comp.lang.c (date)

June 30, 2006

June 29, 2006

June 28, 2006

June 27, 2006

June 26, 2006

June 25, 2006

June 24, 2006

Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Tom St Denis, 23:46
Re: Segfault City, lovecreatesbeauty, 23:43
Re: Segfault City, blmblm, 23:11
Re: Segfault City, blmblm, 23:06
Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Keith Thompson, 21:37
Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Andrew Poelstra, 21:29
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Keith Thompson, 21:26
Re: segmentation fault with getc(), Andrew Poelstra, 21:20
Re: Segfault City, John Smith, 21:13
segmentation fault with getc(), hzmonte, 21:08
Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Keith Thompson, 21:04
Re: Commutativity of operator [], Andrew Poelstra, 20:45
Re: Commutativity of operator [], Kenneth Brody, 19:23
Re: fgets info, Kenneth Brody, 19:17
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 19:05
Re: Segfault City, Ian Collins, 18:59
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins, 18:58
[ot]Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", pete, 18:57
Re: redefine a function with a same name, Herbert Rosenau, 18:48
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 18:43
Re: Segfault City, pete, 18:40
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Barry Schwarz, 18:31
Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson, 18:22
Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Mark McIntyre, 18:20
Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre, 18:18
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 18:17
Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre, 18:16
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins, 18:13
Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson, 17:45
[ot]Re: Segfault City, pete, 17:44
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ben C, 17:43
Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra, 17:41
Re: A debugging implementation of malloc, Ian Collins, 17:40
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 17:14
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 17:02
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 17:01
A debugging implementation of malloc, jacob navia, 17:00
Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson, 16:56
Re: Is the memory argv points to writable ?, Richard Heathfield, 16:43
Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Malcolm, 16:41
Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Richard Heathfield, 16:38
Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra, 16:32
Re: Job: Algorithmic Search Engineers wanted, Keith Thompson, 16:30
Is the memory argv points to writable ?, spibou, 16:30
Re: spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", Andrew Poelstra, 16:29
Re: Named parameters, Keith Thompson, 16:27
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 16:14
Re: Segfault City, Dave Vandervies, 16:09
Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield, 15:51
spinoza1111 resigns from "segfault city", spinoza1111, 15:50
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 15:47
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 15:31
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 15:25
Re: Help requested - Application to use an IP interface, MikeC, 15:16
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 15:15
Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer, 15:14
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Malcolm, 15:12
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 15:09
Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer, 15:09
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 15:02
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 14:59
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:58
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:56
Portable C in the real world (was: Re: Segfault City), Dave Vandervies, 14:55
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:48
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, CBFalconer, 14:45
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:45
Re: Commutativity of operator [], Richard Heathfield, 14:42
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:37
Re: Forward Declarations, Chris Torek, 14:32
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:31
Job: Algorithmic Search Engineers wanted, Frenkel, 14:31
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 14:28
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 14:19
Re: Segfault City, Chris Smith, 14:17
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 14:16
Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Malcolm, 14:07
Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer, 14:03
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 14:02
Re: Commutativity of operator [], Simon Biber, 13:55
Re: Segfault City, pete, 13:51
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 13:44
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 13:27
Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra, 13:12
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield, 12:56
Re: Named parameters, Joe Wright, 12:27
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Thad Smith, 12:26
Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra, 12:09
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 12:09
Re: Segfault City, Walter Roberson, 11:59
Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell, 11:48
Re: Telecom programming, a.abdulwahab@xxxxxxxxx, 11:29
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 11:26
Re: Wrong output - eliminate spaces in sentence., av, 11:25
Re: Segfault City, Ben Pfaff, 11:22
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 11:21
Re: Segfault City, blmblm, 11:15
Re: Segfault City, blmblm, 11:11
Re: Segfault City, John Smith, 10:49
Re: Segfault City, blmblm, 10:28
Re: Segfault City, Roberto Waltman, 10:25
Re: Segfault City, Friedrich Dominicus, 10:23
Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer, 10:13
Re: Multiple Arguements like in printf, Michael Mair, 09:22
Re: sizeof, CBFalconer, 09:13
Multiple Arguements like in printf, bg_ie, 09:13
Re: Segfault City, CBFalconer, 09:01
Re: Segfault City, Michael Mair, 09:00
Re: // vs /*, Tom St Denis, 08:51
Re: Segfault City, Skarmander, 08:50
Re: Segfault City, Malcolm, 08:25
Re: Segfault City, Bill Pursell, 08:19
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 08:14
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 08:06
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 08:01
Re: Segfault City, Mark McIntyre, 07:55
Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall, 07:51
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 07:47
Re: Named parameters, Mark McIntyre, 07:45
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:41
Re: Segfault City, pemo, 07:39
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:36
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 07:35
Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall, 07:32
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:31
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 07:23
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:20
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 07:10
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:05
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 07:00
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 06:37
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 06:36
Re: Segfault City, pete, 06:33
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 06:26
Re: economizing with functions that do the same thing, Michael Mair, 06:16
Re: Segfault City, spibou, 06:11
Re: Segfault City, spinoza1111, 06:00
Re: Segfault City, spibou, 05:59
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Richard Heathfield, 05:58
Re: Forward Declarations, Richard Heathfield, 05:47
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 05:39
Re: Segfault City, pemo, 05:38
Re: Segfault City, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:25
Re: Segfault City, Richard Heathfield, 05:20
Re: // vs /*, jaysome, 05:19
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 05:10
Re: Segfault City, spibou, 04:25
Re: Segfault City, Al Balmer, 03:54
Re: beginner c question, Al Balmer, 03:54
Re: Segfault City, Friedrich Dominicus, 03:52
How about *this* code? (Was: What do you think about the code?), James Dow Allen, 03:01
Re: Segfault City, Andrew Poelstra, 02:34
Re: Segfault City, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:28
Re: Segfault City, Jack Klein, 01:53
Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Jack Klein, 01:37
Re: coderwiki.com is starting and needs you!, Thad Smith, 01:27
Re: beginner c question, Malcolm, 01:18
Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Malcolm, 01:09
Re: strange use of format specifier in printf, Keith Thompson, 00:08
Re: Segfault City, Keith Thompson, 00:05

