 12:55
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Kenneth Brody, 12:50
- Re: Simple problem?, Ben Pfaff, 12:50
- Simple problem?, Shel Sherman, 12:42
- Re: switch error, Walter Roberson, 12:21
- switch error, ampeloso, 12:16
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Default User, 12:11
- Re: [OT]Re: Pointer arithmetic, Frederick Gotham, 12:10
- [OT]Re: Pointer arithmetic, goose, 11:54
- Re: float? double?, Clark S. Cox III, 11:32
- Re: malloc() and limitations, Stephen Sprunk, 11:28
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, goose, 11:20
- Re: Nested FSM implementation, Julian V. Noble, 11:14
- Re: PREPROCESSOR: Multiple expansions., nobrow, 11:10
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Ben Pfaff, 10:59
- Re: Nested FSM implementation, jacob navia, 10:58
- Re: PREPROCESSOR: Multiple expansions., Ancient_Hacker, 10:57
- Re: Nested FSM implementation, Kenny McCormack, 10:39
- Re: typedef, osmium, 10:39
- Re: float? double?, Eric Sosman, 10:38
- Re: PREPROCESSOR: Multiple expansions., nobrow, 10:35
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, jmcgill, 10:29
- Re: K&R exercise 4-1, spibou, 10:27
- Re: K&R exercise 4-1, Aenima1891, 10:20
- Re: PREPROCESSOR: Multiple expansions., Ancient_Hacker, 10:14
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 10:11
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, CBFalconer, 10:09
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, CBFalconer, 10:03
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, CBFalconer, 09:37
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, pete, 09:04
- PREPROCESSOR: Multiple expansions., nobrow, 08:48
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Harald van Dijk, 08:36
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, goose, 08:19
- Re: Is this #define legal?, Eric Sosman, 08:07
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Henryk, 07:44
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Henryk, 07:41
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, dev_cool, 07:06
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, dev_cool, 07:04
- Nested FSM implementation, Polomora, 07:03
- Re: Objectives on C and C++, Philip Potter, 06:46
- Is this #define legal?, Sensei, 06:45
- Re: Objectives on C and C++, Kevin Handy, 06:22
- Re: typedef, Kiru Sengal, 06:17
- Objectives on C and C++, rudranee, 06:13
- typedef, venky, 06:12
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 06:05
- Re: tools.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `VAR_1', Student, 06:00
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 05:57
- tools.o(.data+0x0): multiple definition of `VAR_1', Student, 05:52
- Re: K&R exercise 4-1, Chen shuSheng, 05:39
- Re: malloc() and limitations, goose, 05:31
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Nick Keighley, 05:23
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Nick Keighley, 05:14
- Re: malloc() and limitations, Keith Thompson, 05:14
- Re: float? double?, CBFalconer, 05:11
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Harald van Dijk, 05:00
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, spibou, 04:42
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Harald van Dijk, 04:38
- Re: float? double?, CBFalconer, 04:36
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Richard Bos, 04:36
- Re: K&R exercise 4-1, spibou, 04:34
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 04:24
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, pghoshjobs, 03:41
- K&R exercise 4-1, Aenima1891, 03:39
- Re: program confusion, Richard Bos, 03:39
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Richard Bos, 03:16
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, spibou, 03:01
- Re: malloc() and limitations, ffairy2323, 02:52
- Re: malloc() and limitations, ffairy2323, 02:52
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 02:49
- Re: malloc() and limitations, Keith Thompson, 02:36
- Re: malloc() and limitations, pghoshjobs, 02:26
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Chris Torek, 02:06
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Dave Thompson, 02:05
- Re: switches, Dave Thompson, 02:04
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Dave Thompson, 02:04
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Keith Thompson, 01:51
- Re: float? double?, Chris Torek, 01:40
- Re: array of size 1, Simon Biber, 01:38
- Re: Pointer arithmetic, Morris Dovey, 01:33
- malloc() and limitations, questions?, 01:27
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 01:06
- Pointer arithmetic, main(), 00:58
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Andrew Poelstra, 00:50
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 00:48
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 00:31
August 20, 2006
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Mr.Madtast, 23:57
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Keith Thompson, 23:41
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 23:33
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 23:26
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Flash Gordon, 23:16
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Eigenvector, 23:06
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 22:55
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Dave Vandervies, 22:49
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Andrew Poelstra, 22:35
- Re: Printf Problem, Christopher Benson-Manica, 22:05
- Re: float? double?, Chris Torek, 22:04
- Re: secure integer library, Ed Jensen, 21:52
- Re: float? double?, Ian Collins, 21:20
- Re: float? double?, Joe Wright, 21:06
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 20:57
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 20:53
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 20:50
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 20:45
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Default User, 20:40
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 20:26
- memory allocation (take 2), goose, 19:16
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", CBFalconer, 19:08
- Re: float? double?, Gordon Burditt, 18:59
- Re: float? double?, Gordon Burditt, 18:51
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Malcolm, 18:47
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 18:38
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", goose, 18:33
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 18:09
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: end-of-file problem, Keith Thompson, 17:51
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 17:46
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 17:36
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 17:34
- Re: end-of-file problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:24
- Re: end-of-file problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:22
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Mark McIntyre, 17:17
- Re: secure integer library, Mark McIntyre, 17:15
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Default User, 17:03
- Re: end-of-file problem, Bill Pursell, 16:51
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 16:47
- Re: Printf Problem, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: Portable EOL?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 16:45
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: %u printf, Giorgio Silvestri, 16:33
- Re: end-of-file problem, Keith Thompson, 16:33
- Re: how to implement timer, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: finding how much time that is consumed?, Raymond, 15:46
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Default User, 15:35
- Re: %u printf, Ian Collins, 15:35
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Default User, 15:32
- %u printf, saurabh, 15:32
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Frederick Gotham, 15:29
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 15:24
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Malcolm, 15:14
- Re: Portable EOL?, Joe Wright, 15:13
- Re: float? double?, Tim Prince, 14:42
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Stephen Sprunk, 14:23
- Re: Printf Problem, steve, 14:22
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Stephen Sprunk, 14:17
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, Eigenvector, 13:16
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 13:15
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Jack Klein, 13:07
- Re: end-of-file problem, Markus Pitha, 13:07
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Jack Klein, 13:04
- Re: Learning C for the third time?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 13:01
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 12:56
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, Walter Roberson, 12:41
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 12:28
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 12:27
- Learning C for the third time?, ***** charles, 12:26
- Re: float? double?, Joe Wright, 12:22
- Re: end-of-file problem, Markus Pitha, 11:57
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, fiocco, 11:51
- Re: end-of-file problem, Markus Pitha, 11:36
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, CBFalconer, 11:32
- Re: end-of-file problem, Flash Gordon, 11:25
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Flash Gordon, 10:59
- Printf Problem, dis_is_eagle, 10:53
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Harald van Dijk, 10:47
- Re: Printf Problem, Ico, 10:40
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, spibou, 10:31
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, spibou, 10:21
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, Andrew Poelstra, 10:16
- Re: simple array question, Flash Gordon, 10:15
- Re: end-of-file problem, Harald van Dijk, 10:13
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Andrew Poelstra, 10:11
- Re: end-of-file problem, spibou, 10:05
- end-of-file problem, Markus Pitha, 10:01
- Re: end-of-file problem, boa, 09:47
- Re: end-of-file problem, CBFalconer, 09:35
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, CBFalconer, 09:22
- Re: secure integer library, rCs, 09:12
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, spibou, 09:11
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, CBFalconer, 09:09
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, pemo, 09:02
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, goose, 09:02
- Re: Plzz Explain !!, pemo, 08:52
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Rod Pemberton, 08:27
- Re: secure integer library, stdazi@xxxxxxxxx, 08:25
- Re: end-of-file problem, boa, 08:07
- Re: how to implement timer, Rod Pemberton, 07:51
- Re: simple array question, Rod Pemberton, 07:46
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Harald van Dijk, 07:39
- Plzz Explain !!, dev_cool, 07:31
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Flash Gordon, 06:54
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", goose, 06:23
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Ian Collins, 05:53
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Chris Torek, 05:48
- Anyone know what, pkpkpoo, 05:48
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Chris Torek, 05:29
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Martin Ambuhl, 05:26
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 05:15
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Ian Collins, 05:07
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 05:02
- Re: float? double?, Malcolm, 04:57
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Herbert Rosenau, 04:56
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Herbert Rosenau, 04:56
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Chen shuSheng, 04:53
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, Chris Torek, 04:50
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Ian Collins, 04:48
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 04:39
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Chen shuSheng, 04:39
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Ian Collins, 04:34
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, CBFalconer, 04:34
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Michael Mair, 04:29
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Keith Thompson, 04:26
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Chris Torek, 04:24
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Chen shuSheng, 04:22
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", jacob navia, 04:19
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", spibou, 04:13
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 04:09
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Chen shuSheng, 04:09
- Re: array of size 1, Chris Torek, 04:03
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", jacob navia, 04:03
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Default User, 04:01
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", Michael Mair, 04:01
- Re: How to use lib function "getline", spibou, 03:56
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Chris Torek, 03:49
- How to use lib function "getline", Chen shuSheng, 03:40
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Ark, 02:55
- Re: Portable EOL?, spibou, 02:50
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 01:37
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 01:28
- Re: float? double?, Walter Roberson, 01:06
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Ark, 01:05
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, Al Balmer, 00:34
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Al Balmer, 00:34
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Keith Thompson, 00:29
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 00:04
August 19, 2006
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Chen shuSheng, 23:53
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, MQ, 23:46
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 23:42
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 23:19
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Chen shuSheng, 23:13
- Re: Portable EOL?, Keith Thompson, 23:11
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 23:02
- Re: Portable EOL?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 23:00
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Keith Thompson, 22:51
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Chen shuSheng, 22:50
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Chen shuSheng, 22:43
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Jack Klein, 22:36
- Re: Portable EOL?, Jack Klein, 22:34
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Jack Klein, 22:29
- Re: Direct Pointer assignment, Walter Roberson, 22:22
- Direct Pointer assignment, Chen Shusheng, 21:55
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 21:18
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Keith Thompson, 20:54
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Clark S. Cox III, 20:48
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 20:34
- Re: secure integer library, Clark S. Cox III, 20:26
- Re: What ever happened to?, Keith Thompson, 20:24
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 19:57
- Re: secure integer library, Mark McIntyre, 19:54
- Re: secure integer library, Mark McIntyre, 19:52
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, pete, 19:49
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, pete, 19:22
- Re: What ever happened to?, Len Philpot, 19:19
- Re: What ever happened to?, Default User, 19:06
- Re: float? double?, pete, 19:04
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, CBFalconer, 18:53
- Re: Good Book on Parsing Strings?, Malcolm, 18:50
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, CBFalconer, 18:47
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 18:44
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 18:40
- Good Book on Parsing Strings?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 18:28
- Re: [OT] how to implement timer, Morris Dovey, 18:14
- Re: secure integer library, Keith Thompson, 17:36
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, micans, 17:33
- Re: Portable EOL?, Keith Thompson, 17:20
- Re: Portable EOL?, Keith Thompson, 17:19
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 17:08
- Re: simple array question, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: Portable EOL?, Malcolm, 17:01
- Re: how to implement timer, Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 16:47
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Tim Woodall, 16:37
- Re: secure integer library, Clark S. Cox III, 16:24
- Re: secure integer library, Tom St Denis, 16:20
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, micans, 16:15
- Re: secure integer library, Tom St Denis, 16:09
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 16:02
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, CBFalconer, 15:59
- Re: Portable EOL?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 15:49
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, CBFalconer, 15:44
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Barry Schwarz, 15:39
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 15:37
- Re: secure integer library, CBFalconer, 15:33
- Re: Portable EOL?, Barry Schwarz, 15:31
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Barry Schwarz, 15:13
- Re: secure integer library, Tom St Denis, 15:05
- Re: secure integer library, Tom St Denis, 15:03
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Flash Gordon, 14:50
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 14:48
- Re: secure integer library, Ark, 14:38
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, CBFalconer, 14:38
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Herbert Rosenau, 14:37
- Re: Passing String with \x00, Herbert Rosenau, 14:37
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Flash Gordon, 14:36
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Bill Pursell, 14:34
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Malcolm, 14:31
- Re: Portable EOL?, Ben Pfaff, 14:30
- Re: What ever happened to?, Malcolm, 14:28
- Re: Having issues trying to copy an array, Tom St Denis, 14:19
- Re: secure integer library, Tom St Denis, 14:11
- Portable EOL?, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:08
- Re: secure integer library, jacob navia, 13:59
- Re: simple array question, Flash Gordon, 13:55
- Re: secure integer library, MrDev, 13:40
- Having issues trying to copy an array, Chad, 13:38
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, cman, 12:55
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Flash Gordon, 12:49
- Re: What ever happened to?, osmium, 12:33
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, jmcgill, 12:19
- Re: What ever happened to?, jacob navia, 12:12
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 12:11
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Clark S. Cox III, 12:00
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Flash Gordon, 11:51
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Ben Pfaff, 11:44
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, rain.man, 11:26
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Joe Wright, 11:11
- Re: What ever happened to?, CBFalconer, 10:24
- Re: how to implement timer, Flash Gordon, 10:23
- Re: float? double?, CBFalconer, 10:13
- Re: Opaque pointers, CBFalconer, 10:01
- Re: float? double?, Joe Wright, 08:59
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, goose, 08:39
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, websnarf, 08:37
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Flash Gordon, 08:32
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Ancient_Hacker, 08:31
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Flash Gordon, 08:27
- Re: Opaque pointers, websnarf, 08:20
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Flash Gordon, 08:14
- Re: Get paid to post in forums.., Rod Pemberton, 07:48
- Re: how to implement timer, Rod Pemberton, 07:44
- Re: simple array question, Rod Pemberton, 07:38
- Re: simple array question, pete, 07:31
- Re: Opaque pointers, Rod Pemberton, 07:29
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Malcolm, 07:21
- Re: float? double?, pete, 07:18
- Re: simple array question, Rod Pemberton, 07:14
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Malcolm, 07:05
- Re: What ever happened to?, Mark F. Haigh, 07:02
- Re: finding how much time that is consumed?, Malcolm, 07:01
- Re: float? double?, Malcolm, 06:50
- Re: float? double?, Malcolm, 06:46
- Re: memory allocation wrapper, Malcolm, 06:36
- Re: What ever happened to?, Malcolm, 06:30
- how to implement timer, paresh, 06:29
- Re: Opaque pointers, ena8t8si, 05:35
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Rod Pemberton, 05:08
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Rod Pemberton, 05:08
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Rod Pemberton, 05:08
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, rani, 05:04
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 04:22
- Re: Get paid to post in forums.., Mark Carter, 04:17
- What ever happened to?, jaysome, 03:28
- Re: simple array question, Michael Mair, 02:55
- Re: simple array question, CBFalconer, 02:52
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), CBFalconer, 02:44
- Re: Opaque pointers, websnarf, 02:18
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Harald van Dijk, 02:17
- Re: simple array question, Harald van Dijk, 02:07
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Keith Thompson, 01:57
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Herbert Rosenau, 01:55
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Herbert Rosenau, 01:55
- Re: simple array question, Michael, 01:11
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Barry Schwarz, 01:03
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 00:49
August 18, 2006
- Re: float? double?, Joe Wright, 22:44
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, Keith Thompson, 22:18
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, jmcgill, 21:54
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, goose, 21:47
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 21:38
- Re: simple array question, goose, 21:34
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, jmcgill, 21:30
- Re: simple array question, CBFalconer, 21:19
- Re: float? double?, Ark, 21:12
- Re: float? double?, Dik T. Winter, 21:12
- Re: float? double?, Keith Thompson, 21:06
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, Gordon Burditt, 21:03
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Gordon Burditt, 20:55
- Re: float? double?, Gordon Burditt, 20:50
- Re: float? double?, pete, 20:46
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, jmcgill, 20:32
- Re: How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, jmcgill, 20:28
- Re: Passing String with \x00, J. J. Farrell, 20:21
- memory allocation wrapper, goose, 20:18
- How do I get the mac address/es in C for Windows XP?, marccruz, 20:17
- Re: simple array question, Michael, 20:03
- Re: float? double?, jmcgill, 19:50
- Re: float? double?, jacob navia, 19:39
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Ben Pfaff, 19:33
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 19:27
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Dik T. Winter, 19:21
- Re: float? double?, jmcgill, 19:08
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Jordan Abel, 19:06
- Re: Passing String with \x00, Jordan Abel, 19:01
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, jacob navia, 18:50
- Re: float? double?, jacob navia, 18:43
- Re: simple array question, Joe Wright, 18:30
- Re: float? double?, jmcgill, 17:22
- Re: float? double?, Tim Prince, 16:58
- Re: About Bit Vectors, Hans Sørensen, 16:58
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Mark McIntyre, 16:57
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, jmcgill, 16:46
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), CBFalconer, 16:44
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Martin Golding, 16:38
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, ena8t8si, 16:33
- Re: Opaque pointers, ena8t8si, 16:31
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Mark McIntyre, 16:28
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, Keith Thompson, 16:17
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Mikhail Teterin, 16:08
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, Clark S. Cox III, 16:00
- Re: float? double?, Walter Roberson, 15:31
- Re: float? double?, Walter Roberson, 15:24
- Re: float? double?, Lew Pitcher, 15:15
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, dimka, 15:05
- float? double?, Erick->, 14:59
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Mikhail Teterin, 14:57
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Herbert Rosenau, 14:52
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 14:52
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, dimka, 14:43
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Robert Gamble, 14:25
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, Frederick Gotham, 14:20
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Martin Ambuhl, 14:14
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:58
- Re: Format problem with sprintf, Mike Wahler, 13:41
- Re: help needed regarding compiling 2 C files, Ben Pfaff, 13:18
- Re: help needed regarding compiling 2 C files, jmcgill, 13:12
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Ben Pfaff, 13:07
- Re: help needed regarding compiling 2 C files, skumar434, 13:00
- Re: finding how much time that is consumed?, jmcgill, 12:59
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Al Balmer, 12:46
