| Subject: | Re: Emacs's M-‹key› Notation vs Alt+‹key› Notation |
|---|---|
| From: | David Hansen |
| Date: | Mon, 04 Aug 2008 20:03:09 +0200 |
| Newsgroups: | comp.emacs, alt.religion.emacs |
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 23:23:49 -0700 (PDT) "xahlee@xxxxxxxxx" <xahlee@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Unfortunately, Richard Stallman seems to have been influenced by dumb > users. He's actually thinking it's a good idea! > > http://groups.google.com/group/gnu.emacs.bug/browse_frm/thread/c92887cbc7c6f843/ Now you have to actually implement it, if you want this change. Have fun and expect some even longer discussion on emacs-devel. David |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: can Emacs write to the general exchange buffer?, David Hansen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Emacs's M-‹key› Notation vs Alt+‹key› Notation, Joe Fineman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Emacs's M-‹key› Notation vs Alt+‹key› Notation, xahlee@xxxxxxxxx |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Emacs's M-‹key› Notation vs Alt+‹key› Notation, Joe Fineman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |