Re: ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT SCANNERS

[Mother Tarisa]

Porkolotta's Charm wrote:
> In article <0001HW.C0C7433D0086637AF0386530@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Margolotta <naggingdoubt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It isn't mysteriously unnamed - this is about the sixth time the moronic bint
> > has posted about it in the last couple of days. The first couple of times
> > people replied but, when it became obvious she wasn't coming back for
> > replies, they gave up. Now she's yelling at us.
>
> Where ya been Margolotta? Did you get tossed out again?
> More grotty hostels? Or did the folks let you come
> crawling back?
>
>
> -=-
> This message was sent via two or more anonymous remailing services.

Scientists are not quite sure what "it" (Sarah Balfour) is or how it 
came about.  They first suspected that it may have been the scary result 
of an ape and a human trysting, but shortly thereafter decided to nix 
that theory because the apes it was introduced to rejected it and were 
cruel and abusive to it.  It was quite clear they wouldn't even consider 
it good enough to wipe their arses with.

The next theory presented was that it is the result of a monkey and 
human trysting.  This being a much more plausible theory as it would be 
the start of the aids epidemic, has severe birth defects (yes, I do mean 
aside from how damned ugly it is - see link below), and obviously is a 
huge abomination of God.

It's "baby" picture:
http://www.five.tv/media/image/11738778.jpg

No wonder it stays locked in it's "parent's" basement spewing tripe on 
usenet.