On 08-04-2010 06:48, Geoff Huston wrote:
> Network 184.108.40.206/8 has been assigned by IANA to APNIC on the 19th January
> 2010, for use for as public unicast space for further address allocations and
> assignments. Before APNIC commences allocations and assignments from this
> space, APNIC has undertaken a study into 220.127.116.11/8. The particular question
> under investigation here is the extent to which addresses in network
> 18.104.22.168/8 are an "attractor" for unwanted traffic. In particular, is there a
> significant level of "leakage" of supposedly private use traffic directed to
> addresses in 22.214.171.124/8 that leak into the public Internet?
Thanks for the study and report.
Another issue which should be addressed before allocating these
addresses, is to what extent they are not accepted by networks, either
due to bogon filters, as Roland said, or because they are being used
Could someone try to connect to some web/e-mail/whatever servers from a
properly advertised 1.x.y.z address and see to what extent it works?
apnic-talk mailing list