|
|
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Felipe Leme [mailto:maven@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: jeudi 4 novembre 2004 20:20
> To: Cactus Developers List
> Subject: RE: Maven test case namings
>
> On Thu, 4 Nov 2004 18:51:38 +0100, "Vincent Massol" <vmassol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not completely against cleaning after the build but I don't see any
> real
> > advantage. Is there any?
>
> Well, one advantage would be avoind adding the target on CVS :-) But
> that's not really a good one, as it has an easier solution (i.e., using
> .cvsignore).
>
> Anyway, cleaning or not is not really a big deal. What I'm more worried
> about is a well-defined test structure (i.e., all test cases should follow
> the same pattern, in aspects like naming, description, goals to be called,
> etc...).
>
Agreed!
-Vincent
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: cactus-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: cactus-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
|