June 23, 2006

June 22, 2006

June 21, 2006

Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Dann Corbit, 23:22
Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Dann Corbit, 23:13
Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, santosh, 23:11
Re: Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, doug turnbull, 23:09
Strings, Strings and Damned Strings, Ben, 22:28
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, CBFalconer, 22:21
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andrew Poelstra, 22:19
Re: c source, Arild Hystad, 22:03
Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 21:59
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Barry Schwarz, 21:15
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Barry Schwarz, 21:13
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete, 21:08
OT: Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, jjf, 21:07
Re: FAQ-Question, Barry Schwarz, 21:01
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Barry Schwarz, 20:52
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Tobin, 20:44
Re: x=(x=5,11), Barry Schwarz, 20:44
Re: Named parameters, Martin Ambuhl, 20:40
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson, 20:30
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis, 20:12
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson, 19:45
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis, 19:30
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 19:29
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 19:27
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Sjouke Burry, 19:22
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andrew Poelstra, 19:19
Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra, 19:16
Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin, 19:04
Re: Read-only string, Mark McIntyre, 18:52
Re: // vs /*, Mark McIntyre, 18:50
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Mark McIntyre, 18:45
Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson, 18:06
Re: // vs /*, Andrew Poelstra, 18:06
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Keith Thompson, 17:53
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Harald van Dĳk, 17:36
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Tom St Denis, 17:30
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Keith Thompson, 17:26
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, James, 17:26
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Stephen Sprunk, 17:24
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 17:24
Re: // vs /*, Harald van Dĳk, 17:18
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 17:17
Re: function * = void *, Keith Thompson, 17:12
Re: Named parameters, Clever Monkey, 17:09
Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Keith Thompson, 17:06
Re: // vs /*, Ben Pfaff, 17:06
Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell, 17:03
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson, 17:01
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Nelu, 17:00
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Keith Thompson, 16:59
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 16:57
Re: Read-only string [OT], Chris Torek, 16:55
Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson, 16:47
Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson, 16:46
Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson, 16:32
Re: incorrect warning?, Keith Thompson, 16:31
Re: sizeof, CBFalconer, 16:29
Re: Named parameters, Malcolm, 16:23
Re: Copy 4 byte block into a char array, Tom St Denis, 16:19
Copy 4 byte block into a char array, bg_ie, 16:17
Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell, 16:11
Re: Read-only string, Keith Thompson, 16:10
Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Eric Sosman, 15:59
Re: Named parameters, Eric Sosman, 15:54
Re: sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Michael Mair, 15:49
Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 15:43
Re: Named parameters, William Ahern, 15:38
Re: dependency checking, Michael Mair, 15:29
Re: function * = void *, William Ahern, 15:27
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 15:18
Re: function * = void *, Bill Pursell, 15:01
Re: function * = void *, Bill Pursell, 14:58
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham, 14:57
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Harald van Dĳk, 14:54
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 14:48
Re: sizeof, tedu, 14:46
dependency checking, Weiguang Shi, 14:39
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 14:38
Re: Read-only string, Andrew Poelstra, 14:27
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 14:22
Re: function * = void *, Gordon Burditt, 14:22
Re: // vs /*, Ryan Reich, 14:19
Re: function * = void *, Ben Pfaff, 14:13
Re: Named parameters, Ben Pfaff, 14:10
function * = void *, Bill Pursell, 14:07
sscanf'ing floats into structure members, Bernard Liang, 13:53
Named parameters, Bill Pursell, 13:52
Re: Read-only string [OT], Richard Heathfield, 13:44
Re: // vs /*, Kenneth Brody, 13:41
Re: OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream], Tom St Denis, 13:38
Re: char confusion, Kenneth Brody, 13:29
