On 10/03/2010, at 6:34 PM, Rajesh Chharia wrote:
I repeat that all is on the records and now tell me what’s wrong if we lost the confidence in the body responsible for the election and therefore wanted to be a scrutiniser/observer as per the norms laid-“NON EC member and not voted”.
My understanding was that scrutineers were meant to be NON-APNIC members. At the very least they are meant to be independent of the EC candidates. Hence why the other RIRs typically act as each other's as I understand it.
What is wrong is that you've now admitted to trying to arrange to have a non-independant scrutineer to give inside information on the vote counting process.
This is extremely concerning.
(speaking for himself).