|
|
maybe we should allow both outputs - depending on the case both might
be useful
with a param "type" for example:
- string
- list (default)
On 24 Jun., 13:11, Leszek Stachowski <shaza...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I will submit a ticket with a change (as option) then. Thanks for your
> replies :)
>
> On Jun 24, 1:05 pm, John Andersen <j.andersen...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I will agree - for accessibility reason - as a list it will be
> > understood better!
> > So as Mark (euromark) says, submit a ticket and the change, maybe as
> > an option, so those who for some reason don't want a list can request
> > that :)
> > Thank you for bringing the accessibility issue into the picture, that
> > clarifies a lot - also for me :)
> > Enjoy,
> > John
>
> > On Jun 24, 12:54 pm, Leszek Stachowski <shaza...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:> I
> > didn't write it is not correct (x)html, because syntax of current
> > > result is, indeed, correct. Providing a <ul> or <ol> element for
> > > something which is de facto a list of elements (links, it this case)
> > > is semantically correct and is a accessibility feature. You can see it
> > > is a list, but what about someone using a screen reader? Consider it.
>
> > [snip]- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -
Check out the new CakePHP Questions site http://cakeqs.org and help others with
their CakePHP related questions.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CakePHP" group.
To post to this group, send email to cake-php@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cake-php+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cake-php?hl=en
|
|