Re: Read-only string [OT], Kenneth Brody, 12:33
Re: char confusion, poodles, 12:33
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Walter Roberson, 12:32
Re: OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream], Walter Roberson, 12:22
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Richard Heathfield, 12:20
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Walter Roberson, 12:17
Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, Kenny McCormack, 12:10
Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin, 11:50
Re: sizeof, Richard Tobin, 11:48
Re: // vs /*, Ryan Reich, 11:40
Re: to access the large page(2112 bytes) NAND Flash from the bootloader, Morris Dovey, 11:37
Re: to access the large page(2112 bytes) NAND Flash from the bootloader, Roberto Waltman, 11:36
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Tom St Denis, 11:34
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Eric Sosman, 11:33
OT: [Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream], Tom St Denis, 11:31
about declaration of huge matrix in C, luke.yolanda@xxxxxxxxx, 11:30
Re: about declaration of huge matrix in C, Marc Boyer, 11:30
Re: to access the large page(2112 bytes) NAND Flash from the bootloader, Tom St Denis, 11:18
to access the large page(2112 bytes) NAND Flash from the bootloader, venkatesh.k.desai5@xxxxxxxxx, 11:14
Re: near-TeraHertz processors no dream, v4vijayakumar, 10:35
near-TeraHertz processors no dream, v4vijayakumar, 10:33
Re: // vs /*, Tom St Denis, 10:21
Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack, 10:10
Re: char confusion, Harald van Dĳk, 09:57
Re: esoteric C stuff, what is "debug_flag"??, syn1kk, 09:51
Re: char confusion, Kenneth Brody, 09:44
Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, Tom St Denis, 09:40
Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, sonofsun, 09:37
Re: Read-only string, Kenneth Brody, 09:34
Re: char confusion, Vladimir Oka, 09:26
Re: char confusion, Bart Rider, 09:22
Re: Read-only string [OT], "Nils O. Selåsdal", 09:06
Re: // vs /*, Christopher Benson-Manica, 09:05
Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody, 09:04
Re: char confusion, Vladimir Oka, 09:00
Re: Can We Read Text data From an EXE, Walter Roberson, 08:45
Re: // vs /*, Joe Van Dyk, 08:41
Re: // vs /*, Joe Van Dyk, 08:39
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Dik T. Winter, 08:38
char confusion, poodles, 08:29
Re: data mining, osmium, 08:26
Re: XOR, osmium, 08:19
Re: Read-only string, Vladimir Oka, 07:42
Re: Read-only string, Vladimir Oka, 07:38
Re: sizeof, CBFalconer, 07:35
Re: Read-only string, Marc Thrun, 07:32
Re: Read-only string, Richard Bos, 07:29
Re: Read-only string, Richard Bos, 07:28
Re: // vs /*, Richard Bos, 07:25
Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack, 07:19
Re: Read-only string, Marc Boyer, 07:19
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete, 07:14
Re: data mining, pemo, 07:14
Re: Read-only string, v4vijayakumar, 07:13
Re: Read-only string, v4vijayakumar, 07:09
Re: data mining, Vladimir Oka, 07:00
Re: Assembly problem, Ben C, 06:52
data mining, vmishra85@xxxxxxxxx, 06:50
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 06:05
Re: // vs /*, Nick Keighley, 06:01
Re: Read-only string, Marc Boyer, 05:59
Re: // vs /*, Kenny McCormack, 05:54
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", lovecreatesbeauty, 05:25
Re: Read-only string, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 05:16
Re: x=(x=5,11), google, 05:01
Re: Read-only string, Vladimir Oka, 05:00
Re: incorrect warning?, Duncan Muirhead, 04:56
Re: sizeof, Ben C, 04:40
Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield, 03:52
Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield, 03:46
Re: sizeof, CBFalconer, 03:45
Re: // vs /*, Richard Heathfield, 03:44
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Harald van Dĳk, 03:35
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", lovecreatesbeauty, 03:23
Re: permutation generation, Jean-Marc Bourguet, 03:23
Read-only string, v4vijayakumar, 03:14
Re: Lex Question, Chris Dollin, 03:07
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, Chris Dollin, 02:56
Re: sizeof, Richard Bos, 02:44
Re: sizeof, Ben C, 02:27
XOR, Neil, 02:26
Re: enum question, jaysome, 02:17
Re: sizeof, Richard Bos, 02:13
Re: Really basic.., Richard Bos, 02:12
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Harald van Dĳk, 02:10
Re: // vs /*, Keith Thompson, 02:05
Re: Assembly problem, jaysome, 02:03
Assembly problem, bilaribilari, 01:47
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Old Wolf, 01:30
Re: // vs /*, Bill Pursell, 01:28
Re: // vs /*, Zara, 01:20
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Barry Schwarz, 01:14
Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 01:05
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Old Wolf, 01:00
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Old Wolf, 00:53
Re: // vs /*, Tim Prince, 00:52
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Old Wolf, 00:51
Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 00:40
Re: enum question, ramu, 00:39
Re: FAQ-Question, Old Wolf, 00:39
Re: // vs /*, CBFalconer, 00:20
Re: why this code dumps core?, Charles Richmond, 00:08

