comp.lang.c (date)
July 31, 2006
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, wenmang, 15:52
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, wenmang, 15:50
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, wenmang, 15:45
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Frederick Gotham, 15:45
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Keith Thompson, 15:42
- Re: initialize an array of elements that contain another array, Lew Pitcher, 15:34
- initialize an array of elements that contain another array, wenmang, 15:28
- Re: not able to free up a string..., Lew Pitcher, 15:25
- Re: Returning char** from a function., Ike Naar, 15:23
- Re: not able to free up a string..., Walter Roberson, 15:19
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:12
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Stephen Sprunk, 15:10
- not able to free up a string..., mmonty11, 15:10
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Default User, 15:08
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Default User, 15:03
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Ancient_Hacker, 14:57
- Re: Returning char** from a function., Ben Pfaff, 14:56
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Walter Roberson, 14:50
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, jacob navia, 14:40
- Returning char** from a function., noridotjabi@xxxxxxxxx, 14:15
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 13:50
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, iaesun, 13:45
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, Walter Roberson, 13:42
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, iaesun, 13:39
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Herbert Rosenau, 13:39
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Herbert Rosenau, 13:39
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Herbert Rosenau, 13:39
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Tom St Denis, 13:38
- Re: detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, Tom St Denis, 13:35
- detecting EOF using cin with file redirection, iaesun, 13:33
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Richard Heathfield, 13:26
- Re: Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Walter Roberson, 13:25
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, Richard Heathfield, 13:23
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, sheroork, 13:19
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, Flash Gordon, 13:16
- Re: tutorials about C strucutres, Robbie Hatley, 13:13
- Variable declaration - Is this valid in standard C?, Kannan, 13:11
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, Walter Roberson, 13:08
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Ike Naar, 13:08
- Re: Pointer question?, Eric Sosman, 12:46
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, Frederick Gotham, 12:43
- Re: Boyer - Moore Algorithm, Robbie Hatley, 12:40
- Pointer question?, rattan, 12:37
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Frederick Gotham, 12:31
- Re: tutorials about C strucutres, adshea, 12:20
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Ben Pfaff, 12:09
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, Walter Roberson, 11:58
- Re: [OT] STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Al Balmer, 11:47
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Al Balmer, 11:40
- Re: String problem, I guess?, Richard Heathfield, 11:36
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, Tom St Denis, 11:33
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, polkid, 11:30
- Re: tutorials about C strucutres, John Bode, 11:28
- Re: Boyer - Moore Algorithm, Chris F.A. Johnson, 11:26
- Re: Boyer - Moore Algorithm, Eric Sosman, 11:23
- Re: Boyer - Moore Algorithm, Tom St Denis, 11:03
- Boyer - Moore Algorithm, gurdz, 10:55
- String problem, I guess?, Paul Hobbs, 10:41
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Flash Gordon, 10:36
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 10:20
- Re: String constants, Andrew Poelstra, 10:18
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 10:13
- Thanks everyone, moving to gnu.gcc.help, Andreas Griesmayer, 10:13
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Andrew Poelstra, 10:12
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, Andrew Poelstra, 10:08
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), spibou, 10:07
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, Richard Heathfield, 10:01
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 09:57
- Re: Operation undefined, Andrew Poelstra, 09:57
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, Andrew Poelstra, 09:50
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), spibou, 09:50
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 09:49
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Morris Dovey, 09:30
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 09:13
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), David Resnick, 08:57
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., joshc, 08:54
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 08:44
- Re: Day of the week algorithm, Tak-Shing Chan, 08:39
- Re: tutorials about C strucutres, Richard Heathfield, 08:19
- Re: Volatile, Eric Sosman, 08:01
- Re: tutorials about C strucutres, Kenneth, 07:59
- Re: x used with no following hex digits, Dik T. Winter, 07:40
- Day of the week algorithm, aarklon, 07:29
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Giorgio Silvestri, 07:19
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Giorgio Silvestri, 07:11
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Bos, 07:11
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Bos, 07:09
- tutorials about C strucutres, tanny, 07:08
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Richard Heathfield, 07:05
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 07:03
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 06:42
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, abhi147, 06:41
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Keith Thompson, 06:40
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 06:37
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Ian Collins, 06:36
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Martin Ambuhl, 06:31
- Re: Operation undefined, Martin Ambuhl, 06:28
- Re: Implicit declaration, Keith Thompson, 06:27
- Re: Operation undefined, Robert Gamble, 06:26
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Giorgio Silvestri, 06:22
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Martin Ambuhl, 06:20
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Giorgio Silvestri, 06:15
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Martin Ambuhl, 06:10
- Operation undefined, Christian Christmann, 06:07
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Friedrich Dominicus, 06:02
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 06:02
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Keith Thompson, 05:58
- Re: GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Richard Heathfield, 05:58
- Re: Implicit declaration, Richard Heathfield, 05:52
- Re: Implicit declaration, Ian Collins, 05:41
- GCC-Bug ? (Unintended "overloading"), Andreas Griesmayer, 05:37
- Re: Implicit declaration, Christian Christmann, 05:29
- Re: Implicit declaration, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- Implicit declaration, Christian Christmann, 05:03
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Scorpio, 05:03
- Re: \x used with no following hex digits, Walter Roberson, 05:00
- \x used with no following hex digits, abhi147, 04:58
- Re: Volatile, Richard Heathfield, 04:54
- Re: STOP what you're doing - It doesn't work! 934U, Richard Heathfield, 04:32
- Volatile, Christian Christmann, 04:31
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Richard Heathfield, 04:15
- Re: STOP what you're doing - It doesn't work! 934U, spibou, 04:05
- Re: Simple Serial Port Program, Ian Collins, 03:52
- Simple Serial Port Program, Joel, 03:50
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Scorpio, 03:47
- Re: Register Dump, Ian Collins, 03:41
- Re: Send a series of bit zeros through serial port, Ian Collins, 03:40
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Ian Collins, 03:34
- Send a series of bit zeros through serial port, jwamicha, 03:34
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Keith Thompson, 03:31
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Keith Thompson, 03:27
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 03:21
- Re: String constants, Keith Thompson, 03:17
- Re: [OT] STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Ian Collins, 03:13
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 03:12
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Heathfield, 03:08
- Re: Forward Declarations, Chris Torek, 02:58
- Re: evaluation of for loop, dis_is_eagle, 02:52
- Register Dump, gogo, 02:51
- Re: inline power function replacement, Chris Torek, 02:24
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Harald van Dijk, 02:18
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Harald van Dijk, 02:16
- Re: String constants, Chris Torek, 02:16
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Al Balmer, 02:12
- Re: [OT] STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Al Balmer, 02:12
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Al Balmer, 02:12
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., spibou, 02:09
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Harald van Dijk, 02:03
- Re: inline power function replacement, ena8t8si, 02:01
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, ena8t8si, 01:59
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 01:57
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 01:56
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 01:54
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, ena8t8si, 01:53
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, ena8t8si, 01:51
- Re: Double increment question., ena8t8si, 01:48
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, ena8t8si, 01:44
- Re: OT: const integers, ena8t8si, 01:41
- Re: String constants, gthorpe, 01:33
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 01:32
- Re: String constants, spibou, 01:31
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Jack Klein, 01:20
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Dave Thompson, 01:11
- ANN: Call for papers, qophee, 01:10
- Re: String constants, MQ, 01:06
- String constants, gthorpe, 00:57
- Re: String constants, Walter Roberson, 00:50
- Re: String constants, MQ, 00:42
- Re: Array definition and extern declaration with different size., Endy., 00:22
- Re: evaluation of for loop, Barry Schwarz, 00:15
July 30, 2006
- Array definition and extern declaration with different size., joshc, 23:48
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Keith Thompson, 23:14
- Re: structure malloc help, Old Wolf, 22:22
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Old Wolf, 22:11
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, J. J. Farrell, 21:44
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Frederick Gotham, 20:57
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Richard Heathfield, 19:46
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 19:44
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, jacob navia, 19:41
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 19:22
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Richard Heathfield, 18:38
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, jacob navia, 18:29
- Re: Help with malloc(), Schizoid Man, 18:16
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Malcolm, 18:08
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Richard Heathfield, 17:46
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, jacob navia, 17:37
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Keith Thompson, 17:29
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Stephen Sprunk, 17:12
- Re: Newbie question on loading data from config file, Keith Thompson, 17:12
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Keith Thompson, 17:05
- Re: evaluation of for loop, Keith Thompson, 17:03
- Re: Help with malloc(), Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Richard Heathfield, 16:48
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, spibou, 16:34
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, goose, 16:31
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, nk, 16:30
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Ben Pfaff, 16:30
- Re: doubt about doubt, blmblm, 16:17
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, spibou, 16:15
- Re: Forward Declarations, Chris Torek, 16:13
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Keith Thompson, 16:11
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Eric Sosman, 16:11
- Re: Help with malloc(), Martin Ambuhl, 16:07
- Re: Help with malloc(), Joe Wright, 16:03
- Re: Correspondence between headers and macros, Ben Pfaff, 15:54
- Correspondence between headers and macros, spibou, 15:44
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Leor Zolman, 15:31
- Re: Help with malloc(), Schizoid Man, 15:30
- Re: Help with malloc(), Richard Heathfield, 15:29
- Re: Help with malloc(), Schizoid Man, 15:17
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Herbert Rosenau, 14:52
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Herbert Rosenau, 14:52
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Ben Pfaff, 14:39
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Chris Torek, 14:36
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Herbert Rosenau, 14:28
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Herbert Rosenau, 14:12
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Default User, 13:58
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Richard Heathfield, 13:57
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Ben Pfaff, 13:26
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Malcolm, 13:12
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ark, 13:09
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, August Karlstrom, 13:08
- Re: Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, Richard Heathfield, 12:57
- Pointer to pointer with lots of examples, sheroork, 12:35
- Re: Newbie question on loading data from config file, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 12:33
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 12:09
- Re: Newbie question on loading data from config file, philbo30, 12:01
- Re: evaluation of for loop, Giorgio Silvestri, 11:57
- Re: structure malloc help, Bill Pursell, 11:53
- Re: structure malloc help, Mike, 11:45
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Old Wolf, 11:21
- Re: evaluation of for loop, spibou, 11:11
- Re: evaluation of for loop, Tom St Denis, 10:56
- evaluation of for loop, dis_is_eagle, 10:47
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 09:49
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 09:34
- Re: Help with malloc(), Andrew Poelstra, 09:27
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, spibou, 07:13
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, Skarmander, 06:44
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Skarmander, 06:40
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, spibou, 06:36
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, jacob navia, 06:28
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, spibou, 06:22
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Artemio, 06:01
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, jacob navia, 05:41
- Re: Question about a splint diagnostic, jacob navia, 05:33
- Question about a splint diagnostic, spibou, 05:22
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 04:31
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 04:21
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Keith Thompson, 04:19
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 04:16
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Chris Torek, 04:15
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Chris Torek, 04:07
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 03:38
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Frederick Gotham, 03:33
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Gordon Burditt, 03:29
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 03:04
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Artemio, 02:46
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 02:37
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Artemio, 02:32
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Old Wolf, 01:50
- Re: Size of a structure is not the same as presumed!!!, Barry Schwarz, 01:35
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 01:07
- Re: Help with malloc(), Default User, 00:48
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 00:45
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Tom St Denis, 00:25
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ark, 00:23
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 00:13
July 29, 2006
- Re: Help with malloc(), Morris Dovey, 23:26
- Re: Judge Files Exist, Gordon Burditt, 23:19
- Re: Newbie question on loading data from config file, Joe Wright, 23:14
- Re: Judge Files Exist, Ben Pfaff, 23:07
- Re: Judge Files Exist, Ben Pfaff, 23:07
- Judge Files Exist, sword, 23:04
- Judge Files Exist, sword, 23:04
- Judge Files Exist, sword, 23:04
- Re: Help with malloc(), Chris McDonald, 23:03
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Harald van Dijk, 22:54
- Help with malloc(), Schizoid Man, 22:49
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 22:24
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, P.J. Plauger, 21:29
- Re: Wierd problem with command line args, Dik T. Winter, 21:26
- Re: Newbie question on loading data from config file, Keith Thompson, 21:24
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 20:56
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 20:52
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 20:46
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Ark, 20:39
- Newbie question on loading data from config file, philbo30, 20:35
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 20:32
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 20:26
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 20:18
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ark, 20:17
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ark, 20:07
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Keith Thompson, 20:02
- Re: doubt about doubt, Dik T. Winter, 19:52
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Chris Torek, 19:43
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Dik T. Winter, 19:40
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 19:30
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 19:17
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Joe Wright, 19:15
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 19:15
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 19:10
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 18:56
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, P.J. Plauger, 18:55
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 18:48
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 18:42
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 18:41
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Richard Heathfield, 18:22
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Michael Mair, 17:56
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Michael Mair, 17:26
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Dave Vandervies, 17:24
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Eric Sosman, 17:19
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, Flash Gordon, 17:07
- Re: Wierd problem with command line args, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Flash Gordon, 16:48
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 16:41
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Frederick Gotham, 16:39
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Chris Torek, 16:33
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Ian Collins, 16:30
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Ian Collins, 16:26
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 16:24
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Chris Torek, 16:23
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 16:17
- Re: inline power function replacement, lawrence . jones, 16:16
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, lawrence . jones, 16:16
- Re: Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 16:08
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, mithra, 16:01
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Skarmander, 15:58
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 15:55
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 15:52
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 15:44
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 15:41
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Tom St Denis, 15:39
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Dave Vandervies, 15:36
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Gordon Burditt, 15:32
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 15:30
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 15:25
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 15:19
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 15:18
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 15:14
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 15:14
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 15:02
- Help with sscanf() needed desperately, Artemio, 14:58
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, Comcast News, 14:57
- Re: Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, jacob navia, 14:55
- Initializing an Array of Pointers to Char, nk, 14:48
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 14:44
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 14:34
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 14:27
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 14:25
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Skarmander, 14:17
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Joe Wright, 14:02
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Eric Sosman, 14:02
- Re: i want help on FILE IO, Malcolm, 13:49
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Tom St Denis, 13:45
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Malcolm, 13:44
- Re: Size of a structure is not the same as presumed!!!, Gordon Burditt, 13:38
- STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 9M1D, wdaihsdp, 13:35
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 13:35
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 13:26
- Re: Threads, Frederick Gotham, 13:15
- Re: Threads, Richard Heathfield, 13:06
- Re: Threads, Frederick Gotham, 12:56
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Frederick Gotham, 12:54
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Richard Heathfield, 12:54
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Joe Wright, 12:45
- Re: Threads, Tom St Denis, 11:21
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 11:21
- Re: Threads, Andrew Poelstra, 11:17
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Andrew Poelstra, 11:15
- Re: Double increment question., Andrew Poelstra, 11:09
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 11:06
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 10:58
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Tom St Denis, 10:50
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Michael Mair, 10:41
- Re: Decoding Base64, Becca, 10:06
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Eric Sosman, 09:48
- Re: Must evaluate assertion?, Szabolcs Borsanyi, 09:43
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Eric Sosman, 09:41
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Joe Wright, 09:35
- Must evaluate assertion?, Frederick Gotham, 09:29
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Richard Heathfield, 09:21
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 09:02
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Flash Gordon, 09:00
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, Richard Heathfield, 08:56
- Re: doubt about doubt, blmblm, 08:47
- [OT] Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 08:43
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Richard Tobin, 08:41
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Michael Mair, 07:15
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 07:14
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, jacob navia, 07:13
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 07:06
- Re: long double in gcc implementations, jacob navia, 07:02
- long double in gcc implementations, lcw1964, 06:53
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 06:47
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Keith Thompson, 06:43
- Re: i want help on FILE IO, Richard Heathfield, 06:39
- Re: i want help on FILE IO, Ico, 06:38
- i want help on FILE IO, meet2amit_p@xxxxxxxxx, 06:36
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Keith Thompson, 06:22
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, SuperKoko, 06:15
- Re: Standard for parsing, Malcolm, 06:00
- Re: Decoding Base64, Keith Thompson, 06:00
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Malcolm, 05:55
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, kwikius, 05:53
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Michael Mair, 05:00
- Re: inline power function replacement, Tak-Shing Chan, 04:52
- Re: Double increment question., av, 04:42
- Re: Threads, av, 04:42
- Re: structure malloc help, Bill Pursell, 04:21
- Re: complier problem, Chris Torek, 04:01
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Mabden, 04:00
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Mabden, 03:56
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Old Wolf, 03:23
- Re: Threads, Ian Collins, 03:11
- Re: Threads, Andrew Poelstra, 03:06
- Re: Size of a structure is not the same as presumed!!!, chandanlinster, 02:53
- Re: what is wchar_t, Harald van Dijk, 02:36
- Re: Threads, av, 02:36
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 02:34
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Ian Collins, 02:34
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 02:18
- Re: Size of a structure is not the same as presumed!!!, Robert Gamble, 02:14
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Dave Vandervies, 02:06
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Jack Klein, 02:04
- Size of a structure is not the same as presumed!!!, chandanlinster, 02:01
- Re: A concern about mixing C and C++, Ian Collins, 01:49
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Ian Collins, 01:42
- Re: complier problem, Ark, 01:41
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Andrew Poelstra, 01:37
- A concern about mixing C and C++, ziman137, 01:28
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Andrew Poelstra, 01:28
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Default User, 01:12
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Default User, 01:08
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Al Balmer, 00:52
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 00:34
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 00:32
- Re: ?????????Y???????????????P??C???}???]??????????, lovecreatesbeauty, 00:20
July 28, 2006
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Keith Thompson, 23:46
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Frederick Gotham, 23:46
- Re: Socket Programming Question, Keith Thompson, 23:43
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Keith Thompson, 23:42
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Frederick Gotham, 23:41
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 23:23
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, SM Ryan, 23:14
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Robbie Hatley, 23:03
- Re: Standard for parsing, Keith Thompson, 22:57
- Re: inline power function replacement, Tak-Shing Chan, 22:45
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 22:40
- Re: what is wchar_t, Keith Thompson, 22:39
- Re: inline power function replacement, Keith Thompson, 22:37
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Richard Heathfield, 22:36
- Re: Socket Programming Question, Shaun Duncan, 22:29
- Re: C program to communicate over ethernet, EventHelix.com, 22:15
- Re: what is wchar_t, Old Wolf, 22:14
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Old Wolf, 21:59
- Re: Confused to printf %f, timmu, 21:54
- Re: structure malloc help, Old Wolf, 21:52
- Re: structure malloc help, Thomas J. Gritzan, 21:49
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 21:43
- Re: Confused to printf %f, Richard Heathfield, 21:41
- structure malloc help, mdrons, 21:35
- Confused to printf %f, timmu, 21:32
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Eric Sosman, 21:32
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Old Wolf, 21:22
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, J. J. Farrell, 21:21
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Heathfield, 21:15
- Re: inline power function replacement, Chris Torek, 21:13
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Eric Sosman, 21:13
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Keith Thompson, 20:55
- Re: inline power function replacement, Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Chad, 20:48
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Keith Thompson, 20:44
- Re: Wierd problem with command line args, Ben Pfaff, 20:30
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Keith Thompson, 20:19
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Keith Thompson, 20:17
- Socket Programming Question, Shaun Duncan, 19:59
- Re: Wierd problem with command line args, vjonweb, 19:40
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Ian Collins, 19:26
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Default User, 19:24
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Ian Collins, 19:23
- C program to communicate over ethernet, polkid, 19:19
- Re: Wierd problem with command line args, Ben Pfaff, 19:11
- Wierd problem with command line args, vjonweb, 19:08
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 19:01
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Default User, 18:53
- Re: doubt about doubt, Mark McIntyre, 18:47
- Re: ?????????Y???????????????P??C???}???]??????????, Mark McIntyre, 18:46
- Re: Threads, Mark McIntyre, 18:43
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Mark McIntyre, 18:41
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Mark McIntyre, 18:35
- Re: complier problem, Chris Torek, 18:23
- Re: STOP what you’re doing - It doesn’t work! 934U, Al Balmer, 18:21
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Richard Tobin, 18:18
- Re: Standard for parsing, spibou, 18:16
- Re: Standard for parsing, 31337one, 18:03
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 17:55
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robert Gamble, 17:53
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Default User, 17:43
- Re: Standard for parsing, William Ahern, 17:37
- Re: Decoding Base64, Richard Heathfield, 17:36
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 17:29
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 17:25
- Re: Decoding Base64, Becca, 17:13
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Default User, 17:10
- Re: Standard for parsing, Default User, 17:10
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Default User, 17:10
- Re: doubt about doubt, Default User, 17:10
- Re: inline power function replacement, Default User, 17:10
- Re: complier problem, Andrey Tarasevich, 17:10
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 17:01
- Re: Decoding Base64, Walter Roberson, 16:50
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Frederick Gotham, 16:43
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Dave Vandervies, 16:40
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Frederick Gotham, 16:38
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Julian V. Noble, 16:34
- Re: Threads, Herbert Rosenau, 16:34
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Herbert Rosenau, 16:34
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, Herbert Rosenau, 16:34
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 16:30
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Eric Sosman, 16:16
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robbie Hatley, 16:12
- Re: inline power function replacement, lawrence . jones, 16:10
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, kuyper, 16:09
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Kevin Bagust, 16:02
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Frederick Gotham, 16:02
- Re: Decoding Base64, Becca, 16:01
- Re: complier problem, Chris Torek, 16:01
- Re: Threads, Walter Roberson, 16:00
- Re: Pattern creation, Flash Gordon, 15:57
- Re: Decoding Base64, Flash Gordon, 15:53
- Re: Decoding Base64, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:41
- Re: Decoding Base64, Robbie Hatley, 15:29
- Re: Decoding Base64, Kenneth Brody, 15:24
- Re: Pattern creation, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:23
- Re: inline power function replacement, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:21
- Re: Threads, Michael Wojcik, 15:09
- Re: Standard for parsing, Flash Gordon, 15:01
- Pattern creation, harendra, 15:00
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 14:58
- Re: comp.lang.c, Poly-poly man, 14:55
- Re: Standard for parsing, spibou, 14:54
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, David R Tribble, 14:51
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:50
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 14:49
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, spibou, 14:49
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, David R Tribble, 14:44