- Re: finding how much time that is consumed?, Tim Prince, 12:35
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Stephen Sprunk, 11:56
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, whyglinux, 11:48
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:32
- Re: finding how much time that is consumed?, Eric Sosman, 11:29
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Eric Sosman, 11:04
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, jmcgill, 10:52
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, jmcgill, 10:48
- Re: simple array question, CBFalconer, 10:46
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, jmcgill, 10:43
- Re: how to test the overflow, Flash Gordon, 10:33
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Walter Roberson, 10:28
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Chris Dollin, 10:13
- Format problem with sprintf, Henryk, 09:55
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:52
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, csshine, 09:30
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Philip Potter, 09:30
- finding how much time that is consumed?, raybakk, 09:29
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Flash Gordon, 09:17
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, goose, 09:11
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, eahaa, 08:44
- Re: Passing String with \x00, Rod Pemberton, 08:43
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Ancient_Hacker, 07:53
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, Thomas J. Gritzan, 07:10
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Keith Thompson, 07:07
- Re: Passing String with \x00, Thomas J. Gritzan, 06:57
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, csshine, 05:48
- Re: Passing String with \x00, abhi147, 05:35
- Re: Passing String with \x00, abhi147, 05:21
- Re: why still use C?, Robert Seacord, 04:53
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Chris Dollin, 04:49
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, Bill, 04:40
- Re: Passing String with \x00, Rod Pemberton, 04:31
- Re: Strange sizeof behavior, Simon Biber, 04:28
- Re: Is it declaration or defination?, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:14
- Re: simple array question, pete, 04:02
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, lovecreatesbeauty, 03:56
- Is it declaration or defination?, venky, 03:49
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, websnarf, 03:36
- Re: simple array question, Michael, 03:33
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, CBFalconer, 03:08
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Walter Roberson, 02:54
- Re: simple array question, CBFalconer, 02:51
- Re: simple array question, Keith Thompson, 02:39
- Re: simple array question, Michael Mair, 02:27
- Re: About Bit Vectors, Michael Mair, 02:20
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Andrew Poelstra, 02:11
- simple array question, Michael, 02:08
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Keith Thompson, 02:02
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, CBFalconer, 01:59
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Herbert Rosenau, 01:50
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Herbert Rosenau, 01:50
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Herbert Rosenau, 01:50
- About Bit Vectors, code break, 01:27
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Harald van Dijk, 01:25
- Passing String with \x00, abhi147, 01:22
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Mark F. Haigh, 01:21
- Re: Newbie dummy question, Rafael Almeida, 00:22
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Keith Thompson, 00:22
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), FI, 00:01
August 17, 2006
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood, 23:37
- Re: Screen Editing, Christopher Benson-Manica, 23:37
- Re: Help needed for strings, Stan Milam, 22:57
- Re: discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, Keith Thompson, 22:48
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, websnarf, 22:45
- Newbie dummy question, singlewchildren, 22:39
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, CBFalconer, 22:23
- Re: Screen Editing, Dik T. Winter, 22:22
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Barry Schwarz, 21:51
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Barry Schwarz, 21:34
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 21:30
- discuss portibility of this ENDIAN testing code, G Patel, 21:28
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Edmond Dantes, 21:25
- Re: Screen Editing, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, CBFalconer, 21:10
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, CBFalconer, 21:00
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Dik T. Winter, 20:57
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Old Wolf, 20:55
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:51
- Re: Screen Editing, Ian Collins, 20:49
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 20:47
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:46
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:42
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 20:42
- Re: question, osmium, 20:41
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 20:36
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:31
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 20:25
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Keith Thompson, 20:24
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 20:23
- Re: Screen Editing, J. J. Farrell, 20:19
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:17
- Re: Opaque pointers, pete, 20:12
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 20:11
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 20:10
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Andrew Poelstra, 20:02
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), pete, 19:58
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 19:54
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:48
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, websnarf, 19:47
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Eigenvector, 19:41
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 19:38
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Andrew Poelstra, 19:27
- Re: Help needed for strings, Default User, 19:21
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:08
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Default User, 19:05
- Re: Opaque pointers, pemo, 18:55
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Keith Thompson, 18:51
- Re: Screen Editing, Ben Pfaff, 18:49
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, dimka, 18:46
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 18:45
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 18:44
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Keith Thompson, 18:42
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Stephen Sprunk, 18:38
- Re: Screen Editing, Steve Summit, 18:36
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:32
- Re: Strange sizeof behavior, Joe Wright, 18:32
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:25
- Re: Screen Editing, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: Screen Editing, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Ben Pfaff, 18:17
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 18:14
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 18:13
- Re: Screen Editing, Mark McIntyre, 18:09
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Walter Roberson, 18:08
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 17:53
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Keith Thompson, 17:50
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark McIntyre, 17:47
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 17:47
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:40
- Re: OT: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Mark McIntyre, 17:40
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 17:40
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, dimka, 17:32
- Re: question, Keith Thompson, 17:29
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 17:24
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 17:21
- Re: Opaque pointers, Keith Thompson, 17:20
- Help needed for strings, skumar434, 17:18
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:16
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 17:15
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, tedu, 17:13
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 17:10
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:10
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:04
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 16:58
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 16:51
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 16:46
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 16:44
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 16:34
- Re: Strange sizeof behavior, J. J. Farrell, 16:27
- Re: Screen Editing, Tak-Shing Chan, 16:20
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:17
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:15
- Re: Screen Editing, Thomas Dickey, 16:03
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Harald van Dijk, 15:22
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, CBFalconer, 15:22
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Ancient_Hacker, 14:45
- Re: Screen Editing, Herbert Rosenau, 14:32
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Herbert Rosenau, 14:32
- Re: Strange sizeof behavior, gbostock, 14:12
- Re: Screen Editing, Martin Ambuhl, 13:42
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), Default User, 13:36
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Default User, 13:33
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Walter Roberson, 13:33
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 13:29
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Default User, 13:28
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Default User, 13:15
- Re: OT: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Default User, 13:12
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Robert Gamble, 12:59
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Walter Roberson, 12:44
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Walter Roberson, 12:39
- Re: Screen Editing, Andrew Smallshaw, 12:26
- Re: Command line parameters - argc and argv[], Walter Roberson, 12:13
- Re: Command line parameters - argc and argv[], Christopher Benson-Manica, 12:01
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Jack Klein, 12:01
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Walter Roberson, 11:51
- Command line parameters - argc and argv[], ern, 11:36
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Al Balmer, 11:35
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Al Balmer, 11:28
- Re: Strange sizeof behavior, Robert Gamble, 11:22
- Strange sizeof behavior, Peter, 10:56
- secure integer library, Robert Seacord, 09:58
- Re: Object Initialization, Steve Summit, 09:42
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Chris Dollin, 09:25
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Chen Shusheng, 08:47
- Re: Screen Editing, Ancient_Hacker, 07:59
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Eric Sosman, 07:36
- Re: Opaque pointers, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:35
- Re: Opaque pointers, pete, 07:29
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, CBFalconer, 07:26
- Re: Opaque pointers, pete, 07:25
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, CBFalconer, 07:11
- Re: Screen Editing, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 06:52
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Chen Shusheng, 06:48
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, jaysome, 06:43
- Re: question, Chen Shusheng, 06:37
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), "Nils O. Selåsdal", 06:29
- Re: Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), jaysome, 06:29
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Ancient_Hacker, 06:22
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, jaysome, 06:18
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Skarmander, 06:18
- Re: Opaque pointers, Richard Harnden, 06:09
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Mark F. Haigh, 06:09
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Richard Tobin, 05:59
- Re: question, Philip Potter, 05:57
- Is it ok to pass 'memory address' to free(), FI, 05:57
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Thomas J. Gritzan, 05:56
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, jaysome, 05:54
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark F. Haigh, 05:46
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Skarmander, 05:35
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, Chen Shusheng, 05:27
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mark F. Haigh, 05:25
- Re: question, darklight, 05:18
- Opaque pointers, chankl, 05:07
- Re: question <OT: K&R Versions>, Coos Haak, 05:05
- Re: question <OT: K&R Versions>, darklight, 05:03
- Re: array of size 1, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:00
- Re: array of size 1, Hallvard B Furuseth, 04:56
- Re: "define" and "malloc" more, monnand, 04:48
- "define" and "malloc" more, Chen Shusheng, 04:37
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", lyra, 04:23
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Keith Thompson, 04:18
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", monnand, 04:14
- Re: Question about "define" and "malloc", Nick Keighley, 04:10
- Question about "define" and "malloc", Chen Shusheng, 03:52
- Re: Screen Editing, Chen Shusheng, 03:47
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, ena8t8si, 03:31
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 03:30
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), ena8t8si, 03:27
- Re: looking for statefull snprintf, Andrew Poelstra, 02:44
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Flash Gordon, 02:43
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Andrew Poelstra, 02:34
- looking for statefull snprintf, dimka, 02:25
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Andrew Poelstra, 02:17
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Mikhail Teterin, 02:15
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Andrew Poelstra, 02:03
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Andrew Poelstra, 01:52
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, Andrew Poelstra, 01:47
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 01:44
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 01:27
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Herbert Rosenau, 01:13
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Herbert Rosenau, 01:13
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Thad Smith, 00:17
August 16, 2006
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, CBFalconer, 23:33
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, CBFalconer, 23:28
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), CBFalconer, 23:20
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Len Philpot, 23:13
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 23:04
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Keith Thompson, 22:59
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, Eric Sosman, 22:54
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, Ark, 22:42
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Ronald Bruck, 22:40
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 22:39
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Robert Gamble, 22:36
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, someone, 22:11
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Walter Roberson, 22:10
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, websnarf, 22:08
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, someone, 22:08
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), websnarf, 21:59
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Ian Collins, 21:57
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, Eric Sosman, 21:54
- Re: Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Dik T. Winter, 21:43
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, pete, 21:41
- Re: "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, someone, 21:41
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Barry Schwarz, 21:39
- "To many files open error <EMFILE>" bug, someone, 21:38
- Re: programming wiki needs you, pete, 21:36
- Re: Screen Editing, Keith Thompson, 21:18
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, websnarf, 21:06
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Keith Thompson, 21:05
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Frederick Gotham, 21:05
- Should attachments be accepted in comp.lang.c?, Keith Thompson, 21:03
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 21:01
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 20:58
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, websnarf, 20:56
- Re: Screen Editing, Christopher Benson-Manica, 20:54
- Re: OT: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Al Balmer, 20:38
- Screen Editing, someone, 20:33
- Re: Can Someone please help?, CBFalconer, 20:33
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 20:29
- Re: Can Someone please help?, CBFalconer, 20:29
- Re: 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, CBFalconer, 20:22
- Re: Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, CBFalconer, 20:17
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Philip Guenther, 20:09
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Ian Collins, 20:08
- OT: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Mikhail Teterin, 20:03
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Keith Thompson, 19:54
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Mikhail Teterin, 19:44
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Frederick Gotham, 19:35
- Re: Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Frederick Gotham, 19:34
- Re: Anyone have The Waite Group's 'Learning C' floppies?, Robert Gamble, 19:33
- Re: Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 19:30
- Newbie needs help with pointers/memory allocation, Me Alone, 19:06
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Frederick Gotham, 18:57
- Re: Calling a python script, and getting the returned result in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:30
- Benchmark results (Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine), Mikhail Teterin, 18:27
- Re: Calling a python script, and getting the returned result in C, Default User, 18:18
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: || and &&, lawrence . jones, 18:10
- Calling a python script, and getting the returned result in C, Shuaib, 18:05
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Ancient_Hacker, 17:31
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, gw7rib, 17:26
- Re: Pointer question, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: || and &&, Chris F.A. Johnson, 17:08
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: || and &&, Mark McIntyre, 17:01
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: question, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: question <OT: K&R Versions>, Default User, 16:55
- Re: question, Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: how to test the overflow, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: question <OT: Programmer intellect.>, Andrew Poelstra, 16:38
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Keith Thompson, 16:35
- Re: question, Andrew Poelstra, 16:34
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: question <OT: K&R Versions>, Andrew Poelstra, 16:31
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Frederick Gotham, 15:58
- Re: [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 15:32
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, Michael Mair, 15:29
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Michael Mair, 15:23
- Anyone have The Waite Group's 'Learning C' floppies?, news.usenetbinaries.com, 15:18
- Re: Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, Stephen Sprunk, 15:15
- Re: Pointer question, Charles Richmond, 15:08
- Re: question, Martin Ambuhl, 14:47
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 14:31
- Re: could use help on a simple problem, kshanholtzer, 14:12
- Re: could use help on a simple problem, osmium, 14:10
- [crosspost] Programowanie w C uC a unit testy, Kurciok, 14:07
- could use help on a simple problem, porky008, 13:52
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), Michael Mair, 13:40
- Re: question, osmium, 13:39
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:14
- Re: how to test the overflow, Michael Mair, 13:11
- Re: help for writing my own assert(), John F, 13:07
- Re: question, Coos Haak, 13:03
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Walter Roberson, 13:02
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Simon Biber, 12:53
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Keith Thompson, 12:53
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Keith Thompson, 12:52
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 12:48
- help for writing my own assert(), priyanka, 12:48
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 12:48
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Keith Thompson, 12:44
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, gareth . p . davies, 12:40
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Walter Roberson, 12:38
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Keith Thompson, 12:38
- Re: Platform Independence, jmcgill, 12:35
- Re: Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, Keith Thompson, 12:35
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Rudolf, 12:33
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 12:04
- Re: how to test the overflow, Ancient_Hacker, 11:59
- Re: Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, Walter Roberson, 11:54
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Richard Tobin, 11:52
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 11:52
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 11:50
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:49
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Simon Biber, 11:43
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Simon Biber, 11:38
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 11:37
- Re: Platform Independence, Walter Roberson, 11:35
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:27
- Re: Can Someone please help?, Lew Pitcher, 11:25
- Re: question, osmium, 11:17
- Can Someone please help?, Tiny Tim, 11:16
- Re: programming wiki needs you, Arild Hystad, 11:13
- Re: question, Ancient_Hacker, 11:00
- Re: question, Andrew Poelstra, 10:22
- Re: question, Lowell Gilbert, 10:09
- question, darklight, 10:04
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Flash Gordon, 09:32
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 09:32
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning. THANKS GUYS!!!, Charles Sullivan, 09:28
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Ancient_Hacker, 09:20
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Sven, 09:10
- Re: how to test the overflow, starffly@xxxxxxxxx, 09:08
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, XSPD, 08:55
- Re: Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, MQ, 08:47
- 2004-2006 EXECryptor 2 years uncracked, hanzprof, 08:41
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Eric Sosman, 08:36
- Re: || and &&, Robert Latest, 08:04
- Re: Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Ancient_Hacker, 08:01
- Incorrect time_t value from time() in signal handler, Sven, 07:40
- Re: Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, Ancient_Hacker, 07:24
- Can we determine stack size & Heap size at runtime ?, sunny, 07:06
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, goose, 05:47
- Re: Platform Independence, Keith Thompson, 04:41
- Re: Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, Chris Hills, 04:34
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Chris Dollin, 04:33
- Re: Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, Keith Thompson, 04:33
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 02:48
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 02:48
- Re: integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, Ark, 02:40
- Re: "extern" question?, Ark, 02:06
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Herbert Rosenau, 01:45
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Herbert Rosenau, 01:45
- Re: Platform Independence, Herbert Rosenau, 01:45
- Re: Platform Independence, Herbert Rosenau, 01:45
- OT: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Andrew Poelstra, 01:40
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Andrew Poelstra, 01:24
- Re: Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, Andrew Poelstra, 01:18
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Andrew Poelstra, 01:14
- Re: || and &&, mdh, 00:59
- Re: "extern" question?, sarathy, 00:48
- integer promotion and arithmetic conversion, sarathy, 00:37
August 15, 2006
- Re: "extern" question?, Jack Klein, 23:53
- Re: || and &&, CBFalconer, 22:07
- Re: "extern" question?, Ark, 21:48
- Re: programming wiki needs you, pete, 21:26
- Re: Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, Keith Thompson, 21:21
- Software Testing & Quality Assurance FAQ, paklookup, 21:08
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 21:01
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 21:01
