| Subject: | Re: Does a copied CD sound like Original? |
|---|---|
| From: | Pennywise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:04:57 -0800 |
| Newsgroups: | 24hoursupport.helpdesk |
Shep© <nospam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 11:58:54 -0800 Too Much Ying and you will Pay With >Yang then Pennywise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx sent this : > >> Plato <|@|.|> wrote: >> >>>Wereo_SUPREME wrote: >>>> >>>> I can't find my original "masters" but I have located a couple of sets >>>> recorded directly off them. My question is does the 2nd set of CDs sound >>>> exactly like the Original CDs? With no loss in sound quality whatsoever? I >>>> would say the two sets of 3 are identical. >> >>>Not necessarily. Sound is different then standard data. >>Data is data no matter what form it's in, it's 1 or 0 >Incorrect. > >Data compression of the .mp3 format using the Fruehauf algorithms used >by definition must degrade the source.Your assumed knowledge of this >subject is flawed and lacking. > >You will have to learn more about sound and data compression before >you can even start to ask the correct questions or even start to voice >an opinion,which is all you can do,as you know little or nothing about >modern sound manipulation. > When you copy data it doesn't matter what it is, text, graphic, or music - a 1 or 0 is read then the same is written. Because of this you get a perfect copy. There is no loss of quality be it music or your compressed graphic or zip files. -- The Top Ten Astronomy Images of 2006 http://tinyurl.com/y5nnks |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: DVD Camcorder question, Kenny |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: SADDAM HANGS...THE REAL DEAL, Daave |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Does a copied CD sound like Original?, Whiskers |
| Next by Thread: | Gmail masking, nik.econtriver@xxxxxxxxx |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |