Today is the day we are working towards.
I backed into this schedule assuming we had to have a release by 11/12,
that a vote needed 3d and that QA needed 3 working days with no changes
unless absolutely required.
From: Eddie O'Neil
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 9:42 AM
To: Beehive Developers
Subject: Re: refactored build for controls/
My changes are in both v1/alpha and trunk now. I was under the
impression (someone correct me if I'm wrong), that we weren't going to
roll a source distribution.
At some point soon, we're going to have to cut-off v1/alpha checkins
in order to actually publish a release for ApacheCon. Heather, any idea
what this date is? So, we might either hurry or not worry about
[email protected] wrote:
>>Yeah, svn-snapshot was better than nothing -- using datetimestamp
>>be even better. Just didn't have a place to hang that that everyone
>>would use when creating their distro JARs. Should have that now. <g>
> I'll add that logic to the build-common then.
>>>btw, for the ApacheCon dist, v1/alpha/ is the branch I should be on?
>>Good question. <g> I've done all of my work in trunk/ and not
>>about having that ready for ApacheCon. If others have opinions here
>>(Ken?), speak now and I can likely roll my trunk/ changes back into
> If we're doing a milestone distribution drop for apachecon, I think
> the build changes will help contribute to a nice tidy release, so if
> you could, push at least your build.xml changes on into the branch for
> me. I, too, have been working on the trunk/ only because I wasn't
> sure which was which. The peanut/ removal occurred on trunk/, which,
> if peanut can really go away, applying that nukage to v1/alpha/ would
> be great also.
> thanks, guys,