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 14:43
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Ben Pfaff, 14:42
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Andrew Poelstra, 14:42
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Bill Pursell, 14:42
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Andrew Poelstra, 14:41
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Jerry Coffin, 14:40
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robert Gamble, 14:30
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 14:29
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Al Balmer, 14:29
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 14:18
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, SuperKoko, 14:18
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 14:16
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robert Gamble, 14:13
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Eric Sosman, 14:11
- Re: Decoding Base64, Becca, 14:11
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, spibou, 14:05
- Re: Decoding Base64, Richard Heathfield, 13:56
- Re: Decoding Base64, Becca, 13:49
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Christopher Benson-Manica, 13:47
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:41
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Ben Pfaff, 13:40
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 13:36
- Re: precompiler: pasting and underscore, Arthur J. O'Dwyer, 13:35
- Re: complier problem, Eric Sosman, 13:30
- Re: Decoding Base64, Richard Heathfield, 13:26
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:20
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robert Gamble, 13:20
- Decoding Base64, BB, 13:19
- precompiler: pasting and underscore, Bill Pursell, 13:16
- Re: complier problem, spibou, 13:16
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Robert Gamble, 13:15
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 13:14
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Victor Bazarov, 13:10
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:09
- Re: The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, Richard Heathfield, 13:06
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ed Prochak, 13:03
- Re: Standard for parsing, 31337one, 13:03
- Re: Standard for parsing, spibou, 13:00
- Re: doubt about doubt, Bob Nelson, 13:00
- Re: complier problem, Frederick Gotham, 12:56
- The Wikipedia article on C and C++ operators, spibou, 12:55
- Re: Standard for parsing, 31337one, 12:52
- Re: Standard for parsing, Flash Gordon, 12:46
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, Michael Wojcik, 12:42
- Re: use of %, spibou, 12:38
- Re: Standard for parsing, spibou, 12:36
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 12:35
- Re: use of %, gw7rib, 12:35
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Michael Wojcik, 12:31
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Michael Wojcik, 12:28
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Michael Wojcik, 12:23
- Re: Is this a good habit?, gw7rib, 12:20
- Re: comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 12:19
- Re: use of %, Walter Roberson, 12:14
- Re: use of %, 31337one, 12:10
- Re: inline power function replacement, Walter Roberson, 12:10
- Re: complier problem, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:05
- Re: static array, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:59
- Standard for parsing, 31337one, 11:57
- Re: comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 11:44
- Re: comp.lang.c, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:43
- Re: static array, Richard Heathfield, 11:41
- Perpherial Brains, DietAndBody, 11:40
- Re: complier problem, Eric Sosman, 11:31
- Re: comp.lang.c, Ben Pfaff, 11:21
- Re: what is wchar_t, Clever Monkey, 11:16
- what is wchar_t, sarathy, 11:07
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, asoofi, 10:54
- complier problem, neha, 10:52
- Re: use of %, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:51
- Re: static array, lovecreatesbeauty, 10:50
- use of %, dis_is_eagle, 10:44
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 10:21
- Re: inline power function replacement, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 10:21
- Re: static array, Richard Heathfield, 09:57
- Re: inline power function replacement, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 09:51
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Bob Martin, 09:32
- Re: static array, osmium, 09:12
- Re: test, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:02
- Re: Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Richard Bos, 08:59
- Question about a solution to excercise 4-13 in K & R, Chad, 08:56
- test, xuemiantao@xxxxxxxxx, 08:46
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 08:15
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 08:10
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Nick Keighley, 08:00
- Re: comp.lang.c, Flash Gordon, 07:45
- Re: 1 client and multiple server, Flash Gordon, 07:42
- Re: comp.lang.c, Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- 1 client and multiple server, abhi147, 06:54
- comp.lang.c, dravid, 06:45
- Re: static array, Flash Gordon, 06:01
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Keith Thompson, 06:01
- Re: static array, Richard Heathfield, 06:00
- Re: inline power function replacement, Richard Heathfield, 05:59
- Re: doubt about doubt, Richard Heathfield, 05:56
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, goose, 05:11
- Re: inline power function replacement, Ulrich Eckhardt, 04:55
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Chris Dollin, 04:43
- Re: doubt about doubt, Richard Bos, 04:39
- Re: static array, spibou, 04:00
- Re: static array, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:00
- Re: inline power function replacement, Flash Gordon, 03:00
- Re: doubt about doubt, Keith Thompson, 02:30
- Re: doubt about doubt, Peter Nilsson, 02:16
- Re: doubt about doubt, Michael Mair, 02:16
- Re: inline power function replacement, Michael Mair, 02:10
- doubt about doubt, Bob Nelson, 02:01
- Re: Centre for Excellence in Embedded Training, Bob Nelson, 02:00
- Re: static array, Ian Collins, 01:32
- static array, dis_is_eagle, 01:26
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ian Collins, 01:18
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Ian Collins, 01:10
July 27, 2006
- Re: ??在哪?可以找到中文的?於C主?的?件列表啊?, ?身?, 23:51
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Chris Torek, 23:35
- Re: ??在哪?可以找到中文的?於C主?的?件列表啊?, lovecreatesbeauty, 23:13
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, James Dennett, 22:56
- Re: inline power function replacement, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: generic programming is very powerful. c should support it, Dave Vandervies, 22:26
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:22
- Re: Looking for Embedded Software Engineers with good C programming skills, Nick Vatamaniuc, 22:10
- Re: Threads, Christopher Benson-Manica, 22:09
- Re: inline power function replacement, Nick Vatamaniuc, 22:06
- Re: A couple questions, Christopher Benson-Manica, 22:01
- Re: A couple questions, Chris Torek, 21:57
- Re: wondering, Keith Thompson, 21:56
- Re: Is this a good habit?, J. J. Farrell, 21:56
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 21:51
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Chris Torek, 21:32
- Re: wondering, jkost44, 21:31
- Re: wondering, Walter Roberson, 21:28
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Eric Sosman, 21:25
- Re: wondering, jkost44, 21:07
- Re: wondering, Keith Thompson, 20:40
- wondering, jkost44, 20:26
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Peter Nilsson, 19:51
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Keith Thompson, 19:35
- Re: strnlen() warning, William Ahern, 19:16
- Re: A couple questions, Andrey Tarasevich, 18:57
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, J. J. Farrell, 18:53
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Keith Thompson, 18:36
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Richard Heathfield, 18:35
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, J. J. Farrell, 18:34
- Re: Threads, Keith Thompson, 18:31
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, Andrew Poelstra, 18:31
- Re: Append to File, Kenneth Brody, 18:22
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 18:10
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, jacob navia, 18:08
- Re: Threads, Mark McIntyre, 18:06
- Re: Threads, Mark McIntyre, 18:05
- Re: Threads, Mark McIntyre, 18:04
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Mark McIntyre, 18:02
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Mark McIntyre, 17:59
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Joe Wright, 17:58
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Mark McIntyre, 17:53
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 17:52
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Mark McIntyre, 17:47
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Mark McIntyre, 17:45
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 17:34
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 17:27
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Jack Klein, 17:14
- Re: meaning of strcat(p,p) -- was: managed string library, websnarf, 17:00
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, SM Ryan, 16:39
- Re: A question on linking, SM Ryan, 16:39
- Re: library and #includes in code, Jack Klein, 16:36
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Chris Torek, 16:30
- Re: inline power function replacement, Keith Thompson, 16:25
- Re: strnlen() warning, Keith Thompson, 16:20
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, lawrence . jones, 16:16
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 16:12
- Re: i++ and ++i, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: A couple questions, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: A couple questions, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:42
- Re: Threads, Poly-poly man, 15:36
- Re: A couple questions, Eric Sosman, 15:25
- Re: Double increment question., Andrew Poelstra, 15:23
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, spibou, 15:23
- Re: A couple questions, Andrew Poelstra, 15:19
- Re: Looking for Embedded Software Engineers with good C programming skills, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Keith Thompson, 14:59
- Re: inline power function replacement, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 14:51
- A couple questions, Snis Pilbor, 14:49
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, John Devereux, 14:25
- Re: Threads, Christopher Benson-Manica, 14:25
- Re: Append to File, Tak-Shing Chan, 14:15
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 14:07
- Re: Looking for Embedded Software Engineers with good C programming skills, Skarmander, 14:06
- Re: inline power function replacement, Eric Sosman, 13:59
- Re: Threads, Skarmander, 13:58
- Append to File, Jonathan Shan, 13:57
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 13:37
- Re: Threads, spibou, 13:35
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., mensanator@xxxxxxx, 13:29
- Re: Is this a good habit?, websnarf, 13:25
- Re: Threads, Ancient_Hacker, 13:22
- Threads, Poly-poly man, 13:17
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, jacob navia, 13:16
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Michael Wojcik, 13:15
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Default User, 13:12
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Jalapeno, 13:09
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., spibou, 13:09
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, Default User, 13:08
- ??在哪?可以找到中文的?於C主?的?件列表啊?, ?身?, 13:07
- Re: Is this a good habit?, websnarf, 13:07
- Re: inline power function replacement, Frederick Gotham, 13:05
- Re: RTTI in C, Default User, 13:05
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Tak-Shing Chan, 13:02
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Michael Wojcik, 12:54
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., Chris Dollin, 12:44
- Re: inline power function replacement, websnarf, 12:28
- Re: const integers, Michael Wojcik, 12:18
- Re: Is this a good habit?, goose, 12:13
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., mensanator@xxxxxxx, 12:09
- Re: inline power function replacement, Ancient_Hacker, 12:05
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, goose, 11:49
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, goose, 11:47
- Re: strnlen() warning, Mat, 11:41
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:33
- Re: strnlen() warning, Mat, 11:33
- Re: strnlen() warning, Flash Gordon, 11:27
- Re: strnlen() warning, Thomas J. Gritzan, 11:22
- inline power function replacement, chris.fairles@xxxxxxxxx, 11:22
- Re: strnlen() warning, Mike Wahler, 11:21
- Re: __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Martin Ambuhl, 11:16
- Re: strnlen() warning, Clever Monkey, 11:16
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Bas Wassink, 10:12
- __FUNCTION__ in another macro, Mockey Chen, 10:06
- Re: i++ and ++i, Chris Dollin, 09:55
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Richard Heathfield, 09:52
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Frederick Gotham, 09:46
- Re: i++ and ++i, Frederick Gotham, 09:40
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Chris Dollin, 09:34
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Ancient_Hacker, 09:24
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Richard Heathfield, 09:18
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Chris Dollin, 09:05
- Re: Looking for Embedded Software Engineers with good C programming skills, Flash Gordon, 09:01
- Re: Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Bill Pursell, 08:56
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, websnarf, 08:44
- Re: Is this a good habit?, Duncan Muirhead, 08:37
- Re: easy pointers to functions problem, Michael, 08:28
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Karthikeyan D, 08:15
- Typdef pointers to structs or not?, Johan Tibell, 07:57
- Re: Getting started with C on my Linux machine., Chris Dollin, 07:52
- Looking for Embedded Software Engineers with good C programming skills, stanna, 07:48
- Re: Double increment question., Chris Dollin, 07:46
- Re: Double increment question., Philip Potter, 07:46
July 25, 2006
- Re: library and #includes in code, Eigenvector, 23:10
- Re: Rotate a matrix of any size, Peter Nilsson, 22:59
- Re: Rotate a matrix of any size, Tom St Denis, 22:43
- Rotate a matrix of any size, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:29
- Re: library and #includes in code, Jack Klein, 22:23
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, ozbear, 22:02
- Re: Regarding a query related to References, Keith Thompson, 21:56
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Keith Thompson, 21:53
- Re: Mystery String, Keith Thompson, 21:49
- library and #includes in code, Eigenvector, 21:40
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., BubbaGump, 21:38
- Re: Regarding a query related to References, BubbaGump, 21:34
- [OT] Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Eric Sosman, 21:33
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Snis Pilbor, 21:33
- Re: Double increment question., BubbaGump, 21:22
- Re: Mystery String, Eric Sosman, 21:20
- Re: Mystery String, Rod Pemberton, 21:12
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Old Wolf, 21:11
- Re: Mystery String, Al Balmer, 19:45
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Keith Thompson, 19:14
- Re: Mystery String, spibou, 19:10
- Re: Sizeof int, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:42
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Walter Roberson, 18:25
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Mark McIntyre, 18:20
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Dik T. Winter, 18:18
- Re: Format of browse information, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Dik T. Winter, 18:11
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Mark McIntyre, 18:08
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), Mark McIntyre, 18:06
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Keith Thompson, 18:03
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 18:00
- Re: Segmentation fault, Christopher Benson-Manica, 17:08
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), J. J. Farrell, 17:04
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Eric Sosman, 16:57
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Richard Heathfield, 16:16
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: const integers, Keith Thompson, 16:05
- Re: Help Needed, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Eric Sosman, 15:51
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: Help Needed, Tak-Shing Chan, 15:39
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), P.J. Plauger, 15:38
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Harald van Dijk, 15:29
- Help Needed, den_cse_here, 15:21
- Re: UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Richard Heathfield, 15:19
- UB? Avoiding ``object'' before array's start, Bob Nelson, 15:15
- Re: Mystery String, Jonathan Shan, 14:04
- Re: Mystery String, Andrew Poelstra, 13:54
- Re: Mystery String, Andrew Poelstra, 13:51
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, chandanlinster, 13:51
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Jack Klein, 13:50
- Re: Format of browse information, Jack Klein, 13:45
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Andrew Poelstra, 13:35
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Ben Pfaff, 13:32
- Re: Mystery String, Eric Sosman, 13:32
- Re: Mystery String, Lew Pitcher, 13:28
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Default User, 13:24
- Re: Mystery String, Eric Sosman, 13:20
- Re: Str, Eric Sosman, 13:17
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Giorgio Silvestri, 13:12
- Re: Mystery String, Christoph Schweers, 13:04
- Re: Mystery String, Jonathan Shan, 12:55
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., Michael Wojcik, 12:51
- Re: Mystery String, Andrew Poelstra, 12:47
- Str, Frederick Gotham, 12:47
- Re: const integers, Michael Wojcik, 12:43
- Re: Double increment question., Frederick Gotham, 12:36
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Frederick Gotham, 12:34
- Mystery String, Jonathan Shan, 12:29
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Richard Heathfield, 12:27
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Heathfield, 12:26
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Tak-Shing Chan, 12:25
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Richard Heathfield, 12:25
- Re: Double increment question., Frederick Gotham, 12:24
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Frederick Gotham, 12:18
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Frederick Gotham, 12:15
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, Simon Biber, 12:08
- Re: #define a char pointer, Frederick Gotham, 12:07
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Walter Roberson, 12:03
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Walter Roberson, 11:37
- Re: const integers, Tak-Shing Chan, 11:37
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, P.J. Plauger, 11:31
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, Simon Biber, 11:31
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Flash Gordon, 11:31
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), P.J. Plauger, 11:27
- Re: const integers, Chris Dollin, 11:25
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Simon Biber, 11:18
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, Ross, 11:12
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, fei.liu@xxxxxxxxx, 11:06
- Re: const integers, Richard Bos, 11:02
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Simon Biber, 10:58
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Simon Biber, 10:52
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Jeremy Targett, 10:50
- Re: const integers, Chris Dollin, 10:43
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Ian Malone, 10:43
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, fei.liu@xxxxxxxxx, 10:40
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, Simon Biber, 10:40
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Eric Sosman, 10:39
- error: incompatible types in assignment, fei.liu@xxxxxxxxx, 10:31
- Re: error: incompatible types in assignment, Richard Bos, 10:31
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), Simon Biber, 10:30
- Re: const integers, Richard Heathfield, 10:26
- Re: const integers, Richard Bos, 10:05
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), Richard Bos, 10:04
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:58
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Richard Heathfield, 09:56
- Re: Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, Patrick, 09:32
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., charlie, 09:28
- Cannot believe that this program actually works!!!!!!!!!!, chandanlinster, 09:23
- Format of browse information, jacob navia, 08:27
- Re: Double increment question., Eric Sosman, 08:03
- Re: Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), P.J. Plauger, 07:48
- Re: #define a char pointer, Eric Sosman, 07:33
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Ham, 07:17
- Re: Centre for Excellence in Embedded Training, Richard Heathfield, 06:58
- Array of Bytes to Unicode chars (ISO-8859-1), abhi147, 06:31
- Re: Double increment question., Flash Gordon, 06:21
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Heathfield, 06:19
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Dik T. Winter, 06:10
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Heathfield, 06:08
- Re: Double increment question., Robbie Hatley, 06:05
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, Ross, 05:54
- Re: Double increment question., Robbie Hatley, 05:44
- Re: Double increment question., Chris Dollin, 04:31
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Richard Heathfield, 04:27
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Heathfield, 04:19
- Re: #define a char pointer, Bart Rider, 04:19
- Re: print all permutations of string, Richard Heathfield, 04:08
- Re: Regarding a query related to References, skishorev, 04:04
- Re: Double increment question., Flash Gordon, 04:01
- Re: Regarding a query related to References, Keith Thompson, 03:59
- Re: Double increment question., Robbie Hatley, 03:58
- Re: Double increment question., Robbie Hatley, 03:58
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), Keith Thompson, 03:56
- Re: Regarding a query related to References, BubbaGump, 03:14
- Re: Double increment question., BubbaGump, 03:09
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, BubbaGump, 03:05
- Re: How to use # & ## operator in C??, BubbaGump, 02:55
- Re: Double increment question., spibou, 02:48
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., BubbaGump, 02:37
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), jacob navia, 02:20
- Re: Double increment question., Richard Riley, 01:51
- Re: very simple array question, guru.jois@xxxxxxxxx, 01:36
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, websnarf, 01:23
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., websnarf, 01:00
- Re: Intializing struct containing an union, Keith Thompson, 00:41
- Re: A question, Keith Thompson, 00:28
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Keith Thompson, 00:24
- Re: Intializing struct containing an union, Jack Klein, 00:02
July 24, 2006
- Re: Intializing struct containing an union, Chris Torek, 23:56
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Jack Klein, 23:50
- Re: initialising 2-dim character array, Jeremy Targett, 23:49
- Re: A question, Jack Klein, 23:48
- Re: const integers, Jack Klein, 23:40
- Re: const integers, Jack Klein, 23:35
- Double increment question., Robbie Hatley, 23:31
- initialising 2-dim character array, Jeremy Targett, 23:18
- Regarding a query related to References, skishorev, 22:56
- Re: print all permutations of string, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:51
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., BubbaGump, 22:11
- Re: To Lew or any of the other regulars. I hope this isn't an off topic troll thread -(, Lew Pitcher, 21:48
- Re: To Lew or any of the other regulars. I hope this isn't an off topic troll thread -(, Keith Thompson, 21:33
- To Lew or any of the other regulars. I hope this isn't an off topic troll thread -(, Chad, 21:14
- Re: How do mbtowc() and wctomb() work?, J. J. Farrell, 20:17
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Joe Wright, 20:08
- Re: Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, Monkey, 19:43
- Re: Sizeof int, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:30
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Michael Wojcik, 19:14
- Re: OT: const integers, Keith Thompson, 19:03
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Stephen Sprunk, 18:51
- Re: const integers, Michael Wojcik, 18:44
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, SM Ryan, 18:33
- Re: Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, Mark McIntyre, 18:31
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Re: const integers, Mark McIntyre, 18:23
- Re: OT: const integers, Mark McIntyre, 18:21
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
- Re: A question, Richard Heathfield, 18:06
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Michael Wojcik, 18:04
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Michael Wojcik, 17:56
- Re: A question, Keith Thompson, 17:30
- Re: A question, boa, 17:20
- Re: Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, tharpa, 17:13
- Re: A question, Keith Thompson, 16:40
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Ivanna Pee, 16:36
- Re: Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, Flash Gordon, 16:31
- Re: Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, Andrew Poelstra, 16:17
- Re: A question, Keith Thompson, 16:10
- Re: sizeof(), Stephen Sprunk, 16:10
- Newbie help request - C++ Compiler for Macintosh, macnoob, 16:07
- Re: A question, Michael Mair, 15:34
- Re: A question, Tom St Denis, 15:33
- Re: A question, bob, 15:19
- Re: calling "java from C dll" (system command??), jacob navia, 14:46
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Keith Thompson, 14:28
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., Giorgio Silvestri, 14:26
- Re: realloc() hang, Default User, 13:50
- Re: sizeof(), Flash Gordon, 12:58
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Ben Pfaff, 12:47
- Re: const headache const, Bill Pursell, 12:46
- Re: Sizeof int, Ben Pfaff, 12:46
- Re: #define a char pointer, Al Balmer, 12:08
- Re: realloc() hang, Jonathan Shan, 12:07
- Re: Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, Al Balmer, 12:02
- Re: sizeof(), Walter Roberson, 11:30
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., Chris Dollin, 11:21
- Re: #define a char pointer, Frederick Gotham, 11:07
- Re: sizeof(), Matt Junx, 11:04
- Re: Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, quantumred, 10:59
- Re: A question, Matt Junx, 10:57
- Re: #define a char pointer, Tom St Denis, 10:54
- Re: #define a char pointer, Eric Sosman, 10:47
- Re: #define a char pointer, Frederick Gotham, 10:43
- Re: A question, Christopher Benson-Manica, 10:32
- #define a char pointer, mailursubbu, 10:28
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., charlie, 10:28
- Re: Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, quantumred, 10:24
- Re: Nested ifs and speed., Richard Bos, 10:14
- Nested ifs and speed., charlie, 10:01
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Frederick Gotham, 09:58
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Eric Sosman, 09:51
- Re: Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, Tom St Denis, 09:30
- Re: Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, Papastefanos Serafeim, 09:16
- Book review, jacob navia, 09:10
- Suggestion to a good commercial C IDE?, cp, 09:09
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, jacob navia, 09:00
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Frederick Gotham, 08:58
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Eric Sosman, 08:31
- Intializing struct containing an union, Michael Brennan, 08:08
- Re: A question, Allan M. Bruce, 07:58
- Re: A question, Allan M. Bruce, 07:57
- Re: A question, Allan M. Bruce, 07:57
- Re: A question, John Bode, 07:40
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, John Bode, 07:37
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Chris Dollin, 06:47
- Re: Machine intelligence- can this program be written ??, Chris Dollin, 06:44
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Richard Bos, 06:28
- Re: Difference between int i, j; and int i; int j;, Ico, 06:28
- Re: const integers, Keith Thompson, 04:58
- Re: const integers, Ian Collins, 04:31
- Re: const integers, jaysome, 04:17
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Flash Gordon, 03:30
- Re: const integers, Flash Gordon, 03:17
- Re: very simple array question, Blueboy, 03:14
- Re: How to use # & ## operator in C??, spibou, 02:06
- Re: Casting a byte array to allow assignment, Aaron Gage, 01:25
- Re: Machine intelligence- can this program be written ??, Nick Vatamaniuc, 01:09
- Re: A question, Nick Vatamaniuc, 01:08
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Dave Thompson, 00:56
- Re: email program........., Dave Thompson, 00:56
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Gordon Burditt, 00:48
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Walter Roberson, 00:47
- Re: How to use # & ## operator in C??, Peter Nilsson, 00:40
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, skishorev, 00:39
- Re: How to use # & ## operator in C??, Richard Heathfield, 00:08
- Re: Help getting this to compile, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood, 00:07
- Re: sizeof(), Peter "Shaggy" Haywood, 00:07
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, Richard Heathfield, 00:06
- Re: back up data in C how & when in sudden poweroff?????????, skishorev, 00:05
- Re: const integers, Richard Heathfield, 00:04
July 23, 2006
- Re: "#if" with no condition, Robert Gamble, 11:04
- const integers, Serve Laurijssen, 10:22
- Re: sprintf >> atof question, Allan M. Bruce, 10:15
- Re: sprintf >> atof question, tjay, 10:01
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 09:55
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 09:53
- Re: sprintf >> atof question, Allan M. Bruce, 09:23
- Re: option in gcc that lets us produce object code for 16-bit processor, Walter Roberson, 08:57
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Nils Weller, 08:55
- "#if" with no condition, tomy, 08:41
- option in gcc that lets us produce object code for 16-bit processor, chandanlinster, 08:05
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 08:03
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 08:01
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, jacob navia, 07:59
- Re: conversions from float to int?, chandanlinster, 07:26
- Re: The C language in the planet Mars, Richard Tobin, 07:07
- Re: Sizeof int, Richard Tobin, 07:00
- Re: sprintf >> atof question, tjay, 06:59
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', pemo, 05:57
- Re: sprintf >> atof question, Allan M. Bruce, 05:42
- sprintf >> atof question, tjay, 05:12
- Re: conversions from float to int?, Keith Thompson, 05:07
- Re: rl_readline_name ??, Keith Thompson, 05:02
- Re: Sizeof int, Keith Thompson, 04:57
- The C language in the planet Mars, jacob navia, 04:44
- Re: rl_readline_name ???, J. J. Farrell, 04:38
- Re: rl_readline_name ??, Ian Collins, 04:14
- Re: conversions from float to int?, Peter Nilsson, 04:05
- Re: rl_readline_name ??, onkar, 03:58
- Re: rl_readline_name ??, Ian Collins, 03:57
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Ian Collins, 03:53
- rl_readline_name ??, onkar, 03:47
- rl_readline_name ???, onkar, 03:47
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, SM Ryan, 03:47
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 03:42
- Re: conversions from float to int?, Keith Thompson, 02:54
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 02:47
- conversions from float to int?, chandanlinster, 02:15
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Ian Collins, 01:24
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, SM Ryan, 01:18
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, lovecreatesbeauty, 00:55
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', inmatarian, 00:07
July 22, 2006
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Tom St Denis, 23:25
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, SM Ryan, 23:14
- Re: Sizeof int, Gordon Burditt, 22:36
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Jack Klein, 22:31
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Jack Klein, 22:30
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Jack Klein, 22:30
- Re: Sizeof int, Andrew Poelstra, 21:54
- Re: Sizeof int, Andrew Poelstra, 21:49
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Ian Collins, 21:07
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Ian Gay, 20:45
- Re: Sizeof int, Keith Thompson, 20:41
- Re: Sizeof int, Keith Thompson, 20:35
- Re: Sizeof int, Dik T. Winter, 20:10
- Re: Sizeof int, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:45
- Re: Sizeof int, Richard Tobin, 19:07
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 19:05
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, jacob navia, 18:52
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 18:47
- Re: Segmentation fault, Barry Schwarz, 18:46
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 18:45
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 18:39
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 18:24
- Re: Segmentation fault, jacob navia, 18:22
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 18:15
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Jonathan Lamothe, 18:05
