c-dev@xerces.apache.org
[Top] [All Lists]

[jira] Resolved: (XERCESC-1777) Restriction checking code resolves an el

Subject: [jira] Resolved: (XERCESC-1777) Restriction checking code resolves an element from a wrong schema grammar
From: "Boris Kolpackov (JIRA)"
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:18:08 -0800 PST
     [ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Boris Kolpackov resolved XERCESC-1777.
--------------------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 3.0.0

Fixed in the trunk and xerces-2.

> Restriction checking code resolves an element from a wrong schema grammar
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XERCESC-1777
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XERCESC-1777
>             Project: Xerces-C++
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Validating Parser (Schema) (Xerces 1.5 or up only)
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.0
>         Environment: any
>            Reporter: Boris Kolpackov
>            Assignee: Boris Kolpackov
>             Fix For: 3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: base.xsd, derived.xsd, test.xml
>
>
> The attached test case demonstrates a bug in restriction handling logic. 
> After some debugging it appears that the element in the base type is resolved 
> in the wrong schema grammar. Normally it would fail and the fall back cases 
> would resolve the corrent element. But in this test case we have an otherwise 
> unrelated type at the right position which happened to have an element with 
> the same. If one renames the Value element in the bar type, the error goes 
> away.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: c-dev-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: c-dev-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>