- Re: Unicode characters, J. J. Farrell, 20:48
- Re: || and &&, dcorbit, 20:38
- Re: how to fake argv?, Gordon Burditt, 19:18
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Gordon Burditt, 19:05
- Re: Unicode characters, Dik T. Winter, 18:26
- Re: || and &&, Frederick Gotham, 18:17
- Re: "extern" question?, Jack Klein, 18:15
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, CBFalconer, 18:09
- Re: || and &&, Mark McIntyre, 18:02
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Mark McIntyre, 17:54
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Eric Sosman, 17:51
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Michael Mair, 17:02
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation redux, Andrew Poelstra, 17:00
- Re: || and &&, mdh, 16:21
- Re: I want to know how to create TSRs for the Windows XP using C., dcorbit, 16:21
- Re: || and &&, David Wade, 16:15
- Re: || and &&, mdh, 16:15
- Re: || and &&, jmcgill, 16:11
- Re: || and &&, dcorbit, 16:06
- Re: programming wiki needs you, dcorbit, 16:00
- || and &&, mdh, 15:48
- "extern" question?, jchludzinski@xxxxxxxxx, 15:27
- Re: Pointer question, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: Pointer question, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 14:52
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Walter Roberson, 14:02
- Re: Numerical overflow, Parachute, 13:56
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Herbert Rosenau, 13:33
- Newbie - itoa implementation redux, gareth . p . davies, 13:00
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Default User, 12:56
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ivanna Pee, 12:43
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Clark S . Cox III, 12:40
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ancient_Hacker, 12:40
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Clark S . Cox III, 12:36
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Clark S . Cox III, 12:29
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Simon Biber, 12:28
- programming wiki needs you, da404LewZer, 12:25
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Walter Roberson, 12:17
- Re: how to fake argv?, Eric Sosman, 11:42
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Al Balmer, 11:35
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Al Balmer, 11:31
- Millionare's tip, theinternetbillionaire, 11:30
- Re: How to fool getpass(), jmcgill, 11:27
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Al Balmer, 11:26
- Re: How to fool getpass(), Robert Gamble, 11:11
- How to fool getpass(), marekdec, 11:04
- Re: Unicode characters, Thomas Lumley, 10:57
- Re: Unicode characters, Lew Pitcher, 10:49
- Re: how to fake argv?, trm, 10:43
- Re: Unicode characters, Phlip, 10:29
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Chris Dollin, 09:56
- Re: Pointer question, Michael, 09:44
- Re: Pointer question, Frederick Gotham, 09:31
- Re: Pointer question, Frederick Gotham, 09:24
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ivanna Pee, 09:15
- Re: Pointer question, Thomas J. Gritzan, 09:06
- Re: Pointer question, Michael, 08:46
- Re: how to fake argv?, Frederick Gotham, 08:44
- Re: how to fake argv?, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:33
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ancient_Hacker, 08:18
- how to fake argv?, mwebel, 08:12
- Re: Pointer question, Ancient_Hacker, 07:49
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Chris Hills, 07:30
- Pointer question, Michael, 07:24
- Unicode characters, abhi147, 07:01
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Frederick Gotham, 06:35
- Re: array of size 1, Simon Biber, 06:30
- Re: Numerical overflow, Ancient_Hacker, 06:25
- Re: I want to know how to create TSRs for the Windows XP using C., Ancient_Hacker, 06:22
- I want to know how to create TSRs for the Windows XP using C., ud, 06:18
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Simon Biber, 05:46
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Keith Thompson, 05:00
- Re: writing wide chars, Elie Roux, 04:39
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, goose, 04:02
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ian Collins, 03:36
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Nick Keighley, 03:30
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Nick Keighley, 03:20
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, jaysome, 03:20
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Chris Hills, 03:17
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Chris Hills, 03:14
- Re: need def for conio.h, Andrew Poelstra, 02:59
- Numerical overflow, Parachute, 02:48
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Thomas J. Gritzan, 02:27
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Skarmander, 02:18
- OT: Re: Meaning of unsigned char, ena8t8si, 02:09
- OT: Re: NULL pointer initialization, ena8t8si, 02:02
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, ena8t8si, 01:58
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, ena8t8si, 01:56
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Robert Gamble, 01:25
- Re: Pointer Problem, Keith Thompson, 01:12
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Keith Thompson, 01:04
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Jack Klein, 00:59
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Jack Klein, 00:56
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Jack Klein, 00:53
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 00:44
- Re: program confusion, Barry Schwarz, 00:40
- [OT] Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 00:09
August 14, 2006
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Ark, 23:55
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, J. J. Farrell, 23:20
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Mikhail Teterin, 22:45
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Simon Biber, 22:43
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 22:41
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 22:37
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Frederick Gotham, 22:35
- Re: memory managers and malloc/free, Ark, 22:25
- Re: Platform Independence, Ark, 22:11
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Andrew Poelstra, 22:08
- Re: program confusion, Andrew Poelstra, 22:06
- Re: program confusion, Eric Sosman, 22:06
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, jmcgill, 22:03
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Barry Schwarz, 21:52
- Re: program confusion, Barry Schwarz, 21:52
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Barry Schwarz, 21:52
- Re: Pointer Problem, Barry Schwarz, 21:52
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Simon Biber, 21:51
- Re: writing wide chars, Simon Biber, 21:43
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Eric Sosman, 21:29
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Robert Gamble, 21:08
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Ben Pfaff, 20:57
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Frederick Gotham, 20:52
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, jmcgill, 20:50
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, J. J. Farrell, 20:22
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Ian Collins, 19:16
- Re: How to change colour of console text in c, Gordon Burditt, 19:07
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Keith Thompson, 18:51
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 18:47
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, jmcgill, 17:53
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Flash Gordon, 17:51
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Frederick Gotham, 17:43
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, James Brown, 17:39
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Keith Thompson, 17:34
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Keith Thompson, 17:28
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Eric Sosman, 17:19
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Keith Thompson, 17:13
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Michael Mair, 17:13
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Herbert Rosenau, 17:07
- Re: program confusion, Herbert Rosenau, 17:07
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Herbert Rosenau, 17:07
- Re: string2float, Robert Gamble, 17:05
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: ULONG_LONG_MAX and gcc 3.4.1, Mark McIntyre, 17:02
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: NULL pointer initialization, Walter Roberson, 16:54
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 16:53
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, ena8t8si, 16:48
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 16:46
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 16:45
- NULL pointer initialization, James Brown, 16:43
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Walter Roberson, 16:41
- Re: string2float, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, greg_chu, 16:32
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Keith Thompson, 16:25
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, greg_chu, 16:22
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:16
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Michael Mair, 16:06
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Flash Gordon, 15:54
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Flash Gordon, 15:49
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Michael Wojcik, 15:47
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Stephen Sprunk, 15:43
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 15:34
- quine_C.c, pemo, 15:19
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Eric Sosman, 15:14
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Herbert Rosenau, 14:59
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Flash Gordon, 14:38
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, jmcgill, 14:30
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Lew Pitcher, 14:27
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, skumar434, 14:23
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Walter Roberson, 14:21
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Skarmander, 14:18
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Walter Roberson, 14:07
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Mikhail Teterin, 13:50
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:46
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Flash Gordon, 13:06
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, gareth . p . davies, 13:02
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, jmcgill, 12:58
- Re: sizeof(EmptyStruct) in C and C++, Clark S . Cox III, 12:57
- Re: List available kernel functions with descriptions., Flash Gordon, 12:57
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Flash Gordon, 12:50
- Re: how to test the overflow, Ancient_Hacker, 12:46
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Frederick Gotham, 12:37
- Re: array of size 1, Frederick Gotham, 12:28
- Re: get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, Eric Sosman, 12:05
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, skumar434, 12:00
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Nick Keighley, 11:56
- get the ip address and map a drive according to IP, greg_chu, 11:56
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Lew Pitcher, 11:22
- Re: Meaning of unsigned char, Chris Dollin, 11:22
- Re: how to test the overflow, Eric Sosman, 11:16
- Meaning of unsigned char, sarathy, 11:16
- Re: Platform Independence, Eric Sosman, 11:08
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Walter Roberson, 10:46
- Re: program confusion, Andrew Poelstra, 10:43
- Re: program confusion, Andrew Poelstra, 10:41
- Re: List available kernel functions with descriptions., dspfun, 10:36
- Re: New to C language - HELP Required, Phlip, 10:32
- List available kernel functions with descriptions., dspfun, 10:27
- New to C language - HELP Required, sri, 10:14
- writing wide chars, Elie Roux, 09:36
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Lew Pitcher, 09:24
- Re: Pointer Problem, Racaille, 09:19
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 09:04
- Re: Storage of char in 64 bit machine, Chris Dollin, 09:02
- Storage of char in 64 bit machine, aruna . mysore, 08:55
- Re: string2float, Robert Gamble, 08:53
- Re: how to test the overflow, Eric Sosman, 08:50
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, ena8t8si, 08:50
- Re: how to test value's overflow without comparison, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 08:18
- Re: string2float, Flash Gordon, 07:57
- how to test value's overflow without comparison, starffly@xxxxxxxxx, 07:55
- how to test the overflow, starffly@xxxxxxxxx, 07:44
- Re: string2float, Eric Sosman, 07:42
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, pete, 07:04
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, pete, 06:57
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, pete, 06:49
- Re: sizeof(EmptyStruct) in C and C++, Igmar Palsenberg, 05:32
- Re: sizeof(EmptyStruct) in C and C++, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:30
- Re: array of size 1, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:29
- Re: string2float, Chris McDonald, 05:10
- Re: array of size 1, Sweta, 05:08
- string2float, pontiy . pilat, 05:06
- Re: sizeof(EmptyStruct) in C and C++, Sweta, 04:55
- Re: program confusion, Nick Keighley, 04:18
- Re: program confusion, Nick Keighley, 04:15
- Re: array of size 1, Roman Mashak, 04:14
- Re: array of size 1, jaysome, 04:11
- Re: program confusion, jaysome, 04:08
- array of size 1, Roman Mashak, 03:43
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: static array, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: c interview, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: not able to free up a string..., Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Dave Thompson, 02:59
- Re: program confusion, atpalmer, 02:28
- Re: program confusion, Bill Pursell, 02:04
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 02:04
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Bill Pursell, 01:57
- Re: How to change colour of console text in c, Thomas Matthews, 01:29
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Thomas Matthews, 01:23
- Re: program confusion, Thomas Matthews, 01:21
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Michael Mair, 01:19
August 13, 2006
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, skumar434, 23:30
- Re: program confusion, Snis Pilbor, 22:37
- Re: program confusion, Andrew Poelstra, 21:38
- Re: program confusion, J. J. Farrell, 21:26
- Re: program confusion, Andrew Poelstra, 21:23
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, gcary, 21:18
- Re: program confusion, osmium, 20:14
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 20:07
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 20:04
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, MQ, 20:01
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 19:16
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 18:40
- Re: program confusion, someone, 18:29
- Re: program confusion, someone, 18:26
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, pete, 18:16
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 17:59
- Re: program confusion, osmium, 17:58
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 17:53
- program confusion, someone, 17:43
- program confusion, someone, 17:42
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 17:28
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Clark S . Cox III, 17:23
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Keith Thompson, 17:20
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Michael Mair, 17:19
- Re: C99 stdint.h, ena8t8si, 17:11
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Michael Mair, 17:09
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Michael Mair, 17:03
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Harald van Dijk, 16:48
- Re: C99 stdint.h, ena8t8si, 16:37
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Eric Sosman, 16:19
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 16:17
- Re: structure size, Eric Sosman, 16:16
- Re: sizeof, Hallvard B Furuseth, 16:14
- Re: structure size, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: structure size, amit, 15:57
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Keith Thompson, 15:47
- Re: switch statement with the string being tested, Bill Pursell, 15:44
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- switch statement with the string being tested, priyanka, 15:30
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Harald van Dijk, 15:29
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Keith Thompson, 15:17
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Keith Thompson, 15:16
- Re: structure size, Keith Thompson, 15:15
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, ena8t8si, 14:27
- Re: C99 stdint.h, ena8t8si, 14:24
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Barry Schwarz, 14:22
- Re: Platform Independence, Stephen Sprunk, 14:12
- Re: Pointer Problem, Barry Schwarz, 14:11
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Barry Schwarz, 14:11
- Re: problem with strtok(), Ben Pfaff, 13:43
- Re: problem with strtok(), Stan Milam, 13:28
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 13:23
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Jack Klein, 12:58
- Re: help! desperatly seeking for the answer... encryption problem, Walter Roberson, 12:27
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 12:17
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 12:14
- help! desperatly seeking for the answer... encryption problem, marionane, 12:05
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Andrew Poelstra, 11:15
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Andrew Poelstra, 11:13
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Snis Pilbor, 10:59
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Frederick Gotham, 10:57
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Simon Biber, 10:50
- Re: Platform Independence, Ancient_Hacker, 10:49
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Mark McIntyre, 10:43
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Mark McIntyre, 10:41
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Mark McIntyre, 10:41
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Ancient_Hacker, 09:47
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pemo, 09:23
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, gareth . p . davies, 09:20
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, MQ, 09:14
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., Morris Dovey, 09:10
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pemo, 09:05
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, Harald van Dijk, 08:50
- Re: structure size, Eric Sosman, 08:29
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 08:23
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, MQ, 07:59
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., pete, 07:48
- Re: Newbie - itoa implementation, pete, 07:38
- Re: Platform Independence, Herbert Rosenau, 07:06
- Newbie - itoa implementation, gareth . p . davies, 06:44
- structure size, dis_is_eagle, 06:23
- Re: passing a 2-D array to a function by reference.., Flash Gordon, 06:11
- Re: passing a 2-D array to a function by reference.., Michael Mair, 05:20
- Re: Pointer Problem, av, 05:15
- Re: Platform Independence, Flash Gordon, 05:08
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Harald van Dijk, 05:01
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Flash Gordon, 04:54
- passing a 2-D array to a function by reference.., sonaliagr, 04:42
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Michael Mair, 04:10
- Re: Platform Independence, Ian Collins, 01:25
- Re: Platform Independence, napi, 01:18
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Ivars, 01:08
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., Jack Klein, 01:06
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Peter "Shaggy" Haywood, 00:41
- Re: understanding link list, Dag Viken, 00:09
- Re: Learning GTK+, jmcgill, 00:05
August 12, 2006
- Re: How to change colour of console text in c, invalidinvalidinvalid, 23:25
- Learning GTK+, red_hax0r@xxxxxxxxx, 22:58
- Re: understanding link list, stonemcstone, 22:52
- Re: understanding link list, Ben Pfaff, 22:28
- Re: understanding link list, Morris Dovey, 20:22
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., Morris Dovey, 20:11
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Dik T. Winter, 20:07
- understanding link list, bitshadow, 20:07
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Dik T. Winter, 20:05
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Dik T. Winter, 20:03
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Dik T. Winter, 19:55
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 19:55
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 19:55
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Dik T. Winter, 19:50
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Dik T. Winter, 19:49
- Re: Modified gets_ws() function, Barry Schwarz, 19:13
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., ena8t8si, 18:39
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, nk, 18:20
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., pete, 18:19
- Re: sizeof, ena8t8si, 18:04
- Re: Question about sequence points, Clark S . Cox III, 18:01
- Re: memory managers and malloc/free, Clark S . Cox III, 17:55
- Re: C99 stdint.h, ena8t8si, 17:54
- Re: Natural size: int, ena8t8si, 17:52
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 17:50
- Re: Help me understand this compiler warning., Morris Dovey, 17:38
- Help me understand this compiler warning., Charles Sullivan, 17:25
- Re: Pointer Problem, Ian Collins, 17:24
- Re: Platform Independence, Thad Smith, 17:05
- Re: memory managers and malloc/free, Eric Sosman, 16:35
- Re: Platform Independence, Eric Sosman, 16:16
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, Andrew Poelstra, 16:15
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, Flash Gordon, 15:09
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, Default User, 14:39
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, Coos Haak, 14:37
- memory managers and malloc/free, arne . muller, 14:36
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, osmium, 14:35
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, nk, 14:23
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, nk, 14:22
- Re: Modified gets_ws() function, Andrew Poelstra, 13:08
- Re: Modified gets_ws() function, Andrew Poelstra, 13:05
- Modified gets_ws() function, Andrew Poelstra, 12:57
- Re: sizeof, Andrew Poelstra, 11:30
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Joe Wright, 11:25
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, Andrew Poelstra, 11:24
- Re: Help needed for a string sorting pragram, hankssong, 10:49
- Help needed for a string sorting pragram, nk, 10:33
- Re: Pointer Problem, Christoph Schweers, 09:31
- Re: Pointer Problem, Thomas J. Gritzan, 09:26
- Re: Pointer Problem, Christoph Schweers, 09:19
- Re: Pointer Problem, Racaille, 09:13
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 07:48
- Re: Platform Independence, Ian Collins, 07:22
- Re: Pointer Problem, Ian Collins, 07:19
- Pointer Problem, Sikandar, 07:04
- OT - Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, goose, 06:03
- Re: How to change colour of console text in c, Keith Thompson, 05:52
- Platform Independence, Andy, 05:46
- Re: sizeof, goose, 05:43
- How to change colour of console text in c, gurdz, 05:20
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, J. J. Farrell, 04:58
- Re: a question about constant, phoenix_keeper, 04:58
- Use eBay? Get 100+ POSITIVE FEEDBACK in just 7 days, Adam L, 04:12
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Harald van Dijk, 03:13
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Michael Mair, 03:08
- Re: sizeof, Andrew Poelstra, 02:08
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Andrew Poelstra, 01:59
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Harald van Dijk, 01:45
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Andrew Poelstra, 01:04
- Re: problem with strtok(), pete, 00:51
- Re: can u explain this code?, Andrew Poelstra, 00:46
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Andrew Poelstra, 00:42
- Re: problem with strtok(), Keith Thompson, 00:07
August 11, 2006
- problem with strtok(), Michael, 23:48
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, MQ, 22:22
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Keith Thompson, 22:17
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 21:52
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Tom St Denis, 21:03
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Len Philpot, 20:58
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, J. J. Farrell, 20:53
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Barry Schwarz, 20:24
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Barry Schwarz, 20:10
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Al Balmer, 19:43
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Racaille, 19:42
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Al Balmer, 19:40
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 19:39
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Al Balmer, 19:38
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Robert Gamble, 19:34
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Keith Thompson, 19:25
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 19:21
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 19:18
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, websnarf, 19:15
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 19:14
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Richard Heathfield, 19:13
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Richard Heathfield, 19:12
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 19:08
- Re: sizeof, Joe Wright, 19:06
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 19:04
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 19:01
- Re: need def for conio.h, jmcgill, 19:01
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 19:00
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 18:59
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Al Balmer, 18:58
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 18:57
- Re: sizeof, Mikhail Teterin, 18:51
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 18:50
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Mikhail Teterin, 18:44
- Re: need def for conio.h, Al Balmer, 18:43
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 18:41
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Michael Mair, 18:39
- Re: Posting sample C-code as attachment, Keith Thompson, 18:38
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Keith Thompson, 18:36
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 18:35
- Re: need def for conio.h, Al Balmer, 18:34
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Keith Thompson, 18:30
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 18:25
- Posting sample C-code as attachment, Mikhail Teterin, 18:24
- Re: need def for conio.h, jmcgill, 18:21
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 18:17
- Re: need def for conio.h, pete, 18:14
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 18:14
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, gcary, 18:08
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, jmcgill, 18:07
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Robert Gamble, 18:06
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 17:59
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 17:56
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 17:52
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Eric Sosman, 17:46
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Richard Tobin, 17:43
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Tom St Denis, 17:38
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Keith Thompson, 17:36
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 17:30
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Keith Thompson, 17:29
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 17:27
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Ian Collins, 17:26
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Keith Thompson, 17:21
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 17:16
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Richard Heathfield, 17:09
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 17:01
- Re: passing a union's field to a function, Richard Heathfield, 16:57
- Re: How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, Richard Heathfield, 16:53
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Keith Thompson, 16:51
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, phlip2005, 16:49
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Tom St Denis, 16:38
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, gcary, 16:26
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, dcorbit, 16:24
- Re: need def for conio.h, dcorbit, 16:15
- passing a union's field to a function, Mikhail Teterin, 16:13
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, websnarf, 16:09
- How to assign memory dynamically to a array of structures, skumar434, 16:07
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Kevin Handy, 16:00
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, jmcgill, 15:57
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Ian Collins, 15:57
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Ben Pfaff, 15:56
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, David Resnick, 15:53
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, websnarf, 15:48
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, patrik . weibull, 15:41
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Al Balmer, 15:33
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Al Balmer, 15:29
- Re: Does C distinguish between a C source file and a text file?, Keith Thompson, 15:27
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Keith Thompson, 15:22
- Re: Does C distinguish between a C source file and a text file?, Al Balmer, 15:19
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Al Balmer, 15:12
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Tom St Denis, 14:49
- Re: Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, David Resnick, 14:49
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, jacob navia, 14:44
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:38
- Re: need def for conio.h, Keith Thompson, 14:32
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 14:04
- Re: [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Frederick Gotham, 14:02
- Re: need def for conio.h, jmcgill, 13:59
- [OT] Friendly warning - BACK UP TODAY!, Richard Heathfield, 13:42
- Re: need def for conio.h, Al Balmer, 13:36
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 13:31
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Al Balmer, 13:25
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Flash Gordon, 13:24
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Flash Gordon, 13:22
- Re: Does C distinguish between a C source file and a text file?, amit, 12:48
- Re:[OT] TDD doesn't suck, Al Balmer, 12:36
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Default User, 12:15
- Re: Natural size: int, Eric Sosman, 11:41
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 10:45
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Tom St Denis, 10:37
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Frederick Gotham, 10:27
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 09:33
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, jacob navia, 09:29
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Charles Richmond, 09:18
- Re: Natural size: int, Tom St Denis, 08:58
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard, 08:46
- Re: need def for conio.h, jacob navia, 08:40
- Re: sizeof, Hallvard B Furuseth, 07:30
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 06:57
- Re: dynamically allocate a multidimensional array, xhunga, 06:37
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, vishsid3, 06:16
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Martin Ambuhl, 05:30
- Re: need def for conio.h, Martin Ambuhl, 05:29
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Giorgio Silvestri, 05:27
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Giorgio Silvestri, 05:20
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 05:02
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Serve Laurijssen, 04:34
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Chris Hills, 04:25
- Re: decaying of array, Keith Thompson, 04:21
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Richard Bos, 04:17
- Re: need def for conio.h, Chris Dollin, 04:11
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Keith Thompson, 04:01
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Chris Dollin, 04:00
- Re: need def for conio.h, jmcgill, 03:59
- Re: need def for conio.h, J. J. Farrell, 03:42
- Re: decaying of array, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 03:33
- Re: need def for conio.h, Richard Heathfield, 03:30
- Re: need def for conio.h, Richard Heathfield, 03:29
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Rod Pemberton, 03:19
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks - samfind, Richard Bos, 03:16
- need def for conio.h, annai, 03:14
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard Bos, 03:13
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Richard Bos, 03:08
- Earn $3252 Weekly Send Emails, dataentry . nilam . 1, 03:06
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Richard Bos, 03:05
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Richard Bos, 03:03
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, swets, 03:02
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 03:01
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 02:58
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 02:56
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Keith Thompson, 02:41
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Keith Thompson, 02:24
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Martin Ambuhl, 02:19
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 02:18
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard Heathfield, 02:15
- Re: Network application design, Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 02:09
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Ivars, 02:03
- Re: a question about constant, Rod Pemberton, 02:00
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 01:06
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 01:06
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 01:04
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 01:03
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, goose, 01:01
- Re: Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Barry Schwarz, 00:57
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Barry Schwarz, 00:49
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 00:44
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, Thad Smith, 00:20
August 10, 2006
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, gcary, 23:55
- Can I Trust Pointer Arithmetic In Re-Allocated Memory?, Bill Reid, 23:54
- Re: a question about constant, J. J. Farrell, 23:11
- Re: Natural size: int, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:03
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Thomas Matthews, 22:59
- Re: a question about constant, Thomas Matthews, 22:50
- Re: a question about constant, Keith Thompson, 22:44
- a question about constant, phoenix_keeper, 22:11
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Rod Pemberton, 22:06
- Re: Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, Chris Torek, 21:31
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Barry Schwarz, 21:22
- Re: i need help in structures ....., Barry Schwarz, 21:15
- Re: Mega Newbie pointer question, Chris Torek, 20:54
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 20:05
- Re: Natural size: int, Frederick Gotham, 20:00
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 19:56
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Frederick Gotham, 19:54
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Gordon Burditt, 19:51
- Re: Natural size: int, Dik T. Winter, 19:40
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Robert Gamble, 19:36
- Re: Network application design, jmcgill, 19:35
- Re: sizeof, Dik T. Winter, 19:30
- Re: sizeof, Dik T. Winter, 19:27
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 19:21
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Keith Thompson, 19:17
- Need Help Declaring a Pointer to an Array of Structures, gcary, 19:16
- Re: Network application design, ozbear, 19:13
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Allan M. Bruce, 19:01
- Re: cannot use char and integer in the same program, Ian Collins, 19:00
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 18:58
- Re: Natural size: int, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 18:55
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 18:54
- cannot use char and integer in the same program, yaniv . dg, 18:52
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 18:51
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Michael Wojcik, 18:51
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Keith Thompson, 18:43
- Re: Natural size: int, Eric Sosman, 18:36
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 18:36
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Keith Thompson, 18:33
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 18:25
- Re: Natural size: int, Eric Sosman, 18:13
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: dynamically allocate a multidimensional array, Michael Mair, 18:10
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 18:07
- Re: Recursive structure?, Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: help me plz i am really in need of solution, Michael Mair, 17:01
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks - samfind, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Fred Kleinschmidt, 16:54
- Re: help me plz i am really in need of solution, Flash Gordon, 16:53
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 16:45
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Flash Gordon, 16:38
- Re: Need help with structures and files, Michael Mair, 16:36
- Re: Natural size: int, Giorgio Silvestri, 16:34
- Re: Does C distinguish between a C source file and a text file?, Flash Gordon, 16:26
- Re: Natural size: int, Giorgio Silvestri, 16:25
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Ian Collins, 16:11
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Morris Dovey, 16:05
- Re: Natural size: int, Frederick Gotham, 16:04
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks -, Al Balmer, 16:03
- Re: decaying of array, Default User, 16:02
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks -, Default User, 15:59
- Re: sizeof, Default User, 15:58
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Al Balmer, 15:54
- Re: sizeof, J. J. Farrell, 15:50
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Giorgio Silvestri, 15:49
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 15:48
- help me plz i am really in need of solution, skumar434, 15:48
- Re: sizeof, J. J. Farrell, 15:36
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 15:30
- Re: sizeof, J. J. Farrell, 15:29
- Re: Recursive structure?, Morris Dovey, 15:29
- Re: help me pls, Skarmander, 15:23
- Re: sizeof, ena8t8si, 15:19
- Re: access struct member fields dynamically, Morris Dovey, 15:17
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, ena8t8si, 15:15
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 15:13
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 15:08
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, Keith Thompson, 15:06
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, ena8t8si, 15:04
- Re: Natural size: int, ena8t8si, 15:01
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Harald van Dijk, 14:59
- access struct member fields dynamically, sean . scanlon, 14:59
- Re: Natural size: int, ena8t8si, 14:59
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 14:57
- help me pls, ZaiL, 14:57
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, ena8t8si, 14:56
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 14:56
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Flash Gordon, 14:55
- Re: decaying of array, Eric Sosman, 14:54
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Eric Sosman, 14:51
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 14:50
- Re: Recursive structure?, Keith Thompson, 14:48
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 14:48
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 14:47
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Keith Thompson, 14:44
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks -, Justin, 14:40
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 14:38
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Serve Laurijssen, 14:34
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 14:23
- decaying of array, dis_is_eagle, 14:18
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 14:16
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Richard Heathfield, 14:13
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, av, 14:12
- Re: Natural size: int, av, 14:12
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Richard Heathfield, 14:10
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 14:03
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 13:30
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 13:29
- Re: Mega Newbie pointer question, Mike Wahler, 13:22
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Al Balmer, 13:19
- Re: pointer to *this, Default User, 13:06
- Need help with structures and files, skumar434, 13:06
- Re: switches, Default User, 13:05
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Al Balmer, 13:04
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 12:16
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 12:14
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, goose, 12:13
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks - samfind, Eric Sosman, 12:06
- Re: i need help in structures ....., skumar434, 12:05
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 12:02
- Re: Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks -, Tom St Denis, 12:02
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Eric Sosman, 12:02
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 12:01
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 12:00
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 11:58
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 11:57
- Latest in Ajax - Coming out in Private Beta in the next couple of weeks - samfind, Justin, 11:56
- dynamically allocate a multidimensional array, xhunga, 11:56
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 11:51
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 11:45
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 11:41
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
- Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin, 11:37
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Chris Dollin, 11:36
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Kenneth Brody, 11:32
- Re: sizeof, Sarcastic Zombie, 11:31
- Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin, 11:30
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 11:29
- Re: sizeof, goose, 11:29
- Re: code portability, Chris Dollin, 11:27
- Re: sizeof, Sarcastic Zombie, 11:26
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield, 11:21
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 11:15
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 11:14
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield, 11:05
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Richard Heathfield, 11:03
- Re: sizeof, Lew Pitcher, 11:03
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:57
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 10:54
- Re: code portability, Phlip, 10:51
- Re: sizeof, Richard, 10:50
- Re: code portability, Richard, 10:49
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 10:45
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, goose, 10:45
- Stopping Repetitive Strain Injuries, stoprsi, 10:38
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 10:36
- Re: sizeof, Frederick Gotham, 10:35
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:30
- sizeof, Richard, 10:28
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, goose, 10:27
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, goose, 10:23
- Re: code portability, Chris Dollin, 10:03
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 10:01
- Mega Newbie pointer question, Beginner, 09:54
- Re: Recursive structure?, Morris Dovey, 09:54
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:51
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:44
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:41
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Philip Potter, 09:34
- Re: code portability, Chris Dollin, 09:29
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Nick Keighley, 09:28
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:26
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:20
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, Chris Dollin, 09:16
- Re: realloc causing segfault (under Electric Fence), David Resnick, 09:16
- Re: realloc causing segfault (under Electric Fence), "Nils O. Selåsdal", 09:08
- Re: realloc causing segfault (under Electric Fence), Richard Bos, 09:08
- realloc causing segfault (under Electric Fence), kj, 09:00
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Dik T. Winter, 08:48
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 08:40
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, ramasubramanian . rahul, 08:31
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, ramasubramanian . rahul, 08:31
- Re: Help Needed : Race condition while removing semaphore(sysvsem semaphore), Richard Bos, 08:27
- Re: Trying to understand "restrict", Richard Bos, 08:26
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 08:23
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 08:22
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 08:20
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Christopher Benson-Manica, 08:11
- Re: Help Needed : Race condition while removing semaphore(sysvsem semaphore), zhao.kaiyong@xxxxxxxxx, 08:01
- Re: volatile and pointer functions, manmohan, 07:59
- Re: Natural size: int, Hallvard B Furuseth, 07:48
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Michel Bardiaux, 07:45
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 07:42
- volatile and pointer functions, venky, 07:41
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 07:40
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 07:39
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, djhulme, 07:37
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 07:21
- Re: pointer to *this, liorlew, 07:07
- Re: pointer to *this, liorlew, 07:06
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, pete, 06:34
- Re: shared library accessing common data, Nick Keighley, 06:24
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Richard Bos, 06:23
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Keith Thompson, 05:58
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Chris Dollin, 05:57
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 05:44
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 05:39
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Ian Collins, 05:19
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Ian Collins, 05:18
- Does C distinguish between a C source file and a text file?, amit, 05:17
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, amit, 05:12
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, Keith Thompson, 04:28
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, vish, 04:17
- Re: Trying to understand "restrict", websnarf, 03:58
- Help Needed : Race condition while removing semaphore(sysvsem semaphore), techi_C, 03:51
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 03:50
- Re: switches, Flash Gordon, 03:50
- Re: switches, Jonathan H. Justvig, 03:42
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 03:34
- Re: switches, Richard Heathfield, 03:11
- switches, Jonathan H. Justvig, 03:00
- Re: How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, tinysisi, 02:49
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jaysome, 02:48
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Richard Bos, 02:32
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard Bos, 02:29
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Keith Thompson, 02:26
- How can I run a c executable in pwd ,while the executable is in some other directory, vishsid3, 02:26
- Re: switches, Keith Thompson, 02:16
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 02:13
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, av, 02:04
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Richard Heathfield, 01:25
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Ian Collins, 01:10
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Eric, 01:07
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Christopher Benson-Manica, 01:04
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Christopher Benson-Manica, 01:01
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 00:57
- Re: switches, Richard Heathfield, 00:45
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 00:29
- Re: shared library accessing common data, Richard Heathfield, 00:27
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 00:22
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Richard Heathfield, 00:18
- Re: code portability, Eigenvector, 00:17
- Re: switches, Barry Schwarz, 00:09
August 09, 2006
- Get 98% of your bill rate. Calling all h1b professionals, h1b transfers, US Green Card holders & US Citizens., Scott L / Ram S, 23:49
- Re: switches, Jonathan H. Justvig, 23:20
- Re: switches, Keith Thompson, 22:42
- shared library accessing common data, leby, 22:24
- Re: switches, Keith Thompson, 22:11
- Re: switches, Morris Dovey, 22:10
- Re: switches, levis501, 22:02
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Eric Sosman, 21:51
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Barry Schwarz, 21:40
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, jmcgill, 21:39
- Re: switches, Jonathan H. Justvig, 21:35
- Re: switches, Keith Thompson, 21:02
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, zhao.kaiyong@xxxxxxxxx, 21:02
- Re: switches, Keith Thompson, 20:38
- Re: switches, Snis Pilbor, 20:37
- Re: infinite loop detection, pete, 20:33
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Carson, 20:25
- Re: TDD doesn't suck, Al Balmer, 20:23
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Al Balmer, 20:21
- Re: i need help in structures ....., Ian Collins, 20:20
- Re: switches, Ian Collins, 20:14
- Re: i need help in structures ....., skumar434, 20:13
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 19:54