June 20, 2006

Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 23:59
Re: permutation generation, Peter "Shaggy" Haywood, 23:52
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Joe Van Dyk, 23:41
Re: // vs /*, CBFalconer, 23:41
Re: FAQ-Question, CBFalconer, 23:36
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson, 23:33
enum question, Joe Van Dyk, 23:27
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, CBFalconer, 23:24
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Jack Klein, 23:21
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 23:20
Re: // vs /*, Joe Van Dyk, 23:18
Re: permutation generation, CBFalconer, 23:17
Re: FAQ-Question, Jack Klein, 23:07
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Eric, 23:05
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 23:05
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Keith Thompson, 23:02
Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 22:57
Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble, 22:54
Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble, 22:43
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete, 22:42
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, pete, 22:30
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 22:30
Re: // vs /*, Robert Gamble, 22:24
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Eric, 22:17
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 22:15
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, pete, 22:09
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham, 22:08
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 22:05
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 21:56
// vs /*, Joe Van Dyk, 21:53
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 21:46
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Frederick Gotham, 21:42
Re: FAQ-Question, jjf, 21:16
Re: Malloc for array of string, Barry Schwarz, 20:44
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Michael Mair, 20:41
Re: x=(x=5,11), Barry Schwarz, 20:25
Re: FAQ-Question, dcorbit, 20:19
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, pete, 20:16
Re: FAQ-Question, Dann Corbit, 20:08
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Michael Mair, 19:46
Re: Bit field arrays unsupported?, Dann Corbit, 19:41
Re: FAQ-Question, Keith Thompson, 19:39
Re: FAQ-Question, Dann Corbit, 19:35
Bit field arrays unsupported?, ballpointpenthief, 19:22
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham, 19:13
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham, 19:09
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 19:00
Re: FAQ-Question, Jack Klein, 17:34
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Ben C, 17:29
Re: I need C complier., Quas.co.ua, 17:18
Re: I need C complier., Quas.co.ua, 17:17
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Walter Roberson, 16:46
Re: I need C complier., William Ahern, 16:45
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 16:37
Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, Richard Heathfield, 16:25
Re: sizeof, tedu, 16:21
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 16:10
Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall, 15:48
Re: Strange malloc problem, Quas.co.ua, 15:40
Re: FAQ-Question, Frederick Gotham, 15:31
Re: I need C complier., Dann Corbit, 15:26
Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, xhoster, 15:19
Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble, 15:13
I need C complier., Quas.co.ua, 15:11
Re: why this code dumps core?, Keith Thompson, 15:11
Re: FAQ-Question, Christopher Benson-Manica, 15:05
Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 15:05
Re: FAQ-Question, Dann Corbit, 15:04
Re: FAQ-Question, Robert Gamble, 15:02
FAQ-Question, Till Crueger, 14:53
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Dann Corbit, 14:51
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", John Bode, 14:48
Re: why this code dumps core?, Martin Ambuhl, 14:47
Re: x=(x=5,11), Tim Woodall, 14:44
Re: Really basic.., Keith Thompson, 14:34
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Keith Thompson, 14:14
Re: Really basic.., Frederick Gotham, 14:13
Re: incorrect warning?, Harald van Dĳk, 13:57
Re: incorrect warning?, Keith Thompson, 13:57
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, CBFalconer, 13:55
Re: incorrect warning?, Chris Torek, 13:54
Re: incorrect warning?, Richard Heathfield, 13:54
Re: mxFree, Martin Jørgensen, 13:52
Re: permutation generation, CBFalconer, 13:47
Re: Macros and Variables, Cristian . D . Guajardo, 13:40
Re: Really basic.., August Karlstrom, 13:34
Re: incorrect warning?, parcour@xxxxxxxxx, 13:34
Re: Macros and Variables, Eric Sosman, 13:30
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Frederick Gotham, 13:16
Re: Lex Question, David Shin, 13:11
Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody, 13:09
Re: Macros and Variables, Cristian . D . Guajardo, 13:09
Re: Lex Question, Keith Thompson, 13:08
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 13:05
Re: Lex Question, Vladimir Oka, 13:04
Lex Question, David Shin, 13:01
Lex Question, David Shin, 13:01
Re: Macros and Variables, Vladimir Oka, 13:00
