|
|
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:20:43 -0700, Snit wrote:
>"William Poaster" <wp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>pan.2008.07.30.18.09.00.406807@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 7/30/08 11:09 AM:
>
>...
>
>Why have the ?ed at the end of my URL? I do not get why you and Steve
Why indead, it's so you can put in a trace for 24HSHD users looking at
your site.
You seem to have missed it's in the subject and body of the post you
started the thread with.
>Carroll add that. It shows up in my logs when someone comes from your
They didn't add it..... not that it helps any.
>links... is that the idea? So I will know when someone found my page from
>your derogatory comments... from people I have *no* business dealings with
>and have never even met face to face or even emailed... just weird.
At least you got 1 thing right,
This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional!
although using XHTML and Trans for no reason at all, more so as it is
served out as text/html.
You still have to work on the colors, the little red hotspot (blue in
MSIE) to the right of the banner,
http://www.statcounter.com/free_hit_counter.html
Oh and,
First Impressions
I have read that on average a user spends four seconds looking at a site
before deciding if it is worth their time.
Try 2, in this case font / colors yuck.
Worst of all the font size bug in MSIE, you prevent all users of that
browser from altering the font size from View, and after the XHTML as
well, a big letdown.
Still doesn't make up for
W3C CSS Validator results for
http://prescottcomputerguy.org/pcg/assets/CSS/screen.css (CSS level 2.1)
Congratulations! No Error Found.
The 12 warnings are acceptable.
Not using some CSS shortcuts.
Repeating lots of stuff in the various img
Me
|
|