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 18:05
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 18:05
- Re: Sizeof int, Richard Tobin, 18:02
- Re: realloc() hang, Richard Tobin, 17:59
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Coos Haak, 17:19
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Eric Sosman, 17:15
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', SuperKoko, 17:14
- Re: Object Initialization, Coos Haak, 17:10
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, spibou, 16:50
- Re: Prime program plz helllllp!, Andrew Poelstra, 16:40
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Malcolm, 16:36
- Re: Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Andrew Poelstra, 16:31
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 16:30
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kenny McCormack, 16:27
- Re: Segmentation fault, Shuaib, 16:25
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, spibou, 16:22
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: Segmentation fault, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Jonathan Lamothe, 16:16
- Partial string loss with sprintf/strcat, Neal Barney, 16:12
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Gordon Burditt, 16:12
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Jonathan Lamothe, 16:10
- Re: Prime program plz helllllp!, Don, 16:08
- Re: Segmentation fault, Tom St Denis, 16:03
- Re: Segmentation fault, Kenny McCormack, 16:00
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Tom St Denis, 16:00
- Re: Object Initialization, sarathy, 15:58
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Keith Thompson, 15:58
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Don, 15:57
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Tom St Denis, 15:53
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Eric Sosman, 15:52
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Tom St Denis, 15:46
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Jonathan Lamothe, 15:43
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Gordon Burditt, 15:38
- Re: Sizeof int, Kenneth Brody, 15:29
- Re: Segmentation fault, Tom St Denis, 15:28
- Re: Segmentation fault, Shuaib, 15:28
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Tom St Denis, 15:25
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Gordon Burditt, 15:21
- Re: Segmentation fault, Shuaib, 15:18
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Tom St Denis, 15:14
- Re: Sizeof int, Giorgio Silvestri, 15:13
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, spibou, 15:08
- Re: Array initialization, Keith Thompson, 15:06
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Richard Heathfield, 15:05
- Re: Using cpp, the C Preprocessor Guide, Keith Thompson, 15:04
- Re: very simple array question, Keith Thompson, 15:02
- Re: memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Tom St Denis, 15:02
- memmove: works on C's abstraction layer? or no?, Kobu, 14:57
- Re: Segmentation fault, spibou, 14:57
- Re: fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Tom St Denis, 14:45
- Re: Segmentation fault, Tom St Denis, 14:43
- Segmentation fault, Shuaib, 14:35
- fread/fwrite Portability Issues, Jonathan Lamothe, 14:31
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Kenny McCormack, 14:18
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Kenny McCormack, 14:15
- Re: Sizeof int, Andrew Poelstra, 14:10
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, Andrew Poelstra, 14:06
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 14:02
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 14:00
- Re: Add two numbers using a Single Variable!, Ronald Bruck, 13:35
- Re: Using cpp, the C Preprocessor Guide, ena8t8si, 13:27
- Re: Sizeof int, Gordon Burditt, 13:10
- Re: very simple array question, Mark McIntyre, 12:51
- Re: Sizeof int, Mark McIntyre, 12:49
- Re: Array initialization, Mark McIntyre, 12:49
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, Mark McIntyre, 12:47
- Re: Using cpp, the C Preprocessor Guide, Barry Schwarz, 12:32
- Re: Sizeof int, Barry Schwarz, 12:28
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, Barry Schwarz, 12:11
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 11:58
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 11:56
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 11:44
- Using cpp, the C Preprocessor Guide, aarklon, 11:29
- Re: Sizeof int, Lars, 11:15
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 10:38
- Re: very simple array question, jacob navia, 08:57
- Re: very simple array question, code_wrong, 08:54
- Re: Add two numbers using a Single Variable!, Joe Wright, 08:46
- very simple array question, Michael, 08:43
- Re: Sizeof int, Richard Heathfield, 08:33
- Re: Sizeof int, jacob navia, 08:27
- Re: Sizeof int, Eric Sosman, 08:19
- Re: Sizeof int, Tom St Denis, 07:45
- Re: Sizeof int, sandy, 07:35
- Sizeof int, write2gops, 07:26
- Re: const headache const, Ben Bacarisse, 06:35
- Re: Object Initialization, Chris Torek, 06:01
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Chris Torek, 05:36
- Re: Tagged unions, Chris Torek, 05:15
- Re: Object Initialization, Keith Thompson, 05:10
- Re: Object Initialization, Keith Thompson, 05:07
- Re: Array initialization, Martin Ambuhl, 04:46
- Re: Object Initialization, jaysome, 04:41
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', jaysome, 04:23
- Re: Object Initialization, Richard Heathfield, 04:22
- Re: Array initialization, Richard Heathfield, 04:21
- Object Initialization, sarathy, 04:14
- Array initialization, sarathy, 04:07
- Re: Add two numbers using a Single Variable!, Harald van Dijk, 03:45
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Bill Pursell, 03:43
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, sarathy, 03:18
- Re: Add two numbers using a Single Variable!, Walter Roberson, 02:58
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:52
- Add two numbers using a Single Variable!, nirjhar . oberoi, 02:48
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Richard Heathfield, 02:40
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:28
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Keith Thompson, 02:23
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Keith Thompson, 02:16
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:14
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:04
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Bill Pursell, 01:42
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Bill Pursell, 01:33
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 00:37
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 00:26
July 21, 2006
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Keith Thompson, 23:54
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', inmatarian, 23:24
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Kaz Kylheku, 20:27
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Keith Thompson, 19:51
- Re: realloc() hang, Gordon Burditt, 19:45
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Andrew Poelstra, 19:37
- Re: 'int *i ' or 'int* i', pete, 18:39
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Dik T. Winter, 18:34
- 'int *i ' or 'int* i', Julia, 18:28
- Re: realloc() hang, Eric Sosman, 18:28
- Re: Tagged unions, Johan Tibell, 17:54
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, guillemort, 17:20
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, J. J. Farrell, 16:25
- Re: realloc() hang, Jonathan Shan, 16:24
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Default User, 16:22
- Re: realloc() hang, Eric Sosman, 16:05
- Re: Tagged unions, Rob Thorpe, 15:57
- realloc() hang, Jonathan Shan, 15:42
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Kenneth Brody, 15:38
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Morris Dovey, 15:35
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Keith Thompson, 15:15
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Default User, 15:13
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Michael Wojcik, 14:38
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Michael Wojcik, 14:30
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Whatever5k, 14:13
- Re: Tagged unions, Ben Pfaff, 13:20
- Re: Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, Mark McIntyre, 13:11
- Re: Tagged unions, Tak-Shing Chan, 13:02
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Default User, 12:34
- $5 = $10,000 In PayPal CA$H!, Elaine, 12:32
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Default User, 12:20
- Re: Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, pemo, 10:51
- Re: Tagged unions, Johan Tibell, 10:50
- Re: Tagged unions, Tak-Shing Chan, 09:50
- Re: Function Pointer, Ancient_Hacker, 09:41
- Re: Function Pointer, Chris Dollin, 09:41
- Re: Function Pointer, Tak-Shing Chan, 09:37
- Function Pointer, Sikandar, 09:23
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Tak-Shing Chan, 09:15
- Tagged unions, Johan Tibell, 09:00
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Eric Sosman, 08:28
- Re: Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, Richard Heathfield, 08:04
- Re: Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, Hari, 07:56
- Re: Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, Richard Heathfield, 07:47
- Single Bit Error Correction & Double Eror Detection using CRC32, Hari, 07:43
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, Flash Gordon, 07:11
- Re: Center of Contour [OT], Soumyadip Rakshit, 07:06
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, MQ, 06:40
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Whatever5k, 06:11
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, pln, 05:55
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, Flash Gordon, 04:18
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Keith Thompson, 04:07
- Re: C# MSSQL2000 update, Nick Keighley, 04:02
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Mark McIntyre, 03:51
- C# MSSQL2000 update, pln, 03:41
- Re: nested switches, with common labels, Martin Ambuhl, 02:08
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Whatever5k, 01:23
- Re: Center of Contour [VOT], Morris Dovey, 01:05
- Re: Code problem, Morris Dovey, 00:56
- Code problem, Sikandar, 00:21
- Code problem, Sikandar, 00:21
July 20, 2006
- Re: nested switches, with common labels, Morris Dovey, 23:47
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Richard Heathfield, 22:54
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, J. J. Farrell, 22:52
- Re: nested switches, with common labels, G Patel, 22:51
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 22:50
- nested switches, with common labels, G Patel, 22:45
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 22:22
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Barry Schwarz, 20:52
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Barry Schwarz, 20:52
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 20:35
- Re: sizeof(), Dann Corbit, 20:21
- Re: sizeof(), Ronald Bruck, 19:59
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Keith Thompson, 19:59
- Re: floating point problem, Dik T. Winter, 19:56
- Re: sizeof(), Barry Schwarz, 19:33
- Re: floating point problem, Ronald Bruck, 19:31
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 19:31
- Re: floating point problem, Dann Corbit, 19:13
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Rob Thorpe, 19:11
- Re: floating point problem, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:45
- Re: advanced scanf, Eric Sosman, 18:34
- Re: advanced scanf, Dann Corbit, 18:29
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Ben Pfaff, 18:25
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Dann Corbit, 18:12
- Re: floating point problem, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:12
- Re: floating point problem, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:06
- advanced scanf, Bernard Liang, 18:02
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Chris Torek, 18:02
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 17:56
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, Walter Roberson, 17:52
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Eric Sosman, 17:52
- Re: floating point problem, Mark McIntyre, 17:49
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Bernard Liang, 17:48
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Ben Pfaff, 17:46
- Re: Forward Declarations, Michael Wojcik, 17:43
- Re: floating point problem, Joe Wright, 17:43
- Re: floating point problem, Dann Corbit, 17:42
- Re: Adding 2 sets of roll/pitch/yaw angles, Dann Corbit, 17:40
- Re: floating point problem, Tak-Shing Chan, 17:37
- Re: VERY strange C anomaly, Dann Corbit, 17:37
- VERY strange C anomaly, Bernard Liang, 17:32
- Adding 2 sets of roll/pitch/yaw angles, Dan, 17:32
- Re: floating point problem, Dann Corbit, 16:46
- Re: floating point problem, Joe Wright, 16:45
- Re: floating point problem, Tak-Shing Chan, 16:38
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Bill Pursell, 16:37
- Re: Help getting this to compile, Martin Ambuhl, 16:22
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Eric Sosman, 15:45
- Re: print all permutations of string, Ico, 15:23
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Default User, 15:19
- Re: Game in C using Finite Automata, Ben Pfaff, 15:01
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Whatever5k, 14:50
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, sarathy, 14:30
- Re: Game in C using Finite Automata, Eric Schmidt, 13:56
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Jack Klein, 13:20
- Re: sizeof(), Giorgio Silvestri, 13:10
- Re: Adaptive datatype (or so...), Eric Sosman, 13:06
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 13:06
- Re: Center of Contour [OT], Morris Dovey, 12:58
- Adaptive datatype (or so...), Whatever5k, 12:46
- Re: Game in C using Finite Automata, Flash Gordon, 12:25
- Re: Game in C using Finite Automata, Clever Monkey, 12:01
- Game in C using Finite Automata, onkar, 12:00
- Re: Center of Contour, Walter Roberson, 11:35
- Re: floating point problem, Ancient_Hacker, 11:33
- Re: floating point problem, Keith Thompson, 11:32
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Keith Thompson, 11:21
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Keith Thompson, 11:17
- Re: Questions on bitfields and struct, Walter Roberson, 11:01
- Re: Code, Ed Prochak, 10:26
- Re: sizeof(), Richard Tobin, 10:09
- Re: Simple RegExp function, drasko, 10:04
- Questions on bitfields and struct, sarathy, 09:58
- Center of Contour, Speed, 09:49
- Re: sizeof(), sarathy, 09:48
- Re: const headache const, Frederick Gotham, 09:44
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Frederick Gotham, 09:39
- Re: Question on bitfields & structs, Flash Gordon, 09:37
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 09:06
- Re: how to rewind to file beginning immediately after writing..., Rajorshi Biswas, 09:03
- Re: floating point problem, Dik T. Winter, 08:49
- Re: floating point problem, Ancient_Hacker, 08:28
- Question on bitfields & structs, sarathy, 08:18
- Re: floating point problem, Eric Sosman, 08:08
- Re: floating point problem, Ancient_Hacker, 08:07
- Re: Code, MQ, 07:49
- Re: Code, shweta, 07:31
- Re: floating point problem, Ancient_Hacker, 07:14
- Code, shweta, 07:12
- Re: Help getting this to compile, Allan M. Bruce, 07:12
- Re: Help getting this to compile, Richard Bos, 06:47
- Help getting this to compile, Allan M. Bruce, 06:31
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Johan Tibell, 05:06
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, jaysome, 04:51
- Re: sizeof(), jaysome, 04:40
- Re: Database maintainance through c, MQ, 04:25
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, jaysome, 04:22
- Re: floating point problem, Richard Heathfield, 04:12
- Re: array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 04:06
- Re: floating point problem, Keith Thompson, 04:02
- Re: Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, Richard Heathfield, 04:02
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Keith Thompson, 04:00
- Re: floating point problem, MQ, 03:43
- Re: floating point problem, Default User, 03:42
- Re: floating point problem, Gordon Burditt, 03:42
- Re: floating point problem, MQ, 03:40
- Re: floating point problem, Ian Collins, 03:39
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Bos, 03:36
- floating point problem, dis_is_eagle, 03:32
- Re: how to rewind to file beginning immediately after writing..., Flash Gordon, 03:00
- Re: Socket packet, Skarmander, 02:34
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:29
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:21
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:18
- Re: how to rewind to file beginning immediately after writing..., Rajorshi Biswas, 02:17
- how to rewind to file beginning immediately after writing..., Rajorshi Biswas, 01:59
- Re: free(), Michael Mair, 00:52
July 19, 2006
- Re: int & char, Default User, 23:56
- Re: int & char, Keith Thompson, 23:52
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, quantumred, 23:48
- Re: sizeof(), dbtid, 23:33
- Re: int & char, Default User, 23:32
- Re: int & char, Default User, 22:50
- Re: int & char, Simon Biber, 22:49
- Re: const headache const, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:40
- Re: const headache const, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:39
- int & char, c language, 22:30
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Keith Thompson, 22:10
- Re: struct question, Barry Schwarz, 21:53
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Barry Schwarz, 21:42
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 21:35
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Simon Biber, 21:31
- Re: free(), Simon Biber, 21:15
- Re: array in include, Morris Dovey, 19:42
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, Default User, 19:38
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, Keith Thompson, 19:37
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Michael Wojcik, 19:22
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, fubar . 1010, 19:14
- Re: Preprocessing, SM Ryan, 19:05
- Re: C90: minimum size of long, Dik T. Winter, 18:57
- Re: Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, David Wade, 18:48
- Re: array in include, Mark McIntyre, 18:39
- Re: array in include, Mark McIntyre, 18:36
- Re: Socket packet, Mark McIntyre, 18:28
- Re: Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, Richard Heathfield, 18:21
- Re: sizeof, Mark McIntyre, 18:17
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Mark McIntyre, 18:11
- Re: const headache const, Bill Pursell, 17:59
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 17:59
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, ena8t8si, 17:57
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Ancient_Hacker, 17:36
- Re: Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Re: initializing an integer array, Bill Pursell, 17:31
- Re: Socket packet, Default User, 17:19
- Re: Database maintainance through c, pibru@xxxxxx, 17:05
- Re: C99 differences, Robert Gamble, 16:57
- Re: array in include, Thomas J. Gritzan, 16:38
- Re: Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, Dann Corbit, 16:31
- Re: array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 16:31
- Re: array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 16:28
- Re: array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 16:26
- Re: Socket packet, Clever Monkey, 16:24
- Using [] in z/OS ISPF & emulators, John, 16:21
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 16:11
- C99 differences, Joe Van Dyk, 16:09
- Re: Const expression, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: Socket packet, Default User, 16:00
- Re: const headache const, Michael Mair, 15:42
- Re: struct question, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 15:35
- Re: array in include, Eric Sosman, 15:35
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 15:31
- Re: const headache const, Flash Gordon, 15:18
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Eric Sosman, 15:17
- Re: array in include, Flash Gordon, 15:12
- const headache const, lwawrzyniak, 14:47
- Re: array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 14:40
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Ancient_Hacker, 14:39
- Re: C90: minimum size of long, pete, 14:37
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Ben Pfaff, 14:23
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, pozz, 14:16
- Re: Database maintainance through c, Dann Corbit, 14:08
- Re: Const expression, Chris Torek, 14:01
- Re: Database maintainance through c, Morris Dovey, 14:01
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 14:00
- Re: Socket packet, Skarmander, 13:40
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Ben Pfaff, 13:39
- Re: Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, Walter Roberson, 13:37
- Re: ungetc, av, 13:31
- Re: Database maintainance through c, Walter Roberson, 13:28
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Chris Torek, 13:26
- Writing a function that changes an unknown-type numeric variable, pozz, 13:23
- Re: Database maintainance through c, Tom St Denis, 13:17
- Database maintainance through c, Manmeet Mittal, 13:14
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, vasudevram, 13:11
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Default User, 12:53
- Re: process taking long time to dump core, Clever Monkey, 12:28
- Re: Socket packet, Clever Monkey, 12:25
- Re: sizeof(), Roberto Waltman, 12:06
- Re: sizeof(), Walter Roberson, 12:01
- Re: sizeof(), Robert Gamble, 11:58
- Re: sizeof(), Tom St Denis, 11:54
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, Al Balmer, 11:51
- sizeof(), Jack, 11:51
- Re: ungetc, Walter Roberson, 11:48
- Re: Preprocessing, Mohan, 11:32
- Re: C90: minimum size of long, Flash Gordon, 11:29
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Thomas J. Gritzan, 11:28
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, av, 11:25
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, av, 11:24
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, pemo, 11:19
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Bacarisse, 11:11
- Re: C90: minimum size of long, Tom St Denis, 10:58
- Re: Preprocessing, Allan M. Bruce, 10:57
- C90: minimum size of long, cpp_novice, 10:54
- Re: Preprocessing, R.Biloti, 10:52
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, guillemort, 10:08
- Re: Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, Morris Dovey, 10:01
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, Richard Tobin, 10:00
- Re: Preprocessing, Mohan, 09:46
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, Kenneth Brody, 09:38
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, Chris Dollin, 09:37
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, David West, 09:12
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, jacob navia, 09:09
- Re: sizeof, Dik T. Winter, 09:06
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, Chris Dollin, 09:06
- Preprocessing, R.Biloti, 09:03
- Re: process taking long time to dump core, Dik T. Winter, 09:02
- Re: Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, pemo, 08:58
- Migrating C Code from OS2 to Windows, skulkrinbait, 08:55
- Re: Slashdot and C, Tom St Denis, 08:53
- Re: Const expression, Chris Dollin, 08:39
- Re: Const expression, Flash Gordon, 08:33
- Re: Const expression, reader, 07:50
- struct question, Allan M. Bruce, 07:32
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- Re: sizeof, Flash Gordon, 07:12
- Re: comparison, Richard Heathfield, 07:12
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Richard Heathfield, 07:09
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 07:02
- Re: Const expression, Chris Dollin, 07:02
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 06:54
- Re: Const expression, reader, 06:35
- Re: ungetc, Keith Thompson, 05:58
- Re: Const expression, Chris Dollin, 05:56
- Re: Socket packet, Keith Thompson, 05:54
- Re: comparison, Keith Thompson, 05:52
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, pemo, 05:30
- Re: Socket packet, Flash Gordon, 05:28
- Re: comparison, Martin Ambuhl, 05:25
- Re: Socket packet, MQ, 05:24
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, slebetman@xxxxxxxxx, 05:18
- Slashdot and C, pemo, 05:13
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, pemo, 05:12
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:09
- Re: comparison, Richard Bos, 05:07
- Re: Correct way of taking in two integers, Richard Bos, 05:04
- Re: Const expression, MQ, 05:01
- Re: help with this struct, Chris Dollin, 04:39
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Richard Bos, 04:37
- Const expression, sarathy, 04:35
- Re: C Expressions, Richard Bos, 04:34
- Re: help with this struct, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:25
- Socket packet, Marco, 04:22
- Re: comparison, Chris Dollin, 04:04
- Re: C Expressions, sarathy, 04:03
- Re: process taking long time to dump core, Flash Gordon, 04:00
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Chris Dollin, 03:59
- Re: ungetc, av, 03:49
- Re: process taking long time to dump core, Keith Thompson, 03:44
- Re: comparison, Richard Heathfield, 03:28
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Richard Heathfield, 03:23
- comparison, Ajay, 03:11
- Re: ungetc, Keith Thompson, 03:01
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Keith Thompson, 02:57
- process taking long time to dump core, madhusudan . hv, 02:52
- Function Wrapper: Opinions and Critique Desired, I.M. !Knuth, 02:33
- Re: Correct way of taking in two integers, Keith Thompson, 02:29
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, spibou, 02:19
- Re: initializing an integer array, Harald van Dijk, 02:04
- Re: initializing an integer array, spibou, 01:54
- initializing an integer array, Bill Pursell, 01:27
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., websnarf, 01:23
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Bill Pursell, 01:14
- Re: ungetc, av, 01:02
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, manoj1978, 00:39
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, websnarf, 00:32
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, lovecreatesbeauty, 00:20
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 00:17
July 18, 2006
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Barry Schwarz, 23:59
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, Gordon Burditt, 23:36
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, EventHelix.com, 23:34
- Re: Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, J. J. Farrell, 23:28
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Morris Dovey, 23:24
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, J. J. Farrell, 23:18
- Accessing structure elements using pointer math - padding worries?, quantumred, 23:11
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Eric Sosman, 22:42
- Re: Correct way of taking in two integers, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 22:35
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Joe Wright, 22:26
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Morris Dovey, 22:21
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Jonathan Lamothe, 22:18
- Re: Correct way of taking in two integers, Alf P. Steinbach, 22:11
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:08
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Ian Collins, 21:55
- Correct way of taking in two integers, Steve Carter, 21:46
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), ceeques, 21:28
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Joe Wright, 21:14
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Keith Thompson, 20:05
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, pete, 19:57
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Dann Corbit, 19:45
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, pete, 19:38
- Re: Query regarding warning removal when using extern, Keith Thompson, 19:36
- Re: segementation fault, Keith Thompson, 19:31
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, pete, 19:27
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, pete, 19:22
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Joe Wright, 19:18
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Tom St Denis, 19:09
- Re: How to find memory content at location x?, humanmutantman, 19:06
- Re: sizeof, pete, 18:59
- Re: sizeof, pete, 18:54
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Morris Dovey, 18:52
- Re: How to find memory content at location x?, Walter Roberson, 18:50
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Joe Wright, 18:41
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 18:32
- Re: How to find memory content at location x?, humanmutantman, 18:14
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Keith Thompson, 18:13
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Chris Torek, 18:12
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Morris Dovey, 18:11
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Keith Thompson, 18:06
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, Chris Torek, 18:04
- Re: Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, Tom St Denis, 18:01
- Counting 'on' bits in a byte?, John, 17:47
- Re: query about main(), Keith Thompson, 17:44
- OT Query, Morris Dovey, 17:42
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Mark McIntyre, 17:40
- Re: How to find memory content at location x?, Walter Roberson, 17:39
- Re: query about main(), Simon Biber, 17:30
- Re: How to find memory content at location x?, Ben Pfaff, 17:20
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, John Bode, 17:19
- How to find memory content at location x?, humanmutantman, 17:13
- Re: Keyboard stroke for EOF ?, Keith Thompson, 17:06
- Re: query about main(), Keith Thompson, 17:04
- Re: query about main(), Keith Thompson, 17:02
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, W H G, 17:00
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Eric Sosman, 16:53
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Ben Pfaff, 16:50
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, jacob navia, 16:30
- Re: free(), Michael Mair, 16:29
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 16:28
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Snis Pilbor, 16:22
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Nils Weller, 16:21
- Re: Forward Declarations, Michael Wojcik, 16:13
- Re: Function Prototype - different argument names, Chris Torek, 16:10
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Richard Tobin, 16:09
- Re: sizeof, Flash Gordon, 16:01
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Michael Wojcik, 15:58
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Michael Wojcik, 15:49
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Default User, 15:41
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Default User, 15:34
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Roberto Waltman, 15:27
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Eric Sosman, 15:20
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Walter Roberson, 15:16
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Ben Pfaff, 15:13
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, Eric Sosman, 15:11
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Steve Carter, 15:10
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Tom St Denis, 15:06
- Re: typedef, structs, and pointers, Roberto Waltman, 15:04
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, guillemort, 15:03
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Chris Torek, 15:01
- Re: sizeof, Flash Gordon, 14:50
- typedef, structs, and pointers, Steve Carter, 14:46
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Michael Wojcik, 14:46
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Tom St Denis, 14:45
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, Ben Pfaff, 14:37
- Re: Calling functions with the wrong parameters, pemo, 14:29
- Re: sizeof, Walter Roberson, 14:27
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, guillemort, 14:23
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Herbert Rosenau, 14:21
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Herbert Rosenau, 14:21
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Herbert Rosenau, 14:21
- Re: ungetc, Herbert Rosenau, 14:21
- Calling functions with the wrong parameters, Kenneth Brody, 14:17
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Simon, 14:16
- Re: string comparision, Ben Pfaff, 14:15
- Re: An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, Tom St Denis, 14:13
- string comparision, priyanka, 14:13
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Richard Heathfield, 14:10
- Re: sizeof, Richard Heathfield, 14:07
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Simon, 14:04
- An excursion to pseudo-polymorphism, guillemort, 13:59
- Re: sizeof, Ben Pfaff, 13:56
- Re: Query regarding warning removal when using extern, Eric Sosman, 13:55
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 13:51
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Chris Torek, 13:49
- Re: segementation fault, Eric Sosman, 13:49
- Re: Query regarding warning removal when using extern, Morris Dovey, 13:47
- Re: Query regarding warning removal when using extern, Tom St Denis, 13:47
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Pfaff, 13:44
- Re: segementation fault, Ben Pfaff, 13:43
- Re: segementation fault, Morris Dovey, 13:43
- Re: segementation fault, Ancient_Hacker, 13:40
- Re: segementation fault, Lew Pitcher, 13:40
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, vasudevram, 13:39
- Re: segementation fault, Roberto Waltman, 13:38
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 13:36
- Query regarding warning removal when using extern, gaurav . dube, 13:34
- segementation fault, priyanka, 13:28
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Al Balmer, 13:24
- Re: free(), Jack, 13:20
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Kenneth Brody, 13:08
- Re: help with this struct, Norbert Kolvenbach, 13:01
- Re: sizeof, Flash Gordon, 13:01
- Re: query about main(), Clever Monkey, 13:01
