|
|
Pennywise@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote in
news:1ed9a2drh2n70k8d7e9tcbhs1hc89oite6@xxxxxxx:
> thanatoid <waiting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>|>I run Win98SE Lite on that machine. It has 256MB Ram about
>|>140+ of which is always free. I understand up to 64 can be
>|>used by on-board graphics, even though it appears I can
>|>reserve from 4 to 256MB RAM to "AGP Aperture Size" in BIOS
>|>(but I'm not sure if it's exactly the same thing).
>
>|>I tried a "Fear" demo from "PC Gamer" magazine a few months
>|>ago and it said I needed a 3-D card.
>
> Save your money you can't play F.E.A.R. on your machine.
> This is made for a high end game machine.
>
I don't *want* to play fear, I bought the magazine out of
boredom and to see what ridiculous new heights the graphics card
technology was reaching. I liked the fear logo so tried it and
it didn't run, not surprisingly.
What I want to play is another game which is about 3 years old
and has very modest requirements (800MHz proc etc). My question
regards the graphics side only.
|
|