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., thomas.luce@xxxxxxxxx, 12:59
Re: permutation generation, Keith Thompson, 12:57
Re: can someone tell me if I'm going insane., Eric Sosman, 12:56
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, Default User, 12:55
Re: why this code dumps core?, Nelu, 12:50
Macros and Variables, Cristian . D . Guajardo, 12:47
can someone tell me if I'm going insane., thomas . luce, 12:45
Re: convert a float to a short, Keith Thompson, 12:38
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Ben C, 12:28
Re: why this code dumps core?, Keith Thompson, 12:28
Re: sizeof, Keith Thompson, 12:27
Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield, 12:24
incorrect warning?, Duncan Muirhead, 12:18
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Frederick Gotham, 11:51
Re: mxFree, Nelu, 11:47
Re: problem about function pointer, Betaver, 11:32
Re: convert a float to a short, Partho, 11:19
Re: mxFree, Christopher Benson-Manica, 11:13
Re: Strange malloc problem, Me, 11:12
Re: mxFree, Nelu, 11:05
Re: Is the behaviour of * operator an example of operator oveloading in c?, karthik, 10:58
Re: why this code dumps core?, Nelu, 10:53
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, osmium, 10:46
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, Stephen Sprunk, 10:46
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 10:35
constructor?, Gernot Frisch, 10:29
Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield, 10:20
Re: x=(x=5,11), google, 10:18
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 10:14
Re: Strange malloc problem, Vladimir Oka, 10:05
Re: Strange malloc problem, Me, 09:58
Re: Strange malloc problem, Chris Dollin, 09:58
Re: Strange malloc problem, Me, 09:55
Re: sizeof, Kenneth Brody, 09:43
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, Chris Dollin, 09:36
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, osmium, 09:03
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Chris Dollin, 08:47
Re: Strange malloc problem, pemo, 08:23
Re: x=(x=5,11), Harald van Dĳk, 08:21
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Vladimir Oka, 08:11
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, pete, 08:10
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 08:07
Re: mxFree, Christopher Hulbert, 08:06
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Eric Sosman, 08:05
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 08:01
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andre Reffhaug, 07:54
Re: Strange malloc problem, Vladimir Oka, 07:52
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 07:52
mxFree, dkumar142, 07:52
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Ian Malone, 07:42
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 07:31
Re: c------->c++ and c++------>c, Chris Dollin, 07:29
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 07:29
Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Eric Sosman, 07:22
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 07:20
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Chris Dollin, 07:20
c------->c++ and c++------>c, vim, 07:19
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Andre Reffhaug, 07:17
Strange malloc problem, Me, 06:56
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 06:51
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Richard Heathfield, 06:35
Re: Malloc for array of string, "Nils O. Selåsdal", 06:28
Re: x=(x=5,11), ena8t8si, 06:07
Re: x=(x=5,11), ena8t8si, 06:04
Malloc for array of string, dkumar142, 06:01
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, nsimeonov, 05:58
Re: permutation generation, lovecreatesbeauty, 05:50
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, micans, 05:08
Re: Educated guesses for efficiency?, ena8t8si, 04:57
Re: gcc knows about malloc(), Keith Thompson, 04:29
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Keith Thompson, 04:19
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Richard Heathfield, 04:09
Re: sizeof, Chris Dollin, 04:09
Re: permutation generation, Richard Heathfield, 03:55
Re: gcc knows about malloc(), ena8t8si, 03:33
Re: why this code dumps core?, Ian Collins, 03:23
why this code dumps core?, v4vijayakumar, 03:20
Re: Is the behaviour of * operator an example of operator oveloading in c?, Michael Mair, 03:07
Re: which is const in "char *const argv[]", Michael Mair, 02:54
Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, Peter Nilsson, 02:50
Re: Is the behaviour of * operator an example of operator oveloading in c?, Peter Nilsson, 02:41
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, jaysome, 02:32
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Peter Nilsson, 02:30
Is the behaviour of * operator an example of operator oveloading in c?, karthik, 02:28
Re: Program to toggle nth bit in C, Peter Nilsson, 02:27
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, Eric, 02:15
Program to toggle nth bit in C, sksoule, 02:12
Re: "Numerical Recipes in C" code, Abhi, 02:07
Re: K&R exercise 1-18, qiangchen81, 00:32
Re: Subtracting unsigned ints, CBFalconer, 00:22
Re: permutation generation, CBFalconer, 00:10