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Default User, 13:00
- Re: free(), Default User, 12:50
- Re: query about main(), Walter Roberson, 12:49
- Re: query about main(), Clever Monkey, 12:41
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Morris Dovey, 12:03
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 11:59
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Fred Kleinschmidt, 11:56
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Eric Sosman, 11:52
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 11:47
- Re: help with this struct, Mark McIntyre, 11:46
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Mark McIntyre, 11:43
- Re: Urge for help in a game programming, osmium, 11:38
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Mark McIntyre, 11:37
- Re: help with this struct, Fred Kleinschmidt, 11:36
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Mark McIntyre, 11:33
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:29
- Re: C Expressions, Mark McIntyre, 11:18
- Re: help with this struct, Richard Bos, 11:11
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Chris Dollin, 11:06
- help with this struct, learnfpga, 11:01
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Frederick Gotham, 10:59
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Simon, 10:57
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Chris Dollin, 10:46
- Re: Memory leak, Morris Dovey, 10:45
- Re: beginner level question, Simon Biber, 10:43
- Re: C Expressions, John Bode, 10:40
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Eric Sosman, 10:38
- Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin, 10:37
- Re: Don't understand why my code isn't working, Chris Dollin, 10:34
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 10:30
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 10:18
- Don't understand why my code isn't working, Simon, 10:16
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Morris Dovey, 10:07
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Chris Dollin, 10:01
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 09:54
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Chris Dollin, 09:53
- Re: Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, Simon Biber, 09:52
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Richard Heathfield, 09:51
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, Simon Biber, 09:42
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 09:39
- Re: C Expressions, Kenneth Brody, 09:32
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Flash Gordon, 09:28
- Good Representation for an Abstract Syntax Tree, johan.tibell@xxxxxxxxx, 09:28
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Chris Dollin, 09:25
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 09:07
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Simon Biber, 09:02
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Simon Biber, 08:37
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., websnarf, 08:36
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Flash Gordon, 08:31
- Re: C Expressions, Chris Dollin, 08:30
- Re: query about main(), osmium, 08:27
- Re: C Expressions, Simon Biber, 08:26
- Re: sizeof, Flash Gordon, 08:21
- Re: query about main(), Simon Biber, 08:17
- Re: query about main(), ankisharma, 08:06
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Eric Sosman, 08:04
- Re: query about main(), Flash Gordon, 07:45
- Re: C Expressions, Mark McIntyre, 07:38
- Re: newbie question on malloc.., Neo, 07:37
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Eric Sosman, 07:36
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Eric Sosman, 07:26
- Re: Keyboard stroke for EOF ?, Mark McIntyre, 07:23
- Re: sizeof, Ancient_Hacker, 07:22
- Re: pascal call in C, Mark McIntyre, 07:19
- Re: query about main(), Ancient_Hacker, 07:08
- query about main(), onkar, 06:37
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, ena8t8si, 06:25
- Re: sizeof, Mark McIntyre, 06:11
- Re: converting string into integer, Mark McIntyre, 06:09
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Mark McIntyre, 06:08
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Mark McIntyre, 06:05
- Re: OT: Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins, 06:03
- Re: Segfault City, ena8t8si, 06:00
- newbie question on malloc.., Yugi, 05:59
- Re: Segfault City, Mark F. Haigh, 05:59
- Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson, 05:53
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 05:53
- Re: OT: Re: automated coding standard validation?, ena8t8si, 05:40
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, ena8t8si, 05:27
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, ena8t8si, 05:18
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 05:17
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, Keith Thompson, 05:13
- Re: Segfault City, Mark F. Haigh, 05:03
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, ena8t8si, 04:59
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:54
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, ena8t8si, 04:49
- Re: Sequence point at comma?, ena8t8si, 04:38
- Re: Order of execution, ena8t8si, 04:34
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Gernot Frisch, 04:29
- Re: Segfault City, Chris Dollin, 04:27
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Chris Dollin, 04:24
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 04:24
- Re: Memory leak, ankisharma, 04:11
- C Expressions, sarathy, 04:06
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Rod Pemberton, 04:03
- Re: Simple RegExp function, John Devereux, 03:52
- Re: AhoCorasick, Dietmar Schindler, 03:39
- Re: Keyboard stroke for EOF ?, Rod Pemberton, 03:09
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, deepak, 03:03
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, sarathy, 03:01
- Re: Keyboard stroke for EOF ?, Ico, 02:59
- Keyboard stroke for EOF ?, one . creepy, 02:48
- Re: sizeof, Mabden, 02:36
- Re: free(), Michael Mair, 02:01
- Re: converting string into integer, Ian Collins, 01:54
- Re: free(), Ian Collins, 01:53
- Re: Memory leak, Ian Collins, 01:43
- free(), Jack, 01:40
- Memory leak, Jack, 01:39
- Re: ungetc, Walter Roberson, 01:31
- Re: pascal call in C, Alf P. Steinbach, 01:21
- Re: Function Prototype - different argument names, Mohan, 01:21
- Re: Function Prototype - different argument names, Mohan, 01:18
- Re: ungetc, av, 01:16
- Re: converting string into integer, Old Wolf, 01:10
- Re: pascal call in C, kkrish, 01:01
- Re: beginner level question, raam, 00:56
- Re: pascal call in C, Walter Roberson, 00:53
- Function Prototype - different argument names, cybernerdsx2, 00:50
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Old Wolf, 00:45
- Re: converting string into integer, Bill Pursell, 00:44
- Re: pascal call in C, Alf P. Steinbach, 00:30
- Re: pascal call in C, Keith Thompson, 00:27
- pascal call in C, kkrish, 00:18
July 17, 2006
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 23:52
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 23:33
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Morris Dovey, 23:18
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Old Wolf, 23:17
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Old Wolf, 23:16
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 23:15
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 22:59
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 22:41
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Walter Roberson, 22:02
- Re: converting string into integer, Jack Klein, 22:01
- Re: C library for PDF creation?, Jack Klein, 21:54
- Re: read this, Keith Thompson, 21:42
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 21:38
- Re: converting string into integer, Keith Thompson, 21:38
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), websnarf, 21:35
- Re: sizeof, ena8t8si, 21:24
- read this, George Orwell, 21:19
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Markus Wolf, 21:07
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 21:07
- Re: converting string into integer, Andy, 20:48
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Tobin, 20:24
- Re: C Programming: A Modern Approach 2nd Edition, I.M. !Knuth, 20:08
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 19:30
- Re: error when rename pointer names, Keith Thompson, 19:15
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Pfaff, 19:11
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Default User, 19:10
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 19:06
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Barry Schwarz, 18:55
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Mark McIntyre, 18:55
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), pete, 18:48
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), ceeques, 18:42
- Re: converting string into integer, spibou, 18:37
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), Peter Nilsson, 18:30
- Re: convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), spibou, 18:28
- Re: converting string into integer, Peter Nilsson, 18:28
- converting string into integer, priyanka, 18:22
- Re: error when rename pointer names, Ancient_Hacker, 18:21
- Re: OT: Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins, 18:20
- Re: error when rename pointer names, Peter Nilsson, 18:16
- error when rename pointer names, ehabaziz2001, 18:09
- convert int to string without using standard library (stdio.h), ceeques, 18:06
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Simon Biber, 18:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, John Bode, 17:59
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Simon Biber, 17:55
- Re: Forward Declarations, Keith Thompson, 17:46
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 17:42
- Re: beginner level question, Keith Thompson, 17:33
- Re: fflush(), Keith Thompson, 17:23
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Keith Thompson, 17:16
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Keith Thompson, 17:14
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: Simple RegExp function, drasko, 17:08
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 16:57
- Re: Forward Declarations, ena8t8si, 16:57
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Kevin Handy, 16:57
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 16:55
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, ena8t8si, 16:54
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 16:53
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Skarmander, 16:53
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Dann Corbit, 16:52
- Re: error: invalid operands to binary &, Keith Thompson, 16:52
- OT: Re: automated coding standard validation?, ena8t8si, 16:52
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Skarmander, 16:51
- Re: Inherent inefficiency in domestic "for" loop?, ena8t8si, 16:50
- Re: Segfault City, ena8t8si, 16:49
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Walter Roberson, 16:46
- Re: C free, ena8t8si, 16:45
- Re: C free, ena8t8si, 16:44
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Pfaff, 16:43
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, ena8t8si, 16:42
- Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, ena8t8si, 16:41
- Re: how to write a variable to a file ?, Simon Biber, 16:40
- Re: // vs /*, ena8t8si, 16:39
- Re: // vs /*, ena8t8si, 16:38
- Re: // vs /*, ena8t8si, 16:37
- Re: x=(x=5,11), ena8t8si, 16:34
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 16:32
- Re: x=(x=5,11), ena8t8si, 16:29
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 16:26
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 16:19
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 16:18
- Re: My gets_ws function, Joe Wright, 16:12
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Walter Roberson, 16:11
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Simon Biber, 16:06
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 16:00
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:54
- Re: Simple RegExp function, Michael Mair, 15:53
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 15:50
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:40
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Dann Corbit, 15:30
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Michael Wojcik, 15:27
- Re: Help for designing outlines in c language, Walter Roberson, 15:25
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 15:23
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Pfaff, 15:22
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:20
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Simon Biber, 15:16
- Help for designing outlines in c language, Manmeet Mittal, 15:15
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Michael Wojcik, 15:11
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Clever Monkey, 15:09
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, Simon Biber, 15:06
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 15:06
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:05
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:01
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 15:01
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 15:01
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 14:53
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Manmeet Mittal, 14:49
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Simon Biber, 14:46
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Ben Pfaff, 14:44
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 14:39
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 14:35
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Tom St Denis, 14:27
- Re: beginner level question, John Bode, 14:19
- Re: error: invalid operands to binary &, lawrence . jones, 14:14
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, sarathy, 14:06
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, sarathy, 13:48
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Dann Corbit, 13:47
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Flash Gordon, 13:11
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Frederick Gotham, 13:06
- Re: Difference b/w storage class and storage class specifier, sarathy, 13:06
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, Default User, 13:01
- C library for PDF creation?, vasudevram, 12:59
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, lovecreatesbeauty, 12:48
- Re: Length Issue in Char while type casting, Nelu, 12:45
- Re: Length Issue in Char while type casting, Walter Roberson, 12:33
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, lovecreatesbeauty, 12:31
- Re: Length Issue in Char while type casting, Eric Sosman, 12:27
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Barry Schwarz, 12:24
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, Barry Schwarz, 12:14
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, Barry Schwarz, 12:14
- Re: Length Issue in Char while type casting, Nelu, 12:08
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Ian, 11:57
- Re: ungetc, P.J. Plauger, 11:49
- Length Issue in Char while type casting, ranjeet . gupta, 11:45
- Re: beginner level question, Barry Schwarz, 11:44
- Simple RegExp function, drasko, 11:42
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Tom St Denis, 11:29
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Chris Dollin, 11:05
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Gernot Frisch, 10:37
- Re: [OT] `What is the advantage of C', Morris Dovey, 10:21
- Re: fflush(), Kenneth Brody, 10:13
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Richard Heathfield, 10:03
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Randy Howard, 10:03
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, lovecreatesbeauty, 09:57
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, deepak, 09:49
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, deepak, 09:47
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, pemo, 09:43
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Frederick Gotham, 09:36
- Re: Largest Palindrome, av, 09:27
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Gernot Frisch, 09:26
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Tom St Denis, 09:25
- Re: i need help about Turbo C, Tom St Denis, 09:22
- Re: ungetc, av, 09:20
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Tom St Denis, 09:16
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, yogeshmk, 09:14
- i need help about Turbo C, pipito, 09:12
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Tom St Denis, 09:09
- Re: My gets_ws function, Dietmar Schindler, 08:59
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Frederick Gotham, 08:51
- Re: Windows Coder Needed, Alf P. Steinbach, 08:27
- Windows Coder Needed, need . a . codemaster, 08:08
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, Richard Bos, 07:58
- Re: char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, raxitsheth2000, 07:57
- char *arr[n] Vs. char **arr, yogeshmk, 07:17
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Chris Dollin, 06:16
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., Keith Thompson, 06:05
- Re: error: invalid operands to binary &, spibou, 06:01
- Re: error: invalid operands to binary &, ankisharma, 06:00
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., ankisharma, 05:45
- error: invalid operands to binary &, muthu, 05:41
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., HenryHu, 05:38
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., Python . LeoJay, 05:24
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 04:58
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., Vladimir Oka, 04:52
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., ankisharma, 04:52
- Re: what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., Flo, 04:47
- what's wrong with my code? about the #if statement., Python . LeoJay, 04:14
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 04:03
- Re: Function declaration without parameters, Richard Bos, 03:51
- Function declaration without parameters, Ian, 03:40
- Re: Difference b/w storage class and storage class specifier, Keith Thompson, 03:25
- Re: beginner level question, raam, 03:23
- Re: new question about old C compiler, Rod Pemberton, 03:11
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Bos, 02:56
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Richard Bos, 02:51
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Richard Bos, 02:48
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Chris McDonald, 02:40
- Re: beginner level question, Peter Nilsson, 02:39
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Richard Bos, 02:38
- Re: good C compiler, Herbert Rosenau, 02:37
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Bos, 02:36
- Re: beginner level question, Ian Collins, 02:34
- Re: beginner level question, raam, 02:30
- beginner level question, raam, 02:27
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Gordon Burditt, 02:09
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Al Balmer, 02:08
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Keith Thompson, 01:48
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Dave Thompson, 01:01
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Dave Thompson, 01:01
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Dave Thompson, 01:01
- Re: I need help, Dave Thompson, 01:01
- Difference b/w storage class and storage class specifier, sarathy, 00:54
- Re: new question about old C compiler, prishil, 00:41
July 16, 2006
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Old Wolf, 22:56
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 22:56
- Re: new question about old C compiler, Barry Schwarz, 21:55
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Longfellow, 21:33
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Stephen Sprunk, 21:28
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Stephen Sprunk, 21:13
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Barry Schwarz, 21:13
- Re: new question about old C compiler, Stéphane Zuckerman, 21:01
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Stephen Sprunk, 20:59
- new question about old C compiler, Today's Mulan, 20:28
- Re: Socket connection between multiple interfaces, through a router, Keith Thompson, 20:20
- Re: Socket connection between multiple interfaces, through a router, seets375, 20:13
- Re: Socket connection between multiple interfaces, through a router, Keith Thompson, 19:53
- Re: Socket connection between multiple interfaces, through a router, Ben Pfaff, 19:48
- Socket connection between multiple interfaces, through a router, seets375, 19:18
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Mark McIntyre, 18:59
- Re: How to Convert 1998 morse.c to 2006, Keith Thompson, 18:26
- Re: array in include, Keith Thompson, 18:12
- Re: Bug with the library or program?, Harish Sundararaj, 18:07
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Keith Thompson, 17:49
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Keith Thompson, 17:47
- Cool Ebook Site, bigskipster, 17:37
- Re: Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, Richard Heathfield, 17:01
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Malcolm, 16:41
- Newbie question - displaying trivia questions at random, philbo30, 16:39
- Re: about string, Bill Pursell, 15:29
- Re: about string, Michael Mair, 15:28
- Re: good C compiler, David Wade, 15:16
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), David Wade, 15:10
- Re: array in include, Eric Sosman, 14:34
- Re: help getting substring, August Karlstrom, 14:28
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Harald van Dijk, 14:25
- array in include, Salvatore Di Fazio, 14:05
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Chris Torek, 13:50
- about string, ce_dipak, 13:44
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Chris Torek, 13:41
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Michael Wojcik, 13:25
- Re: How to Convert 1998 morse.c to 2006, Tim Prince, 13:25
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Michael Wojcik, 13:23
- Re: How to Convert 1998 morse.c to 2006, tmp123, 13:23
- Re: help getting substring, Ben Bacarisse, 13:17
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Michael Wojcik, 12:54
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, av, 12:50
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Michael Wojcik, 12:34
- Re: Declaration specifiers, cp, 12:30
- Re: help getting substring, gmclee, 12:14
- How to Convert 1998 morse.c to 2006, humanmutantman, 12:02
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Frederick Gotham, 11:58
- Re: Efficiently generating bits, spibou, 11:58
- Re: help getting substring, Simon Biber, 11:53
- Re: Declaration specifiers, Simon Biber, 11:36
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., lovecreatesbeauty, 11:24
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:08
- Re: Declaration specifiers, Eric Sosman, 10:11
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Ed Prochak, 09:24
- Re: Declaration specifiers, cp, 09:05
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Randy Howard, 09:05
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Randy Howard, 09:00
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Randy Howard, 08:59
- Re: Declaration specifiers, narasimaperumal, 08:54
- Re: Declaration specifiers, spibou, 08:44
- Declaration specifiers, cp, 08:33
- Re: help getting substring, August Karlstrom, 08:06
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Frederick Gotham, 07:40
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", dbz, 07:40
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Bill Pursell, 07:22
- Re: help getting substring, Bill Pursell, 07:07
- Re: help getting substring, manoj1978, 06:12
- Re: help getting substring, tmp123, 06:07
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, av, 05:56
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Bill Pursell, 05:54
- help getting substring, gmclee, 05:04
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Chris Torek, 04:45
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Chris Torek, 04:08
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Chris Torek, 03:42
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Richard Heathfield, 03:10
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Malcolm, 02:39
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Ian Collins, 02:36
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Longfellow, 01:57
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, lovecreatesbeauty, 01:31
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Keith Thompson, 01:16
- Re: ungetc, av, 00:26
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Tosha, 00:03
July 15, 2006
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Richard Heathfield, 22:23
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Richard Heathfield, 22:20
- Re: Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Ian Collins, 21:52
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Rouben Rostamian, 21:43
- Newbie: learning to use malloc()., Longfellow, 21:39
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Skarmander, 20:54
- Re: Efficiently generating bits, nish . sinnadurai, 20:35
- Re: how to do an infinite loop, Man with Oscilloscope, 20:29
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Rod Pemberton, 20:01
- Re: Efficiently generating bits, Ben Pfaff, 19:50
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 19:49
- Efficiently generating bits, nish . sinnadurai, 19:35
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Keith Thompson, 19:29
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 19:28
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Rod Pemberton, 19:03
- TCP Socket login handling. Newbie, shrike, 18:53
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Mark McIntyre, 18:35
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Mark McIntyre, 18:32
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, pete, 18:21
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, pete, 18:09
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Darren New, 17:04
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Eric Sosman, 16:46
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, lovecreatesbeauty, 16:31
- Re: about pcre regex lib, bbq, 16:14
- Re: about pcre regex lib, bbq, 16:07
- Re: about pcre regex lib, bbq, 16:06
- Re: about pcre regex lib, bbq, 15:58
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Skarmander, 15:34
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", jacob navia, 15:16
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Keith Thompson, 15:10
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Keith Thompson, 14:50
- Re: good C compiler, polychrom, 14:43
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 14:35
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 14:29
- Re: About iServicePro, Al Balmer, 14:09
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Al Balmer, 14:09
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, REH, 13:47
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Tim Prince, 13:46
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Frederick Gotham, 13:46
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Eric Sosman, 13:45
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Frederick Gotham, 13:43
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Frederick Gotham, 13:28
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Snis Pilbor, 13:24
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Jack Klein, 13:15
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Frederick Gotham, 13:14
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Ben C, 13:12
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, aragonsr, 13:02
- Re: Whats the deal with 'const'?, Frederick Gotham, 12:55
- Whats the deal with 'const'?, Snis Pilbor, 12:34
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Julian V. Noble, 12:22
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Alf P. Steinbach, 12:17
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Barry Schwarz, 12:05
- Re: ungetc, P.J. Plauger, 11:34
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Joe Wright, 11:34
- Re: Problem with keyboard input for my very little OS, Walter Roberson, 11:08
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, ReaperUnreal, 11:04
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, REH, 10:59
- Re: SHA1, Simon Biber, 10:58
- Re: ungetc, Joe Wright, 10:57
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 10:24
- Re: ungetc, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 10:21
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Frederick Gotham, 09:53
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Joe Wright, 09:44
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Frederick Gotham, 09:26
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", August Karlstrom, 09:17
- Re: easy structure question, Michael, 08:54
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 08:52
- Re: Problem with keyboard input for my very little OS, osmium, 08:46
- Re: A Query in "Pointers to Structures", Tosha, 08:35
- A Query in "Pointers to Structures", dbz, 08:10
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Mark McIntyre, 07:31
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 07:23
- Re: Read System Clock in Windows, Rod Pemberton, 07:13
- Re: How to write a small graceful gcd function?, Nabsha, 06:33
- Re: windows socket recv problem, Arkady Frenkel, 06:09
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: Big problem doing sorted insertion in a list, Franco Perilli, 05:39
- How to write a small graceful gcd function?, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:28
- ungetc, av, 05:10
- Re: Read System Clock in Windows, Skarmander, 04:57
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Keith Thompson, 04:37
- Re: About iServicePro, jjf, 04:28
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Heathfield, 04:15
- Re: easy structure question, Martin Ambuhl, 04:06
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 03:59
- Problem with keyboard input for my very little OS, pelletier.thomas@xxxxxxxxx, 03:11
- Re: Read System Clock in Windows, Rod Pemberton, 03:09
- Re: fflush(), Rod Pemberton, 03:08
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Rod Pemberton, 03:08
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Rod Pemberton, 03:08
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Rod Pemberton, 03:07
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Rod Pemberton, 03:07
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, James Dow Allen, 03:06
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', av, 01:51
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Malcolm, 00:51
- Re: good C compiler, Ian, 00:37
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', av, 00:33
- Re: Largest Palindrome, av, 00:33
- Re: Read System Clock in Windows, Barry Schwarz, 00:27
July 14, 2006
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Snis Pilbor, 23:41
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Jack Klein, 23:33
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Walter Roberson, 23:27
- Re: good C compiler, napi, 23:25
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, jjf, 22:18
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Keith Thompson, 22:10
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Rob Warnock, 22:02
- Re: easy structure question, Ian Collins, 21:53
- easy structure question, Michael, 21:26
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Gordon Burditt, 21:05
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Darren New, 20:43
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Gordon Burditt, 20:39
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Keith Thompson, 19:24
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Keith Thompson, 19:12
- Re: [OT] Debugging and Logging, Dann Corbit, 19:05
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Keith Thompson, 19:05
- Re: arabic_caracters, Dik T. Winter, 18:59
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Al Balmer, 18:34
- Re: Big problem doing sorted insertion in a list, Andrew Poelstra, 18:32
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Al Balmer, 18:30
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Eric Sosman, 18:29
- Re: Read System Clock in Windows, Richard Heathfield, 18:27
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Richard Heathfield, 18:24
- Read System Clock in Windows, Moikel, 18:23
- Re: Big problem doing sorted insertion in a list, Franco Perilli, 18:20
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), goose, 18:16
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Al Balmer, 18:05
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Richard Heathfield, 18:02
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), goose, 17:58
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:56
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 17:53
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:52
- Re: About iServicePro, Ian Collins, 17:49
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Ian Collins, 17:47
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:47
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 17:42
- Re: good C compiler, Ian Gay, 17:41
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Eric Sosman, 17:38
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 17:37
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 17:35
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Eric Sosman, 17:34
- Big problem doing sorted insertion in a list, Franco Perilli, 17:34
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:31
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Richard Heathfield, 17:31
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:29
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Richard Heathfield, 17:28
- Re: fflush(), Dann Corbit, 17:27
- Re: fflush(), Ben Pfaff, 17:25
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 17:23
- fflush(), Jack, 17:20
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:19
