|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Leme [mailto:maven@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: lundi 8 novembre 2004 22:24
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: RE: Cactus-132 bug (+ some other comments on test06)
>
> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 22:16:39 +0100, "Vincent Massol" <vmassol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Why don't you do the change on the client side? Empty dirs get pruned so
> it
>
> The main reason is that it would lose the history (the empty dirs is a
> minor problem). In this case it wouldn't be a big deal though...
Err? How would using a CVS client loose the history? It's quite the
opposite: manipulating the server repository looses the history. Is that
what you meant? :-)
>
> > released the next version we can call a vote to move to SVN. I've been
> using
> > it for Cargo and I'm really really happy about it.
>
> Yes, subversion is supposed to fix all major CVS flaws, like
> moving/renaming files and doing atomic commits.
It does, really.
-Vincent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|