Dear Maemura San,
In my part of world, it is not at all any
conflict of interest rather it is transparency and true democracy. Also, the intent
was to gain back the lost confidence on the issue of timeline.
I thank you for accepting the electoral college as a valid choice. Soon others wud be
able to see the merit in the same J.
Not a bad beginning as a first day progress J
Regards and best wishes,
From: MAEMURA Akinori [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: 09 March 2010 20:58
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Elections
Okay I understand why you propose the Electoral College,
I don't have any idea why you dare to do vote counting
of proposing it, quite frankly speaking.
I agree the electroral
college is valid as a choice, anyways.
"RE: [apnic-talk] Elections"
""Naresh Ajwani" <[email protected]>"
| Dear Maemura San,
| So why didn't we leave the "timeline
issue for the proxy registeration" also on
friends from other RIR? I propose to elaborate the issue further but
| we can't have
norms/conflict of interest at our coneveniences and that's why I
| have proposed the
Electoral College as first area of concern. Whats wrong with
| this proposal; The
electoral college can have friends from other RIR but they
| shall not be accountable to the ECs.
| Other two propsoed areas of discussion have
the similar reasoning and origin but
| I am optimist and want to discuss the
| Regards and best wishes,
| Naresh Ajwani
| -----Original Message-----
| From: [email protected]
| [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of MAEMURA Akinori
| Sent: 09 March 2010 20:18
| To: [email protected]
| Cc: [email protected]
| Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Elections
| Dear Brajesh C Jain,
| In message
| "Brajesh Jain
<[email protected]>" wrote:
| | Dear Maemura San,
| | A senior EC person gave a logic , while
you were in the chair, that a
| | person should not be present in counting
as ballot identity would be known.
| I've checked the scribe but still have no
idea who and what
| part you
mentioned. Whom do you mean by
"A senior EC person"?
| | Ballot papers have no name, so how come
the identity would be known.
| | Hope you would give your response.
| No answer to the question since I clearly
had a conflict of
| interest as a
candidate on anything regarding the election
| on Friday. It is not the question when the motion
| That why I asked Kuo Wei Wu for being
tentative chair since
| he is the only
officeholder not expiring the term.
| For me personally, I have no idea why we
cannot leave the
| vote-counting far
independent friends like colleagues from
| other RIRs. Anyway, such a procedure should be
| not to leave any
| [email protected] rather personally this time
| apnic-talk mailing
| [email protected]