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Malcolm, 17:15
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Mark McIntyre, 17:14
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 17:11
- Re: good C compiler, Mark McIntyre, 17:11
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Skarmander, 17:10
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 17:08
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Flash Gordon, 17:01
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 17:00
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 16:56
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 16:50
- Re: Data processing, Reinhard Skarbal, 16:46
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: must size_t be an alias?, Skarmander, 16:43
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Kenneth Brody, 16:41
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 16:35
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 16:31
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 16:26
- Re: Is this legal?, Michael Wojcik, 16:21
- Re: Bug with the library or program?, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 16:20
- Re: Reading Binary file, Keith Thompson, 16:14
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 16:14
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Flash Gordon, 16:08
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Keith Thompson, 16:08
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 16:04
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 16:01
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 15:59
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 15:40
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Barry Schwarz, 15:37
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Frederick Gotham, 15:37
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Keith Thompson, 15:31
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Barry Schwarz, 15:30
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Andrew Poelstra, 15:30
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Dann Corbit, 15:29
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Keith Thompson, 15:19
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Ancient_Hacker, 15:19
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, ilya2, 15:16
- Re: Data processing, Keith Thompson, 15:15
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Keith Thompson, 15:13
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, goose, 15:11
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Skarmander, 15:11
- Re: C macro, Michael Wojcik, 15:10
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Walter Roberson, 15:10
- Re: arabic_caracters, Simon Biber, 15:09
- Re: must size_t be an alias?, Harald van Dijk, 15:07
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Ben Pfaff, 15:07
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Skarmander, 15:05
- Re: Does malloc() reuse addresses?, Dann Corbit, 14:59
- Re: must size_t be an alias?, Skarmander, 14:54
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Walter Roberson, 14:54
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Dann Corbit, 14:52
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), goose, 14:49
- Re: Reading Binary file, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:49
- Does malloc() reuse addresses?, avasilev, 14:48
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Michael Wojcik, 14:45
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Tom St Denis, 14:43
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Skarmander, 14:41
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Jack, 14:27
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), goose, 14:24
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Jalapeno, 14:22
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Chris Smith, 14:20
- Re: good C compiler, Jaspreet, 14:07
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Walter Roberson, 14:05
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Morris Dovey, 14:01
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, raphfrk, 13:58
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Nelu, 13:50
- Cool Ebooks Site, bigskipster, 13:47
- Re: calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, Tim Prince, 13:47
- Re: printf doubt, Flash Gordon, 13:31
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Andrew Poelstra, 13:27
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Nelu, 13:21
- Re: Reading Binary file, Andrew Poelstra, 13:19
- calling convention adopted by the gcc compiler for the C programs, priyanka, 13:16
- Re: Bug with the library or program?, Default User, 13:14
- Re: Reading Binary file, Andrew Poelstra, 13:11
- Re: Reading Binary file, Shalaka Joshi, 13:11
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Andrew Poelstra, 13:09
- Re: arabic_caracters, Clever Monkey, 13:07
- Re: Reading Binary file, Nelu, 13:00
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Andrew Poelstra, 13:00
- Re: Reading Binary file, Shalaka Joshi, 12:54
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 12:54
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Darren New, 12:54
- Re: good C compiler, Andrew Poelstra, 12:52
- Re: Bug with the library or program?, Barry Schwarz, 12:52
- Re: Reading Binary file, Tom St Denis, 12:50
- Reading Binary file, Shalaka Joshi, 12:48
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Nelu, 12:37
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Eric Sosman, 12:35
- Re: arabic_caracters, Simon Biber, 12:35
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Richard Heathfield, 12:26
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Stephen Sprunk, 12:25
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Nelu, 12:24
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), lovecreatesbeauty, 12:14
- Re: Convert Int Value To Pointer, ReaperUnreal, 12:11
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Al Balmer, 12:10
- Convert Int Value To Pointer, ReaperUnreal, 12:09
- Re: good C compiler, jacob navia, 12:05
- Re: good C compiler, Ian Gay, 12:03
- Re: good C compiler, Al Balmer, 12:02
- Re: arabic_caracters, Clever Monkey, 11:53
- Re: About iServicePro, Al Balmer, 11:52
- Re: Data processing, Barry Schwarz, 11:48
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Default User, 11:42
- Re: open() and fopen(), Ancient_Hacker, 11:38
- Re: Bug with the library or program?, Harish Sundararaj, 11:35
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Nelu, 11:33
- Re: malloc/free question, Al Balmer, 11:33
- Re: malloc/free question, Al Balmer, 11:30
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Chris Smith, 11:30
- Re: Data processing, dmoran21, 11:28
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Al Balmer, 11:26
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Simon Biber, 11:26
- Re: Amazon used lisp & C exclusively? (clc,cll), Richard Heathfield, 11:24
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Richard Heathfield, 11:23
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Richard Heathfield, 11:21
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 11:20
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Richard Heathfield, 11:20
- Re: Data processing, Richard Heathfield, 11:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Al Balmer, 11:19
- Re: printf doubt, Al Balmer, 11:14
- Re: command line arguements with spaces in them, Rouben Rostamian, 11:13
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, David Resnick, 10:55
- command line arguements with spaces in them, raphfrk, 10:54
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, ilya2, 10:52
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, ilya2, 10:49
- Data processing, dmoran21, 10:44
- Bug with the library or program?, Harish Sundararaj, 10:42
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Nelu, 10:37
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Nelu, 10:32
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 10:22
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Richard Heathfield, 10:06
- Re: arabic_caractere, Simon Biber, 10:05
- Re: focus, Flash Gordon, 10:01
- Re: focus, arun, 09:53
- Re: focus, Tom St Denis, 09:53
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Tom St Denis, 09:52
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, osmium, 09:50
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 09:50
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, arun, 09:41
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Richard Heathfield, 09:38
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, iwinux, 09:30
- Re: CPU or MB Serial number, Walter Roberson, 09:28
- Re: good C compiler, AB, 09:02
- Re: good C compiler, polychrom, 08:59
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, pozz, 08:49
- Re: Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, Richard Heathfield, 08:48
- Re: [OT] Debugging and Logging, Richard Heathfield, 08:42
- Re: good C compiler, Richard Heathfield, 08:42
- Re: CPU or MB Serial number, Richard Heathfield, 08:40
- Re: CPU or MB Serial number, Morris Dovey, 08:40
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Richard Heathfield, 08:37
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Eric Sosman, 08:36
- Re: arabic_caractere, Morris Dovey, 08:35
- Looking for a C textbook with emphasis on data types, ilya2, 08:32
- Re: [OT] Debugging and Logging, Eric Sosman, 08:21
- Re: good C compiler, polychrom, 08:21
- arabic_caracters, devdris, 08:20
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, Michael Mair, 08:20
- CPU or MB Serial number, bayazee, 08:19
- arabic_caractere, devdris, 08:17
- focus, devdris, 08:15
- Re: How to use scanf() safely?, pemo, 08:15
- Re: good C compiler, Richard Heathfield, 08:09
- Re: good C compiler, cp, 08:07
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, David Resnick, 08:04
- How to use scanf() safely?, iwinux, 08:00
- Re: good C compiler, osmium, 07:50
- Re: good C compiler, polychrom, 07:40
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, spibou, 07:28
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Richard Heathfield, 07:27
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, spibou, 07:21
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 07:21
- Re: good C compiler, AB, 07:12
- Re: [OT] Debugging and Logging, Martin Ambuhl, 07:02
- good C compiler, polychrom, 07:01
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Ian Collins, 07:00
- Re: how to use STL library in c language, Martin Ambuhl, 06:55
- Re: About iServicePro, Ian Collins, 06:40
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, pozz, 06:38
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, spibou, 06:21
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:17
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, pozz, 06:06
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 05:08
- Re: About iServicePro, jjf, 05:03
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Rod Pemberton, 04:46
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 04:24
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 04:19
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 04:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 04:15
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jaysome, 04:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Harald van Dijk, 04:01
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 03:50
- Re: How to make http call from C, deepak, 03:21
- Re: My gets_ws function, Dietmar Schindler, 03:05
- Re: printf doubt, Flash Gordon, 03:00
- Re: [OT] Debugging and Logging, Ian Collins, 02:49
- [OT] Debugging and Logging, v4vijayakumar, 02:38
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jaysome, 02:37
- how to use STL library in c language, umarriaz, 02:09
- Re: malloc/free question, Don Porges, 00:12
July 13, 2006
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Nicholas Howe, 23:56
- Re: must size_t be an alias?, Ben Pfaff, 23:33
- Re: must size_t be an alias?, Eric Sosman, 23:21
- Re: malloc/free question, Gordon Burditt, 23:20
- must size_t be an alias?, Old Wolf, 22:20
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 22:10
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Old Wolf, 22:06
- Re: malloc/free question, Snis Pilbor, 21:55
- Re: How to make http call from C, Dann Corbit, 21:53
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 21:49
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Gordon Burditt, 21:33
- Re: How to make http call from C, John Bode, 21:18
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gordon Burditt, 21:17
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, WaterWalk, 21:15
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Gordon Burditt, 21:05
- Re: malloc/free question, Keith Thompson, 20:27
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 20:13
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 20:11
- Re: email program........., Jack Klein, 19:55
- Re: malloc/free question, Richard Heathfield, 19:52
- Re: malloc/free question, Stephen Sprunk, 19:45
- Re: Cool Ebooks Site, Al Balmer, 19:12
- Re: malloc/free question, Al Balmer, 19:10
- Re: OT Re: open() and fopen(), Keith Thompson, 18:41
- Re: email program........., Tom St Denis, 18:31
- OT Re: open() and fopen(), Chris Smith, 18:25
- email program........., /*24age*/, 18:16
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Richard Heathfield, 18:13
- Re: printf doubt, Keith Thompson, 18:05
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Sjouke Burry, 18:01
- Re: malloc/free question, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, spibou, 17:53
- Re: How to make http call from C, Keith Thompson, 17:51
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Default User, 17:51
- Re: How to make http call from C, Chris McDonald, 17:51
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Default User, 17:48
- Re: printf doubt, Joe Wright, 17:47
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Keith Thompson, 17:44
- Cool Ebooks Site, bigskipster, 17:42
- Re: about pcre regex lib, websnarf, 17:41
- Re: malloc/free question, Al Balmer, 17:38
- Re: printf( ), Keith Thompson, 17:32
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', lovecreatesbeauty, 17:20
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Flash Gordon, 17:11
- How to make http call from C, SP, 17:05
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Clever Monkey, 17:03
- Re: malloc/free question, Andrey Tarasevich, 17:01
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 17:00
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Mark McIntyre, 17:00
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Morris Dovey, 16:57
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Richard Heathfield, 16:56
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:55
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, spibou, 16:49
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Andrew Poelstra, 16:47
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 16:39
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Morris Dovey, 16:38
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, goose, 16:25
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 16:22
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, jjf, 16:19
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', lovecreatesbeauty, 16:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ancient_Hacker, 16:10
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 15:50
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 15:46
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 15:31
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, Fred Kleinschmidt, 15:25
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Giorgio Silvestri, 15:21
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 15:20
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, John Bode, 15:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, pete, 15:15
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, W Marsh, 15:09
- Re: printf( ), John Bode, 15:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 14:56
- Re: What functions in UNIX 6th implement search and sort algorithm, Al Balmer, 14:53
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 14:53
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, W Marsh, 14:49
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Dann Corbit, 14:45
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, goose, 14:43
- Re: open() and fopen(), Stephen Sprunk, 14:42
- Re: Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, Dann Corbit, 14:40
- Writing a incrementing/decrementing function with roll-over, pozz, 14:37
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, John Bode, 14:35
- Re: malloc/free question, Keith Thompson, 14:34
- Re: [OT] Re: open() and fopen(), Keith Thompson, 14:31
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Keith Thompson, 14:23
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), Lasse Espeholt, 14:14
- Re: Is this legal?, Tom St Denis, 14:07
- Re: OT: open() and fopen(), Keith Thompson, 14:07
- Re: malloc/free question, Tom St Denis, 14:02
- Re: malloc/free question, Tom St Denis, 14:02
- Re: malloc/free question, Morris Dovey, 14:00
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Keith Thompson, 13:56
- malloc/free question, Snis Pilbor, 13:53
- [OT] Re: open() and fopen(), Eric Sosman, 13:49
- Re: printf( ), Al Balmer, 13:48
- Re: open() and fopen(), Al Balmer, 13:37
- Re: open() and fopen(), Al Balmer, 13:35
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ben Pfaff, 13:30
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Keith Thompson, 13:26
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 13:24
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Flash Gordon, 13:01
- Re: parsing arguments, Andrew Poelstra, 13:01
- parsing arguments, Harris Kosmidis, 12:57
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Kenneth Brody, 12:39
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 12:38
- Re: Is this legal?, Andrey Tarasevich, 12:37
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), P.J. Plauger, 12:32
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), polychrom, 12:27
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Tom St Denis, 12:20
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), Jack Klein, 12:19
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Richard Heathfield, 12:12
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Tom St Denis, 12:09
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Jack Klein, 12:05
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, goose, 12:03
- Re: open() and fopen(), Flash Gordon, 11:58
- Re: about pcre regex lib, jacob navia, 11:57
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', lovecreatesbeauty, 11:56
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Walter Roberson, 11:54
- Re: about pcre regex lib, jacob navia, 11:54
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', pemo, 11:54
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), Tom St Denis, 11:52
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), Gernot Frisch, 11:50
- Re: What functions in UNIX 6th implement search and sort algorithm, Walter Roberson, 11:49
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 11:49
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Jack Klein, 11:47
- Re: open() and fopen(), Walter Roberson, 11:46
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Tom St Denis, 11:45
- Re: about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), Tom St Denis, 11:42
- Re: After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', Ben Pfaff, 11:39
- about Visual Studio 2005 Express (free), polychrom, 11:38
- After read a whole OS written by C, someone asks `What is the advantage of C', lovecreatesbeauty, 11:28
- Re: about pcre regex lib, Flash Gordon, 11:26
- Re: thread.h is name pollution ?, Tom St Denis, 11:26
- Re: What functions in UNIX 6th implement search and sort algorithm, pemo, 11:23
- What functions in UNIX 6th implement search and sort algorithm, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:20
- Re: Question on Static Global variable, C_Programmer, 11:14
- Re: open() and fopen(), Ancient_Hacker, 11:12
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:00
- Re: open() and fopen(), zuoyongping, 10:55
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 10:13
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 09:30
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 09:25
- OT: avcall, Kenny McCormack, 09:21
- Re: thread.h is name pollution ?, Ian Bush, 08:30
- thread.h is name pollution ?, Ian Bush, 08:08
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 07:28
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Chris Dollin, 07:27
- Re: can someone explane to the behaviour, srinivas . satish, 07:21
- Re: What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 07:19
- Re: thread.h is name pollution ?, Richard Heathfield, 07:18
- Re: Editing a file at Start, Richard Bos, 07:16
- Re: thread.h is name pollution ?, Chris Dollin, 07:15
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 07:15
- What is strcmp supposed to return if one or both arguments passed to it are NULL ?, spibou, 07:11
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Chris Dollin, 07:08
- Re: can someone explane to the behaviour, Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 07:03
- Re: can someone explane to the behaviour, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:00
- Re: can someone explane to the behaviour, Ancient_Hacker, 06:57
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Richard Heathfield, 06:56
- Re: can someone explane to the behaviour, Chris Dollin, 06:52
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 06:49
- can someone explane to the behaviour, srinivas . satish, 06:41
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:35
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Chris Dollin, 06:31
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:14
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:10
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 06:09
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 06:05
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:04
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 06:02
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Richard Heathfield, 05:56
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 05:56
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 05:51
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 05:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 05:42
- Re: encrypting with preprocessor, Laurent Deniau, 05:41
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, goose, 05:31
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, av, 05:25
- Re: Is this legal?, Richard Bos, 05:18
- Re: Editing a file at Start, goose, 05:15
- encrypting with preprocessor, Gernot Frisch, 05:09
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Gernot Frisch, 04:56
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Gernot Frisch, 04:52
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 04:43
- Re: Is this legal?, pete, 04:32
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, pemo, 04:31
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Robert Latest, 04:29
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, Chris Dollin, 04:28
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Robert Latest, 04:24
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, pemo, 04:24
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Chris Dollin, 04:22
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Chris Dollin, 04:17
- Re: open() and fopen(), SM Ryan, 04:16
- Is this legal?, Kelvin Moss, 04:15
- Re: Strange UNIX "icode" declaration in Lions' book, Chris Dollin, 04:04
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 03:57
- Re: printf( ), jjf, 03:20
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Bill Pursell, 03:09
- Re: printf( ), Richard Bos, 03:08
- Re: C macro, sunny, 03:06
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Michael Mair, 03:00
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 02:55
- Re: printf( ), sarma, 02:42
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Stephen Sprunk, 02:39
- Editing a file at Start, ritesh, 02:33
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Stephen Sprunk, 02:25
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Stephen Sprunk, 02:19
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, Harald van Dijk, 02:11
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 01:49
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, v4vijayakumar, 01:31
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, ritesh, 01:28
- Re: 2D convolution, Tom St Denis, 00:42
- Re: Question on Static Global variable, Chris Torek, 00:26
- Re: printf doubt, robertwessel2@xxxxxxxxx, 00:16
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, Ian Collins, 00:13
July 12, 2006
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 22:48
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 22:47
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, Ian Collins, 22:37
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 22:21
- Re: Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, Ian Collins, 21:45
- Pointers to functions in structures trubble!, addinall, 21:29
- Re: 2D convolution, Ruan Hongning, 21:13
- Re: Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, Keith Thompson, 19:47
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 19:41
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:34
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 19:21
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 19:13
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 19:07
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Coos Haak, 19:07
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 19:03
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 19:01
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 19:01
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:59
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:58
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 18:57
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Coos Haak, 18:56
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 18:56
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:54
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 18:54
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:54
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:52
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:51
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:49
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 18:47
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Al Balmer, 18:46
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:46
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:45
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:42
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:42
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Al Balmer, 18:42
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 18:40
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:39
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:35
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:34
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:32
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, randyhyde@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, 18:31
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 18:31
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:31
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 18:29
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:27
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:27
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:26
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:24
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Mark McIntyre, 18:23
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Mark McIntyre, 18:21
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ian Collins, 18:19
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Fred Kleinschmidt, 18:18
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Default User, 18:15
- Re: Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, spibou, 18:12
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:10
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:06
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 18:05
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 17:59
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 17:58
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 17:57
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 17:55
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 17:52
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Richard Heathfield, 17:52
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 17:48
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 17:47
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Andrew Poelstra, 17:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ben Pfaff, 17:44
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Walter Roberson, 17:43
- Re: Question on Static Global variable, Walter Roberson, 17:41
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 17:38
- Re: Question on Static Global variable, Bill Pursell, 17:36
- Re: C is too old? opinions?, Ben Pfaff, 17:29
- C is too old? opinions?, Lasse Espeholt, 17:26
- Question on Static Global variable, C_Programmer, 17:20
- Re: C macro, Michael Mair, 17:11
- Re: printf doubt, Coos Haak, 17:08
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Michael Mair, 16:58
- Re: use of weak_alias or strong_alias in application code?, Keith Thompson, 16:56
- Re: C macro, Keith Thompson, 16:54
- Re: Another stuct problme, Barry Schwarz, 16:39
- Re: Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: printf doubt, Barry Schwarz, 16:28
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- use of weak_alias or strong_alias in application code?, seyong_choi@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:21
- use of weak_alias or strong_alias in application code?, seyong_choi@xxxxxxxxxxx, 16:20
- Re: Strange UNIX "icode" declaration in Lions' book, lawrence . jones, 16:14
- Re: C macro, Walter Roberson, 16:05
- Re: Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, spibou, 15:31
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, spamtrap, 15:24
- Re: C macro, Clever Monkey, 15:22
- Re: C macro, spibou, 15:08
- Re: Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, Malcolm, 15:08
- Re: C macro, Tak-Shing Chan, 14:57
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, ,a\\/b, 14:57
- Re: C macro, Ancient_Hacker, 14:48
- Re: C macro, Morris Dovey, 14:47
- Re: C macro, Richard Heathfield, 14:28
- C macro, sunny, 14:09
- Re: printf doubt, Michael Wojcik, 13:43
- Re: windows socket recv problem, Skarmander, 13:39
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Giorgio Silvestri, 13:19
- Re: Strange UNIX "icode" declaration in Lions' book, Chris Torek, 13:07
- Should I buy the C reference manual or the standard ?, spibou, 13:02
- Re: windows socket recv problem, Clever Monkey, 12:53
- Re: printf( ), Default User, 12:51
- Re: 2D convolution, Default User, 12:48
- Re: windows socket recv problem, sandeep, 12:46
- Re: windows socket recv problem, Tom St Denis, 12:42
- windows socket recv problem, sonu, 12:40
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Tom St Denis, 12:31
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Ben Pfaff, 12:26
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, av, 12:26
- Re: Anything wrong with the print?, Thomas J. Gritzan, 12:24
- Re: assign constant string to BYTE array, Thomas J. Gritzan, 12:17
- Re: 2D convolution, Al Balmer, 12:14
- Re: Anything wrong with the print?, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 12:14
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Tom St Denis, 12:12
- Re: assign constant string to BYTE array, Al Balmer, 12:11
- Re: Anything wrong with the print?, John Bode, 12:01
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, jontwang, 11:51
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Al Balmer, 11:38
- Re: Anything wrong with the print?, Richard Heathfield, 11:22
- Anything wrong with the print?, QQ, 11:18
- Re: assign constant string to BYTE array, goose, 11:11
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:00
- Re: Strange UNIX "icode" declaration in Lions' book, Chris Dollin, 10:52
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Tom St Denis, 10:52
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Tom St Denis, 10:42
- Re: 2D convolution, Duncan Muirhead, 10:26
- Strange UNIX "icode" declaration in Lions' book, lovecreatesbeauty, 10:20
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:20
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Thad Smith, 10:11
- Re: ptrs validity, Michael Wojcik, 10:11
- Re: 2D convolution, Tom St Denis, 10:04
- Re: Pointers, John Bode, 10:03
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Michael Wojcik, 09:54
- Re: printf( ), Chris Dollin, 09:40
- printf( ), sarma, 09:30
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Frederick Gotham, 09:17
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Frederick Gotham, 09:10
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Richard Heathfield, 09:09
- Re: PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, Chris Dollin, 09:06
- Re: [OT] How to link a library statically in a binary, Dirk Krause, 08:42
- Re: assign constant string to BYTE array, pankaj, 08:42
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Chris Dollin, 08:38
- PORTA & 0x03 == 0x03, sonos, 08:37
- How to link a library statically in a binary, ankur . cdac, 08:19
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Kenny McCormack, 07:59
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Nick Keighley, 07:50
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Juuso Hukkanen, 07:31
- Re: Pointers, Nick Keighley, 06:27
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 06:19