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, jmcgill, 19:29
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 19:23
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 19:11
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 19:09
- Re: Natural size: int, Ian Collins, 19:04
- Re: code portability, Phlip, 19:03
- TDD doesn't suck, Phlip, 19:01
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 18:59
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 18:50
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 18:25
- Re: Natural size: int, Chris Torek, 18:24
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Old Wolf, 18:19
- Re: i need help in structures ....., Keith Thompson, 18:14
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Eric Sosman, 17:57
- Re: Natural size: int, Ancient_Hacker, 17:40
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Eric Sosman, 17:38
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Al Balmer, 17:38
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Al Balmer, 17:34
- Re: Recursive structure?, Morris Dovey, 17:31
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Ben Pfaff, 17:29
- Re: i need help in structures ....., Ian Collins, 17:26
- Re: i need help in structures ....., skumar434, 17:16
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Dann Corbit, 17:13
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Default User, 17:11
- Re: atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, Dann Corbit, 17:10
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, akina, 17:01
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Carson, 16:47
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 16:36
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Harald van Dijk, 16:32
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Michael Mair, 16:31
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, J. J. Farrell, 16:30
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Kevin Handy, 16:29
- Re: Recursive structure?, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:23
- Re: Natural size: int, Malcolm, 16:20
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Richard Tobin, 16:18
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, my . correo . basura, 16:13
- Re: Natural size: int, Malcolm, 16:13
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Default User, 16:12
- Re: Recursive structure?, Ancient_Hacker, 16:11
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, Keith Thompson, 16:09
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: Impact on C???, Malcolm, 16:06
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Frederick Gotham, 16:02
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ancient_Hacker, 16:01
- Re: atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, Keith Thompson, 15:59
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 15:58
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, David Wade, 15:58
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 15:54
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 15:53
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Keith Thompson, 15:52
- Re: Natural size: int, Stephen Sprunk, 15:50
- Re: i need help in structures ....., Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: Natural size: int, Al Balmer, 15:43
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:43
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 15:38
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Chris Torek, 15:32
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Flash Gordon, 15:21
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 15:21
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Harald van Dijk, 15:18
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Flash Gordon, 15:05
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Dann Corbit, 14:54
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, jmcgill, 14:53
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Default User, 14:52
- Re: Looking for a library function!!, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Herbert Rosenau, 14:51
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ancient_Hacker, 14:45
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Al Balmer, 14:44
- Re: infinite loop detection, Flash Gordon, 14:43
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 14:40
- Re: atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, Dann Corbit, 14:37
- Re: remove dash in ssn with sprintf, jmcgill, 14:37
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 14:36
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 14:31
- remove dash in ssn with sprintf, Carson, 14:31
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 14:31
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: code portability, Harald van Dijk, 14:25
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 14:15
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 14:12
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 14:09
- i need help in structures ....., skumar434, 14:09
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 14:08
- Re: code portability, Harald van Dijk, 14:04
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Michael Wojcik, 14:03
- Trying to understand "restrict", Frederick Gotham, 13:52
- Re: [OT} Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 13:47
- Re: Recursive structure?, Morris Dovey, 13:43
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Michael Wojcik, 13:38
- Re: Recursive structure?, Morris Dovey, 13:30
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 13:25
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Al Balmer, 13:20
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 13:19
- Re: code portability, Michael Wojcik, 13:04
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 13:02
- Re: code portability, Phlip, 12:52
- Re: why still use C?, Clark S. Cox III, 12:51
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ancient_Hacker, 12:47
- Re: code portability, Richard, 12:47
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Morris Dovey, 12:44
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Janus, 12:41
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 12:37
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Eric Sosman, 12:37
- Re: Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Richard Heathfield, 12:34
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 12:30
- Re: code portability, Richard, 12:26
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 12:22
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Richard Heathfield, 12:20
- Relational operator outside loops and conditionals.., Janus, 12:18
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Richard Heathfield, 12:13
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 12:12
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Richard Heathfield, 12:11
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 11:46
- Re: Recursive structure?, Chris Dollin, 11:37
- Re: code portability, Richard, 11:36
- Re: Natural size: int, Ancient_Hacker, 11:36
- Re: Recursive structure?, Giorgio Silvestri, 11:36
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, djhulme, 11:35
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Richard, 11:30
- Re: Recursive structure?, Ancient_Hacker, 11:30
- Re: atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, Richard Bos, 11:23
- Re: atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, Ivan Vecerina, 11:21
- Re: Recursive structure?, dspfun, 11:20
- Re: code portability, Richard, 11:19
- Re: code portability, Richard, 11:17
- Re: code portability, Phlip, 11:12
- Re: Network application design, Morris Dovey, 11:10
- atof equivalent for long double in standard ANSI C?, lcw1964, 11:08
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 11:06
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 11:02
- Re: infinite loop detection, Steven Woody, 10:59
- Re: code portability, Phlip, 10:59
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard Bos, 10:58
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Richard Bos, 10:57
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:57
- Re: code portability, Richard, 10:56
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 10:53
- Re: code portability, Richard, 10:53
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 10:51
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:50
- Re: Recursive structure?, Lew Pitcher, 10:49
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:45
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:34
- Re: Natural size: int, Dik T. Winter, 10:31
- Network application design, sagenaut@xxxxxxxxx, 10:25
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 10:23
- Recursive structure?, dspfun, 10:03
- Re: What happens with old allocated memory when realloc fails?, Kenneth Brody, 09:54
- Re: code portability, Richard, 09:46
- Re: code portability, Richard, 09:44
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Laurent Deniau, 09:38
- Re: Natural size: int, Clark S . Cox III, 09:36
- Re: code portability, Richard, 09:34
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Frederick Gotham, 09:28
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 09:23
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:19
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard Bos, 09:19
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:17
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:10
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, manmohan, 09:08
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:03
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 09:01
- Re: Natural size: int, Richard, 08:48
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Eric Sosman, 08:44
- Re: Natural size: int, Ancient_Hacker, 08:32
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, javuchi, 08:27
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, javuchi, 08:18
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Ancient_Hacker, 06:54
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, Ancient_Hacker, 06:47
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Ancient_Hacker, 06:43
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ancient_Hacker, 06:38
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Richard Bos, 06:29
- Re: Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, pemo, 06:25
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, tgur, 06:13
- ALLAH, faruk . nur, 06:03
- Extremly fast dinamic array implementation, javuchi, 05:59
- Re: Natural size: int, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:30
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Keith Thompson, 04:54
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 04:36
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 04:28
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 04:25
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 04:19
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Richard Bos, 04:19
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Richard Bos, 04:16
- Re: code portability, jmcgill, 03:56
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Harald van Dijk, 03:44
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 03:39
- Re: Looking for a library function!!, Flash Gordon, 03:30
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, Flash Gordon, 03:28
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, jacob navia, 03:22
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 03:22
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 03:19
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jaysome, 03:02
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 02:56
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, jmcgill, 02:56
- Re: code portability, jmcgill, 02:43
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 02:43
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, akina, 02:35
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, jaysome, 02:32
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, pete, 02:21
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 02:21
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 02:18
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 02:17
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: can u explain this code?, kartheeknagasuri, 01:52
- Re: can u explain this code?, zhao.kaiyong@xxxxxxxxx, 01:46
- Re: Looking for a library function!!, zhao.kaiyong@xxxxxxxxx, 01:41
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, zhao.kaiyong@xxxxxxxxx, 01:38
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), santosh, 01:17
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 01:16
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 00:55
- Re: Looking for a library function!!, Ian Collins, 00:52
- Looking for a library function!!, Hans, 00:48
- Re: code portability, jmcgill, 00:17
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, ena8t8si, 00:00
August 08, 2006
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 23:57
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 23:55
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 23:54
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Chris Torek, 23:36
- Re: Regd:Video Converter Programming, Keith Thompson, 23:11
- Regd:Video Converter Programming, Ch3ru5, 23:01
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Keith Thompson, 22:29
- Re: what is size of this macro?, my . correo . basura, 22:14
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, SP, 22:09
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 22:02
- Re: Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, Ian Collins, 21:44
- Re: code portability, J. J. Farrell, 21:43
- Common Problems that Compilers Don't Catch, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 21:31
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, Eric Sosman, 21:30
- Re: code portability, Eigenvector, 21:25
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 21:23
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 21:16
- Re: can u explain this code?, MQ, 21:14
- Re: passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Ian Collins, 21:09
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Tom St Denis, 21:07
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 21:07
- passing a structure and casting it void -- help please, Mike, 21:02
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 20:50
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 20:21
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Keith Thompson, 20:19
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 20:01
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ian Collins, 19:45
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 19:29
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Old Wolf, 19:22
- Re: Natural size: int, Al Balmer, 19:22
- Re: What happens with old allocated memory when realloc fails?, insomninja, 19:18
- Re: Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, Ian Collins, 19:16
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Joe Wright, 19:10
- Re: how to use recursive structure to build arbitrary levels' nested loop?, so.intech, 19:09
- Re: What happens with old allocated memory when realloc fails?, jmcgill, 19:06
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, pete, 19:06
- Re: What happens with old allocated memory when realloc fails?, Keith Thompson, 19:00
- Re: Natural size: int, Ian Collins, 18:58
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 18:56
- Creating and Accessing Very Big Arrays in C, djhulme, 18:55
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 18:54
- What happens with old allocated memory when realloc fails?, insomninja, 18:54
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 18:45
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 18:43
- Re: Help with some code, Default User, 18:37
- Re: Natural size: int, Al Balmer, 18:36
- Re: Natural size: int, Al Balmer, 18:32
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 18:27
- Re: Natural size: int, Ian Collins, 18:22
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 18:22
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Ben C, 18:11
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 18:09
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 18:01
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 18:00
- Re: can u explain this code?, Michael Mair, 17:59
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 17:59
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Richard Heathfield, 17:58
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 17:50
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 17:48
- Re: can u explain this code?, Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Stephen Sprunk, 17:44
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 17:40
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 17:32
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 17:27
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 17:26
- Re: code portability, Stephen Sprunk, 17:13
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Kenneth Brody, 17:11
- Re: Natural size: int, J. J. Farrell, 17:11
- Re: Help with some code, Keith Thompson, 17:08
- Re: Natural size: int, Stephen Sprunk, 17:05
- Re: fork inside an for, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, David R Tribble, 17:02
- Re: fork inside an for, Keith Thompson, 17:01
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 17:01
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Eric Sosman, 17:00
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: Natural size: int, Stephen Sprunk, 16:55
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: what is size of this macro?, J. J. Farrell, 16:47
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Re: Natural size: int, Eric Sosman, 16:39
- Re: Natural size: int, Stephen Sprunk, 16:39
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 16:33
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 16:29
- Re: can u explain this code?, Harald van Dijk, 16:27
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Keith Thompson, 16:27
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Default User, 16:22
- Re: what is size of this macro?, venkatesh.k.desai5@xxxxxxxxx, 16:18
- Re: Natural size: int, Frederick Gotham, 16:18
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Keith Thompson, 16:16
- Re: Natural size: int, jmcgill, 16:13
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:12
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: can u explain this code?, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Richard Heathfield, 16:10
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Vlad Dogaru, 16:09
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Default User, 16:09
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 16:09
- Re: Natural size: int, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 16:05
- Re: Natural size: int, Ben Pfaff, 16:02
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Herbert Rosenau, 16:01
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Keith Thompson, 16:00
- Re: what is size of this macro?, venkatesh.k.desai5@xxxxxxxxx, 15:59
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 15:58
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Keith Thompson, 15:54
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Frederick Gotham, 15:54
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Frederick Gotham, 15:53
- Re: Natural size: int, Frederick Gotham, 15:52
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:51
- Re: what is size of this macro?, venkatesh.k.desai5@xxxxxxxxx, 15:51
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 15:49
- Re: what is size of this macro?, Eric Sosman, 15:44
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 15:44
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 15:41
- what is size of this macro?, venkatesh.k.desai5@xxxxxxxxx, 15:37
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 15:35
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Default User, 15:30
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Flash Gordon, 15:30
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, Default User, 15:25
- Re: printf and size_t, Keith Thompson, 15:24
- Re: Natural size: int, Skarmander, 15:23
- Re: Natural size: int, Stephen Sprunk, 15:23
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Herbert Rosenau, 15:20
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Lew Pitcher, 15:18
- Re: Natural size: int, Malcolm, 15:15
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Dann Corbit, 15:03
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 14:57
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Richard Heathfield, 14:55
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Default User, 14:51
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Ivars, 14:43
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:32
- Re: can u explain this code?, Morris Dovey, 14:28
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Ivars, 14:22
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:07
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, gbostock, 14:05
- Re: can u explain this code?, Tak-Shing Chan, 14:04
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Skarmander, 14:01
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 13:57
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 13:54
- Re: scanf %[] information, Robert Gamble, 13:54
- Re: calloc(), Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
- Re: calloc(), Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
- Re: calloc(), Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
- Re: naming convetions, Herbert Rosenau, 13:53
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 13:50
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jacob navia, 13:49
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 13:44
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 13:44
- Re: Natural size: int, jacob navia, 13:42
- Re: can u explain this code?, Richard Heathfield, 13:38
- Re: scanf %[] information, Tak-Shing Chan, 13:37
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 13:34
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Michael Brennan, 13:26
- can u explain this code?, kartheeknagasuri, 13:17
- Re: scanf %[] information, sosij.morris@xxxxxxxxx, 13:09
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Frederick Gotham, 13:08
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 13:08
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Default User, 13:05
- Natural size: int, Frederick Gotham, 13:02
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Default User, 12:58
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Default User, 12:58
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Default User, 12:57
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, Kenneth Brody, 12:56
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, av, 12:54
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, av, 12:53
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Kenneth Brody, 12:51
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Frederick Gotham, 12:50
- Re: fork inside an for, Frederick Gotham, 12:49
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, Frederick Gotham, 12:48
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 12:44
- Re: calloc(), Default User, 12:44
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, Fred Kleinschmidt, 12:41
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, Parahat Melayev, 12:40
- Re: printf and size_t, Richard Heathfield, 12:39
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Stephen Sprunk, 12:34
- Re: Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Parahat Melayev, 12:33
- Difference between exit(0) & exit (1), Vicky, 12:13
- Re: printf and size_t, rayw, 12:08
- Re: Could somebody tell me the difference?, andrew queisser, 11:55
- Re: fork inside an for, Richard, 11:40
- Re: printf and size_t, Richard Heathfield, 11:39
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, Michael McGarry, 11:34
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Richard, 11:33
- Re: how to use recursive structure to build arbitrary levels' nested loop?, Richard Heathfield, 11:33
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 11:29
- Could somebody tell me the difference?, Kenny McCormack, 11:27
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Kenny McCormack, 11:24
- Re: how to use recursive structure to build arbitrary levels' nested loop?, Eric Sosman, 11:23
- Re: printf and size_t, ray . webster, 11:22
- Re: fork inside an for, Kenny McCormack, 11:22
- Re: how to use recursive structure to build arbitrary levels' nested loop?, Chris Dollin, 11:15
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 11:09
- how to use recursive structure to build arbitrary levels' nested loop?, so.intech, 10:57
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 10:53
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 10:46
- Re: code portability, Richard, 10:39
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 10:24
- Re: memset & alignment, Neroku, 10:19
- Re: Initializer element is not constant, whyglinux, 10:08
- Re: code portability, Racaille, 10:03
- Re: Syntax question, Richard Heathfield, 09:59
- Re: Help with some code, Lew Pitcher, 09:57
- Re: Initializer element is not constant, fred, 09:57
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Richard Heathfield, 09:57
- Syntax question, deppy_3, 09:55
- Re: Initializer element is not constant, fred, 09:52
- Re: Initializer element is not constant, whyglinux, 09:52
- Help with some code, Chewbacca, 09:45
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 09:31
