> Regarding point 2 in the "Action" list, I think we should not suggest that
> the ITU to conduct such a study, since that will prolong the situation
> I suggest that we retain the gist of the point but move it under the existing
> paragraph in the section headed "Equitable distribution".
> Here's some suggested text:
> "This community believes there are no exhaustion issues associated with IPv6
> and calls on recognised Industry experts to conduct a formal study into
> projections for IPv6 exhaustion to clarify this."
> This text add or change the statement, but simply moves to where it fits best
> - with the Internet experts qualified to conduct the research.
Positive feedback, I'll work to have it update.
apnic-talk mailing list