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Heathfield, 05:54
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 05:53
- Re: assign constant string to BYTE array, Richard Heathfield, 05:52
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Spiro Trikaliotis, 05:45
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:39
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 05:33
- 2D convolution, Ruan Hongning, 05:28
- Re: simple struct, Chris Dollin, 05:28
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Bos, 05:21
- assign constant string to BYTE array, Orange, 05:19
- Re: simple struct, Potatoman, 05:18
- Re: Pointers, spibou, 05:15
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Chris Dollin, 05:06
- Re: Pointers, pankaj, 05:05
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 05:05
- Re: Another stuct problme, Chris Dollin, 05:03
- Re: simple struct, Chris Dollin, 04:59
- Re: Pointers, Keith Thompson, 04:55
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 04:49
- Re: Pointers, Keith Thompson, 04:48
- Re: simple struct, Keith Thompson, 04:43
- Re: AhoCorasick, Keith Thompson, 04:39
- Re: Pointers, Richard Heathfield, 04:35
- Re: simple struct, Richard Heathfield, 04:34
- Re: simple struct, Richard Heathfield, 04:32
- Re: Pointers, Potatoman, 04:17
- Re: Pointers, Potatoman, 04:14
- Re: Pointers, mdler, 04:07
- Re: simple struct, Potatoman, 04:06
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], James Dow Allen, 04:00
- Pointers, Potatoman, 03:49
- Another stuct problme, Potatoman, 03:42
- Re: simple struct, Potatoman, 03:33
- Re: AhoCorasick, Potatoman, 03:27
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Simon Biber, 03:26
- Re: AhoCorasick, Flash Gordon, 03:21
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Simon Biber, 03:19
- Re: simple struct, Flash Gordon, 03:18
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Richard Heathfield, 03:18
- Re: Commutativity of operator [], Simon Biber, 03:15
- Re: AhoCorasick, Keith Thompson, 03:12
- Re: simple struct, Richard Heathfield, 03:07
- simple struct, Potatoman, 02:58
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Heathfield, 02:57
- AhoCorasick, Potatoman, 02:55
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 02:53
- AhoCorasick, Potatoman, 02:53
- AhoCorasick, Potatoman, 02:53
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Michael Mair, 02:41
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, jjf, 02:30
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, rhyde@xxxxxxxxxx, 00:02
July 11, 2006
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Dave Vandervies, 23:55
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Walter Roberson, 23:44
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, MQ, 23:25
- Re: printf doubt, Keith Thompson, 23:11
- Re: printf doubt, Morris Dovey, 22:45
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Old Wolf, 22:36
- Re: printf doubt, Old Wolf, 22:22
- Re: printf doubt, Ben Pfaff, 22:13
- Re: printf doubt, Barry Schwarz, 22:08
- Re: error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, Joe Wright, 20:54
- Re: error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, Joe Wright, 20:33
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Adam Warner, 20:28
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Old Wolf, 19:19
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Joe Wright, 19:19
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Joe Wright, 19:16
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Peter Nilsson, 18:41
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 18:34
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, pete, 18:33
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, pete, 18:26
- about pcre regex lib, mainland, 18:08
- Re: ptrs validity, Mark McIntyre, 17:50
- Re: open() and fopen(), Robert Gamble, 17:47
- Re: ptrs validity, Mark McIntyre, 17:45
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Ian Collins, 17:43
- Re: open() and fopen(), Joe Wright, 17:38
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Mark McIntyre, 17:37
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Robert Gamble, 17:32
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Ben Pfaff, 17:21
- Re: ptrs validity, Default User, 17:16
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, websnarf, 17:16
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, jontwang, 17:14
- Re: error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, walsht@xxxxxxxxx, 17:13
- Re: ptrs validity, Keith Thompson, 17:10
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, websnarf, 17:10
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Richard Heathfield, 16:50
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Michael Mair, 16:47
- Re: ptrs validity, Default User, 16:45
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, websnarf, 16:45
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Richard Heathfield, 16:42
- Re: Counting args in variadic macros, Michael Mair, 16:40
- Re: error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, Michael Mair, 16:39
- Re: error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, Richard Heathfield, 16:39
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 16:38
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Michael Mair, 16:32
- Counting args in variadic macros, jontwang, 16:32
- error: storage size of 'frm' isn't known, walsht, 16:31
- Re: Time Complexity, Martin Ambuhl, 16:26
- Re: My gets_ws function, Harald van Dijk, 16:20
- Re: printf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 16:11
- Re: ptrs validity, Al Balmer, 16:05
- Re: why does 'a' change?, spibou, 16:04
- Re: why does 'a' change?, spibou, 15:59
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Malcolm, 15:54
- Re: why does 'a' change?, Kenneth Brody, 15:51
- Re: ptrs validity, Keith Thompson, 15:49
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 15:48
- Re: ptrs validity, Kenneth Brody, 15:46
- Re: ptrs validity, Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Re: ptrs validity, David Resnick, 15:38
- Re: ptrs validity, Andrew Poelstra, 15:35
- Re: My gets_ws function, Bas Wassink, 15:26
- Re: Time Complexity, Al Balmer, 15:22
- Re: ptrs validity, Ancient_Hacker, 15:21
- Re: ptrs validity, Ben Pfaff, 15:18
- Re: ptrs validity, Ancient_Hacker, 15:13
- Re: why does 'a' change?, Flash Gordon, 15:07
- Re: ptrs validity, Flash Gordon, 15:04
- Re: why does 'a' change?, Keith Thompson, 15:04
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Keith Thompson, 14:55
- Re: Time Complexity, Keith Thompson, 14:49
- why does 'a' change?, yusufm, 14:47
- Re: printf doubt, Keith Thompson, 14:47
- Re: Macro expansion in armcc, Keith Thompson, 14:39
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Roberto Waltman, 14:29
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Roberto Waltman, 14:23
- Re: Time Complexity, Flash Gordon, 14:23
- Re: ptrs validity, Keith Thompson, 14:16
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Flash Gordon, 14:14
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Fred Kleinschmidt, 14:09
- Re: printf doubt, Flash Gordon, 14:06
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 14:05
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Ben Pfaff, 13:58
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Ben Pfaff, 13:53
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Eric Sosman, 13:49
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Skarmander, 13:48
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 13:46
- Re: A newbie question, Bob Nelson, 13:46
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, yogeshmk, 13:44
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 13:30
- Re: printf doubt, Chris Torek, 13:30
- Re: Time Complexity, Walter Roberson, 13:24
- Re: A newbie question, Jack Klein, 13:20
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 13:17
- Re: printf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 13:11
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Richard Heathfield, 13:10
- Re: printf doubt, Ben Pfaff, 13:09
- Re: printf doubt, Barry Schwarz, 13:03
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Flash Gordon, 13:01
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 12:53
- Re: Time Complexity, Simon Biber, 12:36
- Re: Time Complexity, Walter Roberson, 12:33
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Ben Pfaff, 12:32
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Heathfield, 12:32
- Re: const confusion, Eric Sosman, 12:32
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Ben Pfaff, 12:32
- Re: Time Complexity, forkazoo, 12:31
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Ancient_Hacker, 12:31
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 12:29
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Flash Gordon, 12:25
- Re: const confusion, Frederick Gotham, 12:22
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 12:11
- Re: ptrs validity, Ancient_Hacker, 12:10
- Re: ptrs validity, Al Balmer, 12:10
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Ben Pfaff, 12:04
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Heathfield, 12:02
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Heathfield, 11:55
- Re: ptrs validity, Al Balmer, 11:53
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Eric Sosman, 11:51
- Re: Justify the output in the program, kaushalgoa, 11:49
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Richard Heathfield, 11:47
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Al Balmer, 11:45
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Thomas J. Gritzan, 11:43
- Re: qsort() not sorting -:(, Richard Heathfield, 11:43
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Bill Pursell, 11:41
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Kenneth Brody, 11:40
- const confusion, smnoff, 11:38
- Re: Largest Palindrome, lovecreatesbeauty, 11:36
- Re: Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, Ancient_Hacker, 11:33
- Re: Justify the output in the program, kaushalgoa, 11:28
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Clever Monkey, 11:28
- Re: Largest Palindrome, pete, 11:27
- qsort() not sorting -:(, yogeshmk, 11:26
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Ancient_Hacker, 11:23
- Re: Justify the output in the program, Richard Heathfield, 11:23
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 11:19
- Justify the output in the program, kaushalgoa, 11:18
- Re: printf doubt, Robert Gamble, 10:54
- Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 10:54
- Re: printf doubt, Fred Kleinschmidt, 10:51
- Re: printf doubt, Andrew Poelstra, 10:46
- Calling a function when the number of parameters isn't known till runtime, John Friedland, 10:44
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 10:43
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Andrew Poelstra, 10:38
- Re: printf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 10:30
- Re: printf doubt, Andrew Poelstra, 10:28
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 10:26
- Re: ptrs validity, Kenneth Brody, 10:20
- Re: Time Complexity, Richard Heathfield, 10:19
- Re: printf doubt, dutche, 10:17
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 10:17
- Re: printf doubt, Richard Heathfield, 10:14
- Time Complexity, davide . sammartino, 10:12
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 10:12
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 10:10
- printf doubt, dutche, 10:07
- Re: ptrs validity, David Resnick, 09:54
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Heathfield, 09:43
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 09:33
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 09:22
- Re: ptrs validity, Ancient_Hacker, 09:18
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 08:55
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 08:33
- Re: ptrs validity, Frederick Gotham, 08:23
- Re: A newbie question, mdler, 08:23
- Re: A newbie question, Michael Brennan, 08:22
- Re: ptrs validity, Frederick Gotham, 08:20
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Frederick Gotham, 08:16
- Re: A newbie question, pete, 08:15
- Re: A newbie question, pemo, 08:15
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Frederick Gotham, 08:14
- Re: A newbie question, mdler, 08:13
- Re: Largest Palindrome, osmium, 08:10
- Re: Largest Palindrome, MQ, 08:03
- Re: A newbie question, MQ, 07:51
- Re: A newbie question, cp, 07:42
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Dietmar Schindler, 07:42
- Re: Largest Palindrome, Richard Bos, 07:42
- Re: Macro expansion in armcc, Richard Bos, 07:40
- Re: My gets_ws function, Michael Brennan, 07:25
- Largest Palindrome, ramakrishnadeepak, 06:40
- Macro expansion in armcc, srinu . fsl, 06:37
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 05:07
- A newbie question, dnucit, 05:04
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Bos, 05:02
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Bos, 04:56
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 04:37
- Re: ptrs validity, Keith Thompson, 04:35
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 04:33
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 04:30
- Re: 24 bit words, Robert Dow, 04:22
- Re: ptrs validity, jacob navia, 03:31
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Neil, 03:22
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Bos, 03:03
- Re: My gets_ws function, Harald van Dijk, 03:03
- Re: 24 bit words, Adam Warner, 02:54
- Re: ptrs validity, Richard Heathfield, 02:32
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 02:31
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Bos, 02:30
- ptrs validity, a, 02:20
- Re: 24 bit words, Chris Torek, 01:54
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Chris Torek, 00:34
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 00:18
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Barry Schwarz, 00:16
July 10, 2006
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Peter Nilsson, 23:42
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 23:35
- Re: elementary code needed, Robbie Hatley, 23:33
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, websnarf, 23:06
- Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, jjf, 23:05
- Re: Bad performance multithread, Kevin Sproule, 22:53
- Re: 24 bit words, jjf, 22:49
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 22:49
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Old Wolf, 22:35
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Ian Collins, 22:30
- Re: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?, Old Wolf, 22:29
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 22:24
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:16
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 22:02
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 21:49
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 21:47
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 21:41
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Chris Torek, 21:38
- Re: My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 21:28
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Old Wolf, 21:21
- Re: 24 bit words, Adam Warner, 21:20
- Re: My gets_ws function, Richard Heathfield, 20:23
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 20:12
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 20:06
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 20:04
- Re: My gets_ws function, Michael Brennan, 19:48
- Re: elementary code needed, Charles Richmond, 19:48
- Re: return an int from a function, Joe Wright, 19:36
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, August Karlstrom, 19:33
- Re: open() and fopen(), SM Ryan, 19:32
- Re: Mac C compiler, SM Ryan, 19:32
- My gets_ws function, Andrew Poelstra, 19:22
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 19:07
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Tak-Shing Chan, 19:01
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 19:01
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:47
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Tak-Shing Chan, 18:42
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Dann Corbit, 18:35
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 18:32
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 18:31
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 18:30
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:20
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, lawrence . jones, 18:16
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 18:11
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Richard Heathfield, 18:10
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Tom St Denis, 18:00
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Joe Wright, 17:59
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Dann Corbit, 17:26
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 17:25
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Eric Sosman, 17:24
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 17:21
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 17:21
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, websnarf, 17:08
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, solariun, 16:45
- Re: Working with negative numbers, websnarf, 16:45
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Morris Dovey, 16:29
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Olivier, 16:19
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Eric Sosman, 16:11
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Keith Thompson, 16:06
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Bill Pursell, 16:01
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, pibru@xxxxxx, 15:56
- Re: Syntax question, Keith Thompson, 15:56
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 15:49
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Keith Thompson, 15:45
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Eric Sosman, 15:35
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Ben Pfaff, 15:35
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Ben Pfaff, 15:32
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Walter Roberson, 15:31
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Walter Roberson, 15:23
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 15:12
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Dann Corbit, 15:10
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Tom St Denis, 15:09
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, nleahcim@xxxxxxxxx, 15:08
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, attn.steven.kuo@xxxxxxxxx, 15:07
- How to detect an empty file?, Olivier, 15:05
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Walter Roberson, 15:02
- Re: 24 bit words, Chris Torek, 14:50
- Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, Barry Schwarz, 14:46
- Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, Default User, 14:45
- Re: How to detect an empty file?, Tom St Denis, 14:42
- Re: Syntax question, John Bode, 14:24
- Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, Ben Pfaff, 14:21
- Re: return an int from a function, Andrew Poelstra, 14:09
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Ben Bacarisse, 14:08
- Re: *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, Tom St Denis, 14:08
- *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption: 0x086b6b90 ***, priyanka, 14:01
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, nleahcim@xxxxxxxxx, 14:00
- Re: Syntax question, Andrew Poelstra, 13:58
- Re: Syntax question, Clever Monkey, 13:57
- Re: Syntax question, Walter Roberson, 13:55
- Re: Syntax question, deppy_3, 13:45
- Re: Help, Andrew Poelstra, 13:42
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Roberto Waltman, 13:35
- Re: Syntax question, Clever Monkey, 13:27
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Ben Pfaff, 13:17
- Re: Syntax question, Coos Haak, 13:11
- Re: Syntax question, deppy_3, 13:10
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, nleahcim@xxxxxxxxx, 13:07
- Re: elementary code needed, Clever Monkey, 12:51
- Re: Syntax question, Clever Monkey, 12:49
- Re: elementary code needed, Puppet_Sock, 12:48
- Re: Syntax question, Richard Heathfield, 12:47
- elementary code needed, bromio, 12:43
- Syntax question, deppy_3, 12:41
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Clever Monkey, 12:37
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Jalapeno, 12:29
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ben Pfaff, 12:28
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Clever Monkey, 12:25
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 12:16
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., Clever Monkey, 12:07
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Jalapeno, 11:57
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 11:46
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Default User, 11:42
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Juuso Hukkanen, 11:25
- Re: hello, Kenneth Brody, 11:22
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, solariun, 11:13
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Al Balmer, 11:12
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Al Balmer, 11:05
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, solariun, 11:04
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, pemo, 10:59
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, Richard Heathfield, 10:49
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 10:43
- Re: how to make a very complicated GUI, pemo, 10:37
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, websnarf, 10:36
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 10:32
- Re: Bad performance multithread, P.J. Plauger, 10:32
- Re: Bad performance multithread, websnarf, 10:31
- Re: 24 bit words, Philipp Klaus Krause, 10:29
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 10:27
- Re: 24 bit words, Robert Dow, 10:25
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, websnarf, 10:22
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
- how to make a very complicated GUI, nleahcim, 10:19
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Marc Boyer, 10:17
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Kenny McCormack, 10:11
- Re: ctags URGENT please help, Ben C, 10:11
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 10:11
- Re: 24 bit words, Tom St Denis, 10:08
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Kenny McCormack, 10:06
- 24 bit words, Robert Dow, 10:04
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Chris Dollin, 10:02
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Kenny McCormack, 09:55
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Bob Martin, 09:51
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, websnarf, 09:49
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Ben Pfaff, 09:46
- Re: Bad performance multithread, Tom St Denis, 09:30
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Chris Dollin, 09:12
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Chris Dollin, 09:09
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Kenny McCormack, 08:54
- Re: Bad performance multithread, Roberto Waltman, 08:48
- Re: reading messages from cell phones, Chris Dollin, 08:36
- Re: ctags URGENT please help, Flash Gordon, 08:34
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Flash Gordon, 08:31
- reading messages from cell phones, sagar, 08:28
- Re: Bad performance multithread, P.J. Plauger, 08:18
- Re: <complex.h>, P.J. Plauger, 08:15
- Re: Leak or no leak ??, Richard Heathfield, 07:37
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Flash Gordon, 07:33
- ctags URGENT please help, onkar, 07:28
- Re: Help, pete, 07:27
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Ian Collins, 07:19
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Chris Dollin, 07:10
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, August Karlstrom, 07:08
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, pete, 07:07
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, August Karlstrom, 06:47
- Re: Leak or no leak ??, Nick Keighley, 06:36
- Re: return an int from a function, Nick Keighley, 06:15
- Re: STL map kinda functionality in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:30
- Re: return an int from a function, Martin Ambuhl, 05:28
- Re: Help, Martin Ambuhl, 05:24
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Flash Gordon, 05:16
- Re: Leak or no leak ??, Olivier, 05:16
- STL map kinda functionality in C, comp_novice, 05:02
- Re: implementing isInstanceOf() in C, any ideas ???, Chris Dollin, 05:01
- Leak or no leak ??, Olivier, 05:00
- Re: implementing isInstanceOf() in C, any ideas ???, dwaach, 05:00
- Bad performance multithread, jmartin, 04:43
- Re: Leak or no leak ??, Richard Heathfield, 04:43
- Re: implementing isInstanceOf() in C, any ideas ???, Chris Dollin, 04:21
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: function typedefs, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Scope of specifier extern, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Working with negative numbers, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Forward Declarations, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: C Pointer problem, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: redefine a function with a same name, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: is it possible to access members of struct in loop?, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: Assembly problem, Dave Thompson, 04:19
- Re: return an int from a function, Chris Dollin, 04:19
- Re: pointer and variable scope concept, Chris Dollin, 04:14
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Chris Dollin, 04:12
- Re: Inflexible array members, jjf, 04:03
- Re: return an int from a function, jjf, 03:51
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, jaysome, 03:49
- Re: return an int from a function, Keith Thompson, 03:47
- Re: Help, Keith Thompson, 03:46
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Keith Thompson, 03:18
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 03:16
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, pnreddy1976, 03:14
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Keith Thompson, 03:12
- implementing isInstanceOf() in C, any ideas ???, dwaach, 03:11
- Re: Note to new-comers, Richard Bos, 03:05
- Re: <complex.h>, Keith Thompson, 02:52
- Re: open() and fopen(), Chris Smith, 02:50
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Keith Thompson, 02:43
- Re: return an int from a function, Gordon Burditt, 02:40
- Re: open() and fopen(), Gordon Burditt, 02:38
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Sjouke Burry, 02:26
- open() and fopen(), Jack, 02:22
- Re: return an int from a function, Haroon Shafiq, 02:08
- Re: Inflexible array members, Chris Torek, 02:06
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Chris Torek, 01:53
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Harald van Dijk, 01:50
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Neil, 01:44
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., Neil, 01:34
- return an int from a function, a, 01:30
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Gordon Burditt, 01:13
- Re: Help, Ian Collins, 01:12
- Re: Help, Kenny McCormack, 01:10
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Default User, 01:05
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Martin Ambuhl, 01:05
- Help, pnreddy1976, 00:52
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Marco, 00:49
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, pnreddy1976, 00:45
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, jjf, 00:40
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Eugene Harvey, 00:02
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, William J. Leary Jr., 00:01
July 09, 2006
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Rouben Rostamian, 23:20
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Andrew Poelstra, 23:04
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Andrew Poelstra, 23:02
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Marco, 22:57
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Rouben Rostamian, 22:46
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Marco, 22:41
- Re: parallel port programming simple problem, Andrew Poelstra, 22:36
- parallel port programming simple problem, Marco, 22:32
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:28
- Re: <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 21:56
- Re: <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 21:51
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Barry Schwarz, 21:40
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Jack, 18:25
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., M_Mann, 18:10
- Re: Mac C compiler, Xatapu, 18:02
- Re: Mac C compiler, Xatapu, 17:39
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Michael Mair, 17:37
- Re: Where is a static variable stored?, Keith Thompson, 17:35
- Where is a static variable stored?, Jack, 17:26
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Keith Thompson, 17:13
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Al Balmer, 17:07
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., Al Balmer, 17:07
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Keith Thompson, 16:46
- Re: Parentheses Ineffectual, Roberto Waltman, 16:36
- Re: Problem converting a string to a float value, Keith Thompson, 16:35
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 16:33
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 16:25
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris Hills, 16:17
- Re: hello, Roberto Waltman, 15:54
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 15:34
- Re: <complex.h>, Keith Thompson, 15:29
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Keith Thompson, 15:26
- Re: Problem converting a string to a float value, dean . elwood, 15:15
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, pete, 15:12
- Re: Problem converting a string to a float value, Eric Sosman, 15:10
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, John F, 15:09
- "C Programming" From Its Creator, Kruke, 14:59
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, John F, 14:42
- Problem converting a string to a float value, dean . elwood, 14:39
- Re: <complex.h>, Andrew Poelstra, 14:25
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, Robert Gamble, 14:24
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Andrew Poelstra, 14:19
- Re: <complex.h>, Andrew Poelstra, 14:08
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Joe Wright, 13:52
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Ben C, 13:39
- Re: <complex.h>, Tim Prince, 13:36
- Re: <complex.h>, Rouben Rostamian, 13:29
- Re: <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 13:17
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., Centrinia, 13:03
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, John F, 13:01
- Re: <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 12:59
- Re: <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 12:58
- Re: <complex.h>, Skarmander, 12:54
- Re: <complex.h>, P.J. Plauger, 12:53
- Re: laptop as a stopwatch with an external switch, Skarmander, 12:41
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, John Smith, 12:39
- Re: Parentheses Ineffectual, Malcolm, 12:28
- Re: <complex.h>, Malcolm, 12:24
- Re: <complex.h>, Ben Pfaff, 12:19
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 12:18
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 11:57
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, Richard Heathfield, 11:52
- Re: laptop as a stopwatch with an external switch, Richard Heathfield, 11:42
- Re: <complex.h>, Andrew Poelstra, 11:36
- Re: Parentheses Ineffectual, Walter Roberson, 11:33
- Re: pointer and variable scope concept, Walter Roberson, 11:20
- <complex.h>, Julian V. Noble, 11:18
- Parentheses Ineffectual, Frederick Gotham, 11:16
- pointer and variable scope concept, a, 11:06
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Eric Sosman, 11:04
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Eric Sosman, 10:48
- Re: "C Programming" From Its Creator, Mark McIntyre, 10:44
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, August Karlstrom, 10:34
- "C Programming" From Its Creator, Kruke, 10:14
- Re: permutation code., osmium, 10:12
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 10:04
- Re: Inflexible array members, Mark McIntyre, 09:57
- Re: laptop as a stopwatch with an external switch, Frederick Gotham, 09:54
- laptop as a stopwatch with an external switch, Ron, 09:51
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Joe Wright, 09:46
- Re: permutation code., Flash Gordon, 09:29
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 09:03
- Re: permutation code., rrs . matrix, 09:03
- Re: permutation code., rrs . matrix, 09:03
- permutation code., rrs . matrix, 08:57
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 08:49
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, bert, 08:47
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, pete, 08:37
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Michael Mair, 07:42
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, pete, 07:34
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 07:03
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris Hills, 07:02
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris Hills, 07:00
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, August Karlstrom, 06:57
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Bill Pursell, 06:41
- Re: Time to ask?, Mark McIntyre, 06:39
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 06:35
- Re: Inflexible array members, August Karlstrom, 06:34
- Re: Inflexible array members, Mark McIntyre, 06:32
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Flash Gordon, 05:54
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Robert Gamble, 05:23
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, cp, 05:05
- Re: Time to ask?, Bill Pursell, 03:54
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 03:51
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 03:42