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Robert Gamble, 09:30
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Chris Dollin, 09:25
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Robert Gamble, 09:21
- Re: diff bet getch() & getche(), Chris Dollin, 09:21
- Re: memset & alignment, Chris Dollin, 09:14
- Re: Initializer element is not constant, Robert Gamble, 09:13
- fork inside an for, mutley, 09:12
- diff bet getch() & getche(), ppravin88@xxxxxxxxx, 09:11
- Re: i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), pete, 08:48
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, pete, 08:41
- Re: memset & alignment, pete, 08:38
- memset & alignment, dragoncoder, 08:28
- Initializer element is not constant, fred, 08:22
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jacob navia, 08:22
- i=infinity;0= i*sin k*pi, 1=cos k*pi, k=m/n, n=4,m=0-00; c*G=20=const, 1/sgrt2>G>0.5, 6<N = NA ^2surf/NAvol<7 ; h/N =11=const, e+i*pi; D universe =f(h)*1/ (a))^4, T=f( m, S, D), Ivars, 08:21
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Richard Heathfield, 08:21
- Re: format specifier, Richard Heathfield, 08:17
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 08:06
- format specifier, dis_is_eagle, 07:57
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, pete, 07:37
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Eric Sosman, 07:37
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, Eric Sosman, 07:31
- Re: printf and size_t, Richard Heathfield, 07:28
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard, 07:21
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 06:33
- scanf %[] information, sosij . morris, 06:13
- printf and size_t, ray . webster, 05:57
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 05:44
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 05:27
- Re: code portability, Richard, 05:16
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 05:14
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard, 05:07
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 05:06
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 05:05
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 05:00
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 04:50
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jacob navia, 04:37
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Richard Heathfield, 04:37
- Re: calloc(), Richard, 04:20
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, jaysome, 04:04
- Re: ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 04:01
- Re: calloc(), Flash Gordon, 03:24
- Re: naming convetions, goose, 03:01
- Re: naming convetions, Keith Thompson, 02:59
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, binjobster, 01:52
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 01:48
- Re: naming convetions, Herbert Rosenau, 01:32
- Re: 1 client and multiple server, kulkarni . sunil, 01:27
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 01:18
- 1 client and multiple server, abhi147, 01:06
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Morris Dovey, 00:56
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Dann Corbit, 00:22
- Re: segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, Dann Corbit, 00:17
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Dann Corbit, 00:11
August 07, 2006
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Morris Dovey, 23:59
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Rod Pemberton, 23:59
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, dcorbit, 23:58
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Rod Pemberton, 23:58
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 23:52
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Chris Torek, 23:48
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Eric Sosman, 23:34
- Re: infinite loop detection, inmatarian, 23:29
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 23:28
- Re: Randomly permute a list of integers, Eric Sosman, 23:25
- segmentation fault writing to array elements in structure, SP, 23:21
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Snis Pilbor, 23:19
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Dann Corbit, 23:16
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Dann Corbit, 23:11
- Re: Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, Ian Collins, 23:09
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Ian Collins, 23:07
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Dann Corbit, 23:03
- Typecasting Pointers on a 64 bit System, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 22:58
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, binjobster, 22:56
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Ian Collins, 22:38
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Dann Corbit, 22:38
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, binjobster, 22:31
- Re: Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, Morris Dovey, 22:20
- Is it possible to finding all return values of a C/C++ function?, binjobster, 22:12
- Randomly permute a list of integers, Michael McGarry, 22:01
- Re: calloc(), Ian Collins, 21:57
- Re: calloc(), Michael McGarry, 21:53
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 21:51
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 20:58
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Keith Thompson, 20:57
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 20:55
- Re: calloc(), Al Balmer, 20:01
- Re: calloc(), Al Balmer, 19:57
- Re: long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Keith Thompson, 19:44
- long double versions of functions in gcc under Cygwin, lcw1964, 19:33
- Re: calloc(), Keith Thompson, 19:27
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Joe Wright, 19:25
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 19:19
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Chris Torek, 18:49
- Re: calloc(), Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: calloc(), Richard, 18:37
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, ena8t8si, 18:27
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Joe Wright, 18:25
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Al Balmer, 18:24
- Re: calloc(), Flash Gordon, 18:21
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, J. J. Farrell, 18:19
- Re: calloc(), Ian Collins, 18:19
- Re: calloc(), Default User, 18:16
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 18:14
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 18:10
- Re: calloc(), Keith Thompson, 18:09
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, ena8t8si, 18:07
- Re: code portability, ena8t8si, 18:05
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, ena8t8si, 18:03
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Richard, 18:01
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Keith Thompson, 18:01
- Re: Strange function use, ena8t8si, 17:58
- Re: calloc(), Joe Wright, 17:49
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Keith Thompson, 17:43
- Re: calloc(), Ian Collins, 17:42
- Re: ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, Richard, 17:40
- Re: calloc(), Michael McGarry, 17:38
- Re: calloc(), Default User, 17:35
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Richard, 17:34
- calloc(), Michael McGarry, 17:26
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 17:20
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Keith Thompson, 17:17
- Re: ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, hariharan . priya, 17:03
- Re: ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, Flash Gordon, 15:24
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Skarmander, 15:04
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 14:14
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Skarmander, 14:09
- Re: naming convetions, Richard, 13:57
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Chris Torek, 13:49
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Chris Torek, 13:36
- Re: naming convetions, Herbert Rosenau, 13:36
- Re: naming convetions, Herbert Rosenau, 13:36
- Re: Simple array question..., Joe Wright, 13:30
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Ancient_Hacker, 13:15
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Ben C, 13:08
- I need Good credit card, kolawole, 12:53
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Eric Sosman, 12:36
- Re: ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, jacob navia, 12:36
- Re: naming convetions, Richard, 12:28
- Re: naming convetions, goose, 12:19
- Re: naming convetions, goose, 12:17
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 12:13
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 12:11
- Re: Impact on C???, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:57
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Frederick Gotham, 11:53
- Re: infinite loop detection, David Resnick, 11:48
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Eric Sosman, 11:44
- Re: infinite loop detection, Walter Roberson, 11:36
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 11:06
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 11:05
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Dik T. Winter, 11:01
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Eric Sosman, 10:55
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:53
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:50
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 10:24
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, lawrence . jones, 10:10
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Udo A. Steinberg, 10:06
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Chris Dollin, 09:43
- Re: Macro help, Eric Sosman, 09:40
- Re: Ternary operator and memory access, Richard, 09:39
- Re: Macro help, Richard, 09:35
- Re: Macro help, Eric Sosman, 09:31
- ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, hariharan . priya, 09:24
- ***glibC detected *** double free or corruption (!prev) : 0x08458258***, hariharan . priya, 09:23
- Ternary operator and memory access, Udo A. Steinberg, 09:23
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Richard, 09:22
- Re: Macro help, d2klein, 09:21
- Re: Confused by a c-faq example, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:11
- Re: Macro help, Richard, 09:07
- Confused by a c-faq example, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 09:03
- Re: Macro help, d2klein, 08:43
- Re: Macro help, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 08:20
- Macro help, d2klein, 07:46
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Bernard Xhumga, 07:36
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Richard, 07:32
- Re: code portability, Richard, 07:30
- Re: code portability, Richard, 07:21
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, goose, 07:10
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Keith Thompson, 06:47
- Re: code portability, Philip Potter, 06:47
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 06:39
- Re: code portability, Chris Torek, 06:18
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Chris Torek, 06:00
- Re: intptr_t standard?, Keith Thompson, 05:29
- Re: manipulating linked list, Chris Torek, 05:23
- Re: return value of main, Chris Torek, 05:16
- Re: int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, aarklon, 05:07
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Chris Torek, 04:59
- Re: naming convetions, Keith Thompson, 04:55
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, J. J. Farrell, 04:28
- Re: Intializing struct containing an union, Chris Torek, 04:24
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Richard Bos, 04:19
- Re: How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Richard Heathfield, 04:04
- How to read a Hexadecimal file ?, Vijay, 03:34
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 03:00
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 02:58
- Re: intptr_t standard?, Richard Heathfield, 02:40
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), Richard Heathfield, 02:36
- intptr_t standard?, nikanth, 02:35
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), Snis Pilbor, 02:32
- Re: Simple array question..., Richard Heathfield, 02:18
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), Richard Heathfield, 02:10
- Re: infinite loop detection, Steven Woody, 02:10
- Simple array question..., main(), 02:07
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, Dave Thompson, 01:53
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Dave Thompson, 01:53
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 01:40
- Re: infinite loop detection, Christopher Benson-Manica, 01:10
- Re: infinite loop detection, Walter Roberson, 00:26
- infinite loop detection, Steven Woody, 00:01
August 06, 2006
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), Snis Pilbor, 23:58
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 23:48
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Ben Bacarisse, 23:39
- Re: naming convetions, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:34
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, J. J. Farrell, 22:22
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), Snis Pilbor, 22:18
- Re: Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), J. J. Farrell, 22:11
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 21:39
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Old Wolf, 20:58
- Re: Determining Variable type, Keith Thompson, 19:55
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:49
- Pointer to Pointer Paramters (aka void **), bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:26
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 19:16
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Ian Collins, 19:10
- Re: Determining Variable type, Chris Torek, 19:00
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Chris Torek, 18:52
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Harald van Dijk, 17:52
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: using nonconstant expressions in an initializer list, Keith Thompson, 17:34
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Richard Heathfield, 17:21
- Re: that is my web site, Keith Thompson, 17:20
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Keith Thompson, 17:16
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 17:12
- Re: Determining Variable type, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 17:05
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Flash Gordon, 17:00
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: book, Malcolm, 16:44
- Re: naming convetions, Ian Collins, 16:29
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Herbert Rosenau, 16:25
- Re: naming convetions, Herbert Rosenau, 16:25
- Re: that is my web site, ashu, 15:45
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 15:14
- Re: using nonconstant expressions in an initializer list, Frederick Gotham, 14:58
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 14:53
- using nonconstant expressions in an initializer list, aarklon, 14:37
- Re: book, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:35
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 14:26
- Re: conversion of types., trm, 14:02
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 14:01
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 13:35
- Re: conversion of types., Joe Wright, 13:29
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 13:27
- Re: Question on main, Richard Heathfield, 13:22
- Re: Question on main, Walter Roberson, 13:12
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Martin Golding, 13:08
- Re: book, Morris Dovey, 11:57
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, osmium, 11:45
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Eric Sosman, 11:45
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, gurdz, 11:27
- that is my web site, vuuuuv, 10:53
- this is my site with cracks for many programs and games, vuuuuv, 10:51
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Harald van Dijk, 10:47
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, philbo30, 10:44
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Herbert Rosenau, 10:32
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 10:26
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, CBFalconer, 10:16
- book, vim, 10:15
- Re: conversion of types., CBFalconer, 10:13
- Re: naming convetions, August Karlstrom, 10:11
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Eric Sosman, 09:35
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Richard, 09:24
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Richard, 09:22
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Simon Biber, 09:20
- Re: Determining Variable type, Ancient_Hacker, 08:54
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Ancient_Hacker, 08:47
- Re: naming convetions, Richard Heathfield, 08:30
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 08:28
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, MQ, 08:20
- naming convetions, Jyrgen, 07:38
- Re: Question on main, Keith Thompson, 06:42
- Re: Question on main, Malcolm, 04:55
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, J. J. Farrell, 04:50
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Harald van Dijk, 04:33
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 04:05
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Bill Pursell, 03:48
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 03:37
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 03:30
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 03:17
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Default User, 02:57
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:44
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Al Balmer, 02:17
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Al Balmer, 02:08
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, av, 02:04
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Bill Pursell, 01:50
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Gordon Burditt, 01:26
- Re: Question on main, Stephen Sprunk, 01:05
- Re: Determining Variable type, Gordon Burditt, 00:54
August 05, 2006
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Jack Klein, 23:51
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Jack Klein, 23:50
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, gurdz, 23:28
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, gurdz, 23:28
- [AD]Incredible! $26.00 == The C++ Programming Language (Special 3rd Edition); $35.00 == Thinking in C++ (Vol. 1 & 2), sinousadser, 22:37
- Re: Question on main, MQ, 22:31
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Frederick Gotham, 22:11
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, steve yee, 22:02
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Simon Biber, 21:49
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Frederick Gotham, 21:15
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 20:59
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 20:47
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 20:22
- Re: Question on main, Chris Torek, 20:21
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 20:15
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 20:07
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Richard Heathfield, 19:44
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Snis Pilbor, 19:41
- Re: Question on main, Ian Collins, 19:31
- Re: Question on main, dbtid, 19:17
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Ian Collins, 18:15
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, J. J. Farrell, 18:03
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Keith Thompson, 18:01
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Richard Heathfield, 16:44
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, Ben C, 16:41
- Re: cyclic references of types, Richard Heathfield, 16:39
- string copy. this one works, but why that one doesn't?, Gary, 16:31
- Re: cyclic references of types, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: Question on main, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: Question on main, Ico, 15:45
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Default User, 15:42
- Re: Question on main, Sumit77Sen, 15:27
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Eric Sosman, 15:07
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Richard Heathfield, 14:53
- Re: ULONG_LONG_MAX and gcc 3.4.1, Skarmander, 14:52
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Eric Sosman, 14:49
- Re: Question on main, Richard Heathfield, 14:34
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 14:31
- Re: Question on main, Andrew Poelstra, 14:23
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Andrew Poelstra, 14:22
- Question on main, Sumit77Sen, 14:09
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Al Balmer, 13:46
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Al Balmer, 13:46
- Re: C99 stdint.h, P.J. Plauger, 13:42
- Re: Determining Variable type, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 13:27
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Malcolm, 13:12
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 13:10
- Re: Impact on C???, Richard Heathfield, 13:08
- Re: Impact on C???, Malcolm, 13:08
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Andrew Poelstra, 12:50
- ULONG_LONG_MAX and gcc 3.4.1, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 12:48
- Re: Impact on C???, jacob navia, 12:47
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Andrew Poelstra, 12:44
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 12:38
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Tim Prince, 12:37
- Re: Impact on C???, jacob navia, 12:31
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 12:24
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Walter Roberson, 12:23
- Re: conversion of types., Joe Wright, 12:17
- Re: Determining Variable type, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 12:12
- Re: Determining Variable type, Morris Dovey, 12:12
- Re: code portability, Walter Roberson, 12:08
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Harald van Dijk, 12:07
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Tim Prince, 11:58
- Re: Determining Variable type, Walter Roberson, 11:58
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Michael Wojcik, 11:54
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 11:53
- Re: code portability, Walter Roberson, 11:43
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Tim Prince, 11:41
- Re: code portability, Walter Roberson, 11:33
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 11:28
- Re: cyclic references of types, Bill Pursell, 11:27
- Determining Variable type, Schraalhans Keukenmeester, 11:22
- Re: Impact on C???, Richard Heathfield, 10:57
- Impact on C???, anandh . TheAvenger, 10:40
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Ulrich Eckhardt, 10:39
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Frederick Gotham, 10:38
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 10:35
- Re: C99 stdint.h, Richard Heathfield, 10:33
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Frederick Gotham, 10:14
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, yaniv . dg, 10:13
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Frederick Gotham, 09:59
- C99 stdint.h, Frederick Gotham, 09:56
- Re: indentify if argument is char or float, Richard Heathfield, 09:31
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Joe Wright, 09:28
- indentify if argument is char or float, yaniv . dg, 09:23
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Richard, 09:00
- Re: how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, Eric Sosman, 08:45
- how to detect the compile is 32 bits or 64 bits?, steve yee, 08:29
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Hans-Bernhard Broeker, 08:18
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 07:46
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, MQ, 06:48
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, lovecreatesbeauty, 06:47
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Richard Heathfield, 06:18
- Re: Question about function decay, Flash Gordon, 06:10
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 06:08
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, Flash Gordon, 05:41
- Re: cyclic references of types, Onno, 05:27
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 05:09
- Re: Validating Data in C programming, MQ, 05:09
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 05:08
- Validating Data in C programming, gurdz, 04:24
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, av, 03:56
- Re: code portability, Chris Torek, 03:46
- Re: Values, Andrew Poelstra, 02:23
- Re: Function Pointers as Arguments (ansi question), Harald van Dijk, 02:12
- Re: Values, Jonathan H. Justvig, 02:12
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 02:07
- Re: Tryiing just to read/understand this code, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 02:00
- Re: int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, Chris Torek, 01:46
- Re: code portability, Ben Pfaff, 01:41
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 01:36
- Re: Values, Bill Pursell, 01:36
- Function Pointers as Arguments (ansi question), bwaichu@xxxxxxxxx, 01:30
- Re: Values, Andrew Poelstra, 01:22
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Default User, 01:10
- Re: Values, Jonathan H. Justvig, 01:09
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Keith Thompson, 01:06
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 01:04
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Jack Klein, 00:52
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Jack Klein, 00:46
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Jack Klein, 00:41