June 19, 2006

June 18, 2006

June 17, 2006

June 16, 2006

June 15, 2006

June 14, 2006

June 13, 2006

June 12, 2006

June 11, 2006

June 10, 2006

June 09, 2006

June 08, 2006

June 07, 2006

June 06, 2006

June 05, 2006

June 04, 2006

June 03, 2006

June 02, 2006

June 01, 2006

May 31, 2006

Re: #include from #define macro???, Jack Klein, 23:23
Re: legality of forward declaration, Jack Klein, 23:12
how to prove 'roundup' arithmetic, joefoxreal, 22:39
Re: Testing for EOF in file with binary data, Kenneth Brody, 22:33
Re: malloc() implementation, CBFalconer, 22:05
Re: malloc() implementation, CBFalconer, 22:03
Re: malloc() implementation, Eric Sosman, 21:59
Re: scope q, Keith Thompson, 21:48
Re: Help is need immidiately, Eric Sosman, 21:36
Re: Simplicity has a future, CBFalconer, 21:33
Re: traffic counter in linux or bsd, CBFalconer, 21:30
Re: C Pointer problem, Jordan Abel, 21:26
Re: scope q, Joe Smith, 21:13
Re: C Pointer problem, Barry Schwarz, 20:35
Re: #include from #define macro???, Rick Anderson, 20:34
Re: #include from #define macro???, Peteris Krumins, 20:26
Re: Simplicity has a future, Tom�s, 20:21
Re: #include from #define macro???, Gordon Burditt, 20:11
Re: #include from #define macro???, Ben Pfaff, 20:05
Re: #include from #define macro???, Michael Mair, 20:03
#include from #define macro???, Rick Anderson, 19:58
Re: #include from #define macro???, swengineer001@xxxxxxxxx, 19:43
[OT] Re: malloc() implementation, Michael Mair, 19:17
Re: malloc() implementation, Peter Nilsson, 19:11
Re: C Pointer problem, Peter Nilsson, 19:06
Re: Simplicity has a future, Juuso Hukkanen, 18:51
Re: C Pointer problem, Jordan Abel, 18:19
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 18:01
Re: C Pointer problem, jacob navia, 17:52
Re: C Pointer problem, Default User, 17:33
Re: Simplicity has a future, Mike S, 17:10
Re: C Pointer problem, Richard Heathfield, 16:49
Re: C Pointer problem, Default User, 16:10
Re: malloc() implementation, Keith Thompson, 16:03
Re: Help is need immidiately, W Marsh, 15:05
Re: Help is need immidiately, Al Balmer, 15:02
Re: Help is need immidiately, Richard Heathfield, 15:01
Re: malloc() implementation, Clever Monkey, 14:41
Re: Help is need immidiately, W Marsh, 14:30
Re: Help is need immidiately, Keith Thompson, 14:11
Re: Help is need immidiately, Walter Roberson, 14:00
Re: Help is need immidiately, Eric Sosman, 13:55
Re: C Pointer problem, Richard Heathfield, 12:53
Re: Simplicity has a future, jacob navia, 12:48
C Pointer problem, Markus, 12:42
Re: Help is need immidiately, vinod . bhavnani, 12:41
Re: Simplicity has a future, Default User, 12:38
Re: Simplicity has a future, SuperKoko, 12:17
Hot links, Ozone Radical, 11:57
Re: Simplicity has a future, Marc Boyer, 11:44
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 11:38
Re: malloc() implementation, kyle.tk, 11:33
Re: Simplicity has a future, Marc Boyer, 11:17
Re: legality of forward declaration, Harald van Dĳk, 11:13
Re: Bit fiddling, Eric Sosman, 11:13
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 11:00
Re: Simplicity has a future, Marc Boyer, 10:49
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Bos, 10:47
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 10:25
Re: legality of forward declaration, Vladimir Oka, 10:23
Re: malloc() implementation, Flash Gordon, 10:19
