[email protected]
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [apnic-talk] Community Statement to ITU

Subject: Re: [apnic-talk] Community Statement to ITU
From: Terry Manderson
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 17:23:15 +1000
On 05/03/2010, at 4:59 PM, <[email protected]> 
<[email protected]> wrote:

> Dear Terry and all,
>> I was thinking, glibly, that this would mimic the PDP in some 
>> way... (ie multiple consensus points to allow all stakeholder 
>> review and comment? yes? no?)
> I agree with you that the PDP is ideal way if we didn't need to consider the 
> timeline.
> However, the timeline is very limited actually, since we should submit this 
> statement
> as a contribution for next ITU IPv6 meeting on 15-16 Mar. (Otherwise, it will 
> not be discussed)
> Original submission deadline was this Tue., and ITU kindly accepted to 
> postpone it,
> but still it is TODAY.

That is indeed a shame.. :-(

> Also, I would like to point out that there was many voices from the floor to 
> request
> asking consensus in the session, while I hesitated.
> So, I believe, remaining way is only making contribution based on agreed 
> statement text in the session.
> Of course, we can modify not so substantial points, but we should keep key 
> points.
> This is the reason why I suggested you to writing your submission.

apnic-talk mailing list
[email protected]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>