- Re: int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, Old Wolf, 00:38
- Re: int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, Peter Nilsson, 00:37
- Re: int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, tinysisi, 00:28
- Tryiing just to read/understand this code, smnoff, 00:16
- Re: code portability, Ben Pfaff, 00:04
August 04, 2006
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Ian Collins, 23:53
- int a[2][3]; What does "a" actually contain?, chandanlinster, 23:52
- Re: what is the reason ?, Peter Nilsson, 23:48
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Richard, 23:40
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 23:22
- Re: Values, Keith Thompson, 23:15
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 23:13
- Re: Values, Jonathan H. Justvig, 23:07
- Re: Values, manoj1978, 22:52
- Re: Values, Jonathan H. Justvig, 22:40
- Re: Values, Peter Nilsson, 22:30
- Values, Jonathan H. Justvig, 22:20
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Douglas A. Gwyn, 22:07
- Re: code portability, Chris McDonald, 22:05
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 21:42
- Re: Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Keith Thompson, 21:33
- Troll Alert: Kenny McCormack, Frederick Gotham, 21:26
- Re: code portability, Dik T. Winter, 21:07
- Re: reading data from a file, CBFalconer, 20:31
- Re: Troll Alert, Kenny McCormack, 19:50
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, websnarf, 19:48
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, emmerik, 19:39
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Bernard Xhumga, 19:27
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, CBFalconer, 19:01
- Re: what is the reason ?, Flash Gordon, 19:00
- Re: Question about function decay, Keith Thompson, 19:00
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Keith Thompson, 18:57
- Re: Question about integer promotions, CBFalconer, 18:52
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 18:50
- Re: Question about function decay, Frederick Gotham, 18:30
- Troll Alert, Frederick Gotham, 18:28
- Troll alert, Frederick Gotham, 18:28
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: code portability, lawrence . jones, 18:15
- Re: code portability, lawrence . jones, 18:15
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, jacob navia, 18:13
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Kenny McCormack, 17:37
- Re: Read string for arithmetic operation, CBFalconer, 17:36
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Flash Gordon, 17:35
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, CBFalconer, 17:28
- Re: value returned from a function, Keith Thompson, 17:15
- Re: manipulating linked list, CBFalconer, 17:14
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, CBFalconer, 17:06
- Re: Question about function decay, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: Threads, Michael Wojcik, 16:55
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: Question about function decay, jacob navia, 16:47
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:46
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Eric Sosman, 16:37
- Re: Question about cast, Keith Thompson, 16:34
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Bill Pursell, 16:20
- Re: Question about sequence points 2, lawrence . jones, 16:10
- Re: value returned from a function, lawrence . jones, 16:10
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, nroberts, 16:07
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Ancient_Hacker, 16:06
- Question about function decay, Snis Pilbor, 16:01
- Re: include dependecies--best practice?, Eric Sosman, 15:51
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Kenny McCormack, 15:19
- include dependecies--best practice?, Bill Pursell, 14:51
- Re: code portability, Ben Pfaff, 14:19
- Re: code portability, Harald van Dijk, 14:12
- Re: Question about sequence points, Chris F.A. Johnson, 14:02
- Re: code portability, Ben Pfaff, 13:58
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), grinder, 13:43
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), grinder, 13:42
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Simon Biber, 12:59
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Richard Heathfield, 12:55
- Re: value returned from a function, Keith Thompson, 12:51
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Keith Thompson, 12:47
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Keith Thompson, 12:42
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, jacob navia, 12:38
- Re: code portability, Richard, 12:26
- Re: value returned from a function, John Bode, 12:21
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Philip Guenther, 12:15
- Re: Question about cast, Ben Pfaff, 12:14
- Re: value returned from a function, Ben Pfaff, 12:11
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:09
- Re: code portability, Ben Pfaff, 12:05
- Re: code portability, Stephen Sprunk, 12:03
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 12:03
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Walter Roberson, 12:00
- Re: FAQ incorrect?, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:00
- Re: what is the reason ?, Ancient_Hacker, 11:46
- FAQ incorrect?, nroberts, 11:44
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Bernard Xhumga, 11:13
- Re: what is the reason ?, Clever Monkey, 11:08
- Re: Question about cast, spibou, 11:00
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Philip Potter, 10:44
- Re: what is the reason ?, codergem@xxxxxxxxx, 10:39
- Re: what is the reason ?, Eric Sosman, 10:36
- Re: what is the reason ?, Igmar Palsenberg, 10:31
- Re: difference between these two struct definitions, Hallvard B Furuseth, 10:19
- Re: Question about sequence points, Eric Sosman, 10:12
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, aarklon, 10:10
- what is the reason ?, codergem@xxxxxxxxx, 10:09
- Re: what is a callout structure ?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:08
- what is a callout structure ?, oo@@oo, 10:05
- difference between these two struct definitions, oo@@oo, 09:59
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Richard Heathfield, 09:37
- Question about sequence points 2, spibou, 09:03
- Question about sequence points, spibou, 08:53
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Bernard Xhumga, 08:39
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Ancient_Hacker, 08:33
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Eric Sosman, 08:18
- Re: value returned from a function, Richard Heathfield, 07:56
- Re: value returned from a function, Ancient_Hacker, 07:38
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Ancient_Hacker, 07:30
- Re: value returned from a function, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 07:28
- Re: Read string for arithmetic operation, Thomas Kreuzer, 07:27
- Re: value returned from a function, Richard Bos, 07:13
- value returned from a function, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 07:09
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Haroon Shafiq, 06:41
- Re: Using different font form CHR, Richard Heathfield, 06:15
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, v4vijayakumar, 06:11
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Philip Potter, 04:49
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Martin Ambuhl, 04:48
- Re: granularity of size of operator, goose, 04:36
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Richard, 04:36
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Laurent Deniau, 04:26
- Re: code portability, Richard, 04:20
- Re: Using different font form CHR, Ian Collins, 04:18
- Using different font form CHR, ray_cam2006@xxxxxxxxxxx, 04:10
- Re: granularity of size of operator, chinu, 04:04
- Re: granularity of size of operator, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 03:55
- Re: Why not compile?, Harald van Dijk, 02:45
- Re: granularity of size of operator, Keith Thompson, 02:43
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 02:33
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Harald van Dijk, 02:27
- Re: Why not compile?, Andrew Poelstra, 02:23
- Re: Why not compile?, jacob navia, 02:22
- Re: Why not compile?, wei8010@xxxxxxxxx, 02:21
- Re: code portability, Michael Mair, 02:20
- Re: granularity of size of operator, jacob navia, 02:20
- Re: code portability, Andrew Poelstra, 02:19
- granularity of size of operator, chinu, 02:01
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, MQ, 01:46
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, Herbert Rosenau, 01:37
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Herbert Rosenau, 01:37
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Herbert Rosenau, 01:37
- Re: Why not compile?, Keith Thompson, 01:32
- Re: Why not compile?, Scorpio, 01:32
- Re: Why not compile?, Walter Roberson, 01:31
- Re: about ctype[], Ben Pfaff, 01:26
- Re: Writing to an existing file., Keith Thompson, 01:22
- Re: about ctype[], Keith Thompson, 01:18
- Re: Read string for arithmetic operation, goose, 01:18
- Why not compile?, wei8010@xxxxxxxxx, 01:17
- Re: small query on bitwise shift right operator, nirmalr@xxxxxxxxx, 01:16
- Re: Strange function use, Keith Thompson, 01:13
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 01:08
- Re: How to use sqrt() function with gcc?, Keith Thompson, 01:02
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Dave Vandervies, 00:58
- Re: manipulating linked list, Bill Pursell, 00:52
- Re: Writing to an existing file., Bill Pursell, 00:35
- Re: about ctype[], Ian Collins, 00:30
- Re: code portability, Bill Pursell, 00:27
- Re: about ctype[], bharath539@xxxxxxxxx, 00:22
- Re: code portability, lawrence . jones, 00:16
- Re: code portability, lawrence . jones, 00:16
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 00:16
- Re: code portability, Ian Collins, 00:14
- Re: Strange function use, Ben Pfaff, 00:07
- Re: conversion of types., spibou, 00:01
August 03, 2006
- Re: Strange function use, lovecreatesbeauty, 23:56
- Re: code portability, Andrew Poelstra, 23:51
- conversion of types., jj_76, 23:18
- Re: How to use sqrt() function with gcc?, Richard Heathfield, 22:55
- Re: How to use sqrt() function with gcc?, MrDev, 22:52
- How to use sqrt() function with gcc?, John, 22:41
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, Simon Biber, 22:32
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Morris Dovey, 22:27
- Re: writing to a text file line by line, Simon Biber, 22:19
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Simon Biber, 22:07
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 22:02
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 21:49
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 21:48
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 21:09
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 21:03
- Re: reading data from a file, Richard Heathfield, 20:47
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 20:46
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Stephen Sprunk, 20:43
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Richard, 20:43
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Morris Dovey, 20:35
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 20:07
- Re: something fishy here with stripnl(), Ben Pfaff, 19:49
- Re: return value of main, Walter Banks, 19:41
- Re: reading data from a file, jj_76, 19:28
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 19:23
- something fishy here with stripnl(), grinder, 19:21
- Re: reading data from a file, Old Wolf, 19:19
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, dcorbit, 18:49
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 18:42
- Re: return value of main, Dik T. Winter, 18:36
- Re: Some problem with C Code, Keith Thompson, 18:24
- Re: reading data from a file, Keith Thompson, 18:22
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: Strange function use, Keith Thompson, 18:07
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 18:04
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 17:58
- Re: reading data from a file, Ronald Bruck, 17:15
- Re: code portability, Frederick Gotham, 16:43
- Re: reading data from a file, Default User, 16:35
- Re: reading data from a file, Richard Heathfield, 16:34
- Re: Some problem with C Code, David Wade, 16:29
- Re: manipulating linked list, Chris Torek, 16:01
- Re: reading data from a file, Tom St Denis, 15:56
- Re: Strange function use, Jack Klein, 15:55
- Re: return value of main, Rod Pemberton, 15:52
- Re: return value of main, Rod Pemberton, 15:52
- reading data from a file, jj_76, 15:51
- Re: Writing to an existing file., Chris Torek, 15:43
- Re: code portability, Malcolm, 15:26
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Ben Pfaff, 15:19
- Re: gcc 4.1.1 and 16-bit code generation, Andrew Poelstra, 15:19
- Re: Strange function use, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Frederick Gotham, 15:06
- Re: Strange function use, Keith Thompson, 15:05
- Re: The Holy Shroud, Default User, 15:01
- Re: Writing to an existing file., shalakasan, 14:54
- Re: Question about cast, Ben Pfaff, 14:53
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Frederick Gotham, 14:53
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 14:52
- Re: Question about cast, Ben Pfaff, 14:51
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Flash Gordon, 14:35
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, neha, 14:28
- Re: gcc 4.1.1 and 16-bit code generation, Keith Thompson, 14:22
- Re: Question about cast, Tom St Denis, 14:21
- Re: The Holy Shroud, Keith Thompson, 14:18
- Re: Some problem with C Code, spibou, 14:14
- Question about cast, spibou, 14:12
- Re: Some problem with C Code, jacob navia, 14:04
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Walter Roberson, 13:59
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Martin Ambuhl, 13:53
- Re: manipulating linked list, L7, 13:52
- Re: debugging child threads, Richard, 13:50
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Walter Roberson, 13:48
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Neal Barney, 13:35
- Re: writing to a text file line by line, grinder, 13:24
- Re: The Holy Shroud, spibou, 13:19
- Re: Read string for arithmetic operation, websnarf, 13:12
- Re: The Holy Shroud, Default User, 13:00
- Re: The Holy Shroud, Default User, 13:00
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, websnarf, 12:57
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, websnarf, 12:53
- Re: Question about integer promotions, Eric Sosman, 12:52
- Re: Question about integer promotions, Eric Sosman, 12:42
- Re: Question about integer promotions, Harald van Dijk, 12:27
- Question about integer promotions, spibou, 11:58
- Read string for arithmetic operation, Thomas Kreuzer, 11:57
- Re: small query on bitwise shift right operator, spibou, 11:16
- Re: manipulating linked list, Eric Sosman, 11:05
- Re: small query on bitwise shift right operator, Giorgio Silvestri, 10:31
- Re: Some problem with C Code, apoelstra, 10:29
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, apoelstra, 10:24
- small query on bitwise shift right operator, nirmalr@xxxxxxxxx, 10:21
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, micans, 10:17
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Bernard Xhumga, 10:11
- Re: gcc 4.1.1 and 16-bit code generation, apoelstra, 10:03
- manipulating linked list, junky_fellow@xxxxxxxxxxx, 09:56
- gcc 4.1.1 and 16-bit code generation, chandanlinster, 09:39
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:29
- Re: Strange function use, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Re: Some problem with C Code, p_cricket_guy, 09:21
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, websnarf, 09:20
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, Eric Sosman, 08:28
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 08:24
- Re: Strange function use, spibou, 08:17
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, Kris, 08:13
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, SP, 08:09
- Re: cyclic references of types, Onno, 08:05
- Re: Heap Vs/And Data Segment, Eric Sosman, 08:04
- Re: cyclic references of types, Chris Torek, 08:03
- Re: Strange function use, Chris Torek, 08:01
- Re: Strange function use, Eric Sosman, 07:57
- Re: cyclic references of types, Hallvard B Furuseth, 07:53
- cyclic references of types, Onno, 07:45
- Re: The Holy Shroud, spibou, 07:43
- Re: Strange function use, spibou, 07:32
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 07:19
- Re: Strange function use, pemo, 07:19
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, kwikius, 07:06
- Re: Strange function use, spibou, 07:05
- Re: return value of main, Dik T. Winter, 06:58
- Re: Some problem with C Code, Ico, 06:36
- Re: Strange function use, pemo, 06:33
- Re: Strange function use, Christian Christmann, 06:17
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris Torek, 06:12
- Re: Strange function use, lovecreatesbeauty, 06:05
- Heap Vs/And Data Segment, mailursubbu, 06:00
- Some problem with C Code, spsingh . sunil, 05:56
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, paytam, 05:54
- Re: Strange function use, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:51
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Gernot Frisch, 05:20
- Re: Strange function use, pemo, 05:19
- Re: The Holy Shroud, Felix Rawlings, 05:09
- Re: return value of main, Rod Pemberton, 04:58
- Strange function use, Christian Christmann, 04:55
- Re: return value of main, Rod Pemberton, 04:30
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 04:08
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 04:03
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, spibou, 03:45
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, spibou, 03:38
- Re: [OT] Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Igmar Palsenberg, 03:03
- Re: gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, p_cricket_guy, 02:57
- gets() function generates strong warning message with gcc compiler, paytam, 02:42
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 02:34
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 02:31
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, abhi147, 01:44
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 01:28
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 01:18
- Re: writing to a text file line by line, Simon Biber, 00:53
- Re: How to invoke member functions of an object in set, Martin Ambuhl, 00:17
- Re: type casting, Thomas Lumley, 00:06
August 02, 2006
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Richard Heathfield, 23:32
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Richard Heathfield, 23:30
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Keith Thompson, 23:24
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, Thomas Lumley, 23:22
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, SP, 23:13
- Re: How to invoke member functions of an object in set, xiaohuamao, 23:03
- Re: Looking for malloc() help, xiaohuamao, 23:02
- Re: How to invoke member functions of an object in set, Walter Roberson, 23:02
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Barry Schwarz, 22:56
- How to invoke member functions of an object in set, xiaohuamao, 22:54
- Looking for malloc() help, SP, 22:46
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., MQ, 19:47
- Re: writing to a text file line by line, Default User, 18:36
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, Dik T. Winter, 18:32
- Re: multi-dimensional array and pointers??, Tosha, 18:19
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Ark, 18:02
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 17:55
- Re: c interview, Ancient_Hacker, 17:54
- Re: return value of main, Walter Roberson, 17:48
- Re: writing to a text file line by line, spibou, 17:45
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 17:32
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 17:26
- writing to a text file line by line, grinder, 17:26
- Re: c interview, Kenneth Brody, 17:15
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:13
- Re: return value of main, Kenny McCormack, 17:09
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 16:44
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 16:28
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, Keith Thompson, 16:01
- Re: c interview, Flash Gordon, 15:54
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Keith Thompson, 15:50
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, spibou, 15:50
- Re: return value of main, Richard Heathfield, 15:49
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure, Richard Heathfield, 15:48
- Re: c interview, spibou, 15:40
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Michael Mair, 15:36
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: c interview, Richard Heathfield, 15:32
- Re: c interview, Richard Heathfield, 15:25
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Keith Thompson, 15:25
- Re: print to file question, spibou, 15:24
- Re: type casting, Richard Heathfield, 15:20
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, apoelstra, 15:19
- Re: [OT] Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Walter Roberson, 15:10
- Re: print to file question, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 15:00
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 15:00
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Ark, 14:59
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 14:58
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Flash Gordon, 14:49
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Martin Ambuhl, 14:47
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 14:46
- [OT] Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Martin Ambuhl, 14:44
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 14:36
- Re: Getting intermediate results in 64 bits, Eric Sosman, 14:30
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 14:27
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, goose, 14:21
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Wojtek Lerch, 14:13
- Re: Can it be done at compile time?, Tom St Denis, 14:08
- Can it be done at compile time?, Ark, 14:01
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Bo Persson, 13:53
- Re: Getting intermediate results in 64 bits, Coos Haak, 13:52
- Re: return value of main, Kenny McCormack, 13:50
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure, Skarmander, 13:49
- Re: c interview, Kenneth Brody, 13:48
- Re: Getting intermediate results in 64 bits, Tom St Denis, 13:48
- Re: Getting intermediate results in 64 bits, Walter Roberson, 13:45
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 13:38
- Re: c interview, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:32
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 13:28
- Re: multi-dimensional array and pointers??, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:27
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Keith Thompson, 13:22
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Keith Thompson, 13:15
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Kenny McCormack, 13:07
- Getting intermediate results in 64 bits, tnowles00, 13:07
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Default User, 12:53
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, wenmang, 12:52
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Default User, 12:50
- Re: multi-dimensional array and pointers??, Eric Sosman, 12:48
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Simon Biber, 12:46
- Re: print to file question, Default User, 12:33
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Walter Roberson, 12:18
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Walter Roberson, 12:11
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Al Balmer, 12:01
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, spibou, 12:00
- Re: anyone interested in learning anything?, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:49
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 11:41
- Re: multi-dimensional array and pointers??, chy1013m1, 11:38
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 11:38
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Ark, 11:32
- Re: return value of main, Dingo, 11:29
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Al Balmer, 11:28
- Re: anyone interested in learning anything?, Nick Keighley, 11:26
- multi-dimensional array and pointers??, chy1013m1, 11:25
- Re: c interview, Ancient_Hacker, 11:21
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Nick Keighley, 11:18
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 11:18
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 11:16
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 10:59
- Re: c interview, Afghan Hound, 10:53
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., redefined . horizons, 10:46
- Re: anyone interested in learning anything?, Tom St Denis, 10:45
- Re: anyone interested in learning anything?, apoelstra, 10:33
- Re: anyone interested in learning anything?, Kenny McCormack, 10:26
- Re: c interview, apoelstra, 10:18
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, Eric Sosman, 10:16
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, apoelstra, 10:11
- Re: Library source code ?, Tom St Denis, 10:10
- Re: Library source code ?, sarathy, 10:05
- Re: type casting, apoelstra, 10:04
- Re: debugging child threads, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:58
- debugging child threads, sunil, 09:55
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, jacob navia, 09:54
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, jacob navia, 09:52
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 09:52
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Nelu, 09:50
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 09:47