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 03:05
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 02:56
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Richard Heathfield, 02:26
- Re: Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, Richard Heathfield, 02:20
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, mensanator@xxxxxxx, 02:11
- Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 01:53
- Comments are welcome for two sequential search C functions, lovecreatesbeauty, 01:50
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Bill Pursell, 01:24
- Re: Inflexible array members, Richard Heathfield, 00:17
July 08, 2006
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 23:44
- Re: Safe use of unions, Robert Gamble, 22:01
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, pete, 21:40
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Dik T. Winter, 21:16
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Dik T. Winter, 21:11
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 21:05
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Joe Wright, 20:31
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, mensanator@xxxxxxx, 20:20
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 19:45
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Barry Schwarz, 19:36
- Re: Inflexible array members, Mark McIntyre, 18:55
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Andrew Poelstra, 18:34
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:29
- Re: Inflexible array members, Richard Heathfield, 18:28
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Julian V. Noble, 18:26
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Richard Heathfield, 18:24
- Re: Inflexible array members, Keith Thompson, 18:17
- Re: Inflexible array members, Joe Wright, 18:09
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 18:09
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Bill Pursell, 17:36
- Re: printing the permutation, help, Flash Gordon, 17:28
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, pete, 17:18
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Flash Gordon, 17:16
- Re: Inflexible array members, Richard Heathfield, 17:09
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Robert Gamble, 17:05
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 17:03
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 16:58
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., Keith Thompson, 16:58
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 16:50
- Re: My code, Keith Thompson, 16:42
- Re: Inflexible array members, Keith Thompson, 16:27
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 16:21
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Ian Collins, 16:15
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Ian Collins, 16:12
- Re: Inflexible array members, Richard Heathfield, 15:59
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 15:48
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., jacob navia, 15:19
- Re: My code, Barry Schwarz, 14:46
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Barry Schwarz, 14:38
- Re: Time to ask?, Mark McIntyre, 12:08
- Re: Time to ask?, Mark McIntyre, 12:06
- Re: Inflexible array members, Mark McIntyre, 12:02
- Re: Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., mensanator@xxxxxxx, 11:55
- Re: Mac C compiler, SM Ryan, 11:54
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Mark McIntyre, 11:44
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Mark McIntyre, 11:40
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 11:38
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 11:37
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Richard Heathfield, 10:54
- Pls excuse if you consider this off-topic. Conceptual artists seek programmers here., M_Mann, 09:56
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Joe Wright, 09:32
- Re: Help in this programm in C, ballpointpenthief, 09:26
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 09:22
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Jiri Slaby, 09:17
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Bill Pursell, 09:15
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 09:09
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Ancient_Hacker, 09:00
- Re: Inflexible array members, Frederick Gotham, 08:51
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Frederick Gotham, 08:45
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Michael Mair, 08:27
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris Hills, 08:24
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris Hills, 08:20
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Tosha, 08:18
- Re: Help in this programm in C, ballpointpenthief, 08:16
- Re: Help in this programm in C, ballpointpenthief, 08:13
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Ian Collins, 08:12
- Re: hello, Murali Krishna, 08:08
- Re: Function declarations - why are they needed?, Ian Collins, 08:06
- Re: Inflexible array members, Harald van Dijk, 08:00
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, David Wade, 07:51
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, David Wade, 07:49
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 07:42
- Function declarations - why are they needed?, Seeker, 07:31
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Bill Pursell, 07:30
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Mark McIntyre, 07:24
- Re: My code, Bill Pursell, 07:20
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 07:19
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 07:14
- Re: Note to new-comers, Mark McIntyre, 07:07
- Re: hello, dienet, 06:47
- Re: My code, cman, 06:38
- Re: Help in this programm in C, ballpointpenthief, 06:33
- Re: Inflexible array members, Harald van Dijk, 06:22
- Re: Inflexible array members, Harald van Dijk, 06:19
- Re: Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 05:19
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, jacob navia, 05:17
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Giorgio Silvestri, 05:14
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Harald van Dijk, 05:03
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Ben C, 04:54
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Ian Collins, 04:20
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Ben C, 04:17
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Harald van Dijk, 04:14
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Bill Pursell, 04:12
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Ian Collins, 03:52
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Harald van Dijk, 03:40
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Gordon Burditt, 03:40
- Re: Inflexible array members, Harald van Dijk, 03:32
- Re: (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Ian Collins, 03:24
- Re: Video Playback Resources?, W Marsh, 03:17
- (Silly?) question about linkage of C applications, Bit byte, 03:10
- Re: My code, Bill Pursell, 03:04
- Inflexible array members, Adam Warner, 02:57
- Re: Video Playback Resources?, Peter Nilsson, 02:46
- Re: Video Playback Resources?, jaysome, 02:21
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Peter Nilsson, 01:20
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Peter Nilsson, 01:11
July 07, 2006
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, lovecreatesbeauty, 23:32
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 22:44
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 21:48
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 21:40
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 21:36
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Joe Wright, 21:04
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Mike S, 20:57
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Keith Thompson, 19:36
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Keith Thompson, 19:33
- Re: Note to new-comers, Default User, 19:28
- Re: Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Dingo, 19:25
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 19:16
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Ian Collins, 19:15
- Re: Note to new-comers, Christopher Benson-Manica, 19:13
- Re: Note to new-comers, Joe Wright, 19:05
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 19:01
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 19:01
- Re: My code, cman, 18:55
- Simple assignment operator and object overlap, Mike S, 18:55
- Re: hello, Skarmander, 18:54
- Re: Help in this programm in C, ballpointpenthief, 18:50
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Ian Collins, 18:39
- Re: hello, jacob navia, 18:35
- Re: Help in this programm in C, jacob navia, 18:32
- Re: hello, Richard Heathfield, 18:30
- hello, juliocesardvd, 18:27
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 18:25
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 18:18
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 18:07
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Mark McIntyre, 17:29
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 17:22
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 17:14
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Ian Collins, 17:11
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Clever Monkey, 17:08
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 17:04
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 17:02
- Re: Note to new-comers, Clever Monkey, 16:58
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Dann Corbit, 16:50
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, spibou, 16:49
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Dann Corbit, 16:49
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 16:42
- Re: My code, Bill Pursell, 16:41
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Default User, 16:37
- Re: Help in this programm in C, jacob navia, 16:36
- Re: Note to new-comers, Default User, 16:36
- Re: Help in this programm in C, jacob navia, 16:32
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Nelu, 16:29
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Nelu, 16:22
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 15:49
- Re: Note to new-comers, Keith Thompson, 15:48
- Re: I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Clever Monkey, 15:46
- Re: Note to new-comers, jacob navia, 15:45
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 15:45
- I really need help on this c program!!! pleaaasseeee, Diana, 15:40
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Keith Thompson, 15:33
- Re: Note to new-comers, pemo, 15:27
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 15:25
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Andrew Poelstra, 15:22
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 15:20
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Andrew Poelstra, 15:19
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Nelu, 15:17
- My code, cman, 15:12
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Keith Thompson, 15:08
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 14:55
- Re: Note to new-comers, Frederick Gotham, 14:54
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 14:54
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, Keith Thompson, 14:53
- Re: Note to new-comers, Al Balmer, 14:27
- Re: Video Playback Resources?, Jack Klein, 14:17
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 14:10
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Dann Corbit, 14:07
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, Richard Heathfield, 13:38
- Re: EXECryptor software protection, hanzprof, 13:15
- Re: printing the permutation, help, fool, 12:38
- Video Playback Resources?, dsmith000, 12:26
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 12:21
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Flash Gordon, 12:21
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 12:19
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 12:16
- Re: How to use splint on the win32 platform?, Clever Monkey, 12:10
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Clever Monkey, 12:02
- Re: Help in this programm in C, osmium, 12:01
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Flash Gordon, 12:01
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 11:49
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:48
- Re: printing the permutation, help, Flash Gordon, 11:46
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 11:44
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:43
- Re: printing the permutation, help, Fred Kleinschmidt, 11:35
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Richard Heathfield, 11:35
- Re: printing the permutation, help, Flash Gordon, 11:30
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 11:22
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Richard Heathfield, 11:16
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 11:14
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Richard Heathfield, 11:11
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Frederick Gotham, 11:10
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 11:08
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Richard Heathfield, 11:05
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Andrew Poelstra, 10:57
- Note to new-comers, Frederick Gotham, 10:51
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 10:48
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Nelu, 10:32
- Re: having trouble with string handling, Andrew Poelstra, 10:24
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Kenny McCormack, 10:17
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 10:04
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 09:31
- Re: printing the permutation, help, rrs . matrix, 09:25
- Re: having trouble with string handling, Kenneth Brody, 09:11
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Skarmander, 09:05
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Kenneth Brody, 09:05
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 08:59
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 08:51
- Re: Help in this programm in C, osmium, 08:44
- printing the permutation, help, fool, 08:32
- How to use splint on the win32 platform?, arcliber@xxxxxxxxx, 08:02
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 06:20
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Bos, 06:00
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:59
- Re: Help in this programm in C, jaysome, 05:23
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Jiri Slaby, 05:14
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
- Re: Help in this programm in C, jaysome, 05:00
- Re: Help in this programm in C, Richard Heathfield, 04:38
- Re: Order of execution, Flash Gordon, 04:27
- Re: Time to ask?, Flash Gordon, 04:18
- Help in this programm in C, deppy_3, 04:17
- Re: having trouble with string handling, Ian Collins, 03:57
- Re: having trouble with string handling, YiMkiE, 03:45
- Re: Order of execution, Dietmar Schindler, 03:38
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, spibou, 03:32
- Re: having trouble with string handling, Ian Collins, 03:30
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Ian Collins, 03:26
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Richard Heathfield, 03:21
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, spibou, 03:16
- Re: having trouble with string handling, YiMkiE, 03:03
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Keith Thompson, 02:57
- Re: having trouble with string handling, Richard Bos, 02:55
- Re: difference in time between sun and linux, rrs . matrix, 02:50
- having trouble with string handling, YiMkiE, 02:50
- Re: difference in time between sun and linux, Keith Thompson, 02:50
- Re: difference in time between sun and linux, Bill Pursell, 02:44
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, spibou, 02:40
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 02:30
- difference in time between sun and linux, rrs . matrix, 02:28
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Richard Heathfield, 01:59
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 01:54
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Keith Thompson, 01:52
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, av, 01:21
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, av, 01:21
- Re: Time to ask?, av, 01:20
- Re: Nice a tight loop?, Ian Collins, 01:00
- Nice a tight loop?, Joseph, 00:58
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Dann Corbit, 00:10
July 06, 2006
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, wizardyhnr, 23:45
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 23:38
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 23:35
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Old Wolf, 23:23
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 23:01
- Re: Order of execution, Morris Dovey, 22:31
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 22:01
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 21:34
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 21:11
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 20:53
- Re: Order of execution, Andrew Poelstra, 20:38
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 20:35
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 20:30
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 20:23
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 19:45
- Re: pointers to structures, Jesper, 19:43
- Re: Order of execution, ozbear, 19:40
- Re: pointers to structures, Keith Thompson, 18:00
- Re: how to write a variable to a file ?, Keith Thompson, 17:59
- Re: Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Eric Sosman, 17:57
- Re: Time to ask?, Mark McIntyre, 17:50
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Ian Collins, 17:45
- Re: pointers to structures, Ancient_Hacker, 17:44
- Re: how to write a variable to a file ?, Bill Pursell, 17:34
- how to write a variable to a file ?, priyanka, 17:30
- Howto do the impossible with #define ?>?, Ancient_Hacker, 17:21
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Andrew Poelstra, 17:15
- Re: Feature Article in Better Software Magazine, Keith Thompson, 17:11
- Re: Time to ask?, Tom Plunket, 17:10
- Re: Time to ask?, Tom Plunket, 17:08
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Keith Thompson, 16:55
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Keith Thompson, 16:49
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Flash Gordon, 16:46
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 16:44
- Feature Article in Better Software Magazine, loulou384@xxxxxxxxx, 16:38
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, Rouben Rostamian, 16:27
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Keith Thompson, 16:18
- Re: Mac C compiler, Jack Klein, 16:16
- Mac C compiler, Xatapu, 16:06
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, Eric Sosman, 15:58
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Eric Sosman, 15:52
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Andrew Poelstra, 15:37
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Harald van Dijk, 15:20
- Re: Cast to a struct?, SM Ryan, 14:44
- Re: Cast to a struct?, Herbert Rosenau, 14:39
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, Martin Bootsma, 13:41
- Re: pointers to structures, Default User, 13:16
- Re: What is wrong?, Kenny McCormack, 13:13
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Default User, 13:11
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Andrey Tarasevich, 13:10
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Heathfield, 13:00
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, Alex Fraser, 12:42
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, pemo, 12:42
- Re: Easy question about redefining a function, Rouben Rostamian, 12:41
- Easy question about redefining a function, Martin Bootsma, 11:53
- Re: What is wrong?, Suman, 11:39
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Eric Sosman, 11:12
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Andrew Poelstra, 10:51
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Dollin, 10:42
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Eric Sosman, 10:18
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 10:15
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Richard Heathfield, 10:12
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:54
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 09:44
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 09:43
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Richard Bos, 09:38
- UB and "nasal demons" (was Re: Order of execution), Kenneth Brody, 09:35
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Mike S, 09:34
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Frederick Gotham, 09:28
- Re: Use a suffix or a type cast?, Frederick Gotham, 09:26
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:24
- Re: Help please, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:19
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Hallvard B Furuseth, 09:14
- Use a suffix or a type cast?, Hamish M, 09:14
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 09:13
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 09:01
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Simon Biber, 08:42
- Re: pointers to structures, Suman, 08:39
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 08:37
- Re: pointers to structures, R Dow, 08:33
- Re: pointers to structures, Roberto Waltman, 08:25
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 08:14
- Re: pointers to structures, Tom St Denis, 08:11
- Re: pointers to structures, Frederick Gotham, 08:11
- Re: pointers to structures, Tom St Denis, 08:09
- Re: pointers to structures, Frederick Gotham, 08:08
- pointers to structures, R Dow, 07:58
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Walter Banks, 07:52
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Frederick Gotham, 07:16
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 07:04
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Dik T. Winter, 06:08
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 05:27
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Dietmar Schindler, 05:04
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Dietmar Schindler, 04:42
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Keith Thompson, 03:58
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Keith Thompson, 03:57
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 03:56
- Re: Cast to a struct?, Flash Gordon, 03:55
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 03:28
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, jaysome, 03:21
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 03:13
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 02:57
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 02:55
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Suman, 02:51
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Chris Torek, 02:45
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, jjf, 02:41
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Chris Torek, 02:32
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, lovecreatesbeauty, 02:04
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 02:00
- Re: Is not printf("%p", &i) correct?, Harald van Dijk, 01:35
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Andrew Poelstra, 00:56
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Morris Dovey, 00:53
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 00:49
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 00:40
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 00:25
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 00:17
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 00:16
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 00:15
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 00:11
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 00:09
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 00:09
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 00:08
July 05, 2006
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 23:59
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 23:57
- Re: Order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 23:56
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 23:52
- Re: Cast to a struct?, MQ, 23:52
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Nelu, 23:48
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 23:41
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 23:38
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 23:36
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 23:23
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Richard Heathfield, 23:21
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Keith Thompson, 23:10
- Re: Time to ask?, Richard Heathfield, 23:06
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Ben Bacarisse, 23:05
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Peter Nilsson, 23:01
- Re: Cast to a struct?, Keith Thompson, 22:57
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Stan Milam, 22:46
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 22:40
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 22:38
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 22:32
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 22:30
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Mike S, 22:28
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 22:22
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 22:18
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Robert Gamble, 22:17
- Re: How to get the current date information only?, Ian Collins, 22:15
- How to get the current date information only?, YiMkiE, 22:10
- Re: Cast to a struct?, Ian Collins, 22:08
- Cast to a struct?, Jack, 22:01
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 22:01
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:54
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 21:51
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:46
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:46
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:44
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:43
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 21:41
- Re: Time to ask?, Keith Thompson, 21:41
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 21:31
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 21:28
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 21:12
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Ben Pfaff, 21:11
- Re: Time to ask?, Chris F.A. Johnson, 21:10
- Re: Time to ask?, Barry Schwarz, 21:05
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Barry Schwarz, 20:48
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 20:36
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Frederick Gotham, 20:17
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Frederick Gotham, 20:15
- Re: Order of execution, Walter Roberson, 20:13
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Walter Roberson, 20:10
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 20:03
- Re: Time to ask?, mdh, 20:01
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 19:50
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 19:47
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 19:44
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Jack Klein, 19:29
- Re: Time to ask?, Andrew Poelstra, 19:23
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 19:14
- Re: Time to ask?, Joe Wright, 19:12
- Re: Time to ask?, MQ, 19:11
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Ian Collins, 19:07
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Keith Thompson, 19:02
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Peter Nilsson, 18:56
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Dann Corbit, 18:55
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Dann Corbit, 18:51
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Mark McIntyre, 18:49
- Re: read image from url, Mark McIntyre, 18:42
- Time to ask?, mdh, 18:38
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Ian Collins, 18:34
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Ben C, 18:13
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Keith Thompson, 17:57
- Re: Order of execution, Ian Collins, 17:48
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Chris Torek, 17:36
- Re: Order of execution, Roberto Waltman, 17:27
- Re: Order of execution, Morris Dovey, 17:11
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Keith Thompson, 16:13
- Re: Order of execution, Keith Thompson, 16:07
- Re: decimal symbol problem (using libxml2), Keith Thompson, 16:04
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 15:41
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Morris Dovey, 14:14
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Ben Pfaff, 14:04
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Walter Roberson, 13:52
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 13:52
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Ben Bacarisse, 13:25
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Frederick Gotham, 13:13
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Jack Klein, 13:02
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Jack Klein, 12:48
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Andrew Poelstra, 12:42
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 12:17
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 12:13
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Stephen Sprunk, 12:12
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 12:12
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Ben Pfaff, 11:46
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Stephen Sprunk, 11:40
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Stephen Sprunk, 11:33
- Re: Order of execution, Stephen Sprunk, 11:27
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, SM Ryan, 11:20
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, SM Ryan, 11:20
- Re: What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Eric Sosman, 11:06
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Robert Gamble, 10:37
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Flash Gordon, 10:33
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Richard Heathfield, 10:27
- What's the deal with the "toupper" family?, Frederick Gotham, 10:24
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Tom St Denis, 09:57
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Ben Bacarisse, 09:48
- Re: Converting Gif to JPEG, Roberto Waltman, 09:13
- Re: Raw message view WITH quote highlighting?, Kenneth Brody, 08:59
- Re: Converting Gif to JPEG, Richard Bos, 08:30
- Converting Gif to JPEG, marydeepthy, 08:29
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., John F, 08:28
- Re: decimal symbol problem (using libxml2), Flash Gordon, 08:23
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, moogyd, 08:18
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, jjf, 06:15
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills, 06:12
- Re: Can someone provide Code for vCARD Parser in C language ?, Ravi, 06:11
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:42
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Harald van Dijk, 04:56
- Re: Using size_t clearly (appropriately?), Dietmar Schindler, 04:44
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:43
- decimal symbol problem (using libxml2), corley, 04:25
- Re: Order of execution, Dietmar Schindler, 04:25
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 04:12
- Re: Violating sequence point?, lovecreatesbeauty, 04:07
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 03:50
- Re: read image from url, Richard Heathfield, 03:02
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Bill Pursell, 03:01
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 02:48
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Richard Bos, 02:46
- Re: read image from url, Julián Albo, 02:25
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Roland Csaszar, 02:19
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Roland Csaszar, 02:11
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Heathfield, 02:05
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Richard Heathfield, 02:02
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Richard Heathfield, 01:56
- Re: Violating sequence point?, spibou, 01:18
- Re: What is wrong?, Suman, 01:13
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff, 00:42
- Re: malloc (0), Ben Pfaff, 00:35
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 00:28
- Re: dinmaic variable name, websnarf, 00:20
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 00:06
July 04, 2006
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 23:59
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Robert Gamble, 23:48
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Robert Gamble, 23:35
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Ben Pfaff, 23:26
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Chris Torek, 23:10
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Andrew Poelstra, 23:08
- Re: Violating sequence point?, Andrew Poelstra, 23:02
- Violating sequence point?, Frederick Gotham, 22:06
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Frederick Gotham, 22:03
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Ian Collins, 21:55
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Robert Gamble, 21:49
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Robert Gamble, 21:42
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Frederick Gotham, 21:38
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Jack Klein, 21:38
- Re: What is wrong?, Denis Kasak, 21:33
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Ian Collins, 21:29
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Robert Gamble, 21:21
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 21:19
- Re: strupr Postmortem Analysis, Chris Smith, 21:07
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Old Wolf, 21:01
- strupr Postmortem Analysis, humanmutantman, 20:47
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Kenny McCormack, 20:42
