[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [apnic-talk] [sig-policy] Report on traffic directed to

Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [sig-policy] Report on traffic directed to
From: "McDonald Richards"
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 11:33:50 +1000
I was just about to ask the same thing - the only way I could expand the
images was by "zooming" the web browser.

Geoff - is there any data available on the distribution of the traffic
sources? Did any particular prefixes or ASNs stand out or is this something
for the follow-up experiment mentioned in the recommendation?


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Fincham
Sent: Thursday, 8 April 2010 11:23 AM
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] [sig-policy] Report on traffic directed to

Hi Geoff, List,

On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 11:18 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote:
> Hi,
> Network has been assigned by IANA to APNIC on the 19th January
2010, for use for as public unicast space for further address allocations
and assignments. Before APNIC commences allocations and assignments from
this space, APNIC has undertaken a study into The particular
question under investigation here is the extent to which addresses in
network are an "attractor" for unwanted traffic. In particular, is
there a significant level of "leakage" of supposedly private use traffic
directed to addresses in that leak into the public Internet?
> The report on this study is now available at
http://www.potaroo.net/studies/1slash8/1slash8.html, and two recommendations
are included in this report regarding reservations of particular address
blocks and further followup studies. 

Would it be possible to get a copy of the report posted with larger
images? It may just be a configuration issue at my end but the PNGs
embedded in the page are too small to be legible.

-Michael Fincham
System Administrator, Unleash

apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]

apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>