- Re: return value of main, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:46
- Re: type casting, jj, 09:42
- Re: about ctype[], Markus Moll, 09:39
- Re: about ctype[], Tim Prince, 09:38
- about ctype[], bharath539@xxxxxxxxx, 09:28
- about ctype[], bharath539@xxxxxxxxx, 09:28
- Re: Email NOW $$ HIGH $$ C Programmer WANTED NOW!!, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:25
- Re: type casting, Richard Heathfield, 09:25
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Richard Heathfield, 09:15
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Laurent Deniau, 09:12
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 09:11
- type casting, ram . ragu, 09:01
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Chris Dollin, 08:55
- Re: font engine, p_cricket_guy, 08:47
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 08:46
- Re: Changing the base of a pointer, Eric Sosman, 08:21
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Eric Sosman, 08:17
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Philip Potter, 08:17
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 08:00
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, MQ, 07:54
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Hallvard B Furuseth, 07:52
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 07:52
- Re: code portability, websnarf, 07:50
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, MQ, 07:47
- Re: Library source code ?, Ico, 07:46
- Library source code ?, sarathy, 07:43
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 07:41
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Philip Potter, 07:38
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Richard Bos, 07:37
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 07:37
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Kenny McCormack, 07:34
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Bos, 07:32
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Johan Tibell, 07:30
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Igmar Palsenberg, 07:16
- Changing the base of a pointer, Kris, 07:16
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Philip Potter, 07:15
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Kenny McCormack, 07:09
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Kenny McCormack, 07:08
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Richard Bos, 06:55
- font engine, Savitha, 06:52
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Ivan Vecerina, 06:51
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 06:45
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 06:40
- Re: Email NOW $$ HIGH $$ C Programmer WANTED NOW!!, MQ, 06:40
- Re: Can a function returns a matrix?, MQ, 06:37
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 06:35
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, MQ, 06:33
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 06:19
- Can a function returns a matrix?, Balaji.V, 06:17
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 06:17
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, MQ, 06:15
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Gernot Frisch, 06:10
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 06:01
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 05:58
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Gernot Frisch, 05:58
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 05:55
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 05:42
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Gernot Frisch, 05:31
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 05:24
- Re: c interview, Richard Heathfield, 05:21
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Richard Heathfield, 05:20
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Keith Thompson, 05:14
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, Richard Heathfield, 05:11
- Re: code portability, Keith Thompson, 05:10
- Re: return value of main, Richard Heathfield, 05:09
- Re: return value of main, Keith Thompson, 05:04
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Keith Thompson, 05:01
- Re: return value of main, Martin Ambuhl, 05:00
- Re: anyone interested in decompilation, jaysome, 04:55
- anyone interested in decompilation, QuantumG, 04:23
- Re: c interview, jaysome, 04:23
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 03:58
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 03:49
- Re: return value of main, Papastefanos Serafeim, 03:46
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., Flash Gordon, 03:40
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Ark, 03:40
- Re: print to file question, Flash Gordon, 03:34
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, jaysome, 03:32
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Gernot Frisch, 03:29
- Re: return value of main, Ian Collins, 03:27
- return value of main, Christian Christmann, 03:16
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Keith Thompson, 02:58
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, jacob navia, 02:54
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Johan Tibell, 02:53
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Ark, 02:43
- Re: Confused to printf %f, timmu, 01:53
- Re: Reading binary file with C, acp26b, 01:32
- Re: c interview, Keith Thompson, 01:24
- Re: Question on automatic variables and array arguments, Keith Thompson, 01:20
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Herbert Rosenau, 01:17
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Herbert Rosenau, 01:17
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, Herbert Rosenau, 01:17
- Re: Reading binary file with C, Keith Thompson, 01:16
- Re: Reading binary file with C, Bill Pursell, 01:07
- Re: c interview, Sjouke Burry, 01:01
- Re: c interview, dis_is_eagle, 00:53
- Email NOW $$ HIGH $$ C Programmer WANTED NOW!!, $Need C Programmer$, 00:53
- Question on automatic variables and array arguments, main(), 00:45
- Re: Looking for standard C data structure implementations..., Ben Pfaff, 00:45
- Reading binary file with C, acp26b, 00:45
August 01, 2006
- Re: Looking for standard C data structure implementations..., dcorbit, 23:26
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Keith Thompson, 23:07
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Roy Smith, 22:40
- Re: complier problem, Dann Corbit, 22:37
- Re: c interview, J. J. Farrell, 22:27
- Re: Confused to printf %f, timmu, 22:19
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 21:57
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Kirit Sælensminde, 21:49
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Joe Wright, 21:38
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., Keith Thompson, 21:29
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 21:24
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., MQ, 21:22
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Ike Naar, 21:20
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., MQ, 21:18
- Re: c interview, Christopher Benson-Manica, 21:16
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 20:54
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure, Richard Heathfield, 20:49
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 20:47
- Re: print to file question, Keith Thompson, 20:45
- Re: print to file question, Peter Nilsson, 20:44
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., William Ahern, 20:37
- Re: print to file question, philbo30, 20:28
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Eric Sosman, 20:22
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Sjouke Burry, 20:01
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., Flash Gordon, 20:00
- Re: Writing to an existing file., Keith Thompson, 19:59
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, J. J. Farrell, 19:56
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., Keith Thompson, 19:52
- Re: code portability, Eigenvector, 19:48
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Dik T. Winter, 19:48
- Re: code portability, Eigenvector, 19:48
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 19:47
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 19:39
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Keith Thompson, 19:35
- Re: Writing to an existing file., Default User, 19:04
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 19:01
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 19:01
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 19:01
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 19:01
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 19:01
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., MQ, 18:50
- Re: Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., MQ, 18:47
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Al Balmer, 18:41
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Peter Nilsson, 18:38
- Writing to an existing file., shalakasan, 18:37
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., jacob navia, 18:33
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 18:27
- Casting a generic or void pointer to point to a struct..., redefined . horizons, 18:23
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Keith Thompson, 18:21
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Ben Pfaff, 18:20
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Eric Sosman, 18:20
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 18:16
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Keith Thompson, 18:11
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure, Skarmander, 18:05
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Douglas A. Gwyn, 18:05
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 17:57
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Heathfield, 17:56
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Keith Thompson, 17:51
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Michael Mair, 17:38
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 17:38
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 17:36
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Papastefanos Serafeim, 17:35
- Re: Regarding EAGAIN error in read(), Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: extern char *calargv[] not having values populated earlier., trm, 17:34
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 17:31
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, David R Tribble, 17:25
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure (was: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?), Richard Heathfield, 17:15
- Re: evaluation of for loop, Clever Monkey, 16:57
- Re: pointer to *this, Jens Marder, 16:50
- Re: code portability, Clever Monkey, 16:42
- Re: Looking for standard C data structure implementations..., Clever Monkey, 16:35
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Eric Sosman, 16:32
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., Clever Monkey, 16:31
- Re: Dealing with memory allocation failure (was: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?), Skarmander, 16:30
- Re: aio_read Help, William Ahern, 16:23
- Re: print to file question, Christopher Benson-Manica, 16:21
- Re: code portability, Flash Gordon, 16:10
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Flash Gordon, 16:10
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Ian Collins, 16:03
- Re: Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., jacob navia, 15:56
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Skarmander, 15:52
- Re: Need help with C Language, Andrew Poelstra, 15:48
- Re: Need help with C Language, Andrew Poelstra, 15:47
- Re: Need help with C Language, Andrew Poelstra, 15:40
- Declare an array with a size based on a variable..., redefined . horizons, 15:38
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, websnarf, 15:32
- Looking for standard C data structure implementations..., redefined . horizons, 15:32
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Andrew Poelstra, 15:29
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Al Balmer, 15:22
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Eric Sosman, 15:22
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Andrew Poelstra, 15:14
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, jacob navia, 15:08
- Re: print to file question, Hallvard B Furuseth, 15:08
- print to file question, philbo30, 15:01
- Re: Need help with C Language, Ben Pfaff, 14:51
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Skarmander, 14:49
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 14:49
- Re: code portability, Martin Ambuhl, 14:44
- Re: code portability, Walter Roberson, 14:41
- Re: Need help with C Language, Richard Heathfield, 14:38
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Richard Tobin, 14:34
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 14:33
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Skarmander, 14:33
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Skarmander, 14:31
- Re: Need help with C Language, vinod . bhavnani, 14:26
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Richard Heathfield, 14:25
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:23
- Re: Need help with C Language, Ronald Bruck, 14:16
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Clever Monkey, 14:12
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Richard Heathfield, 14:10
- Re: My hash table is in need of peer review, Richard Tobin, 14:01
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Richard Tobin, 13:55
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 13:52
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Tom St Denis, 13:50
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 13:50
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Tobin, 13:46
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Ancient_Hacker, 13:45
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 13:37
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Walter Roberson, 13:35
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 13:35
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Clever Monkey, 13:29
- Re: code portability, Kenneth Brody, 13:18
- Re: PLEASE HELP - Producer consumer implementation in C, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:14
- Re: PLEASE HELP - Producer consumer implementation in C, Jack Klein, 13:13
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, Jack Klein, 13:09
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 13:07
- My hash table is in need of peer review, Johan Tibell, 12:59
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 12:53
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, Clever Monkey, 12:53
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Ancient_Hacker, 12:50
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Johan Tibell, 12:47
- Re: PLEASE HELP - Producer consumer implementation in C, Tom St Denis, 12:44
- Re: extern char *calargv[] not having values populated earlier., Eric Sosman, 12:41
- Re: PLEASE HELP - Producer consumer implementation in C, pemo, 12:34
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Kirit Sælensminde, 12:31
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 12:28
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Thomas Carter, 12:18
- PLEASE HELP - Producer consumer implementation in C, cpptutor2000@xxxxxxxxx, 12:16
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 12:16
- Re: Need help with C Language, Richard Heathfield, 12:12
- Re: code portability, Al Balmer, 12:07
- Re: Need help with C Language, Clever Monkey, 12:03
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Richard Heathfield, 12:03
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 12:02
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 12:00
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Al Balmer, 12:00
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Kenneth Brody, 11:57
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Heathfield, 11:56
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Morris Dovey, 11:49
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Clever Monkey, 11:46
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 11:44
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 11:43
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 11:41
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Al Balmer, 11:39
- Need help with C Language, vinod . bhavnani, 11:33
- Re: A question, Dave Vandervies, 11:27
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Clever Monkey, 11:22
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 11:17
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 11:16
- extern char *calargv[] not having values populated earlier., yogeshmk, 11:14
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 11:07
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 11:01
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 11:00
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, Simon Biber, 10:50
- Re: code portability, Richard Bos, 10:44
- Re: code portability, jacob navia, 10:30
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Frederick Gotham, 10:24
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 10:23
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 10:21
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 10:19
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Andrew Poelstra, 10:19
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Andrew Poelstra, 10:14
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Andrew Poelstra, 10:12
- Re: Regarding EAGAIN error in read(), Papastefanos Serafeim, 09:54
- Re: Regarding EAGAIN error in read(), Walter Roberson, 09:51
- Regarding EAGAIN error in read(), Madhu, 09:12
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Bos, 09:09
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 08:37
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Kannan, 08:35
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, neha, 08:19
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, Dik T. Winter, 08:16
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, Richard Heathfield, 07:56
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, neha, 07:48
- Re: Floating Point Formats are not linked, Richard Heathfield, 07:34
- Floating Point Formats are not linked, neha, 07:17
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Gernot Frisch, 06:06
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris Torek, 05:56
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris Torek, 05:50
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris Torek, 05:45
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris Torek, 05:27
- Re: Returning char** from a function., Chris Dollin, 04:50
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 04:46
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Haroon Shafiq, 04:44
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Haroon Shafiq, 04:32
- Re: aio_read Help, Flash Gordon, 04:04
- Re: max strlen at compile time?, Richard Heathfield, 03:55
- Re: c interview, gkumar007, 03:50
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Heathfield, 03:48
- Re: code portability, Richard Heathfield, 03:42
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Flash Gordon, 03:33
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 03:30
- Re: c interview, Keith Thompson, 03:30
- max strlen at compile time?, Gernot Frisch, 03:28
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 03:28
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 03:22
- c interview, dis_is_eagle, 03:20
- Re: aio_read Help, Keith Thompson, 03:17
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, Papastefanos Serafeim, 02:56
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, abhi147, 02:50
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, J. J. Farrell, 02:39
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, abhi147, 02:38
- Re: Hex digits to special chars, Richard Bos, 02:25
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jaysome, 02:22
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Old Wolf, 02:18
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Old Wolf, 02:17
- aio_read Help, danu, 02:17
- Hex digits to special chars, abhi147, 02:03
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Bill Pursell, 02:01
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Bill Pursell, 01:57
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, sarathy, 01:50
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Michael Mair, 01:47
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Bill Pursell, 01:33
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Bill Pursell, 01:26
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 01:18
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 01:10
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, Roy Smith, 00:55
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Default User, 00:52
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Andrew Poelstra, 00:50
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., mensanator@xxxxxxx, 00:50
- Re: code portability, Eigenvector, 00:27
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, red floyd, 00:12
- Re: 1's complement and 2's complement, SM Ryan, 00:11
- 1's complement and 2's complement, sarathy, 00:00
July 31, 2006
- Re: code portability, Tom St Denis, 23:56
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, Tom St Denis, 23:52
- code portability, Eigenvector, 23:52
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 23:08
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 21:57
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 21:50
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 21:49
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Dik T. Winter, 21:47
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., Clifford Stern, 21:40
- Re: The illusion of "portability", dcorbit, 21:34
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 21:25
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Barry Schwarz, 21:21
- Re: Returning char** from a function., Eric Sosman, 21:12
- Re: Pointer question?, Barry Schwarz, 21:06
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 21:02
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:58
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:45
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:43
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Al Balmer, 20:34
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:21
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:20
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Flash Gordon, 20:19
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Andrew Poelstra, 20:19
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:17
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 20:16
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Andrew Poelstra, 20:11
- Re: The illusion of "portability", J. J. Farrell, 20:11
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., lawrence . jones, 20:10
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: String problem, I guess?, pete, 19:39
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Tom St Denis, 19:34
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 19:19
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, jacob navia, 19:15
- Re: The illusion of "portability", dcorbit, 19:13
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 19:10
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 19:05
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 19:04
- Re: The illusion of "portability", dcorbit, 19:00
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 18:58
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Frederick Gotham, 18:58
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Ben Pfaff, 18:55
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 18:52
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Frederick Gotham, 18:51
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 18:47
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Keith Thompson, 18:44
- Re: The illusion of "portability", John Bode, 18:42
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, Joe Wright, 18:36
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 18:35
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 18:30
- Re: pointer to *this, Keith Thompson, 18:29
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 18:27
- Re: pointer to *this, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Chris F.A. Johnson, 18:19
- Re: The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 18:16
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Frederick Gotham, 17:59
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Keith Thompson, 17:54
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Eric Sosman, 17:50
- Re: The illusion of "portability", Richard Heathfield, 17:50
- Re: pointer to *this, Frederick Gotham, 17:49
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, jacob navia, 17:48
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Frederick Gotham, 17:43
- Re: pointer to *this, Jens Marder, 17:38
- Re: pointer to *this, jacob navia, 17:36
- pointer to *this, liorlew, 17:32
- The illusion of "portability", jacob navia, 17:30
- Re: Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Richard Heathfield, 17:28
- Checking return values for errors, a matter of style?, Johan Tibell, 17:20
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Richard Heathfield, 17:20
- Re: Returning char** from a function., Andrey Tarasevich, 17:19
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Richard Heathfield, 17:02
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, jacob navia, 17:01
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Keith Thompson, 16:43
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 16:06
Privacy Policy