- Re: read image from url, Kenny McCormack, 20:38
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Old Wolf, 20:37
- Re: malloc (0), Skarmander, 19:39
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Thomas J. Gritzan, 19:02
- Re: malloc (0), Mark McIntyre, 18:26
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Ian Collins, 18:24
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Mark McIntyre, 18:23
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., John F, 18:20
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Mark McIntyre, 18:20
- Re: What is wrong?, Mark McIntyre, 18:19
- Re: Save console buffers, Mark McIntyre, 18:12
- Re: malloc (0), Joe Wright, 18:01
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Mark McIntyre, 17:49
- Re: malloc (0), Eric Sosman, 17:19
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:50
- Re: malloc (0), Joe Wright, 16:43
- Re: read image from url, Kenny McCormack, 16:33
- Re: What is wrong?, Suman, 16:28
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:20
- Re: malloc (0), Clever Monkey, 16:13
- Re: What is wrong?, Suman, 16:07
- Re: malloc (0), "Nils O. Selåsdal", 16:02
- Re: malloc (0), Keith Thompson, 15:51
- Re: I need help, Keith Thompson, 15:48
- Re: malloc (0), Malcolm, 15:42
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 15:32
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 15:24
- Re: malloc (0), Harald van Dijk, 15:20
- Re: What is wrong?, Keith Thompson, 15:14
- Re: malloc (0), Antoine Junod, 15:04
- Re: read image from url, Default User, 15:04
- Re: I need help, Eric Sosman, 15:02
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Keith Thompson, 15:01
- Re: malloc (0), Lew Pitcher, 14:55
- Re: malloc (0), Kiru Sengal, 14:52
- malloc (0), Bhaskar, 14:42
- I need help, federico_bertola, 14:28
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Stephen Sprunk, 13:58
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Stephen Sprunk, 13:50
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, santosh, 13:50
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Andrew Poelstra, 13:48
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., osmium, 13:47
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 13:41
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Eric Sosman, 13:36
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Walter Roberson, 13:03
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., santosh, 12:53
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, santosh, 12:47
- Treasure Trooper, curtisdulmadge, 12:46
- Re: SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., Tobias Witek, 12:35
- SOME DIFFERENT KIND OF SELECTION SORTING OF ARRAY., ANSHUL, 12:32
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Eric Sosman, 11:51
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Kenny McCormack, 11:50
- Re: What is wrong?, Eric Sosman, 11:43
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 11:39
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 11:10
- Re: What is wrong?, Bart Rider, 11:07
- Re: What is wrong?, Andrew Poelstra, 11:02
- Re: What is wrong?, santosh, 11:00
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Flash Gordon, 11:00
- Re: Can someone provide Code for vCARD Parser in C language ?, santosh, 10:48
- Re: What is wrong?, federico_bertola, 10:23
- Can someone provide Code for vCARD Parser in C language ?, Ravi, 10:10
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 10:08
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Christian Wittrock, 10:02
- Re: What is wrong?, Suman, 09:49
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, santosh, 09:36
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Eric Sosman, 09:23
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Kenny McCormack, 09:22
- Re: Application Reading Itself, ReaperUnreal, 09:06
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, santosh, 08:55
- Re: What is wrong?, Richard Bos, 08:52
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, moogyd, 08:49
- Re: Operator Precence Issue/Question, Richard Heathfield, 08:24
- Operator Precence Issue/Question, moogyd, 07:58
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Keith Thompson, 07:26
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, wizardyhnr, 07:25
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, wizardyhnr, 07:25
- Re: Save console buffers, Keith Thompson, 07:23
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 07:17
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, santosh, 07:03
- Re: Save console buffers, santosh, 06:58
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh, 06:41
- Re: Save console buffers, ivan . svaljek, 06:32
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, santosh, 06:03
- Re: What is wrong?, santosh, 05:50
- Re: Save console buffers, santosh, 05:38
- What is wrong?, federico_bertola, 05:35
- Re: Save console buffers, Flash Gordon, 05:28
- Re: Save console buffers, Walter Roberson, 05:26
- Save console buffers, ivan . svaljek, 05:13
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, federico_bertola, 05:10
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Richard Bos, 04:54
- Re: read image from url, jaysome, 03:28
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Harald van Dijk, 03:28
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 02:22
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Malcolm, 02:07
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Richard Heathfield, 02:05
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Alf P. Steinbach, 01:50
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Ben Pfaff, 01:34
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose, 01:33
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Alf P. Steinbach, 01:27
- Re: how to initial and print the unicode character?, Andrew Poelstra, 01:25
- how to initial and print the unicode character?, wizardyhnr, 01:17
- Re: help me please, Default User, 01:04
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 00:26
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Andrew Poelstra, 00:18
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Malcolm, 00:08
July 03, 2006
- Re: Raw message view WITH quote highlighting?, Jordan Abel, 23:57
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Jordan Abel, 23:55
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Jordan Abel, 23:50
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Morris Dovey, 22:40
- Re: Raw message view WITH quote highlighting?, Len Philpot, 20:45
- Re: Raw message view WITH quote highlighting?, Ian Collins, 20:31
- Raw message view WITH quote highlighting?, Len Philpot, 20:22
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Stephen Sprunk, 19:51
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Stephen Sprunk, 19:48
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Default User, 19:31
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 18:47
- Re: help me please, Ian Collins, 18:24
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Keith Thompson, 18:15
- Refactoring, Andrew Baker, 18:12
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Keith Thompson, 18:12
- Re: Refactoring, Ian Collins, 18:12
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 18:11
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 18:06
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Mark McIntyre, 18:04
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 18:03
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 18:00
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 17:58
- Re: help me please, Malcolm, 17:58
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Keith Thompson, 17:56
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 17:53
- Re: dinmaic variable name, santosh, 17:52
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Default User, 17:51
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 17:49
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Default User, 17:48
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Keith Thompson, 17:45
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 17:39
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Keith Thompson, 17:37
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Riley, 17:34
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Keith Thompson, 17:34
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ronald Bruck, 17:22
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 17:18
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Keith Thompson, 17:07
- Re: OT: EOF from a "terminal" (was Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF), Kenny McCormack, 16:55
- Re: help me please, Keith Thompson, 16:41
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Keith Thompson, 16:39
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Eric Sosman, 16:35
- Re: OT: mid/bottom posting (was Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile), Keith Thompson, 16:35
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 16:29
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Eric Sosman, 16:28
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 16:22
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 16:21
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 16:20
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, santosh, 16:18
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Jack Klein, 16:15
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 16:15
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Jack Klein, 16:11
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Morris Dovey, 16:08
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 16:01
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, forkazoo, 15:47
- Re: Help please, backasswards, 15:41
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 15:32
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 15:30
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Chris Hills, 15:28
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Morris Dovey, 15:26
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 15:14
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 15:13
- Re: dinmaic variable name, dbtid, 15:04
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 14:57
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Andrew Poelstra, 14:54
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, dbtid, 14:52
- OT: mid/bottom posting (was Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile), Walter Roberson, 14:50
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, santosh, 14:45
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Walter Roberson, 14:44
- OT: EOF from a "terminal" (was Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF), Kenneth Brody, 14:43
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Rudolf, 14:36
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 14:27
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF [OT], Alf P. Steinbach, 14:27
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham, 14:24
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Frederick Gotham, 14:22
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose, 14:19
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Walter Roberson, 14:18
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF [OT], Kenny McCormack, 14:17
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Kenny McCormack, 14:16
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF [OT], "Nils O. Selåsdal", 14:13
- Re: Help please, santosh, 14:10
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 14:08
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 14:06
- Help please, vinod . bhavnani, 14:05
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 14:01
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Andrew Poelstra, 13:58
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Flash Gordon, 13:42
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Andrew Poelstra, 13:37
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 13:35
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, federico_bertola, 13:29
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, Jack Klein, 13:21
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 13:20
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Jack Klein, 13:10
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, federico_bertola, 13:07
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 13:01
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, federico_bertola, 12:45
- Re: convert a string to all-lowercase string, santosh, 12:39
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh, 12:31
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh, 12:16
- convert a string to all-lowercase string, federico_bertola, 12:12
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Joe Wright, 12:07
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 12:01
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Kevin Handy, 11:56
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Richard Heathfield, 11:41
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, santosh, 11:32
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 11:29
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, cnwy, 11:23
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, cnwy, 11:17
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Chris Dollin, 11:07
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 11:07
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Simon Biber, 11:06
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Simon Biber, 11:06
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Morris Dovey, 11:04
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Juuso Hukkanen, 10:54
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, santosh, 10:54
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 10:51
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, santosh, 10:50
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 10:49
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 10:45
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Morris Dovey, 10:42
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, santosh, 10:41
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, cnwy, 10:24
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Richard Riley, 09:42
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Richard Riley, 09:36
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Albert, 09:12
- Re: complex declarations, Chris Dollin, 08:52
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Chris Dollin, 08:49
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 08:49
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Christian Wittrock, 08:36
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, santosh, 08:28
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Richard Riley, 08:26
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 08:22
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, phus, 08:13
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, santosh, 08:08
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, Keith Thompson, 08:07
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 07:59
- Re: extern keyword, Seeker, 07:49
- Re: complex declarations, Harald van Dijk, 07:49
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 07:42
- Re: complex declarations, santosh, 07:40
- Re: complex declarations, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:39
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:37
- Re: Event Log, Anis, 07:35
- Re: complex declarations, Ian Collins, 07:35
- Re: complex declarations, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 07:35
- Re: complex declarations, michaelquinlivan, 07:35
- Re: complex declarations, michaelquinlivan, 07:34
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 07:32
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 07:31
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Dik T. Winter, 07:29
- Re: how to convert char* to File *, michaelquinlivan, 07:27
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Chris Dollin, 07:23
- Re: 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, michaelquinlivan, 07:19
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark F. Haigh, 06:58
- Re: complex declarations, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 06:54
- Re: complex declarations, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 06:52
- how to convert char* to File *, cnwy, 06:40
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, allanallansson, 06:39
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 06:38
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, Ian Collins, 06:32
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 06:28
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, allanallansson, 06:28
- 16 bit pointer typecast on 16 bit system, Christian Wittrock, 06:24
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, allanallansson, 06:19
- Re: complex declarations, santosh, 06:19
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, santosh, 06:16
- Re: allocating 99% RAM, olaf_giezenaar, 05:59
- Re: complex declarations, Ian Collins, 05:57
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 05:48
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Chris Hills, 05:47
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, santosh, 05:45
- complex declarations, noor.fatma@xxxxxxxxx, 05:41
- allocating 99% RAM, allanallansson, 05:32
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark F. Haigh, 05:20
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Ian Collins, 05:11
- Re: dinmaic variable name, 1999, 05:06
- Re: dinmaic variable name, eyalc1978, 05:05
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Ian Collins, 05:01
- Re: dinmaic variable name, eyalc1978, 04:43
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark F. Haigh, 04:43
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 04:38
- Re: dinmaic variable name, Ian Collins, 04:38
- dinmaic variable name, eyalc1978, 04:34
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Roland Csaszar, 04:18
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 04:05
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Suman, 03:54
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 03:51
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ian Collins, 03:50
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 03:48
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Bos, 03:46
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Chris Hills, 03:45
- Re: Joining 2 char to 1 short, Richard Bos, 03:40
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 03:31
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 03:18
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Ben C, 03:14
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ike Naar, 03:10
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 03:09
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 02:51
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 02:39
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 02:35
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 02:32
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 02:24
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 02:20
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Richard Heathfield, 02:11
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Peter Nilsson, 01:50
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose, 01:48
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose, 01:43
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 01:23
- Re: What do you think about the code?, goose, 01:22
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Harald van Dijk, 01:20
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Chris Torek, 01:08
July 02, 2006
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Old Wolf, 22:41
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Old Wolf, 22:35
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 21:09
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Barry Schwarz, 20:29
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, websnarf, 19:55
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Morris Dovey, 19:52
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Stephen Sprunk, 19:48
- Re: extern keyword, Xicheng Jia, 19:44
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, websnarf, 19:43
- Re: extern keyword, Andrew Poelstra, 19:42
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 18:44
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Ian Collins, 17:38
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Ian Collins, 17:34
- Re: Event Log, Skarmander, 17:31
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 17:17
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 17:17
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Malcolm, 17:16
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 17:16
- Re: commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, Tim Prince, 17:12
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Keith Thompson, 16:58
- commercial c compilers vs free c compilers, geletine, 16:30
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 16:24
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Keith Thompson, 16:23
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 16:19
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 16:13
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Morris Dovey, 16:13
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 16:12
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Barry Schwarz, 16:08
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Keith Thompson, 16:02
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham, 15:52
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 15:52
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark McIntyre, 15:49
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Keith Thompson, 15:46
- Re: BOMDAS Vs BODMAS, Mark McIntyre, 15:46
- Re: porting from power builder to C# .Net, Keith Thompson, 15:40
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 15:23
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Morris Dovey, 15:16
- Re: porting from power builder to C# .Net, santosh, 14:27
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Jack Klein, 14:26
- Re: porting from power builder to C# .Net, Jack Klein, 14:24
- Re: Off Topic Posts, vze7jsc0, 14:18
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Morris Dovey, 14:03
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Martin Golding, 13:57
- Re: Off Topic Posts, Frederick Gotham, 13:26
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 13:16
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, jacob navia, 12:32
- Off Topic Posts, vze7jsc0, 12:24
- Re: Application Reading Itself, ReaperUnreal, 11:56
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Morris Dovey, 11:49
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Kenny McCormack, 11:43
- Re: porting from power builder to C# .Net, Kenny McCormack, 11:42
- porting from power builder to C# .Net, birarai, 11:07
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Kenny McCormack, 09:53
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 09:43
- Re: Event Log, Skarmander, 09:19
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Joe Wright, 08:48
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 08:37
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, websnarf, 08:00
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, websnarf, 07:24
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 06:03
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 05:54
- Re: Event Log, Malcolm, 05:01
- Event Log, Anis, 04:24
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Mark F. Haigh, 04:21
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Martin Golding, 04:00
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Richard Heathfield, 03:54
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Charles Richmond, 03:46
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark F. Haigh, 03:41
- Re: Linked list, New try, Chris Torek, 03:37
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Morris Dovey, 03:29
- Re: time_t question., Longfellow, 03:16
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Richard Heathfield, 02:55
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Morris Dovey, 02:38
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Morris Dovey, 02:30
- Re: Linked list, New try, Mark F. Haigh, 02:07
- Re: time_t question., Richard Heathfield, 01:26
- Re: time_t question., Gordon Burditt, 01:07
- Re: time_t question., Morris Dovey, 00:38
- Re: Linked list, New try, Ben Pfaff, 00:34
- time_t question., Longfellow, 00:05
- 3 Storesonline Websites, John Mahany, 00:02
July 01, 2006
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, websnarf, 23:56
- Re: Linked list, New try, Mark F. Haigh, 23:41
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Ian Collins, 22:45
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Frederick Gotham, 22:37
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Andrew Poelstra, 22:03
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark F. Haigh, 21:47
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Skarmander, 21:00
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Kenny McCormack, 20:37
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Chris Torek, 18:57
- Re: Printing string constants, Richard Heathfield, 18:54
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Dik T. Winter, 18:52
- Re: Printing string constants, Malcolm, 18:41
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Kenny McCormack, 18:29
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Andrew Poelstra, 18:27
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Kenny McCormack, 18:13
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Flash Gordon, 18:04
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Flash Gordon, 17:59
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Skarmander, 17:55
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Flash Gordon, 17:53
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 17:32
- Re: Value Bits Vs Object Bits, Hallvard B Furuseth, 17:27
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 17:16
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Rouben Rostamian, 17:14
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Frederick Gotham, 17:01
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 16:59
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Andrew Poelstra, 16:51
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Skarmander, 16:45
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Frederick Gotham, 16:35
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Ian Collins, 16:24
- Re: Printing string constants, Keith Thompson, 15:43
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Keith Thompson, 15:38
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Keith Thompson, 15:36
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 15:33
- Re: pointer arithmetic, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 13:54
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, jacob navia, 13:53
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh, 13:43
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 13:32
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 13:29
- Re: comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Andrew Poelstra, 13:21
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Andrew Poelstra, 13:18
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Andrew Poelstra, 13:14
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, santosh, 13:12
- Re: Linked list, New try, santosh, 13:05
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Jack Klein, 12:41
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, silversurfer, 12:35
- Re: pointer arithmetic, milhous.30@xxxxxxxxx, 12:27
- Re: 'clear' shell command in Makefile, Walter Roberson, 12:25
- Re: What do you think about the code?, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Richard Heathfield, 12:13
- Re: Greatest number divisible by Y, Old Wolf, 12:08
- Re: What do you think about the code?, milhous.30@xxxxxxxxx, 12:00
- Re: What do you think about the code?, milhous.30@xxxxxxxxx, 11:57
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Seeker, 11:49
- 'clear' shell command in Makefile, silversurfer, 11:45
- Greatest number divisible by Y, Frederick Gotham, 11:12
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Joe Wright, 11:11
- Re: need help with a new site, Malcolm, 10:50
- Re: main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Alf P. Steinbach, 10:38
- main() does not return when getchar() reaches EOF, Seeker, 10:34
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Nelu, 10:03
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Frederick Gotham, 09:56
- Re: Safe use of unions, Richard G. Riley, 09:42
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Nelu, 09:39
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Malcolm, 09:25
- Re: Linked list, New try, Richard G. Riley, 09:13
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Joe Wright, 09:07
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 08:49
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, jacob navia, 08:16
- very good data structure courses, 01, 07:56
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 07:41
- comp.lang.c FAQs - a note of thanks, Richard Heathfield, 07:36
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 07:19
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Heathfield, 07:09
- Re: function typedefs, August Karlstrom, 07:09
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, lovecreatesbeauty, 06:13
- comp.lang.c Answers (Abridged) to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ), Steve Summit, 06:00
- comp.lang.c FAQ list Table of Contents, Steve Summit, 06:00
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, jacob navia, 05:17
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Keith Thompson, 03:52
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), santosh, 03:29
- Re: confusion: casting function pointers, Alex Fraser, 03:19
- Re: Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), Michael Mair, 03:16
- Linked list, New try (was:Linked list, no out put,help), fool, 02:53
- Re: confusion: casting function pointers, Chris Torek, 02:32
- Re: confusion: casting function pointers, Ben Pfaff, 01:31
- confusion: casting function pointers, Beta What, 00:49
- Re: easy structure question, Michael, 00:22
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, bob, 00:12
- Re: function typedefs, Ian Collins, 00:08
- Re: function typedefs, lovecreatesbeauty, 00:04
June 30, 2006
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Nelu, 23:24
- Re: Safe use of unions, Robert Gamble, 23:20
- Re: easy structure question, Nelu, 23:19
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Heathfield, 23:09
- Re: easy structure question, Ian Collins, 23:07
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Nelu, 23:03
- easy structure question, Michael, 23:02
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Nelu, 22:37
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Robert Gamble, 21:55
- Re: function typedefs, Richard Heathfield, 21:27
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Heathfield, 21:25
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Keith Thompson, 21:24
- Re: function typedefs, Ian Collins, 21:15
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Keith Thompson, 21:13
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Ian Collins, 21:11
- function typedefs, Graham Lee, 20:52
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Joe Wright, 20:30
- Re: Printing string constants, Barry Schwarz, 20:26
- Re: Application Reading Itself, Barry Schwarz, 20:26
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Joe Wright, 20:09
- Re: tm_yday to time_t?, Al Balmer, 19:44
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Ian Collins, 19:43
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 19:40
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Frederick Gotham, 19:35
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 19:15
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Stephen Sprunk, 19:05
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Stephen Sprunk, 18:51
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, goose, 18:49
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Richard Heathfield, 18:48
- Re: The C Programming Language: Third Edition, Richard Heathfield, 18:45
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 18:35
- Re: Linked list, no out put,help, goose, 18:32
- The C Programming Language: Third Edition, pduncan00, 18:30
- tm_yday to time_t?, bob, 18:14
- Re: Order of execution, Chris Hills, 18:03
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Al Balmer, 17:53
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham, 17:30
- Re: Printing string constants, Malcolm, 17:13
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Richard Heathfield, 17:10
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 17:09
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ian Collins, 17:04
- Re: BOMDAS Vs BODMAS, Keith Thompson, 17:00
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Flash Gordon, 16:59
- Re: automated coding standard validation?, Ian Collins, 16:58
- Re: C sucks at math? (help), Keith Thompson, 16:57
- Re: void vs void* (philosophical question), Keith Thompson, 16:52
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Keith Thompson, 16:47
- Re: OT: English dialect [Was: Okay to move an "object" will-nilly?], Mark McIntyre, 16:34
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Frederick Gotham, 16:31
- Re: Choosing function parameter types - pointers or objects?, Keith Thompson, 16:31
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Mark McIntyre, 16:30
- Re: OT: Windows console programs (was Re: Function Pointers), Keith Thompson, 16:29
- Re: Order of execution, Mark McIntyre, 16:26
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Ben Pfaff, 16:25
- Re: So what Standard are we working off?, Joe Wright, 16:18
Privacy Policy