Re: legality of forward declaration, Flash Gordon, 10:15
Re: legality of forward declaration, Kenneth Brody, 10:07
Re: Simplicity has a future, Vladimir Oka, 09:35
Re: malloc() implementation, Richard Tobin, 09:28
Re: Simplicity has a future, Marc Boyer, 09:23
Re: legality of forward declaration, Vladimir Oka, 09:18
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Bos, 09:18
Re: malloc() implementation, Richard Heathfield, 09:14
Re: Simplicity has a future, Vladimir Oka, 09:11
Re: malloc() implementation, Flash Gordon, 08:31
Re: malloc() implementation, Flash Gordon, 08:29
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 08:15
Re: Hiding a file, Flash Gordon, 08:04
Re: Bit fiddling, Ralf Schallenberg, 07:59
Re: Simplicity has a future, Marc Boyer, 07:55
Re: malloc() implementation, Haider, 07:50
Re: Hiding a file, santosh, 07:36
Re: malloc() implementation, John Devereux, 07:33
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 07:30
Re: Regarding free function, Flash Gordon, 06:31
Re: Hiding a file, Sync_net, 06:24
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 06:22
Re: Regarding free function, Richard Heathfield, 06:16
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 06:08
Re: problem with size of, Barry Schwarz, 06:06
Regarding free function, Vijay, 06:05
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 05:59
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 05:55
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 05:50
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 05:47
Re: malloc() implementation, Vladimir Oka, 05:37
Re: Simplicity has a future, Harald van Dĳk, 05:31
Re: malloc() implementation, Flash Gordon, 05:22
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 05:20
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 05:17
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 05:15
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 05:12
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 05:07
Re: Simplicity has a future, Harald van Dĳk, 05:06
malloc() implementation, Karsten Jung, 05:06
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 04:55
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 04:52
Re: output from program - why?, Allan M. Bruce, 04:49
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 04:48
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ian Collins, 04:41
Re: Simplicity has a future, James Dow Allen, 04:32
Re: Simplicity has a future, Harald van Dĳk, 04:24
Re: problem with size of, Flash Gordon, 03:55
Re: Simplicity has a future, Flash Gordon, 03:38
Re: lower number, jaks . maths, 03:30
Re: Writing a custom libc, Ico, 03:23
Re: -Bstatic flag, Keith Thompson, 03:15
Re: Writing a custom libc, Levi Campbell, 03:12
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 02:59
Re: Simplicity has a future, Ben Pfaff, 02:38
Re: -Bstatic flag, Ian Collins, 02:33
Re: Simplicity has a future, Friedrich Dominicus, 02:26
Re: Random Number Generation, Michael Mair, 02:21
Re: Simplicity has a future, Richard Heathfield, 02:12
Re: Bit fiddling, Harald van Dĳk, 02:02
Re: Testing for EOF in file with binary data, Keith Thompson, 02:00
Re: Simplicity has a future, Keith Thompson, 01:52
Re: Bit fiddling, jaks . maths, 01:29
-Bstatic flag, seema, 01:18
Re: Bit fiddling, Andrew Poelstra, 00:46
Re: Bit fiddling, Andrew Poelstra, 00:23

May 30, 2006